Keywords

1 Introduction

Nanoparticle can be defined as any particle with size in the range of 1–100 nm. The properties of materials change drastically as one enters into nano world due to increase in surface area to volume ratio and onset of quantum confinement effects [1]. Due to their distinguished features, they find applications in various sectors. In healthcare area, nanoparticles are being synthesised to aid in the migration of chemotherapy drugs, straightway to the site of cancerous growth. Also, Au nanoparticles are commercially used as probe in order to detect the sequence of nucleic acids. Cosmetic sector makes use of TiO2 nanoparticles in the sunscreens, which works by reflecting the visible light and absorbing the UV light, thus acting as a transparent barrier which shields the skin from harmful ultraviolet rays. Apart from this, nano TiO2 also finds use in coatings which are applied to make self-cleaning surfaces [2]. Use of carbon nanotubes in baseball bats has made it lighter, thereby improving the performance. Transistors, which make all the modern computing possible have become smaller and smaller with the advent of nanotechnology [3]. Ultra-High Definition (UHD) displays are available that makes use of quantum dots to generate much vibrant colors and at the same time being more energy efficient [4]. Nanotechnology can also assist in meeting the requirements of clean drinking water by developing novel materials that could help in easy and affordable detection of harmful pollutants in water followed by their facile eradication [5]. In food industry, nanotechnology can bring improvement in food processing and packaging, food safety and in extending the shelf life of food products. Thus, it is clear that there is hardly any area which is not benefitted by the arrival of nanotechnology. Coming to the classification, Siegel classified the nanomaterials based on their dimensionality as 0D, 1D, 2D and 3D (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Classification of nanomaterials on the basis of their dimensionality

  1. (i)

    0-dimensional nanomaterials: In 0-D nanomaterials, all the dimensions are in the nanorange. It comprises of nanospheres and nanoclusters.

  2. (ii)

    1-dimensional nanomaterials: In 1-D nanomaterials, one dimension is not in the nanorange. This category includes nanorods, nanowires, nanofibers etc.

  3. (iii)

    2-dimensional nanomaterials: In 2-D nanomaterials, two dimensions are not in the nanorange. Nanolayers and nanofilms come under this class of materials.

  4. (iv)

    3-dimensional nanomaterials: In 3-D nanomaterials, three dimensions are not in the nanorange. They are made up of multiple nanosize crystals arranged in different directions.

Core shell nanoparticles (CSNP) are concentric multilayer particles where dimension of each layer is in nanometre range [6]. Core–shell nanoparticles have been the centre of attention of the researchers in the field as the transition from bulk/micro particles to nanoparticles to core shell nanoparticles was seen to lead to enormous changes in the physical and chemical properties of the materials [7]. The properties of core shell nanohybrids are not only dependent on size but also on shape. Different physical and chemical features such as melting point, catalytic activity, coercivity, selectivity, optical properties are affected by shape [7,8,9]. In addition to these, the sensitivity towards Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) is influenced by morphology of core–shell nanohybrids. PengzhenGuo et al. reported the synthesis of Au@Agnanohybrid and used it for the detection of pesticide thiram [10]. The detection limit was found to be different for nanocubes and nanocuboids. The schematic showing the different shapes of core–shell nanohybrid material is shown in Fig. 2 [11].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Different core/shell nanoparticles: a spherical; b multicore spherical; c movable core in hollow shell; d multiple small cores coated by single shell; e Single core coated by multiple small particles as shell; f hexagonal (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [11])

The core shell nanohybrids are superior over conventional nanomaterials as their properties can be easily tailored either by varying the constituents or by changing the core to shell ratio. The shell coating provides multiple benefits such as an increase in functionality, dispersibility, stability as well as the ability to release the core in a regulated manner [12]. Apart from this, they are of immense significance from economic frame of reference. A valuable material can be coated onto a cheap material in order to decrease the consumption of expensive material rather than using the costly pure material of the same size [13]. The synthesis of core shell nanomaterial results in incorporation of two functions in one single structure. By adding more shells or by increasing the number of constituents, the versatility of the hybrid material can be increased, leading to an extensive range of applications in various fields [14, 15]. The schematic illustrating the significance of core–shell nanohybrids in diverse areas is shown in Fig. 3. Here in, we have mainly focused on the usage of core–shell nanohybrid for the decontamination of water.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Diverse applications of Core–Shell nanohybrids

The quality of water is degrading continuously making it more and more toxic for humans and environment. Rapid industrialisation, improper planning and urbanisation has resulted in the worldwide contamination of water resources [15]. Heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, dyes, radionuclides are some of the important categories of pollutants which are deteriorating the water quality parameters. Even with the arrival and advancements of new technologies, the heavy metal concentration in potable water is still beyond the prescribed limits set be regulatory bodies in various parts of the globe [16, 17]. The exposure to the heavy metals results in increased risk towards cardiovascular disorders, renal injuries, immune system dysfunction, gastrointestinal and neuronal problems, genomic instability and many more [18, 19]. Apart from heavy metals, the textile industry discharges huge quantities of dyes into water bodies resulting in an enhancement in the chemical and biochemical oxygen demand, inhibition in the growth of plant, bioaccumulation and an increased likelihood of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. The indiscriminate usage of antibiotics on a large scale and their subsequent presence in water bodies has given birth to antibiotic resistance. Other pollutants like pesticides enter into water bodies through surface run off and are well known to adversely affect the health of aquatic species and humans. In view of the increasing load of pollutants, and the crisis for clean drinking water supply across globe, it is necessary to find suitable means to deal with the problem. Various methodologies have been adopted for the treatment of water such as membrane separation, advanced oxidation processes, photochemical degradation, sedimentation, flocculation, adsorption, ozonation etc. [20].

Among all these methods, adsorption is preferred widely because of its cost effectiveness, eco-friendly nature, easy handling and availability of large number of adsorbents. Various adsorbents such as graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, boron nitride, cellulose, chitosan, activated carbon, alumina, ferrites, iron oxide NPs etc. have been used by researchers for the removal of different kinds of pollutants [21,22,23,24,25]. Core–Shell Nanohybrids have proven to be a better adsorbent because of the high surface area and the ability to tailor the properties of core using suitable type of shell and its thickness [26, 27]. In view of the immense significance of core shell nanohybrids, here in we have discussed in detail their classification, synthetic strategies, general characterisation and finally their role in the removal of different kinds of pollutants.

2 Types of Core Shell Nanoparticles

Core shell nanoparticles (CSNP) may be defined as materials consisting of a core (inner material) and a shell (outer material). They can be categorised on the basis of composition of material as shown in Fig. 4 [7].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Classification of Core–Shell Nanohybrids

3 Inorganic/Inorganic CSNP

It is the most significant class among all the types as it finds applications in different fields ranging from information storage, biological labelling, optical bioimaging, catalysis, optoelectronics and many more. These CSNP can be further divided into following types.

3.1 Silica-Based Shell

The reasons for which silica is chosen by researchers for encapsulation of core nanomaterials are its extra ordinary colloidal stability especially in aquatic media, easy and controllable synthesis, modifiable porosity, chemical inertness and optical transparency [28,29,30]. Apart from this, due to the presence of silica shell, the core nanomaterial becomes biocompatible and the rich silica chemistry allows conjugation with functional groups easy which has resulted in widespread use of silica coated nanomaterials for various diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Due to these distinguished properties, silica coatings have been made on different inorganic materials such as metals, metal oxides and metal salts. Silica coating is usually done by employing the classic Stober method involving hydrophobic silanes such as tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS) as silica precursor [31, 32]. Recently, water soluble silanes such as MPTES (3-(mercaptopropyl-triethoxysilane), MPTMS (3-(mercaptopropyl)-trimethoxysilane), MTMS (3-(methyltrimethoxysilane) have also been utilised [33].

3.2 Non Silica-Based Shell

Instead of Silica, various metals such as Au, Ni, Co, Pd, Pt, Cu, metal oxides, semiconductors can also be used as a shell material. Metal nanoshells consist of a dielectric core having a nano range metallic layer (usually of Au) over it. By changing the relative core and shell thickness, a broad variation can be seen in the color of nanoshells making it useful for biomedical applications [34]. Likewise, Fe2O3 coating on CaO and MgO nanoparticles can lead to an increase in the adsorption capacity of toxic materials compared to pure CaO and MgO [35].

3.3 Semiconductor CSNP

Here, either the core or the shell or both are made up of semiconducting material. They can be further classified as Nonsemiconductor/Semiconductor or/Semiconductor/Non-semiconductor Core Shell Nanoparticles. Among various types of nonsemiconductor/semiconductor materials, the ones consisting of a magnetic core having a semiconducting shell around them are very much versatile. The photocatalytic properties of magnetic core semiconductor shell is higher than pure semiconductor [36]. Researchers investigated the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 and Fe2O3/TiO2 core shell hybrid in malignant tumour therapy and they found out that survival of tumour cells is lesser for core/shell nanohybrid compared to pure semiconductor [37].

3.4 Semiconductor/Semiconductor CSNP

Both the core and shell are made up of semiconductor. The major advantage of these particles is that the outer coating of second semiconducting material over first leads to an increase in optical activity and stability towards photooxidation. Depending upon the band gap three subdivisions can be made: type-I, inverse type-1 and type-II [38]. In type I, the shell bandgap is larger than core and hence both hole (h) and electrons (e) are restricted within the core. In inverse type, shell bandgap is smaller than core; the h and e may be partially or wholly restricted to shell depending upon its thickness. In the last type, the edge of valence or conduction edge lies within the core bandgap. Hence, one carrier is chiefly restricted to the core and other to the shell.

4 Inorganic/Organic CSNP

These are made up of metal, metal oxide, metallic compound, or silica core having a polymeric shell or a shell build-up of any organic material of high density. Coating of organic material around metal decreases the susceptibility of metal towards surface oxidation and also makes it biocompatible for applications in biological field [39]. In many cases, the core particles are coated to enhance their stability in suspension media. On the basis of material properties, they can be further divided into following two groups.

4.1 Magnetic/Organic CSNP

Magnetic nanoparticles are coated with organic materials in order to reduce the agglomeration. Polysaccharides and hydrophilic polymers are commonly employed as coating materials. This class of materials find application in magnetic sealing, MRI, magnetic recording, electromagnetic shielding, magnetic shell separation and drug targeting [40,41,42].

4.2 Nonmagnetic/Organic CSNP

This class of materials can be further categorised on the basis of material constituting the nonmagnetic core- metal, metal or metalloid oxide, and metal salts. Among metals, silver and gold have been the centre of attraction because of their distinct optical properties. Au surrounded by polyaniline acts as biosensor for glucose [43]. In metal oxides, polystyrene, poly(methylmethacrylate), polyvinyl chloride are widely used for coating on silica core and the polymer coated silica nanoparticles find application in material additives, sensors, optical and electrical devices. For metal salts, coating is usually done with conducting polymers such as polyaniline, polythiophene, polypyrole etc. [44]. They usually find application in light emitting devices, chemical sensors and electronic devices.

5 Organic/Inorganic CSNP

The core is made up of polymeric material such as polystyrene, polyurethane, poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinylpyrrolidone), poly(vinyl benzyl chloride), surfactants, dextrose, styrene-methyl methacrylate, poly(styrene-acrylic acid) etc. while the shell is composed of metals, metal chalcogenides, metal oxides or silica [45, 46]. The coating of an inorganic material, mainly that of metal oxide over an organic material has several benefits such as increment in the strength of whole material, better colloidal and thermal stability and resistance towards oxidation and abrasion [47, 48]. Further, they could be used as a template for the synthesis of hollow inorganic material via dissolution of the core using an appropriate solvent or by calcination. The preparation of silica microspheres via formation of polystyrene@silica core shell nanohybrid is shown in Fig. 5 [48, 49].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Organic/inorganic core shell nanohybrid as template for the synthesis of hollow inorganic material

6 Organic/Organic CSNP

Both the core and shell are composed of polymeric or some organic material. The profits gained by developing one polymer coating onto another is the modification in the physical properties of whole material, such as its toughness and glass transition temperature. Since, the glass transition temperature plays an important role in deciding whether a synthesised material is most suited for rigid or flexible application; tuning this property could help in getting desired properties. For instance, it has been reported that a high Tg core material improves the mechanical stability while a low Tg shell aids in the improvement of film formation capability. Apart from this, this class of materials also find application in controlled release of drugs. For instance, Dina M. Silva etal synthesised polymeric core shell nanohybrid and utilised it for the co-delivery of two drugs [50]. The curcumin drug is trapped in the core and ciprofloxacin was incorporated in the shell layer. The synthesis of nanohybrid material is shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Schematic representation of the processing steps of the core–shell particles. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]).

7 Core/Multishell Nanoparticles

Bimetallics form an important part of this category of core shell NPs. Benito Rodrı́guez-González synthesised Au–Ag multishell nanoparticles [51]. The optical properties were found to change as second and third shells are placed. The color of pure gold was deep red, when silver shell is placed over it, the color changes to yellow, upon placement of second gold shell it changed to blue hue. Finally, when second silver shell is deposited over it, orange color was observed. When silica shell is placed onto CdSe/ZnS core–shell quantum dots, an enhancement in stability in biological buffers was observed apart from an increase in biocompatibility in case of fluorescence imaging [52].

8 Movable Core/Hollow Shell Nanoparticles

Template assist route is usually followed for the synthesis of movable core/shell NPs. In this methodology, first core with a double shell is prepared and then removal of double shell is done by using an appropriate technique such as calcination or dissolution. The synthetic scheme for the preparation of movable Au core inside a carbon shell following template assisted route is shown in Fig. 7 [53].

Fig. 7
figure 7

One-step synthesis of Au–SiO2–RF polymer CSS nanocomposite and its conversion to Au@C yolk–shell nanostructure. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53])

9 Synthesis Strategies for Core–Shell Nanohybrid Materials

For carrying out the synthesis of these nanomaterials two approaches are generally followed (a) Top-down approach (b) Bottom up approach. In the top down approach, the bulk material is broken down to produce nanosized particles. The techniques included in this approach are ball milling, electrospinning, lithographic technique, laser ablation, sputtering and arc discharge method. The main problem associated with this approach is the creation of imperfections on the surface structure and difficult to maintain uniformity in the core and shell size and dimensions [54]. Contrary to this, the bottom up approach involves the building up of a nanomaterial from bottom, that is either atom by atom or molecule by molecule (Fig. 8). Techniques like chemical vapor deposition, solvothermal methods, sol–gel method, reverse micelle methods, soft and hard templating methods, laser pyrolysis etc. come under the category of bottom up approach methodology [55, 56]. This approach is advantageous in the sense that it can give rise to smaller size nanoparticles as well as creation of less defects. As far as synthesis of core shell nanohybrid is concerned, bottom up approach is found to be more convenient as it gives better control in achieving uniform coating. The two approaches can also be used in combination, for example the core particles can be synthesised via top down approach and then coating can be carried out by bottom up approach so as to maintain more regular shell thickness [57].

Fig. 8
figure 8

Top-down and bottom-up approach for the synthesis of nanomaterials

A two-step process is followed for the synthesis of core/shell nanohybrids. The synthesis strategy can be categorised into two types depending on core particles availability: (i) In first method, synthesis of core particles is done separately followed by washing and drying. Subsequently, appropriate surface modification of the core is carried out in order to coat it with the shell material. (ii) In the second method, core particles are synthesised in situ and afterwards coating with shell is done. The main advantage offered by first method is that the core particles obtained are in the pure form and hence chances of impurities on its surface would be less. While, in the in situ approach, probability of having some impurities lying between core and shell increases [58, 59].

The two things which are of utmost concern in the synthesis of core/shell nanohybrids is to develop a uniform coating of shell around the core and to have a control over its thickness. The major problems encountered by researchers in achieving these goals is primarily because of the following reasons: (i) core particles get agglomerated in reaction media, (ii) separate formation of shell particles instead of onto the core, (iii) core surface is impartially covered, (iv) managing the rate of reaction. Various routes such as microemulsion, precipitation, polymerization, sol–gel condensation, layer by layer adsorption have been adopted for the synthesis of core shell nanohybrids [6, 60,61,62]. Considering the material properties only, synthetic methods utilised for the preparation of inorganic and organic materials irrespective of whether they are acting as core or shell are briefly described below:

9.1 Synthesis of Inorganic CSNP

Inorganic core–shell nano materials can be divided into three classes: (i) metal, (ii) oxides of metal or metalloid, (iii) metal salts and metal chalcogenides.

9.1.1 Synthesis of Metallic CSNP

Following strategies are adopted for the synthesis of cores or shells made up of metal.

9.1.1.1 Reduction

It involves the reduction of a metal salt in the presence of a stabilizer. Various reducing agents have been used such as sodium borohydride, hydrazine, lithium aluminium hydride, tannic acid, sodium citrate; the former two being the most common [6, 63, 64]. Apart from the chemical reduction, greener reducing agents such as plant extract, bacteria and fungi have also been tried in order to reduce the use of harmful chemicals (Fig. 9). The main advantages associated with chemical reduction are its simplicity, cost-effectiveness and ability to control the size of particles by regulating various parameters such as nature of reducing agent, type of stabilizer, amount of reducing agent relative to salt precursor and the molar ratio of salt precursor and stabilizer [65, 66]. The choice of a reducing agent is a significant factor because size, shape as well as particle size distribution are strongly affected by it. For the reduction of metal salts, the reactivity of reducing agent needs to be adjusted appropriately. This is because if during the synthesis the rate of reaction is too fast, large number of nuclei will be formed rapidly resulting in generation of smaller size nanoparticles. Whereas if rate of reaction is very small, agglomeration is more likely to take place giving rise to bigger size nanoparticles.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Synthesis of metal NPs via reduction of metals salts

9.1.1.2 Reduction Transmetallation

This technique is mainly used for the formation of bimetallic type of core–shell nanoparticles. Compared to common reduction methods, redox transmetallation offers numerous advantages for the synthesis of core/shell nanoparticles: (i) Additional reducing agent is not required (ii) Occurrence of spontaneous deposition of shell layer onto the surface of core (iii) Self Nucleation of shell is prevented. The major demerit associated with this method is that only those bimetallic core shell nanoparticles can be synthesised where reduction potential of shell is more than that of the core. Ni/Au, Ni/Ag, Ag/Au, Co/Pt, Co/Cu, Co/Pd, Co/Au are some examples of bimetallic core–shell structures prepared by this technique [67,68,69,70,71]. In this method, first the synthesis of core is carried out. Thereafter addition of metal salt to the solution is done. When these salts come in contact with the surface of core, they get reduced by core atoms present on the surface and thus are deposited on it. Consequently, a part of the metallic core is oxidised to the salt which then diffuses through shell into the solution. Woo-ram Lee reported the synthesis of Co/Pd, Co/Pt, and Co/Cu using redox tranmetallation route [67].

9.1.1.3 Thermal Decomposition

Metal nanoparticles especially that of core can also be synthesised by thermally decomposing the organometallic compounds at high temperature. The surfactants are generally employed for the stabilisation of nanoparticles. A very common example is thermal decomposition of Co2(CO)8. As metal is already in zero-valent state it is possible to dissociate M-CO bond in organic solvent through thermal activation in the presence of a stabilizer [72]. Hess et al. reported the synthesis of Co nanoparticles through decomposition of Co2(CO)8 at 110 °C in toluene [73]. Likewise, Fe NPs have been prepared by decomposition of Fe(CO)5. Thereafter nanoparticles are precipitated and then stored in hexane so as to prevent the oxidation of surface. As the metal carbonyls are expensive and toxic, therefore other organometallic precursors such as [bis(salicylidene) cobalt(II)] oleylamine complex have also been tried for the synthesis of cobalt NPs [74]. Apart from organometallic compounds, metal nanoparticles are also made through thermal decomposition of metal complexes. MasoudSalavati-Niasari reported the synthesis of copper NPs by thermal decomposition of copper oxalate [75]. Similarly, synthesis of Ni and Au nanoparticles from thermal decomposition of their corresponding acetates have been reported [76, 77]. Once the metal is separated, it is washed with anhydrous alcohol for removing the stabilizer from the surface and then coating with shell is carried out. This technique is more helpful in the preparation of core shell nanohybrids of metal/metal oxide type. This is because after the synthesis of core, the only thing needed to be done is the removal of stabilizer from the surface of the core. After this surface atoms will get oxidised by atmospheric oxidation to metal oxide.

9.1.1.4 Wire Electrical Explosion (WEE)

It involves the application of a high voltage across a thin wire under inert conditions in a closed chamber having high pressure. This leads to the generation of an intense pulse with large current density. When such huge current passes through the wire, it becomes overheated causing it to evaporate rapidly. As a result, metal nanoparticles of different size are formed inside chamber. WEE is not commonly used in industry as it is highly expensive and secondly cannot be used for all metals. It can be employed for only those metals which have high electrical conductivity and can be easily obtained in the form of thin wire. Nanoparticles of metals such as Cu, Al, Ni and core shell alloys such as Cu/Zn, Ti/Ni have been synthesised via WEE [78, 79]. The schematic diagram for the synthesis of Nickel nanoparticle using wire electrical explosion followed by coating with silica shell is shown in Fig. 10.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Synthesis of Ni@SiO2 via WEE

9.1.2 Synthesis of Oxide Nanoparticles

They form an important class of materials with interesting applications. The widely used methods for their synthesis are described below.

9.1.2.1 Sol–Gel Method

It comes under wet chemical techniques and is widely employed for the the synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles. Hydrolysis followed by polycondensation are the two key steps leading to the generation of a solid phase network gradually. Metal alkoxides and metal salts are commonly used as precursors in solgel method. By varying various parameters, a wide range of materials such as fine powder, aerogel, xerogel, thin films and monoliths can be prepared [80, 81]. The overall process can be written as:

  1. (1)

    Hydrolysis of precursors (usually alkoxides or chlorides)

    $$M - OR + H_{2} O \to M - OH + R - OH$$

    Here, M = metal, R = alkyl

  2. (2)

    Polycondensation: This step involves the formation of metal oxide linkages with elimination of water or alcohol. The polymeric network gradually grows and ultimately reaches colloidal dimensions. The size of colloidal factors depends mainly on the pH of medium and ratio of precursor to water.

    $$M - OX + M - OH \to H - OX + M - O - M$$

    Here, X = alkyl or H.

  3. (3)

    Aging: During this process the polycondensation reaction continues to take place.

  4. (4)

    Drying: There are different ways in which drying can be done: Supercritical, thermal, and freeze drying leading to formation of aerogel, xerogel and cryogel respectively.

The schematic for the process is shown in Fig. 11 [82, 83].

Fig. 11
figure 11

Synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles using sol–gel method

9.1.2.2 Coprecipitation

Precipitation reaction involves the reaction of two or more than two water soluble salts to generate at least one insoluble salt which precipitates out of the media. The solubility product is the key parameter for precipitation reaction. This is because initially the particles formed will be in liquid phase, and once their concentration exceeds solubility product only then particle formation will begin. This technique has been widely used for the synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles and various ferrites. K. Petcharoen reported the synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles by the coprecipitation of FeCl2.4H2O and FeCl3 in the presence of ammonium hydroxide which is acting as precipitating agent [83]. Both hexanoic and oleic acid were used as coating agents for the stabilisation of formed nanoparticles. Finally, the formed coated nanoparticles were filtered and subsequently washed. First washing is carried out with water in order to remove Cl ions and then with ethanol so as to get rid of excess coating agent. Similarly, Yeong Il Kim prepared CoFe2O4 nanoparticles by the coprecipitation of CoCl2.6H2O and FeCl3.6H2O using sodium hydroxide as the precipitating agent [84]. They also found that particle size can be tuned by properly regulating the temperature during coprecipitation. Apart from ferrites, other metal oxide nanoparticles such as ZnO have been prepared following this route. The extension of this route for the synthesis of core/shell nanohybrids is simple. For instance, after the synthesis of Fe3O4 core by co-precipitation, urea and titanium sulfate are added in the same solution. Decomposition of urea generate ammonia which undergoes reaction with Ti(SO4)2 to form TiO2, thus ultimately forming Fe3O4/TiO2 core shell structure [85].

9.1.2.3 Thermal Decomposition

Metal complexes can be decomposed by heat treatment to generate metal oxide, a process also known as thermolysis. This methodology is mainly adopted for the synthesis of core particles and is quite simple. Various transition metal oxides have been synthesised following this route. Teresa Palacios-Hernández synthesised Co3O4 and CuO nanoparticles by performing calcination of tartarate complexes of Co and Cu complexes respectively for 5 h at a temperature of 500 °C [86]. Similarly, Sun et al. prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticles by thermal decomposition of Fe(acac)3. Oleic acid and oleyl amine were added in the reaction mixture as stabilizer [87]. They also found that particle size can be tuned by changing the reaction conditions or by following seed mediated growth. Likewise, ZnO nanoparticles are prepared by thermally decomposing [bis(acetylacetonato)zinc(II)]–oleylamine complex. Oleyl amine and triphenylphosphine were used for restricting the particle size. The synthetic scheme is shown in Fig. 12 [88].

Fig. 12
figure 12

Synthesis of ZnO NPs by the thermal decomposition of Zn-Oleylamine (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [88])

9.1.3 Synthesis of Metal Salt and Metal Chalcogenide Nanoparticles

Metal chalcogenides, especially sulfides of transition elements are employed as semiconducting materials in electronic industry and metal salts of rare earth metals are utilized for bioimaging. The synthesis of this class of materials is usually carried out by the use of precipitation reaction. Various semiconducting core shell nanohybrids which have been prepared via precipitation are CdS/ZnS, CdS/PbS, CdS/CdSe, ZnS, CdSe etc. [89,90,91,92].

9.2 Synthesis of Organic Nanoparticles

Most of the organic nanoparticles come under the class of polymers. Therefore, the technique most commonly used for the synthesis of organic core or shell is the addition or condensation polymerisation. There are various techniques by which polymerisation can be done- bulk, solution, suspension and emulsion polymerization. Generally, the synthesis of organic core is carried out by emulsion polymerisation and then it is used as a template for the preparation of core shell nanostructure [93, 94]. The development of polymeric shell on either the organic or inorganic material is usually done insitu. For the enhancement of shell coating the surface of core is commonly modified with a polyelectrolye in case of an organic core or via a surfactant for the inorganic core. After surface modification is achieved, polymerisation proceeds on the surface of the core by the technique of solution or bulk polymerisation [95]. A variety of nanohybrids have been synthesised where polymeric nanoparticle is playing the role of either core or shell or both. For instance, Chunlei Wang et al. prepared Fe3O4@CaCO3@PMMA core shell nanohybrid by insitu emulsion polymerisation on the surface of oleic acid altered Fe3O4@CaCO3 nanoparticles. The synthetic scheme is shown in Fig. 13 [96]. The advantage gained by having a polymeric coating of hydrophilic nature around an inorganic core is an enhancement in the biocompatibility of the core.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Fe3O4@CaCO3@PMMA core shell nanohybrid prepared by insitu emulsion polymerisation on the surface of oleic acid altered Fe3O4@CaCO3 nanoparticles [OA: Oleic Acid, SDBS: Sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, MMA: Methyl methacrylate, PMMA: Poly Methyl methacrylate] (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [97])

9.3 General Characterisation of Core Shell Nanohybrid

After the successful synthesis of core shell nanohybrid, the next task is to analyse it with respect to size, shape, particle size distribution, morphology and structural composition. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) which is also known by the name of photon correlation spectroscopy or quasi-elastic light scattering is used for the measurement of size of particles. The technique works by measuring the Brownian motion and correlate it with the size of particle. The bigger the size of particle, the slower will be its Brownian motion. The diameter that is obtained by DLS is actually hydrodynamic diameter because it comes from the way in which a particle diffuses in a fluid. Also, the diameter acquired refers to the diameter of a sphere having identical translational diffusion coefficient to that of the particle. Ionic strength of the medium, alternation in surface structure and degree of non-sphericity in particle have a significant influence on the result of DLS measurements. Further, temperature should be kept stable, otherwise convection currents will result in having a non-random movement in fluid leading to erroneous results. For the determination of shape as well as surface morphology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is employed. It is usually done in conjunction with energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) in order to have a better picture of structural composition. Whereas if one wants to know information about inner structure, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) proves to be very useful. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is beneficial for checking the uniformity of shell coating onto the core. In order to study the surface functionalisation, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in different modes- transmittance, reflectance and attenuated total reflectance (ATR) as well as Raman spectroscopy is widely used. For the identification of crystal structure, X-Ray diffractomers are utilized. If the core shell nanohybrid is to be used for water decontamination or for any other application relying on surface, determination of surface area becomes very much crucial. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) isotherm is usually used by researchers for finding the surface area of a nanosorbent. Zeta potential is an important parameter which determines the stability of nanohybrids and its variation with pH aids in the mechanistic understanding of sorption. The measurements are done with the help of a zetasizer. For characterising the composition, numerous techniques such as FTIR, X-Ray fluorescence, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, flame and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry are available.

9.4 Application of Core–Shell Nanohybrids for Water Treatment

Water contains numerous kinds of pollutants ranging from organic dyes, heavy elements, radionuclides, nanoparticles, pharmaceuticals, pesticides etc. Here, we have discussed the role of nanohybrids in the treatment of water.

9.5 Removal of Conventional Pollutants

Heavy metals are naturally present in earth but anthropogenic activities have caused tremendous increase in their concentration thus posing a major risk on the health of plants, animals and humans. Typical conventional pollutants like As, F, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni etc. can enter the human body through drinking water causing serious health effects [97, 98]. Several regions of the world are already facing higher concentrations of arsenic and fluoride in groundwater. Various core shell nanohybrids have been reported for the removal of conventional pollutants. Abdel Halim A. Saad et al. fabricated ZnO/Chitosan core shell nanocomposite and used it for the removal of Cu2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ [99]. The reusability of the material was found to be high. Meng Zhang prepared Ni/Mg(OH)2 and used it for the adsorption of Zn2+, Cu2+ and Cd2+ ions. Magnesium hydroxide is an ideal sorbent for heavy metal ions and has been already used for the removal of nickel, lead, cadmium, zinc, copper and cobalt [11, 100, 101]. But the problem associated with it is its poor recyclability. In view of this, the researchers synthesised Ni/Mg(OH)2 core shell nanostructure as it can be easily removed from the media by application of external magnetic field [102]. Apart from this the shell acts as a protective layer and aids in preventing the oxidation of Ni to NiO, thereby enabling it to retain its magnetism. Further, removal efficiency of all the metals was found to be close to 100% and remained 95% even after 5 cycles. The recycling strategy is shown as a schematic in Fig. 14.

Fig. 14
figure 14

The recycling strategy of Ni@Mg(OH)2 water treatment agent (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [103])

Another example of a nanohybrid where the shell leads to enhancement in the adsorptive capacity is a core double shell structure prepared by KairuZhe where in the core is made up of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles having an inner polydopamine shell and an outer shell made up of zeoliticidazolate frameworks-8 (MP@ZIF-8). The adsorption capacity of MP@ZIF-8 was found to be 136.56 mg g−1 for Cr(VI) which is greater as compared to MP (92.27 mg g−1). Further from XPS studies it was found that Cr(VI) was partially reduced to Cr(III) during the adsorption process. The authors attributed this to the presence of nitrogen atom groups on polydopamine and ZIF8 which are acting as reducing agents [103]. In another study, core shell silica coated Fe3O4 functionalised with diglycolic acid (FGA-1) was found to be a better adsorbent for the removal of Pb(II) and Cr(VI) ions [104]. The magnetic core has the advantage of ease of isolation by the application of external magnetic field. Further, the presence of different functional groups around the core protects it against agglomeration and also enhances its selectivity. Different sort of chemical modification of core can be done in order to make it selective for the capture of desired metal ions. As the prepared nanosorbent (FGA-1) bears terminal acidic moieties and since it is known that Pb(II) and Cr(VI) ions exhibit excellent binding towards acidic functionalities, they are chosen for carrying out further uptake measurements. From the zeta potential studies, it was found that the surface of nanosorbent is negatively charged at neutral pH, which was attributed to the ionisation of carboxylic acid. As a result, adsorption of Pb(II) is preferred over Cr(VI) ions. However, at lower pH the uptake of Cr(VI) was found to be higher, which the authors thought might be due to the protonation of sorbent. The adsorption capacity for both the ions was found to be high under optimised conditions with reasonably good recyclability upto 5 cycles.

Numerous core–shell nanohybrids have been reported in the literature highlighting their immense significance in the adsorption of a wide range of ions (Zn(II), Cd(II), Hg(II), Pb(II), Cu((II), Cr(VI), Cr(III), Ni(II), Co(II), Co(III), As(VI), As(III) etc.), a comprehensive list of which is outlined in Table 1 [99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141]. Though actinides are too heavy elements, they are dealt in a separate subsection which is exclusively dedicated to role of core shell nanohybrids in radionuclide removal. The table also enlists the sorption capacities of different sorbents for the sake of comparison. But it should be noted that the maximum adsorption capacity reported necessarily need not be at room temperature and the working pH is different for different nanohybrids.

Table 1 Core–shell nanohybrids for removal of conventional pollutants

9.6 Radionuclide Removal

Water resources can get contaminated by radioactive materials. It may occur due to nuclear weapon testing, nuclear accidents, leakage from nuclear power and reprocessing plants. The devastating earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan has caused drastic damage to the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant resulting in the release of tons of water contaminated with radionuclides into the ocean in March, 2011. Other than this, various steps involved in oil extraction also poses threat to the radioactive contamination of water. As hospitals also use numerous isotopes for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes; improper disposal of hospital waste also contributes to the generation of radioactive waste into water. The challenge to meet the energy demand is rising throughout the globe and nuclear power industry is more likely to grow in the coming years, with the risk of generating more and more radioactive waste into water bodies. In view of this, researchers have synthesised various core–shell nanohybrids for the removal of radionuclides [144].

For instance, Yan Liu et al. prepared FeS@Fe3O4 core shell nanohybrid and utilised it for the adsorption of uranyl ions [148]. The synthesis was carried out via ultrasonic assisted strategy. The nanohybrid proved to be a better adsorbent as compared to FeS and Fe3O4 alone. This is supported by their adsorption capacities. For FeS@Fe3O4, the adsorption capacity came out to be 229.03 mg g−1 which is considerably higher than FeS (211.0 mg g−1) and Fe3O4 (154.0 mg g−1). This happens because bare FeS can get easily aggregated, leading to reduction in its sorption capacity. Once it gets encapsulated by Fe3O4 layer, it becomes more stable and dispersible; thereby enhancing its adsorption capacity. The results from surface area measurement are also in agreement with this. The surface area of hybrid material is 82.47 m2g−1 which is significantly larger than that of FeS. Another example highlighting the immense importance of core shell nanohybrid material is the synthesis of silica coated Fe3O4 functionalised with amidoxime. The magnetic core was selected for facilitating the separation of nano-sorbent [150]. But since, the magnetic nanoparticles are susceptible towards oxidation and agglomeration, surface modifications are carried out in order to overcome these limitations. In view of this, the researchers coated the surface of magnetite nanoparticles with silica because of its high stability and ability to functionalise it with different kinds of groups due to the presence of hydroxyl groups on the surface. Finally the core shell material, Fe3O4@SiO2 was functionalised with amidoxime to prepare Fe3O4@SiO2-AO and various studies pertaining to adsorption of uranyl ions were conducted. From the speciation diagram and pH studies, it was proposed that oxime groups and amino nitrogen are responsible for binding with uranyl ion. A consolidated list of various core–shell materials developed for radionuclides removal from water have been listed in Table 2 [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155].

Table 2 Core–Shell nanohybrids for removal of radionuclides

9.7 Removal of Dyes

Water pollution because of dyeing industry is a matter of grave concern since a huge amount of it is released into water bodies every year. As the solubility of dyes in water is high, it becomes really difficult to eradicate them by conventional means. The presence of dyes in water leads to a reduction in the penetration of light into water bodies, thereby causing a decrease in the photosynthesis rate and hence lowering the dissolved oxygen levels. All this adversely affects the life of entire aquatic organisms. The dyes are also reported to have mutagenic and carcinogenic effects and once they enter the food chain can readily undergo biomagnification and thus species at higher trophic level are more likely to get affected. Thus, it becomes very necessary to find measures to deal with dye pollution. Among various ways, adsorption of dyes by nanomaterials can prove to be a promising approach. In particular, core shell naonybrids have emerged as recent adsorbents for tackling dye pollution. Various core–shell nanohybrids have been used for the adsorption of diverse kinds of dyes ranging from acidic to basic. Zikang Xiong et al. synthesised Fe3O4@Carbon@ZIF-8 core shell nanomaterial and used it for the adsorption of Congo red dye [133]. The adsorption capacity of the prepared nanosorbent was found to be very high (806.45 mg g-1). For the easy removal of adsorbents, magnetic cores are commonly preferred and are protected using a shell. The researchers chose amorphous carbon as the inner shell as it is easier to synthesise and more environmentally benign as compared to silica or other polymeric shells. Apart from this, it also plays the role of linker as well as stabilizer between magnetic core and outer shell layer. Metal Organic frameworks [Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 (ZIF-8)] were selected as the outer shell material because of its high surface area, availability of numerous unsaturation sites, tuneable pore size and outstanding chemical stability. Further ZIF-8 was particularly chosen because of its high selectivity and superior water stability. To gain better insight into mechanistic aspects, FTIR and XPS studies are carried out after and before adsorption. It was concluded that electrostatic interaction, pi-pi bonding and hydrogen bonding are the driving forces behind the adsorption of congo red dye. Finally selectivity of the adsorbent was examined in the presence of other anionic and cationic dyes and it was revealed that Fe3O4@Carbon@ZIF-8 can be successfully used for the selective adsorption of Congo Red in complex wastewater system. Similarly, Fe3O4@lignosulfonate/phenolic core–shell microspheres has been used for the adsorption of methylene blue [164]. The nanohybrid material can be separated easily on account of the presence of magnetic core and functional groups of lignosulfonate (shell) are responsible for high adsorption capacity [165]. A list of different core shell nanohybrid materials those have been used for the adsorption of different dyes with their sorption capacities is summarized in Table 3 [165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177].

Table 3 Core–shell nanohybrids for removal of dyes

9.8 Removal of Organic Pollutants

Organic pollutants comprise of pharmaceuticals, pesticides, insecticides, organic solvents and are harmful for human beings because of the concentration in which they are found in aquatic medium. Pharmaceutical pollution also knows as drug pollution occurs when drugs or their metabolites reach the water bodies. This leads to various adverse consequences. To mention a few, it has been revealed from numerous studies that estrogen and chemicals which behave similar to it result in a feminizing effect on fishes thus causing an increase in the population of intersex and female fishes. Apart from this, various commonly used antidepressants were found to be accumulated in the tissues of brain in fishes. Further, as antibiotics are largely used for the treatment of variety of infections, their presence in sewage treatment systems can lead to the inhibition of sewage bacteria, thereby deteriorating the decomposition of organic matter. Some studies also indicate that presence of antibiotics in water has given rise to antibiotic resistance. Besides this, pesticides also poses threats to environment due to their presence in drinking water in significant concentration. Organic solvents are widely used in almost all industries and are too a major contributor in water pollution. A variety of methods are available for the removal of organic pollutants, the particular method being chosen depends upon the nature of pollutant [178,179,180]. Core–Shell nanohybrids also provide a means of getting rid of these organic pollutants from water bodies. Most of the core shell nanohybrids either employ adsorption or photocatalytic degradation for removing the pollutant a list of which is given in Table 4 [178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188] and. As already discussed, many times, most of the core–shell nanosorbents synthesised use magnetite as a core for its facile recovery. The shell material and its further functionalisation is carried out on the basis of nature of pollutant to be removed.

Table 4 Core–shell nanohybrids for removal of organic pollutants

9.9 Conclusion

In this book chapter, various core shell nanohybrid structureshaving application in water decontamination have been discussed. Core shell nanohybrid structuresare obtained through self-assembling techniques, sol–gel method, using polymers for dispersion of building blocks. While major percentage of these nanohybrid structuresare reported for conventional pollutants removal (mainly inorganic, organic pollutants);nanohybrid structures are comparatively less for removal of radionuclides, nanoparticles. Many core shell nanohybrid structures discussed here are potential alternate to conventional water treatment processes due to their advance properties, environment friendliness and cost effectiveness. Most nanostructures, however, are in nascent stage for industrial and large-scale applications due to technical challenges in scaling up, reusability and sometimes owing to lack of stability under ambient environment.