Zusammenfassung
In diesem Kapitel werde ich in wenigen Worten die Psychologie des Risikos und einige ihrer Implikationen beschreiben. Dabei werde ich mit einer Untersuchung der Subjektivität beginnen, sowie den Werten, welche in der Definition und Beurteilung von Risiko inbegriffen sind. Ich werde argumentieren, dass es legitime, werte-geladene Sachverhalte gibt, welche den multiplen Dimensionen der öffentlichen Risikowahrnehmung zu Grunde liegen, und diese Werte sind als Risiko- Richtlinien-Entscheidungen (risk-policy decisions) zu erachten.
Aus dem Amerikanischen von Johannes Schwarze.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Cohen, B. L. (1985). Criteria for technology acceptability. Risk Analysis, 5, 1–2.
Crouch, E. A. C., & Wilson, R. (1982). Risk/Benefit analysis. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Covello, V. T., Flamm, W. G., Rodricks, J. V., & Tardiff, R. G. (1983). The analysis of actual versus perceived risks. New York: Plenum.
DuPont, R. L. (1980). Nuclear phobia: Phobic thinking about nuclear power. Washington, DC: The Media Institute.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1992). Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 251–273). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Gregory, R., Flynn, J., & Slovic, P. (1995). Technological stigma. American Scientist, 83, 220–223.
Krimsky, S., & Golding, D. (1992). Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger- Greenwood.
National Research Council. Committee on Risk Perception and Communication. (1989). Improving risk communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Otway, H. (1992). Public wisdom, expert fallibility: Toward a contextual theory of risk. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 215–228). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Pidgeon, N., Hood, C., Jones, D., Turner, B., & Gibson, R. (1992). Risk perception. In The Royal Society Study Group (Ed.), Risk: Analysis, perception and management (pp. 89–134). London: The Royal Society.
Slovic, P. (1975). Choice between equally valued alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 280–287.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.
Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 117–152). New York: Praeger.
Tengs, T. O., Adams, M. E., Pliskin, J. S., Safran, D. G., Siegel, J. E., & Weinstein. (1995). Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost effectiveness. Risk Analysis, 15, 369–390.
Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371–384.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Policy Analysis. (1987). Unfinished business: A comparative assessment of environmental problems. Washington, DC: Author.
Webster, N. (1983). Webster’s new twentieth century dictionary. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Weiner, R. F. (1993). Comment on Sheila Jasanoff’s guest editorial. Risk Analysis, 13, 495–496.
Wynne, B. (1992). Risk and social learning: Reification to engagement. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 275–300). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Textverweise
This paper is based in part on P. Slovic, » Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield, « in M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, & K. A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior (pp. 277–313). San Francisco: New Lexington, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slovic, P. (2016). Die Ethik des Präferenz-Managements: Risiko, Werte und Entscheidungen. In: Aerni, P., Grün, KJ., Kummert, I. (eds) Schwierigkeiten mit der Moral. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10282-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10282-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10281-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10282-1
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)