Abstract
A domain, degenerating at the initial moment of time, is considered. A boundary value problem of heat conduction in this domain is studied. By virtue of the isotropy property, the solvability theorems for given boundary value problem are established in weight spaces of essentially bounded functions. The proof of the theorems is based on the solvability conditions of a nonhomogeneous integral equation of the third kind. Using the Fourier series method, the problem splits into families of boundary value problems. The method of representation of the solution to the boundary value problem in the form of sum of constructed thermal potentials is used. The given problem is reduced to the problems of solvability of integral equations. In addition, the solvability theorems for the boundary value problems are proved also for the case, when the axial symmetry property is absent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 INTRODUCTION
In modern electrical devices, super-strong and ultra-weak currents are used very often, so there is a need to study new phenomena that were not previously observed when using currents of the normal, medium range. For example, it was experimentally established that when the contacts of the current circuit breakers open, a liquid-metal bridge appears for a short time, which significantly affects the erosion of the contact material [1]. In [2], a mathematical model is presented that describes the transitional phenomena accompanying a vacuum short arc at the initial stage of contact opening. This allows the authors to describe the evolution of the transitional short anode dominant arc, which appears immediately after the fracture of the molten bridge.
Earlier, the boundary value problems (BVP) of heat conduction in one-dimensional degenerating domains is studied (see [3–6]). The application of the method of thermal potentials [7] allows us to reduce the boundary-value problem with a moving boundary to an Volterra type integral equation of the second kind. The integral equation was singular, since the corresponding homogeneous equation (and hence the original homogeneous boundary-value problem) had nonzero solutions [5, 6, 8, 9]. Moreover, the method of successive approximations is not applicable to solve the integral equation in our case. So, we have applied the Carleman–Vekua regularization method. The existence of a solution of the considered problem is reduced to the investigation of a singular integral equation. The unique solvability of BVP is also considered in [10, 11]. In [12], the BVP is equivalently reduced (in the meaning uniqueness and existence of the solution) to Volterra integral equation of the second kind. Note that integral equations with similar singularities arise in the study of BVP with loaded equations or problems with boundary value conditions containing the derivatives [13, 14].
In this paper, we study a two-dimensional BVP with respect to spatial variables in an inverted cone \(G=\left\{\left(x;y,t\right):x^{2}+y^{2}<t^{2},0<t<T\right\}\) for the equation
on the lateral surface of the cone
where \(u_{\textrm{c}}(x,y,t)\) is a given function.
The BVP (1)–(2) simulates the temperature field in a plasma body of an electrical discharge between high-voltage disconnecting contacts [15]. These contacts were initially in the closed state. Taking into account the short duration of the process, there are no instruments that can measure the specified temperature field. It is necessary, at least qualitatively, to evaluate the nature of the carrying out of these thermal processes using methods of mathematical modeling.
In [16], the solvability of BVP (1), (2) in the case, when the isotropy property on an angular coordinate holds, is studied. In other word, a BVP of heat conduction in polar coordinates is studied in [16]. The method of representation of the solution to the BVP in the form of a sum of constructed thermal potentials is used. The problem was reduced to the study of a degenerating Abel integral equation. The fundamental solution of the auxiliary initial-boundary value problem for the thermal potentials is studied in [17]. In this case, the BVP for the ordinary differential equation is obtained. In [18], using the method of the degenerate kernel, the BVP is also integrated as an ordinary differential equation.
This paper consists of an introduction, two sections, and a conclusion. In the first section, we present results on the solvability issues for boundary value problem (1), (2) in the case of the isotropy property. These results are stated in Theorem 2 (classes of solutions to the BVP of heat conduction in polar coordinates) and Theorem 3 (classes of solutions to BVP (1), (2). The proofs of these theorems are based on Theorem 1 regarding the solvability of integral equation to which the posed boundary value problem is reduced. In [16] these results are presented without proofs. In this paper, we give a complete proof of Theorem 3.
The second section provides a process for solving the original BVP that is a process for solving the BVP in the absence of axial symmetry. To solve the problem, it is split into two families of BVP, for which the solvability issues were studied in the previous section. The results of this section are formulated as two theorems (Theorem 4 and Theorem 5).
2 SOME BACKGROUND
In this section we consider the case of the isotropy property on an angular coordinate for BVP (1), (2). Then the BVP is reduced to an integral equation ([16]) and solvability theorems are formulated for the obtained integral equation and the posed boundary value problem.
2.1 Reducing a Boundary Value Problem to an Integral Equation
Converting to polar coordinates in problem (1), (2) and assuming that the isotropy property is fulfilled along the angular coordinate (case of axial symmetry), we encounter the following problem:
In the domain \(\Omega=\{(r,t):0<r<t,0<t<T\}\), to find a solution to BVP:
Usually, instead of condition (4), a limit relation on the boundedness of the solution is required, that is, \(|u(r,t)|\neq\infty\) as \(r\to 0.\) We assume that the solution \(u(r,t)\) has a singularity as \(r\to 0\), that is, we assume that \(u(r,t)\) may have some growth order as \(r\to 0\). We associate this assumption with the property of a fundamental solution to the Laplace operator in the center of the circle. Thus, we admit the presence of some growth property of the required solution \(u(r,t)\) to equation (3) (this will be specified below in Theorems 2 and 3.
As is known (see [19, p. 76, Problem 1.2.2-7]), the function
is a fundamental solution to equation (3), where \(\xi\) is a parameter. \(I_{\mu}(\eta)\) is the modified Bessel function. Using Green’s formula as in [7, p. 476–480], we write the integral representation of the solution to equation (3). Satisfying this solution representation to conditions (4), (5), we get a degenerating Abel integral equation (an integral equation of the third kind) [16]:
where the right-hand side \(f(t)\) of equation (6) contains a unknown function \(\varphi(t)\).
Equations of the form (6) have been the subject of study for many authors. Here, we indicate only the following papers [20–23] and note the numerous studies that are cited in them. In [22], the unique solvability of the integral equation is established, under the assumption that a order of degeneracy is strictly less than unity when degeneracy is determined by the degree of the independent variable \(t\). In ‘[20], an operator acts in the space of quadratically summable functions. Necessary and sufficient conditions are established for representation of the operator as the sum of an operator of multiplication by a bounded function and an integral operator. This sum is called the integral operator of the third kind.
In [21, 23–25] some Volterra-type integral equations are considered. Kernels of the integral operators do not have singularities. Kernels of the integral operators with singularities are considered in [5].
The order of degeneracy in equation (6) is equal to unity, and the kernel of the integral operator has a weak singularity and determines the Abel integral operator. We had studied [16] the solvability of equation (6) in the weight class of essentially bounded functions. In general, when studying BVP, approach based on reduction the problem to integral equations is used often. In [26] the existence of a regular solution of the Gellerstedt spectral problem is also proved by the method of integral equations.
2.2 Solvability Theorems
The theorem on the solvability of integral equation (6) is valid:
Theorem 1. Let \(t^{-1/2}f(t)\in L_{\infty}(0,T)\) . Then integral equation (6) has a general solution
i.e. \(t^{-1/2}\varphi(t)\in L_{\infty}(0,T)\) , where \(C=\textrm{const}\) , \(\varphi_{1hom}(t)\) and \(\varphi_{1part}(t)\) are solutions to homogeneous (when \(f(t)\equiv 0\) ) and nonhomogeneous integral equations (6), respectively.
In [16], using the assertion of Theorem 1, we find the class of solutions to boundary value problem (3)–(5).
Theorem 2. Let \(t^{-1}u_{0}(t)\) , \(t^{-1/2}u_{1}(t)\in L_{\infty}(0,T)\) . Then, BVP (3)–(5) has a general solution
i.e. \(r^{1/2}u(r,t)\in L_{\infty}(\Omega)\) , where \(C=\textrm{const}\) , \(u_{hom}(r,t)\) and \(u_{part}(r,t)\) are solutions to homogeneous (when \(u_{0}(t)\equiv 0\) , \(u_{1}(t)\equiv 0\) ) and nonhomogeneous boundary value problems (3)–(5), respectively.
For the axisymmetric case, the following result follows from Theorem 2.
Theorem 3. Let \(t^{-1/2}u_{1}(t)\equiv t^{-1/2}u_{c}(x,y,t)\big{|}_{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}=t}\in L_{\infty}(0,T)\) . Then, BVP (1), (2) has a general solution
i.e. \((x^{2}+y^{2})^{1/4}u(x,y,t)\in L_{\infty}(G)\) , where \(C=\textrm{const}\) , \(u_{hom}(x,y,t)\) and \(u_{part}(x,y,t)\) are solutions to (homogeneous, when \(u_{\textrm{c}}(x,y,t)\equiv 0\) ) nonhomogeneous boundary value problems (1), (2).
The proofs of these two theorems are based on Theorem 1 regarding the solvability of integral equation (6).
2.3 Proof of Solvability Theorem for Integral Equation (6)
We study solvability issues in the class of essentially bounded functions \(\psi(t)\in L_{\infty}(0;+\infty)\) for the following degenerating Abel’s equation (integral equation of the third kind):
where \(\lambda\) is a given positive constant and \(F(t)\) is a given function such that \(F(t)/t\in L_{\infty}(0;+\infty)\).
2.3.1. Solution to a homogeneous integral equation for (7). The homogeneous integral equation
along with a trivial solution has a nontrivial solution
up to a constant factor. Indeed, applying the Laplace transform to equation (8), we obtain
where \(\hat{\psi}_{hom}(p)\) is the Laplace image of the function \(\psi_{hom}(t)\).
A solution to equation (10) is determined by the formula
A simple substitution shows that function (9) really satisfies the homogeneous integral equation (8).
2.3.2. Particular solution to the nonhomogeneous integral equation (7): Construction of the resolvent. Applying the Laplace transform to equation (7), we obtain
where \(\hat{\psi}_{part}(p)\) is the Laplace image of the function \(\psi_{part}(t)\). Using the solution (11) of homogeneous differential equation (10), by the method of variation of a constant we find a particular solution \(\hat{\psi}_{part}(p)\) of the nonhomogeneous equation (12):
where from (12), it follows that
Hence, from (13), (14), for the Laplace image of the particular solution, we obtain
where
Integrating in parts and using [27, p. 336, formula 3.322.1] for \(\hat{I}(p,\tau)\), we obtain
From (16), (17), we obtain
where
We now find an original for the image \(\hat{R}(p,\tau)\) (19). Obviously, the required original can be found as a convolution of originals of the following two images \(\exp\left\{-2\lambda\sqrt{p}\right\}\) and \(\hat{E}(p,\tau)={\textrm{erfc}}\left(\sqrt{\tau p}-\lambda/\sqrt{\tau}\right).\)
Applying Jordan’s Lemma ([28, p. 410–412], we have
Hence (according to the replacement \(z_{1}=iz\)) the following equality is true:
To obtain the resolvent of the studied equation, we write the above formulas for inverting the images of the Laplace transform:
1\({}^{0}\). \(\exp\left\{-\tau p\right\}\div\delta(t-\tau),\)
2\({}^{0}\). \(\exp\left\{-2\lambda\sqrt{p}\right\}\div\displaystyle\frac{\lambda\exp\left\{-\lambda^{2}/t\right\}}{\sqrt{\pi}t^{3/2}},\)
3\({}^{0}\). \(\frac{\lambda\sqrt{\pi}}{\tau^{3/2}}\exp\left\{\lambda^{2}/\tau\right\}{\textrm{erfc}}\left(\sqrt{\tau p}-\lambda/\tau^{3/2}\right)\div\displaystyle\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{\pi}t\tau\sqrt{t-\tau}}\exp\left\{-\frac{\lambda^{2}}{t-\tau}\right\}\).
In addition, from (18), (19) and 1\({}^{0}\)–3\({}^{0}\), we obtain
where
We calculate in (21) the function \(g(t,\tau)\):
Here, we have used formula 2.3.16.4 from [30, Vol. 1, p. 277]. Substituting (22) into formula (21), from (20) we obtain
According to relations (15), (23), we obtain the following result.
A particular solution \(\psi_{part}(t)\) of the nonhomogeneous integral Abel equation (7) is determined by the relation
where \(R(t,\tau)\) and a resolvent \(R^{*}(t,\tau)\) are defined according to the relations (20)–(23).
2.3.3. Estimate of the resolvent. According to the formulas (21) and (23)–(24), we represent the resolvent in the form
where
The following result takes place.
For all \(\{(t,\tau):0<\tau<t<\infty\}\), the following estimates hold:
for resolvent \(\tau R(t,\tau)\) (25). Indeed,
where \(C_{1}=const\) and
where \(E(\alpha)=\sqrt{\pi}\alpha{\textrm{erfc}}(\alpha)\exp(\alpha^{2}).\)
Here, we need to consider two kinds of features of the function \(R_{2}(t,\tau)\): first, as \(\tau\to t\) and \(t>0\), and second, as \(t\to 0\). In both cases, we use the asymptotics ([7, p. 718]:
Since by virtue of (26), \(E(\alpha)\rightarrow 1\), \(\alpha\rightarrow+\infty,\) and \(|E(\alpha)|<M=const\) \(\forall\tau>0\), \(t>0\). Then,
where \(C_{2}=const\).
The application of Lemmas 2.1–2.4 from [16] completes the proof of Theorem 3.
3 FURTHER RESULTS: BVP (1), (2) IN A DEGENERATING DOMAIN IN THE CASE OF ANISOTROPY OF THE HEAT CONDUCTION ALONG AN ANGULAR COORDINATE
In this case, boundary value problem (3)–(5) takes the following form: in the domain \(\Omega_{1}=\{(r,\theta,t):\ 0<r<t,\ 0\leq\theta<2\pi,\ 0<t<T\}\), find a solution to the equation
satisfying the boundary conditions
where \(\partial\Omega_{1}\) is a lateral surface of the cone.
We apply the Fourier series method (variable separation method) to boundary value problem (27)–(29). So, we seek the required solution \(u(r,\theta,t)\) in the form
Substituting (30) into (27)–(29), we obtain
The solution to the spectral problem:
is a system of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues:
As a result, we obtain
Furthermore, taking into account (31)–(34) from (27)–(29), we obtain a family of boundary value problems for the heat equation:
where
Thus, we obtain a family of boundary value problems (35)–(37), each of which is a boundary value problem of the form (3)–(5). The solvability of these boundary value problems has already been considered (Theorems 2 and 3). According to the assertion of Theorem 2, we find their solutions \(\{v_{n}(r,t),\ n\in\mathbf{Z}\}\), and further, using (33)–(34), we formally construct the series
According to Theorem 2, the solutions of boundary value problems (35)–(37) satisfy the estimate
and a series (formula 5.4.11.2 from [30, p. 585]):
converges for \(\forall t>0\). Thus, due to the convergence of series (38) and according to the assertion of Theorem 2, we obtain the following estimate:
Remark. For equation (27), the fundamental solution is a function [19, p. 181, Problem 2.2.2-1]:
Then, for its averaging over the angular coordinate with weights
the following relations are valid:
\(n\in\{0,1,2,3,...\}\).
Equalities (39) follow from a property of evenness in a variable \(\theta\) of the function \(G_{1}\), and equalities (40) are obtained using formula 2.5.40.3 from [30, p. 370] (in addition to the property of evenness). When \(n=0\), this formula follows from the following remarkable identity: \(\forall\eta\in[0,2\pi]\)
Furthermore, from (39)–(40), we obtain for all \(n\in\mathbf{Z}\)
Thus, we find that each of the boundary problems (35)–(37) corresponds to its own fundamental solution, defined by formulas (41). Using the corresponding fundamental solutions (41), we can solve each of the BVP (35)–(37). Note that this way differs from the proof of Theorems 2 and 3. As a result, taking into account the fact that modified Bessel functions \(\{I_{n}(x),\ n=0,1,2,...\}\) for large values of the argument \(x\) have the same asymptotics, we can obtain the same result that is formulated below theorem. Note that these asymptotics determine the characteristic parts of the integral equations that are usually defined in the Carleman–Vekua regularization method.
Thus, the following theorems are proved for the case where there is no condition of axial symmetry in the angular coordinate \(\theta\).
Theorem 4. Let \(t^{-1}u_{0}(t)\) , \(t^{-1/2}v_{1n}(t)\in L_{\infty}(0,T)\) , \(n\in\mathbf{Z}.\) Then, each of the BVP (35)–(37) has a general solution \(v_{n}(r,t)=Cv_{n,hom}(r,t)+v_{n,part}(r,t)\in L_{\infty}(\Omega;r^{1/2}),\) i.e. \(r^{1/2}v_{n}(r,t)\in L_{\infty}(\Omega)\) , \(n\in\mathbf{Z},\) where \(C=\textrm{const}\) , \(v_{n,hom}(r,t)\) and \(v_{n,part}(r,t)\) are solutions to (homogeneous, when \(u_{0}(t)\equiv 0\) , \(v_{n,1}(t)\equiv 0\) ) nonhomogeneous boundary value problems (35)–(37).
Theorem 5. Let \(t^{-1/2}u_{1}(\arctan\left(y/x\right),t)\big{|}_{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}=t}\equiv t^{-1/2}u_{c}(x,y,t)\big{|}_{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}=t}\in L_{\infty}(\partial\Omega_{1}).\) Then, BVP (1), (2) has a general solution
i.e. \((x^{2}+y^{2})^{1/4}u(x,y,t)\in L_{\infty}(G),\) where \(C=\textrm{const}\) , \(u_{hom}(x,y,t)\) and \(u_{part}(x,y,t)\) are solutions to (homogeneous, when \(u_{\textrm{c}}(x,y,t)\equiv 0\) ) nonhomogeneous BVP (1)–(2).
4 CONCLUSION
By the axial symmetry, the initial BVP (1), (2) was reduced to the BVP (3)–(5). Furthermore, the last problem was reduced to solving the degenerating Abel integral equation of the second kind and the solvability of which was studied. We also noted that boundary condition (4) agrees with the found class of solutions \(u(r,t)\leq Cr^{-1/2}\), \(\{r,t\}\in\Omega\).
We studied a general case where there is no property of axial symmetry. In this case, we proved that Theorems 4 and 5 establish the solvability of boundary value problem (1), (2). The results of this work are a continuation of the research from the work [16].
REFERENCES
R. Holm, Electrical Contacts: Theory and Application, 4th ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1967).
S. N. Kharin, ‘‘Mathematical models of heat and mass transfer in electrical contacts,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE 61st Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, San Diego, CA, Oct. 11–14, 2015 (2015).
M. M. Amangaliyeva, M. T. Jenaliyev, M. T. Kosmakova, and M. I. Ramazanov, ‘‘About Dirichlet boundary value problem for the heat equation in the infinite angular domain,’’ Bound. Value Probl. 213, 1–21 (2014).
M. T. Dzhenaliev and M. I. Ramazanov, ‘‘On a boundary value problem for a spectrally loaded heat operator. II,’’ Differ. Equat. 43, 513–534 (2007).
M. T. Jenaliyev, M. I. Ramazanov, and M. Yergaliyev, ‘‘On the coefficient inverse problem of heat conduction in a degenerating domain,’’ Applic. Anal. 99, 1026–1041 (2020).
M. N. Kalimoldayev and M. T. Jenaliyev, ‘‘To the theory of modeling of electric power and electric contact systems,’’ Open Eng. 6, 455–463 (2016).
A. N. Tikhonov and A. A. Samarskii, Equations of the Mathematical Physics (Nauka, Moscow, 1972; Dover, New York, 2011).
M. M. Amangaliyeva, M. T. Jenaliyev, M. T. Kosmakova, and M. I. Ramazanov, ‘‘On one homogeneous problem for the heat equation in an infinite angular domain. I,’’ Sib. Math. J. 56, 982–995 (2015).
M. M. Amangaliyeva, M. T. Jenaliyev, M. T. Kosmakova, and M. I. Ramazanov, ‘‘On a Volterra equation of the second kind with ’incompressible’ kernel,’’ Adv. Differ. Equat. 71, 1–14 (2015).
T. K. Yuldashev, B. I. Islomov, and A. A. Abdullaev, ‘‘On solvability of a Poincare-Tricomi type problem for an elliptic-hyperbolic equation of the second kind,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 42, 663–675 (2021).
T. K. Yuldashev and O. Kh. Abdullaev, ‘‘Unique solvability of a boundary value problem for a loaded fractional parabolic-hyperbolic equation with nonlinear terms,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 42, 1113–1123 (2021).
A. K. Urinov and A. B. Okboev, ‘‘Nonlocal boundary-value problem for a parabolic-hyperbolic equation of the second kind,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 41, 1886–1897 (2020).
M. T. Jenaliyev, ‘‘Loaded parabolic equations and boundary value problems of heat conduction in non-cylindrical degenerating domains,’’ Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 113, 527–537 (2017).
M. T. Jenaliyev and M. I. Ramazanov, ‘‘On a homogeneous parabolic problem in an infinite corner domain,’’ Filomat 32, 965–974 (2018).
E. I. Kim, V. T. Omel’chenko, and S. N. Kharin, Mathematical Models of Thermal Processes in Electrical Contacts (Gylym, Alma-Ata, 1977) [in Russian].
M. T. Jenaliyev, M. I. Ramazanov, M. T. Kosmakova, and Zh. M. Tuleutaeva, ‘‘On the solution to a two-dimensional heat conduction problem in a degenerate domain,’’ Euras. Math. J. 11 (3), 89–94 (2020).
M. T. Kosmakova, A. O. Tanin, and Zh. M. Tuleutaeva, ‘‘Constructing the fundamental solution to a problem of heat conduction,’’ Bull. Karag. Univ., Math. 97, 68–78 (2020).
T. K. Yuldashev, ‘‘Spectral features of the solving of a Fredholm homogeneous integro-differential equation with integral conditions and reflecting deviation,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 40, 2116–2123 (2019).
A. D. Polyanin, Handbook of Linear Equations of Mathematical Physics (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].
V. B. Korotkov, ‘‘On the integral operators of the third kind,’’ Sib. Math. J. 44, 829–832 (2003).
S. G. Krein and I. V. Sapronov, ‘‘One class of solutions of Volterra equations with regular singularity,’’ Ukr. Math. J. 49, 424–432 (1997).
A. M. Nakhushev, ‘‘Inverse problems for degenerate equations and Volterra integral equations of the third kind,’’ Differ. Equat. 10, 100–111 (1974).
I. V. Sapronov, ‘‘On a class of solutions of Volterra equation of II kind with a regular feature in Banach spaces,’’ Russ. Math. (Iz. VUZ) 48 (6), 45–55 (2014).
A. I. Kozhanov, ‘‘Study of the solvability of some Volterra-type integral and integro-differential equations of third kind,’’ Dokl. Math. 97, 38–41 (2018).
M. T. Jenaliyev and M. I. Ramazanov, ‘‘On a singular Volterra integral equations of the third kind,’’ AIP Conf. Proc. 1759, 020085-122–138 (2016).
T. K. Yuldashev, B. I. Islomov, and E. K. Alikulov, ‘‘Boundary-value problems for loaded third-order parabolic-hyperbolic equations in infinite three-dimensional domains,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 41, 926–944 (2020).
I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products (Elsevier, Burlington, 2007).
M. A. Lavrent’ev and B. V. Shabat, The Methods of the Theory of Functions of Complex Variable (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 1993) [in Russian].
A. P. Prudnikov, Yu. A. Brychkov, and O. I. Marichev, Integrals and Series, Vol. 2: Special Functions (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2003; Taylor Francis, London, 2002).
A. P. Prudnikov, Yu. A. Brychkov, and O. I. Marichev, Integrals and Series, Vol. 1: Elementary Functions (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2002; Gordon and Breach, New York, 1986).
Funding
This work was supported by the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Education and Sciences RK (Grant nos. AP09259780, 2021-2023; AP0885372, 2020-2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
(Submitted by T. K. Yuldashev)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramazanov, M.I., Kosmakova, M.T. & Tuleutaeva, Z.M. On the Solvability of the Dirichlet Problem for the Heat Equation in a Degenerating Domain. Lobachevskii J Math 42, 3715–3725 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080222030179
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080222030179