Abstract
A typical lactic acid bacterium grown under standard conditions is aerotolerant, acid tolerant, organotrophic, and a strictly fermentative rod or coccus, producing lactic acid as a major end product. It lacks cytochromes and is unable to synthesize porphyrins. Its features can vary under certain conditions. Catalase and cytochromes may be formed in the presence of hemes and lactic acid can be further metabolized, resulting in lower lactic acid concentrations. Cell division occurs in one plane, except pediococci. The cells are usually nonmotile. They have a requirement for complex growth factors such as vitamins and amino acids. An unequivocal definition of LAB is not possible (Axelsson, Lactic acid bacteria microbiological and functional aspects. Marcel Dekker, 2004). Lactic acid bacteria are characterized by the production of lactic acid as a major catabolic end product from glucose. Some bacilli, such as Actinomyces israeli and bifidobacteria, can form lactic acid as a major end product, but these bacteria have rarely or never been isolated from must and wine. The DNA of LAB has a G+C content below 55 mol%. LAB are grouped into the Clostridium branch of gram-positive bacteria possessing a relationship to the bacilli, while Bifidobacterium belongs to the Actinomycetes. They are grouped in one order and six families. From the 33 described genera, only 26 species belonging to six genera have been isolated from must and wine.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
In 1873, 10 years after L. Pasteur studied lactic acid fermentation (between 1857 and 1863), the first pure culture of a lactic acid bacterium (LAB) (“Bacterium lactis”) was obtained by J. Lister. Starter cultures for cheese and sour milk production were introduced in 1890, while fermented food has been used by man for more than 5000 years (Schlegel 1999; Stiles and Holzapfel 1997). The first monograph by S. Orla-Jensen appeared in 1919. A typical lactic acid bacterium grown under standard conditions is aerotolerant, acid tolerant, organotrophic, and a strictly fermentative rod or coccus, producing lactic acid as a major end product. It lacks cytochromes and is unable to synthesize porphyrins. Its features can vary under certain conditions. Catalase and cytochromes may be formed in the presence of hemes and lactic acid can be further metabolized, resulting in lower lactic acid concentrations. Cell division occurs in one plane, except pediococci. The cells are usually nonmotile. They have a requirement for complex growth factors such as vitamins and amino acids. An unequivocal definition of LAB is not possible (Axelsson 2004).
Lactic acid bacteria are characterized by the production of lactic acid as a major catabolic end product from glucose. Some bacilli, such as Actinomyces israeli and bifidobacteria, can form lactic acid as a major end product, but these bacteria have rarely or never been isolated from must and wine. The DNA of LAB has a G+C content below 55 mol%. LAB are grouped into the Clostridium branch of gram-positive bacteria possessing a relationship to the bacilli, while Bifidobacterium belongs to the Actinomycetes. They are grouped in one order and six families. From the 33 described genera, only 26 species belonging to six genera have been isolated from must and wine (Table 1.1).
The homofermentative species produce lactic acid (<85%) as the sole end product, while the heterofermentative species produce lactic acid, CO2 and ethanol/acetate from glucose. At least half of the end product carbon is lactate. Heterofermentative LAB utilizes the pentose phosphate pathway, alternatively referred to as the phosphoketolase or phosphogluconate pathway. Homofermentative wine-related LAB include pediococci and group I lactobacilli. Obligate heterofermentative wine-related LAB include Leuconostoc, Oenococcus, Weissella and group III lactobacilli (Tables 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5).
Our present knowledge about LAB in general (Carr et al. 1975; Wood and Holzapfel 1995; Holzapfel and Wood 1998; Wood 1999; Wood and Warner 2003; Salminen et al. 2004; Lahtinen et al. 2012) and their activities on grape or in must and wine (Fleet 1993; Dittrich and Großmann 2005, 2011; Ribéreau-Gayon et al. 2006a, b; Fugelsang and Edwards 2007) has been compiled in several books. Here we concentrate mainly on lactic acid bacteria found in fermenting must and wine.
2 Ecology
In general, LAB occur in habitats with a rich nutrition supply. They occur on decomposing plant material and fruits, in dairy products, fermented meat and fish, beets, potatoes, mash, sauerkraut, sourdough, pickled vegetables, silage, beverages, plants, water, juices, sewage and in cavities (mouth, genital, intestinal and respiratory tract) of human and animals. They are part of the healthy microbiota of the human gut. Apart from dental caries, lactobacilli are generally considered apathogenic. Lb. plantarum could be associated with endocarditis, septicemia and abscesses. Some species are applied as starter cultures for food fermentation. Because of the acidification they prevent food spoilage and growth of pathogenic microorganisms (Hammes et al. 1991). Some LAB are employed as probiotics, which are potentially beneficial bacterial cells to the gut ecosystem of humans and other animals (Tannock 2005). O. oeni strains induced strain-specific cytokine patterns measureable immunomodulatory potential (Foligné et al. 2010).
Lactic acid bacteria can also be found on grapes, in grape must and wine, as well as beer. Undamaged grapes contain <103 CFU per g and the initial titer in must is low (Lafon-Lafourcade et al. 1983). Because of the acidic conditions (pH: 3.0–3.5) grape must provides a suitable natural habitat only for a few microbial groups which are acid tolerant such as LAB, acetic acid bacteria and yeasts. While many microbes are inhibited by ethanol concentrations above 4 vol%, ethanol tolerant species survive in young wine or wine. Besides yeasts, some Lactobacillus species (e.g. Lb. hilgardii) and Oenococcus oeni can grow at higher ethanol concentrations. While only a few LAB species of the genera Lactobacillus (Lb.), Leuconostoc (Lc.), Pediococcus (P.), Oenococcus (O.) and Weissella (W.) (Tables 1.1 and 1.2) and the acetic acid genera Acetobacter, Gluconobacter and Gluconoacetobacter can grow in must and wine, more than 90 yeast species have been found. Malolactic fermentation by lactic acid bacteria is occasionally desirable during vinification, but they can also produce several off-flavours in wine. The genera Carnobacterium, Streptococcus and Bifidobacterium have not been isolated from must and wine, but sometimes also species of the genus Enterococcus (E. faecium) could be detected in wine (Pérez-Martín et al. 2014).
Detailed investigations of the grape associated bacteria have been undertaken (Jackson 2008). Species of the lactic acid genera Lactobacillus (Lb. casei, Lb. hilgardii, Lb. kefiri, Lb. kunkeei, Lb. lindneri, Lb. mali, Lb. plantarum), Weissella paramesenteroides, Enterococcus (E. avium, E. durans, E. faecium, E. hermanniensis), Lactococcus lactis and infrequently species of the acetic acid genera Asaia and Gluconobacter as well as grampositive genera Bacillus and Staphylococcus have been identified in enrichment cultures from undamaged or damaged grapes of the varieties (Cabernet Sauvignon, Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Sauvignon Blanc, Semillion, Shiraz, Tyrian) in Australia (Bae et al. 2006). Vineyard- and winery-associated lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from the Greek wine growing regions Peza and Nemea revealed that Pediococcus pentosaceus and Lb. graminis dominated the grape microbiota and Lb. plantarum the fermenting must (Nisiotou et al. 2015). Species of the genera Enterococcus and Lactococcus are not further considered here.
3 Phenotypic and Phylogenetic Relationship
The classification of LAB is largely based on morphology (rods, cocci, tetrads), mode of glucose fermentation, substrate spectrum, growth at different temperatures (15 and 45 °C), configuration of lactic acid produced, ability to grow at high salt concentrations (6.5% NaCl; 18% NaCl), and acid, alkaline or ethanol tolerance, as well as fatty acid composition and cell wall composition, lactic acid isomers from glucose, behaviour against oxygen (anaerobic or microaerophilic growth), arginine hydrolysis, acetoin formation, bile tolerance, type of hemolysis, production of extracellular polysaccharides, growth factor requirement, presence of certain enzymes, growth characteristics in milk, serological typing, murein, teichoic acid, menaquinone type, fatty acid composition, electrophoretic mobility of the lactate dehydrogenases, DNA base composition, PCR-based fingerprinting techniques (SAPD-PCR; Pfannebecker and Fröhlich 2008; Sebastian et al. 2011; Petri et al. 2013), restriction analysis (Ze-Ze et al. 2000), restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes (Ilabaca et al. 2014), 16S-ARDRA (Rodas et al. 2003), DNA–DNA homology, soluble protein pattern, 16S rDNA and gene sequencing (e.g. recA) (Axelsson 2004), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed field gel electrophoresis analysis (PFGE) (González-Arenzana et al. 2014), quantitative PCR (Cho et al. 2011), marker-targeted quantitative PCR (Solieri and Giudici 2010), amplification of 16S rRNA gene restriction with the endonuclease FseI (Marques et al. 2010), real-time PCR (Kántor et al. 2016), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; Hirschhäuser et al. 2005), mass spectrometry (Napoli et al. 2014; Petri et al. 2015), multiplex PCR (Pfannebecker and Fröhlich 2008; Petri et al. 2013) and complete genome comparison (GGDC - The Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator; DSMZ 2016d). qPCR after propidium monoazide treatment of samples is a rapid tool to enumerate O. oeni viable cells with intact membranes in must and wine (Vendrame et al. 2013).
The genera and species of lactic acid bacteria occurring in must and wine can be differentiated by phenotypic features (Tables 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5). The species can be identified by the API 50 CHL identification system (Bio-Mérieux) or the Biolog Microbial Identification System (Biolog, Inc.) (Testa et al. 2014).
The first taxonomic outline given by Orla-Jensen (1919) is still of some importance. Based on physiological features Kandler and Weiss (1986) divided the genus Lactobacillus into the three groups (1) obligate homofermenters, (2) faculative heterofermenters and (3) obligate heterofermenters (Table 1.3). The phylogenetic relationship has been revealed by rRNA sequencing (Fig. 1.1; Collins et al. 1990, 1991, 1993; Martinez-Murcia and Collins 1990; Dicks et al. 1995). According to the 16S rDNA analysis Collins et al. (1990, 1991, 1993) divided the genus Lactobacillus into three groups. Group I contains obligate homofermentative species and facultatively heterofermentative species. Group II contains more than 30 Lactobacillus species and five pediococcal species. The wine-related facultative heterofermenters Lb. casei and the obligate heterofermenters Lb. brevis, Lb. buchneri and Lb. fermentum belong to this group. Group III contains the genus Weissella, the leuconostocs (Lc. mesenteroides) and O. oeni. Schleifer and Ludwig (1995a, b) proposed the phylogenetic groups (1) Lb. acidophilus group, (2) Lb. salivarius group, (3) Lb. reuteri group (Lb. fermentum), (4) Lb. buchneri group (Lb. buchneri, Lb. fructovorans, Lb. hilgardii) and (5) Lb. plantarum group.
The Leuconostoc group can be clearly separated from other lactobacilli (Collins et al. 1991; Schleifer and Ludwig 1995a, b). The wine-related species Lc. mesenteroides forms a subgroup of the obligately heterofermentative Leuconostoc group. Lc. oenos was placed in the separate genus Oenococcus (Dicks et al. 1995) consisting of the three species O. oeni and O. kitahareae (Endo and Okada 2006) as well as O. alcoholitolerans (Badotti et al. 2015). O. kitahareae was isolated from a composting distilled shochu residue. It does not grow at acidic conditions (pH 3.0–3.5) of must and lacks the ability to perform malic acid degradation. O. alcoholitolerans thrived in an ethanol production plant in Brazil.
Hammes and Hertel (2003) described seven phylogenetic groups, which were modified by Dellaglio and Felis (2005) (cf. Table 1.3).
Today, the lactic acid bacteria are members of the domain Bacteria, where they are assigned to the phylum Firmicutes, the class Bacilli and the order Lactobacillases (Table 1.1) (Garrity 2005); Vos et al. 2009; Whitman 2016).
4 Physiology
Carbohydrates are used as carbon and energy source by a homofermentative or heterofermentative pathway. Fructophilic species have been described (Endo and Okada 2008; Mtshali et al. 2012). Sugars or oligosaccharides taken up by the phosphotransferase system (PTS, e.g. lactose: Lb. casei) or the permease system. Homofermentation of hexoses procedes via the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway, while heterofermentation is performed via the 6-P-gluconate/phosphoketolase pathway resulting in lactate, acetate/ethanol and CO2 as endproducts or the Bifidus pathway (Bifidobacterium). Pentoses are fermented by 6-phosphogluconate/phosphoketolase pathway leading to lactic acid and acetic acid/ethanol. Some lactobacilli such as Lb. salivarius (Raibaud et al. 1973) or Lb. vini (Rodas et al. 2006) can ferment pentoses homofermentatively. Some strains can produce acetate, ethanol and formate from pyruvate under low substrate concentrations and strictly anaerobic conditions (Hammes and Vogel 1995). Lactic acid bacteria form d(−) or l(+) lactic acid or a racemic mixture of lactic acid isomers (Kandler 1983).
The Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway is used by lactobacilli (group I and II; Table 1.3) and pediococci, while group III of lactobacilli, leuconostocs and oenococci use the 6-phosphogluconate/phosphoketolase pathway (other designations: pentose phosphate pathway, pentose phosphoketolase pathway, hexose monophosphate pathway). Changes in the end product composition can be influenced by environmental factors. Depending on the growth conditions the end products of homofermenters can be changed largely. In addition to glucose, the hexoses mannose, fructose and galactose may be fermented after isomerisation and/or phosphorylation. Galactose is used via the tagatose pathway by e.g. Lb. casei.
Under anaerobic conditions pyruvate can be metabolized by Lb. casei to formate and acetate/ethanol (pyruvate formate lyase system) under glucose limitation. End produts are lactate, acetate, formate and ethanol (mixed acid fermentation). Under aerobic conditions Lb. plantarum can convert pyruvate to CO2 and acetyl phosphate with a pyruvate oxidase (Sedewitz et al. 1984).
Flavin-containing enzymes such as NADH:H2O2 oxidase and NADH:H2O oxidase (Condon 1987) can occur in lactic acid bacteria. Oxygen acts as external electron acceptor. Oxygen-dependent glycerol fermentation by P. pentosaceus and mannitol fermentation of Lb. casei are examples. An oxygen-dependent lactate metabolism has been proposed for Lb. plantarum involving NAD+-dependent and/or NAD+-independent lactate dehydrogenase, a pyruvate oxidase and an acetate kinase (Murphy et al. 1985). The defense system against in vitro oxidative stress includes the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging ability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging ability, iron ion chelation (FE), glutathione system, ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP), reduction activity (RA), inhibition of ascorbic oxidation (TAA), and linoleic acid oxidation (TLA) abilities (Su et al. 2015).
Lactobacilli interact with oxygen. Some lactic acid bacteria use high intracellular manganese concentration for protection against superoxide (30–35 mM; Archibald 1986). Theobald et al. (2005) found a growth stimulation of O. oeni at concentrations of 68 μM or 34 mM manganese in the growth medium. In some strains 34 mM manganese could replace tomato juice. Other compounds are also stimulatory for oenococci (Theobald et al. 2007a, b).
Flavin-containing enzymes such as NADH:H2O2 oxidase and NADH:H2O oxidase (Condon 1987) can occur in lactic acid bacteria. Oxygen acts as external electron acceptor. Oxygen-dependent glycerol fermentation by P. pentosaceus and mannitol fermentation of Lb. casei are examples. An oxygen-dependent lactate metabolism has been proposed for Lb. plantarum involving NAD+-dependent and/or NAD+-independent lactate dehydrogenase, a pyruvate oxidase and an acetate kinase (Murphy et al. 1985).
Citrate can lead to diacetyl/acetoin formation if the excess of pyruvate is reduced to lactic acid. Oxaloacetate can also function as electron acceptor leading to succinic acid formation when Lb. plantarum was grown on mannitol (Chen and McFeeters 1986). Lb. brevis and Lb. buchneri can use glycerol as electron acceptor in an anaerobic cofermentation with glucose leading to lactate, acetate, CO2 and 1.3-propandiol (Schütz and Radler 1984a, b). Fructose can be fermented via the 6-phosphocluconate/phosphoketolase pathway and function as electron acceptor to yield mannitol by Lb. brevis (Eltz and Vandemark 1960). Malic acid can be used as sole energy source by Lb. casei yielding acetate, ethanol and CO2 or it can be converted to l-lactate and CO2 (malolactic fermentation) by e.g. O. oeni (Radler 1975). The biosynthesis of amino acids in lactic acid bacteria is limited. Some have peptidases and can hydrolyse proteins. Lactic acid bacteria can also perform chemical cell communication (Nakayama and Sonomoto 2002).
Adaptation of lactobacilli to harsh environmental conditions concern: synthesis of heat-shock proteins, key enzymes of glycolytic pathways, the glutamate decarboxylase system, homoeostasis of intracellular pH, alkalization of the external environment, DNA and protein damage repair, changes in cell membrane composition, changes in cytosolic and surface-located proteins, the fatty acid contents of the cytoplasmic membrane, cell wall biosynthesis, transport of peptides, coenzyme levels and membrane H+-ATPase (Hussain et al. 2013).
5 Genetics
The genome size of lactic acid bacteria varies (Morelli et al. 2004). The total genome of about 211 species/strains of the genera Lactobacillus (genome size: 1.27765–4.87232 Mb), Leuconostoc (genome size: 1.63897–2.29809 Mb), Oenococcus (genome size: 1.15038–1.84224 Mb), Pediococcus (genome size: 1.76496–2.50947 Mb) and Weissella (genome size: 1.33444–2.57773 Mb) is available, including all wine-relevant species (Table 1.1; Makarova et al. 2006; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome, February 2017). For example, the genome of Lb. paracasei ATCC 334 consists of 2.17 Mb (Ferrero et al. 1996) and that of Lb. plantarum CCM 1904 of 3.4 Mb (Chevallier et al. 1994). Genome sequences of O. oeni strains have been determined (Jara and Romero 2015).
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have about 2000 genes in average. They have lost ca. 1000 genes during separation from the ancestral Bacilli during evolution. The lost genes coded for sporulation, cofactors, heme cytochromes and catalase. LAB have also acquired about 86 new genes by gene duplication and horizontal gene transfer regarding e.g. murein and B12 biosynthesis, novel functions of genes coding usually for antibiotic resistance, phage defense mechanisms and IS elements (Morelli et al. 2012).
Lactic acid bacteria possess circular as well as linear plasmids associated with carbohydrate fermentation and proteinase activities, bacteriocin production, phage defense mechanisms, and antibiotic resistance mechanisms (Morelli et al. 2004, 2012).
Phages have been found with the wine-related species of Lactobacillus (Lb. casei, Lb. fermentum, Lb. plantarum,), Leuconostoc (Lc. mesenteroides) and Oenococcus (O. oeni) (Josephsen and Neve 2004). They can cause stuck malolactic fermentation (Poblet-Icart et al. 1998).
6 Activities in Must and Wine
Lactic acid bacteria are involved in food and feed fermentation and preservation as well as food digestion in the intestinal tracts of humans and animals. Due to their tolerance against ethanol and acidic conditions, LAB can grow in must. Generally they are inhibited at ethanol concentrations above 8 vol%, but O. oeni tolerates 14 vol% and Lb. brevis, Lb. fructivorans and Lb. hilgardii can be found even in fortified wines up to an ethanol concentration of 20 vol%. Slime-producing strains of P. damnosus grow up to 12 vol% of ethanol. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from wine grow between 15 and 45 °C in the laboratory with an optimal growth range between 20 and 37 °C. Best growth in must during malolactic fermentation is obtained around 20 °C. During the first days of must fermentation the CFU of LAB increases from 102 to 104–105 ml−1. After the alcoholic fermentation and during the malic acid fermentation, the cell number can reach a titer of 107–108 CFU per ml (Ribérau-Gayan et al. 2006a, b). The titer of different lactic acid species during alcoholic fermentation has been determined by Lonvaud-Funel et al. (1991): O. oeni, 3.4 × 106 (day 13, alcohol content: 18 vol%); Lc. mesenteroides, 9.6 × 104 (day 6, alcohol content: 9 vol%); P. damnosus, 3.8 × 104 (day 3, alcohol content: 7 vol%); Lb. hilgardii, 8.0 × 104 (day 3, alcohol content: 7 vol%); Lb. brevis, 2.0 × 104 (day 3, alcohol content: 7 vol%) and Lb. plantarum, 2.0 × 104 (day 3, alcohol content: 7 vol%).
Lactic acid bacteria gain their energy mainly from sugar fermentation. They use both main hexoses of the wine, glucose and fructose, as energy and carbon source. In this respect they are competitors of the ethanol producing yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The heterofermentative LAB in wine can also use the pentoses (arabinose, xylose, ribose), which occur in minor concentrations in wine.
Lactic acid bacteria also metabolize the three main acids of must: tartrate, malate and citrate. Citrate is converted to lactate, acetic acid, CO2 and acetoin. Malate is converted to l-lactate and CO2 (malolactic fermentation). Especially in northern countries, where must can have high acidity, the biological reduction with starter cultures of O. oeni is an important step in vinification. The malolactic enzyme has been found in many lactic acid bacteria occurring in wine (e.g. Lb. casei, Lb. brevis, Lb. buchneri, Lb. delbruechii, Lb. hilgardii, Lb. plantarum, Lc. mesenteroides, and O. oeni). O. oeni is applied for reduction of the malic acid content because of its high tolerance against ethanol and acidity. Indigenous P. damnosus strains were found to perform malolactic fermentation into Albariño and Caiño wines (Spain) without negative effects on the wine (Juega et al. 2014). Malolactic fermentation and the use of sugars can lead to a more stable wine. Lb. plantarum could be an alternative species to O. oeni for performing malolactic fermentation (Bravo-Ferrada et al. 2013). Tartrate can be converted to lactate, acetate and CO2 by the homofermentative lactic acid bacterium Lb. plantarum and to acetate and CO2 or fumaric acid (succinic acid) by the heterofermentative lactic acid bacterium Lb. brevis (Radler and Yannissis 1972).
Lactic acid bacteria produce different biogenic amines. O. oeni, P. cerevisiae and Lb. hilgardii (Landete et al. 2005; Mangani et al. 2005; Kaschak et al. 2009; Sebastian et al. 2011; Christ et al. 2012) are examples of producers of biogenic amines. The most important is histamine, which is produced by decarboxylation of histidine. The COST Action 917 (2000–2001) of the EU “Biologically active amines in food” suggested prescriptive limits for histamine (e.g. France: 8 mg l−1, Germany: 2 mg l−1) in wines. Biogenic amines can cause health problems (Coton et al. 1998) and sensory defects in wine (Lehtonen 1996; Palacios et al. 2004). From arginine, ammonium is liberated by heterofermentative species such as Lb. higardii and O. oeni, but also by facultatively heterofermentative species like Lb. plantarum. The highest citrulline production in Malbec wine could be correlated with its lower concentrations of glucose, fructose, citric and phenolic acid than the other wines. Therefore, a wine with lower concentration of these sugars and acids could be dangerous due to the formation of ethyl carbamate precursors. The degradation if arginine proceeds via citrulline that forms with ethanol the carcinogen ethyl carbamate. Phenolic compounds could decrease the arginine consumption (protocatechuic acid, gallic acid) or increase (quercetin, rutin, catechin, caffeic acid, vanillic acids). Arginine deiminase activity was stimulated by rutin, quercetin, caffeic acid and vanillic, while gallic acid and protocatechuic acids inhibited this enzyme activity (Alberto et al. 2012; Araque et al. 2016). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a tool to follow the transformation of histidine into histaminol and into histamine during alcoholic and malolactic fermentations and consequently to select suitable strains for malolactic fermentation (López-Rituerto et al. 2013). On the other hand biogenic amines such as histamine, tyramine, and putrescine can be degraded by lactic acid bacteria (e.g. Lb. plantarum, P. acidilactici) (Callejón et al. 2014), which is also true for some yeasts (Bäumlisberger et al. 2015). Strains of Lb. plantarum were selected because of their ability to degrade putrescine and tyramine (Capozzi et al. 2012). Although at different extent, 25% of the LAB especially Lactobacillus and Pediococcus strains were able to degrade histamine, 18% tyramine and 18% putrescine, whereas none of the commercial malolactic starter cultures or type strains were able to degrade any of the tested amines. The application of some lactic acid bacteria could be a promising strategy to reduce biogenic amines in wine (García-Ruiz et al. 2011a).
Lactic acid bacteria have an influence on the flavour of wine, because they can produce acetic acid, diacetyl, acetoin, 2,3-butandiol, ethyl lactate, diethyl succinate and acrolein. The ability of wine lactobacilli to accumulate 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde (3-HPA), a precursor of acrolein, from glycerol in the fermentation media was demonstrated (Bauer et al. 2010). Lactic acid bacteria can also cause a decrease in colour up to 30%. In German wines 1.08 g acetic acid per l white wine or 1.20 g acetic acid per l red wine are the upper limits for acetic acid, while e.g. “Beerenauslese” (German quality distinction) can even have higher concentrations. The natural value is 0.3–0.4 g l−1 and it becomes sensory-significant at concentrations above 0.6 g l−1. Aerobic acetic acid bacteria, facultatively anaerobic heterotrophic lactic acid bacteria, yeast under difficult fermentation conditions and Botrytis cinerea on infected grapes are the potential producers. Fructose is reduced to mannitol or converted to erythrol and acetate. Heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria can produce higher concentrations of acetic acid (>0.6 g l−1), especially in the absence of pantothenic acid (Richter et al. 2001). Lactic acid bacteria can convert sorbic acid, which is used because of its antifungal properties, to 2-ethoxy-3.5-hexadiene (geranium-like odour) (Crowel and Guymon 1975). Glycerol is converted to propandiol-1.3 or allylalcohol and acrolein leading to bitterness (Schütz and Radler 1984a, b). Off-flavour is produced by O. oeni from cysteine and methionine. Cysteine is transformed into hydrogen sulfide or 2-sulfanyl ethanol and methionine into dimethyl disulfide, propan-1-ol, and 3-(methasulfanyl) propionic acid. They increase the complexity of the bouquet. The latter has an earthy, red-berry fruit flavour (Ribéreau-Gayon et al. 2006a, b). Lactic acid bacteria may produce a smell reminiscent of mice (mousiness). Species of Lactobacillus such as Lb. brevis, Lb. hilgardii and Lb. fermentum produce 2-acetyltetrahydropyridine (perception threshold: 1.6 ng l−1) from ethanol and lysine (Heresztyn 1986). Also 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline and 2-ethyltetrahydropyridine can contribute to this off-flavour (Costello and Henschke 2002). Ethyl carbamate is produced from urea and ethanol by O. oeni and Lb. hilgardii (Uthurry et al. 2006; Arena et al. 2013), which probably is carcinogenic. Lactic acid bacteria possess esterases for the synthesis and hydrolysis of esters (Sumby et al. 2013). Lb. plantarum posseses arylesterase which showed high hydrolytic activity on phenyl acetate and lower activity on other relevant wine aroma compounds (Esteban-Torres et al. 2014). Commercial strains of Oenococcus oeni and Lb. plantarum synthesize flavour active fatty acid ethyl esters with the aid of an acyl coenzyme A: alcohol acyltransferase (AcoAAAT) activity and a reverse esterase activity leading to an increased ethyl ester content of wine (Costello et al. 2013). The polyphenol flavan-3-ol was metabolized by Lb. plantarum to phenylpropionic acids (Barroso et al. 2014). In general, flavonols and stilbenes showed the greatest inhibitory effects among wine polyphenols on O. oeni, Lb. hilgardii and P. pentosaceus (García-Ruiz et al. 2011b). The proteome of Oenococcus oeni was studied to get hints about metabolic activities that can modify the taste and aromatic properties of wine (Mohedano et al. 2014). Lb. plantarum converted p-coumaric acid to volatile phenolic compound 4-vinylphenol under wine related conditions (Fras et al. 2014), reactions described earlier to be performed by intestinal bacteria of termites Kuhnigk et al. 1994). Hydroxycinnamic acids stimulated the production of the volatile phenolic compound 4-vinylphenol from p-coumaric acid by the LAB test strains Lb. plantarum, Lb. collinoides and P. pentosaceus (Silva et al. 2011). Isolates belonging to the genera Oenococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Enterococcus exhibited intracellular esterase activities using p-nitrophenyl octanoate as test compound. The esterase activity was decreased by increasing ethanol concentrations (Pérez-Martín et al. 2013).
Polysaccharide production (Claus 2007) leads to graisse of the must, which causes problems during filtration. O. oeni synthesizes homo- and heteropolysaccharides which are important for the adaptation to the wine environment, but also may influence the wine structure (Dimopoulou et al. 2012). P. damnosus increases viscosity. It produces a glucose homopolymer. The repeating unit is a β-1.3 linked glucose disaccharide carrying a β-1.2 linked glucose site group [3)-β-D-Glcp-(1.3)-[β-D-Glcp-(1.2)]-β-D-Glcp-(1] (Llaubères et al. 1990; Dueñas et al. 2003). The viscosity, which is influenced by many factors such as the ethanol concentration and temperature, becomes apparent at 107 colony forming units. A lytic enzyme for the hydrolysis of the slime produced by P. parvulus has been described (Blättel et al. 2011). β-d-Glucosidase activity occurred intracellularly in lactic acid bacteria (Mesas et al. 2012; Pérez-Martín et al. 2012). The application with lysozyme and β-glucanase leads to an improved treatment against glycan producing strains strains (Coulon et al. 2012). Of course, some phenolic compounds are inhibitory for lysozyme (Guzzo et al. 2011). When the S-layer was removed, the corresponding Lb. hilgardii B706 cells became more sensitive to bacteriolytic enzymes and some wine-related stress conditions (Dohm et al. 2011).
Lactic acid disease occurs at higher sugar concentrations when lactic acid bacteria grow during ethanolic fermentation at higher pH values and low nitrogen concentrations. Higher amounts of acetic acid can be produced, which hampers the activities of yeast. Most often, LAB do not multiply or disappear during alcoholic fermentation, except oenococci, which resist at low cell levels. It was found that fatty acids (hexanoic, octanoic and decanoic acid) liberated by growing yeast have a negative effect on bacterial growth (Lonvaud-Funel et al. 1988). Oenococci can grow during the stationary/death phase of the yeasts after alcoholic fermentation, when released cell constituents of yeasts stimulate bacterial growth. In this stage oenococci have an influence on yeast lysis by producing glycosidases and proteases.
The degradation of sugars and acids contributes to the microbial stabilisation of wine by removing carbon and energy substrates. Low concentrations of diacetyl increase the aromatic complexity. If the concentration of volatile acids increases 1 g l−1 the lactic disease becomes apparent, which can lead to a stuck alcoholic fermentation.
Lactic acid bacteria potentially produce antimicrobial components (Rammelberg and Radler 1990; Blom and Mörtvedt 1991) such as acetic acid, higher concentrations of carbon dioxide, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, pyroglutamic acid and bacteriocins, which inhibit the growth of other bacterial and yeast species. The production of bacteriocins by wine lactobacilli and L. mesenteroides is important for the production of wine aroma and combating other spoilage lactobacilli or controlling the malolactic fermentation (Du Toit et al. 2011; Dündar et al. 2016). Brevicin from Lb. brevis inhibits growth of O. oeni and P. damnosus (Rammelberg and Radler 1990). The malolactic fermentation and the consumption of nutrients (hexoses and pentoses) as well as the production of bacteriocines (De Vuyst and Vandamme 1994) lead to a stabilization of wine. Compared to O. oeni Lb. plantarum possesses more genes encoding for glycosidases, proteases, esterases, phenolic acid decarboxylases and citrate lyases and bacteriocins (plantaricins).
Analysis with DNA microarrays and proteomic techniques revealed that genes associated with the amino acid, the malate and the citrate metabolism, the synthesis of certain cell wall proteins were up, but genes related to carbohydrate metabolism were down regulated under wine making conditions. In addition, the thioredoxin and glutathione systems played an adaptive function for life (Margalef-Català et al. 2016).
During incubation with proteins and polypeptides obtained from Cabernet Sauvignon and Syrah wines O. oeni excreted a proteolytic activity. The produced peptides enhanced the beneficial biological activities in respect to antioxidant and antihypertensive status of the wine (Apud et al. 2013a, b). O. oeni could give additional value to wine because of the bioactive peptides from yeast autolysates with multifunctional beneficial activity released as consequence of its proteolytic activity (Aredes Fernández et al. 2011).
The viability of the cells of O. oeni is increased when microcolonies are formed. O. oeni forms microcolonies on stainless steel and oak chip surfaces with extracellular substances (Bastard et al. 2016). Cell in biofilms possessed increased tolerance to wine stress, and performed effective malolactic activities. Biofilm of O. oeni can modulate the wood-wine transfer of volatile aromatic compounds and influence the aging process by decreasing furfural, guaiacol, and eugenol. Most likely, the biofilms consists of polysaccharides, because O. oeni produces cell-linked exopolysaccharides (EPS) consisting of glucose, galactose and rhamnose as well as soluble β-glucan and soluble dextran or levan polymers (Dimopoulou et al. 2016). In addition, heat shock proteins contribute to stress reduction under wine conditions. Beside polysaccharide formation heat shock proteins play a role in acid tolerance. Darsonval et al. (2015) applied the antisense RNA approach to revealed the function of the small heat stress protein (HSP) Lo18 of O. oeni. They found that Lo18 is involved in heat and acid tolerance, which was explained by its membrane-protective role. The heat shock protein Hsp20 is over-expressed (Olguín et al. 2015; Costantini et al. 2015). Nevertheless, high ethanol concentrations in wine have an effect on metabolite transport as well as cell wall and membrane biogenesis.
The development of certain bacterial and yeast starter cultures for wines with special features is a continuous challenge (du Toit et al. 2011; Sumby et al. 2014). Multicolor capillary electrophoresis was performed to derive genotypic and phenotypic characters from fragment length analysis (FLA) profiles (Claisse and Lonvaud-Funel 2014). To improve strain selection a typing scheme for O. oeni using multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis was developed (Claisse and Lonvaud-Funel 2012). In this context it is desirable to find links between O. oeni metabolism, genomic diversity and wine sensory attributes (Bartowsky and Borneman 2011). The genomic diversity is well known among O. oeni strains, which possess variations in the starter-culture efficiency.
Some undesirable lactic acid bacteria from wine samples have other positive features. A P. parvulus strain that was isolated from Douro wines was able to degrade the prominent mycotoxin Ochratoxin A (OTA) (Abrunhosa et al. 2014) and P. pentosaceus exhibited a potential as probiotic (García-Ruiz et al. 2014). Also some unwanted compounds such as copper can be adsorbed of by wine-relevant lactobacilli. About 0.5–1.0 μg copper per ml could be removed from wine samples, which is sufficient enough to lower critical copper concentrations. The highest binding capacity of the tested lactic acid bacteria was found with Lb. buchneri DSM 20057 with a maximum of 46.17 μg copper bound per mg cell in deionized water. (Schut et al. 2011).
7 Characteristics of Genera and Species of Wine-Related Lactic Acid Bacteria
7.1 Genus Lactobacillus
Lactobacillus is one of the most important genus involved in food microbiology and human nutrition, owing to their role in food and feed production and preservation, as well as their probiotic properties. In October 2016 this genus contained in total 189 validly described species (DSMZ 2016a). In addition, several species consist of well characterized subspecies. Lactobacillus species live widespread in fermentable material. Lactobacilli contribute to the flavour of fermented food by the production of diacetyl, H2S and amines. They play a role in the production as well in the spoilage of food (sauerkraut, silage, dairy and meat as well as fish products) and beverages (beer, wine, juices) (Kandler and Weiss 1986; Hammes et al. 1991).
Lactobacilli are straight gram-positive non-motile or rarely motile rods (e.g. Lb. mali), with a form sometimes like coccobacilli. Chains are commonly formed. The tendency towards chain formation varies between species and even strains. It depends on the growth phase and the pH of the medium. The length and curvature of the rods depend on the composition of the medium and the oxygen tension. Peritrichous flagellation occurs only in a few species, which is lost during growth in artificial media. They are aciduric or acidophilic. The maximum for growth pH is about 7.2.
The murein sacculi possess various peptidoglycan types (Lys-d-Asp, m-Dpm-direct, Orn-d-Asp, Lys-Ala, Lys-Ala2, Lys-Ala-Ser, Lys-Ser-Ala2) of group A (DSMZ 2016c). Polysaccharides are often observed. Membrane-bound teichoic acids are present in all species and cell wall-bound teichoic acids in some species (Schleifer and Kandler 1972).
The G+C content of the DNA ranges from 32 to 53 mol%.
Lactobacilli are strict fermenters. They can tolerate oxygen or live anaerobic. They have complex nutritional requirements for carbohydrates, amino acids, peptides, fatty acids, nucleic acid derivatives, vitamins and minerals.
Some species possess a pseudocatalase and some strains can take up porphorinoids and then exhibit catalase, nitrite reductase and cytochrome activities.
They gain energy by homofermentative or heterofermentative carbohydrate fermentation in the absence or presence of oxygen. An energy source is also the conversion of carbamyl phosphate to CO2 and NH3 during arginine degradation. They possess flavine-containing oxidases and peroxidases to carry out an oxidation with O2 as the final electron acceptor. The pathways of sugar fermentation are the Embden-Meyerhof pathway converting 1 mol hexose to 2 mol lactic acid (homolactic fermentation) and the phosphoketolase pathway (heterolactic fermentation) resulting in 1 mol lactic acid, ethanol/acetate and CO2. Pyruvate produced during hexose fermentation may be converted to lactate, but also to other products such as diacetyl or acetic acid, ethanol and formate/CO2. In the presence of oxygen, lactate can be converted to pyruvate and consequently to acetic acid and CO2 or acetate and formate. The conversion of glycerol to 1,3-propanediol with glucose serving as electron donor was observed in Lb. brevis isolated from wine (Schütz and Radler 1984a, b). The homofermentative species possess an FDP aldolase, while the heterofermentative species have a phosphoketolase. The facultative heterofermenters possess an inducible phosphoketolase. Heterofermentative species can also use pentoses as substrate. Some homofermenters use pentoses homofermentatively (Rodas et al. 2006). Strains of Lactobacillus kunkeei turned out to be fructophilic lactic acid bacteria (Endo et al. 2012).
Sucrose is also used for the formation of dextrans with the help of dextran sucrase. Fructose can serve as electron acceptor and mannitol is formed by heterofermentative species. Monomeric sugars and saccharides are taken up by permeases or the phosphotransferase system. They are split inside the cell by glycosidases. Galactose-6-phosphate from lactose phosphate is fermented via the tagatose-6-phosphate pathway (Kandler 1983). Several organic acids such as citric acid, tartaric acid or malic acid are degraded (Radler 1975). Several amino acids are decarboxylated to biogenic amines.
Depending on the stereospecificity of the lactate dehydrogenase or the presence of an inducible lactate racemase lactate may have the d(−) or l(+) configuration. The lactate dehydrogenases can differ with respect to electrophoretic mobility and kinetic properties. Some enzymes are allosteric with FDP and Mn2+ as effectors.
Plasmids linked to drug resistance or lactose metabolism are often found (Smiley and Fryder 1978). Double-stranded DNA phages have been isolated (Sozzi et al. 1981) and lysogeny is widespread (Yokokura et al. 1974). Strains producing bacteriocins (lactocins) have been found among the homo- and heterofermentative species (Tagg et al. 1976). Several serological groups have been designed. From the species in must, Lb. plantarum belongs to group D (antigen: ribitol teichoic acid), Lb. fermentum to group F and Lb. brevis to group E (Archibald and Coapes 1971).
The complete genome of 173 Lactobacillus-species/strains has been sequenced; it includes all the wine related species of the genus Lactobacillus (http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/genome, February 2017).
Some characteristics of the species are compiled in Table 1.3. A combination of physiological and biochemical as well as molecular tests are required for the unambiguous identification of Lactobacillus species (Pot et al. 1994; Hammes and Vogel 1995). The validly published species of the genus Lactobacillus have been assigned to nine groups (cf. Table 1.3) (Yang and Woese 1989; Collins et al. 1991; Hammes et al. 1991; Hammes and Vogel 1995; Dellaglio and Felis 2005). Out of 189 validly described species, eighteen species have been found in must and wine (Table 1.3) (Ribéreau-Gayon et al. 2006a, b; Fugelsang and Edwards 2007).
The type species is Lb. delbrueckii DSM 20074T.
Lb. brevis
Morphology: Rods. 0.7–1.0 μm × 2.0–4.0 μm. Single or chains.
Isolation: Milk, cheese, sauerkraut, sourdough, silage, cow manure, mouth, intestinal tract of humans and rats, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20054.
Lb. buchneri
Morphology: Rods. 0.7–1.0 μm × 2.0–4.0 μm. Single or short chains.
Characteristics: As described for Lb. brevis except the additional fermentation of melezitose and the distinct electrophoretic behaviour of l-LDH and d-LDH.
Isolation: Milk, cheese, plant material and human mouth, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20057.
Lb. casei
Morphology: Rods. 0.7–1.1 μm × 2.0–4.0 μm.
Isolation: Milk, cheese, dairy products, sour dough, cow dung, silage, human intestinal tract, mouth and vagina, sewage, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20011.
Lb. cellobiosus
→ Lb. fermentum.
Lb. curvatus
Morphology: Bean-shaped rods. 0.7–0.9 μm × 1.0–2.0 μm. Pairs, short chains or close rings. Sometimes motile.
Characteristics: LDH is activated by FDP and Mn2+. Lactic acid racemase.
Isolation: Cow dung, milk, silage, sauerkraut, dough, meat products, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20019 (subsp. curvatus).
Lb. delbrueckii
Morphology: Rods. 0.5–0.8 μm × 2.0–9.0 μm. Single or in short chains.
Isolation: Milk, cheese, yeast, grain mash, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20072 (subsp. lactis).
Lb. diolivorans
Morphology: Rods. 1.0 μm × 2.0–10.0 μm. Single, pairs and short chains.
Isolation: Maize silage, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 14421.
Lb. fermentum
Morphology: Rods. Diameter 0.5–0.9 μm, length variable. Single or pairs.
Isolation: Yeast, milk products, sourdough, fermenting plant material, manure, sewage, mouth and faeces of man, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20052.
Lb. florum
Morphology: Rods. 0.8 μm × 1.5–7 μm. Single, pairs, chain.
Characteristics: Catalase negative, except in the presence of sheep blood. Heterofermentative. Production of d,l-lactic acid, ethanol and acetic acid from d-glucose. Nitrate not reduced. Acid production only from d-glucose and d-fructose out of 49 tested sugars. Fructophilic. No acid production from l-arabinose, d-arabitol, N-acetylglucosamine, maltose, ribose, d-arabinose, l-arabitol, adonitol, amygdalin, arbutin, cellobiose, dulcitol, aesculin, erythritol, d-fucose, l-fucose, β-gentiobiose, 2- and 5-ketogluconate, methyl α-d-glucoside, glycerol, glycogen, inositol, inulin, d-lyxose, d-mannose, methyl α-d-mannoside, melezitose, raffinose, rhamnose, sucrose, salicin, starch, sorbitol, l-sorbose, d-tagatose, trehalose, turanose, xylitol, l-xylose, methyl β-xyloside, d-galactose, lactose, mannitol, melibiose or d-xylose. No dextran production from sucrose. Growth at 300 g d-fructose per l, between pH 4.0–8.0, in the presence of 5% (w/v) NaCl and at 15 °C, but not at 45 °C. Pyruvate stimulatory. Murein lacks meso-diaminopimelic acid. DNA G+C content: 42 mol%.
Isolation: South African peony and bietou flowers, grape, wine
Type strain: DSM 22689
Lb. fructivorans
Morphology: Rods. 0.5–0.8 μm × 1.5–4.0 μm (occasionally 20 μm). Single, pairs, chains or long curved filaments.
Isolation: Spoiled mayonnaise, salad dressing, vinegar preserves, spoiled sake, dessert wine and aperitifs.
Type strain: DSM 20203.
Lb. heterohiochii
→ Lb. fructivorans.
Lb. hilgardii
Morphology: Rods. 0.5–0.8 μm × 2.0–4.0 μm. Single, short chains or long filaments.
Isolation: Wine samples.
Type strain: DSM 20176.
Lb. jensenii
Morphology: Rods. 0.6–0.8 μm × 2.0–4.0 μm. Single or short chains.
Isolation: Human vaginal discharge and blood clot, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20557.
Lb. kunkeei
Morphology: Rod. 0.5 μm × 1.0–1.5 μm.
Characteristics: Week catalase activity.
Isolation: Commercial grape wine undergoing a sluggish/stuck alcoholic fermentation.
Type strain: DSM 12361.
Lb. leichmannii
→ Lb. delbrueckii subsp. lactis
Lb. mali
Morphology: Slender rods. 0.6 μm × 1.8–4.2 μm, Single, in pairs, palisades and irregular clumps.
Characteristics: Motile by a few peritrichous flagella. Pseudocatalase activity in MRS medium containing 0.1% glucose. Menaquinones with predominantly eight or nine isoprene residues.
Isolation: Apple juice, cider and wine must.
Type strain: DSM 20444.
Lb. nagelli
Morphology: Rods. 0.5 μm × 1.0–1.5 μm.
Characteristics: Nitrate reduction.
Isolation: Partially fermented wine with sluggish alcoholic fermentation.
Type strain: DSM 13675.
Lb. oeni
Morphology: Rods, 0.63–0.92 μm × 1.38–3.41 μm, single, pairs, chains
Characteristics: motile, catalase negative, growth between 15 and 45 °C and pH 4.5–8.0, no growth at 5 °C and pH 3.3. Heterofermentative. Transformation of L-malic acid into l-lactic acid. Gluconate or ribose not fermented. l-Lactate formed from hexoses. Ammonia is not produced from arginine. Fructose not reduced to mannitol. Exopolysaccharide production from sucrose. Acid produced from N-acetylglucosamine, fructose, glucose, mannose, mannitol, sorbitol, l-sorbose, methyl a-d-glucoside and trehalose. No acid production from adonitol, amygdalin, d- or l-arabinose, d- or l-arabitol, arbutin, cellobiose, dulcitol, erythritol, d- or l-fucose, galactose, gluconate, 2-or 5-ketogluconate, glycogen, inositol, inulin, d-lyxose, lactose, maltose, melezitose, melibiose, raffinose, rhamnose, ribose, starch, sucrose, d-tagatose, turanose, xylitol, d- or l-xylose, methyl a-d-mannoside or methyl bxyloside. Aesculin not hydrolysed. Variable usage of glycerol, salicin and gentiobiose. Murein contains d-meso-diaminopimelic acid. DNA G+C content 37.17 mol%.
Isolation: Bobal grape wine
Type strain: DSM 19972
Lb. paracasei
Morphology: Rods. 0.8–1.0 μm × 2.0–4.0 μm. Single or chains.
Isolation: Dairy products, silage, humans, clinical sources, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 5622 (subsp. paracasei).
Lb. plantarum
Morphology: Rods. 0.9–1.2 μm × 3.0–8.0 μm. Single, pairs or short chains. Characteristics: Nitrate can be reduced under glucose limitation and a pH above 6.0. A pseudocatalase may be produced especially under glucose limitation. A ribitol or glycerol teichoic acid can be present in the cell walls.
Isolation: Dairy products, silage, sauerkraut, pickled vegetables, sourdough, cow dung, human mouth, intestinal tract and stool, sewage and grape must. Type strain: DSM 20174.
Lb. trichodes
→ Lb. fructivorans.
Lb. vermiforme
→ Lb. hilgardii.
Lb. vini
Morphology: Rods. 0.49–0.82 μm × 1.36–2.8 μm. Single, in pairs or in short chains. Motile.
Characteristics: Uses ribore and arabinose homofermentatively. Catalase-negative.
Exopolysaccharide is not produced from sucrose.
Isolation: Fermenting grape must.
Type strain: DSM 20605.
Lb. yamanashiensis
→ Lb. mali
7.2 Genus Leuconostoc
Leuconostocs thrive on plants and sometimes in milk, milk products, meat, sugar cane and other fermented food products. One species, Lc. mesenteroides, has been isolated from must. It is nonhemolytic and nonpathogenic to plants and animals (Garvie 1986a). Leuconostocs are heterofermentative cocci producing only d-lactic acid from glucose and are unable to produce ammonia from arginine (Björkroth and Holzapfel 2006).
Leuconostocs form spherical or lenticular cells, pairs or chains. The peptidoglycan belongs to type A. The interpeptide bridge of the peptidoglycan consists of Lys-Ser-Ala2 or Lys-Ala2.
Sugars are fermented by the 6-P-gluconate/phosphoketolase pathway with d-lactic acid, ethanol/acetate and CO2 as end products. NAD+ or NADP+ will serve as coenzyme of the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. During malolactic fermentation malate is degraded to l-lactate and CO2. Cells are nonproteolytic. Nitrate is not reduced.
Cells grow in a glucose medium as elongated cocci. Cells are found singly or in pairs, and form short to medium length chains. On solid media, cells form short rods.
Leuconostocs share many features with the heterofermentative lactobacilli (Dellaglio et al. 1995).
Dextrans, which are of industrial importance, are produced by leuconoctocs, especially Lc. mesenteroides, from sucrose as substrate.
Leuconostoc species were divided by Garvie (1960) into six different groups according to the fermentation of 19 carbohydrates. Electrophoretic mobilities of enzymes e.g. LDHs, cell protein pattern, cellular fatty acids, DNA base composition and DNA homology are applied for differentiation of the species (Dellaglio et al. 1995). Citrate metabolisms of Lc. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides might be plasmid linked (Cavin et al. 1988). No other phenotypic features were found to be coded on plasmids, while plasmids of Lactobacillus and Pediococcus code for sugar utilisation, proteinase, nisin, bacteriocins production, drug resistance, slime formation, arginine hydrolysis and bacteriophage resistance (Dellaglio et al. 1995).
Leuconostocs play a role in the organoleptic quality and texture of food such as milk, butter, cheese, meat and wine. Leuconostocs can also spoil food, but they often contribute to the flavour of dairy products due to the production of diacetyl from citrate. These strains are used as starter cultures, for e.g., buttermilk and cheese production. They produce gas from glucose, which can change the texture of fermented food. Due to their slow growth and acidification properties, they represent a minor percentage of the LAB in food. They can become predominant when antibiotic agents are present. They can influence the organoleptic behavior of wine.
Lc. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides (Wibowo et al. 1985), Lc. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicus (Björkroth and Holzapfel 2006) and Lc. mesenteroides subsp. cremoris (Yurdugul and Bozoglu 2002) have been isolated from grape must during alcoholic fermentation.
The G+C content of the DNA ranges between 37 and 41 mol%.
The genus Leuconostoc contains in total: 13 species (July 2016; DSMZ 2016a). Some species contain well characterized subspecies. Only three subspecies of Lc. mesenteroides play a role in must and wine. Some characteristics are compiled in Table 1.4.
The type species is Lc. mesenteroides DSM 20343T.
Lc. mesenteroides subsp. cremoris
Morphology: Like Lc. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides, occur often in long chains.
Characteristics: No dextran formation from sucrose.
Isolation: Milk, fermented milk products, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20346
Lc. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicus
Morphology: Like Lc. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides.
Characteristics: Dextran formation to a lesser extent than Lc. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides.
Isolation: Plant material, meat, milk, dairy products, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 203484
Lc. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides
Morphology: Coccoid cells in milk, elongated cocci in glucose containing culture media. Single, pairs, short to medium chains. Often rod-shaped on solid media. Characteristics: Production of excess of exopolysaccharides (dextran) from sucrose. Phages have been described (Sozzi et al. 1978).
Isolation: Silage, fermenting olives, sugar milling plants, meat, milk, dairy products, grape must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20343
7.3 Genus Oenococcus
Oenococci have been isolated from must and wine (Garvie 1986a). They form spherical or lenticular cells, pairs or chains. Murein belongs to type A (DSMZ 2016c). The interpeptide bridge contains Lys-Ala-Ser or Lys-Ser-Ser. Only NAD+ will serve as coenzyme of the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (Björkroth and Holzapfel 2006). Petri et al. (2015) applied MALDI-TOF-MS and nested SAPD-PCR for the discrimination of Oenococcus oeni isolates at the strain level.
Oenococci have been separated from the genus Leuconostoc by 16S rDNA sequence analysis (Fig. 1.1; Dicks et al. 1995; Schleifer and Ludwig 1995a, b). Only three species O. oeni (Dicks et al. 1995), O. kitahareae (Endo and Okada 2006) and O. alcoholitolerans (Badotti et al. 2015) have been described (DSMZ 2016a), and can easily be distinguished. O. kitaharae (type strain: DSM 17330T) has been isolated from a composting distilled shochu residue. l-Malate is not decarboxylated to l-lactate and CO2 in the presence of fermentable sugars. Cells do not grow below pH 4.5 and in 10% ethanol. Growth is not stimulated by tomato juice. The DNA G+C content ranges from 41 to 43 mol%. O. kitaharae possess several functions in cellular defence (bacteriocins, antimicrobials, restriction-modification systems), which are lacking in Oenococcus oeni living in must with fewer competitive microbes (Borneman et al. 2012). O. alcoholitolerans was isolated from an ethanol production plant in Brazil. Distinctive phenotypic characteristics are the ability to metabolise sucrose but not trehalose (Badotti et al. 2015). The usage of glucose, cellobiose, trehalose, and mannose was demonstrated (Jamal et al. 2013).
O. oeni can grow at pH 3.0 and 10% ethanol. Many strains of O. oeni can even grow at 14% of ethanol (Bordas et al. 2013). Heat shock proteins and special membrane lipids are produced under these environmental conditions (Coucheney et al. 2005). Changes in the expression level of the geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase gene was detected under ethanol stress (Cafaro et al. 2014b). Vigentini et al. (2016) isolated O. oeni strains from wineries of the Aosta Valley developing at 10 °C in Petit Rouge wine. These strains can be used for performing malolactic acid fermentation (MLF) in cold climate territories.
The DNA homology with other lactic acid genera is relatively low with a certain relationship to the genera Leuconostoc and Weissella (Stiles and Holzapfel 1997). The distinct pylogenetic position (Fig. 1.1) because of the quite different 16S rDNA sequence may indicate a quick evolving rRNA in the genus Oenococcus (Yang and Woese 1989), which could not be approved by a comparison of the gene sequences of the DNA-dependent RNA-polymerases (Morse et al. 1996). Oenococci can be distinguished from less acid tolerant Leuconostoc species by using saccharose, lactose and maltose as substrate (Garvie 1986a).
It is important to use selected strains for wine making under special conditions, because some features are expressed at strain level. Insertion sequences (IS) could be one of the reasons for genotypic and phenotypic variants of oenococci (El Gharniti et al. 2012). The whole genome of different strains of O. oeni was performed, which allowed to define the invariant and variable DNA regions between the strains. Genetic variation in amino acid and sugar metabolism was a common feature (Capozzi et al. 2014; Lamontanara et al. 2014; Sternes and Borneman 2016). Protein expression profiling of Oenococcus oeni from Aglianico wine allowed to analyze the cellular pathways (Cafaro et al. 2014a). Mohedano et al. (2014) identified 152 unique proteins were identified in O. oeni.
O. oeni can use the hexoses glucose and fructose, while not all strains use trehalose (Garvie 1986a). l-arginine can be degraded to carbon dioxide, ammonia and ornithine. O. oeni can perform a malolactic fermentation (Caspritz and Radler 1983), which is also found in the genera Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and Pediococcus. The malolactic fermentation leads to a membrane potential and a proton gradient. With the aid of an F1F0 ATPase energy can be gained (Poolman et al. 1991).
Oenococci were able to synthesize capsular heteropolysaccharides made of glucose, galactose and rhamnose, β-glucans and homopolysaccharide (α-glucan or β-fructan) (Dimopoulou et al. 2014)
Oenococci exhibit a high mutability due to the lack of the mismatch repair genes mutS and mutL (Marcobal et al. 2008), which may facilitate the formation of strains. Specific methods for the rapid detection or differentiation of O. oeni strains in must and wine samples have been developed (Kelly et al. 1993; Viti et al. 1996; Zavaleta et al. 1997; Fröhlich 2002; Fröhlich and König 2004; Larisika et al. 2008).
O. oeni strains can contain bacteriophages (Doria et al. 2013; Jaomanjaka et al. 2013) and plasmides (Favier et al. 2012).
The type species is O. oeni DSM 20252T.
O. oeni
Morphology: Spherical, lenticular cells in pairs or chains.
Characteristics: Growth below pH 3.0 and 10% ethanol.
Isolation: must/wine.
Type strain: DSM 20252T.
7.4 Genus Pediococcus
Pediococci occur on plant material, fruits and in fermented food. They are nonpathogenic to plants and animals. Cells are spherical and never elongated as it is the case with leuconostocs and oenococci. The cell size is 0.36–1.43 μm in diameter. Cell division occurs in two directions in a single plane. Short chains by pairs of cells or tetrads are formed (Garvie 1986b). Tetrad-forming homofermentative LABs in wine are pediococci. Pediococci are nonmotile and do not form spores or capsules (Simpson and Tachuchi 1995). The murein belongs to type A with an interpeptide bridge consisting of l-Lys-Ala-Asp (Holzapfel et al. 2003).
Glucose is fermented by the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway to dl or l-lactate. A wide range of carbohydrates is used such as hexoses, pentoses, disaccharides, trisaccharides and polymers such as starch. All wine-related species grow only in the presence of carbohydrates. The PTS system is used for glucose transport. Species producing dl-lactate possess an l- and d-LDH. Pyruvate can be converted mainly by P. damnosus to acetoin/diacetyl. P. pentosaceus and P. damnosus can degrade malate. They are nonproteolytic and nitrate is not reduced. Pediococci are catalase negative. Some strains of P. pentosaceus produce pseudocatalase. Pediococci do not reduce nitrate.
The G+C content of the DNA ranges from 34 to 44 mol%.
Pediococci can have plasmids, which code for production of bacteriocins or fermentation of carbohydrates. P. pentosaceus has three different plasmids for the fermentation of raffinose, melibiose and sucrose.
Pediococci are involved in beer spoilage (P. damnosus) and cause off-flavour in wine by production of diacetyl. P. halophilus, which has not been found in must/wine, is used to prepare soya sauce. Pediococci are used as starter culture in cheese production, silage and sausage production (P. acidilactici; P. pentosaceus). They play a role in cheese ripening. Pediococci (P. acidilactici; P. pentosaceus) can produce bacteriocins (pediocin) which can prevent meat spoilage. P. damnosus is a major spoilage organism in beer manufacturing, since it may produce diacetyl resulting in a buttery taste.
The species are differentiated by their range of sugar fermentation, hydrolysis of arginine, growth at different pH levels (4.5, 7.0), the configuration of lactic acid produced (Axelsson 2004) and ribotyping (Satokari et al. 2000). P. pentosaceus produces a nonheme pseudocatalase (Engesser and Hammes 1994).
The genus Pediococcus contains 11 species (July 2016; DSMZ 2016a). Four species have been found in must or wine (P. damnosus, P. inopinatus, P. parvulus, P. pentosaceus). Some characteristics of the species are compiled in Table 1.5).
The type species is P. damnosus DSM 20331T.
P. damnosus
Morphology: Tetrades.
Characteristics: Ribose not fermented, arginine not hydrolysed. No growth at pH 8 or 35 °C. dl-lactic acid produced from glucose.
Isolation: Beer and wine.
Type strain: DSM 20331
P. inopinatus
Morphology: Tetrades
Characteristics: P. parvulus and P. inopinatus can be distinguished by the electrophoretic mobility of the l- and d-LDHs.
Isolation: Fermenting vegetables, beer, wine.
Type strain: DSM 20285
P. parvulus
Morphology: Tetrades, 0.7 μm × 1.1 μm in diameter. Single, pairs, tetrads, irregular clusters.
Characteristics: Grows at pH 4.5. Lactose, starch and pentoses not utilized. Arginine not hydrolysed. dl-lactic acid produced from glucose.
Isolation: Plant material, sauerkraut, fermented vegetables, fermented beans, beer, cider and wine.
Type strain: DSM 20332
P. pentosaceus
Morphology: Tetrades.
Characteristics: Pentoses and maltose fermented. Arginine is hydrolysed. Growth up to 45 °C. Used for the inoculation of semi-dry sausage, cucumber, green bean or soya milk fermentations and silage. Some strains produce pediocins. Isolation: Plant material and wine.
Type strain: DSM 20336
7.5 Genus Weissella
Based on rDNA analysis Lc. paramesenteroides (“Lc. paramesenteroides group”) was reclassified as W. paramesenteroides. Five heterofermentative lactobacilli (Lb. confusus, Lb. halotolerans, Lb. kandleri, Lb. minor, Lb. viridescens) were also assigned to the genus Weissella (Collins et al. 1993; Björkroth and Holzapfel 2006). Weissellas are spherical, lenticular or irregular rods. They are heterofermentative species, which produce d, l-lactic acid, while W. paramesenteroides forms d-lactic acid from glucose. They have been isolated from food and meat. Weissellas produce greenish oxidized porphyrins in meat products by H2O2 accumulation. The genus Weissella contained 21 validly described species (July 2016, DSMZ 2016a). W. paramesenteroides is the only species of this genus isolated from must/wine.
The type species is W. viridescens DSM 20410T.
W. paramesenteroides
Morphology: Sperical, lenticular
Characteristics: Pseudocatalase may be produced in the presence of low glucose content.
Isolation: must/wine, fresh vegetables, sausages
Type strain: DSM 20288T
8 Conclusions
Lactic acid bacteria are widespread in habitats with complex nutritional supply such as plant material or fruit juice as well as animals. They influence the aroma, the quality, the consistency and safety of food. Since the 1900s, the production of fermented food and consequently the demand for starter cultures of lactic acid bacteria has been largely increased (Mäyrä-Mäkinen and Bigret 2004). They play an important role in the fermentation of sugar-containing food. Because of the acid formation and production of inhibitory components, they contribute to the preservation of food. On the other hand, they can produce off-flavour (e.g. diacetyl) and cause ropiness by exopolysaccharide production.
Especially in northern wine growing regions, grapes can contain high amounts of acid with unfavourable organoleptic properties. So far, mainly O. oeni and sometimes Lb. plantarum are used as starter cultures for wine making to reduce the malic acid content.
References
Abrunhosa L, Inês A, Rodrigues AI, Guimarães A, Pereira VL, Parpot P, Mendes-Faia A, Venâncio A (2014) Biodegradation of ochratoxin A by Pediococcus parvulus isolated from Douro wines. Int J Food Microbiol 188:45–52
Alberto MR, de Nadra MC, Arena ME (2012) Influence of phenolic compounds on the growth and arginine deiminase system in a wine lactic acid bacterium. Braz J Microbiol 43:167–176
Apud GR, Stivala MG, Fernández PA, Rodríguez Vaquero MJ (2013a) Proteolytic activity of Oenococcus oeni enables the increase in antioxidant and antihypertensive activities from wine. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 14:809–813
Apud GR, Vaquero MJ, Rollan G, Stivala MG, Fernández PA (2013b) Increase in antioxidant and antihypertensive peptides from Argentinean wines by Oenococcus oeni. Int J Food Microbiol 163:166–170
Araque I, Gil J, Carreté R, Constantí M, Bordons A, Reguant C (2016) Arginine deiminase pathway genes and arginine degradation variability in Oenococcus oeni strains. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 61:109–118
Archibald F (1986) Manganese: its acquisition by and function in lactic acid bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 13:63–109
Archibald AR, Coapes HE (1971) The wall teichoic acids of Lactobacillus plantarum N.I.R.D.C106. Location of the phosphodiester groups and separation of the chains. Biochem J 124:449–460
Aredes Fernández PA, Stivala MG, Rodríguez Vaquero MJ, Farías ME (2011) Increase in antioxidant and antihypertensive activity by Oenococcus oeni in a yeast autolysis wine model. Biotechnol Lett 33:359–364
Arena ME, Lisi MS, Manca de Nadra MC, Alberto MR (2013) Wine composition plays an important role in the control of carcinogenic precursor formation by Lactobacillus hilgardii X1B. J Sci Food Agric 93:142–148
Axelsson L (2004) Lactic acid bacteria: classification and physiology. In: Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand AC (eds) Lactic acid bacteria microbiological and functional aspects, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–66
Badotti F, Moreira AP, Tonon LA, de Lucena BT, de Gomes C, Kruger R, Thompson CC, de Morais MA Jr, Rosa CA, Thompson FL (2015) Oenococcus alcoholitolerans sp. nov., a lactic acid bacteria isolated from cachaça and ethanol fermentation processes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 106:1259–1267
Bae S, Fleet GH, Heard GM (2006) Lactic acid bacteria associated with wine grapes from several Australian vineyards. J Appl Microbiol 100:712–727
Barroso E, Van de Wiele T, Jiménez-Girón A, Muñoz-González I, Martín-Alvarez PJ, Moreno-Arribas MV, Bartolomé B, Peláez C, Martínez-Cuesta MC, Requena T (2014) Lactobacillus plantarum IFPL935 impacts colonic metabolism in a simulator of the human gut microbiota during feeding with red wine polyphenols. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:6805–6815
Bartowsky EJ, Borneman AR (2011) Genomic variations of Oenococcus oeni strains and the potential to impact on malolactic fermentation and aroma compounds in wine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:441–447
Bastard A, Coelho C, Briandet R, Canette A, Gougeon R, Alexandre H, Guzzo J, Weidmann S (2016) Effect of biofilm formation by Oenococcus oeni on malolactic fermentation and the release of aromatic compounds in wine. Front Microbiol 7:613
Bauer R, du Toit M, Kossmann J (2010) Influence of environmental parameters on production of the acrolein precursor 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde by Lactobacillus reuteri DSMZ 20016 and its accumulation by wine lactobacilli. Int J Food Microbiol 137:28–31
Bäumlisberger M, Moellecken U, König H, Harald Claus H (2015) The potential of the yeast Debaryomyces hansenii H525 to degrade biogenic amines in food. Microorganisms 3:839–850
Björkroth J, Holzapfel W (2006) Genera Leuconostoc, Oenococcus and Weissella. In: Dworkin M (ed) The prokaryotes. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 267–319. http://link.springer.de/link/service/books
Blättel V, Larisika M, Nowak C, Eich A, Eckelt J, König H (2011) β-1,3-Glucanase from Delftia tsuruhatensis strain MV01 and its potential application in vinification. J Appl Environ Microbiol 77:983–990
Blom H, Mörtvedt C (1991) Anti-microbial substances produced by food associated microorganisms. Biochem Soc Trans 19:694–698
Bordas M, Araque I, Alegret JO, El Khoury M, Lucas P, Rozès N, Reguant C, Bordons A (2013) Isolation, selection, and characterization of highly ethanol-tolerant strains of Oenococcus oeni from south Catalonia. Int Microbiol 16:113–123
Borneman AR, JM MC, Chambers PJ, Bartowsky EJ (2012) Functional divergence in the genus Oenococcus as predicted by genome sequencing of the newly-described species, Oenococcus kitaharae. PLoS One 7:e29626
Bravo-Ferrada BM, Hollmann A, Delfederico L, Valdés La Hens D, Caballero A, Semorile L (2013) Patagonian red wines: selection of Lactobacillus plantarum isolates as potential starter cultures for malolactic fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:1537–1549
Cafaro C, Bonomo MG, Rossano R, Larocca M, Salzano G (2014a) Efficient recovery of whole cell proteins in Oenococcus oeni – a comparison of different extraction protocols for high-throughput malolactic starter applications. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 59:399–408
Cafaro C, Bonomo MG, Salzano G (2014b) Adaptive changes in geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase gene expression level under ethanol stress conditions in Oenococcus oeni. J Appl Microbiol 116:71–80
Callejón S, Sendra R, Ferrer S, Pardo I (2014) Identification of a novel enzymatic activity from lactic acid bacteria able to degrade biogenic amines in wine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:185–198
Capozzi V, Russo P, Lamontanara A, Orrù L, Cattivelli L, Spano G (2014) Genome sequences of five Oenococcus oeni strains isolated from Nero Di Troia wine from the same terroir in Apulia, Southern Italy. Genome Announc 23:2
Capozzi V, Russo P, Ladero V, Fernández M, Fiocco D, Alvarez MA, Grieco F, Spano G (2012) Biogenic Amines degradation by Lactobacillus plantarum: toward a potential application in wine. Front Microbiol 3:122
Carr JG, Cutting CV, Whiting GC (1975) Lactic acid bacteria in beverages and food. Academic, London
Caspritz G, Radler F (1983) Malolactic enzyme of Lactobacillus plantarum. Purification, properties, and distribution among bacteria. J Biol Chem 258:4907–4910
Cavin J-F, Schmitt P, Arias A, Lin J, Diviès C (1988) Plasmid profiles in Leuconostoc species. Microbiol Aliment Nutr 6:55–62
Chen K-H, McFeeters RF (1986) Utilization of electron-acceptors for anaerobic metabolism by Lactobacillus plantarum. Enzymes and intermediates in the utilization of citrate. Food Microbiol 3:83–92
Chevallier B, Hubert JC, Kammerer B (1994) Determination of chromosome size and number of rrn loci in Lactobacillus plantarum by pulsed-field gel-electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 120:51–56
Cho GS, Krauss S, Huch M, Du Toit M, Franz CM (2011) Development of a quantitative PCR for detection of Lactobacillus plantarum starters during wine malolactic fermentation. J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:1280–1286
Christ E, König H, Pfeiffer P (2012) Bacterial formation of biogenic amines in grape juice: the influence of cultivation conditions. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 108:73–78
Claisse O, Lonvaud-Funel A (2012) Development of a multilocus variable number of tandem repeat typing method for Oenococcus oeni. Food Microbiol 30:340–347
Claisse O, Lonvaud-Funel A (2014) Multiplex variable number of tandem repeats for Oenococcus oeni and applications. Food Microbiol 38:80–86
Claus H (2007) Extracelluläre enzyme und peptide von Milchsäurebakterien: Relevanz für die Weinbereitung. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 103:505–511
Collins MD, Williams AM, Wallbanks S (1990) The phylogeny of Aerococcus and Pediococcus as determined by 16S rRNA sequence analysis: description of Tetragenococcus gen. nov. FEMS Microbiol Lett 70:255–262
Collins MD, Rodrigues UM, Ash C, Aguirre M, Farrow JAE, Martinez-Murica A, Phillips BA, Williams AM, Wallbanks S (1991) Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus and related lactic acid bacteria as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16 S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 77:5–12
Collins MD, Samelis J, Metaxopoulos J, Wallbanks S (1993) Taxonomic studies on some Leuconostoc-like organisms from fermented sausages – description of a new genus Weissella for the Leuconostoc paramesenteroides group of species. J Appl Bacteriol 75:595–603
Condon S (1987) Responses of lactic acid bacteria to oxygen. FEMS Microbiol Rev 46:269–280
Costantini A, Rantsiou K, Majumder A, Jacobsen S, Pessione E, Svensson B, Garcia-Moruno E, Cocolin L (2015) Complementing DIGE proteomics and DNA subarray analyses to shed light on Oenococcus oeni adaptation to ethanol in wine-simulated conditions. J Proteome 123:114–127
Costello PJ, Henschke PA (2002) Mousy off-flavor of wine: precursors and biosynthesis of the causative n-heterocycles 2-ethyltetrahydropyridine, 2-acetyltetrahydropyridine, and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline by Lactobacillus hilgardii DSM 20176. J Agric Food Chem 50:7079–7087
Costello PJ, Siebert TE, Solomon MR, Bartowsky EJ (2013) Synthesis of fruity ethyl esters by acyl coenzyme A: alcohol acyltransferase and reverse esterase activities in Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus plantarum. J Appl Microbiol 114:797–806
Coton E, Rollan G, Bertrand A, Lonvaud-Funel A (1998) Histamine-producing lactic acid bacteria in wines: early detection, frequency, and distribution. Am J Enol Vitic 49:199–204
Coucheney F, Gal L, Beney L, Lherminier Gervais JP, Guzzo J (2005) A small HSP, Lo18, interacts with the cell membrane and modulates lipid physical state under heat shock conditions in a lactic acid bacterium. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1720:92–98
Coulon J, Houlès A, Dimopoulou M, Maupeu J, Dols-Lafargue M (2012) Lysozyme resistance of the ropy strain Pediococcus parvulus IOEB 8801 is correlated with beta-glucan accumulation around the cell. Int J Food Microbiol 159:25–29
Crowel EA, Guymon MF (1975) Wine constituents arising from sorbic acid addition, and identification of 2-ethoxyhexa-3,5-diene as source of geranium-like off-odor. Am J Enol Vitic 26:97–102
Darsonval M, Msadek T, Alexandre H, Grandvalet C (2015) The antisense RNA approach: a new application for in vivo investigation of the stress response of Oenococcus oeni, a wine-associated lactic acid bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:18–26
De Vuyst L, Vandamme EJ (1994) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: microbiology, genetics and applications. Blackie, London
Dellaglio F, Felis G (2005) Taxonomy of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. In: Tannock GW (ed) Probiotics and prebiotics: scientific aspects. Caister Academic, Wymondham
Dellaglio F, Dicks LMT, Torriani S (1995) The genus Leuconostoc. In: Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH (eds) The genera of lactic acid bacteria. Blackie, London, pp 235–278
Dicks LMT, Dellaglio F, Collins MD (1995) Proposal to reclassify Leuconostoc oenos as Oenococcus oeni [corrig.] gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:395–397
Dimopoulou M, Hazo L, Dols-Lafargue M (2012) Exploration of phenomena contributing to the diversity of Oenococcus oeni exopolysaccharides. Int J Food Microbiol 153:114–122
Dimopoulou M, Vuillemin M, Campbell-Sills H, Lucas PM, Ballestra P, Miot-Sertier C, Favier M, Coulon J, Moine V, Doco T, Roques M, Williams P, Petrel M, Gontier E, Moulis C, Remaud-Simeon M, Dols-Lafargue M (2014) Exopolysaccharide (EPS) synthesis by Oenococcus oeni: from genes to phenotypes. PLoS One 9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098898
Dimopoulou M, Bardeau T, Ramonet PY, Miot-Certier C, Claisse O, Doco T, Petrel M, Lucas P, Dols-Lafargue M (2016) Exopolysaccharides produced by Oenococcus oeni: from genomic and phenotypic analysis to technological valorization. Food Microbiol 53:10–17
Dittrich HH, Großmann M (2005) Mikrobiologie des Weines, 3rd ed. Ulmer, Stuttgart
Dittrich HH, Großmann M (2011) Mikrobiologie des Weines, 4th edn. Ulmer, Stuttgart
Dohm N, Petri A, Schlander M, Schlott B, König H, Claus H (2011) Molecular and biochemical properties of the S-layer protein from the wine bacterium Lactobacillus hilgardii B706. Arch Microbiol 193:251–261
Doria F, Napoli C, Costantini A, Berta G, Saiz JC, Garcia-Moruno E (2013) Development of a new method for detection and identification of Oenococcus oeni bacteriophages based on endolysin gene sequence and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:4799–4805
DSMZ (2016a) Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Germany, Prokaryotic Nomenclature Up-to-Date (July 2016). http://www.dsmz.de/bacterial-diversity/prokaryotic-nomenclature-up-to-date
DSMZ (2016b) The bacterial metadata base. http://bacdive.dsmz.de
DSMZ (2016c) Nomenclature of peptidoglycan structures. https://www.dsmz.de/catalogues/catalogue-microorganisms/groups-of-organisms-and-their-applications/peptidoglycans.html
DSMZ (2016d) The genome-to-genome distance calculator. https://www.dsmz.de/bacterial-diversity.html
Du Toit M, Engelbrecht L, Lerm E, Krieger-Weber S (2011) Lactobacillus: the next generation of malolactic fermentation starter cultures – an overview. Food Bioprocess Technol 4:876–906
Dueñas M, Munduate A, Perea A, Irastorza A (2003) Exopolysaccharide production by Pediococcus damnosus 2.6 in a semidefined medium under different growth conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 87:113–120
Dündar H, Salih B, Bozoğlu F (2016) Purification and characterization of a bacteriocin from an oenological strain of Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. cremoris. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 46:354–359
El Gharniti F, Dols-Lafargue M, Bon E, Claisse O, Miot-Sertier C, Lonvaud A, Le Marrec C (2012) IS30 elements are mediators of genetic diversity in Oenococcus oeni. Int J Food Microbiol 158:14–22
Eltz RW, Vandemark PJ (1960) Fructose dissimilation by Lactobacillus brevis. J Bacteriol 79:763–776
Endo A, Okada S (2006) Oenococcus kitaharae sp. nov., a non-acidophilic and non-malolactic -fermenting oenococcus isolated from a composting distilled shochu residue. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2345–2348
Endo A, Okada S (2008) Reclassification of the genus Leuconostoc and proposal of Fructobacillus fructosus gen. nov., comb. nov., Fructobacillus durionis comb. nov., Fructobacillus ficulneus com. nov., and Fructobacillus pseudoficulneus comb. Nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2195–2205
Endo A, Futagawa-Endo Y, Sakamoto M, Kitahara M, Dicks LM (2010) Lactobacillus florum sp. nov., a fructophilic species isolated from flowers. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:2478–2482
Endo A, Irisawa T, Futagawa-Endo Y, Takano K, du Toit M, Okada S, Dicks LM (2012) Characterization and emended description of Lactobacillus kunkeei as a fructophilic lactic acid bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:500–504
Engesser DM, Hammes WP (1994) Non-heme catalase activity of lactic acid bacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 17:11–19
Esteban-Torres M, Barcenilla JM, Mancheño JM, de las Rivas B, Muñoz R (2014) Characterization of a versatile arylesterase from Lactobacillus plantarum active on wine esters. J Agric Food Chem 62:5118–51125
Favier M, Bilhère E, Lonvaud-Funel A, Moine V, Lucas PM (2012) Identification of pOENI-1 and related plasmids in Oenococcus oeni strains performing the malolactic fermentation in wine. PLoS One 7:e49082. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049082
Felis GE, Dellaglio F (2007) Taxonomy of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 8:44-61
Ferrero M, Cesena C, Morelli L, Scolari G, Vescovo M (1996) Molecular characterization of Lactobacillus casei strains. FEMS Microbiol Lett 140:215–219
Fleet GH (ed) (1993) Wine microbiology and biotechnology. Harwood Academic, Chur
Foligné B, Dewulf J, Breton J, Claisse O, Lonvaud-Funel A, Pot B (2010) Probiotic properties of non-conventional lactic acid bacteria: immunomodulation by Oenococcus oeni. Int J Food Microbiol 140:136–145
Fras P, Campos FM, Hogg T, Couto JA (2014) Production of volatile phenols by Lactobacillus plantarum in wine conditions. Biotechnol Lett 36:281–285
Fröhlich J (2002) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and single cell micro-manipulation as novel applications for identification and isolation of new Oenococcus strains. Yeast-Bacteria Interactions Lallemand. Langenlois 10:33–37
Fröhlich J, König H (2004) Gensonden zum Nachweis von Species der Gattung Oenococcus. Patent DE 102 04 858 C2
Fugelsang KC, Edwards CG (2007) Wine microbiology. Practical applications and procedures. Springer, Heidelberg
García-Ruiz A, González-Rompinelli EM, Bartolomé B, Moreno-Arribas MV (2011a) Potential of wine-associated lactic acid bacteria to degrade biogenic amines. Int J Food Microbiol 148:115–120
García-Ruiz A, Moreno-Arribas MV, Martín-Álvarez PJ, Bartolomé B (2011b) Comparative study of the inhibitory effects of wine polyphenols on the growth of enological lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 145:426–431
García-Ruiz A, González de Llano D, Esteban-Fernández A, Requena T, Bartolomé B, Moreno-Arribas MV (2014) Assessment of probiotic properties in lactic acid bacteria isolated from wine. Food Microbiol 44:220–225
Garrity GM (ed) (2005) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd edn. The proteo-bacteria. Part A. Introductory essays. Appendix 2: Taxonomic outline of Archaea and Bacteria. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 207–220, vol 2
Garvie EI (1960) The genus Leuconostoc and its nomenclature. J Dairy Res 27:283–292
Garvie EI (1986a) Leuconostoc. In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 2. Williams and Wilkins, London, pp 1071–1075
Garvie EI (1986b) Pediococcus. In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 2. Williams and Wilkins, London, pp 1075–1079
González-Arenzana L, Santamaría P, López R, López-Alfaro I (2014) Oenococcus oeni strain typification by combination of multilocus sequence typing and pulsed field gel electrophoresis analysis. Food Microbiol 38:295–302
Guzzo F, Cappello MS, Azzolini M, Tosi E, Zapparoli G (2011) The inhibitory effects of wine phenolics on lysozyme activity against lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 148:184–190
Hammes W, Hertel C (2003) The genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium. In: Dworkin M (ed) The prokaryotes. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 320–403. http://link.springer.de/link/service/books
Hammes WP, Vogel RF (1995) The genus Lactobacillus. In: Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH (eds) The genera of lactic acid bacteria. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, pp 19–54
Hammes WP, Weis N, Holzapfel WP (1991) The genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium. In: Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer KH (eds) The prokaryotes, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 1535–1594
Heresztyn T (1986) Formation of substituted tetrahydropyridines by species of Brettanomyces and Lactobacillus isolated from mousy wines. Am J Enol Vitic 37:127–132
Hirschhäuser S, Fröhlich J, Gneipel A, Schönig I, König H (2005) Fast protocols for the 5S rDNA and ITS-2 based identification of Oenococcus oeni. FEMS Lett 244:165–171
Holzapfel WH, Wood BJB (eds) (1998) The genera of lactic acid bacteria, 1st edn. London, Blackie Academic and Professional
Holzapfel W, Franz C, Ludwig W, Back W, Dicks L (2003) The genera Pediococcus and Tetragenococcus. In: Dworkin M (ed) The prokaryotes. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 229–266. http://link.springer.de/link/service/books
Hussain MA, Hosseini Nezhad M, Sheng Y, Amoafo O (2013) Proteomics and the stressful life of lactobacilli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 349:1–8
Ilabaca C, Jara C, Romero J (2014) The rapid identification of lactic acid bacteria present in Chilean winemaking processes using culture-independent analysis. Ann Microbiol 64:1857–1859
Jackson RS (2008) Origin and growth of lactic acid bacteria. In: Jackson RS (ed) Wine science: principles and applications. Academic, San Diego, pp 394–402
Jamal Z, Miot-Sertier C, Thibau F, Dutilh L, Lonvaud-Funel A, Ballestra P, Le Marrec C, Dols-Lafargue M (2013) Distribution and functions of phosphotransferase system genes in the genome of the lactic acid bacterium Oenococcus oeni. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3371–3379
Jaomanjaka F, Ballestra P, Dols-lafargue M, Le Marrec C (2013) Expanding the diversity of oenococcal bacteriophages: insights into a novel group based on the integrase sequence. Int J Food Microbiol 166:331–340
Jara C, Romero J (2015) Genome sequences of three Oenococcus oeni strains isolated from Maipo Valley, Chile. Genome Announc 3(4). pii:e00866-15
Josephsen J, Neve H (2004) Bacteriophage and antiphage mechanisms of lactic acid bacteria. In: Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand AC (eds) Lactic acid bacteria Microbiological and functional aspects, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 295–350
Juega M, Costantini A, Bonello F, Cravero MC, Martinez-Rodriguez AJ, Carrascosa AV, Garcia-Moruno E (2014) Effect of malolactic fermentation by Pediococcus damnosus on the composition and sensory profile of Albariño and Caiño white wines. J Appl Microbiol 116:586–595
Kandler O (1983) Carbohydrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 49:209–224
Kandler O, Weiss N (1986) Lactobacillus. In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 2. Williams & Wilkins, London, pp 1209–1034
Kántor A, Kluz M, Puchalski C, Terentjeva M, Kačániová M (2016) Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from wine using real-time PCR. J Environ Sci Health B 51:52–56
Kaschak E, Göhring N, König H, Pfeiffer P (2009) Biogene Amine in deutschen Weinen: Analyse und Bewertung nach Anwendung verschiedener HPLC-Verfahren. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 105:375–384
Kelly WJ, Huang CM, Asmundson RV (1993) Comparison of Leuconostoc oenos strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3969–3972
Kuhnigk T, Borst E, Ritter A, Kämpfer P, Graf A, Hertel H, König H (1994) Degradation of lignin monomers by the hindgut flora of termites. Syst Appl Microbiol 17:76–85
Lafon-Lafourcade S, Carre E, Ribéreau-Gayon P (1983) Occurrence of lactic-acid bacteria during the different stages of vinification and conservation of wines. Appl Environ Microbiol 46:874–880
Lahtinen S, Ouwehand A-C, Salminen S, von Wright A (eds) (2012) Lactic acid bacteria. Microbial and functional aspects, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Lamontanara A, Orrù L, Cattivelli L, Russo P, Spano G, Capozzi V (2014) Genome sequence of Oenococcus oeni OM27, the first fully assembled genome of a strain isolated from an Italian wine. Genome Announc 2(4). pii:e00658-14
Landete JM, Ferrer S, Pardo I (2005) Which lactic acid bacteria are responsible for histamine production in wine? J Appl Microbiol 99:580–586
Larisika M, Claus H, König H (2008) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for the discrimination of Oenococcus oeni isolates from different wine-growing regions in Germany. Int J Food Microbiol 123:171–176
Lehtonen P (1996) Determination of amines and amino acids in wine – a review. Am J Enol Vitic 47:127–133
Llaubères RM, Richard B, Lonvaud-Funel A, Dubourdieu D (1990) Structure of an exocellular beta-D-glucan from Pediococcus sp., a wine lactic bacteria. Carbohydr Res 203:103–107
Lonvaud-Funel A, Joyeux A, Desens C (1988) Inhibition of malolactic fermentation of wines by products of yeast metabolism. J Sci Food Agric 44:183–191
Lonvaud-Funel A, Joyeux A, Ledoux O (1991) Specific enumeration of lactic-acid bacteria in fermenting grape must and wine by colony hybridization with nonisotopic DNA probes. J Appl Bacteriol 71:501–508
López-Rituerto E, Avenoza A, Busto JH, Peregrina JM (2013) NMR study of histidine metabolism during alcoholic and malolactic fermentations of wine and their influence on histamine production. J Agric Food Chem 61:9464–9469
Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, Pavlov A, Pavlova N, Karamychev V, Polouchine N, Shakhova V, Grigoriev I, Lou Y, Rohksar D, Lucas S, Huang K, Goodstein DM, Hawkins T, Plengvidhya V, Welker D, Hughes J, Goh Y, Benson A, Baldwin K, Lee JH, Díaz-Muñiz I, Dosti B, Smeianov V, Wechter W, Barabote R, Lorca G, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Ganesan B, Xie Y, Rawsthorne H, Tamir D, Parker C, Breidt F, Broadbent J, Hutkins R, O’Sullivan D, Steele J, Unlu G, Saier M, Klaenhammer T, Richardson P, Kozyavkin S, Weimer B, Mills D (2006) Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15611–15616
Mañes-Lázaro R, Ferrer S, Rosselló-Mora R, Pardo I (2009) Lactobacillus oeni sp. nov., from wine. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:2010–2014
Mangani S, Guerrini S, Granchi L, Vincenzini M (2005) Putrescine accumulation in wine: role of Oenococcus oeni. Curr Microbiol 51:6–10
Marcobal AM, Sela DA, Wolf YI, Makarova KS, Mills DA (2008) Role of hypermutability in the evolution of the genus Oenococcus. J Bacteriol 190:564–570
Margalef-Català M, Araque I, Bordons A, Reguant C, Bautista-Gallego J (2016) Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of Oenococcus oeni adaptation to wine stress conditions. Front Microbiol 7:1554. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01554
Marques AP, Zé-Zé L, San-Romão MV, Tenreiro R (2010) A novel molecular method for identification of Oenococcus oeni and its specific detection in wine. Int J Food Microbiol 142:251–255
Martinez-Murcia AJ, Collins MD (1990) A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Leuconostoc based on reverse transcriptase sequencing or 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 70:73–84
Mäyrä-Mäkinen A, Bigret M (2004) Industrial use and production of lactic acid bacteria. In: Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand AC (eds) Lactic acid bacteria: microbiological and functional aspects, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 175–198
Mesas JM, Rodríguez MC, Alegre MT (2012) Basic characterization and partial purification of β-glucosidase from cell-free extracts of Oenococcus oeni ST81. Lett Appl Microbiol 55:247–255
Mohedano ML, Russo P, de Los RV, Capozzi V, Fernández de Palencia P, Spano G, López P (2014) A partial proteome reference map of the wine lactic acid bacterium Oenococcus oeni ATCC BAA-1163. Open Biol 4:130154
Morelli L, Calleagri ML, Vogensen FK, von Wright A (2012) Genetics of lactic acid bacteria. In: Lahtinen S, Ouwehand A-C, Salminen S, von Wright A (eds) Lactic acid bacteria. Microbial and functional aspects, 4rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 17–37
Morelli L, Vogensen FK, von Wright A (2004) Genetics of lactic acid bacteria. In: Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand AC (eds) Lactic acid bacteria: microbiological and functional aspects, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 249–293
Morse R, Collins MD, O’Hanlon K, Wallbanks S, Richardson PT (1996) Analysis of the beta’ subunit of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase does not support the hypothesis inferred from 16S rRNA analysis that Oenococcus oeni (formerly Leuconostoc oenos) is a tachytelic (fast-evolving) bacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46:1004–1009
Mtshali PS, Divol B, du Toit M (2012) Identification and characterization of Lactobacillus florum strains isolated from South African grape and wine samples. Int J Food Microbiol 153:106–113
Murphy MG, O’Connor L, Walsh D, Condon S (1985) Oxygen dependent lactate utilization by Lactobacillus plantarum. Arch Microbiol 141:75–79
Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2002) Cell-to-cell communication in lactic acid bacteria. J Japan Soc Biosci Biotechnol Agrochem 76:837–839
Napoli A, Aiello D, Aiello G, Cappello MS, Di Donna L, Mazzotti F, Materazzi S, Fiorillo M, Sindona G (2014) Mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach in Oenococcus oeni enological starter. J Proteome Res 13:2856–2866
Nisiotou A, Dourou D, Filippousi ME, Banilas G, Tassou C (2014) Weissella uvarum sp. nov., isolated from wine grapes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3885–3890
Nisiotou AA, Dourou D, Filippousi ME, Diamantea E, Fragkoulis P, Tassou C, Banilas G (2015) Genetic and technological characterisation of vineyard- and winery-associated lactic acid bacteria. Biomed Res Int 2015:508254
Olguín N, Champomier-Vergès M, Anglade P, Baraige F, Cordero-Otero R, Bordons A, Zagorec M, Reguant C (2015) Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of Oenococcus oeni PSU-1 response to ethanol shock. Food Microbiol 51:87–95
Orla-Jensen S (1919) The lactic acid bacteria. Fred Host and Son, Copenhagen
Palacios A, Suárez C, Krieger S, Didier T, Otaño L, Peña F (2004) Perception by wine drinkers of sensory defects caused by uncontrolled malolactic fermentation. In: Proceedings of XVI es Entretiens Scientifiques Lallemand, Porto, pp 45–52
Pérez-Martín F, Seseña S, Izquierdo PM, Martín R, Palop ML (2012) Screening for glycosidase activities of lactic acid bacteria as a biotechnological tool in oenology. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1423–1432
Pérez-Martín F, Seseña S, Izquierdo PM, Palop ML (2013) Esterase activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from malolactic fermentation of red wines. Int J Food Microbiol 163:153–158
Pérez-Martín F, Seseña S, Izquierdo PM, Palop ML (2014) Are Enterococcus populations present during malolactic fermentation of red wine safe? Food Microbiol 42:95–101
Petri A, Pfannebecker J, Fröhlich J, König H (2013) Fast identification of wine related lactic acid bacteria by multiplex PCR. Food Microbiol 33:48–54
Petri A, Rabenstein A, Kuever KH (2015) Application of MALDI-TOF-MS and nested SAPD-PCR for discrimination of Oenococcus oeni isolates at the strain-level. J Wine Res 26:69–80
Pfannebecker J, Fröhlich J (2008) Use of a species-specific multiplex PCR for the identification of pediococci. Int J Food Microbiol 128:288–296
Poblet-Icart M, Bordons A, Lonvaud-Funel A (1998) Lysogeny of Oenococcus oeni (syn. Leuconostoc oenos) and study of their induced bacteriophages. Curr Microbiol 36:365–369
Poolman B, Molenaar D, Smid EJ, Ubbink T, Abee T, Renault PP, Konings WN (1991) Malolactic fermentation – electrogenic malate uptake and malate lactate antiport generate metabolic energy. J Bacteriol 173:6030–6037
Pot B, Ludwig W, Kersters K, Schleifer KH (1994) Taxonomy of lactic acid bacteria. In: De Vuyst L, Vandamme EJ (eds) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: genetic and applications. Chapman and Hall, Glasgow
Radler F (1975) The metabolism of organic acids by lactic acid bacteria. In: Carr JG, Cutting CV, Whiting GC (eds) Lactic acid bacteria in beverages and food. Academic, London, pp 17–27
Radler F, Yannissis C (1972) Decomposition of tartrate by lactobacilli. Arch Microbiol 82:219–239
Raibaud P, Galpin HV, Ducluzeau R, Mocquot G, Oliver G (1973) La genre Lactobacillus dans le tube digestif du rat. I Charactère des souches homofermentaires isolèes de rats holo- et gnotoxeniques. Ann Inst Pasteur 124A:83–109
Rammelberg M, Radler F (1990) Antibacterial polypeptides of Lactobacillus species. J Appl Bacteriol 69:177–184
Ribéreau-Gayon P, Dubourdieu D, Donèche B, Lonvaud A (2006a) Handbook of enology, 2nd edn. The microbiology of wine and vinifications. Wiley, Chichester, vol 1
Ribéreau-Gayon P, Glories Y, Maujean A, Dubourdieu D (2006b) Handbook of enology, 2nd edn. The chemistry of wine stabilization and treatment. Wiley, Chichester, vol 2
Richter H, Vlad D, Unden G (2001) Significance of pantothenate for glucose fermentation by Oenococcus oeni and for suppression of the erythritol and acetate production. Arch Microbiol 175:26–31
Rodas AM, Ferrer S, Pardo I (2003) 16S-ARDRA, a tool for identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from grape must and wine. Syst Appl Microbiol 26:412–422
Rodas AM, Chenoll E, Macián MC, Ferrer S, Pardo I, Aznar R (2006) Lactobacillus vini sp. nov., a wine lactic acid bacterium homofermentative for pentoses. I. J System Evol Microbiol 56:513–517
Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand AC (eds) (2004) Lactic acid bacteria: microbiological and functional aspects, 3rd edn. New York, Marcel Dekker
Satokari R, Mattila-Sandholm T, Suihko ML (2000) Identification of pediococci by ribotyping. J Appl Microbiol 88:260–265
Schlegel HG (1999) Geschichte der Mikrobiologie. Acta Historica Leopoldina, Halle
Schleifer KH, Kandler O (1972) Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 36:407–477
Schleifer KH, Ludwig W (1995a) Phylogenetic relationship of lactic acid bacteria. In: Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH (eds) The genera of lactic acid bacteria. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, pp 7–18
Schleifer KH, Ludwig W (1995b) Phylogeny of the genus Lactobacillus and related genera. Syst Appl Microbiol 18:461–467
Schut S, Zauner S, Hampel G, König H, Claus H (2011) Biosorption of copper by wine-relevant lactobacilli. Int J Food Microbiol 145:126–131
Schütz H, Radler F (1984a) Propanediol-1,2-dehydratase and metabolism of glycerol of Lactobacillus brevis. Arch Microbiol 139:366–370
Schütz H, Radler F (1984b) Anaerobic reduction of glycerol to propanediol-1.3 by L. brevis and L. buchneri. Syst Appl Microbiol 5:169–178
Sebastian P, Herr P, Fischer U, König H (2011) Molecular identification of lactic acid bacteria occuring in must and wine. S Afr J Enol Vitic 32:300–309
Sedewitz B, Schleifer KH, Götz F (1984) Physiological role of pyruvate oxidase in the aerobic metabolism of Lactobacillus plantarum. J Bacteriol 160:462–465
Silva I, Campos FM, Hogg T, Couto JA (2011) Wine phenolic compounds influence the production of volatile phenols by wine-related lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 111:360–370
Simpson WJ, Tachuchi H (1995) The genus Pediococcus, with notes on the genera Tetratogenococcus and Aerococcus. In: Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH (eds) The genera of lactic acid bacteria. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, pp 125–172
Smiley MB, Fryder V (1978) Plasmids, lactic acid production, and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine fermentation in Lactobacillus helveticus subsp. jugurti. Appl Environ Microbiol 35:777–781
Solieri L, Giudici P (2010) Development of a sequence-characterized amplified region marker-targeted quantitative PCR assay for strain-specific detection of Oenococcus oeni during wine malolactic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7765–7774
Sozzi T, Poulain JM, Maret R (1978) Etude d’un bactériophage de Leuconostoc mesenteroides isolé de protuits laitiers, Schweiz. Milchwirtsch Forsch 7:33–40
Sozzi T, Watanabe K, Stetter K, Smiley M (1981) Bacteriophages of the genus Lactobacillus. Intervirology 16:129–135
Sternes PR, Borneman AR (2016) Consensus pan-genome assembly of the specialised wine bacterium Oenococcus oeni. BMC Genomics 17:308
Stiles ME, Holzapfel WH (1997) Lactic acid bacteria of foods and their current taxonomy. Int J Food Microbiol 36:1–29
Su J, Wang T, Li YY, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang H, Li H (2015) Antioxidant properties of wine lactic acid bacteria: Oenococcus oeni. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:5189–5202
Sumby KM, Grbin PR, Jiranek V (2013) Characterization of EstCOo8 and EstC34, intracellular esterases, from the wine-associated lactic acid bacteria Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus hilgardii. J Appl Microbiol 114:413–422
Sumby KM, Grbin PR, Jiranek V (2014) Implications of new research and technologies for malolactic fermentation in wine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:8111–8132
Tagg JR, Dajana AS, Wannamaker LW (1976) Bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 40:722–756
Tannock G (ed) (2005) Probiotics and prebiotics: scientific aspects, 1st edn. Wymondham, Caister Academic
Testa B, Lombardi SJ, Tremonte P, Succi M, Tipaldi L, Pannella G, Sorrentino E, Iorizzo M, Coppola R (2014) Biodiversity of Lactobacillus plantarum from traditional Italian wines. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:2299–2305
Theobald S, Pfeiffer P, König H (2005) Manganese-dependent growth of oenococci. J Wine Res 16:171–178
Theobald S, Pfeiffer P, Zuber U, König H (2007a) Influence of epigallocatechin gallate and phenolic compounds from green tea on the growth of Oenococcus oeni. J Appl Microbiol 104:566–572
Theobald S, Pfeiffer P, Paululat T, Gerlitz M, König H (2007b) Neue Hinweise für synergistische Wachstumsfaktoren zur erfolgreichen Kultivierung des weinrelevanten Bakterium Oenococcus oeni. Lebensmittel-Rundschau 103:411–416
Uthurry CA, Suárez Lepe JA, Lombardero J, Garcia del Hierro JRJ (2006) Ethyl carbamate production by selected yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in red wine. Food Chem 94:262–270
Vendrame M, Iacumin L, Manzano M, Comi G (2013) Use of propidium monoazide for the enumeration of viable Oenococcus oeni in must and wine by quantitative PCR. Food Microbiol 35:49–57
Vigentini I, Praz A, Domeneghetti D, Zenato S, Picozzi C, Barmaz A, Foschino R (2016) Characterization of malolactic bacteria isolated from Aosta Valley wines and evidence of psychrotrophy in some strains. J Appl Microbiol 120:934–945
Viti C, Giovannetti L, Granchi L, Ventura S (1996) Species attribution and strain typing of Oenococcus oeni (formerly Leuconostoc oenos) with restriction endonuclease fingerprints. Res Microbiol 147:651–660
Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer K-H, Whitman W (eds) (2009) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. The firmicutes, vol 3. Springer, Heidelberg
Whitman WB (ed) (2016) Bergey’s manual of systematics of archaea and bacteria. Wiley Online Library. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118960608/toc
Wibowo D, Eschenbruch R, Davis CR, Fleet GH, Lee TH (1985) Occurence and growth of lactic acid bacteria in wine. A review. Am J Enol Vitic 36:302–313
Wood BJB (ed) (1999) Lactic acid bacteria in health and disease. Kluwer Academic, New York
Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH (eds) (1995) The genera of lactic acid bacteria. Blackie Academic and Professional, London
Wood BJB, Warner PJ (2003) Genetics of lactic acid bacteria. Kluwer Academic, New York
Yang D, Woese CR (1989) Phylogenetic structure of the “Leuconostocs”: an interesting case of rapidly evolving organisms. Syst Appl Microbiol 12:145–149
Yokokura T, Kodaira S, Ishiwa H, Sakurai T (1974) Lysogeny in lactobacilli. J Gen Microbiol 84:277–284
Yurdugul S, Bozoglu F (2002) Studies on an inhibitor produced by lactic acid bacteria of wines on the control of malolactic fermentation. Eur Food Res Technol 215:38–41
Zavaleta AI, Martínez-Murcia AJ, Rodríguez-Valera F (1997) Intraspecific genetic diversity of Oenococcus oeni as derived from DNA fingerprinting and sequence analyses. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1261–1267
Ze-Ze L, Tenreiro O, Paveia H (2000) The Oenococcus oeni genome: physical and genetic mapping of strain GM and comparison with the genome of a ‘divergent’ strain, PSU-1. Microbiology 146:3195–3204
Acknowledgements
We thank the Stiftung Rheinland-Pfalz für Innovation, the Forschungsring des Deutschen Weinbaus (FDW, Germany) of the Deutschen Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft (DLG, Germany), the German Science Foundation (DFG) and the Fonds der Johannes Gutenberg-University in Mainz for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
König, H., Fröhlich, J. (2017). Lactic Acid Bacteria. In: König, H., Unden, G., Fröhlich, J. (eds) Biology of Microorganisms on Grapes, in Must and in Wine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60021-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60021-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60020-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60021-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)