Abstract
Egypt is considered one of the world’s driest and most water-stressed regions. A considerable amount of wastewater produced annually in Egypt attracts a variety of treatment technologies based on several factors, most notably cost and efficiency. Natural treatment methods such as constructed wetlands (CWs) are a rapidly growing technology. CWs have been applied in Egypt for almost 30 years. Horizontal subsurface flow (HSF) CWs represent 60% of the experimental and/or full-scale and/or pilot-scale systems. In comparison, 25% of the literature refers to Free water surface (FWS) CWs, and the remaining to Vertical flow (VF) and Hybrid Systems. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) as a floating plant and Cyperus papyrus and Typha angustifolia as emergent plants are widely used in CWs in Egypt. In general, CWs have shown a high treatment potential to treat wastewater under the climatic conditions of Egypt with an increasing number of applications.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
3.1 Introduction
Water scarcity and wastewater management are considered significant challenges that affect the ecosystem and the urban environment worldwide. Many countries and regions worldwide continuously face growing pressure on their limited freshwater resources, particularly in arid countries such as Egypt [1]. Egypt is classified among the driest areas and the most water-stressed regions in the world, with an average annual temperature of 25 °C and even higher in summer months, and with limited annual precipitation below 250 mm, resulting in an extremely freshwater scarcity [2, 3]. Moreover, the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) in Ethiopia threatens Egyptian water security, and negatively impacts on Egypt’s freshwater since Egypt depends on the Nile River to secure 95% of its total water needs [4,5,6,7,8]. Thus, in Egypt, wastewater reuse is encouraged when it is safe and economically feasible to increase the water demand [9]. Several methods exist to treat wastewater based on different factors, mainly cost and efficiency, while nature-based solutions [10, 11], such as constructed wetlands (CWs), are the most growing technology.
Developing countries fail to use nature-based solutions to solve wastewater crises [1, 12]. About 95% of wastewater is discharged without treatment into lakes, seas, or other reservoirs, posing a threat to water sources and other serious environmental problems. CWs could offer an affordable and accessible solution for lower-income countries. CWs are defined as engineered eco-systems initiated and operated to treat different types of wastewater by manipulating the simultaneous physical, chemical, and biological processes [13, 14]. CWs have been rapidly developed to cover several types of wastewaters, such as municipal and industrial, due to their cost-effectiveness and eco-friendly character [1, 9, 14,15,16,17,18,20]. As a result of the growing attention to CW technology, the hydraulic design, construction, and operation have been extended to introduce various new configurations that facilitate the process as a whole and improve the performance for pollution removal [20,21,22,24, 25]. Locally, this technology has been applied in Egypt for almost 30 years.
From exploring the scientific literature, the significant number of publications related to CWs as individual experimental research or reviews on the Web of Science might be a good indicator of the increased transparency of this field’s knowledge. A Web of Science database research (a tool from Clarivate Analytics, August 15, 2020) using the keyword “constructed wetlands, constructed wetlands in Egypt” resulted in 13,426 and 31 studies, respectively. This indicates that although there is a flourishing publication record available on CWs worldwide, it is limited in Egypt. Figure 3.1 depicts the number of papers per year from 2010 to 2020, showing that the topic has experienced a gradual growth in the number of studies. In addition, many books have been published recently, for instance, CWs hydraulic design [15], CWs as a suitable technology for sustainable water management [26], and CWs for industrial wastewater treatment [16].
Several review papers discussed CWs’ performance in removing a wide range of pollutants from different wastewater types. These reviews have undoubtedly discussed the dynamics of pollutants, emerging organic pollutants such as antibiotics and pharmaceutical contaminants, and mechanisms of pollutant transformations. As a result of the increased attention to water scarcity in arid and hot regions such as Egypt, authorities have focused on wastewater reuse to protect the limited freshwater resources. Although CWs present a promising technology in Egypt, individual experiments and review papers are rarely reported.
Within this context, this chapter summarizes the current knowledge on CWs applications in Egypt along with the current status of water scarcity, taking into consideration different system configurations, operational parameters, and removal efficiencies. For this, an update on the application of CWs in Egypt is provided through a literature review of the last 10 years. Publications on CWs treating different types of wastewater in Egypt as pilot-scale and full-scale were also reviewed.
3.2 Water and Wastewater in Egypt
Egypt has a dry climate, with 95% of its area being a desert. There is a narrow strip of fertile lands alongside the major stream of the Nile and a comparatively small delta in the north [27]. It became the basis of one of the most distinctive old civilizations’ societal and economic life, where the primary human activity was agriculture [28]. The total precipitation is around 25.7 mm/year; in summer, there is an evapotranspiration rate of about 0.7 mm/day. The relative humidity varies from 45–75%, and the mean daily temperature ranges from 13–38 °C. There are also limited amounts of rain and flash floods. The Nile River is Egypt’s principal and almost sole freshwater supply. The country depends on Lake Nasser’s accessible water to meet Egypt’s annual water quota requirements, which amounts to 55.5 billion m3/year [29].
Over the last few decades, the pollution load to the Nile system (e.g., the Nile River, canals, and drains) has grown due to population increase, many new industrial projects, and new projects for agricultural irrigation, and other activities along the Nile River. As a result, the quality of Nile water has declined significantly in the last few years [30, 31]. The Nile system’s dilution capacity is likely to decrease as the policy of expanding irrigated farming progress and industrial capacity development increases the amount of pollutants discharged into the Nile [32]. The primary sources of most hazardous contaminants to the Nile and main canals are effluents from agricultural drains (including heavy metals, pesticides, fertilizers, and microbes) and the treated or incompletely treated municipal and industrial wastewaters. The most contaminated region in the Nile is between Cairo and the Mediterranean Sea within the two branches of the Nile, Rosetta and Damietta [31,32,35].
The industrial sector is the second essential source of water consumption and a contributor to pollution. The Egyptian factories use about 7.8 billion m3/year of water, 4050 million m3/year of which are discharged back to the Nile system. Hence, industrial wastewater is the second source of Nile water pollution due to hazardous organic and inorganic chemical loads in this wastewater. Industrial activities are clustered around large cities like Cairo, Giza, and Alexandria, which use 40% of total water [36]; however, small-scale private agro-industrial factories in Upper Egypt have recently begun contributing to Nile system pollution as well. Roughly 129 plants discharge their wastewater into the Nile River system. Untreated discharge of large amounts of this wastewater impacts river water used for both irrigation and drinking and has a harmful impact on aquatic life [28, 29, 37]. Food processing industries are responsible for more than 50% of the biological oxygen demand (BOD), while more than 60% of heavy metal discharges come from chemical factories. Wastewater from electroplating plants in the Helwan region (south Cairo) has a high content of Fe, Zn, Cr, Cu, and Mn [38]. Several studies have also reported the occurrence and concentration of Lead (0.001–330 μg/L) and cadmium (0.001–80 μg/L) in the Nile water [37,38,39,40,41,44]. Despite all official efforts to avoid these dangerous pollutants, 34 plants still do not comply with the Egyptian regulations for water disposal into the Nile systems [45].
The municipal wastewater effluent is considered as the third main source of Nile system pollution. The increasing population in Egypt along the Nile River leads to more wastewater generation, and policymakers are expected to expand the number of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). There are nearly 239 WWTPs in Egypt with an annual flow of 4.5 billion m3, of which 1.3 billion m3/year are discharged to the Nile water system. Toxic chemicals such as organic micro-pollutants and heavy metals are released in this wastewater because of domestic mixing with commercial and industrial activities [29]. These elevated values are higher than the standard limit and, in some areas of the Nile, higher than the permissible limits for healthy water streams. The two Nile branches, Damietta and Rosetta, downstream Delta Barrage, represent the worst River Nile quality. Some antibiotics such as sulfamethoxazole, azithromycin, and ciprofloxacin have been detected in the effluent of municipal WWTP in Beni-Suef city. Additionally, the detection of azithromycin in these municipal WWTP was higher than that detected in municipal WWTP in central Greece, China, and Thailand [46].
3.3 Constructed Wetlands (CWs)
CWs are defined as low-cost wastewater treatment techniques based on natural processes, which simulate the natural wetlands (e.g., swamps, marshes, and boglands) in a controlled environment [47]. CWs can be an effective treatment system, which can be very useful in developing countries [48], as they can remove most pollutants (e.g., pathogens, nutrients, organic and inorganic pollutants).
3.3.1 Constructed Wetland Types
As known, there are four typical types of CWs, i.e., Free water surface (FWS), Horizontal subsurface flow (HSF), Vertical flow (VF), and Hybrid Systems. In Egypt, all those types have been investigated and applied for different types of wastewaters, as shown in Table 3.1. About 60% of the experimental studies indicated that HSF is used either in full-scale or pilot-scale. HSF system in Egypt showed a high potential ability for pollutants removal compared to other systems. Approximately 25% of the reviewed literature revealed that FWS is also applied, while only one study was found on VF and another for a hybrid system.
3.3.2 Plants Used in CWs in Egypt
Local plant species can be used and grow in CWs. The plants in CWs in Egypt are classified into two types; floating plants, and emergent plants (Table 3.2).
In Egypt, the water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) plant is an emerged plant and grows in natural waters (Lakes, Nile river, irrigation channels). It is considered an invasive aquatic weed and was found 100 years ago in the Nile Delta for the first time but entered Egypt 200 years ago. Eichhornia crassipes are intensively found in Northern Lakes, creating many problems such as clogging of irrigation canal intakes and flooding, disturbing the operation of hydropower and water supply systems, and resulting in the degradation of the local biodiversity [59]. It is also considered a hyper-accumulator species; however, it has many benefits, and remediation through CWs is one of them. The policies in Egypt concerning Eichhornia crassipes eradicating and controlling the plant from water bodies through mechanical or biological control [57], presented an efficient management scenario for its coverage percentage to enhance the phytoremediation of different pollutants and reduce the water losses instead of fall eradication. Eichhornia crassipes in CWs have a significant role in efficient nutrient absorption and high potential pollutants removal at high rates. Pistia stratiote is a floating aquatic plant, and its leaves spread in a rosette on the water surface that inhibits algae growth. Pistia stratiote is found in Egyptian waters in the spring and fall seasons. It has a high potential ability for contamination removal, as shown by [58]. Lemna spp. (Duckweed) the plant is an aquatic plant amongst the promising aquatic plants having the enormous capacity to treat eutrophicated wastewaters [60]; however, it’s rarely used in Egypt phytoremediation studies. Duckweed is an invasive plant and is found in fresh Egyptian waterbodies. All of floating plants are used in FWS (CWs).
Cyperus papyrus plant is originated in Egypt, which has a historical benefits such as paper made and others. Cyperus papyrus is intensively used in CWs worldwide as a result of its high efficiency for pollutants removal [61]. Also, its root structures provide more microbial fixation sites, sufficient residence time of wastewater, entrapment, and settlement of suspended particles, the surface area for adsorption of contaminants, absorption, assimilation in plant tissues, and oxygen for the oxidation of organic matter and inorganic in the rhizosphere [62]. Canna flaccida is an invasive plant for the Egyptian environment; it hashing high growth rates with big roots, which may be a potential plant species that can be utilized effectively to remediate emerging organic contaminants [48, 63]. Canna flaccida has a colorful blossom, which can add an esthetically pleasing element to treatment sites. Phragmites are a native plant with many different species in Egypt; it usually distributes channels, lakes, and other water bodies. It has a high salinity tolerance so that it can grow on beaches.
Phragmites plant, especially Phragmites australis species, are widely used worldwide in CWs for treated wastewater [64]; in Egypt, many studies have used it, revealing their high ability and tolerance for heavy pollutants removal, as noted in Table 3.2. CWs widely use Typha angustifolia in Egypt, classified as an emergent plant with a high growth rate. Typha angustifolia is an invasive plant that originated from Europe and is distributed widely in many parts of the world [24]. There are many species of typha; Typha angustifolia has12–16 narrow and flat leaves [65]. Typha angustifolia is found in Northern lakes and the Nile River in Egypt. Typha angustifolia is known to have potential phytoremediation ability for various contaminants and has an antimicrobial effect against many pathogenic bacteria [22]. Typha angustifolia has approved its capacity for uptake the pollutants and performed efficiently in CWs. Typha latifolia (Cattails) is a native plant in Egypt found intensively in Lakes and the Nile River. Cattails plant has a wide range of applications, especially for its ability for pollutants removal through CWs.
3.4 Conclusions
Water scarcity and wastewater management are considered significant challenges that affect the ecosystem and the urban environment worldwide, especially in Egypt. With limited freshwater resources, Egypt has a huge amount of wastewater annually, partially treated using different methods, with Constructed wetlands (CWs) technology among them. CWs literature for wastewater treatment in Egypt has been reviewed for a period of the last 10 years. The HSF system was found to be the most widely applied system in either full-scale or pilot-scale, followed by the FWS design. Also, the commonly used plants in this technology were reviewed and showed a wide range of suitable plants growing in the Egyptian environment. This green technology has become increasingly known in Egypt and has a wide implementation potential; however, the number of publications is growing slowly. The currently limited experiences with CWs in Egypt imply the ability of this technology to contribute to addressing the water scarcity issues in Egypt effectively.
References
Stefanakis AI (2020) Constructed wetlands for sustainable wastewater treatment in hot and arid climates: opportunities, challenges and case studies in the Middle East. Water 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061665
FAO (2014) AQUASTAT Database 2014
Prăvălie R (2016) Drylands extent and environmental issues. Global Approach Earth-Sci Rev 161:259–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.003
Abdelhaleem FS, Helal EY (2015) Impacts of grand Ethiopian renaissance dam on different water usages in upper Egypt. British J Appl Sci Technol 8(5):461–483. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/17252
Walsh D, Sengupta S (2020) For thousands of years, Egypt Controlled the Nile. A New Dam Threatens That. New York times
El-Nashar WY, Elyamany AH (2018) Managing risks of the grand Ethiopian renaissance dam on Egypt. Ain Shams Eng J 9:2383–2388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.06.004
Hamada YM (2017) The grand Ethiopian renaissance dam, its impact on Egyptian agriculture and the potential for alleviating water scarcity. Environ Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54439-7
Abdelwahab O, Gaballahab MS, Barakata, Khouloud M, Aboagye D (2021) Pilot modified settling techniques as a novel route for treating water influent from Lake-Marriott. J Wat Proc Eng 42:101985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101985
Elzein Z, Abdou A, ElGawad IA (2016) Constructed wetlands as a sustainable wastewater treatment method in communities. Procedia Environ Sci 34:605–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.053
Stefanakis AI, Calheiros CS, Nikolaou I (2021) Nature-based solutions as a tool in the new circular economic model for climate change adaptation. Circ Econ Sust 1:303–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00022-3
Oral HV, Radinja M, Rizzo A, Kearney K, Andersen TR, Krzeminski P, Buttiglieri G, Ayral-Cinar D, Comas J, Gajewska M, Hartl M, Finger DC, Kazak JK, Mattila H, Vieira P, Stefania PP, Palermo A, Turco M, Pirouz B, Stefanakis A, Regelsberger M, Ursino N, Carvalho PN (2021) Management of Urban Waters with nature-based solutions in circular cities—exemplified through seven urban circularity challenges. Water 13(23):3334. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233334
Morris JC, Georgiou I, Guenther E et al (2021) Barriers in implementation of wastewater reuse: identifying the way forward in closing the loop. Circ Econ Sust 1:413–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00018-z
Stefanakis AI (2020) Constructed wetlands: description and benefits of an eco-tech water treatment system. In: Khosrow-Pour M (ed) Waste management: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 503–525
Stefanakis AI (2019) The role of constructed wetlands as green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management. Sustainability 11(24):6981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246981
Eslamian S, Okhravi S, Eslamian F (2020) Constructed wetlands: hydraulic design. CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
Stefanakis AI (2018) Constructed wetlands for industrial wastewater treatment, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester
Gomes AC, Silva L, Albuquerque A, Simões R, Stefanakis AI (2018) Investigation of lab-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating industrial cork boiling wastewater. Chemosphere 207:430–439
Ramírez S, Torrealba G, Lameda-Cuicas E, Molina-Quintero L, Stefanakis AI, Pire-Sierra MC (2019) Investigation of pilot-scale constructed wetlands treating simulated pre-treated tannery wastewater under tropical climate. Chemosphere 234:496–504
Gholipour A, Zahabi H, Stefanakis AI (2020) A novel pilot and full-scale constructed wetland study for glass industry wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 247:125966
Schultze-Nobre L, Wiessner A, Bartsch C, Paschke H, Stefanakis AI, Aylward LA, Kuschk P (2017) Removal of dimethylphenols and ammonium in laboratory-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Eng Life Sci 17(12):1224–1233
Andreo-Martínez P, García-Martínez N, Quesada-Medina J, Almela L (2017) Domestic wastewaters reuse reclaimed by an improved horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland: a case study in the southeast of Spain. Bioresour Technol 233:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.123
Gaballah MS, Abdelwahab O, Barakat KM, Aboagye D (2020) A novel horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland planted with Typha angustifolia for treatment of polluted water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:28449–25462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08669-5
Mustafa A (2013) Constructed wetland for wastewater treatment and reuse: a case study of developing country. Int J Environ Sci Dev 4. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2013.V4.296
Shingare RP, Nanekar SV, Thawale PR, Karthik R, Juwarkar AA (2017) Comparative study on removal of enteric pathogens from domestic wastewater using Typha latifolia and Cyperus rotundus along with different substrates. Int J Phytoremediation 19:899–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1303809
Al-Wahaibi BM, Jafary T, Al-Mamun A, Baawain MS, Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M, Stefanakis AI (2021) Operational modifications of a full-scale experimental vertical flow constructed wetland with effluent recirculation to optimize total nitrogen removal. J Clean Prod 296:126558. S0959652621007782 126558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126558
Duran-Dominguez-de-Bazua M, Del C, Navarro-Frometa AE, Bayona JM (2018) Artificial or constructed wetlands: a suitable technology for sustainable water management. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Abd Ellah RG (2020) Water resources in Egypt and their challenges, Lake Nasser case study. Egypt J Aquat Res 46:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2020.03.001
Loutfy NM (2010) Reuse of wastewater in Mediterranean region, Egyptian experience. In: Barcelo D, Petrovic M (eds) Waste water treatment and reuse in the Mediterranean region, Hdb Env Chem. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2010_76
Shamrukh M, Abdel-Wahab A (2011) Water pollution and riverbank filtration for water supply along River Nile, Egypt, in: Ray, C., M. Shamrukh (Eds.), pp 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0026-0_2
Abdel-Dayem S, Abdel-Gawad S, Fahmy H (2007) Drainage in Egypt: a story of determination, continuity, and success. Irrig Drain 56:S101–S111. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.335
Abdel-Satar AM (2005) Water quality assessment of River Nile from Idfo to Cairo. Egypt J Aquat Res 31:200–223
MWRI, (Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation) (2002) Survey of Nile system pollution sources. APRP-Water Policy Activity, Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (MWRI), EPIQ Report No. 64
Abdo MH (2004) Environmental studies on the River Nile at Damietta branch region. Egypt J Egypt Acad Soc Environ Dev Stud 5:85–104
NAWQAM (1998) Present status of water quality in Egypt. National Water Quality and availability management project (NAWQAM), National Water Research Centre, Canadian Executive Agency, Assessment Interim Report
NAWQAM (2003) Nile research institute data. National Water Quality and availability management project (NAWQAM), National Water Research Centre. Egypt
Wahaab RA, Badawy MI (2004) Water quality assessment of the River Nile system: an overview. Biomed Environ Sci 17:87–100
Elbana TA, Bakr N, Elbana M (2019) Reuse of treated wastewater in Egypt: challenges and opportunities. Handb Environ Chem 75:429–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_46
El-Rafei S, El-Shawarby SI, Fahim FA (1987) Heavy metals in wastewater to the Nile. Desalination 67:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(87)90254-2
Ali MM, Soltan ME (1999) Heavy metals in aquatic macrophytes, water and hydrosoils from the river Nile. Egypt J Univ Arab Biol:99–115
Elsokkary IH, Müller G (1990) Assessment and speciation of chromium, nickel, lead and cadmium in the sediments of the River Nile. Egypt Sci Total Environ 97–98:455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(90)90256-T
Gomaa MNE (1995) Recycling study of some heavy metals in the Egyptian aquatic ecosystem. Food Chem 54:297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)00050-S
Mohamed MAM (1998) Environmental pollution of River Nile and drinking water by pesticides and heavy metals, Ph. D. thesis, Biochemistry Department, Cairo University, Egypt
Rashed MN (2001) Monitoring of environmental heavy metals in fish from Nasser Lake. Environ Int 27:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00050-2
Soltan ME, Awadallah RM (1995) Chemical survey on the River Nile water from Aswan into the outlet. J Environ Sci Heal Part A Environ Sci Eng Toxicol 30:1647–1658. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529509376293
NBI (2005) Nile Basin water quality monitoring baseline report. Transboundary Environmental Action Project, Nile Basin Initiative
Younes HA, Mahmoud HM, Abdelrahman MM, Nassar HF (2019) Seasonal occurrence, removal efficiency and associated ecological risk assessment of three antibiotics in a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Egypt. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 12:100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100239
Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380:48–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014
Abou-Elela SI, Hellal MS (2012) Municipal wastewater treatment using vertical flow constructed wetlands planted with Canna, Phragmites and Cyperus. Ecol Eng 47:209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.044
Zidan ARA, El-Gamal MM, Rashed AA, El-Hady Eid MAA (2015) Wastewater treatment in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands using different media (setup stage). Water Sci 29:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsj.2015.02.003
Abou-Elela SI, Hellal MS, Elekhnawy MA (2019) Phytoremediation of municipal wastewater for reuse using three pilot-scale HFCW under different HLR, HRT, and vegetation: a case study from Egypt. Desalin Water Treat 140:80–90. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.23362
Khalifa ME, Gaber Y, El-Reash A, Ahmed MI, Rizk FW (2020) Effect of media variation on the removal efficiency of pollutants from domestic wastewater in constructed wetland systems. Ecol Eng 143:105668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105668
Abou-Elela SI, Golinelli G, El-Tabl AS, Hellal MS (2014) Treatment of municipal wastewater using horizontal flow constructed wetlands in Egypt. Water Sci Technol 69:38–47. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.530
Abdel-Shafy HI, El-Khateeb MA (2013) Integration of septic tank and constructed wetland for the treatment of wastewater in Egypt. Desalin Water Treat 51:3539–3546. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.749585
Hamad MTMH (2020) Comparative study on the performance of Typha latifolia and Cyperus Papyrus on the removal of heavy metals and enteric bacteria from wastewater by surface constructed wetlands. Chemosphere 260:127551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127551
Abdel-Shafy HI, El-Khateeb MA, Shehata M (2017) Blackwater treatment via combination of sedimentation tank and hybrid wetlands for unrestricted reuse in Egypt. Desalin Water Treat 71:145–151. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20538
El-Sheikh MA, Saleh HI, El-Quosy DE, Mahmoud AA (2010) Improving water quality in polluted drains with free water surface constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 36:1478–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.030
Gaballah MS, Ismail K, Aboauge D, Ismail M, Sobhi M, Stefanakis AI (2021) Effect of design and operational parameters on nutrients and heavy metal removal in pilot floating treatment wetlands with Eichhornia Crassipes treating polluted lake water. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12442-7
Gaballah MS, Ismail K, Beltagy A, Zein Eldin AM, Ismail MM (2019) Wastewater treatment potential of water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) with modified engineering design. J Water Chem Technol 41:197–205. https://doi.org/10.3103/s1063455x1903010x
Sasaqi D, Setyono P (2019) Estimation of water losses through evapotranspiration of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Caraka Tani J Sustain Agric 34:86–100
Iqbal J, Javed A, Baig MA (2019) Growth and nutrient removal efficiency of duckweed (lemna minor) from synthetic and dumpsite leachate under artificial and natural conditions. PLoS One 14:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221755
Alufasi R, Parawira W, Stefanakis AI, Lebea P, Chakauya E, Chingwaru W (2022) Environ Technol 43(7):949–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1811395
García-Ávila F, Patiño-Chávez J, Zhinín-Chimbo F, Donoso-Moscoso S, Flores del Pino L, Avilés-Añazco A (2019) Performance of Phragmites Australis and Cyperus Papyrus in the treatment of municipal wastewater by vertical flow subsurface constructed wetlands. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 7:286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.04.001
Hwang JI, Li Z, Andreacchio N, Ordonez Hinz F, Wilson PC (2020) Potential use of floating treatment wetlands established with Canna flaccida for removing organic contaminants from surface water. Int J Phytoremediation 22:1304–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2020.1768511
Gholipour A, Stefanakis AI (2021) A full-scale anaerobic baffled reactor and hybrid constructed wetland for university dormitory wastewater treatment and reuse in an arid and warm climate. Ecol Eng 170:106360. S0925857421002159 106360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106360
Sricoth T, Meeinkuirt W, Pichtel J, Taeprayoon P, Saengwilai P (2018) Synergistic phytoremediation of wastewater by two aquatic plants (Typha angustifolia and Eichhornia crassipes) and potential as biomass fuel. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5344–5358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0813-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gaballah, M.S., Saber, A.N., Guo, J. (2022). A Review of Constructed Wetlands Types and Plants Used for Wastewater Treatment in Egypt. In: Stefanakis, A. (eds) Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment in Hot and Arid Climates. Wetlands: Ecology, Conservation and Management, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03600-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03600-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-03599-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-03600-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)