Abstract
This paper argues that modern versions of categorial grammar and in particular multimodal categorial grammar can profit considerably from reintroducing Haskell Curry’s old distinction between what he called phenogrammatics and tectogrammatics. Tectogrammatics is the abstract way in which linguistic signs are built up, while phenogrammatics deals with concrete processes of string formation and the way in which the sign ultimately manifests itself. The distinction will be modeled in a theory called Lambda Grammars in which tectogrammatics is formalized by taking linear lambda terms over a given lexicon. Phenogrammatics can then be formalized with the help of a set of modal operators. The procedure is illustrated by means of an analysis of some aspects of Dutch word order that is based on earlier multimodal work of Oehrle and Moortgat on Dutch.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ajdukiewicz, K. (1935). Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosophica, 1, 1–27. English translation in S. McCall (ed.), Polish logic, 1920–1939, Oxford, 1967, 207–231.
Bar-Hillel Y. (1953) A Quasi-arithmetical Notation for Syntactic Description. Language 29, 47–58
van Benthem J. (1986) Essays in logical semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel
van Benthem, J. (1991). Language in action. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Curry, H. (1961). Some logical aspects of grammatical structure. In R. O. Jakobson (Ed.), Structure of language and its mathematical aspects, Vol. 12 of Symposia on applied mathematics (pp. 56–68). Providence: American Mathematical Society.
Dalrymple, M., J. Lamping, & V. Saraswat (1993). LFG Semantics via Constraints. In Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the European ACL. European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
de Groote, P. (2001). Towards abstract categorial grammars. In Association for Computational Linguistics, 39th Annual Meeting and 10th Conference of the European Chapter, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 148–155). Toulouse, France, ACL.
de Groote, P. (2002). Tree-adjoining grammars as abstract categorial grammars. In TAG+6, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Frameworks (pp. 145–150).
Dowty D. (1982) Grammatical relations and montague grammar. In: Jacobson P., Pullum G. (eds). The nature of syntactic representation. Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 79–130
Dowty D. (1995) Toward a minimalist theory of syntactic structure. In: Bunt H., van Horck A. (eds). Syntactic discontinuity (pp. 11–62). The Hague, Mouton. (Paper originally presented at a 1989 conference).
Groenendijk, J., & M. Stokhof (1984). Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Heim I. (1992) Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9, 183–221
Johnson, M. (1991). Logic and feature structures. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Sydney, Australia.
Kaplan R., Bresnan J. (1982) Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In: Bresnan J. (eds). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 173–281
Kratzer A. (1977) What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 337–355
Kurtonina, N. (1995). Frames and labels: A modal analysis of categorial inference. Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Amsterdam.
Lambek J. (1958) The mathematics of sentence structure. American Mathematical Monthly 65, 154–170
Marcus, M., D. Hindle, & M. Fleck. (1983). D-theory: talking about talking about trees. In Proceedings of the 21st ACL (pp. 129–136).
Moortgat, M. (1997). Categorial type logics. In J. v. Benthem & A. t. Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language (pp. 93–177). Elsevier.
Moortgat, M. (1999). Meaningful patterns. In JFAK, essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the occasion of his 50th birthday. Vossiuspers/Amsterdam University Press. CD-Rom.
Moortgat, M., & R. Oehrle (1993). Adjacency, dependency and order. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 447–466). Amsterdam: ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.
Morrill G. (1994) Type logical grammar: Categorial logic of signs. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Muskens R. (1995) Meaning and partiality. Stanford: CSLI
Muskens, R. (2001a). Categorial grammar and lexical-functional grammar. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference, University of Hong Kong (pp. 259–279). Stanford CA. CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/6/lfg01.html.
Muskens, R. (2001b). Lambda grammars and the syntax-semantics interface. In R. van Rooy & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 150–155). Amsterdam.
Muskens, R. (2003). Language, lambdas, and logic. In G.-J. Kruijff & R. Oehrle (Eds.), Resource sensitivity in binding and anaphora, Studies in linguistics and philosophy (pp. 23–54). Kluwer.
Oehrle R. (1988). Multi-dimensional compositional functions as a basis for grammatical analysis. In: Oehrle R., Bach E., Wheeler D. (eds). Categorial grammars and natural language structures. Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 349–389
Oehrle R. (1994) Term-labeled categorial type systems. Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 633–678
Oehrle R. (1995) Some 3-dimensional systems of labelled deduction. Bulletin of the IGPL 3, 429–448
Oehrle, R. (1998). Multi-modal type-logical grammar. In R. Borsley & K. Borjars (Eds.), Non-transformational Syntax. Blackwell. to appear.
Stalnaker R. (1984) Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Muskens, R. Separating Syntax and Combinatorics in Categorial Grammar. Res on Lang and Comput 5, 267–285 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-007-9035-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-007-9035-1