Abstract
In nature, mercury (Hg) occurs in the elemental form (Hg0), as well as in inorganic (InHg) and organic (OrgHg) compounds. It is the only heavy metal that is liquid at room temperature and easily turns into a gas. Mercury vapours can be transported with air masses for hundreds and thousands of kilometres and—after falling down—contribute to the pollution of land and waters. In aquatic environments biogeochemical processes promote the natural microbial conversion of InHg to methylmercury (MeHg), the most bioavailable form of Hg.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Human activities have increased atmospheric Hg concentrations 3–5 times over the past 150 years, mainly as a result of the combustion of fossil fuels. It is believed that all forms of Hg are toxic to endothermic animals and humans, but MeHg is particularly dangerous because of its neurotoxic and teratogenic effects as well as negative influence on reproduction. Moreover, in nature MeHg is biomagnified, and its concentration reaches the highest levels in top predators, especially piscivorous species. For several decades, there have also been reports documenting the local occurrence of dangerously high concentrations of Hg in organisms living in terrestrial ecosystems (including spiders, insects and songbirds feeding on them) in areas, which had been subject to anthropogenic Hg pollution many decades ago. Studies on inland aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems have indicated the long-term persistence of Hg introduced into the environment and the complexity of its transformations and circulation in nature. A better understanding of these processes requires further research, including the issue of bioaccumulation and biomagnification of MeHg in various ecosystems.
1 Introduction
Mercury causes many environmental and health problems. Together with lead and cadmium, it belongs to the group of particularly toxic metals, which do not have any physiological functions in warm-blooded vertebrates (including humans), and therefore even small amounts of absorbed mercury result in the disruption of biochemical processes in the body. Its elevated concentrations in birds and mammals lead to the development of many diseases (mainly in the nervous and excretory systems) and death (Clarkson and Magos 2006).
2 General Properties
Mercury (Hg from “hydrargyrum”, i.e. “liquid silver” from Greek “hydr-” for water and “argyros” for silver) is a heavy metal with a density of 13.55 g cm–3. It is the only metal which occurs in a liquid form at room temperature; its freezing point is –38.83°C and boiling point is 356.73°C. It has good electrical conductivity and high volatility, reaching a vapour pressure of 1.22 × 10–3 mm at 20°C (2.8 × 10–3 mm at 30°C). Its solubility in water is 6 × 10–6 g–1 100 ml (25°C). In the atomic table of elements, mercury is located in the group IIB, with atomic number 80 and atomic mass 200.59. There are 33 known isotopes of Hg, of which 7 are stable. The general pool of Hg is dominated by three isotopes: 199Hg, 200Hg and 202Hg. at 16.9%, 23.1% and 29.7%, respectively (Blum 2011). In the environment, mercury exists in the elemental form (Hg0) and in compounds with I (mercurous or Hg+) and II oxidation states (mercuric or Hg2+). Elemental mercury is an extremely good “solvent” for gold, silver and many other metals (except iron) via the formation of amalgams (alloys). It forms both inorganic and organic compounds, with the latter known as organomercurials. Common mercury salts contain halides (fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine) and sulphur (HgS). Organic compounds occur as R2Hg and RHgX, where R represents a simple alkyl group such as methyl (CH3 –) and X represents atoms or groups such as chlorine, bromine, iodine, cyanide and hydroxyl. Two of the organic compounds are monomethyl mercury CH3HgX (methylmercury, MeHg) and dimethyl mercury (CH3)2Hg, the most important chemical forms of Hg with respect to environmental impact assessments (National Research Council 2000; Scoullos et al. 2001).
3 Mercury in Nature
Mercury is a natural component of the Earth’s crust, occurring in soil, water and air where it penetrates into living organisms. In the environment it is found in an elemental form or in inorganic and organic compounds with varying degrees of toxicity to plants and animals, including vertebrates.
3.1 Mercury in the Abiotic Environment
It is estimated that Hg constitutes only 0.083 × 10–4% of the Earth’s crust and is in the 63rd position in terms of percentage share in the lithosphere. Mercury is present in the Earth’s upper crust at a mean concentration of ~0.05 mg kg–1 (ppm). Its abundance in igneous rocks is lower than in sedimentary rocks (0.004–0.08 and 0.01–0.40 ppm, respectively) and is mainly concentrated in argillaceous sediments. As a chalcophile element, this metal exhibits high affinity for sulphur and low to oxygen. Mercury occurs mainly in minerals containing sulphides and sulpho-salts and accompanies the ores of many metals (including copper, silver, zinc and lead). Generally, Hg is considered to be a rare element and extensively dispersed in the lithosphere (Yaroshevsky 2006; Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee 2007; Kabata-Pendias 2011).
About 90 Hg minerals have been described, including cinnabar (HgS) and calomel (Hg2Cl2). Various ores generally contain from 0.1 to 2.5% Hg and occasionally >7% Hg. In some parts of the world there are geological anomalies with very high accumulations of minerals rich in Hg. Geologists have described more than 2200 sites where ores not only contain significant amounts of mercury but where also the soil, deposits of coal and oil and inland waters are characterized by elevated Hg content. Most of these sites are located within three transcontinental belts, usually with significant volcanic activity. The first belt (Mediterraneo-Himalayan) runs from the Iberian Peninsula in Europe to the Himalayas in Asia, the second covers the area lying along the west coast of the Pacific, and the third runs through the western areas of the Americas, together with the Pacific Ocean adjoining them; therefore, the Pacific is surrounded by the zone naturally high in mercury (Rytuba 2003; AMAP/UNEP 2013). Ores containing cinnabar, the most widespread of natural mercury-containing minerals, are present in approximately 60 countries. Five of the richest deposits of Hg include three European sites (Almaden in Spain, Monte Amiata in Central Italy, Idrija in Slovenia) and one located in North America (including New Almaden and New Idria in California, USA) and in South America (Huancavelica in Peru). These deposits were exploited for hundreds of years but eventually were closed in the period 1982–2002 (Ferrara et al. 1999; Gnamuš and Horvat 1999; US GS 2016a). In addition to those already mentioned, areas particularly rich in mercury can be found in China and Kyrgyzstan (Scoullos et al. 2001; Hylander and Meili 2003; Gómez et al. 2007).
The concentration of Hg in environmental samples is generally low outside of these geological anomalies and areas anthropogenically contaminated by this element. Hg levels in the air in Greenland range between 0.01 and 0.06 ng m–3 and in snow and rainwater do not normally exceed 0.2 μg L–1. In inland surface waters, the concentration of Hg ranges from 0.2 to 1.0 μg L–1, and it is typically lower in rivers than in lakes (Adriano 2001). Globally, the average concentration of mercury in soils assumes is about 0.16 mg kg–1 dry weight, (range 0.06–0.20 mg kg–1 dw), but in European agricultural soils, it is markedly less and does not exceed 0.04 mg kg–1 dw (Adriano 2001; De Vos et al. 2006). Much higher values are listed in soils of volcanic origin, where the concentration of Hg can exceed 7 mg kg–1 (Kabata-Pendias 2011). From the environmental and economic points of view, the mercury content in mined and processed raw materials is most essential. These are mainly ores of mercury and other metals, which are accompanied by mercury, rocks used in the cement industry and fossil fuels (Table 17.1). To obtain mercury on an industrial scale, ore with an average content of 0.6–3.2% is exploited, while there are also deposits in Almaden (Spain) which comprise 8% Hg or 80,000 ppm. In addition, some local rocks there contain small drops of native mercury (Kim et al. 2004; Gómez et al. 2007). Most mercury mines in the world have been closed, with those remaining open are located mainly in Asia.
3.2 Mercury Production and Uses
Due to its unique properties, mercury and its compounds have been used in a variety of applications since ancient times. Over the centuries, cinnabar (vermilion) with a characteristic vivid red colour was widely used as a pigment in art, wall decorations, cosmetics and some medicines in Rome, mediaeval Europe, Egypt, India and China. Even in the twenty-first century, it is used in some ritualistic and spiritual practices. Up to now mercury was extracted in poor countries by heating cinnabar in a current of air and condensing the vapour. By 500 BC, mercury was used to make amalgams with other metals. This property of mercury to form alloys is still widely used, particularly in obtaining precious metals and the preparation of dental amalgams (“silver fillings”). Such cheap and permanent fillings have been used in dentistry since the nineteenth century. Since the last century, mercury has been used on a large scale in the chemical and electrochemical industries for electrical and electronic applications (among others in switches, batteries, fluorescent lamps and energy-saving light bulbs). It is also found in some control devices (thermometers, barometers and manometers) and some pesticides, although developed countries significantly reduced the use of mercury in various products and processes due to its high toxicity and environmental hazard (Caley 1928; Parsons and Percival 2005; Masur 2011; Teaf and Garber 2012).
The world’s richest source of cinnabar and quicksilver in Almaden (Spain) was operated for over 2000 years, with about 7 million tons of Hg extracted (Tejero et al. 2015). For comparison, from 1500 to 2000, the entire world production of Hg was less than 1 million tons, of which Almaden accounted for ~33% (Gómez et al. 2007; Hylander and Meili 2003; Tejero et al. 2015). As late as in 1971–1980, world production of Hg was very large, with an estimated production of 81,925 tons Hg, of which the former Soviet Union (including Ukraine, Russia, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan) accounted for 26%, Spain (Almaden) for 18% and the United States (California and Nevada) for 10.2% (Hylander and Meili 2003). Since then, the global excavation of Hg has dropped more than five times, and in the decade from 2001 to 2010, it amounted to a total of 16,310 tons (US GS 2001–2011). Table 17.2 shows the three countries with the highest production of Hg in the period 1980–2015.
By the end of 1970, mining mercury in European mines in Almaden, Monte Amiata, Idrija and North America, and Hg use in various sectors of the economy in those parts of the world, was significantly higher compared to developing countries in Europe and Asia. Over time, it changed significantly, and since 2005 China has been the world leader in extraction (Table 17.2). In 2015, 1600 tons Hg was excavated in China, accounting for nearly 70% of global production (US GS 2016b). It is estimated that 80% of the world’s mercury reserves have already been processed through human products (Meinert et al. 2016).
Before 1980 metallic mercury had been used in significant quantities, mainly for the extraction of gold and silver (for centuries), in dental amalgam fillings, as a catalyst in the chlor-alkali industry (where liquid Hg is the cathode, and this is one of three chlorine production technologies) and production of vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) used to synthesize polyvinyl chloride, PVC, to produce tubes, bottles, window frames and many articles. Moreover, metallic Hg is used in measuring devices, in electrical and electronic switches as well as in fluorescent lamps. Inorganic mercury compounds were used, among others, in Hg-oxide batteries, as pigments and dyes and as antiseptics in pharmaceuticals, while organic compounds of Hg (including alkyl forms) were used mainly as effective biocides in the paper industry and were added as an antifouling agent to paints and as fungicide to protect seeds and plants from fungal diseases (Hylander and Meili 2003). Due to the strong toxicity of mercury, already well documented in medical and ecotoxicological studies from 1950 to 1980, and focusing on the protection of health and care for the quality of the environment, regulations limiting economic exploitation, mining and trade of mercury have been gradually introduced in the European Union (EU) and North America. In those parts of the world, mercury mines had been shut before 2002. The consequence of the aforementioned actions was a drastic reduction in demand for mercury and a drop in its prices (Hylander and Meili 2003; Parsons and Percival 2005; Mohapatra and Mitchell 2009; UNEP 2013).
World mercury mining in 1980 was still relatively high at 6811 tons, but in 2005 it fell to 1520 tons. At that time, production and consumption of mercury shifted significantly from Europe and North America to Asia (US GS 1981, 2006). In 2005, including in Asia, Europe and North America, various sectors of the economy consumed 3188 tons Hg, of which Asia accounted for almost 67%, Europe (EU25 + CIS and other European countries) for 22.5% and North America 10.8% (AMAP/UNEP 2008). In Asia, most mercury is used in VCM and battery production (750 and 280 tons, respectively), in EU25 in mercury-cell chlor-alkali production (175 tons) and dental amalgam production (95 tons) and in North America in mercury-cell chlor-alkali production (60 tons) and production of measuring and control devices (48 tons). Several years later (in 2011), the global demand for mercury had dropped to 1930 tons, and the dominant recipient of this metal was chemical manufacturing (including 15% of the chlor-alkali industry and 21% of vinyl chloride monomer production) and artisanal and small-scale gold mining ASGM (24%) and batteries (13%), and further positions were dental amalgams 8%, measuring and control devices 7%, electrical and electronic devices 7% and fluorescent lighting 4% (UNEP 2013). According to a report by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) Global Mercury Partnership and its mercury-cell chlor-alkali production partnership area, this industry saw a very noticeable reduction in global demand for mercury. Between the base year 2005 and 2015, the consumption of mercury in the chlor-alkali industry fell by 50%, from 500 to 250 tons, resulting from the reduction in the number of plants that uses mercury in the production of chlorine and alkalis, through their closure or a shift into mercury-free technology (UNEP 2016), especially in this regard in the EU, where the use of mercury in chlor-alkali industry will have ceased in 2017 (Eurochlor 2016).
Although between 1980 and 2007 the global demand for mercury fell dramatically, and its production decreased almost six times (from 6811 to 1170 tons according to US GS in 1981, 2008), in recent years this downward trend has unfortunately changed, caused by the global economic crisis in 2008. For comparison, in 2008 and 2015, the global production of mercury was, respectively, 1320 and 2340 tons, significantly higher than in 2007 (US GS 2010, 2016b). The current increase in demand for mercury is significantly associated with an increased demand for gold, as its acquisition by the inexpensive method of amalgamation requires Hg. This method is mainly used in ASGM in developing countries (UNEP 2013).
3.2.1 Emission Sources of Mercury
Hg is released from natural (geogenic) and anthropogenic sources, including intentional (Hg acquisition from its ores, meeting the needs of certain sectors of the economy) and unintentional, that accompany various production and energy processes. Geogenic sources of mercury in nature include volcanic eruptions, weathering of rocks, natural forest fires and steppes and evaporation of the seas and oceans. Partially, these also include areas around active and abandoned Hg mines (with the deposited waste), often with significant levels of that element. Terrestrial sources and the oceans are credited with 48 and 52% of total annual emissions of mercury into the air. Researchers that from 80 to 600 tons of Hg reach from the land to the air, with the geogenic emissions mainly caused by mass burning (13%) and metal release from the desert, metalliferous and non-vegetated zones (10%), as well as some biomes such as tundra, grassland, savannah, prairie and chaparral (9%) (Pirrone et al. 2010; AMAP/UNEP 2013). In 2010 oceanic sources accounted for up to 2900 tons of Hg released into the global atmosphere, including the contribution from re-emission processes, which are emissions of previously deposited Hg originating from anthropogenic and natural sources, and primary emissions from natural reservoirs (AMAP/UNEP 2013).
Over the past few decades, the major sources of anthropogenic mercury unintentionally released into the air are the combustion of fossil fuels, mining and the processing of non-ferrous ores, cement production, natural gas cleaning, recycling and government stockpiles and incineration of sludge from biological treatment (Mohapatra and Mitchell 2009). Fossil fuels and various industrial raw materials usually contain small quantities of Hg (Table 17.1), but given the huge amounts used by man, their contribution to environmental pollution with Hg is a key position in its biogeochemical cycle. However, in 2010 it was recognized that global anthropogenic emissions of mercury to the air are mainly based on artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM), before the process of burning coal for the needs of electro-energy (AMAP/UNEP 2013). It is estimated that in 2010, Hg from anthropogenic sources amounted to about 2000 tons, and another 1000 tons was released into waters, wherein the emission of water is much less recognized and evaluated in comparison to the atmospheric release. It is believed that chlor-alkali plants, paper pulp factories and mine wastes have been the major industrial sources that discharge mercury waste into water bodies (Mohapatra and Mitchell 2009; AMAP/UNEP 2013; UNEP 2013). In 2010, global atmospheric mercury emissions totalled 8900 tons, of which the current emissions from natural and anthropogenic sources account for 80–600 tons and about 2000 tons. The remaining amount of Hg (60%) in the annual amount came from re-emission, with the terrestrial and oceanic volumes estimated to be 1700–2800 and 2000–2950 tons, respectively (AMAP/UNEP 2013).
For about 200 years, we have seen a significant increase in the quantity of mercury circulating in nature. This is indicated by comparative studies of lake bottom sediments, peat deposits and core glaciers (Schuster et al. 2002; Allan et al. 2013). It is estimated that, compared to pre-industrial times, the concentration of Hg in the atmosphere and in the geochemical background has increased at least three times and probably 5–10 times in relation to the natural level (Mason et al. 2012; Horowitz et al. 2014). On a global scale, in the period 1850–2010, unintentional anthropogenic sources (from “by-product” sectors including fossil fuel combustion) issued to the atmosphere 215,000 tons of mercury. During that time, a further 540,000 tons of mercury was introduced into the environment from intentional commercial Hg uses and nonatmospheric releases from chlor-alkali plants and mining processes. From this very large pool, 20% reached the air, 30% waters, 30% soils and 20% landfill wastes. Some of this mercury remains in landfills or is associated with bottom sediments, but a significant quantity (310,000 tons) actively participates in the geochemical cycle (Horowitz et al. 2014).
Emissions of mercury into the environment have clearly differed between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, where human economic activity releases 70% and 30% Hg, respectively (Pacyna et al. 2006; Selin et al. 2008; Pirrone et al. 2010; AMAP/UNEP 2013). This disparity in the emissions of Hg between the two hemispheres has historical, economic and demographic reasons.
Mercury released from natural and anthropogenic sources circulates in nature for a long time and is transmitted over long distances by strong atmospheric and ocean currents. Probably, it will take about a thousand years before mercury is released from stable formations in the lithosphere and circulating in the air-water-soil system, settles on the ocean floor and is permanently bound by mineral deposits in the rock formation processes (Mason et al. 2012; Horowitz et al. 2014).
Between 1980 and 2007, the mining of mercury decreased almost six times, which was driven by the results of numerous studies and regulations for the protection of health and the environment. Scientific studies provide ample evidence of the strong toxicity of Hg (especially MeHg) on humans and other warm-blooded vertebrates and document a dramatic increase in the amount of anthropogenic environment (Hylander and Meili 2003; Clarkson and Magos 2006; Horowitz et al. 2014). Out of many disasters caused by environmental Hg poisoning, the best known are the tragic events from the Japanese Minamata Bay from the 1950s, with the mass Hg poisoning of residents, their cats and wild birds, via the fish and seafood consumed. The primary source of mercury was wastewater from chemical plants discharging into the bay. The increasing awareness of risks arising from the increase in the amount of anthropogenic Hg in the environment has led to the introduction of regulations aimed at limiting the extraction, use and trade of Hg and consequently a reduction in the release of mercury into the air, water and soil from anthropogenic sources. Such pro-health and pro-environmental legislative action were taken earliest in the well-developed countries of the EU, North America and Japan, but globally more important will be the implementation of the provisions of the Minamata Convention, adopted on 10 October 2013 at a diplomatic conference held in Kumamoto, Japan. The convention entered into force on 16 August 2017 (www.mercuryconvention.org).
3.3 Biological Status of Mercury
According to current knowledge, mercury does not have any physiological function in eukaryotic and in most prokaryotic organisms. Its accumulation results in various life-threatening disorders and can lead to fatal poisoning (Clarkson 1992; Barkay and Wagner-Döbler 2005; Scheuhammer et al. 2015). Recently, Gregoire and Poulain (2016) showed a peculiar exception among prokaryotes: photosynthetic microorganisms from the group of purple non-sulphur bacteria (representing genera Rhodobacter and Rhodopseudomonas) are able to use Hg as an electron acceptor during photosynthesis.
Mercury was identified thousands of years ago and is one of the oldest toxicants known. The three forms of Hg, i.e. elemental, inorganic and organic mercury (especially CH3Hg-R; methyl-Hg or MeHg), have different toxicological properties. Mercury can occur in compounds either in +1 or +2 oxidation state, i.e. in mercurous(I) and mercuric(II) compounds, respectively. In nature, inorganic divalent Hg(II) compounds predominate, with relatively few monovalent Hg(I) compounds. Monovalent Hg compounds are less toxic than Hg(II) compounds as they are less soluble in water (WHO 2003; Park and Zheng 2012).
The biogeochemical cycle of Hg and toxicity involve bacteria that produce MeHg. In the environment some anaerobic sulphate- and iron-reducing bacteria can methylate oxidized mercury (Hg2+) and to a smaller degree Hg0, thus generating MeHg (Hu et al. 2013; Li and Cai 2013). Biologically mediated production of MeHg predominantly occurs under anaerobic conditions in sediments of inland waters, nearshore and oceanic sea floors, as well as in peatlands, wetland soils and some rice paddy fields, for example, in China (Zhang et al. 2010; Gu et al. 2011; Windham-Myers et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2016). MeHg is also present in most if not all aquatic organisms. Methylation of InHg to MeHg and demethylation of MeHg are the two most important processes in the cycling of MeHg, determining the levels of MeHg in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Aerobic bacteria have evolved an efficient strategy of eliminating mercuric (Hg2+) and organic mercury compounds (including MeHg) from the environment through the reduction of Hg2+ to Hg0 (Li and Cai 2013).
Methylation and biomagnification of Hg have been well researched in aquatic ecosystems due to the consumption of Hg-contaminated fish, crayfish and molluscs, which may lead to poisoning of humans and other warm-blooded vertebrates. By contrast, studies on Hg and especially MeHg in terrestrial ecosystems are few (Clarkson 1992; Larosa and Allen-Gil 1995; Wolfe et al. 1998; Jackson et al. 2011; Douglas et al. 2012; Kalisinska et al. 2012a; Rieder et al. 2013; Scheuhammer et al. 2015). Since MeHg in aquatic ecosystems is subject to biomagnification, Hg reaches its highest levels in predatory fish, piscivorous birds and marine and semiaquatic mammals. Mercury concentrations in those biotas can be many millions of times greater than in the waters which serve as their aquatic habitat or food source (Lavoie et al. 2013; Finley et al. 2016). The greatest increase in MeHg concentration occurs in the trophic step between water and algae. It is estimated that the biomagnification factor (BMF) between water and seston often ranges from ~105 to ~106 with the BMF of MeHg concentrations between successive trophic levels above algae generally less than 101 (Wolfe et al. 2007). In terrestrial ecosystems, biomagnification of MeHg also occurs, yet this phenomenon has been much less researched (Rimmer et al. 2010; Rieder et al. 2013; Osborn et al. 2011; Jackson et al. 2015; Abeysinghe et al. 2017).
3.4 Mercury Toxicity
In the 1950s, dramatic events took place in the Japanese Bay of Minamata with many lethal mercury poisonings in humans, cats and wild birds. Over 3000 brain-damaged victims were diagnosed with “Minamata disease”, and veterinary medicine introduced the term “dancing cats” to describe the neurological symptoms observed in cats. Both “Minamata disease” and “dancing cats” were the result of Hg poisoning accompanied by other contaminants spilled into the gulf from a nearby chemical factory. In the gulf’s sediments, bacteria transformed inorganic mercury into MeHg, whose levels progressively increased in organisms from successive trophic levels. Large amounts of MeHg in fish, crustaceans and mussels were consumed by humans and animals inhabiting those areas, resulting in diseases and fatal poisonings (D’Itri 1991; Aronson 2005; Hachiya 2006; Ekino et al. 2007; Grandjean et al. 2010). Also in the 1950s, MeHg toxicity in the developing brain was first recognized in cases of congenital Minamata disease among newborns and children. At the same time, it was noted that the mothers had no symptoms of Hg toxicity or were minimal (Clarkson and Magos 2006; Ekino et al. 2007).
A few later studies from the 1960s to 1970s were conducted by Swedish naturalists on birds and rodents feeding on grains and on predators feeding on these granivores. They showed that Hg poisoning can also occur in terrestrial environments, not just aquatic environments. Inorganic and organic Hg compounds (including MeHg) were then common components of pesticides (fungicides) serving as seed dressing. Large quantities of Hg from the fungicides were detected in granivores and even larger levels in predatory birds and mammals preying on the passerines and rodents (Borg et al. 1969; Johnles and Westermark 1969). From 1960 to 1990, Hg-containing fungicides had been banned in Northern Hemisphere countries with highly developed agriculture (UNEP 2002). After all those years, it is very difficult to determine how much of the Hg pesticides has been introduced into the environment since the usage (launched in the first quarter of the twentieth century) lasted dozens of years. In the United States, Sweden and Japan, it is estimated that 800, 600 and 1600 tons of Hg fungicides were sprayed each year in rural areas of those countries (with Japan being more than 20 times smaller in area than in the United States) (Smart 1968; Kiesling and Lloyd 1971). Currently, agricultural soils are also being contaminated with anthropogenic Hg due to fertilization with sewage sludge, but this process is much less intense. It is estimated that in the EU, the Hg concentrations in sewage sludge recycled to agriculture vary among its member states from 0.2 to 4.6 mg kg–1 dw (Milieu Ltd. WRc and RPA 2010). In the 2000s the amount of mercury introduced into agricultural soils in the 27 EU countries probably exceeded 4 tons per year (AMAP/UNEP 2013). Total Hg from atmospheric deposition (derived from natural and anthropogenic sources) of agricultural origin and released from soil rocks contributes to pollution of the terrestrial environment. Mercury is washed away from these areas and is transported to various waters bodies where it is methylated and (partly as Hg0) is released into the atmosphere and transported over considerable distances. In addition, soils in river valleys are exposed to various forms of Hg during periodic inundations. However, in aquatic environments, as compared to land, Hg is to a much greater degree integrated into food chains, and aquatic food can be a significant threat to the health of humans and wildlife. Generally free-living terrestrial animals are chronically exposed to low concentrations of Hg contained in food, water and ambient air. Mercury toxicity has been studied at the levels of molecules, cells, tissues, organisms, species and ecosystems (Borg et al. 1969; Wren 1984; Scheuhammer et al. 1998a, b; Aschner 2000; Schurz et al. 2000; Silva-Pereira et al. 2005; Wolfe et al. 2007).
The toxicity of mercury has been attributed to its high affinity to protein-containing sulfhydryl (thiol) groups (–SH). These groups are especially abundant in proteins containing cysteine and methionine, which are sulphur amino acids. Proteins rich in cysteine include glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), metallothioneins (MTs) and keratins. GSH-Px belongs to the family of very important antioxidant enzymes, which also contain selenium (Se) (Clarkson and Magos 2006). MTs and keratin structures (including hair and feathers) may contain up to 30% and 26% of cysteine, respectively (Clarkson and Magos 2006; Agarwal and Behari 2007; Greenwold and Sawyer 2013). The MTs are low-molecular-weight proteins and are present in various cells (especially in the liver and kidneys) and serum of vertebrates, but they were also discovered in invertebrates. MTs have a few main hypothesized functions: homeostasis of essential metals such as zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu), detoxification of non-essential Hg and cadmium (Cd), protection against oxidative damage and free radical scavenging (Isani and Carpenè 2014).
All mercury species are accumulated by eukaryotic organisms. Vertebrates can uptake toxic mercury from the environment through the lungs, gills, skin and from the digestive tract. In wildlife the alimentary tract plays the most important route. From avian and mammalian gastrointestinal tracts, MeHg is most effectively absorbed at a rate over 90%. InHg is absorbed from the diet, at most at a rate of a few to a dozen percent, and Hg0 at <0.01% (Serafin 1984; Clarkson and Magos 2006; Park and Zheng 2012; Ye et al. 2016). Inhaled Hg0 vapour in the lungs of mammals is absorbed at up to 85%, as demonstrated by experimental research on mammals and epidemiological studies of humans occupationally exposed to mercury vapour (Pendergrass et al. 1997; Falnoga et al. 2000; Bose-O’Reilly et al. 2010; Bernhoft 2012).
Mercury toxicity studies have taken into account many factors, including the physico-chemical properties of this element. Mercury is classified as a chalcophile element (alongside Se, Cd and Pb), with a typically higher affinity to sulphur (S) and a lower affinity to oxygen (O) than iron (Fe). In living organisms, Hg is highly competitive in relation to essential metals, mainly Zn and Cu, which are displaced from the S binding sites in cysteine to be replaced by Hg+2 and/or MeHg+. Sulphur amino acids (cysteine, Cys, and methionine, Met) are constituents of enzyme, transport and structural proteins, which after binding to Hg change their properties and structure (Grosicki and Kowalski 2002; Fraga 2005; García-Barrera et al. 2012; Dobrakowski et al. 2013). In the case of Cys, over the course of evolution, S has been replaced by Se to form the 21st amino acid, selenocysteine (SeCys). It is a natural component of selenoproteins in all animal kingdoms including vertebrates (Lu and Holmgren 2009). From this group of proteins, the most important are enzymes such as GSH-Px, thioredoxin reductase and iodothyronine deiodinase. These proteins participate in the antioxidant protection of cells and the metabolism of thyroid hormones and of immunological processes. Selenoproteins may contain from 1 to 15 SeCys per protein subunit (Ralston et al. 2008; Mehdi et al. 2013). MeHg+ ions possess electrophilic properties, and they interact with and oxidize nucleophilic groups of various biomolecules, especially those containing sulfhydryl groups. Besides proteins (i.e. antioxidant enzymes, neurotransmitter receptors, transporters), sulphydryl groups contain nonprotein thiols such as cysteine and glutathione, GSH (Farina et al. 2013). GSH is an important antioxidant in animals, preventing damage to cellular components caused by reactive oxygen species and other factors including Hg+2 and MeHg+ (Schurz et al. 2000; Pompella et al. 2003; Clarkson and Magos 2006; Wolfe et al. 2007).
As the binding affinity of Hg for Se is up to a million times higher than for S, Hg (especially Hg2+ and MeHg+) inexorably sequesters Se, directly impairing selenoenzyme activity and synthesis. At the same time, Se compounds are able to decrease the toxicity of Hg, which has been established in all investigated species of mammals, birds and fish (Dietz et al. 2000; Belzile et al. 2009; Ralston and Raymond 2010).
3.4.1 Mercury Cytotoxicity, Genotoxicity, Cancerogenicity and Teratogenicity
The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the various forms of Hg are evaluated mainly in vitro assays on human and non-human cell lines (De Flora et al. 1994; Silva-Pereira et al. 2005; Robinson et al. 2010; Polunas et al. 2011; Fernandes Azevedo et al. 2012; Roy et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2013, 2016). The results of in vivo Hg genotoxicity tests (based mostly on leucocytes) that assessed the damage of nuclear genetic material (comet assay, micronucleus test, chromosome aberration tests) do not always confirm differences between the material obtained from warm-blooded vertebrates exposed to Hg and from control/comparison groups (Hansteen et al. 1993; Rozgaj et al. 2005; Kenow et al. 2008; Crespo-López et al. 2009). Various ions of Hg exhibit a high ability to bind –SH groups of protein and nonprotein compounds, and on this ground a number of hypotheses have been formulated about molecular mechanisms of Hg genotoxicity. In this respect, the most commonly mentioned are four mechanisms: oxidative stress connected with generation of free radicals, effect on microtubules, influence on DNA repair mechanisms and direct interaction with DNA molecules (De Flora et al. 1994; Myers and Davidson 1998; Burbacher et al. 1990; Crespo-López et al. 2009).
In vitro cytotoxicity studies have shown that in various human and animal cell lines, both InHg and MeHg induce numerous adverse changes. These changes mainly rely on altering mitochondrial function and raising oxidative stress by generating free radicals or by interacting with sulfhydryl groups (Polunas et al. 2011; Farina et al. 2013; Agrawal et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2013, 2016). Additionally, in human embryonic neural progenitor cells, MeHg induces oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA (Wang et al. 2016).
The carcinogenetic potential of InHg is still being debated. In the 1990s the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC 1993) classified MeHg compounds as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), but metallic mercury and InHg compounds were not classifiable as carcinogenic to humans (Group 3). The classifications of MeHg, Hg0 and InHg are still in use by the IARC (2017). Drasch et al. (2004) reviewed papers concerning the influence of Hg on laboratory rats and mice and revealed that male rats receiving extremely high oral doses of HgCl2 or MeHgCl had an increased number of renal tubule tumours. These compounds caused severe nephropathy in the rodents. It is likely that dietary MeHgCl may act in mice as a tumour promoter. However, the connection between Hg exposure and carcinogenesis remains controversial (Drasch et al. 2004; Crespo-López et al. 2009).
Methylmercury is known as an embryotoxic and teratogenic agent. The teratogenicity of MeHg is well documented in fish, birds, mammals and humans. This compound especially affects normal development of the central nervous system (Domingo 1994; Samson and Shenker 2000; Schurz et al. 2000; Heinz et al. 2011; Gandhi et al. 2013). In addition to the already mentioned adverse effects of Hg on wildlife, its effects on endocrine and immune systems are also important (Zhu et al. 2000; Kenow et al. 2007; Tan et al. 2009). Tan et al. (2009) listed five main endocrine-related mechanisms of Hg across these systems: (a) accumulation in the endocrine system, (b) specific cytotoxicity in endocrine tissues, (c) changes in hormone concentrations, (d) interactions with sex hormones and (e) upregulation or downregulation of enzymes within the steroidogenesis pathway. However, disorder and impairment of endocrine and immune systems by Hg and the net effects on the demography of wild animals are poorly understood (Kenow et al. 2007; Frederick and Jayasena 2011).
3.4.2 Mercury Neurotoxicity and Lethal Levels of Total Mercury in Soft Tissues
All three Hg species may occur in the brain, including elemental Hg. A certain part of inhaled Hg0 is deposited in the brain as demonstrated in humans and laboratory animals (Warfvinge et al. 1992; Tjälve and Henriksson 1999; Bose-O’Reilly et al. 2010; Park and Zheng 2012). Also Hg0 can be transported through the olfactory pathway to the olfactory bulbs and later into other brain areas (Galić et al. 1999; Tjälve and Henriksson 1999; Park and Zheng 2012). As Hg0 is lipid soluble and highly diffusible, it can cross the blood-brain barrier and other cellular and intracellular membranes (Park and Zheng 2012). In humans inhalation of Hg0 vapour can cause acute and chronic intoxication. Typical symptoms connecting with this include airway symptoms and many neurological problems (tremor, ataxia, coordination disturbances, abnormal reflexes, polyneuropathy with sensation difficulties, loss of memory, neurocognitive disorders) as well as kidney problems such as proteinuria (Bose-O’Reilly et al. 2010). In laboratory animals, the neurological symptoms following exposure to Hg0 are poorly understood, but in rats a significant increase in Hg concentrations in different parts of the brain (primarily in the neocortex, in the basal nuclei and in the cerebellar granule cells) and in the kidneys were shown in comparison to the control group (Warfvinge et al. 1992; Galić et al. 1999). Unlike elemental and organic mercury species, the oxidized Hg forms (Hg2+) are not able to effectively cross the blood-brain barrier, but such process could not be excluded (Park and Zheng 2012). Organic Hg compounds, especially MeHg, can easy cross the blood-brain barrier (however, less efficiently as Hg0) and are accumulated in vertebrate brains. The probable active transport of MeHg (via neutral amino acid transporters) into the brain is preceded by the formation of MeHg-cysteine complexes (ADSTR 1999; Clarkson and Magos 2006). MeHg does not uniformly affect the nervous system, and Hg concentration in the brain varies between the compartments (Eto et al. 1999, 2010; Farina et al. 2013).
Speciation analyses of brain Hg in vertebrates show that a much larger proportion of THg is present in the form of MeHg (typically >80%) and a small fraction as InHg. Depending on the degree and duration of exposure to MeHg, the percentage of brain THg may change over time and varies greatly between individuals of the same species and between various species. In extreme cases in some people exposed to MeHg in childhood and for more than 20 years, up to 80% of brain THg may be InHg (Farina et al. 2013). Most wildlife is exposed to long-term exposure to small amounts of MeHg contained in the diet, with the exception of long-living piscivorous species. MeHg, which has penetrated into the brain, is gradually demethylated and transformed into InHg. The demethylation of MeHg has been found in the brain of humans and several wild species of birds and mammals from inland environments (Eto et al. 1999; Gnamuš and Horvat 1999; Scheuhammer et al. 2008; Strom 2008; Eagles-Smith et al. 2009; Haines et al. 2010; Basu 2012; Kalisinska et al. 2014a; Jo et al. 2015). Presumably, the remaining part of brain InHg can occur in insoluble and biologically inert compounds with selenium such as tiemannite (HgSe) (Whanger 2001; Nakazawa et al. 2011). In long-lived animals and humans, the half-life for MeHg in the brain is determined in days or months, but for InHg it is many years (Vahter et al. 1994; ADSTR 1999; Rice et al. 2014). Until recently it had been assumed that MeHg that gets into the brain did not leave, similar to InHg produced by MeHg demethylation or oxidation of Hg0. However, works by Lohren et al. (2015, 2016), investigating MeHg and InHg transfer across the blood-brain barrier in a primary in vitro porcine model, may lead to the revision of this view. In the latter paper, Lohren et al. (2016), the researchers documented the transport of MeHg via the barrier in both directions, with diffusion as the transfer mechanism. Additionally for HgCl2, their data delivered evidence that the blood-brain barrier transfers InHg out of the brain.
Lethal brain levels of Hg have not yet been established for most mammals and birds. In literature, in the brains of piscivorous mammals experimentally intoxicated with MeHg, river otter Lontra canadensis and American mink Neovison vison (previously Mustela vison), Hg levels were 23.7 and 19.9 mg kg–1 ww and 11.9 mg kg–1 ww, respectively (Aulerich et al. 1974; Wobeser et al. 1976; O’Connor and Nielsen 1981). In field studies in North America, brain Hg in single dead or dying river otter and mink were ~30 and 13.4 mg kg–1 ww, respectively (Wren 1985; Sleeman et al. 2010; Wobeser and Swift 1976). A lower range was shown by THg concentrations (8.1–18.6 mg kg–1 ww) in experimentally and non-intentionally intoxicated domestic cats from Japan and Northwestern Ontario Reserve (Canada), which revealed neurological symptoms typical for Minamata disease (Takeuchi et al. 1977). Shore et al. (2011) defined >10 mg THg kg–1 ww as a lower indicative value in mammalian brains, which may be associated with adverse effects on survival and resulting in death. Krey et al. (2015) analysed a large number of reports on mammalian brain Hg concentrations and proposed a THg threshold concentrations for toxic endpoints: clinical symptoms >6.75 mg kg–1 ww (29 mg kg–1 dw), neuropathological signs >4 mg kg–1 ww (17.2 mg kg–1 dw), neurochemical changes >0.4 mg kg–1 ww (1.72 mg kg–1 dw) and neurobehavioral changes >0.1 mg kg–1 ww (0.43 mg kg–1 dw).
In adult passerines (starling Sturnus vulgaris, grackle Quiscalus quiscula, red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus, brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater, zebra finch Poephila guttata and piscivorous great egret Ardea albus), which were experimentally intoxicated with MeHg, the concentration of brain THg was in the range of 20–45 mg kg–1 ww (Finley et al. 1979; Scheuhammer 1988; Spalding et al. 2000). The highest THg residues in brains among wild birds found dead in fields were within the range of 13–14 mg kg–1 ww: in tawny owl Strix aluco from Norway feeding on small rodents, piscivorous white-tailed eagle Haliaeetus albicilla from Sweden and common loon Gavia immer from Canada (Jensen et al. 1972; Holt et al. 1979; Scheuhammer et al. 2008). The values found in wild birds were clearly smaller than in experimental studies, but free-living animals are more exposed to various adverse environmental factors, including food shortages, than captive ones (Van der Molen et al. 1982; Wiener et al. 2003). A combination of the environmental factors can cause premature death before brain THg levels in birds reach ≥20 mg kg–1 ww, established as lethal in laboratory conditions. In addition, dead animals are quickly eaten by scavengers, which is why they are rarely obtained for analysis. It has been experimentally shown that chicks are more sensitive to the toxic effects of Hg than adult birds. Data presented by Heinz and Locke (1976) indicate that lethal brain THg levels can be as low as 3–7 ppm in mallard ducklings. Shore et al. (2011) suggested indicative values of THg concentrations for avian brains of non-marine species, which may be associated with bird deaths at >15 mg kg–1 ww and >3 mg kg–1 ww in adults and developing youngs, respectively, and correspond well to data from Jensen et al. (1972), Holt et al. (1979), Scheuhammer et al. (2008) and Heinz and Locke (1976). Neurological symptoms (e.g. trembling) have been observed in 1 hatch-year osprey with 1.2 mg kg–1 ww THg in the brain (or 6.2 mg kg–1 dw) (Hopkins et al. 2007). However, THg threshold concentrations for toxic endpoints analogous to those proposed for mammals have not been developed, i.e. ones that would include subclinical, neuropathological, neurochemical and neurobehavioral changes, although some attempts have been made in this regard (Scheuhammer et al. 2008; Rutkiewicz et al. 2011; Rutkiewicz 2012).
Mercury is not only neurotoxic but also nephrotoxic for elemental and inorganic mercury species. The kidney is a major repository of InHg in warm-blooded vertebrates. Within the kidney divalent Hg accumulates primarily in the cortex and outer stripe of the outer medulla (Aschner and Aschner 1990; Wolfe et al. 1998; Bridges and Zalups 2010). It should be underlined that birds differ from mammals in having a renal portal system. In birds the venous blood from the terminal portion of the digestive tract flows to the kidney rather than the liver, as in mammals. This may make the avian kidney more vulnerable than the mammalian (Wolfe et al. 1998). Indicative values of THg concentrations in mammalian kidney associated with death, as proposed by Shore et al. (2011), are lower than in avian species, >25–30 mg kg–1 ww compared to >40 mg kg–1 ww. Also THg indicative value estimated for the adult mammalian brain are lower than in the analogous avian organ. However, in the case of the liver, the indicative value is higher in mammals than birds: >25–30 THg kg–1 versus >20 mg THg kg–1 (Shore et al. 2011).
Lethal concentrations of THg in the soft tissues of mammals and birds are most commonly determined in the liver and kidney, followed by the brain. Muscles are rarely taken into consideration, although they constitute a large part of the body weight of the animals, and the collection of muscle samples is easy when compared to the brain (Finley et al. 1979; O’Connor and Nielsen 1981; Wren et al. 1987; Farrar et al. 1994; Thompson 1996; Shore et al. 2011; WVDL 2015). In addition, the efficient functioning and coordination of skeletal muscles play a key role, especially in predators, because they co-determine the effectiveness of hunting. Based on relatively scarce data concerning THg concentrations in tissue pairs: liver (L)–muscle (M) and muscle–brain (B) in adult individuals of wild animals and birds, and those experimentally intoxicated with organomercury, correlation coefficients (r) and the values of two indices MTHg/LTHg and BTHg/MTHg were calculated, and potentially lethal muscle THg concentrations were estimated. In both animal groups, an increasing hepatic THg concentration was initially accompanied by a marked increase in muscle levels (Fig. 17.1, panels a and b). After exceeding ~10 mg kg–1 ww in the muscle, the increase in THg slowed down and stabilized at 25–35 and 25–40 mg kg–1 ww in mammals and birds, respectively, while the hepatic THg significantly exceeded 100 mg kg–1 ww over time in some cases. Among inland mammalian and avian species, the highest hepatic THg levels were detected in river otter (96 mg kg–1 ww) and common loon (200 mg kg–1 and 370 mg kg–1 ww) (Wren 1985; Stone and Okoniewski 2001; Scheuhammer et al. 2008). In the livers of marine mammals and birds, levels exceeding 1000 and 200 mg THg kg–1 ww, respectively, were found in some cases (Kim et al. 1996; Storelli et al. 1999; Pompe-Gotal et al. 2009).
In the multispecies groups of mammals and birds, the correlation coefficient between the concentration of THg in the liver and muscle exceeded 0.95, and the values of r were, respectively, 0.928 and 0.964 (Fig. 17.1, panels a and b). Using the appropriate equations from panels A and B, we calculated THg concentrations for avian and mammalian muscle when the concentration of hepatic THg reached the lower limit values of the estimated lethal range (25 and 20 mg kg–1 ww, respectively) (Shore et al. 2011). At these hepatic THg concentrations in mammalian and avian muscle, potentially lethal values were 9.8 and 7.3 mg kg–1 ww. Other researchers had also found a significant correlation (r ranging from 0.60 to 0.98) between muscle and hepatic THg concentrations in inland mammals (Lord et al. 2002; Millan et al. 2008; Strom 2008; Kalisinska et al. 2009; Lodenius et al. 2014) and birds (Hopkins et al. 2007; Eagles-Smith et al. 2008), although not always (Halbrook et al. 1994; Kalisinska et al. 2010; Lanocha et al. 2014). These ambiguous results may be related to the large variations of hepatic THg concentration and MTHg/LTHg index in endothermic animals exposed to Hg. The mean value of the index is statistically higher in mammals than birds (0.42 versus 0.31, t = 2.34; p < 0.03). Wolfe et al. (2007) emphasized a poor correlation between liver THg concentration and its effects. Unlike the liver, the muscle THg concentration is more representative of brain THg concentration and correlates better with its effect. Moreover, MeHg is a dominant species of Hg in the brain and muscle tissues. These suggestions are supported by our analysis of data on THg concentration in the muscle and brain of mammals and birds combined into one group (Fig. 17.1, panel c). The correlation coefficient for this relationship exceeded 0.97, and values of the index BTHg/MTHg for mammals and birds were close, at 0.73 and 0.82, respectively. In another study, Shore et al. (2011) suggested that the lethal concentrations of THg in the brain of mammals and birds are >10 and >15 mg kg–1 ww, respectively. Taking into consideration the equation from panel c, it may be assumed that the lethal THg level in muscle is about 13 mg kg–1 ww for mammals and 18 mg kg–1 ww for birds. On the basis of equations from Fig. 17.1, it can be assumed that the lethal concentration of THg in the muscles of mammals and birds is in the range 10–13 mg kg–1 ww and 7–18 mg kg–1 ww, respectively. Heinz (1996), based on literature data, estimated that muscle Hg concentrations associated with harmful Hg exposure in adult birds ranged from 15 to 30 mg kg–1 ww. In the context of our analysis of avian muscle, it seems that the lower value suggested by Heinz (1996) is more likely.
3.4.3 Inorganic and Organic Mercury Distribution in Bodies of Mammals and Birds
The three forms of Hg (elemental, inorganic and organic) that penetrate the organisms of vertebrates differ with respect to their toxicokinetics regarding absorption, distribution and accumulation. In laboratory studies, the influence of MeHg (in MeHgCl form) and mercury compounds of Hg(II) (especially HgCl2) are most frequently investigated. Mercurous mercury Hg(I), for example, in the form of mercurous chloride (Hg2Cl2), is little absorbed in the body. This compound readily dissociates in body fluids where, from Hg2Cl2, double atom cations of Hg2 2+ are realized and from this is formed one atom of divalent Hg2+ and another of elemental mercury (Hg0). Elemental mercury from this unimportant source and the vapour of this metal from inhaled air are oxidized into the mercuric form (Hg2+) in erythrocytes and tissues. Both inorganic and organic Hg species are excreted primarily in faeces. Absorption of MeHg from the digestive tract in warm-blooded vertebrates is very high (about 90%), with a great amount of it excreted in faeces (about 85–90%) and 5% with urine. Scientists have estimated that only up to 15% of absorbed MeHg is incorporated in various tissues and organs. Fur or hair in mammals as well as feather in birds are also an important route of excretion, especially MeHg (Farris et al. 1993; Clarkson and Magos 2006; Wolfe et al. 2007).
Mammalian pelt and avian plumage sometimes incorporates even >80% of THg in the body. MeHg is permanently built into hair and feathers during their growth. It is a dominant species of Hg in these tissues and becomes biologically inactive there, as confirmed in studies on experimental animals and wildlife from inland ecosystems. After long exposure to MeHg in laboratory experiments and chronic exposure of wildlife, MeHg and/or THg concentrations in these keratin skin structures usually reach the highest values in comparison to liver, kidney, brain and muscle THg (Thomas et al. 1988; Farris et al. 1993; Wood et al. 1996; DesGranges et al. 1998; Mierle et al. 2000; Hyvärinen et al. 2003; Bennett et al. 2009; Lieske et al. 2011; Nam et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2014). However, THg and/or MeHg are rarely assayed in all of the mentioned tissues in the same individuals. Eventually, MeHg is removed from mammalian and avian bodies during moulting, and therefore hair and feathers are also an important additional route of Hg excretion (Honda et al. 1986; Farris et al. 1993; Clarkson and Magos 2006; Wolfe et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2014; Evans et al. 2016). After Hg in fur and feathers, the second largest Hg pool can be found in skeletal muscles, with up to 50% of the remaining MeHg in the body (Farris et al. 1993; DesGranges et al. 1998; Saeki et al. 2000; Nam et al. 2005) from the large proportion of skeletal muscles in the body mass of vertebrates and their vasculature. For example, in the body of predatory mammals and birds, these muscles represent on average 50–55% and 30–40% of body mass, respectively (Honda et al. 1986; Biewener 2011; Muchlinski et al. 2012), and in the case of fish, it is up to 70% of their body weight (Kisia 1996). In the muscles of warm-blooded vertebrates from inland ecosystems, Hg occurs mainly in the form of MeHg (70–95% of THg), and the concentration is usually low (<0.50 mg kg–1 ww), with the exception of the muscles of fish species near the top of a food web and piscivorous wildlife (Wren et al. 1980; Mason et al. 1986; Rothschild and Duffy 2005; Kinghorn et al. 2007; Strom 2008; Ruelas-Inzunza et al. 2009; Chumchal et al. 2011; Burger et al. 2013; Hall et al. 2014; Kalisinska et al. 2014a, b, 2017; Wentz et al. 2014). Observed transient storage of large amounts of MeHg in the muscle may protect other tissues against MeHg toxicity.
Because of the large proportion of muscles in body weight and easily digestible MeHg contained in them, they play an important role in the transfer of this substance from freshwater invertebrates and fish to semiaquatic piscivores and benthophages and from carrion of these animals to terrestrial scavengers (Sheffy and St Amant 1982; Halbrook et al. 1994; Langlois and Langis 1995; Fortin et al. 2001; Evers et al. 2005; Chumchal et al. 2011; Kalisinska et al. 2009, 2016). However, mercury, especially MeHg, is rarely assayed in the muscles of warm-blooded vertebrates. Among the tissues of terrestrial vertebrates, Hg achieves the highest concentration in the liver and kidneys, so THg is most frequently analysed in these organs, although in total they account for no more than 4–6% of the body weight of mammals and birds (Fischer and Bartlett 1957; Holliday et al. 1967; Hughes 1970; Kruska and Schreiber 1999; Lanszki et al. 2008; Balk et al. 2009; Kalisinska et al. 2010). In the kidney and livers of many fish-eating mammalian and avian species, the percentage of MeHg decreases as THg concentration increases in the organs (Norheim and Frøslie 1978; Wiener et al. 2003; Gamberg et al. 2005a). The liver and kidney have been suggested as one of the major sites of MeHg demethylation in mammals and birds. Above the threshold value of 10 mg THg kg–1 dw (~3 mg THg kg–1 ww), hepatic %MeHg declines rapidly from a high value (~90%) (Eagles-Smith et al. 2009). However, interspecies differences are observed in this respect, and hepatic intensification of MeHg demethylation in birds can occur already in the range of 5–7 mg THg kg–1 dw, because then %MeHg in THg falls below 70% (Scheuhammer et al. 1998b; Dietz et al. 2013; Kalisinska et al. 2014c). Some researchers (Gamberg et al. 2005a; Martin et al. 2011) suggest that in piscivorous mammals (such as mink), the demethylation process of hepatic MeHg is activated well below the 30 mg THg kg–1 dw threshold (10 mg kg–1 ww) suggested by Wiener et al. (2003). Energy costs of MeHg demethylation in avian and mammalian livers are probably high but to date have not been estimated (Eagles-Smith et al. 2009; Dietz et al. 2013; Kalisinska et al. 2014c). Methylmercury demethylation is observed in tissues other than the liver and kidney but at a lower intensity and efficiency. This process is well documented in the brain of a number of mammals and birds, including terrestrial species. However, species of endothermic animals differ in the proportion of brain MeHg to THg (Vahter et al. 1994; Farina et al. 2003; Scheuhammer et al. 2008, 2015). It is generally assumed that demethylation of MeHg in fish and other vertebrate muscles does not occur or is negligible, with the percentage of MeHg in THg usually exceeding 80–90% (O’Connor and Nielsen 1981; Houserova et al. 2006; Strom 2008; George et al. 2011; Kalisinska et al. 2014b; Harley et al. 2015; Scheuhammer et al. 2015). However, in a few papers concerning the muscle of fish, birds and mammals, we can find data indicating that %MeHg can be ≤70%, especially in cases where THg < 0.5 mg kg–1 ww. Pal et al. (2012) and Park et al. (2010) found in 8 out of 13 (8/13) and 5/13 investigated Asian freshwater fish species (generally with muscle THg 0.05–0.45 mg kg–1 ww) mean values of %MeHg were in the range 50–69%. Sometimes in predatory freshwater fish (such as Elops machnata and Pelates quadrilineatus from Taiwan), whose muscles contained >1 mg THg kg–1 ww, MeHg did not exceed 70% of THg (Huang et al. 2008). In three aquatic birds species from Mexico THg muscle levels varied from 0.32 to 0.45 mg kg–1 ww, and the %MeHg was in the range of 26–61% (Ruelas-Inzunza et al. 2009). In two populations of white-tailed eagle from Europe, the share of MeHg reached 45 and 58% when the mean THg in the eagle muscle was just 4.8 and 0.46 mg kg–1 ww, respectively (Norheim and Frøslie 1978; Kalisinska et al. 2014a). In the muscle of the piscivorous river otter mean, 72% MeHg of THg was sporadically revealed (THg = 0.89 mg kg–1 ww, Wren et al. 1980), but in marine cetaceans a value <70% was very often noticed. In 11 out of 16 studied species, the means were in the range 36–67%, and THg concentrations varied from 1.0 to 39.5 mg kg–1 ww (Endo et al. 2005). The data quoted above may indicate that MeHg demethylation in vertebrate muscles does occur, although this process requires further investigation and collection of more data. On the basis of comparative studies of two populations of blue shark (Prionace glauca) from the Azores and the Canary Islands, Branco et al. (2004) speculated that the diet of migrating animals may differ significantly in MeHg content due to differences in exposure to Hg at different locations. Periodic stays in areas where prey contains less MeHg promote gradual demethylation and elimination of MeHg already accumulated in the muscles of sharks, and at the same time the supply of new portions of MeHg with food to their organisms is then lower. Branco et al. (2004) found in the shark’s muscle from the Canaries %MeHg much lower than in sharks from the Azores 55–70% and >80%, respectively, although muscle THg concentrations were similar.
3.5 Mercury in Elements of Inland Food Chains
Food is the main source of Hg for humans and wildlife, but its absorption from digestive tract is strictly dependent on the chemical form and amount of Hg in various diets. Mercury concentrations increased from autotrophic organisms to herbivores < detritivores < omnivores < carnivores (Rimmer et al. 2010). For terrestrial herbivorous and omnivorous animals, plant, fungi and invertebrates are the most important components of their food. Soil invertebrates, insects, spiders and other arthropods or small- and medium-sized birds and mammals are eaten by different predators depending on their body size and food preferences. Some carnivore mammals and aquatic birds of inland habitats are highly specialized in catching fish. Below are presented some aspects of Hg transfer between different environmental components, including soil and plants, plants and warm-blooded herbivores as well as preys and predators.
3.5.1 Mercury in Plants and Mushrooms
The amount of MeHg in soils is low relative to THg, and the dominant form in soils is InHg (Burton et al. 2006). Bioavailability of soil InHg for plants is very low. A significant part of the InHg taken from the soil is retained in the roots, which are a barrier to mercury uptake. There is a positive correlation between the concentration of InHg in the soil and roots, but it does not occur between soil Hg and its content in shoots and leaves, which are about ten times lower than in the roots, and probably the transport of Hg from the roots to the stems either does not occur or is a very slow process (Wang and Greger 2004; Tomiyasu et al. 2005). The main soil factors affecting the collection of this toxic metal by plants include organic matter, oxygen and carbon, redox potential, Hg species and their concentrations and the presence of other metals in the soil solution (Tomiyasu et al. 2005; Patra and Sharma 2000; Azevedo and Rodriguez 2012). In plants, the dominant form is InHg, which is >97% THg (Mailman and Bodaly 2005; Dombaiová 2005). In unpolluted areas, THg concentration in leaves is negligible and is characterized by considerable variability, ranging from several to several dozen micrograms per kilogram of dry matter (μg kg–1 dw). In addition to the species diversity of plants, it is related to seasonal variation. In young leaves, compared to older ones, at the end of the growing season, the concentration of mercury is an order of magnitude smaller. The mercury detected in the leaves basically comes from the surrounding air, most likely Hg0, entering through the stomata, and probably leaf uptake of Hg is irreversible (Bushey et al. 2008; Laacouri et al. 2013). In areas where Hg was mined (e.g. Almaden zone in Spain), Hg concentration in soils is many thousand mg kg–1 dw, and in some herbal plant species, it reaches 7–23 mg THg kg–1 dw (or 7000–23,000 μg kg–1 dw), thousands of times greater than in plants in uncontaminated areas (Moreno-Jimenez et al. 2006; Laacouri et al. 2013). In contrast to InHg, which is absorbed by the root system and kept there, in wetlands MeHg enters more efficiently both to water plants and through the roots to the aerial parts of plants (Patra and Sharma 2000; Windham-Myers et al. 2014). This organic species of mercury in plants from paddy fields may reach levels up to 63 μg kg–1 dw in rice grain and pose a significant health risk to people, as has been demonstrated for rice grown on soils with a high concentration of Hg in Asia (Qiu et al. 2012; Rothenberg et al. 2014). Probably, due to the consumption of rice grain from such areas, not only humans but also grain-feeding animals (especially granivorous birds) are at risk of MeHg intoxication.
Of the nonanimal inland organisms, fungi are considered the greatest accumulator of Hg from the soil (Falandysz and Borovička 2013). Usually, higher Hg concentrations are detected in these than in their substrates, and fungi accumulate especially high levels in the areas of geochemical anomalies such as the mercuriferous Eurasian belt (including Almaden in Spain, Monte Amiata in Italy and Chinese Yunnan Province). In the mushrooms found there, the average concentration of THg varies from 1 to 100 mg kg–1 dw (Bargali and Baldi 1984; Esbri et al. 2011; Falandysz et al. 2015). The concentration of MeHg in mushrooms is generally low and ranges between 0.01 and 3.7 mg kg–1 dw, with the proportion of MeHg in THg not exceeding 5% (Bargali and Baldi 1984; Rieder et al. 2011).
3.5.2 Mercury in Earthworms
For some terrestrial invertebrates and vertebrates, the source of mercury may be soil contaminated with Hg. It is the essential food of earthworms or is an admixture for the intaken plant and animal foods of soil invertebrates, birds and mammals (Hargreaves et al. 2011; Rieder et al. 2013). In soils, over 90% of the invertebrate biomass may consists of earthworms. That is why, they are a significant object in ecotoxicological studies on Hg (Zhang et al. 2009; Teršič and Gosar 2012; Rieder et al. 2011; Abeysinghe et al. 2017). Concentrations of Hg in earthworm bodies depend on animal species and various soil conditions such as Hg forms and their amount, content of organic matter, pH and oxygen availability (Zhang et al. 2009; Rieder et al. 2013; Abeysinghe et al. 2017). Additionally, Rieder et al. (2011) demonstrated that earthworms inhabiting topsoils (endogenic) contained the highest concentrations THg and MeHg, followed by deep-burrowing earthworms (anecic) and litter-inhabiting organisms (epigeic). Methylated organic Hg species bioaccumulate more readily, and much higher bioconcentration factors (BCFs) from soil to earthworms are reported for MeHg than for THg (BCFs are calculated as THg or MeHg concentrations in the organisms divided by the corresponding concentrations in the soils). For example, in earthworms from Swiss forest, soils non-contaminated with Hg (mean THg level at 0.18 mg kg–1 dw) mean THg and MeHg in all investigated earthworm groups were 1.04 and 0.09 mg kg–1 dw, respectively. The share of MeHg in THg did not exceed 9%. BCF for THg and MeHg differed significantly: 7.2 vs. 83.1 (Rieder et al. 2011).
Analogical data has also been presented for earthworms living in rice paddy soils (Abeysinghe et al. 2017) sampled at various distances from abandoned mercury mines in Guizhou (China) and at control sites without a history of Hg mining. The highest mean THg concentrations were detected in the soil near the mines (80–125 mg kg–1 dw). However, even at sites distant from a mine (7–8 km) and in control samples THg levels were quite high (~20 and ~0.6 mg kg–1 dw, respectively). On the other hand, in those samples the concentration of MeHg was negligible and did not exceed 0.001 mg kg–1 dw, with the proportion of MeHg in THg estimated at ≤0.01%. In earthworm bodies, mean concentrations of THg and MeHg decreased with the increasing distance from the mine. In the animal samples at sites distant 7–8 km from the mine and at control areas, the average THg concentrations were approximately 10 and 0.60 mg kg–1 dw and for MeHg 0.10 and 0.05 mg kg–1 dw, respectively. Share of MeHg in THg in the two group of earthworms was ~8 and ~2%, similar to levels reported by other researchers (Zhang et al. 2009; Rieder et al. 2011). In the study, BCFs for THg and especially for MeHg increased with distance from the mine. In earthworms sampled at 7–8 km from mines and at reference sites mean values of BCFs for THg were in the range 0.5–1.0 and almost three orders of magnitude lower than BCFs calculated for MeHg. Mean values of BCF for MeHg at control sites and 7–8 km from mines were about 900 and 300, respectively. Abeysinghe et al. (2017) suggested that specific soil conditions in rice paddies may make the earthworms important biomagnifiers of MeHg. Such large differences observed between the BCF for THg and BCF for MeHg in the case of earthworms and soils (even with negligible Hg contamination) are influenced by very high absorption of lipophilic MeHg from their intestine compared to InHg. This is probably due to the methylation of InHg occurring in their digestive tract due to the activity of the microbiota. At least two arguments for this are given by Rieder et al. (2013) on the basis of their experimental studies. Firstly, earthworms contained about six times higher concentrations of MeHg if they grew in soils treated with InHg than in soils without Hg. Secondly, the concentrations of MeHg in earthworm casts and in the soils were similar and did not change over time.
3.5.3 Mercury in Spiders and Insects
Studies of MeHg contamination of food webs have historically focused on aquatic organisms including those inhabiting inland reservoirs. However, recent reports have shown that terrestrial organisms such as songbirds, bats and reptiles can exhibit elevated Hg burden by feeding on MeHg-contaminated spiders and insects (Cristol et al. 2008; Jackson et al. 2011; Drewett et al. 2013; Yates et al. 2014; Gann et al. 2015). Studies in this field are mainly conducted in floodplains, riparian and wetland ecosystems of North America, which have documented historical influence of Hg pollutants. It has been shown that in such areas (especially not too distant from Hg point sources) MeHg in terrestrial predatory spiders from the Lycosidae family reach high concentrations, in the range 0.60–1.29 mg kg–1 dw, which may be comparable or greater than in fish from neighbouring waters (Cristol et al. 2008; Speir et al. 2014; Gann et al. 2015; Standish 2016). In areas with negligible contamination or unpolluted with Hg, average concentration of MeHg in Lycosidae varies from 0.06 to 0.15 mg kg–1 dw (Bartrons et al. 2015; Gann et al. 2015; Tavshunsky et al. 2017). Depending on trophic position (which can be derived from δ15N), other arthropods in the areas with the historically proven exposure to Hg may exhibit MeHg concentrations from 0.02 mg kg–1 dw in herbivorous leafhoppers to 1.18 mg kg–1 dw in detritofagous isopods (Cristol et al. 2008; Standish 2016).
Long-lived cicadas are another example of increased concentrations of MeHg in arthropods. The larvae of these insects live in the ground (2–17 years) and feed on root juice. In the Hg-contaminated soils, the effective absorption of MeHg occurs through the roots from where it can be taken up by cicadas. In Huludao City (NE China), with a chlor-alkali plant and two zinc smelters (industrial sources of Hg), its soils contained on average 4.08 mg THg kg–1 dw and 0.009 mg MeHg kg–1 dw. Cicadas Cryptotympana atrata from such soils accumulated in their bodies on average 0.124 mg MeHg kg–1 dw, in a range from 0.021 to 0.319 mg MeHg kg–1 dw (Zheng et al. 2010). Thus, these insects, although not associated with aquatic food chains, may constitute an important local source of MeHg intoxication for predatory arthropods, insectivorous birds, bats and other animals. The number of studies on bioaccumulation and biomagnification of MeHg in terrestrial food webs is gradually increasing, which should result in a better understanding and explanation of these processes. Importantly, this requires close cooperation between specialists in various fields, including zoology, ecology, toxicology of animals, plants and soils.
3.5.4 Transfer of Mercury from Inland Aquatic Ecosystems to Terrestrial Vertebrates
Compared to the Hg transfer between the links of the aforementioned food chains, much more data has been gathered on predatory warm-blooded vertebrates (including semiaquatic mammals and aquatic birds) that inhabit inland areas and feed on aquatic food, especially fish. Studies on the relationships between these organisms, taking into account Hg forms and their concentration levels, have been conducted at least since the mid-twentieth century. Their initiation was closely related to the dramatic events in the Gulf of Minamata and documented the neurotoxic and disruptive effects of Hg on reproductive processes in humans and other homeothermic animals. Fish (and in less degree shellfish) are considered most significant source of MeHg exposure for humans and wildlife. Therefore, many countries have set standards to protect humans from Hg in food. For example, in the EU the limit for Hg in freshwater fish for humans is 0.5 mg kg–1 ww or 500 μg kg–1 ww (1000 μg kg–1 ww for pike Esox lucius and eel Anguilla anguilla) (Commission Regulation, EC 2006), and in the United States 300 μg MeHg kg–1 ww is recommended (US EPA 2001, 2010). According to the EU Water Framework Directive, Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for some chemicals in biota have been set, with mercury being defined as a priority hazardous substance (Directive 2008/105/EC). EQS are intended to protect top predators against secondary poisoning and refer to THg; for freshwater fish, the EQS for Hg (EQS/Hg) is at 20 μg kg–1 ww. Apart from the EU, only Canada has a standard designed of Hg (MeHg) to protect fish-eating animals at 33 μg kg–1 ww (Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines 2000). The Canadian standard concerning Hg in freshwater fish is 65% higher than the European EQS/Hg. In North America the value of 100 μg kg–1 ww in fish is of concern for the protection of piscivorous mammals, including mink and otters (Scudder et al. 2009). However, robust data on the dietary Hg exposure thresholds that result in deleterious effects, including disturbances in reproduction, exist only for very few bird species. Typical range of Hg effect thresholds are approximately from 200 to over 1400 μg kg–1 ww in natural and/or experimental diets (Fuchsman et al. 2017). In North America, the piscivorous common loon has been intensively studied in field and laboratory settings (Evers et al. 2003; Kenow et al. 2008; Scheuhammer et al. 2008; Kenow et al. 2011). The dietary screening benchmark of 180 μg Hg kg–1 ww in whole body prey fish was established for this species, characterized as moderately sensitive to Hg intoxication (Heinz et al. 2009; Depew et al. 2012).
The concentration of Hg in fish depends on the degree of environmental pollution with this metal, the intensity of Hg methylation, the size of fish (closely correlated with their age) and their trophic level (Depew et al. 2013a; Eagles-Smith et al. 2014). Because of the higher cost of MeHg analysis (2–3 times greater than that for Hg analysis), THg in various animal tissues is assayed in the most investigations, including monitoring studies. It is generally accepted that the Hg in fish muscle occurs in the form of MeHg, which accounts for ~90% of THg (US EPA 2010). Concentration of Hg in freshwater fish in various parts of the world varies considerably. The United States and Canada have very large databases on Hg concentration in many species of fish. These data (after appropriate selection, standardization and statistical processing) allow an estimate of Hg concentrations in prey (HgPREY) of piscivorous fish and wildlife and evaluate their potential. In North America ecological monitoring of Hg depends crucially on top piscivorous fish such as walleye Sander vitreus and northern pike Esox lucius and among fish from lower trophic levels—yellow perch Perca flavescens and largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Among piscivorous wildlife, Hg monitoring uses common loon, bald eagle (to a smaller extent), mink and river otter (Evers and Clair 2005; Evers et al. 2007; Depew et al. 2013a). The United States Geological Survey (USGS) developed the National Descriptive Model for Mercury in Fish (NDMMF, http://emmma.usgs.gov; Wente 2004), which was later adopted in Canadian reports (Depew et al. 2013b). For example, in standardized fish (collected in 1998–2005) coming from streams across the United States, fish Hg concentrations at 27% of sampled sites exceeded the US EPA human health criterion (300 μg kg–1 ww). However, THg concentrations in fish from >66% of the sites exceeded the value of 100 μg kg–1 ww that is of concern for the protection of piscivorous mammals. The highest mean Hg concentrations (between 1800 and 1950 μg kg–1 ww) were noticed in fish from blackwater coastal-plain streams draining forests or wetlands in eastern and south-eastern part of the United States as well as from streams draining gold- or Hg-mined basins in the Western United States (Scudder et al. 2009). Clearly lower concentrations of Hg were found in fish living in 21 national parks in the Western United States, with average value at ~78 μg kg–1 ww (Eagles-Smith et al. 2014). According to Depew et al. (2013b) Hg concentration in Canadian fish (gathered in years 1967–2010) averaged 370 μg kg–1 ww (from below detection to 10,430 μg kg–1 ww). In fish from years 1990–2010 estimated HgPREY ranged from 10 to 960 μg kg–1 ww with a mean of 90 μg kg–1 ww, decreasing westwards. This is consistent with spatio-temporal tendency in the United States of a decrease in HgPREY from east to west (Evers et al. 2007). This situation is closely related to the strong industrialization of the south-eastern regions of Canada and the Northeastern United States, where winds carry air masses anthropogenically contaminated with Hg. Mercury contamination is gradually deposited westwards, but the influence of mercury from bedrocks cannot be ruled out either (Page and Murphy 2005; Evers et al. 2007; Wentz et al. 2014).
The European Union as a whole lacks a common database on Hg concentration in fish that could be comparable to the North American one. In Scandinavian countries Hg concentrations in freshwater fish have been reported regularly since the late 1960s and early 1970s. The most data was collected for top predator northern pike followed by Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis, which represents a lower trophic level (Munthe et al. 2007; Danielsson et al. 2011; Akerblom et al. 2014). Munthe et al. (2007) took into account all lacustrine data for Sweden, Norway and Finland from 1965 to 2004. In a standardized size of pike and perch, they found mean Hg concentrations of 730 and 400 μg kg–1 ww, respectively, in the three Scandinavian countries. Importantly, mean value of Hg in “standard fish” (1 kg pike or 0.3 kg perch or 3.2 kg brown trout Salmo trutta or 1.4 kg Arctic char Salvelinus alpinus) was estimated to be as high as 690 μg kg–1 ww (Munthe et al. 2007). The authors of that report stated that the data from Scandinavia show some similarity with data from a large survey in NE North America, when considering the mean values for various fish species. In the recent past in both regions, similar levels of atmospheric Hg pollution were noticed, and the geographic characteristics of bedrock and soils exhibit many analogies. For Eurasian perch and North American yellow perch, the mean concentrations were comparable: 400 versus 440 μg kg–1 ww. However, an important difference was observed between these two regions, with Hg concentration in the pike from Scandinavia higher than in NE North America: 730 vs. 640 μg kg–1 ww (Munthe et al. 2007). Miller et al. (2013) analysed data concerning Eurasian perch from Sweden and Finland covering the period 1974–2005. Swedish data from a later period (post-1996) show that in the fish from 22 and 72% lakes Hg concentrations were as high as >500 μg kg–1 ww and between 200 and 500 μg kg–1 ww, respectively. By contrast, after 1996 more lakes in Finland showed Hg concentrations in fish greater than 500 μg kg–1 ww (31%), while fewer lakes had fish Hg concentrations below 500 μg kg–1 ww (68%). Despite considerable reductions in Hg use and production as well as lower Hg atmospheric deposition in these countries, Miller et al. (2013) indicated that Hg concentrations in the fish exceeded the EQS/Hg (and EQS/Hg for the Nordic region was 200–250 μg kg–1 ww). Moreover, in both Finland and Sweden, the perch from over 90% lakes exhibited Hg concentration exceeding 100 μg kg–1 ww, which in North America is a level of concern for the protection of piscivorous mammals. One of the probable reasons for the persistence of elevated Hg concentrations in fish may be significantly lower selenium concentration in the Scandinavian environment (similar to Poland and eastern Germany). The deficiency of this element in the diet of vertebrates is accompanied by an increased accumulation of Hg, and in the case of fish from Scandinavia and Poland, this was indicated by Julshamn et al. (1986), Lindqvist et al. (1991), Hultberg (2002) and Kalisinska et al. (2017). In addition to the aforementioned species, bream Abramis brama is used to assess the quality of the aquatic environments in Europe, a common benthofagous species sampled in the German Environmental Specimen Bank (Wellmitz 2010). German biomonitoring research from the years 1994–2009 showed that on average Hg concentrations changed from ~100 to 350 μg kg–1 ww and exceeded the EQS/Hg in all analysed years and all 17 sites from which breams came from: rivers Rhine, Danube, Saar, Elbe and its tributaries Saale and Mulde (Wellmitz 2010). Between 2007 and 2013, Hg levels were analysed in breams from five riverine places in France, Netherlands, Sweden and United Kingdom and one German lake as reference site (Nguetseng et al. 2015). Means of Hg concentration ranged from 18 to 246 μg kg–1 ww. However, the EQS/Hg was exceeded in all years and at all riverine sites including the reference site except for the year 2012. The available data show that in Europe, the areas with not exceeded EQS/Hg in various fish species (even in non-piscivorous breams) are not very often reported; exceptions include some freshwater aquifers in Poland and Croatia (Zrncic et al. 2013; Szkoda et al. 2014).
In Asia, several year-long and systematic biomonitoring of Hg in freshwater fish has only been conducted in South Korea. In other countries occasional research has usually concerned individual species and reservoirs (Jin et al. 2006; Kim et al. 2012; Pal et al. 2012; Zhu et al. 2012). In 2006–2008 in Korea, analysis covered 55 species of wild freshwater fish, among which seven species predominated. The most numerous of them were two piscivores (largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and Far Eastern catfish Silurus asotus) and five omnivores (steed barbell Hemibarbus labeo, Korean bullhead Pseudobagrus fulvidraco, pale chub Zacco platypus, crucian carp Carassius auratus, carp Cyprinus carpio). Each freshwater fish species was assigned to an appropriate trophic level (piscivore, carnivore, omnivore, planktivore). The piscivores had the highest median Hg concentration (148 μg kg–1 ww) than carnivores and omnivores (83 μg kg–1 ww and 68 μg kg–1 ww, respectively). The median in planktivores was the lowest, at 30 μg kg–1 ww. In most piscivorous species (including largemouth bass) from 12 sites Hg level exceeded 500 μg kg–1 ww, which is recommended by the Korea Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization to protect human health (Kim et al. 2012).
The fish bioaccumulation factor (BAF), which expresses the ratio of THg (or MeHg) concentration in fish to the concentration in ambient water, depends on many factors including trophic position and fish size (US EPA 2000; Yu et al. 2011). BAF is mainly presented in a logarithmic form (log10), and in freshwater prey fish and larger predatory fish, it is usually in the range from 5.9 to 6.6 (Yu et al. 2011; Scudder Eikenberry et al. 2015; Wu 2017). In ecotoxicological studies, analysis of MeHg biomagnification is very important, including indicators of changes in concentration between different trophic levels (TMF, trophic magnification factor). Extensive analysis of Lavoie et al. (2013) shows that in freshwater food webs MeHg levels increase by a factor of 8.1 per trophic level. In addition, they stated that TMF is higher in lentic than lotic waters (7.6 vs. 9.8), and values of this factor increase from tropical via temperate to polar climatic zones (TMF, 3.9, 7.5 and 12, respectively). Finally, biomagnification factors (BMFs) are also estimated within food web, and the factor concerning MeHg (or THg) is expressed as the ratio of concentration in animal bodies to the concentration in their food (in ppm or ppb) (Rolfhus et al. 2011). BAF and BMF are very seldom presented in piscivorous inland birds and mammals, which participate in transport of Hg from aquatic to terrestrial environments. BAF and BMF calculated for piscivorous birds take into account Hg concentrations in water, fish and avian blood, feathers or eggs but rarely in soft tissues including muscle (Henny et al. 2009; Yu et al. 2011; Falkowska et al. 2013). In the transmission of Hg (especially MeHg) from freshwater fish to piscivorous wildlife of inland ecosystems muscle tissue plays important role for at least two reasons. Firstly, among soft digestible tissues, skeletal muscles represent the largest percentage of body weight, and secondly Hg present in them is almost all in MeHg form, which is easily absorbed. Therefore, it seems reasonable to analyse BMF using Hg concentrations in fish and wildlife muscle (not fish muscle and indigestible fur or feathers). For example (based on muscle tissue), in two pairs American mink—fish and Eurasian otter—fish from Western Poland BMFs were 27.3 and 10.9, respectively (Kalisinska et al. 2017). In addition, they found that these mammals quite often die on the roads and are later eaten by scavengers, thus contributing to the further transmission of Hg in the local terrestrial food web.
3.6 Mercury Concentrations in Soft Tissues in Various Groups of Inland Wildlife
The literature available in English includes many publications on the concentration of THg and much fewer investigate MeHg in soft and hard tissues of wild animals, especially in North America and Europe. In spite of this, there are basically no studies which estimate the average concentrations of THg representing the main ecotrophic groups. In order to characterize and compare the concentration of THg in wild terrestrial mammals and birds of the Northern Hemisphere, 140 studies from the years 1973–2017 were selected, including data on at least one of four soft tissues: liver, kidney, muscle and brain. The average concentrations of THg (mainly arithmetic means) from these reports concerned a minimum of three specimens of an individual species. If several groups of animals of the same species were included in the study (due to sex, age, temporal or territorial division), mean THg concentrations selected for the analysis referred to the largest number of individuals, preferring adults. Since the concentrations in soft tissues were given in mg kg–1 in dry or wet weight, we made appropriate calculations, and the final results are presented in mg kg–1 ww. Mammalian livers, kidneys, muscles and brains contain on average 70%, 75%, 75% and 80% of water, respectively, as calculated on the basis of several works (Weiner 1973, Blus and Henny 1990, Reinoso et al. 1997; Gamberg et al. 2005a, b; Sleeman et al. 2010; Kalisinska et al. 2012a, b). In the case of birds, it was assumed that their liver, kidney, muscle and brain contain 70%, 75%, 70% and 80% water, respectively (mean values were calculated based on the work of Cosson et al. 1988; Cosson 1989; Binkowski et al. 2013; Kalisinska et al. 2010, 2014a).
Data on mammals and birds were grouped according to their ecotrophic category. Among mammals, three groups were identified: Herb-M (predominantly herbivorous), Carn-M (terrestrial carnivores) and SemCarn-M (semiaquatic carnivores). Four groups were distinguished among the birds: TerrOmn-B (terrestrial omnivores and herbivores), TerrPred-B (diurnal and nocturnal predators), W-B (non-piscivorous waterfowl) and Pisc-B (piscivores). Groups, names of species and data sources are given in Table 17.3.
The analysis excluded cases indicating very high THg concentrations in the liver and kidneys, which were recorded in warm-blooded vertebrates living in areas heavily contaminated with mercury. For carnivorous mammals and those who prefer a different diet, excessive concentrations of mercury in liver and/or kidney were assumed to be above 16.5 and 12.5 mg kg–1 ww, respectively, i.e. two-thirds and one-half of the value associated with mortality of mammals (lower value of the range: <25–30 mg kg–1 ww), which was reported by Shore et al. (2011). The data of piscivorous birds and other ecotrophic groups that indicated very high Hg exposure were not included in this analysis. The threshold levels in the livers and kidneys in Pisc-B were over 2/3 of the levels, shown by Shore et al. (2011) to be associated with the death of non-marine birds (20 mg kg–1 ww and >40 mg kg–1 ww, respectively). Therefore, cases were excluded from statistical calculations when hepatic and nephric THg concentrations were higher than 13.2 and 26.4 mg kg–1 ww. In relation to other ecotrophic bird groups, the exclusion limit was 1/2 of the levels indicated for avian liver and kidney by Shore et al. (2011), i.e. 10 and 20 mg kg–1 ww.
Figure 17.2 shows the mean concentrations of THg in soft tissues of the various ecotrophic groups of birds and mammals inhabiting the inland areas in the Northern Hemisphere. Many species included in Table 17.3 occur in both Eurasia and North America. Some of them are native species on both continents (such as common loon, mallard, osprey, Eurasian elk/moose, reindeer/caribou), but some of them have been introduced, for example, fallow deer from Europe to North America and American mink and raccoon from North America to Europe (Genovesi et al. 2012; Bradley et al. 2014). Belonging to the same species and/or genus, occurrence on both continents and the large biological similarity (e.g. bald eagle and white-tailed eagle) are a justification for using their THg data in joint analyses.
3.6.1 Mercury Concentrations in Mammalian Soft Tissues
The low concentration of THg in the aboveground parts of plants (with the predominant share of InHg poorly absorbed in the gastrointestinal tracts of mammals and birds) results in a negligible exposure of most herbivorous animals to this toxic metal. In the three groups of mammals we distinguished above, THg concentrations were the smallest in Herb-M, but they can be arranged in the following ascending order: muscle < brain < liver < kidney (0.015, 0.026, 0.056 and 0.173 mg kg–1 ww). According to Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (WVDL 2015), normal THg concentration in cervid kidney and liver does not exceed 0.1 mg kg–1 ww, which only in the case of liver is consistent with the level established for the multispecies group of Herb-M. Two reports on special cases were excluded from this group, which indicated that increased concentrations of THg may be found even among herbivores. In the early 1990s among herbivorous ungulate mammals, there were exceptions such as roe deer from zones of a mercury mine in Idrija (Slovenia), which was active in the 1990s, and caribou from Canadian Arctic, Northwest Territories and Nunavut (Gnamuš and Horvat 1999; Gamberg et al. 2005b). In the roe deer, liver and kidney Hg levels were 0.64 and 15.56 mg kg–1 ww. Hepatic and nephric tissues of the caribou contained 2.04 and 12.80 mg Hg kg–1 ww, respectively. In both cases, the main reason for such a high concentration of Hg was the specific diet of these animals, containing large amounts of Hg. In the aboveground parts of plants from a smelter area of Idrija, average Hg was ~50 mg kg–1 dw. Leaves of plants in those areas intensively absorbed Hg0 released during the roasting of ores containing this metal (Gnamuš and Horvat 1999). Caribou in the far north, on the other hand, mainly feeds on mosses and lichens, perennial plants which lack root systems and absorb contaminants (including Hg), along with their nutrients, from atmospheric deposition. In addition, high Hg levels in detoxification organs were related to the caribou weight loss in spring, resulting in lower absolute organ weights (Gamberg et al. 2005b).
The diet of carnivores (Carn-M) is very diverse. Their prey consists mostly of rodents, lagomorphs and birds, with the admixture of carrion, reptiles, frogs, insects, fruits and other parts of plants. In these predators, the average THg concentration in the liver and kidneys was similar and amounted to 0.105 mg kg–1 ww and 0.140 mg kg–1 ww, respectively. Farrar et al. (1994) argue that in the liver and kidneys of the dog, the concentration of THg usually does not exceed 0.1 mg kg–1 ww, and in the WVDL list for canids from 2015 (including domestic dog), the normal Hg concentration in tissues is <0.1 mg kg–1 ww and <0.200 mg kg–1 ww, respectively. In both cases, these values do not differ from those calculated by us for the multispecies Carn-M group. In their muscles and brain, the THg concentration was an order of magnitude lower than in the liver and kidneys, and they did not exceed 0.018 mg kg–1 ww and 0.030 mg kg–1 ww, respectively (Fig. 17.2).
SemCarn-M group represents four species of the superfamily Musteloidea, including piscivorous mustelids. Among them, the diet of otters is 90% fish, American mink 60%, and raccoon 30% (Table 17.3; Kalisinska et al. 2017). This mammalian group is characterized by the largest body of data (especially with regard to the liver and kidney). Median THg concentration in the liver, kidney, muscle and brain of SemCarn-M were, respectively, 1.70, 1.09, 0.51 and 0.34 mg kg–1 ww. Comparisons of median hepatic and nephric THg concentrations between Eurasian otter (liver n = 12, 2.57 mg kg–1 ww; kidney n = 7, 1.30 mg kg–1 ww) and river otter from North America (liver n = 25, 1.78 mg kg–1 ww; kidney n = 11, 1.42 mg kg–1 ww) showed no significant differences.
According to WVDL (2015), normal THg concentrations in the liver and kidneys of mustelids are <0.20–0.70 mg kg–1 ww and <1.0 mg kg–1 ww, respectively, much lower than our results. In North American studies from the 1980s, when Hg intoxication of otters and minks was much more frequent, background hepatic THg in those piscivorous species was indicated as <4–5 mg kg–1 ww and ~2 mg kg–1 ww, respectively (Wren 1986; O’Connor and Nielsen 1981; Carmichael and Baker 1989). In the light of the quoted papers from 1980s and our statistical analysis (taking into account European and North American reports from 1981 to 2017), it can be assumed that currently the values of hepatic background level for otters and American mink are <3.0 mg kg–1 ww and <1.5 mg kg–1 ww, respectively. According to our analysis, THg levels in the kidney, muscle and brain of the piscivorous mammals are <1.5, 1.0–1.3 and 0.3–0.6 mg kg–1 ww, respectively.
Comparisons of hepatic THg concentration showed statistically confirmed differences between all three ecotrophic groups, and their values can be arranged in a decreasing series of SemCarn-M > Carn-M > Herb-M (1.700 > 0.105 > 0.015 mg kg–1 ww). In relation to SemCarn-M, the concentrations of THg in the kidneys, muscles and brain of Carn-M were about an order of magnitude lower, and in the Herb-M groups, it was two orders of magnitude lower. No significant differences were found in kidney and brain THg between Carn-M and Herb-M (Fig. 17.2). In muscle, the concentrations of THg in Carn-M and Herb-M were more than 28 and 100 times lower than in SemCarn-M. In comparison to Carn-M, Herb-M had a 3.6 times lower level of muscle THg. In the muscles, similar to the liver, the concentrations could be arranged in a descending order (0.508 > 0.018 > 0.005 mg kg–1 ww), and all intergroup differences were statistically significant.
3.6.2 Mercury Concentrations in Avian Soft Tissues
In birds, the lowest levels of THg in the liver, kidneys, muscles and brain occurred in the TerrOmn-B group, and their medians ranged from 0.024 to 0.067 mg kg–1 ww. In some reports, especially in the case of muscles and the brain, the concentrations were very low, below the limit of detection, but increased levels (≥0.10 mg kg–1 ww) were found in tissues of granivorous birds from Scandinavia in the 1970s, when large amounts of organic Hg fungicides were used in agriculture in that part of Europe (Holt et al. 1979).
Although in the liver and kidneys of waterfowl (W-B group) we found an order of magnitude higher THg concentration than in the TerrOmn-B group, the differences between these groups were not statistically significant. The largest number of differences were recorded between piscivorous birds (Pisc-B) and other analysed groups of birds. Pisc-B had the highest concentration of THg in the liver, kidneys, muscles and brain (3.21, 2.69, 0.78, 0.72 mg kg–1 ww, respectively) and significantly differed in this regard from TerrOmn-B and W-B. Pisc-B and TerrPred-B showed no statistically confirmed difference in muscle THg (0.78 vs. 0.44 mg kg–1 ww) and brain THg (0.72 vs. 0.35 mg kg–1 ww).
In contrast to mammals, the WVDL list (2015) does not include the normal THg level for or different systematic groups of birds. Normal concentration is proposed of avian liver in the range of 0.01–0.10 mg kg–1 ww and for the kidney at <0.02–0.30 mg kg–1 ww. Puls (1988) suggested that normal concentrations of THg in the liver, kidney, muscle and brain of poultry were 0.01–0.10, 0.05–0.30, 0.008–0.100 and 0.10 mg kg–1 ww, respectively. These levels coincide with those we calculated for TerrOmn–B, i.e. typical terrestrial birds, including galliformes. Other researchers, investigating various wild water birds, argue that hepatic and renal THg residues represent background concentrations when they are 0.3–3.0 mg kg–1 ww (Ohlendorf 1993; Badzinski et al. 2009). This range includes median hepatic THg concentrations calculated by us for two groups of bird: W-B and TerrPred-B (Fig. 17.2). In the group of piscivorous birds (Pisc–B), hepatic THg exceeds 3.0 mg kg–1 ww (3.21), but for the kidneys it is lower (2.69 mg kg–1 ww).
Mammals and birds are characterized by different sensitivity to Hg, and depending on the type of intaken food, they accumulate different amounts of this toxic element. Significantly, the lowest adverse effect level (LOAEL) has not been established for most wild endothermic animals. In the common loon, in the case of the liver, kidney, breast muscle and brain, LOAEL values do not exceed 4.0, 2.3, 1.2 and 0.80 mg kg–1 ww, respectively (Zhang et al. 2013). The quoted values coincide with the THg levels proposed by us for piscivorous birds, with the exception of muscle THg, which we estimated to be ~0.80 mg kg–1 ww.
3.7 Mercury Concentrations in Hair and Feathers of Inland Wildlife
Hair (fur) and feathers are often used in ecotoxicological studies because they can be taken from living individuals. Here, the dominant form of Hg is MeHg, which reaches hair/fur/feathers in the period of their growth and reflects only that period. As in the case of soft tissues, the concentration of Hg in fur/feathers is closely related to the ecotrophic association of wildlife and Hg contamination of habitats. Sheffy and St Amant (1982) based on various furbearers from Wisconsin (USA) considered that Hg 1–5 mg kg–1 ww (ppm dw) in hair to be normal background levels. In herbivorous mammals (such as American beaver, muskrat, white-tailed deer and lagomorphs), the average concentration of hair Hg does not exceed 0.3 ppm dw, and in many individuals it is below the limit of detection (Cumbie and Jenkins 1975; Sheffy and St Amant 1982; Stevens et al. 1997; Lourenco et al. 2011). In omnivorous mammals, such as common opossum Didelphis marsupialis, average hair Hg, depending on the environmental Hg pollution, ranged from 1.3 to 44 ppm dw (Cumbie and Jenkins 1975). Until recently, piscivorous mammals were thought to have the highest hair Hg concentrations among terrestrial mammals. The average hair Hg concentrations in these mammals from North America in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries usually exceeded 5, and sometimes 15 ppm dw (Sheffy and St Amant 1982; Stevens et al. 1997; Wolfe & Norman 1998; Mierle et al. 2000; Yates et al. 2005; Strom 2008). The maximum values in river otter and mink from the United States (Maine) reached 234 and 68.5 ppm dw, respectively (Yates et al. 2005). However, several years ago even greater concentrations were detected in the hair of insectivorous bats from Virginia (the South River, USA): little brown bat Myotis lucifugus and big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus, at 274 and 65.4 mg kg–1 dw, respectively (Wada et al. 2010; Nam et al. 2012). Probably, the concentrations greater than 30 ppm dw in fur are associated with the clinical neurological effects, or they may be lethal (Wobeser and Swift 1976; Evers 2005; Basu et al. 2007), but there is little data on wild mammals in this respect.
In monitoring programs, feathers have low priority status for several reasons. Feather Hg concentration is characterized by high variability even in the same individual (depending, among others, on the type and location of feathers). Moreover, it relatively weakly correlates with the Hg concentration in soft tissues. Usually, the times of moulting and replacement of certain types of feathers are not known for most species, and it is even more complicated for migratory birds. In addition, the period of feather growth is accompanied by the redistribution of Hg in internal organs and its increased transport to feathers, both in chickens and older individuals (Honda et al. 1986; Eagles-Smith et al. 2008; Ackerman et al. 2011, 2016; Odsjo et al. 2012). In general, bird feathers have average Hg concentrations in the range of 0.1–5 ppm dw (Lodenius and Solonen 2013), but in some European herbivores, such as wood pigeon Columba palumbus and red-legged partridge Alectoris rufa, it may be <0.1 ppm (Hahn et al. 1993; Lourenco et al. 2011). Natural background levels of Hg in feathers of non-piscivorous raptorial birds are in the range 1–5 ppm dw (Scheuhammer 1991). Among adult piscivorous birds, it is estimated that this level for bald eagle in North America is much higher and in some regions ~20 ppm dw (DeSorbo et al. 2008). Among piscivorous birds the maximum concentration of Hg in feathers sometimes exceeds 190 ppm, for example, in osprey from Canada (DesGranges et al. 1998) and white-tailed eagle from Germany (Niecke et al. 1998). Mercury levels in feathers that are associated with adverse effects in birds are 5 ppm fresh weight or 7.5 mg kg–1 dw. Concentrations of 15 ppm are required for adverse effects of mercury in some predatory birds (Burger and Gochfeld 2009). In raptorial birds concentrations >20 ppm may be connected with toxic effects, but in bald eagle it is probably >60 ppm (Scheuhammer 1991; DeSorbo et al. 2008).
Despite the large number of works with Hg concentration in mammalian fur and bird feathers, huge species and ecological diversity of wildlife make interpretation of results difficult, especially since the correlation between Hg concentration in these tissues and concentration in soft tissues in general are usually very weak or non-existent. Therefore, information on Hg obtained from fur and feather samples is not sufficient to clearly assess Hg intoxication of wildlife and their habitats.
4 Conclusions
Long-term studies of the abiotic environment, human toxicology and the ecotoxicology of Hg hold major gaps in knowledge on the behaviour of Hg in nature (including MeHg biomagnification) and subsequent long-term ignoring of the evidence of the negative effects of this metal on humans and other vertebrates. Maintaining the functioning of the various economic sectors based on Hg and coal-based energy has led to a dramatic increase in the environmental problems associated with Hg. Currently, the most important way to reduce anthropogenic Hg emissions and to reduce the health risks to humans and ecosystems globally is to act in international agreements. The first formal and very important preventive action was the signing of the Minamata Convention on Mercury in October 2013 (Kessler 2013; Larson 2014). However, its ratification, implementation and raising of awareness of entire societies and individuals will determine not only the health condition of this and future generations and the different environments and also the survival of many sensitive species, especially those directly or indirectly dependent on aquatic food chains. This requires, among other things, control of the presence of Hg in abiotic and biotic environments, including biomonitoring.
References
Aastrup P, Riget F, Dietz R, Asmund D (2000) Lead, zinc, cadmium, mercury, selenium and copper in Greenland caribou and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Sci Total Environ 245:149–159
Abeysinghe KS, Yang XD, Goodale E, Anderson CWN, Bishop K, Cao A et al (2017) Total mercury and methylmercury concentrations over a gradient of contamination in earthworms living in rice paddy soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:1202–1210
Ackerman JT, Eagles-Smith CA, Herzog MP (2011) Bird mercury concentrations change rapidly as chicks age: toxicological risk is highest at hatching and fledging. Environ Sci Technol 45:5418–5425
Ackerman JT, Eagles-Smith CA, Herzog MO, Hartman CA, Peterson SH, Evers DC et al (2016) Avian mercury exposure and toxicological risk across western North America: a synthesis. Sci Total Environ 568:749–769
Adriano DC (2001) Trace elements in terrestrial environments. Biogeochemistry, BIOAVAILABILITY, AND RISK OF METALS. Springer, New York, pp 411–458
ADSTR (1999) Toxicological profile for mercury. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, pp 600
Agarwal R, Behari JR (2007) Role of selenium in mercury intoxication in mice. Ind Health 45:388–395
Agrawal H, Bhatnagar P, Flora SJS (2015) Changes in tissue oxidative stress, brain biogenic amines and acetylcholinesterase following co-exposure to lead, arsenic and mercury in rats. Food Chem Toxicol 86:208–216
Akerblom S, Bignert A, Meili M, Sonesten L, Sundbom M (2014) Half a century of changing mercury levels in Swedish freshwater fish. Ambio 43(Suppl 1):91–103
Albinska J, Góralski J, Szynkowska MI, Leśniewska E, Paryjczak T (2011) Mercury in carcasses of wild animals hunted in the province of Lodz [in Polish]. Rocz Ochr Środ 13:525–540
Allan M, Le Roux G, Sonke JE, Piotrowska N, Streel M, Fagel N (2013) Reconstructing historical atmospheric mercury deposition in Western Europe using: Misten peat bog cores, Belgium. Sci Total Environ 442:209–301
Alleva E, Francia N, Pandolfi M, De Marinis AM, Chiarotti F, Santucci D (2006) Organochlorine and heavy-metal contaminants in wild mammals and birds of Urbino-Pesaro province, Italy: an analytic overview for potential bioindicators. Arch Environ Conatm Toxicol 51:123–134
AMAP/UNEP (2008) Technical background report to the global atmospheric mercury assessment. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme/UNEP Chemicals Branch, pp 159
AMAP/UNEP (2013) Technical background report for the global mercury assessment 2013. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, Norway/UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland. vi + 263 p
Aronson SM (2005) The dancing cats of Minamata Bay. Med Health R I 88:209
Aschner JL (2000) Possible mechanisms of methylmercury cytotoxicity. Mol Biol Today 1:43–48
Aschner M, Aschner JL (1990) Mercury neurotoxicity: mechanisms of blood–brain barrier transport. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 14:169–176
Aulerich RJ, Ringer RK, Iwamoto S (1974) Effects of dietary mercury on mink. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2:43–50
Azevedo R, Rodriguez E (2012) Phytotoxicity of mercury in plants: a review. J Bot 2012, Article ID 848614, pp 6
Badzinski SS, Gorman KB, Petrie SA (2009) Relationships between hepatic trace element concentrations, reproductive status, and body condition of female greater scaup. Environ Pollut 157:1886–1893
Balk L, Hägerroth PA, Akerman G, Hanson M, Tjärnlund U, Hansson T et al (2009) Wild birds of declining European species are dying from a thiamine deficiency syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12001–12006
Bank MS, Burgess JR, Evers DC, Loftin CS (2007) Mercury contamination of biota from Acadia National Park, Maine: a review. Environ Monit Assess 126:105–115
Bargali R, Baldi F (1984) Mercury and methyl mercury in higher fungi and their relation with the substrata in a cinnabar mining area. Chemosphere 13:1059–1071
Barkay T, Wagner-Döbler I (2005) Microbial transformations of mercury: potentials, challenges, and achievements in controlling mercury toxicity in the environment. Adv Appl Microbiol 57:1–52
Bartrons M, Gratton C, Spiesman BJ, Vander Zanden MJ (2015) Taking the trophic bypass: aquatic-terrestrial linkage reduces methylmercury in a terrestrial food web. Ecol Appl 25:151–159
Basu N (2012) Piscivorous mammalian wildlife as sentinels of methylmercury exposure and neurotoxicity in humans. In: Ceccatelli S, Aschner M (eds) Methylmercury and neurotoxicity, Current topics in neurotoxicity, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 357–370
Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Bursian SJ, Elliott J, Rouvinen-Watt K, Chan HM (2007) Mink as a sentinel species in environmental health. Environ Res 103:130–144
Belzile N, Chen YW, Yang DY, Truong YTH, Zhao QX (2009) Selenium bioaccumulation in freshwater organisms and antagonistic effect against mercury assimilation. Environ Bioindic 4:203–221
Bennett RS, French JB, Rossmann R, Haebler R (2009) Dietary toxicity and tissue accumulation of methylmercury in American kestrels. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56:149–156
Bernhoft RA (2012) Mercury toxicity and treatment: a review of the literature. J Environ Publ Health 2012:460508
Berzas Nevado JJ, Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadios RC, Mateo R, Rodríguez Fariñas N, Rodríguez-Estival J, Patiño Ropero MJ (2012) Mercury exposure and mechanism of response in large game using the Almaden mercury mining area (Spain) as a case study. Environ Res 112:58–66
Biewener AA (2011) Muscle function in avian flight: achieving power and control. Philos Trans R Soc B 366:1496–1506
Bilandžić N, Sedak M, Dokić M, Simic B (2010a) Wild boar tissue levels of cadmium, lead and mercury in seven regions of continental Croatia. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:738–743
Bilandžić N, Deždek D, Sedak M, Dokić M, Solomun B, Verenina I et al (2010b) Concentrations of trace elements in tissues of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and stone marten (Martes foina) from suburban and rural areas in Croatia. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 85:486–491
Binkowski ŁJ, Sawicka-Kapusta K, Szarek J, Strzyżewska E, Felsmann M (2013) Histopathology of liver and kidneys of wild living mallards Anas platyrhynchos and coots Fulica atra with considerable concentrations of lead and cadmium. Sci Total Environ 450–451:326–333
Blum JD (2011) Applications of stable mercury isotopes to biogeochemistry. In: Baskaran M (ed) Handbook of environmental isotope geochemistry, Advances in isotope geochemistry. Springer, Berlin, pp 229–245
Blus LJ, Henny CJ (1990) Lead and cadmium concentrations in mink from northern Idaho. Northwest Sci 64:219–223
Borg K, Wanntrop H, Erne K, Hanko E (1969) Alkyl mercury poisoning in terrestrial Swedish wildlife. Viltrevy 6:301–379
Bose-O’Reilly S, McCarty KM, Steckling N, Lettmeier B (2010) Mercury exposure and children’s health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 40:186–215
Bowman J, Kidd AG, Martin PA, McDaniel TV, Nituch LA, Schulte-Hostedde AI (2012) Testing for bias in a sentinel species: contaminants in free-ranging domestic, wild, and hybrid mink. Environ Res 112:77–82
Bradley RD, Ammerman LK, Baker RJ, Bradley LC, Cook JA, Dowler RC et al (2014) Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico. Occas Pap Mus Tex Tech Univ 327:1–27
Branco V, Canario J, Vale C, Raimundo J, Reis C (2004) Total and organic mercury concentrations in muscle tissue of the blue shark (Prionace glauca L.1758) from the Northeast Atlantic. Mar Pollut Bull 49:854–874
Braune BM, Malone BJ (2006a) Organochlorines and trace elements in upland birds harvested in Canada. Sci Total Environ 363:60–69
Braune BM, Malone BJ (2006b) Mercury and selenium in livers of waterfowl harvested in northern Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50:284–289
Bridges CC, Zalups RK (2010) Transport of inorganic mercury and methylmercury in target tissues and organs. J Toxicol Environ Health B 13:385–410
Brzezinski M, Zalewski A, Niemczynowicz A, Jarzyna I, Suska-Maławska M (2014) The use of chemical markers for the identification of farm escapees in feral mink populations. Ecotoxicology 23:767–778
Burbacher TM, Rodier PM, Weiss B (1990) Methylmercury developmental neurotoxicity: a comparison of effects in human and animals. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12:191–202
Burger J, Gochfeld M (1985) Comparisons of nine heavy metals in salt gland and liver of greater scaup (Aythya marila), black duck (Anas rubripes) and mallard (A. platyrhynchos). Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Comp Pharmacol 81(2):287–292
Burger J, Gochfeld M (2009) Comparison of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese, mercury and selenium in feathers in bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and comparison with common eider (Somateria mollissima), glaucous-winged gull (Larus glaucescens), pigeon guillemot (Cepphus columba), and tufted puffin (Fratercula cirrhata) from the Aleutian Chain of Alaska. Environ Monit Assess 152:357–367
Burger J, Jehl JR, Gochfeld M (2013) Selenium:mercury molar ratio in eared grebes (Podiceps nigricollis) as a possible biomarker of exposure. Ecol Indic 34:60–68
Burton DT, Turley SD, Fisher DJ, Green DJ, Shedd TR (2006) Bioaccumulation of total mercury and monomethylmercury in the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Water Air Soil Pollut 170:37–54
Bushey JT, Nallana AG, Montesdeoca MR, Driscoll CT (2008) Mercury dynamics of a northern hardwood canopy. Atmos Environ 42:6905–6914
Caley ER (1928) Mercury and its compounds in ancient times. J Chem Educ 5:419–424
Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (2000) Canadian tissue residue guidelines for the protection of wildlife consumers of aquatic biota: methylmercury. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Winnipeg, pp 7. http://ceqg-rcqe.ccme.ca/download/en/294, accessed 20.04.2014
Carmichael DB, Baker OE (1989) Pesticide, PCB and heavy metal residues in South Carolina mink. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agen 43:444–451
Celechovska O, Malota L, Zima S (2008) Entry of heavy metals into food chains: a 20-year comparison study in Northern Moravia (Czech Republic). Acta Vet Brno 77:645–652
Champoux L, Rodrigue J, Braune B, Leclair D (1999) Contaminants in Northern Québec wildlife. In: Jensen J (ed) Synopsis of research conducted under the 1997-1998 Northern Contaminants Program. Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa, Canada, pp 109–116
Charbonneau SM, Munro IC, Nera EA, Willes RF, Kuiper-Goodman T, Iverson F et al (1974) Subacute toxicity of methylmercury in the adult cat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 27:569–581
Chumchal MM, Rainwater TR, Osborn SC, Roberts AP, Abel MT, Cobb GP et al (2011) Mercury speciation and biomagnification in the food web of Caddo Lake, Texas and Louisiana, USA, a subtropical freshwater ecosystem, USA, a subtropical freshwater ecosystem. Environ Chem 30:1153–1162
Clarkson TW (1992) Mercury: major issues in environmental health. Environ Health Perspect 100:31–38
Clarkson TW, Magos L (2006) The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 36:609–662
Commission Regulation, EC (2006) Commission Regulation No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. OJ EU L364/5
Corsolini S, Focardi S, Leonzio C, Lovari S, Monaci F, Romeo G (1999) Heavy metals and chlorinated hydrocarbon concentrations in the red fox in relation to some biological parameters. Environ Monit Assess 54:87–100
Cosson RP (1989) Relationships between heavy metal and metallothionein-like protein levels in the liver and kidney of two birds: the greater flamingo and the little egret. Comp Biochem Physiol 94C:243–248
Cosson RP, Amiard JC, Amiard-Triquet C (1988) Trace elements in little egrets and flamingos of Camargue, France. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 15:107–116 (Hg, Cd, Pb, Se)
Crespo-López ME, Macêdo GL, Pereira SI, Arrifano GP, Picanço-Diniz DL, Nascimento JL et al (2009) Mercury and human genotoxicity: critical considerations and possible molecular mechanisms. Pharmacol Res 60:212–220
Cristol DA, Brasso RL, Condon AM, Fovargue RE, Friedman SL, Hallinger KK et al (2008) The movement of aquatic mercury through terrestrial food webs. Science 320:335
Cristol DA, Savoy L, Evers DC, Perkins C, Taylor R, Varian-Ramos CW (2012) Mercury in waterfowl from a contaminated river in Virginia. J Wildl Manag 76:1617–1624
Cumbie PM, Jenkins JH (1975) Mercury accumulation in native mammals of the southeast. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Game Fish Comm 28:639–648
Danielsson S, Hedman J, Miller A, Bignert A (2011) Mercury in perch from Norway, Sweden and Finland—Geographical patterns and temporal trends. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Report nr 8:2011, pp 22
Dauwe T, Janssens E, Bervoets L, Blust R, Eens M (2005) Heavy-metal concentrations in female laying great tits (Parus major) and their clutches. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49:249–256
De Flora S, Bennicelli C, Bagnasco M (1994) Genotoxicity of mercury compounds. A review. Mutat Res 317:57–79
Dehn LA, Follmann EH, Thomas DL, Sheffield GG, Rosa C, Duffy LK et al (2006) Trophic relationships in an Arctic food web and implications for trace metal transfer. Sci Total Environ 362:103–123
Depew DC, Basu N, Burgess NM, Campbell LM, Evers DC, Grasman KA et al (2012) Derivation of screening benchmarks for dietary methylmercury exposure for the common loon (Gavia immer): rationale for use in ecological risk assessment. Toxicol Chem 31:2399–2407
Depew DC, Burgess NM, Anderson MR, Baker R, Bhavsar SP, Bodaly RA et al (2013a) An overview of mercury concentrations in freshwater fish species: a national fish mercury dataset for Canada. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 70:436–451
Depew DC, Burgess NM, Campbell LM (2013b) Modelling mercury concentrations in prey fish: derivation of a national-scale common indicator of dietary mercury exposure for piscivorous fish and wildlife. Environ Pollut 176:234–243
DesGranges JL, Rodrigue J, Tardif B, Laperle M (1998) Mercury accumulation and biomagnification in ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in the James Bay and Hudson Bay regions of Québec. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 35:330–341
DeSorbo CR, Nye PE, Loukmas JJ, Evers DC (2008) Assessing mercury exposure and spatial patterns in adult and nestling bald eagles in New York State, with an emphasis on the Catskill Region. Report BRI 2008-06 Submitted to The Nature Conservancy, Albany, New York. BioDiversity Research Institute, Gorham, Maine, pp 1–34
De Vos W, Tarvainen T, Salminen R, Reeder S, De Vivo B, Demetriades A et al (2006) Geochemical Atlas of Europe. Part 2. Interpretation of geochemical maps, additional tables, figures, maps and related publications. Geological Survey, Finland
Dietz R, Riget F, Born EW (2000) An assessment of selenium to mercury in Greenland marine animals. Sci Total Environ 245:15–24
Dietz R, Sonne C, Basu N, Braune B, O’Hara T, Letcher RJ et al (2013) What are the toxicological effects of mercury in Arctic biota? Sci Total Environ 443:775–790
Directive 2008/105/EC (2008) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. OJ EU L348/84
D’Itri FM (1991) Mercury contamination—what we have learned since Minamata. Environ Monit Assess 19:165–182
Dobrakowski M, Kiełtucki J, Wyparło-Wszelaki M, Kasperczyk S (2013) Effects of a chronic lead intoxication on the pathophysiological changes in the digestive system and interactions of lead with trace elements. Med Środ 16:42–46 [in Polish]
Dobrowolska A, Melosik M (2002) Mercury contents in liver and kidneys wild boar (Sus scrofa) and red deer (Cervus elaphus). Z Jagdwiss 48:156–160
Dombaiová R (2005) Mercury and methylmercury in plants from differently contaminated sites in Slovakia. Plant Soil Environ 51:456–463
Domingo JL (1994) Metal-induced developmental toxicity in mammals: a review. J Toxicol Environ Health 42:123–141
Dornbos P, Strom S, Basu N (2013) Mercury exposure and neurochemical biomarkers in multiple brain regions of Wisconsin river otters (Lontra canadensis). Ecotoxicology 22:469–475
Douglas TA, Loseto LL, Macdonald RW, Outridge P, Dommergue A, Poulain A et al (2012) The fate of mercury in Arctic terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, a review. Environ Chem 9:321–355
Drasch G, Horvat M, Stoeppler M (2004) Mercury. In: Merian E, Anke M, Ihnat M, Stoepper M (eds) Elements and their compounds in the environment. WILEY-VCH, Weinheim, pp 931–1005
Drewett DVV, Willson JD, Cristol DA, Chin SY, Hopkins WA (2013) Inter- and intraspecific variation in mercury bioaccumulation by snakes inhabiting a contaminated river floodplain. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:1178–1186
Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT, Yee J, Adelsbach TL, Takekawa JY, Miles AK et al (2008) Mercury correlations among six tissues for four waterbird species breeding in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:2136–2153
Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT, Yee J, Adelsbach TL (2009) Mercury demethylation in livers of four waterbird species: evidence for dose-response thresholds with liver total mercury. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:568–577
Eagles-Smith CA, Willacker JJ, Flanagan Pritz CM (2014) Mercury in fishes from 21 national parks in the Western United States—inter- and intra-park variation in concentrations and ecological risk. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1051, pp 54
Eckersley N (2010) Advanced mercury removal technologies. Hydrocarbon Proc 89:29–35
Eira C, Torres J, Vingada J, Miquel J (2005) Concentration of some toxic elements in Oryctolagus cuniculus and in its intestinal cestode Mosgovoyia ctenoides, in Dunas de Mira (Portugal). Sci Total Environ 346:81–86
Ekino S, Susa M, Ninomiya T, Imamura K, Kitamura T (2007) Minamata disease revisited: an update on the acute and chronic manifestations of methyl mercury poisoning. J Neurol Sci 262:131–144
Endo T, Haraguchi K, Hotta Y, Hisamichi Y, Lavery S, Dalebout ML et al (2005) Total mercury, methyl mercury, and selenium levels in the red meat of small cetaceans sold for human consumption in Japan. Environ Sci Technol 39:5703–5708
Esbri JM, Lopez-Berdonzes MA, Higueras P, Gonzalez-Pavon A (2011) Mercury bioaccumulation in wild fungi from Almaden mining district (Spain). Geophys Res Abstr 13:EGU2011-12550-1
Eto K, Takizawa Y, Akagi H, Haraguchi K, Asano S, Takahata N et al (1999) Differential diagnosis between organic and inorganic mercury poisoning in human cases—the pathologic point of view. Toxicol Pathol 27:664–671
Eto K, Marumoto M, Takeya M (2010) The pathology of methylmercury poisoning (Minamata disease). Neuropathology 30:471–479
Eurochlor (2016) Chlor-alkali industry needs permanent disposal solutions and welcomes the proposed EU Mercury Regulation (2016/0023). Eurochlor 17, 7 Mar 2016
Evans ED (1993) Mercury and other metals in bald eagle feathers and other tissues from Michigan, nearby areas of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ohio, Ontario and Alaska 1985-1989. Wildlife Division Report No. 3200, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, pp 57
Evans RD, Addison EM, Villeneuve JY, MacDonald KS, Joachim DG (2000) Distribution of inorganic and methylmercury among tissues in mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis). Environ Res 84:133–139
Evans RD, Hickie B, Rouvinen-Watt K, Wang W (2016) Partitioning and kinetics of methylmercury among organs in captive mink (Neovison vison): a stable isotope tracer study. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 42:163–169
Evers DC (2005) Mercury connections: the extent and effects of mercury pollution in northeastern North America. BioDiversity Research Institute, Gorham, ME pp 28
Evers DC, Clair T (2005) Mercury in northeastern North America: a synthesis of existing databases. Ecotoxicology 14:7–14
Evers DC, Taylor KM, Major A, Taylor RJ, Poppenga R, Scheuhammer AM (2003) Common loon eggs as indicators of methylmercury availability in North America. Ecotoxicology 12:69–81
Evers DC, Burgess NM, Champoux L, Hoskins B, Major A, Goodale WM et al (2005) Patterns and interpretation of mercury exposure in freshwater avian communities in northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14:193–221
Evers DC, Han YJ, Driscoll CT, Kamman NC, Goodale MW, Lambert KF et al (2007) Biological mercury hotspots in the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada. BioScience 57:29–43
Falandysz J (1994) Some toxic and trace metals in big game hunted in the northern part of Poland in 1987–1991. Sci Total Environ 141:59–73
Falandysz J, Borovička J (2013) Macro and trace mineral constituents and radionuclides in mushrooms—health benefits and risks. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:477–501
Falandysz J, Jakuczun B, Mizera T (1988) Metals and organochlorines in four female white-tailed eagles. Marine Pollut Bull 19:521–526
Falandysz J, Ichihashi H, Mizera T, Yamasaki S (2000) Mineral composition of selected tissues and organs of white-tailed eagle. Rocz PZH 51:1–5 (in Polish)
Falandysz J, Zhang J, Wang Y-Z, Saba M, Krasinska G, Wiejak A et al (2015) Evaluation of mercury contamination in fungi Boletus species from latosols, lateritic red earths, and red and yellow earths in the circum-Pacific mercuriferous belt of southwestern China. PLoS One 10(11):e0143608
Falkowska L, Reindl AR, Szumiło E, Kwaśniak J, Staniszewska M, Bełdowska M et al (2013) Mercury and chlorinated pesticides on the highest level of the food web as exemplified by herring from the Southern Baltic and African penguins from the Zoo. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1549
Falnoga I, Tusek-Znidaric M, Horvat M, Stegnar P (2000) Mercury, selenium, and cadmium in human autopsy samples from Idrija residents and mercury mine workers. Environ Res 84:211–218
Farina M, Dahm KC, Schwalm FD, Brusque AM, Frizzo ME, Zeni G et al (2003) Methylmercury increases glutamate release from brain synaptosomes and glutamate uptake by cortical slices from suckling rat pups: modulatory effect of ebselen. Toxicol Sci 73:135–140
Farina M, Avila DS, da Rocha JBT, Aschner M (2013) Metals, oxidative stress and neurodegeneration: a focus on iron, manganese and mercury. Neurochem Int 62:575–594
Farrar WP, Edwards JF, Willard MD (1994) Pathology in a dog associated with elevated tissue mercury concentrations. J Vet Diagn Invest 6:511–514
Farris FF, Dedrick RL, Allen PV, Smith JC (1993) Physiological model for the pharmacokinetics of methyl mercury in the growing rat. Appl Pharm 119:74–90
Fernandes Azevedo B, Barros Furieri L, Peçanha FM, Wiggers GA, Vassalio PF, Simones MR et al (2012) Toxic effects of mercury on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012:article ID: 949048 pp 11
Ferrara R, Maserti BE, Mazzolai B, Di Francesco F, Eijner H, Svanberg S et al (1999) Atmospheric mercury in abandoned mine structures and restored mine buildings at Mt. Amiata, Italy. In: Ebinghaus R, Turner RR, de Lacerda LDD, Vasiliev O, Salomons W (eds) Mercury contaminated sites: characterization, risk assessment, and remediation. Springer, Berlin, pp 249–257
Finley MT, Stickel WH, Christensen RE (1979) Mercury residues in tissues of dead and surviving birds fed methylmercury. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 21:105–110
Finley MLD, Kidd KA, Curry RA, Lescord GL, Clayden MG, O’Driscoll NJ (2016) A comparison of mercury biomagnification through lacustrine food webs supporting brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and other salmonid fishes. Front Environ Sci 4:23
Fischer HI, Bartlett LM (1957) Diurnal cycles in liver weights in birds. Condor 59:364–372
Florijančić T, Opačak A, BoŠković I, Jelkić D, Ozimec SŠ, Bogdanović T, ListeŠ I, Škrivanko M, PuŠkadija Z (2016) Heavy metal concentrations in the liver of two wild duck species: influence of species and gender. Ital J Anim Sci 8(sup3):222–224
Fortin C, Beauchamp G, Dansereau M, Larivière N, Bélanger D (2001) Spatial variation in mercury concentrations in wild mink and river otter carcasses from the James Bay territory, Quebec, Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 40:121–127
Fraga CG (2005) Relevance, essentiality and toxicity of trace elements in human health. Mol Aspects Med 26:235–244
Frederick P, Jayasena N (2011) Altered pairing behaviour and reproductive success in white ibises exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of methylmercury. Proc Biol Sci 278:1851–1857
Fuchsman PC, Brown LE, Henning MH, Bock MJ, Magar VS (2017) Toxicity reference values for methylmercury effects on avian reproduction: critical review and analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:294–319
Galić N, Prpic-Mehicic G, Prester L, Blanusa M, Krnic Z, Ferencic Z (1999) Dental amalgam mercury exposure in rats. Biometals 12:227–231
Gamberg M, Braune BM (1999) Contaminant residue levels in arctic wolves (Canis lupus) from the Yukon Territory, Canada. Sci Total Environ 243–244:329–338
Gamberg M, Boila G, Stern G, Roach P (2005a) Cadmium, mercury and selenium concentrations in mink (Mustela vison) from Yukon, Canada. Sci Total Environ 351–352:523–529
Gamberg M, Braune BM, Davey E, Elkin B, Hoekstra PF, Kennedy D et al (2005b) Spatial and temporal trends of contaminants in terrestrial biota from the Canadian Arctic. Sci Total Environ 351–352:148–164
Gamberg M, Palmer M, Roach P (2005c) Temporal and geographic trends in trace element concentrations in moose from Yukon, Canada. Sci Total Environ 351–352:530–538
Gandhi DN, Panchal GM, Dhull DK (2013) Influence of gestational exposure on the effects of prenatal exposure to methyl mercury on postnatal development in rats. Cent Eur J Public Health 21:30–35
Gann GL, Powell CH, Chumchal MM, Drenner RW (2015) Hg-contaminated terrestrial spiders pose a potential risk to songbirds at Caddo Lake (Texas/Louisiana, USA). Environ Toxicol Chem 34:303–306
García-Barrera T, Gómez-Ariza JL, González-Fernández M, Moreno F, García-Sevillano MA, Gómez-Jacinto V (2012) Biological responses related to agonistic, antagonistic and synergistic interactions of chemical species. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:2237–2225
Gasparik J, Dobias M, Capcarova M, Smehyl P, Slamecka J, Bujko J et al (2012) Concentration of cadmium, mercury, zinc, copper and cobalt in the tissues of wild boar (Sus scrofa) hunted in the western Slovakia. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 47:1212–1216
Genovesi P, Carnevali L, Alonzi A, Scalera R (2012) Alien mammals in Europe: updated numbers and trends, and assessment of the effects on biodiversity. Integr Zool 7:247–253
George GN, MacDonald TC, Korbas M, Singh SP, Myers GJ, Watson GE et al (2011) The chemical forms of mercury and selenium in whale skeletal muscle. Metallomics 3:1232–1237
Gerstenberger SL (2004) Mercury concentrations in migratory waterfowl harvested from Southern Nevada Wildlife Management areas, USA. Environ Toxicol 19:35–44
Giżejewska A, Spodniewska A, Barski D (2014) Concentration of lead, cadmium, and mercury in tissues of European beaver (Castor fiber) from the north-eastern Poland. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 58:77–80
Glodek A, Pacyna JM (2009) Mercury emission from coal-fired power plants in Poland. Atmos Environ 43:5668–5673
Gnamuš A, Horvat M (1999) Mercury in the terrestrial food web of the Idrija mining area. In: Ebinghaus R, Turner RR, de Lacerda LDD, Vasiliev O, Salomons W (eds) Mercury contaminated sites: characterization, risk assessment, and remediation. Springer, Berlin, pp 281-317
Gómez MG, Klink JDC, Boffetta P, Español S, Sällsten G, Quintana JG (2007) Exposure to mercury in the mine of Almadén. Occup Environ Med 64:389–395
Grandjean P, Satoh H, Murata K, Eto K (2010) Adverse effects of methylmercury: environmental health research implications. Environ Health Perspect 118:1137–1145
Greenwold MJ, Sawyer RH (2013) Molecular evolution and expression of archosaurian β-keratins: diversification and expansion of archosaurian β-keratins and the origin of feather β-keratins. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 9999:1–13
Gregoire DS, Poulain AJ (2016) A physiological role for Hg during phototrophic growth. Nat Geosci 9:121–125
Greichus YA, Greichus A, Emerick RJ (1973) Insecticides, polychlorinated biphenyls and mercury in wild cormorants, pelicans, their eggs, food and environment. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 9:321–328
Grosicki A, Kowalski B (2002) Lead, cadmium and mercury influence on selenium fate in rats. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 46:337–343
Gu B, Bian Y, Miller CL, Dong W, Jiang X, Liang L (2011) Mercury reduction and complexation by natural organic matter in anoxic environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:1479–1483
Gutleb AC, Kranz A, Nechay G, Toman A (1998) Heavy metal concentrations in livers and kidneys of the otter (Lutra lutra) from central Europe. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 60:273–279
Hachiya N (2006) The history and the present of Mina mata disease. JMAJ 49:112–118
Hahn E, Hahn K, Stoeppler M (1993) Bird feathers as bioindicators in areas of the German environmental specimen bank—bioaccumulation of mercury in food-chains and exogenous deposition of atmospheric pollution with lead and cadmium. Sci Total Environ 140:259–270
Haines KJR, Evans RD, O’Brien M, Evans HE (2010) Accumulation of mercury and selenium in the brain of river otters (Lontra canadensis) and wild mink (Mustela vison) from Nova Scotia, Canada. Sci Total Environ 408:537–542
Halbrook RS, Jenkins JH, Bush PB, Seabolt ND (1994) Sublethal concentrations of mercury in river otters: monitoring environmental contamination. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 27:306–310
Hall BD, Doucette JL, Bates LM, Bugajski A, Niyogi S, Somers CM (2014) Differential trends in mercury concentrations in double-crested cormorant populations of the Canadian Prairies. Ecotoxicology 23:419–428
Hanko E, Erne K, Wanntorp H, Borg K (1970) Poisoning in ferrets by tissues of alkyl mercury-fed chickens. Acta Vet Scand 11:268–282
Hansteen H, Ellingsen DG, Clausen KO, Kjuus H (1993) Chromo some aberrations in chloralkali workers previously exposed to mercury vapour. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:375–381
Harding L, Harris M, Elliott J (1998) Heavy and trace metals in wild mink (Mustela vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) captured on rivers receiving metals discharges. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 61:600–607
Hargreaves AL, Whiteside DP, Gilchrist G (2011) Concentrations of 17 elements, including mercury, in the tissues, food and abiotic environment of Arctic shorebirds. Sci Total Environ 409:3757–3770
Harley J, Lieske C, Bhojwani S, Castellini JM, López JA, O’Hara TM (2015) Mercury and methylmercury distribution in tissues of sculpins from the Bering Sea. Polar Biol 38:1535–1543
Heinz GH (1996) Mercury poisoning in wildlife. In: Faibrother A, Locke LN, Hoff GL (eds) Non-infectious diseases of wildlife. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp 118–127
Heinz GH, Locke LN (1976) Brain lesions in mallard ducklings from parents fed methylmercury. Avian Dis 20:9–17
Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Klimstra JD, Stebbnis KR, Kondrad SL, Erwin CA (2009) Species differences in the sensitivity of avian embryos to methylmercury. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56:129–138
Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Klimstra JD, Stebbins KR, Kondrad SL, Erwin CA (2011) Teratogenic effects of injected methylmercury on avian embryos. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:1593–1598
Henny CJ, Kaiser JL, Grove RA (2009) PCDDs, PCDFs, PCBs, OC pesticides and mercury in fish and osprey eggs from Willamette River, Oregon (1993, 2001 and 2006) with calculated biomagnification factors. Ecotoxicology 18:151–173
Henriksson K, Karppanen E, Helminen M (1966) High residue of mercury in Finnish white-tailed eagles. Ornis Fennica 43:38–45
Hernández LM, González MJ, Rico MC, Fernández MA, Baluja G (1985) Presence and biomagnification of organochlorine pollutants and heavy metals in mammals of Doñana National Park (Spain), 1982-1983. J Environ Sci Health B 20:633–650
Hernandez F, Oldenkamp RE, Webster S, Beasley JC, Farina LL, Wisely SM (2017) Raccoons (Procyon lotor) as sentinels of trace element contamination and physiological effects of exposure to coal fly ash. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 72:235–246
Hills LM, Stevenson RW (2006) Mercury and lead content in raw materials. PCA R&D Serial No. 2888 (www.cement.org, 12.03.2012)
Hoekstra PF, Braune BM, Elkin B, Armstrong FAJ, Muir DCG (2003) Concentrations of selected essential and non-essential elements in arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) and wolverines (Gulo gulo) from the Canadian Arctic. Sci Total Environ 309:81–92
Holliday MA, Potter D, Jarrah A, Bearg S (1967) The relation of metabolic rate to body weight and organ size. Pediatr Res 1:185–195
Holt G, Frøslie A, Norheim G (1979) Mercury, DDE, and PCB in the avian fauna in Norway 1965-1976. Acta Vet Scand (Suppl) 70:1–28
Honda K, Nasu T, Tatsukawa R (1986) Seasonal changes in mercury accumulation in the black-eared kite, Milvus migrans lineatus. Environ Pollut 42A:325–334
Honda K, Ichihashi H, Tatsukawa R (1987) Tissue distribution of heavy metals and their variations with age, sex, and habitat in Japanese serows (Capricornis crispus). Arch Environ Conatm Toxicol 16:551–561
Hopkins WA, Hopkins LB, Unrine JM, Snodgrass J, Elliot JD (2007) Mercury concentrations in tissues of osprey from the Carolinas, USA. J Wildl Manag 71:1819–1829
Horowitz HM, Jacob DJ, Amos HM, Streets DG, Sunderland EM (2014) Historical mercury releases from commercial products: global environmental implications. Environ Sci Technol 48:10242–10250
Hough EJ, Zabik ME (1972) Distribution of mercury in organs of McGraw-mallard ducks given methyl mercury chloride. Poult Sci 51:2101–2103
Houserova P, Hedbavny J, Matejicek D, Kràčmar S, Sitko J, Kubàň V (2005) Determination of total mercury in muscle, intestines, liver and kidney tissues of cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus) and Eurasian buzzard (Buteo buteo). Vet Med Czech 50:61–68
Houserova P, Kubàň V, Spurny P, Habarata P (2006) Determination of total mercury and mercury species in fish and aquatic ecosystems of Moravian rivers. Vet Med 51:101–110
Houserova P, Kubàň V, Kràčmar S, Sitko J (2007) Total mercury and mercury species in birds and fish in an aquatic ecosystem in the Czech Republic. Environ Pollut 145:185–194
Hu H, Lin H, Zheng W, Tomanicek SJ, Johs A, Feng X et al (2013) Oxidation and methylation of dissolved elemental mercury by anaerobic bacteria. Nat Geosci 6:751–754
Huang SW, Chen CY, Chen MH (2008) Total and organic hg in fish from the reservoir of a chlor-alkali plant in Tainan, Taiwan. J Food Drug Anal 16:75–80
Hughes MR (1970) Relative kidney size in nonpasserine birds with functional salt glands. Condor 72:164–168
Hughes KD, Martin PA, de Solla SR (2014) Contaminants in overwintering canvasbacks (Aythya valisineria) and resident mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) in the Lake St. Clair/St. Clair River Area. Environment Canada, Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, pp 21
Hultberg H (2002) Treatment of lakes and storage reservoirs with very low dosages of selenium to reduce methyl mercury in fish. Report, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd, pp 38
Hylander LD, Meili M (2003) 500 years of mercury production: global annual inventory by region until 2000 and associated emissions. Sci Total Environ 304:13–27
Hyvärinen H, Tyni P, Nieminen P (2003) Effects of moult, age, and sex on the accumulation of heavy metals in the otter (Lutra lutra) in Finland. Bull Environ Conatm Toxicol 70:278–284
IARC (1993) International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol 58, WHO
IARC (2017) International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol 58, WHO. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php
Isani G, Carpenè E (2014) Metallothioneins, unconventional proteins from unconventional animals: a long journey from nematodes to mammals. Biomolecules 4:435–457
Jackson AK, Evers DC, Folsom SB, Condon AM, Diener J, Goodrick LF et al (2011) Mercury exposure in terrestrial birds far downstream of an historical point source. Environ Pollut 159:3302–3308
Jackson AK, Evers DC, Adams EM, Cristol DA, Eagles-Smith C, Edmonds ST et al (2015) Songbirds as sentinels of mercury in terrestrial habitats of eastern North America. Ecotoxicology 24:453–467
Jensen S, Johnels AG, Olsson M, Westermark T (1972) The avifauna of Sweden as indicators of environmental contamination with mercury and chlorinated hydrocarbons. In: Brill EJ (ed) Proceedings of the 15th international ornithological congress, Hague, The Netherlands, pp 455–465
Jin L, Liang L, Jiang G, Ying Xu Y (2006) Methylmercury, total mercury and total selenium in four common freshwater fish species from Ya-Er Lake, China. Environ Geochem Health 28:401–407
Jo S, Woo HD, Kwon HJ, Oh SY, Park JD, Hong YS et al (2015) Estimation of the biological half-life of methylmercury using a population toxicokinetic model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:9054–9067
Johnles A, Westermark T (1969) Mercury contamination of the environment in Sweden. In: Miller MW, Berg GG (eds) Chemical fallout. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp 221–239
Julshamn K, Ringdal O, Haugsnes J (1986) Minerals and trace elements in fillets of nine freshwater fishes from Norway. Fisk Dir Skr Ser Ernering 2:185–191
Kabata-Pendias A (2011) Trace elements in soils and plants, 4th edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL
Kabata-Pendias A, Mukherjee AB (2007) Trace elements from soil to human. Springer, Berlin
Kalas JA, Ringsby TH, Lierhagen S (1995) Metals and selenium in wild animals from Norwegian areas close to Russian nickel smelters. Environ Monit Assess 36:251–270
Kalisinska E, Lisowski P, Salicki W, Kucharska T, Kavetska K (2009) Mercury in wild terrestrial carnivorous mammals from north-western Poland and unusual fish diet of red fox. Acta Theriol 54:345–356
Kalisinska E, Budis H, Podlasińska J, Łanocha N, Kavetska KM (2010) Body condition and mercury concentration in apparently healthy goosander (Mergus merganser) wintering in the Odra estuary, Poland. Ecotoxicology 19:1382–1399
Kalisinska E, Lisowski P, Kosik-Bogacka DI (2012a) Red fox Vulpes vulpes (L., 1758) as a bioindicator of mercury contamination in terrestrial ecosystems of north-western Poland. Biol Trace Elem Res 145:172–180
Kalisinska E, Budis H, Łanocha N, Podlasińska J, Baraniewicz E (2012b) Comparison of hepatic and nephric concentrations of mercury between feral and ranch American mink (Neovison vison) from NW Poland. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 88:802–806
Kalisinska E, Kosik-Bogacka DI, Lisowski P, Lanocha N, Jackowski A (2013) Mercury in the body of the most commonly occurring European game duck, the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos L. 1758), from northwestern poland. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 64(4):583–593
Kalisinska E, Gorecki J, Lanocha N, Okonska A, Melgarejo JB, Budis H et al (2014a) Total and methyl mercury in soft tissues of white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) and osprey (Pandion haliaetus) collected in Poland. AMBIO 43:858–870
Kalisinska E, Gorecki J, Okonska A, Pilarczyk B, Tomza-Marciniak A, Budis H et al (2014b) Mercury and selenium in the muscle of piscivorous common mergansers (Mergus merganser) from a selenium-deficient European country. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 101:107–115
Kalisinska E, Gorecki J, Okonska A, Pilarczyk B, Tomza-Marciniak A, Budis H et al (2014c) Hepatic and nephric mercury and selenium concentration in common merganser Mergus merganser from Baltic Region, Europe. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:421–340
Kalisinska E, Kosik-Bogacka DI, Lanocha-Arendarczyk N, Budis H, Podlasinska J, Popiolek M et al (2016) Brains of native and alien mesocarnivores in biomonitoring of toxic metals in Europe. PLoS One 11(8):e0159935
Kalisinska E, Lanocha-Arendarczyk N, Kosik-Bogacka DI, Budis H, Pilarczyk B, Tomza-Marciniak A et al (2017) Muscle mercury and selenium in fishes and semiaquatic mammals from a selenium-deficient area. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 136:24–30
Keeyask Hyd Ltd (2012) Keeyask Generation Project environmental impact stetement. Supporting volume terrestrial environment, pp 75. http://keeyask.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Section-8-Wildlife-and-Mercury.pdf
Kenntner N, Tataruch F, Krone O (2001) Heavy metals in soft tissue of white-tailed eagles found dead or moribund in Germany and Austria from 1993 to 2000. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:1831–1837
Kenntner N, Krone O, Altenkamp R, Tataruch F (2003) Environmental contaminants in liver and kidney of free-ranging northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) from three regions of Germany. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45:128–135
Kenntner N, Crettenand Y, Funfstuck HJ, Janovsky M, Tataruch F (2007) Lead poisoning and heavy metal exposure of golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) from the European Alps. J Ornithol 148:173–177
Kenow KP, Grasman KA, Hines RK, Meyer MW, Gendron-Fitzpatrick A, Spalding MG et al (2007) Effects of methylmercury exposure on the immune function of juvenile common loons (Gavia immer). Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1460–1469
Kenow KP, Hoffman DJ, Hines RK, Meyer MW, Bickham JW, Matson CW et al (2008) Effects of methylmercury exposure on glutathione metabolism, oxidative stress, and chromosomal damage in captive-reared common loon (Gavia immer) chicks. Environ Pollut 156:732–738
Kenow KP, Meyer MW, Rossmann R, Gendron-Fitzpatrick A, Gray BR (2011) Effects of injected methylmercury on the hatching of common loon (Gavia immer) eggs. Ecotoxicology 20:1684–1693
Kessler M (2013) Minamata Convention on Mercury. A first step towards protecting future generations. Environ Health Perspect 121:A304–A309
Khan AT, Forester DM (1995) Mercury in white-tailed deer forage in Russell Plantation, Macon County, Alabama. Vet Hum Toxicol 37:45–46
Khan AT, Thompson SJ, Mielke HW (1995) Lead and mercury levels in raccoons from Macon County, Alabama. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 54:812–816
Kiesling RL, Lloyd EH (1971) Chemicals: fungicide uses and problems in North Dakota. Farm Res 28:29–31
Kim EY, Saeki K, Tanabe S, Tanaka H, Tatsukawa R (1996) Specific accumulation of mercury and selenium in seabirds. Environ Pollut 94:261–265
Kim CS, Rytuba JJ, Brown GE (2004) Geological and anthropogenic factors influencing mercury speciation in mine wastes: an EXAFS spectroscopy study. Appl Geochem 19:379–393
Kim CK, Lee TW, Lee KT, Lee JH, Lee CB (2012) Nationwide monitoring of mercury in wild and farmed fish from fresh and coastal waters of Korea. Chemosphere 89:1360–1368
Kinghorn A, Solomon P, Chan HM (2007) Temporal and spatial trends of mercury in fish collected in the English-Wabigoon river system in Ontario, Canada. Sci Total Environ 372:615–623
Kisia SM (1996) Structure of fish locomotory muscle. In: Datta-Munshi JS, Gutta HM (eds) Fish morphology—horizon of new research. Science, pp 169–178
Kitowski I, Kowalski R, Komosa A, Sujak A (2015) Total mercury concentration in the kidneys of birds from Poland. Turk J Zool 39:1–9
Klenavic K, Champoux L, O’Brien M, Daoust PY, Evans RD, Evans HE (2008) Mercury concentration in wild mink (Mustela vison) and river otters (Lontra canadensis) collected from eastern and Atlantic Canada: relationship to age and parasitism. Environ Pollut 156:359–366
Komov VT, Ivanova ES, Gremyachikh VA, Poddubnaya NY (2016) Mercury content in organs and tissues of indigenous (Vulpes vulpes L.) and invasive (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray) species of canids from areas near Cherepovets (North-Western Industrial Region, Russia). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 97:480–485
Krey A, Kwan M, Chan HM (2015) Mercury speciation in brain tissue of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from the Canadian Arctic. Environ Res 114:24–30
Krone O, Willie F, Kenntner N, Boertmann D, Tataruch F (2004) Mortality factors, environmental contaminants, and parasites of white-tailed sea eagles from Greenland. Avian Dis 48:417–424
Krone O, Stjernberg T, Kenntner N, Tataruch F, Koivusaari J, Nuuja I (2006) Mortality factors, helminth burden, and contaminant residues in white-tailed sea eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) from Finland. AMBIO J Hum Environ 35(3):98–104
Kruska D, Schreiber A (1999) Comparative morphometrical and biochemical–genetic investigations in wild and ranch mink (Mustela vison: Carnivora: Mammalia). Acta Theriol 44:377–382
Kruuk H, Conroy JWH, Webb A (1997) Concentration of mercury in otters (Lutra lutra) in Scotland in relation to rainfall. Environ Pollut 96:13–18
Krynski A, Kałużynski J, Wlazełko M, Adamowski A (1982) Contamination of roe deer by mercury compounds. Acta Theriol 27:499–507
Kucera E (1983) Mink and otter as indicators of mercury in Manitoba waters. Can J Zool 61:2250–2256
Laacouri A, Nater EA, Kolka RK (2013) Distribution and uptake dynamics of mercury in leaves of common deciduous tree species in Minnesota, U.S.A. Environ Sci Technol 47:10462–10470
Lang D, Holmes J, Gardner M (2012) Mercury arising from oil and gas production in the United Kingdom and UK continental shelf. IKIMP, Mercury Knowledge Exchange, University of Oxford, Oxford, pp 42
Langlois C, Langis R (1995) Presence of airborne contaminants in the wildlife of northern Québec. Sci Total Environ 160(161):391–402
Lanocha N, Kalisinska E, Kosik-Bogacka DI, Budis H, Podlasinska J, Jedrzejewska E (2014) Mercury levels in raccoons (Procyon lotor) from the Warta Mouth National Park, north-western Poland. Biol Trace Elem Res 159:152–160
Lanszki J, Sugár L, Orosz E, Nagy D (2008) Biological data from post mortem analysis of otters in Hungary. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 54:201–212
Lanszki J, Orosz E, Sugar L (2009) Metal levels in tissues of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) from Hungary: variation with sex, age, condition and location. Chemosphere 74:741–743
Larosa B, Allen-Gil S (1995) The methylmercury to total mercury ratio in selected marine, freshwater, and terrestrial organism. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:905–913
Larson H (2014) The Minamata Convention on Mercury: risk in perspective. Lancet 383:198–199
Lavoie RA, Jardine TD, Chumchal MM, Kidd KA, Campbell LM (2013) Biomagnification of mercury in aquatic food webs: a worldwide meta-analysis. Environ Sci Technol 47:13385–13394
Lazarus M, Orct T, Blanusa M, Vickovic I, Sostarić B (2008) Toxic and essential metal concentrations in four tissues of red deer (Cervus elaphus) from Baranja, Croatia. Food Addit Contam A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 25:270–283
Lemarchand C, Rosoux R, Berny P (2010) Organochlorine pesticides, PCBs, heavy metals and anticoagulant rodenticides in tissues of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) from upper Loire River catchment (France). Chemosphere 80:1120–1124
Lemarchand C, Rosoux R, Penide ME, Berny P (2012) Tissue concentrations of pesticides, PCBs and metals among ospreys, Pandion haliaetus, collected in France. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 88:89–93
Li YB, Cai Y (2013) Progress in the study of mercury methylation and demethylation in aquatic environments. Chin Sci Bull 58:177–185
Lieske CL, Moses SK, Castellini JM, Klejka J, Hueffer K, O’Hara TM (2011) Toxicokinetics of mercury in blood compartments and hair of fish-fed sled dogs. Acta Vet Scand 53:66
Lindqvist O, Johansson K, Bringmark L, Timm B, Aastrup M, Andersson A et al (1991) Mercury in the Swedish environment—recent research on causes, consequences and corrective methods. Water Air Soil Pollut 55:1–261
Lindsay RC, Dimmick RW (1983) Mercury residues in wood ducks and wood duck foods in eastern Tennessee. J Wildl Dis 19:114–117
Ljungvall K, Magnusson U, Korvela M, Norrby M, Bergquist J, Persson S (2017) Heavy metal concentrations in female wild mink (Neovison vison) in Sweden: sources of variation and associations with internal organ weights. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:2030–2035
Lodenius M, Solonen T (2013) The use of feathers of birds of prey as indicators of metal pollution. Ecotoxicology 22:1319–1334
Lodenius M, Skaren U, Hellstedt P, Tulisalo E (2014) Mercury in various tissues of three mustelid and other trace metals in liver o European otter from eastern Finland. Environ Monit Assess 186:325–333
Lohren H, Bornhorst J, Galla H-J, Schwerdtle T (2015) The blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier—first evidence for an active transport of organic mercury compounds out of the brain. Metallomics 7:1420
Lohren H, Bornhorst J, Fitkau R, Pohl G, Galla H-J, Schwerdtle T (2016) Effects on and transfer across the blood-brain barrier in vitro—Comparison of organic and inorganic mercury species. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 17:63
Lord CG, Gaines KF, Boring CS, Brisbin IL, Gochfeld M Jr, Burger J (2002) Raccoon (Procyon lotor) as a bioindicator of mercury contamination at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 43:356–363
Lourenco R, Tavares PC, Degaldo MM, Rabaca JE, Penteriani V (2011) Superpredation increases mercury levels in a generalist top predator, the eagle owl. Ecotoxicology 20:635–642
Lu J, Holmgren A (2009) Selenoproteins. J Biol Chem 284:723–727
Mailman M, Bodaly RA (2005) Total mercury, methyl mercury, and carbon in fresh and burned plants and soil in Northwestern Ontario. Environ Pollut 138:161–166
Martin PA, McDaniel TV, Hughes KD, Hunter B (2011) Mercury and other heavy metals in free-ranging mink of the lower Great Lakes basin, Canada, 1998–2006. Ecotoxicology 20:1701–1712
Mason CF, Madsen AB (1992) Mercury in Danish otters (Lutra lutra). Chemosphere 25:865–867
Mason CF, Last NI, Macdonald SM (1986) Mercury, cadmium, and lead in British otters. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 37:844–849
Mason RP, Choi AL, Fitzgerald WF, Hammerschmidt CR, Lamborg CH, Soerensen AL et al (2012) Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications. Environ Res 119:101–117
Masur LC (2011) A review of the use of mercury in historic and current ritualistic and spiritual practices. Altern Med Rev 16:314–320
Mayack DT (2012) Hepatic mercury, cadmium, and lead in mink and otter from New York State: monitoring environmental contamination. Environ Monit Assess 184:2497–2516
Mazloomi SA, Esmaeili SM, Ghasempoori SM, Omidi A (2008) Mercury distribution in liver, kidney, and feathers of Caspian Sea common cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). Res J Environ Sci 2:433–437
Mehdi Y, Hornick JL, Istasse L, Dufranse I (2013) Selenium in the environment, metabolism and involvement in body functions. Molecules 18:3292–3311
Meinert LD, Robinson GR, Nassar NT (2016) Mineral resources: reserves, peak production and the future. Resources 5:14
Mierle G, Addison EM, MacDonald KS, Joachim DG (2000) Mercury levels in tissues of otters from Ontario, Canada: variation with age, sex, and location. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:3044–3051
Mierzykowski SE, Smith JEM, Todd CS, Kusnierz D, DeSorbo CR (2011) Liver contaminants in bald eagle carcasses from Maine. USFWS Spec Proj Rep FY09-MEFO-6-EC, Maine Field Office, Orono, ME, pp 53
Mierzykowski SE, Todd CS, Pokras MA, Oliveira RD (2013) Lead and mercury levels in livers of bald eagles recovered in New England. USFWS. Spec Proj Rep FY13-MEFO-2-EC, Maine Field Office, Orono, ME, pp 26
Milieu Ltd (2010) Environmental, economic and social impacts of the use of sewage sludge on land. Part II: Report on Options and Impacts. Report prepared for the European Commission under Study Contract DG ENV.G.4/ETU/2008/0076r
Millan J, Mateo R, Taggart MA, López-Bao JV, Viota M, Monsalve L et al (2008) Levels of heavy metals and metalloids in critically endangered Iberian lynx and other wild carnivores from southern Spain. Sci Total Environ 399:193–201
Miller A, Bignert A, Porvari P, Danielsson S, Verta M (2013) Mercury in perch (Perca fluviatilis) from Sweden and Finland. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1472
Mohapatra SP, Mitchell A (2009) Mercury trade in globalizing world. In: Watanabe Y, Yamashita H (eds) Trade policy in globalizing world. Nova, New York, pp 141–150
Moreno-Jimenez E, Gamarra R, Carpena-Ruiz RO, Millan R, Penalosa JM, Esteban E (2006) Mercury bioaccumulation and phytotoxicity in two wild plant species of Almaden area. Chemosphere 63:1969–1973
Muchlinski MN, Snodgrass JJ, Terranova CJ (2012) Muscle mass scaling in primates: an energetic and ecological perspective. Am J Primatol 74:395–407
Mukherjee AB, Zevenhoven R, Bhattacharya P, Sajwan KS, Kikuchi R (2008) Mercury flow via coal and coal utilization by-products: a global perspective. Resour Conser Recycl 52:571–591
Munthe J, Wängberg I, Rognerud S, Fjeld E, Verta M, Porvari P et al (2007) Mercury in Nordic ecosystems. IVL Report B1761
Myers GJ, Davidson PW (1998) Prenatal methylmercury exposure and children: neurologic, developmental, and behavioral research. Environ Health Perspect 106(Suppl 3):841–847
Nakazawa E, Ikemoto T, Hokura A, Terada Y, Kunito T, Tanabe S et al (2011) The presence of mercury selenide in various tissues of the striped dolphin: evidence from μ-XRF-XRD and XAFS analyses. Metallomics 3:719–725
Nam DH, Anan Y, Ikemoto T, Okabe Y, Kim EY, Subramanian A et al (2005) Specific accumulation of 20 trace elements in great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) from Japan. Environ Pollut 134:503–514
Nam DH, Yates D, Ardapple P, Evers DC, Schmerfeld J, Basu N (2012) Elevated mercury exposure and neurochemical alterations in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) from a site with historical mercury contamination. Ecotoxicology 21:1094–1101
National Research Council (2000) Toxicological effects of methylmercury. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/9899
Nguetseng R, Fliedner A, Knopf B, Lebreton B, Quack M, Rüdel H (2015) Retrospective monitoring of mercury in fish from selected European freshwater and estuary sites. Chemosphere 134:427–434
Niecke M, Kruger A, Hauff P, Ellenberg H, Labes R, Niecke S (1998) Quecksilber in Seeadlerfedern aus Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit Hilfe der Hamburger Protonenmikrosonde. Z Umweltchem Okotox 10:3–14 (in German)
Norheim G, Frøslie A (1978) The degree of methylation and organ distribution of mercury in some birds of prey in Norway. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 43:196–204
Norheim G, Sivertsen T, Brevik EM, Frøslie A (1984) Mercury and selenium in wild mink (Mustela vision) from Norway. Nord Vet Med 36:43–48 (in Norwegian)
O’Connor DJ, Nielsen SW (1981) Environmental survey of methylmercury levels in wild mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis) from the northeastern United States and experimental pathology of methylmercurialism in the otter. In: Chapman JA, Pursley D (eds) Worldwide furbearer conference proceedings, 3–11 Aug 1980, Frostburg, MD, pp 1728–1745
Odsjo T, Raikkonen J, Bignert A (2012) Time trends of metals in liver and muscle of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) from northern and central Lapland, Sweden, 1983-2005. Swedish monitoring programme in terrestrial biota. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, p 33
Ohlendorf HM (1993) Marine birds and trace elements in the temperate North Pacific. In: Vermeer K, Briggs KT, Morgan KH, Siegel-Causey D (eds) The status, ecology, and conservation of marine birds of the North Pacific. Canadian Wildlife Service Special Publication, Ottawa, pp 232–240
Osborn CE, Evers DC, Duron M, Schoch N, Yates D, Buck D et al (2011) Mercury contamination within terrestrial ecosystems in New England and Mid-Atlantic states: profiles of soil, invertebrates, songbirds, and bats. Report BRI 2011-09. Submitted to the Nature Conservancy—Eastern New York Chapter. Biodiversity Research Institute, Gorham, ME, pp 100
Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Steenhuisen F, Wilson S (2006) Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmos Environ 40:4048–4063
Page KD, Murphy JB (2005) Mercury concentrations in the bedrock of southwestern Nova Scotia: a reconnaissance study. Atl Geol 40:31–40
Pal M, Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay M, Ghosh M (2012) Methyl mercury in fish—a case study on various samples collected from Ganges River at West Bengal. Environ Monit Assess 184:3407–3414
Park JD, Zheng W (2012) Human exposure and health effects of inorganic and elemental mercury. J Prev Med Public Health 45:344–352
Park JS, Lee JS, Kim GB, Cha JS, Shin SK, Kang HG et al (2010) Mercury and methylmercury in freshwater fish and sediments in South Korea using newly adopted purge and trap GC-MS detection method. Water Air Soil Pollut 207:391–401
Parslow JLF, Thomas GJ, Williams TD (1982) Heavy metals in the livers of waterfowl from the ouse washes, England. Environ Pollut Ser A, Ecol Biol 29(4):317–327
Parsons MB, Percival JB (2005) A brief history of mercury and its environmental impact. In: Parsons MB, Percival JB (eds) Mercury: sources, measurements, cycles and effects. Mineralogical Association of Canada, Halifax, Nova Scotia pp 20
Patra M, Sharma A (2000) Mercury toxicity in plants. Bot Rev 66:379–422
Pendergrass JC, Haley BE, Vimy MJ, Winfield SA, Lorscheider FL (1997) Mercury vapor inhalation inhibits binding of GTP to tubulin in rat brain: similarity to a molecular lesion in Alzheimer diseased brain. Neurotoxicology 18:315–324
Petrie SA, Badzinski SS, Drouillard KG (2007) Contaminants in lesser and greater scaup staging on the lower Great Lakes. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52:580–589
Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X, Finkelman RB, Friedli HR, Leaner J et al (2010) Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmos Chem Phys 10:5951–5964
Piskorova L, Vasilkova Z, Krupicer I (2003) Heavy metals residues in tissues of wild boar (Sus scrofa) and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Central Zemplin region of the Slovak Republik. Czech J Anim Sci 48:134–138
Pollock B, Machin KL (2008) Effects of cadmium, mercury, and selenium on reproductive indices in male lesser scaup (Aythya affinis) in the western Boreal forest. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:730–739
Polunas M, Halladay A, Tjalkens RB, Philbert MA, Lowndes H, Reuhl K (2011) Role of oxidative stress and the mitochondrial permeability transition in methylmercury cytotoxicity. Neurotoxicology 32:526–534
Pompe-Gotal J, Srebocan E, Gomercic H, Prevendar Crinic A (2009) Mercury concentrations in the tissues of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and striped dolphins (Stenella coeruloalba) stranded on the Croatian Adriatic coast. Vet Med 54:598–606
Pompella A, Visvikis A, Paolicchi A, De Tata V, Casini AF (2003) The changing faces of glutathione, a cellular protagonist. Biochem Pharmacol 66:1499–1503
Poole KG, Elkin B (1992) Environmental contaminants, population structure, and biological condition of harvested mink in the Western Northwest Territories, 1991–92. Department of Renewable Resources Government of the Northwest Territories Yellowknife, NWT., Report No 66
Poole KG, Elkin BT, Bethke RW (1995) Environmental contaminants in wild mink in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Sci Total Environ 160(161):473–786
Prestrud P, Norheim G, Sivertsen T, Daae HL (1994) Levels of toxic and essential elements in arctic fox in Svalbard. Polar Biol 14:155–159
Puls R (1988) Mineral levels in animal health. Sherpa, Clearbrook, BC
Pye S, Jones G, Stewart R, Woodfield M, Kubica K, Kubica R, et al (2006) Costs and environmental effectiveness of options for reducing mercury emissions to air from small-scale combustion installations. AEAT/ED48706/Final Report, AEA Technology Environment, Harwell, Oxon, UK, pp 122
Qiu G, Feng X, Meng B, Wang X (2012) Methylmercury in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown from the Xunyang Hg mining area, Shaanxi province, northwestern China. Pure Appl Chem 84:281–289
Ralston NV, Raymond LJ (2010) Dietary selenium’s protective effects against methylmercury toxicity. Toxicology 278:112–123
Ralston NVC, Ralston CR, Blackwell JL, Raymond LJ (2008) Dietary and tissue selenium in relation to methylmercury toxicity. Neurotoxicology 29:802–811
Reinoso RF, Telfer BA, Rowland M (1997) Tissue water content in rats measured by desiccation. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 38:87–92
Rice KM, Walker EM, Wu M, Gillette C, Blough ER (2014) Environmental mercury and its toxic effects. J Prev Med Public Health 47:74–83
Rieder SR, Brunner I, Horvat M, Jacobs A, Frey B (2011) Accumulation of mercury and methylmercury by mushrooms and earthworms from forest soils. Environ Pollut 159:2861–2869
Rieder SR, Brunner I, Daniel O, Liu B, Frey B (2013) Methylation of mercury in earthworms and the effect of mercury on the associated bacterial communities. PLoS One 8:e61215
Rimmer CC, Miller EK, McFarland KP, Taylor RJ, Faccio SD (2010) Mercury bioaccumulation and trophic transfer in the terrestrial food web of a montane forest. Ecotoxicology 19:697–709
Robillard S, Beauchamp G, Paillard G, Bélanger D (2002) Levels of cadmium, lead, mercury and 137caesium in caribou (Rangifer tarandus) tissues from northern Québec. Arctic 55:1–9
Robinson JF, Guerrette Z, Yu X, Hong S, Faustman EM (2010) A systems-based approach to investigate dose- and time-dependent methylmercury-induced gene expression response in C57BL/6 mouse embryos undergoing neurulation. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod 89:188–200
Rolfhus KR, Hall BD, Monson BA, Paterson MJ, Jeremiason JD (2011) Assessment of mercury bioaccumulation within the pelagic food web of lakes in the western Great Lakes region. Ecotoxicology 20:1520–1529
Ropek RM, Neely RK (1993) Mercury levels in Michigan river otters, Lutra canadensis. J Freshwat Ecol 8:141–147
Rothenberg SE, Windham-Myers L, Creswell JE (2014) Rice methylmercury exposure and mitigation: a comprehensive review. Environ Res 133:407–423
Rothschild RFN, Duffy LK (2005) Mercury concentrations in muscle, brain and bone of Western Alaskan waterfowl. Sci Total Environ 349:277–283
Roy A, Dey SK, Saha C (2013) Modification of cyto- and genotoxicity of mercury and lead by antioxidant on human lymphocytes in vitro. Curr Sci 104:224–228
Rozgaj R, Kasuba V, Blanusa M (2005) Mercury chloride genotoxicity in rats following oral exposure, evaluated by comet assay and micronucleus test. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 56:9–15
Rudy M (2010) Chemical composition of wild boar meat and relationship between age and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in muscle and liver tissue. Food Addit Contam A Chem Anal Control Expos Risk Assess 27:464–472
Ruelas-Inzunza J, Hernández-Osuna J, Páez-Osuna F (2009) Organic and total mercury in muscle tissue of five aquatic birds with different feeding habits from the SE Gulf of California, Mexico. Chemosphere 76:415–418
Rutkiewicz JM (2012) Neurochemical biomarkers to assess mercury’s health impacts in birds. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 200
Rutkiewicz J, Nam DH, Cooley T, Neumann K, Padilla IB, Route W et al (2011) Mercury exposure and neurochemical impacts in bald eagles across several Great Lakes states. Ecotoxicology 20:1669–1676
Rytuba JJ (2003) Mercury from mineral deposits and potential environmental impact. Environ Geol 43:326–338
Saeki K, Okabe Y, Kim E, Tanabe S, Fukuda M, Tatsukawa R (2000) Mercury and cadmium in common cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo). Environ Pollut 108:249–255
Samson JC, Shenker J (2000) The teratogenic effects of methylmercury on early development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Aqua Toxicol 48:343–354
Scheuhammer AM (1988) Chronic dietary toxicity of methylmercury in the zebra Finch, Poephila guttata. Bull Environ Contarn Toxicol 40:123–130
Scheuhammer AM (1991) Effects of acidification on the availability of toxic metals and calcium to wild birds and mammals. Environ Pollut 71:329–375
Scheuhammer AM, Atchison CM, Wong AHK, Evers DC (1998a) Mercury exposure in breeding common loons (Gavia immer) in central Ontario, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:191–196
Scheuhammer AM, Wong AH, Bond D (1998b) Mercury and selenium accumulation in common loons (Gavia immer) and common mergansers (Mergus merganser) from eastern Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:197–201
Scheuhammer AM, Basu N, Burgess NM, Elliott JE, Campbell GD, Wayland M et al (2008) Relationships among mercury, selenium, and neurochemical parameters in common loons (Gavia immer) and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). Ecotoxicology 17:93–101
Scheuhammer AM, Braune B, Chan HM, Frouin H, Krey A, Letcher R et al (2015) Recent progress on our understanding of the biological effects of mercury in fish and wildlife. Sci Total Environ 509-510:91–103
Schurz F, Sabater-Vilar M, Fink-Gremmels J (2000) Mutagenicity of mercury chloride and mechanisms of cellular defence: the role of metal-binding proteins. Mutagenesis 15:525–530
Schuster PF, Krabbenhoft DP, Naftz DL, Cecil LD, Olson ML, Dewild JF et al (2002) Atmospheric mercury deposition during the last 270 years: a glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources. Environ Sci Technol 36:2303–2310
Scoullos M, Vonkeman GH, Thorton I, Makuch Z (2001) Mercury. In: Scoullos M, Vonkeman GH, Thorton I, Makuch Z (eds) Mercury—cadmium—lead handbook for sustainable heavy metals policy and regulation. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 11–68
Scudder Eikenberry BC, Riva-Murray K, Knightes CD, Journey CA, Chasar LC, Brigham ME et al (2015) Optimizing fish sampling for fish-mercury bioaccumulation factors. Chemosphere 135:467–473
Scudder BC, Chasar LC, Wentz DA, Bauch NJ, Brigham ME, Moran PW et al (2009) Mercury in fish, bed sediment, and water from streams across the United States, 1998–2005. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5109, pp74
Selin NE, Jackob DJ, Yantosca RM, Strode S, Jaegle L, Sunderland EM (2008) Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury: present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 22:GB2011
Sellers P (2010) A survey of chemical contaminants in wild meat harvested from the traditional territories of Wabauskang First Nation (Wabauskang), Asubpeeschoseewagong Netum Anishinabek (Grassy Narrows), and Wabaseemoong Independent Nation (Whitedog). First Nations Environmental Contaminants Program (National) as Partial fulfillment of Project No. HQ0900055, pp 65
Sepúlveda MS, Poppenga RH, Arregis JJ, Quinn LB (1998) Concentrations of mercury and selenium in tissues of double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) from southern Florida. Colon Waterbirds 21:35–42
Serafin JA (1984) Avian species differences in the intestinal absorption of xenobiotics (PCB, dieldrin, Hg2+). Comp Biochem Physiol C 78:4910–4496
Sheffy TB, St Amant JR (1982) Mercury burdens in furbearers in Wisconsin. J Wildl Manage 46:1117–1120
Shore RF, Pereira MG, Walker LA, Thompson DR (2011) Mercury in nonmarine birds and mammals. In: Beyer WN, Meador JP (eds) Environmental contaminants in biota. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 609–642
Silva-Pereira LC, Cardoso PCS, Leite DS, Bahia MO, Bastos WR, Smith MAC et al (2005) Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of low doses of mercury chloride and methylmercury chloride on human lymphocytes in vitro. Braz J Med Biol Res 38:901–907
Sleeman JM, Cristol DA, White AE, Evers DC, Gerhold RW, Keel MK (2010) Mercury poisoning in free-living northern river otter (Lontra canadensis). J Wildl Dis 46:1035–1039
Smart NA (1968) Use and residues of mercury compounds in agriculture. In: Gunther FA (ed) Residue review. Springer, New York, p 36
Smith TG, Armstrong FAJ (1975) Mercury in seals, terrestrial carnivores, and principal food items of the Inuit from Holman, N.W.T. J Fish Res Board Can 32:795–801
Sobanska MA (2005) Wild boar hair Sus scrofa as a non-invasive indicator of mercury pollution. Sci Total Environ 339:81–88
Souza MJ, Donnell R, Ramsay E (2013) Metal accumulation and health effects in raccoons (Procyon lotor) associated with coal fly ash exposure. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 64:529–536
Spalding MG, Frederick PC, McGill HC, Bouton SN, McDowell LR (2000) Methylmercury accumulation in tissues and its effects on growth and appetite in captive great egrets. J Wildl Dis 36:411–422
Speir SL, Chumchal MM, Drenner RW, Cocke WG, Lewis ME, Whitt HJ (2014) Methyl mercury and stable isotopes of nitrogen reveal that a terrestrial spider has a diet of emergent aquatic insects. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:2506–2509
Spiric Z, Srebocan E, Crnic AP (2012) Mercury in hares organs (Lepus europaeus Pallas) in the vicinity of the mercury-contaminated natural gas treatment plant in Croatia. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 47:77–83
Srebocan E, Prevendar Crnić A, Ekert-Kabalin AM, Lazarus M, Jurasović J, Tomljanović K et al (2011) Cadmium, lead, and mercury concentrations in tissues of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) and wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) from lowland Croatia. Czech J Food 29:624–633
Standish CL (2016) Evaluation of total mercury and methylmercury concentrations of terrestrial invertebrates along Lower East Fork Poplar Creek in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Master’s thesis, University of Tennessee, pp 117. http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4078
Stansley W, Velinsky D, Thomas R (2010) Mercury and halogenated organic contaminants in river otters (Lontra canadensis) in New Jersey, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2235–2242
Stevens RT, Ashwood TL, Sleeman JM (1997) Mercury in hair of muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) and mink (Mustela vison) from the U. S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 58:720–725
Stickel LF, Stickel WH, McLanc MAR, Bruns M (1977) Prolonged retention of methyl mercury by mallard drakes. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 18:393–400
Stone WB, Okoniewski JC (2001) Necropsy findings and environmental contaminants in common loons from New York. J Wildl Dis 37:178–184
Storelli MM, Zizzo N, Marcotrigiano GO (1999) Heavy metals and methylmercury in tissues of Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus) and Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris) stranded in Italy (South Adriatic Sea). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 63:703–710
Stout JH, Trust KA (2002) Elemental and organochlorine residues in bald eagles from Adak Island, Alaska. J Wildl Dis 38:511–517
Strom SM (2008) Total mercury and methylmercury residues in river otters (Lutra canadensis) from Wisconsin. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:546–554
Suran J, Prisc M, Rasic R, Srebocan E, Crnic AP (2013) Malondialdehyde and heavy metal concentrations in tissues of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) from central Croatia. J Environ Sci Health B 48:147–152
Szkoda J, Durkalec M, Kołacz R, Opaliński S, Żmudzki J (2012) Content of cadmium, lead and mercury in the tissues of game animals. Med Weter 68:689–692 (in Polish)
Szkoda J, Zmudzki J, Nawrocka A, Kmieciak M (2014) Toxic elements in free-living freshwater fish, water and sediments in Poland. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 58:589–595
Takeuchi T, D’Itri FM, Fischer PV, Annett CS, Okabe M (1977) The outbreak of Minamata disease (methyl mercury poisoning) in cats on Northwestern Ontario Reserves. Environ Res 13:215–228
Tan SW, Meiller JC, Mahaffey KR (2009) The endocrine effects of mercury in humans and wildlife. Crit Rev Toxicol 39:228–269
Tavshunsky I, Eggert SL, Mitchell CPJ (2017) Accumulation of methylmercury in invertebrates and masked shrews (Sorex cinereus) at an Upland Forest-Peatland Interface in Northern Minnesota, USA. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 99:673–678
Teaf CM, Garber M (2012) Mercury exposure considerations: evaluating the chemical form and activities of the individual. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference on soils, sediments, water and energy, vol 17, pp 25–42
Tejero J, Higueras PL, Garrido I, Esbrí JM, Oyarzun R, Español S (2015) An estimation of mercury concentrations in the local atmosphere of Almadén (Ciudad Real Province, South Central Spain) during the twentieth century. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4833–4841
Teršič T, Gosar M (2012) Comparison of elemental contents in earthworm cast and soil from a mercury-contaminated site (Idrija area, Slovenia). Sci Total Environ 430:28–33
Thomas DJ, Fisher HL, Sumler MR, Hall LL, Mushak P (1988) Distribution and retention of organic and inorganic mercury in methyl mercury-treated neonatal rats. Environ Res 47:59–71
Thompson DR (1996) Mercury in birds and terrestrial mammals. In: Beyer WN, Heinz GH, Redmon-Norwood AW (eds) Environmental contaminants in wildlife: interpreting tissue concentrations. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 341–356
Tjälve H, Henriksson J (1999) Uptake of metals in the brain via olfactory pathways. Neurotoxicology 20:181–195
Tomiyasu T, Matsuo T, Miyamoto J, Imura R, Anazawa K, Sakamoto H (2005) Low level mercury uptake by plants from natural environments—mercury distribution in Solidago altissima L. Environ Sci 12:231–238
Toole-O’Neil B, Tewalt SJ, Finkelmanb RB, Akers DJ (1999) Mercury concentration in coal—unraveling the puzzle. Fuel 78:47–54
Tsipoura N, Burger J, Newhouse M, Mizrahi D (2011) Lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium, and arsenic levels in eggs, feathers and tissues of Canada geese of the New Jersey Meadowlands. Environ Res 111:775–784
UNEP (2002) Chemicals. Global mercury assessment. Report no. 54790-01. Geneva, Switzerland, pp 258. http://www.chem.unep.ch
UNEP (2013) Mercury: time to act. Technical report. Chemicals Branch, Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP, Geneva, pp 1–44. http://www.unep.org/PDF/PressReleases/Mercury_TimeToAct.pdf/
UNEP (2016) Business plan of the mercury cell chlor-alkali production partnership area. http://www.unep.org/chemicalsandwaste/Portals/9/Mercury/Chloralkali/Chlor-alkali%20business%20plan%2002_2016.pdf
US Bureau of Mines (1981) Mercury. In: Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook. US Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC, pp 585–591
US Bureau of Mines (1986) Mercury. In: Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook. US Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC, pp 659–665
US Bureau of Mines (1991) Mercury. In: Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook. US Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC, pp 989–995
US EPA (2000) Bioaccumulation testing and interpretation for the purpose of sediment quality assessment. Status and needs. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Bioaccumulation Analysis Workgroup, Washington, DC, EPA-823-R-00-001, pp 136
US EPA (2001) Water quality criterion for the protection of human health: methylmercury. US Environmental Protection Agency EPA-823-R-01-001. Office of Water, Washington, DC. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/aqlife/methylmercury/upload/2009_01_15_criteria_methylmercury_mercury-criterion.pdf
US EPA (2010) Guidance for Implementing the January 2001 Methylmercury Water Quality Criterion. EPA 823-R-10-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC
US GS (1981) Minerals yearbook. Mercury. US Department of the U.S. Geological Survey, pp 585–591
US GS (1996) Mercury. In: Mineral commodity summaries. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp 106–107
US GS (2001) Mercury. In: Mineral Commodity Summaries. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp 104–105
US GS (2006) Mercury. In: Mineral commodity summaries. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp 108–109
US GS (2010) Mercury. In: Mineral commodity summaries. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC, p 101
US GS (2011) Mercury. In: Mineral commodity summaries. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp 102–103
US GS (2016a) 2014 Minerals yearbook. Mercury. US Department of the US Geological Survey, pp 48.1–48.5. https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/mercury/myb1-2014-mercu.pdf
US GS (2016b) Mercury. In: Mineral commodity summaries. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp 108–109
Vahter M, Mottet NK, Friberg L, Lind B, Shen D, Burbacher T (1994) Speciation of mercury in the primate blood and brain following long-term exposure to methylmercury. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 124:221–229
Van der Molen EJ, Blok AA, de Graaf GJ (1982) Winter starvation and mercury intoxication in grey herons (Ardea cinerea) in the Netherlands. Ardea 70:173–184
Visvanathan C (2003) Treatment and disposal of mercury contaminated waste from oil and gas exploration facilities. In: International environmental disaster and emergency response conference, 13–14 Nov 2003, Yunlin, Taiwan, pp 11
Wada H, Yates DE, Evers DC, Taylor RJ, Hopkins WA (2010) Tissue mercury concentrations and adrenocortical responses of female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) near a contaminated river. Ecotoxicology 19:1277–1284
Walker LA, Chaplow JS, Grant HK, Lawlor AJ, Pereira MG, Potter ED et al (2016) Mercury (Hg) concentrations in predatory bird livers and eggs as an indicator of changing environmental concentrations: a Predatory Bird Monitoring Scheme (PBMS) report. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, UK, pp 23
Wang Y, Greger M (2004) Clonal differences in mercury tolerance, accumulation, and distribution in willow. J Environ Qual 33:1779–1785
Wang H, Tong J, Bi Y, Wang C, Guo L, Lu Y (2013) Evaluation of mercury mediated in vitro cytotoxicity among cell lines established from green sea turtles. Toxicol In Vitro 27:1025–1030
Wang W, Evans D, Hickie BE, Rouvinen-Watt K, Evans HE (2014) Methylmercury accumulation and elimination in mink (Neovison vison) hair and blood: results of a controlled feeding experiment using stable isotope tracers. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:2873–2880
Wang X, Yan M, Zhao L, Wu Q, Wu C, Chang X et al (2016) Low-dose methylmercury-induced apoptosis and mitochondrial DNA mutation in human embryonic neural progenitor cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016:article ID 5137042
Warfvinge K, Hua J, Berlin M (1992) Mercury distribution in the rat brain after mercury vapor exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 117:46–52
Weech SA, Wilson LK, Langelier KM, Elliott JE (2003) Mercury residues in livers of bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) found dead or dying in British Columbia, Canada (1987–1994). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45:562–569
Weiner J (1973) Dressing percentage, gross body composition and caloric value of the roedeer. Acta Theriol 18:209–222
Wellmitz J (2010) Mercury levels and trends in fish and mussels from German surface waters—comparison with the EQS as specified in Directive 2008/105/EC. German Federal Environment Agency, Sec II 2.5, pp 26. www.umweltprobenbank.de
Wente SP (2004) A statistical model and national data set for partitioning fish-tissue mercury concentration variation between spatiotemporal and sample characteristic effects. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 2004-5199, pp 15
Wentz DA, Brigham ME, Chasar LC, Lutz MA, Krabbenhoft DP (2014) Mercury in the Nation’s streams— Levels, trends, and implications: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1395, pp 90. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1395
Whanger PD (2001) Selenium and the brain: a review. Nutr Neurosci 4:81–97
WHO (2003) Elemental mercury and inorganic mercury compounds: human health aspects. http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/cicad/en/cicad50.pdf
Wiener JG, Krabbenhoft DP, Heinz GH, Scheuhammer AM (2003) Ecotoxicology of mercury. In: Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Burton GA, Cairns J (eds) Handbook of ecotoxicology, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 409–463
Wilhelm SM, Liang L, Cussen D, Kirchgessener DA (2007) Mercury in crude oil processed in the United States (2004). Environ Sci Technol 41:4509–5414
Windham-Myers L, Marvin-DiPasquale M, Kakouros E, Agee JL, Kieu le H, Stricker CA et al (2014) Mercury cycling in agricultural and managed wetlands of California, USA: seasonal influences of vegetation on mercury methylation, storage, and transport. Sci Total Environ 484:308–318
Wobeser G, Swift M (1976) Mercury poisoning in a wild mink. J Wildl Dis 12:335–340
Wobeser G, Nielsen NO, Schiefer B (1976) Mercury and mink. II. Experimental methyl mercury intoxication. Can J Comp 40:34–45
Wolfe M, Norman D (1998) Effects of waterborne mercury on terrestrial wildlife at Clear Lake: evaluation and testing of a predictive model. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:214–227
Wolfe MF, Schwarzbach S, Sulaiman RA (1998) Effects of mercury on wildlife: a comprehensive review. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:146–160
Wolfe MF, Atkeson T, Bowerman W, Burger J, Evers DC, Murray MW et al (2007) Wildlife Indicators. In: Harris R, Krabbenhoft DP, Mason R, Murray MW, Reash RJ, Saltman T (eds) Ecosystem responses to mercury contamination: indicators of change. SETAC books. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 123–189
Wood PB, White JH, Steffer A, Wood JM, Facemire CF, Percival HF (1996) Mercury concentrations in tissues of Florida bald eagle. J Wildl Manage 60:178–185
Wren CD (1984) Distribution of metals in tissues of beaver, raccoon and otter from Ontario, Canada. Sci Total Environ 34:177–184
Wren CD (1985) A probable case of mercury poisoning in a wild otter (Lutra canadensis) from north-western Ontario. Can Field Nat 99:112–114
Wren CD (1986) A review of metal accumulation and toxicity in wild mammals. I. Mercury. Environ Res 40:210–244
Wren CD, MacCrimmon H, Frank R, Suda P (1980) Total methylmercury levels in wild mammals from the Precambrian shield area of south central Ontario, Canada. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 25:100–105
Wren CD, Hunter DB, Leatherland JE, Stokes PM (1987) The effects of polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury, singly and in combination, on mink. I. Uptake and toxic responses. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 16:441–447
Wu P (2017) Methylmercury in boreal freshwater food webs. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University, Uppsala, pp 67
WVDL (2015) Normal range values for WVDL toxicology. accessed 28 Apr 2015
Yaroshevsky AA (2006) Abundances of chemical elements in the Earth’s crust. Geochem Int 44:48–55
Yates DE, Mayack DT, Munney K, Evers DC, Major A, Kaur T, Taylor RJ (2005) Mercury levels in mink (Mustela vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) from northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14:263–274
Yates DE, Adams EM, Angelo SE, Evers DC, Schmerfeld J, Moore MS et al (2014) Mercury in bats from the northeastern United States. Ecotoxicology 23:45–55
Ye B-J, Kim B-G, Jeon MJ, Kim S-Y, Kim HC, Jang T-W et al (2016) Evaluation of mercury exposure level, clinical diagnosis and treatment for mercury intoxication. Ann Occup Environ Med 28:5
Yu X, Driscoll CT, Montesdeoca M, Evers D, Duron M, Williams K et al (2011) Spatial patterns of mercury in biota of Adirondack, New York lakes. Ecotoxicology 20:1543–1554
Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi R, Esmaili-Sari A, Savabieasfahani M, Ghasempouri SM, Bahramifar N (2010) Mercury pollution in three species of waders from Shadegan Wetlands at the head of the Persian Gulf. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84(3):326–330
Zarski TP, Debski B, Samek M (1995) Relation between selenium and mercury concentrations in tissues of hares (Lepus europaeus Pall.) from regions with various environmental contaminations. Ekologia (Bratislava) 14:93–97
Zarski TP, Rejt L, Zarska H, Jarmul J (2015) Investigation on the distribution of mercury in tissues and organs of wild birds obtained from the area covered by Greater Warsaw. J Elem 20:247–254
Zhang ZS, Zheng DM, Wang QC, Lv XV (2009) Bioaccumulation of total and methyl mercury in three earthworm species (Drawida sp., Allolobophora sp., and Limnodrilus sp.). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 83:937–942
Zhang H, Feng X, Larssen T, Shang L, Li P (2010) Bioaccumulation of methylmercury versus inorganic mercury in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain. Environ Sci Technol 44:4499–4504
Zhang R, Wu F, Li H, Guo G, Feng C, Giesy JP, Chang H (2013) Toxicity reference values and tissue residue criteria for protecting avian wildlife exposed to methylmercury in China. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 223:53–80
Zhao L, Anderson WNC, Qiu G, Meng B, Wang D, Feng X (2016) Mercury methylation in paddy soil—source and distribution of mercury species at a Hg mining area, Guizhou Province, China. Biogeosciences 13:2429–2440
Zheng D, Zhang Z, Wang Q (2010) Total and methyl mercury contents and distribution characteristics in cicada, Cryptotympana atrata (Fabricius). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:749–753
Zhu X, Kusaka Y, Sato K, Zhang Q (2000) The endocrine disruptive effects of mercury. Environ Health Prev Med 4:174–183
Zhu H, Yan B, Cao H, Wang L (2012) Risk assessment for methylmercury in fish from the Songhua River, China: 30 years after mercury-containing wastewater outfalls were eliminated. Environ Monit Assess 184:77–88
Zilincar VJ, Bystrica B, Zvada P, Kubin D, Hell P (1992) Die Schwermeallbelastung bei den Braunbaren in den Westkarpten. Z Jagdwiss 38:235–243 (in German)
Zrncic S, Oraic D, Caleta M, Mihaljevic Z, Zanella D, Bilandzic N (2013) Biomonitoring of heavy metals in fish from the Danube River. Environ Monit Assess 185:1189–1119
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalisińska, E., Łanocha-Arendarczyk, N., Kosik-Bogacka, D.I. (2019). Mercury, Hg. In: Kalisińska, E. (eds) Mammals and Birds as Bioindicators of Trace Element Contaminations in Terrestrial Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00121-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00121-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00119-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00121-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)