Abstract
Oehrle (1994) introduced a categorial grammar architecture in which word order is represented using the terms of a typed λ-calculus and the syntactic type system is based on linear logic. In this paper, we use a variant of this architecture to analyze interrogatives in English and Chinese. We show that separating word order (phenogrammar) and syntactic combinatorics (tectogrammar) in this way brings out the underlying similarities between different question-forming strategies. In particular, the difference between wh extraction (overt movement) and wh in situ (covert movement) turns out to be purely phenogrammatical.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Baldridge, Jason, Lexically Specied Derivational Control in Combinatory Categorial Grammar. Ph.D. thesis. University of Edinburgh (2002)
Curry, H.: Some logical aspects of grammatical structure. In: Jakobson, R. (ed.) Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects (1961)
de Groote, P.: Towards Abstract Categorial Grammar. In: Proceedings of ACL (2001)
Karttunen, L.: Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 1 (1977)
Kitagawa, Y.: Prosody, syntax and pragmatics of WH-questions. English Linguistics 22, 2 (2005) (in Japanese)
Joachim, L., Scott, P.J.: Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic. Cambridge University Press (1986)
Montague, R.: The proper treatment of quantification in English. In: Thomason, R. (ed.) Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, pp. 247–270. Yale University Press, New Haven (1974)
Moortgat, M.: Generalized quantification and discontinuous type constructors. In: Bunt, H., van Horck, A. (eds.) Discontinuous Constituency. Mouton de Gruyter (1996)
Moortgat, M.: Categorial type logics. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)
Glyn, M., Fada, M., Valentin, O.: Nondeterministic discontinuous Lambek calculus. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2007), Tilburg (2007)
Muskens, R.: Language, lambdas, and logic. In: Kruijff, G.-J., Oehrle, R. (eds.) Resource Sensitivity in Binding and Anaphora. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Kluwer (2003)
Muskens, R.: Sense and the computation of reference. Linguistics and Philosophy 28, 4 (2005)
Muskens, R.: Intensional models for the theory of types. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 72, 1 (2007a)
Muskens, R.: Separating syntax and combinatorics in categorial grammar. Research on Language and Computation 5, 3 (2007b)
Nishigauchi, T.: Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990)
Oehrle, R.: Term-labeled categorial type systems. Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 6 (1994)
Pollard, C.: Type-Logical HPSG. In: Jäger, G., Monachesi, P., Penn, G., Wintner, S. (eds.) Proceedings of Formal Grammar 2004, pp. 107–124. European Summer School in Language, Logic, and Information, Nancy (2004)
Pollard, C.: Hyperintensions. Journal of Logic and Computation 18, 2 (2008a)
Pollard, C.: Hyperintensional Questions. In: Hodges, W., de Queiroz, R. (eds.) WoLLic 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5110, pp. 272–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Smith, E.A.: Correlational Comparison in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics. The Ohio State University (2010)
Takahashi, D.: Movement of WH-phrases in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 4 (1993)
Thomason, R.: A model theory for propositional attitudes. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 1 (1980)
Vermaat, W.: The Logic of Variation. A Cross-Linguistic Account of Wh-Question Formation. Ph.D. thesis. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mihaliček, V., Pollard, C. (2012). Distinguishing Phenogrammar from Tectogrammar Simplifies the Analysis of Interrogatives. In: de Groote, P., Nederhof, MJ. (eds) Formal Grammar. FG FG 2010 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7395. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32024-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32024-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32023-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32024-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)