Abstract
Oily wastewater has severely contaminated the ecosystem which caused serious damage to human reproduction and overall health. Following the growing campaign to protect the environment, the treatment of wastewater containing oil, emulsified oil, or hydrocarbons generally known as oily wastewater has received worldwide attention. Wastewater such as oily wastewater has complicated components which make its treatment technology challenging. This paper discusses the membrane technology progression that involves membrane modification and combined methods with the intention of high efficiency and environmental protection. The challenges faced by membrane technology are also discussed.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
14.1 Introduction
Fast-growing industrial and agricultural show higher demand for fossil fuels and a variety of substances, which leads to serious environmental problems globally such as polluted oily wastewater (Zhang et al. 2016a). As one of the important contaminants in water, oil causes wastewater problems in environments (Mustafa et al. 2014). Decontamination of wastewater from industry is a key challenge from the environmental and ecological perspective (Sharma et al. 2018). This indicates that there is an increasing demand to treat oily wastewater to preserve the environment from its adverse impacts, and this situation has drawn the scientific community’s interest (Modi and Bellare 2019).
Oily wastewater can be treated using conventional treatment methods such as gravity separation and skimming, dissolved air flotation, de-emulsification, coagulation, and flocculation. However, some shortcomings such as low efficacy, high operating costs, deterioration, and concern about decontaminating make the conventional treatment methods less attractive (Makki and Zghair 2014). Compared to conventional treatment methods, pressure-driven membrane filtrations such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and nanofiltration (NF) membranes are attracting worldwide attention due to their obvious performance. Nevertheless, though NF membranes have the benefit of maintaining low molecular weight species, the low-pressure MF and UF membranes have an advantage over NF membranes and can be utilized as submerged membranes (Chin et al. 2007).
Various research described the usage of polymeric membranes for wastewater treatment (Ong et al. 2014; Dzinun et al. 2017; Yaacob et al. 2020). Polyethersulfone and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) are the two polymeric membranes that widely monopolize the membrane market despite membrane fouling badly controlling the polymeric membrane’s progress because of their intrinsic hydrophobicity. On the other hand, ceramic membranes were unable to discover widespread use owing to their overprice and instability which jeopardizes the membrane’s integrity. Hence, polymeric membranes are attracting much attention internationally (Shen et al. 2020).
Membrane filtrations are used to treat wastewater as the growing demand for clean water supply and water scarcity, in recent years (Hossein Razzaghi et al. 2014). Karakulski and Gryta (2017) reported that MF and UF membranes are frequently employed for oily wastewater treatment. These days, photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) with UF membranes are used for the effective removal of organic compounds from water, and the use of UF membranes were cost-efficient for the treatment of oily wastewater because there is no need for chemical additives and environment-friendly (Rani et al. 2021). The treated wastewater can then be utilized in different ways such as by industry in utility plants, farming, and cleaning uses to prevent global water shortage (Rasouli et al. 2017).
14.2 Nanocomposite Membranes
The incorporation of nanoparticles into polymeric membrane matrixes produces nanocomposite membranes (Wen et al. 2019). The usage of titanium dioxide (TiO2) or zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles in membrane fabrication not only improves the morphology of the membrane but to aid in getting higher permeability. Furthermore, the extremely reactive oxygen species generated by TiO2 aid oxide molecules to achieve full mineralization and add the antifouling characteristic to the membrane surface (Sakarkar et al. 2020). 3 wt% ZnO/polyvinyl chloride (PVC) nanocomposite membranes prepared by Rabiee et al. (2015) showed improvement in the flux recovery ratio from 69 to >90% indicating that the nanocomposite membranes were less susceptible to being fouled.
14.3 Photocatalytic Membranes
The fabrication of membrane using pure catalysts through methods such as coating or mixing of catalysts over a commercial membrane produces photocatalytic membranes (Iglesias et al. 2016) with photocatalytic ultraviolet (UV) responsive membranes and photocatalytic visible light responsive membranes are the two photocatalytic membranes widely used. For the functional membrane, the photocatalytic ultraviolet (UV) responsive membranes are activated by UV illumination and are mostly concentrating on TiO2 or ZnO-based photocatalysts (Shi et al. 2019). ZnO has been recognized in photocatalysis and antifouling agent due to the high surface-to-volume ratio of ZnO nanoparticles which makes it an important nanostructure in many disciplines (Shen et al. 2020). Meanwhile, the non-toxicity, high decontaminating action, economical, chemically inactive, deterioration resistance, and stability make TiO2 the frequently used photocatalyst in solar or artificial light-driven photocatalysis (Sharma et al. 2018).
Moghadam et al. (2015) reported that 20 wt% TiO2/PVDF nanocomposite membranes exhibited improved antifouling properties under UV illumination in comparison to neat PVDF membranes. The flux recovery ratio of 98.1% has confirmed their antifouling property. The membrane hydrophilicity and porous structure also showed improvement because the UV illumination forms surface oxygen defects at the attaching site, which makes the dissociative adsorption of water more favorable at the membrane surface. Oily industrial wastewater was well treated using an 8 wt% TiO2/PVDF-trifluoro ethylene (TrFE) nanocomposite membrane in a solar photoreactor as reported by Zioui et al. (2019). The reduction in the contact angle on the polymer matrix with the incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles is believed to allow for a higher contact between the nanoparticles and the oily wastewater.
14.4 Photocatalytic Membrane Reactors
Photocatalytic reaction and membrane separation are paired in photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) to perform a transformation of chemicals process. The pairing improves the capabilities of classical photoreactors and membrane filtrations. The membrane enables an uninterrupted process in a system whereby the reaction during photocatalytic, the recovery of photocatalyst, and the separation of the products from the treated wastewater take place in a single step (Molinari et al. 2020). Generally, the two major arrangements for PMR are (i) slurry PMR whereby the reactor contains suspended catalyst particles in the feed solution, and (ii) immobilized PMR whereby the reactor is paired with immobilized catalysts in/on the membrane (immobilized PMR). The succeeding option is more promising since the TiO2 photocatalyst recovering process can be shortened which eases the operating complexity and practical application expenses (Ong et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2016b). The former option is associated with photocatalyst regeneration, low photocatalytic efficiency, high membrane resistance, and fouling (Rameshkumar et al. 2020).
A reactor system with TiO2 suspended is reported to show improved performance than when deposited on the membrane surface. However, the slurry PMR involves a secondary process to free the catalyst from the treated water. In contrast, immobilization of TiO2 in the membrane matrix can eliminate this additional process despite this approach leading to a decreasing surface area of the available sites for the reaction during photocatalytic. As such, evenly distributing TiO2 nanoparticles within the membrane is required and can be accomplished through a single-step co-extrusion process. This is important to ensure a higher amount of TiO2 nanoparticles be exposed to UV light and enable the reaction during photocatalytic to occur (Dzinun et al. 2017).
Soon after, a type of PMR with advantages such as inexpensive installation, energy efficiency, and ease of maintenance known as submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor (SPMR) emerged (Nguyen et al. 2020). In this integrated treatment process, the membrane plays a dual role in which the membrane acts as the support for TiO2 photocatalyst as well as a physical selective barrier for the degraded products. TOC degradation and oil rejection as high as 80 and >90% were reported using 2 wt% TiO2/PVDF hollow fiber membranes using SMPR (Ong et al. 2014).
14.5 Challenges
One of the challenges during the fabrication process of nanocomposite membranes includes the agglomeration of nanoparticles. Agglomeration can lead to a possible reduction in the antifouling ability of TiO2 nanoparticles and a change in membrane topography and hydrophilicity as a result of the irregular distribution of particles in the membrane (Razmjou et al. 2012).
Challenges on photocatalytic UV-responsive membranes are the risk for the structure of the membrane to experience severe destruction by both reactive oxygen species (e.g., ·OH) and UV light and the impacts on the polymeric membranes are harsher. Apart from that, the solar energy usage efficiency is controlled by the TiO2 or ZnO catalyst bandgap around 3–4% of the solar spectrum (UV region) while about 44–47% of visible light is left unexploited. Additionally, the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 or ZnO-based catalysts is seriously limited by the rapid recombination of the photogenerated charges and demonstrate low photoactivity in the visible light region (Shi et al. 2019).
14.6 Conclusion
Oil pollution has brought substantial effects on the ecosystem, human security, and economic growth, which caught worldwide attention. With the laws and standards on environmental protection becoming stricter over time, the existing oily wastewater treatment technology can no longer satisfy the higher standard requirement. The development of improved oily wastewater treatment becomes more prominent to protect the environment. Nevertheless, the improved treatment methods are still facing some challenges which need to be overcome.
References
Chin SS, Lim TM, Chiang K, Fane AG (2007) Factors affecting the performance of a low-pressure submerged membrane photocatalytic reactor. Chem Eng J 130:53–63
Dzinun H, Othman MHD, Ismail AF, Puteh MH, Rahman MA, Jaafar J (2017) Performance evaluation of co-extruded microporous dual-layer hollow fiber membranes using a hybrid membrane photoreactor. Desalination 403:46–52
Hossein Razzaghi M, Safekordi A, Tavakolmoghadam M, Rekabdar F, Hemmati M (2014) Morphological and separation performance study of PVDF/CA blend membranes. J Memb Sci 470:547–557
Iglesias O, Rivero MJ, Urtiaga AM, Ortiz I (2016) Membrane-based photocatalytic systems for process intensification. Chem Eng J 305:136–148
Karakulski K, Gryta M (2017) The application of ultrafiltration for treatment of ships generated oily wastewater. Chem Pap 71:1165–1173
Makki HF, Zghair NH (2014) Forward-reverse osmosis processes for oily wastewater treatment. J Eng 20:91–212
Modi A, Bellare J (2019) Efficiently improved oil/water separation using high flux and superior antifouling polysulfone hollow fiber membranes modified with functionalized carbon nanotubes/graphene oxide nanohybrid. J Environ Chem Eng 7:102944
Moghadam MT, Lesage G, Mohammadi T, Mericq JP, Mendret J, Heran M, Faur C, Brosillon S, Hemmati M, Naeimpoor F (2015) Improved antifouling properties of TiO2/PVDF nanocomposite membranes in UV-coupled ultrafiltration. J Appl Polym Sci 132:13–15
Molinari R, Lavorato C, Argurio P (2020) Application of hybrid membrane processes coupling separation and biological or chemical reaction in advanced wastewater treatment. Membranes 10:281
Mustafa YA, Alwared AI, Ebrahim M (2014) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation for treatment of oil from wastewater. Al-Khwarizmi Eng J 10:53–61
Nguyen VH, Tran QB, Nguyen XC, Hai LT, Ho TTT, Shokouhimehr M, Vo DVN, Lam SS, Nguyen HP, Hoang CT, Ly QV, Peng W, Kim SY, Tung TV, Le QV (2020) Submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor with suspended and immobilized N-doped TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac removal from wastewater. Process Saf Environ Prot 142:229–237
Ong CS, Lau WJ, Goh PS, Ng BC, Ismail AF (2014) Investigation of submerged membrane photocatalytic reactor (sMPR) operating parameters during oily wastewater treatment process. Desalination 353:48–56
Rabiee H, Vatanpour V, Farahani MHDA, Zarrabi H (2015) Improvement in flux and antifouling properties of PVC ultrafiltration membranes by incorporation of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles. Sep Purif Technol 156:299–310
Rameshkumar S, Henderson R, Padamati RB (2020) improved surface functional and photocatalytic properties of hybrid ZnO-MoS2-deposited membrane for photocatalysis-assisted dye filtration. Membranes 10:106
Rani CN, Karthikeyan S, Prince Arockia Doss S (2021) Photocatalytic ultrafiltration membrane reactors in water and wastewater treatment—a review. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensif 165:108445
Rasouli Y, Abbasi M, Hashemifard SA (2017) Investigation of in-line coagulation-MF hybrid process for oily wastewater treatment by using novel ceramic membranes. J Clean Prod 161:545–559
Razmjou A, Resosudarmo A, Holmes RL, Li H, Mansouri J, Chen V (2012) The effect of modified TiO2 nanoparticles on the polyethersulfone ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes. Desalination 287:271–280
Sakarkar S, Muthukumaran S, Jegatheesan V (2020) Polyvinylidene fluoride and titanium dioxide ultrafiltration photocatalytic membrane: fabrication, morphology, and its application in textile wastewater treatment. J Environ. Eng (United States) 146:1–12
Sharma B, Boruah PK, Yadav A, Das MR (2018) TiO2–Fe2O3 nanocomposite heterojunction for superior charge separation and the photocatalytic inactivation of pathogenic bacteria in water under direct sunlight irradiation. J Environ Chem Eng 6:134–145
Shen L, Huang Z, Liu Y, Li R, Xu Y, Jakaj G, Lin H (2020) Polymeric membranes incorporated with ZnO nanoparticles for membrane fouling mitigation: a brief review. Front Chem 8:1–9
Shi Y, Huang J, Zeng G, Cheng W, Hu J (2019) Photocatalytic membrane in water purification: is it stepping closer to be driven by visible light? J Memb. Sci 584:364–392
Wen Y, Yuan J, Ma X, Wang S, Liu Y (2019) Polymeric nanocomposite membranes for water treatment: a review. Environ Chem Lett 17:1539–1551
Yaacob N, Goh PS, Ismail AF, Mohd Nazri NA, Ng BC, Zainal Abidin MN, Yogarathinam LT (2020) ZrO2-TiO2 incorporated PVDF dual-layer hollow fiber membrane for oily wastewater treatment: effect of air gap. Membranes 10:124
Zhang L, Gu J, Song L, Chen L, Huang Y, Zhang J, Chen T (2016a) Underwater superoleophobic carbon nanotubes/core–shell polystyrene@Au nanoparticles composite membrane for flow-through catalytic decomposition and oil/water separation. J Mater Chem A 4:10810–10815
Zhang W, Ding L, Luo J, Jaffrin MY, Tang B (2016b) Membrane fouling in photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) for water and wastewater treatment: a critical review. Chem Eng J 302:446–458
Zioui D, Salazar H, Aoudjit L, Martins PM, Lanceros-Méndez S (2019) Polymer-based membranes for oily wastewater remediation. Polymers 12:42
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yaacob, N. (2023). Membranes Technology Development and Challenges in Oily Wastewater Treatment: A Brief Review. In: Ismail, A., Zulkipli, F.N., Yaakup, S., Öchsner, A. (eds) Materials and Technologies for Future Advancement. Advanced Structured Materials, vol 193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38993-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38993-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38992-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38993-1
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)