Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the main pathogen associated with pulmonary exacerbation in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). CF is a multisystemic genetic disease caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene, which mainly affects pulmonary function. P. aeruginosa isolated from individuals with CF in Brazil is not commonly associated with multidrug resistance (MDR), especially when compared to global occurrence, where the presence of epidemic clones, capable of expressing resistance to several drugs, is often reported. Due to the recent observations of MDR isolates of P. aeruginosa in our centers, combined with these characteristics, whole-genome sequencing was employed for analyses related to antimicrobial resistance, plasmid identification, search for phages, and characterization of CF clones. All isolates in this study were polymyxin B resistant, exhibiting diverse mutations and reduced susceptibility to carbapenems. Alterations in mexZ can result in the overexpression of the MexXY efflux pump. Mutations in oprD, pmrB, parS, gyrA and parC may confer reduced susceptibility to antimicrobials by affecting permeability, as observed in phenotypic tests. The phage findings led to the assumption of horizontal genetic transfer, implicating dissemination between P. aeruginosa isolates. New sequence types were described, and none of the isolates showed an association with epidemic CF clones. Analysis of the genetic context of P. aeruginosa resistance to polymyxin B allowed us to understand the different mechanisms of resistance to antimicrobials, in addition to subsidizing the understanding of possible relationships with epidemic strains that circulate among individuals with CF observed in other countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous microorganism capable of adapting to several environments. It is an opportunistic pathogen associated with airway infections, which, when well established, is practically impossible to eradicate, especially the chronicity. This morbidity can culminate in pulmonary exacerbations and irreversible lung damage in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) [1].
CF is a multisystemic, autosomal recessive disease caused by cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations located on the long arm of chromosome 7, involving mucus and sweat producer cells. The lungs are the most severely affected, increasing mucus viscosity and inability to clear bacteria, resulting in chronic airway inflammation. Airway damage mainly occurs due to bacterial infections caused by typical microorganisms, which can lead to reduced lung function, leading to decreased quality of life in patients with CF [2,3,4].
P. aeruginosa possesses a diverse pool of resistance mechanisms, such as porins, efflux pumps and enzymes, affecting its susceptibility to several antimicrobial classes, such as β-lactams, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones and polymyxins [5, 6]. Resistance to carbapenems, mediated by permeability alterations and carbapenemases, is a significant concern as carbapenems are considered first-line drugs in the treatment of airway infections caused by P. aeruginosa in CF [5, 7, 8]. Similarly, resistance to polymyxins, facilitated by alterations in two-component system (TCS) and acquisition of exogenous DNA (plasmid mcr gene) is also a cause for concern since polymyxins are often considered a last resort treatment for MDR P. aeruginosa [9,10,11].
One of the challenges encountered in P. aeruginosa infection is the existence of multidrug-resistant strains and their spread among patients with CF [12], such as the Liverpool, Manchester, Midlands, Australia, Denmark, and Canada strains [13, 14]. Phylogenetic analysis aims to identify common bacterial clones that can be used as strains with important resistance profiles against CF [3, 15].
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a standard technique for investigating outbreaks and bacterial typing. In addition to the rapid identification of agents that cause infections with high accuracy, it allows the detection of genes associated with antimicrobial resistance and relevant virulence factors. Despite the high cost and requirement for specialized professionals, it has been adopted by several laboratories and hospital institutions. In silico analysis of bacterial data obtained from WGS guarantees speed in the characterization and management of outbreaks, personalized therapy, and facilitates approaches in the control of nosocomial infections [16].
In recent years, an increase in P. aeruginosa isolates obtained from individuals with CF, followed up in two centers in Rio de Janeiro, showed decreased susceptibility to carbapenems, polymyxin B, and other antimicrobials [17]. This results in difficulties in the treatment and eradication of the pulmonary environment; therefore, it is necessary to analyze the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of these isolates. The aim of this study was to perform a genetic analysis of P. aeruginosa resistance to polymyxin B, which may contribute to understanding the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance, its phylogeny, and other important genomic aspects.
Materials and methods
Clinical specimens
Isolation and identification
We selected ten P. aeruginosa isolates from microbiological cultures of the respiratory secretions of five patients with CF (1 to 4 isolates per individual), obtained between 2010 and 2014 (Table 1), and stored in the bacteriological collection at the State University of Rio de Janeiro. Isolates from archived strains were used and no patient data were consulted for this study, therefore, informed consent was not obtained. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (CAAE: 79547616.1.0000.5259), and the approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
Biochemistry test evaluations of the oxidative metabolism of glucose (non-fermentative), oxidase production (positive), arginine decarboxylation (positive), and physiological tests, such as motility and growth at 42ºC were conducted as previously described [18]. The sample inclusion criteria was a non-susceptibility profile to polymyxin B using the supplemental colistin agar test [19].
Antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST)
Disk-diffusion test (DDT) was performed for the following antimicrobials: piperacillin-tazobactam (PPT) (100/10 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ) (30 µg), cefepime (FEP) (30 µg), meropenem (MER) (10 µg), imipenem (IMP) (10 µg), doripenem (DOR) (10 µg), aztreonam (ATM) (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP) (5 µg), amikacin (AMI) (30 µg) and tobramycin (TOB) (10 µg) (Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD, Sparks, NV, USA) as described in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [19]. The P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 strain was used as a quality control.
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by broth microdilution technique [20] only to polymyxin B (10.000 µg/mL, Sigma, St. Louis, USA) using the quality control strain P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853, and the breakpoints of ≤ 2 µg/mL as intermediate and ≥ 4 µg/mL as resistant [19].
Bacterial resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents
P. aeruginosa isolates were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) when they were resistant to ≥ 1 agent in ≥ 3 antimicrobial categories tested; and as extensively drug-resistant (XDR) when they were resistant to ≥ 1 agent in all but ≤ 2 categories tested as it was described by Magiorakos and collaborators [21].
Genomic analysis and bioinformatic tools (in silico analysis)
Bacterial DNA were extracted and purified from recent bacterial cultures using a QIAmp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). DNA was quantified by the QuantiFluor® (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) system, genomic libraries were created using Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation (Illumina Inc, California, USA) kit, and then sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq System (Illumina Inc, California, USA).
Reads quality control were carried out in FastQC v.0.11.9 (usergalaxy.org.au) program and then assembled in contigs using Unicycler v.0.4.8 [22] in Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC) (bv-brc.org) platform. Annotations were performed using Rapid Annotation Subsystem Technology (rast.nmpdr.org/rast.cgi) and BV-BRC (bv-brc.org). The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) database was used to ensure the integrity of the sequences using BLASTn and BLASTp tools. Extrinsic resistance genes were identified using the Center for Genomic Epidemiology tool, ResFinder (cge. food. dtu. dk/services/Resfinder/), and intrinsic resistance genes were identified using the BV-BRC databases. The sequences were aligned using the P. aeruginosa PAO1 reference strain in Bioedit (bioedit.software.informer.com/7.2/). Plasmids were assembled and annotated using Galaxy Australia (usergalaxy.org.au) tools, plasmidSPAdes v.3.9.0 [23] and Bakta v.1.5.0 [24]. The online tool PHAge Search Tool Enhanced Release was used for phages [25]. Molecular typing was performed using the Public Database for Molecular Typing and Microbial Genome Diversity (pubmlst. org/), and the ST relation of the samples was compared with epidemic CF clones using the Grapetree tool [26].
The WGS Shotgun projects have been deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the following accession numbers: JAPTHH000000000 (9876, BioProject PRJNA890687), JAOYMC000000000 (10,705, BioProject PRJNA890688), JAOYMD000000000 (11,227, BioProject PRJNA890692), JAOYME000000000 (14,297, BioProject PRJNA890694), JAOYMF000000000 (14,339, BioProject PRJNA890695), JAOYMG000000000 (17,138, BioProject PRJNA890696), JAOYMG000000000 (17,749, BioProject PRJNA890697), JAOYMI000000000 (17,801, BioProject PRJNA890698), JAOYMJ000000000 (17,828, BioProject PRJNA890700) and JAOYMK000000000 (17,973, BioProject PRJNA890701).
Results
The 10 P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to polymyxin, as noticed by screening tests, with MIC ranging from 4 to 8 µg/mL, highlighting that almost all had an MIC of 4 µg/mL. All isolates were tested against 10 different antibiotics using DDT. Full or intermediate resistance was observed for all antimicrobials evaluated, with the highest marker resistance observed for carbapenems (IMP and MER) and the lowest for CAZ. Five isolates were categorized as MDR, and four as XDR (Table 2).
After annotation of the genomes, the contigs per isolate ranged from to 45–120 with an average genome size of 6.434.232 kpb (6.250.921–6.738.939 kpb) and 72–58 RNA genes (Table 3).
According to molecular typing, the isolates were classified as ST252 (isolate 9876), ST865 (10,705), ST871 (14,297), ST2211 (17,138 and 17,749) and ST1560 (17,801). The three new STs were identified as ST4051 (11,227), ST4052 (14,339), and ST4053 (17,828 and 17,973) (Table 4). Using a phylogenetic tree, the following CF-transmissible strains of P. aeruginosa were compared with clinical isolates: Liverpool, Manchester, Midlands, Praire, Australian 1, 2, and 3, Denmark, Clone C, and Dutch strains. Through phylogenetic analysis based on the distances calculated from the known STs and the strains included in this study, it was not possible to establish phylogenetic correlation between the described isolates and the typical transmissible strains observed around the world (Fig. 1).
The genes associated with intrinsic antimicrobial resistance were also investigated. Isolates 17,138 and 17,749, both ST2211 strains, exhibited the highest number of mutations (substitutions, “s”) in the efflux pump regulators mexR (5 s), nalC (17 s), nalD (4 s), nfxB (26 s), mexS (6 s), and mexZ (18 s). The remaining isolates showed variations of 1–3 s for the same genes. In isolate 14,339, a premature stop codon (sc) was detected in the mexZ amino acid chain at position 134 (Supplementary Material 1).
Each isolate exhibited substitutions in at least one of the studied porin genes, with isolate 11,227 displaying the highest number of alterations in oprD. When compared with other porin genes, oprD showed the greatest number of modifications (deletions “Δ”, insertions “ins” and substitutions) among the isolates, being the only gene among porins that showed deletions (Table 5). In oprD, isolates 9876, 10,705, 11,227 and 14,339 presented a frameshift deletion in codons 372, 373 and 383; 17,138, 17,749 and 17,801, exhibited a premature stop codon in the codon 277. Additionally, 9876, 10,705, 11,227, and 14,339 exhibited a sequence of mutations ranging from codon 375 to 382 (Supplementary Material 1).
Regarding TCS genes, in connection with their capacity to induce polymyxin resistance through genetic mutations, isolates 17,138 and 17,749 displayed the highest number of substitutions among all isolates. This emphasizes the involvement of pmrB (28 s and 1sc), parS (32 s), and cprS (25 s) genes. Furthermore, both isolates exhibited identical alterations and were the only isolates that manifested mutations in all TCS genes. Mutations in colR were unique to these two isolates (3 s). The other isolates displayed a variable range of alterations, ranging from one to five substitutions (Table 5).
Similar to that observed for TSC, four genes (gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE) related to the DNA gyrase and Topoisomerase IV subunits showed the same mutations in 17,138 and 1749 isolates (Table 5).
Among the extrinsic resistance genes, oxacillinases OXA-4 (17,828 and 17,973), OXA-50 (14,339), OXA-395 (14,297, 17,801, 17,828 and 17,973), and OXA-486 (9876, 10,705, 11,227 and 14,297) were found (Table 6).
The aph(3’)-llb and aadA24 genes, related to aminoglycoside resistance, were exclusively detected in isolates 17,828 and 17,973, both ST4053. crpP, which is associated with CIP resistance, was detected in isolates 17,138, 17,749, and 17,801. The sul1 gene, associated with sulfamethoxazole resistance, was only detected in isolate 17,801. catB7 and fosA, related to chloramphenicol and fosfomycin resistance respectively, were present in all isolates, except for 17,138 and 17,749 (ST2211). Notably, isolates 17,828 and 17,973 (ST4053) had the highest number of extrinsic resistance genes (Table 6).
Broad variations were observed in the size and presence of genes in the annotated plasmids. The smallest plasmid (15,805 bp) was found in isolate 9876, whereas the largest (414,162 bp) was found in isolate 17801. According to the Bakta database, each isolate carried one plasmid. Resistance genes were identified in the plasmid of isolates 17138 (crpP), 17801 (OXA-395), 17828, and 17973 (OXA-1like and aaC(6’)lb).
Intact phages found were Pseudo_YMC11/02/R656 (9876 and 10,705 isolates), Pseudo_H66 (11,227 isolate), Pseudo_JD024 (14,297 isolate), Escher_vB_EcoM_ECO1230_10 (17,749 isolate), Pseudo_Dobby (17,828 and 17,973 isolates), Pseudo_ F10 (17,828 and 17,973 isolates).
Discussion
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the main pathogens associated with CF, severely affecting the lungs and contributing to the worsening of disease prognosis through inflammation and airway damage. It is difficult to eradicate due to its ability to withstand antimicrobial agents and establish chronicity [27]. Several mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance, biofilm formation, and persistence of multidrug-tolerant cells are strongly associated with chronic infections [8, 28].
In the present study, P. aeruginosa polymyxin-resistant isolates demonstrated reduced susceptibility to at least one carbapenem, a concern in patients with CF, owing to the use of these first-line drugs in the treatment of chronically infected patients. This makes it even more difficult to achieve a positive therapy response and eradicate pulmonary infection [29].
Studies have highlighted the emergence of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa in CF in several regions of the world [29,30,31,32]. However, in Brazil, carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa reports on CF remain scarce [17, 33, 34].
One treatment option for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa in CF is the use of polymyxins; however, monotherapy may lead to resistance [35, 36]. Variations in polymyxin susceptibility among patients with CF have also been observed in Europe. A study conducted in Italy reported an increase in polymyxin susceptibility, from 93 to 98% [37]. However, an investigation in Denmark from 2008 to 2016 identified an increase in polymyxin resistance from 7 to 13% among individuals with CF colonized with P. aeruginosa [38]. In Brazil, data on P. aeruginosa polymyxin resistance in individuals with CF are limited. In a recent study of 179 isolates from individuals with CF, 7.2% exhibited polymyxin resistance [17].
The detection of P. aeruginosa polymyxin resistance in individuals with CF is uncommon; however, resistance to polymyxins has been increasingly reported in non-CF cases [39,40,41,42]. This could be related to mutations in the TCS genes or the presence of plasmid genes that alter the polarity of lipid A, such as mcr [43,44,45,46]. To date, P. aeruginosa polymyxin resistance harboring mcr has not yet been described in individuals with CF, including those in our study.
The emergence of MDR P. aeruginosa isolates from patients with CF has been described for more than two decades [47,48,49,50]. Nevertheless, cases of MDR isolates from CF centers in Brazil have been reported over the last decade [17, 33, 34, 51].
In the present study, most isolates were classified as either MDR or XDR strains. This result was expected because of the study’s inclusion criteria, which required the isolates to exhibit resistance to polymyxin B. Based on the criteria established by Magiorakos and collaborators [21], isolate 10,705 was not classified as MDR or XDR despite exhibiting resistance to IMP and polymyxin B. This still draws our attention as isolate 10,705 exhibited mutations in mexS, oprD, opdP, opdD, pmrA, pmrB, parS and parC genes. All these genes, except for parC, can mediate resistance to carbapenems or polymyxins through mechanisms such as efflux pumps (overexpression of MexEF), porins (OprD, OpdP and OpdD) and lipid A modification (PmrAB and ParRS). In the case of parC, which can confer resistance to fluoroquinolones through change in the target site [52], our study only tested ciprofloxacin. This may present a methodology gap, as we cannot conclusively determine the isolate’s resistance to other fluoroquinolones, which could classify this isolate as MDR. Nevertheless, numerous definitions outlining the phenomenon of MDR in Gram-negative organisms are prevalent worldwide. These definitions exhibit variations contingent on their intended applications and originating country or institution. The choice of specific definitions of MDR should facilitate uniformity in epidemiological surveillance practices [53,54,55].
Through molecular typing, the isolates were categorized into eight ST, among which three new STs were identified. Notably, among the 10 isolates analyzed, 17,138 and 17,749, both recovered from the same individual with a one-year interval between isolations, shared the same ST (2211), and exhibited resistance to all tested antimicrobials. This is an important issue because multidrug resistance is often induced by the exposure of individuals with CF to multiple antimicrobials, thereby reducing therapeutic options and life expectancy [56].
Using a comparative analysis to assess the relationship between these STs and ST related to CF-transmissible strains, no similarity was observed, similar to previous studies conducted by our group [34, 57]. The existence of these transmissible strains has initiated debates concerning infection control protocols and the management of patients with CF. Continuous surveillance is imperative due to their considerable potential for global dissemination and their ability to harbor multiple resistance and virulence genes.
Genes associated with intrinsic and extrinsic antimicrobial resistance were investigated by WGS. Notably, isolates 17,138 and 17,749, which were observed in the same patient, exhibited the highest number of mutations in the same gene (Supplementary Material 1). The mutations observed in these isolates, such as the efflux pump regulators MexAB (mexR, nalC and nalD), MexCD (nfxB), MexEF (mexS), porins (opdP, opdD, opdH, and oprE), TCS (phoP, phoQ, pmrA, parR, cprR, cprS, colR, and colS), and the enzymatic DNA gyrase and Topoisomerase IV subunits (gyrB and parE), did not correlate with previously described mutations in MDR strains.
The oprH porin gene, involved in polymyxin resistance [8], was searched in all isolates in this study. The gene sequences were aligned with the reference strain P. aeruginosa PAO1, revealing that, with exception of isolates 17,138 and 17,749, all isolates exhibited 100% similarity with the oprH from P. aeruginosa PAO1. Blast comparison showed that oprH from isolates 17,138 and 17,749, shared 96.52% similarity with the oprH from P. aeruginosa PAO1, indicating the presence of the same protein function, with only allele variations.
mexZ, a MexXY efflux pump regulator, displayed a premature stop codon at codon 134 in isolate 14,339. Although alterations at this position have not been published, loss of protein function and impairment of repressor function have been reported when mutations occur at other positions in the amino acid chain [58, 59]. This may be related to the overexpression of the efflux pump, a determinant of resistance to aminoglycosides in the CF P. aeruginosa [60], similar to the resistance profile observed in AST.
Analyses of oprD, related to carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa, showed frameshift deletions and premature stop codons, previously reported as modifications promoting resistance to these antimicrobials and porin suppressors [61, 62].
In previous studies, defective or absent oprD was reported in non-CF P. aeruginosa, and some of these alterations were similar to those observed in the present study [63, 64]. Isolates 9876, 10,705, 11,227, and 14,339 showed a sequence of mutations (372 M-382Y) with alternating deletions and substitutions, and some similar previously described cases demonstrated that changes in these amino acids were associated with increased susceptibility to MER [62, 65]. Notably, this was true for two isolates (10,705 and 14,339) in this study.
Substitutions in pmrB (15 V-I, 68G-S, and 343T-A), observed in isolates 11,227, 17,138, 17,749, and 17,801, were thought to be associated with colistin non-susceptibility in non-CF P. aeruginosa, as these are common mutations described solely in non-susceptible isolates [66]. Additionally, a substitution in parS (398 H-R), detected in all isolates in this study, has been linked to colistin resistance, as it occurs under external stress conditions, thereby affecting colistin resistance [67]. Both genes are known to be involved in lipid A polarity modifications which can cause polymyxin resistance.
Substitutions in gyrA (83T-I) and parC (87 S-L) were identified in isolate 17,801, resistant to CIP, already well established as causing high-level resistance to fluoroquinolones in non-CF P. aeruginosa [52, 68, 69].
crpP, which encodes extrinsic resistance to CIP, was identified in three phenotypically resistant isolates (17,138, 17,749, and 17,801), which are not always correlated [70]. Corroborating the findings of the authors, two isolates were resistant to CIP, but did not have crpP, which can be explained by another mechanism of resistance, such as the overexpression of efflux pumps [71].
A correlation between the results of phenotypic resistance obtained in the AST and the presence of OXA-4, OXA-50, OXA-486, and crpP was observed. However, for OXA-395, aph(3’)-llb, aadA24 it was not possible to establish the same association, possibly due to not being expressed, expressed at a very low level, or another mechanism [72]. Sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, and fosfomycin were not tested in this study; therefore, the relationship between sul1, catB7, and fosA cannot be reported.
In Brazil, the presence of carbapenemases in P. aeruginosa strains isolated from patients with CF is rare. This was highlighted in a report of a single isolate carrying the blaSPM−1 gene [33]. Furthermore, the presence of blaKPC has been documented in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae among individuals with CF under surveillance in facilities within the same city. This observation has raised concerns regarding the potential transmission of these genes, including those within P. aeruginosa [73, 74].
In the plasmid analysis, the presence of mcr was not observed in any of the isolates, which may suggest a different origin of resistance to polymyxin B. Nonetheless, the crpP, OXA-395, and aaC(6’)lb plasmid genes were identified in different isolates of P. aeruginosa polymyxin resistance in CF; to our knowledge, this study is the first time this has been described in Brazil.
Most isolates showed at least one intact phage. Notably, YMC11/02/R656 was present in two isolates (9876 and 10,705) from individuals with CF treated at the same follow-up center. The same phage was described in a study by our group with Achromobacter ruhlandii in a different CF center [75]. This is concerning since lung infections via CF are polymicrobial, and the potential of P. aeruginosa to acquire transmissible genetic information allows the dissemination of resistance factors, including those from different bacterial species [76, 77].
Conclusion
Among the isolates, a high resistance rate was observed, with many multi-resistance profiles. WGS is fundamental for the identification of mutations related to permeability and alterations in the outer membrane and target site, which could influence the resistance of the isolates. Additionally, it allows the localization of plasmid resistance genes and bacteriophages, which may spread and perform horizontal gene transfer between other bacteria in the same center. Furthermore, molecular typing described new STs but did not correlate with previously described epidemic clones.
References
Mielko KA, Jabłoński SJ, Milczewska J, Sands D, Łukaszewicz M, Młynarz P (2019) Metabolomic studies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35:178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-019-2739-1
Goss CH (2019) Acute pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 40:792–803. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697975
Rojas LJ, Yasmin M, Benjamino J et al (2022) Genomic heterogeneity underlies multidrug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a population-level analysis beyond susceptibility testing. PLoS ONE 17:e0265129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265129
Reyne N, McCarron A, Cmielewski P, Parsons D, Donnelley M (2023) To bead or not to bead: a review of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection models for cystic fibrosis. Front Physiol 14:1104856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1104856
Bassetti M, Vena A, Croxatto A, Righi E, Guery B (2018) How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs Context 7:212527. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.212527
Subedi D, Vijay AK, Wilcox M (2018) Overview of mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an ocular perspective. Clin Exp Optom 101:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12621
Gniadek TJ, Carroll KC, Simner PJ (2016) Carbapenem-resistant non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli: the missing piece to the puzzle. J Clin Microbiol 54:1700–1710. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03264-15
Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin T, Cheng Z (2019) Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv 37:177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013
Olaitan AO, Morand S, Rolain J (2014) Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front Microbiol 5:643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00643
Scott A, Pottenger S, Timofte D et al (2019) Reservoirs of resistance: polymyxin resistance in veterinary-associated companion animal isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Vet Rec 185:206. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105075
Tahmasebi H, Dehbashi S, Arabestani MR (2019) New approach to identify colistin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa by high-resolution melting curve analysis assay. Lett Appl Microbiol 70:290–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13270
Williams D, Fothergill JL, Evans B et al (2018) Transmission and lineage displacement drive rapid population genomic flux in cystic fibrosis airway infections of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic strain. Microb Genom 4:e000167. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000167
Cheng K, Smyth RL, Govan JR et al (1996) Spread of β-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a cystic fibrosis clinic. Lancet 348:639–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05169-0
Parkins MD, Somayaji R, Waters VJ (2018) Epidemiology, biology, and impact of clonal Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 31:e00019–e00018. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00019-18
Lees JA, Kendall M, Parkhill J, Colijn C, Bentley SD, Harris SR (2018) Evaluation of phylogenetic reconstruction methods using bacterial whole genomes: a simulation based study. Wellcome Open Res 3:33. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14265.2
Bogaerts B, Winand R, Braekel JV et al (2021) Evaluation of WGS performance for bacterial pathogen characterization with the Illumina technology optimized for time-critical situatuions. Microb Genom 7:000699. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000699
Almeida MM, Freitas MT, Folescu TW et al (2021) Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic lung infection: current resistance profile and hypermutability in patients with cystic fibrosis. Curr Microbiol 78:696–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02337-0
Miller JM, Binnicker MJ, Campbell S et al (2018) A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2018 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology. Clin Infect Dis 67:e1–e94. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy381
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2023) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. M100, 33rd edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2018) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. M07-A10, 11th edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA
Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB et al (2012) Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x
Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE (2017) Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595
Antipov D, Hartwick N, Shen M, Raiko M, Lapidus A, Pevzner P (2016) PlasmidSPAdes: assembling plasmids from whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32:3380–3387. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw493
Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, Goesmann A (2021) Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom 7:000685. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000685
Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A et al (2016) PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W16–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw387
Zhou Z, Alikhan N, Sergeant MJ et al (2018) GrapeTree: visualization of core genomic relationships among 100,000 bacterial pathogens. Genome Res 28:1395–1404. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.232397.117
Reece E, Bettio PH, Renwick J (2021) Polymicrobial interactions in the cystic fibrosis airway microbiome impact the antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiot (Basel) 10:827. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10070827
Laborda P, Hernando-Amado S, Martínez JL, Sanz-García F (2022) Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas. Adv Exp Med Biol 1386:117–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08491-1_5
Saadh MJ, Lohrasbi A, Ghasemian E et al (2022) The status of carbapenem resistance in cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yale J Biol Med 95:495–506
Courtois N, Caspar Y, Maurin M (2018) Phenotypic and genetic resistance traits of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains infecting cystic fibrosis patients: a French cohort study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52:358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.05.008
Zamudio R, Hijazi K, Joshi C, Aitken E, Oggioni M, Gould IM (2019) Phylogenetic analysis of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and carbapenems in piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents 53:774–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.02.022
Sherrard LJ, Wee BA, Duplancic C et al (2022) Emergence and impact of oprD mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 21, e-35-e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2021.03.007
Lutz L, Leão RS, Ferreira AG et al (2013) Hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients from two Brazilian cities. J Clin Microbiol 51:927–930. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02638-12
Ferreira AG, Leão RS, Carvalho-Assef AP et al (2015) Low-level resistance and clonal diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa among chronically colonized cystic fibrosis patients. APMIS 123:1061–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12463
Zusman O, Avni T, Leibovici L et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro synergy of polymyxins and carbapenems. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5104–5111. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01230-13
Horcajada JP, Montero M, Oliver A et al (2019) Epidemiology and treatment of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00031–e00019. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00031-19
Lucca F, Guarnieri M, Ros M, Muffato G, Rigoli R, Dalt L (2018) Antibiotic resistance evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients (2010–2013). Clin Respir J 12:2189–2196. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12787
Pedersen SS, Olesen HV, Jensen-Fangel S, Nørskov-Lauritsen N, Wang M (2018) Colistin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Achromobacter spp. cultured from Danish cystic fibrosis patients is not related to plasmid-mediated expression of mcr-1. J Cyst Fibros 17(e22–e23). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2017.12.001
Wi YM, Choi J, Lee J et al (2017) Emergence of colistin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST235 clone in South Korea. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:767–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.01.023
Chen X, Xu J, Zhu Q, Ren Y, Zhao L (2020) Polymyxin B resistance rates in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and a comparison between Etest® and broth microdilution methods of antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Exp Ther Med 16:749–767. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16d30.x
Xiao C, Zhu Y, Yang Z et al (2022) Prevalence and molecular characteristics of polymyxin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital. Antibiot (Basel) 11:799. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060799
Zarate M, Barrantes D, Cuicapuza D et al (2021) Frequency of colistin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: first report from Peru. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 38:308–312. https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2021.382.6977
Snesrud E, Maybank R, Kwak YI, Jones AR, Hinkle MJ, McGann P (2018) Chromosomally encoded mcr-5 in colistin-nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00679–e00618. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00679-18
Hameed F, Khan MA, Muhammad H, Sarwar T, Bilal H, Rehman TU (2019) Plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene in Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: first report from Pakistan. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 52:e20190237. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0237-2019
Lo Sciuto A, Cervoni M, Stefanelli R, Mancone C, Imperi F (2020) Effect of lipid A aminoarabinosylation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa colistin resistance and fitness. Int J Antimicrob Agents 55:105957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105957
Chen H, Mai H, Lopes B, Wen F, Patil S (2022) Novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains co-harbouring blaNDM–1 metallo β-lactamase and mcr-1 isolated from immunocompromised paediatric patients. Infect Drug Resist. 15, 2929–2936. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S368566
Döring G, Conway SP, Heijerman HG et al (2000) Antibiotic therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: a European consensus. Eur Respir J 16:749–767. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16d30.x
Li Y, Zhang X, Wang C et al (2015) Characterization by phenotypic and genotypic methods of metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis. Mol Med Rep 11:494–498. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2685
Mustafa M, Chalhoub H, Denis O et al (2016) Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients in Northern Europe. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6735–6741. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01046-16
Kostoulias X, Chang C, Wisniewski J, Abbott IJ, Zisis H, Dennison A (2023) Antimicrobial susceptibility of ceftolozane-tazobactam against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Melbourne. Australia Pathol 55:663–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2023.03.009
Hermes DM, Pitt CP, Lutz L et al (2013) Evaluation of heteroresistance to polymyxin B among carbapenem-susceptible and -resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 62:1184–1189. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.059220-0
Nguyen L, Garcia J, Gruenberg K, MacDougall C (2018) Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas infections: hard to treat, but hope on the horizon? Curr Infect Dis Rep 20:23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-018-0629-6
KRINKO (2012) Hygiene measures for infection or colonization with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Commission recommendation for hospital hygiene and infection prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 55:1311–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1549-5
Wolfensberger A, Kuster SP, Marchesi M, Zbinden R, Hombach M (2019) The effect of varying multidrug-resistence (MDR) definitions on rates of MDR gram-negative rods. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 8:193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0614-3
Friedli O, Völlmy I, Schrenzel J, Harbarth S, Kronenberg A (2022) Retrospective data analysis for definition of multidrug resistance in gram-negative bacteria - a consensus proposal. Swiss Med Wkly 152:w30195. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2022.w30195
Durda-Masny M, GoździkSpychalska J, John A et al (2021) The determinants of survival among adults with cystic fibrosis – a cohort study. J Physiol Anthropol 40:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-021-00269-7
Leão RS, Carvalho-Assef AP, Ferreira AG et al (2010) Comparison of the worldwide transmissible Pseudomonas aeruginosa with isolates from Brazilian cystic fibrosis patients. Braz J Microbiol 41:1079–1081. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838220100004000028
Prickett MH, Hauser AR, McColley SA et al (2017) Aminoglycoside resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis results from convergent evolution in the mexZ gene. Thorax 72:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208027
Singh M, Yau YC, Wang S, Waters V, Kumar A (2017) MexXY efflux pump overexpression and aminoglycoside resistance in cystic fibrosis isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from chronic infections. Can J Microbiol 63:929–938. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2017-0380
Suresh M, Nithya N, Jayasree PR, Vimal KP, Kumar PR (2018) Mutational analyses of regulatory genes, mexR, nalC, nalD and mexZ of mexAB-oprM and mexXY operons, in efflux pump hyperexpressing multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34:83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2465-0
Haenni M, Bour M, Châtre P, Madec J, Plésiat P, Jeannot K (2017) Resistance of animal strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to carbapenems. Front Microbiol 8:1847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01847
Horna G, López M, Guerra H, Saénz Y, Ruiz J (2018) Interplay between MexAB-OprM and MexEF-OprN in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep 8:16463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34694-z
Farra A, Islam S, Strålfors A, Sörberg M, Wretlind B (2008) Role of outer membrane protein OprD and penicillin-binding proteins in resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem and meropenem. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31:427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.12.016
Kim CH, Kang HY, Kim BR et al (2016) Mutational inactivation of OprD in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Korean hospitals. J Microbiol 54:44–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-016-5562-5
Kao C, Chen S, Hung K et al (2016) Overproduction of active efflux pump and variations of OprD dominate in imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with bloodstream infections in Taiwan. BMC Microbiol 16:107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0719-2
Lee J, Ko KS (2014) Mutations and expression of PmrAB and PhoPQ related with colistin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 78:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.11.027
Lee J, Chung ES, Na IY, Kim H, Shin D, Ko KS (2014) Development of colistin resistance in pmrA-, phoP, parr- and cprr-inactivated mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:2966–2971. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku238
Domitrovic TN, Hujer AM, Perez F et al (2016) Multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing prosthetic valve endocarditis: a genetic-based chronicle of evolving antibiotic resistance. Open Forum Infect Dis 3:ofw188. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofw188
Teo JQ, Tang CY, Lim JC et al (2021) Genomic characterization of carbapenem-non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Singapore. Emerg Microbes Infect 10:1706–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2021.1968318
Hernández-García M, García-Castillo M, García-Fernandéz S et al (2021) Presence of chromosomal crpp-like genes is not always associated with ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates recovered in ICU patients from Portugal and Spain. Microorganisms 9(388). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020388
Rehman A, Patrick WM, Lamont IL (2019) Mechanisms of ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new approaches to an old problem. J Med Microbiol 68:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000873
Stasiak M, Maćkiw E, Kowalska J, Kucharek K, Postupolski J (2021) Silent genes: antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic production. Pol J Microbiol 70:421–429. https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2021-040
Leão RS, Pereira RH, Folescu TW et al (2011) KPC-2 carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 10:140–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2010.12.003
Alves DP, Carvalho-Assef AP, Conceição-Neto OC et al (2018) Enterobacter cloacae harbouring blaKPC–2 and qnrB-1 isolated from a cystic fibrosis patient: a case report. New Microbes New Infect. 25, 49–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2018.06.010
Rodrigues ER, Rocha GA, Ferreira AG, Leão RS, Albano RM, Marques EA (2016) Draft genome sequences of four Achromobacter ruhlandii strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 111:777–780. https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760160130
Botelho J, Grosso F, Peixe L (2019) Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa – mechanisms, epidemiology and evolution. Drug Resist Updat 44:100640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2019.07.002
Johnson G, Banerjee S, Putonti C (2022) Diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa temperate phages. mSphere 7(e0101521). https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.01015-21
Acknowledgements
We express our profound gratitude for the technical assistance provided by the Laboratory of Bacteriology at Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto (HUPE-UERJ).
Funding
This study was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) /MCTI/CT-Saúde No 52/2022 - Ações em Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação para o enfrentamento da Resistência Antimicrobiana (RAM), Processo: 408725/2022-2 and Projeto REDES - Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faperj E-26/211.554/2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All author contributed to the study conception and design. In terms of the manuscript composition and information acquisition, FAS played a primary role as the main contributor. Bioinformatics assistance and writing were provided by MMA, while HSR facilitated the search process and comprehension of bioinformatics tools. Corrective measures, content structuring, and information consolidation were carried out with the contributions of EAM and RSL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by FAS, MMA, EAM and RSL, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (CAAE: 79547616.1.0000.5259), and the approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, in view of the retrospective nature of the study and all the procedures were performed with samples stored in a bacteriological collection.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Afonso Luis Barth.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Simão, F.A., Almeida, M.M., Rosa, H.S. et al. Genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in polymyxin B resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from airways of patients with cystic fibrosis. Braz J Microbiol 55, 1415–1425 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-024-01311-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-024-01311-3