Abstract
Runtime verification of temporal logic properties requires a definition of the truth value of these properties on the finite paths that are observed at runtime. However, while the semantics of temporal logic on infinite paths has been precisely defined, there is not yet an agreement on the definition of the semantics on finite paths. Recently, it has been observed that the accuracy of runtime verification can be improved by a 4-valued semantics of temporal logic on finite paths. However, as we argue in this paper, even a 4-valued semantics is not sufficient to achieve a semantics on finite paths that converges to the semantics on infinite paths. To overcome this deficiency, we consider in this paper Manna and Pnueli’s temporal logic hierarchy consisting of safety, liveness (guarantee), co-Büchi (persistence), and Büchi (recurrence) properties. We propose the use of specialized semantics for each of these subclasses to improve the accuracy of runtime verification. In particular, we prove that our new semantics converges to the infinite path semantics which is an important property that has not been achieved by previous approaches.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Temporal Logic
- Linear Temporal Logic
- Conjunctive Normal Form
- Linear Temporal Logic Formula
- Specialized Semantic
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Armoni, R., Bustan, D., Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.: Resets vs. Aborts in Linear Temporal Logic. In: Garavel, H., Hatcliff, J. (eds.) TACAS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2619, pp. 65–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, But How Ugly Is Ugly? In: Sokolsky, O., Taşıran, S. (eds.) RV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4839, pp. 126–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: Comparing LTL semantics for runtime verification. Journal of Logic and Computation 20(3), 651–674 (2010)
Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: Runtime verification for LTL and TLTL. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (2011)
Chang, E., Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Characterization of Temporal Property Classes. In: Kuich, W. (ed.) ICALP 1992. LNCS, vol. 623, pp. 474–486. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
Eisner, C., Fisman, D., Havlicek, J., Lustig, Y., McIsaac, A., van Campenhout, D.: Reasoning with Temporal Logic on Truncated Paths. In: Hunt Jr., W.A., Somenzi, F. (eds.) CAV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2725, pp. 27–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Emerson, E.: Temporal and modal logic. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science: Formal Models and Semantics, vol. B, ch.16, pp. 995–1072. Elsevier (1990)
Falcone, Y., Fernandez, J.-C., Mounier, L.: What can you verify and enforce at runtime? Research Report TR-2010-5, Verimag (January 2010)
Maler, O., Pnueli, A.: Timing Analysis of Asynchronous Circuits Using Timed Automata. In: Camurati, P.E., Eveking, H. (eds.) CHARME 1995. LNCS, vol. 987, pp. 189–205. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Miyano, S., Hayashi, T.: Alternating automata on ω-words. Theoretical Computer Science (TCS) 32, 321–330 (1984)
Morgenstern, A., Schneider, K., Lamberti, S.: Generating deterministic ω-automata for most LTL formulas by the breakpoint construction. In: Scholl, C., Disch, S. (eds.) Methoden und Beschreibungssprachen zur Modellierung und Verifikation von Schaltungen und Systemen (MBMV), Freiburg, Germany, pp. 119–128. Shaker (2008)
Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 46–57. IEEE Computer Society, Providence (1977)
Pnueli, A., Zaks, A.: PSL Model Checking and Run-Time Verification Via Testers. In: Misra, J., Nipkow, T., Karakostas, G. (eds.) FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4085, pp. 573–586. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Ruf, J., Hoffmann, D., Kropf, T., Rosenstiel, W.: Simulation-guided property checking based on a multi-valued AR-automata. In: Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE), Munich, Germany, pp. 742–748. ACM (2001)
Schneider, K.: Improving Automata Generation for Linear Temporal Logic by Considering the Automaton Hierarchy. In: Nieuwenhuis, R., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2250, pp. 39–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Schneider, K.: Verification of Reactive Systems – Formal Methods and Algorithms. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science (EATCS Series). Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Morgenstern, A., Gesell, M., Schneider, K. (2012). An Asymptotically Correct Finite Path Semantics for LTL. In: Bjørner, N., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7180. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28717-6_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28717-6_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28716-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28717-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)