Erratum to: Atten Percept Psychophys

DOI 10.3758/s13414-017-1321-x

Figures 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the published article were not the ones submitted by the authors. Specifically, they were of lower quality than the submitted images, and missed credible intervals from each panel A. The correct figures appear below. The original article was corrected.

Fig. 2
figure 1

Multilevel logistic regression model of the apparent motion task, Experiment 1. (A) Average model-predicted probabilities of apparent motion for the no-action (solid line) and voluntary-action (dashed line) conditions, with 95% credible intervals (CIs) as lighter shades of the different line colors. (B) Points of subjective equality (PSEs) in both experimental conditions, as well as their difference (voluntary action–no action). Error bars indicate 95% CIs

Fig. 3
figure 2

Multilevel regression model of the interval estimation task in Experiment 1. (A) Average model-predicted interval estimates for the no-action (solid line) and voluntary-action (dashed line) conditions, with 95% credible intervals (CIs) as lighter shades of the different line colors. (B) Difference in interval estimates (voluntary action–no action) for each ISI; error bars indicate 95% CIs

Fig. 4
figure 3

Multilevel logistic regression model of the Ternus display task in Experiment 2a. (A) Average model-predicted probabilities of element motion responses for the no-action (solid line) and voluntary-action (dashed line) conditions, with 95% credible intervals (CIs) as lighter shades of the different line colors. (B) Points of subjective equality in both experimental conditions, and their difference (voluntary action–no action; error bars indicate 95% CIs)

Fig. 5
figure 4

Multilevel logistic regression model of the Ternus display task in Experiment 2b. (A) Average model-predicted probabilities of element motion responses for the no-action (solid line) and voluntary-action (dashed line) conditions, with 95% credible intervals (CIs) as lighter shades of the different line colors. (B) Points of subjective equality in both experimental conditions, and their difference (voluntary action–no action; error bars indicate 95% CIs)

Fig. 6
figure 5

Multilevel logistic regression model of the Ternus display task in Experiment 3. (A) Average model-predicted probabilities of element motion responses for the no-warning (solid line) and warning sound (dashed line) conditions, with 95% credible intervals (CIs) as lighter shades of the different line colors. (B) Points of subjective equality in both experimental conditions, and their difference (warning–no warning;error bars indicate 95% CIs)