Abstract
Microorganisms associated with plants can affect their health positively or negatively, thus influencing hugely crop yield and productivity. Several investigations have reported that the microbes associated with different plants are much diversified. Especially, those microorganisms of agricultural interest belong mainly to bacteria and fungi. Additionally, they are various mechanisms of plant/microorganisms interaction, which are already elucidated and well documented, bringing together two principal categories; by one side, the implication of germs in biotic and abiotic stress reactions; by the other side, the all aspects related to plant responses. This work aimed to expose some aspects of the microbe’s associates to plants and the functional attributes for ameliorating crop productivity and yields.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
2.1 Introduction
The industrial revolution of farming in the twentieth century has drastically transformed and accelerated the market and agricultural activities; in order to raise crops and feed the planet’s increasing population (Zorner et al. 2018). In addition, modern agriculture faces several problems, including environmental issues, and an increase in supply for durable manufacturing (Compant et al. 2019; Sharma et al. 2021). In particular, eco-friendly and durable farming techniques are vital for ensuring food safety, like the use of effective farm-benefit microorganisms (bioinoculants) that play potential roles in sustainable crop manufacturing due to their vast characteristics for plant increase, improving adaptability and viability under stressful conditions; and other important utilizations that can efficiently reduce the use of pesticides and fertilizers in modern farming (Singh et al. 2016; Kumar et al. 2021). These microbes ensure a crucial function in various farm ecosystems (Deveau et al. 2018; Prasad et al. 2021). Since ancestor plant lines colonized the land 450 million years ago, plants and their microorganisms interacting there formed an association of organisms often designed as a “holobiont.” (Hassani et al. 2018). Particularly in the last years, intensive efforts have been dedicated to elucidate the interaction between plants and bacteria, both beneficial and pathogenic (Degrassi et al. 2012).
Colonization is arduous for microbial populations in their niches, particularly because of their huge diversity, dynamic interactions, constant genetic interchange and deficiency of adequate analytical techniques (Singh et al. 2010). Equally, the microbes associated with plants include algae, bacteria, fungi and viruses. Depending upon their localization on the host plant, they can be endophytic and/or epiphytic. Endophytic microbial interrelationships affect the inner part (Rana et al. 2020a; Singh et al. 2020), whereas epiphytic microbial interrelationships affect the outer surface of plants (Kumar et al. 2017). Notably, in the last decade, diverse studies have indicated the complicated microbial accumulations related to various plants, and particular plant compartments (Reinhold-Hurek 2015). Moreover, several researches reported the benefits of rhizobacteria and endophytic bacteria belonging to the specific phylogenetic group on the biological characteristics of different vegetable crops (Vansuyt et al. 2007). Generally, epiphytic, endophyte or rhizophyte interrelations can be harmful or beneficial to both the microbe or the plant and may be considered competition, amensal, synergism, commensal, mutual, parasitism or neutral (Montesinos 2003; Yadav 2021).
2.2 Microbes Linked with Crops
2.2.1 Rhizospheric Microbiomes
Rhizosphere is the region in which the roots and related microbes engage in diverse interactions and is characterized by wide microbial diversity (Patra et al. 2016). The exudation of roots comprises of a mixture of compounds such as sugars, organic acids, amino acids and vitamins, which attracts a diverse microbial population (Bertin et al. 2003; Kour et al. 2019b). Proteobacteria, especially those of tα and β groups, tend to dominate. Acidbacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Planctomycetes are among the other principal groups (Turner et al. 2013). Particularly, root and rhizosphere microbial communities are named plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) play key functions in determining plant health and productivity (Verbon and Liberman 2016; Hesham et al. 2021).
2.2.2 Epiphytic Microbiomes
Plant aerial parts are the habitat of several epiphytic microorganisms, which could be noxious or useful to the plant (Sharma et al. 2019). Epiphytic microbes live on fruit, flowers, leaves, buds and stems (Whipps et al. 2008; Mukhtar et al. 2010). Apparently, microbial interrelations in the phyllosphere may influence soil health in native populations, crop yield production and the security of human-consuming horticultural products (Whipps et al. 2008). This analysis points toward the soil and air as important sources of leaf and root microbial inoculums (Kumar et al. 2019a, 2019b).
The action of insects, wind and rain could allow microorganisms to reach the surface or to leave the plant surface. This analyzes the air and soil as key root and leaf microbial inoculum provenances (Lilley et al. 1997). The complexity, role and relation to the microbiota of the rhizosphere are also emerging research areas (Bai et al. 2015). The content and richness of bacterial communities are specific to host, memberships of the alphaproteobacteria predominate and are widely spread in phyllosphere microbiotas, and the genera Methylobacterium and Sphingomonas are frequently observed among various hosts (Delmotte et al. 2009).
2.2.3 Endophytic Microbiomes
Endophytes comprise all species occupying plant organs that could populate interior plant tissues at any stage of their life without doing any obvious damage to the host (Petrini 1991; Rana et al. 2020b). Endophytes are ecologically ubiquitous and diversified in the majority of plant species and perform various fundamental functions in nature for plant productiveness, mainly by metabolism and enhancement of nutrient assimilation, synthesizing plant development hormones, controlling the host's defensive gene expression and other elementary metabolic processes (Zhou et al. 2017).
In particular, plant-associated endophytes, including endophytic fungi, are widely distributed in nature (Jia et al. 2016). Also, endophytic bacteria–plant relationships have been widely studied for their various roles, mainly in the improvement of plant increase, biocontrol, phytopathogenicity, resistance toward stressful factors and bioremediation (Fester et al. 2014; Yadav et al. 2021b). Figure 2.1 shows the microbes associated with crop ecology.
2.3 Mechanisms of Increasing Crop Productivity and Yield
Among the benefits of plant-useful microorganisms, different mechanisms can be listed like plant increase improvement, synthesizing various antibiotic/antifungal molecules inhibiting several phytopathogens, resistance to numerous environmental stress factors and microorganism-assisted elimination of organopollutants (Wu et al. 2009). Furthermore, soil microbial populations are essential for several of the earth's biogeochemical cycles like mineralization of nutritional compounds, organic carbon decomposition and nitrogen cycle (Patra et al. 2016). Notably, a number of soil microbial mechanisms convert unavailable nutritional elements to be easily assimilated by plants (Lalitha 2017). Endophytes and epiphytes have no negative impacts on the plant; instead, they cause the production of certain essential chemicals like hormones (Kumar et al. 2017). Additionally, some other microbes can synthesize auxin, which improves growth and ensures a crucial function in plant life cycle (Fernandes et al. 2011). Globally, inside rhizosphere PGPR assist the indirect and direct increase of plants through various mechanisms. They participate in nutrient uptake, nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubility, siderophores formation, IAA and other diverse phytohormones (Pahari et al. 2016; Rai et al. 2020; Subrahmanyam et al. 2020; Abdel-Azeem et al. 2021). Figure 2.2 illustrates the mechanisms developed by plant-associated microbes for protecting and increasing crop productivity and yields.
2.3.1 Phosphate Solubilization
It is well established that plants need at least 14 mineral elements for sufficient nutrition, in addition to water, carbon dioxide and oxygen (Mengel et al. 2001). Insufficiency of any of these mineral elements decreases plant growth and crop yields (El-Ramady et al. 2014). In particular, microbes of various genera are capable of transforming insoluble phosphate into soluble compounds, which are then available to plants, and are generally known as phosphorus solubilizing microbes or PSMs (Shrivastava et al. 2018; Kour et al. 2020, 2021). Phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria ensure a function in phosphate nutrition via increasing its accessibility to plants, releasing phosphate pools from organic and inorganic soil and solubilizing and mineralizing mechanisms (Khan et al. 2009). Enhanced crop productivities arise from PSM solubilization of fixed soil P and applied phosphates (Zaidi 1999). They also improve soil fertility and crop productivity in organic farming (Kaur and Reddy 2014).
2.3.2 Siderophores
Iron is a crucial plant nutritional element that operates as a cofactor in various enzymes of the respiratory system, photosynthetic activity and nitrogen fixation. Although iron is quite prevalent in soil, it is often inaccessible to microbes and plants because it arises under aerobic environment primarily as a trivalent state iron Fe(III) (Bano and Ilyas 2012). Iron deficiency can adversely impact plant, beneficial and phytopathogenic microorganisms. For instance, the microbial surface hydrophobicity significantly reduces under iron-deficient growth conditions that also distort the surface protein constitution (Simões et al. 2007). On the other hand, siderophores are secondary metabolites with low molecular weight and an iron-chelating capability (Kour et al. 2019c; Sharaff et al. 2020). These are substances characterized by small peptide molecules with laterally chains and operational groups that have a ligand with great affinity that binds ferrous ions into the cellular membrane (Niehus et al. 2017). Nearly, all microbes develop them in reaction to an iron insufficiency (Crowley 2006). Siderophore production is controlled by well-established bacterial and fungal transcriptional factors (Troxell and Hassan 2013); in particular, the bacteria generating siderophores are frequently isolated from the rhizospheric plant area (Calvente et al. 2001). Plants may also produce Fe(III)-chelating molecules designed phytosiderophores forming unique and solid Fe(III) structures (Ma 2005; Kraemer et al. 2006).
A number of investigations explain the function of siderophores as an important component in ISR protection effects (Vleesschauwer and Hofte 2009). Mahmoud and Abd-Alla (2001) mentioned that hydroxymate, a kind of siderophore produced by Pseudomonas sp., which stimulated the formation of nodules and fixation of nitrogen by mung bean seedlings as compared to sowing infested with Bradyrhizobium sp. strain solely. Furthermore, bacteria-forming siderophores play a major function in the suppression of some phytopathogenic microorganisms (Beneduzi et al. 2012).
2.3.3 Phytohormones
Ethylene, cytokinins, abscisic acid, gibberellins and auxins are widespread among various regulating factors of growing plants and are well known for their acting processes (Kashyap et al. 2017; Suyal et al. 2021). In this case, microorganisms interacting with plants generate main plant growth hormones such as auxins and gibberellins. Generation of gibberellins is the most usual for the development of root-associated microorganisms and auxin is widespread into whole plant-related microbes (Yadav et al. 2017; Tiwari et al. 2020). Especially, the great effective and typical auxin in plants is indole 3-acetic acid (IAA) (Kashyap et al. 2017). Patten and Glick (1996) mentioned the synthesis and secretion of auxin as elementary molecule of around 80% of rhizosphere microorganisms. Notably, auxins are important in phototropism and geotropism, differentiation of the vascular tissue, apical dominance, lateral and adventitious root initiation, cellular division, extension of root and stem (Grobelak et al. 2015; Rastegari et al. 2020a, 2020b).
2.3.4 N2 Fixation
Nitrogen is an important element responded in different ecosystems. For instance, inorganic nitrogen in the marine ecosystem ranges from nitrate to ammonia in various oxidation forms (Ravikumar and Kathiresan 2007). Moreover, nitrogen is among the most essential nutrients affecting the production of crops. Especially, leguminous in combination with rhizobia provide an invaluable function, in the natural and agricultural environments, to the global nitrogen balance (Vance 2001; Rana et al. 2019). It has been estimated that the price of utilizing N-fixing microorganisms is 1% more than the price of utilizing chemical products (Stokstad 2016).
2.3.5 ISR and ASR
Most plants respond to a local attack by herbivores or pathogenic microorganisms through the formation of compounds aiming to mitigate or prevent further attacks, or the effectiveness of their enemies. The reactions occur in either the initially attacked plant organ (local reaction) or remote but not damaged sections (systemic reactions). One of these reactions is the induced systemic resistance (ISR), and the other is systemic acquired resistance (SAR) forming together the plant defensive system against plant pathogens (Heil and Bostock 2002). Furthermore, a number of PGPR induce transformations related to chemical or physical protection system in the plant (Van Loon et al. 1998). Nevertheless, combined ISR and SAR present greater protection than any of them alone, suggesting that they might act synergistically to promote pathogen tolerance (Van Wees et al. 2000).
2.3.6 ACC Deaminase
This enzyme metabolizes ACC (1-aminocycle-1-carboxylate) in plant tissues, which is the initial precursor to ethylene (Yang and Hoffman 1984; (Kour et al. 2019a). Moreover, ethylene, usually, is involved in crucial plant processes like differentiation of tissues, shoot and root formation primordia, root ramification and extension, the implementation of the lateral bud, floration, flora senescence, fruit maturation and abscission, formation of anthocyanin, the elaboration of volatile organic substances responsible for the fruits aroma production (Glick 2014). Moreover, for the germination of seed, ethylene is necessary, as it is established by its rate of production rising considerably during germination and planting growing (Abeles et al. 1992). Additionally, ACC deaminase is a plant hormone that is largely stimulated by stress factors and can limit considerably the activity of increasing plants (Dikilitas et al. 2021). On the other hand, a number of microorganisms could reduce the plant’s rate of ethylene by assimilating the ACC, the main plant’s produced ethylene precursor (Ajar et al. 2017). ACC deaminase-producing microbes convert ACC into ammonia and α-ketobutyrate (Glick 2005). In particular, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria endowed with ACC deaminase properties stimulate plant development and productivity and can be effectively enclosed in bioengineering of biofertilizers (Shaharoona et al. 2006). The root-interacting bacteria decrease the rate of ethylene by ACC cleavage ultimately plant stress tolerance (Van de Poel and Van Der Straeten 2014). Importantly, it has been reported that the use of bacteria-producing ACC deaminase against a variety of biotic and abiotic factors improved plant resistance against different stressful factors (Glick 2014; Yadav et al. 2020a, 2020b, 2021a).
2.3.7 Lytic Enzymes
Several plant growth-promoting bacteria secrete various lytic enzymes like lipase, protease, chitinase or β 1,3 glucanase, all of which contribute to cellular fungal degradation (Chet and Inbar 1994). Thus, these enzymes affect the growth and development of phytopathogenic fungi (El-Tarabily 2006). PGPB have been reported to have biocontrol effect toward a number of phyopathogenic fungi like Pythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii, Fusarium oxysporum, Botrytis cinerea and Phytophta spp. by synthesis of one or more lytic enzymes (Frankowski et al. 2001; Singh et al. 1999). Whereas, other particular enzymes of plant-associated microbes like cutinases were identified as necessary for spore fixation on the surface of many phytopathogens such as Blumeria graminis, Colletotrichum graminicola and Uromyces viciae-fabae (Deising et al. 1992; Pascholati et al. 1993). Generally, such activities of the diverse hydrolase enzymes are very important in rhizosphere soil, as they reflect soil capability to ensure complex biochemical processes, the fertility of the soil and plant productiveness conservation (Burns 1982; Shukla and Varma 2011; Schloter et al. 2018). Microbial enzymes are important for soil operation and quality because of their implication in organic matter dynamics and nutrient cycles, organic compound degradation, mineralization and the release of nutritional elements including nitrogen, carbon and other important metals (Khare and Yadav 2017; Yadav et al. 2020c).
2.3.8 Nanoparticles
Nanomaterials and nanoparticles are generally described as molecules of approximately 1–100 nm measurements that demonstrate characteristics not observed in the bulk state (Bulgari et al. 2019; Patil et al. 2021). They are incorporated into the ground through a range of human practices, which include deliberate land releases via water and soil treatment, the extensive utilization of farming (e.g. chemical fertilization) and unconscious water, air and wastewater disposal onto the soil (Mishra and Kumar 2009); or are produced biologically in situ in the soil by microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) in contact with contaminants such as silver. This is of particular concern for soil benefit microbes since AgNPs act as antimicrobials by inhibiting enzymatic activity, damaging DNAand generating reactive oxygen species that lead to cell death (Li et al. 2010). Several microbial suppressive impacts of nanoparticles have been observed impacting directly microbe’s survival (Lovern and Klaper 2006). Generally, antiphytopathogenic activity, seed germination enhancement and improving crop development were reported using zinc oxide and silver nanoparticles (Gogos et al. 2012).
2.3.9 Biofilms
Historically, microbes had been explored as planktonic cells (or free swimmings). The majority of these cells has been established in multi-cell joint to surfaces, called biofilms (Rudrappa et al. 2008). According to Costerton et al (1999), a biofilm is described as “a structural community of bacterial cells enclosed in a self-produced polymeric matrix and adherent to an inert or living surface. On plant surfaces, they are formed mostly by bacteria in pathogenic, mutualistic, or symbiotic association on leaves, roots, and in the soil (Cavalcante et al. 2017). It is a property in plant growth-promoting bacteria that enable them to resist various abiotic stresses (Bouskill et al., 2016). Especially, biofilm formation on plant roots appears to be associated with symbiotic interactions. For instance, these structures help to create protective niches for Rhizobia (Barriuso, 2017). Recently, it has been shown that biofilm-mediated microcolonies formed on root hairs of finger millet by endophytic Enterobacter sp. conferred protection against colonization by the pathogenic organisms (Mousa et al. 2016). Apart from the root surface, microbial biofilms are also reported on the phyllospheric region and vasculature (Torres et al. 2006). Epiphytic microbes are often formed in biofilms, likely because these microenvironments protect bacteria from harsh environmental conditions (Monier and Lindow 2004). Furthermore, certain bacteria in biofilm matrices have been found to stimulate plant growth and protect plants from phytopathogens while others are involved in pathogenesis (Bogino et al. 2013).
2.3.10 Antibiotics
Antibiotics produced by microorganisms play a major role in plant pathogens and the diseases they cause (Pal and McSpaddenGardener 2006). The production of antibiotics is one of the important mechanisms most commonly associated with the capability of PGPB to act as antagonistic agents (Glick et al. 2007; Abdel-Azeem et al. 2021). Furthermore, the production of antibiotics is used in the acquisition of genes coding for antibiotic resistance from transgenic plants by plant-associated bacteria (Montesinos 2003). Amongst PGPR, species belonging to Pseudomonas excrete a great variety of effective antibiotics such as 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (2,4-DAPG), pyoluteorin, pyrrolnitrin, (Raaijmakers et al. 2002; (Singh and Yadav 2020; Yadav et al. 2020c). In addition, some species can also produce hydrogen cyanide (HCN) that is toxic to certain pathogenic fungi (Dowling and O’Gara 1994).
In soil, several metabolites from endophytic Streptomyces sp. have been characterized, which are associated with antibiotic activity (Castillo et al. 2003; Guan et al. 2005). Furthermore, endophytic fungus, Acremonium zeae, has been implicated in the protection of its host against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides (Wicklow et al. 2005).
2.4 Beneficial Effects on Crop Production and Yield
Plant-associated microbiomes play a pivotal role in plant biology, performing key functions in germination, growth, health and stress protection (Mendes and Raaijmakers 2015; Tiwari et al. 2021). An increasing number of studies have shown that plant-associated microbes improve plants’ nutritional conditions, resistance to abiotic stresses and inhibit pathogens and pests (Vandenkoornhuyse et al. 2015). Importantly, rhizospheric microbes affect plant growth, development and stress resistance by diverse mechanisms (Lareen et al. 2016; Rai et al. 2020). Beneficial effects of some plant-associated microbes on crop productivity and yields have been listed in Table 2.1.
2.4.1 Seed Germination Enhancement
Seed germination is an important stage in the life cycle of plants (Song et al. 2005). In particular, seed-associated microorganisms can be essential for the germination process in different plant phyla (Jacquemyn et al. 2015). Effectively, PGPB can accelerate seed germination and improve seedling emergence (Souza et al. 2015). This is illustrated by seed treatment of legumes with Rhizobaceae that frequently leads to increase in yield (Thilakarathna and Raizada 2017). In addition, the application of beneficial microorganisms to seeds is an efficient mechanism for the placement of microbial inoculum to soil and protection against soil-borne diseases and pests (O’Callaghan 2016).
The enhancement mechanism of seed germination is ensured via the production of different PGP traits. Seed treatment of cowpea with Bacillus sp. exhibiting multiple PGP attributes improved seed germination and yield parameters (Minaxi et al. 2012). Paul et al. (2011) reported IAA-producing bacterium Azotobacter chroomcoccum, particularly when co-inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve seed germination.
2.4.2 Stimulation of Plant Growth
The positive response of different crops to microbial inoculation has been assessed in many experiments under greenhouse and field conditions (Calvo et al. 2014). It has been reported that specific guilds of taxa among the soil bacterial microbiome can be selected to modify plant traits and to coordinate changes in soil resource pools (Pfeiffer et al. 2017). Notably, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are beneficial microorganisms that help in promoting plant growth and significantly increase soil fertility (Kashyap et al. 2017). Some microorganisms when given the opportunity to inhabit plant roots become root symbionts. Such root colonization by symbiotic microbes can enhance crop yields by promoting the growth, nutrient uptake, fixation, resistance to pests, diseases and abiotic environmental stress conditions stresses (Harman and Uphoff 2019; Yadav et al. 2018).
2.5 Resistance to Abiotic Stress
Abiotic stress in soils includes extreme temperatures, pH, drought, water-logging and toxic metals (Wu 2017), salinity (Shrivastava and Kumar 2015) and some gases and nutrient deficiency or excess (Hayat et al. 2017). They are greatly affecting plant growth and agricultural productivity and cause more than 50% of worldwide yield loss of major crops every year (Jarvis et al. 2006; Kumari et al. 2019). These conditions often favor pathogens and negatively affect plant productivity and soil fertility (Dresselhaus and Hückelhoven 2018). Particularly, drought has affected 64% of the worldwide land area, salinity 6%, anoxia 13%, soil alkalinity 15%, mineral starvation 9% and cold 57% (Mittler 2006). For example, drought stress limits the growth and productivity of crops particularly in arid and semi-arid areas (Kramer and Boyer 1995).
Plant-associated microbiomes have a much greater evolutionary potential for dealing with abiotic stresses than the plant itself (Jones et al. 2019). Therefore, it is potentially more sustainable to manage abiotic stresses in a holistic and multifaceted manner. The microorganisms use indirect and direct mechanisms to promote plant growth and development during stress conditions (Kumar and Verma 2018). Some bacteria have sigma factors to change gene expression under adverse conditions to overcome negative effects (Gupta et al. 2013). Notably, microorganism communications with the plants incite a few fundamental responses that improve their metabolic mechanism for defense against abiotic stress conditions (Nguyen et al. 2016).
2.5.1 Bioremediation
Environmental pollution resulting from human activities has a great impact on the biodiversity and functioning of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and is a major threat to human health across the globe (Alava et al. 2017). Extensive pollution of terrestrial ecosystems with petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) has generated a need for hazardous and expensive physico-chemical remediation techniques. Alternatively, plant-associated bacteria and cooperation between these bacteria and their host plants allow for greater plant survivability and treatment outcomes in contaminated sites (Gkorezis et al. 2016). Such ecological microorganisms are expected to have multiple implications for maintaining pollutant decomposition and ecological services in terrestrial environments (Shi et al. 2018). Filamentous fungi including Aspergillus sp., Mucor sp., Penicillium sp. and Trichoderma sp. have been reported to possess capability to tolerate heavy metal stress (Ezzouhri et al. 2009; Oladipo et al. 2017). Mycorrhizal fungi, free-living or endophytic fungi are also known for their strong degradative capacities and are often applied during phytoremediation of organic pollutants (Deng and Cao 2017).
The basic principle of bioremediation involves reducing the solubility of environmental contaminants by changing pH, the redox reactions and adsorption of contaminants from the polluted environment (Jain and Arnepalli 2019). Especially, the in situ bioremediation processes have become an attractive way to rehabilitate various contaminated sites (Ayoub et al. 2010). More particular, phytoremediation is using plants and associated bacteria for the treatment of soil contaminated by toxic pollutants (Salt et al. 1998). Concerning plant-associated microbes, such as rhizospheric bacteria, implicated in “Rhizomediation”, it has been demonstrated that they lead to the decomposition of polluted soil by harmful organic elements and may enhance phytoremediation (Babalola 2010). These microbes’ capacity to cleave contaminants depends on the effectiveness of their development and various metabolic surrounding conditions, including appropriate pH, temperature and humidity (Verma and Jaiswal 2016).
2.5.2 Plant Disease and Pest Control
Plant infections typically happen in regions, forests or fields when different plant components (like leaves, fruits or flowers) are attacked (Sastry and Zitter 2014). They are principally treated mainly by chemical pesticides. Plant-related microorganisms may also serve as biological control agents due to their protective effect based likely on the synthesis of effective inhibiting enzymes and substances like hydrolases and antibiotics destruct the phytopathogenic cell wall (Kumar et al. 2017). Genera, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria such as Burkholderia, Pantoes, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Paenibacillus, Streptomyces and Pseudomonas were, in particular, mentioned for their involvement in pathogen suppression (Schlatter et al. 2017). Additionally, certain native plant epiphytic microorganisms could be employed in the suppression of agri-foodstuff phytopathogens (Lopez-Velasco et al. 2012), and at a less degree of endophytic bacteria.
2.6 Factors Affecting Crop Productivity and Yield
Crop productivity and yield can be influenced by many organisms as a community contributes efficient genome and chemical exchange to create a competitive metagenome, contributing to improved plants’ production and to strengthen relationships with each other (Zorner et al. 2018). The nature and the quality of plant and microorganism interaction and soil microbial diversity can affect largely crop productivity and yields. Several experiments have also shown the direct effect of various plant species on the selection of rhizosphere populations (Marschner et al. 2004; Coleman-Derr et al. 2015). Nevertheless, other considerations are included like developmental stage or variety (Qiao et al. 2017) that may additionally affect their microbiome contents. In addition, microbiome balance and abiotic indicators can contribute to crop productivity and yield determination including soil structure, stability in wet aggregate, water supply potential, rigidity of the soil, pH, capability for nutritional element and cation exchange (Jeanne et al. 2019). Furthermore, crop productivity and yield are affected by environmental impacts of unhealthy soil via microbial activities that could not sequester carbon but cause emissions of methane, CO2 and other greenhouse gases that harm ecosystems in turn. For example, the increased global temperature has led adversely to high greenhouse gasses (Saha and Mandal 2009). Similarly, soil microbial communities are impacted by meteorology (Terrat et al. 2017). Figure 2.3 illustrates the factors affecting crop productivity and yield including: Environmental factors, biotic and abiotic stresses and plants (species, genotype and stage development).
2.7 Conclusion and Future Prospects
The microbes associated with plants are much diversified and can eventually occupy all the plant parts during their all-development cycle; from seeds to maturation. These microbes can be both beneficial and harmful, leading to a loss of crop yields or countless beneficial effects for development and protection against various biotic and abiotic stresses, undoubtedly leading to an effective increase in crop productivity and yields. Furthermore, the variability and complexity of the interaction mechanisms between microbes, plants and soil always require more investigations; especially with regard to the overlap and simultaneous effects of interaction mechanisms such as the association of abiotic and biotic stress impacts on both plants and microorganisms, as well as the different strategies developed by each partnership in these specific and complex interactions.
References
Abdel-Azeem AM, Yadav AN, Yadav N, Usmani Z (2021) Industrially important fungi for sustainable development, vol-1: biodiversity and ecological perspective. Springer, Cham
Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME Jr (1992) Ethylene in plant biology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York
Alava JJ, Cheung WWL, Ross PS, Sumaila UR (2017) Climate change–contaminant interactions in marine food webs: toward a conceptual framework. Glob ChangBiol 23:3984–4001
Babalola (2010) Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotech Lett 32:1559–1570
Bai Y, Müller DB, Srinivas G, Garrido-Oter R, Potthoff E, Rott M et al (2015) Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature 528:364–369
Bano A, Ilyas N (2012) Potential use of soil microbial community in agriculture. In: Maheshwari DK (eds) Bacteria in agrobiology: plant probiotics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27515-9_3
Barriuso J (2017) Quorum sensing mechanisms in rhizosphere biofilms. In: Ahmad I, Mabood Husain FM (eds) Biofilms in plant and soil health. Wiley, NJ, USA, pp 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119246329.ch6
Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35:1044–1051
Bertin C, Yang XH, Weston LA (2003) The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 256:67–83
Bogino PC, Oliva MDLM, Sorroche FG, Giordano W (2013) The role of bacterial biofilms and surface components in plant-bacterial associations. Int J Mol Sci 14:15838–15859
Bouskill NJ, Wood TE, Baran R, Hao Z, Ye Z, Bowen BP et al (2016) Belowground response to drought in a tropical forest soil. II: change in microbial function impacts carbon composition. Front Microbiol 7:1–11
Bulgari R, Franzoni G, Ferrante A (2019) Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy 9:1–30
Burns RG (1982) Enzyme activity in soil: location and a possible role in microbial ecology. Soil BiolBiochem 14:423–427
Cabra Cendales T, Rodríguez González CA, Villota Cuasquer CP, Tapasco Alzate OA, Hernández Rodriguez A (2017) Bacillus effect on the germination and growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L). Acta Biol Colomb 22:37–44
Calvente V, de Orellano ME, Sansone G, Benuzzi D, Sanz de Tosetti MI (2001) A simple agar plate assay for screening siderophore producer yeasts. J Microbiol Meth 47:273–279
Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW (2014) Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383:3–41
Cao L, Jiang M, Zeng Z, Du A, Tan H, Liu Y (2008) Trichoderma atroviride F6 improves phytoextraction efficiency of mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Coss. var. foliosa Bailey) in Cd Ni contaminated soils. Chemosphere 71:1769–1773
Castillo U, Harper JK, Strobel GA, Sears J, Alesi K, Ford E et al (2003) Kakadumycins, novel antibiotics from Streptomyces sp. NRRL 30566, an endophyte of Grevillea pteridifolia. FEMS Microbiol Lett 224:183–190
Cavalcante JJDV, Cardoso AM, de Pádua VLM (2017) Concept of mono and mixed biofilms and their role in soil and in plant association. In: Ahmed I, Hussain FM (eds) Biofilms in plant and soil health. Wiley, pp 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119246329.ch3
Chet I, Inbar J (1994) Biological control of fungal pathogens. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 48:37–43
Coleman-Derr D, Desgarennes D, Fonseca-Garcia C, Gross S, Clingenpeel S, Woyke T et al (2015) Plant compartment and biogeography affect microbiome composition in cultivated and native Agave species. New Phytolo 209:798–811
Commare RR, Nandakumar R, Kandan A, Suresh S, Bharathi M, Raguchander T et al (2002) Pseudomonas fluorescens based bio-formulation for the management of sheath blight disease and leaffolder insect in rice. Crop Prot 21:671–677
Compant S, Samad A, Faist H, Sessitsch A (2019) A review on the plant microbiome: ecology, functions and emerging trends in microbial application. J Adv Res 19:29–37
Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318–1322
Crowley DE (2006) Microbial siderophores in the plant rhizosphere. In: Barton LL, AbadíaJ (eds) Iron nutrition in plants and rhizospheric microorganisms. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4743-6_8
Degrassi G, Bertani I, Devescovi G, Fabrizi A, Gatti A, Venturi V (2012) Response of plant-bacteria interaction models to nanoparticles. Environ Qual 8:39–50
Deising H, Nicholson RL, Haug M, Howard RJ, Mendgen K (1992) Adhesion pad formation and the involvement of cutinase and esterases in the attachment of uredospores to the host cuticle. Plant Cell 4:1101–1111
Delmotte N, Knief C, Chaffron S, Innerebner G, Roschitzki B, Schlapbach R et al (2009) Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:16428–16433
Deng Z, Cao L (2017) Chemosphere fungal endophytes and their interactions with plants in phytoremediation: a review. Chemosphere 168:1100–1106
Deveau A, Bonito G, Uehling J, Paoletti M, Becker M, Bindschedler S et al (2018) Bacterial–fungal interactions: ecology, mechanisms and challenges. FEMS Microbiol Rev 42:335–352
Dikilitas M, Karakas S, Simsek E, Yadav AN (2021) Microbes from cold deserts and their applications in mitigation of cold stress in plants. In: Yadav AN, Rastegari AA, Yadav N (eds) Microbiomes of extreme environments: biodiversity and biotechnological applications. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429328633-7
Dowling DN, O’Gara F (1994) Metabolites of Pseudomonas involved in the biocontrol in the biocontrol of plant diseases. Trends Biotechnol 12:133–141
Dresselhaus T, Hückelhoven R (2018) Biotic and abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Agronomy 8:1–6
El-Ramady HR, Alshaal TA, Amer M, Domokos-Szabolcsy E, Elhawat N, Prokisch J et al (2014) Soil quality and plant nutrition. In: Ozier-Lafontaine H, Lesueur-Jannoyer M (eds) Sustainable agriculture reviews 14: agroecology and global change, sustainable agriculture reviews. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 345–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06016-3_11
El-Tarabily KA (2006) Rhizosphere competent isolates of Streptomycete and non-streptomycete Actinomycetes capable of producing cell-wall degrading enzymes to control Pythium aphanidermatum damping off disease of cucumber. Can J Bot 84:211–222
EzzouhriL CE, MoyaM EF, Lairini K (2009) Heavy metal tolerance of filamentous fungi is olated from polluted sites in Tangier. Morocco Afr J Microbiols Res 3:35–48
Fernandes R, Júnior G, Aparecida E, Pedrinho N, Cristina T, Castellane L (2011) Auxin-producing bacteria isolated from the roots of Cattleya walkeriana, an endangered Brazilian orchid, and their role in acclimatization. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 35:729–737
Fester T, Giebler J, Wick LY, Schlosser D, Kästner M (2014) Plant-microbe interactions as drivers of ecosystem functions relevant for the biodegradation of organic contaminants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:168–175
Frankowski J, Lorito M, Scala F, Schmid R, Berg G, Bahl H (2001) Purification and properties of two chitinolytic enzymes of Serratia plymuthica HRO-C48 .Arch Microbiol 176:421–426
Gkorezis P, Daghio M, Franzetti A, Van Hamme JD, Sillen W, Vangronsveld J (2016) The Interaction between plants and bacteria in the remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: an environmental perspective. Front Microbiol 7:1–27
Glick BR (2005) Modulation of plant ethylene levels by the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 251:1–7
Glick BR (2014) Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res 169:30–39
Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producingsoil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:329–339
Gogos A, Knauer K, Bucheli TD (2012) Nanomaterials in plant protection and fertilization: currentstate, foreseen applications, and research priorities foreseen applications, and research priorities. J Agric Food Chem 60:9781–9792
Grobelak A, Napora A, Kacprzak M (2015) Using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve plant growth. Ecol Eng 84:22–28
Guan SH, Sattler I, Lin WH, Guo DA, Grabley S (2005) p-Aminoacetophenonic acids produced by a mangrove endophyte: streptomyces griseus subspecies. J Nat Prod 68:1198–1200
Gupta G, Panwar J, Jha PN (2013) Natural occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a dominant cultivable diazotrophic endophytic bacterium colonizing Pennisetum glaucum (L.). R Br Appl Soil Ecol 64:252–261
Harman GE, Uphoff N (2019) Symbiotic root-endophytic soil microbes improve crop productivity and provide environmental benefits. Scientifica 2019:1–25
Hassani MA, Durán P, Hacquard S (2018) Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome 6:1–17
Hayat S, Faraz A, Faizan M (2017) Root exudates: composition and impact on plant–microbe interaction. In: Iqbal A, HusainFM (eds) Biofilms in Plant Soil and Health. John Wiley and Sons, pp179–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119246329.ch10
Hesham AE-L, Kaur T, Devi R, Kour D, Prasad S, Yadav N et al. (2021) Current trends in microbial biotechnology for agricultural sustainability: conclusion and future challenges. In: Yadav AN, Singh J, Singh C, Yadav N (eds) Current trends in microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore, pp 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6949-4_22
Heil M, Bostock RM (2002) Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defences. Ann Bot 89:503–512
Jacquemyn H, Waud M, Merckx VSFT, Lievenes B, Brys R (2015) Mycorrhizal diversity, seed germination and long term changes in population size across nine populations of the terrestrial orchid Neottia ovata. Mol Ecol 24:3269–3280
Jain S, Arnepalli D (2019) Biominerlisation as a remediation technique: A critical review. In: Stalin V, MuttharamM (eds) Geotechnical Characterisation and Geoenvironmental Engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0899-4_19
Jarvis D, Mar I, Sears L (2006) Enhancing the use of crop genetic diversity to manage abiotic stress in agricultural production systems. In: Proceedings of a workshop, Budapest, Hungary, 23–27 May, 2005. Enhancing the use of crop genetic diversity to manage abiotic stress in agricultural production systems. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI)
Jeanne T, Parent SÉ, Hogue R (2019) Using a soil bacterial species balance index to estimate potato crop productivity. PLoS ONE 14:1–15
Jia M, Chen L, Xin HL, Zheng CJ, Rahman K, Han T et al (2016) A friendly relationship between endophytic fungi and medicinal plants: a systematic review. Front Microbiol 7:1–14
Jones P, Garcia BJ, Furches A, Tuskan GA, Jacobson D (2019) Plant host-associated mechanisms for microbial selection. Front Plant Sci 10:1–14
Kashyap AS, Pandey VK, Manzar N, Kannojia P, Singh UB, Sharma PK (2017)Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving crop productivity in sustainable agriculture. In: Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R (eds) Plant-Microbe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Perspectives. Springer, Singapore, pp 673–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6593-4_28
Kassogué A, Dicko AH, Traoré D, Fané R, Valicente FH, Babana AH (2016) Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated from agricultural soils in mali tested for their potentiality on plant growth promoting traits. Br Microbiol Res J 14:1–7
Kaur G, Reddy MS (2014) Role of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in improving the soil fertility and crop productivity in organic farming. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:549–564
Khan AA, Jilani J, Akhtar MS, Naqvi SMS, Rasheed M (2009) Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria: occurrence, mechanisms and their role in crop production. J Agric Biol Sci 1:48–58
Khare E, Yadav A (2017) The role of microbial enzyme systems in plant growth promotion. Clim Chang Environ Sustain 5:122–145
Kour D, Kaur T, Yadav N, Rastegari AA, Singh B, Kumar V et al. (2020) Phytases from microbes in phosphorus acquisition for plant growth promotion and soil health. In: Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N (eds) Trends of microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture and biomedicine systems: diversity and functional perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820526-6.00011-7
Kour D, Rana KL, Yadav AN, Yadav N, Kumar V, Kumar A et al. (2019a) Drought-tolerant phosphorus-solubilizing microbes: Biodiversity and biotechnological applications for alleviation of drought stress in plants. In: Sayyed RZ, Arora NK, Reddy MS (eds) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable stress management, vol 1: rhizobacteria in abiotic stress management. Springer, Singapore, pp 255–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6536-2_13
Kour D, Rana KL, Yadav N, Yadav AN, Kumar A, Meena VS et al. (2019b) Rhizospheric microbiomes: biodiversity, mechanisms of plant growth promotion, and biotechnological applications for sustainable agriculture. In: Kumar A, Meena VS (eds) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for agricultural sustainability: from theory to practices. Springer, Singapore, pp 19–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7553-8_2
Kour D, Rana KL, Kaur T, Yadav N, Yadav AN, Kumar M et al (2021) Biodiversity, current developments and potential biotechnological applications of phosphorus-solubilizing and -mobilizing microbes: a review. Pedosphere 31:43–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60057-1
Kour D, Rana KL, Yadav N, Yadav AN, Singh J, Rastegari AA et al. (2019c) Agriculturally and industrially important fungi: current developments and potential biotechnological applications. In: Yadav AN, Singh S, Mishra S, Gupta A (eds) Recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi, vol 2: perspective for value-added products and environments. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14846-1_1
Kraemer SM, Crowley DE, Kretzschmar R (2006) Geochemical aspects of phytosiderophore promoted iron acquisition by plants. AdvAgron 91:1–46
Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995) Water relations of plants and soils. Academic, San Diego
Kumar M, Kour D, Yadav AN, Saxena R, Rai PK, Jyoti A et al (2019a) Biodiversity of methylotrophic microbial communities and their potential role in mitigation of abiotic stresses in plants. Biologia 74:287–308. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-019-00190-6
Kumar M, Saxena R, Rai PK, Tomar RS, Yadav N, Rana KL et al. (2019b) Genetic diversity of methylotrophic yeast and their impact on environments. In: Yadav AN, Singh S, Mishra S, Gupta A (eds) Recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi: volume 3: perspective for sustainable environments. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25506-0_3
Kumar A, Verma JP (2018) Does plant-microbe interaction confer stress tolerance in plants: a review? . Microbiol Res 207:41–52
Kumari P, Kumari R, Sharma B, Prasad SK, Singh RK (2019) Abiotic stress response of field crops: recent approach. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 8:1761–1769
Kumar J, Singh D, Ghosh P, Kumar A (2017) Endophytic and epiphytic modes of microbial interactions and benefits. In: Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R (eds) Plant-microbe interactions in agro-ecological perspectives. Springer, Singapore, pp 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5813-4_12
Kumar M, Yadav AN, Saxena R, Paul D, Tomar RS (2021) Biodiversity of pesticides degrading microbial communities and their environmental impact. Biocat Agric Biotechnol 31:101883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101883
Lalitha S (2017) Plant growth-promoting microbes: a boon for sustainable agriculture. In: Dhanarajan A (ed) Sustainable agriculture towards food security. Springer, Singapore, pp 125–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6647-4_8
Lareen A, Burton F, Schafer P (2016) Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes. Plant Mol Biolo 90:575–587
Li WR, Xie XB, Shi QS, Zeng HY, Ou-Yang YS, Chen YB (2010) Antibacterial activity and mechanism of silver nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. ApplMicrobiolBiot 85:1115–1122
Lilley AK, Hails RS, Cory JS, Bailey MJ (1997) The dispersal and establishment of pseudomonad populations in the phyllosphere of sugar beet by phytophagous caterpillars. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 24:151–157
Lopez-Velasco G, Tydings HA, Boyer RR, Falkinham JO, Ponder MA (2012) Characterization of interactions between Escherichia coli O157:H7 with epiphytic bacteria in vitro and on spinach leaf surfaces. Int J Food Microbiol 153:351–357
Lovern SB, Klaper R (2006) Environ. Toxicol Chem 25:1132–1137
Mahmoud ALE, Abd-Alla MH (2001) Siderophore production by some microorganisms and their effect on Bradyrhizobium-Mung Bean symbiosis. Int J Agric Biol 03:157–162
Ma JF (2005) Plant root responses to three abundant soil minerals: silicon, aluminum and iron. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:267–281
Marschner P, Crowley D, Yang CH (2004) Development of specific rhizosphere bacterial communities in relation to plant species, nutrition and soil type. Plant Soil 261:199–208
Mendes R, Raaijmakers JM (2015) Cross-kingdom similarities in microbiome functions. ISME J 9:1905–1907
Mengel K, Kirkby EA, Kosegarten H, Appel T (2001) Principles of plant nutrition 2nd edn, Springer, Netherlands
Minaxi LN, Yadav RC, Saxena J (2012) Characterisation of multifaceted Bacillus sp. RM-2 for its use as plant growth promoting bioinoculant for crops grown in semi arid deserts. Appl Soil Ecol 59:124–135
Mishra VK, Kumar A (2009) Impact of metal nanoparticles on the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Dig J Nanomater Bios 4:587–592
Mittler R (2006) Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci 11:15–19
Monier J-M, Lindow SE (2004) Frequency, size, and localization of bacterial aggregates on bean leaf surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:346–355
Montesinos E (2003) Plant-associated microorganisms: a view from the scope of microbiology. Int Microbiol 6:221–223
Mousa WK, Shearer C, Limay-Rios V, Ettinger CL, Eisen JA, Raizada MN (2016) Root-hair endophyte stacking in finger millet creates a physicochemical barrier to trap the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Nat Microbiol 1:1–12
Mukhtar I, Mushtaq S, Ali A, Khokhar I (2010) Epiphytic and endophytic phyllosphere microflora of Cassytha filiformis L. and its hosts. Ecoprint: Int J Ecol 17:1–8
Nguyen D, Rieu I, Mariani C, van Dam NM (2016) How plants handle multiple stresses: Hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory. Plant Mol Biol 91:727–740
Niehus R, Picot A, Oliveira NM, Mitri S, Foster K (2017) The evolution of siderophore production as a competitive trait. Evolution 71:1443–1455
O’Callaghan M (2016) Microbial inoculation of seed for improved crop performance: issues and opportunities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5729–5746
Oladipo OG, Awotoye OO, Olayinka A, Bezuidenhout CC, Maboeta MS (2017) Heavy metal tolerance traits of filamentous fungi isolated from gold and gemstone mining sites. Braz J Microbiol 49:29–37
Pahari A, Dangar TK, Mishra BB (2016) Siderophore quantification of bacteria from Sundarban and its effect on growth of Brinjal (Solanum melongena. L). Bioscan 11:2147–2151
Pal KK, McSpaddenGardener B (2006) Biological control of plant pathogens. In: The plant health instructor. In press. https://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/advanced/topics/Documents/PHIBiologicalControl.pdf.
Pascholati SF, Deising H, Leiti B, Anderson D, Nicholson RL (1993) Cutinase and non-specific esterase activities in the conidial mucilage of Colletotrichum graminicola. Physiol Mol Plant P 42:37–51
Patil AG, Kounaina K, Aishwarya S, Harshitha N, Satapathy P, Hudeda SP et al. (2021) Myco-nanotechnology for sustainable agriculture: challenges and opportunities. In: Yadav AN (ed) Recent trends in mycological research: vol 1: agricultural and medical perspective. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60659-6_20
Patra AK, Adhikari T, Bhardwaj AK (2016) Enhancing crop productivity in salt-affected environments by stimulating soil biological processes and remediation using nanotechnology. In: Dagar J, Sharma P, Sharma D, Singh A(eds) Innovative saline agriculture. Springer, New Delhi, pp 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2770-0_4
Patten CL, Glick BR (1996) Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Can J Microbiol 42:207–220
Paul S, Rathi MS, Tyagi SP (2011) Interactive effect with AM fungi and Azotobacter inoculated seed on germination, plant growth and yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Indian J Agric Sci 81:1041–1045
Petrini O (1991) Fungal endophytes of tree leaves. In: Andrews JH, Hirano SS (eds) Microbial ecology of leaves. Brock/Springer series in contemporary bioscience. Springer, New York, NY, pp 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3168-4_9
Pfeiffer S, Mitter B, Oswald A, Schloter-Hai B, Schloter M, Declerck S et al (2017) Rhizosphere microbiomes of potato cultivated in the high andes show stable and dynamic core microbiomes with different responses to plant development. FEMS MicrobiolEcol 93:1–12
Prasad S, Malav LC, Choudhary J, Kannojiya S, Kundu M, Kumar S et al. (2021) Soil microbiomes for healthy nutrient recycling. In: Yadav AN, Singh J, Singh C, Yadav N (eds) Current trends in microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6949-4_1
Qiao Q, Wang F, Zhang J, Chen Y, Zhang C, Liu G et al (2017) The variation in the rhizosphere microbiome of cotton with soil type, genotype and developmental stage. Sci Rep 7:1–10
Raaijmakers JM, Vlami M, de Souza JT (2002) Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 81:537–547
Rai PK, Singh M, Anand K, Saurabhj S, Kaur T, Kour D et al (2020) Role and potential applications of plant growth promotion rhizobacteria for sustainable agriculture. In: Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N (eds) Trends of microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture and biomedicine systems: diversity and functional perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820526-6.00004-X
Rana KL, Kour D, Kaur T, Devi R, Yadav AN, Yadav N et al (2020a) Endophytic microbes: biodiversity, plant growth-promoting mechanisms and potential applications for agricultural sustainability. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113:1075–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-020-01429-y
Rana KL, Kour D, Kaur T, Sheikh I, Yadav AN, Kumar V et al (2020b) Endophytic microbes from diverse wheat genotypes and their potential biotechnological applications in plant growth promotion and nutrient uptake. Proc Natl Acad Sci India B. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-020-01168-0
Rana KL, Kour D, Yadav AN (2019) Endophytic microbiomes: biodiversity, ecological significance and biotechnological applications. Res J Biotechnol 14:142–162
Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N (2020a) New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering: trends of microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture and biomedicine systems: diversity and functional perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N (2020b) New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering: trends of microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture and biomedicine systems: perspectives for human health. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Ravikumar S, Kathiresan K (2007) Growth of Avicennia marina and Ceriops decandra seedlings inoculated with halophilic azotobacters. J Environ Biol 28:601–603
Reinhold-Hurek B, Bünger W, Burbano CS, Sabale M, Hurek T (2015) Roots shaping their microbiome: global hotspots for microbial activity. Annu Rev Phytopathol 53:403–424
Rudrappa T, Biedrzycki ML, Bais HP (2008) Causes and consequences of plant-associated biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:153–166
Sadeghi A, Karimi E, Dahaji PA, Javid MG, Dalvand Y, Askari H (2012) Plant growth promoting activity of an auxin and siderophore producing isolate of Streptomyces under saline soil conditions. World J Microbiol Biot 28:1503–1509
Saha N, Mandal B (2009) Soil health–a precondition for crop production. In: Khan M, Zaidi A, Musarrat J (eds) Microbial strategies for crop improvement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01979-1_8
Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I (1998) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plantphysiol Plant Mol Biol 49:643–668
Sastry KS, Zitter TA (2014) Management of virus and viroid diseases of crops in the tropics. In: Sastry KS, Zitter, TA (eds) Plant virus and viroid diseases in the tropics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 149–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7820-7_2
Schloter M, Nannipieri P, Sorensen SJ, van Elsas JD (2018) Microbial indicators for soil quality. BiolFertil Soils 54:1–10
Selvakumar G, Mohan M, Kundu S, Gupta AD, Joshi P, Nazim S et al (2008) Cold tolerance and plant growth promotion potential of Serratia marcescens strain SRM (MTCC 8708) isolated from flowers of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo). LettApplMicrobiol 46:171–175
Shaharoona B, Arshad M, Zahir ZA, Khalid A (2006) Performance of Pseudomonas spp. Containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the presence of nitrogenous fertilizer. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2971–2975
Sharaff MS, Subrahmanyam G, Kumar A, Yadav AN (2020) Mechanistic understanding of root-microbiome interaction for sustainable agriculture in polluted soils. In: Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N (eds) Trends of microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture and biomedicine systems: diversity and functional perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820526-6.00005-1
Sharma VP, Singh S, Dhanjal DS, Singh J, Yadav AN (2021) Potential strategies for control of agricultural occupational health hazards. In: Yadav AN, Singh J, Singh C, Yadav N (eds) Current trends in microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6949-4_16
Sharma S, Kour D, Rana KL, Dhiman A, Thakur S, Thakur P, et al. (2019) Trichoderma: biodiversity, ecological significances, and industrial applications. In: Yadav A, Mishra S, Singh S, Gupta A (eds) Recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi. Springer, Cham, pp 85–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10480-1_3
Sharma SK, Johri BN, Ramesh A, Joshi OP, Prasad SS (2011) Selection of plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas spp. that enhanced productivity of soybean-wheat cropping system in central India. J MicrobiolBiotechnol 21:1127–1142
Shi Y, Li Y, Xiang X, Sun R, Yang T, He D et al (2018) Spatial scale affects the relative role of stochasticity versus determinism in soil bacterial communities in wheat fields across the North China Plain. Microbiome 6:1–10
Shrivastava P, Kumar R (2015) Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci 22:123–131
Shrivastava M, Srivastava PC, D’Souza SF (2018) Phosphate-solubilizing microbes: diversity and phosphates solubilization mechanism. In: Meena VS (ed) Role of rhizospheric microbes in soil. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp 138–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0044-8_5
Shukla G, Varma A (2011) Soil enzymology, vol 22. Springer, Berlin
Simões LC, Simões M, Vieira MJ (2007) Biofilm interactions between distinct bacterial genera isolated from drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6192–6200
Singh BK, Bardgett RD, Smith P, Reay DS (2010) Microorganisms and climate change: terrestrial feedbacks and mitigation options. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:779–790
Singh C, Tiwari S, Singh JS, Yadav AN (2020) Microbes in agriculture and environmental development. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Singh J, Yadav AN (2020) Natural Bioactive products in sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore
Singh JS, Koushal S, Kumar A, Vimal SR, Gupta VK (2016) Book review: microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity vol 2: functional application. Front Microbiol 7:1–2
Singh PP, Shin YC, Park CS, Chung YR (1999) Biological control of Fusarium wilt of cucumber by chitinolytic bacteria. Phytopathology 89:92–99
Song J, Feng G, Tian CY, Zhang FS (2005) Strategies for adaptation of Suaeda physophora, Haloxylon ammodendron and Haloxylon persicum to a saline environment during seed germination stage. Ann Bot 96:399–405
Souza R, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet Mol Biol 38:401–419
Stokstad E (2016) The nitrogen fix. Science 353:1225–1227
Subrahmanyam G, Kumar A, Sandilya SP, Chutia M, Yadav AN (2020) Diversity, plant growth promoting attributes, and agricultural applications of rhizospheric microbes. In: Yadav AN, Singh J, Rastegari AA, Yadav N (eds) Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Springer, Cham, pp 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38453-1_1
Suyal DC, Soni R, Yadav AN, Goel R (2021) Cold adapted microorganisms: survival mechanisms and applications. In: Yadav AN, Rastegari AA, Yadav N (eds) Microbiomes of extreme environments: biodiversity and biotechnological applications. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 177–192
Swędrzyńska D (2000) Effect of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on development and yielding of winter wheat and oat under different cultivation conditions. Pol J Environ Stud 9:505–509
Terrat S, Horrigue W, Dequietd S, Saby NPA, Lelièvre M, Nowak V et al (2017) Mapping and predictive variations of soil bacterial richness across France. PLoS ONE 12:5–8
Thilakarathna MS, Raizada MN (2017) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of diverse rhizobia inoculants on soybean traits under field conditions. Soil Biol Biochem105:177–196
Tiwari P, Bajpai M, Singh LK, Yadav AN, Bae H (2021) Portraying fungal mechanisms in stress tolerance: perspective for sustainable agriculture. In: Yadav AN (ed) Recent trends in mycological research: vol 1: agricultural and medical perspective. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 269–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60659-6_12
Tiwari P, Bajpai M, Singh LK, Mishra S, Yadav AN (2020) Phytohormones producing fungal communities: Metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crops. In: Yadav AN, Mishra S, Kour D, Yadav N, Kumar A (eds) Agriculturally important fungi for sustainable agriculture, vol 1: perspective for diversity and crop productivity. Springer, Cham, pp 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45971-0_8
Torres MA, Jones JDG, Dangl JL (2006) Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol 141:373–378
TroxellB HHM (2013) Transcriptional regulation by Ferric Uptake Regulator (Fur) in pathogenic bacteria. Front Cell Infect Mi 3:59
Turner TR, James EK, Poole PS (2013) The plant microbiome. Genome Biol 14:1–10
Van de Poel B, Van DerStraeten D (2014) 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in plants: more than just the precursor of ethylene! Front Plant Sci 5:1–11
Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483
Van Wees SCM, De Swart EAM, Van Pelt JA, Van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ (2000) Enhancement of induced disease resistance by simultaneous activation of salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 97:8711–8716
Vance CP (2001) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in the world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol 127:390–397
Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A (2015) The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol 206:1196–1206
Vansuyt G, Robin A, Briat JF, Curie C, Lemanceau P (2007) Iron acquisition from Fe pyoverdine by Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:441–447
Verbon EH, Liberman LM (2016) Beneficial microbes affect endogenous mechanisms controlling root development. Trends Plant Sci 21:218–229
Verma JP, Jaiswal DK (2016) Book review: Advances in biodegradation and bioremediation of industrial waste. Front Microbiol 6:1–2
Vleesschauwer DDE, Hofte M (2009) Rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance. In: VanLoon LC (eds) plant innate immunity. Academic Press Ltd, Elsevier Science Ltd, London, pp 223–281. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2296(09)51006-3
Whipps J, Hand P, Pink D, Bending GD (2008) Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype. J Appl Microbiol 105:1744–1755
Wicklow DT, Roth S, Deyrup ST, Gloer JB (2005) A protective endophyte of maize: Acremonium zeae antibiotics inhibitory to Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides. Mycol Res 109:610–618
Wu CH, Bernard SM, Andersen GL, Chen W (2009) Developing microbe-plant interactions for applications in plant-growth promotion and disease control, production of useful compounds, remediation and carbon sequestration. J Microbial Biotechnol 2:428–440
Wu QS (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizas and stress tolerance of plants. Springer, Singapore
Yadav AN, Kumar V, Dhaliwal HS, Prasad R, Saxena AK (2018) Microbiome in crops: diversity, distribution, and potential role in crop improvement. In: Crop improvement through microbial biotechnology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 305–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63987-5.00015-3
Yadav AN, Verma P, Kour D, Rana KL, Kumar V, Singh B et al (2017) Plant microbiomes and its beneficial multifunctional plant growth promoting attributes. Int J Environ Sci Nat Resour 3:1–8
Yang SF, Hoffman NE (1984) Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 35:155–189
Yadav AN (2021) Beneficial plant-microbe interactions for agricultural sustainability. J Appl Biol Biotechnol 9:1–4. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2021.91ed
Yadav AN, Mishra S, Kour D, Yadav N, Kumar A (2020a) Agriculturally important fungi for sustainable agriculture, volume 1: perspective for diversity and crop productivity. Springer International Publishing, Cham
Yadav AN, Mishra S, Kour D, Yadav N, Kumar A (2020b) Agriculturally important fungi for sustainable agriculture, volume 2: functional annotation for crop protection. Springer International Publishing, Cham
Yadav AN, Singh J, Rastegari AA, Yadav N (2020c) Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Springer, Cham
Yadav AN, Kaur T, Devi R, Kour D, Yadav N (2021a) Biodiversity and biotechnological applications of extremophilic microbiomes: current research and future challenges. In: Yadav AN, Rastegari AA, Yadav N (eds) Microbiomes of extreme environments: biodiversity and biotechnological applications. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429328633-16
Yadav AN, Singh J, Singh C, Yadav N (2021b) Current trends in microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore
Zaidi A (1999) Synergistic interactions of nitrogen fixing microorganisms with phosphate mobilizing microorganisms, PhD thesis, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
Zhou Y, Zhu H, Yao Q (2017) Improving soil fertility and soil functioning in cover cropped agroecosystems with symbiotic microbes. In: Singh J, Seneviratne G (eds) Agro-environmental sustainability. Springer, Cham, pp 149–171. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49724-2_8
Zorner P, Farmer S, Alibek K (2018) Quantifying crop rhizosphere microbiome ecology: the next frontier in enhancing the commercial utility of agricultural microbes. Ind Biotechnol 14:116–119
Acknowledgements
The authors of this chapter are grateful to Mr. Abbaci Hocine teacher–researcher at the University of Bejaia, FSNV, Laboratory of Mastery of Renewable Energies, for his help and collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mokrani, S., El-hafid Nabti (2021). Microbes Associated with Crops: Functional Attributes for Crop Productivity. In: Yadav, A.N. (eds) Soil Microbiomes for Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73507-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73507-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73506-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73507-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)