Abstract
Mangroves and salt marshes are important habitats for resident and migratory birds. Nevertheless, information on avian species richness and composition in Brazilian mangroves and salt marshes is scattered and has never been comprehensively investigated. This chapter aims to identify the diversity of birds inhabiting Brazilian mangroves and salt marshes, their adaptations, threats, conservation challenges, and knowledge gaps. A compilation of 81 published studies on mangrove and salt marsh birds was reviewed and personal observations of the authors were included. In Brazilian mangroves, 368 bird species can be encountered, or 19% of the country’s avifauna. Five species are exclusive, 87 regular, and 275 occasional, with 40 migrants. Fifteen species are of conservation concern. In salt marshes, there are 163 species, representing 8% of the Brazilian avifauna. Nearly 72% of these species also occur in mangroves and only one is exclusive. A total of 123 species are regular and 39 occasional, with 34 migrants. Thirteen species are of conservation concern. Habitat loss and modification are the main threats to birds, but the harvesting of aquatic resources, pollution, invasive alien species, and climate change are also important. Additionally, 15 knowledge gaps related to ecological and anthropogenic impacts on mangrove and salt marsh birds are summarized.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Importance of Mangroves and Salt Marshes to Birds
Mangrove ecosystems are highly productive, representing important nutrient sources for both terrestrial and aquatic food webs and serving as breeding and resting ground for many animals, including birds (Luther and Greenberg 2009). Bird diversity in mangroves is mostly related to habitat heterogeneity, especially due to plant species richness, the density of the understory, and food resource distribution (Nagelkerken et al. 2008; Mohd-Azlan et al. 2015). The aerial roots of mangroves provide substrates on which many species live, including algae, tunicates, sponges, and bivalves. Many infaunal and epifaunal species, together with prawns, crabs, and fish, dwell on the soft substrate and may be predated by birds (Nagelkerken et al. 2008). In Brazil, mangrove-resident bird species such as the scarlet ibis (Eudocimus ruber) and the yellow-crowned night heron (Nyctanassa violacea) feed mainly on fiddler crabs in mangroves (Olmos and Silva e Silva 2001), while the tricolored egret (Egretta tricolor) feeds on small fish (Poecilia spp.) (Martinez 2010).
The mangrove trees and canopy provide important habitats for bird species to rest, roost, and nest. All three abovementioned species and others, such as herons and passerines, nest in mangrove trees (Olmos et al. 2001; Mancini et al. 2018), highlighting the importance of this ecosystem as breeding sites. Some mangrove sites such as the Maranhão State and Santos-Cubatão area, São Paulo State, shelter several thousands of bird nests every year (Martinez and Rodrigues 1999; Silva e Silva 2007) (see Chap. 3, Maps 3 and 14, respectively).
On the Brazilian northern coast, roughly one thousand semipalmated plovers (Charadrius semipalmatus) were recorded perched on the red mangrove prop roots during high tide (Rodrigues 2007). Therefore, mangroves also provide high-tide refuge for birds feeding in nearby areas (Rodrigues 2007; Valente et al. 2011). Every year hundreds of thousands of migratory birds such as plovers, sandpipers, terns, and other species fly to Brazilian mangroves after the breeding season. They come mainly from North America, such as the gray plover (Pluvialis squatarola) and whimbrel (Numenius hudsonicus), both migrating from northern Canada and the Arctic (Sick 1997).
Mangroves are also important as a stopover or wintering grounds because birds need to restore their energy by feeding and resting in these areas to continue their migration. In northern Brazil, the Amazon River and its mangroves harbor about 50% of the North American population of migratory gray plovers, 70% of the population of ruddy turnstones (Arenaria interpres), around 50% of the population of willets (Tringa semipalmata), and 43% of the population of whimbrels (Morrison and Ross 1989). Also, in the Brazilian state of Sergipe, in the city of Aracaju, about 100,000 individuals of 18 different shorebird species yearly aggregate in mangrove areas (Barbieri 2007) (see Chap. 3, Map 10). Furthermore, there are records of site fidelity of the semipalmated sandpiper (Calidris pusilla) in three mangrove wintering areas in the Brazilian Amazon (Rodrigues et al. 2007) and semipalmated plover on the northern coast of São Paulo State (Olmos and Silva e Silva 2001). Thus, mangrove areas have an important role in supporting the maintenance of these species’ migratory routes. Strips of mangroves provide habitat for diverse faunal species to rest, find shelter, and feed, especially in regions deprived of inland vegetation (Linneweber and Lacerda 2002).
Wading and aquatic birds often nest and rear their young in large colonies in mangroves, taking advantage of the relative inaccessibility of the forest canopy to terrestrial predators. Mangrove areas are also used by many bird species as roosting sites, especially for heron species such as the snowy egret (Egretta thula), little blue heron (E. caerulea), black-crowned night heron, and great egret (Ardea alba) (Olmos and Silva e Silva 2001; Mestre et al. 2007; Mancini et al. 2018). This means that mangroves are key to aggregations of several bird species for feeding, roosting, as dormitory sites, and breeding purposes.
At the same time, birds are also a key component of this ecosystem, due to their ecological role in the dynamics of mangroves (Acevedo and Aide 2008; Mohd-Azlan et al. 2015). They oxygenate the soil while feeding and fertilize these sites by releasing nutrients into the water column through their feces and food waste, distributing nutrients within the mangrove food chain (Onuf et al. 1977; Navedo et al. 2015). Moreover, they control prey populations and weed seeds, regulate competition through grazing, and consume invertebrate pests (e.g., golden apple snails or zebra mussels) while facilitating the colonization by less competitive plants and invertebrates (Nagelkerken et al. 2008; Green and Elmberg 2013). They also host exclusive parasites and disperse seeds and invertebrates, linking plants and organisms in remote marshes (Nagelkerken et al. 2008; Green and Elmberg 2013).
Salt marsh ecosystems are particularly important for birds due to their high primary productivity, acting as prime feeding sites and offering roosting and nesting opportunities for a series of resident and migratory species and occasional visitors from adjacent habitats (Hughes 2004; Greenberg et al. 2014). The total number of bird species in southern Brazilian salt marshes is considered relatively high. At the Saco da Mangueira, in the Patos Lagoon estuary, Rio Grande do Sul State, 89 species were recorded in salt marshes, including mud- and sandflats and open water at the edges of marshes (Dias and Maurício 1998) (see Chap. 3, Map 17). At the mouth of the same estuary, three salt marshes harbored 66, 85, and 87 species (Dias et al. 2017).
Variations in species richness between individual salt marshes in that region are largely driven by their distance to the ocean, with the more species-poor sites being found near the mouth of the estuary, which reflects the progressive influence of abiotic stress upon the avifauna (Dias et al. 2017). Within salt marshes, zonation and environmental gradients with adjacent freshwater marshes and grasslands play an important role in shaping avian diversity (Greenberg et al. 2014). In South Brazil, the more densely vegetated and less-flooded high marsh (at or above the mean high-tide line) harbors mostly passerines and rails (and some shorebirds when overgrazed by livestock or recently burned). The low marsh (below the mean high-tide line) and associated mud- and sandflats and open-water habitats are used by ducks, swans, grebes, flamingos, cormorants, egrets, herons, coots, gulls, terns, and shorebirds (Resende and Leeuwenberg 1987; Dias and Maurício 1998; Bencke et al. 2003; Dias et al. 2011, 2017).
Despite the relatively high number of species found in salt marshes, few of them use these wetlands as breeding sites, namely, small passerines, ducks, raptors, shorebirds, and rails (Bencke et al. 2003; Maurício et al. 2013; Greenberg et al. 2014). Likewise, there are no salt marsh-specialist species in South America, despite the high richness in the continent (Greenberg et al. 2014). One of the possible explanations refers to the low contrast between South American salt marshes and the adjacent open-vegetation environments, which minimizes isolation and speciation (Isacch et al. 2014).
The main uses of southern Brazilian salt marshes and associated estuarine habitats by birds are feeding and roosting (Greenberg et al. 2014; Dias et al. 2017). Salt marshes and adjacent waters support large populations of fishes and invertebrates that constitute major food sources for carnivorous birds, such as grebes, cormorants, egrets, herons, shorebirds, gulls, and terns. The seagrass Ruppia maritima Linnaeus and other aquatic plants growing in shallow waters along the margins of marshes are consumed by herbivorous ducks, swans, and coots, and the seeds of some salt marsh plants are eaten by a few granivorous species (Isacch et al. 2014; Greenberg et al. 2014; Dias et al. 2017). Salt marshes also constitute a habitat for terrestrial invertebrates, which in turn are prey for carnivorous passerines. Larger carnivorous birds, such as falcons and harriers, hunt birds and other small animals in the marshes, and scavengers such as caracaras and vultures patrol the vegetation and the water margins searching for dead fish, crabs, and shellfish.
Large concentrations of birds have been recorded in Brazilian salt marshes. For example, at least 800 individuals of buff-breasted sandpipers (Calidris subruficollis), 688 white-rumped sandpipers (Calidris fuscicollis), and 545 American golden plovers (Pluvialis dominica), all Nearctic migrants, were recorded in high densities feeding in overgrazed salt marshes and adjacent grasslands at Ilha da Torotama, in the Patos Lagoon estuary (RS) (Lanctot et al. 2002; Bencke et al. 2006; Dias et al. 2011). In transition areas with freshwater wetlands at the same locality, flocks of approximately 400 individuals of lesser yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes), 100 white-rumped sandpipers, and 200 pectoral sandpipers (Calidris melanotos) have been registered (Dias et al. 2011). Thousands of black-necked swans (Cygnus melancoryphus) gather in shallow bays surrounded by salt marshes at Patos Lagoon estuary during dry summers and autumns, a substantial part of the population inhabiting the country (Bencke et al. 2006). Nearly 500 barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) were seen foraging over salt- and neighboring freshwater marshes of the Ilha da Torotama (Dias et al. 2011). Salt marshes at the mouth of the Patos Lagoon estuary also harbor important concentrations of birds, especially gulls and terns, e.g., >5000 common terns (Sterna hirundo) (Dias et al. 2011, 2017).
The salt marshes at the Peixe Lagoon (RS) are also important areas for birds. Large numbers of buff-breasted sandpipers and American golden plovers use overgrazed marshes and adjacent grasslands, and thousands of Hudsonian godwits (Limosa haemastica), red knots (Calidris canutus), sanderlings (Calidris alba), and common terns feed and especially roost in mud- and sandflats on the margin of the marshes. Hundreds of black-necked swans and Chilean flamingos (Phoenicopterus chilensis) use the lagoon waters to feed (Bencke et al. 2006).
Bird communities inhabiting Brazilian mangroves and salt marshes have never been comprehensively reviewed. Here we present a compilation of published data together with our unpublished field observations to characterize this particular avifauna, its diversity patterns, how they are adapted to live in these ecosystems, the main threats, conservation strategies, and knowledge gaps.
2 Bird Adaptations to Live in Mangroves and Salt Marshes
Mangroves and salt marshes are unique and dynamic ecosystems marked by high- and low-tide levels. All exclusive and typical mangrove animal species are subject to dynamic, often extreme, environmental conditions, and birds are the terrestrial group with the most adaptations related to their mobility and feeding habits (Hutchings and Saenger 1987).
Mangrove bird assemblages comprise both terrestrial and aquatic species, which explore resources in diverse ways. Hence, all mangrove microhabitats, i.e., arboreal strata, mudflats, sandflats, and salt flats, are used for foraging by a wide range of bird species with different morphologies and behaviors. For instance, gleaning, bark-foraging, and flycatching insectivores (e.g., Tyrannidae species) are adapted to feed on prey items that piscivorous, carnivorous, or species that probe directly in mudflats are not able to explore (e.g., Scolopacidae species). In countries like Malaysia and Australia, bird assemblages exhibit zonation of prey exploration in mangrove trees. In such cases, different branching patterns and structures of the foliage seem to differ enough so that birds could specialize to different mangrove trees (Noske 1995, 1996; Luther and Greenberg 2009). However, in Brazil, no studies have been conducted on feeding adaptations or vertical zonation patterns in mangroves.
In general, mangrove-exclusive bird species feed primarily on insects (~50%), followed by a smaller proportion that feeds on crabs, nectar, and fish (Lefebvre and Poulin 1997; Luther and Greenberg 2009). Roughly 20% of the bird species restricted to mangroves have larger bills than related subspecies or sister taxa inhabiting inland habitats (Grenier and Greenberg 2005; Luther and Greenberg 2009). There is a consistent pantropical pattern of longer and deeper bills in passerine birds restricted to mangroves and salt marshes (Grenier and Greenberg 2005; Greenberg and Olsen 2010; Luther and Greenberg 2011; Greenberg et al. 2012). Longer and slender bills are correlated with a wider foraging-niche breadth and are advantageous for probing in small cracks and crevices, where many prey items can be found. Long bills are also likely useful for probing in mud and among mangrove roots where other prey may be abundant (Luther and Greenberg 2011). Bill size is also related to temperature, as birds living in habitats with higher temperatures tend to have larger bills than birds living in cooler climates and inland terrestrial habitats (Greenberg et al. 2012; Luther and Greenberg 2014). Bills might play an important thermoregulatory role, as reported for tidal marsh sparrows from hot and exposed dune/salt marsh environments. The bill expels excess body heat in these unbuffered, freshwater-limited environments and potentially may reduce water loss (Greenberg et al. 2012).
In salt marshes, some morphological characteristics facilitate bird activities (e.g., foraging, evading predators, and intraspecific communication). The most conspicuous is the morphology of the bill and legs of shorebirds using the marsh vegetation or adjacent mud- and sandflats. Rails have long legs and toes and slender bodies to move through the dense herbaceous vegetation, using colorful frontal shields for visual communication in the dark environment (Sick 2001). Some passerines adapted to live in grasslands also occur in the tall, dense vegetation of salt marshes and have strong legs, long and curved claws, and long tails used for balance. Most are carnivorous and use long and thin bills to hunt in the vegetation, some also hop or walk on the mud, and a few are granivorous and use thick bills to crush seeds of salt marsh plants. In coastal salt marshes, North American sparrow populations have comparatively longer and thinner bills than their inland counterparts, which could be an adaptation that increases the consumption of marine invertebrates at the decrease in seed availability (Greenberg et al. 2012). In the bay-capped wren-spinetail (Spartonoica maluroides), a species strongly associated with South American salt marshes, there are differences in bill shape and plumage coloration between coastal and inland marsh populations. These differences may be explained by the selective pressures related to the adaptation of the beak shape to explore prey in salt marshes, whereas the change in plumage pigmentation (melanism) may improve camouflage and assist in predator evasion (Cardoni et al. 2013). Overall, in tidal marshes of North America, birds often show a high degree of local morphological differentiation (Chan et al. 2006; Greenberg et al. 2006), but this topic has not yet been investigated in Brazilian salt marshes.
3 Bird Diversity Across Mangroves and Salt Marshes
The species richness of birds in Brazilian mangroves and salt marshes has never been properly investigated and the available information is scattered throughout the literature. The data presented herein were obtained through the compilation of 81 published studies on the matter, encompassing 56 peer-reviewed articles, 16 books, and nine book chapters. Data available in online platforms, e.g., Wikiaves 2021, Xeno-Canto, e-Bird, and Taxeus, was not included for not specifying habitat type in their records. For the same reason, we have not included records of museum specimens, as the habitat type in which birds were collected was frequently omitted, particularly in the older ones. We have also omitted a large part of avian studies conducted in Brazilian mangroves and salt marshes for, again, not mentioning explicitly the habitat type of the records. Hence, in this chapter, we included only studies that clearly stated the presence of a species, or the number of species, in specific areas of mangroves and salt marshes, either in the results section itself or in a species list. Although some of these studies may have considered species from nearby habitats as being of mangroves and salt marshes, a fact that is hard to evaluate, the information presented in this chapter is the most objective compilation of the core avifauna of mangroves and salt marshes in Brazil based on available, published studies (see appendix for the list of the considered references).
The species (Table 12.1) were classified according to their conservation status at global (IUCN 2022) and national levels (MMA 2016, 2022) Nomenclature follows the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee (Pacheco et al. 2021). Birds were classified into three categories, as follows:
-
Exclusive species (EXC): Resident species that occur exclusively in mangrove or salt marsh areas
-
Regular species (Re): Species that use mangrove and salt marsh habitats regularly, either throughout the year or on a seasonal basis (in case they are migratory), but that are also recorded in other habitat types, such as terrestrial forests, grasslands, freshwater wetlands, and marine environments, including beaches
-
Occasional species (O): Species occasionally recorded in mangrove and salt marsh habitats
Since mangroves and salt marshes are important areas for migratory birds, we highlighted migratory species using these ecosystems in Brazil. We defined migratory species following Somveille et al. (2018): “(...) those whose breeding and non-breeding distributions do not completely overlap.” Migratory species were identified using references listed in the appendix and Somenzari et al. (2018). Only fully migratory species along the entire Brazilian coast were included, i.e., species breeding in south Brazil and that winter in the northern part of the country were not included in the list. Migratory birds were then attributed into the migration systems defined by Joseph (1997):
-
Pan New World migrants (PNW): Species that winter and summer between the geographical extremes of the South and North American continents
-
Nearctic-Neotropical temperate-tropical migrants (NNTT): Species breeding in temperate North America and migrating to the warm humid tropics
-
South American cool, temperate migrants (SACT): Species breeding in southernmost South America and that migrate towards the midlatitudes of the continent
Species breeding in the Old World (Africa and Eurasia) were indicated separately.
3.1 Mangrove Birds
In Brazilian mangroves there are 368 bird species distributed in 24 orders and 62 families, representing 19% of the species occurring in the country. The most representative families are Tyrannidae (34 out of 144 species in Brazil), Thraupidae (32/156), Rallidae (16/35), Accipitridae (20/47), Scolopacidae (20/36), Ardeidae (16/24), Picidae (16/57), Anatidae (12/26), Icteridae (11/42), Trochilidae (11/89), Psittacidae (10/87), and Falconidae (9/20). From this list, there are 117 species in common with birds recorded in salt marshes. Also, 87 species (23%) are regularly recorded in mangroves, in addition to the five exclusive species, representing 5% of the birds in Brazil. The most representative families of the regularly recorded species were Scolopacidae (13), Ardeidae (11), Anatidae (5), Accipitridae (4), Alcedinidae (4), Rallidae (4), and Charadriidae (4) (see Table 12.1).
3.1.1 Exclusive Species
Five species are included in this category: tricolored heron, scarlet ibis, rufous crab hawk (Buteogallus aequinoctialis), mangrove rail (Rallus longirostris), and mangrove cuckoo (Coccyzus minor). Another species, bicolored conebill (Conirostrum bicolor), is exclusive to mangroves in most of its range but also inhabits the várzea forests of the Amazon basin (Cohn-Haft et al. 2007). In mangroves, this species is frequently recorded and more common than the other exclusive ones. The tricolored egret and mangrove cuckoo show restricted geographical ranges in relation to the distribution of mangroves along the Brazilian littoral, occurring only in the north and northeast regions, whereas the remaining species present broader distributions. The scarlet ibis has large populations in the north and northeastern regions, with a population in the southeast region currently expanding both northwards and southwards from Cubatão, São Paulo State. Rufous crab hawk presents local occurrence, with reduced populations; mangrove rail is frequent in the south and southeastern regions of the country, rarer in the northeast, and absent in the north (Vieira 2015) (Fig. 12.1).
3.1.2 Regular Species
As many as 87 species are included in this category. The yellow-crowned night heron and the little wood-rail (Aramides mangle) are largely restricted to mangroves. The former species is not considered exclusive to mangroves because there is a population in a salt marsh area in south Brazil (Gianuca et al. 2011). The little wood-rail is a typical mangrove species, although the populations from Northeast Brazil perform partial landward migrations during the rainy season, a movement still poorly known (Marcondes et al. 2014). A large part of the regular species is associated with aquatic habitats (families Anatidae, Ardeidae, Alcedinidae, among others), and only five passerines are associated with those environments, namely, the yellow-chinned spinetail (Certhiaxis cinnamomeus), short-crested flycatcher (Myiarchus ferox), masked water-tyrant (Fluvicola nengeta), southern rough-winged swallow (Stelgidopteryx ruficollis), and masked yellowthroat (Geothlypis aequinoctialis). Other species such as the black vulture (Coragyps atratus), ruddy ground-dove (Columbina talpacoti), and great kiskadee (Pitangus sulphuratus) are associated with a broad range of habitats, including open environments and urban areas. The azure jay (Cyanocorax caeruleus), long-billed wren (Cantorchilus longirostris), and Brazilian tanager (Ramphocelus bresilia) are frequently recorded in mangroves due to the direct connection between the latter and the coastal lowland forests and restinga forests where they dwell. Among sandy beach species, the migratory common tern and the resident collared plover (Charadrius collaris) are frequently recorded in mangroves, using sedimentary banks (muddy or preferably sandy) for resting. Some seabird species such as the South American tern (Sterna hirundinacea), Cabot’s tern (Thalasseus acuflavidus), and royal tern (Thalasseus maximus) display local occurrences in mangroves, mainly in regions where there are sandbanks between or within mangroves.
3.1.3 Occasional Species
There are 275 species included in this category, represented by a wide range of families. The high species richness in this category may be explained by the broad latitudinal extension of mangroves along the Brazilian coast, enabling the occurrence of species from a broad range of adjacent habitat types, even sporadically. In northern Brazil, the least tern (Sternula antillarum), yellow-billed tern (Sternula superciliaris), large-billed tern (Phaetusa simplex), gull-billed tern (Gelochelidon nilotica), and roseate tern (Sterna dougallii) show local occurrences in mangroves, mainly in regions where there are sandbanks between or within mangrove areas. The toco toucan (Ramphastos toco) and curl-crested jay (Cyanocorax cristatellus) have expanded their ranges eastwards in the last decades, especially in São Paulo State, and have been locally recorded in mangrove areas (Silva e Silva and Olmos 2007; Mancini et al. 2018). Brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) and western reef-heron (Egretta gularis) are vagrant (Somenzari et al. 2018). The remaining species present local and sporadic occurrences.
3.1.4 Migrant Species
In mangroves, 40 migrant species were recorded (including 27 in common with salt marshes), mainly of the families Scolopacidae (19), Charadriidae (4), and Laridae (4). There are 29 Pan New World migrants, 17 of which are frequently recorded in mangrove areas and 12 that use this habitat occasionally. Among the most frequent species are the shorebirds Tringa spp. and Calidris spp. and the osprey Pandion haliaetus. Six species are Nearctic-Neotropical temperate-tropical migrants such as the American flamingo (Phoenicopterus ruber), brown pelican, and great blue heron. The lake duck (Oxyura vittata), rufous-chested dotterel (Charadrius modestus), and austral negrito (Lessonia rufa) are South American cool, temperate migrants. Lastly, the squacco heron (Ardeola ralloides), western reef-heron, and marbled godwit (Limosa fedoa) are migrants from the Old World (Table 12.1).
3.1.5 Knowledge Gaps in Species Composition
The knowledge about mangrove birds in Brazil presents some important gaps regarding species composition. There are at least three species that occur in mangroves in adjacent French Guiana, namely, rufous-necked wood rail (Aramides axillaris), arrowhead piculet (Picumnus minutissimus), and northern scrub-flycatcher (Sublegatus arenarum) that may potentially occur in Brazil (Restall et al. 2006; Sigrist 2006; Robbins 2018; Taylor 2018; Winkler et al. 2018). Furthermore, there are species known to use mangroves in neighboring countries but that never have been reported for these environments in Brazil, e.g., red-legged honeycreeper (Cyanerpes cyaneus), carib grackle (Quiscalus lugubris), and Amazonian tyrannulet (Inezia subflava) (Ridgely and Tudor 1994; Restall et al. 2006). New taxonomic proposals, which often elevate some populations to the species level, may contribute to increasing avian species richness in Brazilian mangroves as well. In addition, some species have more than one subspecies with known or potential occurrence on the Brazilian coast and that may attain specific status after future studies, e.g., Wilson’s plover (Charadrius wilsonia) and mangrove rail, the former even presenting two subspecies in North and Northeast Brazil (Grantsau and Lima 2008; Vieira 2015).
3.1.6 Conservation
Among the 368 species recorded in mangroves, 15 (4.1%) are currently considered endangered to some extent. Seven are globally threatened (IUCN 2022), nine are included in the Brazilian list of threatened taxa (MMA 2016, 2022) and two, Dot-winged Crake (Laterallus spilopterus) and buffy-fronted seedeater (Sporophila frontalis), are in both lists. Regarding the 87 species classified as regular mangrove users, seven are included in the Brazilian Red List: Wilson’s plover, red knot, South American tern and Cabot tern are vulnerable; royal tern and semipalmated sandpiper and short-billed dowitcher (Limnodromus griseus) are endangered (MMA 2016, 2022).
Habitat loss is the main cause for all population declines (Morrison and Ross 1989; Mohr et al. 2008; Campos 2010; Sipinski et al. 2014; Schunck and Rodrigues 2018). The red-tailed parrot (Amazona brasiliensis) has a stable population in its main area of occurrence in the state of Paraná, but its restricted range (from the southern coast of São Paulo State to the northern coast of Santa Catarina State) makes it especially vulnerable to habitat loss (Sipinski et al. 2014). The same occurs with royal tern, whose breeding areas in Brazil are all located in São Paulo State (Mohr et al. 2008; Campos 2010). For the Pan New World migrant red knot, there was a population decline of 55% in Northeast Brazil in the last three decades (Morrison and Ross 1989; Schunck and Rodrigues 2018). This decline happened because of the fall in food availability at Delaware Bay, in the United States of America, together with habitat loss along migration routes (Baker et al. 2004; Morrison et al. 2004). Similarly, short-billed dowitcher has presented a population decline of roughly 86% in the last decades in North Brazil (Morrison and Ross 1989; Schunck and Almeida in prep.), due to habitat loss both in the wintering grounds and along the migration routes (Rodrigues and Carvalho 2011; Valente et al. 2011). The population of semipalmated sandpiper declined 79% in northern Brazil since the 1980s (Valente et al. 2011; Morrison et al. 2012; Schunck et al. in prep.). Wilsons’s plover presents a resident subspecies in Brazil; nevertheless, some other populations migrate to Brazil, such as Charadrius w. cinnamominus (Wiersma et al. 2018), and in northern and northeastern Brazilian coast, these populations have been declining in the last decades (Rodrigues 2007; Oliveira in prep.), probably due to disturbance in their breeding grounds.
3.2 Salt Marsh Birds
In Brazilian salt marshes 163 bird species (18 orders and 39 families) were reported in the literature, representing 8% of the country’s species list. The most representative families are Scolopacidae (18 out of 28 species in Brazil), Laridae (15/29), Tyrannidae (12/144), Rallidae (11/35), Ardeidae (11/24), Furnariidae (10/106), Anatidae (9/26), and Charadriidae (7/11) (see Table 12.1). From this list, 117 species also occur in mangroves. A total of 123 species occurs regularly in salt marshes, representing 75% of Brazilian salt marsh birds and 6% of the Brazilian avifauna. The most representative families of the regularly recorded species were Scolopacidae (18), Ardeidae (10), Sternidae (9), Rallidae (8), Anatidae (7), and Charadriidae (7).
3.2.1 Exclusive Species
The dot-winged crake (Laterallus spilopterus) is the only species exclusively recorded in salt marshes in Brazil (Bencke et al. 2003). This small, globally threatened bird inhabits mainly salt marshes covered by dense stands of denseflower cordgrass (Spartina densiflora Brongn). The Peixe and Patos lagoons (RS) are the only localities where this bird has been recorded in the country (Bencke et al. 2003). The species is found almost exclusively in halophytic vegetation throughout its range in southern South America, both in coastal and inland wetlands, and is one of the few birds strongly associated with salt marshes in the continent (Greenberg et al. 2014) (Fig. 12.1).
3.2.2 Regular Species
A total of 123 bird species are included in this category, 43 in common with regular mangrove species such as yellow-crowned night heron, roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), and lesser yellowlegs. Nearly 65% of the regular species in this category belong to typical waterbird families (e.g., Scolopacidae, Anatidae, Ardeidae, among others). Among the remaining regular species, some are exclusive of wetland habitats, despite being members of families of predominantly terrestrial species, such as the furnariids wren-like rushbird (Phleocryptes melanops) and sulfur-throated spinetail (Limnoctites sulphuriferus), the tyrannids of the genus Pseudocolopteryx, and the icterids yellow-winged blackbird (Agelasticus thilius) and chestnut-capped blackbird (Chrysomus ruficapillus). Several grassland birds, aerial-feeding species, and habitat generalists complete the list. Most waterbirds of regular occurrence in salt marshes also use freshwater wetlands or beaches and lagoons in southern Brazil (Belton 1994). However, some of them are more abundant or frequent in salt marshes and associated habitats and probably rely more on this kind of wetland than other wetland types, namely, the Chilean flamingo, Andean flamingo (Phoenicoparrus andinus), yellow-crowned night-heron, little blue heron, semipalmated plover, Hudsonian godwit, willet, semipalmated sandpiper, Olrog’s gull (Larus atlanticus), and bay-capped wren-spinetail (Barbieri 2008). The latter is also strongly associated with salt marsh habitats in Argentina and Uruguay and may be considered a salt marsh specialist after additional investigations (Greenberg et al. 2014). Despite being recorded in a broad range of grassland habitats, sometimes in expressive numbers, the buff-breasted sandpiper and grass wren (Cistothorus platensis) are particularly abundant in Brazilian salt marshes, where both attain high densities (Bencke et al. 2003).
3.2.3 Occasional Species
This category includes 39 species represented by a range of families. Included in this list are birds common in adjacent freshwater wetlands and grasslands and that occasionally venture into estuarine habitats, such as the white-faced whistling-duck (Dendrocygna viduata), spot-flanked gallinule (Porphyriops melanops), spotted nothura (Nothura maculosa), and Hellmayr’s pipit (Anthus hellmayri), as well as species reliant on shrubs and trees to fulfill part of or their entire life cycles, e.g., rufous hornero (Furnarius rufus), Spix’s spinetail (Synallaxis spixi), and tropical kingbird (Tyrannus melancholicus). These species are only found in salt marshes with the presence of woody vegetation, which is naturally rare. Species that are uncommon in south Brazil are also included among the occasional users of salt marshes, such as the magnificent frigatebird (Fregata magnificens), short-billed dowitcher, and black tern (Chlidonias niger) (Belton 1994).
3.2.4 Migrant Species
A total of 34 migrant species are reported in Brazilian salt marshes, mainly Scolopacidae (16) and Laridae (4), all of which also occur in mangroves. There are 27 Pan New World migrant species, of which 85% are regularly recorded in salt marshes. Among the most frequent species are the shorebirds Tringa spp. and Calidris spp. Seven species are South American cool, temperate migrants, all making frequent use of salt marshes (Table 12.1).
3.2.5 Conservation
Among the 163 species recorded in salt marshes, 13 are of conservation concern. One is globally threatened (IUCN 2022), ten are included in the Brazilian list of threatened taxa (MMA 2016, 2022), and two species, the dot-winged crake and the black-and-white monjita (Heteroxolmis dominicanus), are in both lists (MMA 2016, 2022; IUCN 2022). Of the three globally threatened species, only the Andean flamingo and dot-winged crake are salt marsh regulars. The former is mostly an Andean breeder found in Brazil in shallow waters and mudbanks adjacent to and, more rarely, within salt marshes in a few localities of Santa Catarina State and at Peixe Lagoon (Bencke et al. 2006; Ghizoni-Jr and Piacentini 2010). The species occurs in small and varying numbers throughout the year in Brazil, being more numerous in the winter, and may largely be composed of immature and nonbreeding individuals (Bencke et al. 2006; Ghizoni-Jr and Piacentini 2010). Disturbance by humans, coastal development, and hunting are the main threats to this flamingo in Brazil (Ghizoni-Jr and Piacentini 2010). Individuals at Peixe Lagoon are protected within the Lagoa do Peixe National Park, but since this protected area is not fully implemented, they are often disturbed by shrimp harvesters and tourists.
In Brazil, the dot-winged crake occurs only in salt marshes of the Peixe Lagoon, which are located entirely within the national park, plus a handful of individual salt marshes at the estuary of Patos Lagoon (Bencke et al. 2003; Dias et al. 2017). This resident species inhabits dense vegetation and is largely threatened by overgrazing and burning of salt marshes and, to a lesser extent, by coastal development (Bencke et al. 2003). Despite occurring in two protected areas (Parque Nacional da Lagoa do Peixe and Área de Proteção Ambiental da Lagoa Verde) (see Chap. 3, Map 17), overgrazing and burning are still major threats due to the low regulation enforcement in both areas (Bencke et al. 2003, 2006; Dias et al. 2017). Two of the regionally threatened species considered regular salt marsh users, semipalmated sandpiper and red knot, are found in large numbers in Brazilian salt marshes only at the mouth of the Peixe Lagoon. In this locality, semipalmated sandpiper occurs throughout the austral warm season, whereas red knot peaks in the late austral summer and early austral autumn (Resende and Leeuwenberg 1987; Bencke et al. 2006). Both species may be impacted by disturbance by shrimp harvesters, fishermen, and tourists, which are frequent at the mouth of the lagoon (Bencke et al. 2006).
Royal tern also occurs in large numbers in salt marshes at the mouths of the Patos and Peixe lagoons, especially in winter, where they use sandbanks for roosting and may also suffer disturbance from fishermen and tourists. The two most important areas used by the buff-breasted sandpiper in Brazil, Lagoa do Peixe National Park and Torotama Island, are used throughout the austral spring and summer (Resende and Leeuwenberg 1987; Bencke et al. 2003, 2006). This sandpiper is restricted to areas of stunted vegetation where overgrazing by domestic livestock maintains the grass low. Suitable habitat on Torotama Island is relatively stable, but with the full implementation of Lagoa do Peixe National Park and the removal of livestock from the protected area, this species is expected to lose a substantial area of habitat unless specific habitat management practices are put in place (Bencke et al. 2003, 2006).
Cinereus harrier (Circus cinereus) is regionally threatened by the loss of nesting habitat in freshwater wetlands (Bencke et al. 2003). This bird hunts over a variety of natural and man-made open vegetation habitats, especially grasslands and freshwater wetlands, and is comparatively rarer in salt marshes (Bencke et al. 2003). Likewise, populations of Hudson’s canastero (Asthenes hudsoni) inhabiting salt marshes are comparatively less threatened than those using adjacent sandy grasslands, which are prone to exotic pine tree invasion and urban and wind energy development (Serafini 2013).
4 Threats to Birds in Mangroves and Salt Marshes
Brazilian mangroves have steadily decreased in the area (Magris and Barreto 2010; Schaeffer Novelli et al. 2016), which represents a major threat to its avifauna. On the other hand, salt marsh destruction has been less severe, remaining almost unchanged since 1947 in south Brazil (Marangoni and Costa 2009a, b). Although the role of habitat loss and fragmentation upon avian diversity in Brazilian mangroves has not been properly explored, studies in other countries have demonstrated that area reduction can lead to population declines and local extinctions, predominantly of insectivorous species (Alongi 2009; Buelow and Sheaves 2015; Lawson et al. 2017).
Studies evaluating the effects of mangrove fragmentation on birds have shown contradictory results, either emphasizing (Alongi 2009) or deemphasizing (Chacin et al. 2015) the role of isolation in reducing diversity. In salt marshes, bird diversity is positively associated with patch size and proximity to other patches, with large wetlands possibly serving as population sources for some species, while small, isolated marshes act as population sinks (Shriver et al. 2004; Powell 2006). The landscape context in which mangrove and salt marsh fragments are inserted may also influence species richness and composition since adjacent patches of unsuitable habitat usually correlate with less diversity (Lefebvre and Poulin 1997; Shriver et al. 2004).
Mangrove and salt marsh remnants in Brazil are subject to habitat modification from a series of anthropogenic activities. Avian diversity in mangroves is positively associated with habitat heterogeneity, especially of vegetation features and foraging habitats (Mohd-Azlan et al. 2015; Mancini et al. 2018). Although there are no studies evaluating how habitat modification influences mangrove birds in the country, it is likely that human-induced habitat homogenization, especially through logging, garbage disposal, and canalization (Olmos and Silva e Silva 2003; Valente et al. 2011; Schaeffer Novelli et al. 2016), is negatively affecting bird diversity.
Fishing and harvesting of aquatic resources are widespread along the Brazilian coastline. Direct effects include the damage to mangrove roots and propagules, plastic and oil pollution, and erosion from the wake of boats, while indirect effects are linked to the removal of keystone species known to influence forest structure and nutrient cycling (Schories et al. 2003; Nascimento et al. 2017). Harvesting may impact fish-, shrimp- and crab-eating birds or even the entire bird community indirectly via habitat modification (Nagelkerken et al. 2008; Mohd-Azlan et al. 2015). Trophic cascade effects are also known to affect salt marsh ecosystems. In North America, overfishing of predator species increased herbivory by crabs and led to marsh die-offs (Altieri et al. 2012). Crabs are also important primary consumers in Brazilian salt marshes (Alberti et al. 2007) and may indirectly influence the diversity of bird communities by altering vegetation structure, as observed in nearby Argentina (Cardoni et al. 2007). Nevertheless, how the harvesting of aquatic resources influences avian diversity in Brazilian estuaries remains to be properly evaluated.
The increasing use of estuarine habitats for leisure may also impact birds due to direct disturbance promoted by people and their pets. People walking or running, accompanied by unleashed dogs, driving all-terrain vehicles and boats disrupt avian behavior, especially feeding, resting, and breeding (Smit and Visser 1993; Borgmann 2011; Scarton 2018). This may cause alterations on how birds use key estuarine habitats, affecting food intake, resting/non-resting budgets, and breeding performance – all of which are expected to have negative consequences at the population level due to energetic and reproductive costs (Smit and Visser 1993; Borgmann 2011; Scarton 2018). In Brazil, such forms of disturbance are more likely to affect plovers, sandpipers, and terns (most of which are migratory) roosting in sandbars and mudflats, especially near cities, ports, and touristic destinations (Olmos and Silva e Silva 2003; Valente et al. 2011; Dias et al. 2013).
Invasive alien species, such as water buffalos in mangroves (Valente et al. 2011) and feral pigs and wild boars in salt marshes (Quintela et al. 2010) may additionally impact bird communities. Browsing by livestock alters the morphological structure of mangroves (Hoppe-Speer and Adams 2015) and may lead to habitat simplification and associated loss of avian diversity. Pigs uproot salt marsh vegetation, eliminating habitat for rails and salt marsh passerines reliant on dense, tall vegetation. Pigs may also prey on bird eggs and younglings, directly affecting the population of breeding birds such as rails and ducks.
Southern Brazilian salt marshes are also affected by poorly managed extensive livestock ranching, which impacts wetlands by decreasing aboveground plant material, altering biodiversity, and modifying ecosystem functioning (FNMA et al. 2009; Marangoni and Costa 2009a). Similar effects have been recorded in salt marshes subject to fire, which are frequently used to manage pastures in livestock ranching areas (Marangoni and Costa 2009a). In Argentinean salt marshes, overgrazing and burning impact birds by reducing the abundance of tall-vegetation specialists, including species of conservation concern as dot-winged crake and bay-capped wren-spinetail, while favoring a few short-vegetation species but without major influence on abundance and species richness (Isacch et al. 2004; Isacch and Cardoni 2011). However, tallgrass birds can maintain populations under low-intensity grazing and burning, which demonstrates that livestock ranching and avian conservation are compatible under proper management (Cardoni et al. 2012).
Pollution from various sources (e.g., sewage and urban wastewater, industrial and agricultural effluents, garbage and solid waste, airborne pollutants) is also a common threat to Brazilian estuarine ecosystems, particularly to mangroves and salt marshes inserted within or near urban and industrial areas (Olmos and Silva e Silva 2003; Marangoni and Costa 2009a; Magris and Barreto 2010; Valente et al. 2011; Schaeffer Novelli et al. 2016). Birds are vulnerable to a range of pollutants that can result in mortality or sublethal behavioral, reproductive, and physiological effects depending on the intrinsic toxicity of the pollutant and exposure (Burger and Gochfeld 2001). The effects of pollutants depend on whether the exposure is acute or chronic, and in aquatic birds, this usually occurs through the ingestion of food and water (Burger and Gochfeld 2001, 2004). Oil spills recorded in Brazilian mangroves (Olmos and Silva e Silva 2003; Valente et al. 2011) may have impacted birds by disrupting their thermal balance and via toxicological effects following ingestion (Jenssen 1994; Burger and Gochfeld 2001). Plastic pollution is widespread (Olmos and Silva e Silva 2003; Valente et al. 2011) and tends to increase in coastal environments, threatening birds through entanglement and ingestion of plastic litter (Derraik 2002). Chemicals from sewage and urban wastewater, as well as industrial and agricultural effluents, usually affect individuals and populations through chronic effects linked to neurotoxicity and endocrine disruption (Burger and Gochfeld 2001, 2004; Köhler and Triebskorn 2013). Bioaccumulation of pollutants is a major concern, especially because many birds in mangroves and salt marshes occupy high trophic levels (Burger and Gochfeld 2001, 2004). On top of that, chemical pollution from sewage discharges may also modify the physiognomy of salt marsh vegetation, indirectly altering the composition and abundance of bird assemblages (Cardoni et al. 2011).
The greatest potential threat to mangroves and salt marshes is climate change, which will impact estuarine habitats via alterations in temperature and rainfall regimes, increasing extreme weather events, storms, and high tides, higher oceanic carbon dioxide concentration, and sea-level rise (Schaeffer Novelli et al. 2016). The survival of bird populations under climate change will depend on how they adapt to climate change and track their preferred climate via dispersal (Sekercioglu et al. 2012). Migratory species are expected to be particularly susceptible because higher temperatures may influence the timing of migration, as well as the availability of food resources in breeding and nonbreeding areas (Wrona et al. 2006; Sekercioglu et al. 2012). Since many mangroves and salt marsh areas in Brazil are key staging or wintering sites for migratory sea- and shorebirds (Valente et al. 2011; Dias et al. 2013), the fate of these areas under climate change will have important implications for avian conservation on a global scale.
If higher temperatures indeed promote an increase in mangrove cover along the Brazilian coast, such habitat expansion could benefit mangrove birds. However, the predicted increase is expected to be accompanied by changes in vegetation physiognomy and diversity (Schaeffer Novelli et al. 2016), potentially altering the diversity of avian communities. Loss of mangrove area among other effects of climate change, on the other hand, would reduce avian diversity overall, implying important population declines (or even extinction) of typical mangrove species (e.g., rufous crab hawk, little wood-rail), as well as forest birds that use these habitats as a refuge because of the loss of other upland adjacent forest types (Nagelkerken et al. 2008; Luther and Greenberg 2009).
The extensive salt marshes in south Brazil are expected to shrink in area due to erosion by rising sea level and invasion by southward expanding mangroves (Schaeffer Novelli et al. 2016). This may lead to the regional extinction of exclusive species (e.g., dot-winged crake), as well as important population losses of birds that are particularly abundant in these marshes (e.g., bay-capped wren-spinetail, grass wren) (Bencke et al. 2003). Changes in bird community structure may already be taking place in southern Brazilian salt marshes, even though mangrove trees have not yet colonized these formations. For example, the recent expansion and breeding of mangrove birds (e.g., yellow-crowned night heron and little blue heron) in salt marshes of south Brazil have been linked to the local increase in air temperature (Gianuca et al. 2011, 2012). Such expansion suggests that mangrove bird species may move ahead of the vegetation shift by using other forest types to breed and roost.
5 Conservation Challenges and Initiatives
Mangroves represent a rare forest type found in intertidal coastal zones largely restricted to tropical and subtropical regions (Sandilyan and Katherisan 2012). This complex ecosystem has been facing increasing threats due to human activities in the last decades, and it is estimated that roughly 35% of the global cover of mangroves was lost between 1980 and 2000 (Valiela et al. 2001; ICMBio 2015). Such reduction may be responsible for increasing the risk of extinction of at least 40% of the animal species that are restricted to mangroves (Polidoro et al. 2010), and ca. 14 bird species that are threatened to some extent. Nevertheless, detailed studies regarding the effects of mangrove destruction on the avifauna are still insufficient, especially in the Neotropics.
Brazil is the second country in mangrove extension, encompassing nearly 10% of this ecosystem in the world (Hamilton and Casey 2016). Roughly 80% of the Brazilian mangroves are in legally protected areas in the three levels of governance (national, state, and municipal) (Ferreira and Lacerda 2016). Taking national protected areas into consideration, ca. 79% are designed to promote sustainable use, most under the categories of environmental protected areas (APA) and extractive reserves (RESEX) (Magris and Barreto 2010). However, continuous threats are known to impact Brazilian mangroves, such as the deterioration of water quality in freshwater effluents and coastal habitats, deforestation, use of salt flats for salt extraction, and shrimp farming, among others. Of all threats, aquaculture represents the highest one (Alongi 2002; Magris and Barreto 2010). Recent estimates indicate that roughly 500 km2 of Brazilian mangroves were destroyed in the last 30 years (FAO 2007; Romanach et al. 2018), even though the Brazilian Forest Code defines these ecosystems as Areas of Permanent Preservation (APP) and imposes restrictions to their use and occupation. Thus, it is extremely important not only to create protected areas and elaborate management plans but also to strengthen law enforcement (for more information, see Chap. 16).
Globally, salt marsh areas have declined between 25% and 50% in cover (Duarte et al. 2008; Crooks et al. 2011). In Brazil, a large portion of salt marshes is considered either Areas of Permanent Preservation (APP) or of restricted use according to the Brazilian Forest Code (Dias et al. 2017). Although a few individual marshes in southern Brazil have been partially or entirely lost to urban and industrial development and shrimp farms up to the 1990s, law enforcement has maintained salt marsh area stable up to the present (Marangoni and Costa 2009a, b). Two protected areas conserve salt marshes in Brazil: the Lagoa Verde Environmental Protection Area (510 ha under municipal responsibility) and the Lagoa do Peixe National Park (34,000 ha under national responsibility) (FNMA et al. 1999; Bencke et al. 2006; Dias et al. 2017). The former has been poorly implemented and allows “sustainable development,” meaning that it is managed not only for biodiversity conservation but also for human sustainable activities (Dias et al. 2017). Although included in a more restrictive category, the Lagoa do Peixe National Park is also not fully implemented and still has many private areas used for livestock ranching within its boundaries (Bencke et al. 2006). Particularly troublesome is the dilemma of the removal of livestock from the park since it provides habitat for some bird species reliant on shortgrass habitats while eliminating tallgrass salt marshes on which other birds depend (Bencke et al. 2006). Shrimp harvesters and fishermen still carry on with their activities in the park, and unregulated tourism is common (Bencke et al. 2006). Fully implementing these protected areas and including formal measures to ensure adequate habitat management and the protection of threatened species in management plans would benefit salt marsh birds (Bencke et al. 2006; Dias et al. 2017).
Large, virtually pristine salt marshes exist at Pequena Lagoon and Torotama Island and the establishment of protected areas could ensure their conservation (Dias et al. 2017). Law enforcement and environmental education campaigns would also benefit avian conservation, especially if the restrictions imposed by the Forest Code were reinforced (Dias et al. 2017). Moreover, awareness towards conservation should be stimulated through environment-friendly activities (e.g., birdwatching, organic farming, properly managed extensive livestock ranching), all of which have the potential to generate income for local communities if properly implemented (Dias et al. 2017).
Recently, the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio), a branch of the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment, has promoted working groups to elaborate conservation plans for specific bird groups, such as mangrove birds and migrant shorebirds. The National Plan for the Conservation of Migrant Shorebirds (ICMBio 2013) and the National Plan for Threatened Mangrove Species of Socioeconomic Importance (ICMBio 2015) have as their main goals the proposal of effective conservation policies and the establishment of mechanisms that ensure the protection of the species under their scope and minimize the loss of their habitat.
6 Knowledge Gaps
Knowledge gaps are summarized in Table 12.2. Among the 69 consulted pieces of literature on Brazilian mangrove birds, 74% were scientific papers, 17% books, and 9% book chapters. A substantial part of these studies does not present detailed information on species specifically recorded in mangroves. Field studies represent the largest amount of information in the literature (93%), while the other 7% are large compilations (books), which are also based on field studies, museum specimens, and authors’ observations (Ridgely and Tudor 1989, 1994; Stotz et al. 1996; Sick 1997; Willis and Oniki 2003; Sigrist 2006; Grantsau 2010). There is also important information on mangrove birds in dissertations and congress abstracts (gray literature). Virtually nothing is known about birds using salt marshes in Brazil other than what features in studies carried out in the Peixe and Patos lagoons (RS). The avifauna of salt marsh fringes in mangrove areas, for example, is unknown.
6.1 Field Studies
The published information on mangrove birds was collected in 16 Brazilian states that contain these habitats, with the number of studies varying according to the extension of habitat in each state. One of the most well-studied mangrove areas in Brazil is Mangue Seco in Bahia State, northeast Brazil, but the published studies do not mention the precise habitat where the bird species were recorded.
The largest part of the available studies presents qualitative data over quantitative or natural history data. Among the quantitative data, most studies focus on Nearctic migrants of the families Charadriidae, Laridae, Scolopacidae, and Sternidae, as well as Accipitridae, Anatidae, Ardeidae, Falconidae, Psittacidae, and Threskiornithidae (e.g., Olmos and Silva e Silva 2003; Galetti et al. 2006; Almeida and Rodrigues 2015; Souza and Rodrigues 2015). Natural history accounts are available only for a few species, such as the scarlet ibis, yellow-crowned night heron, Wilson’s plover, orange-winged parrot (Amazona amazonica), and red-tailed parrot (e.g., Cunha et al. 2000; Gianuca 2007; Grose et al. 2013). The more incipient studies are those aimed at investigating the effects of human activities, e.g., water pollution, illegal mangrove occupation, and oil spills on coastal birds, including mangrove species (e.g., Olmos and Silva e Silva 2003; Rodrigues 2007; Valente et al. 2011), albeit not quantitatively evaluating those impacts (e.g., Barbieri 2001; Hvenegaard and Barbieri 2010).
Long-term bird population studies are still lacking in Brazilian mangroves and salt marshes. Such studies are crucial for a better understanding of population trends on both local and national scales. Quantitative studies that detect annual rates of changes in the average number of individuals in different areas, especially of sensitive taxa (e.g., threatened, exclusive, or migrant species), may reveal population declines that would go unnoticed with purely qualitative, presence/absence-based studies (see Lloyd and Doyle 2011). Likewise, natural history studies focused on elucidating avian ecology may also help to understand the proximal causes of eventual declines. This may be especially important for habitat-specialist species, for which the diminishing quality or extent of habitat surely is an important pressure.
Virtually nothing is known about the potential impacts of pollutants in urban and industrial wastewater on Brazilian mangrove and salt marsh bird communities. Long-term, wide-range monitoring initiatives as well as short-term, local studies targeting the effects of water quality on mangrove and salt marsh bird species are highly recommended. Likewise, environmental impact assessments (EIA), a national requirement ensuring that decision-makers understand the environmental impacts of their projects and plans, must be conducted more rigorously and taking into account their effects on mangrove and salt marsh birds. Unfortunately, human interference and its consequences to coastal ecosystems are still underestimated, and thorough population studies in mangroves and salt marshes, correlated with physical and other biological parameters, are critical to determine avian population trends and whether eventual declines are in course.
7 Final Remarks
Besides the significant advances in the knowledge of mangrove and salt marsh birds and the gaps mentioned above, additional procedures may improve our understanding of this ecological system. Ornithological studies conducted in mangrove and salt marsh areas (e.g., inventories, monitoring programs, specimen collection) must explicitly include a reference of the habitat where each species was recorded. This is valid for photographic, sound, or video records deposited in databases as well. In the case of published works, this information must be included either in the results section, in species accounts, or as details in species lists (see, e.g., Olmos and Silva e Silva 2003; Lees et al. 2014). Relevant information present in the grey literature should be formally published to better understand the occurrence and status of poorly known species in mangroves, such as red-and-white spinetail (Certhiaxis mustelinus), pileated finch (Coryphospingus pileatus), crested oropendola (Psarocolius decumanus), comb duck (Sarkidiornis sylvicola), and yellow-bellied seedeater (Sporophila nigricollis), among others.
Field studies in Brazilian mangroves are urgent along the whole coast, including quantitative data, which are crucial for short- and long-term populational monitoring initiatives. Detailed studies of the human impacts on mangrove birds are also fundamental from a conservation perspective. In addition to that, reviews of the information available in museum specimens and citizen science online platforms (e.g., Wikiaves, e-Bird, Xeno-Canto, Táxeus) are also important for a better understanding of the occurrence and conservation status of mangrove and salt marsh birds.
In some mangrove regions, bird assemblages exhibit zonation, with species even specializing on different mangrove tree species (Noske 1995, 1996; Luther and Greenberg 2009). Since habitat loss may have a differential effect upon distinct mangrove zones, some bird species may be more threatened than others by human activities within or nearby these ecosystems (Magris and Barreto 2010; Polidoro et al. 2010). Therefore, future studies should focus on detecting and documenting fine-scale habitat requirements of exclusive and regular species to better understand niche partitioning and the possible existence of avian zonation in Brazilian mangroves. This could shed light on how different species respond to different human activities and their potential negative effects. Another goal is the implementation of local conservation education programs and citizen science initiatives, with public engagement and the involvement of local communities, which are fundamental to set best practices for the conservation of mangrove and salt marsh birds.
Finally, the creation of new protected areas encompassing mangroves (ICMBio 2018) and salt marshes would be important to conserve birds and other organisms in Brazil. However, even the categorization of mangrove habitats as Areas of Permanent Protection (APP) has been constantly threatened by the current government. In 2020, the National Environment Council (CONAMA) approved the removal of these regulations, which would allow developers to clear large areas of natural habitats for tourism or real state enterprises. Fortunately, the Federal Supreme Court revoked the removal of these regulations following protests from researchers and environmentalists. Mangrove restoration projects are limited to less than 25 isolated attempts, rarely exceeding half a hectare and with high plant mortality rates (Menghini et al. 2018). Furthermore, data on restoration and monitoring remain unpublished or reduced to planting techniques (Rovai et al. 2012). Salt marsh restoration projects are also incipient and limited to small areas (Costa 2011).
References
Acevedo MA, Aide TM (2008) Bird community dynamics and habitat associations in karsts, mangrove and Pterocarpous forest fragments in an urban zone in Puerto Rico. Caribb J Sci 44:402–416
Aguiar KMO, Naiff RH, Xavier B (2010) Aves da Reserva Biológica do Lago Piratuba, Amapá, Brasil. Ornithologia 4:1–14
Alberti J, Escapa M, Daleo P, Iribarne O, Silliman B, Bertness M (2007) Local and geographic variation in grazing intensity by herbivorous crabs in SW Atlantic salt marshes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 349:235–243
Almeida BJM, Barbieri E (2008) Biodiversidade das aves do manguezal da 13 de julho em Aracaju, Sergipe. O Mundo da Saúde 32:317–328
Almeida BJM, Ferrari SF (2011) Occurrence and breeding record of the American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus palliatus, Temminick 1820) in Sergipe, Northeastern Brazil. Ararajuba 19:405–408
Almeida BJM, Rodrigues AAF (2015) Abundância sazonal de aves limícolas em área costeira amazônica, praia de Panaquatira, golfão maranhense, Brasil. Ornithologia 8:38–42
Alongi DM (2002) Present status and future of the world’s mangrove forest. Environ Conserv 29(3):331–349
Alongi DM (2009) Paradigm shifts in mangrove biology. In: Perillo GME, Wolanski EJ, Cahoon DR, Brinson MM (eds) Coastal wetlands: an integrated ecosystem approach. Elsevier, Duivendrecht, pp 615–640
Altieri AH, Bertness MD, Coverdale TC, Herrmann NC, Angelini C (2012) A trophic cascade triggers collapse of a salt marsh ecosystem with intensive recreational fishing. Ecology 93:1402–1410
Alves VS, Soares ABA, Ribeiro AB (1997) Birds of Jequia mangrove system, Ilha do Governador, Baía da Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In: Björn K, Lacerda LD, Diop HS (eds) Mangrove ecosystem studies in Latin America and Africa. UNESCO, Paris, pp 163–170
Amorim JF, Piacentini VQ (2007) Novas áreas de ocorrência de três Passeriformes no sul do Brasil. Lundiana 8(1):69–73
Araújo HFP, Nishida AK (2007) Considerações sobre colônias de garças (Ciconiiformes, Ardeidae) no estado da Paraíba-Brasil. Ornithologia 2:34–40
Araújo HFP, Rodrigues RC, Nishida AK (2006) Composição da avifauna em complexos estuarinos no estado da Paraíba, Brasil. Ararajuba 14:249–259
Azevedo MAG, Machado DA, Albuquerque JLB (2003) Aves de rapina da Ilha de Santa Catarina, SC: Composição, Frequência de ocorrência, Uso de habitat e Conservação. Ararajuba 11:75–81
Azevedo-Júnior SM (1992) Anilhamento de aves migratórias na Coroa do Avião, Igarassu, Pernambuco, Brasil. In: Cadernos Ômega da Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Série Biologia, vol 3. UFRPE, Recife, pp 31–47
Azevedo-Júnior SM (1998) As aves do Canal de Santa Cruz, Pernambuco, Brasil. In: Cadernos Ômega da Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Série Biologia, vol 5. UFRPE, Recife, pp 35–50
Baker AJ, Gonzáles PM, Piersma T, Niles LJ, Nascimento ILS, Atkinson PW, Clark NA, Minton CDT, Peck MK, Aarts G (2004) Rapid population decline in red knots: fitness consequences of decreased refuelling rates and late arrival in Delaware Bay. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 271:875–882
Barbieri E (2001) A expansão urbana e seu impacto sobre as aves da Lagoa Verde, Rio Grande (RS), Cadernos Faculdades Integradas São Camilo, vol 7. Faculdades Integradas São Camilo, São Paulo, pp 85–95
Barbieri E (2007) Seasonal abundance of shorebirds at Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil. Wader Study Group Bull 113:34–41
Barbieri E (2008) Variação sazonal do gaivotão (Larus dominicanus) durante o ano de 2005 no estuário de Cananéia-Iguape-Ilha Comprida, São Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotrop 8:21–26
Belton W (1994) Aves do Rio Grande do Sul: distribuição e biologia. UNISINOS, São Leopoldo
Bencke GA, Fontana CS, Dias RA, Maurício GN, Mähler JKF Jr (2003) Aves. In: Fontana CS, Bencke GA, Reis RE (eds) Livro vermelho da fauna ameaçada de extinção no Rio Grande do Sul. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre, pp 189–479
Bencke GA, Maurício GN, Develey PF, Goerck JM (2006) Áreas importantes para a conservação das aves no Brasil. Parte I – Estados do Domínio da Mata Atlântica. SAVE Brasil, São Paulo
Bisinela GC, Araújo TRA, Cremer MJ (2014) Ecologia reprodutiva de Nyctanassa violacea, Egretta thula e Egretta caerulea no ninhal do rio Pedreira, Santa Catarina. Biotemas 27:109–121
Borgmann KL (2011) A review of human disturbance impacts on waterbirds. Audubon California. http://www.sfbayjv.org/news-general.php
Buelow C, Sheaves M (2015) A birds–eye view of biological connectivity in mangrove systems. Estuar Coast Shelf S 152:33–43
Burger J, Gochfeld M (2001) Effects of chemicals and pollution on seabirds. In: Schreiber EA, Burger J (eds) Biology of marine birds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 485–525
Burger J, Gochfeld M (2004) Marine birds as sentinels of environmental pollution. EcoHealth 1:263–274
Campos FP (2010) Thalasseus maximus (Boddaert, 1783). In: Bressan PM, Kierulff MCM, Sugieda AM (eds) Fauna Ameaçada de extinção no Estado de São Paulo – Vertebrados, 1st edn. Fundação Parque Zoológico de São Paulo and Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, São Paulo, p 156
Cardoni DA, Isacch JP, Iribarne OO (2007) Indirect effects of the intertidal burrowing crab Chasmagnathus granulatus in the habitat use of Argentina’s South West Atlantic salt marsh birds. Estuar Coast 30:382–389
Cardoni DA, Isacch JP, Fanjul ME, Escapa M, Iribarne OO (2011) Relationship between anthropogenic sewage discharge, marsh structure and bird assemblages in an SW Atlantic saltmarsh. Mar Environ Res 71:122
Cardoni DA, Isacch JP, Iribarne O (2012) Effects of cattle grazing and fire on the abundance, habitat selection, and nesting success of the Bay–Capped Wren–Spinetail (Spartonoica maluroides) in coastal saltmarshes of the Pampas Region. Condor 114(4):803–811
Cardoni DA, Greenberg R, Maldonado JE, Isacch JP (2013) Morphological adaptation to coastal marshes in spite of limited genetic structure in the Neotropical passerine Spartonoica maluroides (Aves:Furnariidae). Biol J Linn Soc 109:78–91
Carvalho DL, Rodrigues AAF (2011) Spatial and temporal distribution of migrant shorebirds (Charadriiformes) on Caranguejos Island in the Gulf of Maranhão, Brazil. Ararajuba 19:486–492
Chacin DH, Giery ST, Yeager LA, Layman CA, Langerhans RB (2015) Does hydrological fragmentation affect coastal bird communities? A study from Abaco Island, The Bahamas. Wetl Ecol Manag 23:551–557
Chan YL, Hill CE, Maldonado JE, Fleischer RC (2006) Evolution and conservation of tidal marsh vertebrates: molecular approaches. Stud Avian Biol-Ser 32:54–76
Cohn-Haft M, Naka LN, Fernandes AM (2007) Padrões de distribuição da avifauna da várzea dos rios Solimões e Amazonas. In: Albernaz AL (ed) Conservação da várzea: identificação e caracterização de regiões biogeográficas. IBAMA, Manaus, pp 287–323
Costa CSB (2011) Restoration of coastal salt marshes in Brazil using native salt marsh plants. In: Greipsson S (ed) Restoration ecology. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, pp 333–338
Crooks S, Herr D, Tamelander J, Laffoley D, Vandever J (2011) Mitigating climate change through restoration and management of coastal wetlands and near-shore marine ecosystems: challenges and opportunities, Environment department papers, vol 121. World Bank, Washington, DC
Cunha AHF, Rodrigues AAF, Martínez C (2000) Desenvolvimento de filhotes de Taquiri, Nyctanassa violacea (Ciconiiformes: Ardeidae) na Ilha do Cajual, Alcântara, Maranhão, Brasil. Bol Mus Paraense Emilio Goeldi Ser Zool 16(1):7–21
Dantas SM, Pereira GA, Farias GB, Brito MT, Periquito MC, Vasconcelos EST (2007) Registros relevantes de aves para o estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Ararajuba 15:113–115
Derraik JGB (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 44(9):842–852
Develey PF (2004) As aves da Estação Ecológica Juréia-Itatins. In: OAV M, Duleba W (eds) Estação Ecológica Juréia-Itatins: Ambiente físico, flora e fauna. Ribeirão Preto (SP). Holos, Ribeirão Preto, pp 278–295
Dias RA, Maurício GN (1998) Lista preliminar da avifauna da extremidade sudoeste do Saco da Mangueira e arredores, Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul. Atualidades Ornitológicas 86:10–11
Dias RA, Gianuca D, Gianuca A, Gomes-Júnior A, Chiaffitelli R, Ferreira WLS (2011) Estuário da Lagoa dos Patos. In: Valente RM, Silva JMC, Straube FC, Nascimento JLX (eds) Conservação de Aves Migratórias Neárticas do Brasil. Conservation International, Belém, pp 335–341
Dias RA, Bastazini VAG, Gonçalves MSS, Bonow FC, Müller SC (2013) Shifts in composition of avian communities related to temperate-grassland afforestation in southeastern South America. Iheringia Ser Zool 103(1):12–19
Dias RA, Maurício GN, Bugoni L (2017) Birds of the Patos Lagoon Estuary and adjacent coastal waters, southern Brazil: species assemblages and conservation implications. Mar Biol Res 13:108–120
Duarte C, Dennison W, Orth RW, Carruthers TB (2008) The Charisma of coastal ecosystems: addressing the imbalance. Estuar Coast 3(2):233–238
Efe MA, Azevedo MAG, Filippini A (2007) Avifauna da Estação Ecológica de Carijós, Florianópolis – SC. Ornithologia 2:1–13
Favoretti MR, Batalla JF (2017) Levantamento da avifauna no mangue do rio Juqueriquerê, Caraguatatuba, SP. Unisanta Bioscience 6:272–285
Fedrizzi EC, Carlos CJ (2009) Aves, Charadriiformes, Scolopacidae, Calidris fuscicolis (Vieillot, 1819) (White-rumped Sandpiper): documented records for the states of Piauí and Ceará in north-eastern Brazil. Checklist 5:471–474
Ferreira AC, Lacerda LD (2016) Degradation and conservation of Brazilian mangroves, status and perspectives. Ocean Coast Manage 125:38–46
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – FAO (2007) The world’s mangroves: 1980–2005. FAO, Rome
Fundo Nacional do Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente, Núcleo de Ecologia e Monitoramento Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Pelotas – FNMA, FURG, IBAMA, NEMA, UFPel (1999) Plano de Manejo do Parque Nacional da Lagoa do Peixe. Fundação Universidade do Rio Grande, Rio Grande
Fundo Nacional do Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente, Núcleo de Ecologia e Monitoramento Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Pelotas – FNMA, FURG, IBAMA, NEMA, UFPel (2009) Plano de Manejo do Parque Nacional da Lagoa do Peixe. Fundação Universidade do Rio Grande, Rio Grande
Galetti M, Schunck F, Ribeiro M, Paiva A, Toledo R, Fonseca L (2006) Distribuição e tamanho populacional do papagaio-de-cara-roxa (Amazona brasiliensis) no Estado de São Paulo. Ararajuba 14:239–247
Ghizoni-Jr IR, Piacentini VQ (2010) The Andean Flamingo Phoenicoparrus andinus (Philippi, 1854) in southern Brazil: is it a vagrant? Rev Bras Ornitol 18(3):263–266
Ghizoni-Jr IR, Faria FB, Vieira BP, Willrich G, Silva ES, Mendonça EM, Albuquerque JLB, Gass D, Ternes MH, Nascimento CE, Roos AL, Couto CCM, Serrão M, Serafini PP, Dias D, Fantacini F, Santi S, Souza MCR, Silva MS, Barcellos A, Albuquerque C, Espinola CRR (2013) Checklist da avifauna da Ilha de Santa Catarina. Atualidades Ornitológicas 171:50–75
Gianuca D (2007) Ocorrência sazonal e reprodução do socó-caranguejeiro Nyctanassa violacea no estuário da Lagoa dos Patos, novo limite sul da sua distribuição geográfica. Ararajuba 15:464–467
Gianuca D, Branco JO, Vooren CM (2011) Notes on breeding by Yellow–crowned Night Heron Nyctanassa violacea in southern Brazil. Cotinga 33(1):63–72
Gianuca D, Gianuca AT, Vooren CM (2012) Abundance, breeding and food of the Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea (Aves, Ardeidae) in the Patos lagoon estuary, a recently colonized area in southern Brazil. Iheringia Ser Zool 102(1):19–25
Girão W, Albano C (2011) Ilha Grande. In: Valente RM, Silva JMC, Straube FC, Nascimento JLX (eds) Conservação de Aves Migratórias Neárticas no Brasil. Conservation International, Belém, pp 129–132
Gomes DN, Tavares AA, Cardoso CO, Santos AGS, Silva PC, Guzzi A (2013) Ocorrência de Aratinga acuticaudata haemorrhous Spix, 1824 na Área de Proteção Ambiental Delta do Parnaíba, Piauí, Brasil. Ornithologia 5:118–121
Grantsau R (2010) Guia completo para identificação das Aves do Brasil. Editora Vento Verde, São Carlos, 1249 pp
Grantsau R, Lima PC (2008) Uma nova subespécie de Charadrius wilsonia (Aves, Charadriiformes) para o Brasil. Atualidades Ornitológicas 142:4–5
Green AJ, Elmberg J (2013) Ecosystem services provided by waterbirds. Biol Rev 89:105–122
Greenberg R, Olsen B (2010) Bill size and dimorphism in tidal–marsh sparrows: island–like processes in a continental habitat. Ecology 91:2428–2436
Greenberg R, Elphick C, Nordby JC, Gjerdrum C, Spautz H, Shriver G, Schmeling B, Olsen B, Marra P, Nur N, Winter M (2006) Flooding and predation: trade-offs in the nesting ecology of tidal-marsh sparrows. Stud Avian Biol 32:96–109
Greenberg R, Danner RM, Olsen BJ, Luther D (2012) High temperatures explain bill size in salt marsh sparrows. Ecography 35:146–152
Greenberg R, Cardoni A, Ens B, Gan X, Isacch J, Koffijberg K, Loyn R (2014) The distribution and conservation of birds of coastal salt marshes. In: Maslo B, Lockwood J (eds) Coastal conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 180–242
Grenier JL, Greenberg R (2005) A biogeographic pattern in sparrow bill morphology: parallel adaptation to tidal marshes. Evolution 59:1588–1595
Grimm R (2013) Santuário das aves: Parque Nacional da Lagoa do Peixe. Autor, Porto Alegre
Grose AV, Cremer MJ (2015) Aves migratórias no litoral norte de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Ornithologia 8:22–32
Grose AV, Cremer MJ, Moreira N (2013) Reprodução do guará Eudocimus ruber no estuário da baía da Babitonga, litoral norte de Santa Catarina. In: Annals of the XX Congresso Brasileiro de Ornitologia, Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, 4–7 November 2013
Hamilton SE, Casey D (2016) Creation of a high spatio-temporal resolution global database of continuous mangrove forest cover for the 21st century (CGMFC-21). Global Ecol Biogeogr 25:729–738
Hass A, Matos RHR, Marcondes-Machado LO (1999) Ecologia reprodutiva e distribuição espacial da colônia de Eudocimus ruber (Ciconiiformes, Threskiornithidae) na Ilha do Cajual, Maranhão. Ararajuba 7:41–44
Hoppe-Speer SCL, Adams JB (2015) Cattle browsing impacts on stunted Avicennia marina mangrove trees. Aquat Bot 121:9–15
Hughes RG (2004) Climate change and loss of saltmarshes: consequences for birds. Ibis 146:21–28
Hutchings P, Saenger P (1987) Ecology of mangroves. University of Queensland Press, St Lucia
Hvenegaard GT, Barbieri E (2010) Shorebirds in the State of Sergipe, northeast Brazil: potential tourism impacts. Ararajuba 18:169–175
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade – ICMBio (2013). Sumário Executivo do Plano de Ação Nacional para Conservação das Aves Limícolas Migratórias. Brasília.
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade – ICMBio (2015) Plano de Ação Nacional para Conservação das Espécies Ameaçadas e de Importância Socioeconômica do Ecossistema Manguezal – PAN Manguezal. Diário Oficial da União 21, Brasília. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/faunabrasileira/plano-de-acao-nacional-lista/2840-plano-de-acao-nacional-para-a-conservacao-dos-manguezais. Accessed 26 Mar 2018
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade – ICMBio (2018) Atlas dos Manguezais do Brasil. ICMBio, Brasília
International Union for Conservation of Nature – IUCN (2022) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-1.
Isacch JP, Cardoni DA (2011) Different grazing strategies are necessary to conserve endangered grassland birds in short and tall salty grasslands of the flooding Pampas. Condor 113:724–734
Isacch JP, Holz S, Ricci L, Martínez MM (2004) Postfire vegetation change and bird use of a salt marsh in coastal Argentina. Wetlands 24:235–243
Isacch JP, Cardoni DA, Iribarne OO (2014) Diversity and habitat distribution of birds in coastal marshes and comparisons with surrounding upland habitats in southeastern South America. Estuar Coast 37:229–239
Jenssen BM (1994) Review article: effects of oil pollution, chemically treated oil, and cleaning on thermal balance of birds. Environ Pollut 86(2):207–215
Joseph L (1997) Towards a broader view of Neotropical migrants: consequences of a re-examination of austral migration. Ornitol Neotrop 8:31–36
Köhler HR, Triebskorn R (2013) Wildlife ecotoxicology of pesticides: can we track effects to the population level and beyond? Science 341:759
Lanctot RB, Blanco DE, Dias RA, Isacch JP, Gill VA, Almeida JB, Delhey K, Petracci PF, Bencke GA, Balbueno R (2002) Conservation status of the buff-breasted sandpiper: historic and contemporary distribution and abundance in South America. Wilson Bull 114:44–47
Lawson LP, Fessl B, Vargas FH, Farrington HL, Cunninghame HF, Mueller JC, Nemeth E, Sevilla PC, Petren K (2017) Slow motion extinction: inbreeding, introgression, and loss in the critically endangered mangrove finch (Camarhynchus heliobates). Conserv Genet 18(1):159–170
Lees AC, Moura NG, Santana A, Aleixo A, Barlow J, Berenguer E, Ferreira J, Gardner TA (2012) Paragominas: a quantitative baseline inventory of an eastern Amazonian avifauna. Rev Bras Ornitol 20:93–118
Lees AC, Thompsom I, Moura NG (2014) Salgado Paraense: an inventory of a forgotten coastal Amazonian avifauna. Bol Mus Paraense Emílio Goeldi Cienc Natur 9:135–168
Lefebvre G, Poulin B (1997) Bird communities in Panamanian black mangroves: potential effects of physical and biotic factors. J Trop Ecol 13:97–113
Lima PC (2006) Aves do litoral norte da Bahia. Atualidades Ornitológicas 134:29
Lima LM, Schunck F, Siciliano S, Carlos CJ, Rennó B, Fonseca-Neto FP, Fedrizzi CE, Albano C, Moura JF (2010) Distribuição, abundância e sazonalidade de Leucophaeus atricilla (Charadriiformes: Laridae) no Brasil. Ararajuba 18:199–206
Linneweber V, Lacerda LD (2002) Mangrove ecosystems: function and management. Springer, Berlin
Lloyd JD, Doyle T (2011) Abundance and population trends of mangrove landbirds in southwest Florida. J Field Ornithol 82(2):132–139
Luther DA, Greenberg R (2009) Mangroves: a global perspective on the evolution and conservation of their terrestrial vertebrates. BioScience 59:602–612
Luther DA, Greenberg R (2011) The island syndrome in coastal wetland ecosystems: convergent evolution of large bills in mangrove passerines. Auk 128:201–204
Luther DA, Greenberg R (2014) Habitat type and ambient temperature contribute to bill morphology. Ecol Evol 4(5):699–705
Maciel E (2009) Aves do município do Rio de Janeiro. Technical Books Editora, Rio de Janeiro, 407 pp
Magris RA, Barreto R (2010) Mapping and assessment of protection of mangrove habitats in Brazil. Pan Am J Aquat Sci 5(4):546–556
Mancini PL, Reis-Neto A, Fischer LG, Silveira LF, Schaeffer Novelli Y (2018) Differences in diversity and habitat use of avifauna in distinct mangrove areas in São Sebastião. Ocean Coast Manage 164:79–91
Marangoni JC, Costa CSB (2009a) Diagnóstico ambiental das marismas no estuário da Lagoa dos Patos – RS. Atlântica 31(1):85–98
Marangoni JC, Costa CSB (2009b) Natural and anthropogenic effects on salt marsh over five decades in the Patos Lagoon (Southern Brazil). Braz J Oceanogr 57(4):345–350
Marcondes RS, Del-Rio G, Rego MA, Silveira LF (2014) Geographic and seasonal distribution of a little-known Brazilian endemic rail (Aramides mangle) inferred from occurrence records and ecological niche modeling. Wilson J Ornithol 126:663–672
Martinez C (2010) Trophic niche breadth and overlap of three egret species in a Neotropical mangrove swamp. Waterbirds 33:285–292
Martinez C, Rodrigues AAF (1999) Breeding biology of the Scarlet Ibis on Cajual Island, Northern Brazil. J Field Ornithol 70:558–566
Martinez–Curci NS, Azpiroz A, Gianuca A, Gianuca D, Simpson RE, Dias RA (2014) Willet (Tringa semipalmata) status update in southeastern South America. Ornitol Neotrop 25:135–144
Martuscelli P (1995) Ecology and conservation of the Red-tailed Amazon Amazona brasiliensis in south-eastern Brazil. Bird Conserv Int 5:225–240
Maurício GN, Dias RA (1996) Novos registros e extensões de distribuição de aves palustres e costeiras no litoral sul do Rio Grande do Sul. Ararajuba 4(1):45–71
Maurício GN, Dias RA (2000) New distributional information for birds in southern Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and the first record of the Rufous Gnateater Conopophaga lineata for Uruguay. Bull Br Ornithol Club 118:14–25
Maurício GN, Bencke GA, Repenning M, Machado DB, Dias RA, Bugoni L (2013) Review of the breeding status of birds in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Iheringia Ser Zool 103(2):163–184
Melo DC, Ferreira AP, Leal LGPS, Souza EA, Loures-Ribeiro A, Sousa AEBA (2014) Distribution of the Orange-winged Parrot Amazona amazonica (Linnaeus, 1766) (Aves, Psittacidae) in the coastal region of the State of Paraíba, Brazil. Acta Sci Biol 36(3):307–312
Menghini RP, Rovai AS, Almeida R, Coelho-Junior C, Schaeffer-Novelli Y (2018) Restauração ecológica de manguezais. In: Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) Atlas dos Manguezais do Brasil. ICMBio, Brasília, pp 95–104
Mestre LAM, Krul R, Moraes V (2007) Mangrove bird community of Paranaguá Bay – Paraná, Brazil. Braz Arch Biol Techn 50:75–83
Ministério do Meio Ambiente – MMA 2022. Altera os Anexos da Portaria nº 443, de 17 de dezembro de 2014, da Portaria nº 444, de 17 de dezembro de 2014, e da Portaria nº 445, de 17 de dezembro de 2014, referentes à atualização da Lista Nacional de Espécies Ameaçadas de Extinção. Diário Oficial da União. 148. Seção 1. Publicado em 07/06/2022. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília. https://www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/destaques-e-eventos/704-atualizacao-da-lista-oficial-das-especies-ameacadas-de-extincao.html. Acesso em 14 de novembro 2022.
Ministério do Meio Ambiente – MMA (2016) Portaria N° 77, de 27 de julho de 2016. Atualiza e aprova o Plano de Ação Nacional para a Conservação das Aves Limícolas Migratórias – PAN Aves Limícolas Migratórias, contemplando cinco táxons ameaçados de extinção, estabelecendo seu objetivo geral, objetivos específicos, prazo de execução, abrangência e formas de implementação e supervisão (Processo SEI n° 02061.000023/2012-77). Diário Oficial da União 145, Brasília. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/faunabrasileira/plano-de-acao-nacional-lista/3567-plano-de-acao-nacional-para-conservacao-das-aves-limicolas. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
Mohd–Azlan J, Noske RA, Lawes MJ (2015) The role of habitat heterogeneity in structuring mangrove bird assemblages. Diversity 7:118–136
Mohr LV, Efe MA, Bugoni L (2008) Thalasseus maximus (Boddaert, 1783). In: Machado ABM, Drummond GM, Paglia AP (eds) Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília and Belo Horizonte, pp 448–450
Morrison RIG, Ross RK (1989) Atlas of Nearctic shorebirds on the coast of South America, vol 2. Canadian Wildlife Service Special Publication, Ottawa
Morrison RIG, Ross RK, Niles LJ (2004) Declines in wintering populations of red knots in southern South America. Condor 106(1):60–70
Morrison RIG, Mizrahi DS, Ross RK, Ottema OH, de Pracontal N, Narine A (2012) Dramatic declines of Semipalmated Sandpipers on the Major wintering areas in the Guianas, Northern South America. Waterbirds 35(1):120–134
Nagelkerken I, Blaber SJM, Bouillon S, Green P, Haywood M, Kirton LG, Meynecke JO, Pawlik J, Penrose HM, Sasekumar A, Somerfield PJ (2008) The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: a review. Aquat Bot 89:155–185
Naka LN, Rodrigues M, Roos AL, Azevedo MAG (2002) Bird conservation on Santa Catarina Island. Bird Conserv Int 12:123–150
Nascimento JLX (2011) Parque Nacional da Lagoa do Peixe. In: Valente RM, Silva JMC, Straube FC, Nascimento JLX (eds) Conservação de Aves Migratórias Neárticas do Brasil, 1st edn. Conservation International, Belém, pp 321–324
Nascimento DM, Alves AGC, Alves RRN, Barboza RRD, Diele K, Mourão JS (2017) An examination of the techniques used to capture mangrove crabs, Ucides cordatus, in the Mamanguape River estuary, northeastern Brazil, with implications for management. Ocean Coast Manage 130:50–57
Navedo JG, Hahn S, Parejo M, Abad–Gómez JM, Gutiérrez JS, Villegas A, Sánchez–Guzmán JM, Masero JA (2015) Unravelling trophic subsidies of agroecosystems for biodiversity conservation: food consumption and nutrient recycling by waterbirds in Mediterranean rice fields. Sci Total Environ 511:288–297
Noske RA (1995) Ecology of mangrove forest birds in peninsular Malaysia. Ibis 137:250–263
Noske RA (1996) Abundance, zonation, and foraging ecology of birds in mangroves of Darwin Harbour, Northern Territory. Wildlife Res 1996:443–474
Nunes FC, Barbosa-Filho RC, Roos A, Mestre LAM (2010) The Cattle Egret (Bubulcus ibis) on Fernando de Noronha Archipelago: history and population trends. Ararajuba 18:1–13
Olmos F (2000) Dieta e biologia reprodutiva de Eudocimus ruber e Egretta caerulea (Aves, Ciconiiformes) nos manguezais de Santos-Cubatão, São Paulo. PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual Paulista
Olmos F, Silva e Silva R (2001) The avifauna of a southeastern Brazilian mangrove swamp. Int J Ornithol 4(3/4):135–205
Olmos F, Silva e Silva R (2003) Guará: ambiente, flora e fauna dos manguezais de Santos-Cubatão. Empresa das Artes, São Paulo
Olmos F, Silva e Silva R, Prado A (2001) Breeding season diet of Scarlet Ibises Eudocimus ruber and Little Blue Herons Egretta caerulea in a Brazilian mangrove. Waterbirds 24:50–57
Olmos F, Rumsey S, Brickle N (2013) First documented record of Grey Kingbird, Tyrannus dominicensis (Passeriformes: Tyrannidae) in Brazil. Rev Bras Ornitol 21:133–135
Onuf CP, Teal JM, Valiela I (1977) Interactions of nutrients, plant growth, and herbivory in a mangrove ecosystem. Ecology 58:514–526
Pacheco JF (1994) O interessante gavião-asa-de-telha (Parabuteo unicintus) no Brasil: um gavião raro? Atualidades Ornitológicas 61:13
Pacheco JF, Silveira LF, Aleixo A, Agne CE, Bencke GA, Bravo G, Brito GRR, Cohn-Haft M, Maurício G, Naka LN, Olmos F, Posso S, Lees AC, Figueiredo LF, Carrano E, Guedes RC, Cesari E, Franz I, Schunck F, Piacentini VQ (2021) Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee, 2nd ed. Ornithol Res 29:94–105
Pereira GA, Whittaker A, Whitney BM, Zimmer KJ, Dantas SM, Roda AS, Bevier LR, Coelho G, Hoyer RC, Albano C (2008) Novos registros de aves para Pernambuco, Brasil, com notas sobre algumas espécies pouco conhecidas no Estado. Ararajuba 16:47–53
Pereira GA, Lobo-Araújo LW, Leal S, Medcratf J, Marantz CA, Toledo MT, Araújo HF, Albano C, Pinto T, Santos CHA, Serapião LCH, Silva GBM, Pioli D (2012) Important bird records from Alagoas, Pernambuco and Paraíba, north-east Brazil. Cotinga 34:17–22
Pereira GA, Rodrigues PP, Leal S, Periquito MC, Silva GBM, Menezes M, Correa GS, Sonntag FA, Almeida AEMN, Nunes PB (2014) Important bird records from Alagoas, Pernambuco and Paraíba, north-east Brazil, vol 2. Cotinga 36:45–50
Periquito MC, Pereira GA, Brito MT (2008) Aves no manguezal do Espaço Ciência, Olinda, Pernambuco. Atualidades Ornitológicas 145:36–38
Piacentini VQ, Ghizoni-Jr IR, Azevedo MAG, Carrano E, Borchardt-Jr CA, Amorim JF, Grose AV (2009) Ocorrência, expansão e distribuição do maçarico-de-cara-pelada Phimosus infuscatus (Lichtenstein, 1823) (Ciconiiformes: Threskiornithidae) no Estado de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. Rev Bras Ornitol 17:107–112
Polidoro BA, Carpenter KE, Collins L, Duke NC, Ellison AM, Ellison JC, Farnsworth EJ, Fernando ES, Kathiresan K, Joedam NE, Livingstone SR, Miyagi T, Moore GE, Nam VN, Ong JE, Primavera JH, Salmo SG III, Sanciangco JC, Sukardjo S, Wang Y, Yong WHY (2010) The loss of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS One 5(4):1–10
Powell AN (2006) Are southern California’s fragmented saltmarshes capable of sustaining endemic bird populations? Stud Avian Biol-Ser 32:198–204
Quintela FM, Santos MB, Oliveira SV, Costa RC, Christoff AU (2010) Javalis e porcos ferais (Suidae, Sus scrofa) na Restinga de Rio Grande, RS, Brasil: ecossistemas de ocorrência e dados preliminares sobre impactos ambientais. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 5(3):172–178
Resende SL, Leeuwenberg F (1987) Ecological studies of Lagoa do Peixe, Final report to World Wildlife Fund (WWF). WWF, Washington, DC
Restall R, Rodner C, Lentino M (2006) Birds of Northern South America: an identification guide. Volume 1: species accounts. Yale University Press, New Haven/London
Ridgely RS, Tudor G (1989) The birds of South America, vol I. The oscine passerines. University of Texas, Austin
Ridgely RS, Tudor G (1994) The birds of South America, vol II. The suboscine passerines. University of Texas, Austin
Robbins M (2018) Northern Scrub-flycatcher (Sublegatus arenarum). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona
Roda AS, Pereira GA (2006) Distribuição recente e conservação das aves de rapina florestais do Centro Pernambuco. Ararajuba 14:331–344
Rodrigues AAF (1995) Ocorrência da reprodução de Eudocimus ruber na Ilha do Cajual, Maranhão, Brasil (Ciconiiformes: Threskiornithidae). Ararajuba 3:67–68
Rodrigues AAF (2007) Priority areas for conservation of migratory and resident waterbirds on the coast of Brazilian Amazonia. Rev Bras Ornitol 15:209–218
Rodrigues AAF, Carvalho DL (2011) Reentrâncias Paraenses. In: Valente RM, Silva JMC, Straube FC, Nascimento JLX (eds) Conservação de aves migratórias neárticas no Brasil. Conservação Internacional Brasil, Belém, pp 85–87
Rodrigues RC, Araújo HFP, Lyra-Neves RM, Telino-Jr WR, Botelho MCN (2007) Caracterização da Avifauna na Área de Proteção Ambiental de Guadalupe, Pernambuco. Ornithologia 2:47–61
Romanach SS, DeAngelis DL, Koh HL, Li Y, Teh SY, Barizan RSR, Zhai L (2018) Conservation and restoration of mangroves: global status, perspectives, and prognosis. Ocean Coast Manage 154:72–82
Rovai AS, Soriano-Sierra EJ, Pagliosa PR, Cintrón G, Schaeffer-Novelli Y, Menghini RP, Coelho-Jr C, Antunes-Horta P, Lewis RR, Simonassi JC, Andrade JÁ, Boscatto F, Dutra SJ (2012) Secondary succession impairment in restored mangroves. Wetl Ecol Manag 20(5):447–459
Rupp AE, Fink D, Silva GT, Zermiani M, Laps RR, Zimmermann CE (2008) Novas espécies de aves para o Estado de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. Biotemas 21:165–169
Ruschi PA, Simon JE (2007) Primeiro registro de Agyrtria leucogaster (Gmelin, 1788) (Aves: Trochilidae) para o Estado do Espírito Santo, Brasil. Ararajuba 15:451–452
Sandilyan S, Katherisan K (2012) Mangrove conservation: a global perspective. Biodivers Conserv 21(14):3523–3542
Santos MPD (2011) Cajueiro da Praia. In: Valente RM, Silva JMC, Straube FC, Nascimento JLX (eds) Conservação de Aves Migratórias Neárticas no Brasil, 1st edn. Conservation International, Belém, pp 125–128
Scarton F (2018) Disturbance of non–breeding waders by pedestrians and boats in a Mediterranean lagoon. Ardeola 65(2):209–220
Schaeffer Novelli Y, Soriano–Sierra EJ, Vale CC, Bernini E, Rovai AS, Pinheiro MAA, Schmidt AJ, Almeida R, Coelho-Jr C, Menghini RP, Martinez DI, Abuchahla GMO, Cunha–Lignon M, Charlier–Sarubo S, Shirazawa–Freitas J, Cintrón–Molero G (2016) Climate changes in mangrove forests and salt marshes. Braz J Oceanogr 64:37–52
Schories D, Barletta–Bergan A, Barletta M, Krumme U, Mehlig U, Rademaker V (2003) The keystone role of leaf–removing crabs in mangrove forests of North Brazil. Wetl Ecol Manag 11:243–225
Schunck F, Rodrigues AAF (2018) Calidris canutus (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Ministério do Meio Ambiente (org) Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção, 1st edn. MMA, Brasília, pp 145–148
Sekercioglu CH, Primack RB, Wormworth J (2012) The effects of climate change on tropical birds. Biol Conserv 148:1–18
Serafini PP (2013) Plano de Ação Nacional para Conservação dos Passeriformes Ameaçados dos Campos Sulinos e Espinilho. ICMBio, Brasília
Shriver WG, Hodgman TP, Gibbs JP, Vickery PD (2004) Landscape context influences salt marsh bird diversity and area requirements in New England. Biol Conserv 119:545–553
Sick H (1997) Ornitologia Brasileira, 2nd edn. Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro
Sick H (2001) Ornitologia Brasileira, 3rd edn. Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro
Sigrist T (2006) Aves do Brasil: uma visão artística. Fosfertil, Uberaba
Silva e Silva R (2007) Guarás Vermelhos do Brasil. Avis Brasilis, Vinhedo
Silva e Silva R (2008) Aves de Fernando de Noronha. Avis Brasilis, Vinhedo
Silva e Silva R, Olmos F (2002) Osprey ecology in the mangroves of southeastern Brazil. J Raptor Res 36:328–331
Silva e Silva R, Olmos F (2007) Adendas e registros significativos para a avifauna dos manguezais de Santos-Cubatão, SP. Ararajuba 15:551–560
Silva JMC, Oren DC, Roma JC, Henriques LMP (1997) Composition and distribution patterns of the avifauna of an Amazonian upland savanna, Amapá, Brazil. Ornithol Monogr 48:743–762
Sipinski EAB, Abbud MC, Sezerban RM, Serafini PP, Boçon R, Manica LT, Guaraldo AC (2014) Tendência populacional do papagaio-de-cara-roxa (Amazona brasiliensis) no litoral do estado do Paraná. Ornithologia 6:136–143
Smit CJ, Visser GJM (1993) Effects of disturbance on shorebirds: a summary of existing knowledge from the Dutch Wadden Sea and Delta area. Wader Study Group Bull 68:6–19
Somenzari M, Amaral PP, Cueto VR, Guaraldo AC, Jahn AE, Lima DM, Lima PC, Lugarini C, Machado CG, Martinez J, Nascimento JLX, Pacheco JF, Paludo D, Prestes PN, Serafini PF, Silveira LF, Souza AEBAS, Souza NA, Souza MA, Telino-Jr WR, Whitney BM (2018) An overview of migratory birds in Brazil. Pap Avulsos Zool 58:e20185803
Somveille M, Manica A, Rodrigues AS (2018) Where the wild birds go: explaining the differences in migratory destinations across terrestrial bird species. Ecography 41:1–12
Souza AP, Rodrigues AAF (2015) Censo populacional do maçarico-de-peito-vermelho Calidris canutus rufa na praia de Panaquatira, Maranhão, Brasil, em um ciclo anual. Ornithologia 8:33–37
Souza EA, Nunes MFC, Roos AL, Araújo HFP (2008) Aves do Parque Nacional do Cabo Orange, Amapá: Guia de Campo. ICMBio/Cemave, Brasília
Stotz DF, Fitzpatrick JW, Parker TA III, Moskovits DK (1996) Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 478 pp
Taylor B (2018) Rufous-necked wood-rail (Aramides axillaris). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona
Valente RM, Silva JMC, Straube FC, Nascimento JLX (2011) Conservação de aves migratórias neárticas no Brasil. Conservation International, Belém
Valiela I, Bowen JL, York JK (2001) Mangrove forests: one of the world’s threatened major tropical environments: at least 35% of the area of mangrove forests has been lost in the past two decades, losses that exceed those for tropical rain forests and coral reefs, two other well-known threatened environments. BioScience 51(10):807–815
Vieira BP (2015) Population trends and conservation of the Mangrove Rail. Rev Bras Ornitol 23:327–335
Wiersma P, Kirwan GM, Boesman P (2018) Wilson’s Plover. In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona
WIKIAVES - A Enciclopédia das Aves do Brasil. Avalilable: https://www.wikiaves.com.br/index.php. Acess em: 11 nov. 2021. eBird - https://ebird.org/home Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. Xeno-Canto - https://xeno-canto.org/ Taxeus - https://www.taxeus.com.br/
Willis EO, Oniki Y (2003) Aves do Estado de São Paulo. Editora Divisa, Rio Claro, 398 pp
Winkler H, Christie DA, Sharpe CJ, Motis A (2018) Arrowhead Piculet (Picumnus minutissimus). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona
Wrona FJ, Prowse TD, Reist JD, Hobbie JE, Lévesque LMJ, Vincent WF (2006) Climate change effects on aquatic biota, ecosystem structure and function. AMBIO 35(7):359–369
Xavier BF, Boss RL (2011) Estação Ecológica Maracá-Jipioca. In: Valente RM, Silva JMC, Straube FC, Nascimento JLX (eds) Conservação de aves migratórias neárticas no Brasil. Conservation International, Belém, pp 28–32
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Mangrove Bird References
Ridgely and Tudor (1989), Azevedo-Júnior (1992), Pacheco (1994), Ridgely and Tudor (1994), Martuscelli (1995), Rodrigues (1995), Stotz et al. (1996), Alves et al. (1997), Sick (1997), Silva et al. (1997), Azevedo-Júnior (1998), Hass et al. (1999), Cunha et al. (2000), Olmos (2000), Olmos and Silva-e-Silva (2001), Silva e Silva and Olmos (2002), Naka et al. (2002), Azevedo et al. (2003), Olmos and Silva e Silva (2003), Willis and Oniki (2003), Develey (2004), Araújo et al. (2006), Galetti et al. (2006), Lima (2006 apud Somenzari et al. 2018), Roda and Pereira (2006), Sigrist (2006), Silva e Silva (2007), Amorim and Piacentini (2007), Araújo and Nishida (2007), Dantas et al. (2007), Efe et al. (2007), Mestre et al. (2007), Rodrigues (2007), Rodrigues et al. (2007), Ruschi and Simon (2007), Silva e Silva and Olmos (2007), Almeida and Barbieri (2008), Pereira et al. (2008), Periquito et al. (2008), Rupp et al. (2008), Silva e Silva (2008), Souza et al. (2008), Fedrizzi and Carlos (2009), Maciel (2009), Piacentini et al. (2009), Aguiar et al. (2010), Grantsau (2010), Lima et al. (2010), Nunes et al. (2010), Almeida and Ferrari (2011), Girão and Albano (2011), Carvalho and Rodrigues (2011), Santos (2011), Xavier and Boss (2011), Lees et al. (2012), Pereira et al. (2012), Ghizoni-Jr et al. (2013), Gomes et al. (2013), Grose et al. (2013), Olmos et al. (2013), Bisinela et al. (2014), Lees et al. (2014), Melo et al. (2014), Pereira et al. (2014), Grose and Cremer (2015), Vieira (2015), Favoretti and Batalla (2017), and Mancini et al. (2018)
Salt Marsh Bird References
Resende and Leeuwenberg (1987), Maurício and Dias (1996), Dias and Maurício (1998), FNMA et al. (1999), Maurício and Dias (2000), Bencke et al. (2003), Bencke et al. (2006), Dias et al. (2011), Nascimento (2011), Grimm (2013), Martinez-Curci et al. (2014), Greenberg et al. (2014), and Dias et al. (2017)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mancini, P.L., da Costa, T.V.V., Dias, R.A., Silveira, L.F., Schunck, F. (2023). Mangrove and Salt Marsh Migratory and Resident Birds. In: Schaeffer-Novelli, Y., Abuchahla, G.M.d.O., Cintrón-Molero, G. (eds) Brazilian Mangroves and Salt Marshes. Brazilian Marine Biodiversity . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13486-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13486-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13485-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13486-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)