Abstract
Plant defence strategies start at the plant cell plasma membrane, where volatile organic compounds (VOCs) induced by insect herbivores or plant pathogens interact chemically and trigger plant signalling molecules. The earliest plant responses for the perception of VOCs are ion flux imbalances generated in the plant cell plasma membrane at the perception zone. This different charge distribution generates variation in the plasma transmembrane potential (V m), which is the first event preceding the regulation of signal transduction pathways and gene expression. Change in the V m can be through either an increase (hyperpolarization) or a decrease (depolarization) in the membrane potential. Here, we review recent advances in electrophysiological methods for the study of the early events of VOC perception and the correlation between V m depolarization and plant signal transduction pathways leading to changes in gene expression.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Plasma membrane potential
- Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
- Herbivores
- Pathogens
- Electrophysiology
- Early events
1 Introduction
The plasma membrane represents the sensing element that recognizes changes in the cell-surrounding environment and starts cascades of electric signalling, eventually resulting in specific plant responses. Leaf damage, infection by plant pathogens, and feeding by insect herbivores induce the delivery of elicitors or the generation of plant cell wall-derived elicitors that may bind to specific receptors in the plant plasma membrane. Emerging evidence indicates that many high-affinity receptors for insect herbivores (Maffei et al. 2007a, 2012), plant pathogens (Elmore and Coaker 2011), and allelochemicals (Roshchina 2001) are located in the plant cell plasma membrane. The elicitor–receptor interaction results in variation in the plasma transmembrane potential (V m), which is defined as the difference in the electrochemical gradient between the interior and exterior of the plant cell. This variation can lead to either more positive (depolarization) or more negative (hyperpolarization) V m values, and these events eventually lead to the generation of signalling cascades.
Intercellular plasma membrane depolarization was recorded in Nitella sp. cells for the first time in 1930, earlier than the first intracellular electrical signal recording in animal cells (Nastuk and Hodgkin 1950; Tasaki 1952). Recently, most of the chemistry of the neuromotoric system of animals has been found in plants; for example, neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine and cellular messengers and cellular motors such as calmodulin and actin (Cao et al. 2006). Although this nerve-like cellular machinery never develops the same degree of complexity as in animal nerves, a simple plant neural network is formed, especially within phloem cells, which is responsible for the symplastic plasmodesmata-mediated communication over long distances (Fromm and Lautner 2007; Bricchi et al. 2013). Despite the direct effect of herbivore or microbial elicitors, plant membranes can also respond to VOCs either produced by the same plant or emitted by neighboring plants. Here, we summarize recent research on V m variation as a common event of plant–VOC interactions. We will start this overview by describing the techniques currently used in plant electrophysiology to detect V m variation.
2 Electrophysiological Methods for the Evaluation of V m Variations
The system we currently use to measure V m in leaf segments is the result of many technical tests, which eventually gave a useful set of electrical, electronic, and hydraulic instruments for conducting on-line (or real-time) recording of electrical variation in plant plasma transmembrane potential. This system was initially developed to measure membrane potential variations upon the effect of the phytoalexin isosakuranetin (5,7-dihydroxy 4′-methoxy flavanone) on potassium uptake in wheat root segments (Sacco and Maffei 1997) and the allelopathic effects of Mentha x piperita essential oil and monoterpenes on cucumber root membrane potential (Maffei et al. 2001). The system consists mainly of a homemade block constructed from Plexiglas, a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) polymer, or Teflon, a more inert polymer of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and some wells and sockets as shown in Fig. 12.1. We use this block to perfuse specific chemicals (including plant volatiles) dissolved in a buffer through a leaf segment, which allows electrophysiological measurements to be made from living tissues. A small square section of a leaf is incubated in a fresh buffer and then placed in the central socket of the block, and the V m is measured as described in Fig. 12.1. A peristaltic pump—normally operating at a speed of 1 ml min−1—pumps the buffer through the system. The core of the equipment is the electrical circuit, which allows V m measurement. In order to measure V m, we use very fine tipped (2–3 μm) borosilicate glass capillaries (WPI Inc, model 1B150F-4), which are made with a capillary puller (Nareshige model PE-21) and filled with a 3 M KCl solution diluted with ultrapure water (Millipore) (Maffei et al. 2004). Due to the very fine tip, the 3 M KCl solution in the inner part of the glass electrode permits an efficient electrical conductance with a very low (fM) loss of ions from the electrode to the cellular matrix. Glass microelectrodes are directly connected to a probe (WPI Inc.) by means of an electrode holder (WPI Inc.); this probe does the first step of cleaning and stabilizing the signal and is connected to a signal amplifier (WPI Inc.; e.g., model Electro 705). The amplifier takes the electrical signal coming from the cell and brings it amplified, cleaned, and stabilized to an oscilloscope (e.g., Tektronics model TDS 210), for further digital elaboration and data storage. The signal is measured and recorded in mV. The oscilloscope also allows visualizing the wave of the electrical signal, the shape of which gives important information about cell condition, electrode integrity, and, in general, the electrical conditions of the entire system. The oscilloscope is also plugged to the ground, to complete the electrical circuit; ground is represented by the silver wire solenoid in the well. The ground is a special silver–silver chloride electrode, which acts as a signal transducer by converting ionic currents in a solution to an electric current within a wire, the same operation done by the probe attached to the glass electrode.
All instruments and electrical devices are very sensitive to both physical vibration and environmental electrical noises; thus all equipment is mounted on a stable work table, electrically grounded, and kept in a Faraday cage; all cables and wires, when not shielded properly, are wrapped with aluminum foil in order to reduce noise. Obtaining a good V m is a very delicate operation, and the use of a micromanipulator, which can move in three directions, is fundamental. A stereo microscope or a special video camera is also needed in order to see exactly where to position the electrode onto the leaf tissue. Data recording is performed on a normal paper recorder or directly to a computer equipped with data logger software.
V m can also be recorded in intact plant leaves. Therefore, we developed a chamber where molecules diffused in air can be focussed on leaves. Figure 12.2 shows how a plant cutting bearing entire leaves can be analyzed. The membrane potential is captured with a glass electrode that is positioned directly on a leaf that is fixed on a holder. The V m of intact plant tissue is measured with two glass micropipettes filled with 3 M KCl and with a tip resistance of 4–10 MΩ. With the help of a micromanipulator, the first electrode is inserted into the mesophyll cells of the leaf. The electrode is then connected to a probe and to the amplifier. The position of the second electrode depends on the experimental setup. When the experiment utilizes a potted plant, the electrode is inserted into the plant stem phloem cells using a micromanipulator and is then connected to the ground port (Fig. 12.3) (Zebelo et al. 2012). When the experiment is with a plant cutting (Fig. 12.2), the plant cutting’s stem is immersed in an ionic solution in a Teflon well. A salt bridge allows the plant to be in contact with the ground through a special coiled silver–silver chloride electrode, which acts as a signal transducer by converting ionic currents in the solution to an electric current within a wire connected to the ground port of the oscilloscope (Maffei and Bossi 2006).
3 Mechanisms of Electrical Signalling
Now that we have shown how to detect V m variation in plants, we will turn our attention to the known electrical signalling mechanisms that plants adopt to respond to insect and pathogen attacks, and in the perception of VOCs. In principle, the systemic signalling induced by biotic stressors and volatile signals is transduced by either chemical or electrical signals (Heil and Silva Bueno 2007; Maffei et al. 2007b; Mithöfer et al. 2009; Zebelo and Maffei 2012b; Zimmermann et al. 2009). Three broad mechanisms are recognized for the transmission of electrical signals, those involving action potentials (APs), variation potentials (VPs), and system potentials (SPs).
Action Potentials
In higher plants, action potentials (APs) are defined generically as a long distance signalling system that may act to potentiate a host response to subsequent signals delivered through alternative long distance information packages. An AP is a momentary change in electrical potential of plant cells in response to environmental stimuli that eventually leads to intercellular and intracellular communication. A number of substances strongly depolarize the plasma membrane and thus presumably activate (voltage-gated) ion channels. Excitation of APs in plant cells depends on Ca2+, Cl−, and K+ ions (Zebelo and Maffei 2012a; Zimmermann et al. 2009; Felle and Zimmermann 2007). Felle and Zimmermann (2007) showed that although in principle it is possible that (anion) channels are directly activated by depolarization, the temporal sequence of the ion flux kinetics of barley leaves shows that Ca2+ is lost from the apoplast well before apoplastic anion concentration (measured as Cl−) starts to increase. Therefore, channel activity is involved in APs, and the more the channels are activated the more rapid the depolarization will be, eventually leading to an accelerated depolarization that is measured as membrane potential “break-through,” typical of an AP. When plasma membrane depolarization reaches a certain critical threshold level, AP is generated according to the “all or none” rule (Pyatygin et al. 2008). Like herbivores (and their oral secretions) and plant pathogens (and their elicitors), volatile signalling is known to cause APs, which usually appear as a single pulse; in rare cases, several repeated pulses are generated during VOC perception, and then APs propagate along the conducting bundles beyond the area of its generation. APs generated by VOCs propagate as fast electrical signals that travel through the entire plant from the point of VOC interception (Zebelo et al. 2012). APs generated by herbivory propagate at a speed up to 40 m s−1 (Volkov and Mwesigwa 2000). Using the aphid technique, Fromm and Bauer (1994) measured electric and cold-shock triggered APs in maize sieve tubes travelling at 3–5 cm s−1. In the presence of leaf-feeding larvae of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata), the speed at which insect-induced APs moved downward through the stem was about 0.05 cm s−1 (Fig. 12.4). Zebelo and coworkers demonstrated that herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) trigger APs and VPs on nearby receiver plants (Zebelo et al. 2012).
Since APs are released by agents added in a realistic concentration range, it is suggested that they may serve as the first and fast systemic signals following attack from pathogens (Felle and Zimmermann 2007). Indeed, APs with a complete Ca2+ signature are required for activation of plant defence responses against pathogens (Blume et al. 2000). Similar Ca2+ signatures were recorded in tomato plants exposed to herbivore-induced plant volatiles and synthetic VOCs (Zebelo et al. 2012). Figure 12.4 shows a typical configuration of apparatus for measurement of APs upon herbivory.
Variation Potentials
Variation potentials (VPs) are defined as slow oscillations of the plasma transmembrane potential. In plants, VPs are characterized by amplitudes and speeds that decrease with increasing distance from the site injured by insect herbivores (Maffei and Bossi 2006) or plant pathogen infection (Elmore and Coaker 2011; Bricchi et al. 2012). While APs do not carry much information about the nature or intensity of the damage caused by the insect herbivore or plant pathogen infection, VPs are modulated in amplitude as well as in their interdependent ion fluxes, from which the plant or the affected organ may be able to gain information about the nature and intensity of the biotic injury (Zebelo and Maffei 2012a). V m changes upon biotic stress have been associated with other important signalling events such as intracellular Ca2+ concentration variations (see below) and oxidative stress caused by either H2O2 or NO (Maffei et al. 2004; Maischak et al. 2007; Zebelo and Maffei 2012a; Bricchi et al. 2010). Mechanically damaged Lima bean leaves react fast and dramatically to H2O2 by undergoing a strong V m depolarization. However, leaves wounded by the herbivore Spodoptera littoralis already show a reduced starting V m with the consequence of a dramatically lower or even no responsiveness to H2O2 application (Maffei et al. 2006). Thus, the depolarization of the V m by the action of herbivory is linked to a reduction in downstream responses of attacked leaves to signalling molecules such as H2O2 and NO (Bricchi et al. 2010).
Manipulation of VPs by pathogens might result in significant lowering of host tissue responses and activation of defence. For instance, in Arabidopsis thaliana, significant VP variations were recorded after sixteen hours of Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 infection. At the same time, a large number of defence genes were downregulated including the respiratory burst oxidase protein C (RbohC)/NADPH oxidase (At5g51060), NADP-dependent oxidoreductase (At5g16960), universal stress protein (USP) family protein (At3g62550), mechanosensitive ion channel domain-containing protein (At1g53470), and a MATE efflux protein (At1g58340) (Bricchi et al. 2012).
Herbivorous insects and their oral secretions, plant pathogens and their elicitors, as well as volatile signalling are known to cause both APs and VPs, but it is still unclear whether herbivorous insects and volatile signalling can cause SPs (Bricchi et al. 2013; Maffei et al. 2007b; Zebelo and Maffei 2012b). SPs have recently been described as novel electrical long distance apoplastic signals in plants induced by wounding and acting as a forerunner of slower travelling chemical signals (Zebelo and Maffei 2012a; Zimmermann et al. 2009). SPs serve as a backup to APs and VPs and overlap with APs and VPs in some instances. Having this brief background about SPs, it is hard to exclude the occurrence of SPs during volatile signalling (Zebelo and Maffei 2012a).
4 Generation of Electrical Signals Upon Biotic Stress
4.1 The Plant Plasma Transmembrane Potential (V m) Responds to Biotic Stress
Plant defence strategies against biotic stressors are generally orchestrated as a network of perception systems, which start at the front line of damage (the plasma membrane) where insect herbivores or plant pathogens interact with plants physically (by mechanical damage) and chemically (by introducing elicitors or triggering plant-derived signalling molecules). There a fast state change (the V m variation) triggers gene expression-independent reactions, eventually leading to the activation of signalling pathways able to affect the cell, its surroundings, and the whole plant, with concerted local and systemic responses. In contrast to hydraulic, mechanical, and hormonal signal transduction, electrical signals are able to deliver fast information over long distances. To better understand the role of V m variation as a triggering event, we will address some key questions on (i) how the plasma transmembrane potential (V m) responds to biotic stress and (ii) how ion channels and transporters are involved in the perturbation of the chemiosmotic balance.
As stated above, the cell plasma membrane is the only cellular component with direct contact to the environment and represents the sensing element able to recognize changes and to initiate cascades of events eventually leading to specific responses. Changes in V m or modulation of ion fluxes at the plasma membrane level are among the fastest cellular responses to biotic and abiotic stresses (Shabala and Bose 2012; Maffei et al. 2007a). The candidate ion species responsible for V m variations in plant cells upon biotic stress are calcium (Ca+2), protons (H+), potassium (K+), and chlorine (Cl−1).
Herbivory-Dependent V m Variations
Herbivory-dependent V m variations result from the combination of two concomitant processes: (1) the mechanical damage of the plant tissues and (2) the introduction of oral secretion (OS) of the feeding insect into wounded tissues. Thus, the attacked plant faces both a mechanical and a chemical challenge (Bricchi et al. 2010; Mithöfer et al. 2009). Application of insect OS to a mechanical injury can mimic most plant responses to herbivory (Reymond et al. 2004), suggesting that OS elicitors are major contributing factors to a plant recognizing insect attacks (Bricchi et al. 2012; Consales et al. 2012; Maffei et al. 2012). Indeed, several elicitors have been isolated from insect OS that trigger plant defences against herbivory, such as β-glucosidase (Mattiacci et al. 1995), volicitin (a fatty acid–amino acid conjugate) (Halitschke et al. 2001), caeliferins (Alborn et al. 2007), inceptins (Schmelz et al. 2006), and a still uncharacterized polysaccharide elicitor (Bricchi et al. 2013). Lepidopteran OS consists of mandibular and other labial secretions, glandular secretions from the ventral eversible gland, and regurgitate from the digestive tract (Felton 2008; Zebelo and Maffei 2012b). In the S. littoralis–Phaseolus lunatus interaction, both direct herbivory and the insect's oral secretions have been demonstrated to induce a fast plant cell V m depolarization (Bricchi et al. 2010, 2012; Maffei and Bossi 2006; Maffei et al. 2004), and the same response was shown when S. littoralis was feeding on other higher plant species such as A. thaliana (Zebelo and Maffei 2012b; Bricchi et al. 2013) and Ginkgo biloba (Mohanta et al. 2012) and lower plant species such as the fern Pteris vittata (Imbiscuso et al. 2009). Interestingly, a significant V m depolarization was observed at almost every stylet puncture during phloem feeding by Myzus persicae (Bricchi et al. 2012).
During insect-elicited V m variations, the plant cell responds with a V m depolarization, the duration of which depends on the nature of the biotic attack. For instance, the V m depolarization is much more rapid in response to feeding by S. littoralis (30 min) than by the aphid Myzus persicae (4–6 h) (Bricchi et al. 2012). Irrespective of the nature of the biotroph, this event occurs at the same intensity, which in Arabidopsis corresponds to a V m depolarization of about 40 mV. The different timing of V m depolarization appears to be associated with the mode of biotic damage. The fast clipping and consistent plant tissue removal by chewing herbivores evidently induces a “quantitative” response that is proportional to the amount of tissue damage; however, stylet probing and phloem feeding by aphids induces less damage, which requires more time for a plant response. This implies that the speed of the V m response allows setting a time scale for conducting comparative genome-wide analyses. In fact, in Arabidopsis, a clear relationship between V m depolarization and gene expression was found. When genome analyses were conducted at the point of V m depolarization, feeding by the aphid M. persicae regulated a wider array of Arabidopsis genes than feeding by S. littoralis (Bricchi et al. 2012).
Pathogen-Dependent V m Variations
In plant–pathogen interactions, V m depolarization is a reliable early indicator of the leaf hypersensitive response (HR) (Pike et al. 2005). P. syringae DC3000 infection is also able to induce a V m depolarization in Arabidopsis with the same magnitude of V m depolarization as recorded for aphid and herbivore attacks, suggesting the presence of a V m threshold that has to be reached for a successful herbivory/infection response (Bricchi et al. 2012; Pike et al. 2005). Bacterial flagellin represents one of the best studied pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) that induce V m depolarization in mesophyll cells and in root hair cells of Arabidopsis (Jeworutzki et al. 2010). Elicitors isolated from the fungus Cladosporium fulvum were also demonstrated to induce V m depolarization in tomato plants (Gelli et al. 1997). Plasma membrane ion channels are rapidly activated by pathogen infection or by elicitor treatment of plant cells (Fisahn et al. 2004). However, bacterial growth and tissue damage take time, which appears to be proportional to the timing of V m depolarization (14–16 h) (Bricchi et al. 2012). At the time of V m depolarization, an almost completely opposite state of regulation was observed for Arabidopsis damaged by the aphid M. persicae and the pathogen P. syringae DC3000, with the former suppressing and the latter activating defence responses (Bricchi et al. 2012). In parsley cells treated with Pep-13, an oligopeptide fragment of a 42-kDa Phytophthora sojae cell wall glycoprotein, extracellular alkalinization, Ca2+ influx, and efflux of K+ and Cl− lead to V m depolarization (Fisahn et al. 2004; Blume et al. 2000).
Abiotic and biotic stresses, including mechanical wounding and insect attack, elicit signals that trigger a phosphorylation cascade leading to jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis. JA is a key regulatory component in defence-signalling pathways. The JA level increases in corn (Zea mays) and hybrid poplar (Populus deltoides × nigra) seedlings after exposure to green leaf volatiles (Engelberth et al. 2004).
4.2 V m Changes and Ion Variations in Response to Biotic Stress
Plant ion channels are transmembrane proteins located in the plant cell membranes that mediate ion fluxes across the cell compartments (Wang 2012). The hydrophilic pore structure of plant ion channels allows the passage of ions through the membranes at extremely high rates (106–108 ions per second through one channel protein) driven by transmembrane electrochemical potentials (Maathuis et al. 1997). Different plant ion channels are selectively expressed in specific tissues or cells, where they perform the appointed functions to facilitate the physiological processes of those tissues or cells (Wang 2012). Recall that V m variations are caused by an unbalanced ion distribution across the plasma membrane and that depolarization occurs when cations (such as K+ and Ca2+) are allowed to enter the cell or anions (e.g., Cl−) are allowed to exit the cell. Furthermore, hyperpolarization depends mainly on the activity of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase or when inward anion channels or outward cation channels are opened (Maffei et al. 2004).
Herbivory-Dependent Ion Fluctuations and Their Effects on the V m
An electrophysiological approach called the planar (black) lipid bilayer technique (BLM) is widely used to elucidate the molecular mechanisms and activities of various biologically active substances (Winterhalter 2000). Using BLM, Boland and coworkers demonstrated that insect-derived elicitors (e.g., fatty-acid–glutamine conjugates, LeaGln) and the Spodoptera exigua-derived OS directly interact with artificial lipid bilayers to generate channel-like activities that are highly conductive and selective for certain ions (Maischak et al. 2007).
In general, upon herbivory, the increase in cytosolic calcium precedes membrane depolarization (Maffei et al. 2007a). Ca2+ is one of the principal intracellular messengers and during electric signal generation and propagation, Ca2+ enters the cytoplasm through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels located at the plasma membrane and other membranes of intracellular stores (Arimura and Maffei 2010). Herbivore feeding causes a dramatic Ca2+ cytosolic ion influx limited to a few cell layers lining the wounded zone (Zebelo and Maffei 2015). This response is limited to herbivory or biotrophic activity, since neither single nor repeated mechanical wounding events are able to induce significant changes in cytosolic Ca2+ ion influx (Bricchi et al. 2010). Insect feeding and isolated insect-derived elicitors are known to cause activation of Ca2+ channels (Arimura and Maffei 2010; Maffei et al. 2007a), and these events have been associated with V m depolarization (Maffei et al. 2004).
However, upon herbivory, the Ca2+ signalling depends on the symplastic continuity granted by functioning plasmodesmata. We have recently made the surprising observation that an Arabidopsis line (pdko3) mutated in genes encoding plasmodesmal proteins is defective in some of the typical plant responses to herbivory. Following herbivory and the release of OS, both the pdko3 and wild-type (WT) plants showed increased accumulation of cytosolic Ca2+, but, unlike WT plants, the mutant line showed an almost complete loss of V m depolarization. Thus, the mutations in genes for plasmodesmal proteins have provided valuable genetic tools for the dissection of the complex spectrum of responses to herbivory and shown us that the responses to herbivory imply a Ca2+-independent V m depolarization (Bricchi et al. 2013).
Increased K+ channel activity was observed when Arabidopsis plants were damaged by S. littoralis feeding, or OS was introduced to mechanically damaged leaves (Bricchi et al. 2013). Potassium represents the major osmotically active cation in plant cells and is fundamental for plant functions such as control of membrane potential (Geiger et al. 2009; Lebaudy et al. 2007). Upon herbivory, the increased concentration of cytosolic Ca2+ triggers the opening of inward rectifier K+ channels that are the major factor responsible for herbivore-induced V m depolarization. In the pdko3 Arabidopsis mutant, it appears that the connection between increased calcium and K+ channel activation is broken leading to significantly decreased V m depolarization, although lower absolute levels of cytosolic calcium in pdko3 leaves opens the possibility of a threshold effect on K+ channel activation (Bricchi et al. 2013).
Microbe-Induced Variation in Ion Homeostasis and the Effect on V m
Receptor-mediated recruitment of calcium stores and activation of plasma membrane anion channels represent initial steps in pathogen recognition and innate immunity-related signalling (Elmore and Coaker 2011). The increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration observed in response to stress induced by bacteria and fungi involves extracellular polysaccharides, peptidoglycans, lipo-oligosaccharides, or chitin and appears to be an essential, common event after recognition of microbes by plant cells (Aslam et al. 2009; Lecourieux et al. 2005; Miya et al. 2007; Nurnberger and Scheel 2001; Romeis et al. 2001).
The use of ion-selective electrodes and imaging of simultaneous changes in cytosolic-free Ca2+ concentration allowed identification of the ion species involved in membrane depolarization following bacterial flagellin (flg22) treatment (Jeworutzki et al. 2010). Application of 10 nM flg22 to Arabidopsis leaves and roots induced a strong V m depolarization after a lag phase of 1–3 min, with the magnitude and velocity of the depolarization dependent on the concentration at which flg22 was applied. Aequorin is a calcium-activated photoprotein; its apoprotein is called apoaequorin, and its prosthetic group is called the luciferin. Stimulation of Arabidopsis plants constitutively expressing apoaequorin to monitor the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration after application of flg22 resulted in a dose-dependent transient rise in cytosolic Ca2+. When membrane potential recordings and Ca2+ imaging experiments were performed simultaneously, flg22 addition was found to cause a V m depolarization and a cytosolic Ca2+ increase, which occurred within the same time frame (Jeworutzki et al. 2010).
Cryptogein is a 10-kD protein secreted by the oomycete Phytophthora cryptogea that induces a hypersensitive response in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants and systemic acquired resistance against various pathogens. Within the first 5 min after infection, cryptogein induces an anion efflux and a Ca+2 influx, which gives rise to a fast and large V m depolarization. The latter, in cryptogenin-treated plants, has been associated with the inhibition of glucose uptake, which is symported with H+ and, thus, depends on the transmembrane electrochemical potential difference (Bourque et al. 2002). Elicitors from C. fulvum activate tomato plasma membrane Ca2+ permeable channels resulting in increased cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations (Gelli et al. 1997).
Alamethicin is an elicitor from the fungus Trichoderma viride and is well known to produce pores in artificial membranes as well as in animal and plant cell membranes (Duclohier et al. 2003). Alamethicin induces pore formation in the tonoplast membrane of the plant Chara corallina, and these pores are conductive depending on the polarity of the voltage applied in the plasma membranes (Luhring et al. 2007).
Unlike other plant–pathogen interactions and in a similar fashion to plant responses to herbivory, Ca2+ signalling appears to be nonessential to the recognition of the early stages of viral infection. Shabala et al. (2010) observed significant changes in K+ fluxes as early as 10 min after viral inoculation, which were mediated by depolarization-activated outward-rectifying K+ channels. This may suggest that viral infections trigger a different mechanism of plant defence signalling compared to signals derived from other microbial pathogens; hence, altered Ca2+ fluxes across the plasma membrane may not be a common prerequisite for all elicitor-activated defence reactions.
VOC-Dependent Ion Fluctuations and Their Effects on V m
Compared to herbivore- and microbe-dependent ion fluctuations, there is limited information on the role of VOC-dependent ion fluctuations and their effects on the V m. Zebelo and coworkers showed that VOCs emitted by tomato plants damaged by the herbivore Spodoptera littoralis trigger a significant V m depolarization in the mesophyll cells of receiver tomato plants (Zebelo et al. 2012). In the same study, VOCs from mechanically damaged and control unwounded tomato plants did not exert significant differences in the V m of receiver tomato plants compared to the effects of clean air. In a real-time experiment using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), tomato plants treated with the fluorescent calcium indicator Calcium orange were exposed to herbivore-induced plant VOCs and showed an increase in cytosolic calcium concentration [Ca2+]cyt (Zebelo et al. 2012). These results show that plant perception of volatile cues from the surrounding environment is mediated by early events, occurring within seconds and involving the alteration of the plasma membrane potential and increases in the cytosolic calcium. GLVs are produced as long as herbivory is present, therefore the continuous emission of these molecules signals to neighbor plants the persistency of herbivore attack. Although the volatile language is still difficult to decipher, we found that low molecular weight VOCs such as GLVs prompt a faster and stronger V m and calcium response when compared to higher molecular weight compounds such as monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, which appear to act only on the V m component of the plant cell response (Zebelo et al. 2012).
4.3 Effects of Biotic Stress on Transporter Activity
Transporters are specialized proteins that assist in the movement of small molecules, ions, macromolecules, peptides, and lipids across a biological membrane. The plasma membrane H+-ATPases are the primary pumps responsible for the establishment of cellular membrane potential in plants (Boller and Felix 2009). Plasma membrane H+-ATPases use energy derived from ATP hydrolysis to pump protons to the extracellular space and inside the vacuole, thus creating and maintaining a negative V m potential (Elmore and Coaker 2011). Therefore, any alteration in H+-ATPase activity leads to V m variation, with a depolarizing effect caused by the reduction of its ability to expel protons from the cytosol. In addition to regulating basic aspects of plant cell function, these enzymes contribute to signalling events in response to diverse environmental stimuli. H+-ATPases are dynamically regulated during plant immune responses, and quantitative proteomics studies have demonstrated complex spatial and temporal modulation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity during early pathogen recognition (Keinath et al. 2010; Nuhse et al. 2007) and insect herbivore recognition (Bricchi et al. 2013; Schaller and Oecking 1999). For instance, in response to pathogens, an increase in H+-ATPase activity (i.e., V m hyperpolarization) has been demonstrated in tomato (Veraestrella et al. 1994) and barley (Knogge 1996), whereas the inhibition of the H+-ATPase (i.e., V m depolarization) is exploited by pathogens in order to overcome plant resistance (Zhou et al. 2000). The pea pathogen, Mycosphaerella pinodes, inhibits H+-ATPase activity in the pea plasma membrane through the action of the suppressor of phytoalexin accumulation, supprescin B (Kato et al. 1993).
H+-ATPases and Ca2+-ATPases are members of a class known as P-type ATPases. In response to insect herbivory, Ca2+ ions are released into the cytosol via channel proteins and pumped back into their stores (organelles) and the apoplast via Ca2+-ATPase pumps (Bricchi et al. 2010; Maffei et al. 2004). Ca2+-ATPases are regulated by herbivore OS (Maischak et al. 2007). Given the numerous roles of P-ATPase activity in plant cell physiology, it is no wonder that pathogens have evolved mechanisms to target these enzymes (Elmore and Coaker 2011).
Fusicoccin is produced by the fungal pathogen Fusicoccum (Phomopsis) amygdale and functions by locking the interaction between 14-3-3 proteins and the C-terminal regulatory domain of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase, which leads to constitutive activation of this hydrogen pump and causes a constant V m hyperpolarization (Baunsgaard et al. 1998). The mechanism for the reverse effect, where some still unknown biotic elicitors may interfere with the activation of the H+-ATPase rendering the pump unable to repolarize a depolarized V m, is particularly intriguing.
5 Concluding Remarks
Depolarization of the V m is one of the first responses to biotic stress of the plasma membrane, which mainly depends on ion fluxes, including the opening of K+ channels and the release of calcium from internal stores or through influx from the apoplast. These early events are followed by the activation of signalling pathways, eventually leading to plant responses to biotic stress (Fig. 12.5).
Thus, electrophysiology is indeed a valuable tool to study and understand early events in plant interactions with other organisms (including other plants), and V m evaluation, more than the single patch analysis, gives a tissue image of cooperative interplay among wounded and unwounded cells.
Understanding fast responses of plants to the surrounding environment is of interest not only from an ecological and evolutionary perspective but also for the development of novel crop protection strategies. Owing to the massive damage that herbivores and pathogens cause to valuable crops, the deciphering of early signals from plants represents one of the most exciting fields of research in the first line of defence.
Three areas where future efforts might result in major breakthroughs are related to the identification of herbivore-specific signal molecules, their recognition, and further signal transduction. The challenge for further research is to determine their mode of action, whether these signals are transduced by receptor-mediated processes or simply interact with the plant membranes and thereby initiate signal transduction pathways. One approach to achieve this goal might be the use of plant mutants that are not responsive to a particular herbivory-related signal; indeed, the Arabidopsis pdko3 mutant was instrumental to dissecting early and late events in plant responses to herbivory (Bricchi et al. 2013). Characterization and the use of such mutants could result in the identification of genes encoding proteins involved in signal perception. Not only can such studies uncover individual signalling pathways, but they can also establish links in a network of alternative routes regulating the multitude of inducible plant defences. Much more has to be done in this field, but the promising results obtained in intact rooted plants following biotic and abiotic stress may lead to interesting new discoveries.
References
Alborn HT, Hansen TV, Jones TH, Bennett DC, Tumlinson JH, Schmelz EA, Teal PEA (2007) Disulfooxy fatty acids from the American bird grasshopper Schistocerca americana, elicitors of plant volatiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(32):12976–12981
Arimura G, Maffei ME (2010) Calcium and secondary CPK signaling in plants in response to herbivore attack. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 400(4):455–460
Aslam SN, Erbs G, Morrissey KL, Newman MA, Chinchilla D, Boller T, Molinaro A, Jackson RW, Cooper RM (2009) Microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP) signatures, synergy, size and charge: influences on perception or mobility and host defence responses. Mol Plant Pathol 10(3):375–387
Baunsgaard L, Fuglsang AT, Jahn T, Korthout HAAJ, de Boer AH, Palmgren MG (1998) The 14-3-3 proteins associate with the plant plasma membrane H+-ATPase to generate a fusicoccin binding complex and a fusicoccin responsive system. Plant J 13(5):661–671
Blume B, Nurnberger T, Nass N, Scheel D (2000) Receptor-mediated increase in cytoplasmic free calcium required for activation of pathogen defense in parsley. Plant Cell 12(8):1425–1440
Boller T, Felix G (2009) A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:379–406
Bourque S, Lemoine R, Sequeira-Legrand A, Fayolle U, Delrot S, Pugin A (2002) The elicitor cryptogein blocks glucose transport in tobacco cells. Plant Physiol 130(4):2177–2187
Bricchi I, Leitner M, Foti M, Mithöfer A, Boland W, Maffei ME (2010) Robotic mechanical wounding (MecWorm) versus herbivore-induced responses: early signaling and volatile emission in Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.). Planta 232(3):719–729
Bricchi I, Bertea CM, Occhipinti A, Paponov IA, Maffei ME (2012) Dynamics of membrane potential variation and gene expression induced by Spodoptera littoralis, Myzus persicae, and Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 7(10)
Bricchi I, Occhipinti A, Bertea CM, Zebelo SA, Brillada C, Verrillo F, De Castro C, Molinaro A, Faulkner C, Maule AJ, Maffei ME (2013) Separation of early and late responses to herbivory in Arabidopsis by changing plasmodesmal function. Plant J 73(1):14–25
Cao J, Cole IB, Murch SJ (2006) Neurotransmitters, neuroregulators and neurotoxins in the life of plants. Can J Plant Sci 86(4):1183–1188
Consales F, Schweizer F, Erb M, Gouhier-Darimont C, Bodenhausen N, Bruessow F, Sobhy I, Reymond P (2012) Insect oral secretions suppress wound-induced responses in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 63(2):727–737
Duclohier H, Alder G, Kociolek K, Leplawy MT (2003) Channel properties of template assembled alamethicin tetramers. J Pept Sci 9(11–12):776–783
Elmore JM, Coaker G (2011) The role of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase in plant–microbe interactions. Mol Plant 4(3):416–427
Engelberth J, Alborn HT, Schmelz EA, Tumlinson JH (2004) Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(6):1781–1785
Felle HH, Zimmermann MR (2007) Systemic signalling in barley through action potentials. Planta 226(1):203–214
Felton G (2008) Caterpillar secretions and induced plant responses. In: Schaller A (ed) Induced plant resistance to herbivory. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 369–387
Fisahn J, Herde O, Willmitzer L, Pena-Cortes H (2004) Analysis of the transient increase in cytosolic Ca2+ during the action potential of higher plants with high temporal resolution: requirement of Ca2+ transients for induction of jasmonic acid biosynthesis and PINII gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol 45(4):456–459
Fromm J, Bauer T (1994) Action-potentials in maize sieve tubes change phloem translocation. J Exp Bot 45(273):463–469
Fromm J, Lautner S (2007) Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants. Plant Cell Environ 30(3):249–257
Geiger D, Becker D, Vosloh D, Gambale F, Palme K, Rehers M, Anschuetz U, Dreyer I, Kudla J, Hedrich R (2009) Heteromeric AtKC1.AKT1 channels in Arabidopsis roots facilitate growth under K+-limiting conditions. J Biol Chem 284(32):21288–21295
Gelli A, Higgins VJ, Blumwald E (1997) Activation of plant plasma membrane Ca2+-permeable channels by race-specific fungal elicitors. Plant Physiol 113(1):269–279
Halitschke R, Schittko U, Pohnert G, Boland W, Baldwin IT (2001) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. III. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates in herbivore oral secretions are necessary and sufficient for herbivore-specific plant responses. Plant Physiol 125(2):711–717
Heil M, Silva Bueno JC (2007) Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defense in nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(13):5467–5472
Imbiscuso G, Trotta A, Maffei M, Bossi S (2009) Herbivory induces a ROS burst and the release of volatile organic compounds in the fern Pteris vittata L. J Plant Interact 4(1):15–22
Jeworutzki E, Roelfsema MRG, Anschutz U, Krol E, Elzenga JTM, Felix G, Boller T, Hedrich R, Becker D (2010) Early signaling through the Arabidopsis pattern recognition receptors FLS2 and EFR involves Ca2+-associated opening of plasma membrane anion channels. Plant J 62(3):367–378
Kato T, Shiraishi T, Toyoda K, Saitoh K, Satoh Y, Tahara M, Yamada T, Oku H (1993) Inhibition of ATPase activity in pea plasma-membranes by fungal suppressors from Mycosphaerella pinodes and their peptide moieties. Plant Cell Physiol 34(3):439–445
Keinath NF, Kierszniowska S, Lorek J, Bourdais G, Kessler SA, Shimosato-Asano H, Grossniklaus U, Schulze WX, Robatzek S, Panstruga R (2010) PAMP (pathogen-associated molecular pattern)-induced changes in plasma membrane compartmentalization reveal novel components of plant immunity. J Biol Chem 285(50):39140–39149
Knogge W (1996) Fungal infection of plants. Plant Cell 8(10):1711–1722
Lebaudy A, Very AA, Sentenac H (2007) K+ channel activity in plants: genes, regulations and functions. FEBS Lett 581(12):2357–2366
Lecourieux D, Lamotte O, Bourque S, Wendehenne D, Mazars C, Ranjeva R, Pugin A (2005) Proteinaceous and oligosaccharidic elicitors induce different calcium signatures in the nucleus of tobacco cells. Cell Calcium 38(6):527–538
Luhring H, Nguyen VD, Schmidt L, Rose USR (2007) Caterpillar regurgitant induces pore formation in plant membranes. FEBS Lett 581(28):5361–5370
Maathuis JM, Ichida AM, Sanders D, Schroeder JI (1997) Roles of higher plant K+ channels. Plant Physiol 114(4):1141–1149
Maffei M, Bossi S (2006) Electrophysiology and plant responses to biotic stress. In: Volkov A (ed) Plant electrophysiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 461–481
Maffei M, Camusso W, Sacco S (2001) Effect of Mentha x piperita essential oil and monoterpenes on cucumber root membrane potential. Phytochemistry 58(5):703–707
Maffei M, Bossi S, Spiteller D, Mithöfer A, Boland W (2004) Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves. I. Membrane potentials, intracellular calcium variations, oral secretions, and regurgitate components. Plant Physiol 134(4):1752–1762
Maffei ME, Mithofer A, Arimura GI, Uchtenhagen H, Bossi S, Bertea CM, Cucuzza LS, Novero M, Volpe V, Quadro S, Boland W (2006) Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves. III. Membrane depolarization and involvement of hydrogen peroxide. Plant Physiol 140(3):1022–1035
Maffei ME, Mithöfer A, Boland W (2007a) Before gene expression: early events in plant–insect interaction. Trends Plant Sci 12(7):310–316
Maffei ME, Mithöfer A, Boland W (2007b) Insects feeding on plants: rapid signals and responses preceding the induction of phytochemical release. Phytochemistry 68(22–24):2946–2959
Maffei ME, Arimura GI, Mithöfer A (2012) Natural elicitors, effectors and modulators of plant responses. Nat Prod Rep 29(11):1288–1303
Maischak H, Grigoriev PA, Vogel H, Boland W, Mithöfer A (2007) Oral secretions from herbivorous lepidopteran larvae exhibit ion channel-forming activities. FEBS Lett 581(5):898–904
Mattiacci L, Dicke M, Posthumus MA (1995) Beta-glucosidase—an elicitor of herbivore-induced plant odor that attracts host-searching parasitic wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(6):2036–2040
Mithöfer A, Mazars C, Maffei ME (2009) Probing spatio-temporal intracellular calcium variations in plants. In: Pfannschmidt T (ed) Plant signal transduction, vol 479, Methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, New York, NY, pp 79–92
Miya A, Albert P, Shinya T, Desaki Y, Ichimura K, Shirasu K, Narusaka Y, Kawakami N, Kaku H, Shibuya N (2007) CERK1, a LysM receptor kinase, is essential for chitin elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(49):19613–19618
Mohanta TK, Occhipinti A, Zebelo SA, Foti M, Fliegmann J, Bossi S, Maffei ME, Bertea CM (2012) Ginkgo biloba responds to herbivory by activating early signaling and direct defenses. PLoS One 7(3):e32822
Nastuk WL, Hodgkin AL (1950) The electrical activity of single muscle fibers. J Cell Comp Physiol 35(1):39–73
Nuhse TS, Bottrill AR, Jones AME, Peck SC (2007) Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of plasma membrane proteins reveals regulatory mechanisms of plant innate immune responses. Plant J 51(5):931–940
Nurnberger T, Scheel D (2001) Signal transmission in the plant immune response. Trends Plant Sci 6(8):372–379
Pike SM, Zhang XC, Gassmann W (2005) Electrophysiological characterization of the Arabidopsis avrRpt2-specific hypersensitive response in the absence of other bacterial signals. Plant Physiol 138(2):1009–1017
Pyatygin SS, Opritov VA, Vodeneev VA (2008) Signaling role of action potential in higher plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 55(2):285–291
Reymond P, Bodenhausen N, Van Poecke RMP, Krishnamurthy V, Dicke M, Farmer EE (2004) A conserved transcript pattern in response to a specialist and a generalist herbivore. Plant Cell 16(11):3132–3147
Romeis T, Ludwig AA, Martin R, Jones JDG (2001) Calcium-dependent protein kinases play an essential role in a plant defence response. EMBO J 20(20):5556–5567
Roshchina VV (2001) Molecular–cellular mechanisms in pollen allelopathy. Allelopath J 8(1):11–28
Sacco S, Maffei M (1997) The effect of isosakuranetin (5,7-dihydroxy 4′-methoxy flavanone) on potassium uptake in wheat root segments. Phytochemistry 46(2):245–248
Schaller A, Oecking C (1999) Modulation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity differentially activates wound and pathogen defense responses in tomato plants. Plant Cell 11(2):263–272
Schmelz EA, Carroll MJ, LeClere S, Phipps SM, Meredith J, Chourey PS, Alborn HT, Teal PEA (2006) Fragments of ATP synthase mediate plant perception of insect attack. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(23):8894–8899
Shabala S, Bose J (2012) Application of non-invasive microelectrode flux measurements in plant stress physiology. In: Volkov AG (ed) Plant electrophysiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 91–126
Shabala S, Babourina O, Rengel Z, Nemchinov LG (2010) Non-invasive microelectrode potassium flux measurements as a potential tool for early recognition of virus-host compatibility in plants. Planta 232(4):807–815
Tasaki I (1952) Properties of myelinated fibers in sciatic nerve and in spinal cord (Frog) as examined with microelectrodes. Science 116(3020):529–530
Veraestrella R, Barkla BJ, Higgins VJ, Blumwald E (1994) Plant defense response to fungal pathogens—activation of host-plasma membrane H+-ATpase by elicitor-induced enzyme dephosphorylation. Plant Physiol 104(1):209–215
Volkov AG, Haack RA (1995) Insect-induced bioelectrochemical signals in potato plants. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 37(1):55–60
Volkov A, Mwesigwa J (2000) Interfacial electrical phenomena in green plants: action potentials. In: Volkov AG (ed) Liquid interfaces in chemical, biological, and pharmaceutical applications. Dekker, New York, NY
Wang Y (2012) Functional characterization of plant ion channels in heterologous expression systems. In: Volkov AG (ed) Plant electrophysiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 301–321
Winterhalter M (2000) Black lipid membranes. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 5(3–4):250–255
Zebelo SA, Maffei M (2012a) Signal transduction in plant–insect interactions: from membrane potential variations to metabolomics. In: Volkov AG (ed) Plant electrophysiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 143–172
Zebelo SA, Maffei ME (2012b) The ventral eversible gland (VEG) of Spodoptera littoralis triggers early responses to herbivory in Arabidopsis thaliana. Arthropod Plant Interact 6(4):543–551
Zebelo AS, Maffei ME (2015) Role of early signalling events in plant–insect interactions. J Exp Bot 66:435–448
Zebelo SA, Matsui K, Ozawa R, Maffei ME (2012) Plasma membrane potential depolarization and cytosolic calcium flux are early events involved in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon) plant-to-plant communication. Plant Sci 196:93–100
Zhou FS, Andersen CH, Burhenne K, Fischer PH, Collinge DB, Thordal-Christensen H (2000) Proton extrusion is an essential signalling component in the HR of epidermal single cells in the barley–powdery mildew interaction. Plant J 23(2):245–254
Zimmermann MR, Maischak H, Mithofer A, Boland W, Felle HH (2009) System potentials, a novel electrical long-distance apoplastic signal in plants, induced by wounding. Plant Physiol 149(3):1593–1600
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zebelo, S.A., Maffei, M.E. (2016). Plant Electrophysiology: Early Stages of the Plant Response to Chemical Signals. In: Blande, J., Glinwood, R. (eds) Deciphering Chemical Language of Plant Communication. Signaling and Communication in Plants. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33498-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33498-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33496-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33498-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)