Abstract
Biopolymer composites are emerging as promising materials for smart sensors in the fields of civil engineering and intelligent cities. With enhanced mechanical properties, tailored sensitivity, and versatile fabrication methods, biopolymer composites provide a compelling solution for sustainable sensing technologies. The versatility of biopolymer composites with different electrical properties enables their applications in resistive, capacitive, and piezoelectric sensors, thus enhancing their potentials in healthcare, environmental monitoring, and consumer electronics. Here, we review an advancement of biopolymer composites in sensor technology, such as piezoresistive strain sensors used in structural health monitoring and a novel biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) biosensor for water monitoring. Integrating biopolymer composites into electrical biosensors has demonstrated promising results in detecting various substances, including moisture content in soil and model pollutants. Furthermore, their utilization in biopolymer-bound soil composites for building materials holds potential implications for sustainable construction practices. In summary, the incorporation of biopolymer composites in sensing applications paves the pathway towards developing smart and sustainable cities. As research continues, these materials are expected to play an increasingly significant role in sensor technology, providing eco-friendly solutions for challenges in civil engineering, environmental monitoring, and beyond. Furthermore, the potential for biopolymer composites to contribute to a more sustainable and interconnected world is considerable, making them a promising avenue for future sensor manufacturing and Internet of Things (IoT) applications.
Graphical Abstract
The advancement of sustainable biopolymer composites for sensors is comprehensively reviewed with their manufacturing and applications in smart cities.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Sensors are widely utilized in civil engineering for environmental monitoring [1,2,3], structural health assessment [4,5,6,7], healthcare [8,9,10], and human motion [11, 12]. They can detect pollutants, heavy metals, and contaminants in water, air, and soil, providing real-time data on environmental quality [13,14,15] and working conditions [16]. Additionally, sensors integrated into structures aid in assessing their health by detecting stress and potential failures [17]. Soil monitoring benefits from sensors measuring parameters like pH and moisture content [18]. Smart materials with such sensors can self-detect and repair damage [19]. It also aids disaster monitoring and early warning systems [20]. Such sensors could be manufactured in variety of technics. However, looking at the Sustainable Development Goals, particularly the application of SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production) for SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities), it is essential to use raw material, which is part of the ecology and environment for implementation in sustainable technologies [21]. One such possibility is in the use of biopolymer composites, which offers several advantages in sensor manufacturing process and applications. They can be combined with reinforcing fillers or nanoparticles to improve mechanical properties, sensitivity, and fabrication methods. Their biocompatibility, eco-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness make them suitable for diverse sensor applications with reduced environmental impact [22, 23].
In sectors such as healthcare [24, 25], environmental monitoring [26, 27], and consumer electronics [28, 29], biopolymer composites are opening new possibilities [30]. Their resistance to chemicals enables deployment in harsh environments, while their mechanical strength and flexibility enhance durability [31]. As research progresses, the role of biopolymer composites in sensor technology is poised to expand, providing sustainable and innovative solutions to sensor manufacturing challenges. Biopolymer composites can be fine-tuned to detect specific analytics, making them ideal for various sensing needs and healthcare applications [32]. Their biodegradability and renewable sourcing reduce environmental impact, making them suitable for disposable or environmental monitoring sensors [33]. Biopolymer composites can be engineered to exhibit different electrical properties, making them applicable in resistive, capacitive, and piezoelectric sensors. There are a few review papers regarding biopolymers for environmental, medical applications [34, 35], humidity sensing [36], and electrochemical sensing [37]. However, there are no review yet for the biopolymers and their composites for their applications in sensor manufacturing and smart cities. In this paper, firstly, biopolymers and their composites utilized in smart and sustainable cities are described in detail. Research questions are formulated for a search of suitable literature and all the literature corresponding to the existing technologies and their advantages are explained further.
2 Background
Different from petro-based polymers [38] such as epoxy [39], polyurethane [40], polystyrene [41], acrylic resin [42], polyimide [43, 44], polypropylene [45,46,47,48,49,50,51], polyethylene [52, 53], conjugated polymers [54], and polyvinyl alcohol [55], biopolymers are a distinctive and diverse family of materials with potential uses in almost every industry. While the terms “biopolymer” and “biodegradable polymer” are sometimes used interchangeably in the literature, there is a significant distinction between these two types of polymers [56]. Biodegradable polymers are characterized as materials, whose chemical and physical properties deteriorate and completely disintegrate when subjected to microbes, aerobic, and anaerobic processes [57]. The term “biobased” is used when referring to polymers developed from renewable sources to emphasize the raw materials’ basis. Materials are considered renewable if natural processes regenerate raw resources at rates equal to or faster than their rate of use.
The two main factors that define a “biopolymer” are (1) the origin of the raw materials and (2) the polymer’s biodegradability. Biopolymers can be categorized as follows: (A) biopolymers that are both biodegradable and manufactured from renewable source materials (biobased); (B) biopolymers that are not biodegradable and are derived from sustainable raw materials (biobased); and (C) biopolymers that are both biodegradable and manufactured from fossil fuels.
Biopolymers such as polysaccharide can be created chemically from natural starting materials (such as starch, sugar, and maize) or by biological systems (microorganisms, plants, and animals) [58, 59]. Biodegradable biobased biopolymers include (1) synthetic polymers made from renewable resources, such as poly(lactic acid) (PLA); (2) biopolymers produced by microorganisms, such as PHAs; (3) naturally occurring biopolymers, such as proteins and starch.
Natural polymers are, by definition, those produced through various biosynthetic pathways in the biosphere. The majority of biobased polymers used worldwide come from first-generation feedstock, including non-consumable sources like natural rubber and edible biomass like starch, sugar, and plant oils [60,61,62,63]. Natural rubber was one of the first biopolymers employed, but the goal of moving away from resources centered on food and significant advancements in biotechnology has caused a subsequent shift in focus. Biobased polymers that resemble conventional polymers are produced by bacterial fermentation through the synthesis of monomers from sustainable sources, especially lignocellulosic biomass (starch and cellulose), fatty acids, and organic waste (Fig. 1). Another category of biobased polymers is known as natural biobased polymers, which include polysaccharides [64,65,66,67,68,69], cellulose [70, 71], collagen [72], and chitosan [73, 74], as well as proteins and nucleic acids [75, 76]. These biobased polymers have seen significant growth in recent years in terms of technological advancements and practical uses. The three primary approaches to produce biobased polymers from renewable resources are as follows: firstly, using natural biobased polymers that have undergone some modification to meet specific requirements (e.g., starch); secondly, producing polymerized biobased monomers through fermentation or conventional chemistry, such as polylactic acid; and thirdly, the direct bacterial synthesis of biobased polymers, such as polyhydroxyalkanoates.
3 Methodology
Once the background of the variety of biopolymers is understood, it is essential to formulate specific research questions to determine the applicability in smart cities. To progress with the search, it is essential to narrow down the applications to smart and sustainable cities. Others acquire special qualities that could open up a variety of new commercial opportunities, while some biopolymers can directly replace synthetically created materials in typical uses. Established agricultural and chemical corporations as well as small biotechnology companies are researching new biopolymer molecules (Fig. 2). To find the most up-to-date literature on biopolymer composite sensors, academic databases like PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar were used. Here are the six keywords used and named as K1, K2, K3, K4, K5, and K6, respectively, and details are given as follows: K1, biopolymer composite sensors; K2, biopolymer-based sensors; K3, biopolymer nanocomposite sensors; and K4, smart materials for sensing.
The relevant papers out of all keywords together were found to be 80. The biopolymer composites that are utilized for civil engineering applications are shown in Table 1.
Based on the application purpose, the following research questions have been formulated for the literature review.
-
1.
Research Question 1: “How can biopolymer composites be further optimized to enhance sensitivity and selectivity in biosensors for air quality monitoring in smart cities?”
-
2.
Research Question 2: “What are the potential applications and performance improvements of biopolymer composite-based soil sensors in precision agriculture for optimizing irrigation and nutrient management?"”
-
3.
Research Question 3: “How can biopolymer composite sensors be tailored and integrated into structural health monitoring systems to ensure resilient and sustainable smart infrastructure in urban environments?”
These research questions explore different aspects of biopolymer composite sensors, their applications in smart cities, and potential areas for further development and optimization. Addressing these questions can contribute to advancements in sensor technology, environmental monitoring, and urban sustainability. The composites can be formed by integrating with various nanostructural materials such as silver nanoparticles [77,78,79,80,81,82,83], gold nanoparticles [84, 85], carbon nanospecies [86,87,88], and Mxene [89,90,91,92,93].
Biopolymer composite sensors have been extensively studied for various applications, including environmental monitoring, biomedical sensing, and smart materials. They offer advantages such as biocompatibility, renewable nature, and potentially lower environmental impact compared to traditional sensor materials. Biopolymer-based nanocomposites usually show excellent stability, maximum accessibility, and even fascinating advantages caused by the interaction of nanoparticles and matrix, in addition to their inherent properties. They are frequently utilized as biosensors [36], antioxidant [93], antibacterial [94, 95], antifouling [96], and drug delivery agents [97]. They are also commonly used as adsorbents for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from effluent water solutions [98,99,100] and energy materials [101].
4 Mechanism of the sensors
Biopolymer composites serve as sensor materials in various applications [102, 103]. The actual mechanism of sensors using biopolymer composites can vary depending on the specific type of sensor and the intended purpose. However, a general overview of how biopolymer composites function as sensors is provided below:
Biopolymer composites can exhibit changes in their physical, chemical, or electrical properties in response to a specific stimulus. This stimulus could be temperature, pressure, humidity, pH, chemical analytes, or biological molecules [104, 105]. The composite’s matrix material is biopolymer. Typical biopolymers found in sensor applications are collagen, chitosan, cellulose, starch, and gelatin. The ideal qualities and compatibility with the sensing application determine which biopolymer to be used [106].
A biomolecule, conductive filler, or dye can be used as the composite’s sensing agent. The target stimulus must be detected and converted into a measurable signal by the sensing agent [107]. The structure, morphology, or chemical properties of the biopolymer composite are altered when a stimulus interacts with it. Depending on the particular application, these modifications can be irreversible or reversible [108]. A measurable signal is produced by the stimulus-induced modifications in the biopolymer composite. Depending on the kind of sensor, the signal transduction mechanism may use mechanical, optical, or electrical techniques [109]. The presence, strength, or other properties of the stimulus can be ascertained by reading and interpreting the measurable signal that the sensor produces. For analysis or control purposes, this data may be recorded, viewed, or subjected to additional processing [110]. Depending on the needs for sensing, various kinds of biopolymer composites, sensing agents, and signal transduction mechanisms are used [111]. Spectrophotometers or colorimeters can be used to measure the absorbance, fluorescence intensity, or color change of the biopolymer composite [112]. Prior to using any sensor like the pH sensor, calibration is of utmost importance for developing a relationship between the measured signal and the actual values for reliability [113]. The pH value is then ascertained by comparing the measured signal to the calibration curve or reference standards. Depending on how the sensor is designed, the pH data may be shown numerically or understood using color-coded indicators [114]. Sensors can utilize various common sensing mechanisms to detect and measure different physical, chemical, or biological parameters. Some of the commonly used sensing mechanisms in sensors are electrical, optical, piezoelectric, magnetic, thermal, and electrochemical [115].
Electrical sensors measure changes in electrical properties such as resistance, capacitance, or conductivity [116, 117]. Examples include thermistors (temperature sensors), strain gauges (measuring deformation), pH electrodes [118, 119], and humidity [120]. Sensors that use optics can identify variations in polarization in light, wavelength, or intensity by use of concepts of fluorescence, reflection, refraction, or absorption [121, 122]. Optical fiber sensors, spectrometers, and photodiodes are a few examples of the same [123]. Due to chemical reactions at electrode interfaces, electrochemical sensors measure changes in electrical current or potential. Examples are biosensors, pH sensors, and gas sensors (like oxygen or carbon monoxide sensors) [124]. When mechanical stress or pressure is applied, piezoelectric sensors produce an electrical signal [125]. They use materials which generate an electric charge when mechanically distorted, for example: accelerometers, pressure sensors, and ultrasonic sensors [126, 127].
Magnetic sensors use the Hall effect or magnetic materials to detect changes in magnetic fields. They are capable of measuring current, position, and proximity. For example, compasses, magnetic encoders, and magnetic field sensors [128]. Thermal sensors are used in tracking the variation in heat flow or temperature. The concept of infrared radiation, resistance, and other temperature-dependent characteristics are utilized for the same. Infrared sensors, thermistors, and thermocouples are a few examples. Acoustic sensors pick up vibrations or sound waves. They take measurements of variables like phase, amplitude, and frequency. Microphones, vibration sensors, and ultrasonic sensors are a few examples [129].
Biological sensors, also known as biosensors, detect and measure biological or biochemical interactions. They often utilize biomolecules or biological receptors to selectively interact with target analytes. Examples include enzyme-based sensors, immune-sensors, and DNA sensors [130, 131].
Table 2 shows a few examples of the common sensing mechanisms used in sensors in smart city application. Each sensing mechanism has its own principles, advantages, and limitations. The choice of sensing mechanism depends on the specific application and the parameter to be measured. Sensor technologies often combine multiple sensing mechanisms to enhance sensitivity, selectivity, and accuracy in detecting and measuring various parameters [132, 133].
5 Use of biopolymer sensors in smart cities
Biopolymer sensors hold significant potential in revolutionizing smart cities by enhancing sustainability and efficiency. These sensors, constructed from renewable materials, offer a greener alternative to conventional plastic-based counterparts. Their integration into urban environments allows for real-time monitoring of crucial parameters like air and water quality, noise levels, and temperature. This data empowers cities to make informed decisions, improving environmental conditions and public well-being. Biopolymer sensors also contribute to waste management, structural integrity monitoring, and energy conservation efforts, thereby optimizing resource allocation. By incorporating these eco-friendly sensors, smart cities demonstrate a commitment to environmentally responsible practices, aligning with broader sustainability goals and fostering a more resilient urban landscape. There are some key points that highlight the role of biopolymer sensors in smart cities and the schematic diagram is shown in Fig. 3.
Biopolymer sensors have the capacity to measure key parameters like air and water quality, noise levels, and temperature. This data is instrumental in the effective management and enhancement of the overall environmental conditions within a city. By providing real-time information on these vital aspects, biopolymer sensors enable timely interventions and informed decision-making to address issues related to pollution, noise levels, and temperature variations. This, in turn, contributes to creating a healthier and more sustainable urban environment for residents and ecosystems alike [134,135,136].
Integration of biopolymer sensors with IoT (Internet of Things) systems offers a seamless connection that enables the collection and transmission of real-time data. Therefore, these sensors can communicate with other devices and systems within a network which is highly of use for smart city application. It allows for the continuous monitoring of environmental conditions, such as air quality or noise levels, and transmits this data instantly. As a result, city officials and decision-makers have access to up-to-date information which empowers them to make well-informed choices about urban planning and management in changing environmental conditions, contributing to a more adaptive and efficient urban environment [137,138,139]. Biopolymer sensors play a pivotal role in revolutionizing waste management systems. They are adept at optimizing collection routes and keeping tabs on the fill levels of waste bins. Additionally, these sensors excel in identifying hazardous materials within the waste stream. This integration leads to a marked improvement in the efficiency and sustainability of waste management practices. By utilizing biopolymer sensors, cities can streamline their waste collection processes, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently. Moreover, the ability to detect hazardous materials enhances safety measures and promotes responsible waste handling. Ultimately, the implementation of biopolymer sensors in waste management systems represents a significant step towards creating cleaner, more environmentally conscious urban environments [134, 135, 140, 141]. By integrating these sensors, cities can take proactive measures to curb wastage and minimize energy expenditure. For instance swiftly detect and rectify any inefficiencies in building systems, ensuring that energy is utilized judiciously. This not only leads to significant cost savings but also aligns with broader sustainability goals by reducing the environmental impact associated with excessive energy consumption [100, 106, 142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154]. Biopolymer sensors can be seamlessly integrated into critical structures such as bridges, roads, and buildings. Their primary function is to meticulously oversee the structural integrity of these constructions. This involves the continuous analysis of various factors that may affect their stability, including signs of wear and tear, stress points, or indications of potential safety hazards [134, 135, 140, 141, 155,156,157,158,159,160]. By providing real-time data on the condition of these infrastructures, biopolymer sensors empower city planners and engineers to take proactive measures to address any potential issues before they escalate. This not only enhances overall safety but also prolongs the lifespan of vital urban structures, ultimately contributing to the creation of more resilient and reliable urban environments.
In urban agriculture and green spaces, the incorporation of biopolymer sensors represents a significant advancement. These sensors are adept at monitoring crucial parameters such as soil conditions, humidity levels, and the overall health of plants. By continuously collecting and analyzing this data, biopolymer sensors provide invaluable insights for optimizing agricultural practices in urban settings. This includes making informed decisions about irrigation schedules, selecting appropriate plant varieties, and applying fertilizers or nutrients as needed [106, 137, 142,143,144, 146, 147, 161].
Data gathered through biopolymer sensors serves as a powerful tool for fostering public engagement and environmental awareness. By sharing this information with the community, citizens gain valuable insights into the current state of their environment, including factors like air quality, noise levels, and temperature. This transparency not only educates the public about the conditions in their city but also empowers them to take an active role in sustainability efforts. Citizens are more likely to participate in initiatives aimed at reducing environmental impact and improving overall urban well-being.
Biopolymer sensors are invaluable tools in ensuring that cities adhere to regulatory standards for environmental monitoring and reporting. They provide accurate and reliable data on various environmental parameters, such as air and water quality. This information is essential for demonstrating compliance with legal requirements set forth by governing bodies. By utilizing biopolymer sensors, cities can efficiently gather the necessary data and maintain documentation to demonstrate their adherence to environmental regulations [162, 163]. This proactive approach not only helps avoid potential legal issues but also reinforces the city’s commitment to responsible environmental stewardship.
Biopolymer sensors play a pivotal role in fostering a circular economy. Their design takes into account what happens at the end of their lifespan. This means that they are intentionally created to be either recyclable or biodegradable. In the context of a circular economy, this approach ensures that once a biopolymer sensor reaches the end of its useful life, it can be reintegrated into the production cycle in an environmentally sustainable manner. Recyclable sensors can be processed and reused in the manufacturing of new products, conserving valuable resources. Meanwhile, biodegradable sensors can naturally decompose, minimizing waste, and environmental impact. This thoughtful design not only aligns with the principles of a circular economy but also contributes to a more sustainable and responsible approach to sensor production and disposal.
To understand further the usage of these biopolymer composites in smart cities, the role and the mechanism of the different sensors used in the civil engineering application are characterized in Fig. 4.
Further, Fig. 5 describes the different aspects in smart and sustainable cities wherein biopolymer composites are utilized.
6 Specific use of biopolymer in sensors
The choice of biopolymer for a specific sensor application depends on the required properties, target analytes, and environmental conditions of the intended application. Biopolymer composites can be tailored to meet the unique needs of each sensor, making them versatile materials for various smart city applications. As research continues, new biopolymer composites and sensor designs may further expand the possibilities for sustainable and efficient sensor technology in smart cities and related fields [164]. In 2004, M. Rayan and colleagues developed an electronic nose that uses an array of about 32 polymers–carbon black composite sensors. They claimed to have constructed a capable array for identifying and quantifying a broad range of target compounds, including alcohols, aromatics, and isomers. Additionally, a model of the interaction between target molecules and the polymer–carbon black composite sensors is under development. In 2011, Evgeni and co-workers recognized that a significant portion of the population spends most of their time indoors, making indoor air quality crucial. To address this issue, they proposed a sensor for monitoring indoor pollution using bioluminescent bacteria as bioreporters. The authors suggested the use of this system as a portable fiber optic biosensor, which could be part of indoor air pollution alert systems [165].
In 2017, M. Abhilash and his team highlighted the implementation of biopolymers from renewable resources in the fields of science and industry. They emphasized the potential of bionanocomposites made of biopolymers in the creation of chemical sensors, offering enhanced biocompatibility, sensitivity, and selectivity. The coupling of polymers with carbon nanomaterials opens up new avenues for research [166]. A quaternized and crosslinked poly(4-vinylpyridine) and polyaniline and polyaniline bilayer-structured composite humidity sensor was created by Krebsz M. and colleagues that same year. As low as 1% relative humidity could be detected with great sensitivity by this sensor. The concentration of PANI and poly(4-vinylpyridine) as well as the order in which the sensitive layers were deposited affected the composite’s ability to sense humidity. Researchers used a carbon nanotube polymer material to create a piezoresistive strain sensor for use in structural health monitoring applications. They improved strain transfer, reproducibility, and linearity by employing the polymer to improve the interfacial connection between the nanotubes. An electrical model for the nanotube strain sensor was developed as a result of this sensor’s foundation in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and strain testing [34]. A unique biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) biosensor for water monitoring was created in 2003 by Jianbo et al. The biosensor made use of co-immobilized Bacillus subtilis and Trichosporon cutaneum in a composite material derived from sol–gel that included silica and a grafting copolymer of 4-vinylpyridine and poly(vinyl alcohol). When measuring BOD in water samples, the biosensor showed outstanding long-term stability and repeatability [167]. J. Gobet and associates developed a flexible microelectrode array sensor for water quality monitoring that same year. The construction of the array was based on batch microelectronic techniques, which allowed for high-pressure operation for online water quality monitoring and stable passivation of the silicon chip surface. The sensor was used to track the levels of ozone, dissolved chlorine, and dissolved oxygen in different water samples. An overview of electrochemical sensors for the detection of various water contaminants, such as pesticides, nitrates, nitrites, phosphorus, water hardeners, disinfectants, and emerging contaminants, was presented by Kanoun et al. in 2021. They also talked about the effects of using imprinted polymers, metallic nanostructures, and carbon nanomaterials to modify the surface of working electrodes [168]. A moisture microsensor based on the conductive polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene-poly(styrene-sulfonate)) was created in 2008 by Jie Liu and his colleagues. This sensor was capable of detecting gravimetric water content in highly plastic soil samples. The sensor’s sensitivity was attributed to changes in the electrical properties of the PEDOT-PSS film in response to moisture content [169]. In 2022, a fully biodegradable paper substrate with enhanced surface properties through cellulose nanofibril (CNF) infiltration was used to create a capacitive moisture sensor. The authors demonstrated that CNF infiltration improved the substrate’s moisture response and its suitability for RF passive wireless sensing systems [170]. In the same year, Madhur Atreya and colleagues introduced an electronic soil decomposition sensor using the biopolymer poly(3-hydroxybutyrate/co-3-hydroxyvalerate) as a binder. The sensor relied on the degradation of a printed conductive composite trace and showed a correlation between sensor response and the intensity of microbial decomposition activity in soil [171]. Biological recognition components, such as enzymes, nucleic acids, cells, and tissues, are primarily used in biosensors. Biopolymers are commonly employed as matrices for immobilizing these components due to their biocompatibility and ability to swell in an aqueous environment. Combining biopolymers with various functional components, such as conducting polymers, metal nanoparticles, and carbon-based nanomaterials, enhances their bio-analytical performance in biosensors, particularly electrical biosensors [164]. In 2014, Sheetal Patil and her team developed a small and low-cost piezoresistive microcantilever sensor for measuring soil moisture and relative humidity. The sensor was realized using a nanocomposite made of SU-8 and carbon black and showed sensitivity to humidity changes [172]. In 2003, J. Artigas described the development of a thick-film sensor for soil analysis. This sensor had probes at different depths and a copper plate as a reference electrode. The sensors were calibrated on-site with soil samples, and their results were compared to extracts of soil samples analyzed using the Kjeldahl method. In 2020, Jin Woo Bae prepared an optical biosensor module for detecting soil contamination using bioluminescent bacterial bioreporters encapsulated in poly-dopamine-coated alginate microbeads. The biosensor module demonstrated the potential for monitoring soil contamination, especially in areas with suspected chemical pollution [152]. In 2019, Henning Roedel presented a damage-based model for estimating the compressive strength of biopolymer-bound soil composites. This model predicted the behavior of BSC materials under uniaxial compression and explored various mixture designs with different biopolymer solution contents [144]. In the study of Varma and colleagues, a new capacitive sensor known as “DQN-70,” covered with a polymer material, was employed to measure soil moisture content. The performance of the sensor was calibrated using a thermogravimetric method, and the probe’s capacitance variations were observed at various moisture levels. Vinay and his associates talked about the effects of MEMS and NEMS technology on integrated agricultural and environmental monitoring systems in 2013. They provide a summary of inexpensive polymers that are utilized in sensing devices to capture environmental factors and soil-related variables [145]. A self-sensing carbon nanotube/cement composite for traffic monitoring was created in 2009 by Han Yu and his colleagues. This composite showed promise for a range of traffic monitoring applications and revealed sensitivity to mechanical stresses caused by traffic flow [149]. A cement composite containing carbon black filler was used as a piezoresistive sensor for traffic monitoring by A.O. Monteiro and associates in 2017. The composite showed reversible and linear pressure-sensing capabilities and was responsive to different compressive loadings that mimicked traffic situations [146]. In the same year, A.O. Monteiro and his team investigated the piezoresistivity of a cement composite with conductive carbon black filler for traffic monitoring. The results demonstrated the potential of such composites as stress-sensitive materials for various traffic monitoring applications [147]. In 2017, Sadasivuni and associates explored biocomposites-based proximity and touch sensors, providing insights into their ambient stimulus detection capabilities [143]. In 2022, Vasudevan and colleagues conducted a review of biopolymers in biosensor applications, focusing on their enhanced properties when combined with various functional components, particularly in electrical biosensors. The review inspired new possibilities in medical diagnostic tests [142].
6.1 Biopolymer composites for civil engineering applications
The research questions formulated provided a wide range of opportunities for the utilization of biodegradable materials, including natural fibers from plant and animal sources, as well as natural and/or synthetic biopolymers. These materials, when combined as composites, are commonly referred to as “biopolymer composites” [106, 150]. The inclusion of natural fibers as reinforcement agents in the discontinuous phase of the continuous biopolymer matrix enhances the stiffness and tensile strength of the resulting composite. The primary objective of such composites is to create products with high mechanical performance and durability by utilizing natural fibers and biopolymers [153]. Biocomposites typically exhibit maximum stiffness and tensile strengths within the ranges of 1–4 GPa and 20–200 MPa, respectively [151]. The adoption of biopolymer composites offers several notable benefits, such as sustainability, economic viability, lightweight characteristics, exceptional specific strength, biodegradability, environmental friendliness through the use of renewable resources, and safety for both manufacturers and consumers [148]. The properties of biopolymer composites are influenced by various factors, including the type of fiber, the percentage of fiber content, moisture absorption of the fiber, surface modification techniques, composite structure, interfacial adhesion between the fiber and matrix, presence of voids, and the incorporation of additives like plasticizers, compatibilizers, nanofillers, and binding agents [138, 161]. The density, water sensitivity, gas permeability, degradability, and shelf life of biopolymer composites are also affected by the reinforcing elements and plasticizers employed. Moreover, the chemical enhancement of biopolymer composite performance depends on the processing methods, specific processing requirements, and environmental conditions [137].
6.2 Biopolymer composites for energy applications
Biopolymers have emerged as a class of materials characterized by their biodegradability, renewable sourcing, and compatibility with various renewable energy sources. The material usage highlights their transformative potential in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and advancing energy technologies. By offering a sustainable alternative to conventional materials, biopolymers present a pathway toward more environmentally conscious energy solutions. It is imperative to acknowledge the existence of challenges and impediments on the path to mainstream biopolymer integration. These include increasing manufacturing scale, doing in-depth research, and improving economic viability. Overcoming these obstacles will be made possible by the synergy of multidisciplinary collaboration including scientists, engineers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders.
6.3 Biopolymer composites for geotechnical engineering applications
Biopolymer composites are gaining traction in geotechnical engineering due to their potential to provide sustainable, eco-friendly alternatives to traditional materials. There are few key points about the use of biopolymer composites in geotechnical applications as illustrated in Fig. 6.
Soil stabilization
Biopolymer composites serve as a valuable solution for soil stabilization in geotechnical applications. When integrated with soil, these composite materials work to enhance the soil’s load-bearing capacity and overall stability. By effectively blending biopolymer composites with soil, reinforced layers are created that exhibit increased resistance to common issues like erosion and settlement. This reinforcement mitigates the potential for structural failure and instability, making it particularly beneficial in construction projects where strong, stable soil foundations are crucial. This approach not only improves the overall performance and longevity of the engineered structure but also aligns with sustainable practices, as biopolymer composites are derived from renewable resources [139].
Biopolymer composites offer an effective solution for erosion control in areas susceptible to soil erosion. Few examples could be embankments, slopes, and riverbanks. Post application, these composite materials act as a protective barrier against the forces of water flow and wind action. By creating a stable and resilient surface, they effectively impede the loss of soil, safeguarding the integrity of critical landscapes. This application is especially crucial in regions where natural erosion processes can lead to environmental degradation, property damage, and compromised infrastructure. Biopolymer composites provide a sustainable approach towards mitigating erosion since these materials are derived from renewable resources [159].
Biopolymer-based materials present an innovative and eco-friendly option for constructing retaining walls and reinforcing slopes. These materials, derived from renewable sources, offer a sustainable alternative to conventional options such as concrete or steel. When employed in the construction of retaining walls, biopolymer-based materials provide a robust and stable support structure, effectively preventing soil erosion and retaining the integrity of landscapes. Similarly, in slope reinforcement, they bolster the stability of inclines, reducing the risk of landslides or slope failure [155]. This application not only enhances the structural integrity of the landscape but also aligns with environmentally conscious practices, as biopolymer-based materials have a lower environmental impact compared to traditional alternatives. In essence, incorporating biopolymer-based materials in these construction projects represents a significant step towards more sustainable and resilient infrastructure solutions.
Biopolymer composites offer a valuable solution for landfill liners, playing a crucial role in preventing the contamination of surrounding soil and groundwater. These composite materials serve as an impermeable barrier, effectively containing leachate, which is the liquid that results from the decomposition of waste within landfills. What sets biopolymer composites apart is their biodegradability, which can be advantageous in specific applications. Unlike traditional liners made from non-biodegradable materials, biopolymer composites have the potential to naturally break down over time, reducing the long-term environmental impact of landfills. This feature aligns with sustainable waste management practices, making biopolymer-based liners a promising option for more environmentally responsible landfill containment systems.
Tunnelling and under-ground constructions
Biopolymer-based materials offer a valuable solution for tunnelling and underground construction endeavors. When applied in these projects, these materials provide essential reinforcement and support for excavated areas. Their inherent strength and stability make them effective in fortifying the surrounding soil or rock, reducing the risk of collapses or structural failures during the construction process. Additionally, biopolymer-based materials offer the advantage of being derived from renewable resources, aligning with sustainable practices [158]. This means that they not only enhance the safety and stability of tunneling and underground construction projects, but also contribute to a more environmentally conscious approach to infrastructure development. In essence, incorporating biopolymer-based materials in these applications represents a significant advancement towards more resilient and sustainable underground structures.
6.4 Biopolymer composites in hydraulics
Biopolymer composites have emerged as a promising choice for crafting essential components in hydraulic systems, including valves, pumps, and actuators. Their mechanical characteristics, including strength, durability, and resistance to wear and tear, render them well-suited for these critical applications. By utilizing biopolymer composites in the production of hydraulic components, manufacturers can benefit from materials that exhibit the necessary performance attributes, while also contributing to sustainability efforts due to their renewable and eco-friendly nature. This integration of biopolymer composites not only enhances the operational efficiency of hydraulic systems but also aligns with the broader industry trend towards more environmentally conscious engineering solutions. The use of biopolymer composites in various fields of hydraulics is explained below and represented in the schematic Fig. 7.
Biopolymer composites offer a distinct advantage in terms of weight reduction compared to conventional materials such as metals or alloys. Their inherent lightweight nature translates to a significant decrease in the overall weight of hydraulic components. This characteristic is particularly advantageous in applications where minimizing weight is a critical consideration. Lighter components not only facilitate easier handling and installation but also contribute to improved overall system efficiency. Additionally, in sectors like aerospace or automotive industries, where fuel efficiency and payload capacity are paramount, the use of biopolymer composites can lead to notable gains in performance and resource utilization [134]. Thus, the adoption of biopolymer composites for their reduced weight properties presents a practical and impactful advancement in hydraulic system design and engineering.
The resistance of biopolymer composites to corrosion stands as a notable advantage, particularly in hydraulic systems that are frequently exposed to moisture or corrosive fluids. Unlike traditional materials like metals, which can degrade over time when in contact with corrosive elements, biopolymer composites exhibit a high level of resistance to such chemical deterioration. This property ensures that the structural integrity and functionality of hydraulic components remain preserved, even in harsh environmental conditions. By incorporating corrosion-resistant biopolymer composites, manufacturers can extend the lifespan of hydraulic systems and reduce maintenance requirements [135]. This not only enhances the reliability and longevity of the equipment but also contributes to cost savings and overall operational efficiency. In essence, the corrosion-resistant nature of biopolymer composites represents a significant benefit for hydraulic systems operating in challenging and corrosive environments.
Biopolymer composites demonstrate commendable heat resistance, a trait that proves invaluable in hydraulic systems subject to varying temperature conditions. This characteristic ensures that these composite materials maintain their structural integrity and functionality even when exposed to elevated temperatures. In hydraulic systems, where temperature fluctuations are commonplace, having components that can withstand these conditions is crucial for consistent and reliable performance [141]. The heat-resistant nature of biopolymer composites safeguards against deformation, degradation, or loss of mechanical properties, ultimately contributing to the longevity and efficiency of the hydraulic system.
Biopolymer composites offer a valuable feature in hydraulic systems—the ability to contribute to noise reduction. Their unique damping properties play a crucial role in mitigating vibrations and noise generated by the movement of various components. This is especially important in environments where noise levels need to be controlled, such as in industrial settings or applications where sound pollution is a concern. By incorporating biopolymer composites, hydraulic systems can operate with reduced noise emissions, creating a more comfortable and quieter working environment. Additionally, this noise-dampening effect can also lead to enhanced overall system performance, as excessive vibrations and noise can sometimes lead to wear and tear on components. In essence, the inclusion of biopolymer composites for their noise reduction capabilities not only improves the working conditions but also contributes to the efficiency and longevity of hydraulic systems [140].
Biopolymer composites offer a compelling solution for crafting seals and gaskets within hydraulic systems. These critical components play a vital role in preventing fluid leakage and ensuring the proper functioning of the system. Biopolymer composites, known for their robust mechanical properties, provide an effective and reliable sealing solution. Additionally, their environmentally friendly nature sets them apart from conventional sealant materials. Derived from renewable resources, biopolymer composites align with sustainability objectives, reducing reliance on non-renewable resources and minimizing the environmental impact associated with sealant production. This dual advantage of effective sealing performance and environmental friendliness positions biopolymer composites as a highly favorable choice for seals and gaskets in hydraulic systems.
6.5 Biopolymer sensors in construction management
Structural health monitoring
Structural health monitoring (SHM) involves the use of specialized sensors to assess the condition and performance of construction elements within buildings, bridges, or other structures. Biopolymer sensors, with their unique properties, offer a novel approach to SHM. They can be seamlessly integrated into building materials, such as concrete or steel, to provide continuous and real-time data on critical structural parameters. This includes information on stresses, strains, and other relevant indicators. This real-time monitoring capability is invaluable as it enables early detection of potential structural issues or deterioration [156]. By embedding biopolymer sensors, construction managers and engineers can stay proactive in addressing any emerging problems, thereby enhancing the safety, durability, and longevity of the structure. Figure 8 represents the use of biopolymer composites in various fields of construction management. This advanced monitoring technique represents a significant advancement in construction practices, facilitating a more sustainable and resilient built environment. Additionally, the use of biopolymer sensors aligns with eco-friendly construction approaches, as they are derived from renewable resources, further emphasizing their contribution to sustainable construction management.
Material property and quality assurance
The incorporation of biopolymer sensors into construction materials marks a significant leap in quality assurance and material evaluation processes. These sensors, due to their specialized properties, have the capacity to provide detailed assessments of the material properties and overall quality. By embedding these sensors within construction materials, engineers and quality control personnel can conduct on-site evaluations, gaining real-time insights into crucial characteristics like strength, density, and composition. This enables immediate identification of any deviations from specified standards, allowing for timely adjustments or replacements as needed. This proactive approach to quality control greatly reduces the risk of structural failures, ensuring that the final constructed product meets the highest standards of safety and performance. The integration of biopolymer sensors in material assessments not only enhances the reliability of construction projects but also contributes to a more streamlined and efficient quality assurance process in the field of construction management.
Construction site safety
Biopolymer sensors play a crucial role in bolstering safety protocols on construction sites. These specialized sensors, when strategically deployed, serve as vigilant monitors for potential hazards. For instance, they can swiftly detect hazardous gas levels, providing an early warning system that enables workers to take immediate action. This early detection capability is paramount in ensuring the well-being of personnel on-site, as it allows for timely evacuation or implementation of safety measures. Additionally, biopolymer sensors can be programmed to alert workers to various dangers, such as unstable structures or unsafe conditions, further fortifying overall safety protocols [157, 163]. By integrating these sensors into construction site operations, companies demonstrate a commitment to prioritizing the welfare and security of their workforce. This proactive approach not only safeguards the lives and health of workers but also contributes to a culture of safety excellence within the construction industry.
Construction waste management
Biopolymer sensors introduce a forward-thinking approach to construction waste management. By strategically deploying these sensors, construction sites gain the capability to monitor waste levels in real time. This data provides valuable insights into the volume and types of waste being generated during the construction process. Armed with this information, construction managers can implement more effective waste management strategies, optimizing collection schedules and resource allocation. Moreover, the use of biopolymer sensors supports sustainability goals by reducing the environmental impact associated with waste production. It enables construction sites to minimize the amount of material sent to landfills and promotes recycling efforts by identifying opportunities for material reuse or repurposing. This integrated approach not only improves the efficiency of waste management practices but also aligns with broader environmental conservation initiatives, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable construction industry [173].
Integration with building information modeling (BIM)
The integration of biopolymer sensors with building information modeling (BIM) systems represents a significant advancement in construction management. BIM serves as a digital representation of a construction project, incorporating detailed information about its various elements. By integrating biopolymer sensors into this system, construction managers gain a powerful tool for real-time monitoring of structural parameters. This includes data on stresses, strains, and other critical indicators provided by the sensors. This combined approach offers a comprehensive view of construction progress and performance, allowing for accurate assessments of the project’s status. The real-time data from biopolymer sensors, when integrated with BIM, enables construction managers to make informed decisions about planning, scheduling, and resource allocation. They can identify potential issues or deviations from the original plan early on, facilitating timely adjustments to maintain project timelines. Additionally, the integration enhances the ability to allocate resources efficiently, ensuring that materials and labor are deployed where they are most needed. Overall, the integration of biopolymer sensors with BIM systems enhances the precision and effectiveness of construction management. It empowers construction professionals to proactively address challenges, optimize resource utilization, and ultimately deliver projects with higher levels of accuracy and efficiency. This integrated approach is a testament to the ongoing technological advancements in the construction industry, driving improvements in project management and execution.
Energy efficiency and building performance
The integration of biopolymer sensors into construction materials introduces a ground-breaking approach to enhancing energy efficiency and overall building performance. These specialized sensors have the capability to monitor and collect data on energy usage within constructed spaces. By embedding them within the building materials, engineers and construction professionals can gain real-time insights into how energy is being consumed and utilized. This data serves as a valuable resource for making informed decisions about optimizing energy-efficient practices. For instance, it can reveal areas where energy is being wasted or identify opportunities for implementing more efficient technologies or practices. By leveraging this information, construction teams can make targeted adjustments to improve the building’s energy performance. Furthermore, the use of biopolymer sensors supports the broader goal of sustainability in constructed buildings. It allows for the implementation of measures that reduce energy consumption, lower environmental impact, and enhance the overall ecological footprint of the structure [174]. This integrated approach aligns with the global movement towards more sustainable and environmentally conscious construction practices. In essence, the incorporation of biopolymer sensors into construction materials represents a significant step towards creating buildings that not only meet high-performance standards but also contribute to a more energy-efficient and sustainable built environment. This innovative approach stands as a testament to the evolving technology-driven solutions in the construction industry [162, 175].
7 Conclusion and perspectives
There is a lot of potential in using biopolymer composites in the production of sensors for civil engineering and smart city sensing applications. Biopolymer composites are ideal for these kinds of applications because they have a number of special benefits. These benefits include enhanced mechanical qualities, customized sensitivity, and adaptability in manufacturing techniques. In addition, the composites are economical, ecologically friendly, and biocompatible, all of which are in line with the rising need for sustainable methods in IoT and civil engineering. Biopolymer composites are perfect for a variety of sensing applications since they can be precisely adjusted to detect particular analytics. They are appropriate for disposable or environmental monitoring sensors due to their biodegradability and renewable supply, which also lessen their influence on the environment. These composites’ potential uses in industries including consumer electronics, healthcare [176], and environmental monitoring are increased by their capacity to be engineered to show various electrical characteristics, which enable them to be used in resistive, capacitive, and piezoelectric sensors. The study described in this paper demonstrates a number of fascinating developments and uses of biopolymer composites in sensor technology. For example, piezo-resistive strain sensors for structural health monitoring have been developed by combining carbon nanotubes with biopolymer composites, which provide enhanced linearity, repeatability, and strain transmission. Additionally, a novel BOD biosensor was developed using co-immobilized microorganisms in a sol–gel-derived composite material, demonstrating excellent repeatability and long-term stability for water monitoring.
The advancement of novel biopolymeric materials with improved properties, such as enhanced thermal stability and electrical conductivity, is directly related to the development of smart cities. These materials can be applied in various smart city infrastructure components, such as energy-efficient buildings, sensors, and renewable energy systems, contributing to improved sustainability and resource efficiency. Additionally, conducting rigorous environmental assessments of biopolymeric energy solutions aligns with the smart city concept’s focus on environmental sustainability and the reduction of ecological footprints, making it essential for the development of eco-friendly and resilient urban environments.
Moreover, the integration of biopolymer composites in electrical biosensors has shown promising results for detecting various substances, including moisture content in soil and toluene in soil as a model pollutant. These sensors exhibited reliable responses and could be employed in soil contamination tracking applications. Another notable development includes the use of biopolymer-bound soil composites for building materials, with damage-based models predicting their compressive strength, which could have potential implications for sustainable construction practices. Overall, the utilization of biopolymer composites in sensing applications offers a path towards smart, sustainable cities and infrastructure. As research continues, these materials are expected to play an increasingly significant role in sensor technology, providing innovative, eco-friendly solutions to address various challenges in civil engineering, environmental monitoring, and beyond. The potential for biopolymer composites to contribute to a more sustainable and interconnected world is considerable, making them a promising avenue for future sensor manufacturing and IoT applications.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Zhan X-Q, Ran Z-Q, Bao H-Y, Ye Q, Chen H, Fu Q, Ni W, Xu J-M, Ma N, Tsai F-C (2023) Intelligent hydrogel on–off controller sensor for irrigation. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 7:6
Gao Y, Yi N, Ou Z, Li Z, Ma T, Jia H, Xing W, Yang G, Li Y (2018) Thioacetal modified phenanthroimidazole as fluorescence probe for rapid and sensitive detection of Hg2+ in aqueous solution assisted by surfactant. Sensors Actuators B Chem 267:136–144
Gao Y, Huang G, Zhize O, Wang Z, Baolong J, Li Y, Wang X, Yin S (2015) Selective sensing of citrate by a supramolecular ensemble formed by a phenazine copper(I) complex and a perylene diimide derivative. New J Chem 39(11):8948–8955. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NJ01694K
Venkatesan A, Ryu H, Devnath A, Yoo H, Lee S (2024) Air-stable, all-dry transferred ReS2/GaSe heterostructure-based NO2 gas sensor. J Mater Sci Technol 168:79–87
Devnath A, Choi Y, Ryu H, Venkatesan A, Hyun G, Kim S, Lee S (2023) Real-time detection of mercury ions based on vertically grown ReS2 film. J Mater Sci Technol 164:52–58
Li Y, Guo J, Li M, Tang Y, Murugadoss V, Seok I, Yu J, Sun L, Sun C, Luo Y (2021) Recent application of cellulose gel in flexible sensing-a review. ES Food Agrofor 4:9–27
Sivasankarapillai VS, Sharma TSK, Hwa K-Y, Wabaidur SM, Angaiah S, Dhanusuraman R (2022) MXene based sensing materials: current status and future perspectives. ES Energy Environ 15:4–14
Liu Y, Wang J, Chen J, Yuan Q, Zhu Y (2023) Ultrasensitive iontronic pressure sensor based on rose-structured ionogel dielectric layer and compressively porous electrodes. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 6:210
Shi C-X, Li Y-Z, Liu Q, Chen Z-P, Li S-S, Yu R-Q (2021) Label-free microRNA detection through analyzing the length distribution pattern of the residual fragments of probe DNA produced during exonuclease III assisted signal amplification by mass spectrometry. Talanta 231:122414
Li T, Wei H, Zhang Y, Wan T, Cui D, Zhao S, Zhang T, Ji Y, Algadi H, Guo Z, Chu L, Cheng B (2023) Sodium alginate reinforced polyacrylamide/xanthan gum double network ionic hydrogels for stress sensing and self-powered wearable device applications. Carbohydr Polym 309:120678
Yao C, Zhao W, Liu L, Liu Q, Li J (2023) Flexible, programable sensing system with poly(AAm-HEMA-SA) for human motion detection. ES Materials & Manufacturing 20:818
Wu Z, Deng X, Yu X, Gu J, El-Bahy ZM, Mersal GAM, Zhang J, Alhadhrami A, Xu H, Guo N, Gao J, Weng L, Guo Z (2024) Electrospun thermoplastic polyurethane membrane decorated with carbon nanotubes: a platform of flexible strain sensors for human motion monitoring. Polymer 303:127120
Farrar CR, Worden K (2007) An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 365:303–315
Jyoti R, Deji, Chauhan M, Choudhary BC, Sharma RK (2022) Density functional theory study of manganese doped armchair graphene nanoribbon for effective carbon dioxide gas sensing. ES Energy Environ 18:47–55
Rohilla D, Chaudhary S, Umar A (2021) An overview of advanced nanomaterials for sensor applications, Engineered. Science 16:47–70
Sidheekha MP, Shabeeba A, Rajan L, Thayyil MS, Ismail YA (2023) Conducting polymer/hydrogel hybrid free-standing electrodes for flexible supercapacitors capable of self-sensing working conditions: large-scale fabrication through facile and low-cost route. Eng Sci 23:890
Cheng S, Azarian MH, Pecht MG (2010) Sensor systems for prognostics and health management. Sensors 10:5774–5797
Kairanbayeva A, Zhantayev Z, Nurakynov S, Nurtas M, Nurpeissova G, Panyukova D, Mitkov A, Talgarbayeva D, Kudaibergenov M (2024) Predictive system for road condition monitoring based on open climate and remote sensing data-a case study with mountain roads. Engineered Science 28:1081
Guo X, Yang F, Sun X, Bai Y, Liu G, Liu W, Wang R, He X (2022) Anti-freezing self-adhesive self-healing degradable touch panel with ultra-stretchable performance based on transparent triboelectric nanogenerators. Adv Func Mater 32:2201230
Placidi P, Morbidelli R, Fortunati D, Papini N, Gobbi F, Scorzoni A (2021) Monitoring soil and ambient parameters in the iot precision agriculture scenario: An original modeling approach dedicated to low-cost soil water content sensors. Sensors 21:5110
Omer MA, Noguchi T (2020) A conceptual framework for understanding the contribution of building materials in the achievement of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Sustain Cities Soc 52:101869
Laasri I, Bakkali M, Mejias L, Laglaoui A (2023) Marine collagen: Unveiling the blue resource-extraction techniques and multifaceted applications. Int J Biol Macromol 253:127253
Srivastava A, Azad UP (2023) Nanobioengineered surface comprising carbon based materials for advanced biosensing and biomedical application. Int J Biol Macromol 253:126802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126802
Govindaraj P, Mirabedini A, Jin X, Antiohos D, Salim N, Aitchison P, Parker J, Fuss FK, Hameed N (2023) Health and safety perspectives of graphene in wearables and hybrid materials. J Mater Sci Technol 155:10–32
Hossen MM, Hossain ML, Mitra K, Hossain B, Bithi UH, Uddin MN (2022) Phytochemicals and in-vitro antioxidant activity analysis of Aloe vera by-products (skin) in different solvent extract. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 10:100460
Thakur M, Chandel M, Kumar A, Kumari S, Kumar P, Pathania D (2023) The development of carbohydrate polymer- and protein-based biomaterials and their role in environmental health and hygiene: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 242:124875
Saritha GNG, Anju T, Kumar A (2022) Nanotechnology - Big impact: How nanotechnology is changing the future of agriculture? Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 10:100457
Qin Z, Zhao G, Zhang Y, Gu Z, Tang Y, Aladejana JT, Ren J, Jiang Y, Guo Z, Peng X, Zhang X, Xu BB, Chen T (2023) A simple and effective physical ball-milling strategy to prepare super-tough and stretchable PVA@MXene@PPy hydrogel for flexible capacitive electronics. Small 19(45):23038. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202303038
Das HS, Mishra S, Dash MK, Nandi PK, Maity SK, Khatua D, Chatterjee A, Guo Z, Xu BB, Roymahapatra G (2023) Transparent conducting gallium-doped zinc oxide thin films on glass substrate for optoelectronic device applications. ES Mater Manuf 22:1–7. https://doi.org/10.30919/esmm5f841
Zhang Z, Abidi N, Lucia L (2023) Smart superabsorbent alginate/carboxymethyl chitosan composite hydrogel beads as efficient biosorbents for methylene blue dye removal. J Mater Sci Technol 159:81–90
Ma X, Zhao D, Xiang Y, Hua Y, Zhao W, Cui Y, Zhang Z (2023) Layer-by-layer self-assembly and clinical application in orthopedics. J Mater Sci Technol 147:241–268
Jin X, Heidari G, Hua Z, Lei Y, Huang J, Wu Z, Cláudia Paiva-Santos A, Guo Z, Karimi Male H, Neisiany RE, Sillanpää M, Prakash C, Wang X, Tan Y, Makvandi P, Xu Y (2024) Nanoengineered polymers and other organic materials in lung cancer treatment: Bridging the gap between research and clinical applications. Eur Polym J 208:112891
Park H, Kim W, Lee SW, Park J, Lee G, Yoon DS, Lee W, Park J (2022) Flexible and disposable paper-based gas sensor using reduced graphene oxide/chitosan composite. J Mater Sci Technol 101:165–172
Madej-Kiełbik L, Gzyra-Jagieła K, Jóźwik-Pruska J, Dziuba R, Bednarowicz A (2022) Biopolymer composites with sensors for environmental and medical applications. Materials 15(21):7493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217493
Ramdzan NSM, Fen YW, Anas NAA, Omar NAS, Saleviter S (2020) Development of biopolymer and conducting polymer-based optical sensors for heavy metal ion detection. Molecules 25(11):2548. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112548
Anisimov YA, Evitts RW, Cree DE, Wilson LD (2021) Polyaniline/biopolymer composite systems for humidity sensor applications: a review. Polymers 13(16):2722. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162722
Vasudevan M, Perumal V, Karuppanan S, Ovinis M, Bothi Raja P, Gopinath SCB, Immanuel Edison TNJ (2022) A comprehensive review on biopolymer mediated nanomaterial composites and their applications in electrochemical sensors critical reviews in analytical. Chemistry:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2022.2135090
Singh MV, Sethi M, Srivastav S, Stanikzai K, Chauhan A, Pan D, Guo Z, Seok I, Pereira A, Tanwar S (2024) Exploring the potential of transforming sustainable waste thermoplastics into liquid petrochemicals. ES Energy & Environment 24:1121
Gong X, Liu Y, Ibrahim MM, Zhang H, Amin MA, Ma Y, Xu BB, Algadi H, Wasnik P, El-Bahy ZM, Guo Z (2023) Activation of inert triethylene tetramine-cured epoxy by sub-critical water decomposition. React Funct Polym 193:105746
Fu K, Zhang GX, Liu YB, Tan JJ, Zhang HP, Zhang QY (2022) All-organic superhydrophobic coating comprising raspberry-like particles and fluorinated polyurethane prepared via thiol-click reaction. Macromol Rapid Commun 43:2100599
Meng X, Li Y, AlMasoud N, Wang W, Alomar TS, Li J, Ye X, Algadi H, Seok I, Li H, Xu BB, Lu N, El-Bahy ZM, Guo Z (2023) Compatibilizing and toughening blends of recycled acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene/recycled high impact polystyrene blends via styrene-butadiene-glycidyl methacrylate terpolymer. Polymer 272:125856
Gao F, Liu Y, Jiao C, El-Bahy SM, Shao Q, El-Bahy ZM, Li H, Wasnik P, Algadi H, Xu BB, Wang N, Yuan Y, Guo Z (2023) Fluorine-phosphate copolymerization waterborne acrylic resin coating with enhanced anticorrosive performance. J Polym Sci 61:2677–2687
Zhao X, Hu Y, Xu X, Li M, Han Y, Huang S (2023) Sound absorption polyimide composite aerogels for ancient architectures’ protection. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 6:137
Zhao X, Ruan K, Qiu H, Zhong X, Gu J (2023) Fatigue-resistant polyimide aerogels with hierarchical cellular structure for broadband frequency sound absorption and thermal insulation. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 6:171
Chen S, Bai L, Wang X, Li H, Xu BB, Algadi H, Guo Z (2024) Effect of hydrophobic nano-silica/β-nucleating agent on the crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of polypropylene random copolymers. Polym Int 73:108–118
Zhao H, Zhang W, Yin X, Wu Y, Du C, Zhao W, Zhaoab L, Liu C (2020) Conductive polyurethane elastomer electrolyte (PUEE) materials for anodic bonding. RSC Advances 10(22):13267–13276. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA10944G
Gao C, Liao J, Lu J, Ma J, Kianfar E (2021) The effect of nanoparticles on gas permeability with polyimide membranes and network hybrid membranes: a review. Rev Inorg Chem 41(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/revic-2020-0007
Wang B, Lin F-h, Li X-y, Ji X-r, Liu S-x, Han X-j, Yuan Z, Luo J (2019) Transcrystallization of isotactic polypropylene/bacterial cellulose hamburger. Composite Polymers 11(3):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11030508
Wang B, Lin FH, Li XY, Zhang ZW, Xue XR, Liu SX, Ji XR, Yu Q, Yuan ZQ, Chen XD, Luo J (2018) Isothermal crystallization and rheology properties of isotactic polypropylene/bacterial cellulose composite. Polymers 10(11):1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10111284
Wang B, Zhang H-R, Huang C, Xiong L, Luo J, Chen X-d (2017) Study on non-isothermal crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene/bacterial cellulose composites. RSC Adv 7(67):42113–42122. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA07731A
Chen Y-h, Yang H-q, Yang S, Qiu-yu Z, Zhong-ming L (2017) Temperature dependent β-crystal growth in isotactic polypropylene with β-nucleating agent after shear flow. Chin J Polym Sci 35(12):1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-017-1990-x
Wang G, Dong M, Yuan M, Ren J, Gu J, Zhang X, Tan D, Zhang Y, Yao C, El-Bahy ZM, Elsharkawy ER, Guo Z (2024) Effects of process conditions and nano-fillers on the cell structure and mechanical properties of co-injection molded polypropylene-polyethylene composites. Polymer 299:126935
Khan WU, Bahar MK, Mazhar H, Shehzad F, Al-Harthi MA (2023) Recent advances in nitride-filled polyethylene nanocomposites. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 6:222
Lan D, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhu X, Li H, Guo X, Ren J, Guo Z, Wu G (2023) Impact mechanisms of aggregation state regulation strategies on the microwave absorption properties of flexible polyaniline. J Colloid Interface Sci 651:494–503
Mao SD, Lin FH, Zhao YY, Li XY, Zhang YL, Dong YP, Zhao JL, Zhang H, Wang B (2022) Preparation of the polyvinyl alcohol thermal energy storage film containing the waste fly ash based on the phase change material. Polym Eng Sci 62:3433–3440
Nimbagal V, Banapurmath N, Sajjan AM, Patil AY, Ganachari SV (2021) Studies on hybrid bio-nanocomposites for structural applications. J Mater Eng Perform 30:6461–6480
Li Z, Li J, Wu B, Wei H, Guo H, El-Bahy ZM, Liu B, He M, Melhi S, Shi X, Mekkey SD, Sun Y, Xu BB, Guo Z (2024) Interfacial-engineered robust and high performance flexible polylactic acid/polyaniline/MXene electrodes for high-perfarmance supercapacitors. J Mater Sci Technol 203:201–210
Zhao K, Wu X, Han G, Sun L, Zheng C, Hou H, Xu BB, El-Bahy ZM, Qian C, Kallel M, Algadi H, Guo Z, Shi Z (2024) Phyllostachys nigra (Lodd. ex Lindl.) derived polysaccharide with enhanced glycolipid metabolism regulation and mice gut microbiome. Int J Biol Macromol 257:128588
Zhao K, Qian C, Qi L, Li Q, Zhao C, Zhang J, Han G, Xia L, El-Bahy ZM, Gu J, Helal MH, Yan Z, Guo Z, Shi Z (2024) Modified acid polysaccharide derived from Salvia przewalskii with excellent wound healing and enhanced bioactivity. Int J Biol Macromol 263:129803
Ma Y, Lv L, Guo Y, Fu Y, Shao Q, Wu T, Guo S, Sun K, Guo X, Wujcik EK, Guo Z (2017) Porous lignin based poly (acrylic acid)/organo-montmorillonite nanocomposites: swelling behaviors and rapid removal of Pb (II) ions. Polymer 128:12–23
Lin C, Hu L, Cheng C, Sun K, Guo X, Shao Q, Li J, Wang N, Guo Z (2018) Nano-TiNb2O7/carbon nanotubes composite anode for enhanced lithium-ion storage. Electrochim Acta 260:65–72
Kang H, Cheng Z, Lai H, Ma H, Liu Y, Mai X, Wang Y, Shao Q, Xiang L, Guo X, Guo Z (2018) Superlyophobic anti-corrosive and self-cleaning titania robust mesh membrane with enhanced oil/water separation. Sep Purif Technol 201:193–204
Tremblay-Parrado K-K, García‐Astrain C, Avérous L (2021)) Click chemistry for the synthesis of biobased polymers and networks derived from vegetable oils. Green Chem 23(12):4296–4327. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC00445J
Das G, Sen AK (2024) Structural investigation of a novel polysaccharide (HWSPP) from semi-ripe bael fruit pulp (Aegle marmelos), ES Food Agrofor, in press. https://doi.org/10.30919/esfaf31100.
Das G, Sen AK (2022) Partial characterization and combination therapy with a pectic polysaccharide from semi-ripe Bael (Aegle marmelos) fruit in a murine model of visceral leishmaniasis. ES Food Agrofor 9:54–60
Liu S, Wu H, Lu X, Qu J (2022) Regulation of calcium carbonate biomimetic mineralization by biomass polysaccharide with different molecular weights and spatial configurations. ES Food Agrofor 9:45–53
Liu H, Xiong W, He L, Chu G, Dong D, Jielun H (2023) Moisturizing and aroma enhancing effects of polysaccharides during pyrolysis. J Agric Food Res 12:100609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100609
Bourouis I, Pang Z, Liu X (2023) Recent advances on uses of protein and/or polysaccharide as fat replacers: textural and tribological perspectives: a review. J Agric Food Res 11:100519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100519
Rashid H, Zaidi A, Anwar MA, Tariq M (2023) A synbiotic made of an autochthonous enterococcus durans strain and microbial polysaccharides improves broiler chicken health. J Agric Food Res 14:100812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100812
Wang B, Nie K, Xue X-R, Lin F-H, Li X-Y, Xue Y-B, Luo J (2018) Preparation of maleic anhydride grafted polybutene and its application in isotactic polybutene-1/microcrystalline cellulose composites. Polymers 10:393
Zhang N, Cheng Y, Hu X, Yeo J (2019) Toward rational algorithmic design of collagen-based biomaterials through multiscale computational modeling. Curr Opin Chem Eng 24:79–87
Kang Y, Chen P, Shi X, Zhang G, Wang C (2018) Multilevel structural stereocomplex polylactic acid/collagen membranes by pattern electrospinning for tissue engineering. Polymer 156:250–260
Kloster M, de Almeida AA, Muraca D, Marcovich NE, Mosiewicki MA (2023) Chitosan-based magnetic particles as adsorbents for anionic contaminants. Eng Sci 22:851
Kadhim IAU, Sallal HA, Al-Khafaji ZSA (2023) A review in investigation of marine biopolymer (Chitosan) for bioapplications. ES Materials & Manufacturing 21:828
Kloster M, de Almeida AA, Muraca D, Marcovich NE, Mosiewicki MA (2023) Chitosan-based magnetic particles as adsorbents for anionic contaminants. Eng Sci 22:851
Mohajer F, Hashemi M, Noori SMA, Adibi S, Khanzadi A, Sayadi M (2023) Effect of electrolyzed water and chitosan coating incorporated with thymol and carvacrol on inoculation of Escherichia coli O157H7, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Listeria monocytogenes, in rainbow trout fillet. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 14:100757
Gong X, Jadhav ND, Lonikar VV, Kulkarni AN, Zhang H, Sankapal BR, Ren J, Xu BB, Pathan HM, Ma Y, Lin Z, Witherspoon E, Wang Z, Guo Z (2024) An overview of green synthesized silver nanoparticles towards bioactive antibacterial, antimicrobial and antifungal applications. Adv Coll Interface Sci 323:103053
Huang A, Guo Y, Zhu Y, Chen T, Yang Z, Song Y, Wasnik P, Li H, Peng S, Guo Z, Peng X (2023) Durable washable wearable antibacterial thermoplastic polyurethane/carbon nanotube@silver nanoparticles electrospun membrane strain sensors by multi-conductive network. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 6:101
Ran F, Li C, Hao Z, Zhang X, Dai L, Si C, Shen Z, Qiu Z, Wang J (2022) Combined bactericidal process of lignin and silver in a hybrid nanoparticle on E. coli. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 5:1841–1851
Han YX, Ruan KP, Gu JW (2023) Multifunctional thermally conductive composite films based on fungal tree-like heterostructured silver nanowires@boron nitride nanosheets and aramid nanofibers. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 62:e202216093
Ma Z, Xiang X, Shao L, Zhang Y, Gu J (2022) Multifunctional wearable silver nanowire decorated leather nanocomposites for joule heating, electromagnetic interference shielding and piezoresistive sensing. Angew Chem Int Ed 61:e202200705
Li J, Qi S, Li J, Zhang M, Wang Z (2015) A highly thermostable and transparent lateral heat spreader based on silver nanowire/polyimide composite. RSC Adv 5:59398–59402
Li Z, Zhang L, Qi R, Xie F, Qi S (2016) Improved lateral heat spreading performance for polyvinylidene fluoride composite film comprising silver nanowire in light-emitting diode. RSC Advances 6:35884–35891
Zhuang Z, Li Z, Gong G, Li Q, Zhang Y, Huang C, Huang Y, Tian L, Wang P, Guo Z, Jiang Q (2023) Two-dimensional superlattice films of gold nanoparticle-polystyrene composites: a bioactive platform for bone homeostasis maintenance. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 6:166
Sun M, Guo W, Tian J, Chen X, Zhang Q (2022) Fast tailoring of gold nanoflowers by an interface-modified reverse microdroplet strategy. Colloids Surf, A 642:128590
Yi Y, Zhao C, Shindume HL, Ren J, Chen L, Hou H, Ibrahim MM, El-Bahy ZM, Guo Z, Zhao Z, Gu J (2024) Enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption of magnetite-spinach derived carbon composite. Colloids Surf, A 694:134149
Wang D, Yao D, Wang Y, Wang F, Xin Y, Song S, Zhang Z, Su F, Zheng Y (2019) Carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide-based solvent-free hybrid nanofluids functionalized mixed-matrix membranes for efficient CO2/N2 separation. Sep Purif Technol 221:421–432
Ren F, Zhu G, Xie J, Wang K, Cui X (2015) Cyanate ester filled with graphene nanosheets and multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a microwave absorber. J Polym Res 22:89
Li H, Ru X, Song Y, Wang H, Yang C, Zheng S, Gong L, Zhang X, Duan H, Liu Z, Zhang Q, Chen Y (2022) Flexible sandwich-structured silicone rubber/MXene/Fe3O4 composites for tunable electromagnetic interference shielding. Ind Eng Chem Res 61:11766–11776
Li T, Xu Z, Xu BB, Guo Z, Jiang Y, Zhang X, Bayati M, Liu TX, Liu Y-H (2023) Advancing pressure sensors performance through a flexible MXene embedded interlocking structure in a microlens array. Nano Res 16:10493–10499
Lin Z, Li X, Zhang H, Xu BB, Wasnik P, Li H, Singh MV, Ma Y, Li T, Guo Z (2023) Research progress of MXenes and layered double hydroxides for supercapacitors, Inorganic Chemistry. Frontiers 18:4358–4392
Li K, Dai K, Xu XB, Zheng GQ, Liu CT, Chen JB, Shen CY (2013) Organic vapor sensing behaviors of carbon black/poly (lactic acid) conductive biopolymer composite. Colloid Polym Sci 291:2871–2878
Shehabeldine A, El-Hamshary H, Hasanin M, El-Faham A, Al-Sahly M (2021) Enhancing the antifungal activity of griseofulvin by incorporation a green biopolymer-based nanocomposite. Polymers 13:542
Li LHZ, Li GZ, Wu Y, Lin YC, Qu YC, Wu Y, Lu KY, Zou Y, Chen H, Yu Q, Zhang YX (2022) Dual-functional bacterial cellulose modified with phase-transitioned proteins and gold nanorods combining antifouling and photothermal bactericidal properties. J Mater Sci Technol 110:14–23
Boni BOO, Lamboni L, Mao L, Bakadia BM, Shi Z, Yang G (2022) In vivo performance of microstructured bacterial cellulose-silk sericin wound dressing: effects on fibrosis and scar formation, Engineered. Science 19:175–185
Bagheripour E, Moghadassi AR, Hosseini SM, Van der Bruggen B, Parvizian F (2018) Novel composite graphene oxide/chitosan nanoplates incorporated into PES based nanofiltration membrane: chromium removal and antifouling enhancement. J Ind Eng Chem 62:311–320
Miao YE, Zhu H, Chen D, Wang RY, Tjiu WW, Liu TX (2012) Electrospun fibers of layered double hydroxide/biopolymer nanocomposites as effective drug delivery systems. Mater Chem Phys 134:623–630
Gu H, Huo X, Chen J, El-Bahy SME, El-Bahy ZME (2022) An overview of cellulose aerogel: classification and applications. ES Food Agrofor 10:1–9
Hui Y, Xie W, Gu H (2021) Reduced graphene oxide/nanocellulose/amino-multiwalled carbon nanotubes nanocomposite aerogel for excellent oil adsorption. ES Food Agrofor 5:38–44
Guo X, Yang F, Sun X, Han C, Bai Y, Liu G, Liu W, Wang R (2022) Fabrication of a novel separation-free heterostructured photocatalyst with enhanced visible light activity in photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics. J Mater Chem A 10:3146–3158
Zhang H-C, Yu C-N, Li X-Z, Wang L-F, Huang J, Tong J, Lin Y, Min Y, Liang Y (2022) Recent developments of nanocellulose and its applications in polymeric composites. ES Food Agrofor 9:1–14
Guo X, Yang F, Liu W, Han C, Bai Y, Sun X, Hao L, Jiao W, Wang R (2021) Skin-inspired self-healing semiconductive touch panel based on novel transparent stretchable hydrogels. J Mater Chem A 9:14806–14817
Han C, Yang F, Guo X, Bai Y, Liu G, Sun H, Wang P, Liu W, Wang R (2021) Ultra-stretchable self-healing composite hydrogels as touch panel. Adv Mater Interfaces 8:2100742
Wu Y, Liu J, Lin S, Huang K, Chen E, Huang K, Lei M (2022) New pressure matrix array sensor composed of flexible mechanical sensor elements, Engineered. Science 18:105–112
Li T, Wei H, Zhang Y, Wan T, Cui D, Zhao S, Zhang T, Ji Y, Algadi H, Guo Z, Chu L, Cheng B (2023) Sodium alginate reinforced polyacrylamide/xanthan gum double network ionic hydrogels for stress sensing and self-powered wearable device applications. Carbohyd Polym 309:120678
Sadasivuni KK, Saha P, Adhikari J, Deshmukh K, Ahamed MB, Cabibihan JJ (2020) Recent advances in mechanical properties of biopolymer composites: a review. Polym Compos 41:32–59
Khatib M, Zohar O, Haick H (2021) Self-healing soft sensors: from material design to implementation. Adv Mater 33(11):2004190
Xiong R, Grant AM, Ma RL, Zhang SD, Tsukruk VV (2018) Naturally-derived biopolymer nanocomposites: interfacial design, properties and emerging applications. Mater Sci Eng: R: Rep 125:1–41
Pinelli F, Magagnin L, Rossi F (2020) Progress in hydrogels for sensing applications: a review. Mater Today Chem 17:100317
Grieshaber D, MacKenzie R, Vörös J, Reimhult E (2008) Electrochemical biosensors -: sensor principles and architectures. Sensors 8:1400–1458
Suginta W, Khunkaewla P, Schulte A (2013) Electrochemical biosensor applications of polysaccharides chitin and chitosan. Chem Rev 113:5458–5479
Hötzer B, Medintz IL, Hildebrandt N (2012) Fluorescence in nanobiotechnology: sophisticated fluorophores for novel applications. Small 8:2297–2326
Lee H, Choi TK, Lee YB, Cho HR, Ghaffari R, Wang L, Choi HJ, Chung TD, Lu NS, Hyeon T, Choi SH, Kim DH (2016) A graphene-based electrochemical device with thermoresponsive microneedles for diabetes monitoring and therapy. Nat Nanotechnol 11:566
Fischer M, Wahl M, Friedrichs G (2012) Design and field application of a UV-LED based optical fiber biofilm sensor. Biosens Bioelectron 33:172–178
Vyas S, Shukla A, Shivhare S, Das R, Venkatesh R (2024) Core-shell structured polyaniline (PANI)-manganese dioxide (MnO2) nanocomposites as an electrochemical sensor for detection of emamectin benzoate. ES Mater Manuf 23:1002
Sun X, Hao L, Chen L, Guo X, Han C, Chen J, Jiao W, Wang R, He X (2022) Spray deposition of colorimetric H2 detector with Pd/MoO3 nanocomposites for rapid hydrogen leakage monitoring at room temperature. Appl Surf Sci 599:153878
Liu G, Yang F, Bai Y, Han C, Liu W, Guo X, Wang P, Wang R (2021) Enhancement of bonding strength between polyethylene/graphene flakes composites and stainless steel and its application in type IV storage tanks. J Energy Storage 42:103142
Flandin L, Bréchet Y, Cavaillé JY (2001) Electrically conductive polymer nanocomposites as deformation sensors. Compos Sci Technol 61:895–901
Zhao L, Tallman T, Lin G (2021) Spatial damage characterization in self-sensing materials via neural network-aided electrical impedance tomography: a computational study. ES Mater Manuf 12:78–88
Mishra S, Chaudhary P, Yadav BC, Umar A, Lohia P, Dwivedi DK (2021) Fabrication and Characterization of an ultrasensitive humidity sensor based on chalcogenide glassy alloy thin films, Engineered. Science 15:138–147
Xin F, Tian Y, Zhang X (2020) Ratiometric fluorescent probe for highly selective detection of gaseous H2Se. Dyes Pigm 177:108274
Huang Y, Luo Y, Liu H, Lu X, Zhao J, Lei Y (2020) A subcutaneously injected SERS nanosensor enabled long-term in vivo glucose tracking, Engineered. Science 14:59–68
Gauglitz G (2005) Direct optical sensors: principles and selected applications. Anal Bioanal Chem 381:141–155
Majeed S, Naqvi ST, ul Haq MN, Ashiq MN (2022) Electroanalytical techniques in biosciences: conductometry, coulometry, voltammetry, and electrochemical sensors. Analytical Techniques in Biosciences. Academic Press, pp 157–178
Su Y-F, Han G, Kong Z, Nantung T, Lu N (2020) Embeddable piezoelectric sensors for strength gain monitoring of cementitious materials: the influence of coating materials, Engineered. Science 11:66–75
Kapat K, Shubhra QTH, Zhou M, Leeuwenburgh S (2020) Piezoelectric nano-biomaterials for biomedicine and tissue regeneration. Adv Func Mater 30:1909045
Wang H, Li Y, Wang X, Liu Z, Ahmed MF, Zeng C (2021) Preparation and characterization of piezoelectric foams based on cyclic olefin copolymer, Engineered. Science 16:203–210
Roy A, Sampathkumar P, Kumar PA (2020) Development of a very high sensitivity magnetic field sensor based on planar Hall effect. Measurement 156:107590
Kosterev AA, Tittel FK, Serebryakov DV, Malinovsky AL, Morozov IV (2005) Applications of quartz tuning forks in spectroscopic gas sensing. Rev Sci Instrum 76(4)
Abdelbasset WK, Jasim SA, Bokov DO, Oleneva MS, Islamov A, Hammid AT, Mustafa YF, Yasin G, Alguno AC, Kianfar E (2022) Comparison and evaluation of the performance of graphene-based biosensors. Carbon Letters 32:927–951
Lee SH, Sung JH, Park TH (2012) Nanomaterial-based biosensor as an emerging tool for biomedical applications. Ann Biomed Eng 40:1384–1397
Howes PD, Chandrawati R, Stevens MM (2014) Bionanotechnology Colloidal nanoparticles as advanced biological sensors. Science 346:1247390
Jung YH, Park B, Kim JU, Kim TI (2019) Bioinspired electronics for artificial sensory systems. Adv Mater 31:e1803637
Udayakumar GP, Muthusamy S, Selvaganesh B, Sivarajasekar N, Rambabu K, Sivamani S, Sivakumar N, Maran JP, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A (2021) Ecofriendly biopolymers and composites: preparation and their applications in water-treatment. Biotechnol Adv 52:107815
Rajak DK, Pagar DD, Kumar R, Pruncu CI (2019) Recent progress of reinforcement materials: a comprehensive overview of composite materials. J Market Res 8:6354–6374
Guo X, Ge S, Wang J, Zhang X, Zhang T, Lin J, Zhao CX, Wang B, Zhu G, Guo Z (2018) Waterborne acrylic resin modified with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA): formula optimization and property analysis. Polymer 143:155–163
Vinod A, Sanjay MR, Suchart S, Jyotishkumar P (2020) Renewable and sustainable biobased materials: an assessment on biofibers, biofilms, biopolymers and biocomposites. Journal of Cleaner Production 258:120978
Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F (2012) Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: an overview. Compos B Eng 43:2883–2892
Fatehi H, Ong DEL, Yu J, Chang I (2021) Biopolymers as green binders for soil improvement in geotechnical applications: a review. Geosciences 11:291
Rubino C, Bonet Aracil M, Gisbert-Paya J, Liuzzi S, Stefanizzi P, Zamorano Canto M, Martellotta F (2019) Composite eco-friendly sound absorbing materials made of recycled textile waste and biopolymers. Materials (Basel) 12:4020
A. Nour M, M. Hussain M (2020) A review of the real-time monitoring of fluid-properties in tubular architectures for industrial applications. Sensors (Basel) 20:3907
Vasudevan M, Perumal V, Karuppanan S, Ovinis M, Bothi Raja P, Gopinath SC, Immanuel Edison TN (2022) A comprehensive review on biopolymer mediated nanomaterial composites and their applications in electrochemical sensors. Crit Rev Anal Chem, 1–24
Sadasivuni KK, Al Haddad AY, Javed H, Yoon WJ, Cabibihan JJ (2017) Strain, pressure, temperature, proximity, and tactile sensors from biopolymer composites, Biopolymer Composites in Electronics, pp. 437–457
Roedel H, Rosa I, Allende MI, Lepech MD, Loftus DJ, Garboczi EJ (2019) Prediction of ultimate compressive strength for biopolymer-bound soil composites (BSC) using sliding wingtip crack analysis. Eng Fract Mech 218:106570
Palaparthy VS, Baghini MS, Singh DN (2013) Review of polymer-based sensors for agriculture-related applications, Emerging. Mater Res 2:166–180
Monteiro AO, Loredo A, Costa PMFJ, Oeser M, Cachim PB (2017) A pressure-sensitive carbon black cement composite for traffic monitoring. Constr Build Mater 154:1079–1086
Monteiro AO, Costa PMFJ, Oeser M, Cachim PB (2020) Dynamic sensing properties of a multifunctional cement composite with carbon black for traffic monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 29:025023
Mohamed SA, Zainudin ES, Sapuan SM, Azaman MD, Arifin AM (2018) Introduction to natural fiber reinforced vinyl ester and vinyl polymer composites, Natural Fibre Reinforced Vinyl Ester and Vinyl Polymer Composites, 1–25. Woodhead Publishing
Han B, Yu X, Kwon E (2009) A self-sensing carbon nanotube/cement composite for traffic monitoring. Nanotechnology 20:445501
Diez-Pascual AM (2019) Synthesis and applications of biopolymer composites. Int J Mol Sci 20:2321
S.J. Christian (2020) Natural fibre-reinforced noncementitious composites (biocomposites), Nonconventional and Vernacular Construction Materials, pp. 169–187. Woodhead Publishing
Bae JW, Seo HB, Belkin S, Gu MB (2020) An optical detection module-based biosensor using fortified bacterial beads for soil toxicity assessment. Anal Bioanal Chem 412:3373–3381
Aaliya B, Sunooj KV, Lackner M (2021) Biopolymer composites: a review. International Journal of Biobased Plastics 3:40–84
Yuan Y, Yang P, Wang Z, He Q, Sun K, Fan R (2024) Epsilon-negative materials with lower percolation threshold derived from segregated structures. Polymer Composites. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.28922
Wang L, Yao Y, Li J, Liu K, Wu F (2023) A state-of-the-art review of organic polymer modifiers for slope eco-engineering. Polymers 15:2878
Sun L, Shang Z, Xia Y, Bhowmick S, Nagarajaiah S (2020) Review of bridge structural health monitoring aided by big data and artificial intelligence: from condition assessment to damage detection. J Struct Eng 146:04020073
Ravichandran R (2010) Nanotechnology applications in food and food processing: innovative green approaches, Opportunities and Uncertainties for Global Market. Int. J. Green Nanotechnol: Phys Chem 1:P72–P96
Lu X, Jiao H, Shi Y, Li Y, Zhang H, Fu Y, Guo J, Wang Q, Liu X, Zhou M, Ullah MW, Sun J, Liu J (2023) Fabrication of bio-inspired anisotropic structures from biopolymers for biomedical applications: a review. Carbohyd Polym 308:120669
Dubey AA, Ravi K, Shahin MA, Dhami NK, Mukherjee A (2021) Bio-composites treatment for mitigation of current-induced riverbank soil erosion. Sci Total Environ 800:149513
Yuan Y, Zhang C, Jiang B, Lei Y, Li Z, Sun K, Zhang Y (2024) A robust photothermal superhydrophobic anti/de-icing composite coating fabricated from BP/SiO2 on a modified fluorocarbon coating base. Prog Org Coat 196:108725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2024.108725
Getme AS, Patel B (2020) A Review: Bio-fiber’s as reinforcement in composites of polylactic acid (PLA). Mater Today: Proc 26:2116–2122
Thomsen MR (2022) Computational design logics for bio-based design. Archit Intell 1:13
Pessoa S, Guimarães AS, Lucas SS, Simões N (2021) 3D printing in the construction industry - a systematic review of the thermal performance in buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 141:110794
Sawant SN (2017) Development of biosensors from biopolymer composites. Biopolymer Composites in Electronics. Elsevier, pp 353–383
Eltzov E, Pavluchkov V, Burstin M, Marks RS (2011) Creation of a fiber optic based biosensor for air toxicity monitoring. Sens Actuators, B Chem 155:859–867
Abhilash M, Thomas D (2017) Biopolymers for biocomposites and chemical sensor applications. Biopolymer Composites in Electronics. Elsevier, pp 405–435
Jia J, Tang M, Chen X, Qi L, Dong S (2003) Co-immobilized microbial biosensor for BOD estimation based on sol-gel derived composite material. Biosens Bioelectron 18:1023–1029
Kanoun O, Lazarević-Pašti T, Pašti I, Nasraoui S, Talbi M, Brahem A, Adiraju A, Sheremet E, Rodriguez RD, Ben Ali M, Al-Hamry A (2021) A review of nanocomposite-modified electrochemical sensors for water quality monitoring. Sensors (Basel) 21:4131
Liu J, Agarwal M, Varahramyan K, Berney ES, Hodo WD (2008) Polymer-based microsensor for soil moisture measurement. Sens Actuators, B Chem 129:599–604
Iyer GM, Zaccarin A-M, Olsson RH, Turner KT (2022) Fabrication and characterization of cellulose-based materials for biodegradable soil moisture sensors. IEEE Sensors 2022:1–4
Atreya M, Desousa S, Kauzya JB, Williams E, Hayes A, Dikshit K, Nielson J, Palmgren A, Khorchidian S, Liu S, Gopalakrishnan A, Bihar E, Bruns CJ, Bardgett R, Quinton JN, Davies J, Neff JC, Whiting GL (2023) A transient printed soil decomposition sensor based on a biopolymer composite conductor. Adv Sci (Weinh) 10:e2205785
Patil SJ, Adhikari A, Baghini MS, Rao VR (2014) An ultra-sensitive piezoresistive polymer nano-composite microcantilever platform for humidity and soil moisture detection. Sens Actuators, B Chem 203:165–173
Jain A, He Z (2018) “NEW” resource recovery from wastewater using bioelectrochemical systems: moving forward with functions. Front Environ Sci Eng 12:1–3
Berglund EZ, Monroe JG, Ahmed I, Noghabaei M, Do J, Pesantez JE, Khaksar Fasaee MA, Bardaka E, Han K, Proestos GT, Levis J (2020) Smart infrastructure: a vision for the role of the civil engineering profession in smart cities. J Infrastruct Syst 26:03120001
Bühler MM, Hollenbach P, Michalski A, Meyer S, Birle E, Off R, Lang C, Schmidt W, Cudmani R, Fritz O, Baltes G, Kortmann G (2023) The industrialisation of sustainable construction: a transdisciplinary approach to the large-scale introduction of compacted mineral mixtures (CMMs) into building construction. Sustainability 15:10677
Jiang W, Zhang X, Liu P, Zhang Y, Song W, Yu D-G, Lu X (2022) Electrospun healthcare nanofibers from medicinal liquor of Phellinus igniarius. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 5:3045–3056
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Xingkui Guo and Hua Hou conceived and supervised the research. Xingkui Guo, Hua Hou, and Duo Pan built the framework and organized the figures. Bingkun Liu, Anjana S. Desai, Xiaolu Sun, Juanna Ren, Neeru Bhagat, Habib M. Pathan, Vaishnavi Dabir, and Aparna Ashok wrote the initial manuscript under the guidance of Xingkui Guo, Hua Hou and Neeru Bhagat. All authors have provided feedback and contributed to the manuscript writing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, B., Desai, A.S., Sun, X. et al. An overview of sustainable biopolymer composites in sensor manufacturing and smart cities. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 7, 146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-024-00938-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-024-00938-y