Abstract
Targeted parathyroidectomy is indicated for primary hyperparathyroidism when the parathyroid adenoma has been preoperatively localized on imaging. Various minimal and remote-access techniques have been described though no approach has been shown to be overwhelmingly superior.
The latest addition to the armamentarium of head and neck and endocrine surgeons is single-port transaxillary robotic parathyroidectomy. The robotic technique overcomes the technical limitations associated with conventional endoscopic surgery. This novel technique has equivalent results in terms of cure compared to preexisting techniques. The primary advantage is the avoidance of a neck scar by concealing it in the axilla.
In this chapter, we present in a step-by-step pictorial narrative the surgical technique for single-port transaxillary robotic parathyroidectomy and also discuss important issues around this advanced remote-access targeted parathyroidectomy technique.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
-
1.
Preoperative considerations
-
2.
Informed consent
-
3.
Patient positioning
-
4.
Surgical equipment
-
5.
Transaxillary access to the neck
-
6.
Preparation of the robotic field
-
7.
Robotic surgery
-
8.
Postoperative care and follow-up
-
9.
Surgical complications
-
10.
Mentoring and proctorship
11.1 Preoperative Considerations
As with all surgical operations, patient selection is paramount. Prior to offering the approach to a patient, a multidisciplinary evaluation with an endocrinologist and radiologist is mandatory. This is to confirm the presence of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT), localize the adenoma, and exclude conditions such as vitamin D deficiency or familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH) which do not require surgical intervention [1].
Single-port transaxillary robotic parathyroidectomy (RP) constitutes an advanced remote-access targeted parathyroidectomy approach. When considering the indications, the approach is an option when a single adenoma has been clearly identified and there is concordance between different imaging modalities. To minimize the risk of failure and need for revision surgery, we advocate triple modality concordance using ultrasonography, sestamibi scintigraphy, and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT).
Adenoma size is not a limitation nor is adenoma location. With the exception of giant parathyroid adenomas that are exquisitely rare, parathyroid adenomas are usually relatively small [2]. Ectopic parathyroid adenomas located in the mediastinum and retropharyngeal space have also been successfully removed using the robotic technique. However, access to these locations is not the same (thoracoscopic and transoral routes, respectively) and beyond the scope of this chapter [3,4,5,6,7].
Other important considerations prior to offering RP include body habitus, comorbidities, and patient psyche. A list of contraindications to RP is presented in Table 11.1.
The ideal RP patient would be slim with a preoperatively localized parathyroid adenoma. Individuals with a predisposition to hypertrophic scarring and keloid formation are ideal candidates as the avoidance of a neck scar is particularly desirable [8].
11.2 Informed Consent
Informed consent is undertaken by the attending surgeon. RP may be offered as an alternative to the conventional cervical approach, and both options should be discussed with the patient.
The risks associated with RP are the same as for conventional parathyroidectomy with regard to the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), infection, hematoma, seroma, persistent hyperparathyroidism, and need for revision surgery. The literature does not support an increased infection rate with RP compared to cervical parathyroidectomy [9].
Additional points that should be explained to the patient include the fact that there will still be a scar though this will be concealed in the axilla. Moreover, it is very likely that they will experience dysesthesia on the chest over the area that the subcutaneous flap has been raised. This almost always resolves though may take several months. Pain is not a particular problem with RP [9, 10]. The patient should also be made aware of the risk of brachial plexus neurapraxia. This is rare and becomes almost a “theoretical” risk when the ipsilateral arm is placed in the “extended salute” position (see Sect. 3, “Patient Positioning”).
With regard to the latter risks (axillary scar, dysesthesia on chest, and potential for brachial plexus neurapraxia) and the prolonged operative time, it should be made clear to the patient that these are specific to RP and not associated with conventional parathyroidectomy so that they can subsequently make an informed decision. The inpatient stay and time off work are similar to the conventional open technique [9, 11].
11.3 Patient Positioning
It is important to position the patient’s ipsilateral arm when they are awake in order to ensure comfort and thus minimize the risk of traction on the brachial plexus (and associated neurapraxia) [12]. The ipsilateral arm must be free of identification bracelets, lines, blood pressure cuffs, or EKG leads. Arm positioning involves the back of the patient’s hand touching the central portion of the forehead, in an “extended salute” position (Fig. 11.1). This has been shown to minimize the risk of brachial plexus neurapraxia [13].
A 5–6 cm axillary incision is also marked at this point as in our experience this is the optimal way to plan where to place the incision to prevent subsequent migration. The incision may need to be extended superiorly in a curvilinear fashion so that it sits in a natural skin crease. This reduces tension and a tendency toward hypertrophic and pigmented scarring. Laterality (side of surgery) is indicated by a skin marker (arrow).
Following this, the anesthesiologist intubates the patient and ventilates them via a transoral endotracheal tube with electrodes (NIM EMG Endotracheal Tube, Medtronic, Inc., Jacksonville, FL). The correct positioning of the NIM EMG endotracheal tube with the electrodes at the level of the glottis is confirmed by direct laryngoscopy. Visualization of the electromyographic waveform on the nerve integrity monitor (NIM) following insertion of the stimulator and earth leads serves as additional confirmation. An extended tip of the NIM must be available due to the long distance between the axillary incision and neck. At induction, the patient is routinely administered intravenously 1.2 g co-amoxiclav and 4 mg dexamethasone.
Contrary to conventional parathyroid surgery, a shoulder roll is not placed under the shoulders as this leads to neck extension moving the parathyroid adenoma away from the robotic instruments. Instead, a pillow is placed under the patient’s head and shoulders to provide adequate and comfortable support in a subtle “sniffing the morning air” position. The head of the table is then dropped to about 20° to widen the angle between the arm and chest.
11.6 Preparation of the Robotic Field
11.7 Robotic Surgery
Following docking of the da Vinci surgical robot, the instruments are placed through their corresponding ports in the respective robotic arms. Initially, provided the robotic surgeon is right-handed, the fenestrated bipolar forceps is placed in the right (first) robotic arm and the 5 mm Maryland dissector in the left (second) one. In the third robotic arm, the DeBakey forceps is placed which can be interchanged with the clutch on the robotic platform with the fenestrated bipolar forceps. Once the parathyroid adenoma and its pedicle are delineated, this can be replaced with the Harmonic shears so that the robotic surgeon has a combination of 5 mm Maryland, DeBakey, and Harmonic shears for dissection and hemostasis. In the fourth arm, the 8 mm ProGrasp is inserted and placed under the endoscope to contralaterally retract the thyroid lobe.
The different stages of the robotic dissection are presented in a step-by-step narrative in Figs. 11.18, 11.19, 11.20, 11.21, 11.22, 11.23, and 11.24.
Following delivery of the parathyroid adenoma, this is sent for histopathological analysis. We do not routinely use intraoperative quick PTH (iQPTH) monitoring as all RP cases in our endocrine surgery tertiary referral center undergo an intensive multidisciplinary preoperative workup and only patients with triple modality concordance are considered for this approach. This is precisely to minimize the risk of persistent hyperparathyroidism and subsequent need for revision surgery (see Sect. 1, “Preoperative Considerations”). We do however use iQPTH routinely if no triple modality concordance exists or there is any other doubt about adenoma location or the presence of parathyroid hyperplasia, though, as already discussed, such patients would not constitute candidates for robotic surgery. In the presence of preoperative triple modality concordance, iQPTH monitoring can be safely omitted when performing focused parathyroidectomy for most cases of pHPT [17, 18].
As with all parathyroid surgery, hemostasis should be meticulous. The anesthesiologist is asked to bring the blood pressure up to normal and a reversed Trendelenburg position and Valsalva maneuver applied. Any remaining bleeding points are addressed at this stage to ensure hemostasis. As in conventional parathyroid surgery, no drain is applied. We have not found this to be a problem.
Following hemostasis, the da Vinci robot is withdrawn and 2-layer closure completed with 4-0 subcuticular Vicryl Rapide sutures (Ethicon Products, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Cincinnati, OH) followed by application of Dermabond (Ethicon Products, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Cincinnati, OH) tissue glue on the wound (Fig. 11.25). An anterior chest wall compression dressing is applied overnight (Fig. 11.26).
11.8 Postoperative Care and Follow-Up
Patients are discharged the following morning once corrected calcium and PTH levels have been checked and confirmed to be normal (<24 h hospital stay). They are advised to wear a sports bra or vest for 2 weeks to provide light compression to the anterior chest wall. Antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 625 mg three times a day) are routinely given for 7 days and analgesia (acetaminophen 1 g four times a day for 7 days) as required. Regular follow-up at 2 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months allows prospective long-term evaluation.
11.9 Surgical Complications
As discussed, the risks associated with RP are the same as for conventional parathyroidectomy with regard to the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), infection, hematoma, seroma, persistent hyperparathyroidism, and need for revision surgery. Thus, preventing and managing those complications involves the same measures as in conventional parathyroid surgery. The only exception relates to the prevention of hematoma and seroma where following wound closure, an anterior chest wall compression dressing is applied overnight. The next morning, this is removed, and the patient is advised to wear a sports bra or vest for 2 weeks to provide light compression to the anterior chest wall.
This section will address those complications that relate specifically to RP. These are dysesthesia on the chest over the area of the subcutaneous flap and brachial plexus neurapraxia.
Regarding dysesthesia over the chest wall, it is important to mention this to the patient before surgery so that they expect it. As a matter of fact, this is not a complication but a natural occurrence following subcutaneous flap elevation. All patients will experience this to a certain extent. It is equally important to explain to the patient that it almost always resolves though can take several months to do so. Pain is not a particular problem with RP [9, 10].
The other risk is brachial plexus neurapraxia. Patients need to be also made aware of this, but at the same time, they need to be explained so that this is exquisitely rare, provided the correct preventative measures have been employed. These are described below.
The key to preventing brachial plexus neurapraxia is by placing the arm in the “correct” position and maintaining this for the duration of the operation. The reason for this is that the mechanism underlining this complication involves hyperextension of the brachial plexus. By “correct” we mean a position where the ipsilateral arm is comfortable for the patient while ensuring optimal transaxillary access to the neck. The only way to achieve this is by positioning the patient’s arm when they are awake in order to assess for comfort (and thus prevent hyperextension of the brachial plexus) [12]. The position we advise for the arm is the “extended salute” position described in detail in Fig. 11.1. This position shortens the distance between the incision site and parathyroid adenoma by elevating and externally rotating the clavicle whilst protecting the brachial plexus from traction. A Velcro coin is attached to the hand and forehead to maintain the position during surgery.
As part of the routine postoperative check in the recovery room, it is vital not only to ask the patient for any abnormal sensation or weakness along their arm but also formally assess the neurovascular status of their upper limb. If any neurological deficit or shoulder stiffness is identified that has not resolved by the next morning, it is paramount to involve a physiotherapist at an early stage, i.e., prior to discharge to teach the patient what exercises to do daily and follow them up on an outpatient basis until full resolution occurs.
11.10 Mentoring and Proctorship
The most important influence on outcomes in parathyroid surgery is the experience and volume of the surgeon [19]. Thus, mentoring and proctorship are vital to optimize surgical results and minimize complications [20].
RP should only be undertaken by appropriately trained surgeons with sufficient experience in parathyroid surgery employed in high-volume institutions that possess the necessary equipment and access to technical support [11]. Finally, there needs to be a dedicated robotic nursing team too with the appropriate training and experience so as to enhance the performance of the robotic team.
References
Tolley N, Arora A, Palazzo F, Garas G, Dhawan R, Cox J, Darzi A. Robotic-assisted parathyroidectomy: a feasibility study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(6):859–66.
Garas G, Poulasouchidou M, Dimoulas A, Hytiroglou P, Kita M, Zacharakis E. Radiological considerations and surgical planning in the treatment of giant parathyroid adenomas. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97(4):e64–6.
Bearelly S, Prendes BL, Wang SJ, Glastonbury C, Orloff LA. Transoral robotic-assisted surgical excision of a retropharyngeal parathyroid adenoma: a case report. Head Neck. 2015;37(11):E150–2.
Bodner J, Profanter C, Prommegger R, Greiner A, Margreiter R, Schmid T. Mediastinal parathyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot: presentation of a new technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(6):1831–2.
Chan AP, Wan IY, Wong RH, Hsin MK, Underwood MJ. Robot-assisted excision of ectopic mediastinal parathyroid adenoma. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2010;18(1):65–7.
Ismail M, Maza S, Swierzy M, Tsilimparis N, Rogalla P, Sandrock D, Ruckert RI, Muller JM, Ruckert JC. Resection of ectopic mediastinal parathyroid glands with the da Vinci robotic system. Br J Surg. 2010;97(3):337–43.
Van Dessel E, Hendriks JM, Lauwers P, Ysebaert D, Ruyssers Jr N, Van Schil PE. Mediastinal parathyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot. Innovations (Phila). 2011;6(4):262–4.
Arora A, Swords C, Garas G, Chaidas K, Prichard A, Budge J, Davies DC, Tolley N. The perception of scar cosmesis following thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016;25:38–43.
Tolley N, Garas G, Palazzo F, Prichard A, Chaidas K, Cox J, Darzi A, Arora A. Long-term prospective evaluation comparing robotic parathyroidectomy with minimally invasive open parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Head Neck. 2014;38 Suppl 1:E300–6.
Garas G, Holsinger FC, Grant DG, Athanasiou T, Arora A, Tolley N. Is robotic parathyroidectomy a feasible and safe alternative to targeted open parathyroidectomy for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism? Int J Surg. 2015;15:55–60.
Garas G, Arora A, Tolley N. Robotic surgery of the parathyroid glands. In: Grillone GA, Jalisi S, editors. Robotic surgery of the head and neck a comprehensive guide. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 133–46.
Chung WY. Pros of robotic transaxillary thyroid surgery: its impact on cancer control and surgical quality. Thyroid. 2012;22(10):986–7.
Arora A, Garas G, Sharma S, Muthuswamy K, Budge J, Palazzo F, Darzi A, Tolley N. Comparing transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy with conventional surgery in a UK population: a case control study. Int J Surg. 2016;27:110–7.
Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(11):2399–406.
Foley CS, Agcaoglu O, Siperstein AE, Berber E. Robotic transaxillary endocrine surgery: a comparison with conventional open technique. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2259–66.
Garas G, Okabayashi K, Ashrafian H, Shetty K, Palazzo F, Tolley N, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Zacharakis E. Which hemostatic device in thyroid surgery? A network meta-analysis of surgical technologies. Thyroid. 2013;23(9):1138–50.
Mownah OA, Pafitanis G, Drake WM, Crinnion JN. Contemporary surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism without intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97(8):603–7.
Soyder A, Unubol M, Omurlu IK, Guney E, Ozbas S. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy without using intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring or gamma probe. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2015;31(1):9–14.
Stavrakis AI, Ituarte PH, Ko CY, Yeh MW. Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery. Surgery. 2007;142(6):887–899; discussion 887–99.
Athanasiou T, Patel V, Garas G, Ashrafian H, Shetty K, Sevdalis N, Panzarasa P, Darzi A, Paroutis S. Mentoring perception and academic performance: an Academic Health Science Centre survey. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92(1092):597–602.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garas, G., Darzi, A., Arora, A., Tolley, N. (2017). Single-Port Transaxillary Robotic Parathyroidectomy. In: Gil, Z., Amit, M., Kupferman, M. (eds) Atlas of Head and Neck Robotic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49578-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49578-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49576-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49578-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)