Abstract
Nanotechnology delivers emerging applications in functional food by engineering biological and synthetic molecules toward functions that are exceptionally changed from those they have originally. Nanotechnology has enhanced the superiority of foods by making them flavoured, nutritive and more healthier. Nanotechnology generates also novel food products, better packaging, coating and shelf storage techniques. Applications in food also improve shelf life, food quality, safety and fortification. Biosensors in food packaging are designed to detect contaminated or spoiled food. Nanotechnology improve food processes that use enzymes to confer nutrition and health benefits. This report reviews applications of nanotechnology in agriculture, and food science and technology. Furthermore, risk assessment, safety concerns and social implications are discussed.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Food nanotechnology
- Agriculture nanotechnology
- Food processing
- Food packaging
- Nanotechnology in food supplements
3.1 Introduction
Nanotechnologists are being hopeful that nanotechnology will able to transform the entire scenario of food industry by bringing significant changes in the various processes in the food industry: production, processing, packaging, transportation and consumption of food and food products. Increase and exploitation of nanotechnology in these processes ensures the safety of food and food products and creates a healthy food culture which dominantly enhancing the nutritional quality of foods which is the need of an hour (deAzeredo 2009; Ravichandran 2010; Dasgupta et al. 2017; Shukla et al. 2017; Jain et al. 2016). Moreover smart food packaging systems can be developed using nanotechnology that in turn boosts the shelf-life of food products by developing active antifungal and antimicrobic surfaces, improving properties like heat-resistance and mechanical, modifying the permeation behaviour of foils simultaneously detecting and signalling biochemical and microbiological changes (Neethirajan and Jayas 2011). Implication of nanotechnology in current food processing is creating an incredible impact on the advanced development of interactive and functional foods which deliver nutrients and respond to the body’s requirements in an efficient manner (Dunn 2004). Nanocapsules which are added into food products with the aim to deliver nutrients and nanoparticles when added to food and food products increase the absorption of nutrients. Organic and polymeric nanoparticles are being used to deliver vitamins or other nutrients in food and beverages without affecting the taste and appearance of the product. The nutrients are encapsulated by the nanoparticles and carried all the way through the stomach and reaches into the bloodstream. This method applied for delivery of many vitamins in higher percentage of availability of the nutrients to be used by the body because, when nutrients are not encapsulated by the nanoparticles, few of the nutrients would be lost in stomach (Ezhilarasi et al. 2013). Researchers are also engaged in development of nanocapsules containing nutrients that would be released when nanosensors detect a deficiency in of particular nutrient in body. Fundamentally the phenomenon behind this is to construct a super vitamin storage system in body that gives only what body need and when body need. Dominantly nanomaterials are being developed to improve the overall quality viz. taste, color, and texture of foods. Taken an example “interactive” foods are continuously being developed that would allow consumer to choose which flavor and color a piece of food has (Dunn 2004). Nanosensors are enormously developed and improved that can prior detect bacteria and other contaminants on the surfaces of food at a packaging plants . Resultantly this will allow for frequent testings at a much lower cost than usually is acquire by sending samples to a lab for analysis and wait till the results will arrive. This particular packaging testing point is conducted more properly and carefully, has great potential to considerably reduce the chance of contaminated food reaching grocery store shelves.
In August 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) formed a Nanotechnology Task Force with goals that include; (i) evaluate the effectiveness of the agency’s regulatory approaches and authorities to meet any unique challenge that may be presented by the use of nanotechnology materials in FDA-regulated products. (ii) Explore opportunities to foster innovation using nanotechnology materials to develop safe and effective drugs, biologics, and devices, and to develop safe foods, feeds, and cosmetics. (The US Department of Agriculture 2015) Focusing this goals nanotechnology is having a significant impact on numerous facet of the food industry, from how food is grown to how it is travelled, processed and packaged. Industries are developing nanomaterials that will make a difference not only in the taste of food, but also in food safety, and the health benefits food going to delivers when consumed. Increasing developments in micro- and nanotechnologies are growing at a rapid rate and strongly offers the functional potential to not only improve the products in terms of textural and sensory qualities, stability and health benefits, but also develop new products or manufacturing processes for the food industry. Today food industry is the one of the largest manufacturing sector in the world, with counting an annual turnover approximating US $4 trillion. Worldwide, a large amount of foods are consumed after only minimum processing e.g., fresh fruits, vegetables, nuts, some cereals and with additionally high post-harvest losses considerably with fruits and vegetables (Fig. 3.1) (U.S. FDA 2014).
Nanotechnology offering wide ranges of opportunities for the development and improvement of innovative products and applications in food manufacturing system. Recently developed functional foods, neutraceuticals, bioactive compounds, enriched farmafoods, etc. are highlighted examples of it.
Majorly of the sector where nanotechnologies are settling to make a difference is in meat food processing in near future like, intelligent packaging of meat and meat products, meat derived bioactive peptides, pro- and pre-biotics inclusion in processed meat products, fat based nanoemulsions, nanosensors and nanotracers for meat biosecurity tracing and nanostructured meat food products with distinct functions (Table 3.1). Complex set of engineering techniques and occurrence of scientific challenges in the food and bioprocessing industries for manufacturing high quality and safe food through efficient and sustainable means can proven to be solved through nanotechnology . Identification of contaminating bacteria and monitoring of food quality using highly precised biosensors ; intelligent, active, and smart food packaging systems; and nano-encapsulation of bioactive food compounds are strong establishing applications of nanotechnology for the next generation food industry. Nanotechnologies are not new and researchers have been making various polymers based on nanoscale subunits for many years. The result of new, previously unknown, properties attributed to engineered nanoparticles (NP) many inventive consumer products containing these Nanoparticles have been launched to the market recently. Application of nanotechnologies in electronics, medicine, textiles, defence, food, agriculture , cosmetics, and other areas are already a reality and fruits of it applications are beginning to impact the next generation of food production and processing industries (Chen et al. 2006). Within food and agricultural sector nanotechnologies covering many aspects, such as food security, packaging materials, disease treatment, delivery systems, bioavailability, new tools for molecular and cellular biology and new materials for pathogen detection (Maynard et al. 2006; Jasińska et al. 2010). The latent profit for consumers and producers of these innovative products are widely emphasized.
3.2 Role of Nanotechnology in Agriculture
There is huge potential in nanoscience and technology in the stipulation of state-of-the-art key for various challenges faced by and opportunities missed by agriculture development society today and in the future. Concerning to climate change, increase in urbanization, elevated use of natural resources and environmental issues like runoff and continuous accumulation of pesticides and fertilizers are the burning issues for today’s agriculture sector and the researcher community, who are waiting for the recommendations of many nanotechnological strategies for the advancement of scientific and technological knowledge currently being examined. The future, demand for food will increase tremendously while natural resources such as land, water and soil fertility are actually limited. Utilization of nanotechnology in materials science and biomass conversion technologies applied in agriculture are the starting point of providing food, feed, fiber, fire and fuels in the agriculture sector. With reference to the cost of production inputs like chemical fertilizers and pesticides is increasing at an alarming rate due to the limited reserves of fuel such as natural gas and petroleum. To overcome these constraints, precision farming is proving a better option to reduce the initial production costs and to maximize agricultural product output. Possible through implicational advancement in nanotechnology , a number of techniques exist for the improvement of precision farming practices which will allow precise control at nanometer scale (Ingale and Chaudhari 2013).
Nanoencapsulation researchers are working on applications of pesticides encapsulated in nanoparticles; these only release active pesticide in a target insect’s stomach, which minimizes the possibility of contamination of plants themselves. A further development being looked at is a network of nanosensors , nanotracers and dispensers throughout a food crop. The sensors and tracers have ability to recognize when a particular plant needs nutrients or water, before crop grower could see any sign that the plant is deficient of the nutrients and water. Dispensers release fertilizer, nutrients, or water as needed demand, optimizing the growth of each plant in the field one by one.
3.2.1 Precision Farming
The precision farming is process that maximizes the crop yield and minimizing the excessive usage of pesticides, fertilizers and herbicides through efficient monitoring. Precision farming applies advanced remote sensing devices, computers and global satellite positioning systems to precisely analyze various environmental conditions in order to determine the growth behavior of plants under the conditions and identify problems related to crops and their growing environments. Mainly this helps in determine timely development of plant, soil conditions, usage and take up of water and chemicals, fertilizers and seeding and consequently controls environmental pollution to a minimum extent by helping in reducing agricultural waste. The implementation of nanotechnology in the form of sensors and monitoring devices will anticipate creating a positive impact on the future use of precision farming methodologies. Nanosensors enabling systems help in growing the use of autonomous sensors that are linked to GPS systems to provide proficient monitoring services which focusing on crop growth and soil conditions. The use of smart sensors in precision farming will results in incredibly increased agricultural crop productivity by providing accurate information that will enable the farmers to make accurate decisions related to plant growth and soil suitability. Applying precision farming tools like, centralized data storage and collection system to determine soil conditions and plant development, seeding, fertilizer, chemical and water use can be accurately fine-tuned to lowers the production costs and certainly increase production which all the way benefiting the hard worker farmer (Rickman et al. 1999).
Precision farming is also helping to reduce the massive generation of agricultural waste and thus keeping environmental pollution to a minimum extent. But still not fully put into practice yet, small sensors and monitoring systems enabled by nanotechnology certainly will have a huge impact on future precision farming methodologies. One of the major functionality of nanotechnology -enabled devices will be the increased use of autonomous sensors linked into a GPS system for real-time monitoring of the implemented field and its environmental conditions. These nanosensors are distributed throughout the field where they can monitor soil conditions and crop growth.
The use of nanotechnology in development of precision sensors will create equipment of increased sensitivity, allowing an earlier response to environmental changes. For example: Nanosensors which are utilizing carbon nanotubes (Fujii et al. 2005) or nano-cantilevers (Vashist 2007) are fairly small enough to trap and measure individual proteins or even small molecules of farmer interest. Nanoparticles or nanosurfaces can be specifically engineered to trigger a specific electrical or chemical signal in the existence of a active contaminant such as bacteria. While other nanosensors work by triggering a running enzymatic reaction or by using nanoengineered branching molecules called dendrimers as detecting probes to bind to target chemicals and proteins (Ruiz-Altisenta et al. 2010). Sooner or later, future precision farming, with the help of advanced smart sensors, will allow enhanced productivity in agriculture by providing accurate information, thus helping farmers to make better decisions and improving the profit folds.
Particular Nanobiosensors are successfully used for sensing of a wide variety of chemical fertilizers, herbicide, pesticide, insecticide, pathogens, moisture, soil pH, and their controlled use can support sustainable development of agriculture for enhancing crop quality and productivity (Rai et al. 2012). This technology provides farmers a better fertilization management, reduction of inputs, and better management of time and the environment. This system could help in the efficient use of available agricultural natural resources like water, nutrients, and chemicals through precision farming. Operational nanosensors which are dispersed in the field can also successfully detect the presence of plant viruses and other crop pathogens, and the level of soil nutrients in the defined area (Jones 2006; Brock et al. 2011). Levels of existing environmental pollution can be evaluated quickly by nano-smart dust (the use of tiny wireless sensors and transponders) and gas sensors (Mousavi and Rezaei 2011). Application of nanobarcodes and nanoprocessing could also be used to monitor the quality of agricultural produce (Li et al. 2005). By keeping an eye on nanotechnology -based plant regulation of hormones such as auxin helps scientists to understand how the plant roots adapt to their environment variations, especially to marginal soils where the variations are too flexible (McLamore et al. 2010). The biosensors based on specific interactions creats atomic force spectroscopy more effective in detecting enzyme-inhibiting herbicides. A nanobiosensor based on an atomic force microscopy tip functionalized with the acetolactate synthase enzyme was successfully detected for the herbicide metsulfuron-methyl, an acetolactate synthase inhibitor, through the acquisition of force curves (daSilva et al. 2013). Bionanosensors also allow the more quantification and rapid detection of bacteria and viruses, thereby increasing the safety of the food for the customer (Otles and Yalcin 2010).
It is difficult to predict the long-term and broad applications of nanotechnology in agriculture and agricultural process and product development. Within agriculture, precision farming is settling a promising objective. Applications like smart sensors for early warning of changing climatic and crop conditions, and the use of nanocapsules with pesticides that are able to respond to the raised different conditions (Fig. 3.2).
3.2.2 Agrochemicals
Extensive amount of work is also being carried out in the development of various nanosized agrochemicals, such as fertilizers, pesticides and veterinary medicines. The aim to use of nanosized active ingredients has been suggested to offer improved and targeted delivery of agrochemicals in the only required area of field, better efficacy of pesticides in terms of minimal use and better control over necessary dosing of veterinary products. Nano-encapsulated and solid lipid nanoparticles have been widely discovered for the delivery of agrochemicals (Frederiksen et al. 2003); applicably it includes slow- or controlled-release of fertilizers and pesticides within the stipulated time and required area. Combination of fertilizer with pesticide formulation encapsulated in nanoclay for the slow release of growth stimulants and biocontrol agents, has been tested (Chung et al. 2010).
The progress of nano-emulsions (water/polyoxyethylene) non-ionic surfactant (methyl decanoate) containing the pesticide beta-cypermethrin has been characteristically described by Wang et al. (2007a, b) and similarly, the manufacturing of organic–inorganic nanohybrid material for controlled release of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate has been described by Bin Hussein et al. (2005). Porous hollow silica nanoparticles, developed for the controlled delivery of the water-soluble pesticide validamycin with a high loading capacity (36 wt%), have been shown to have a multistaged release pattern (Liu et al. 2006).
Use of zinc–aluminium layered double hydroxide to host the herbicide active ingredient by self-assembly. A few fertilizers claimed to contain nanosized micronutrients which are mainly oxides and carbonates of zinc, calcium, magnesium, molybdenum, etc. are available till date. For remineralisation of soil a micronized (volcanic) rock dust is available from a variety of sources. Product, which comprises sulphates of iron, cobalt, aluminium, magnesium, manganese, nickel and silver, is available for treatment of seed and bulbs prior to planting. Research and development into slow- or controlled-release fertilizers is continuously being carried out in China and India in large extent. The use of nanoforms of agrochemicals offers a number of potential benefits in terms to significantly reduced use of toxic chemicals, but may also raise numerous concerns over exposure of agricultural workers, and elevated contamination of agri-food products. Apart from the intended use and application of nanotechnologies in agriculture and food sectors, there may be seen instances where engineered nanomaterials can get into food and drinks through environmental contamination. Researchers identified possible route of exposure through environmental contamination from the manufacture, use and disposal of consumer products containing advanced engineered nanomaterials . In the product list the major share is contributed by cosmetics and personal care products (TiO2, ZnO, fullerene (C60), Fe2O3, Ag, Cu, Au), catalysts, lubricants and fuel additives (CeO2, Pt, MoS3), paints and coatings (TiO2, SiO2, Ag, quantum dots), water treatment and environmental remediation (Fe, Fe–Pd, polyurethane), agrochemicals (porous SiO2 carriers and other nanosized agrochemicals), food packaging (Ag, nanoclay, TiO2, ZnO, TiN), nanomedicine and carriers (silver, Fe, magnetic nanoparticles) (Dasgupta et al. 2016; Boxall et al. 2007).
3.3 Role of Nanotechnology in Food Processing
Consumers increasing demand of fresh, authentic, textured, convenient and flavourful food products in competitive market is keeping nanotechnology to leadership in the food and food processing industry. The next generation food industry belongs to innovative products manufactured by novel processes, with the ambition to enhancing the performance of the product, prolonging the shelf life, keeping the freshness, improving the safety and quality of food product. The advance processing of food products has been asserting to give new tastes; improved textures, consistency and stability of used emulsions, compared with conventionally produced and processed food products (Nandita et al. 2016; Walia et al. 2017). An increasing demand of the heath conscious society, benefit of this technology results in form of a low-fat containing food product that is as creamy as the full-fat alternative, and hence offers a healthy option to the consumer. The food product which is oil in water emulsion that contains nanodroplets of water inside the oil droplets is in the pipeline. This offers different taste and texture attributes similar to the full-fat equivalent, but with a substantial reduction in fat intake by the consumer (Kaiser 2004) (Table 3.2).
Another area of application of nanotechnology in food processing involves the development of nanostructures also termed nanotextures in foodstuffs. Mostly mechanisms commonly used for preparing nanostructured food products include nano-emulsions, surfactant micelles, emulsion bilayers, double or multiple emulsions and reverse micelles (Weiss et al. 2006). Examples of nanotextured foodstuffs include spreads, mayonnaise, cream, yoghurts, ice creams, etc. a further area of application involves the use of nanosized or nano-encapsulated food additives. The broaden application is expected to exploit a much huge segment of the health food sector, and include colours, preservatives, flavourings and supplements. Efforts are taking to make better dispersion of water-insoluble additives in food products without the use of excessive fat or surfactants, and enhanced tastes and flavours due to the enlarged surface area of nanosized additives, compared with conventional additives forms. Quantities of consumer products containing nanosized additives are already available in some food markets, including foods, health foods, supplements and nutraceuticals. This includes minerals, antimicrobials, vitamins, antioxidants, etc. nearly all of these products are claiming to have improved absorption and bioavailability in the body compared with their conventional equivalents.
3.3.1 Monitoring Food Quality
Researchers are importantly keeping eye on quality assurance in food production and processing industry because consumers demands of more safe and wholesome food products in addition to the governments imposing to strictly follow stringent regulations to ensure food products safety and feed hygiene. For this sensor or advanced detection systems for rapid detection of spoilage of product and its components, for quality control, and for ignorance in detection at source and during production chain is possible through nanotechnology . In monitoring of food quality the analytical methods for contamination detection must have the flexibility to detect different analytes as well as the specificity to distinguish between different bacteria, and the sensitivity to detect bacteria directly and on-line in real samples without pre treatment to meet consumer expectations. Biosensor technology is holding a promise with manufacturing of inexpensive and simple devices to satisfy these requirements (Palchetti and Mascini 2008; Ozimek et al. 2010). Mainly biosensors can be an inherent alternative to the traditional methods for the detection of toxins and pathogens in food and food product (Bogue 2005, 2008; Connolly 2008).
3.3.1.1 Nanosensors for Bacteria Identification
Most commonly found food born Campylobacter jejuni are bacteria on infection which cause savoir abdominal cramps and diarrhea in humans (Ingale and Goto 2013). The campylobacter infections can possibly be traced from poultry meat products which have been contaminated with intestinal contents of the livestock during processing. Stutzenberger et al. (2007) group worked to tackle this food safety problem, they have developed a novel strategy that utilizes bioactive nanoparticles in the chicken feed which is specifically designed to bind to the biomolecular structures on the surfaces of campylobacters. This antibiotic enriched feed with functioning nanocarbohydrate particles successively binds with the bacterium’s surface to remove it through the animals excretes.
Another biosensor developed by Fu et al. (2008) utilized fluorescent dye particles which attaches to anti-salmonella antibodies on a silicon or gold nanorod array. On testing the nanosized dye particles on the sensor become visible when the salmonella bacteria present in the food. In contrast to the time-consuming conventional laboratory testings that are based on bacterial cultures maintenance and labour consuming process, this biosensor can detect the salmonella in food instantly.
An analytical technology called reflective interferometry have been developed by Horner et al. (2006), which provides specific, rapid, and label-free optical detection of biomolecules in complex mixtures. This new technology has provided food quality assurance by detecting Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria in a food sample by measuring and detecting light scattering by cell mitochondria. This sensor works on the principle of this sensor is that a protein of a known and characterized bacterium is set on a silicon chip and can bind with any other E. coli bacteria present in the food sample. A nanosized light scattering is emitted by this binding and detected by analysis of digital images.
Industry named Agromicron Ltd, located in Hong Kong has developed a low cost Nano Bioluminescent Spray (Plexus Institute 2006), which can react with the pathogen strain on food and produce a visual glow for easy detection. The spray contains nanoparticles and would work based on its adherence reaction with the bacteria. The higher the number of adherence between bacteria and molecules, the more intense the glow produced by the particles. A broad range of food related pathogens are identified by this spray, such as Salmonella and E. coli. Cheng et al. (2009) demonstrated detection of E. coli in food using biofunctional magnetic nanoparticles (about 20 nm in diameter) in combination with adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence. Zhao et al. (2004) successfully developed an ultrasensitive immunoassay for in situ pathogen quantification in spiked ground beef samples using antibody-conjugated silica fluorescent nanoparticles (about 60 nm in diameter).
3.3.2 Nanoencapsulation
Recently role of food materials has progressed from being only a source of energy and nutrients to actively contributing to the health conscious consumers. The nutrients such as enzymes can be sensitive to proteases and other denaturing compounds to protect this nutrients there is need to immobilise it on different tailored carriers this may also improved nutrients stability to pH and temperature changes. Hence the protection as well as controlled release of bioactive compounds at the right time and the right place can be implemented by encapsulation. Nanoencapsulation remains to be the one of the most promising technologies having the feasibility to entrap bioactive compounds offers targeted site-specific delivery and efficient absorption through cells. Encapsulation is mostly carried out by physical and chemical techniques such as emulsification, coacervation, inclusion, complexation nanoprecipitation, emulsification–solvent evaporation, and supercritical fluid for food ingredients, drying techniques such as spray drying and freeze drying for stabilization of nanoparticles describes in Table 3.3.
Microencapsulation of foods components or products is well established technique, microencapsulated fish oil has been added to bread for a health benefit which masks the unpleasant taste of fish oil (Chaudhry et al. 2008a, b) and this bread is marketed successfully. The nanoencapsulation of food components and additives is a coherent advancement of the encapsulation technology to provide protective barriers, flavour and taste masking, increased bioavailability, increased potency, controlled release and better dispersion in aqueous systems for water-insoluble food ingredients and additives (Chaudhry et al. 2008a, b; Mozafari et al. 2006).
The chief protein found in corn, zein, has received attention in food nanotechnologies because it has the potential to form a mesh like tubular network resistant to microorganisms. The zein nanomaterial is widely as a vehicle for flavouring ingredients of the food product and the nanoencapsulation of dietary supplements has been explored (Sozer and Kokini 2009). Just like carbon nanotubes, the nanotubes of a-lactalbumin have a cavity diameter ranging of 8–10 nm which may enable the binding of food components such as vitamins and enzymes (Srinivas et al. 2010), cavities could also be used to encapsulate neutraceuticals or to cover undesirable flavour or aroma compounds (Graveland-Bikker and de Kruif 2006). Nanotubes can be obtained from milk protein by appropriately conditioning the partial hydrolysis of milk with a specific protease, a-lactalbumin will self assemble into nanotubes (Graveland-Bikker and de Kruif 2006). As the origin of these nanomaterials used for encapsulation is milk protein or in the case of zein, corn protein, they are considered to be food grade material and so their introduction to the market should be relatively easy for a nano ingredient. The food grade association of these proteins may facilitate widespread applications in nanoencapsulating nutrients, supplements and pharmaceuticals.
Thus the size and the structure of food is influenced the functionality of foods by providing the taste, texture, and stability properties that desired by the consumer. Here nanotechnology can prove to play a vital role in controlling the size and structure of food to a greater extent to make the desirable texture of food. It serves healthier foods (lower fat, lower salt) with desirable sensory properties; ingredients with improved neutraceutic properties; and the potential for removal of certain additives without loss of spreadability and stability (Garti and Benichou 2004).
3.3.3 Ultrafiltration in Food Processing
Filtration process has been widely applied in numerous foods processing industries for the last two decades due to its operational advantages over conventional ingredient separation processes such as gentle product treatment, high selectivity, and lower energy consumption (Mohammad et al. 2012). Ultrafiltration becomes an essential part in food technology as a tool for separation and increase the concentration. Same time membrane fouling compromises the benefits of ultrafiltration as fouling significantly reduces the performance and hence increases the cost of ultrafiltration resulted in overall increase in product cost. Recently various advanced intensive studies carried out to improve ultrafiltration, focusing on membrane fouling control and cleaning of fouled membranes.
Membrane filters are extensively used in dairy processing industries. The dairy industry has been one of the pioneers in the development of equipment and techniques of ultrafiltration based on the practice gained from its application in the dairy processing field (Daufin et al. 2001; Fox et al. 2004; Moresi and Lo Presti 2003; Pouliot 2008; Rosenberg 1995; Saxena et al. 2009). Ultrafiltration has found a major appliance in the making of cheese, during cheese production, whey was discharged to the sewer due to its high salt and lactose content, causing the direct use as a food supplement difficult, but now whey can be processed to obtain additional food values through a newer process using ultrafiltration membrane by increasing the fraction of milk proteins used as cheese or some other useful products and reduce the waste disposal problem represented by whey (Saxena et al. 2009). Membrane filtration technology is documented as a standard tool in the food processing and beverage industry (Cheryan 1998). It is being in use for processing a variety of fruit and vegetable juices (lemon, orange, grapefruit, tangerine, tomato, pomegranate, sweetlemon, cucumber, carrot, and mushroom) (Echavarria et al. 2011). For clarification of juices, ultrafiltration can be used to separate juices into fibrous concentrated pulp and a clarified fraction free of spoilage microorganisms. The clarified fraction can then undergo non-thermal membrane concentration and eventually whole juice reconstitution by combination with pasteurized pulp, in order to obtain a product with improved organoleptic qualities (Cassano et al. 2008). In addition, a better quality clarified fruit juice could able to stand in new market areas, such as clear juice blends, liqueur and related food juice products such as carbonated soft drinks (de Barros et al. 2003). Ultrafiltration is also applied in the concentration process in fruit juice production and processing industry. To recover bioactive components in fruit juice ultrafiltration were employed; bioactive compounds of the depectinized kiwifruit juice were recovered in the clarified fraction of the ultrafiltration process (Galaverna et al. 2008). Ultrafiltration used for fractionation and recovery of waste in fish processing industry. To improve the bioactivity of a saithe protein hydrolysates the ultrafiltration process were employed, by fractionating or concentrating some specific molecular weight peptide classes it increases the concentration of the protein in the filtrate (Chabeaud et al. 2009). Using cross-flow membrane ultrafiltration and nanofiltration the protein recovery from fish meal effluents were made technically and economical feasible (Afonso et al. 2004).
3.4 Role of Nanotechnology in Food Packaging
Increasing the shelf life of food by avoiding spoilage, bacteria, or the loss of food nutrient can be achieved by smart packaging. Nanotechnology offering advanced hopes in food packaging by promising its longer shelf life, safer packaging, better traceability of food products, and does providing healthier food. Intelligent, smart, and active packaging systems produced by nanotechnology would be able to repair the tears and leakages, and respond to environmental conditions. In addition polymer nanocomposite technology also holds the key to future advances in flexible, intelligent, and active packaging (Cushena et al. 2012).
Smart food packaging can detect when its contents are spoiling, and alert the consumer prior to start or in the early stages of the spoiling, as active packaging will release a preservative such as antimicrobials, flavors, colors, or nutritional supplements into the food when it begins to spoil (Ranjan et al. 2014). Nanotechnology provide solutions for food packaging by modifying the permeation behavior of foils, increasing barrier properties (mechanical, chemical, and microbial), providing antimicrobial properties, and by improving heat-resistance properties (Brody et al. 2008; Chaudhry et al. 2008a, b).
3.4.1 Nanoparticles for Food Packaging
The application of bionanocomposites for food packaging protects the food and increases its shelf life, and also be considered a more eco friendly solution because it reduces the requirement to use plastics as toxic, nondegradable packaging materials. Conventional packaging materials are made from nondegradable materials, which increase environmental pollution in addition it consuming restricted fossil fuels for their production. This current alternative of biodegradable films exhibit poor barrier and mechanical properties and these properties need to be improved considerably before they could replace traditional plastics (Suyatma et al. 2004; Tharanathan 2003) and thus help to manage the global waste problem (Sorrentino et al. 2007. The use of inorganic particles, such as clay, into the biopolymeric matrix enhances the biodegradability of a packaging material and can also be controlled with surfactants that are used for the modification of layered silicate. The inorganic particles use also makes it possible to introduce multiple functionalities, which might help to improve the delivery of fragile micronutrients within edible capsules (Bharadwaj et al. 2002; Alexandre and Dubois 2000).
3.4.2 Improved Food Storage
Storage of food is the major concern in the food industry as there are numerous reasons which affect the food storage. The main cause for food deterioration inside food packaging is oxygen; as a result of it oxidation of fats and oils and growth of microorganisms develops in the package. It also accelerates the processes inside food packaging leading to discoloration, changes in texture, rancidity and off-odor, and flavor trouble. Nanotechnologies effectively produce oxygen scavengers for sliced and processed meat, beer, beverages, cooked pastas, and ready-to-eat snacks; moisture absorber sheets for fresh meat, poultry, and fish; and ethylene-scavenging bags for packaging of fruit and vegetables. A functional packaging film for selective control of oxygen transmission through the package and aroma affecting enzymes has been developed by using the nanotechnology approach (Rivett and Speer 2009). The modification of the surface of nanosized materials by dispersing agents can act as substrates for the oxidoreductase enzymes based on reactions catalyzed by food grade enzymes oxygen absorbing s packaging system are also commercially available in the market. Packaging film supplemented with silicate nanoparticles produced, reduces the entrance of oxygen and other gasses, and the exit of moisture and can prevent the food from spoilage. The clay nanoparticles embedded in the plastic bottles strengthen the packaging, reducing gas permeability, and minimizes the loss of carbon dioxide from the beer and the ingress of oxygen to the bottle, keeping the beverage fresher and increases the shelf life (Avella et al. 2005).
3.4.3 Antimicrobial Packaging
Antimicrobial packaging systems holds the impression of being significant for the food industry and the consumers sight because these systems can help extend the product shelf life and maintain food safety by reducing or merely inhibiting the growth rate of microorganisms. Antimicrobial nanoparticle covering in the matrix of the packaging material can reduce the growth of bacteria on or near the food product, inhibiting the microbial growth on nonsterilized foods and maintain the sterility and quality of pasteurized foods by preventing the post manufacture contamination (Table 3.4). Sophisticated techniques of antimicrobial packaging systems contain adding an antimicrobial nanoparticle sachet into the package, dispersing bioactive antimicrobial agents in the packaging; coating of bioactive agents on the surface of the packaging material or utilizing antimicrobial macromolecules with film forming properties or edible matrices (Coma 2008). Foods such as cheese, sliced meat, and bakery that are prone to spoiling on the surface can be protected by contact packaging imbued with antimicrobial nanoparticles, a typical antimicrobial coating nanopackaging film was developed (Buonocore et al. 2005). Paper having active antifungal properties developed for packaging by Rodriguez et al. (2008) which incorporating cinnamon oil with solid wax paraffin using nanotechnology as an active coating was shown to be used as an effective packaging material for numerous bakery products. Working with oregano oil and apple puree, Rojas-Grau et al. (2006) have created edible food films that are able to kill E. coli bacteria.
Nanoparticles posing antimicrobial property have been synthesized and tested for applications in antimicrobial packaging and food storage boxes which include silver oxide nanoparticles (Sondi and Salopek-Sondi 2004), zinc oxide, and magnesium oxide nanoparticles (Jones et al. 2008) and nisin particles produced from the fermenation of a bacteria (Gadang et al. 2008). Many antimicrobials are hypothetically proposed to be used in the formulation of edible films and coatings in order to inhibit the spoilage flora and to decrease the risk of pathogens. There is a trend to select the antimicrobials from natural sources and to use generally recognized as safe compounds so as to meet consumer demands for healthy foods, free of harmful chemical additives (Devlieghere et al. 2004).
The most commonly used antimicrobials are organic acids, the polysaccharide chitosan, some polypeptides as nisin, the lactoperoxidase system, and some plant extracts and its essential oils among others. Organic acids such as lactic, acetic, malic, and citric acids, among others, are present in the ingredients of many foods and are broadly used for preservation. The efficacy of antimicrobial activity is based on pH reduction, disruption of substrate transport, and reduction of proton motive force. The most common acidulant agents are acetic, lactic, and malic acids. They are obtained by fermentation and are effective against the main pathogen bacteria encountered in foods (Samelis and Sofos 2003).
In whey-protein-based packaging films containing of glycerol as plasticizer, the use of formic, acetic, and fumaric acids or citric acid produced films of extreme brittleness. In the case of use of acetic acid, whey proteins precipitated since pH was close to isoelectric pH of proteins; as a consequence, gels formed were thick and could not form films (Pintado et al. 2009). Different molecular weighted chitosan can be extracted from shell wastes with different degree of deacetylation, due to difference in molecular weight different functional properties and biological activities were exerted by these chitosan (No et al. 2007). The antimicrobial activity is related to its positively charged amino group which interacts with negatively charged microbial cell membrane promoting an increase in their permeability in the cell and causing disruptions that lead to cell death (Ziani et al. 2009). Chitosan inhibit the growth of many spoilage causing, yeast, molds and pathogenic bacteria (No et al. 2007; Roller 2003). The antimicrobial activity of chitosan is depends on the type of chitosan, degree of acetylation, its molecular weight, the target microorganism, pH of the medium, and presence of other additives or food components (Aider 2010). Researchers have reported that efficacy of chitosan activity depends on the application technique used; in a coating solution it is more available to act as a preservative than when the preservative is forming the film (Vásconez et al. 2009; Zivanovic et al. 2005). Addition of other antimicrobials to chitosan films and coatings generally enhances the antimicrobial activity and also modified physical and mechanical properties of films and coatings. Taking into consideration the mentioned trend, addition of another antimicrobial agent such as potassium sorbate, nisin, and essential oils, to enhance chitosan antimicrobial action explained in Table 3.5 (Hosseini et al. 2009; Pranoto et al. 2005; Vásconez et al. 2009). Combination of compounds from aromatic plant, clove, and cinnamon essential oils to chitosan films, in general, inhibited the growth of L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, Salmonella enteriditis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Hosseini et al. 2009). Essential oil exhibited the greatest inhibitory action on contaminating bacteria and also modifies physical and mechanical properties of films and coatings. It has seen in essential-oil-free films, inhibition of bacterial growth was not observed, suggesting that chitosan is unable to diffuse through the agar layer and pointed out the necessary addition of other antimicrobial in the film to exert chitosan its influence (Pranoto et al. 2005). Zinc oxide nanoparticles have been incorporated in different materials including glass, low density polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethane, paper and chitosan using different incorporation methods (Espitia et al. 2012). Antimicrobial activity if zinc oxide nanocomposites material has been tasted by agar diffusion test, direct contact with culture broth contained microorganisms followed by colony counting (Applerot et al. 2009; Jin et al. 2009; Vicentini et al. 2010). Antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanocomposites performed against Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli as well as Gram-positive bacteria such as B. subtilis, S. aureus and L. plantarum (Applerot et al. 2009; Emamifar et al. 2010; Jin and Gurtler 2011). Paper coated with ZnO nanoparticles has shown antimicrobial activity against E. coli (Ghule et al. 2006).
3.4.4 Green Packaging
Use of natural biopolymer, bio-nanocomposites-based functional packaging materials have generated great potential for enhancing food quality, safety, and stability as smart packaging and processing technology. Researchers are taking efforts to manufacture biodegradable and fully compostable bioplastics packaging (CSIRO 2006), made from organic corn starch using aspects of nanotechnology . Use of bio degradable biopolymer in food packaging material also provide enhanced organoleptic characteristics such as appearance, odor, and flavor (Zhao et al. 2008). The exceptional advantages of the use of natural biopolymer packaging are that these can easily handle particulate foods, can act as carriers for functionally active components, and provide nutritional supplements (Rhim and Ng 2007). A natural polymer and a main component of lobster shells called chitin is used for the making of biodegradable green food packaging using electrospinning technique. The electrospinning technique involves dissolving chitin in a solvent and drawing it through a tiny hole with applied electricity to produce nanoslim fiber spins (Kriegel et al. 2009).
3.4.5 Edible Films and Coatings
Development of edible films and coatings has been possible due to the film forming capacity of natural biopolymers. Hydrocolloids have good ability to form a uniform and cohesive matrix with controlling mechanical properties (Bourtoom 2008, 2009). This ability of hydrocolloids is related to the chemical structure of these compounds, which allows the association through hydrogen bonding of their polymeric chains. The most common biopolymers used for edible antimicrobial film production are polysaccharides, proteins single or mixtures from different sources, and combination of carbohydrates and proteins. While lipids such as waxes and fatty acids are main constituent of edible films and coatings, they do not possess a stand-alone film making nature. For this reason, lipids are often supported on a polysaccharide matrix to provide a film with mechanical strength (Bourtoom 2009). Incorporation of lipids in hydrocolloid-based film formulations facilitates to improve their water barrier characteristics or change their visual appearance (Karbowiak et al. 2010; Maftoonazad et al. 2007) (Table 3.5).
Polysaccharides
Polysaccharides make transparent and homogeneous edible films with moderate mechanical properties. The application of these films is limited by their water solubility and poor permeability. To solve this issue, the blending of this with different biopolymers (Xu et al. 2005), addition of hydrophobic materials like oils or waxes (Anker et al. 2001; Ayranci and Tunc 2003; García et al. 2000), or chemical modification of polymer structure have been proposed (Marques et al. 2006).
Cellulose and Derivatives
Cellulose is the major structural material of plant cell walls and it is composed of linear chains of (1 → 4)-β-D-glucopyranosyl units. Chemical substitution of some hydroxyl groups along the chain gives origin to ionic (carboxymethylcellulose, CMC) and nonionic cellulose ethers (methylcellulose, MC; hydroxypropylcellulose, HPC; hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, HPMC). Cellulose derivatives films are tough, flexible, totally transparent, and highly sensible to water presence but resistant to fats and oils (Lin and Zhao 2007; Vargas et al. 2008). Crosslinking treatments can be used to decrease the water solubility of cellulose ethers (Coma et al. 2003).
Chitosan
Chitosan is a natural carbohydrate polymer derived by deacetylation of chitin [poly-β-(1 → 4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine]. It is a high molecular weight cationic polysaccharide that exhibits antibacterial, antifungal activity and film-forming properties (Fernandez-Saiz et al. 2009; Ziani et al. 2009: Arvanitoyannis 2008; Sebti et al. 2005). Numerous information has been reported about chitosan potential to act as a food preservative, function that was evaluated either on the basis of in vitro trials or through direct application of chitosan on real complex matrix foods (Durango et al. 2006; Han et al. 2004; Park et al. 2004; Ribeiro et al. 2007; Vásconez et al. 2009). Because of the good film-forming capacity of chitosan, it is broadly used to protect, improve quality and extend the shelf life of fresh and processed foods. Only chitosan coating was successfully applied on silver carp (Fan et al. 2009) and ready-to-eat roast beef coating (Beverlya et al. 2008); chitosan coatings incorporated with cinnamon oil retained the good quality characteristics as well as extended the shelf life during the refrigerated storage of rainbow trout (Ojagh et al. 2010); modified atmosphere packaging in combination with chitosan edible coating maintained quality and enhanced phenolic content in carrot sticks (Simões et al. 2009) and coatings based on selectively high molecular weight chitosan alone (Han et al. 2005) or combined with oleic acid extended strawberry shelf life (Vargas et al. 2006).
3.4.6 Nanocomposites for Food Packaging
Efficient nanocomposite materials for food packaging are developed with nanotechnology can provide better solutions to food industry challenges concerning to product safety and performance as well as economic and environmental advantages (Silvestre et al. 2011; Ingale 2014). In preservation of food, implications of nanotechnology can extends and improve functional packaging, which like been inhibition and protection from contaminants, preservation, marketing and communication, leading to a active food packaging system. In synthesis of nanocomposite, the composites are made of a polymeric matrix act as continuous phase and a discontinuous phase known as filler, fibres, platelets and particles have been widely used as fillers, so as to improve the mechanical properties and heat resistance of polymers hence it also enhances the overall properties of nanocomposites. (Ajayan et al. 2003; Chaudhry et al. 2008a, b; Arora and Padua 2010). Zinc oxide (ZnO) is an inorganic compound enormously used in everyday applications and also facilitates in formation of nanocomposites since currently listed as a generally recognized as safe (GRAS) material by the Food and Drug Administration and hence is used as element of food additive. ZnO nanoparticles have shown antimicrobial properties and been incorporated in polymeric matrices in order to fabricate nanocomposite which provide antimicrobial activity to the packaging material and improve packaging properties (Espitia et al. 2012). Polyurethane films incorporated nanoparticles have shown antimicrobial activity against E. coli and B. subtilis, amongst E. coli being more sensitive to the developed nanocomposite material, eventually this may be the result of a strong affinity of the nanoparticles with E. coli cells and consider that the antibacterial activity of ZnO is due to the generation of H2O2 in nanoparticle surface (Li et al. 2009).
3.5 Role of Nanotechnology in Food Supplements
Food supplements are generally considered to include vitamins, minerals, fiber, fatty acids, or amino acids, among or within other food substances. Nutrients are essential to the sustainability of a body, the bioactive compounds are not essential since the body can functions without them but bioactive compounds can have an influence on health and can believe to act as alternative of direct drug use external to the body. Bioactive compounds are known to be considering are flavonoids, caffeine, carotenoids, carnitine, choline, coenzyme Q, creatine, dithiolthiones, phytosterols, phytoestrogenss, glucosinolates, polyphenols, anthocyanins (Golmohamadi et al. 2013).
3.5.1 Bioactive Compounds
Bioactive compounds defined as extra nutritional constituents that normally occur in small quantities in foods, include beta-carotene from carrots, lycopene from tomato, beta-glucan from oats, omega-3 acid from salmon oil, conjugated linoleic acid from cheese, Lactobacillus from yogurt, and isoflavones from soybeans, etc. There is evidence to recommend consuming food sources rich in bioactive compounds. From a practical perspective, this translates to recommending a diet rich in a variety of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, oils, and nuts (Kris-Etherton et al. 2002). Nanotechnology has made known better potential in improving the efficiency and delivery of nutraceuticals and bioactive compounds in functional foods ultimately to improve human health. Enhanced solubility; improve bioavailability and protection of the stability of micronutrients and bioactive compounds during processing, storage and distribution results by efforts of nanoencapsulation (Chen et al. 2006).
Bioactive compounds can be protected by nanoencapsulation from absorption and ensures controlled release of beneficial live probiotic species to promote healthy and targeted gut function. Thus the viability of probiotic organisms including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Bifidobacterium spp. within freeze dried yogurt can be improved by encapsulation of this bioactive component with calcium alginate (Kailasapathy and Rybka 1997). The bioavailability of antioxidant component from mainly from tomato; lycopene can be increased by synthesizing nanoparticles of lycopene and incorporating in tomato juice, pasta sauce, and jam (Auweter et al. 1999). Casein a bulky found milk protein, was used to make nanosized micelles and has been employed as a vehicle for delivering sensitive health promoting ingredients like various vitamin (Semo et al. 2007). Biopolymer nanofibers prepared by electrospinning technique by zein for encapsulating beta-carotene show the potential of nanotechnology in food and nutraceutical formulation and catings, bioactive food packaging , and food processing industries (Fernandez et al. 2009). New naturally derived carrier nanotubes for nanoencapsulation of nutrients, supplements, and pharmaceuticals are assembled from hydrolysed milk protein α-lactalbumin (Graveland-Bikker and de Kruif 2006).
3.5.2 Interactive Foods
Nanotechnology is helping to develop interactive foods which can allow consumers to choose and modify the food depending on their own nutritional needs or choice of tastes and flavors. The nanocapsules containing flavor or color enhancers or added nutritional elements would remain in dormant phase in the food and will only be released when triggered by the consumer (Dunn 2004). Efforts are made to develop foods which are capable of changing their color, flavor, or nutritional properties according to a consumer nutritional needs, allergies, or taste preference. Nanotechnology can facilitate techniques to make foods such as soft drinks, ice cream, chocolate, or chips to be commercially marketed as ‘health’ foods by reducing fat, carbohydrate or calorie content or by increasing protein, fiber or vitamin content. In addition, nanotechnology can help in the production of stronger flavorings, colorings, and nutritional additives, and processing aids to increase the speed of manufacturing and lowers costs of ingredients and processing (Burdo 2005). Utilization of nanofilters and membranes successfully can screen out or pass through certain molecules based on the shape and or size to remove toxins or adjust flavors, Nestle and Unilever are reported to be developing a nanoemulsion based ice cream with a lower fat content that retains a fatty texture and flavor (Renton 2006).
3.5.3 Texture
Commonly Texture Described as What Things Are Made of and how they Feel on Contact. Textures can Be Illustrated as Rough, Smooth, Hard, Soft, Liquid, Solid, Lumpy, Gritty Etc. Consumer like or Dislike Food because of its Taste, but the Texture of the Food Also Plays a Part in whether Consumer like it or Not. Texturing Is Big Business and the Science of Food Structure Even Has its Own Logy that Is Food Rheology.
Reduction of the size of food molecules to nanosized crystals creates more particles for providing greater surface area. Smaller particles improve food’s spreadability and stability, and can assist in developing healthier minimal fat food products. Multiple emulsions such as water-in-oil-in-water can distribute the lipids more evenly to reduce extra stabilizers and thickeners to achieve a desirable food texture (Garti and Benichou 2004). Food texturing researchers, prepared nanoscale assays can activate the taste receptors of human tongue and can reduce the bitterness naturally inherent in some foods. (Wenner 2008). In beverages industry, photocatalytic process developed using gold nanoparticles by Lin et al. (2008) for decreasing the aging period and enhancing the sensory quality of sorghum spirits. Contreras et al. (2009) showed that zinc nanoparticles can be used to optimize conditions for surface enhancement of infrared absorption of food components. This technique able to demonstrate that butter treated with zinc naoparticles exerts trans fat spectral information along with the degree and the unsaturation of the acyl groups. These results clearly indicate the potential of nanomaterials in real time imaging sector to reveal useful information concerning food allergens, bioactive compounds, and microbial pathogens.
3.6 Safety and Societal Implications
Recently, interest has extensively grown in safety issues regarding the use of nanoparticles, nanocomposites, nanoconjugates in food packaging . Awareness about food safety and quality as well as its potential impact on consumers are key issues related to food processing and packaging which are developed by nanotechnology (Jain et al. 2016). Researchers are particularly more concerned with the possible ways of nanoparticles migration from the process to packaging material into the packed food and whether this migration would have a negative impact on the safety of food and consumer or quality of the packaged product (Bradley et al. 2011). Nanoparticles have much larger surface area to volume ratios, thus they may exhibit substantially different physicochemical and biological properties compared to conventionally larger sized particles (Ingale and Chaudhari 2013). There are three key factors majorly concerned of nanoparticle toxicity test strategies includes, physicochemical characterization, in vitro assays and in vivo studies (Oberdörster et al. 2005).
The existing functional safety laws, safety testing protocols, and the workplace health procedures are apparently inadequate to measure the exposure and assess the risks posed by nanofoods, nanofood packaging material and nanobased chemicals. Still the industries following established guidelines in the safety assessments of nanomaterials used for manufacturing nanofoods and nanopackaging materials and are not assessed as new chemicals. Novel experimental protocols and research tests should be performed to generate hazard and exposure information leading to risk assessments and to reliably answer concerns about the possible toxicological effects of exposure to nanoparticles, nanocomposites in the food product. A study shows that toxicities of nanoparticles and large particles were similar when the dose was expressed in surface area (Monteiller et al. 2007).
Toxicological evaluation of nanomaterials in food applications has done by high content screening technique and utilizing Zebrafish model can provide valuable developmental toxicity information in terms of endpoint identification and mechanism elucidation (Donofrio 2006). Nevertheless, currently there is a huge demand for low cost in vitro assays without reducing the efficiency and reliability of the risk assessment , since in vivo experiments are expensive, slow and ethically questionable (Siripireddy et al. 2017; Maddinedi et al. 2015, 2017; Tammina et al. 2017; Sannapaneni et al. 2016; Ranjan et al. 2016).
3.7 Conclusion and Perspective
Numerous varied opportunities for nanotechnology exist to play an important role in techniques of agriculture , food processing and packaging. The uses and benefits of nanotechnolog y are countless, from productivity enhancement through nanotechnology driven advanced precision farming and maximization of output in terms of yield with profit and minimization of inputs of fertilizers through better monitoring and targeted action only where required is desirable. Precision farming enables plants to use water, pesticides, and fertilizers more efficiently and reduces its excessive use. Use of nanotechnology may bring great benefits to farmers through ease in food production and to the food industry through development of new products through food processing, preservation, and packaging.
Expected applications of agricultural food nanotechnolog y include nanosensors or nanobiosensors for detecting contaminants and for soil quality and for plant health monitoring, for steady release and efficient dosage of water and fertilizers for plants, nanocapsules for agrochemical delivery, creating biofuels, nanocomposites for bioplastic film coatings used in food packaging , antimicrobial nanocomposites used for applications in decontamination of food, nanobiosensors for identification of pathogen contamination, and improving plant breeding (Dasgupta et al. 2015a, b). Additionally existing efforts are extra oriented to effectively reduce the negative impact of developed agrochemical products in the environment and human health, rather than its direct applications to improve the properties for food production. Agro formulations with higher bioavailability and efficacy and better selectivity will be seen actively functioning the near future of agriculture .
The use of biopolymers in the food industry has solved feasibility problems related to their relatively high cost and overall performance when compared to those of synthetic polymers. Several nanocomposites can provide active and or smart properties to food packaging materials, such as antimicrobial properties, oxygen scavenging ability, enzyme immobilization, or indication of the degree of exposure to some degradation related factor. Nanocomposites can not only protect the food against environmental factors, but also incorporate properties to the packaging material so it may actually enhance quality of foods to be consumed. Nanotechnological developed Membrane filters and filtration processes are gaining more attention and focus in food industry due to its exponential advantages (environmental friendliness, cost saving, and product improvement) when compared with other traditional methods. Use of nanotechnology in food industry, has provided sensors and diagnostic devices with improved sensitivity and selectivity to monitor food processes and assure food quality measurements along the real time production lines. Moreover antimicrobial edible films and coatings are utilized for improving the shelf life of food products without impairing consumer acceptability.
In addition to antimicrobial properties of antimicrobial edible films and coatings, zinc nanocomposites has presented modifications in the structure and properties of packaging materials like mechanical and thermal resistance. The design of a food packaging is significant since each industrial trait influences the physical integrity of the developed packaging and, therefore, ensures the protection of the packaged food. Understanding gap in addressing and framing the authority regulations of nanotechnology usage for foods, food additives, and food packaging materials is in progress through various regional and international agencies. Majorly the potential benefits of nanotechnology in agriculture and next generation food industry need to be balanced concerning for the soil, water, environment, and the occupational health of workers.
References
Afonso MD, Ferrer J, Bórquez R (2004) An economic assessment of proteins recovery from fish meal effluents by ultrafiltration. Trends Food Sci Technol 15(10):506–512
Aider M (2010) Chitosan application for active bio-based films production and potential in the food industry: review. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:837–842
Ajayan PM, Schadler LS, Braun PV (2003) Nanocomposite science and technology. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. ISBN: 978-3-527-30359-5
Alexandre M, Dubois P (2000) Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Mater Sci Eng 28:1–63
Anand P, Nair HB, Sung B, Kunnumakkara AB, Yadav VR, Tekmal RR, Aggarwal BB (2010) Design of curcuminloaded PLGA nanoparticles formulation with enhanced cellular uptake, and increased bioactivity in vitro and superior bioavailability in vivo. Biochem Pharmacol 79(3):330–338
Anarjan N, Mirhosseini H, Baharin BS, Tan CP (2011) Effect of processing conditions on physicochemical properties of sodium caseinate-stabilized astaxanthin nanodispersions. LWT Food Sci Technol 44(7):1658–1665
Anker M, Berntsen J, Hermansson AM, Stading M (2001) Improved water vapour barrier of whey protein films by addition of an acetylated monoglyceride. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 3:81–92
Applerot G, Lipovsky A, Dror R, Perkas N, Nitzan Y, Lubart R, Gedanken A (2009) Enhanced antibacterial activity of nanocrystalline ZnO due to increased ROS-mediated cell injury. Adv Funct Mater 19(6):842–852
Arora A, Padua GW (2010) Review: nanocomposites in food packaging. J Food Sci 75(1):43–49
Arvanitoyannis IS (2008) The use of chitin and chitosan for food packaging applications. In: Chiellini E (ed) Environmentally compatible food packaging. Cambridge, CRC Wood head Publishing, pp 137–158
Auweter H, Bohn H, Haberkorn H, Horn D, Luddecke E, Rauschenberger V (1999) Production of carotenoid preparations in the form of coldwater-dispersible powders and the use of the novel carotenoid preparations. US Patent 5968251 (in English)
Avella M, De Vlieger JJ, Errico ME, Fischer S, Vacca P, Volpe MG (2005) Biodegradable starch or clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chem 93(3):467–474
Ayranci E, Tunc S (2003) A method for the measurement of the oxygen permeability and the development of edible films to reduce the rate of oxidative reactions in fresh foods. Food Chem 80:423–431
Bejrapha P, Min SG, Surassmo S, Choi MJ (2010) Physicothermal properties of freeze-dried fish oil nanocapsules frozen under different conditions. Dry Technol 28(4):481–489
Bejrapha P, Surassmo S, Choi M, Nakagawa K, Min S (2011) Studies on the role of gelatin as a cryo- and lyo-protectant in the stability of capsicum oleoresin nanocapsules in gelatin matrix. J Food Eng 105(2):320–331
Belhaj N, Arab-Tehrany E, Linder M (2010) Oxidative kinetics of salmon oil in bulk and in nanoemulsion stabilized by marine lecithin. Process Biochem 45(2):187–195
Benichou A, Aserin A, Garti N, (2004) Double emulsions stabilized with hybrids of natural polymers for entrapment and slow release of active matters. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 108–109:29–41. ISSN 0001-8686, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2003.10.013. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001868603001350) Keywords: Double emulsions; Slow, Control and sustained release; Biopolymeric emulsifiers; Steric stabilization
Beverlya RL, Janesa ME, Prinyawiwatkulaa W, Nob HK (2008) Edible chitosan films on ready-to-eat roast beef for the control of Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiol 25:534–537
Bharadwaj RK, Mehrabia AR, Hamiltona C, Trujilloa C, Murgaa M, Fana R, Chavira A, Thompsonb AK (2002) Structure-property relationships in crosslinked polyester-clay nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 43:3699–3705
Bin Hussein MZ, Yahaya AH, Zainal Z, Kian LH (2005) Nanocomposite-based controlled release formulation of an herbicide, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate incapsulated in zinc-aluminium-layered double hydroxide. Sci Technol Adv Mater 6(8):956–962
Bogue R (2005) Developments in biosensors – where are tomorrow’s markets? Sens Rev 25(3):180–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/02602280510606426
Bogue R (2008) Nanosensors: a review of recent progress. Sens Rev 28(1):12–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/02602280810849965
Bourtoom T (2008) Edible films and coatings: characteristics and properties. Int Food Res J 15(3):237–248
Bourtoom T (2009) Review article. Edible protein films: properties enhancement. Int Food Res J 16:1–9
Boxall A, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, Watts C (2007) Current and predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Central Science Laboratory, York
Bradley EL, Castle L, Chaudhry Q (2011) Applications of nanomaterials in food packaging with a consideration of opportunities for developing countries. Trends Food Sci Technol 22(11):604–610
Brock DA, Douglas TE, Queller DC, Strassmann JE (2011) Primitive agriculture in a social amoeba. Nature 469(7330):393–396
Brody AL, Bugusu B, Han JH, Koelsch Sand C, McHugh TH (2008) Innovative food packaging. J Food Sci 73(8):107e117
Buonocore G, Conte A, Corbo MR, Sinigaglia M, Del Nobile MA (2005) Mono- and multilayer active films containing lysozyme as antimicrobial agent. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 6:459–464
Burdo O (2005) Nanoscale effects in food production technologies. J Eng Phys Thermophys 78(1):90–97
Cagri A, Ustunol Z, Ryser ET (2001) Antimicrobial, mechanical, and moisture barrier properties of low pH whey protein-based edible films containing p-amino benzoic or sorbic acids. J Food Sci 66(6):865–870
Cassano A, Donato L, Conidi C, Drioli E (2008) Recovery of bioactive compounds in kiwifruit juice by ultrafiltration. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 9(4):556–562
Chabeaud A, Vandanjon L, Bourseau P, Jaouen P, Chaplain- Derouiniot M, Guerard F (2009) Performances of ultrafiltration membranes for fractionating a fish protein hydrolysate: application to the refining of bioactive peptidic fractions. Sep Purif Technol 66(3):463–471
Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Boxall A, Castle L, Aitken R, Watkins R (2008a) Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit Contam 25(3):241–258
Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Boxall A, Castle L, Aitken R, Watkins R (2008b) Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit Contam: Part A 25(3):241–258
Chen H, Weiss J, Shahidi F (2006) Nanotechnology in nutraceuticals and functional foods. Food Technol 60(3):30–36
Cheng Y, Liua Y, Huanga J, Lia K, Zhang W, Xiana Y, Jin L (2009) Combining biofunctional magnetic nanoparticles and ATP bioluminescence for rapid detection of Escherichia coli. Talanta 77(4):1332–1336
Cheong JN, Tan CP, Yaakob B, Che M, Misran M (2008) α-Tocopherol nanodispersions: preparation, characterization and stability evaluation. Int J Food Eng 89(2):204–209
Cheryan M (1998) Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Choi MJ, Ruktanonchai U, Min SG, Chun JY, Soottitantawat A (2010) Physical characteristics of fish oil encapsulated by ß-cyclodextrin using an aggregation method or polycaprolactone using an emulsion–diffusion method. Food Chem 119(4):1694–1703
Chung YL, Ansari S, Estevez L, Hayrapetyan S, Giannelis EP, Lai HM (2010) Preparation and properties of biodegradable starch-clay nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 79(2):391e396
Coma V (2008) Bioactive packaging technologies for extended shelf life of meat-based products. Meat Sci 78(2):90–103
Coma V, Deschamps A, Martial-Gros A (2003) Bioactive packaging materials from edible chitosan polymer-antimicrobial assessment on dairy related contaminants. J Food Sci 68(9):2788–2792
Connolly (2008) Nanosensor developments in some European universities. Sens Rev 28(1):18–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/02602280810849974
Contreras MP, Avula RY, Singh RK (2009) Evaluation of nano zinc (ZnO) for surface enhancement of ATR–FTIR spectra of butter and spread. Food Bioprocess Technol 3(4):629–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-009-0237-4
CSIRO (2006) Farm factories: harvesting bioplastics. http://www.solve.csiro.au/0806/article6.htm. Accessed 20 June 2015
Cushen M, Kerry J, Morris M, Cruz-Romero M, Cummins E (2012) Nanotechnologies in the food industry – recent developments, risks and regulation. Trends Food Sci Technol 24(1):30–46. ISSN 0924-2244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.10.006. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924224411002378)
Dandekar PP, Jain R, Patil S, Dhumal R, Tiwari D, Sharma S, Vanage G, Patravale V (2010) Curcumin-loaded hydrogel nanoparticles: application in anti-malarial therapy and toxicological evaluation. J Pharm Sci 99(12):4992–5010
Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Mundekkad D, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, Kumar A (2015a) Nanotechnology in agro-food: from field to plate. Food Res Int 69:381–400
Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Mundra S, Ramalingam C, Kumar A (2015b) Fabrication of food grade vitamin E nanoemulsion by low energy approach, characterization and its application. Int J Food Prop 19(3):700–708
Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Chakraborty AR, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, Kumar A (2016) Nanoagriculture and water quality management. In: Eric L (ed) Sustainable agriculture reviews: nanoscience in food and agriculture 1. Springer-Nature, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39303-2_1
Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Ramalingam C (2017) Applications of nanotechnology in agriculture and water quality management. Environ Chem Lett 15(4):591–605
daSilva AC, Deda DK, da Róz AL, Prado RA, Carvalho CC, Viviani V, Leite FL (2013) Nanobiosensors based on chemically modified AFM probes: a useful tool for metsulfuron-methyl detection. Sensors (Basel) 13(2):1477–1489
Daufin G, Escudier JP, Carrère H, Bérot S, Fillaudeau L, Decloux M (2001) Recent and emerging applications of membrane processes in the food and dairy industry. Food Bioprod Process 79(2):89–102
deAzeredo HMC (2009) Nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Food Res Int 42:1240–1253
deBarros STD, Andrade CMG, Mendes ES, Peres L (2003) Study of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification by ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci 215(1–2):213–224
dePaz E, Martin A, Estrella A, Rodriguez-Rojo S, Matias AA, Duarte CMM, Cocero MJ (2012) Formulation of β- carotene by precipitation from pressurized ethyl acetate-on water emulsions for application as natural colorant. Food Hydrocoll 26(1):17–27
Devlieghere F, Vermeiren L, Debevere J (2004) New preservation technologies: possibilities and limitations. Int Dairy J 14:273–285
Donofrio R (2006) Rapid safety testing of food nanomaterials using high content screening and zebrafish model. In: Nano and micro technologies in the food and health food industries conference, 25–26 October 2006 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Dube A, Ken N, Nicolazzo JA, Ian L (2010) Effective use of reducing agents and nanoparticle encapsulation in stabilizing catechins in alkaline solution. Food Chem 122(3):662–667
Dunn J (2004) A mini revolution. Food Manufacture, London. http://www.foodmanufacture.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/472/A%20mini%20revolution.htm. Accessed 23 Apr 2015
Durango AM, Soares NFF, Andrade NJ (2006) Microbiological evaluation of an edible antimicrobial coating on minimally processed carrots. Food Control 17:336–341
Echavarria AP, Torras C, Pagan J, Ibarz A (2011) Fruit juice processing and membrane technology application. Food Eng Rev 3(3–4):136–158
Emamifar A, Kadivar M, Shahedi M, Soleimanian-Zad S (2010) Evaluation of nanocomposite packaging containing Ag and ZnO on shelf life of fresh orange juice. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 11(4):742–748. ISSN 1466-8564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2010.06.003. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856410000664) Keywords: Orange juice; Nanocomposite; Nano-ZnO; Nanosilver
Espitia PJP, Soares FFN, dosReis CJS, deAndrade NJ, Cruz SR, Medeiros EAA (2012) Zinc oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antimicrobial activity and food packaging applications. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:1447–1464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0797-6
Eswaranandam S, Hettiarachhy NS, Johnson MG (2004) Antimicrobial activity of citric, lactic, malic, or tartaric acids and nisin incorporated soy protein film against Listeria monocytogenes, Eschericchia coli O157:H7, and Salmonella gaminara. J Food Sci 69(3):FMS79–FMS84
Ezhilarasi PN, Karthik P, Chhanwal N, Anandharamakrishnan C (2013) Nanoencapsulation techniques for food bioactive components: a review. Food Bioprocess Technol 6:628–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0944-0
Fan W, Sun J, Chen Y, Qiu J, Zhang Y, Chi Y (2009) Effects of chitosan coating on quality and shelf life of silver carp during frozen storage. Food Chem 115:66–70
Fernandez A, Torres-Giner S, Lagaron JM (2009) Novel route to stabilization of bioactive antioxidants by encapsulation in electrospun fibers of zein prolamine. Food Hydrocoll 23(5):1427–1432
Fernandez-Saiz P, Lagaron JM, Ocio MJ (2009) Optimization of the biocide properties of chitosan for its application in the design of active films of interest in the food area. Food Hydrocoll 23:913–921
Ferreira I, Rocha S, Coelho M (2007) Encapsulation of antioxidants by spray-drying. Chem Eng Trans 11(9):713–717
Flores SK, Costa D, Yamashita F, Gerschenson LN, Grossmann MV (2010) Mixture design for evaluation of potassium sorbate and xanthan gum effect on properties of tapioca starch films obtained by extrusion. Mater Sci Eng C 30:196–202
Fox PF, McSweeney P, Cogan TM, Guinee TP (2004) Application of membrane technology to cheese production. Cheese: major cheese groups, 3rd edn, vol 2, pp 261–286
Frederiksen HK, Kristensen HG, Pedersen M (2003) Solid lipid microparticle formulations of the pyrethroid gamma-cyhalothrin-incompatibility of the lipid and the pyrethroid and biological properties of the formulations. J Control Release 86(2–3):243–252
Fu J, Park B, Siragusa G, Jones L, Tripp R, Zhao Y, Cho YJ (2008) An Au/Si hetero-nanorod based biosensor for Salmonella detection. Nanotechnology 19:1–7
Fujii M, Xing Z, Huaqing X, Hiroki A, Koji T, Tatsuya I, Hidekazu A, Tetsuo S (2005) Measuring the thermal conductivity of a single carbon nanotube. Phys Rev Lett 95:065502
Gadang VP, Hettiarachchy NS, Johnson MG, Owens C (2008) Evaluation of antibacterial activity of whey protein isolate coating incorporated with nisin, grape seed extract, malic acid, and EDTA on a turkey frankfurter system. J Food Sci 73(8):389–394
Galaverna G, DiSilvestro G, Cassano A, Sforza S, Dossena A, Drioli E, Marchelli R (2008) A new integrated membrane process for the production of concentrated blood orange juice: effect on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity. Food Chem 106(3):1021–1030
García M, Martino M, Zaritizky N (2000) Lipid addition to improve barrier properties of edible starch-based films and coatings. J Food Sci 65(6):941–947
Garti N, Benichou A (2004) Recent developments in double emulsions for food applications. In: Friberg S, Larsson K, Sjoblom J (eds) Food emulsions, 4th edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 353–412
Ghule K, Ghule AV, Chen BJ, Ling YC (2006) Preparation and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles coated paper and its antibacterial activity study. Green Chem 8(12):1034–1041
Golmohamadi A, Möller G, Powers J, Nindo C (2013) Effect of ultrasound frequency on antioxidant activity, total phenolic and anthocyanin content of red raspberry puree. Ultrason Sonochem 20(5):1316–1323
Gou M, Men K, Shi H, Xiang M, Zhang J, Song J, Long J, Wan Y, Luo F, Zhao X, Qian Z (2011) Curcumin-loaded biodegradable polymeric micelles for colon cancer therapy in vitro and in vivo. Nanoscale 3(4):1558–1567
Graveland-Bikker JF, deKruif CG (2006) Unique milk protein based nanotubes: food and nanotechnology meet. Trends Food Sci Technol 17(5):196–203
Hadaruga NG, Hadaruga DI, Paunescu V, Tatu C, Ordodi VL, Bandur G, Lupea AX (2006) Thermal stability of the linoleic acid/α- and β-cyclodextrin complexes. Food Chem 99(3):500–508
Han C, Zhao Y, Leonard SW, Traber MG (2004) Edible coating to improve storability and enhance nutritional value of fresh and frozen strawberries (Fragaria x Ananassa) and raspberries (Rubus ideaus). Postharvest Biol Technol 33:67–78
Han C, Lederer C, Mcdaniel M, Zhao Y (2005) Sensory evaluation of fresh strawberries (Fragaria ananassa) coated with chitosan-based edible coatings. J Food Sci 70(3):S172–S178
Heyang J, Fei X, Cuilan J, Yaping Z, Lin H (2009) Nanoencapsulation of lutein with hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose phthalate by supercritical antisolvent. Chin J Chem Eng 17(4):672–677
Horner SR, Mace CR, Rothberg LJ, Miller BL (2006) A proteomic biosensor for enteropathogenic E. coli. Biosens Bioelectron 21(8):1659–1663
Hosseini MH, Razavi SH, Mousavi MA (2009) Antimicrobial, physical and mechanical properties of chitosanbased films incorporated with thyme, clove and cinnamon essential oils. J Food Process Preserv 33:727–743
Ingale AG, Chaudhari AN (2013) Biogenic synthesis of nanoparticles and potential applications: an eco-friendly approach. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 4:165. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7439.1000165
Ingale AG, Goto S (2013) Identification of antigenic epitopes, homology modelling and structural characterization of capsule biosynthesis protein (CapA) from Compylobacter jejunni. Gene Ther Mol Biol 15:74–84
Ingale AG (2014) Nanocomposite for surface coating. In: Soni S, Salhotra A, Suar M (eds) Handbook of research on diverse applications of nanotechnology in biomedicine, chemistry, and engineering. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 612–623
Jafari SM, He Y, Bhandari B (2007a) Encapsulation of nanopartricles of D-limonene by spray drying: role of emulsifiers and emulsifying agent. Dry Technol 25(6):1079–1089
Jafari SM, He Y, Bhandari B (2007b) Production of submicron emulsions by ultrasound and microfluidization techniques. J Food Eng 82(4):478–488
Jafari SM, Assadpoor E, Bhandari B, He Y (2008) Nanoparticle encapsulation of fish oil by spray drying. Food Res Int 41(2):172–183
Jain A, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Ramalingam C (2016) Nanomaterials in food and agriculture: an overview on their safety concerns and regulatory issues. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1160363
Janardan S, Pothini S, Ragul G, Anjaneyulu U, Shivendu R, Dasgupta N, Ramalingam C, Swamiappan S, Vijayakrishna K, Sivaramakrishna A (2016) Assessment on the antibacterial activity of nanosized silica derived from hypercoordinated silicon(iv) precursors. RSC Adv 6(71):66394–66406
Jasińska M, Dmytrów I, Mituniewicz-Małek A, Wąsik K (2010) Cow feeding system versus milk utility for yoghurt manufacture. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment 9(2):189–199
Jin T, Sun D, JY S, Zhang H, Sue HJ (2009) Antimicrobial efficacy of zinc oxide quantum dots against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Food Sci 74(1):M46–M52
Jin T, Gurtler JB (2011) Inactivation of Salmonella in liquid egg albumen by antimicrobial bottle coatings infused with allyl isothiocyanate, nisin and zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Appl Microbiol 110:704–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04938.x
Jincheng W, Xiaoyu Z, Siahao C (2010) Preparation and properties of nanoencapsulated capsaicin by complex coacervation method. Chem Eng Commun 197(7):919–933
Jones PBC (2006) A nanotech revolution in agriculture and the food industry. Information Systems for Biotechnology, Blacksburg. Available from http://www.isb.vt.edu/articles/jun0605.htm. Accessed 19 Apr 2014
Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit KT, Manna AC (2008) Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 279:71–76
Kailasapathy K, Rybka S (1997) L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp.—their therapeutic potential and survival in yoghurt. Aust J Dairy Technol 52:28–35
Kaiser Helmut Consultancy (2004) Study: nanotechnology in food and food processing industry worldwide 2003–2006–2010–2015. Available at www.hkc22.com/Nanofood.html
Karbowiak T, Debeaufort D, Voilley A, Trystram G (2010) From macroscopic to molecular scale investigations of mass transfer of small molecules through edible packaging applied at interfaces of multiphase food products. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 11:352–360
Kentish S, Wooster TJ, Ashokkumar M, Balachandran S, Mawson R, Simons L (2008) The use of ultrasonics for nanoemulsion preparation. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 9(2):170–175
Kriegel C, Kit KM, McClements DJ, Weiss J (2009) Influence of surfactant type and concentration on electrospinning of chitosan–poly(ethylene oxide) blend nanofibers. Food Biophys 4:213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-009-9119-6
Kris-Etherton PM, Hecker KD, Bonanome A, Coval SM, Binkoski AE, Hilpert KF, Griel AE, Etherton TD (2002) Bioactive compounds in foods: their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. Am J Med 11(3-9S2):71–88
Kristo E, Koutsoumanis KP, Biliaderis CG (2008) Thermal, mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of sodium caseinate films containing antimicrobials and their inhibitory action on Listeria monocytogenes. Food Hydrocoll 22:373–386
Kumari A, Yadav SK, Pakade YB, Singh B, Yadav SC (2010) Development of biodegradable nanoparticles for delivery of quercetin. Colloids Surf B:Biointerf 80(2):184–192
Kwon SS, Nam YS, Lee JS, BS K, Han SH, Lee JY, Chang IS (2002) Preparation and characterization of coenzyme Q10-loaded PMMA nanoparticles by a new emulsification process based on microfluidization. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 210:95–104
Leong TSH, Wooster TJ, Kentish SE, Ashokkumar M (2009) Minimising oil droplet size using ultrasonic emulsification. Ultrason Sonochem 16(6):721–727
Leong WF, Lai OM, Long K, Yaakob B, Mana C, Misran M, Tan CP (2011) Preparation and characterisation of water-soluble phytosterol nanodispersions. Food Chem 129(1):77–83
Li Y, YT C, Luo D (2005) Multiplexed detection of pathogen DNA with DNA-based fluorescence nanobarcodes. Nat Biotechnol 23(7):885–889
Li JH, Hong RY, Li MY, Li HZ, Zheng Y, Ding J (2009) Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on the mechanical and antibacterial properties of polyurethane coatings. Prog Org Coat 64(4):504–509
Lin D, Zhao Y (2007) Innovations in the development and application of edible coatings for fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 6(3):60–75
Lin LY, Peng C, Wang H, Chuang C, Yu T, Chen K, Chiu W, Peng RY (2008) Acceleration of maturity of young sorghum (kaoliang) spirits by linking nanogold photocatalyzed process to conventional biological aging—a kinetic approach. Food Bioprocess Technol 1:234–245
Liu F, Wen LX, Li ZZ, Yu W, Sun HY, Chen JF (2006) Porous hollow silica nanoparticles as controlled delivery system for water-soluble pesticide. Mater Res Bull 41(12):2268–2275
Luo Y, Zhang B, Whent M, Yu L, Wang Q (2011) Preparation and characterization of zein/chitosan complex for encapsulation of α-tocopherol, and its in vitro controlled release study. Colloids Surf B: Biointerf 85(2):145–152
Maddinedi SB, Mandal BK, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N (2015) Diastase assisted green synthesis of size-controllable gold nanoparticles. RSC Adv 5(34):26727–26733
Maddinedi SB, Mandal BK, Patil SH, Andhalkar VV, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N (2017) Diastase induced green synthesis of bilayered reduced graphene oxide and its decoration with gold nanoparticles. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 166:252–258
Maftoonazad N, Ramaswamy HS, Marcotte M (2007) Moisture sorption behavior, and effect of moisture content and sorbitol on thermo-mechanical and barrier properties of pectin based edible films. Int J Food Eng 3(4):Article 10. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol3/iss4/art10
Marques PT, Lima AMF, Bianco G, Laurindo JB, Borsali R, Le Meins JF, Soldi V (2006) Thermal properties and stability of cassava starch films crosslinked with tetraethylene glycol diacrylate. Polym Degrad Stab 91(4):726–732
Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdörster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, Tinkle SS, Tran L, Walker NJ, Warheit B (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–269
McLamore ES, Diggs A, Marzal PC, Shi J, Blakeslee JJ, Peer WA, Murphy AS, Porterfield DM (2010) Non-invasive quantification of endogenous root auxin transport using an integrated flux microsensor technique. Plant J 63(6):1004–1016
Mitrakas GE, Koutsoumanis KP, Lazarides HN (2008) Impact of edible coating with or without anti-microbial agent on microbial growth during osmotic dehydration and refrigerated storage of a model plant material. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 9:550–555
Mohammad AW, Ching YN, Ying PL, Gen HN (2012) Ultrafiltration in food processing industry: review on application, membrane fouling, and fouling control. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:1143–1156
Monteiller C, Tran L, MacNee W, Faux S, Jones A, Miller B, Donaldson K (2007) The pro-inflammatory effects of low-toxicity lowsolubility particles, nanoparticles and fine particles, on epithelial cells in vitro: the role of surface area. Occup Environ Med 64:609–615
Moresi M, Lo Presti S (2003) Present and potential applications of membrane processing in the food industry. Ital J Food Sci 15:3–34
Mousavi SR, Rezaei M (2011) Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 1(10):414–419
Mozafari RM, Flanagan J, Matia-Merino L, Awati A, Omri A, Suntres EZ, Singh H (2006) Recent trends in the lipid-based nanoencapsulation of antioxidants and their role in foods. J Sci Food Agric 86:2038e2045
Mukerjee A, Vishwanatha JK (2009) Formulation, characterization and evaluation of curcumin loaded PLGA nanosphere for cancer therapy. J Anticancer Res 29(10):3867–3875
Nakagawa K, Surassmo S, Min SG, Choi MJ (2011) Dispersibility of freeze-dried poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanocapsules stabilized by gelatin and the effect of freezing. J Food Eng 102(2):177–188
Neethirajan S, Jayas DS (2011) Nanotechnology for the food and bioprocessing industries. Food Bioprocess Technol 4:39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0328-2
No HK, Meyres SP, Prinyawiwatkull W, Xu Z (2007) Applications of chitosan for improvement of quality and shelf life of foods: a review. J Food Sci 72:R87–R100
Oberdörster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K, Castranova V, Fitzpatrick J, Ausman K, Carter J, Karn B, Kreyling W, Lai D, Olin S, Monteiro-Riviere N, Warheit D, Yang H (2005) Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Part Fibre Toxicol 2(8):1–35
Ojagh SM, Rezaei M, Razavi SH, Hosseini MH (2010) Effect of chitosan coatings enriched with cinnamon oil on the quality of refrigerated rainbow trout. Food Chem 120:193–198
Otles S, Yalcin B (2010) Nano-biosensors as new tool for detection of food quality and safety. LogForum 6(4):67–70
Ozimek L, Pospiech E, Narine S (2010) Nanotechnologie in food and meat processing. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment 9(4):401–412
Palchetti I, Mascini M (2008) Electroanalytical biosensors and their potential for food pathogen and toxin detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 391:455–471
Park SI, Daeschel MA, Zhao Y (2004) Functional properties of antimicrobial lysozyme-chitosan composite films. J Food Sci 69(8):215–221
Pintado CM, Ferreira MASS, Sousa I (2009) Properties of whey protein-based films containing organic acids and nisin to control Listeria monocytogenes. J Food Prot 72(9):1891–1896
Plexus Institute (2006) New nanotechnology food research—if it glows don’t eat it. http://www.plexusinstitute.org/news-events/show_news.cfm?id=164. Accessed 20 Oct 2016
Pouliot Y (2008) Membrane processes in dairy technology—from a simple idea to worldwide panacea. Int Dairy J 18(7):735–740
Pranoto Y, Rakshit SK, Salokhe VM (2005) Enhancing antimicrobial activity of chitosan films by incorporating garlic oil, potassium sorbate and nisin. LWT Food Sci Technol 38:859–865
Preetz C, Rube A, Reiche I, Hause G, Mader K (2008) Preparation and characterization of biocompatible oil-loaded polyelectrolyte nanocapsules. Nanomedicine: nanotechnology. Biol Med 4(2):106–114
Rai V, Acharya S, Dey N (2012) Implications of nanobiosensors in agriculture. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 3:315–324
Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Chakraborty AR, Samuel SM, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, Kumar A (2014) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies in food industries: opportunities and research trends. J Nanopart Res 16:2464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2464-5
Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Srivastava P, Ramalingam C (2016) A spectroscopic study on interaction between bovine serum albumin and titanium dioxide nanoparticle synthesized from microwave-assisted hybrid chemical approach. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 161:472–481
Ravichandran R (2010) Nanotechnology applications in food and food processing: innovative green approaches, opportunities and uncertainties for global market. Int J Green Nanotechnol Phys Chem 1(2):72–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19430871003684440
Renton A (2006) Welcome to the world of nanofoods. The Observer, London. http://observer.guardian.co.uk/foodmonthly/futureoffood/story/0,,1971266,00.html. Accessed 17 June 2015
Rhim J, Ng PKW (2007) Natural biopolymer-based nanocomposite films for packaging applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 47(4):411–433
Ribeiro C, Vicente AA, Teixeira JA, Miranda C (2007) Optimization of edible coating composition to retard strawberry fruit senescence. Postharvest Biol Technol 44:63–70
Ribeiro HS, Chua BS, Ichikawab S, Nakajima M (2008) Preparation of nanodispersions containing β-carotene by solvent displacement method. Food Hydrocoll 22(1):12–17
Rickman D, Luvall JC, Shaw J, Mask P, Kissel D, Sullivan D (1999) Precision Agriculture: Changing the Face of Farming. www.ghccmsfcnasagove/precisionag/
Rivett J, Speer DV (2009) Oxygen scavenging film with good interplay adhesion. US Patent 75141512 (in English)
Rodriguez A, Nerin C, Batlle R (2008) New cinnamon-based active paper packaging against Rhizopusstolonifer food spoilage. J Agric Food Chem 56(15):6364–6369
Rojas-Grau MA, Bustillos ARD, Friedman M, Henika PR, Martin-Belloso O, Mc Hugh TH (2006) Mechanical, barrier and antimicrobial properties of apple puree edible films containing plant essential oils. J Agric Food Chem 54:9262–9267
Roller S (2003) Introduction. In: Roller (ed) Natural antimicrobials for the minimal processing of foods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–10
Rosenberg M (1995) Current and future applications for membrane processes in the dairy industry. Trends Food Sci Technol 6(1):12–19
Ruiz-Altisenta M, Ruiz-Garciaa L, Moredaa GP, Lub R, Hernandez-Sancheza N, Correaa EC, Diezmaa B, Nicolaïc B, García-Ramosd J (2010) Sensors for product characterization and quality of specialty crops—a review. Comput Electron Agric 74:176–194
Samelis J, Sofos JN (2003) Organic acids. In: Roller (ed) Natural antimicrobials for the minimal processing of foods. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Saxena A, Tripathi BP, Kumar M, Shahi VK (2009) Membrane-based techniques for the separation and purification of proteins: an overview. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 145(1–2):1–22
Sebti I, Martial-Gros A, Carnet-Pantiez A, Grelier S, Coma V (2005) Chitosan polymer as bioactive coating and film against Aspergillus niger contamination. J Food Sci 70(2):100–104
Semo E, Kesselman W, Danino D, Livney YD (2007) Casein micelle as a natural nano-capsular vehicle for nutraceuticals. Food Hydrocoll 21(6):936–942
Shen XL, JM W, Chen Y, Zhao G (2010) Antimicrobial and physical properties of sweet potato starch films incorporated with potassium sorbate or chitosan. Food Hydrocoll 24:285–290
Shukla A, Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Singh S, Chidambram R (2017) Nanotechnology towards prevention of anaemia and osteoporosis: from concept to market. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 31(5):863–879
Silva HD, Cerqueira MA, Souza BWS, Ribeiro C, Avides MC, Quintas MAC, Coimbra JSR, Cunha MGC, Vicente AA (2011) Nanoemulsions of β-carotene using a highenergy emulsification–evaporation technique. J Food Eng 102(2):130–135
Silvestre C, Duraccio D, Cimmino S (2011) Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 36(12):1766–1782
Simões ADN, Tudela JA, Allende A, Puschmann R, Gil MI (2009) Edible coatings containing chitosan and moderate modified atmospheres maintain quality and enhance phytochemicals of carrot sticks. Postharvest Biol Technol 51:364–370
Siripireddy B, Mandal BK, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Ramalingam C (2017) Nano-zirconia – evaluation of its antioxidant and anticancer activity. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 170:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.04.004
Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B (2004) Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci 275:177–182
Sorrentino A, Gorrasi G, Vittoria V (2007) Potential perspectives of bionanocomposites for food packaging applications. Trends Food Sci Technol 18:84–95
Sowasod N, Charinpanitkul ST, Tanthapanichakoon W (2008) Nanoencapsulation of curcumin in biodegradable chitosan via multiple emulsion/solvent evaporation. Int J Pharm 347:93–101
Sozer N, Kokini JL (2009) Nanotechnology and its applications in the food sector. Trends Biotechnol 27(2):82e89
Srinivas PR, Philbert M, Vu TQ, Huang Q, Kokini JL, Saos E, Chen H, Peterson CM, Friedl KE, McDade-Ngutter C, Hubbard V, Starke-Reed P, Miller N, Betz JM, Dwyer J, Milner J, Ross SA (2010) Nanotechnology research: applications in nutritional sciences. J Nutr 140(1):119e124
Stutzenberger FJ, Latour RA, Sun Y, Tzeng T (2007) Adhesin-specific nanoparticles and process for using same. US Patent No 20070184120 (in English)
Surassamo S, Bejrapha P, Min SG, Choi MJ (2010) Effect of surfactants on capsicum oleoresin loaded nanocapsules formulated through emulsion diffusion method. Food Res Int 43(1):8–17
Suyatma NE, Copinet A, Tighzert L, Coma V (2004) Mechanical and barrier properties of biodegradable films made from chitosan and poly (lactic acid) blends. J Polym Environ 12:1–6
Tachaprutinun A, Udomsup T, Luadthong C, Wanichwecharungruang S (2009) Preventing the thermal degradation of astaxanthin through nanoencapsulation. Int J Pharm 374(1–2):119–124
Tammina SK, Mandal BK, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N (2017) Cytotoxicity study of Piper nigrum seed mediated synthesized SnO2 nanoparticles towards colorectal (HCT116) and lung cancer (A549) cell lines. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 166:158–168
Tharanathan RN (2003) Biodegradable films and composite coatings: past, present and future. Trends Food Sci Technol 14:71–78
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (2015) Nanoscale Science and Engineering for Agriculture and Food Systems. http://nifa.usda.gov/program/food-science-technology-programs. Accessed on 15th July 2015
Tiyaboonchai W, Tungpradit W, Plianbangchang P (2007) Formulation and characterization of curcuminoids loaded solid lipid nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 337(1–2):299–306
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2014) Food safety for moms-to-be: medical professionals – foodborne pathogens. http://www.fda.gov/food/resourcesforyou/healtheducators/ucm091681.htm
Vargas M, Albors A, Chiralt A, González-Maríınez C (2006) Quality of cold-stored strawberries as affected by chitosan–oleic acid edible coatings. Postharvest Biol Technol 41:164–171
Vargas M, Pastor C, Chiralt A, McClements DJ, González- Martínez C (2008) Recent advances in edible coatings for fresh and minimally processed fruits. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 48(6):496–511
Vásconez MB, Flores SK, Campos CA, Alvarado J, Gerschenson LN (2009) Antimicrobial activity and physical properties of chitosan–tapioca starch based edible films and coatings. Food Res Int 42(7):762–769
Vashist SK (2007) A review of microcantilevers for sensing applications. J Nanotechnol online 3. https://doi.org/10.2240/azojono0115
Vicentini DS, AJr S, Laranjeira MCM (2010) Chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) films containing ZnO nanoparticles and plasticizers. Mater Sci Eng C 30(4):503–508
Walia N, Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Chen L, Ramalingam C (2017) Fish oil based vitamin D nanoencapsulation by ultrasonication and bioaccessibility analysis in simulated gastro-intestinal tract. Ultrason Sonochem 39:623–635
Wang L, Li X, Zhang G, Dong J, Eastoe J (2007a) Oil-in-water nanoemulsions for pesticide formulations. J Colloid Interface Sci 314(1):230–235
Wang J, Zhou G, Chen C, Yu H, Wang T, Ma Y, Jia G, Gao Y, Li B, Sun J, Li Y, Jiao F, Zhao Y, Chai Z (2007b) Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different sized titanium dioxide particles in mice after oral administration. Toxicol Lett 168(2):176–185
Wang JC, Chen SH, ZC X (2008a) Synthesis and properties research on the nanocapsulated capsaicin by simple coacervation method. J Dispers Sci Technol 29(5):687–695
Wang X, Jiang Y, Wang YW, Huang MT, Hoa CT, Huang Q (2008b) Enhancing anti-inflammation activity of curcumin through O/W nanoemulsions. Food Chem 108(2):419–424
Weiss J, Takhistov P, McClements DJ (2006) Functional materials in food nanotechnology. J Food Sci 71(9):107–116
Wenner M (2008) Magnifying taste: new chemicals trick the brain into eating less. Scientific American Magazine:96–99
Xing F, Cheng G, Yi K, Ma L (2004) Nanoencapsulation of capsaicin by complex coacervation of gelatin, acacia, and tannins. J Appl Polym Sci 96(6):2225–2229
Xu YX, Kimb KM, Hanna MA, Nag D (2005) Chitosan–starch composite film: preparation and characterization. Ind Crop Prod 21:185–192
Yuan Y, Gao Y, Mao L, Zhao J (2008a) Optimisation of conditions for the preparation of β-carotene nanoemulsions using response surface methodology. Food Chem 107(3):1300–1306
Yuan Y, Yanxiang G, Zhao J, Mao L (2008b) Characterization and stability evaluation of β-carotene nanoemulsions prepared by high pressure homogenization under various emulsifying conditions. Food Res Int 41(1):61–68
Zhao X, Hilliard LR, Mechrey SJ, Wang Y, Bagwe RP, Jin S, Tan W (2004) A rapid bioassay for single bacterial cell quantitation using bioconjugated nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:15027–15032
Zhao R, Torley P, Halley PJ (2008) Emerging biodegradable materials: starch- and protein-based bio-nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 43:3058–3071
Zhao L, Xiong H, Peng H, Wang Q, Han D, Bai C, Liu Y, Shi S, Deng B (2011) PEG-coated lyophilized pro-liposomes: preparation, characterizations and in vitro release evaluation of vitamin E. Eur Food Res Technol 232(4):647–654
Ziani K, Fernandez Pan I, Royo M, Maté J (2009) Antifungal activity of films and solutions based on chitosan. Food Hydrocoll 23:2309–2314
Zimet P, Livney YD (2009) Beta-lactoglobulin and its nanocomplexes with pectin as vehicles for ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Food Hydrocoll 23(4):1120–1126
Zivanovic S, Chi S, Draughon AF (2005) Antimicrobial activity of chitosan films enriched with essential oils. J Food Sci 70:M45–M51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb09045.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ingale, A.G., Chaudhari, A.N. (2018). Nanotechnology in the Food Industry. In: Gothandam, K., Ranjan, S., Dasgupta, N., Ramalingam, C., Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Nanotechnology, Food Security and Water Treatment. Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70166-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70166-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70165-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70166-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)