Abstract
Meningiomas are tumors arising from the arachnoidal coverings of the brain [45]. They are responsible for the vast majority of meningeal tumors and occur anywhere on the brain surface, including the skull base, and rarely also in the ventricular system.
Other than meningiomas, hemangiopericytomas and meningeal sarcomas belong to the group of intrinsic meningeal tumors [45]. As with every other tissue, both metastases and lymphoma can also be found in the meninges.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Definition
Meningiomas are tumors arising from the arachnoidal coverings of the brain [45]. They are responsible for the vast majority of meningeal tumors and occur anywhere on the brain surface, including the skull base, and rarely also in the ventricular system.
Other than meningiomas, hemangiopericytomas and meningeal sarcomas belong to the group of intrinsic meningeal tumors [45]. As with every other tissue, both metastases and lymphoma can also be found in the meninges.
Epidemiology
Epidemiological data for most tumors of the central nervous system are difficult to obtain as cancer registries tend to be regional or at best national as in the Scandinavian countries [12]. A very comprehensive source is the statistical report published by CBTRUS (Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States); the latest 2007/2008 edition covers the data collection period 2000–2004.
Meningiomas show a rising incidence with age. In unselected autopsy series, 2.7% of the male and 6.2% of the female population over the age of 80 had menin-giomas that up to that point had been undiscovered. The reported incidence is variable between different investigations, but disregarding the changing proportions from the growing incidence of cerebral metastases with better oncological therapies, one can assume that meningiomas are responsible for about 15% of all intracranial tumors in males and 30% in females. Not considering the autopsy cases, the reported numbers on a population base vary between 1.6 and 5.5 per 100,000. CBTRUS reports an incidence of 5.51 per 100,000 person years, resulting in 33.3% of all tumors of the central nervous system. As a rule the tumors are reported to be 1.5–3 times more frequent in females. In the 2000–2004 period the rate given by CBTRUS was 3.29 for males and 7.19 for females, showing a slight increase over the years that, however, may still be a reflection of the broader availability of and access to diagnostic procedures. Peak incidence is the sixth decade of life (median age at diagnosis for CBTRUS is 65 years). Pediatric meningiomas are very rare, with 2% of all tumors being in that population [44].
There does not seem to be any association with race or any geographical preference that cannot be explained by the access to medical care or pattern of reporting.
An unselected 10-year series from the University of Hamburg Department of Neurosurgery reflects these demographics with a female to male ratio of 507:172 (2.9:1) (Table 4.1).
Molecular Genetics
The majority of patients who suffer from neurofibro-matosis type 2 (NF2) develop meningiomas [34, 36, 50]. In sporadic meningiomas NF2 gene mutations are detectable in up to 60% and thus represent the most frequent gene alteration. The NF2 tumor suppressor gene is located on chromosome arm 22q, and mutations in one allele are typically associated with either mono-somy 22 or large deletions involving the other allele. Absent or strongly reduced immunoreactivity of the NF2 gene product merlin (schwannomin) has also been demonstrated in meningiomas. Merlin belongs to the 4.1 family of structural proteins that link the cytoskeleton to proteins of the cytoplasmic membrane. Recently, another member of this family, the 4.1B/ DAL-1 protein has been implicated in meningioma pathogenesis. 4.1B/DAL-1 expression is lost in 70–80% of meningiomas. No mutations were detected in the 4.1B/DAL-1 gene, which is located on chromosome arm 18p. However, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) involving the 4.1B/DAL-1 region on 18p was identified in 70% of meningiomas [33].
Inactivation of the NF2 and 4.1B/DAL-1 genes occurs with approximately equal frequency in benign (WHO grade I), atypical (WHO grade II) and anaplas-tic (WHO grade III) meningiomas, suggesting that both represent relatively early events in tumorigenesis. In contrast, several other genetic alterations have been identified more frequently in the more malignant tumor forms and are therefore believed to be associated with meningioma progression [63]. In the approximate order of their frequency, these alterations are allelic losses on chromosome arms 1p, 14q, 10q, 9p and 17q. However, with the exception of the CDKN2A, p14 ARF and CDKN2B genes on 9p, which display alterations in the majority of malignant meningiomas, no other tumor suppressor genes could consistently be identi-fied as altered in meningiomas.
Gene expression analyses by array-based techniques have been used also in meningioma research, and in a series where spinal and cranial meningiomas were compared that way, a distinct set of 35 genes distinguishing between these entities was identified [52], but as such there are no surprising new insights from micro-array techniques in the analysis of meningioma.
Etiology and Prevention
Meningiomas should be considered spontaneous tumors. Very early on, they were found to be associated with a complete or partial loss of chromosome 22 [65], but that has so far not provided any clues for the origin of these tumors. The only established association is with ionizing radiation; this was obtained from the large series of immigrants into Palestine in the early 1950s who were regularly irradiated for tenia capitis and then had a much higher than normal incidence of meningiomas with a delay of about 35 years [51]. Likewise, the follow-up of citizens from Hiroshima and Nagasaki who were exposed to the atomic blasts has shown that in this population there was a higher incidence of meningiomas with a very similar delay [46]. The doses producing meningioma with this long delay should be considered rather low as high doses of therapeutic radiation for neoplasm lead to meningiomas with a shorter delay (around 5 years [57]) or rather induce anaplastic gliomas. The literature about the role of diagnostic exposure to radiation is most likely limited to specific dental procedures [37].
As meningiomas occur most frequently in post-menopausal women [58] and meningiomas are known to have high levels of steroid hormone receptors, establishing a relationship between steroid hormones and the growth of meningiomas has long been attempted [23, 25]. The only vague association comes from the observation that in some cases, meningiomas that had gone undetected became symptomatic during pregnancy [62] (Fig. 4.1) and even grew so rapidly that they spontaneously hemorrhaged. In that context there is a constantly ongoing debate whether women who are known to have a meningioma or have had a menin-gioma removed should be on hormonal replacement therapy. Currently there does not appear to be a risk in respect to contraceptives, but there is a hint of an indication that hormonal replacement therapy may increase the risk for meningioma [13]. As, however, no study has been done up to now in which the use of steroid replacement has been evaluated in a randomized, controlled, prospective fashion in these patients and likely never will be, their management remains in the hands of physicians who have to observe the patient closely and make individual decisions about what is best.
Signs and Symptoms
There are no typical signs or symptoms that are unequivocally specific for meningiomas. The clinical symptomatology is basically determined by the location of the lesion, the size and the impact on its immediate surroundings. For clinical purposes, meningiomas are subspecified according to their site of origin, and this classification allows the description of the most frequent signs associated with the typical locations (Table 4.2).
The direct symptoms also depend very much on the size of the tumor and the growth rate. Large tumors that have grown over many years may have produced only very few symptoms because the surrounding brain had a chance to adapt while slowly becoming displaced (Fig. 4.2). In cases of caudal skull base men-ingiomas, this may lead to extreme brain stem compression almost without any symptoms (Fig. 4.3). As meningiomas also differ in their respect for the arach-noidal boundary–independent of size–the less the brain shows any reaction to the tumor, the bigger the tumor usually is. Seizures are more frequent in the typical ictogenic regions, particularly when lesions extend exophytically into the temporomesial region or the perirolandic area.
There are also many ways for meningiomas to affect the brain indirectly and produce symptoms. Meningiomas at the tentorial edge, whether supra- or infratentorial, can lead to compression of the CSF pathways and thus result in occlusive hydrocephalus, as do large meningiomas in the posterior fossa (Fig. 4.4). Meningiomas that produce an extraordinary amount of edema (frequently of the secretory type [7]) cause an indirect mass effect exceeding their own mass several fold and can cause drowsiness and even loss of consciousness up to the extreme of herniation (Fig. 4.5). Meningiomas occluding a major sinus such as the falcine meningiomas or parasagittal meningiomas or those of the torcular or transverse sinus can cause venous congestion and generalized edema to the extreme of chronic intracranial hypertension with papilloedema and impairment of visual acuity (Fig. 4.6). It is frequently seen that even after complete resection of a meningioma, an edema-like change in signal intensity in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can remain for many years (Fig. 4.6).
It is a general rule that the risk of surgical treatment of a meningioma can be very well assessed when edema and neurological symptoms are present. When these symptoms disappear with appropriate steroid treatment (see below), surgery will be much less risky than when the symptoms persist despite edema resolution.
Staging and Classification
As described in the chapter on histopathology of CNS tumors, meningiomas are graded according to the WHO grading system into well-differentiated meningiomas of the WHO grade I, atypical meningiomas WHO grade II and anaplastic meningiomas WHO grade III [14]. In addition, there are several subtypes, of which two in themselves are equivalent to a higher grade [45]. Due to serially acquired genetic aberrations, progression from a lower grade to the next higher grade is possible [34] (Fig. 4.7), and this is also accompanied by increasing production of angiogenic factors [35] and the late incidence of metastasis in the situation of anaplastic meningioma [27].
There is no clinical staging for the extent of the disease or the aggressiveness of the tumor, but there is for the resection (see below). The significance of the his-tological grading is related to the decision making for adjuvant therapies (see below) and the follow-up regimen. In general, there is a correlation of the grades with survival, but only when the tumors are in comparable locations and similar extents of resection can be achieved. On the other hand, there is a much better prognosis for a completely resected atypical menin-gioma (WHO grade II) of the convexities compared to a non-resectable meningioma WHO grade I of the skull base (Fig. 4.8).
Diagnostic Procedures
Many meningiomas are found incidentally because of unrelated complaints such as a dizzy spell, a transient ischemic attack or uncharacteristic headache, or because after a minor trauma an MRI has been performed (Fig. 4.9). Otherwise, any of the symptoms summarized in Table 4.2 above may specifically lead to some kind of neuroimaging.
Computed Tomography (CT): CT shows menin-giomas usually as well-described mass lesions with uniform contrast enhancement located at the surface of the brain, either at the convexity or the base of the skull. A non-enhanced scan must be obtained in the first place because it may show extensive calcification, which is mostly associated with very slow growth and thus only a relative indication for therapy. Especially in fronto-orbital tumors it is important to have thin sections and a series of bone windows because they define the borders of infiltration and resection if there is not even resectability. CT is the optimal modality to assess intraosseous components of frontobasal skull base meningiomas (Fig. 4.10) or to detect primary intraosseous meningiomas (Fig. 4.11).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): MRI is now the major modality for the diagnosis of meningiomas, especially as many lesions have some skull base component or extensions into compartments that are not as well visualized or differentiated in the CT. Again, the mass of the tumor will show not only homogeneous contrast enhancement, but also tail-like extensions in the meninges will be seen [the so-called meningeal tail sign [Fig. 4.12] ] and infiltration of neighboring structures. Petroclival meningiomas, for example, can be assessed anatomically for their complex extension towards the optic canal and into the cerebellopontine angle (Fig. 4.13). The carotid artery, which is regularly encased by petroclival meningiomas, can be judged for its width, shape and patency. When considerable narrowing is present, a “time-to-peak” analysis after gado-lineum application comparing the timing of gadolineum arrival in the two hemispheres already allows some estimate of hemodynamic relevance of the stenosis and indication for bypass surgery (Fig. 4.14). Frontobasal meningiomas are occasionally not much more than a thin layer of contrast enhancement, and this is especially true for optic sheath meningiomas, which will be missed except on thin-sliced MRI with special attention to all three planes (Fig. 4.15). When close to a sinus or originating from a sinus wall, extension of the tumor into the sinus or patency of the sinus can be seen on T2-weighted images and MR angiography (Fig. 4.16).
The extent of edema is shown equally well in CT and MRI. The major differential diagnosis is a solid metastatic lesion because the age groups with the peak incidence overlap. Clues to decide for meningioma would be the extent of dural involvement and especially a reaction of the bone-like hyperostosis (Fig. 4.17). Meningiomas may also occur in multiple locations in the same patient (Fig. 4.18), but multiplicity is much more common in metastasis, and for three metastatic lesions it would be very unusual to have all of them on the surface of the brain. In tumors over 1 cm, MR spec-troscopy is an additional tool showing a characteristic spectrum of metabolites that can provide an increasingly reliable estimate of the nature of the lesion [18]. Diagnostic pitfalls are the rare cystic meningiomas with an appearance similar to a pilocytic astrocytoma or a cystic metastasis (Fig. 4.19).
Angiography: This diagnostic tool is only used to answer specific questions related to the surgical strategy and has no use for diagnosis itself. It is indicated to determine the patency of sinuses, col-lateralizations and the hemodynamic relevance of a stenosis within a sinus. Angiography provides a good overview of the vascularization (Fig. 4.19) and in some cases provides an opportunity for preopera-tive embolization, especially when there is a major blood supply from the tentorial or mastoidal menin-geal arteries that would be caught only later in the surgical procedure.
Therapy
Surgery
Therapy of meningiomas is generally surgical [2, 3]. Especially for the skull base locations, over last the decade it has become more interdisciplinary [22], with additional treatment opportunities also for radiotherapists and radiosurgeons with their improving tools [29]. The refinement of microsurgical approaches offers a resective option, or at least a partial one, for almost all meningioma locations [2, 3]. Again, as for the symptoms, surgical management differs according to location.
The most important question is whether a meningioma needs to be treated at all or can be left to observation, keeping in mind that many lesions are found accidentally. Especially with incidental, calcified meningiomas in the elderly, repeated imaging within 6 months or even a year is justified; when no increase in size is seen, the lesion is left to observation. Calcification in CT as such does not indicate a presumably slow growth as the tumor upon resection may still be well vascularized and vital, and all the hyperdensity might have been due to microcalcification (Fig. 4.20). Tumors may even change their growth characteristics over time. A tumor may recur, or a residual may slowly grow with advancing age, and then slow down and remain constant for many years (Fig. 4.21).
The classical, typical meningioma of the convexity or lateral sphenoid wing should be resected, including its origin, likewise meningiomas of the falx or the frontal skull base. Excision of the dura should be performed as far as the preoperative imaging showed any enhancement (meningeal tail sign). In most cases there will be sufficient periosteum to substitute the resected dura. If not, artificial materials exist that can be used instead. When the bone appears to be affected, it can be drilled out at the suspicious site, and if it is completely infiltrated, it has to be replaced as well. Thus, in some cases the reconstruction is more laborious than the resection itself, especially in cases of fronto-orbital meningiomas or olfactory groove meningiomas where it may be necessary to close a bony destruction of the frontal skull base with split bone and periosteum [8].
Involvement of the sinuses poses a specific problem. When the sagittal sinus in its frontal part is involved or a transverse sinus that has become hemodynamically irrelevant and is compensated by the other side, it can be sacrificed for the sake of a radical resection as there are good collaterals. If the sagittal sinus in its parietal aspect or the confluents or a dominant transverse sinus is involved and still patent and infiltrated to an extent that is beyond what can be easily patched during surgery, the wall and any intrasinusoidal part should be left. It can be irradiated or left to grow on and occlude the sinus slowly while forming collaterals, which usually happens over years and as a rule goes unnoticed. Then the whole residual can be removed in one block. There are papers about sinus repair, but the rates of complication exceed that of this “ wait-and-see” and “second look” approach [54]. Only in selected individual cases is it advocated to attempt venous repair after radical resection [55]. Reports about focal irradiation have not yet been published, but it is to be expected that this will lead to some better local control either arresting the tumor or leading to a longer delay until the sinus is closed.
The use of preoperative embolization has not become standard [5, 47]. Although many meningiomas would lend themselves to this approach, it is an unnecessary risk for the patient because with most tumors, the surgical approach to the lesion already involves extensive devascularization and achieves the same result as embo-lization. Fibrin glue and particles have been used mostly as embolic materials, and this leads to necrosis in the tumor, which can make histopathological classification more difficult. Also there may be swelling with ensuing neurological deficits necessitating more urgent surgical intervention than anticipated. The indication for preop-erative embolization should be very strict and limited to cases where there is a clear surgical advantage or a situation in which blood transfusions are anticipated but cannot be recommended in general [48].
The most consequential new therapeutic development over the last decades has been the inclusion of radiosurgery. For several tumor locations, the treatment paradigms over the last years have shifted, and the extensive skull base approaches with bypass surgery and cranial nerve interpositions have been left in favor of a radiosurgical treatment component (Fig. 4.22). It is now common to approach large skull base menin-giomas that involve the cavernous sinus as a whole or in parts opportunistically. This applies to petroclival meningiomas and some lesions of the clivus and cere-bellopontine angle. Any exophytic parts will be aggressively removed and the tumor reduced to the part containing encased cranial nerves and blood vessels that will be left. This part can then be treated with con-formal fractionated radiation or radiosurgery with any of the radiosurgical tools (Fig. 4.22) [22]. With growing experience the possible risks of radiosurgery become apparent [15, 41] and lead to the conclusion that radical surgery should really be attempted wherever possible so that radiation treatment is only applied when surgical risks are too high. In particular, the possibility of an accelerated aggressive growth after radiotherapy might be considered [15].
Another specific situation occurs in optic sheath meningiomas (Fig. 4.23) [42]. These meningiomas are usually very difficult to treat and pose a major dilemma. In an attempt to temporarily stabilize the disease, surgery is limited to decompression of the optic nerve canal and splitting of the sheath as much as the tumor infiltration allows. Attempts at resection almost always result in severe immediate deterioration of vision. With decompression only, visual loss will come gradually and may be postponed for a long time. There are reports about radiotherapy that show that in the majority of cases stable disease can be secured, although long-term results over several decades are not available yet [4]. Whatever therapy is selected, care should be taken that it is administered only to patients with progressive disease because the course can be stable without treatment for many years [17].
Radiosurgery as a primary modality is reserved for cases in which surgical manipulation is associated with presently unacceptable morbidity and the likelihood of only subradical resection. As with menin-giomas that have a radiosurgical component in the interdisciplinary strategy, the locations are mostly at the skull base, with true intracavernous meningiomas being the largest group, but also locations in the cer-ebellopontine angle and the perisellar region. In addition to location, age, comorbidities and general status of health have to be included into the decision making (Fig. 4.24). The results of larger series show that disease control can be achieved in the majority of cases with acceptable morbidity, which, however, is not negligible [21]. Total remissions, however, are rare, which is expected when the induction of fibrous changes and stable disease is the major goal in these rather slowly proliferating lesions [29].
Chemotherapy has almost no role in the treatment of meningiomas. Even in anaplastic meningiomas, there is only limited experience and limited efficacy for the classical chemotherapeutic agents [10, 11, 31]. Hope has long rested with the discoveries about the cell biology of meningiomas and the possibility to develop targeted approaches, which in the context of meningioma hold only limited promise [43]. But neither the presence of progesterone receptors nor the presence of dopamine receptors [9] has lead to therapeutic opportunities despite phase II clinical trials [20] since those cells expressing the progesterone receptor do not divide [60]. The only option with some limited efficacy comes from drawing an analogy to chronic lymphatic leukemia, which also is a slowly proliferating disorder. Hydroxyurea, which is effective in that disorder, has shown a therapeutic effect also in some patients [38, 40], but a large randomized prospective phase III trial is still unavailable.
Prognosis
The prognosis of meningiomas depends on their grade and their location. It can only be determined in the individual patient from regular follow-up. It has been difficult to find prognostic parameters based on histological markers except for grade and subtype. All other markers do not seem to have prognostic relevance. Based on the resection, the completeness of removal has been classified and basically distinguishes between a radical resection including the origin (Simpson grade 1), resection with coagulation of the origin (Simpson grade 2), partial resection (Simpson grade 3) and a mere biopsy (Simpson grade 4) [53].
Evidently there is better prognosis with more radical resection, but this may need to be revisited with the now widespread use of radiotherapeutic techniques for residual tumors. As a rule of thumb, one can expect permanent cure of a convexity meningioma of WHO grade I or II, which is fully resected in over 90% of the cases. Skull base meningiomas even when completely reduced to their site of origin will recur in 50% of the cases.
Anaplastic meningiomas have a poor prognosis and will eventually even metastasize.
Follow-Up
Patients with resected meningiomas need to be followed regularly after treatment, and thisat may require interdisciplinary cooperation. At first there should be follow-up intervals with imaging of 6 months or 1 year and later every 2 years. MRI is generally the best modality, but in cases of bone involvement at the skull base, CT may need to be done as well. Because imaging changes may be subtle in some patients, other monitoring modalities may need to be included, such as regular ophthalmological assessment or audiograms, when the tumor is in the area of the respective compromised cranial nerves and recurrence/progression impairing their function is feared. As it has been reported that patients with radiosurgical treatment for residual tumor may experience sudden aggressive growth with years of delay, special attention must be given to patients with such combined treatments.
Only when after 10 years there is no evidence of any disease activity can patients be dismissed from regular follow-up. Bearing in mind that tumors may alter their growth characteristics over years, patients can be advised that not each indication of new tumor activity needs to be treated right away because it may not cause any symptoms and can be safely watched for some time. However, it must be pointed out that exactly because of the usually slow-growing nature, regular follow-up is important because symptoms from a recurrent or progressing lesion may arise only late, and then optimal therapeutic opportunities may have been missed. There are no blood tests that allow monitoring of tumor activity.
Future Perspectives
Optimal definition of the treatment modalities in an interdisciplinary setting and evaluation of that concept in larger series with meticulous follow-up will make treatment of meningiomas safer and more efficacious on a much more individualized basis. Given the absence of any pharmacological treatment option and lack of perspective of such in the near future, therapy will be resting on surgery and radiation for a long time. It is to be hoped that refined and meticulously clinically correlated gene expression analyses will lead to the defini-tion of candidate genes for truly targeted therapies.
Other Meningeal Tumors
Hemangiopericytoma comprises about 2% of menin-geal tumors [24]. They tend to occur at a younger age than the meningiomas, with a peak incidence in the fourth and fifth decades. Also, there appears to be a slight prevalence in the male sex. By WHO grading they are allocated to the grades II and III, but the parameters distinguishing the two still need to be fully validated. The genetic alterations are different from meningioma, with alterations of the chromosome 22 absent. Most alterations are found on chromosomes 12q13 and 6p21.
As for clinical signs and symptoms, there is no difference between meningiomas and hemangiopericy-tomas. The neuroradiological features are slightly different from meningiomas. The tumors tend to cause lytic lesions in bone and do not grow through the bone like the meningiomas, which with rare exceptions either cause hyperostosis or just distend the bone without completely destroying it. The tumors are highly vascularized and upon angiography show a wealth of pathological vessels [39]. In contrast to meningiomas, calcifications are rare.
Treatment of hemangiopericytoma is more complex than that of the average meningioma. The tumors should be removed as completely as possible, and then there is a consensus that the region needs to be irradiated [1], because otherwise the rate of recurrence is 91% [60]. Also, these tumors have a tendency to metastasize, primarily into bone [56]. No chemotherapeutic regimen has emerged as an effective standard [16]. Corresponding to the aggressiveness of the disease, patients need to be followed closely, especially to detect metastases. The high rate of recurrence and metastases are the cause for mortality, and despite aggressive treatment, up to 60% of the patients may have succumbed to the disease within 15 years [61].
Dural Lymphoma
Dural lymphomas present as contrast-enhancing lesions with an extension like a subdural hematoma, like a nodular meningioma with a dural tail, like an en-plaque meningioma or just like dural hypertrophy. Particularly suspicious is an extension deep into the arachnoid spaces and sulci (Fig. 4.25). Primary dural lymphomas are rare and not to be mistaken for primary CNS lymphoma (see Chap. 19). They are mostly of the MALT type [19, 49], although other kinds and regular Hodgkin's disease have been reported [26]. They seem to have a better prognosis than PCNSL and respond well to cranial radiation [6]. Many of the reported dural lymphomas were unexpected, and therefore, some were resected like en-plaque meningiomas. Cranial radiation is to be recommended even after resection, but certainly after biopsy.
Dural Metastases
Metastatic disease to the brain is seen with increasing frequency, but in comparison to the parenchymal or leptomeningeal variants, purely dural involvement is rare and is detected most frequently in the context of suspected meningioma [32, 59]. Whereas in intracere-bral disease where a metastasis is more readily suspected because of imaging characteristics and has a known primary in about 80% [64], the diagnosis of a dural metastasis is made much more frequently when the primary tumor is still unknown [59]. This can be partially explained by the fact that dural metastases may occur in any type of cancer, but show a different spectrum from intracranial disease. A large combined surgical and autoptic series showed a surprisingly broad spectrum, including the expected high numbers of breast cancer as primary, but an even higher number of underlying prostate cancer, which can have extensive manifestation (Fig. 4.26), and also such primaries as the larynx, gall bladder and stomach, which otherwise rarely metastasize to the brain [28].
When purely dural and having an appearance like meningioma, the differential diagnosis is close to impossible without a tissue diagnosis because the neuroradio-logical techniques may not provide sufficient parameters for differentiation [30]. The tumors may be dural with a flat spread, nodular or show a combination of subdural– dural–skull extension. Depending on the context of the overall status of the patient, there may be an indication for resection, especially when the differential diagnosis toward meningioma cannot be made without histology and there is no known primary. As the spectrum of his-tological origins is very heterogeneous, there are no published series about the role of radiotherapy or chemotherapy as there are for leptomeningeal metastatic disease. How to proceed after histological verification of a dural metastasis will depend on the established treatment paradigms for the primary tumor and has to be determined in an interdisciplinary tumor board.
References
Alen JF, Lobato RD, Gomez PA, Boto GR, Lagares A, Ramos A, Ricoy JR. (2001) Intracranial hemangiopericytoma: study of 12 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:575–586
Al-Mefti O. (1991) Meningiomas. Raven, New York
Al-Mefti O. (1998) Operative atlas of meningioma. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA
Becker G, Jeremic B, Pitz S, Buchgeister M, Wilhelm H, Schiefer U, Paulsen F, Zrenner E, Bamberg M. (2002) Stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy in patients with optic nerve sheath meningioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:1422–1429
Bendszus M, Rao G, Burger R, Schaller C, Scheinemann K, Warmuth-Metz M, Hofmann E, Schramm J, Roosen K, Solymosi L. (2000) Is there a benefit of preoperative menin-gioma embolization? Neurosurgery 47:1306–1311; discussion 1311–1302
Beriwal S, Hou JS, Miyamoto C, Garcia-Young JA. (2003) Primary dural low grade BCL-2 negative follicular lymphoma: a case report. J Neurooncol 61:23–25
Buhl R, Hugo HH, Mehdorn HM. (2001) Brain oedema in secretory meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci 8(Suppl 1):19–21
Bull WJ, Vandevender D, Cimino VG. (2003) Reconstruction of defects of the cranial base. Tech Neurosurg 9:106–112
Carroll RS, Schrell UM, Zhang J, Dashner K, Nomikos P, Fahlbusch R, Black PM. (1996) Dopamine D1, dopamine D2, and prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression by the polymerase chain reaction in human men-ingiomas. Neurosurgery 38:367–375
Chamberlain MC. (2004) Meningiomas. Curr Treat Options Neurol 3:67–76
Chamberlain MC, Tsao-Wei DD, Groshen S. Temozolomide for treatment-resistant recurrent meningioma. Neurology 62:1210–1212
Christensen HC, Kosteljanetz M, Johansen C. (2003) Incidences of gliomas and meningiomas in Denmark, 1943 to 1997. Neurosurgery 52:1327–1333; discussion 1333–1324
Claus EB, Black PM, Bondy ML, Calvocoressi L, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M. (2007) Exogenous hormone use and meningioma risk: what do we tell our patients? Cancer 110:471–476
Collins VP. (2004) Brain tumours: classification and genes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75(Suppl 2):ii2–11
Couldwell WT, Cole CD, Al-Mefty O. (2007) Patterns of skull base meningioma progression after failed radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 106:30–35
Ecker RD, Marsh WR, Pollock BE, Kurtkaya-Yapicier O, McClelland R, Scheithauer BW, Buckner JC. (2003) Hemangiopericytoma in the central nervous system: treatment, pathological features, and long-term follow-up in 38 patients. J Neurosurg 98:1182–1187
Egan RA, Lessell S. (2002) A contribution to the natural history of optic nerve sheath meningiomas. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1505–1508
Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Gotsis SD, Kapsalakis JZ, Smisson HF, 3rd, Johnston KW, Robinson JS, Jr., Papadakis N. (2000) In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 74:83–94
Goetz P, Lafuente J, Revesz T, Galloway M, Dogan A, Kitchen N. (2002) Primary low-grade B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue of the dura mimicking the presentation of an acute subdural hematoma. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 96:611–614
Grunberg SM. (1994) Role of antiprogestational therapy for meningiomas. Hum Reprod 9(Suppl 1):202–207
Han JH, Kim DG, Chung HT, Park CK, Paek SH, Kim CY, Jung HW. (2008) Gamma knife radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas: long-term radiologic and clinical outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(5):1324–1332
Hart DJ, Gianotta SL. (2003) Complex cranial base menin-gioma: combined management. Tech Neurosurg 9:86–92
Hsu DW, Efird JT, Hedley-Whyte ET. (1997) Progesterone and estrogen receptors in meningiomas: prognostic considerations. J Neurosurg 86:113–120
Jääskeläinen J, Louis DN, Paulus W, Haltia M. (2000) Haemangiopericytoma. In: Kleihues P, Cavanee WK (eds) Tumors of the central nervous system: pathology and genetics. IARC Press, Lyon
Jhawar BS, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ. (2003) Sex steroid hormone exposures and risk for meningioma. J Neurosurg 99:848–853
Johnson MD, Kinney MC, Scheithauer BW, Briley RJ, Hamilton K, McPherson WF, Barton JH, Jr. (2000) Primary intracerebral Hodgkin's disease mimicking meningioma: case report. Neurosurgery 47:454–456; discussion 456–457
Kaminski JM, Movsas B, King E, Yang C, Kronz JD, Alli PM, Williams J, Brem H. (2001) Metastatic meningioma to the lung with multiple pleural metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 24:579–582
Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK. (2001) Dural metastases. A retrospective surgical and autopsy series. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:880–887
Kondziolka D, Nathoo N, Flickinger JC, Niranjan A, Maitz AH, Lunsford LD. (2003) Long-term results after radiosur-gery for benign intracranial tumors. Neurosurgery 53:815– 821; discussion 821–812
Kremer S, Grand S, Remy C, Pasquier B, Benabid AL, Bracard S, Le Bas JF. (2004) Contribution of dynamic contrast MR imaging to the differentiation between dural metastasis and meningioma. Neuroradiology 46:642–648
Kyritsis AP. (1996) Chemotherapy for meningiomas. J Neurooncol 29:269–272
Laidlaw JD, Kumar A, Chan A. (2004) Dural metastases mimicking meningioma. Case report and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 11:780–783
Lamszus K. (2004) Meningioma pathology, genetics, and biology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 63:275–286
Lamszus K, Kluwe L, Matschke J, Meissner H, Laas R, Westphal M. (1999) Allelic losses at 1p, 9q, 10q, 14q, and 22q in the progression of aggressive meningiomas and undif-ferentiated meningeal sarcomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 110:103–110
Lamszus K, Lengler U, Schmidt NO, Stavrou D, Ergun S, Westphal M. (2000) Vascular endothelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and placenta growth factor in human menin-giomas and their relation to angiogenesis and malignancy. Neurosurgery 46:938–947; discussion 947–938
Lamszus K, Vahldiek F, Mautner VF, Schichor C, Tonn J, Stavrou D, Fillbrandt R, Westphal M, Kluwe L. (2000) Allelic losses in neurofibromatosis 2-associated menin-giomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59:504–512
Longstreth WT, Jr., Phillips LE, Drangsholt M, Koepsell TD, Custer BS, Gehrels JA, van Belle G. (2004) Dental X-rays and the risk of intracranial meningioma: a population-based case-control study. Cancer 100:1026–1034
Loven D, Hardoff R, Sever ZB, Steinmetz AP, Gornish M, Rappaport ZH, Fenig E, Ram Z, Sulkes A. (2004) Non-resectable slow-growing meningiomas treated by hydroxyu-rea. J Neurooncol 67:221–226
Marc JA, Takei Y, Schechter MM, Hoffman JC. (1975) Intracranial hemangiopericytomas. Angiography, pathology and differential diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 125:823–832
Mason WP, Gentili F, Macdonald DR, Hariharan S, Cruz CR, Abrey LE. (2002) Stabilization of disease progression by hydroxyurea in patients with recurrent or unresectable meningioma. J Neurosurg 97:341–346
Muracciole X, Regis J. (2008) Radiosurgery and carcino-genesis risk. Prog Neurol Surg 21:207–213
Newman SA. (2003) Optic nerve sheath meningiomas. Tech Neurosurg 9:64–77
Norden AD, Drappatz J, Wen P Y. (2007) Targeted drug therapy for meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 23:E12
Perry A, Dehner LP. (2003) Meningeal tumors of childhood and infancy. An update and literature review. Brain Pathol 13:386–408
Perry A, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, Budka H, von Deimling A. (2007) Meningiomas. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavanee WK (eds) WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. IARC Press, Lyon, pp. 164–172
Preston DL, Ron E, Yonehara S, Kobuke T, Fujii H, Kishikawa M, Tokunaga M, Tokuoka S, Mabuchi K. (2002) Tumors of the nervous system and pituitary gland associated with atomic bomb radiation exposure. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1555–1563
Probst EN, Grzyska U, Westphal M, Zeumer H. (1999) Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas with a fibrin glue preparation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1695–1702
Rosen CL, Ammerman JM, Sekhar LN, Bank WO. (2002) Outcome analysis of preoperative embolization in cranial base surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:1157–1164
Rottnek M, Strauchen J, Moore F, Morgello S. (2004) Primary dural mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-type lymphoma: case report and review of the literature. J Neurooncol 68:19–23
Ruttledge MH, Sarrazin J, Rangaratnam S, Phelan CM, Twist E, Merel P, Delattre O, Thomas G, Nordenskjold M, Collins VP, et al (1994) Evidence for the complete inactiva-tion of the NF2 gene in the majority of sporadic menin-giomas. Nat Genet 6:180–184
Sadetzki S, Modan B, Chetrit A, Freedman L. (2000) An iatrogenic epidemic of benign meningioma. Am J Epidemiol 151:266–272
Sayagues JM, Tabernero MD, Maillo A, Trelles O, Espinosa AB, Sarasquete ME, Merino M, Rasillo A, Vera JF, Santos-Briz A, de Alava E, Garcia-Macias MC, Orfao A. (2006) Microarray-based analysis of spinal versus intracranial men-ingiomas: different clinical, biological, and genetic characteristics associated with distinct patterns of gene expression. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 65:445–454
Simpson D. (1957) The recurrence of intracranial menin-giomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:22–29
Sindou M. (2001) Meningiomas invading the sagittal or transverse sinuses, resection with venous reconstruction. J Clin Neurosci 8(Suppl 1):8–11
Sindou MP, Alvernia JE. (2006) Results of attempted radical tumor removal and venous repair in 100 consecutive menin-giomas involving the major dural sinuses. J Neurosurg 105:514–525
Soyuer S, Chang EL, Selek U, McCutcheon IE, Maor MH. (2004) Intracranial meningeal hemangiopericytoma: the role of radiotherapy: report of 29 cases and review of the literature. Cancer 100:1491–1497
Strojan P, Popovic M, Jereb B. (2000) Secondary intracra-nial meningiomas after high-dose cranial irradiation: report of five cases and review of the literature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:65–73
Swensen R, Kirsch W. (2002) Brain neoplasms in women: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:904–927
Tagle P, Villanueva P, Torrealba G, Huete I. (2002) Intracranial metastasis or meningioma? An uncommon clinical diagnostic dilemma. Surg Neurol 58:241–245
Tonn JC, Ott MM, Bouterfa Hikerkans S, Kapp M. (1997) Inverse correlation of cell proliferation and expression of progesterone receptors. Neuosurgery 41:1152–1159
Vuorinen V, Sallinen P, Haapasalo H, Visakorpi T, Kallio M, Jaaskelainen J. (1996) Outcome of 31 intracranial haeman-giopericytomas: poor predictive value of cell proliferation indices. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138:1399–1408
Wan WL, Geller JL, Feldon SE, Sadun AA. (1990) Visual loss caused by rapidly progressive intracranial meningiomas during pregnancy. Ophthalmology 97:18–21
Weber RG, Bostrom J, Wolter M, Baudis M, Collins VP, Reifenberger G, Lichter P. (1997) Analysis of genomic alterations in benign, atypical, and anaplastic meningiomas: toward a genetic model of meningioma progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:14719–14724
Westphal M, Heese O, de Wit M. (2003) Intracranial metastases: therapeutic options. Ann Oncol 14(Suppl 3): iii4–10
Zang KD. (2001) Meningioma, a cytogenetic model of a complex benign human tumor. Cytogenet Cell Genet 93:207–220
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Westphal, M., Lamszus, K., Tonn, J.C. (2010). Meningiomas and Meningeal Tumors. In: Tonn, JC., Westphal, M., Rutka, J.T. (eds) Oncology of CNS Tumors. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02874-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02874-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02873-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02874-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)