Abstract
Epidemiologic studies have contributed importantly to current knowledge of environmental and genetic risk factors for breast cancer. Worldwide, breast cancer is an important cause of human suffering and premature mortality among women. In the United States, breast cancer accounts for more cancer deaths in women than any site other than lung cancer. A variety of risk factors for breast cancer have been well-established by epidemiologic studies including race, ethnicity, family history of cancer, and genetic traits, as well as modifiable exposures such as increased alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, exogenous hormones, and certain female reproductive factors. Younger age at menarche, parity, and older age at first full-term pregnancy may influence breast cancer risk through long-term effects on sex hormone levels or by other biological mechanisms. Recent studies have suggested that triple negative breast cancers may have a distinct etiology. Genetic variants and mutations in genes that code for proteins having a role in DNA repair pathways and the homologous recombination of DNA double stranded breaks (APEX1, BRCA1, BRCA2, XRCC2, XRCC3, ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51, XPD), have been implicated in some cases of breast cancer.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
2.1 Introduction
The global burden of breast cancer in women, measured by incidence or mortality, is substantial and rising in several countries [1, 2]. Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed invasive cancer in the United States for women of all racial and ethnic groups, with an estimated 231,840 new cases diagnosed in 2015 [3]. Breast cancer accounts for more cancer deaths among United States women than any site other than lung cancer. Breast cancer also occurs in men [4], but the disease is rare among men and there is a pronounced female-to-male disparity in breast cancer incidence. This chapter provides a summary of the distribution and determinants of breast cancer in women including both the descriptive epidemiology of the disease and an up-to-date review of risk factors identified in epidemiologic studies.
2.1.1 Incidence and Mortality Rates in the US
Breast cancer incidence and death rates increase with age; about 95% of new cases occur in women 40 years of age and older [3]. Breast cancer incidence rates in the United States continue to rise after menopause and are highest in the older age categories. Age-standardized incidence rates are higher among white women than black women, although black women in the United States have a higher mortality rate than white women. Incidence rates for Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic women in the United States are generally lower than those for white or black women [5, 6]. Mortality rates from breast cancer have decreased in recent years but racial disparities persist [7]. Whitman et al. [8] examined disparities in breast cancer mortality for the period 2005–2007 in the 25 largest cities in the United States. Almost all the non-Hispanic black rates were greater than almost all the non-Hispanic white rates. In an updated analysis of data from Chicago and nine other cities, the racial disparity in breast cancer mortality decreased in Chicago by 13.9% but, in the remaining nine cities, the mortality disparity either grew or remained the same.
The incidence of breast cancer in the United States increased until about 2000 then decreased from 2002 to 2003 [9]. Most of the decrease in that period was among women with estrogen receptor positive cancers [10]. From 2004 to 2012, overall breast cancer incidence rates remained stable [3].
2.1.2 International Trends in Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality
Worldwide, an estimated 1.7 million women were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2012 and about 521,900 women died from the disease that same year [2]. Breast cancer incidence rates tend to be higher among more affluent women, both within countries and internationally. More than two-thirds of breast cancer cases are diagnosed in women aged 50 years and older; the majority of these cases are in developed countries [11]. For women aged 15–49 years, twice as many breast cancer cases are diagnosed in developing countries than in developed countries [9]. Between 1980 and the late 1990s, breast cancer incidence rates rose about 30% in westernized countries [2]. This trend was likely due to changes in reproductive patterns and increased screening. Since about 2000, rates in several countries have stabilized or decreased [2]. In many low- and middle-income countries, incidence rates have continued to increase [2]. In countries where mammography is available or affordable, adherence to recommendations for routine screening is associated with reduced mortality from breast cancer. Since about 1990, breast cancer mortality has been decreasing in many countries in Europe and North America [2].
2.2 Risk Factors
A variety of risk factors for breast cancer have been well-established by epidemiologic studies carried out to date, in addition to increasing age and female sex. These risk factors include nonmodifiable factors such as race, ethnicity, and genetics, as well as modifiable exposures related to diet, physical inactivity, exogenous hormones, and certain female reproductive factors. Circulating levels of endogenous sex steroid hormones such as estradiol have been associated with increased risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women [12]. Sex hormone levels are strongly associated with some risk factors for breast cancer (for example, obesity and higher alcohol consumption) and may mediate the effects of these factors on breast cancer risk [13].
2.2.1 Race
Several factors may account for racial differences in breast cancer mortality including socioeconomic factors, access to screening mammography and timely treatment, and biological factors. In the United States, Hispanic ethnicity and black race have been associated with later stage at breast cancer diagnosis [7, 14, 15]. Compared with white women in the United States, black women tend to have more aggressive breast cancers that present more frequently as estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumors [16]. Among premenopausal women, tumors that are ER negative, progesterone receptor (PR) negative, and HER2 negative (“triple negative” tumors) are more common among black women than among white women.
2.2.2 Age at Menarche, Parity, and Age at First Live Birth
Younger age at menarche, parity, and older age at first full-term pregnancy are well-established risk factors for breast cancer. These risk factors may influence breast cancer risk through long-term effects on sex hormone levels in premenopausal women, through long-lasting changes in breast tissue, or by other biological mechanisms [17]. Reproductive hormones may influence breast cancer risk by increasing cell proliferation and increasing the likelihood of damage to DNA or by promoting cancer growth [3]. In a pooled analysis of control group data from 13 studies of postmenopausal women, circulating levels of estradiol were 6% lower in women who had menarche at ages 14 years or older than in women who had menarche before 12 years [13].
Nulliparity increases breast cancer risk in older women [18]. Results from a cohort study of Norwegian women indicated that nulliparity and obesity may have a synergistic effect on breast cancer risk among older women [19]. In the Black Women’s Health Study in the United States [20], higher parity was associated with a reduced risk of ER positive/PR positive breast cancer (hazard ratio = 0.53, 95% CI 0.39–0.73 for 3 vs. 0 births, p-trend = 0.0002). Pregnancy may reduce breast cancer risk by bringing about persistent changes in the mammary gland that make the breast less susceptible to carcinogenic factors [19]. Younger age at first live birth is protective.
2.2.3 Breastfeeding
Breastfeeding reduces a woman’s risk of breast cancer and is an important modifiable preventive behavior. Longer duration of breastfeeding has been associated with a greater reduction in breast cancer risk. The higher incidence of ER negative/PR negative breast cancer among black women in the United States may be partly explained by their lower prevalence of breastfeeding relative to white women [20].
2.2.4 Menopausal Status and Age at Menopause
Older age at menopause is also a well-recognized risk factor for breast cancer. Both early menarche and older age at menopause increase lifetime exposure of breast tissue to hormones. Menopause hormone therapy is discussed below in Sect. 2.2.6.
2.2.5 Oral Contraceptives
Epidemiologic studies of oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk have generally shown little or no increased risk [21]. Recent use of oral contraceptives may slightly increase the risk of breast cancer [3]. Using data from the Alberta Cancer Registry, Grevers et al. [22] estimated that about 6.3% of breast cancers diagnosed in Alberta in 2012 were attributable to the use of oral contraceptives. In an analysis of data from a multicenter, population-based case–control study, Marchbanks et al. found that breast cancer risk did not vary by oral contraceptive formation [21]. No formulation was significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.
2.2.6 Hormone Therapy
Results from observational studies and the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial indicate that hormone replacement therapy after menopause increases breast cancer risk [23,24,25]. Use of a regimen that includes both estrogen and progesterone has been associated with a higher risk of breast cancer than the use of estrogen alone [23]. In the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, DeBono et al. [26] found that black women were less likely than white women to use any hormone therapy (HT) and were more likely to use an unopposed-estrogen formulation. Combined estrogen-progestin HT use was associated with a greater odds of breast cancer in white (adjusted OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.03–2.13) and black women (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.76–2.70). Studies of breast cancer incidence in the United States, Canada, and European countries showed a 5–10% decline in breast cancer incidence following reductions in HT use after 2002 [27]. In several countries, however, temporal changes in screening mammography are also likely to have played a role in the decline in breast cancer incidence. Women who do not currently use HT may also undergo screening mammography less frequently [27, 28].
2.2.7 Diet
A wide variety of dietary factors have been examined as potential breast cancer risk factors in case–control and prospective studies, including increased consumption of alcohol [29,30,31], red meat, processed meat, and animal fat, and decreased consumption of fruits and vegetables, calcium, vitamin D, soy, and antioxidants such as beta-carotene and other carotenoids, vitamin C, and vitamin E [32,33,34,35]. The ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acids has also been examined in relation to breast cancer risk. Although initial studies suggest that a higher ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 fats may reduce breast cancer risk, more research is warranted [36]. For most dietary factors, epidemiologic studies of breast cancer have provided inconsistent or inconclusive results. A notable exception is alcohol consumption, which is discussed separately below.
Foods with a high glycemic index and glycemic load and dietary carbohydrates, which can influence blood glucose and insulin concentrations, have also been examined in relation to breast cancer risk [37,38,39,40]. Low-energy dense diets are generally high in fiber and fruits and vegetables and low in fat [41]. The glycemic index is an indicator of the blood sugar response of the body to a standardized amount of carbohydrate in food. The glycemic load takes into account the amount of food consumed [36]. A meta-analysis by Mulholland et al., which focused on cohort study results, showed no overall association between postmenopausal breast cancer risk and glycemic load intake (RR = 1.03, 95 % CI 0.94–1.12) [42].
In a meta-analysis of prospective studies (14 studies of breast cancer incidence and 4 studies of breast cancer recurrence), Dong and Qin found that soy isoflavones consumption was inversely associated with breast cancer risk (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.79–0.99). However, the protective effect of soy was only observed among studies conducted in Asian populations [32].
Recent studies have examined dietary patterns in relation to breast cancer risk [43,44,45,46]. Harris et al. [44] examined whether adolescent and early adulthood inflammatory dietary pattern (high intake of sugar-sweetened and diet soft drinks, refined grains, red and processed meat, and margarine, an low intake of green leafy vegetables, cruciferous vegetables, and coffee) was associated with breast cancer among 45,204 women in the Nurses’ Health Study II. Women in the fifth quintile of the inflammatory pattern score had adjusted hazard ratios for premenopausal breast cancer of 1.35 for adolescent diet (95% CI 1.06–1.73, p-trend = 0.002) and 1.41 for early adulthood diet (95% CI 1.11–1.78, p-trend = 0.0006) compared with women in the first quintile. Similar associations were not observed for postmenopausal breast cancer. In the Netherlands Cohort Study, van den Brandt and Schulpen [46] found a significant inverse association between Mediterranean diet adherence and risk of ER negative breast cancer (hazard ratio = 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.93, for high vs. low Mediterranean diet adherence, p-trend = 0.032). Mediterranean diet adherence showed only weak inverse associations with ER positive or total breast cancer risk. In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Cohort Study [45], which recruited women from ten countries, adherence to the Mediterranean diet was inversely associated with breast cancer risk overall (high vs. low adapted relative Mediterranean diet score hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% CI 0.88–1.00, p-trend = 0.048) and in postmenopausal women (high vs. low adapted relative Mediterranean diet score hazard ratio = 0.93, 95% CI 0.87–0.99, p-trend = 0.037). In a study of 20,009 cases and 2086 controls of the Canadian National Enhanced Cancer Surveillance System [43], consumption of the highest quartile of the “healthy” dietary pattern was related to a 22% decreased in risk of breast cancer (95% CI 0.61–1.00) compared to the lowest quartile.
2.2.8 Alcohol
An increasing number of epidemiologic studies have implicated alcohol consumption as a risk factor for breast cancer [29,30,31, 47]. Studies have shown a linear dose–response relation between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk. Chen et al. [29] examined the association of breast cancer with alcohol consumption among 105,986 women enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study, of whom 7690 developed invasive breast cancer over the period 1980 through June 2008. Alcohol consumption was significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk even at levels as low as 5.0–9.9 g per day, or about three to six drinks per week (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.06–1.24). Cumulative average alcohol consumption over long periods of time was found to be the most relevant measure [29]. The possible biological mechanisms include alcohol’s effects on circulating estrogen levels. Ja Kim et al. [47] examined the association between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk in younger women in the Nurses’ Health Study II. Alcohol consumption was not associated with breast cancer risk overall (multivariate hazard ratio = 1.07, 95% CI 0.94–1.22 for 10 g/day intake vs. nondrinkers). However, when the association was stratified by family history and folate intake, a positive association between alcohol consumption and breast cancer was found among those with a positive family history and folate intake of <400 μg/day (multivariate hazard ratio = 1.82, 95% CI 1.06–3.12, p-trend = 0.08).
2.2.9 Physical Activity
There is considerable evidence from epidemiologic studies that high levels of physical activity reduces breast cancer risk in women [48]. The possible biological mechanisms include the influences of physical activity on body composition, insulin resistance, and circulating levels of sex steroid hormones [49]. In the Women’s Health Initiative Cohort Study, which involved 74,171 women aged 50–79 years recruited by 40 United States clinical centers, women who engaged in regular strenuous physical activity at age 35 had a 14% decreased risk of breast cancer (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.78–0.95) compared to inactive women [50]. Similar but attenuated findings were observed for strenuous physical activity at ages 18 years and 50 years. The study results also indicated that longer duration of physical activity provides the most benefit [50]. The majority of epidemiologic studies that have examined associations between physical activity and breast cancer risk have evaluated activity during adulthood. Recent studies have found that physical activity during childhood and adolescence may also be inversely related to breast cancer risk [51,52,53].
2.2.10 Anthropometric Factors
Anthropometric factors such as body height, weight, and adiposity have been extensively studied in epidemiologic studies of breast cancer [54, 55]. Body fat provides a substrate for the production of estrogen from androgen in adipose tissue [56]. In the Cancer Prevention Study II cohort (n = 495,477 women), Calle et al. found that women with higher values of body mass index had an increased risk of dying from breast cancer and certain other cancers [57]. Welti et al. [58] examined weight-change patterns during early to mid-adulthood and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer using data from the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Compared with weight stability, weight gain was associated with risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio = 1.11, 95% CI 1.03–1.20) after adjustment for body mass index. Although overweight and obesity are important modifiable risk factors for breast cancer among postmenopausal women, epidemiologic studies have shown that high body mass index and other measures of adiposity are associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women [59, 60]. The age at which body mass or adiposity is assessed (childhood, adolescence, or adulthood) is important. In some studies, body mass index at age 18 years and body fatness during youth have been inversely associated with breast cancer risk in both pre- and postmenopausal women [60].
Obesity and physical inactivity are important determinants of hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. Hyperinsulinemia with insulin resistance has been reported to be an independent risk factor for breast cancer [61]. Higher insulin levels may contribute to increased tumor growth [62].
Obesity influences the amount of free insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) available to cells. Breast cancer has been related to cell proliferation in response to growth factors such as IGF-1 and sex hormones [63]. The IGF-1 system is involved in breast cancer development, progression, and metastasis [62, 64]. Increases in serum or plasma levels of IGF-I have been observed in some epidemiologic studies of premenopausal breast cancer [65] but results to date have been inconsistent. Schernhammer et al. [66] conducted a nested, case-control study of IGF-I, insulin-like binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) and IGFBP-3 and breast cancer incidence in the Nurses Health Study II cohort, which mainly consists of premenopausal women. Plasma levels of IGF-I and its binding proteins were measured using prediagnostic samples obtained from 317 women diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer and 634 matched controls. Overall, plasma levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 were not associated with breast cancer risk. To examine the relationships between IGF-I and breast cancer incidence among premenopausal women. The relationship between prediagnostic IGF-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels and breast cancer risk was examined in a meta-analysis of data from 17 prospective studies conducted in 12 countries [67]. The overall odds ratio for breast cancer for women in the highest versus the lowest quintile of IGF-I concentration was 1.28 (95% CI 1.14–1.44). The positive association with IGF-I, which was not substantially modified by IGFBP-3 or menopausal status, was limited to estrogen receptor positive breast cancers.
In general, results from epidemiologic studies do not support an association between IGFBP-1 and breast cancer risk. Although results from some epidemiologic studies support an association between IGFBP-3 and risk of breast cancer among younger women, results to date have been inconsistent. Rinaldi et al. conducted a pooled analysis of data from three prospective studies in New York, Northern Sweden, and Milan, Italy [68]. Statistically nonsignificant, positive associations were observed between IGF-I and IGFBP-3 and breast cancer risk among younger women.
2.2.11 Mammographic Breast Density
Breast density is one of the strongest established risk factors for breast cancer. Women with more extensive mammographic density have over a fourfold increased risk of breast cancer [69]. Recent studies have suggested that interactions between mammographic breast density and breast cancer are modified by tumor characteristics such as ER status and grade [70, 71]. Mammographic density likely reflects the amount of epithelial and stromal cells in the breast and the proliferation of these cells but does not indicate any histological abnormality [72]. Mammographic breast density is less extensive in women who are parous and in those with a larger number of life births, and changes in response to exposure to hormones [72]. Mammographic breast density decreases throughout menopause and increases with combined hormone therapy [73]. Longitudinal epidemiologic studies have shown that mammographic density declines as women get older [74]. The change in mammographic density with age reflects a reduction in glandular tissue and increase in fat [72]. Although influenced by changes in exposure to hormones, mammographic density is also a heritable quantitative trait [73].
2.2.12 Environmental and Occupational Exposures
Exposure to ionizing radiation (as a result of nuclear explosions, diagnostic fluoroscopy, or radiotherapy in adolescence) is an established breast cancer carcinogen [75, 76]. The biological mechanism is likely to be induction of DNA mutations. A variety of chemical exposures have been purported to be associated with breast cancer. In epidemiologic studies, organochlorines, which included polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, and pesticides such as dichlorodiphyenyl-trichlorethane (DDT), lindane and hexachlorobenzene, have not been consistently associated with breast cancer [77,78,79]. The risks of breast cancer associated with a wide variety of environmental exposures were reviewed by the Institute of Medicine at the request of Susan G.Komen for the Cure [80]. The IOM concluded that the evidence associating individual chemicals with breast cancer risk is not conclusive, and also recognized the need for further research in this area. The IOM noted that exposure to chemicals with estrogenic or other properties relevant to sex steroid activity, such as bisphenol A (BPA), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and certain dioxins or dioxin-like compounds, may possibly influence breast cancer risk. The risk of breast cancer from exposure to 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) has been reviewed by several authors and expert panels with no consistent evidence of an increased risk [81]. Despite the lack of conclusive evidence from epidemiologic studies, exposures to chemicals with estrogenic or other properties relevant to sex steroid activity could influence breast cancer risk if the exposures occur at critical life stages or in combination with exposure to other similar chemicals [80]. Body mass and weight change may also modify associations between environmental exposures and breast cancer. In a population-based study of 10,006 post-menopausal women with in situ or invasive breast cancer and 990 age-frequency matched controls, Niehoff et al. [82] found that body mass index modified the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons-DNA adduct and breast cancer association. The odds ratio for detectable vs. non-detectable adducts was increased among women with a body mass index ≥25 (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.94–1.92), but not in those with a body mass index <25 (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.57–1.28). Sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons included cigarette smoking, grilled or smoked meat intake, residential synthetic log burning, and vehicle exhaust.
Shift work (evening or night work, rotating shifts, and working on-call) has an important influence on the body’s sleep-wake rhythm. Results from several studies support an association between shift work and disruption of the circadian rhythm with breast cancer risk. In 2007, the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that shift work was probably associated with breast cancer, based on studies in animals and humans. However, some epidemiologic studies that have not found an association between shift work and breast cancer risk. In the Nurses’ Health Study [83] a moderate increase in breast cancer risk was observed among women who worked 1–14 years (adjusted RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.99–1.18) or 15–29 years on rotating night shifts (adjusted RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.90–1.30). Levels of serum melatonin, which may have a protective effect, decrease when people are exposed to light at night. In experimental studies, the disruption of the nocturnal melatonin signal has been shown to activate human breast cancer growth, metabolism, and signaling [84].
Epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation have been associated with breast cancer in epidemiologic studies [85]. DNA methylation, which has been associated with environmental exposures such as cigarette smoke and persistent organic pollutants, may play a role in cancer causation by silencing genes through hyper-methylation or, conversely, by activating genes through hypomethylation [85].
2.3 Risk Factors According to ER, PR, and HER2 Expression
As detailed in other chapters in this book, breast cancer subtypes are biologically distinct and may have distinct etiologies [86, 87]. This includes cases that express estrogen and/or progesterone receptors and those that overexpress the tyrosine kinase human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) due to amplification of its encoding oncogene ERBB2. Using data from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (n = 743,623 women), Phipps et al. [88] examined associations between reproductive history and breast cancer cases classified according to tumor marker expression: estrogen receptor (ER) positive (n = 8203 cases), ER negative/progesterone receptor (PR) negative/HER2 positive (n = 288), or ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 negative (triple negative, n = 645). Nulliparity was most strongly associated with risk of ER positive breast cancer (hazard ratio = 1.31, 95% CI 1.23–1.39). Late age at first birth was most strongly associated with risk of ER negative/PR negative/HER2 positive disease (hazard ratio = 1.83, 95% CI 1.31–2.56). Neither parity nor age at first birth was associated with triple negative breast cancer. About 12% of breast cancers are triple negative [3]. The most consistent evidence from epidemiologic studies for associations with reproductive risk factors exists for ER positive breast cancers [89]. The single protective factor most consistently associated with triple negative breast cancer was longer duration of breastfeeding [89]. In a pooled analysis of data from three population-based case-control studies, Ma et al. [90] examined associations of reproductive factors and risk of triple negative breast cancer in white women and African-American women. Risk of triple negative breast cancer decreased with increasing duration of breastfeeding (p-trend = 0.006), but age at menarche, age at first live birth, and nulliparity were not associated with risk of triple negative breast cancer. The association between breastfeeding and risk of triple negative breast cancer was modified by age and race; the decrease in risk was greater for younger African-American women. Studies have shown that female reproductive factors such as early age at menarche, nulliparity, and older age at first live birth are most clearly associated with hormone receptor positive tumors, suggesting that triple negative breast cancer may have a distinct etiology [89,90,91]. Shi et al. [92] examined the relationship of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) with ER/PR/HER-defined post-menopausal breast cancer risk. Total lifetime leisure-time MVPA was associated with reduce risk of ER negative/PR negative breast cancer (p-trend = 0.014), regardless of HER2 status. In contrast, total lifetime household MVPA was associated with reduced risk of ER positive and/or PR positive breast cancer (p-trend <0.001), regardless of HER2 status. Recent studies, including emerging areas of research, have focused on central obesity and the metabolic syndrome as predictors of triple negative breast cancer [93].
2.4 Genetic Factors
Population-based epidemiologic studies and family-based studies have identified a number of low-penetrance genetic variants and rare, moderate-to-high penetrance genetic mutations including BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. As discussed in other chapters in this book, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and genetic factors likely account for pathological subtypes and much of the heterogeneity of the disease [94].
2.4.1 Family History of Cancer
Having a positive family history of breast cancer is an established risk factor for the disease. Women who have one first degree relative with breast cancer have about a twofold increased risk of developing breast cancer [95, 96]. Risk increases the younger the relative was at the time of diagnosis and with increasing number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer [3]. About 20% of breast cancer patients have a family history of the disease in a first degree relative. Only about 5–10% of breast cancer cases associated with a family history of the disease in a first-degree relative are inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. These cases have features such as bilaterality, early age at onset, and occurrence in multiple generations [97]. Most breast cancer cases are sporadic and not associated with high penetrance gene mutations.
2.4.2 Genetic Polymorphisms
Genetic polymorphisms may account for why some people are more sensitive than others to environmental carcinogens such as exogenous estrogens and alcohol. A large number of genetic variants have been reported to be associated with breast cancer risk but relatively few low-penetrance polymorphisms have been consistently associated with the disease [98]. Most breast cancer susceptibility loci identified in candidate gene studies have not been confirmed [94]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the XRCC2 and XRCC3 genes, which code for proteins that play a role in the homologous recombination of DNA double strand breaks, have been shown to influence breast cancer risk. These include XRCC2 rs3218536 and rs3218536 [98,99,100]. A variant of the caspase 8 gene (CASP8) has been convincingly associated with breast cancer risk [94]. Caspase 8 is a protease that is involved in the initiation of programmed cell death (apoptosis) following DNA damage [101].
2.4.3 BRCA Gene Mutations
Mutations in the BRCA1 gene, which is located on chromosome 17q, have been identified as causes of predisposition to breast, ovarian, and other cancers. The BRCA2 gene is located on chromosome 13q. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are expressed in breast, ovarian, and other tissues and play a key role in the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks in the cell nucleus. Most of the deleterious mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are small deletions or insertions that result in the translation of a truncated protein [94]. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for about 15–20% of familial breast cancers [102]. Women who carry BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have an estimated 40–87% risk of breast cancer by age 70, although these risks are modified by other factors [103, 104]. There is considerable variability in the age of onset of cancer and the site of cancer across populations [105]. Kuchenbaecker et al. [106] examined risks of breast and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers using data from the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study, the Breast Cancer Family Registry, and the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer. The cumulative breast cancer risk by age 80 years was 72% (95% CI 65–79%) for BRCA1 and 69% (95% CI 61–77%) for BRCA2 carriers. For contralateral breast cancer, the cumulative risk 20 years after breast cancer diagnosis was 40% (95% CI 35–45%) for BRCA1 and 26% (95% CI 20–33%) f for BRCA2 carriers.
Genetic variants and gene–gene interactions that account for inter-individual variation in DNA repair capacity influence risk of breast cancer [105]. These include variants in the APEX1, CHEK2, PALB2, ATM, and XPD genes, which, like BRCA1 and BRCA2, play a role in DNA repair mechanisms and help to maintain chromosomal stability [94]. Studies have suggested that genomic variation at multiple loci modify breast cancer risk in women who carry BRCA1 mutations [107]. Some of these loci are known to encode proteins that interact biologically with BRCA1 [94]. Candidate gene studies suggest that homozygosity for the RAD51 135G [C allele is associated with breast cancer risk in women who carry BRCA2 gene mutations [108]. Interacting with BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM at the cellular level, RAD51 is part of a protein complex that plays a role in the repair of double strand DNA breaks. Genome-wide association studies carried out in general populations have identified additional genetic variants that are associated with breast cancer risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Other high-penetrance genetic mutations that increase breast cancer risk, and which are rare in the general population, include TP53 germ-line mutations (found in Li-Fraumeni cancer syndrome), PTEN mutations (Cowden syndrome), and STK1 mutations (Peutz-Jegher syndrome) [94].
2.5 Summary and Conclusions
This chapter has summarized the substantial epidemiologic literature on environmental and genetic risk factors for breast cancer in women. Breast cancer risk factors that have been well-established by epidemiologic studies include race, ethnicity, family history of cancer, and genetic variants, as well as modifiable exposures such as increased alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, exogenous hormones, and certain female reproductive factors such as younger age at menarche, nulliparity, and older age at first full-term pregnancy. Based upon attributable risks, about 30–35% of breast cancers could potentially be prevented by addressing obesity, physical inactivity, alcohol consumption, and hormone replacement therapy [109,110,111,112]. There is increasing evidence that breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and that subtypes such as triple negative breast cancers may have a distinct etiology. Epidemiologic studies, family studies, and genome-wide association studies have identified several genetic variants and rare but moderate-to-high penetrance gene mutations that account for some cases of breast cancer. These include genetic variants of genes involved in DNA repair and the homologous recombination of DNA double-stranded breaks. However, the etiology of many breast cancer cases in the population remains unknown.
References
Coughlin SS, Ekwueme DU (2009) Breast cancer as a global health concern. Cancer Epidemiol 33:315–318
American Cancer Society (2011) Global cancer facts and figures, 2nd edn. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
American Cancer Society (2011) Breast cancer facts and figures 2011–2012. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
Miao H, Verkooijen HM, Chia KS, Bouchardy C, Pukkala E, Laronningen S, Mellemkjaer L, Czene K, Hartman M (2011) Incidence and outcome of male breast cancer: an international population-based study. J Clin Oncol 29:4381–4386
Joslyn SA, Foote ML, Nasseri K, Coughlin SS, Howe HL (2005) Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer rates by age: NAACCR breast cancer project. Breast Cancer Res Treat 92:97–105
Wingo PA, King J, Swan J, Coughlin SS, Kaur JS, Erb-Alvarez JA, Jackson-Thompson J, Arambula Solomon TG (2008) Breast cancer incidence among American Indian and Alaska native women: US, 1999–2004. Cancer 113(5):1191–1202
Yedjou CG, Tchounwou PB, Payton M, Miele L, Fonseca DD, Lowe L, Alo RA (2017) Assessing the racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality in the United States. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 14:486
Whitman S, Orsi J, Hurlbert M (2011) The racial disparity in breast cancer mortality in the 25 largest cities in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol 36:e147–ee51
DeSantis C, Howlader N, Cronin KA, Jemal A (2011) Breast cancer incidence rates in US women are no longer declining. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 20:733–799
Anderson WF, Katki HA, Rosenberg PS (2011) Incidence of breast cancer in the United States: current and future trends. J Natl Cancer Inst 21:1397–1402
Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, Naghavi M (2011) Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 378:1461–1484
James RE, Lukanova A, Dossus L et al (2011) Postmenopausal serum sex steroids and risk of hormone receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer: a nested case-control study. Cancer Prev Res 4:1626–16311
Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group (2011) Circulating sex hormones and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of 13 studies. Br J Cancer 105:709–722
Coughlin SS, Yoo W, Whitehead MS, Smith SA (2015) Advancing breast cancer survivorship among African-American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153:253–261
Coughlin SS, Richardson LS, Orelien J, Thompson T, Richards TB, Sabatino SA, Wu W, Conney D (2009) Contextual analysis of breast cancer stage at diagnosis among women in the United States, 2004. Open Health Services Policy J 2:45–46
Dunn BK, Agurs-Collins T, Browne D, Lubet R, Johnson KA (2010) Health disparities in breast cancer: biology meets socioeconomic status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121:281–292
Russo J, Moral R, Balogh GA, Mailo D, Russo IH (2005) The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 7:131–142
Jatoi I, Anderson WF (2010) Qualitative age interactions in breast cancer studies: a mini-review. Future Oncol 6:1781–1788
Opdahl S, Alsaker MD, Jansky I, Romundstad PR, Vatten LJ (2011) Joint effects of nulliparity and other breast cancer risk factors. Br J Cancer 105:731–736
Palmer JR, Boggs DA, Wise LA, Ambrosone CB, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L (2011) Parity and lactation in relation to estrogen receptor negative breast cancer in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 20:1883–1891
Marchbanks PA, Curtis KM, Mandel MG, Wilson HG, Jeng G, Folger SG, McDonald JA, Daling JR, Bernstein L, Malone KE, Wingo PA, Simon MS, Norman SA, Strom BL, Ursin G, Weiss LK, Burkman RT, Spirtas R (2012) Oral contraceptive formulation and risk of breast cancer. Contraception 85:342–350
Grevers X, Grundy A, Poirier AE, Khandwala F, Feldman M, Friedenreich CM, Brenner DR (2016) Cancer incidence attributable to the use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapy in Alberta in 2012. CMAJ Open 4:E754–EE59
Calle EE, Feigelson HS, Hildebrand JS, Teras LR, Thun MJ, Rodriguez C (2009) Postmenopausal hormone use and breast cancer associations differ by hormone regimen and histologic subtype. Cancer 115:936–945
Reeves GK, Beral V, Green J, Gathani T, Bull D, Million Women Study Collaborators (2006) Hormonal therapy for menopause and breast-cancer risk by histological type: a cohort study and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 7:910–918
Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD et al (2003) Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the women’s health initiative randomized trial. JAMA 289:3243–3253
DeBono NL, Robinson WR, Lund JL, Tse CK, Moorman PG, Olshan AF, Troester MA (2017) Race, menopausal hormone therapy, and invasive breast cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 27:377–386
Pelucchi C, Levi F, La Vecchia C (2010) The rise and fall in menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer incidence. Breast 19:198–201
Breen N, Cronin KA, Tiro JA, Meissner HI, McNeel TS, Sabatino SA, Tangka FK, Taplin SH (2011) Was the drop in mammography rates in 2005 associated with the drop in hormone therapy use? Cancer 117:5450–5460
Chen WY, Rosner B, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Willett WC (2011) Moderate alcohol consumption during adult life, drinking patterns, and breast cancer risk. JAMA 306:1884–1890
Hamajima N, Hirose K, Tajima K, Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer et al (2002) Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer 87:1234–1245
Tjonneland A, Christensen J, Olsen A et al (2007) Alcohol intake and breast cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Cancer Causes Control 18:361–373
Dong JY, Qin LQ (2011) Soy isoflavones consumption and risk of breast cancer incidence or recurrence: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 125:315–323
Pan SY, Zhou J, Gibbons L, Morrison H, Wen SW (2011) Antioxidants and breast cancer risk—a population-based case-control study in Canada. BMC Cancer 11:372
Farvid MS, Cho E, Chen WY, Eliassen AH, Willett WC (2014) Dietary protein sources in early adulthood and breast cancer incidence: prospective cohort study. BMJ 348:g3437
Farvid MS, Chen WY, Michels KB, Cho E, Willett WC, Eliassen AH (2016) Fruit and vegetable consumption in adolescence and early adulthood and risk of breast cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ 353:i12343
Donaldson MS (2004) Nutrition and cancer: a review of the evidence for an anti-cancer diet. Nutr J 3:19
Sieri S, Pala V, Brighenti F, Pellegrini N, Muti P, Micheli A, Evangelista A, Grioni S, Contiero P, Berrino F, Krogh V (2007) Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and the risk of breast cancer in an Italian prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 86:1160–1166
Lajous M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Fabre A, Clavel-Chapelon F, Romieu I (2008) Carbohydrate intake, glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a prospective study of French women. Am J Clin Nutr 87:1384–1391
Shikany JM, Redden DT, Neuhouser ML, Chlebowski RT, Rohan TE, Simon MS, Liu S, Lane DS, Tinker L (2011) Dietary glycemic load, glycemic index, and carbohydrates and risk of breast cancer in the women’s health initiative. Nutr Cancer 63:899–907
Jonas CR, McCullough ML, Teras LR, Walker-Thurmond KA, Thun MJ, Calle EE (2003) Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of incident breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 12:573–577
Hartman TJ, Gapstur SM, Gaudet MM, Shah R, Flanders WD, Wang Y, McCullough ML (2016) Dietary energy density and postmenopausal breast cancer incidence in the cancer prevention study II nutrition cohort. J Nutr 146:2045–2050
Mulholland HG, Murray LJ, Cardwell CR, Cantwell MM (2008) Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 99:1170–1175
Van Ryswyk K, Villeneuve PJ, Johnson KC, Epidemiology Research Group TC (2016) Dietary patterns and the risk of female breast cancer among participants of the Canadian national enhanced cancer surveillance system. Can J Public Health 107:e49–e55
Harris HR, Willett WC, Vaidya RL, Michels KB (2017) An adolescent and early adulthood dietary pattern associated with inflammation and the incidence of breast cancer. Cancer Res 77:1179–1187
Buckland G, Travier N, Cottet V et al (2013) Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and risk of breast cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition study. Int J Cancer 132:2918–2927
van den Brandt PA, Schulpen M (2017) Mediterranean diet adherence and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: results of a cohort study and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 140:2220–2231
Kim HJ, Jung S, Eliassen AH, Chen WY, Willett WC, Cho E (2017) Alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk by family history of breast cancer and folate intake in younger women. Am J Epidemiol 186:524–531
Neilson HK, Farris MS, Stone CR, Vaska MM, Brenner DR, Friedenreich CM (2017) Moderate-vigorous recreational physical activity and breast cancer risk, stratified by menopause status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Menopause 24:322–344
Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Lynch BM (2010) State of the epidemiological evidence on physical activity and cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer 46:2593–2604
McTiernan A, Kooperberg C, White E, Wilcox S, Coates R, Adams-Campbell LL, Woods N, Ockene J (2003) Recreational physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The women’s health initiative cohort study. JAMA 290:1331–1336
Neihoff NM, White AJ, Sandler DP (2017) Childhood and teenage physical activity and breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164:697–705
Kobayashi LC, Janssen I, Richardson H, Lai AS, Spinelli JJ, Aronson KJ (2013) Moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity across the life course and risk of pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139:851–861
Boeke CE, Eliassen AH, Oh H, Spiegelman D, Willett WC, Tamimi RM (2014) Adolescent physical activity in relation to breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:715–724
Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M (2008) Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 371:569–578
Green J, Cairns BJ, Casabonne D, Wright FL, Reeves G, Beral V (2011) Height and cancer incidence in the million women study: prospective cohort, and meta-analysis of prospective studies of height and total cancer risk. Lancet Oncol 12:785–794
McTiernan A, Ulrich C, Slate S, Potter J (1998) Physical activity and cancer etiology: associations and mechanisms. Cancer Causes Control 9:487–509
Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ (2003) Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of US adults. N Engl J Med 348:1625–1638
Welti LM, Beavers DP, Caan BJ, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Vitolins MZ, Beavers KM (2017) Weight fluctuation and cancer risk in postmenopausal women: the women’s health initiative. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 26:779–786
Feigelson HS, Jonas CR, Teras LR, Thun MJ (2004) Weight gain, body mass index, hormone replacement therapy, and postmenopausal breast cancer in a large prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13:220–224
Baer HJ, Tworoger SS, Hankinson SE, Willet WC (2010) Body fatness at young ages and risk of breast cancer throughout life. Am J Epidemiol 171:1183–1194
Bruning PF, Bonfrer JM, van Noord PA, Hart AA, de Jong-Bakker M, Nooijen WJ (1992) Insulin resistance and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer 52:511–516
Coughlin SS, Smith SA (2015) The insulin-like growth factor axis, adipokines, physical activity, and obesity in relation to breast cancer incidence and recurrence. Cancer Clin Oncol 4:24–31
Talamini R, Franceschi S, Favero A, Negri E, Parazzini F, LaVecchia C (1997) Selected medical conditions and risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 75:1699–1703
Christopoulos PF, Msaouel P, Koutsilieris M (2015) The role of the insulin-like growth factor-I system in breast cancer. Mol Cancer 14:43
Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Michaud DS, Deroo B, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Pollak M (1998) Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of breast cancer. Lancet 351:1393–1396
Schernhammer ES, Holly JM, Hunter DJ, Pollak MV, Hankinson SE (2006) Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), its binding proteins (IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3) and growth hormone and breast cancer risk in the nurses health study II. Endocr Relat Cancer 13:583–592
Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group (2010) Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies. Lancet Oncol 11:530–542
Rinaldi S, Toniolo P, Muti P et al (2005) IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and breast cancer in young women: a pooled reanalysis of three prospective studies. Eur J Cancer Prev 14:493–496
Harris HR, Tamimi RM, Willett WC, Hankinson SE, Michels KB (2011) Body size across the life course, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 174:909–918
Yaghiyan L, Tamimi RM, Bertrand KA, Scott CG, Jensen MR, Pankratz VS, Brandt K, Visscher D, Norman A, Cough F, Shepherd J, Fan B, Chen YY, Ma L, Beck AH, Cummings SR, Kerlilowske K, Vachon CM (2017) Interaction of mammographic breast density with menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use in relation to the risk of aggressive breast cancer subyptes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 165:421–431
Bertrand KA, Scott CG, Tamimi RM, Jensen MR, Pankratz VS, Norman AD, Visscher DW, Cough FJ, Shepherd J, Chen YY, Fan B, Wu FF, Ma L, Beck AH, Cummings SR, Kerlikowske K, Vachon CM (2015) Dense and nondense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 24:798–809
Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S (2011) Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res 13:223
Boyd NF, Melnichouk O, Martin LJ, Hislop G, Chiarelli AM, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S (2011) Mammographic density, response to hormones, and breast cancer risk. J Clin Oncol 29:2985–2929
Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Lurie G, Kolonel LN (2006) A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15:732–739
Land CE (1995) Studies of cancer and radiation dose among atomic bomb survivors: the example of breast cancer. JAMA 274:402–407
Hancock SL, Tucker MA, Hoppe RT (1993) Breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin’s disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:25–31
Millikan R, DeVoto E, Duell EJ et al (2000) Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethene, polychlorinated biphyenyls, and breast cancer among African-American and white women in North Carolina. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 9:1233–1240
Calle EE, Frumkin H, Henley SJ et al (2002) Organochlorines and breast cancer risk. CA Cancer J Clin 52:301–309
Krieger N, Wolff MS, Hiatt RA et al (1994) Breast cancer and serum organochlorines; a prospective study among white, black, and Asian women. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:589–599
Institute of Medicine (2012) Breast cancer and the environment: a life course approach. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Boffetta P, Mundt KA, Adami H-O, Cole P, Mandel JS (2011) TCDD and cancer: a critical review of epidemiologic studies. Crit Rev Toxicol 41:622–636
Niehoff N, White AJ, McCullogh LE, Steck SE, Beyea J, Mordukhovich I, Shen J, Neugut AI, Conway K, Santella RM, Gammon MD (2017) Polychyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and postmenopausal breast cancer: an evaluation of effect measure modification by body mass index and weight change. Environ Res 152:17–25
Schernhammer ES, Laden F, Speizer FE, Willet WC, Hunter DJ, Kawachi I, Colditz GA (2001) Rotating night shifts and risk of breast cancer in women participating in the nurses’ health study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1563–1568
Blask DE, Hill SM, Dauchy RT, Xiang S, Yuan L, Duplessis T, Mao L, Dauchy E, Sauer LA (2011) Circadian regulation of molecular, dietary, and metabolic signaling mechanisms of human breast cancer growth by the nocturnal melatonin signal and the consequences of its disruption by light at night. J Pineal Res 51:259–269
Terry MB, Delgado-Cruzata L, Vin-Raviv N, Wu HC, Santella RM (2011) DNA methylation in white blood cells. Association with risk factors in epidemiologic studies. Epigenetics 6:828–837
Phipps AI, Buist DS, Malone KE, Barlow WE, Porter PL, Kerlikowske K, Li CI (2011) Reproductive history and risk of three breast cancer subtypes defined by three biomarkers. Cancer Causes Control 22:399–405
de Ruijter TC, Veeck J, de Hoon JPJ, van Engeland M, Tjan-Heijnen VC (2011) Characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:183–192
Phipps AI, Chlebowski RT, Prentice R, McTierman A, Wactawski-Wende J, Kuller LH, Adams-Campbell LL, Lane D, Stefanick ML, Vitolins M, Kabat GC, Rohan TE, Li CI (2011) Reproductive history and oral contraceptive use in relation to risk of triple-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:470–477
Anderson KN, Schwab RB, Martinez ME (2014) Reproductive risk factors and breast cancer subtypes: a review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:1–10
Ma H, Ursin G, Xu X, Lee E, Togawa K, Duan L, Lu Y, Malone KE, Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Simon MS, Folger SG, Sullivan-Halley J, Deapen DM, Press MF, Bernstein L (2017) Reproductive factors and the risk of triple-negative breast cancer in white women and African-American women: a pooled analysis. Breast Cancer Res 19:6
Yang XR, Chang-Claude J, Goode EL et al (2011) Associations of breast cancer risk factors with tumor subtypes: a pooled analysis from the breast cancer association consortium studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:250–263
Shi J, Kobayashi LC, Grundy A, Richardson H, SenGupta SK, Lohrisch CA, Spinelli JJ, Aronson KJ (2017) Lifetime moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and ER/PR/HER-defined post-menopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 165:201–213
Davis AA, Kaklamani VG (2012) Metabolic syndrome and triple-negative breast cancer: a new paradigm. Int J Breast Cancer 2012:809291
Mavaddat N, Antoniou AC, Easton DF, Garcia-Closas M (2010) Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. Mol Oncol 4:174–191
Coughlin SS, Khoury MJ, Steinberg KK (1999) BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and risk of breast cancer. Public health perspectives. Am J Prev Med 16:91–98
Newman B, Millikan RC, King M-C (1997) Genetic epidemiology of breast and ovarian cancers. Epidemiol Rev 19:69–79
Anderson TI (1996) Genetic heterogeneity in breast cancer susceptibility. Acta Oncol 35:407–410
Zhang B, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Long J, Zheng W (2011) Genetic variants associated with breast-cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence. Lancet Oncol 12:477–488
Lin WY, Camp NJ, Cannon-Albright LA et al (2011) A role for XRCC2 gene polymorphisms in breast cancer risk and survival. J Med Genet 48:477–484
Silva SN, Tomar M, Paulo C, Gomes BC, Azevedo AP, Teixeira V, Pina JE, Rueff J, Gaspar JF (2010) Breast cancer risk and common single nucleotide polymorphisms in homologous recombination DNA repair pathway genes XRCC2, XRCC3, NBS1 and RAD51. Cancer Epidemiol 34:85–92
Fulda S (2009) Caspase-8 in cancer biology and therapy. Cancer Lett 281:128–133
Turnbull C, Rahman N (2008) Genetic predisposition to breast cancer: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 9:321–345
Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72:1117–1113
Begg CB, Haile RW, Borg A et al (2008) Variation of breast cancer risk among BRCA1/2 carriers. JAMA 299:194–201
Ricks-Santi LJ, Sucheston LE, Yang Y, Freudenheim JL, Isaacs CJ, Schwartz MD, Dumitrescu RG, Marian C, Nie J, Vito D, Edge SB, Shields PG (2011) Association of Rad51 polymorphism with DNA repair in BRCA1 mutation carriers and sporadic breast cancer risk. BMC Cancer 11:278
Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR et al (2017) Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 317:2402–2416
Rebbeck TR, Mitra N, Domchek SM et al (2011) Modification of BRCA1-associated breast and ovarian cancer risk by BRCA1-interacting genes. Cancer Res 71:5792–5805
Wang X, Pankratz VS, Fredericksen Z et al (2010) Common variants associated with breast cancer in genome-wide association studies are modifiers of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Hum Mol Genet 19:2886–2897
Dartois L, Fagherazzi G, Baglietto L et al (2016) Proportion of premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancers attributable to known risk factors: estimates from the E3N-EPIC cohort. Int J Cancer 138:2415–2427
Wilson LF, Page AN, Dunn NA et al (2013) Population attributable risk of modifiable risk factors associated with invasive breast cancer in women aged 45-69 years in Queensland, Australia. Maturitas 76:370–376
Taminimi RM, Spiegelman D, Smith-Warner SA, Wang M, Pazaris M, Willett WC, Eliassen AH, Huntr DJ (2016) Population attributable risk of modifiable and nonmodifiable breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 184:884–893
Coughlin SS, Besenyi GB, Bowen D, De Leo G (2017) Development of a smartphone application for preventing breast cancer in women. mHealth 13(3):288
Mokdad AH et al (2017) Trends and patterns of disparities in cancer mortality among US counties, 1980-2014. JAMA 317(4):388–406. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.20324
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coughlin, S.S. (2019). Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in Women. In: Ahmad, A. (eds) Breast Cancer Metastasis and Drug Resistance. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1152. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20300-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20301-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)