Abstract
Benign and cancerous prostate tissue is dependent upon androgens. Androgen ablation causes prostate tissue to undergo apoptosis which thereby provides the rationale of castration as a systemic therapy for advanced prostate cancer. The full-length androgen receptor is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates the expression of genes required for growth, function, and survival of prostate cells in response to androgen. Androgen binds to the androgen receptor which then translocates to the nucleus to bind to androgen response elements on target genes termed “androgen-responsive genes” (ARGs) to regulate their transcription and levels of expression. Identification and characterization of ARGs may provide an understanding of androgen receptor signaling, resistance mechanisms to current hormonal therapies, and reveal biomarkers for patient selection and sequential application of current and new therapies targeting the androgen axis. This review addresses differential expression of ARGs following androgen ablation treatment during progression of advanced prostate cancer.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Androgen-responsive gene
- Prostate cancer
- Androgen receptor
- Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)
- Gene expression
9.1 Introduction
9.1.1 Prostate and Androgen
The prostate depends on androgen with androgen ablation therapy (castration) inducing programmed cell death and involution of the prostate. Androgen receptor mediates the effects of androgen and thereby regulates the development, function, and survival of prostate cells. Prostate cancer is also dependent upon androgens and this is why castration is a form of therapy for advanced disease. When androgen binds to the androgen receptor, the receptor becomes transactivated and translocates to the nucleus where it binds to androgen-response elements (AREs) in enhancer and promoter regions of target genes to regulate their transcription. The target gene is generally termed an “androgen-responsive gene” (ARG) and its levels of expression can be altered by addition or withdrawal of androgen. Expression of ARGs can be regulated at many different levels, such as transcription, RNA processing, RNA stability, protein translation, and protein stability [1]. ARGs are fundamental in normal prostate development, growth, survival, and function and many of these genes are speculated to be important in the progression of prostate cancer [2].
9.1.2 Androgen Receptor Mechanisms of Resistance
Resistance of prostate cancer to androgen ablation therapy is inevitable at least by current approaches. Initially based upon the reexpression of ARGs such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), there have since been many proposed mechanisms that involve resumed androgen receptor signaling that include overexpression and/or gene amplification of androgen receptor; gain-of-function mutations in the ligand-binding domain of androgen receptor; androgen receptor splice variants lacking the ligand-binding domain; ligand-independent activation by alterative signaling pathways; and/or increased levels of intracellular androgen [3–8].
9.1.3 Identification of Androgen-Responsive Genes
The quest to identify ARGs lies in their potential to reveal biomarkers for prognosis and patient selection for therapies as well as yield insight into novel approaches for the development of new treatments for prostate cancer. Identification of ARGs has encompassed numerous models including prostate cancer cell lines, rodents, and/or human xenografts. It is estimated that 1.5–4.3% of genes are responsive to androgen in LNCaP cells [9]. This percentage includes the genes directly or indirectly (as a consequent event) regulated by androgen receptor. In 2009, 1,785 human genes, 583 rat genes, and 993 mouse genes were considered to be ARGs based on a literature search [10]. Most ARGs identified have functions in binding (72%) or catalytic activity (36%) according to gene ontology (GO) analysis from the Androgen-Responsive Gene Database website (http://argdb.fudan.edu.cn/index_info.php). There are many other cellular functions mediated by androgen receptor signaling. Understanding the changes in expression of ARGs between benign and cancerous prostate and ultimately in lethal CRPC may facilitate the development of therapeutic approaches to target androgen receptor signaling. Expression patterns of ARGs may provide indications of time, duration, and doses of therapies required to inhibit androgen receptor.
9.1.4 Prostate-Specific Antigen: The Prototype ARG
The best characterized ARG is prostate-specific antigen (PSA/KLK3). The PSA gene contains several functional AREs in its enhancer and promoter regions and its transcription is highly inducible by androgen [11–14]. Although cellular levels of PSA may decrease in cancer compared to normal prostate tissue, especially in poorly differentiated tumors, levels of PSA in the serum enables the early detection of prostate cancer. It is important to note that serum levels of PSA do not correlate to tissue levels in any stages of prostate cancer [15–17]. Serum level of PSA is also a useful early indication of biochemical failure and recurrence of prostate cancer after primary therapy as well as after secondary and tertiary therapies. After primary therapy, 30% of patients will have biochemical failure and require secondary treatment, which involves androgen ablation by chemical or surgical castration. For those patients with metastatic disease, approximately 75–80% respond to androgen ablation therapies [18]. However, androgen ablation therapy is only palliative with ultimate failure and progression to lethal CRPC [19]. New approaches involving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or new hormonal approaches recently approved by the FDA have improved overall survival by approximately 2–5 months for men with CRPC [7, 20–24]. Current approaches of androgen ablation and androgen receptor blockade are considered to fail by mechanisms that lead to resumed transcriptionally active androgen receptor and concomitant expression of ARGs, or at least a subset of ARGs.
9.2 Approaches of Gene Expression Analyses
9.2.1 Model Systems for Samples
Gene expression profiles have been carried out in human prostate cancer cell lines treated with and without androgen such as dihydrotestosterone (DHT) or R1881, a synthetic androgen. Most of the cell lines used were originally derived from metastatic disease. LNCaP, derived from lymph node metastatic tumor, is the most frequently analyzed cell line for transcriptome changes in response to androgen. The frequent use of LNCaP cells is probably because it is a well-differentiated human prostate cancer cell line that expresses a functional androgen receptor and can be grown as a xenograft in murine hosts to mimic several aspects of human disease such as becoming castration resistant when the host is castrated [25]. LNCaP cells have a mutation in the ligand-binding domain at T877A making the receptor more promiscuous and activated by other steroids and some antiandrogens [26–30] which may impact gene expression signatures. It is important to note that androgen not only causes growth and survival but also causes differentiation of prostate cells. This is an important concept when studying ARGs as different subsets of genes may be expressed depending on whether cells are proliferating or become quiescent with differentiation. LNCaP cells display biphasic response on proliferation with increasing concentrations of androgen. The cells proliferate in response to DHT ranging between 0.1 and 1 nM. However, proliferation is inhibited and cells become more differentiated when DHT concentration is 10 nM or higher [31–33]. A simple diagram of the biphasic proliferative response is shown in Fig. 9.1. This biphasic proliferative effect may occur at slightly varying concentration ranges because of different cell line types, cell culture passage number, culture conditions prior to androgen treatment, and treatment duration [31, 34–36]. These variables may be responsible for the relatively few numbers of ARGs that are commonly detected amongst different gene expression profiling studies [37]. The spectrum of expression of ARGs over different concentrations of androgen still remains relatively uncharacterized with few studies that have examined ARGs using the relevant concentrations of androgens that would be encountered under castrate conditions.
Advantages of using cell lines include that they are relatively homogeneous, easily accessible, and stringent control of experimental conditions can be achieved thereby providing potentially highly reproducible data. However, cell lines growing as a monolayer on plastic culture dishes and passaged many times may not accurately reflect the complexity of tumor environment nor represent different stages of disease. Therefore human xenografts and rodents have been explored as more complex models. Rodents with intact tissue structure including cell–cell interaction between different types of cells, such as epithelial cells, stromal cells, and blood cells make them suitable as an in vivo model for gene expression profiling analyses. However, these too may fall short and do not necessarily reflect the complexity of tumor progression in humans. Of note are the physiological differences between rodents and humans in the structure of the prostate. Unlike human prostate separating into zones, rodent prostate consists of distinct lobes. Rat ventral lobe is the most commonly studied because the epithelial cells in the ventral lobe undergo involution in response to androgen ablation [1]. Mouse dorsolateral lobe is the most commonly studied because the gene expression pattern in these two lobes is more similar to human prostate than other lobe [38]. Of note, the most characterized ARG in humans, PSA, is not expressed in rodents. This allows monitoring of serum PSA in mice carrying human xenografts to be a relatively accurate indication of tumor growth since only the human prostate tissue would be accountable for levels of PSA in the blood.
9.2.2 Clinical Samples
Difficulties in obtaining clinical samples from patients before and after castration from both the prostate as well as distant sites that are suitable to measure levels of RNA have led to fewer gene expression studies with clinical tissues. Generally, clinical samples are categorized based on disease stages, treatment type, treatment duration, location of tissues (primary prostate or metastatic tumor), and androgen responsiveness (androgen sensitive or castration resistant). Several factors need to be considered when using clinical samples for transcriptome analyses. First, the sample quality and sample handling affect gene expression analyses. Freshly frozen tissues and paraffin-fixed tissues (and fixing duration) provide different RNA quality (stability and degradation) [39]. Second, heterogeneity of cell populations in a tumor sample may complicate the gene expression analyses. Therefore, enrichment of epithelial cells or tumor cells is usually achieved by laser capture microdissection. The importance of microdissection is emphasized for those clinical samples with a Gleason Score greater or equal to 7. This is because of the often potential lethality of a Gleason Grade of 4 or more. Combination of RNA from both fields, such as a Gleason 4 with a Gleason 3 from a Gleason Score 7 tumor may confound interpretation of data since Gleason Grade 3 is considered generally to be relatively benign [40–42].
9.2.3 Methods of Analysis
Different platforms for genome-wide expression profiling have varying sensitivities to detect ARGs. Dehm and Tindall [9] summarized the following percentages of genes that were detected to be regulated by androgen in LNCaP cells depending upon the approach: serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) analyses yielded 1.5–2.1%; oligonucleotide array analyses, 2.8–3.7%; and cDNA array analyses, 4.3%. However, it is important to consider the total number of genes detected by each platform which may vary considerably.
Depending on the methods used to generate gene expression profiles, starting materials such as total RNA or mRNA (polyA+ RNA) may result in different detection sensitivities due to RNA extraction manipulation and influence of non-transcripts. Reverse-transcribed cDNA or amplified RNA is used as the source for detection by different profiling methods. Other considerations include that tumor samples from individual patients are usually pooled to obtain enough material and to have an average expression value, but this approach may mask the variation between individuals. The choice of reference sample for comparison and to present data as fold change is also a critical factor that influences the data obtained, interpreting changes in expression, and for comparison amongst different studies. Ultimately data validation is carried out by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, tissue microarray, or immunohistochemistry due to the propensity of high-throughput approaches to generate false positives and less than optimal dynamic ranges of some approaches which may underestimate fold-change.
9.3 ARGs
9.3.1 ARGs Detected Using Human Cells Lines
Human prostate cell lines have been used in a large number of ARG expression studies. Reviews from Dehm and Tindall [9] and Clegg and Nelson [1] comprehensively discuss the ARGs and their functions in prostate cancer and provide a list of the studies about gene expression profiling using human prostate cell lines or rodent models. As mentioned in Sect. 9.2.1, different cell lines may respond differently to varying concentrations of androgen, and even in the same cell lines, especially the extensively studied LNCaP cells. Such differences may be contributed from the strains of LNCaP cells or variations in culture and/or experimental conditions [37, 43]. For example, the presence or absence of serum in the control samples not treated with androgen will have profound effect on overall differences in the expression patterns obtained. This is because serum would provide cholesterol precursors for potential de novo androgen synthesis as well as contains a variety of growth factors and cytokines that may impact androgen receptor activity and gene expression.
Velasco et al. [37] cross-compared expression patterns of four in vitro studies and revealed that only 13 ARGs were common amongst four different studies: BCHE, CDK8, CTBP1, DHCR24, FKBP5, FN1, HERC3, PSA/KLK3, LIFR, MMP16, NDRG1, PIK3R3, and RAB4A. Interestingly, an oligonucleotide microarray and LongSAGE analyses in LNCaP cells treated with R1881 also detected differential expression of 7 of these genes: DHCR24, FKBP5, PSA/KLK3, MMP16, NDRG1, PIK3R3, and RAB4A [44, 45]. One study that analyzed ARG identified in vitro for relevance in clinical samples revealed that transcripts of CAMK2N1 and GLO1 were significantly increased in the primary lesions from patients that later had biochemical failure [46].
Importantly LNCaP cells have been used to identify genes potentially associated with CRPC. The majority of CRPC involves osseous metastases and hence creating in vitro conditions that tried to mimic CRPC was attempted by culturing LNCaP cells with osteoblast-conditioned media [47]. In the absence of androgen, osteoblast-derived factors activate androgen receptor transcriptional activity and increase proliferation of LNCaP cells [47, 48]. The gene expression signature that was identified in LNCaP cells in response to osteoblast-conditioned media was enriched with ARGs such as PSA/KLK3, ACPP, and cell cycle-related genes that included ASNS, AURKB, BUB1, BUB1B, CCNA2, CCNB1, CCNB2, CCNE2, CDC2, CDC6, CDC7, CDC20, CDC25C, CDKN3, CHEK1, DEPDC1, ESPL1, GTSE1, HCAP-G, MCM5, PLK1, SMC4L1, and STK6. Blocking interleukin-6, which is abundant in osteoblast-conditioned media and also known to activate the androgen receptor in the absence of androgen [49], decreased expression of AURKB, CCNA2, CCNB1, CCNB2, CDC2, and PSA/KLK3 in response to osteoblast-conditioned media [47]. Importantly, this gene expression signature could identify both clinical metastases and CRPC. All of the cyclins identified in response to osteoblast-conditioned media (CCNA2, CCNB1, CCNB2, and CCNE2) and most of the CDCs (CDC2, CDC6, CDC20, CDKN3, and CDC25C) were upregulated in clinical samples of metastases and the genes overlapping with CRPC clinical samples were CCNB1, CDC20, CHEK1, ESPL1, HCAP-G, SMC4L1, and STK3 [47]. Later additional in vitro validation that androgen receptor regulates a distinct transcriptional program in androgen-insensitive cells was generated by comparing sublines of LNCaP cells [50]. Importantly, androgen receptor was shown to selectively upregulate M-phase cell-cycle genes in androgen-independent cells including CCNA2, CCNE2, CDC2, CDC20, CDC25C, CDKN3, and UBE2C [50]. Some of these genes known to be regulated by androgen receptor were associated with high expression of androgen receptor splice variant in bone metastases such as CCNA2, CDC20, CDK1, HSP27, C-MYC, UBE2C, and UGT2B17, while other known ARGs such as PSA/KLK3, KLK2, NKX3.1, FKBP5, and TMPRSS2 were not associated with metastases containing high level of splice variant [51].
9.3.2 ARGs Discovered Using In Vivo Models
More than a decade ago, dysregulation of ARGs was demonstrated in human xenografts including CWR22 and the CWR22-R1 xenograft derived from CWR22 cells. These studies revealed that some genes normally regulated by androgens (e.g., FKBP5 and S100P), that had reduced levels of expression in response to castration were reexpressed when the tumors began to grow again in the absence of testicular androgens [52, 53]. One of the largest in vivo study in terms of three million tags generated was from a LongSAGE analyses using the LNCaP Hollow Fiber model. This study uniquely used serial samples from the same mouse from before and after castration to reveal differential expressed genes in response to androgen ablation and with CRPC. The differential expressed genes identified in CRPC included genes known to be altered in response to androgen (ABHD2, BM2, BTG1, C19orf48, CAMK2N1, CXCR7, EEF1A2, ELOVL5, ENDOD1, ENO2, HSD17B4, MAOA, MDK, NKX3.1, ODC1, P4HA1, PCGEM1, PGK1, PSA/KLK3, SELENBP1, TMEM66, TPD52, and TRPM8) as well as those involved in androgen receptor signaling (CCNH, CUEDC2, FLNA, and PSMA7) and androgen biosynthesis and metabolism (DHCR24, DHRS7, ELOVL5, HSD17B4, and OPRK1) [54]. This library (GSE18402) is freely available at Gene Expression Omnibus and provides a resource where anyone can mine the data to determine if their gene of interest changes expression in vivo in the LNCaP Hollow Fiber model in response to castration and in CRPC.
It is important to note that the LNCaP hollow fiber model has genomic similarity to clinical samples in terms of differential gene expression during hormonal progression [55]. This model provided evidence for the reactivation of the androgen receptor signaling pathway in CRPC by hierarchical two-dimensional clustering algorithm based on similarity of expression patterns of 1,092 ARGs. Pathway-based characterization of gene expression revealed activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and interaction with androgen receptor in CRPC [55].
9.4 ARG Analyses Using Clinical Patient Tumor
9.4.1 Clinical Sample Analyses
Gene expression profiling may be a useful tool to categorize tumor subtypes since the changes at molecular level are correlated with tumor progression [56–59]. ARGs may have important roles in the development of castrate resistance since androgen receptor protein is detected in most CRPC [37]. Profiling the expression of ARGs at different stages of prostate cancer will help elucidate the mechanism(s) leading to terminal CRPC as well as provide biomarkers for prognosis and patient selection for therapies. Several studies on the gene expression analyses have been carried out to compare androgen-responsive and castrate-resistant tumors [16, 60–63]. Studies by Holzbeierlein et al. [60] and Chandran et al. [16] analyzed tumor specimens without separating different types of cells to examine gene expression, while studies from Best et al. [61] and Tamura et al. [63] analyzed epithelial cells separated by laser capture microdissection. Heterogeneity of gene expression levels must be considered. For example, although the majority of lethal CRPC still express PSA, the levels are extremely variable [64]. Tissue levels of expression of PSA/KLK3 and AMACR can vary considerably from high expression to non-detectable within tumors from the same patient [16, 65]. Also there is no correlation between expression of PSA and androgen receptor [66]. Expression levels of a gene may also be high in the primary tumor and downregulated in the metastatic tumor such as seen with FOS and JUNB [16].
It is important to note whether change in levels of expression of an ARG is in direct response with change in occupancy of androgen receptor on an ARE on the ARG locus or if it is a downstream effect. The time from treatment to sample collection may affect gene expression. Studies from Holzbeierlein et al. [60] demonstrated that differential expression of ARGs was directly regulated by androgen after 3 months of androgen ablation therapy based upon in vitro validation that 22.8% of those genes had differential expression in LNCaP cultures after 36 h of androgen withdrawal. There are additional complexities that may be encountered with patient tissue as described by Mostaghel et al. [17] showing evidence that after short-term suppression of androgen, even though the serum testosterone levels are decreased, the intraprostatic levels may not be reduced. Hence, patients receiving androgen ablation therapy may not have complete suppression of androgen in the prostate microenvironment which would have profound effects on expression of ARGs. Therefore, duration of hormonal therapy and the residual levels of tissue androgen need to be considered for gene expression analyses on patient samples.
Finally the definition of CRPC needs to be consistent between analyses for correct interpretation of the data. Different criteria for clinical castrate resistance have been employed. For example, Best et al. [61] defined CRPC as patients with two rising PSA levels and at least one new lesion found in bone or progressive measurable disease, whereas Tamura et al. [63] defined CRPC as patients with three rising PSA levels.
9.4.2 ARGs and Androgen Ablation Therapy
Despite the potential incomplete suppression of androgen within prostate tissues, the expression of ARGs is altered after short-term (1–9 months) androgen ablation therapy [17, 60]. Notably, there was a higher percentage of genes downregulated than those that were upregulated following androgen ablation therapy. These studies showed that 56% of the altered genes were downregulated while 44% of the altered genes were upregulated in response to androgen ablation treatment, even though the numbers of altered genes, profiling platform, analysis criteria, tissues sources, treatment agents, and treatment duration were different between the two studies [17, 60]. Comparison between these two studies revealed only nine ARGs that were in common and were differentially regulated after short-term castration in benign versus malignant prostate. One ARG, TFF1, was upregulated in response to castration, while six others (ABCC4, CAMK1, DCXR, SORD, SPON2, and TMPRSS2) were downregulated [17, 60]. GSTM1 (involved in metabolism) was upregulated in the tumor [60], but downregulated in benign prostate [17] after castration, whereas FOLH1 was downregulated in the tumor but upregulated in benign prostate after castration.
TFF1, DCXR, and SORD are involved in carbohydrate metabolism and these alterations consequently affect the cell proliferative capacity [16, 17]. CAMK1 has a role in calmodulin-dependent protein kinase cascade but its exact role in prostate cancer in response to androgen ablation requires investigation. ABCC4, a member of ABC-type multidrug transporters, transports a number of molecules. Its gene expression was highly upregulated in malignant compared to benign prostate and it is suggested to be involved in tumor progression [67]. Consistent with patient samples, expression of SPON2 was reduced by castration and then highly expressed in CRPC in the LNCaP hollow fiber model [54]. SPON2 protein is a proposed serum biomarker for prostate cancer [68]. TMPRSS2 encodes a serine protease and is one of the best characterized ARGs with bona fide AREs [69, 70]. Expression of TMPRSS2 is decreased following short-term castration [17, 60]. The discovery of the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene has increased interest in this ARG with this fusion gene expressed in ∼50% of primary prostate cancers [71, 72]. Comparison of gene expression profiles between TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-positive tumor cells to fusion-negative cells after androgen ablation treatment revealed that most of the differentially expressed genes are probably targets of ERG. Hence, these differentially expressed genes in fusion-positive tumor cells after short-term castration are indirect consequent of androgen receptor regulation. Moreover, these differentially expressed genes are associated with cell cycle and mitosis, indicating the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion has influence on proliferation-related genes that are potentially regulated by androgen receptor [73, 74].
The fact that only nine genes overlapped in the two gene expression studies (less than 5% of the genes detected), flags the importance of experimental design and/or highlights how different approaches of androgen ablation therapy may impact gene expression. Lehmusvaara et al. [74] reported that gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (goserelin) and anti-androgen (bicalutamide) treatments result in different gene expression profiles even though the clinical outcomes are similar. In their studies, only 16% of the differentially expressed genes were common in both treatments. DCXR and TMPRSS2, included in the list of the nine common genes found between Holzbeierlein et al. [60] and Mostaghel et al. [17] studies, were also found to be downregulated after bicalutamide treatment. Lack of high frequency of common genes amongst different treatments may be due to different targets at the molecular level. Moreover, some genes responding to androgen ablation were not detected in the above gene expression profiling analyses but were found in the prostate tumor after androgen ablation in studies from other researchers. Examples include beta1C (b1C) integrin and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) death ligand [75, 76]. Expression of b1C integrin was upregulated after 1 month of androgen ablation therapy using goserelin and bicalutamide but was not differentially expressed after 3- or 6-month periods of androgen ablation therapy [75]. Expression of TRAIL and its receptor (TRAIL-R) was upregulated in patients with advanced prostate cancer after androgen ablation therapy, but expression was lower in CRPC. These results suggest that androgen ablation therapy may be effective only initially with tumors susceptible to apoptosis, and longer periods of androgen ablation enable the cells to escape apoptosis [76]. Such a scenario has been put forth as an underlying hypothesis that intermittent androgen suppression may lead to increased apoptosis as compared to continuous androgen ablation [77, 78].
9.4.3 ARGs Change in CRPC
Eight of the nine common genes differentially expressed after short-term castration (TFF1, CAMK1, DCXR, SORD, SPON2, TMPRSS2, GSTM1, and FOLH1) were not detected in CRPC. The one exception was ABCC4 which decreased expression in CRPC [16]. However, comparing all the differentially expressed genes after androgen ablation therapy from Holzbeierlein et al. [60] and Mostaghel et al. [17] studies with differential gene expression analyses from CRPC samples in studies from other groups (list in Table 9.1), a few number of genes reversed their expression in CRPC. For example, CYB561, NTN4, and RARRES1 had reversed expression in CRPC compared with tumor samples treated with androgen ablation [60]. CYB561 was upregulated, while NTN4 and RARRES1 were downregulated in CRPC. CYB561 (cytochrome b561) encodes a secretory vesicle-specific electron transport protein [79]. NTN4 (Netrin 4) is a secreted protein and involved in anti-angiogenesis and has tumor suppressive activity in breast cancer [80]. RARRES1 (retinoic acid receptor responder 1) also has tumor suppressive activity and plays an important role in tumorigenesis [81, 82]. The function of CYB561 is currently unclear in prostate cancer. The reversed expression of NTN4 and RARRES1 and their function as tumor suppressors suggest that they have important roles in prostate cancer during the transition from androgen sensitive to castration resistant.
Although the frequency of the same ARGs responding to androgen ablation and castration resistance is very low based on current gene expression profiling analyses, many studies have demonstrated that androgen receptor function is reactivated in CRPC as upregulation of androgen receptor was detected in CRPC, compared to androgen-sensitive tumors [16, 60, 62, 63]. This observation is consistent with studies that have examined xenograft models [83]. Although androgen receptor was not differentially expressed between androgen ablation treated prostate and untreated prostate [17, 60], upregulation of its expression and reactivation of its transcriptional activity in CRPC tumors indicate its critical role in CRPC [44, 52, 54]. The recent discovery of constitutively active splice variants of androgen receptor that lack ligand-binding domain, especially V567es that seems to be expressed exclusively in response to androgen ablation [51, 84], may provide an important marker of CRPC and indication of eminent failure to current therapies that target the ligand-binding domain of full-length androgen receptor. These variants appear to regulate a unique transcriptome that is different from full-length androgen receptor. A recent study demonstrated that androgen receptor splice variants regulate expression of cell cycle genes in the absence of full-length androgen receptor, while the full-length androgen receptor mainly regulates genes associated with macromolecular synthesis, metabolism, and differentiation in CRPC [85]. Importantly, their studies revealed that expression of splice variant of androgen receptor, but not the full-length androgen receptor, was strongly correlated with expression of the cell cycle gene UBE2C in CRPC.
Interestingly, although downregulation of TMPRSS2 was detected in prostate tissues (benign or malignant) following short-term castration, no differential expression was detected in clinical CRPC compared to primary tumors in gene expression profiling analyses. Instead, upregulation or restoration of expression of androgen receptor regulated TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, together with androgen receptor reactivation, were detected in other studies of CRPC [73]. Increased levels of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion may contribute to the progression to CRPC by altering genes associated with cell proliferation under regulation by androgen receptor. On the other hand, TMPRSS2-ERG fusion can inhibit androgen receptor signaling. Yu et al. [71] proposed a model showing that TMPRSS2-ERG interferes with the balance between androgen receptor-mediated differentiation and EZH2-mediated dedifferentiation of prostate cells as well as inhibits androgen receptor signaling, thus leading to a selective pressure for development of CRPC [71]. Of note, non-androgen receptor-mediated signaling pathway, such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway involving cell survival and proliferation, may also contribute to CRPC development and the aggressive phenotype of tumor cells [60, 63, 86].
Similar to gene expression profiles of tumors after androgen ablation treatment, the expression profiles for CRPC showed very few common genes amongst different studies. However, several cellular functions including coordinated ARGs and response to androgen were altered in CRPC. These included altered expression of steroidogenic enzymes of androgen biosynthetic and metabolic pathways in CRPC as compared to androgen-sensitive tumors [16, 17, 60, 62, 87, 88]. Examples include AKR1C3, HSD3B2, and SRD5A1 for biosynthesis and AKR1C1, AKR1C2, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17 for metabolism. Increased expression of CYP17A1 and HSD17B3 was also detected in CRPC [89]. The enzyme CYP17A1 produces androgens from progestins and the enzyme HSD17B3 converts testosterone from androstenedione [89]. The altered expression of SRD5A genes (SRD5A1 and SRD5A2), encoding 5-alpha-reductases, was detected in CRPC clinical samples as well as in the DuCaP cell line [89, 90]. Increased expression of these enzymes in CRPC provides the availability of androgen and conversion of low-level androgen to testosterone and DHT to allow reactivation of androgen receptor to ultimately overcome androgen ablation therapies. Identification of these genes enables development of therapeutic strategies to ultimately reduce levels of residual androgens in CRPC. One example of such a therapy is abiraterone, an inhibitor of CYP17A1 enzyme that blocks biosynthesis of androgen [91]. Mostaghel and Nelson [92] raised several questions regarding the targeting steroidogenic enzymes for CRPC treatment. The treatment outcome may be affected by the choice of a particular steroidogenic enzyme to inhibit duration of androgen ablation therapy in CRPC patients and the specific tissues/sites of targeting, e.g., adrenal gland or prostate tumor [92].
Other altered cellular functions of identified ARGs involve cell–cell interaction and cell adhesion. Upregulation of SPP1, FN1, or CDH11, all involved in cell adhesion, was detected in CRPC [16, 61, 62]. Osteopontin (SPP1) promotes metastasis [16] and cadherin11 (CDH11) contributes to metastasis [93]. The role of fibronectin-1 (FN1) in prostate cancer is unclear. However, induction of apoptosis by tumor necrosis factor-alpha can be blocked by fibronectin in LNCaP cells [94].
9.5 Summary
Comparison of gene expression profiling studies of cell lines, xenografts, and clinical tissues revealed that only a few of the differentially expressed ARGs were common amongst the different samples. These ARGs included UBE2C, SPON2, FKBP5, TMPRSS2, and KLK3 (PSA). Although the majority of differentially expressed ARGs were different, three major cellular functions were commonly affected by androgen during progression of prostate cancer and were (1) androgen biosynthesis and metabolism; (2) cell cycle and proliferation; and (3) cell adhesion (Fig. 9.2). ARGs with differential expression included CYP17A1 and SRD5A (steroidogenic enzymes), UBE2C (cell cycle), TMPRSS2 (cell proliferation), and SPP1 and CDH11 (cell adhesion). These ARGs are potential candidates as diagnostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets. Evaluation of expression of these and other ARGs may provide insight of androgen receptor activity in prostate cancer and be utilized for personalized therapies by shedding light on efficacy of hormonal therapies, sequencing of therapies, selection of patients for clinical trials, and mechanisms of resistance.
References
Clegg N, Nelson PS (2009) Androgen-regulated genes in the prostate. In: Tindall D, Mohler J (eds) Book androgen-regulated genes in the prostate. Springer Science, New York, NY
Varambally S, Yu J, Laxman B et al (2005) Integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of prostate cancer reveals signatures of metastatic progression. Cancer Cell 8:393–406
Sadar MD, Hussain M, Bruchovsky N (1999) Prostate cancer: molecular biology of early progression to androgen independence. Endocr Relat Cancer 6:487–502
Dutt SS, Gao AC (2009) Molecular mechanisms of castration-resistant prostate cancer progression. Future Oncol 5:1403–1413
Hotte SJ, Saad F (2010) Current management of castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Curr Oncol 17(Suppl 2):S72–S79
Lonergan PE, Tindall DJ (2011) Androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer development and progression. J Carcinog 10:20
Amaral TM, Macedo D, Fernandes I et al (2012) Castration-resistant prostate cancer: mechanisms, targets, and treatment Prostate. Cancer 2012:327253
Sadar MD (2012) Advances in small molecule inhibitors of androgen receptor for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. World J Urol 30:311–318
Dehm SM, Tindall DJ (2006) Molecular regulation of androgen action in prostate cancer. J Cell Biochem 99:333–344
Jiang M, Ma Y, Chen C et al (2009) Androgen-responsive gene database: integrated knowledge on androgen-responsive genes. Mol Endocrinol 23:1927–1933
Luke MC, Coffey DS (1994) Human androgen receptor binding to the androgen response element of prostate specific antigen. J Androl 15:41–51
Cleutjens KB, van Eekelen CC, van der Korput HA et al (1996) Two androgen response regions cooperate in steroid hormone regulated activity of the prostate-specific antigen promoter. J Biol Chem 271:6379–6388
Cleutjens KB, van der Korput HA, van Eekelen CC et al (1997) An androgen response element in a far upstream enhancer region is essential for high, androgen-regulated activity of the prostate-specific antigen promoter. Mol Endocrinol 11:148–161
Zhang J, Zhang S, Murtha PE et al (1997) Identification of two novel cis-elements in the promoter of the prostate-specific antigen gene that are required to enhance androgen receptor-mediated transactivation. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3143–3150
Weir EG, Partin AW, Epstein JI (2000) Correlation of serum prostate specific antigen and quantitative immunohistochemistry. J Urol 163:1739–1742
Chandran UR, Ma C, Dhir R et al (2007) Gene expression profiles of prostate cancer reveal involvement of multiple molecular pathways in the metastatic process. BMC Cancer 7:64
Mostaghel EA, Page ST, Lin DW et al (2007) Intraprostatic androgens and androgen-regulated gene expression persist after testosterone suppression: therapeutic implications for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res 67:5033–5041
Gronberg H (2003) Prostate cancer epidemiology. Lancet 361:859–864
Feldman BJ, Feldman D (2001) The development of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 1:34–45
Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH et al (2004) Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1513–1520
Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR et al (2004) Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1502–1512
Berthold DR, Pond GR, de Wit R et al (2008) Survival and PSA response of patients in the TAX 327 study who crossed over to receive docetaxel after mitoxantrone or vice versa. Ann Oncol 19:1749–1753
Higano CS, Schellhammer PF, Small EJ et al (2009) Integrated data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of active cellular immunotherapy with sipuleucel-T in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 115:3670–3679
Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND et al (2010) Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 363:411–422
Horoszewicz JS, Leong SS, Kawinski E et al (1983) LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res 43:1809–1818
Taplin ME, Bubley GJ, Ko YJ et al (1999) Selection for androgen receptor mutations in prostate cancers treated with androgen antagonist. Cancer Res 59:2511–2515
Chang CY, Walther PJ, McDonnell DP (2001) Glucocorticoids manifest androgenic activity in a cell line derived from a metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Res 61:8712–8717
Krishnan AV, Zhao XY, Swami S et al (2002) A glucocorticoid-responsive mutant androgen receptor exhibits unique ligand specificity: therapeutic implications for androgen-independent prostate cancer. Endocrinology 143:1889–1900
Steketee K, Timmerman L, Ziel-van der Made AC et al (2002) Broadened ligand responsiveness of androgen receptor mutants obtained by random amino acid substitution of H874 and mutation hot spot T877 in prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 100:309–317
Sun C, Shi Y, Xu LL et al (2006) Androgen receptor mutation (T877A) promotes prostate cancer cell growth and cell survival. Oncogene 25:3905–3913
Schuurmans AL, Bolt J, Voorhorst MM et al (1988) Regulation of growth and epidermal growth factor receptor levels of LNCaP prostate tumor cells by different steroids. Int J Cancer 42:917–922
Sonnenschein C, Olea N, Pasanen ME et al (1989) Negative controls of cell proliferation: human prostate cancer cells and androgens. Cancer Res 49:3474–3481
de Launoit Y, Veilleux R, Dufour M et al (1991) Characteristics of the biphasic action of androgens and of the potent antiproliferative effects of the new pure antiestrogen EM-139 on cell cycle kinetic parameters in LNCaP human prostatic cancer cells. Cancer Res 51:5165–5170
Langeler EG, van Uffelen CJ, Blankenstein MA et al (1993) Effect of culture conditions on androgen sensitivity of the human prostatic cancer cell line LNCaP. Prostate 23:213–223
Navone NM, Olive M, Ozen M et al (1997) Establishment of two human prostate cancer cell lines derived from a single bone metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 3:2493–2500
Culig Z, Hoffmann J, Erdel M et al (1999) Switch from antagonist to agonist of the androgen receptor bicalutamide is associated with prostate tumour progression in a new model system. Br J Cancer 81:242–251
Velasco AM, Gillis KA, Li Y et al (2004) Identification and validation of novel androgen-regulated genes in prostate cancer. Endocrinology 145:3913–3924
Shappell SB, Thomas GV, Roberts RL et al (2004) Prostate pathology of genetically engineered mice: definitions and classification. The consensus report from the Bar Harbor meeting of the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium Prostate Pathology Committee. Cancer Res 64:2270–2305
Dunn TA, Fedor HL, De Marzo AM et al (2012) Molecular profiling of indolent human prostate cancer: tackling technical challenges to achieve high-fidelity genome-wide data. Asian J Androl 14:385–392
Lau WK, Blute ML, Bostwick DG et al (2001) Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4. J Urol 166:1692–1697
Stark JR, Perner S, Stampfer MJ et al (2009) Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3? J Clin Oncol 27:3459–3464
Wright JL, Salinas CA, Lin DW et al (2009) Prostate cancer specific mortality and Gleason 7 disease differences in prostate cancer outcomes between cases with Gleason 4 + 3 and Gleason 3 + 4 tumors in a population based cohort. J Urol 182:2702–2707
Bolton EC, So AY, Chaivorapol C et al (2007) Cell- and gene-specific regulation of primary target genes by the androgen receptor. Genes Dev 21:2005–2017
Wang G, Jones SJ, Marra MA et al (2006) Identification of genes targeted by the androgen and PKA signaling pathways in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene 25:7311–7323
Romanuik TL, Wang G, Holt RA et al (2009) Identification of novel androgen-responsive genes by sequencing of LongSAGE libraries. BMC Genomics 10:476
Romanuik TL, Ueda T, Le N et al (2009) Novel biomarkers for prostate cancer including noncoding transcripts. Am J Pathol 175:2264–2276
Wang G, Haile S, Comuzzi B et al (2009) Osteoblast-derived factors induce an expression signature that identifies prostate cancer metastasis and hormonal progression. Cancer Res 69:3433–3442
Blaszczyk N, Masri BA, Mawji NR et al (2004) Osteoblast-derived factors induce androgen-independent proliferation and expression of prostate-specific antigen in human prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 10:1860–1869
Ueda T, Mawji NR, Bruchovsky N et al (2002) Ligand-independent activation of the androgen receptor by interleukin-6 and the role of steroid receptor coactivator-1 in prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem 277:38087–38094
Wang Q, Li W, Zhang Y et al (2009) Androgen receptor regulates a distinct transcription program in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Cell 138:245–256
Hornberg E, Ylitalo EB, Crnalic S et al (2011) Expression of androgen receptor splice variants in prostate cancer bone metastases is associated with castration-resistance and short survival. PLoS One 6:e19059
Gregory CW, Hamil KG, Kim D et al (1998) Androgen receptor expression in androgen-independent prostate cancer is associated with increased expression of androgen-regulated genes. Cancer Res 58:5718–5724
Amler LC, Agus DB, LeDuc C et al (2000) Dysregulated expression of androgen-responsive and nonresponsive genes in the androgen-independent prostate cancer xenograft model CWR22-R1. Cancer Res 60:6134–6141
Romanuik TL, Wang G, Morozova O et al (2010) LNCaP Atlas: gene expression associated with in vivo progression to castration-recurrent prostate cancer. BMC Med Genomics 3:43
Wang G, Wang J, Sadar MD (2008) Crosstalk between the androgen receptor and beta-catenin in castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res 68:9918–9927
Lapointe J, Li C, Higgins JP et al (2004) Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:811–816
Yu PK, Cheung T, Butson MJ (2004) Prostate dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 27:60–62
Chandran UR, Dhir R, Ma C et al (2005) Differences in gene expression in prostate cancer, normal appearing prostate tissue adjacent to cancer and prostate tissue from cancer free organ donors. BMC Cancer 5:45
Lapointe J, Li C, Giacomini CP et al (2007) Genomic profiling reveals alternative genetic pathways of prostate tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 67:8504–8510
Holzbeierlein J, Lal P, LaTulippe E et al (2004) Gene expression analysis of human prostate carcinoma during hormonal therapy identifies androgen-responsive genes and mechanisms of therapy resistance. Am J Pathol 164:217–227
Best CJ, Gillespie JW, Yi Y et al (2005) Molecular alterations in primary prostate cancer after androgen ablation therapy. Clin Cancer Res 11:6823–6834
Stanbrough M, Bubley GJ, Ross K et al (2006) Increased expression of genes converting adrenal androgens to testosterone in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Cancer Res 66:2815–2825
Tamura K, Furihata M, Tsunoda T et al (2007) Molecular features of hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells by genome-wide gene expression profiles. Cancer Res 67:5117–5125
Stein BS, Vangore S, Petersen RO (1984) Immunoperoxidase localization of prostatic antigens. Comparison of primary and metastatic sites. Urology 24:146–152
Zhou M, Chinnaiyan AM, Kleer CG et al (2002) Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA racemase: a novel tumor marker over-expressed in several human cancers and their precursor lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 26:926–931
Shah RB, Mehra R, Chinnaiyan AM et al (2004) Androgen-independent prostate cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases: lessons from a rapid autopsy program. Cancer Res 64:9209–9216
Ho LL, Kench JG, Handelsman DJ et al (2008) Androgen regulation of multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4/ABCC4) in prostate cancer. Prostate 68:1421–1429
Qian X, Li C, Pang B et al (2012) Spondin-2 (SPON2), a More Prostate-Cancer-Specific Diagnostic Biomarker. PLoS One 7:e37225
Paoloni-Giacobino A, Chen H, Peitsch MC et al (1997) Cloning of the TMPRSS2 gene, which encodes a novel serine protease with transmembrane, LDLRA, and SRCR domains and maps to 21q22.3. Genomics 44:309–320
Tomlins SA, Rhodes DR, Perner S et al (2005) Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. Science 310:644–648
Yu J, Mani RS, Cao Q et al (2010) An integrated network of androgen receptor, polycomb, and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions in prostate cancer progression. Cancer Cell 17:443–454
Inoue T, Ogawa O (2011) Role of signaling transduction pathways in development of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer 2011:647987
Cai C, Wang H, Xu Y et al (2009) Reactivation of androgen receptor-regulated TMPRSS2:ERG gene expression in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res 69:6027–6032
Lehmusvaara S, Erkkila T, Urbanucci A et al (2012) Chemical castration and anti-androgens induce differential gene expression in prostate cancer. J Pathol 227(3):336–345
Fuzio P, Lucarelli G, Perlino E et al (2009) Androgen deprivation therapy regulation of beta1C integrin expression in prostate cancer. Oncol Rep 22:327–335
Koksal IT, Sanlioglu AD, Kutlu O et al (2010) Effects of androgen ablation therapy in TRAIL death ligand and its receptors expression in advanced prostate cancer. Urol Int 84:445–451
Bhandari MS, Crook J, Hussain M (2005) Should intermittent androgen deprivation be used in routine clinical practice? J Clin Oncol 23:8212–8218
Abrahamsson PA (2010) Potential benefits of intermittent androgen suppression therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 57:49–59
Srivastava M, Gibson KR, Pollard HB et al (1994) Human cytochrome b561: a revised hypothesis for conformation in membranes which reconciles sequence and functional information. Biochem J 303(Pt 3):915–921
Fujikane T, Nishikawa N, Toyota M et al (2010) Genomic screening for genes upregulated by demethylation revealed novel targets of epigenetic silencing in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122:699–710
Jing C, El-Ghany MA, Beesley C et al (2002) Tazarotene-induced gene 1 (TIG1) expression in prostate carcinomas and its relationship to tumorigenicity. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:482–490
Sahab ZJ, Hall MD, Me Sung Y et al (2011) Tumor suppressor RARRES1 interacts with cytoplasmic carboxypeptidase AGBL2 to regulate the alpha-tubulin tyrosination cycle. Cancer Res 71:1219–1228
Chen CD, Welsbie DS, Tran C et al (2004) Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy. Nat Med 10:33–39
Sun S, Sprenger CC, Vessella RL et al (2010) Castration resistance in human prostate cancer is conferred by a frequently occurring androgen receptor splice variant. J Clin Invest 120:2715–2730
Hu R, Lu C, Mostaghel EA et al (2012) Distinct transcriptional programs mediated by the ligand-dependent full-length androgen receptor and its splice variants in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res 72(14):3457–3462
Taylor BS, Schultz N, Hieronymus H et al (2010) Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 18:11–22
Mostaghel EA, Montgomery B, Nelson PS (2009) Castration-resistant prostate cancer: targeting androgen metabolic pathways in recurrent disease. Urol Oncol 27:251–257
Massie CE, Lynch A, Ramos-Montoya A et al (2011) The androgen receptor fuels prostate cancer by regulating central metabolism and biosynthesis. EMBO J 30:2719–2733
Montgomery RB, Mostaghel EA, Vessella R et al (2008) Maintenance of intratumoral androgens in metastatic prostate cancer: a mechanism for castration-resistant tumor growth. Cancer Res 68:4447–4454
Pfeiffer MJ, Smit FP, Sedelaar JP et al (2011) Steroidogenic enzymes and stem cell markers are upregulated during androgen deprivation in prostate cancer. Mol Med 17:657–664
de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A et al (2011) Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1995–2005
Mostaghel EA, Nelson PS (2008) Intracrine androgen metabolism in prostate cancer progression: mechanisms of castration resistance and therapeutic implications. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 22:243–258
Lee YC, Cheng CJ, Huang M et al (2010) Androgen depletion up-regulates cadherin-11 expression in prostate cancer. J Pathol 221:68–76
Fornaro M, Plescia J, Chheang S et al (2003) Fibronectin protects prostate cancer cells from tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced apoptosis via the AKT/survivin pathway. J Biol Chem 278:50402–50411
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tien, A.H., Sadar, M.D. (2013). Androgen-Responsive Gene Expression in Prostate Cancer Progression. In: Wang, Z. (eds) Androgen-Responsive Genes in Prostate Cancer. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6182-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6182-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6181-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6182-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)