Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is an established causative agent for gastric cancer. Although the oral cavity is a part of the gastrointestinal system, the presence and possible causative role of HP in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a subject of controversy. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate HP infection in two cohorts of OSCC patients with different demographic characteristics, lifestyles and habitual risk factors. A total of 242 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded OSCC specimens from two different patient cohorts (Norway, n = 171 and Nepal, n = 71) were used to examine HP using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Two different HP specific genes (23S rRNA and ureA) were used for TaqMan-based qPCR, and for subsequent verification using HP specific RIDAGENE HP kit and SYBR Green based qPCR. All of the OSCC specimens from both cohorts were found to be negative for HP infection with IHC and qPCR, although the positive control specimens tested positive. Our findings suggest that HP is absent in the examined OSCC cohorts, irrespective of race, lifestyle and habitual risk factors. This indicates that, in contrast to gastric cancer, HP is an unlikely contributing factor for OSCC pathogenesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Oral cancer is a highly aggressive malignant tumor arising from the anterior 2/3 of tongue, buccal mucosa, gingiva, floor of the mouth and hard palate. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), the most common histologic variant, represents more than 90% of oral cancer cases1. Combined with malignancies in the lip and pharynx, oral cancer ranks as the 7th most common cancer type worldwide with approximately 300 000 deaths every year2. Despite improvements in the diagnostic and treatment modalities, 5-year survival of OSCC patients remains around 60%3. Smokeless tobacco (such as betel quid, ghutka), alcohol and smoking are the most important risk factors for OSCC in Southeast Asia; whereas smoking and alcohol are important in the western countries4,5. Nevertheless, a fraction of OC cases cannot be linked to the aforementioned risk factors. This indicates the possibility of other factors including microorganisms in the pathogenesis of OSCC. Indeed, approximately 20% of human malignancies have been attributed to microorganisms6. In this context, it is worth mentioning that the oral cavity harbors approximately 700 different bacterial species7, and dysbiosis of several of the oral bacteria has been reported in OSCC specimens and/or brush biopsies and saliva from OSCC patients as compared to the normal controls8,9,10,11.
Helicobacter pylori (HP) is a gram negative, spiral-shaped bacterium, which is estimated to infect the stomach of almost half of the world’s population. HP was considered to be a class I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group in 199412. HP infection is considered to be the most common cause of infection-related cancers, particularly gastric cancer along with MALT lymphoma13,14. Elimination of HP infection is associated with the reduction in the risk of gastric cancer development from the HP infected gastric precancerous lesions, further supporting the link with gastric carcinogenesis15. HP can be divided into CagA-positive and CagA-negative types based on the presence or absence of cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA). CagA-positive HP are considered more carcinogenic than the CagA-negative type. At the molecular level, CagA protein (encoded by CagA gene) is delivered into the gastric epithelial cells by a bacterial type IV secretion system, which in turn deregulates SHP2 oncoprotein and its downstream signaling pathways, thereby contributing to the transformation of gastric epithelial cells16.
HP has been shown to be present in dental plaque and saliva17 and to colonize different parts of the oral cavity (reviewed in18). HP infection has been linked to several disease conditions in the oral cavity, such as stomatitis, glossitis and periodontitis17,19. Given the role of HP in gastric carcinogenesis and observations that HP could colonize and lead to inflammatory conditions in the oral cavity, one could hypothesize that HP infection might be related to the development of oral precancer and cancerous lesions, at least in a subset of HP positive lesions. Only a handful of studies have attempted to look at the presence of HP in OSCC, with conflicting results20,21,22,23. Some studies have linked the presence of HP with oral cancer progression; others have shown no significant association or even protective effect20,22,24. Interestingly, betel chewing has been reported to be associated with higher risk for HP infection in OSCC21, indicating that OSCC-related habitual risk factors might influence the susceptibly for HP infection. This study aimed to investigate HP infection status in two cohorts of OSCC specimens, one from Nepal and one from Norway, with differing race, lifestyle and habitual risk factors for OSCC, by using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Results
Clinicopathological characteristics of OSCC
The clinicopathological characteristics of the specimens used are summarized in Supplementary Table S1,S2. Briefly, the median age of Nepalese OSCC cases was 56 years, and that of Norwegian cases was 66. The male to female ratio for Nepalese cases was 3:1, whereas for Norwegian cases it was 1.5:1.
IHC
The positive control (gastric biopsies) showed brown colored rod/filament shaped HP mostly located in the gastric pits (Fig. 1A). However, all of the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) OSCC specimens (n = 71) from Nepal tested negative for HP with IHC (Fig. 1B).
DNA yield, sensitivity and amplification of TaqMan based qPCR assay
The range of DNA yield from OSCC FFPE sections was between 1.4 to 575 ng/ µl. Only 5.7% (n = 14) of samples yielded DNA concentration of less than 10 ng/µl. The purity (260/280 ratio) of 95% of samples (n = 230) was higher than 1.8.
Amplification of serially diluted DNA from positive control DNA showed that as little as 6 femtograms could be amplified by the TaqMan based assay (Fig. 2A,B). The amplification of ureA and 23S rRNA was found to be 95% and 87% efficient, respectively (data not shown).
Amplification of HP specific genes using in-house TaqMan based qPCR assay
Among the OSCC specimens (n = 242) from Norway and Nepal, the human HBB gene (coding for human beta globulin) could not be amplified in 7.02% of samples (n = 17), indicating poor quality of DNA and were therefore excluded from the study. All of the remaining OSCC specimens (n = 225) tested negative for HP specific genes with TaqMan based assay. Nevertheless, DNA from positive controls tested positive for both 23S rRNA and ureA genes (Fig. 2A–C).
Amplification of HP specific genes using RIDAGENE HP kit
DNA from the OSCC specimens were examined by using an independent RIDAGENE HP kit PCR. The DNA from positive controls resulted in good amplification of internal control DNA and HP specific genes (Fig. 2D,E). Despite the good amplification of internal control DNA, HP specific genes could not be amplified from DNA from OSCC samples (Fig. 2D,E).
Amplification of HP specific genes using SYBR green-based qPCR assay
Although HP specific genes were amplified for the DNA from positive controls, none of the tested OSCC samples showed amplification for these genes (data not shown).
Discussion
Using two different detection techniques (IHC and qPCR), the current work aimed to investigate HP infection in two different OSCCs cohorts (Norway and Nepal) differing with respect to race, lifestyle and habitual risk factors for OSCC.
Several methods (culture, serology, rapid urease test, histology/IHC, PCR) are available for the detection of HP in different types of specimens, each with some advantages and limitations25. The combination of qPCR and IHC was chosen in the current study as the use of these methods in FFPE specimens has been well assessed for HP detection with reasonably high sensitivity and specificity26. qPCR, being a highly sensitive method, is very sensitive to the quality of DNA input, well designed primer pairs and selection of proper detection chemistry27. To address these issues, several quality control measures were used in the current study. Firstly, all OSCC specimens with Ct values of >37 or not amplified for human HBB gene, indicating a poor quality of isolated DNA, were excluded from the study (Fig. 2C). Secondly, serial dilution series of DNA from the positive controls were used to examine the amplification efficiency (95% for ureA and 87% for 23S rRNA) of the in-house TaqMan PCR system (Fig. 2A,B). Indeed, our in-house TaqMan PCR protocol was able to amplify bacterial DNA template from as little as 6 femtograms. Thirdly, commercially available RIDAGENE HP kit was used to confirm the results of in-house TaqMan qPCR. Moreover, internal control DNA included in the RIDAGENE HP kit suggested that there was no obvious inhibition to PCR amplification due to possible carry-over components in the DNA template (Fig. 2D,E). Finally, independent validation using a SYBR Green-based qPCR corroborated the results from in-house TaqMan qPCR and RIDAGENE HP kit. Similarly, proper positive and negative controls were used for IHC to ensure the validity of the method. These measures ensure that the HP test protocols in the current study were accurate and reproducible.
In the current study, none of the OSCC samples was found to be HP positive with IHC, although the positive control gastric biopsy demonstrated HP infection, primarily in the gastric pit (Fig. 1A). Supporting these results, HP specific genes (ureA and 23SrRNA) were not amplified by qPCR in any of the OSCC specimens, although they were readily amplified in the positive controls (Fig. 2A–D). The current findings are in line with some previous studies reporting either an absence or lower rate of HP positivity in dental plaque, saliva or OSCC specimens, thereby questioning a causative role for HP in OSCC development28,29,30,31. However, another study has reported a higher rate of HP positivity (21.5%) in OSCC specimens, suggesting a link between HP and OSCC22. Interestingly, several other studies have found a relatively high HP seropositivity in OSCC patients as well as in healthy controls and suggested that either HP is not linked to OSCC or it can even have a protective effect on OSCC pathogenesis20,21,24. Overall, these observations cannot establish a role for HP in OSCC, either as carcinogenic or as a protective factor.
Several factors such as type and size of sample used, sample collection procedure, methodology used, and type of population studied might be responsible for these variable observations. Indeed, with the exception of the study by Grimm et al.22, a majority of the above-mentioned studies have used relatively smaller sample sizes. Moreover, there exists a wide variation in the sensitivities of different test methods (Supplementary Table S3). Positive serology and rapid urease test do not necessarily reflect the true HP status in biopsy specimens examined32,33. The current study benefited from the use of a large cohort of OSCCs and two different detection methods, with subsequent independent validation protocols. There is a wide variation in HP prevalence with respect to geography, race and lifestyle34,35. Betel chewing, a common habit in Southeast Asia, has been suggested to predispose for HP infection in oral cavity21. Absence of HP in both Nepalese and Norwegian cases with 36.6% and 0% cases with history of betel chewing respectively, suggest that betel quid might not predispose for HP infection in OSCC.
The current study has limitations. Although excluded from the analysis, about 7% OSCC cases were found to have a lower DNA quality, and availability of corresponding fresh tissues for at least for some of FFPE tissues would have been useful to examine the effect of DNA quality. The current study lacks information on the prior use of antibiotics (triple therapy), as it has been shown to eliminate HP from oral cavity in 40% of individuals36. In addition, oral health status17 as well as information on concurrent HP status in stomach37, considered to be important determinants for oral HP, are also unavailable. In conclusion, although oral cavity (dental plaque and saliva) has been considered as a primary extragastric reservoir for HP, the results of the current study suggest that HP is uncommon in OSCCs irrespective of race, lifestyle and habitual risk factors; and is an unlikely contributing factor for OSCC pathogenesis.
Material and Methods
Specimens
The tissue samples used in the current study consisted of FFPE archival OSCC specimens from Nepal (Chitwan) and Norway (Bergen). The specimens were collected respectively from B.P. Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital (BPKMCH) (between 2011 and 2014) and Haukeland University Hospital (between 1998 and 2012). Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. Collection of specimens from Nepal was approved by the Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in West Norway (2011/1244 REK vest) and Nepal Health Research Council (ref 526/2012); and specimens from Bergen by the Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in West Norway (2010/481 REK vest). A total number of 242 FFPE OSCCs (n = 71 from Nepal and n = 171 from Norway) were used for DNA qPCR, whereas 71 OSCCs (all from Nepal) were used for HP IHC. Protocols used for the tissue collection, processing (formalin fixation and paraffin embedding) and storage at BPKMCH were similar to that at Haukeland University Hospital. Briefly, diagnostic/surgical biopsy specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for up to 48 hours (depending on the size of the specimens), dehydrated using increasing ethanol concentrations and xylene, and embedded in paraffin. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant ethical guidelines and regulations of the University of Oslo, where the experiments were performed.
IHC
A total of 71 (n = 71) FFPE specimens of OSCC from Nepal (specimens from Norway were not used for HP IHC), were used for the immunohistochemical detection of HP. The details of the clinicopathological parameters of the OSCC patients are summarized in Supplementary Tables S1,S2. Four-micron thick FFPE sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in decreasing concentrations of ethanol and antigen retrieval was done by pressure cooker treatment in Tris-EDTA buffer, pH 9.0 (Cat. no: S2367 DAKO). Blocking was done with 10% goat serum in 3% bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature. Polyclonal rabbit anti-HP primary antibody (Code B047, DAKO, 1:100 dilutions) was applied for 45 minutes at room temperature. After inactivation of peroxidase by incubating with DAKO REAL (code S2023, DAKO) peroxidase blocking solution, anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase labeled polymer (EnVision System, DAKO) was applied for 30 min. Presence of antigen was visualized by staining with 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, DAKO), counterstained with hematoxylin (DAKO) and mounted with EUKITT mounting medium. Sections incubated only with antibody diluent (Cat. no: S0809, DAKO) instead of primary antibody served as negative controls. HP positive human gastric samples, regularly used as positive controls at the diagnostic lab at the Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, were used as positive controls in the current study. IHC was evaluated by SP and DS using Nikon E90i microscope equipped with DS-Ri1 camera using the NIS-elements software.
DNA extraction
Serially cut tissue sections (7 μm) from FFPE tissues (n = 242) were used for extraction of DNA. New microtome blade was used for sectioning every new sample. Additionally, microtome was thoroughly cleaned with DNA removal solution (DNA AWAY, Cat. no: 7010, Molecular BioProducts, USA) before and after sectioning of each paraffin block. The first paraffin section was discarded to minimize the effect of oxidized DNA on the surface of FFPE block. Several incubation times and temperatures for the treatment with proteinase K were tested and overnight incubation at 56 °C was found to be most efficient for DNA extraction from OSCC samples. Treatment with MetaPolyzyme (enzyme cocktail to break down the cell wall of bacteria, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. no: MAC4L) was found not to improve DNA yield and amplification of HP genes in the positive control samples, and therefore was not used for DNA isolation. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, cat. no: 56404) was used for DNA extraction from FFPE sections. Briefly, eight to ten consecutive sections, depending upon the size of available tissue in FFPE blocks, were placed in a 1.5 ml eppendorf tube with the help of disposable long neck pipette tips. The tissue was deparaffinized in xylene and ethanol, and digested with proteinase K overnight at 56 °C. DNA was eluted in 75 µl volume of ATE buffer. DNA concentration was measured with a NanoDrop 2000cSpectrophotometer (ND-1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).
Primer design and qPCR
Primer pairs and corresponding TaqMan probe sequences for two different HP specific genes (23S rRNA38, ureA39) (Table 1) were modified, and used for TaqMan- and SYBR- based qPCR systems. Primer pairs specific to human HBB gene (coding for Beta globulin)40 was used to assess the quality of isolated DNA. Serially diluted DNA isolated from HP positive gastric biopsy and HP culture (CCUG 39500 T) was used to examine the amplification efficiency, optimal reaction conditions (DNA input, primer and probe concentrations and cycling conditions) as well as used as positive controls. Samples where DNA template was replaced with an equal volume of sterile water served as negative controls.
TaqMan PCR assays
Following manufacturers’ instructions, up to 200 nanograms of DNA per sample was used in a 20 μl reaction volume in 96-well PCR plate (ABgene, cat.no AB-0600) for PCR amplification of respective genes using Mx3005P qPCR system in a single replicate. Briefly, the 20 μl reaction mixture contained 10 μl of 2x Brilliant III Ultra-Fast qPCR master mix (Agilent Technologies, cat. No: 600880-51), 2 μl probe (5 µM) and primer (2,5 µM) mixture, 0,3 μl of Rox 1/500, 2,7 μl of nuclease free water and 5 µl of DNA. Master mix contained a mixture of mutant Taq DNA polymerase, dNTPs, MgCl2 (5.5 Mm) and a buffer specially formulated for fast cycling. PCR amplification was performed in Mx3005P qPCR system using the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 45 amplification cycles (95 °C for 10 sec, and 60 °C for 30 sec). The data were analyzed with MxPro qPCR Software version 4.10. Samples with more than 37 Ct values were considered negative41.
SYBR green PCR assays
Amplification efficiency of the primers (Table 1) were examined by using an independent master mix chemistry, SYBR green (SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix, BIO-RAD, cat. no: 1725271). Additionally, 9 OSCC where human HBB gene could not be amplified with TaqMan system, were examined using SYBR green system. The concentrations of the primers and template DNA, and the cycling conditions were same as that for TaqMan system.
Verification with RIDAGENE HP kit
Presence of HP DNA in the OSCC samples and positive control was also examined by using RIDAGENE HP kit (cat. no: PG2305, r-biopharm). Previous studies have shown excellent sensitivity and specificity of this kit for the detection of HP in gastric biopsy42. This kit is based on Taq-polymerase enzyme chemistry and consists of primer pairs/probes for the HP specific genes and internal control DNA. Randomly selected OSCC samples (n = 60) and positive control DNA from gastric biopsy and HP culture were used for this kit. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, up to 100 nanograms of DNA template was used for PCR amplification.
Data availability
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ariyoshi, Y. et al. Epidemiological study of malignant tumors in the oral and maxillofacial region: survey of member institutions of the Japanese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2002. Int J Clin Oncol 13, 220–228, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0756-9 (2008).
Shield, K. D. et al. The global incidence of lip, oral cavity, and pharyngeal cancers by subsite in 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 67, 51–64, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21384 (2017).
Liu, F. et al. Prospective study on factors affecting the prognosis of oral cancer in a Chinese population. Oncotarget 8, 4352–4359, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13842 (2017).
Nair, U., Bartsch, H. & Nair, J. Alert for an epidemic of oral cancer due to use of the betel quid substitutes gutkha and pan masala: a review of agents and causative mechanisms. Mutagenesis 19, 251–262, https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geh036 (2004).
Warnakulasuriya, S. Causes of oral cancer – an appraisal of controversies. Bdj 207, 471, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.1009 (2009).
de Martel, C. et al. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis. Lancet Oncol 13, 607–615, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70137-7 (2012).
Dewhirst, F. E. et al. The Human Oral Microbiome. J Bacteriol. 192, 5002–5017, https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00542-10 (2010).
Al-hebshi, N. N. et al. Inflammatory bacteriome featuring Fusobacterium nucleatum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa identified in association with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 7, 1834, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02079-3 (2017).
La Rosa, G. R. M. et al. Association of oral dysbiosis with oral cancer development. Oncol Lett 19, 3045–3058, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11441 (2020).
Zhao, H. et al. Variations in oral microbiota associated with oral cancer. Sci Rep. 7, 11773, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11779-9 (2017).
Hayes, R. B. et al. Association of oral microbiome with risk for incident head and neck squamous cell cancer. JAMA Oncol. 4, 358–365, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4777 (2018).
Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 7-14 June 1994. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 61, 1–241 (1994).
Eidt, S. & Stolte, M. The significance of Helicobacter pylori in relation to gastric cancer and lymphoma. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7, 318–321 (1995).
Uemura, N. & Okamoto, S. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on subsequent development of cancer after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer in Japan. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 29, 819–827, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8553(05)70149-7 (2000).
Wong, B. et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication to prevent gastric cancer in a high-risk region of china: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291, 187–194, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.2.187 (2004).
Hatakeyama, M. Helicobacter pylori and gastric carcinogenesis. J Gastroenterol 44, 239–248, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-009-0014-1 (2009).
Souto, R. & Colombo, A. P. Detection of Helicobacter pylori by polymerase chain reaction in the subgingival biofilm and saliva of non-dyspeptic periodontal patients. J Periodontol 79, 97–103, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070241 (2008).
Adler, I. et al. Helicobacter pylori and oral pathology: relationship with the gastric infection. World J Gastroenterol 20, 9922–9935, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9922 (2014).
Anand, P. S., Nandakumar, K. & Shenoy, K. T. Are Dental Plaque, Poor Oral Hygiene, and Periodontal Disease Associated With Helicobacter pylori Infection? J Periodontol. 77, 692–698, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050163 (2006).
Meng, X. et al. An inverse association of Helicobacter pylori infection with oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 45, 17–22, https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12324 (2016).
Fernando, N. et al. Presence of Helicobacter pylori in betel chewers and non betel chewers with and without oral cancers. BMC Oral Health 9, 23, https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-23 (2009).
Grimm, M., Munz, A., Exarchou, A., Polligkeit, J. & Reinert, S. Immunohistochemical detection of Helicobacter pylori without association of TLR5 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 43, 35–44, https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12082 (2014).
Gupta, A. A., Kheur, S., Raj, A. T. & Mahajan, P. Association of Helicobacter pylori with oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 24, 13–23, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03125-2 (2020).
Grandis, J. R., Perez-Perez, G. I., Yu, V. L., Johnson, J. T. & Blaser, M. J. Lack of serologic evidence for Helicobacter pylori infection in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 19, 216–218 (1997).
Garza-González, E., Perez-Perez, G. I., Maldonado-Garza, H. J. & Bosques-Padilla, F. J. A review of Helicobacter pylori diagnosis, treatment, and methods to detect eradication. World J Gastroenterol 20, 1438–1449, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1438 (2014).
Miftahussurur, M. & Yamaoka, Y. Diagnostic Methods of Helicobacter pylori Infection for Epidemiological Studies: Critical Importance of Indirect Test Validation. Biomed Res Int. 2016, 14, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4819423 (2016).
Valasek, M. A. & Repa, J. J. The power of real-time PCR. Adv Physiol Educ 29, 151–159, https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00019.2005 (2005).
Singh, K., Kumar, S., Jaiswal, M. S., Chandra, M. & Singh, M. Absence of Helicobacter pylori in oral mucosal lesions. J Indian Med Assoc 96, 177–178 (1998).
Dayama, A., Srivastava, V., Shukla, M., Singh, R. & Pandey, M. Helicobacter pylori and oral cancer: possible association in a preliminary case control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12, 1333–1336 (2011).
Martinez-Gomis, J., Diouf, A., Lakhssassi, N. & Sixou, M. Absence of Helicobacter pylori in the oral cavity of 10 non-dyspeptic subjects demonstrated by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Oral Microbiol Immunol 21, 407–410, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2006.00295.x (2006).
Olivier, B. J. et al. Absence of Helicobacter pylori within the oral cavities of members of a healthy South African community. J Clin Microbiol 44, 635–636, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.2.635-636.2006 (2006).
Morand, G. B. et al. Detection of Helicobacter pylori in patients with head and neck cancer: Results from a prospective comparative study combining serology, polymerase chain reaction, and rapid urease test. Head & Neck 38, 769–774, https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23958 (2016).
Aktepe, O. C., Ciftçi, I. H., Safak, B., Uslan, I. & Dilek, F. H. Five methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori in the Turkish population. World J Gastroenterol 17, 5172–5176, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i47.5172 (2011).
Epplein, M. et al. Race, African ancestry, and Helicobacter pylori infection in a low-income United States population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20, 826–834, https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1258 (2011).
den Hollander, W. J. et al. Ethnicity is a strong predictor for Helicobacter pylori infection in young women in a multi-ethnic European city. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28, 1705–1711, https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12315 (2013).
Gebara, E. C. E. et al. Persistence of Helicobacter pylori in the oral cavity after systemic eradication therapy. J Clin Periodontol 33, 329–333, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00915.x (2006).
Okuda, K. et al. Helicobacter pylori May Have Only a Transient Presence in the Oral Cavity and on the Surface of Oral Cancer. Microbiol Immunol 44, 385–388, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1348-0421.2000.tb02510.x (2000).
Kirveskari, J. & Rautelin, H. Method for detecting helicobacter pylori dna in a stool sample. Finland patent (2013).
Ramírez-Lázaro, M. J. et al. Real-Time PCR Improves Helicobacter pylori Detection in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding. PLOS ONE 6, e20009, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020009 (2011).
Kobayashi, D. et al. Gastric mucosal density of Helicobacter pylori estimated by real-time PCR compared with results of urea breath test and histological grading. J Med Microbiol 51, 305–311, https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-51-4-305 (2002).
Lins, A. K., Lima, R. A. & Magalhaes, M. Clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in Recife, Brazil, directly identified from gastric biopsies by polymerase chain reaction. Arq Gastroenterol 47, 379–382, https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032010000400011 (2010).
Bénéjat, L., Ducournau, A., Lehours, P. & Mégraud, F. Real-time, P. C. R. for Helicobacter pylori diagnosis. The best tools available. Helicobacter 23, e12512, https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12512 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Bindu Shrestha and Manohar Shrestha for assistance with collection, processing and storage of specimens at BPKMCH; Evan Michael Vallenari (UiO, IOB) for his valuable contribution in language editing, and Siren Fromreide (UiB) for providing SP with necessary lab training on Immunohistochemistry and FFPE specimen sectioning. This study was funded by starting grant at UiO for DS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.S. and F.C.P. conceived and designed research; D.S., A.C.J., D.E.C., C.B.P., D.K.G. and F.C.P. contributed with specimens and reagents; S.P. and B.F.-A. performed the experiments; S.P., B.F.-A. and D.S. analyzed the data. S.P., B.F.-A. and D.S. wrote the manuscript. D.S., D.E.C. and F.C.P. supervised the work. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pandey, S., Follin-Arbelet, B., Pun, C.B. et al. Helicobacter pylori was not detected in oral squamous cell carcinomas from cohorts of Norwegian and Nepalese patients. Sci Rep 10, 8737 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65694-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65694-7
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Machine learning-based approaches for cancer prediction using microbiome data
Scientific Reports (2023)