Abstract
Heavy metals (HMs) and radionuclides pose a serious threat to human health because of their ubiquity, non-biodegradability, and long-term persistence in the environment. The presence of high amounts of these pollutants in soil has a detrimental influence on soil fertility, agricultural productivity, and yield. HMs and radionuclides contamination have been remediated using a variety of conventional approaches. However, these technologies have limitations, such as excessive cost, intensive labor, and alteration of the soil native microflora by affecting soil properties with the potential to pollute the environment with the release of secondary pollutants. As a result, switching to a more cost-effective and eco-friendly method is very desirable. Phytoremediation technology for HMs and radionuclides decontamination has been recognized as a novel, low-cost, and ecologically acceptable solution. The present chapter explains the major processes of phytoremediation, as well as the function of transgenic plants in increasing plant efficacy for HMs and radionuclides decontamination. The role of plant growth regulators (PGRs), beneficial microorganisms, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and nanoparticles (NPs) in phytoremediation is also discussed.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Arsenic
- Gibberellic acid
- Metallothionein
- Phytostabilization
- Nanoparticles
- Heavy metals
- Radionuclides
- Phytoremediation
5.1 Introduction
Pollutants are substances that are found at higher concentrations in the environment than their natural abundance and have a negative impact on the ecosystem. Organic pollutants include benzene, toluene, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), dioxins, nitro-aromatics, dyes, polymers, pesticides, and chlorinated organics. Inorganic pollutants, on the other hand, comprise a variety of toxic heavy metals (HMs) and radionuclides. HMs are highly notorious contaminants because of their abundance, non-biodegradability, and long-term persistence in the environment. They include copper (Cu), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), arsenic (As), aluminum (Al), silver (Ag), and platinum (Pt). HMs pollute the soil and water and have toxic, genotoxic, teratogenic, and mutagenic impacts on living organisms. Once accumulated in soils, these metals have an inverse effect on soil fertility and diminish agricultural production. Furthermore, even at low concentrations, they induce endocrine disruption and neurological problems. They are classified as priority pollutants by environmental protection agencies across the globe because they can pose serious health risks. Like HMs, radionuclides cannot be naturally or synthetically degraded. In addition, numerous studies have reported that cesium (37Cs) and strontium (90Sr) are not removed from the top 0.4 meters of soil even under high rainfall, and the migration rate from the top few centimeters of soil is slow. Therefore, radionuclides have become a threat to public health when exposed and/or deposited in the soil and water. Moreover, exposure to radioactivity is a common and natural phenomenon. For instance, exposure to cosmic radiation, radon (Rn) gas from rocks and soil, or potassium (40K) through food.
Furthermore, elevated levels of these pollutants in soils have a negative impact on crop development, and yields by dissolving cell organelles and disrupting membranes, acting as genotoxic substances, disrupting physiological processes like photosynthesis, or inactivating respiration, protein synthesis, and carbohydrate metabolism. Hence, remediation of these pollutants has become a necessity to sustain a stable environment. Several traditional remediation approaches have been explored to remediate HMs and radionuclides contamination. However, these technologies are costly and hazardous with the potential to release secondary pollutants into the environment. Therefore, adaptation to an alternative, cost-effective, eco-friendly technology having high removal efficiency is highly desirable. Phytoremediation has been identified as an emerging, low-cost, and eco-sustainable approach to HMs and radionuclides decontamination (Sarma et al. 2021). Phytoremediation uses plants to remove, degrade, or detoxify toxic metals (Nedjimi 2021; Thakare et al. 2021). Phytoextraction, phytostabilization, phytovolatilization, phytodegradation, and rhizodegradation are types of phytoremediation techniques that have been utilized for soil decontamination. The present chapter discusses various sources and toxic effects of HMs and radionuclides, plant strategies for avoiding and/or tolerating hazardous metals, as well as the importance of genetic engineering (GE) in improving efficiency of phytoremediation. The role of plant growth regulators (PGRs), beneficial microorganisms, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and nanoparticles (NPs) in assisting phytoremediation is also highlighted.
5.2 Heavy Metals (HMs) and Radionuclides
Heavy metals (HMs) are defined as elements with numerous metallic properties, i.e., ductility, conductivity, stability, ligand specificity, etc., an atomic number >20, and a density >5 g/cm3. They are generally present in the environment at a trace level (<1 g/kg/ppb). HMs can also be classified into essential and non-essential HMs. Essential HMs consist of Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Zn and non-essential includes Pb, Cd, and Hg. In addition, according to their level of toxicity, they can also be grouped as extremely poisonous, moderately poisonous, and relatively less poisonous. Radionuclides, on the other hand, are a class of chemicals where the nucleus of the atom is unstable. Radionuclides achieve stability through changes in the nucleus (spontaneous fission, emission of alpha particles, or conversion of neutrons to protons or the reverse). The emission of radionuclides from nuclear power plants, as well as their subsequent mobility in the environment, is a subject of intense public concern. HMs and radionuclides are emitted from both natural as well as anthropogenic sources, such as automobile exhaust, smelting, warfare, electronic industries, agrochemical use, irrigation, waste disposal, fossil fuel consumption, nuclear plants, and nuclear weapons testing as shown in Table 5.1.
The accumulation of HMs in the soil causes severe health problems for plants, animals, and humans. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), soil HM contamination has caused health issues for about ten million humans all over the world. As a result, HM accumulation in plants via the soil–root interface is a serious threat (Sakizadeha and Ghorbani 2017). The most well-known case of Hg poisoning is the Minamata disease in Japan. Another example of HM poisoning is the disaster in the Spanish national reserve. The water in the reservoir was polluted with traces of HMs, mineral sediment, and acidic chemicals. In addition, Hinckley water contamination is another most common example of Cr contamination in the world. Lead poisoning is also not uncommon and is probably the best example of an HM poisoning. It has been reported that 890,000 children aged 1–5 have elevated blood lead levels in the USA (Pirkle et al. 1998). The Kyshtym disaster (1957), Stationary Low-Power Reactor Number One, also known as SL-1 accident (1961), Three Mile Island accident (1979), Chernobyl accident (1986), and Fukushima Daiichi disaster (2011) are a few major nuclear disasters in history. The Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine is a common example. The Chernobyl accident happened in a dangerously constructed nuclear power reactor with a total meltdown of the core and 10 days of free emission of radionuclides into the atmosphere. In addition, nuclear disasters, such as Fukushima, have contaminated coastal ecosystems by dispersing radionuclides. Several amendments’ applications, independently of their type and concentration, reduced their concentrations in the soil available fraction and the soil leachates. Any change in the concentration of these metals will either cause deficiency or will interfere with cellular functions, ultimately adversely affecting the growth of plants, as presented in Table 5.2.
5.3 Phytoremediation: An Environmental Tool for the Reclamation of Contaminated Sites
Phytoremediation is a broad concept that refers to a variety of processes involving plant–soil–atmosphere interactions. It is an emerging technology that involves the use of plants to extract, sequester, degrade, or immobilize pollutants from the soil and water. Potential plants for phytoremediation usually possess four important characteristics; (1) rapid growth and high biomass, (2) abstruse root system, (3) harvestable, and (4) accumulation of excessive concentration of pollutants in the shoots. The ability of plants to remove HMs and radionuclides from soils has been reported by many researchers. Eichhornia crassipes roots removed 54% of the initial U within 4 min of contact time (Bhainsa and D’Souza 2001). Entry et al. (2001) compared the potential of bahiagrass, Johnson grass, and switchgrass to accumulate 137Cs and 90Sr from contaminated soils in the presence and absence of either sphagnum peat or poultry litter amendments. Johnson grass growing on soil treated with chicken litter showed the highest accumulation of these radionuclides. Among three plants, viz., Indian mustard, redroot pigweed, and tepary bean, redroot pigweed showed the highest accumulation of 137Cs and 90Sr (Fuhrmann et al. 2002). Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska and Urban (2004) reported that onion plants (Allium cepa) may play an important role in the 137Cs recycling by facilitating the transfer of fallout 137Cs to the soil. Eapen et al. (2006) reported that Calotropis gigantea plants accumulated 90Sr and 137Cs more in their roots than in their shoots. Sasmaz and Sasmaz (2009) reported that Astragalus gummifer can be utilized to rehabilitate the soil contaminated by Sr. In another study, Ocimum basilicum seeds showed significant uptake of both 137Cs and 90Sr. The maximum adsorption capacity was 160 mg Cs g−1 and 247 mg Sr g−1 seed dry weight (Chakraborty et al. 2007). Melastoma malabathricum L. was reported to accumulate a relatively high range of Pb and As concentration (Selamat et al. 2014). In comparison to other plants, Miscanthus floridulus and Cyperus iria are reported to have the potential for phytoremediation of radionuclide 232Th in the soil (Yan 2016). In another study, Bhat et al. (2016) reported that Centella asiatica can uptake and accumulate Fe significantly in the aerial parts. Silva et al. (2018) suggested that Cassia alata plants can be used for the phytoremediation of Cd. Hypnum plumaeforme has been described as a possible Rn pollution accumulator plant, as well as a possible indicator plant for Rn pollution monitoring (Zhang et al. 2019). Phytoremediation employs various techniques, such as phytoextraction, phytostabilization, phytovolatilization, phytodegradation, and rhizodegradation for the remediation of polluted soil as present in Fig. 5.1.
5.3.1 Phytoextraction
Plants can absorb nutrients from the soil naturally. The absorption of chemicals through the plant’s root system and the accumulation of metal and radioactive contaminants from the soil in their shoots is known as phytoextraction. Phytoextraction is also called phytoaccumulation. The contaminants, as well as plant biomass containing metals and radionuclides, have been extracted during the post-harvest process (Raskin and Ensley 2000). Phytoextraction has been applied to many contaminants such as metals-Ag, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, and Zn (Salt et al. 1995), metalloids-As and Se (Kumar et al. 1995), and radionuclides- 90Sr, 95Nb, 99Tc,106Ru, 144Ce, 226,228Ra, 239,240Pu, 241Am, 228,230,232Th, 244Cm, and 237Np (Nisbet and Shaw 1994; Kabata-Pendias and Pendias 1996). The ability of a plant to translocate and accumulate contaminants varies, depending on the plant species (Susarla et al. 2002).
5.3.2 Phytostabilization
The alternative approach is to slow down contaminant movement and stabilize the contaminant by storing it in the plant roots or precipitating it with root exudate. This method is best for dealing with radionuclides with short half-lives (Lee 2013) and metals such as Pb, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, and Zn (Etim 2012). Metals in the root zone can be stabilized by changing their oxidation state from soluble to insoluble by root-mediated precipitation. Metal-tolerant plants are used to restore vegetation at polluted sites, reducing the risk of contaminants migrating by wind erosion and transport of exposed surface soils, as well as pollution leaching into groundwater. Plants also help to prevent soil erosion and reduce the amount of water available in the environment through a thick root system.
5.3.3 Phytovolatilization
Phytovolatilization is the process of contaminants being absorbed and converted into less toxic volatile forms which are assimilated by the roots, translocated to the shoot, and then volatilized in the atmosphere as vapors through the stomatal leaves (Tollsten and Muller 1996; Raskin and Ensley 2000). Phytovolatilization can occur with contaminants present in the soil, sediment, or water. This approach has the benefit of converting the contaminant, mercuric ion, into a less toxic material. The downside is that Hg emitted into the atmosphere is likely to be recycled by precipitation and then redeposited in lakes and oceans. Phytovolatilization of radionuclides, which takes advantage of a plant’s ability to transpire massive quantities of water, is currently being used for tritium (3H) remediation. Tritium, a radioactive hydrogen isotope with a half-life of around 12 years, decays to stable He. However, since phytovolatilization requires the release of pollutants into the environment, a risk assessment of the effects on the ecosystem and human health may be required.
5.3.4 Phytodegradation
Phytodegradation, also known as phytotransformation, is the degradation of organic contaminants into simple molecules through a plant metabolic method. Contaminant-metabolizing enzymes formed by plants can be released into the rhizosphere, where they may continue to work in contaminant transformation. Dehydrogenase, nitrogenase, laccase, and nitrilase are examples of plant-formed enzymes in plant sediments and soils and released by roots (Schnoor et al. 1995). The plant degrades the organic contaminant and uses it for its own purposes. Plants can pick up nitrate and integrate it into proteins or other nitrogen-containing compounds or it can be converted to nitrogen gas. Some organic contaminants, such as chlorinated solvents, herbicides, 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene, and trichloroethylene, are remedied through phytodegradation.
5.3.5 Rhizodegradation
Rhizodegradation is a term that describes the breakdown of pollutants in the rhizosphere of plants. Plants provide habitats for bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi to work together to degrade pollutants. The bacteria flourished in the rhizosphere, causes the contaminant to degrade. Plant exudates, such as sugar, amino acids, enzymes, and other components increase the microbial population (Shahzad et al. 2015). The rate of rhizodegradation can be accelerated by soil characteristics such as aeration and moisture content (Kirk et al. 2005). Organic chemicals such as petroleum hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), chlorinated solvents, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes are removed through rhizodegradation. Table 5.3 presents various phytoremediation techniques employed for the remediation of HMs and radionuclides.
5.4 Plants Strategies Towards Metals
Plants tolerant to the presence of high concentrations of metals in the soil are classified as metallophytes. To cope with the toxicity of high amounts of elements in the soil, metallophytes exhibit two major strategies, viz., exclusion and accumulation (Baker 1981). In exclusion, plants resist the translocation of metals to their tissues. The metal excluder restricts the amount of metal translocated from roots to shoots, thus maintaining low levels of metal concentration in the aerial sections of the plants. Exclusion involves modification of the pH in the rhizosphere by secretion of organic acids from roots which bind to the metals and decrease their bioavailability. Other mechanisms involve the accumulation of metals in cell walls. However, beyond a certain threshold dose, this mechanism usually breaks down and the metal is taken up by the roots. In Silene paradoxa, the generation of metal-excluding root cell walls was suggested to be one of the factors contributing to low Cu accumulation and thus limiting the Cu uptake by the root cells by decreasing their pectin concentration in the cell wall and increasing pectin methylation, thus preventing the binding of Cu (Colzi et al. 2012). Seregin et al. (2003) reported maize as an excluder plant, with its root system acting as a barrier, restricting Ni uptake by above-ground organs. In another study, Wei et al. (2005) reported Oenothera biennis and Commelina communis as Cd excluders and Taraxacum mongolicum as a Zn excluder.
In accumulation, metals are accumulated in a non-toxic form in the upper plant parts at both low and high concentrations. Plants can be distinguished as indicators, accumulators, and hyperaccumulators based on their ability to accumulate metals in their tissues. Indicator plants sequester metals in the above-ground aerial tissue, but the level of metal within their tissue reflects those in the surrounding soil. These plants are of biological and ecological importance since they are pollution indicators. Accumulator plant species can accumulate greater metal concentrations in the aerial portions of the plant with a shoot/root ratio of >1 (Baker 1981). Hyperaccumulator plants can accumulate extraordinarily high amounts of metals in the aerial organs, far above the levels found in the majority of species, without experiencing phytotoxic effects. These plants have a high rate of metal uptake, a faster root-to-shoot translocation, and a better ability to detoxify and sequester toxic metal in their leaves (Rascio and Navari-Izzo 2011). The criterion for hyperaccumulators of Co, Cu, Cr, Pb, and Ni are plants containing over 1000 μg/g of any of these elements in the dry matter; for Mn and Zn, the criterion is 10,000 μg/g (Baker and Brooks 1989). The fate of hyperaccumulation depends on the plant species, soil physicochemical properties such as pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), organic matter content, electrical conductivity (EC), and metal concentration in the soil. Hyperaccumulators are excellent models for studying metal control, including the physiology of metal intake, transport, and sequestration, as well as evolution and adaption in harsh settings. Above-ground parts assimilate high amounts of metal as compared to ground parts in hyperaccumulator plants. Species belonging to the family Brassicaceae, Asteraceae, Amaranthaceae, Cyperaceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Poaceae, and Euphorbiaceae have been qualified as hyperaccumulators (Table 5.4). However, high metal specificity, lower biomass production with specific ecology and requirements in terms of climate, soil characteristics, water regime, are some of the obstacles to hyperaccumulator plants based remediation technology.
HMs/radionuclides can be transferred by apoplastic and symplastic channels through the roots, stems, and leaves (Song et al. 2017). Acidification of the rhizosphere via plasma membrane proton pumps and release of ligands capable of chelating the metal allows plants to desorb metals from the soil matrix. The metal ion can be transferred through the root in a radial fashion. Before reaching the xylem for transport to the shoot, the metal passes through the epidermis, cortex, casparian strip in the endodermis, and the pericycle of the roots. Once metal reaches the xylem, it is transported to the leaves by the flow of xylem sap, where it crosses a membrane to enter the leaf tissues. Once metal penetrates the leaf tissues, it can be sequestered in numerous subcellular compartments, such as the cell wall, cytosol, and vacuole, or volatilized through the stomata. Cellular compartmentation of metals in leaves varies between hyperaccumulator species. Kupper et al. (1999) demonstrated that Zn was sequestered predominantly in the epidermal vacuoles in Thlaspi caerulescens leaves instead of its mesophyll cells. However, in another study, Arabidopsis halleri preferentially accumulated Zn in its mesophyll cells as compared to epidermal cells (Kupper et al. 2000).
5.5 Phytoremediation by Transgenic Plants
Genetic engineering (GE) is used as an efficient method for evaluation and a better understanding of various important steps at the molecular level for improving plant tolerance to various environmental stresses and metal toxicity. A gene from a foreign source, such as a plant species, bacteria, or animals, is transferred and incorporated into the genome of a target plant. The foreign gene inherited after DNA recombination confers unique traits to the plants. GE can significantly improve metal absorption, transport, oxidation, and sequestration. Important crop plants like maize, rice, and sorghum are frequently grown in acidic soils where Al toxicity is a major issue. Overproduction of citrate resulted in Al tolerance in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum and Carica papaya plants. This study demonstrates that organic acid excretion is a mechanism of Al tolerance in higher plants (de la Fuente et al. 1997). Arabidopsis thaliana expressing merBpe that encodes for organomercurial lyase (MerB) grew vigorously at a wide range of concentrations of monomethylmercuric chloride and phenylmercuric acetate (Bizily et al. 1999). Arabidopsis thaliana expressing merBpe may be used to degrade methylmercury at polluted sites and sequester Hg(II). Expression of CAX2 (calcium exchanger 2) in Nicotiana tabacum accumulated more Ca2+, Cd2+, and Mn2+ and was more tolerant to elevated Mn2+ levels. The expression of CAX2 also increased Cd2+ and Mn2+ transport in isolated root tonoplast vesicles. These findings imply that CAX2 has a broad substrate range and maybe a key component in improving plant ion tolerance (Hirschi et al. 2000). Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing Escherichia coli arsenate reductase (arsC) and γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS) genes enhanced As tolerance and hyperaccumulation of As in above-ground parts (Dhankher et al. 2002). Pilon et al. (2003) expressed a mouse (Mus musculus) Se-Cys lyase (SL) in the cytosol or chloroplasts of Arabidopsis to direct Se flow away from incorporation into proteins. SL specifically catalyzes the decomposition of Se-Cys into elemental Se and alanine. The transgenics showed SL activities up to two-fold in cytosolic lines and six-fold in chloroplastic lines compared to wild-type plants. Se incorporation into proteins was reduced two-fold in both types of SL transgenics, indicating that the approach successfully redirected Se flow in the plant. Enhanced shoot Se concentrations up to 1.5-fold were shown in both the cytosolic as well as chloroplastic lines.
Eapen et al. (2003) developed hairy root cultures of Brassica juncea and Chenopodium amaranticolor by Agrobacterium rhizogenes mediated genetic transformation. The stable, transformed root systems of B. juncea and C. amaranticolor uptake 20–23% and 13% of U from the solution containing up to 5000 mM concentration, respectively. Wangeline et al. (2004) reported that Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] transgenics overexpressing ATP sulfurylase were more tolerant to As(III), As(V), Cd, Cu, Hg, and Zn, but less tolerant to Mo and V than the wild-type. LeDuc et al. (2004) overexpressed the gene encoding selenocysteine methyltransferase (SMT) from Astragalus bisulcatus in Arabidopsis and B. juncea. SMT transgenic seedlings tolerated Se, particularly selenite, producing three- to seven-fold greater biomass and three-fold longer root lengths. A significant increase in Se accumulation and volatilization was also observed in SMT plants. To enhance the phytoextraction capacity of Linum usitatissimum L., the linseed breeding line AGT 917 was engineered to constitutively express the genetic fusion of the α-domain of mammalian metallothionein 1a (αMT1a) and the β-glucuronidase gus gene. The stem of the αMT1/2 line contained an average of 3.3 and 1.9 times higher levels of Cd than stems of the corresponding AGT 917 when grown in soils amended with Cd at 20 and 360 mg kg−1 (Vrbova et al. 2013). In another study, expression of the bacterial Hg transporter MerE promoted the transport and accumulation of methylmercury in transgenic Arabidopsis, which may be a useful method for improving the efficacy of plants to facilitate the phytoremediation of methylmercury pollution (Sone et al. 2013). Transgenic plants enhancing the phytoremediation of HMs are depicted in Table 5.5.
5.6 Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) Facilitated Phytoremediation
Plant growth regulators (PGRs) are organic substances that regulate increased plant tolerance to abiotic stress by stimulating expression of the genes associated with antioxidant activity, modulation of cellular redox homeostasis, and alteration in transcription element activities. PGRs include auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, ethylene, abscisic acid, salicylic acid, jasmonates, brassinosteroids, and strigolactones (Bulak et al. 2014). The exogenous application of indole acetic acid alleviated the negative effect of Cr on growth, protein, nitrogen content, and nitrogen metabolism, and led to a decrease in oxidative injuries caused by Cr (Gangwar and Singh 2011). In A. thaliana, 5 μM of gibberellic acid was reported to alleviate Cd toxicity by reducing Cd uptake and lipid peroxidation (Zhu et al. 2012). Ali et al. (2015) reported that the application of gibberellic acid-3 enhanced the length, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots as well as grain yield of mungbean in the Ni contaminated soils. Application of gibberellic acid-3 significantly increased the biomass of Solanum nigrum by 56% and increased Cd concentrations in the shoot by 16% at 1000 mg L−1 (Ji et al. 2015). The exogenous abscisic acid can decrease Zn concentrations in Populus x canescens tissues by modulating the transcript levels of key genes involved in Zn uptake and detoxification, and by activating the antioxidative defense system (Shi et al. 2015). In another study, the addition of exogenous abscisic acid enhanced the tolerance of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) to excess Zn due to the expression of both VviZIP genes and detoxification-related genes (Song et al. 2019). The application of different PGRs (indole-3-acetic acid, indole-3-butyric acid, diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate, 6-benzylaminopurine, 1-naphthylacetic acid, abscisic acid, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, ethrel, brassinolide, gibberellic acid-3, and compound sodium nitrophenolate) enhanced the growth of Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. and the phytoextraction efficiency of Cd. However, the application of indole-3-butyric acid or diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate was reported to fix more Cd in upper and lower epidermal cells (Sun et al. 2019). Zhang et al. (2020) reported increased tolerance of tea plants to Cd stress on exogenous application of indole acetic acid (10 μM). Gong et al. (2020) reported that the exogenous application of indole-3-acetic acid reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations in Cu stressed seedlings and increased biomass, proline content, and the activities of antioxidant enzymes. Thus, indole-3-acetic acid alleviated Cu toxicity and enhanced Cu tolerance in spinach seedlings.
5.7 Microbial Facilitated Phytoremediation
Beneficial microorganisms associated with plants enhance the efficiency of the phytoremediation process either by altering the metal accumulation in plant tissues or by conferring plant metal tolerance and/or enhancing plant biomass production. These microorganisms influence metal uptake through translocation, transformation, chelation, immobilization, solubilization, precipitation, volatilization, and complexation of metal, ultimately facilitating phytoremediation. Siderophores producing microorganisms inhabiting the rhizosphere are believed to play an important role in HM and radionuclide phytoextraction. Siderophores solubilize unavailable forms of HM and radionuclide bearing minerals by complexation reaction. The production of siderophores by Streptomyces tendae F4 has been reported to enhance uptake of Cd in sunflower (Dimkpa et al. 2009). Microbial production of other metabolites such as organic acids (Sayer et al. 1999; Saravanan et al. 2007), biosurfactants (Juwarkar et al. 2007; Sonowal et al. 2022), hormones (Ma et al. 2008), and extracellular polymeric substances such as exopolysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides (Joshi and Juwarkar 2009) also contribute to phytoremediation. Through oxidation or reduction reactions, several plant-associated microorganisms can alter HM and radionuclide mobility. A significant increase in the mobility of Cu, Cd, Hg, and Zn by >90% was reported when co-inoculated with Fe-reducing bacteria and the Fe/S oxidizing bacteria (Beolchini et al. 2009).
Many researchers have reported improved phytoremediation efficiency with plant-associated microorganisms. Chen et al. (2013) suggested that two metal-resistant and plant growth-promoting bacteria, viz., Burkholderia sp. J62 and Pseudomonas thivervalensis Y-1-3-9, promoted the growth and Cd uptake of Brassica napus. The study indicates there might be potential for developing an effective plant–microbe partnership for phytoextraction of Cd from heavily Cd contaminated soils. In another study, inoculation of Pseudomonas sp. Lk9 significantly increased shoot dry biomass (14%) and accumulated Cd (46.6%), Zn (16.4%), and Cu (16.0%) in aerial parts of Solanum nigrum L. compared to uninoculated plants. This symbiotic association between S. nigrum L. and Pseudomonas sp. Lk9 also resulted in a significant increase in the soil microbial biomass C (39.2%) and acid phosphatase activity (28.6%.) (Chen et al. 2014). Soil inoculation with Arthrobacter sp. TISTR 2220 enhanced Cd accumulation in the roots, above-ground tissues, and whole plant of Ocimum gratissimum L. by 1.2-fold, 1.4-fold, and 1.1-fold, respectively. This synergistic use of Arthrobacter sp. with O. gratissimum L. could be a feasible economic and environmental option for the reclamation of Cd polluted areas (Prapagdee and Khonsue 2015). Szuba et al. (2017) reported that Paxillus involutus accumulated Pb in the roots and stems of Populus × canescens trees, thus improving the host plant growth. Inoculation of Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth with endophytic bacterial consortia (Pantoea stewartii ASI11, Enterobacter sp. HU38, and Microbacterium arborescens HU33) resulted in a 22–51% increase in root length, 25–62% increase in shoot height, 10–21% increase in chlorophyll content, and 17–59% more plant biomass in U and Pb contaminated soils. Enhanced metal uptake capacity by 53–88% for U and 58–97% for Pb was also observed (Ahsan et al. 2017).
Piriformospora indica enhanced growth, Chl a, Chl b, proline content and showed the ability to immobilize Cd in the root and reduce Cd concentrations in the stem and leaves. This alleviated metal toxicity in the Helianthus annuus cv. Zaria plants, and also resulted in phytostabilization of Cd polluted soils (Shahabivand et al. 2017). Inoculation of three metallotolerant siderophore-producing Streptomyces sp. B1-B3 strains significantly stimulated plant biomass, reduced oxidative stress, and enhanced the uptake and bioaccumulation of Zn, Cd, and Pb in Salix dasyclados L (Zloch et al. 2017). Bacillus cereus (T1B3) removed Cr6+ (82%), Fe (92%), Mn (67%), Zn (36%), Cd (31%), Cu (25%), and Ni (43%) in the HM amended extract medium. Results indicated that inoculating the native hyperaccumulator Vetiveria zizanioides with the T1B3 strain improves the phytoremediation efficiency of V. zizanioides (Nayak et al. 2018). Jin et al. (2019) reported that Simplicillium chinense QD10 significantly enhanced the phytoextraction of Cd and Pb by Phragmites communis. Irshad et al. (2019) reported higher As uptake and removal efficiency by Vallisneria denseserrulata and the indigenous Bacillus sp. XZM partnership. Enterobacter sp. FM-1, a potent bioaugmentation agent, facilitated Mn and Cd phytoextraction in Polygonum hydropiper L. and Polygonum lapathifolium L. (Li et al. 2020). Cupriavidus basilensis strain r507 showed excellent As tolerance, rapid arsenite oxidation ability, and strong colonization of Pteris vittata. Inoculation of P. vittata with strain r507 accumulated As (up to 171%), suggesting the feasibility of co-cultivating hyperaccumulators with facilitator bacteria for practical As phytoremediation (Yang et al. 2020).
5.8 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Facilitated Phytoremediation
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) increases tolerance to HMs and radionuclides, improves acquisition of water and nutrients, and results in the establishment of plants in contaminated soil (Thakare et al. 2021). AMF improves phytoremediation via chelation/complexation, compartmentation in vacuoles, metal retention in vesicules, arbuscules, spore and cell walls, and production of glomalin (Cabral et al. 2015). Entry et al. (1999) reported the accumulation of 137Cs and 90Sr from the contaminated soil by bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), Johnson grass (Sorghum halpense), and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) after inoculation with Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices. Arriagada et al. (2004) reported that combined inoculation of Glomus deserticola and Trichoderma koningii resulted in the highest accumulation of Cd in the stem of the eucalyptus plant.
The AM association helped Phyllanthus niruri and Paspalum vaginatum plants to survive in a disturbed ecosystem by enhancing the uptake and recycling of radionuclides, particularly 137Cs and 90Sr (Selvaraj et al. 2004). Wang et al. (2005) reported that inoculation of an AM fungal consortium consisting of Gigaspora margarita ZJ37, Gigaspora decipiens ZJ38, Scutellospora gilmori ZJ39, Acaulospora spp., and Glomus spp., increased not only the shoot biomass but also the uptake of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd into the shoots of Elsholtzia splendens Nakai ex F. Maekawa. Hashem et al. (2016) reported that AMF inoculation mitigated the Cd stress tolerance of Cassia italica Mill by reducing lipid peroxidation and enhancing the antioxidant activity. Trigonella foenum graecum plants accumulated high concentrations of Cd in their root systems from AMF inoculation. Furthermore, AMF colonization diminished the negative effects of Cd on plant development by increasing antioxidant enzyme activity, soluble protein content, and decreasing malondialdehyde (MDA) content (Abdelhameed and Metwally 2019). Thus, AMF presents a viable strategy to remediate and reclaim sites contaminated with HMs and radionuclides.
5.9 Nanoparticles (NPs) Facilitated Phytoremediation
The use of nanotechnology in conjunction with phytoremediation is progressing rapidly. A nanoparticle’s size typically falls between 1 and 100 nanometers. The ability of nanoparticles (NPs) to penetrate within plants and translocate from roots to other areas of the plants is largely determined by their size. Owing to their small size and large surface area, NPs can penetrate the contaminant zone where other particles are unable to, enabling NPs to have a wider range of applications. NPs cause physiological and morphological changes in plants and the plants’ response strongly depend on the NPs type, dose, and speciation as well as on the plant species involved. NPs raise the pH of the soil and adsorb metal, reducing its mobility and bioavailability. NPs also boost the plant defense system by regulating the metal transport genes, promoting the synthesis of protective agents, and scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Zhou et al. 2020; Prasad et al. 2017).
Singh and Lee (2016) observed that an application of 300 mg/kg of nano-titanium dioxide (TiO2) particles significantly enhanced the Cd uptake (507.6 μg/g) by soybean plants (Glycine max) from contaminated soil. In another study, the application of 5 g/kg nano-hydroxyapatite (NHAP) to Pb contaminated soils significantly increased the ryegrass biomass (Jin et al. 2016). Souri et al. (2017) reported a significant beneficial effect of salicylic acid nanoparticles (SANPs) on the growth and phytoremediation efficiency of Isatis cappadocica against As toxicity. The maximum As accumulation in the shoots and roots reached 705 mg/kg and 1188 mg/kg, respectively. Gong et al. (2017) studied the effect of 100, 500, and 1000 mg/kg starch stabilized nZVI (S-nZVI) particles on the Cd accumulation in Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich (ramie). The addition of S-nZVI particles increased the Cd accumulation in the roots, stems, and leaves by 16–50%, 29–52%, and 31–73%, respectively. Huang et al. (2018) observed maximum accumulation of Pb (1175.40 μg/pot) in ryegrass (Lolium perenne) with the treatment of 100 mg/kg nZVI. However, decreased Pb accumulation was reported in high concentrations of nZVI (1000 and 2000 mg/kg). In another study, thidiazuron (TDZ) growth regulator and magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles increased plant growth, phenolic and flavonoid contents, free radical scavenging activity, and Pb phytoaccumulation by radish (Raphanus sativus L.) (Hussain et al. 2019).
5.10 Conclusion
Phytoremediation is a cost-effective plant-based approach for the reclamation of HM and radionuclide polluted sites that has a high level of public acceptance. Plants can also be genetically modified to achieve desirable traits such as rapid growth, high biomass output, high metal tolerance and accumulation, and strong adaptation to a variety of climatic and geological settings. The prospect of using transgenic plants to clean up contaminated sites has been thoroughly investigated and many plant species harboring transgenes of various origins and presumptive functions have been surveyed. Furthermore, PGRs, plant-associated microorganisms, AMF, and NPs also boost phytoremediation efficiency.
References
Abdelhameed RE, Metwally RA (2019) Alleviation of cadmium stress by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Int J Phytoremediation 28:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2018.1556584
Adki VS, Jadhav JP, Bapat VA (2013) Nopalea cochenillifera, a potential chromium (VI) hyperaccumulator plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1125-4
Ahsan MT, Najam-ul-haq M, Idrees M et al (2017) Bacterial endophytes enhance phytostabilization in soils contaminated with uranium and lead. Int J Phytoremediation 19:937–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1303813
Ali MA, Asghar HN, Khan MY et al (2015) Alleviation of nickel-induced stress in mungbean through application of gibberellic acid. Int J Agric Biol 17:990–994
Arriagada CA, Herrera MA, Garcia-Romera I, Ocampo JA (2004) Tolerance to Cd of soybean (Glycine max) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal and saprobe fungi. Symbiosis 36:1–15
Baker AJM (1981) Accumulators and excluders-strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals. J Plant Nutr 3:643–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904168109362867
Baker AJM, Brooks RR (1989) Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements: a review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1:81–126
Banasova V, Horak O, Nadubinska M et al (2008) Heavy metal content in Thlaspi caerulescens J. et C. Presl growing on metalliferous and non-metalliferous soils in Central Slovakia. Int J Environ Pollut 33:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2008.019388
Beolchini F, Dell’Anno A, Propris LD et al (2009) Auto- and heterotrophic acidophilic bacteria enhance the bioremediation efficiency of sediments contaminated by heavy metals. Chemosphere 74:1321–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.057
Bhainsa KC, D’Souza SF (2001) Uranium (VI) biosorption by dried roots of Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth). J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 36:1621–1631. https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-100106247
Bhat IUH, Mauris EN, Khanam Z (2016) Phytoremediation of iron from red soil of tropical region by using Centella asiatica. Int J Phytoremediation 18:918–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2016.1156637
Bhuiyan MSU, Min SR, Jeong WJ et al (2011) Overexpression of a yeast cadmium factor 1 (YCF1) enhances heavy metal tolerance and accumulation in Brassica juncea. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 105:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9845-y
Bidwell SD, Woodrow IE, Batianoff GN, Sommer-Knudsen J (2002) Hyperaccumulation of manganese in the rainforest tree Austromyrtus bidwillii (Myrtaceae) from Queensland, Australia. Funct Plant Biol 29:899–905. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP01192
Bizily SP, Rugh CL, Summers AO, Meagher RB (1999) Phytoremediation of methylmercury pollution: merB expression in Arabidopsis thaliana confers resistance to organomercurials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:6808–6813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.12.6808
Boonyapookana B, Parkplan P, Techapinyawat S, DeLaune RD, Jugsujinda A (2005) Phytoaccumulation of lead by sunflower (Helianthus annuus), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), and vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides). J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 40:117–137. https://doi.org/10.1081/ese-200033621
Buendia-Gongalez L, Orozco-Villafuerte J, Cruz-Sosa F et al (2010) Prosopis laevigata a potential chromium (VI) and cadmium (II) hyperaccumulator desert plant. Bioresour Technol 101:5862–5867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.027
Bulak P, Walkiewicz A, Brzezinska M (2014) Plant growth regulators-assisted phytoextraction. Biol Plant 58:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-013-0382-5
Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska G, Urban PL (2004) Accumulation and translocation of cesium-137 in onion plants (Allium cepa). Environ Exp Bot 51:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(03)00039-X
Cabral L, Soares CRFS, Giachini AJ, Siqueira JO (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of contaminated areas by trace elements: mechanisms and major benefits of their applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 31:1655–1664. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-015-1918-y
Chakraborty D, Maji S, Bandyopadhyay A, Basu S (2007) Biosorption of cesium-137 and strontium-90 by mucilaginous seeds of Ocimum basilicum. Bioresour Technol 98:2949–2952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.035
Che D, Meagher RB, Heaton ACP et al (2003) Expression of mercuric ion reductase in Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) confers mercuric ion reduction and resistance. Plant Biotech J 1:311–319. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-7652.2003.00031.x
Chen ZJ, Sheng XF, He LY et al (2013) Effects of root inoculation with bacteria on the growth, Cd uptake and bacterial communities associated with rape grown in Cd-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 244–245:709–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.063
Chen L, Luo S, Li X et al (2014) Interaction of Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and functional endophyte Pseudomonas sp. Lk9 on soil heavy metals uptake. Soil Biol Biochem 68:300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.021
Chen Y, Yang W, Chao Y et al (2017) Metal-tolerant Enterobacter sp. strain EG16 enhanced phytoremediation using Hibiscus cannabinus via siderophore-mediated plant growth promotion under metal contamination. Plant Soil 413:203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3091-y
Chuaphasuk C, Prapagdee B (2019) Effects of biochar-immobilized bacteria on phytoremediation of cadmium-polluted soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:23679–23688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05661-6
Colzi I, Arnetoli M, Gallo A et al (2012) Copper tolerance strategies involving the root cell wall pectins in Silene paradoxa L. Environ Exp Bot 78:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.028
D’Souza RJ, Varun M, Masih J, Paul MS (2010) Identification of Calotropis procera L. as a potential phytoaccumulator of heavy metals from contaminated soils in Urban North Central India. J Hazard Mater 184:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.056
Daghan H, Arslan M, Uygur V, Loleli N (2013) Transformation of tobacco with ScMTII gene-enhanced cadmium and zinc accumulation. CLEAN Soil Air Water 41:503–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201200298
de la Fuente JM, Ramirez-Rodrıguez V, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Herrera-Estrella L (1997) Aluminum tolerance in transgenic plants by alteration of citrate synthesis. Science 276:1566–1568. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5318.1566
Dhankher OP, Li Y, Rosen BP et al (2002) Engineering tolerance and hyperaccumulation of arsenic in plants by combining arsenate reductase and γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase expression. Nat Biotechnol 20:1140–1145. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt747
Dimkpa CO, Merten D, Svatos A et al (2009) Siderophores mediate reduced and increased uptake of cadmium by Streptomyces tendae F4 and sunflower (Helianthus annuus), respectively. J Appl Microbiol 107:1687–1696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04355.x
Dixit P, Singh S, Vancheeswaran R et al (2010) Expression of a Neurospora crassa zinc transporter gene in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum enhances plant zinc accumulation without co-transport of cadmium. Plant Cell Environ 33:1696–1707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02174.x
Eapen S, Suseelan KN, Tivarekar S et al (2003) Potential for rhizofiltration of uranium using hairy root cultures of Brassica juncea and Chenopodium amaranticolor. Environ Res 91:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-9351(02)00018-x
Eapen S, Singh S, Thorat V et al (2006) Phytoremediation of radiostrontium (90Sr) and radiocesium (137Cs) using giant milky weed (Calotropis gigantea R.Br.) plants. Chemosphere 65:2071–2073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.049
Ellis DR, Sors TG, Brunk DG et al (2004) Production of Se-methylselenocysteine in transgenic plants expressing selenocysteine methyltransferase. BMC Plant Biol 4:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-4-1
Entry JA, Watrud LS, Reeves M (1999) Accumulation of 137Cs and 90Sr from contaminated soil by three grass species inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi. Environ Pollut 104:449–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00163-8
Entry JA, Watrud LS, Reeves M (2001) Influence of organic amendments on the accumulation of 137Cs and 90Sr from contaminated soil by three grass species. Water Air Soil Pollut 126:385–398. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005201220596
Etim EE (2012) Phytoremediation and its mechanisms: a review. Int J Environ Bioenerg 2:120–136
Forte J, Mutiti S (2017) Phytoremediation potential of Helianthus annuus and Hydrangea paniculata in copper and leadcontaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 228:77
Francesconi K, Visoottiviseth P, Sridokchan W, Goessler W (2002) Arsenic species in an arsenic hyperaccumulating fern, Pityrogramma calomelanos: a potential phytoremediator of arsenic-contaminated soils. Sci Total Environ 284:27–35
Fuhrmann M, Lasat MM, Ebbs SD et al (2002) Uptake of cesium-137 and strontium-90 from contaminated soil by three plant species; application to phytoremediation. J Environ Qual 31:904–909. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2002.9040
Fulekar MH, Singh A, Thorat N et al (2010) Phytoremediation 137Cs from low level nuclear waste using Catharanthus roseus. Indian J Pure Appl Phys 48:516–519
Gangwar S, Singh VP (2011) Indole acetic acid differently changes growth and nitrogen metabolism in Pisum sativum L. seedlings under chromium (VI) phytotoxicity: implication of oxidative stress. Sci Hortic 129:321–328
Gasic K, Korban SS (2007) Transgenic Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) plants expressing an Arabidopsis phytochelatin synthase (AtPCS1) exhibit enhanced As and Cd tolerance. Plant Mol Biol 64:361–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-007-9158-7
Gisbert C, Ros R, De Haro A et al (2003) A plant genetically modified that accumulates Pb is especially promising for phytoremediation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 303:440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00349-8
Gong X, Huang D, Liu Y et al (2017) Stabilized nanoscale zerovalent iron mediated cadmium accumulation and oxidative damage of Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich cultivated in cadmium contaminated sediments. Environ Sci Technol 51:11308–11316. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03164
Gong Q, Li Z, Wang L et al (2020) Exogenous of indole-3-acetic acid application alleviates copper toxicity in spinach seedlings by enhancing antioxidant systems and nitrogen metabolism. Toxics 8:1. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics8010001
Guo J, Dai X, Xu W, Ma M (2008) Overexpressing GSH1 and AsPCS1 simultaneously increases the tolerance and accumulation of cadmium and arsenic in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chemosphere 72:1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.018
Harada E, Choi YE, Tsuchisaka A et al (2001) Transgenic tobacco plants expressing a rice cysteine synthase gene are tolerant to toxic levels of cadmium. J Plant Physiol 158:655–661. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00314
Hashem A, AbdAllah EF, Alqarawi AA, Egamberdieva D (2016) Bioremediation of adverse impact of cadmium toxicity on Cassia italica Mill by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Saudi J Biol Sci 23:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.11.007
He J, Li H, Ma C et al (2015) Overexpression of bacterial γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase mediates changes in cadmium flux, allocation and detoxification in poplar. New Phytol 205:240–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13013
Hinton TG, Knox AS, Kaplan DI, Sharitz R (2005) Phytoextraction of uranium and thorium by native trees in a contaminated wetland. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 264:417–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-005-0731-8
Hirschi KD, Korenkov VD, Wilganowski NL, Wagner GJ (2000) Expression of Arabidopsis CAX2 in tobacco. Altered metal accumulation and increased manganese tolerance. Plant Physiol 124:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.1.125
Huang JW, Blaylock MJ, Kapulnik Y, Ensley BD (1998) Phytoremediation of uranium-contaminated soils: role of organic acids in triggering uranium hyperaccumulation in plants. Environ Sci Technol 32:2004–2008. https://doi.org/10.1021/es971027u
Huang D, Qin X, Peng Z et al (2018) Nanoscale zero-valent iron assisted phytoremediation of Pb in sediment: impacts on metal accumulation and antioxidative system of Lolium perenne. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 153:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.01.060
Hussain F, Hadi F, Akbar F (2019) Magnesium oxide nanoparticles and thidiazuron enhance lead phytoaccumulation and antioxidative response in Raphanus sativus L. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:30333–30347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06206-7
Irshad S, Xie Z, Wang J et al (2019) Indigenous strain Bacillus XZM assisted phytoremediation and detoxification of arsenic in Vallisneria denseserrulata. J Hazard Mater 381:120903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120903
Islam MS, Kashem MA, Khan TO (2016) Phytoextraction efficiency of lead by arum (Colocasia esculenta L.) grown in soil. Int J Soil Sci 11:130–136. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijss.2016.130.136
Jaffre T, Brooks RR, Lee J, Reeves RD (1976) Sebertia acuminata: a hyperaccumulator of nickel from New Caledonia. Science 193:579–580
Ji P, Tang X, Jiang Y et al (2015) Potential of gibberellic acid 3 (GA3) for enhancing the phytoremediation efficiency of Solanum nigrum L. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 95:810–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1670-x
Jin Y, Liu W, Li XL et al (2016) Nano-hydroxyapatite immobilized lead and enhanced plant growth of ryegrass in a contaminated soil. Ecol Eng 95:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.071
Jin Z, Deng S, Wena Y et al (2019) Application of Simplicillium chinense for Cd and Pb biosorption and enhancing heavy metal phytoremediation of soils. Sci Total Environ 697:134148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134148
Joshi PM, Juwarkar AA (2009) In vivo studies to elucidate the role of extracellular polymeric substances from Azotobacter in immobilization of heavy metals. Environ Sci Technol 43:5884–5889. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900063b
Juwarkar AA, Nair A, Dubey KV et al (2007) Biosurfactant technology for remediation of cadmium and lead contaminated soils. Chemosphere 68:1996–2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.02.027
Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (1996) Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 365 pp
Kabeya FI, Pongrac P, Lange B et al (2018) Tolerance and accumulation of cobalt in three species of Haumaniastrum and the influence of copper. Environ Exp Bot 149:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.01.018
Khan AR, Ullah I, Khan AL et al (2014) Phytostabilization and physicochemical responses of Korean ecotype Solanum nigrum L. to cadmium contamination. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2147-y
Khan WR, Rasheed F, Zulkifli SZ et al (2020) Phytoextraction potential of Rhizophora apiculata: a case study in matang mangrove forest reserve, Malaysia. Trop Conserv Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082920947344
Kirk JL, Klironomos JN, Lee H, Trevors JT (2005) The effects of perennial ryegrass and alfalfa on microbial abundance and diversity in petroleum contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 133:455–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.002
Kumar PN, Dushenkov V, Motto H, Raskin IJE (1995) Phytoextraction: the use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environ Sci Technol 29:1232–1238. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00005a014
Kumar D, Bharti SK, Anand S et al (2018) Bioaccumulation and biochemical responses of Vetiveria zizanioides grown under cadmium and copper stresses. Environ Sustain 1:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-018-0009-z
Kupper H, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP (1999) Cellular compartmentation of zinc in leaves of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Physiol 119:305–311. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.119.1.305
Kupper H, Lombi E, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP (2000) Cellular compartmentation of cadmium and zinc in relation to other elements in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Planta 212:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250000366
LeDuc DL, Tarun AS, Montes-Bayon M et al (2004) Overexpression of selenocysteinemethyltransferase in Arabidopsis and Indian mustard increases selenium tolerance and accumulation. Plant Physiol 135:377–383. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.026989
Lee JH (2013) An overview of phytoremediation as a potentially promising technology for environmental pollution control. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 18:431–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-013-0193-8
Lei M, Wan X, Guo G et al (2016) Phytoextraction of arsenic-contaminated soil with Pteris vittata in Henan Province, China: comprehensive evaluation of remediation efficiency correcting for atmospheric depositions. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8184-x
Li Y, Lin J, Huang Y et al (2020) Bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation of manganese and cadmium co-contaminated soil by Polygonaceae plants (Polygonum hydropiper L. and Polygonum lapathifolium L.) and Enterobacter sp. FM-1. Plant Soil 448:439–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04447-x
Liu W, Shu W, Lan C (2004) Viola baoshanensis, a plant that hyperaccumulates cadmium. Chin Sci Bull 49:29–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02901739
Liu Z, He X, Chen W et al (2009) Accumulation and tolerance characteristics of cadmium in a potential hyperaccumulator-Lonicera japonica Thunb. J Hazard Mater 169:170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.090
Liu D, An Z, Mao Z et al (2015) Enhanced heavy metal tolerance and accumulation by transgenic sugar beets expressing Streptococcus thermophilus StGCS-GS in the presence of Cd, Zn and Cu alone or in combination. PLoS One 10:e0128824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128824
Ma L, Komar K, Tu C et al (2001) A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic. Nature 409:579. https://doi.org/10.1038/35054664
Ma Y, Rajkumar M, Fritas H (2008) Inoculation of plant growth promoting bacterium Achromobacter xylosoxidans strain Ax10 for the improvement of copper phytoextraction by Brassica juncea. J Environ Manag 90:831–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.014
Manikandan R, Sahi SV, Venkatachalam P (2015) Impact assessment of mercury accumulation and biochemical and molecular response of Mentha arvensis: a potential hyperaccumulator plant. Sci World J 715217. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/715217
Martinez M, Bernal P, Almela C et al (2006) An engineered plant that accumulates higher levels of heavy metals than Thlaspi caerulescens, with yields of 100 times more biomass in mine soils. Chemosphere 64:478–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.10.044
Mihalik J, Tlustos P, Szakova J (2010) Comparison of willow and sunflower for uranium phytoextraction induced by citric acid. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 285:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0538-0
Misra S, Gedamu L (1989) Heavy metal tolerant transgenic Brassica napus L. and Nicotianatabacum L. plants. Theor Appl Genet 78:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288793
Mkandawire M, Dudel G (2005) Accumulation of arsenic in Lemna gibba L. (duckweed) in tailing waters of two abandoned uranium mining sites in Saxony, Germany. Sci Total Environ 336:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.06.002
Moreno FN, Anderson CW, Stewart RB, Robinson BH (2008) Phytofiltration of mercury-contaminated water: volatilisation and plant-accumulation aspects. Environ Exp Bot 62:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.07.007
Nahar N, Rahman A, Nawani NN et al (2017) Phytoremediation of arsenic from the contaminated soil using transgenic tobacco plants expressing ACR2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Physiol 218:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.08.001
Nayak AK, Panda SS, Basu A, Dhal NK (2018) Enhancement of toxic Cr(VI), Fe, and other heavy metals phytoremediation by the synergistic combination of native Bacillus cereus strain and Vetiveria zizanioides L. Int J Phytoremediation 20:682–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1413332
Nedjimi B (2021) Phytoremediation: a sustainable environmental technology for heavy metals decontamination. SN Appl Sci 3:286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04301-4
Nedjimi B, Daoud Y (2009) Cadmium accumulation in Atriplex halimus subsp. schweinfurthii and its influence on growth, proline, root hydraulic conductivity and nutrient uptake. Flora 204:316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2008.03.004
Ni TH, Wei YZ (2003) Subcellular distribution of cadmium in mining ecotype Sedum alfredii. Acta Bot Sin 45:925–928
Nisbet A, Shaw S (1994) Summary of a five-year lysimeter study on the time dependent transfer of 137Cs, 90Sr, 239,240Pu and 241Am to crops from three contrasting soil types. Distribution between different plant parts. J Environ Radioact 23:171–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(94)90059-0
Pan A, Yang M, Tie F et al (1994) Expression of mouse metallothionein-I gene confers cadmium resistance in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Mol Biol 24:341–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020172
Pentyala VB, Eapen S (2020) High efficiency phytoextraction of uranium using Vetiveria zizanioides L. Nash. Int J Phytoremediation 22:1137–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2020.1741506
Phaenark C, Pokethitiyook P, Kruatrachue M, Ngernsansaruay C (2009) Cd and Zn accumulation in plants from the padaeng zinc mine area. Int J Phytoremediation 11:479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510802656243
Pilon M, Owen JD, Garifullina GF et al (2003) Enhanced selenium tolerance and accumulation in transgenic Arabidopsis expressing a mouse selenocysteinelyase. Plant Physiol 131:1250–1257. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.014639
Pirkle JL, Kaufmann RB, Brody DJ et al (1998) Exposure of the U.S. population to lead, 1991-1994. Environ Health Perspect 106:745–750. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.98106745
Pollard AJ, Stewart HL, Roberson CB (2009) Manganese hyperaccumulation in Phytolacca americana L. from the Southeastern United States. Northeast Nat 16:155–162
Postrigan BN, Knyazev AB, Kuluev BR et al (2012) Expression of the synthetic phytochelatin gene in tobacco. Russ J Plant Physiol 59:275–280. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443712020136
Prapagdee B, Khonsue N (2015) Bacterial-assisted cadmium phytoremediation by Ocimum gratissimum L. in polluted agricultural soil: a field trial experiment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3843–3852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0816-z
Prapagdee S, Piyatiratitivorakul S, Petsom A, Tawinteung N (2014) Application of biochar for enhancing cadmium and zinc phytostabilization in Vigna radiata L. cultivation. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2233-1
Prasad R, Gupta N, Kumar M, Kumar V, Wang S, Abd-Elsalam KA (2017) Nanomaterials act as plant defense mechanism. In: Prasad R, Kumar M, Kumar V (eds) Nanotechnology. Springer, Singapore, pp 253–269
Qiu R, Fang X, Tang Y, Du S, Zeng X (2006) Zinc hyperaccumulation and uptake by Potentilla griffithii Hook. Int J Phytoremediation 8:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510600992865
Rascio N, Navari-Izzo F (2011) Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant Sci 180:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.016
Raskin I, Ensley BD (2000) Recent developments for in situ treatment of metal contaminated soils. In: Phytoremediation of toxic metals: using plants to clean up the environment. Wiley, New York
Reeves RD, Brooks RR, Macfarlane RM (1981) Nickel uptake by californian Streptanthus and Caulanthus with particular reference to the hyperaccumulator S. polyoaloides gray (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 68:708–712
Robinson BH, Brooks RR, Howes AW et al (1997a) The potential of the high biomass nickel hyperaccumulator Berkheya coddii for phytoremediation and phytomining. J Geochem Explor 60:115–126
Robinson BH, Chiarucci A, Brooks RR et al (1997b) The nickel hyperaccumulator plant Alyssum bertolonii as a potential agent for phytoremediation and phytomining of nickel. J Geochem Explor 59:75–86
Rodriguez N, Menendez N, Tornero J, Amils R, De La Fuente V (2005) Internal iron biomineralization in Imperata cylindrica, a perennial grass: chemical composition, speciation and plant localization. New Phytol 165:781–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01264.x
Rugh CL, Wilde HD, Stack NM et al (1996) Mercuric ion reduction and resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing a modified bacterial merA gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:3182–3187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.8.3182
Rugh CL, Senecoff JF, Meagher RB, Merkle SA (1998) Development of transgenic yellow poplar for mercury phytoremediation. Nat Biotechnol 16:925–928. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1098-925
Sahi SV, Bryant NL, Sharma NC, Singh SR (2002) Characterization of a lead hyperaccumulator shrub, Sesbania drummondii. Environ Sci Technol 36:4676–4680. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020675x
Sakizadeha M, Ghorbani H (2017) Concentration of heavy metals in soil and staple crops and the associated health risk. Arch Hyg Sci 6:303–313
Salt D, Blaylock M, Kumar N et al (1995) Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Nat Biotechnol 13:468–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0595-468
Santana NA, Rabuscke CM, Soares VB et al (2018) Vermicompost dose and mycorrhization determine the efficiency of copper phytoremediation by Canavalia ensiformis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:12663–12677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1533-1
Saravanan VS, Madhaiyan M, Thangaraju M (2007) Solubilization of zinc compounds by the diazotrophic, plant growth promoting bacterium Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus. Chemosphere 66:1794–1798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.067
Sarma H, Islam NF, Prasad R, Prasad MNV, Ma LQ et al (2021) Enhancing phytoremediation of hazardous metal(loid)s using genome engineering CRISPR–Cas9 technology. J Hazard Mater 414:125493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125493
Sasmaz A, Sasmaz M (2009) The phytoremediation potential for strontium of indigenous plants growing in a mining area. Environ Exp Bot 67:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.014
Sayer JA, Cotter-Howells JD, Watson C et al (1999) Lead mineral transformation by fungi. Curr Biol 9:691–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80309-1
Schnoor JL, Light LA, McCutcheon SC et al (1995) Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 29:318–323. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00007a002
Selamat SN, Abdullah SRS, Idris M (2014) Phytoremediation of lead (Pb) and arsenic (As) by Melastoma malabathricum L. from contaminated soil in separate exposure. Int J Phytoremediation 16:694–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2013.856843
Selvaraj T, Padmanabhan C, Jeong YJ, Kim H (2004) Occurrence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi and their effect on plant growth in endangered vegetations. J Microbiol Biotechnol 14:885–890
Seregin IV, Kozhevnikova AD, Kazyumina EM, Ivanov VB (2003) Nickel toxicity and distribution in maize roots. Russ J Plant Physiol 50:711–717. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025660712475
Shahabivand S, Parvaneh A, Aliloo AA (2017) Root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica affected growth, cadmium partitioning and chlorophyll fluorescence of sunflower under cadmium toxicity. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 145:496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.064
Shahzad T, Chenu C, Genet P et al (2015) Contribution of exudates, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and litter depositions to the rhizosphere priming effect induced by grassland species. Soil Biol Biochem 80:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.09.023
Shams M, Ekinci M, Turan M et al (2019) Growth, nutrient uptake and enzyme activity response of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) to excess copper. Environ Sustain 2:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00051-7
Shi WG, Li H, Liu TX et al (2015) Exogenous abscisic acid alleviates zinc uptake and accumulation in Populus × canescens exposed to excess zinc. Plant Cell Environ 38:207–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12434
Shim D, Kim S, Choi YI et al (2013) Transgenic poplar trees expressing yeast cadmium factor 1 exhibit the characteristics necessary for the phytoremediation of mine tailing soil. Chemosphere 90:1478–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.044
Sidhu GPS, Singh HP, Batish DR, Kohli RK (2017) Tolerance and hyperaccumulation of cadmium by a wild, unpalatable herb Coronopus didymus (L.) Sm (Brassicaceae). Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 135:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.10.001
Silva JRR, Fernandes AR, Silva Junior ML et al (2018) Tolerance mechanisms in Cassia alata exposed to cadmium toxicity: potential use for phytoremediation. Photosynthetica 56:495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-017-0698-z
Singh J, Lee BK (2016) Influence of nano-TiO2 particles on the bioaccumulation of Cd in soybean plants (Glycine max): a possible mechanism for the removal of Cd from the contaminated soil. J Environ Manag 170:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.015
Singh S, Korripally P, Vancheeswaran R, Eapen S (2011) Transgenic Nicotiana tabacum plants expressing a fungal copper transporter gene show enhanced acquisition of copper. Plant Cell Rep 30:1929–1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1101-3
Smolinska B (2019) The influence of compost and nitrilotriacetic acid on mercury phytoextraction by Lepidium sativum L. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5970
Sone Y, Nakamura R, Pan-Hou H et al (2013) Increase methylmercury accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana expressing bacterial broad-spectrum mercury transporter MerE. AMB Express 3:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-3-52
Song WY, Sohn EU, Martinoia E et al (2003) Engineering tolerance and accumulation of lead and cadmium in transgenic plants. Nat Biotechnol 21:914–919. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt850
Song Y, Jin L, Wang X (2017) Cadmium absorption and transportation pathways in plants. Int J Phytoremediation 19:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2016.1207598
Song C, Yan Y, Rosado AR, Zhang Z, Castellarin SD (2019) ABA alleviates uptake and accumulation of zinc in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) by inducing expression of ZIP and detoxificationrelated genes. Front Plant Sci 10:872
Sonowal S, Nava AR, Joshi SJ, Borah SN, Islam NF, Pandit S, Prasad R, Sarma H (2022) Biosurfactants assisted heavy metals phytoremediation: Green technology for the United Nations sustainable development goals. Pedosphere 2(1):198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60067-X
Souri Z, Karimi N, Sarmadi M, Rostami E (2017) Salicylic acid nanoparticles (SANPs) improve growth and phytoremediation efficiency of Isatis cappadocica Desv., under As stress. IET Nanobiotechnol 11:650–655. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0202
Sun S, Zhou X, Cui X et al (2019) Exogenous plant growth regulators improved phytoextraction efficiency by Amaranths hypochondriacus L. in cadmium contaminated soil. Plant Growth Regul. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-019-00548-5
Susarla S, Medina VF, McCutcheon SC (2002) Phytoremediation: an ecological solution to organic chemical contamination. Ecol Eng 18:647–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(02)00026-5
Szuba A, Karlinski L, Krzeslowska M, Hazubska-Przybyl T (2017) Inoculation with a Pb-tolerant strain of Paxillus involutus improves growth and Pb tolerance of Populus × canescens under in vitro conditions. Plant Soil 412:253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3062-3
Thakare M, Sarma H, Datar S, Roy A, Pawar P, Gupta K, Pandit S, Prasad R (2021) Understanding the holistic approach to plant-microbe remediation technologies for removing heavy metals and radionuclides from soil. Curr Res Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2021.02.004
Tollsten L, Muller P (1996) Volatile organic compounds emitted from beech leaves. Phytochemistry 43:759–762. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900144
Usman ARA, Lee SS, Awad YM et al (2012) Soil pollution assessment and identification of hyperaccumulating plants in chromated copper arsenate (CCA) contaminated sites, Korea. Chemosphere 87:872–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.028
Vrbova M, Kotrba P, Horacek J et al (2013) Enhanced accumulation of cadmium in Linum usitatissimum L. plants due to overproduction of metallothionein α-domain as a fusion to β-glucuronidase protein. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 112:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0239-1
Wang F, Lin X, Yin R (2005) Heavy metal uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizas of Elsholtzia splendens and the potential for phytoremediation of contaminated soil. Plant Soil 269:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-0517-8
Wang D, Wen F, Xu C et al (2012) The uptake of Cs and Sr from soil to radish (Raphanus sativus L.)—potential for phytoextraction and remediation of contaminated soils. J Environ Radioact 110:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.01.028
Wangeline AL, Burkhead JL, Hale KL et al (2004) Overexpression of ATP sulfurylase in Indian mustard: effects on tolerance and accumulation of twelve metals. J Environ Qual 33:54–60. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2004.5400
Wei S, Zhou Q, Wang X (2005) Identification of weed plants excluding the uptake of heavy metals. Environ Int 31:829–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.05.045
Wojas S, Clemens S, Sklodowska A, Antosiewicz DM (2010) Arsenic response of AtPCS1- and CePCS-expressing plants-effects of external As(V) concentration on As-accumulation pattern and NPT metabolism. J Plant Physiol 167:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.017
Xue SG, Chen YX, Reeves RD (2004) Manganese uptake and accumulation by the hyperaccumulator plant Phytolacca acinosa Roxb. (Phytolaccaceae). Environ Pollut 131:393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.03.011
Yan X (2016) Uptake of radionuclide thorium by twelve native plants grown in uranium mill tailings soils from south part of China. Nucl Eng Des 304:80–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.04.019
Yang X, Long X, Ni W et al (2002) Sedum alfredii H: a new Zn hyperaccumulating plant first found in China. Chin Sci Bull 47:1634–1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184113
Yang SX, Deng H, Li MS (2008) Manganese uptake and accumulation in a woody hyperaccumulator, Schima superba. Plant Soil Environ 54:441–446
Yang C, Ho YN, Makita R et al (2020) Cupriavidus basilensis strain r507, a toxic arsenic phytoextraction facilitator, potentiates the arsenic accumulation by Pteris vittata. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 190:110075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110075
Zhang H, Xu W, Dai W et al (2006) Functional characterization of cadmium-responsive garlic gene AsMT2b: a new member of metallothionein family. Chin Sci Bull 51:409–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-006-0409-9
Zhang XH, Liu J, Huang HT et al (2007) Chromium accumulation by the hyperaccumulator plant Leersia hexandra Swartz. Chemosphere 67:1138–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.014
Zhang Y, Li C, Luo X (2019) Enrichment effect of Hypnum plumaeforme on 210Po and 210Pb. Int J Phytoremediation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2019.1652560
Zhang C, He Q, Wang M et al (2020) Exogenous indole acetic acid alleviates Cd toxicity in tea (Camellia sinensis). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 190:110090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110090
Zhao FJ, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP (2002) Arsenic hyperaccumulation by different fern species. New Phytol 156:27–31
Zhao C, Qiao M, Yu Y et al (2010) The effect of the heterologous expression of Phragmites australis γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase on the Cd2+ accumulation of Agrostis palustris. Plant Cell Environ 33:877–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02113.x
Zhou P, Adeel M, Shakoor N et al (2020) Application of nanoparticles alleviates heavy metals stress and promotes plant growth: an overview. Nanomaterials 11:26. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010026
Zhu YL, Pilon-Smits EAH, Tarun AS et al (1999) Cadmium tolerance and accumulation in Indian mustard is enhanced by overexpressing γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase. Plant Physiol 121:1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.4.1169
Zhu XF, Jiang T, Wang ZW et al (2012) Gibberellic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity by reducing nitric oxide accumulation and expression of IRT1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Hazard Mater 239–240:302–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.08.077
Zhuang P, Yang QW, Wang HB, Shu WS (2007) Phytoextraction of heavy metals by eight plant species in the field. Water Air Soil Pollut 184:235–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9412-2
Zloch M, Kowalkowski T, Tyburski J, Hrynkiewicz K (2017) Modeling of phytoextraction efficiency of microbially stimulated Salix dasyclados L. in the soils with different speciation of heavy metals. Int J Phytoremediation 19:1150–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1328396
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jhilta, P., Dipta, B., Rana, A. (2021). Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals and Radionuclides: Sustainable Approach to Environmental Management. In: Prasad, R. (eds) Phytoremediation for Environmental Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5621-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5621-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5620-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5621-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)