Abstract
Understanding inequality energy consumption at the global level delivers key insights for strategies to mitigate climate change. Recent contributions [4, 28, 48, 49] have studied energy inequality through the lens of maximum entropy. They claim a weighted international distribution of total primary energy demand should approach a Boltzmann-Gibbs maximum entropy equilibrium distribution in the form of an exponential distribution. This implies convergence to a Gini coefficient of 0.5 from above. The present paper challenges the validity of this claim and critically discusses the applicability of statistical equilibrium reasoning to economics from the viewpoint of social accounting. It is shown that the exponential distribution is only a robust candidate for a statistical equilibrium of energy inequality when employing one particular accounting convention for energy flows, the substitution method. But this method has become problematic with a higher renewable share in the international energy mix, and no other accounting method supports the claim of a convergence to a 0.5 Gini. We conclude that the findings based on maximum entropy reasoning are sensitive to accounting conventions and critically discuss the epistemological implications of this sensitivity for the use of maximum entropy approaches in social sciences.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
O. Akizu-Gardoki, G. Bueno, T. Wiedmann, J.M. Lopez-Guede, I. Arto, P. Hernandez, D. Moran, J. Clean. Prod. 202, 1145 (2018)
S. Anand, P. Segal, The global distribution of income, in Handbook of income distribution (Elsevier B.V., 2015), pp. 37–979
A.B. Atkinson, J. Econ. Theory 2, 244 (1970)
A. Banerjee, V.M. Yakovenko, New J. Phys. 12, 075032 (2010)
J.K. Boyce, Ecol. Econ. 150, 52 (2018)
L. Chancel, T. Piketty, Carbon and Inequality: from Kyoto to Paris, Paris Sch. Econ. 1, 1–4 (2015)
Z. Csereklyei, M. Rubio-Varas, D.I. Stern, Energy J. 37, 1 (2016)
Z. Darvas, World Dev. 121, 16 (2019)
P.L. Dos Santos, Complexity 2017, 9 (2017)
P.L. dos Santos, E. Scharfenaker, Ind. Corp. Chang. 28, 1587 (2019)
A. Dragulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 585 (2011)
U. Dubois, H. Meier, Energy Res, Soc. Sci. 18, 21 (2016)
J.A. Duro, Energy Policy 83, 257 (2015)
J.A. Duro, V. Alcántara, E. Padilla, Ecol. Econ. 69, 2468 (2010)
EIA, Monthly Energy Review (U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2019)
E. Farjoun, M. Machover, Laws of Chaos: a probabilistic approach to political economy (Verso, London, 1983)
D.K. Foley, J. Econ. Theory. 62, 321 (1994)
R. Fouquet, Energy Res, Soc. Sci. 22, 7 (2016)
A. Fremstad, M. Paul, Ecol. Econ. 163, 88 (2019)
J.K. Galbraith, M. Berner, Inequality and industrial change?: a global view (2001)
F. Hedenus, C. Azar, Ecol. Econ. 55, 351 (2005)
M.K. Heun, P.E. Brockway, Appl. Energy 251, 112697 (2019)
International Energy Agency, Word energy balances 2018 (International Energy Agency, Paris, 2018)
J.D. Jenkins, Energy Policy 69, 467 (2014)
J. Koomey, Z. Schmidt, H. Hummel, J. Weyant, Environ. Model. Softw. 111, 268 (2019)
V. Krey, O. Masera, G. Blanford, T. Bruckner, R. Cooke, K. Fisher-Vanden, H. Haberl, E. Hertwich, E. Kriegler, D. Mueller, S. Paltsev, L. Price, S. Schlömer, D. Ürge-Vorsatz, D. van Vuuren, T. Zwickel, Annex II: metrics and methodology, in Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate, edited by O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, J.C. Minx (2014)
R. Lahoti, A. Jayadev, S.G. Reddy, J. Glob. Dev. 7, 61 (2016)
S. Lawrence, Q. Liu, V.M. Yakovenko, Entropy 15, 5565 (2013)
T. Lawson, The nature of social reality (Routledge, Oxford, New York, 2019)
J. Macknick, Carbon Manag. 2, 189 (2011)
A. Maza, J. Villaverde, Energy Policy 36, 4255 (2008)
B. Milanovic, Worlds apart (Princeton University Press, 2005)
B. Milanovic, Global inequality?: a new approach for the age of globalization (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016)
M. Nino-Zarazua, L. Roope, F. Tarp, Rev. Income Wealth 63, 661 (2016)
G.P. Peters, R.M. Andrew, J.G. Canadell, S. Fuss, R.B. Jackson, J.I. Korsbakken, C. Le Quéré, N. Nakicenovic, Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 118 (2017)
N.D. Rao, J. Min, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev, Clim. Chang. 9, 1 (2018)
N.D. Rao, S. Pachauri, Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 25011 (2017)
M. Ravallion, Eur. Econ. Rev. 111, 85 (2019)
J. Rogelj, A. Popp, K.V. Calvin, G. Luderer, J. Emmerling, D. Gernaat, S. Fujimori, J. Strefler, T. Hasegawa, G. Marangoni, V. Krey, E. Kriegler, K. Riahi, D.P. Van Vuuren, J. Doelman, L. Drouet, J. Edmonds, O. Fricko, M. Harmsen, P. Havlk, F. Humpenöder, E. Stehfest, M. Tavoni, Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 325 (2018)
E. Scharfenaker, G. Semieniuk, Metroeconomica 68, 465 (2017)
G. Semieniuk, Economic Growth: Is Faster Growth Greener?, SOAS Dep. Econ. Work. Pap. Ser. 208, 2018
G. Semieniuk, L. Taylor, A. Rezai, D.K. Foley, Do the IPCC 1.5 °C scenarios stand up to historical scrutiny?, SOAS Econ Work. Pap. Ser., 2020
A. Shaikh, I. The U.S.-China Trade Balance and the Theory of Free Trade: Debunking the Currency Manipulation Argument, Weber, New Sch. Dep. Econ. Work. Pap., Working Papers 1805, 2018
T. Sousa, P.E. Brockway, J.M. Cullen, S.T. Henriques, J. Miller, A.C. Serrenho, T. Domingos, Ecol. Econ. 141, 11 (2017)
Y. Tao, X. Wu, T. Zhou, W. Yan, Y. Huang, H. Yu, B. Mondal, V.M. Yakovenko, J. Econ. Interact. Coord. 14, 345 (2019)
J.J. Teixidó, S.F. Verde, Ecol. Econ. 138, 109 (2017)
UN, The united nations energy statistics database (United Nations Energy Statistics Division, New York, 2016)
V. Yakovenko, Sci. Culture 76, 430 (2010)
V.M. Yakovenko, Applications of statistical mechanics to economics: entropic origin of the probability distributions of money, income, and energy consumption, in Social fairness and economics: economic essays in the spirit of Duncan Foley, edited by L. Taylor, A. Rezai, T. Michl (Routledge, Oxford, New York, 2013), pp. 53–82
J. Yang, J. Econ. Surv. 32, 940 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Semieniuk, G., Weber, I.M. Inequality in energy consumption: statistical equilibrium or a question of accounting conventions?. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 229, 1705–1714 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900125-5
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900125-5