Abstract
Meningiomas are a major group of intracranial neoplasms. According to the WHO classification, they are subdivided into three grades with increasing anaplasia, grade I being the commonest (about 80%) followed by the atypical grade II tumors (about 20%) and the rare anaplastic, WHO grade III (1–3%) type. Meningiomas have a wide spectrum of presenting symptoms, depending on the site of the skull where they originate. Likewise, the neuroradiological appearance is highly variable but a uniform feature of contrast enhancement. Signs of calcification are frequent, especially in slowly growing lesions and cystic variants exist. Meningiomas may be surrounded by massive edema, resulting from venous compression or from secreted cytokines. Treatment is multidisciplinary with an attempt at resection as primary option but also combinations of partial removal and ensuing radiotherapy for some skull base lesions. For selected cases, especially meningiomas of the cavernous sinus, primary conformal stereotactic radiotherapy is an option. There is no targeted medical therapy for meningiomas. Meningiomas can recur, and there are patients with a “chronic meningioma disease” who will accumulate genetic aberrations leading to increasing anaplasia. The prognosis is generally excellent when a gross total resection including the original matrix is possible but extremely bad for recurrent anaplastic tumors. Encasement of skull base structures such as the carotids or the basilar artery, the optic nerves or caudal cranial nerves, as well as superficial brain invasion in occipital falcine meningiomas may be prognostically unfavorable for function and survival even in grade I lesions rendering the distinction between benign and malignant lesions irrelevant for individual cases. The spectrum of clinical presentations and the differential therapeutic approaches is outlined in detail in this chapter.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Definition
Meningiomas are tumors arising from the arachnoidal coverings of the brain [64]. They are responsible for the vast majority of meningeal tumors and occur anywhere on the brain surface including the skull base and rarely also in the ventricular system.
Other than meningiomas, hemangiopericytomas and meningeal sarcomas belong to the group of mesenchymal, non-meningothelial tumors [4]. As with every other tissue, metastases and lymphoma can also occur in the meninges.
2 Epidemiology
Epidemiological data for most tumors of the central nervous system are difficult to obtain as cancer registries tend to be regional or at best national as in the Scandinavian countries [16]. A very comprehensive source is the statistical report published by CBTRUS (Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States) of which the latest 2017 edition covers the data collection time of 2010–2014 [60].
Meningiomas show a rising incidence with age. In unselected autopsy series, 2.7% of the male and 6.2% of the female population over the age of 80 have meningiomas which up to that point were undiscovered. The reported incidence is variable between different investigations but disregarding the changing proportions from the growing incidence of cerebral metastases with better oncological therapies; one can assume that meningiomas are responsible for about 15% of all male intracranial tumors and 30% of the females. Meningiomas make up 36.8% of the gross total of adult tumors of the CNS [60]. Not considering the autoptic cases, the numbers which are reported on a population base vary between 1.6 and 5.5 per 100,000. CBTRUS reports an age-adjusted incidence rate of 8.41 per 100,000 of the US standard population and 0.25 for the age group up to 19 years demonstrating the relation to age [60] . As a rule the tumors are reported to be 1.5–3 times more frequent in females. In the 2010–2014 period, the rate given by CBTRUS is 4.86 for males and 11.01 for females showing an increase over the years which however may be a reflection of broader availability of and access to diagnostic procedures as well as a reflection of an aging population with growing life expectancy. Peak incidence is the sixth decade in life (median age at diagnosis at CBTRUS is 66 years). Pediatric meningiomas are very rare making up 6.7% in the age group between 0 and 19 years in this report [60] with others putting the number as 2% of all tumors in that population [62].
There does not seem to be any association with race or any geographical preference which cannot be explained with access to medical care or pattern of reporting.
An unselected 10-year series from the university department of neurosurgery in Hamburg reflects these demographics with a female/male ratio of 507:172 (2.9:1) (Table 8.1).
3 Molecular Genetics
The majority of patients who suffer from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) develop meningiomas [46, 48, 73]. In sporadic meningiomas NF2 gene mutations are detectable in up to 60% and thus represent the most frequent gene alteration. The NF2 tumor suppressor gene is located on chromosome arm 22q, and mutations in one allele are typically associated with either monosomy 22 or large deletions involving the other allele. Absent or strongly reduced immunoreactivity of the NF2 gene product merlin (schwannomin) has also been demonstrated in meningiomas. Merlin belongs to the 4.1 family of structural proteins that link the cytoskeleton to proteins of the cytoplasmic membrane. Recently, another member of this family, the 4.1B/DAL-1 protein, has been implicated in meningioma pathogenesis. 4.1B/DAL-1 expression is lost in 70–80% of meningiomas. No mutations were detected in the 4.1B/DAL-1 gene which is located on chromosome arm 18p. However, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) involving the 4.1B/DAL-1 region on 18p was identified in 70% of meningiomas [45].
Inactivation of the NF2 and 4.1B/DAL-1 genes occurs with approximately equal frequency in benign (WHO grade I), atypical (WHO grade II), and anaplastic (WHO grade III) meningiomas, suggesting that both represent relatively early events in tumorigenesis. In contrast, several other most likely random genetic alterations have been identified more frequently in the more malignant tumor forms and are therefore believed to be associated with meningioma progression [91]. In the approximate order of their frequency, these alterations are allelic losses on chromosome arms 1p, 14q, 10q, 9p, and 17q. However, with the exception of the CDKN2A, p14ARF, and CDKN2B genes on 9p which display alterations in the majority of malignant meningiomas and spell for particularly shortened survival ([61], no other tumor suppressor genes could consistently be identified as altered in meningiomas. Recent mutations found in NF2-intact meningiomas affect the AKT1 (involved in PI3K signaling), SMO (Hedgehog activation), KLF4 (transcription factor), and TRAF7 (a ubiquitin ligase) genes [17]. Interestingly these meningiomas were found to be clinically more benign and stable and appeared to have a preference for the medial skull base. Another new mutation affecting the TERT promotor seems to be associated with highly aggressive biological behavior [75].
Gene expression analyses by array-based techniques have been used also in meningioma research and in a series where spinal and cranial meningiomas were compared that way; a distinct set of 35 genes distiguishing between these entities was identified [76], but as such there are no surprising new insights from microarray techniques in the analysis of meningioma.
4 Etiology and Prevention
Meningiomas should be considered spontaneous tumors. Very early they have been found to be associated with a complete or partial loss of chromosome 22 [90], but that has so far not provided any clues as for the origin of these tumors. The only established association is with ionizing radiation, and that has been obtained from the large series of immigrants into Palestine in the early 1950s who were regularly irradiated for tinea capitis and then had a much higher than normal incidence of meningiomas with a delay of about 35 years [74]. Likewise has the follow-up from citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki who were exposed to the atomic blasts shown that in this population, there was a higher incidence of meningiomas with a very similar delay [65]. The doses producing meningioma with this long delay are to be considered rather low as high doses of therapeutic radiation for neoplasm produces meningiomas with a shorter delay (around 5 years [84]) or rather induces anaplastic gliomas. The indications about the role of diagnostic exposure to radiation are most likely limited to specific dental procedures [49].
As meningiomas occur most frequently in postmenopausal women [85] and meningiomas are known to have high levels of steroid hormone receptors, it has been attempted for a long time to establish a relationship between steroid hormones and the growth of meningiomas [33, 35]. The only vague association comes from the observation that, in some cases, meningiomas which had gone undetected became symptomatic during pregnancy [90] (Fig. 8.1) and even grew so rapidly that they spontaneously hemorrhaged (personal observation). In that context there is a constantly ongoing debate whether women who are known to have a meningioma or have had a meningioma removed should be on hormonal replacement therapy. Currently there does not appear to be a risk in respect to contraceptives, but there is a hint of an indication that hormonal replacement therapy may increase the risk for meningioma [18]. As, however, no study has been done up to date in which the use of steroid replacement has been evaluated in a randomized controlled prospective fashion in these patients and likely never will be, the management of these patients will remain in the hands of individually deciding physicians who have to closely observe the patient and decide what is best. More recent studies failed to demonstrate any hormonal clues in women [20] and in men found that estrogen-like dietary components of soy and tofu are somewhat reducing the risk, while a high body mass index is associated with a higher incidence of meningioma [78]. A considerable number of meningiomas express progesterone receptors; however proliferating cells shut down the receptor which explains the failure of anti-progesterone therapies in meningiomas [21].
There is a weak indication that there may be an inherited susceptibility as in one epidemiological study, a first degree relative with a meningioma increases the risk 4.4-fold to also develop such lesion [19].
5 Signs and Symptoms
There are no typical signs or symptoms which are unequivocally specific for meningiomas. The clinical symptomatology is basically determined by the location of the lesion, the size, and the impact on its immediate surroundings. For clinical purposes, meningiomas are subspecified according to their site of origin, and this classification allows the description of the most frequent signs associated with the typical locations (Table 8.2).
The direct symptoms also depend very much on the size of the tumor and the growth rate. Large tumors which have grown over many years may have produced only very few symptoms because the surrounding brain had a chance to adapt while slowly becoming displaced (Fig. 8.2). In cases of caudal skull base meningiomas, this may lead to extreme brain stem compression without almost any symptoms (Fig. 8.3) or in the case of perisellar meningiomas absence of endocrinopathies. Meningiomas also differ in their respect for the arachnoidal boundary, independent of size. As arachnoid infiltration is related to edematous brain reaction, tumors respecting the arachnoid tend to be larger because of lack of brain reaction.
Seizures may be a presenting sign and were seen in 22.7% of patients preoperatively in one large series [15]. Seizures are more frequent in the typical ictogenic regions, particularly when lesions extend exophytically into the temporomesial region or the perirolandic area.
There are many ways for meningiomas to also indirectly affect the brain and produce symptoms. Meningiomas at the tentorial edge, be they supra- or infratentorial, can lead to compression of the CSF pathways and thus result in occlusive hydrocephalus as do large meningiomas in the posterior fossa (Fig. 8.4). Meningiomas which produce an extraordinary amount of edema (frequently of the secretory type [10, 55]) cause an indirect mass effect exceeding their own mass severalfold and can cause drowsiness and even loss of consciousness up to the extreme of herniation (Fig. 8.5). Meningiomas occluding a major sinus such as the falcine meningiomas or parasagittal meningiomas or those of the torcular or transverse sinus can cause venous congestion and generalized edema to the extreme of chronic intracranial hypertension with papilloedema and impairment of visual acuity and the development of pseudotumor cerebri especially when the occluded sinus is dominant (Fig. 8.6a, b). It is frequently seen that even after complete resection of a meningioma, an edema-like change in signal intensity in the MRI can remain for many years (Fig. 8.6).
It is a general rule that the risk of surgical treatment of a meningioma can be very well assessed when neurological deficits are related to edema. When appropriate treatment with steroids (see below) causes symptoms to dissappear, the surgery will be much less likely to result in additional or increased neurological deficit than when the symptoms persist despite edema resolution.
6 Staging and Classification
As described in the chapter on histopathology of CNS tumors, meningiomas are graded according to the WHO grading system into well-differentiated meningiomas of the WHO grade I, atypical meningiomas WHO grade II, and anaplastic meningiomas WHO grade III. According to the most recent revision of the WHO classification system, brain invasion alone qualifies for classification as WHO grade II [62]. In addition there are several subtypes of which two in themselves are equivalent to a higher grade [63]. Due to serially acquired genetic aberrations, progression from a lower grade to the next higher grade is possible [46] (Fig. 8.7a) but rare, and that is also accompanied by increasing production of angiogenic factors [47] and the late incidence of metastasis in the situation of anaplastic meningioma [39]. Meningioma may become a chronic disease in some patients spreading throughout the cranium including the skull bone and spread also to extracranial sites like the spine (Fig. 8.7b).
Although it would be desirable to clinically stage meningiomas for the extent of the disease, chronicity, or the aggressiveness of the tumor, such distinction is lacking. But there is a classification for the resection (see below). The significance of the histological grading is related to the decision-making for adjuvant therapies (see below) and the follow-up regimen. In general there is a correlation of the grades with survival but only when the tumors are in comparable locations and similar extents of resection can be achieved. On the other hand, there is a much better prognosis for a completely resected atypical meningioma (WHO grade II) of the convexities compared to a non-resectable meningioma grade WHO I of the skull base (Fig. 8.8).
7 Diagnostic Procedures
Many meningiomas are found incidentally because of unrelated complaints such as a dizzy spell, a transient ischemic attack, and uncharacteristic headache or because after a minor trauma, an MRI has been performed (Fig. 8.9). Otherwise any of the symptoms summarized in Table 8.2 above may have specifically led to some kind of neuroimaging. Recently, guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of meningiomas have been published [29].
Computed tomography (CT): CT shows meningiomas usually as well as described mass lesions with uniform contrast enhancement located at the surface of the brain, either at the convexity or the base of the skull. A non-enhanced scan must be obtained in the first place because it may show extensive calcification which is mostly associated with very slow growth and thus only relative indications for therapy. Especially in fronto-orbital tumors, it is important to have thin sections and a series of bone windows because that defines the borders of infiltration and resection if not even resectability. CT is the optimal modality to assess intraosseous components of frontobasal skull base meningiomas (Fig. 8.10) or to detect primary intraosseous meningiomas (Fig. 8.11). The extent of edema is shown equally well in CT and MRI.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): MRI is the major modality for the diagnosis of meningiomas, especially as many lesions have some skull base component or extensions into compartments which are not as well visualized or differentiated in the CT. Again, the mass of the tumor will show homogeneous contrast enhancement, but also tail-like extensions in the meninges will be seen (the so-called “meningeal tail sign’’ (Fig. 8.12) and infiltration of neighboring structures such as the sinuses). Meningiomas of the medial skull base can be assessed whether they are limited to the cavernous sinus or, for example, can be assessed anatomically for their complex extension towards the optic canal or into the cerebellopontine angle (Figs. 8.13 and 8.14) which leads to various degrees of brain stem compression and is extensive in typical petroclival meningiomas. The carotid artery which is regularly encased by petroclival meningiomas can be judged for its width and shape and patency. When considerable narrowing is present, a “time to peak” analysis after gadolinium application comparing the timing of gadolinium arrival in the two hemispheres already allows to estimate the hemodynamic relevance of the stenosis and indication for bypass surgery (Fig. 8.15). Frontobasal meningiomas are occasionally not much more than a thin layer of contrast enhancement and that is especially true for optic sheath meningiomas which other than on thin-sliced MRI with special attention to all three planes will be missed (Fig. 8.16). When close to a sinus or originating from a sinus wall, extension of the tumor into the sinus or patency of the sinus can be seen on T2-weighted images and MR angiography (Fig. 8.17).
Some differential diagnosis at first imaging is to be considered. In the first place, meningiomas may be taken for a solid metastatic lesion because the age groups with the peak incidence overlap. Clues to decide for meningioma would be the extent of dural involvement and especially a reaction of the bone-like hyperostosis (Fig. 8.18). Meningiomas may also occur in multiple locations in the same patient (Fig. 8.19), but multiplicity is much more common in metastasis, and for three metastatic lesions, it would be very unusual to have all of them on the surface of the brain. Metastases also tend to be cystic from necrosis after a certain size. In patients with a known neoplastic disease, direct metastasis to the meningioma is possible and has to qualify any reservation about surgery in an incidental finding. Most common intrameningiomatous metastases are from mammary carcinoma [77] and second most are from the lung [69].
In tumors over 1 cm3, MR spectroscopy is an additional tool which shows a characteristic spectrum of metabolites which can provide an increasingly reliable estimate of the nature of the lesion [26]. Diagnostic pitfalls are the rare cystic meningiomas which are from their appearance like a pilocytic astrocytoma or a cystic metastasis (Fig. 8.5).
Angiography: This diagnostic tool is only used to answer specific questions related to the surgical strategy and has no use in the diagnosis itself. It is indicated to answer the question of patency of sinuses, collateralizations, and the hemodynamic relevance of a stenosis within a sinus. It provides a good overview of the vascularization (Fig. 8.20) and in some cases will provide an opportunity for preoperative embolization, especially when there is major blood supply from tentorial or mastoidal meningeal arteries which during surgery will be caught only later during the procedure.
Meningiomas have been found to have several interesting hormone receptors, none of which however have led to targeted therapeutics except for the somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) [23], which is explored for radiotherapy (see below) or imaging. To determine in cases of inoperable tumors, residuals, or recurrence of the optimal treatment volumes for radiotherapy, a radiolabeled compound, 68Ga-DOTATATE, a positron emitter, is used to delineate active tumor and follow treatment effects (Fig. 8.21) [67]. The place for PET imaging in meningiomas is currently being defined by its increasing use [27].
8 Therapy
8.1 Surgery
Therapy of meningiomas generally involves surgery [1, 2]. Especially for the skull base locations, over the last decade, it has become more interdisciplinary [32] with additional treatment opportunities also for radiotherapists and neuroradiologists with their improving tools [41]. The refinement of microsurgical approaches offers a resective option, at least partial for almost all locations of meningiomas [1, 2]. Again, as for the symptoms, there are different strategies of surgical management according to location.
The most important question is whether a meningioma needs to be treated at all or can be left to observation, keeping in mind that many lesions are found incidentally. Especially with incidental, calcified meningiomas in the elderly, a repeated imaging within 6 months or even a year is justified, and when no increase in size is seen, the lesion is left to observation. In a recent survey, the observation periods to decide for treatment were even 5–10 years [54]. Calcification in CT as such does not indicate a priori slow growth as the tumor upon resection may still be well vascularized and vital and all the hyperdensity due to microcalcification (Fig. 8.22). Tumors may even change their growth characteristics over time. A tumor may recur or a residual may slowly grow in higher age and then slow down and remain constant for many years (Fig. 8.23).
The classical, typical meningioma of the convexity or lateral sphenoid wing will be resected including its origin, likewise meningiomas of the falx or the frontal skull base. Excision of the dura should be performed as far as the preoperative imaging showed any enhancement (meningeal tail sign). In most cases there will be sufficient periosteum to substitute the resected dura. If not, artificial materials exist which may be used instead. When the bone appears to be affected, it might be drilled out at the suspicious site, and if it is completely infiltrated, it has to be replaced as well. Thus, in some cases the reconstruction is more laborious than the resection itself, especially in fronto-orbital meningiomas or olfactory grove meningiomas where it may be necessary to close a bony destruction of the frontal skull base with split bone and periosteum [11].
Involvement of sinuses pose a specific problem. When the sagittal sinus in its frontal part is involved or a transverse sinus which has hemodynamically become irrelevant and is compensated by the other side, it can be sacrificed for the sake of a radical resection as there are good collaterals. If the sagittal sinus in its parietal aspect or the confluens or a dominant transverse sinus is involved and still patent and infiltrated to an extent which is beyond what can be easily patched during surgery, the wall and any intrasinusoidal part should be left. It can be irradiated or left to slowly grow on and slowly occlude the sinus while forming collaterals which usually happens over years and as a rule goes unnoticed. Then the whole residual can be removed in one block if there are sufficient symptoms or growth over time to justify surgery. There are reports about sinus repair, but the rates of complication exceed that of this “wait and see” and “second look” approach [81] although it is advocated to attempt a venous repair after radical resection if not too risky, which means in selected individual cases [82]. Many reports about focal irradiation have now emerged which state that local control is achieved in a high percentage (see below) either arresting the tumor or leading to a longer delay until the sinus is closed.
The use of preoperative embolization has not become standard [6, 66]. Although many meningiomas would lend themselves to this approach, it is an unnecessary risk for the patient because with most tumors, the surgical approach to the lesion already involves extensive devascularization and achieves the same result as embolization. A large series reports a low complication rate of 3.7% and reduced necessity of blood transfusions, but there is no mention of conversion of an inoperable case to a surgical case [9]. Fibrin glue and particles have been used mostly as embolic materials, and this leads to necrosis in the tumor which can make histopathological classification more difficult. Also there may be swelling with ensuing neurological deficits necessitating more urgent surgical intervention than anticipated. The indication for preoperative embolization should be very strict and limited to cases where there is a clear surgical advantage or a situation in which blood transfusions are anticipated but cannot be done for medical or nonmedical reasons [71]. In one small series, the lesion shrunk considerably so that surgery was delayed for several months or canceled [57].
8.2 Radiation
Radiation therapy has a long history as part of meningioma management, either as external beam fractionated radiotherapy (RT) or stereotactic radiation of small volumes with high intensity either as single dose or in very few fractions (stereotactic radiosurgery, SRS). The inclusion of radiosurgery has been the most consequential new therapeutic development over the last decades.
For several tumor locations the treatment paradigms over the last years have shifted and the extensive skull base approaches with bypass surgery and cranial nerve interpositions have been left in favor of a radiosurgical treatment component (Figs. 8.14 and 8.24). It is now common to approach large skull base meningiomas which involve the whole cavernous sinus or parts opportunistically. That applies to petroclival meningiomas and some lesions of the clivus and cerebellopontine angle or fronto-orbital meningiomas where remnants may be left behind deliberately in critical areas to be then treated with preconceived radiotherapy [88]. Any exophytic parts will be aggressively removed and the tumor reduced to the part containing encased cranial nerves and blood vessels which will be left. That part can then be treated with conformal fractionated radiation or radiosurgery with any of the radiosurgical tools [32]. With growing experience the possible risks of radiosurgery become apparent [22, 56] and lead to the conclusion that radical surgery should really be attempted wherever possible so that radiation treatment is only applied when surgical risks are too high. In particular the possibility of an accelerated aggressive growth after radiotherapy is troublesome [22].
Recently, somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy has been shown to be quite effective in a multi-institutional series of heavily pretreated progressive meningiomas [79], but further confirmatory studies are pending.
Another specific situation occurs in optic sheath meningiomas (Fig. 8.25a, b) [58]. These meningiomas are usually very difficult to treat and pose a major dilemma. In an attempt to temporarily stabilize the disease, surgery may for some cases be limited to decompression of the optic nerve canal and splitting of the sheath as much as the tumor infiltration allows (Fig. 8.25b). Attempts at resection almost always result in severe immediate deterioration of vision. With decompression only, visual loss will come gradually and may be postponed for a long time. There are reports about radiosurgery, and these show that in the majority of cases, stable disease can be secured, although long-term results over several decades are not available yet [5]. Whatever therapy is selected, care should be taken that it is administered only to patients with progressive disease because the course can be stable without treatment for many years [25]. For these reasons, it is advocated to intervene early with exploratory surgery in medial sphenoid wing meningiomas as tumor may extend into the optic canal before that is detectable on MRI, and direct surgical inspection is the most sensitive technique to detect such extensions, and resection eliminates the need for radiation, at least until recurrence can be documented.
Radiosurgery as a primary modality is reserved to cases in which surgical manipulation is associated with presently unacceptable morbidity and the likelihood of only subradical resection. As with the meningiomas which have a radiosurgical component in the interdisciplinary strategy, the locations are mostly at the skull base with true intracavernous meningiomas being the largest group but also locations in the cerebellopontine angle and the perisellar region. In addition to location, age, comorbidities, and general status of health have to be included into the decision-making. The results of larger series show that disease control can be achieved in the majority of cases with acceptable morbidity which, however, is not negligible [31]. Total remissions, however, are rare which is expected when the induction of fibrous changes and stable disease is the major goal in these rather slowly proliferating lesions [41]. The issue of radiation as such, be it RT or SRS, is heavily debated and extensively reviewed [53, 70], and while a clear benefit shown in many series is acknowledged, the uniform application is still seen controversial, and the rates for tumor control, regression, and side effects vary widely most likely reflecting discordant histological gradings due to retrospective series and changing WHO guidelines. The inclusion of RT and SRS or the use of SRS instead of resection has to follow an individual evaluation of histology, grade of resection, risk of radiation damage, and risk of recurrence/progression.
Chemotherapy has never played a major role in the treatment of meningiomas. Even in anaplastic meningiomas, there is only limited experience and limited efficacy for the classical chemotherapeutic agents [13, 14, 43]. Hope has for a long time rested with the discoveries about the cell biology of meningiomas and the possibility to develop targeted approaches which in the context of meningioma hold only limited promise [59]. The intriguing presence of progesterone receptors has eventually been explored in a phase III clinical trial for non-resectable meningiomas, but no efficacy was seen for the synthetic antiprogestin mifepristone [36]. Also the detection of dopamine receptors [12] has not translated into therapeutic opportunities despite phase II clinical trials [30]. Because of their abundant vasculature, anti-angiogenic therapy has been explored, and there are early clinical indications that the small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib may be active in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas when the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 was present in the tumors [38]. The most widely used chemotherapeutic option with some limited efficacy comes from drawing an analogy to chronic lymphatic leukemia which also is a slowly proliferating disorder. Hydroxyurea which is effective in that disorder has shown a therapeutic effect also in some patients [50, 52], but a large randomized prospective phase III trial is still unavailable. Also when used in combination with imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, the efficacy is described as modest in a phase II trial [68].
Immunotherapy has become a major component in oncology but is still under evaluation for intrinsic brain tumors and not established for meningiomas. The analysis of components of the immune system which seem to be prerequisite for effective immune checkpoint inhibition has shown that potentially that approach is worth exploring but mainly for anaplastic meningiomas and clinical trials are outstanding [8].
9 Prognosis
The prognosis of meningiomas depends on their grade and their location. It can only be determined in the individual patient from regular follow-up. It has been difficult to find prognostic parameters based on histological markers except for grade and subtype. All other markers do not seem to have prognostic relevance. Based on the resection, the completeness of removal has been classified and basically distinguishes between a radical resection including the origin (Simpson grade 1), resection with coagulation of the origin (Simpson grade 2), partial resection (Simpson grade 3), and a mere biopsy (Simpson grade 4) [80].
Evidently there is better prognosis with more radical resection, but that may need to be revisited with the now widespread use of radiotherapeutic techniques for residual tumors. As a rule of thumb, one can expect permanent cure of a convexity meningioma grade WHO I or II which is fully resected in over 90% of the cases. Skull base meningiomas even when completely reduced to their site of origin will recur in 50% of the cases.
Anaplastic meningiomas have a poor prognosis and will eventually even metastasize.
To quote any numbers for average survival when facing patients is meaningless for the most part as there is no uniformity in the diagnosis of meningioma as such and the term “benign” is counterproductive in large unresectable skull base tumors (Fig. 8.8).
10 Follow-Up
Patients with resected meningiomas need to be followed regularly after treatment, and the scheduling includes WHO grade and degree of resection. After complete resection (Simpson grade 1) and WHO grade 1, first follow-up by MRI after the immediate post-op imaging should be at 1 year and, when that scan is clear, in intervals increasing from 2 to 3 years thereafter. In atypical meningiomas WHO grade II, the schedule should be 6 months for the first follow-up and then yearly for 3 years increasing to 2 years thereafter. For anaplastic meningiomas WHO grade III, the follow-up will be as for high-grade gliomas. Recurrent meningiomas when recapitulating the original tumor underlie the same considerations about resection, partial safe resection, and additional treatment with radiation or re-irradiation [87].
For resection Simpson grade 2 and above, the schedule depends on the dynamics of the residual. In some cases regrowth or increase in size cannot be detected for years even without treatment, and in some, growth detectible at 6 months will determine what kind of additional therapy is recommended. MRI is generally the best modality, but in cases of bone involvement at the skull base, CT may need to be done as well. Because imaging changes may be subtle in some patients, other interdisciplinary monitoring modalities may need to be included like regular ophthalmological assessment or audiograms when the tumor was in the area of the respective compromised cranial nerves and recurrence/progression impairing their function is feared. As it has been reported that patients with radiosurgical treatment for residual tumor may experience sudden aggressive growth with years of delay, special attention must be given to patients with such combined treatments.
Only when after 10 years there is no evidence for any activity of the disease, patients can be dismissed from regular follow-up. Bearing in mind that tumors may alter their growth characteristics over the years, patients can be advised that not each indication of a new tumor activity needs to be treated right away because it may not cause any symptoms and might be safely watched for some time. On the other hand, it must be pointed out that exactly because of the usually slow-growing nature, regular follow-up is important because symptoms from a recurrent or progressing lesion may arise only late and then optimal therapeutic opportunities may have been missed. There are no blood tests yet which would allow monitoring of tumor activity, but the development of detection techniques for tumor constituents in plasma such as extracellular vesicles may revolutionize the whole follow-up regimens.
11 Future Perspectives
Optimal definition of the treatment modalities in an interdisciplinary setting and evaluation of that concept in larger series with meticulous follow-up will make treatment of meningiomas safer and more efficacious on a much more individualized basis. Given the absence of any pharmacological treatment option and lack of perspective of such in the near future, therapy will for a long time rest on surgery and radiation. It is to be hoped that refined and meticulously clinically correlated gene expression analyses will lead to the definition of candidate genes for truly targeted therapies.
12 Other Meningeal Tumors
The 2016 WHO contains now a chapter of mesenchymal, non-meningothelial tumors [4]. According to this, Haemangiopericytoma which comprises about 2% of meningeal tumors [34] is now used synonymously with solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) which is the preferred terminology in the WHO classification. These tumors tend to occur at a younger age than the meningiomas with a peak incidence in the fourth and fifth decade. Also, there appears to be a slight prevalence for the male sex. By WHO grading they are allocated to the grades II and III, but the parameters distinguishing the two still need to be fully validated. The genetic alterations are different from meningioma with alterations of the chromosome 22 absent. Most alterations are found on chromosome 12q13 and 6p21.
As for clinical signs and symptoms, there is no difference between meningiomas and hemangiopericytomas. The neuroradiological features may be identical to meningioma (Fig. 8.26) but are somewhat different from meningiomas in respect to bone. The tumors tend to cause lytic lesions in bone and do not grow through the bone like the meningiomas which with rare exceptions either cause hyperostosis or just distend the bone without completely destroying it. The tumors are highly vascularized and upon angiography show a wealth of pathological vessels (Fig. 8.26), [51]. In contrast to meningiomas, calcifications are rare.
Treatment of hemangiopericytoma is more complex than that of the average meningioma. The tumors should be removed as completely as possible, and then there is a consensus that the region needs to be irradiated [3] because otherwise the rate of recurrence is 91% [89]. Especially with anaplastic tumors, the prognosis is bad without radical removal and radiation, but when achieved and completed, 5-year overall survival may be 90% [93]. Also, these tumors have a tendency to metastasize, primarily into bone [83]. No chemotherapeutic regimen has emerged as an effective standard [24]. Corresponding to the aggressiveness of the disease, patients need to be followed closely, especially to detect metastases. The high rate of recurrence and metastases is the cause for mortality, and despite aggressive treatment, up to 60% of the patients may have succumbed to the disease by 15 years [89].
12.1 Dural Lymphoma
Dural lymphomas present as contrast-enhancing lesions with an extension like a subdural hematoma, like a nodular meningioma with a dural tail, like an en plaque meningioma, or just as dural hypertrophy. Particularly suspicious is an extension deep into the arachnoid spaces and sulci (Fig. 8.26). Primary dural lymphomas are rare and not to be mistaken for primary CNS lymphoma (see Schlegel, this volume). They are mostly of the MALT type [28, 72] although other kinds and regular Hodgkin’s disease have been reported [37]. They seem to have a better prognosis than PCNSL and respond well to cranial radiation [7]. Many of the reported dural lymphomas were unexpected, and therefore, some were resected like en plaque meningiomas. Cranial radiation is to be recommended even after resection but certainly after biopsy.
12.2 Dural Metastases
Metastatic disease to the brain is seen with increasing frequency, but in comparison with the parenchymal or leptomeningeal variants, purely dural involvement is rare and is detected most frequently in the context of suspected meningioma [44, 86]. Whereas in intracranial disease, a metastasis is more readily suspected because of imaging characteristics and has a known primary in about 80% [92]; the diagnosis of a dural metastasis is made much more frequently when the primary tumor is still unknown [86]. This can be partially explained by the fact that dural metastases may occur in any type of cancer but show a spectrum which is different from intracranial disease. A large combined surgical and autoptic series showed a surprisingly broad spectrum including the expected high numbers of breast cancer as primary but an even higher number of underlying prostate cancer which can have extensive manifestation (Fig. 8.27) and also such primaries as the larynx, gall bladder, and stomach, which otherwise rarely metastasize to brain [40].
When purely dural and an appearance like meningioma, the differential diagnosis is close to impossible without a tissue diagnosis because the neuroradiological techniques may not provide sufficient parameters for differentiation [42]. The tumors may be dural with a flat spread, be nodular, or show a combination of subdural-dural-skull extension. Depending on the context of the overall status of the patient, there may be an indication for resection, especially when the differential diagnosis toward meningioma cannot be made without histology and there is no known primary. As the spectrum of histological origins is very heterogeneous, there are no published series about the role of radiotherapy or chemotherapy as there are for leptomeningeal metastatic disease. How to proceed after histological verification of a dural metastasis will depend on the established treatment paradigms for the primary tumor and has to be determined in an interdisciplinary tumor board (Fig. 8.28).
References
Al-Mefti O (1991) Meningiomas. Raven Press, New York
Al-Mefti O (1998) Operative Atlas of Meningioma. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia
Alen JF, Lobato RD, Gomez PA, Boto GR, Lagares A, Ramos A, Ricoy JR (2001) Intracranial hemangiopericytoma: study of 12 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:575–586
Antonescu CR, Paulus W, Perry A, Rushing EJ, Hainfellner JA, Bouvier C, Figarella-Branger D, von Deimling A, Wesseling P (2016) Mesenchymal, non-meningothelial tumours. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavanee WK, Ellison DW, Figarella-Branger D, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 248–257
Becker G, Jeremic B, Pitz S, Buchgeister M, Wilhelm H, Schiefer U, Paulsen F, Zrenner E, Bamberg M (2002) Stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy in patients with optic nerve sheath meningioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:1422–1429
Bendszus M, Rao G, Burger R, Schaller C, Scheinemann K, Warmuth-Metz M, Hofmann E, Schramm J, Roosen K, Solymosi L (2000) Is there a benefit of preoperative meningioma embolization. Neurosurgery 47:1306–1311. ; discussion 1311–1302
Beriwal S, Hou JS, Miyamoto C, Garcia-Young JA (2003) Primary dural low grade BCL-2 negative follicular lymphoma: a case report. J Neuro-Oncol 61:23–25
Bi WL, Wu WW, Santagata S, Reardon DA, Dunn IF (2016) Checkpoint inhibition in meningiomas. Immunotherapy 8:721–731
Borg A, Ekanayake J, Mair R, Smedley T, Brew S, Kitchen N, Samandouras G, Robertson F (2013) Preoperative particle and glue embolization of meningiomas: indications, results, and lessons learned from 117 consecutive patients. In: Neurosurgery, vol 73, pp ons244–ons251. ; discussion ons252
Buhl R, Hugo HH, Mehdorn HM (2001) Brain oedema in secretory meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci 8(Suppl 1):19–21
Bull WJ, Vandevender D, Cimino VG (2003) Reconstruction of defects of the cranial base. Tech Neurosurg 9:106–112
Carroll RS, Schrell UM, Zhang J, Dashner K, Nomikos P, Fahlbusch R, Black PM (1996) Dopamine D1, dopamine D2, and prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression by the polymerase chain reaction in human meningiomas. Neurosurgery 38:367–375
Chamberlain MC (2001) Meningiomas. Curr Treat Options Neurol 3:67–76
Chamberlain MC, Tsao-Wei DD, Groshen S (2004) Temozolomide for treatment-resistant recurrent meningioma. Neurology 62:1210–1212
Chen WC, Magill ST, Englot DJ, Baal JD, Wagle S, Rick JW, McDermott MW (2017) Factors associated with pre- and postoperative seizures in 1033 patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma resection. Neurosurgery 81:297–306
Christensen HC, Kosteljanetz M, Johansen C (2003) Incidences of gliomas and meningiomas in Denmark, 1943 to 1997. Neurosurgery 52:1327–1333. ; discussion 1333–1324
Clark VE, Erson-Omay EZ, Serin A, Yin J, Cotney J, Ozduman K, Avsar T, Li J, Murray PB, Henegariu O, Yilmaz S, Gunel JM, Carrion-Grant G, Yilmaz B, Grady C, Tanrikulu B, Bakircioglu M, Kaymakcalan H, Caglayan AO, Sencar L, Ceyhun E, Atik AF, Bayri Y, Bai H, Kolb LE, Hebert RM, Omay SB, Mishra-Gorur K, Choi M, Overton JD, Holland EC, Mane S, State MW, Bilguvar K, Baehring JM, Gutin PH, Piepmeier JM, Vortmeyer A, Brennan CW, Pamir MN, Kilic T, Lifton RP, Noonan JP, Yasuno K, Gunel M (2013) Genomic analysis of non-NF2 meningiomas reveals mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO. Science 339:1077–1080
Claus EB, Black PM, Bondy ML, Calvocoressi L, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M (2007) Exogenous hormone use and meningioma risk: what do we tell our patients? Cancer 110:471–476
Claus EB, Calvocoressi L, Bondy ML, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M (2011) Family and personal medical history and risk of meningioma. J Neurosurg 115:1072–1077
Claus EB, Calvocoressi L, Bondy ML, Wrensch M, Wiemels JL, Schildkraut JM (2013) Exogenous hormone use, reproductive factors, and risk of intracranial meningioma in females. J Neurosurg 118:649–656
Cossu G, Levivier M, Daniel RT, Messerer M (2015) The role of mifepristone in meningiomas management: a systematic review of the literature. Biomed Res Int 2015:267831
Couldwell WT, Cole CD, Al-Mefty O (2007) Patterns of skull base meningioma progression after failed radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 106:30–35
Dutour A, Kumar U, Panetta R, Ouafik L, Fina F, Sasi R, Patel YC (1998) Expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in human brain tumors. Int J Cancer 76:620–627
Ecker RD, Marsh WR, Pollock BE, Kurtkaya-Yapicier O, McClelland R, Scheithauer BW, Buckner JC (2003) Hemangiopericytoma in the central nervous system: treatment, pathological features, and long-term follow up in 38 patients. J Neurosurg 98:1182–1187
Egan RA, Lessell S (2002) A contribution to the natural history of optic nerve sheath meningiomas. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1505–1508
Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Gotsis SD, Kapsalakis JZ, Smisson HF 3rd, Johnston KW, Robinson JS Jr, Papadakis N (2000) In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 74:83–94
Galldiks N, Albert NL, Sommerauer M, Grosu AL, Ganswindt U, Law I, Preusser M, Rhun EL, Vogelbaum MA, Zadeh G, Dhermain F, Weller M, Langen KJ, Tonn JC (2017) PET imaging in patients with meningioma-report of the RANO/PET gGroup. Neuro Oncol 19:1576–1587
Goetz P, Lafuente J, Revesz T, Galloway M, Dogan A, Kitchen N (2002) Primary low-grade B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue of the dura mimicking the presentation of an acute subdural hematoma. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 96:611–614
Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M, Jenkinson MD, Sallabanda K, Houdart E, von Deimling A, Stavrinou P, Lefranc F, Lund-Johansen M, Moyal EC, Brandsma D, Henriksson R, Soffietti R, Weller M (2016) EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol 17:e383–e391
Grunberg SM (1994) Role of antiprogestational therapy for meningiomas. Hum Reprod 9(Suppl 1):202–207
Han JH, Kim DG, Chung HT, Park CK, Paek SH, Kim CY, Jung HW (2008) Gamma knife radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas: long-term radiologic and clinical outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(5):1324–1332
Hart DJ, Gianotta SL (2003) Complex cranial base meningioma : combined management. Tech Neurosurg 9:86–92
Hsu DW, Efird JT, Hedley-Whyte ET (1997) Progesterone and estrogen receptors in meningiomas: prognostic considerations. J Neurosurg 86:113–120
Jääskeläinen J, Louis DN, Paulus W, Haltia M (2000) Haemangiopericytoma. In: Kleihues P, Cavanee WK (eds) Tumors of the central nervous system : pathology and genetics. IARC Press, Lyon
Jhawar BS, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ (2003) Sex steroid hormone exposures and risk for meningioma. J Neurosurg 99:848–853
Ji Y, Rankin C, Grunberg S, Sherrod AE, Ahmadi J, Townsend JJ, Feun LG, Fredericks RK, Russell CA, Kabbinavar FF, Stelzer KJ, Schott A, Verschraegen C (2015) Double-blind phase III randomized trial of the antiprogestin agent mifepristone in the treatment of unresectable meningioma: SWOG S9005. J Clin Oncol 33:4093–4098
Johnson MD, Kinney MC, Scheithauer BW, Briley RJ, Hamilton K, McPherson WF, Barton JH Jr (2000) Primary intracerebral Hodgkin’s disease mimicking meningioma: case report. Neurosurgery 47:454–456. ; discussion 456–457
Kaley TJ, Wen P, Schiff D, Ligon K, Haidar S, Karimi S, Lassman AB, Nolan CP, DeAngelis LM, Gavrilovic I, Norden A, Drappatz J, Lee EQ, Purow B, Plotkin SR, Batchelor T, Abrey LE, Omuro A (2015) Phase II trial of sunitinib for recurrent and progressive atypical and anaplastic meningioma. Neuro Oncol 17:116–121
Kaminski JM, Movsas B, King E, Yang C, Kronz JD, Alli PM, Williams J, Brem H (2001) Metastatic meningioma to the lung with multiple pleural metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 24:579–582
Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK (2001) Dural metastases. A retrospective surgical and autopsy series. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:880–887
Kondziolka D, Nathoo N, Flickinger JC, Niranjan A, Maitz AH, Lunsford LD (2003) Long-term results after radiosurgery for benign intracranial tumors. Neurosurgery 53:815–821. ; discussion 821–812
Kremer S, Grand S, Remy C, Pasquier B, Benabid AL, Bracard S, Le Bas JF (2004) Contribution of dynamic contrast MR imaging to the differentiation between dural metastasis and meningioma. Neuroradiology 46:642–648
Kyritsis AP (1996) Chemotherapy for meningiomas. J Neurooncol 29:269–272
Laidlaw JD, Kumar A, Chan A (2004) Dural metastases mimicking meningioma. Case report and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 11:780–783
Lamszus K (2004) Meningioma pathology, genetics, and biology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 63:275–286
Lamszus K, Kluwe L, Matschke J, Meissner H, Laas R, Westphal M (1999) Allelic losses at 1p, 9q, 10q, 14q, and 22q in the progression of aggressive meningiomas and undifferentiated meningeal sarcomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 110:103–110
Lamszus K, Lengler U, Schmidt NO, Stavrou D, Ergun S, Westphal M (2000) Vascular endothelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and placenta growth factor in human meningiomas and their relation to angiogenesis and malignancy. Neurosurgery 46:938–947. ; discussion 947–938
Lamszus K, Vahldiek F, Mautner VF, Schichor C, Tonn J, Stavrou D, Fillbrandt R, Westphal M, Kluwe L (2000) Allelic losses in neurofibromatosis 2-associated meningiomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59:504–512
Longstreth WT Jr, Phillips LE, Drangsholt M, Koepsell TD, Custer BS, Gehrels JA, van Belle G (2004) Dental X-rays and the risk of intracranial meningioma: a population-based case-control study. Cancer 100:1026–1034
Loven D, Hardoff R, Sever ZB, Steinmetz AP, Gornish M, Rappaport ZH, Fenig E, Ram Z, Sulkes A (2004) Non-resectable slow-growing meningiomas treated by hydroxyurea. J Neurooncol 67:221–226
Marc JA, Takei Y, Schechter MM, Hoffman JC (1975) Intracranial hemangiopericytomas. Angiography, pathology and differential diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 125:823–832
Mason WP, Gentili F, Macdonald DR, Hariharan S, Cruz CR, Abrey LE (2002) Stabilization of disease progression by hydroxyurea in patients with recurrent or unresectable meningioma. J Neurosurg 97:341–346
Minniti G, Sacaringi F, F B (2017) Radiation therapy for intracranial meningiomas : current results and controversial issues. WFNOS Magazine 2:55–65
Mohammad MH, Chavredakis E, Zakaria R, Brodbelt A, Jenkinson MD (2017) A national survey of the management of patients with incidental meningioma in the United Kingdom. Br J Neurosurg 31:459–463
Mohme M, Emami P, Matschke J, Regelsberger J, Westphal M, Eicker SO (2016) Secretory meningiomas: characteristic features and clinical management of a unique subgroup. Neurosurg Clin N Am 27:181–187
Muracciole X, Regis J (2008) Radiosurgery and carcinogenesis risk. Prog Neurol Surg 21:207–213
Nakajima N, Fukuda H, Adachi H, Sasaki N, Yamaguchi M, Mitsuno Y, Kitagawa M, Horikawa F, Murao K, Yamada K (2017) Long-term volume reduction effects of endovascular embolization for intracranial meningioma: preliminary experience of 5 cases. World Neurosurg 105:591–598
Newman SA (2003) Optic nerve sheath meningiomas. Tech Neurosurg 9:64–77
Norden AD, Drappatz J, Wen PY (2007) Targeted drug therapy for meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 23:E12
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, Vecchione-Koval T, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2017) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2010-2014. Neuro Oncol 19:v1–v88
Perry A, Banerjee R, Lohse CM, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Scheithauer BW (2002) A role for chromosome 9p21 deletions in the malignant progression of meningiomas and the prognosis of anaplastic meningiomas. Brain Pathol 12:183–190
Perry A, Dehner LP (2003) Meningeal tumors of childhood and infancy. An update and literature review. Brain Pathol 13:386–408
Perry A, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, Budka H, von Deimling A (2007) Meningiomas. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavanee WK (eds) WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 164–172
Perry A., Louis DN, Budka H., von Deimling A., Rushing E.J., Mawrin C., Claus E.B., Loeffler J, Sadetzki S Meningioma, in Louis D.N., Ohgaki H, Wiestler O.D., Cavanee W.K., Ellison D.W., Figarella-Branger D., Perry A., Reifenberger G., von Deimling A. (ed): WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Lyon, IARC Press, 2016, pp 232–245
Preston DL, Ron E, Yonehara S, Kobuke T, Fujii H, Kishikawa M, Tokunaga M, Tokuoka S, Mabuchi K (2002) Tumors of the nervous system and pituitary gland associated with atomic bomb radiation exposure. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1555–1563
Probst EN, Grzyska U, Westphal M, Zeumer H (1999) Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas with a fibrin glue preparation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1695–1702
Rachinger W, Stoecklein VM, Terpolilli NA, Haug AR, Ertl L, Poschl J, Schuller U, Schichor C, Thon N, Tonn JC (2015) Increased 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake in PET imaging discriminates meningioma and tumor-free tissue. J Nucl Med 56:347–353
Reardon DA, Norden AD, Desjardins A, Vredenburgh JJ, Herndon JE II, Coan A, Sampson JH, Gururangan S, Peters KB, McLendon RE, Norfleet JA, Lipp ES, Drappatz J, Wen PY, Friedman HS (2012) Phase II study of Gleevec(R) plus hydroxyurea (HU) in adults with progressive or recurrent meningioma. J Neurooncol 106:409–415
Richter B, Harinath L, Pu C, Stabingas K (2017) Metastatic spread of systemic neoplasms to central nervous system tumors: review of the literature and case presentation of esophageal carcinoma metastatic to meningioma. Clin Neuropathol 36:60–65, 2017
Rogers L, Barani I, Chamberlain M, Kaley TJ, McDermott M, Raizer J, Schiff D, Weber DC, Wen PY, Vogelbaum MA (2015) Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg 122:4–23
Rosen CL, Ammerman JM, Sekhar LN, Bank WO (2002) Outcome analysis of preoperative embolization in cranial base surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:1157–1164
Rottnek M, Strauchen J, Moore F, Morgello S (2004) Primary dural mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-type lymphoma: case report and review of the literature. J Neurooncol 68:19–23
Ruttledge MH, Sarrazin J, Rangaratnam S, Phelan CM, Twist E, Merel P, Delattre O, Thomas G, Nordenskjold M, Collins VP et al (1994) Evidence for the complete inactivation of the NF2 gene in the majority of sporadic meningiomas. Nat Genet 6:180–184
Sadetzki S, Modan B, Chetrit A, Freedman L (2000) An iatrogenic epidemic of benign meningioma. Am J Epidemiol 151:266–272
Sahm F, Schrimpf D, Olar A, Koelsche C, Reuss D, Bissel J, Kratz A, Capper D, Schefzyk S, Hielscher T, Wang Q, Sulman EP, Adeberg S, Koch A, Okuducu AF, Brehmer S, Schittenhelm J, Becker A, Brokinkel B, Schmidt M, Ull T, Gousias K, Kessler AF, Lamszus K, Debus J, Mawrin C, Kim YJ, Simon M, Ketter R, Paulus W, Aldape KD, Herold-Mende C, von Deimling A (2016) TERT promoter mutations and risk of recurrence in meningioma. J Natl Cancer Inst 108
Sayagues JM, Tabernero MD, Maillo A, Trelles O, Espinosa AB, Sarasquete ME, Merino M, Rasillo A, Vera JF, Santos-Briz A, de Alava E, Garcia-Macias MC, Orfao A (2006) Microarray-based analysis of spinal versus intracranial meningiomas: different clinical, biological, and genetic characteristics associated with distinct patterns of gene expression. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 65:445–454
Sayegh ET, Burch EA, Henderson GA, Oh T, Bloch O, Parsa AT (2015) Tumor-to-tumor metastasis: breast carcinoma to meningioma. J Clin Neurosci 22:268–274
Schildkraut JM, Calvocoressi L, Wang F, Wrensch M, Bondy ML, Wiemels JL, Claus EB (2014) Endogenous and exogenous hormone exposure and the risk of meningioma in men. J Neurosurg 120:820–826
Seystahl K, Stoecklein V, Schuller U, Rushing E, Nicolas G, Schafer N, Ilhan H, Pangalu A, Weller M, Tonn JC, Sommerauer M, Albert NL (2016) Somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy for progressive meningioma: benefit linked to 68Ga-DOTATATE/-TOC uptake. Neuro Oncol 18:1538–1547
Simpson D (1957) The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:22–29
Sindou M (2001) Meningiomas invading the sagittal or transverse sinuses, resection with venous reconstruction. J Clin Neurosci 8(Suppl 1):8–11
Sindou MP, Alvernia JE (2006) Results of attempted radical tumor removal and venous repair in 100 consecutive meningiomas involving the major dural sinuses. J Neurosurg 105:514–525
Soyuer S, Chang EL, Selek U, McCutcheon IE, Maor MH (2004) Intracranial meningeal hemangiopericytoma: the role of radiotherapy: report of 29 cases and review of the literature. Cancer 100:1491–1497
Strojan P, Popovic M, Jereb B (2000) Secondary intracranial meningiomas after high-dose cranial irradiation: report of five cases and review of the literature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:65–73
Swensen R, Kirsch W (2002) Brain neoplasms in women: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:904–927
Tagle P, Villanueva P, Torrealba G, Huete I (2002) Intracranial metastasis or meningioma? An uncommon clinical diagnostic dilemma. Surg Neurol 58:241–245
Talacchi A, Muggiolu F, De Carlo A, Nicolato A, Locatelli F, Meglio M (2016) Recurrent atypical meningiomas: combining surgery and radiosurgery in one effective multimodal treatment. World Neurosurg 87:565–572
Terpolilli NA, Rachinger W, Kunz M, Thon N, Flatz WH, Tonn JC, Schichor C (2016) Orbit-associated tumors: navigation and control of resection using intraoperative computed tomography. J Neurosurg 124:1319–1327
Vuorinen V, Sallinen P, Haapasalo H, Visakorpi T, Kallio M, Jaaskelainen J (1996) Outcome of 31 intracranial haemangiopericytomas: poor predictive value of cell proliferation indices. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138:1399–1408
Wan WL, Geller JL, Feldon SE, Sadun AA (1990) Visual loss caused by rapidly progressive intracranial meningiomas during pregnancy. Ophthalmology 97:18–21
Weber RG, Bostrom J, Wolter M, Baudis M, Collins VP, Reifenberger G, Lichter P (1997) Analysis of genomic alterations in benign, atypical, and anaplastic meningiomas: toward a genetic model of meningioma progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:14719–14724
Westphal M, Heese O, de Wit M (2003) Intracranial metastases: therapeutic options. Ann Oncol 14(Suppl 3):iii4–ii10
Zhang GJ, Zhang LW, Li D, Wu Z, Zhang JT (2017) Analysis of prognostic factors, survival rates, and treatment in anaplastic Hemangiopericytoma. World Neurosurg 104:795–801
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Westphal, M., Lamszus, K., Tonn, JC. (2019). Meningiomas and Meningeal Tumors. In: Tonn, JC., Reardon, D., Rutka, J., Westphal, M. (eds) Oncology of CNS Tumors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04152-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04152-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04151-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04152-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)