Zusammenfassung
Soziale Roboter als neue Lerntechnologie und ihr Einsatz in kollaborativen Lehr-Lernkontexten rücken zunehmend in den Fokus, da sie kollaboratives Lernen fördern und Interaktionen zwischen Lernenden initiieren und unterstützen können. Bisherige Arbeiten zu ihrer Anwendbarkeit konzentrieren sich jedoch primär auf die Technologie und vernachlässigen lerntheoretische Aspekte für eine effektive Integration. Die vorliegende Arbeit reflektiert theoretisch-methodische Überlegungen zur Umsetzbarkeit interaktiver Lehr-Lernformen mit sozialen Robotern sowie potenzielle Konsequenzen des Einsatzes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Alimisis, D. (2012). Robotics in education and education in robotics: Shifting focus from technology to pedagogy. In 3rd international conference on robotics in education (S. 7–14). Charles University.
Alnajjar, F., Bartneck, C., Baxter, P., Belpaeme, T., Cappuccio, M. L., Dio, C., Eyssel, F., Handke, J., Mubin, O., Obaid, M., & Reich-Stiebert, N. (2021). Roboter in der Bildung. Wie Robotik das Lernen im digitalen Zeitalter bereichern kann. Hanser.
Alves-Oliveira, P., Sequeira, P., Melo, F. S., Castellano, G., & Paiva, A. (2019). Empathic robot for group learning: A field study. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 8(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3300188.
Baumgartner, P., Brandhofer, G., Ebner, M., Gradinger, P., & Korte, M. (2016). Medienkompetenz fördern – Lehren und Lernen im digitalen Zeitalter. In M. Bruneforth, F. Eder, K. Krainer, C. Schreiner, A. Seel, & C. Spiel (Hrsg.), Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2015: Fokussierte Analysen bildungspolitischer Schwerpunktthemen (S. 95–113). Leykam. https://www.iqs.gv.at/downloads/bildungsberichterstattung/nationaler-bildungsbericht-2015. Zugegriffen: 27. Aug. 2021.
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat5954. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954.
Breazeal, C. L. (2002). Designing sociable robots. MIT Press.
Breiter, A., Stolpmann, B. E., & Zeising, A. (2015). Szenarien lernförderlicher IT-Infrastrukturen in Schulen. Betriebskonzepte, Ressourcenbedarf und Handlungsempfehlungen. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Calo, M. R. (2011). Robots and privacy. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Hrsg.), Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics (S. 187–201). MIT Press.
Conti, D., Di Nuovo, A., Cirasa, C., & Di Nuovo, S. (2017). A comparison of kindergarten storytelling by human and humanoid robot with different social behavior. In Proceedings of the companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (S. 97–98). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3038359.
De Carolis, B., Palestra, G., Della Penna, C., Cianciotta, M., & Cervelione, A. (2019). Social robots supporting the inclusion of unaccompanied migrant children: Teaching the meaning of culture-related gestures. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(2), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1636.
Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
Eyssel, F., & Kuchenbrandt, D. (2011). Manipulating anthropomorphic inferences about NAO: The role of situational and dispositional aspects of effectance motivation. In 20th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (S. 467–472). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005233.
Eyssel, F., & Reich, N. (2013). Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots): On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In 8th international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (S. 121–122). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483531.
Fink, J. (2012). Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction. In S. S. Ge, O. Khatib, J.-J. Cabibihan, R. Simmons, & M.-A. Williams (Hrsg.), Social robotics (S. 199–208). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_20.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Hrsg.). (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5.
Fischer, K. (2019). Why collaborative robots must be social (and even emotional) actors. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 23(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20191120104.
Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., & Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2020). Gathering expert opinions for social robots’ ethical, legal, and societal concerns: Findings from four international workshops. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00605-z.
Gibson, I. W. (2001). At the intersection of technology and pedagogy: Considering styles of learning and teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200102.
Grunwald, A. (2019). Der unterlegene Mensch: Die Zukunft der Menschheit im Angesicht von Algorithmen, künstlicher Intelligenz und Robotern. Riva Premium.
Haag, L. (2004). Tutorielles Lernen. In G. W. Lauth, M. Grünke, & J. C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Interventionen bei Lernstörungen. Förderung, Training und Therapie in der Praxis (S. 402–410). Hogrefe.
Hascher, T. (2014). Forschung zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrbildung. In E. Terhart, H. Bennewitz, & M. Rothland (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrberuf (S. 542–571). Waxmann.
Hattie, J. (2010). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Heinen, R., & Kerres, M. (2015). Individuelle Förderung mit digitalen Medien. Handlungsfelder für die systematische, lernförderliche Integration digitaler Medien in Schule und Unterricht. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Hofree, G., Ruvolo, P., Bartlett, M. S., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Bridging the mechanical and the human mind: Spontaneous mimicry of a physically present android. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e99934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099934.
Holz, T., Dragone, M., & O’Hare, G. M. P. (2009). Where robots and virtual agents meet: A survey of social interaction research across Milgram’s reality-virtuality continuum. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0002-2.
Horstmann, A. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2019). Great expectations? Relation of previous experiences with social robots in real life or in the media and expectancies based on qualitative and quantitative assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 939. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00939.
Huber, A., Weiss, A., & Rauhala, M. (2016). The ethical risk of attachment how to identify, investigate and predict potential ethical risks in the development of social companion robots. In 11th international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), (S. 367–374). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451774.
Istenič Starčič, A. (2019). Human learning and learning analytics in the age of artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2974–2976. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12879.
Jamet, F., Masson, O., Jacquet, B., Stilgenbauer, J.-L., & Baratgin, J. (2018). Learning by teaching with humanoid robot: A new powerful experimental tool to improve children’s learning ability. Journal of Robotics, 2018(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4578762.
Kennedy, J., Lemaignan, S., Montassier, C., Lavalade, P., Irfan, B., Papadopoulos, F., Senft, E., & Belpaeme, T. (2017). Child speech recognition in human-robot interaction: Evaluations and recommendations. In 12th international conference on human-robot interaction (S. 82–90). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020229.
Kerres, M. (2001). Multimediale und telemediale Lernumgebungen: Konzeption und Entwicklung. Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486593815.
Kersting, C. (2019). Humanoide Unterstützung an der Schule. Roboter im Klassenzimmer. Deutschlandfunk. https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/humanoide-unterstuetzung-an-der-schule-roboter-im.680.de.html?dram:Article_id=453439. Zugegriffen: 27. Aug. 2021.
Kiesler, S., Powers, A., Fussell, S. R., & Torrey, C. (2008). Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot-like agent. Social Cognition, 26(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.169.
Klovert, H. (2017). Roboter im Hörsaal: Pepper eröffnet Veranstaltung für Anglisten. Der Spiegel, 19.10.2017. https://www.spiegel.de/lebenundlernen/uni/roboter-im-hoersaal-pepper-eroeffnet-veranstaltung-fuer-anglisten-a-1173713.html. Zugegriffen: 27. Aug. 2021.
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts – A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2.
Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2020). Robot tutor and pupils’ educational ability: Teaching the times tables. Computers & Education, 157, 103970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103970.
Lehmann, H., & Rossi, P. G. (2019). Social robots in educational contexts: Developing an application in enactive didactics. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1633.
Lemaignan, S., Jacq, A., Hood, D., Garcia, F., Paiva, A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2016). Learning by teaching a robot: The case of handwriting. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(2), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2546700.
Lohan, K. S., Sheppard, E., Little, G., & Rajendran, G. (2018). Toward improved child-robot interaction by understanding eye movements. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 10(4), 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2018.2838342.
Lutz, C., Schöttler, M., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2019). The privacy implications of social robots: Scoping review and expert interviews. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(3), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919843961.
Malle, B. F., & Scheutz, M. (2019). Learning how to behave: Moral competence for social robots. In O. Bendel (Hrsg.), Handbuch Maschinenethik (S. 1–24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17484-2_17-1.
Mann, J. A., MacDonald, B. A., Kuo, I.-H., Li, X., & Broadbent, E. (2015). People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.029.
Martin, J.-P., & Kelchner, R. (1998). Lernen durch Lehren. In J.-P. Timm (Hrsg.), Englisch lernen und lehren. Didaktik des Englischunterrichts (S. 211–219). Cornelsen.
Menne, I. M. (2017). Yes, of course? An investigation on obedience and feelings of shame towards a robot. In A. Kheddar, E. Yoshida, S. S. Ge, K. Suzuki, J.-J. Cabibihan, F. Eyssel, & H. He (Hrsg.), Social robotics (S. 365–374). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_36.
Mietzel, G. (2017). Pädagogische Psychologie des Lernens und Lehrens (9. Aufl.). Hogrefe.
Miller, D. P., & Nourbakhsh, I. (2016). Robotics for education. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Hrsg.), Springer handbook of robotics (S. 2115–2134). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_79.
Mubin, O., Wadibhasme, K., Jordan, P., & Obaid, M. (2019). Reflecting on the presence of science fiction robots in computing literature. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 8(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303706.
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153.
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999). Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 1093–1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00142.x.
O’Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Hrsg.), Handbook of educational psychology (S. 781–802). Erlbaum.
Özgür, A., Johal, W., Mondada, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2017). Windfield: Learning wind meteorology with handheld haptic robots. In 12th international conference on human-robot interaction (S. 156–165). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020231.
Prensky, N. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816.
Rath, M. (2020). Kritische Medienkompetenz. Zur ethischen Überforderung einer allein pädagogischen Medienbildung. Communicatio Socialis, 53(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2020-2-148.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1998). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI.
Reich, K. (2005). Konstruktivistische Didaktik. Beispiele für eine veränderte Unterrichtspraxis. Schulmagazin 5 bis 10, 73(3), 5–12.
Reich-Stiebert, N., & Eyssel, F. (2015). Learning with educational companion robots? Toward attitudes on education robots, predictors of attitudes, and application potentials for education robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(5), 875–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0308-9.
Reich-Stiebert, N., & Eyssel, F. (2016). Robots in the classroom: What teachers think about teaching and learning with education robots. In A. Agah, J.-J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, & H. He (Hrsg.), Social Robotics (Bd. 9979, S. 671–680). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_66.
Reinmann-Rothmeier, G., & Mandl, H. (2001). Unterrichten und Lernumgebungen gestalten. In A. Krapp & B. Weidenmann (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 601–646). Beltz.
Resing, W. C. M., Bakker, M., Elliott, J. G., & Vogelaar, B. (2019). Dynamic testing: Can a robot as tutor be of help in assessing children’s potential for learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4), 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12358.
Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., & Janse, M. D. (2010). Expressive robots in education: Varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems – CHI ’10, 1613, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753567.
Scassellati, B., Boccanfuso, L., Huang, C.-M., Mademtzi, M., Qin, M., Salomons, N., Ventola, P., & Shic, F. (2018). Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat7544. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat7544.
Schneider, S., & Kummert, F. (2018). Comparing the effects of social robots and virtual agents on exercising motivation. In S. S. Ge, J.-J. Cabibihan, M. A. Salichs, E. Broadbent, H. He, A. R. Wagner, & Á. Castro-González (Hrsg.), Social robotics (S. 451–461). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_44.
Sharkey, A. (2016). Should we welcome robot teachers? Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9387-z.
Sharkey, N., & Sharkey, A. (2007). Artificial intelligence and natural magic. Artificial Intelligence Review, 25(1–2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9048-z.
Smakman, M., & Konijn, E. A. (2020). Robot tutors: Welcome or ethically questionable? In M. Merdan, W. Lepuschitz, G. Koppensteiner, R. Balogh, & D. Obdržálek (Hrsg.), Robotics in education (S. 376–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_34.
Smith, E. E., Kahlke, R., & Judd, T. (2020). Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5689.
Subramanian, R. (2017). Emergent AI, social robots and the law: Security, privacy and policy issues. Journal of International, Technology and Information Management, 26(3), 81–105.
Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022.
Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172.
Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03.
Vygotskij, L. S., Metraux, A., Lompscher, J., & Rückriem, G. (2017). Denken und Sprechen: Psychologische Untersuchungen (3. Aufl.). Beltz.
Wijnen, F. M., Davison, D. P., Reidsma, D., Meij, J. V. D., Charisi, V., & Evers, V. (2020). Now we’re talking: Learning by explaining your reasoning to a social robot. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345508.
Wildfeuer, W. (2006). Kommunikation – Moderation – Mediation: Ein Trainingsprogramm für Schüler und Lehrer. Juventa.
Zaga, C., Lohse, M., Truong, K. P., & Evers, V. (2015). The effect of a robot’s social character on children’s task engagement: Peer versus tutor. In A. Tapus, E. André, J.-C. Martin, F. Ferland, & M. Ammi (Hrsg.), Social robotics (704–713). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_70.
Złotowski, J., Proudfoot, D., Yogeeswaran, K., & Bartneck, C. (2015). Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and challenges in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0267-6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reich-Stiebert, N. (2023). Roboter in kollaborativen Lehr-Lernkontexten. Theoretische Reflexionen interaktiver Lehr-Lernformen mit sozialen Robotern. In: de Witt, C., Gloerfeld, C., Wrede, S.E. (eds) Künstliche Intelligenz in der Bildung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40079-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40079-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-40078-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-40079-8
eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)