Abstract
Most of our current understanding of the neuromolecular mechanisms of Cannabis action focusses on two plant cannabinoids, THC and CBD. THC acts primarily through presynaptic CB cannabinoid receptors to regulate neurotransmitter release in the brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves. CBD action, on the other hand, is probably mediated through multiple molecular targets.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
2.1 Introduction and Scope of this Chapter
Cannabis, like many natural products, is a complex and variable mix of metabolites, some of which are common across many plant species, such as terpenoids and flavonoids, and some of which appear to be unique to Cannabis. These phytocannabinoids constitute a group of C21 or C22 terpeno-phenolic constituents, with the principal constituents being acids, including Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid, cannabidiolic acid, cannabinolic acid, cannabinodiolic acid, cannabigerolic acid and cannabichromenic acid, for review, see Andre et al. (2016). Intriguingly, the bioactivity of the acids has drawn little attention. By contrast, the decarboxylated products of the acids have enjoyed the vast majority of attention from both scientific and non-scientific audiences. A particular focus has been on THC, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, which is the predominant psychoactive cannabinoid and the primary reason for the nonmedicinal consumption of Cannabis. This compound was first isolated from Cannabis preparations over 50 years ago (Gaoni and Mechoulam 1964). The second most investigated cannabinoid is CBD, cannabidiol, which lacks the psychoactivity of THC. Our understanding of the bioactivity of the remainder of the phytocannabinoids falls off a knowledge cliff.
Accordingly, this chapter reviews the targets and neural functions of the cannabinoids. We will describe the receptor targets of THC, which are well established. We will consider the evidence for the molecular targets of CBD, which are less well-established. For the wider family of phytocannabinoids, we will review the evidence for their molecular and cellular functions.
2.1.1 Neuromolecular Targets of THC: The Cannabinoid Receptors
In 1990, the orphan G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) SKR6 cloned from rat brain was reported to respond with similar potency to THC and its lower abundance isomer Δ8-THC, but not CBD or cannabinol (CBN), in recombinant expression (Matsuda et al. 1990). Shortly thereafter, the human orthologue was cloned from the brainstem and testes, and identified as a cannabinoid receptor with over 97% identity to the rat protein (Gerard et al. 1991). The following year saw the first endogenous cannabinoid being identified in extracts from pig brain; this arachidonic acid conjugate was termed anandamide by Will Devane and Raphi Mechoulam (Devane et al. 1992). Three years after the cloning of the first cannabinoid receptor, a second, quite distinct GPCR was cloned from the HL60 human promyelocytic leukaemia cell line (Munro et al. 1993). This was initially described as a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids and bound THC and CBN with similar affinities, anandamide with lower affinity and CBD with much lower affinity. In 1995, a second endocannabinoid was identified; this was also an arachidonic acid conjugate, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, 2AG (Mechoulam et al. 1995; Sugiura et al. 1995).
The Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (NC-IUPHAR) currently recognises just two cannabinoid receptors, termed as CB1 and CB2 (Howlett et al. 2002; Pertwee et al. 2010), corresponding to the ‘central’ and ‘peripheral’ receptors, respectively. The two GPCRs share 44% amino acid sequence homology, although this correspondence increases to 68% for the ligand-binding domains of the transmembrane regions. They belong to the rhodopsin or family A of GPCR, which signal through pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi/o proteins and function by activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family and inhibiting adenylyl cyclase (Howlett et al. 2002; Pertwee et al. 2010).
2.1.1.1 CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Characterisation: Protein, Distribution, Signalling and Pharmacology
The CB1 receptor, coded in humans by the CNR1 gene (Pertwee et al. 2010), is of relatively long length for the rhodopsin family, 472 amino acids, having an N-terminus over 110-amino acid-long (Gerard et al. 1991). The N-terminus contains two asparagine residues, Asn77 and Asn83, which are putative locations for glycosylation, a feature of most, if not all, GPCR. For the rat receptor, glycosylation increases the apparent molecular size from 53 to 64 kDa (Song and Howlett 1995). A similar phenomenon has been reported for the CB1 receptor in human brain preparations (De Jesus et al. 2006). Towards the C-terminus, Cys415 has been described to be palmitoylated (Oddi et al. 2012), a common but not universal post-translational modification for GPCR. Palmitoylation was reported to anchor the receptor in lipid rafts of the plasma membrane and to assist in coupling to G proteins (Oddi et al. 2012). Two N-terminal splice variants of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor have been described that differ in length and possess different ligand-binding properties (Ryberg et al. 2005) and are expressed at significantly lower levels in various tissues (Ryberg et al. 2005; Shire et al. 1995) when compared to the full-length receptor. The physiological and pharmacological effects of these genetic variants are yet to be fully elucidated.
The first CB1 receptor antagonist identified was rimonabant (Rinaldi-Carmona et al. 1995), which gained approval for the treatment of metabolic disorder/obesity for a brief period in Europe (Di Marzo and Despres 2009). The antagonist structure was modified to produce AM6538, which was recently crystallised with the CB1 receptor (Hua et al. 2016). A further structurally-unrelated antagonist, taranabant, was co-crystallised in a contemporaneous study (Shao et al. 2016). Two additional crystal structures of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor have been reported where agonists were involved. AM841 and AM11542 are structural analogues of THC (Hua et al. 2017). In an attempt to gain further understanding of the signalling mechanisms of the CB1 receptor, the structure of a CB1-Gi signalling complex bound to a high affinity, high efficacy agonist, MDMB-Fubinaca (Krishna Kumar et al. 2019). This characterisation of the distinct structures of the CB1 receptor by various classes of compounds will likely aid future drug discovery centred on the cannabinoid receptors (Krishna Kumar et al. 2019).
As identified above, the CB1 cannabinoid receptor is Gi/o-coupled, which is associated with the inhibition of cyclic AMP production (Howlett et al. 2002). In neuronal cells, however, alternative signalling pathways are thought to predominate. Thus, the CB1 receptor couples to the potassium channel opening leading to cellular hyperpolarisation, while inhibiting voltage-gated calcium channels (Mackie et al. 1995). In recombinant expression and in particular cells in culture, the CB1 receptor also enhances intracellular calcium release via the G protein-dependent (apparently Gβγ subunit) stimulation of phospholipase C-β (PLC-β) leading to inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate generation (Lauckner et al. 2005).
Investigations utilising immunocytochemistry, quantitative autoradiography, and in situ hybridisation (Howlett et al. 2002) revealed that the CB1 receptors are expressed abundantly at the terminals of central and peripheral neurons, where they inhibit the release of multiple neurotransmitters (Pertwee et al. 2010). There is high expression specifically in the cerebellum, olfactory bulb, neocortex, basal ganglia, brain stem and hippocampus (Herkenham et al. 1991). Peripherally, the CB1 receptor is expressed in the testes, vascular endothelium, spleen, in the enteric nervous system of the gastrointestinal tract (Izzo and Sharkey 2010), adipocytes and retina.
The physiological role of CB1 receptors in the CNS is best understood in the Schaffer collateral commissural pathway. Modelling of the operation of endocannabinoids at a glutamatergic synapse highlighted the post-junctional location of ligand-gated ion channels and Gq-coupled GPCR activated by high-frequency stimulation-evoked release of high levels of presynaptic glutamate. These receptors evoke generation of diacylglycerol (and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate), which is metabolised by perisynaptic diacylglycerol lipase to produce 2AG. By as yet unidentified mechanisms, 2AG leaves the postjunctional neuron to activate presynaptic CB1 receptors, leading to the inhibition of neuronal excitability (Zachariou et al. 2013). This adaptation of synaptic efficiency is termed short-term depression or depolarisation-evoked suppression of excitation. It is attractive to hypothesise that this phenomenon is related to the observation that Cannabis and THC elicit impairments of short-term memory in vivo (Melges et al. 1970).
Endocannabinoids also play a role in a related phenomenon termed as depolarisation-evoked suppression of inhibition. This phenomenon plays out in much the same way as depolarisation-evoked suppression of excitation, except that the 2AG-generated post-junctionally acts on CB1 receptors on a GABAergic nerve terminal. This leads to a reduction of GABA release, which thereby elicits disinhibition of synaptic efficacy, and enhanced neurotransmission through the affected pathway. There appears to be a predominance of CB1 receptors on GABAergic nerve terminals compared to glutamatergic nerve terminals (Marsicano and Lutz 1999), which makes it likely that the administration of Cannabis or THC leads to changes in GABA signalling pathways.
Prolonged exposure to THC has been found to produce an array of effects in humans, including analgesia, dysphoria, dependence and tolerance (Mechoulam and Parker 2013) and the majority of these effects were prevented following pretreatment with the CB1 selective blocker rimonabant (Kendall and Yudowski 2016). In animal models, long-term treatment with THC resulted in a region-dependent reduction in the CB1 receptor radioligand binding (Romero et al. 1997). In the hippocampus, long-term potentiation (a corollary of learning and memory) exhibited a long-lasting inhibition with repeated THC administration, persisting for up to 14 days after treatment was halted (Hoffman et al. 2007).
2.1.1.2 CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor Characterisation: Protein, Distribution, Signalling and Pharmacology
The CB2 receptor is coded by the CNR2 gene (Pertwee et al. 2010) located on chromosome 1p36 and is composed of 360 amino acids in humans (Munro et al. 1993). Compared to the CB1 cannabinoid receptor, the CB2 receptor has a much shorter N terminus, with a base molecular size of ~42 kDa, which was increased to ~55 kDa by glycosylation (Zhang et al. 2007). Analogous to the CB1 cannabinoid receptor, a cysteine residue is expressed in the C-terminus close to the seventh transmembrane domain, Cys320. As yet, there are no published data on the possibility that Cys320 is palmitoylated. In 2009, a second splice variant of the CB2 receptor was recognised based on a human neuroblastoma cDNA library (Liu et al. 2009). The two CB2 receptor isoforms were found to display tissue-specific expression patterns. The previously identified CB2 receptor isoform was primarily identified in the spleen and the immune system, while the novel isoform was recognised abundantly in the testes and brain regions of the reward system.
Very recently, a crystal structure of the CB2 receptor was published and described (Li et al. 2019). In this report, a ligand derived from rimonabant was used, which was modified to enhance CB2 receptor affinity, AM10257. An interesting feature of the crystal structure is that the antagonist-bound conformation of the CB2 receptor has more similarity to the agonist-bound conformation of the CB1 receptor than the antagonist-bound version (Li et al. 2019). It will be interesting to see the impact that this divergence in structure will have on future drug design.
Both the CB1 and CB2 receptors share some common pharmacology (activation by the same endocannabinoids and THC) and both couple to the same family of G proteins; however, they differ profoundly in their signalling profiles. As opposed to the CB2 receptor, the CB1 receptor has been reported to couple in addition to Gs and to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity (Glass and Felder 1997). In early studies, comparing the two receptors in recombinant expression in the same host cells, there was a further distinction between the two receptors. When expressed in anterior pituitary cells, both receptors coupled to the inhibition of cAMP production, while only the CB1 receptor coupled to the inhibition of voltage-gated calcium channels and opening of potassium channels (Felder et al. 1995).
Investigations using in situ hybridisation, northern blot and receptor autoradiography (Howlett et al. 2002; Pertwee 1997) revealed that the CB2 receptor was predominantly expressed in the macrophages, spleen (Munro et al. 1993), tonsils (Carayon et al. 1998) and immune cells. The precise immune cells that abundantly express CB2 include monocytes, B cells, polymorphonuclear neutrophils, natural killer cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and when stimulated, they regulate immune cell migration and cytokine release (Galiegue et al. 1995; Schatz et al. 1997). Using quantitative PCR, the CB2 receptor was also detected in the monocytes and macrophages of the spleen and certain leukocyte populations, precisely the eosinophils (Galiegue et al. 1995). CB2 receptor expression was also evaluated in other human organs and it was determined that the receptor was absent from the majority of non-immune organs with the exception of the uterus, pancreas and lungs, which exhibited low levels of mRNA (Turcotte et al. 2016). The CB2 receptor was detected in the reproductive tissues of both sexes (Battista et al. 2012; Grimaldi et al. 2009) and was suggested to perform a function in affecting the fertility of both males and females. As mentioned above, the CB2 receptor is often referred to as the peripheral cannabinoid receptor, given its abundant peripheral presence (Howlett et al. 2002), compared to its limited CNS expression (Gong et al. 2006). Nevertheless, recent investigations have detected the expression of the CB2 receptor in the CNS, by the microglia (Atwood and Mackie 2010) following neuroinflammation, degeneration (Ashton and Glass 2007), in neuropathic pain (Zhang et al. 2003) in multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Yiangou et al. 2006). The expression level of the CB2 receptor was variable and determined by the state of the cell; i.e. microglia do not express CB2 in healthy human brain (Stella 2004). The degree of CB2 receptor expression in the neurons and their physiological role remains to be fully elucidated.
Presumably because of the immune location of CB2 receptors, there are fewer investigations of the potential for tolerance with repeated administration in humans. In preclinical models, however, CB2 receptor-selective agonists failed to exhibit tolerance in a chronic pain model (Romero-Sandoval et al. 2008). Intriguingly, pregnancy seemed to influence CB receptor expression in B lymphocytes, such that CB2 receptors were down-regulated, while CB1 expression was increased (Wolfson et al. 2016).
2.1.2 Neuromolecular Targets of THC: Beyond the Cannabinoid Receptors
Other than the well-identified and investigated CB1 and CB2 receptors, other GPCRs, ion channel and nuclear receptors have been described to be stimulated by cannabinoid ligands (Pertwee et al. 2010). There are three GPCRs, which have been described as cannabinoid foster children, rather than orphan receptors; these are GPR18, GPR55 and GPR119 (Irving et al. 2017). Although there is little sequence homology with CB1 or CB2 receptors (given the low homology between the CB1 and CB2 receptors, this may not have a deeper implication), there is some homology between the putative endogenous ligands thought to activate them. Thus, GPR119 is activated by monounsaturated fatty acid analogues of anandamide and 2AG, N-oleoylethanolamine and 2-oleoylglycerol (Overton et al. 2006), but does not appear to respond to plant-derived or synthetic cannabinoids. GPR18 and GPR55, however, have been suggested to be targets for these agents. GPR18 is proposed to be activated endogenously by an oxidised version of anandamide, N-arachidonoylglycine (Kohno et al. 2006), while GPR55 is proposed to be activated endogenously by a conjugated version of 2AG, lysophosphatidylinositol (Oka et al. 2009). GPR18 has also been reported to be activated in vitro by THC (McHugh et al. 2012), as has GPR55 (Lauckner et al. 2008). However, whether these receptors are targets for THC in vivo has not yet been determined, and the role of these receptors in neural pathways is also unclear.
The endocannabinoid anandamide (and other endogenous analogues) has also been observed to activate the TRPV1 receptor (Alharthi et al. 2018; Zygmunt et al. 1999), which is a target for the hot component of spicy food derived from chilli peppers, capsaicin (Voets et al. 2004). The TRPV1 receptor is expressed at high levels in primary afferent neurones, where it functions as a broad integrator of nociceptive signalling and is the best investigated of a large family of cation-gating ion channels, the transient receptor potential family. THC appears not to activate the TRPV1 (De Petrocellis et al. 2011), but has been observed to activate other family members: TRPA1 (De Petrocellis et al. 2008), TRPC1 (Rao and Kaminski 2006), TRPM8 (De Petrocellis et al. 2008), TRPV2 (De Petrocellis et al. 2011), and TRPV3 (De Petrocellis et al. 2012). The contribution of these interactions to the action of THC in vivo is not clear.
Both anandamide and THC have been reported to act as positive allosteric modulators of the ligand-gated ion channel glycine receptor (Hejazi et al. 2006). There is evidence that this mechanism can contribute to the anti-nociceptive profile of these agents in vivo (Xiong et al. 2011). THC also inhibited human recombinant 5-HT3 receptors, another ligand-gated ion channel, in vitro with high potency and efficacy (Barann et al. 2002). In contrast, THC also inhibited a third ligand-gated ion channel, α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, but with a much lower potency and efficacy (Oz et al. 2004).
In terms of voltage-gated ion channels, THC was found to inhibit a number of human recombinant subtypes of voltage-gated calcium channels in vitro (Ross et al. 2008) and to inhibit an intrinsic sodium current in mouse neuroblastoma cells (Turkanis et al. 1991). Although it is attractive to hypothesise that these effects might contribute to the analgesic effect induced by THC in vivo, there is little evidence for this.
THC could be described as having an opportunistic nature in which it has a wide interactome. It has an unusual property in common with anandamide in which it is able to activate members of three of the four receptor superfamilies. Identified above are examples of GPCR and ligand-activated ion channels, which THC activates. It has also been described to activate members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, particularly members of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, PPARs, for review, see (O’Sullivan 2016). THC was an agonist in a reporter gene assay of PPARγ (O’Sullivan et al. 2005), although there are contrasting reports of THC action at PPARα (Sun et al. 2007; Takeda et al. 2014). PPARβ has been less thoroughly investigated in terms of responses to cannabinoids (O’Sullivan 2016).
2.1.3 Neuromolecular Targets of CBD
In contrast to THC, our knowledge of the neuromolecular mechanisms of cannabidiol is limited, which is a frustration. On the one hand, there are a number of putative targets through which CBD has been proposed to act, but none of these have features that are totally convincing as mechanisms of the in vivo action of CBD.
CBD action at the conventional cannabinoid receptors is contradictory. The majority of studies have failed to show occupancy of CB1 or CB2 receptors by CBD (Matsuda et al. 1990; Munro et al. 1993). However, CBD has been suggested to be a negative allosteric modulator of the CB1 receptor in recombinant expression (Laprairie et al. 2015). There are reports that CBD can reduce the side effects caused by the administration of THC (Mechoulam and Hanus 2002) and it is attractive to hypothesise that the negative allosteric modulation of the CB1 receptor might be the neuromolecular mechanism for this observation. CBD seems to have an interaction with the endocannabinoid system in which acute administration increased brain levels of a variety of N-acylethanolamines, including anandamide, with little impact on 2AG levels (Leishman et al. 2018). CBD has been reported to inhibit the anandamide hydrolysis enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase activity in vitro with a range of mostly lower potencies (Bisogno et al. 2001; De Petrocellis et al. 2011; Watanabe et al. 1996) and it would be attractive to suggest this as an in vivo mechanism of action. However, the pattern of metabolite accumulation evoked by CBD and a selective inhibitor of fatty acid amide hydrolase differ, suggesting a distinct impact (Leishman et al. 2018).
CBD has been reported to interact with serotonergic signalling through multiple routes (Ledgerwood et al. 2011). It directly activated 5-HT1A receptors (Russo et al. 2005), an effect implicated in anxiolytic effects (Campos and Guimaraes 2008), neuroprotection following hypoxia/ischemia (Mishima et al. 2005; Pazos et al. 2013), inhibition of nausea and vomiting behaviours (Rock et al. 2012) and inhibition of morphine-evoked reward (Katsidoni et al. 2013) of CBD in vivo. CBD also evoked an allosteric inhibition of 5-HT3A receptors (Yang et al. 2010) in vitro, which may be mediated through accelerating the rate of receptor desensitisation (Xiong et al. 2011). However, this does not seem to be a major route for CBD effects in vivo.
As with THC, CBD has been reported to enhance glycine receptor function as a positive allosteric modulator (Ahrens et al. 2009), which appeared to be mediated through a transmembrane domain-located serine residue (Foadi et al. 2010). The analgesic effects of CBD in animal models have been suggested to be mediated through glycine receptors (Lu et al. 2018; Xiong et al. 2012).
As mentioned above for THC, CBD has a broad interactome. It also has been reported to modulate the function of the transient receptor potential family to stimulate TRPA1, inhibit TRPM8 (De Petrocellis et al. 2008), stimulate TRPV1 (Costa et al. 2004), TRPV2 (Qin et al. 2008), TRPV3 and TRPV4 (De Petrocellis et al. 2012). Other investigations reported that CBD decreases neuronal hyperactivity in epilepsy by causing activation followed by rapid desensitisation of TRPV1 and TRPV2 (Iannotti et al. 2014).
CBD also regulates calcium homeostasis in the hippocampal neurons as well as blocking the low-voltage T-type calcium channels, which are prominent modulators of neuronal excitability which specifically controlled partial or generalised seizures (Jones et al. 2010).
CBD was also reported to enhance adenosine signalling by inhibiting its uptake, which has been associated with its anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective and immunosuppressive roles (Carrier et al. 2006). Additionally, this mechanism for elevating extracellular adenosine leading to an indirect activation of adenosine receptors was implicated in CBD effects in vivo on pain modulation (Maione et al. 2011), and hypoxia/ischemia-induced brain damage (Castillo et al. 2010) and ventricular arrhythmias (Gonca and Darici 2015).
2.1.4 Neuromolecular Targets of Other Cannabinoids
A number of the other cannabinoids from the Cannabis plant have been described to have effects both in vitro and in vivo. However, there is a limited capacity to correlate the two profiles.
2.1.4.1 Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabidivarin
Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabidivarin (THCV) is a close structural analogue of THC, which also binds to CB receptors. Initially, THCV was suggested to act as an antagonist at both CB1 and CB2 receptors (Thomas et al. 2005), although later it was observed to act as a partial agonist at human recombinant CB2 receptors (Bolognini et al. 2010). CB2 activation appeared to translate to in vivo models of inflammation (Bolognini et al. 2010) and Parkinson’s disease (Garcia et al. 2011). THCV was also described to potentiate 5-HT1A receptor function in vitro and in an in vivo model of psychosis (Cascio et al. 2015). THCV also activated TRPA1, TRPV1, TRPV2 and blocked TRPM8 channels in recombinant expression (De Petrocellis et al. 2011). In vivo, THCV was able to reverse the effects of THC in a model of visceral pain (Booker et al. 2009).
2.1.4.2 Cannabinol
Cannabinol accumulates over time by the natural oxidation of THC. It was not thought to bind the CB1 cannabinoid receptor (Matsuda et al. 1990), but a later report described agonist action at both CB1 and CB2 receptors (Rhee et al. 1997). Cannabinol was less potent than THC at the CB1 receptor, but more potent than THC at the CB2 receptor. In vivo, cannabinol evoked a reduction in pain behaviours in a model of visceral pain in a manner sensitive to a CB1 receptor antagonist (Booker et al. 2009) and also evoked a CB1 antagonist-sensitive increase in feeding behaviours (Farrimond et al. 2012).
Cannabinol activated TRPA1, inhibited TRPM8, was ineffective at TRPV1, inhibited TRPV2 (De Petrocellis et al. 2011) and showed limited agonist activity at TRPV3 and TRPV4 (De Petrocellis et al. 2012).
2.1.4.3 Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid
Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid, THCA-A, is the naturally-occurring precursor of THC, which is abundant in the Cannabis plant. In binding studies, THCA-A was much weaker than THC at CB1 or CB2 cannabinoid receptors (McPartland et al. 2017). THCA-A was less potent than THC as an agonist at TRPA1, TRPV2, and TRPV3, as inactive at TRPV1, more active than THC at TRPV4 and equipotent as a TRPM8 antagonist (De Petrocellis et al. 2011; De Petrocellis et al. 2012). THCA was recently described as a potent PPARγ agonist in vitro, with beneficial effects in a seizure model in vivo, which could be reversed by a PPARγ antagonist (Nadal et al. 2017).
2.1.4.4 Cannabidivarin
Cannabidivarin is a close structural analogue of CBD, which displayed low-potency binding to CB1 receptors (Hill et al. 2013), but showed sub-micromolar affinity at human recombinant CB2 receptors (Rosenthaler et al. 2014). CBDV was a potent agonist at TRPA1, TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV3 and TRPV4 and a potent antagonist at TRPM8 (De Petrocellis et al. 2011; De Petrocellis et al. 2012). In vivo, CBDV showed an anticonvulsant action through an unestablished mechanism (Amada et al. 2013; Hill et al. 2012; Hill et al. 2013). In addition, CBDV delayed memory deficits in mutant mice, again through an unidentified mechanism (Zamberletti et al. 2019).
2.1.4.5 Cannabidiolic Acid
Cannabidiolic acid, CBDA, is the naturally-occurring precursor of CBD. CBDA has been suggested to inhibit COX-2 (Takeda et al. 2008). CBDA was a low-potency agonist at TRPA1, less potent at TRPV1 and TRPV4, inactive at TRPV2 and TRPV3 and a low-potency antagonist at TRPM8 (De Petrocellis et al. 2011; De Petrocellis et al. 2012). CBDA anti-nociceptive behavioural effects were blocked by a TRPV1 antagonist in vivo (Rock et al. 2018). CBDA evoked an inhibition of nausea and vomiting behaviours in vivo; effects of which were reduced by 5-HT1A receptor blockade (Bolognini et al. 2013). In vitro, CBDA appeared to act as a positive allosteric modulator of 5-HT1A receptors (Bolognini et al. 2013).
2.1.4.6 Cannabigerol
Cannabigerol, CBG, has a distinct chemical structure from the other Cannabis-derived metabolites, with lower affinity at CB1 and CB2 receptors than THC (Rosenthaler et al. 2014). In contrast, it showed much higher affinity as an agonist at α2-adrenoceptors and antagonist at 5-HT1A receptors (Cascio et al. 2010). CBG was a potent agonist at TRPA1, less potent at TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV3 and TRPV4 and a potent antagonist at TRPM8 (De Petrocellis et al. 2011; De Petrocellis et al. 2012). CBG was also able to activate both PPARα and PPARγ in vitro (D’Aniello et al. 2019). In vivo, CBG stimulated appetite in a manner yet to be explained (Brierley et al. 2016, 2017) and blocked the anti-nausea effect of CBD (Rock et al. 2011). CBG reduced colon cancer progression in vivo in a manner consistent with TRPM8 blockade (Borrelli et al. 2014).
2.1.4.7 Cannabichromene
A further chemical class of abundant Cannabis metabolite is cannabichromene, CBC, which exhibits lower potency at CB1 and CB2 receptors than THC (Rosenthaler et al. 2014). It was a very potent TRPA1 agonist with much lower potency at TRPV1, TRPV2 and TRPM8 and intermediate TRPV3 and TRPV4 potency (De Petrocellis et al. 2011; De Petrocellis et al. 2012). CBC activation of ERK activity in adult neural stem cells could be blocked by an A1 adenosine receptor antagonist (Shinjyo and Di Marzo 2013). In vivo, CBC appeared to have anti-inflammatory properties, which was suggested to be mediated via TRPA1 channels (Romano et al. 2013).
2.1.5 Concluding Remarks
In this chapter, we have considered the evidence for bioactivity of the major cannabinoid metabolites from the Cannabis plant. It is clear that, although we have been aware of the predominant molecular mechanisms of action of THC for decades, there is much less knowledge of neuromolecular mechanisms for the remainder of the cannabinoids. A further point worth making is that many of these cannabinoids appear to have contradictory effects at the molecular targets which have been identified, particularly members of the TRP receptor family. Interpreting the impact of complex mixtures of these cannabinoids in vivo is consequently extremely difficult, complicated further by variation in pharmacokinetic profiles of these agents, an issue that has been researched only in limited detail.
Abbreviations
- 2AG:
-
2-Arachidonoylglycerol
- 2-AGE:
-
2-Arachidonoylglycerol ether
- CB1:
-
Cannabinoid receptor type 1
- CB2:
-
Cannabinoid receptor type 2
- CBC:
-
Cannabichromene
- CBD:
-
Cannabidiol
- CBDA:
-
Cannabidiolic acid
- CBDV:
-
Cannabidivarin
- CBG:
-
Cannabigerol
- COX:
-
Cyclooxygenase
- DAGL:
-
Diacylglycerol lipase
- FAAH:
-
Fatty acid amide hydrolase
- GPCR:
-
G protein-coupled receptors
- MAGL:
-
Monoacylglycerol lipase
- PLC:
-
Phospholipase C
- PPAR:
-
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
- THC:
-
Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol
- THCA-A:
-
Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid
- THCV:
-
Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabivarin
- TRPV:
-
Transient receptor potential vanilloid family
References
Ahrens J, Leuwer M, Demir R, Krampfl K, de la Roche J, Foadi N, Karst M, Haeseler G (2009) Positive allosteric modulatory effects of ajulemic acid at strychnine-sensitive glycine alpha1- and alpha1beta-receptors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 379:371–378
Alharthi N, Christensen P, Hourani W, Ortori C, Barrett DA, Bennett AJ, Chapman V, Alexander SPH (2018) N-3 polyunsaturated N-acylethanolamines are CB2 cannabinoid receptor-preferring endocannabinoids. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 1863:1433–1440
Amada N, Yamasaki Y, Williams CM, Whalley BJ (2013) Cannabidivarin (CBDV) suppresses pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced increases in epilepsy-related gene expression. PeerJ 1:e214
Andre CM, Hausman JF, Guerriero G (2016) Cannabis sativa: the Plant of the Thousand and one Molecules. Front Plant Sci 7:19
Ashton JC, Glass M (2007) The cannabinoid CB2 receptor as a target for inflammation-dependent neurodegeneration. Curr Neuropharmacol 5:73–80
Atwood BK, Mackie K (2010) CB2: a cannabinoid receptor with an identity crisis. Br J Pharmacol 160:467–479
Barann M, Molderings G, Bruss M, Bonisch H, Urban BW, Gothert M (2002) Direct inhibition by cannabinoids of human 5-HT3A receptors: probable involvement of an allosteric modulatory site. Br J Pharmacol 137:589–596
Battista N, Meccariello R, Cobellis G, Fasano S, Di Tommaso M, Pirazzi V, Konje JC, Pierantoni R, Maccarrone M (2012) The role of endocannabinoids in gonadal function and fertility along the evolutionary axis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 355:1–14
Bisogno T, Hanus L, De Petrocellis L, Tchilibon S, Ponde DE, Brandi I, Moriello AS, Davis JB, Mechoulam R, Di Marzo V (2001) Molecular targets for cannabidiol and its synthetic analogues: effect on vanilloid VR1 receptors and on the cellular uptake and enzymatic hydrolysis of anandamide. Br J Pharmacol 134:845–852
Bolognini D, Costa B, Maione S, Comelli F, Marini P, Di Marzo V, Parolaro D, Ross RA, Gauson LA, Cascio MG, Pertwee RG (2010) The plant cannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin can decrease signs of inflammation and inflammatory pain in mice. Br J Pharmacol 160:677–687
Bolognini D, Rock EM, Cluny NL, Cascio MG, Limebeer CL, Duncan M, Stott CG, Javid FA, Parker LA, Pertwee RG (2013) Cannabidiolic acid prevents vomiting in Suncus murinus and nausea-induced behaviour in rats by enhancing 5-HT1A receptor activation. Br J Pharmacol 168:1456–1470
Booker L, Naidu PS, Razdan RK, Mahadevan A, Lichtman AH (2009) Evaluation of prevalent phytocannabinoids in the acetic acid model of visceral nociception. Drug Alcohol Depend 105:42–47
Borrelli F, Pagano E, Romano B, Panzera S, Maiello F, Coppola D, De Petrocellis L, Buono L, Orlando P, Izzo AA (2014) Colon carcinogenesis is inhibited by the TRPM8 antagonist cannabigerol, a cannabis-derived non-psychotropic cannabinoid. Carcinogenesis 35:2787–2797
Brierley DI, Samuels J, Duncan M, Whalley BJ, Williams CM (2016) Cannabigerol is a novel, well-tolerated appetite stimulant in pre-satiated rats. Psychopharmacology 233:3603–3613
Brierley DI, Samuels J, Duncan M, Whalley BJ, Williams CM (2017) A cannabigerol-rich Cannabis sativa extract, devoid of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, elicits hyperphagia in rats. Behav Pharmacol 28:280–284
Campos AC, Guimaraes FS (2008) Involvement of 5HT1A receptors in the anxiolytic-like effects of cannabidiol injected into the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray of rats. Psychopharmacology 199:223–230
Carayon P, Marchand J, Dussossoy D, Derocq JM, Jbilo O, Bord A, Bouaboula M, Galiegue S, Mondiere P, Penarier G, Fur GL, Defrance T, Casellas P (1998) Modulation and functional involvement of CB2 peripheral cannabinoid receptors during B-cell differentiation. Blood 92:3605–3615
Carrier EJ, Auchampach JA, Hillard CJ (2006) Inhibition of an equilibrative nucleoside transporter by cannabidiol: a mechanism of cannabinoid immunosuppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:7895–7900
Cascio MG, Gauson LA, Stevenson LA, Ross RA, Pertwee RG (2010) Evidence that the plant cannabinoid cannabigerol is a highly potent α2-adrenoceptor agonist and moderately potent 5HT1A receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 159:129–141
Cascio MG, Zamberletti E, Marini P, Parolaro D, Pertwee RG (2015) The phytocannabinoid, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin, can act through 5-HT1A receptors to produce antipsychotic effects. Br J Pharmacol 172:1305–1318
Castillo A, Tolon MR, Fernandez-Ruiz J, Romero J, Martinez-Orgado J (2010) The neuroprotective effect of cannabidiol in an in vitro model of newborn hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in mice is mediated by CB2 and adenosine receptors. Neurobiol Dis 37:434–440
Costa B, Giagnoni G, Franke C, Trovato AE, Colleoni M (2004) Vanilloid TRPV1 receptor mediates the antihyperalgesic effect of the nonpsychoactive cannabinoid, cannabidiol, in a rat model of acute inflammation. Br J Pharmacol 143:247–250
D’Aniello E, Fellous T, Iannotti FA, Gentile A, Allara M, Balestrieri F, Gray R, Amodeo P, Vitale RM, Di Marzo V (2019) Identification and characterization of phytocannabinoids as novel dual PPARα/γ agonists by a computational and in vitro experimental approach. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1863:586–597
De Jesus ML, Salles J, Meana JJ, Callado LF (2006) Characterization of CB1 cannabinoid receptor immunoreactivity in postmortem human brain homogenates. Neuroscience 140:635–643
De Petrocellis L, Ligresti A, Moriello AS, Allara M, Bisogno T, Petrosino S, Stott CG, Di Marzo V (2011) Effects of cannabinoids and cannabinoid-enriched Cannabis extracts on TRP channels and endocannabinoid metabolic enzymes. Br J Pharmacol 163:1479–1494
De Petrocellis L, Orlando P, Moriello AS, Aviello G, Stott C, Izzo AA, Di Marzo V (2012) Cannabinoid actions at TRPV channels: effects on TRPV3 and TRPV4 and their potential relevance to gastrointestinal inflammation. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 204:255–266
De Petrocellis L, Vellani V, Schiano-Moriello A, Marini P, Magherini PC, Orlando P, Di Marzo V (2008) Plant-derived cannabinoids modulate the activity of transient receptor potential channels of ankyrin type-1 and melastatin type-8. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 325:1007–1015
Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA, Griffin G, Gibson D, Mandelbaum A, Etinger A, Mechoulam R (1992) Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science 258:1946–1949
Di Marzo V, Despres JP (2009) CB1 antagonists for obesity--what lessons have we learned from rimonabant? Nat Rev Endocrinol 5:633–638
Farrimond JA, Whalley BJ, Williams CM (2012) Cannabinol and cannabidiol exert opposing effects on rat feeding patterns. Psychopharmacology 223:117–129
Felder CC, Joyce KE, Briley EM, Mansouri J, Mackie K, Blond O, Lai Y, Ma AL, Mitchell RL (1995) Comparison of the pharmacology and signal transduction of the human cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. Mol Pharmacol 48:443–450
Foadi N, Leuwer M, Demir R, Dengler R, Buchholz V, de la Roche J, Karst M, Haeseler G, Ahrens J (2010) Lack of positive allosteric modulation of mutated α1S267I glycine receptors by cannabinoids. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 381:477–482
Galiegue S, Mary S, Marchand J, Dussossoy D, Carriere D, Carayon P, Bouaboula M, Shire D, Le Fur G, Casellas P (1995) Expression of central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors in human immune tissues and leukocyte subpopulations. Eur J Biochem 232:54–61
Gaoni Y, Mechoulam R (1964) Isolation, structure and partial synthesis of active constituent of hashish. J Am Chem Soc 86:1646–1647
Garcia C, Palomo-Garo C, Garcia-Arencibia M, Ramos J, Pertwee R, Fernandez-Ruiz J (2011) Symptom-relieving and neuroprotective effects of the phytocannabinoid Δ9-THCV in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Br J Pharmacol 163:1495–1506
Gerard CM, Mollereau C, Vassart G, Parmentier M (1991) Molecular cloning of a human cannabinoid receptor which is also expressed in testis. Biochem J 279(Pt 1):129–134
Glass M, Felder CC (1997) Concurrent stimulation of cannabinoid CB1 and dopamine D2 receptors augments cAMP accumulation in striatal neurons: evidence for a Gs linkage to the CB1 receptor. J Neurosci 17:5327–5333
Gonca E, Darici F (2015) The effect of cannabidiol on ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias: the role of adenosine A1 receptors. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 20:76–83
Gong JP, Onaivi ES, Ishiguro H, Liu QR, Tagliaferro PA, Brusco A, Uhl GR (2006) Cannabinoid CB2 receptors: immunohistochemical localization in rat brain. Brain Res 1071:10–23
Grimaldi P, Orlando P, Di Siena S, Lolicato F, Petrosino S, Bisogno T, Geremia R, De Petrocellis L, Di Marzo V (2009) The endocannabinoid system and pivotal role of the CB2 receptor in mouse spermatogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:11131–11136
Hejazi N, Zhou C, Oz M, Sun H, Ye JH, Zhang L (2006) Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and endogenous cannabinoid anandamide directly potentiate the function of glycine receptors. Mol Pharmacol 69:991–997
Herkenham M, Lynn AB, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, de Costa BR, Rice KC (1991) Characterization and localization of cannabinoid receptors in rat brain: a quantitative in vitro autoradiographic study. J Neurosci 11:563–583
Hill TD, Cascio MG, Romano B, Duncan M, Pertwee RG, Williams CM, Whalley BJ, Hill AJ (2013) Cannabidivarin-rich cannabis extracts are anticonvulsant in mouse and rat via a CB1 receptor-independent mechanism. Br J Pharmacol 170:679–692
Hill AJ, Mercier MS, Hill TD, Glyn SE, Jones NA, Yamasaki Y, Futamura T, Duncan M, Stott CG, Stephens GJ, Williams CM, Whalley BJ (2012) Cannabidivarin is anticonvulsant in mouse and rat. Br J Pharmacol 167:1629–1642
Hoffman AF, Oz M, Yang R, Lichtman AH, Lupica CR (2007) Opposing actions of chronic Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabinoid antagonists on hippocampal long-term potentiation. Learn Mem 14:63–74
Howlett AC, Barth F, Bonner TI, Cabral G, Casellas P, Devane WA, Felder CC, Herkenham M, Mackie K, Martin BR, Mechoulam R, Pertwee RG (2002) International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors. Pharmacol Rev 54:161–202
Hua T, Vemuri K, Nikas SP, Laprairie RB, Wu Y, Qu L, Pu M, Korde A, Jiang S, Ho JH, Han GW, Ding K, Li X, Liu H, Hanson MA, Zhao S, Bohn LM, Makriyannis A, Stevens RC, Liu ZJ (2017) Crystal structures of agonist-bound human cannabinoid receptor CB1. Nature 547:468–471
Hua T, Vemuri K, Pu M, Qu L, Han GW, Wu Y, Zhao S, Shui W, Li S, Korde A, Laprairie RB, Stahl EL, Ho JH, Zvonok N, Zhou H, Kufareva I, Wu B, Zhao Q, Hanson MA, Bohn LM, Makriyannis A, Stevens RC, Liu ZJ (2016) Crystal structure of the human cannabinoid receptor CB1. Cell 167(750–762):e714
Iannotti FA, Hill CL, Leo A, Alhusaini A, Soubrane C, Mazzarella E, Russo E, Whalley BJ, Di Marzo V, Stephens GJ (2014) Nonpsychotropic plant cannabinoids, cannabidivarin (CBDV) and cannabidiol (CBD), activate and desensitize transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channels in vitro: potential for the treatment of neuronal hyperexcitability. ACS Chem Neurosci 5:1131–1141
Irving A, Abdulrazzaq G, Chan SLF, Penman J, Harvey J, Alexander SPH (2017) Cannabinoid receptor-related orphan G protein-coupled receptors. Adv Pharmacol 80:223–247
Izzo AA, Sharkey KA (2010) Cannabinoids and the gut: new developments and emerging concepts. Pharmacol Ther 126:21–38
Jones NA, Hill AJ, Smith I, Bevan SA, Williams CM, Whalley BJ, Stephens GJ (2010) Cannabidiol displays antiepileptiform and antiseizure properties in vitro and in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 332:569–577
Katsidoni V, Anagnostou I, Panagis G (2013) Cannabidiol inhibits the reward-facilitating effect of morphine: involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Addict Biol 18:286–296
Kendall DA, Yudowski GA (2016) Cannabinoid receptors in the central nervous system: their signaling and roles in disease. Front Cell Neurosci 10:294
Kohno M, Hasegawa H, Inoue A, Muraoka M, Miyazaki T, Oka K, Yasukawa M (2006) Identification of N-arachidonylglycine as the endogenous ligand for orphan G-protein-coupled receptor GPR18. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 347:827–832
Krishna Kumar K, Shalev-Benami M, Robertson MJ, Hu H, Banister SD, Hollingsworth SA, Latorraca NR, Kato HE, Hilger D, Maeda S, Weis WI, Farrens DL, Dror RO, Malhotra SV, Kobilka BK, Skiniotis G (2019) Structure of a signaling cannabinoid receptor 1-G protein complex. Cell 176(448–458):e412
Laprairie RB, Bagher AM, Kelly ME, Denovan-Wright EM (2015) Cannabidiol is a negative allosteric modulator of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Br J Pharmacol 172:4790–4805
Lauckner JE, Hille B, Mackie K (2005) The cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 increases intracellular calcium via CB1 receptor coupling to Gq/11 G proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:19144–19149
Lauckner JE, Jensen JB, Chen HY, Lu HC, Hille B, Mackie K (2008) GPR55 is a cannabinoid receptor that increases intracellular calcium and inhibits M current. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:2699–2704
Ledgerwood CJ, Greenwood SM, Brett RR, Pratt JA, Bushell TJ (2011) Cannabidiol inhibits synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal cultures and slices via multiple receptor pathways. Br J Pharmacol 162:286–294
Leishman E, Manchanda M, Thelen R, Miller S, Mackie K, Bradshaw HB (2018) Cannabidiol’s Upregulation of N-acyl Ethanolamines in the central nervous system requires N-acyl Phosphatidyl ethanolamine-specific phospholipase D. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 3:228–241
Li X, Hua T, Vemuri K, Ho JH, Wu Y, Wu L, Popov P, Benchama O, Zvonok N, Locke K, Qu L, Han GW, Iyer MR, Cinar R, Coffey NJ, Wang J, Wu M, Katritch V, Zhao S, Kunos G, Bohn LM, Makriyannis A, Stevens RC, Liu ZJ (2019) Crystal structure of the human cannabinoid receptor CB2. Cell 176(459–467):e413
Liu QR, Pan CH, Hishimoto A, Li CY, Xi ZX, Llorente-Berzal A, Viveros MP, Ishiguro H, Arinami T, Onaivi ES, Uhl GR (2009) Species differences in cannabinoid receptor 2 (CNR2 gene): identification of novel human and rodent CB2 isoforms, differential tissue expression and regulation by cannabinoid receptor ligands. Genes Brain Behav 8:519–530
Lu J, Fan S, Zou G, Hou Y, Pan T, Guo W, Yao L, Du F, Homanics GE, Liu D, Zhang L, Xiong W (2018) Involvement of glycine receptor alpha1 subunits in cannabinoid-induced analgesia. Neuropharmacology 133:224–232
Mackie K, Lai Y, Westenbroek R, Mitchell R (1995) Cannabinoids activate an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance and inhibit Q-type calcium currents in AtT20 cells transfected with rat brain cannabinoid receptor. J Neurosci 15:6552–6561
Maione S, Piscitelli F, Gatta L, Vita D, De Petrocellis L, Palazzo E, de Novellis V, Di Marzo V (2011) Non-psychoactive cannabinoids modulate the descending pathway of antinociception in anaesthetized rats through several mechanisms of action. Br J Pharmacol 162:584–596
Marsicano G, Lutz B (1999) Expression of the cannabinoid receptor CB1 in distinct neuronal subpopulations in the adult mouse forebrain. Eur J Neurosci 11:4213–4225
Matsuda LA, Lolait SJ, Brownstein MJ, Young AC, Bonner TI (1990) Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA. Nature 346:561–564
McHugh D, Page J, Dunn E, Bradshaw HB (2012) Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and N-arachidonyl glycine are full agonists at GPR18 receptors and induce migration in human endometrial HEC-1B cells. Br J Pharmacol 165:2414–2424
McPartland JM, MacDonald C, Young M, Grant PS, Furkert DP, Glass M (2017) Affinity and efficacy studies of Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid a at cannabinoid receptor types one and two. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2:87–95
Mechoulam R, Ben-Shabat S, Hanus L, Ligumsky M, Kaminski NE, Schatz AR, Gopher A, Almog S, Martin BR, Compton DR et al (1995) Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid receptors. Biochem Pharmacol 50:83–90
Mechoulam R, Hanus L (2002) Cannabidiol: an overview of some chemical and pharmacological aspects Part I: chemical aspects. Chem Phys Lipids 121:35–43
Mechoulam R, Parker LA (2013) The endocannabinoid system and the brain. Annu Rev Psychol 64:21–47
Melges FT, Tinklenberg JR, Hollister LE, Gillespie HK (1970) Marihuana and temporal disintegration. Science 168:1118–1120
Mishima K, Hayakawa K, Abe K, Ikeda T, Egashira N, Iwasaki K, Fujiwara M (2005) Cannabidiol prevents cerebral infarction via a serotonergic 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor-dependent mechanism. Stroke 36:1077–1082
Munro S, Thomas KL, Abu-Shaar M (1993) Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids. Nature 365:61–65
Nadal X, Del Rio C, Casano S, Palomares B, Ferreiro-Vera C, Navarrete C, Sanchez-Carnerero C, Cantarero I, Bellido ML, Meyer S, Morello G, Appendino G, Munoz E (2017) Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid is a potent PPARγ agonist with neuroprotective activity. Br J Pharmacol 174:4263–4276
Oddi S, Dainese E, Sandiford S, Fezza F, Lanuti M, Chiurchiu V, Totaro A, Catanzaro G, Barcaroli D, De Laurenzi V, Centonze D, Mukhopadhyay S, Selent J, Howlett AC, Maccarrone M (2012) Effects of palmitoylation of Cys415 in helix 8 of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor on membrane localization and signalling. Br J Pharmacol 165:2635–2651
Oka S, Toshida T, Maruyama K, Nakajima K, Yamashita A, Sugiura T (2009) 2-Arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoinositol: a possible natural ligand for GPR55. J Biochem 145:13–20
O’Sullivan SE (2016) An update on PPAR activation by cannabinoids. Br J Pharmacol 173:1899–1910
O’Sullivan SE, Tarling EJ, Bennett AJ, Kendall DA, Randall MD (2005) Novel time-dependent vascular actions of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 337:824–831
Overton HA, Babbs AJ, Doel SM, Fyfe MC, Gardner LS, Griffin G, Jackson HC, Procter MJ, Rasamison CM, Tang-Christensen M, Widdowson PS, Williams GM, Reynet C (2006) Deorphanization of a G protein-coupled receptor for oleoylethanolamide and its use in the discovery of small-molecule hypophagic agents. Cell Metab 3:167–175
Oz M, Zhang L, Ravindran A, Morales M, Lupica CR (2004) Differential effects of endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids on alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated responses in Xenopus oocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310:1152–1160
Pazos MR, Mohammed N, Lafuente H, Santos M, Martinez-Pinilla E, Moreno E, Valdizan E, Romero J, Pazos A, Franco R, Hillard CJ, Alvarez FJ, Martinez-Orgado J (2013) Mechanisms of cannabidiol neuroprotection in hypoxic-ischemic newborn pigs: role of 5HT(1A) and CB2 receptors. Neuropharmacology 71:282–291
Pertwee RG (1997) Pharmacology of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. Pharmacol Ther 74:129–180
Pertwee RG, Howlett AC, Abood ME, Alexander SPH, Di Marzo V, Elphick MR, Greasley PJ, Hansen HS, Kunos G, Mackie K, Mechoulam R, Ross RA (2010) International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIX. Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands: beyond CB1 and CB2. Pharmacol Rev 62:588–631
Qin N, Neeper MP, Liu Y, Hutchinson TL, Lubin ML, Flores CM (2008) TRPV2 is activated by cannabidiol and mediates CGRP release in cultured rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurosci 28:6231–6238
Rao GK, Kaminski NE (2006) Induction of intracellular calcium elevation by Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in T cells involves TRPC1 channels. J Leukoc Biol 79:202–213
Rhee MH, Vogel Z, Barg J, Bayewitch M, Levy R, Hanus L, Breuer A, Mechoulam R (1997) Cannabinol derivatives: binding to cannabinoid receptors and inhibition of adenylylcyclase. J Med Chem 40:3228–3233
Rinaldi-Carmona M, Barth F, Heaulme M, Alonso R, Shire D, Congy C, Soubrie P, Breliere JC, Le Fur G (1995) Biochemical and pharmacological characterisation of SR141716A, the first potent and selective brain cannabinoid receptor antagonist. Life Sci 56:1941–1947
Rock EM, Bolognini D, Limebeer CL, Cascio MG, Anavi-Goffer S, Fletcher PJ, Mechoulam R, Pertwee RG, Parker LA (2012) Cannabidiol, a non-psychotropic component of cannabis, attenuates vomiting and nausea-like behaviour via indirect agonism of 5-HT(1A) somatodendritic autoreceptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Br J Pharmacol 165:2620–2634
Rock EM, Goodwin JM, Limebeer CL, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Mechoulam R, Parker LA (2011) Interaction between non-psychotropic cannabinoids in marihuana: effect of cannabigerol (CBG) on the anti-nausea or anti-emetic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) in rats and shrews. Psychopharmacology 215:505–512
Rock EM, Limebeer CL, Parker LA (2018) Effect of cannabidiolic acid and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia and edema in a rodent model of inflammatory pain. Psychopharmacology 235:3259–3271
Romano B, Borrelli F, Fasolino I, Capasso R, Piscitelli F, Cascio M, Pertwee R, Coppola D, Vassallo L, Orlando P, Di Marzo V, Izzo A (2013) The cannabinoid TRPA1 agonist cannabichromene inhibits nitric oxide production in macrophages and ameliorates murine colitis. Br J Pharmacol 169:213–229
Romero J, Garcia-Palomero E, Castro JG, Garcia-Gil L, Ramos JA, Fernandez-Ruiz JJ (1997) Effects of chronic exposure to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on cannabinoid receptor binding and mRNA levels in several rat brain regions. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 46:100–108
Romero-Sandoval A, Nutile-McMenemy N, DeLeo JA (2008) Spinal microglial and perivascular cell cannabinoid receptor type 2 activation reduces behavioral hypersensitivity without tolerance after peripheral nerve injury. Anesthesiology 108:722–734
Rosenthaler S, Pohn B, Kolmanz C, Huu CN, Krewenka C, Huber A, Kranner B, Rausch WD, Moldzio R (2014) Differences in receptor binding affinity of several phytocannabinoids do not explain their effects on neural cell cultures. Neurotoxicol Teratol 46:49–56
Ross HR, Napier I, Connor M (2008) Inhibition of recombinant human T-type calcium channels by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. J Biol Chem 283:16124–16134
Russo EB, Burnett A, Hall B, Parker KK (2005) Agonistic properties of cannabidiol at 5-HT1a receptors. Neurochem Res 30:1037–1043
Ryberg E, Vu HK, Larsson N, Groblewski T, Hjorth S, Elebring T, Sjogren S, Greasley PJ (2005) Identification and characterisation of a novel splice variant of the human CB1 receptor. FEBS Lett 579:259–264
Schatz AR, Lee M, Condie RB, Pulaski JT, Kaminski NE (1997) Cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2: a characterization of expression and adenylate cyclase modulation within the immune system. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 142:278–287
Shao Z, Yin J, Chapman K, Grzemska M, Clark L, Wang J, Rosenbaum DM (2016) High-resolution crystal structure of the human CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Nature 540:602–606
Shinjyo N, Di Marzo V (2013) The effect of cannabichromene on adult neural stem/progenitor cells. Neurochem Int 63:432–437
Shire D, Carillon C, Kaghad M, Calandra B, Rinaldi-Carmona M, Le Fur G, Caput D, Ferrara P (1995) An amino-terminal variant of the central cannabinoid receptor resulting from alternative splicing. J Biol Chem 270:3726–3731
Song C, Howlett AC (1995) Rat brain cannabinoid receptors are N-linked glycosylated proteins. Life Sci 56:1983–1989
Stella N (2004) Cannabinoid signaling in glial cells. Glia 48:267–277
Sugiura T, Kondo S, Sukagawa A, Nakane S, Shinoda A, Itoh K, Yamashita A, Waku K (1995) 2-Arachidonoylglycerol: a possible endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand in brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 215:89–97
Sun Y, Alexander SP, Garle MJ, Gibson CL, Hewitt K, Murphy SP, Kendall DA, Bennett AJ (2007) Cannabinoid activation of PPARα; a novel neuroprotective mechanism. Br J Pharmacol 152:734–743
Takeda S, Ikeda E, Su S, Harada M, Okazaki H, Yoshioka Y, Nishimura H, Ishii H, Kakizoe K, Taniguchi A, Tokuyasu M, Himeno T, Watanabe K, Omiecinski CJ, Aramaki H (2014) Delta(9)-THC modulation of fatty acid 2-hydroxylase (FA2H) gene expression: possible involvement of induced levels of PPARalpha in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Toxicology 326:18–24
Takeda S, Misawa K, Yamamoto I, Watanabe K (2008) Cannabidiolic acid as a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitory component in cannabis. Drug Metab Dispos 36:1917–1921
Thomas A, Stevenson LA, Wease KN, Price MR, Baillie G, Ross RA, Pertwee RG (2005) Evidence that the plant cannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin is a cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 146:917–926
Turcotte C, Blanchet MR, Laviolette M, Flamand N (2016) The CB2 receptor and its role as a regulator of inflammation. Cell Mol Life Sci 73:4449–4470
Turkanis SA, Karler R, Partlow LM (1991) Differential effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and its 11-hydroxy metabolite on sodium current in neuroblastoma cells. Brain Res 560:245–250
Voets T, Droogmans G, Wissenbach U, Janssens A, Flockerzi V, Nilius B (2004) The principle of temperature-dependent gating in cold- and heat-sensitive TRP channels. Nature 430:748–754
Watanabe K, Kayano Y, Matsunaga T, Yamamoto I, Yoshimura H (1996) Inhibition of anandamide amidase activity in mouse brain microsomes by cannabinoids. Biol Pharm Bull 19:1109–1111
Wolfson ML, Muzzio DO, Ehrhardt J, Franchi AM, Zygmunt M, Jensen F (2016) Expression analysis of cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 in B cells during pregnancy and their role on cytokine production. J Reprod Immunol 116:23–27
Xiong W, Cheng K, Cui T, Godlewski G, Rice KC, Xu Y, Zhang L (2011) Cannabinoid potentiation of glycine receptors contributes to cannabis-induced analgesia. Nat Chem Biol 7:296–303
Xiong W, Cui T, Cheng K, Yang F, Chen SR, Willenbring D, Guan Y, Pan HL, Ren K, Xu Y, Zhang L (2012) Cannabinoids suppress inflammatory and neuropathic pain by targeting α3 glycine receptors. J Exp Med 209:1121–1134
Xiong W, Koo BN, Morton R, Zhang L (2011) Psychotropic and nonpsychotropic cannabis derivatives inhibit human 5-HT3A receptors through a receptor desensitization-dependent mechanism. Neuroscience 184:28–37
Yang KH, Galadari S, Isaev D, Petroianu G, Shippenberg TS, Oz M (2010) The nonpsychoactive cannabinoid cannabidiol inhibits 5-hydroxytryptamine3A receptor-mediated currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 333:547–554
Yiangou Y, Facer P, Durrenberger P, Chessell IP, Naylor A, Bountra C, Banati RR, Anand P (2006) COX-2, CB2 and P2X7-immunoreactivities are increased in activated microglial cells/macrophages of multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord. BMC Neurol 6:12
Zachariou M, Alexander SP, Coombes S, Christodoulou C (2013) A biophysical model of endocannabinoid-mediated short term depression in hippocampal inhibition. PLoS One 8:e58926
Zamberletti E, Gabaglio M, Piscitelli F, Brodie JS, Woolley-Roberts M, Barbiero I, Tramarin M, Binelli G, Landsberger N, Kilstrup-Nielsen C, Rubino T, Di Marzo V, Parolaro D (2019) Cannabidivarin completely rescues cognitive deficits and delays neurological and motor defects in male Mecp2 mutant mice. J Psychopharmacol 33:894–907
Zhang J, Hoffert C, Vu HK, Groblewski T, Ahmad S, O’Donnell D (2003) Induction of CB2 receptor expression in the rat spinal cord of neuropathic but not inflammatory chronic pain models. Eur J Neurosci 17:2750–2754
Zhang R, Kim TK, Qiao ZH, Cai J, Pierce WM Jr, Song ZH (2007) Biochemical and mass spectrometric characterization of the human CB2 cannabinoid receptor expressed in Pichia pastoris--importance of correct processing of the N-terminus. Protein Expr Purif 55:225–235
Zygmunt PM, Petersson J, Andersson DA, Chuang H, Sorgard M, Di Marzo V, Julius D, Hogestatt ED (1999) Vanilloid receptors on sensory nerves mediate the vasodilator action of anandamide. Nature 400:452–457
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adel, Y., Alexander, S.P.H. (2021). Neuromolecular Mechanisms of Cannabis Action. In: Murillo-Rodriguez, E., Pandi-Perumal, S.R., Monti, J.M. (eds) Cannabinoids and Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1264. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57369-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57369-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57368-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57369-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)