Abstract
In this paper it is established that in an infinite angular domain for Dirichlet problem of the heat conduction equation the unique (up to a constant factor) non-trivial solution exists, which does not belong to the class of summable functions with the found weight. It is shown that for the adjoint boundary value problem the unique (up to a constant factor) non-trivial solution exists, which belongs to the class of essentially bounded functions with the weight found in the work. It is proved that the operator of a boundary value problem of heat conductivity in an infinite angular domain in a class of growing functions is Noetherian with an index which is equal to minus one.
MSC: 35D05, 35K20, 45D05.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Different kinds of processes of mass and heat transfer lead to solving boundary value problems for parabolic equations in a domain with a moving in time boundary (non-cylindrical domain). These processes are the most important factor that affects, for example, the reliability of various contact systems. Due to the increased speed-in-action of the electrical contacts, that is, because of the short duration of the process, it is experimentally impossible to determine accurately the temperature field of the contact system and the dynamics of its change in time. Therefore, the study of boundary value problems of heat conduction in domains with moving boundary and the degeneracy at the initial time is actual. Consideration of a wide range of issues of mathematical physics [1], [2], in particular, the solving of boundary value problems in the heat equation degenerating domains leads to the need to study the singular integral equations of Volterra type when the norm of a integral operator is equal to unit. These problems have a direct connection with the theory of loaded equations [3], [4]. It turned out that these issues have a close connection with the problem of establishing the classes of uniqueness from [5]–[8], which have been further developed in [9]–[16] and other works.
2 On classes of uniqueness
Let us give a brief overview of some works on uniqueness classes for parabolic equations. In the domain for the boundary value problem
the following classes of uniqueness are established: , (Holmgren [5]). (Tikhonov [6]). , (Täcklind [7]). For the boundary value problem in :
where A is the linear elliptic operator of orders 2p, the following classes of uniqueness are established:
(Ladyzhenskaya [9] for one equation with coefficients depending only on t).
(Oleinik [10] for systems of parabolic equations with coefficients depending on x and t; [11] for the Cauchy-Neumann problem in an unbounded domain, arbitrarily ‘tapering’ at infinity).
We also note works of Oleinik and Radkevich [12], Gagnidze [13], Kozhevnikova [14]–[16], and others, devoted to the establishment of classes of uniqueness for parabolic equations and systems.
3 VP Mihajlov’s example on the existence of non-trivial solution for the homogeneous Dirichlet problem in the degenerate domain
Let be the domain bounded by a closed curve Γ: , passing through the origin of coordinates and the point and symmetrical with respect to the axis 0t. The boundary value problem [8]
has a non-trivial solution
We note that although , the following inclusions hold:
4 Statement of the boundary value problem L
In the domain it is required to find a solution to the heat conduction equation
satisfying the boundary conditions
where has to belong to the class
when
It is required to show that problem (1)-(2) has not in the class (3) non-trivial solutions.
We note that the functions
satisfying (1), do not belong to (3).
Boundary value problems of the form (1)-(2) arise in the mathematical modeling of thermophysical processes in high-current electric arc of the disconnecting device. Tool for describing the physics of the processes in the arc is the heat equation, in which the influence of the heat sources in the arc and the effect of the contraction of the axial section of the arc in the cathode region to a contact spot are taken into account. The diameter of the contact spot is several orders smaller than the diameter of the developed section of the arc column and this fact gives the chance to consider the contact spot as a mathematical point. The solution domain changes over time according to the law which is defined by the conditions of the bridging contact. At the fixed terminal time the contacts close and the solution domain of the problem degenerate. From a mathematical point of view, problematic nature of the problem consists in the presence of a moving boundary and degeneracy of the solution domain at the fixed terminal time. It should be emphasized that the boundary value problems for parabolic equations in a domain with a moving boundary are fundamentally different from the classical problems. Due to the size of the domain depending on the time for this type of problems methods of separating the variables and integral transformations not be applied, as remaining within the classical methods of mathematical physics you cannot conform the solution of the heat equation to the motion of the border line of the heat transport domain.
In addition, the finding of a nonzero solution of the homogeneous problem (1)-(2) allows one to define precisely the uniqueness classes.
5 Reduction of problem L(1)-(2) to an integral equation
We are looking for a solution of boundary problem (1)-(2) as the sum of the heat potentials of the double layer [17]
Using conditions (2) and the properties of heat potentials, we have the following system of integral equations for the unknown densities and [17], p.480]:
Excluding from system (5) , we find
We introduce the following notation:
where
Here we have used substitution in integral and the known equality [18], p.321, 3.325]
Substituting the value of the integral into (8) we have
In view of (8)-(9), we rewrite (7) in the form
where
We note that the kernel has the following properties:
-
(1)
and is continuous on ;
-
(2)
;
-
(3)
, .
Indeed, properties (2) and (3) follow from the following equality:
where , t satisfy a condition .
To prove (3) we note that the first summand of this equality tends to zero when , since for large for the exponent we have the inequality:
Here we have used the asymptotic formula [17], p.718, Formula 3].
6 Investigation of the integral equation (10)
In the homogeneous integral equation (10) we transform its kernel. Using the relations
we obtain
where
It is well known that in order to solve (10) it is sufficient to find a solution of the following equation:
To solve (13) we introduce the following substitutions:
As a result, (13) takes the form
From the latter equation using the next substitution of the required function,
we obtain
Applying to (14) the Laplace transform, we obtain
that is, we have
The general solution of differential equation (15) is determined by the following formula:
To find the original of this function, we rewrite it in the form of a series
Applying the inverse Laplace transform to (17) we have
By inverse substitutions , and recalling that equality (18) takes the form
that is, for (10) a non-trivial solution is given by
Thus, (19) defines a solution of the homogeneous integral equation (13) and (20) defines a solution of the homogeneous integral equation (10), respectively.
However, the solution (4) of problem (1)-(2) defined by the function (20) does not belong to class (3), defined by the inclusion of
when
that is
For violation of condition (3), it is sufficient to show it for the solution (4), corresponding to the first term of the sum (20) which is constant. Violation of condition (3) really takes place, the homogeneous boundary value problem L (1)-(2) in class (3) has only the trivial solution.
Thus we have established the following.
Proposition 1
For the boundary value problem L (1)-(2) in class (3)
7 Statement of the adjoint boundary value problem
In the domain we consider the following problem: it is required to find a non-trivial solution to the heat conduction equation
satisfying the boundary conditions:
where has to belong to the class
and
It is required to show that problem (21)-(22) has in class (23) only one non-trivial solution.
We note that the functions
8 Reduction of problem (21)-(22) to an integral equation
We are looking for a solution of boundary problem (21)-(22) as the sum of the heat potentials of the double layer [17]
Using conditions (22) and the properties of heat potentials, we have the following system of integral equations for the unknown densities and [17], p.480]:
Excluding from the system (25) , we find
where
and
Here we have used the substitution in the integral and the known equality [18], p.321, 3.325]
Substituting the value of the integral into (28), we have
In view of (28)-(29), we rewrite (27) in the form
where
We note that the kernel has the following properties:
-
(1)
and is continuous on ;
-
(2)
, ;
-
(3)
.
Indeed, taking into account that we have
From the last equality, the validity of properties (2), (3) of the function follows.
9 Investigation of the integral equation (30)
An important feature of (30) given by property (3) of the kernel is expressed by the fact that the corresponding non-homogeneous equation cannot be solved by the method of successive approximations.
We note that boundary value problems for spectrally loaded parabolic equation are reduced to analogous integral equations when the load line moves according to the law [19]–[21].
In the homogeneous integral equation (30) we transform its kernel. Using the relations
we obtain
where
It is well known that to solve (30) it is sufficient to find a solution of the following equation:
10 Solving the characteristic equation
To study the integral equation (33) we allocate its characteristic part, namely
where
and
Equation (34) is the characteristic equation for (33) since
Assuming that the right side of (34) is known, we will find its solution, that is, the solution to the characteristic equation.
Similarly, as in [22], [23], (34) will be reduced to an equation with a difference kernel. To this end, performing in (34) the substitutions
we have
or, further,
The homogeneous equation corresponding to (37) has the unique solution (); a solution of the non-homogeneous equation (37) is a function
where (see [24], p.86, according to the (1.2.56)] for )
After substitutions inverse to (36) we obtain the solution of the non-homogeneous equation (34):
where
11 Reducing (33) to the Abelian equation
Using (39)-(40) for the solution of the characteristic equation (34) and taking into account (35) for the function , we obtain
We now calculate the inner integral in (41). We have
where
and
We calculate the integrals and . Making the substitution we find
For the integral using the equality [18], p.321, 3.325]
we obtain
So, we have
Substituting the value in (42), we obtain
Thus, (41) takes the form
Thus, the integral equation (33) is reduced to (43) which is a non-homogeneous Abelian integral equation of the second kind.
12 Solving the Abelian equation (43)
We will find a solution of the Abelian equation (43), corresponding homogeneous equation (33) (for simplicity, we assume a constant equal to unity).
The solution of the Abelian equation (43) is determined by the formula [25]
Direct verification [24] shows that the function (44) is indeed a solution to (43).
We note that after the multiplication of (44) by (i.e. with the substitution after (33)), we obtain the solution of the homogeneous equation corresponding to the initial equation (30)
We prove (44) using a representation of the solution of the Abelian equation (43) by using the convolution of the fundamental solution in the form of the Mittag-Leffler function [22], p.33, (1.90)]
with the right part of (43) with and , by the following Hille-Tamarkin formula [23], p.93]:
Here we use the replacement . To reduce solution (46) to (44) we use the following formula [18], p.383, 3.621.3, 3.621.4]:
In view of (47) from (46) we have
It remains to transform the first sum in (48):
since we have the decomposition [18], p.320 3.321 (1)]
The second sum of (48) is equal to
Thus, the solution presented using the convolution from (46) coincides with the solution (44).
13 Solving the initial boundary value problem (21)-(22)
Now we can find the solution of the homogeneous boundary value problem for the heat conductivity equation in an infinite angular domain,
which has a nonzero solution , defined by the formula
where
and the function is determined according to (45).
14 Estimate of non-trivial solution (49)
To find the class of the non-trivial solution (49) we find the accurate estimate on its order of growth
where
We estimate the second summand of (50). We have for
where we use the substitution . Further,
Since , we have for the function
where we use the substitution . Hence it follows
Thus we have
The first two inequalities can be replaced by the following one:
Further, for the first summand in the function (50) we have
We express the function as the sum
where
We have
where we use the substitution . Further, since , we have
Here we use following substitutions:
and
Thus we obtain
Using (53), we estimate the following summands of solutions and :
where we use the substitution .
Further we have
where .
Thus we have
Estimates for the functions (in the order of growth they are accurate) , , and (51), (52), and (54) determine the following estimate:
where
, , i.e.,
where
The following is established.
Proposition 2
For problem (21)-(22) in class (23)
15 The main result. Classes of uniqueness
Theorem
(The main result)
The boundary value problem L (1)-(2) is Noetherian, i.e.
From the above it follows that the classes of uniqueness for the boundary value problem (21)-(22) are determined, for example, by the following proposition.
Proposition 3
Classes of uniqueness are
where
Analyzing the previous expression for the function we obtain:
-
1.
, ;
-
2.
, .
16 Conclusion
To summarize, the following is established.
In an infinite angular domain for the homogeneous Dirichlet problem for the heat conduction equation the existence of a unique (up to a constant factor) non-trivial solution, which, however, does not belong to the class of summable functions with the weight found in the work is proved.
For the boundary value problem adjoint to the Dirichlet problem, the existence of a unique (up to a constant factor) non-trivial solutions, which belongs to the class of essentially bounded functions with the weight is found in the work is established.
In the weight class of summable functions it is shown that the index of the Dirichlet problem is equal to minus one.
Weight classes of uniqueness for the boundary value problem considered in the work are found.
Problems in non-cylindrical domains, similar to those considered in this paper are highly relevant not only for modeling the processes of electrical contact apparatuses but also in the related field of the designing plasma torches. Similar problems arise in creating the new technologies, the production of crystals, laser technology and in the other branches. Mathematical modeling these processes allows one to carry out the optimal choice of parameters and operating modes of technological equipment and maximize economic and environmental benefits. Finally, we note that the results can be developed for non-homogeneous boundary value problems of heat conduction, when the data are selected from the corresponding weight classes.
References
Kim EI: Solution of the certain class of singular integral equations with the line integrals. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1957, 113: 24-27. (in Russian) [Reshenie odnogo klassa singuljarnyh integral’nyh uravnenij s linejnymi integralami]
Kharin, SN: Thermal processes in the electrical contacts and related singular integral equations (in Russian) [Teplovye processy v jelektricheskih kontaktah i svjazannyh singuljarnyh integral’nyh uravnenij]. Dissertation for the degree of c.ph.-m.sc. 01.01.02, Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR, Almaty, 13 (1970)
Nakhushev AM: Loaded Equations and Their Applications. Nauka, Moscow; 2012.
Kozhanov AI: On a nonlinear loaded parabolic equation and the related with it inverse problem. Math. Notes 2004, 76(6):840-853. (in Russian) [Ob odnom nelinejnom nagruzhennom parabolicheskom uravnenii i o svjazannoj s nim obratnoj zadache]
Holmgren E: Sur les solutions quasi analytiques de l’equation de la chaleur. Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys. 1924, 18(9):64-95. (in Swedish)
Tikhonov AN: Théorèmes d’unicité pour l’équation de la chaleur. Sb. Math. 1935, 42: 199-216.
Täcklind, S: Sur les classes quasianalytiques des solutions des équations aux dérivées partielles du type parabolique (in French). Nova acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsaliensis. Ser. IV., vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 1-57 (1936)
Mikhailov VP: Existence and uniqueness theorem of the solution of a boundary value problem for parabolic equations in the domain with the singular points on the boundary. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics 1967, 47-58. (in Russian) [Teorema sushhestvovanija i edinstvennosti reshenija odnoj granichnoj zadachi dlja parabolicheskogo uravnenija v oblasti s osobymi tochkami na granice]
Ladyzhenskaya OA: On uniqueness of the Cauchy problem solution for a linear parabolic equation. Sb. Math. 1950, 27(69):175-184. (in Russian) [O edinstvennosti reshenija zadachi Koshi dlja linejnogo parabolicheskogo uravnenija]
Oleinik OA: On uniqueness of the Cauchy problem solution for general parabolic systems in the classes of increasing functions. Russ. Math. Surv. 1974, 29(5):229-230. (in Russian) [O edinstvennosti reshenija zadachi Koshi dlja obshhih parabolicheskih sistem v klassah rastushhih funkcij]
Oleinik OA: On examples of nonuniqueness of the boundary value problem solution for a parabolic equation in an unbounded domain. Russ. Math. Surv. 1983, 38(1):183-184. (in Russian) [O primerah needinstvennosti reshenija kraevoj zadachi dlja parabolicheskogo uravnenija v neogranichennoj oblasti] 10.1070/RM1983v038n01ABEH003409
Oleinik OA, Radkevich EV: The method of introducing a parameter for study of evolutionary equations. Russ. Math. Surv. 1978, 33(5):7-76. (in Russian) [Metod vvedenija parametra dlja issledovanija jevoljucionnyh uravnenij] 10.1070/RM1978v033n05ABEH002513
Gagnidze AG: On uniqueness classes of solutions of the boundary value problems for the second order parabolic equations in an unbounded domain. Russ. Math. Surv. 1984, 39(6):193-194. (in Russian) [O klassah edinstvennosti reshenij kraevyh zadach dlja parabolicheskih uravnenij vtorogo porjadka v neogranichennoj oblasti] 10.1070/RM1984v039n06ABEH003185
Kozhevnikova LM: On uniqueness classes of solutions of the first mixed problem for a quasilinear parabolic system of the second order in an unbounded domain. Izv. Math. 2001, 65(3):51-66. (in Russian) [O klassah edinstvennosti reshenija pervoj smeshannoj zadachi dlja kvazilinejnoj parabolicheskoj sistemy vtorogo porjadka v neogranichennoj oblasti] 10.1070/IM2001v065n03ABEH000335
Kozhevnikova LM: Uniqueness classes of solutions of the first mixed problem for the equation with the quasi-elliptic operator A in the unbounded domains. Sb. Math. 2007, 198(1):59-102. (in Russian) [Klassy edinstvennosti reshenij pervoj smeshannoj zadachi dlja uravnenija s kvazijellipticheskim operatorom A v neogranichennyh oblastjah] 10.4213/sm1519
Kozhevnikova LM: Examples of non-uniqueness of solutions of the mixed problem for the heat equation in the unbounded domains. Math. Notes 2012, 91(1):67-73. (in Russian) [Primery needinstvennosti reshenij smeshannoj zadachi dlja uravnenija teploprovodnosti v neogranichennyh oblastjah]
Tikhonov AN, Samarskii AA: Equations of the Mathematical Physics. 4th edition. Nauka, Moscow; 1972.
Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM: Tables of Integrals, Series and Products. Fizmatgiz, Moscow; 1963.
Jenaliyev MT, Ramazanov MI: The Loaded Equations as Perturbations of Differential Equations. Gylym, Almaty; 2010.
Akhmanova DM, Jenaliyev MT, Ramazanov MI: On a particular second kind Volterra integral equation with a spectral parameter. Sib. Math. J. 2011, 52(1):3-14. (in Russian) [Ob osobom integral’nom uravnenii Vol’terra vtorogo roda so spektral’nym parametrom] 10.1134/S0037446606010010
Amangaliyeva MM, Akhmanova DM, Jenaliyev MT, Ramazanov MI: Boundary value problems for a spectrally loaded heat operator with load line approaching the time axis at zero or infinity. Differ. Equ. 2011, 47(2):231-243. (in Russian) [Kraevye zadachi dlja spektral’no-nagruzhennogo operatora teploprovodnosti s priblizheniem linii zagruzki v nule ili na beskonechnosti] 10.1134/S0012266111020091
Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI: Integrals and Derivatives of Fractional Order and Some of Their Applications. Nauka i Technika, Minsk; 1987.
Nakhushev AM: Fractional Calculus and Its Application. Fizmatgiz, Moscow; 2003.
Akhmanova DM, Jenaliyev MT, Kosmakova MT, Ramazanov MI: On a singular integral equation of Volterra and its adjoint one. Bull. Univ. Karaganda, ser. Math. 2013, 3(71):3-10.
Akhmanova DM, Kosmakova MT, Ramazanov MI, Tuimebayeva AE: On the solutions of the homogeneous mutually conjugated Volterra integral equations. Bull. Univ. Karaganda, ser. Math. 2013, 2(70):153-158.
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by Committee of Science of the Ministry of Education and Scinces (Grant 0112 RK 00619/GF on priority ‘Intellectual potential of the country’).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
he Jenaliyev, M., Amangaliyeva, M., Kosmakova, M. et al. About Dirichlet boundary value problem for the heat equation in the infinite angular domain. Bound Value Probl 2014, 213 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-014-0213-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-014-0213-4