Abstract
Surveys were conducted in 2013/2014 across seven Tunisian citrus production areas for the identification of pathogens associated with citrus gummosis. Samples were analyzed using PARP-BH selective media. Collected isolates were identified based on morphology and DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region analysis. Ten isolates of P. nicotianae and five isolates of P. cryptogea were obtained. In vitro inoculation of five citrus varieties (Clementine Hernandina, Mandarins Tangerine, Blood Orange Maltese, Valencia Late and Thomson Navel) showed that P. nicotianae were pathogenic to cuttings twigs and P. cryptogea were pathogenic to leaves. In the case of P. nicotianae, the most susceptible variety was C. hernandina, while the most tolerant variety was M. tangerine. For P. cryptogea the most susceptible variety was C. Hernandina, while the most tolerant variety was V. late. In greenhouse assays, inoculation of trunks of C. Hernandina with P. nicotianae and P. cryptogea inocula induced the appearance of necrotic area and gum-exudation when inoculated with P. nicotianae. However, inoculation of rootstocks Sour orange with the same isolates induced root necrosis and leaf wilt. This is the first report of P. cryptogea causing gummosis in citrus orchards in Tunisia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Citrus is one of the most important group of fruit crops worldwide, raking first in the international fruit trade in terms of value (Cacciola and Magnano Di San Lio 2008). This sector accounts for the production of about 100 million tons with massive area of cultivation spread over 7.2 million hectares (Savita and Avinash 2012). In Tunisia, commercial citrus crop expanded considerbly more recently, being now grown on over 22,000 ha - a 26% growh from 1999 to 2014 (CTA 2014). Citrus is susceptible to soil-borne pathogens which cause serious losses to the crop. Gummosis, caused by Phytophthora spp., is one of the most economically important diseases for citrus worldwide (Erwin and Ribeiro 1996; Timmer et al. 2000; Naqvi 2004; Verniere et al. 2004; Mounde et al. 2009; Jagtap et al. 2012; Faldoni et al. 2015). In recent years, gummosis symptoms have been observed in the most grown areas of citrus in Tunisia and became a serious problem for citrus production (Benfradj et al. 2017). The most susceptible variety to gummosis in Tunisia are ‘C. hernandina’ (Benfradj et al. 2017). The causal agents of this disease are able to survive in soil for long periods as chlamydospores and oospores (Bumbieris 1979). In previous studies, ten Phytophthora spp. have been reported to infect citrus around the world. Two species, Phytophthora citrophthora and Phytophthora nicotianae, are most damaging to roots, trunk and branches (gummosis) and fruits, both before and after harvest of trees (Erwin and Ribeiro 1996). In South-Africa, P. nicotianae is one of the most commonly species isolated from affected citrus orchards (Maseko and Coutinho 2002), whereas P. citrophthora had a limited occurrence in that region, likely due to local climatic conditions (Ricci et al. 1990). Furthermore, Phytophthora cryptogea was also shown to be one of the main pathogens affecting the roots (Benigni and Bompeix 2006) an causing yield losses that ranged from 10% to 50% (Erwin and Ribeiro 1996; Garibaldi et al. 2000; Ptaszek et al. 2009). The pathogen is easily recovered from irrigation water and from soil (Garibaldi et al. 2003; Stanghellini and Rasmussen 1994). The aims of this study were to 1) identify the agents responsible for citrus gummosis in Tunisia and 2) assess their pathogenicity and incidence.
Materials and methods
Disease surveys and sampling
Surveys were conducted from october 2013 to December 2014 across seven areas of citrus production, Northen Tunisia (Menzel bouzalfa, Benikhaled, Soliman, Bouargoub, Takilsa, Grombalia and Hawaria) (Fig. 1). From each orchard, information on the citrus variety, plant age, the type of irrigation and the type of rootstock were recorded. Diseased trees were firstly examined for gummosis disease symptoms at the lower part of the trunk. A citrus tree was considered infected when symptoms of internal necrosis in tissue of the trunk with or without the presence of a gum-exudation was noticed. At least five diseased trees were sampled from each orchard. From each infected tree, samples were taken from the trunk and the soil with roots of symptomatic trees. The sampling varied according to the type of irrigation (flood or drip system). In flood irrigated orchards, sampling from the trunk was carried out according to the degree of tree’s infestation by gummosis. However, in the mildly infested orchards, these samples were taken from the trunks on the line in the direction of the water stream. The soil samples were collected under the canopy of the infected trees to a depth of 15–20 cm. In heavily infested orchards, samples are collected randomly and soil samples were taken in the same way as for the low degree of infestation orchards by gummosis. In drip irrigated orchards, the soil sampling areas located directly under the four emitters arranged in paired rows on either side of the shaft. A total of 30 samples from trunk and 30 samples of soil included roots were transferred to the laboratory in plastic bags for further analysis. Disease incidence per variety was calculated as the percentage of infected trees over the total number of trees per variety.
Isolation of Phytophthora species from infected trees and from soil
Trunk samples were washed under running tap water to remove any adhering soil particles and excess water was removed by placed them between steril absorbent filter paper. Then, surface of these samples has been sterilized by ethanol (70%). After, each samples were cut from the edge of the lesions to pieces (about 2–5 mm wide), and when dried, these were plated onto 90 mm Petri dish, containing PARP-BH selective medium (CMA amended with Pimaricin, Ampicilin, Rifampicin, Benomyl, Pentachloronitrobenzene and Hymexazol) as described by Jeffers and Martin (1986). The plates were then incubated at 25 ± 1 °C in the dark and examined within 2–3 days. Pure cultures were obtained by sub-culturing hyphal tips onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) (DIFCO). Samples of soil and roots material were baited using the technique described by Hendrix and Campbell (1970) for Phytophthora isolation. Apples cv ‘Golden delicious’ were used as baits and three holes per fruit and 2 fruits per sample were used. Holes were then filled with sampled soil and incubated at room temperature. After three days, small pieces of tissue were aseptically removed from the inoculated apples fruits at the junction of the healthy and necrotic tissue and placed on PAR-PBH medium. Petri dishes were incubated at 25 ± 1 °C in the dark and checked daily for colony growth. Mycelia resembling to Phytophthora species were transferred to PDA plates and the purification was made by the hyphal tip method. Pure mycelium was then placed onto Petri dishes containing V8 medium (200 ml V8 juice, 2 g CaCO3 and 15 g agar in 800 ml of distilled water) at 25 ± 1 °C in the dark for morphological features study and stored in 1.5 ml test tubes of sterile soil solution.
Morphological identification
Phytophthora spp. identification was based on the morphology of the colony, mycelial characteristics, cardinal growth temperatures, sporangia, oogonia and antheridia morphology (Erwin and Ribeiro 1996). For this, a 5-mm-diameter of mycelial plug of each isolate was transferred upside down in the center of PDA and on V8 medium dishes and incubated at 25 °C for 7 days in the dark. For temperature growth studies, a 4-mm-diameter of mycelial plug of each isolate was transferred onto V8 medium plates and incubated at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 °C, using three replicates per isolate. Diameter of colonies was measured after 2, 4 and 6 days, following the onset of linear growth along two lines intersecting the center of the inoculum at right angles (Jung et al. 2000). Sporangia formation was induced by flooding cultures with sterilized soil extract as described below. Sporangia were obtained from 5-mm-agar squares in the advancing margin of a colony grown on V8 of 5-days-old colonies and floating them with enough sterile soil extract in Petri dishes and incubated under fluorescent light at room temperature. The sterile soil extract was made by mixing 100 g of soil with 1 L of deionized water. Soil extract water was left to settle overnight after which the water was filtered through cheesecloth followed by filter paper. Then 50 ml of the supernatant was taken and added to 950 ml of distilled water and sterilized. Sporangial morphology was examined under a compound Leica microscope (DM 2500) and the shape, size, presence or absence of papilla, proliferation and sporangiophore branching were recorded. The description of sporangial shape, measurement of length and breadth of each isolate were carried out and their length to breadth (l/b) ratios calculated. For all characteristics traits, 25 measurements were taken, per each isolate, and the average value was calculated. The heterothallic species were paired with A1 and A2 tester strains of P. nicotianae kindly provided by Pr. P. Abad-Campos (Universidad Politécnica de Valencia). Production of sex organs was cheeked from 2 weeks after the incubation at 24 °C in the dark.
DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing
Isolates obtained has been grouped according to their morphology, and from each group a representative isolate has been used from molecular identification. These representatives isolates were grown on PDA medium covered with sterile cellophane disc and incubated at 25 °C for 5 days. Then, mycelium was scraped from the agar surface and freeze-dried for extended storage at −20 °C. Thereafter, between 50 and 100 mg of mycelia was placed into 2 ml eppendorf tube and the total DNA was extracted, using the kit ‘EZNA Plant DNA Kit’ (Omega Bio-tek) according to the manufacture’s protocol. PCR amplification was carried out using universal primers (ITS1–ITS4) designed on the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region (Cooke et al. 2000). Polymerase chain reaction was carried out in twenty five microliters of reaction mixture containing: 2.5 μl PCR buffer (10×), 3 μl MgCl2 (2.5 nM), 0.5 μM each dNTP(10 μM), 2.5 μl of ITS4 and ITS1 (10 μM) primers, 5 μl of template DNA, 0.5 μl of Taq polymerase (Genespin) and 11 μl H2O. PCR amplification was performed with an initial denaturation of 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C and 40 s at 72 °C with a final elongation step for 10 min at 72 °C. The PCR amplification products were separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel (Genespin) in a 1X TBE (Tris-boric acid-EDTA) and stained with 0.4% ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light. PCR products were purified by using ‘mi-PCR Purification kit’ (Metabion) and sequenced at Macrogen. The rDNA-ITS sequence of isolates were compared with known sequences of Phytophthora spp. obtained from the GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), using the BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) program (Table 1). A dendrogram was constructed after cluster analysis of the similarity coefficients by means of the unweighted pair-group method (UPGMA) using MEGA.5 software.
Pathogenicity tests
Pathogenicity tests of all Phytophthora isolates collected were conducted in two separate assays (in-vitro and in-vivo inoculations) using mycelium and zoospores as sources of inoculum.
In vitro shoot inoculation
Five citrus varieties (Clementine hernandina, Mandarins tangerine, Blood orange maltese, Valencia late and Thomson navel) collected from citrus orchards of The Technical Center of Organic Agriculture in Tunisia (CTAB) were chosen for the inoculation test. Isolates were inoculated into one-year-old citrus plants shoots (10 cm × 1 cm) (Kröber and Karnatz 1979). Shoots were cut from fresh branches of citrus trees rinsed in sterile water, and disinfected with ethanol (70%). The bark in the middle of each shoot was removed. Mycelium (4 mm in diameter) plugs obtained from each isolate (7 days-old), were placed onto the wounded area, with the mycelium facing the cambium and covered by Parafilm. Sterile agar plugs were used as a control. All isolates found had been tested and four replicates per isolate and per variety were considered. The inoculated shoots were planted equidistantly in a sterile perlite (autoclaved twice, at 120 °C, for 20 min) imbibed with sterile distilled water, and incubated in the dark at 24 °C. Two weeks after incubation, the outer bark was removed and the inner bark was examined for lesions development. Disease severity was determined by measuring the area of lesion appeared around the inoculation sites. Re-isolation was carried out on PARP-BH medium and the identity of each organism was confirmed by observing colony characteristics and sporangial morphology.
Leaf inoculation
Since some Phytophthoras prefers to enter the host by different tissues, isolates used and who did not showing symptoms after the twigs inoculation were used for leaves inoculation assay. Isolates were cultured on V8 medium and incubated at 25 °C for 14 days to produce sporangia. To obtain zoospores, cultures were flooded with 10 ml of sterile water, until an abundant sporangia production occurred. Sporangia were then dislodged into the water by rubbing the surface of the culture with a sterile bent glass. The liquid was poured off the plates and collected in a sterile beaker which was placed firstly in a refrigerator at 7 °C for 1 h, then returned to room temperature for a further 75 min to induce the zoospores release (Parke et al. 2002). The resulting suspension for each isolate was filtered to remove residual pieces of mycelium, chlamydospores and empty sporangia, to obtain pure zoospores suspensions, which were transferred to sterile beakers. A 0.3 ml of each zoospore suspension was placed in a separate micro-tube and shaken on a vortex mixer (90 s) to initiate zoospore encystment. The concentration of each suspension was adjusted to 2–4 × 105 zoospores ml−1. Thirty ml of the adjusted suspension of each isolate was dispensed into individual sterile 50 mL glass beakers and plant material was inoculated as follows. The midpoint of each leaf was marked with a permanent pen. Sixteen leaves of each variety were divided into two treatment groups: i) ‘non-wounded leaves’: leaves were dipped in the zoospores suspension, apical end first, up to the midway mark, for 1 min. On removal, excess liquid was allowed to drop off; and ii) wounded treatments’: two 5-mm-deep V-shaped incisions were made on leaves of each variety. Then the distal end of each leaf was dipped in zoospores solution. Control leaves were dipped in sterile water.
The presence/absence of necrosis was recorded, based on visual inspection after six days. To confirm that lesions were caused by the pathogen, pieces of plant tissue per leaf were plated on PARP-BH. Infection was confirmed by calculating re-isolation percent (number of positive re-isolation out of four to six tissue pieces plated per leaf) of the pathogen.
In-vivo branch inoculation
Pathogenicity of all Phytophthora isolates found was tested on 18 months old citrus plants (‘C. hernandina’ grafted onto Sour orange rootstock), grown in 6 L plastic pots containing potting mix. The inoculation was made in a greenhouse, with three repetitions per plant and per isolate. A 4-mm circular incision was performed in the bark, so as to reach the cambium; the incised portion was then removed and replaced with a same-size plug of mycelium of each isolate of the pathogen, grown in Petri dishes on PDA, for 20 days at 25 °C in the dark. The inoculation site was then sealed with a strip of Parafilm. Five replicates of two plants, for each isolate, were tested and arranged in a complete randomized block design. Five additional trees, used as control, were treated with a sterile plug of PDA medium. The size of the infection spreading from inoculation wound was measured every 2 weeks. At the end of the trial, the bark at the inoculation point was removed and cultured onto PARP-BH medium for re-isolation. When mycelia growth occurred, its culture characteristics were recorded and the isolate was identified. The isolates with similar culture characteristics and disease symptoms on the inoculated plants to those observed originally, were identified as causals agents of citrus gummosis.
Soil infestation test
Soil infestation trials were performed from March to June 2014 in a glasshouse under natural light conditions. Three replicates of 18 months old plants of citrus ‘C. hernandina’, grown in plastic pots were used for each isolate. For each isolate, a mixture of 400 g of sand-oat (V/V) has been putted in a Erlenmeyer flask and autoclaved twice (at 120 °C, for 20 min). Ten mycelium plugs, of 7 days-old, of each isolate were placed in each Erlenmeyer and the mixture has been incubated between 4 to 5 weeks. Then this mixture was added to the substrate of each pot. The soil in the pots was kept moisted by watering when needed. Symptom development (wilting, leaf browning and defoliation) was regularly recorded each week. After 90 days from inoculation, all plants were removed from the potting bags and washed under running water to remove excess potting mix adhering to roots. For each plant, the root fresh weight (g) was recorded. All roots were then excised, weighed and the total root weight has been calculated and expressed as root disease severity. A re isolation has been made from these roots to confirm the presence of pathogens.
Statistical analyses
Morphometric and pathogenicity data were analysed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using S-N-K test (Student–Newman–Keuls) as a post-hoc test, emploing Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) computer software (version 18.0). The percentage data were transformed to angles.
Results
Disease symptoms and affected variety
Conducted surveys have shown that the disease was prevalent in all the orchards with different magnitude of infection. In the same orchards, infected trees exhibited reduced vigor in comparison to healthy ones grown. Mature trees showed symptoms of decline, including leaf chlorosis, dieback of twigs, small and poor colored fruit, off spring fruit production, tip wilting twig dieback and withering of leaves during periods of drought, if the infection affects more than 50% of the circumference of the trunk. Symptoms of the disease usually appear above the soil line on the butt of the plant as narrow bark cracks and cankers of trunks and branches, from which a pale yellow gum-exudation is produced. These symptoms expand upwards affecting the main branches and secondary branches. Necrosis appeared on taproots and crowns, and some roots decayed completely. In case of a severe infection the lesions slowly girdling the tree and died. Gum-exudation proceeds from longitudinal cracks of the bark around necrotic areas, which have a distinct water-soaked discoloration and persistent in dry conditions but disappears after heavy rains. The gum is water-soluble, but even if it is washed away by the rain, the discoloration on the cortex is visible (Fig. 2). The symptoms of gummosis have been observed in the varieties C. hernandina (73%), and T. navel (16%), B. O. maltese (10%) and in the variety M. tangerine (1%). All infected trees were grafted onto sour orange. The infected orchards were mainly watered by drip irrigation (69%), while 31% of them are watered by flood system.
Morphological and molecular characterization of isolates and their distribution
A total of 70 samples has been collected. Twenty Phytophthora-like isolates were obtained from trunk (30%) and from soil (70%). Based on morphological characteristics, 15 isolates were identified as P. nicotianae-like (75%) and five isolates were identified as P. cryptogea (25%). 50% of P. nicotianae-like isolates were collected from the region of Takilsa, followed by Bouargoub (10%), Gobba (5%), Soliman (5%) and Bnikhaled (5%). However, 15% of P. cryptogea-like isolates were collected from the region of Hawaria, followed by Menzel bouzalfa (5%) and Soliman (5%).
P. nicotianae isolates showed an aerial dense mycelium, immersed in the culture medium in the beginning and stoloniferous to rosaceous on PDA medium, while it were submerged with a faint radiation pattern and little or no aerial mycelium on V8 medium. However, P. cryptogea isolates showed, both in V8 juice agar and PDA medium, a white stellate to slightly radiate colonies and a limited aerial mycelium (Fig. 3).
Sporangia of P. nicotianae isolates were formed sparsely in V8 and abundantly on PDA medium. Shapes of sporangia ranged from ellipsoid, ovoid, pyriform to spherical with a prominent papilla. Measurements of sporangia size were 28.7–54.37 μm in long × 18.67–29.02 μm of wide (average 41.53 μm × 23.84 μm), with a length-breadth ratio of 1.11 μm to 1.71 μm (average 1.35 μm). Sporangia were typically terminal but were often sub-terminal and occasionally intercalary, and weakly deciduous. Chlamydospores were also present, and they are abundant in all isolates. They are terminal or intercalary and 17.58 μm to 68.76 μm (average 27.60 μm). Sporangiophore is sympodially branched and hyphal swellings were present. All of the 15 isolates of P. nicotianae that were tested for mating types formed sexual structures when paired with the opposite mating type after the 7-day incubation period. Of these, two thirds (10 isolates) were identified as mating type A1 and the remaining 5 isolates were identified as A1. They showed spherical oogonia with amphigynous antheridia. The oospores, are spherical and aplerotic with a diameter ranged from 27.1 μm to 28.6 μm. The growth rates, of P. nicotianae isolates, on V8 were between 15 and 30 °C, with an optimum of 25 °C and no growth at 35 °C (Fig. 4).
The hyphal swelling of P. cryptogea isolates was abundant and formed when cultures were submerged in soil extract. Sporangia were not produced on solid media but were abundant in soil-extract medium. Sporangia were non-papillate with rounded bases, ovoid to obpyriform and non-caducous, internally proliferating. Measurements of sporangia size were 25.2 μm −55.5 μm in length and 18.9 μm - 35.1 μm of width (average 40.35 μm × 27 μm). The sporangiophore was generally un-branched. The growth rates of P. cryptogea isolates was between 5 and 33 °C, with an optimum at 25 °C.
Identification of all Phytophthora isolates obtained from infected citrus trees by gummosis were also confirmed by molecular analysis by rDNA ITS sequences (accessions numbers are given in Table 2). The average of rDNA ITS sequences of P. cryptogea isolates identified were all about 750 base pairs (bp) length. BLAST analysis revealed that the nucleotide sequences shared between 97% and 100% identity with nucleotide sequences of 14 isolates of P. cryptogea from Genbank .
However, the average of rDNA ITS sequences of the P. nicotianae isolates were all about 800 base pairs (bp) length. BLAST analysis revealed that the nucleotide sequences shared identity between 97% and 100% with 12 isolates of P. nicotianae from Genbank. Phylogenetic relationship, reconstructed with ITS sequences showed that P. cryptogea and P. nicotianae occurred in two separate clusters (Fig. 5).
Pathogenicity tests
In vitro shoot inoculation
Symtoms of discolored lesions extended from the point of inoculation of the inoculated shoots of citrus has been observed. These symptoms were developed only on shoots inoculated by P. nicotianae, while no symptoms appeared when P. cryptogea isolates were used. P. nicotianae isolates induced brown to reddish, and rotted, necrotic lesions reached into the wood seedlings. P. nicotianae was more aggressive on ‘C. hernandina’ and ‘B. O. maltese’ varieties than on the other tested varieties. The widest canker area was noted on ‘C. hernandina’ variety (1543.21 mm2), while the lowest one was noted on ‘M.Tangerine’ (912.86 mm2) (Table 3).
In vitro leaf inoculation
Citrus leaves inoculation exhibited necrosis symptoms with no significant differences among P. cryptogea isolates pathogenicity. However, different level of susceptibility to P. cryptogea inoculations has been noted among the different varieties of citrus. In fact, the highest levels of necrosis were showed on ‘C. hernandina’ variety with an average of necrosis between 95% and 100%, for the non-wounded and wounded leaves, respectively, while the lowest levels were on ‘V.late’ variety with an average of necrosis between 30% and 45% for the non-wounded and wounded leaves, respectively (Table 4). All P. nicotianae and P. cryptogea isolates were re-isolated from the symptomatic tissues excised from the margin of the lesion of shoots and leaves of citrus varieties.
In-vivo branch inoculation
In greenhouse, branch inoculations with P. cryptogea isolates have not cause any disease symptom. On the other hand, Typical symptoms of citrus gummosis were developed in branches of citrus inoculated by P. nicotianae. P. nicotianae isolates were found to be pathogenic on branches of ‘C.hernandina’ variety. The inoculated plants showed symptoms of necrotic and lesion. Gum-exudation was observed within. Control plants remained symptomless. 15 days after inoculation, a variation in virulence among P. nicotianae isolates has been observed. Results obtained from the first date of evaluation (15 days after inoculation) correlated with the second date of evaluation (30 days after inoculation). The lesion length developed between 17.1 mm and 18.3 mm. After 60 days of inoculation, the lesion measured 30.8 mm and after 90 days, the canker length ranged between 50 and 50.2 mm (Table 5). No significant differences in pathogenicity were noted between the isolates of P. nicotianae. Koch’s postulates were confirmed by re-isolating the same isolates from diseased plants.
Soil infestation
The results of citrus root inoculation by soil infestated with P. nicotianae and P. cryptogea isolates showed damaged roots with color varying from brown to completely black and alteration of root architecture changes after 90 days of inoculation. These symptoms were not found in the roots of the un-inoculated control trees. This root infection affects also the development of root system. In fact, P. nicotianae isolates (28,68 g) reduced the root weight of infected plants more that P. cryptogea isolates (22.47 g) (Table 6). Significant differences in virulence were noted between the isolates of each especie. Koch’s postulates were confirmed by re-isolating the same isolates from diseased plants.
Discussion
The present investigation showed that P. nicotianae and P. cryptogera are involved in this diseases of citrus caused by Phyytophthora spp. in Tunisia. The phenotypic and molecular identification showed the existence of P. nicotianae in five citrus localities with severe gummosis symptoms. Symptoms observed during the surveys were similar to typical symptoms of gummosis described by others authors (Savita and Avinash 2012).
Morphological and molecular markers revealed also the presence of P. cryptogea. ITS sequences of these isolates were identic to those obtained from P. cryptogea infected peach trees in Chile (Ampuero et al. 2008). Isolates of P. cryptogea were pathogenic on leaves and on roots of citrus, re- producing the symptoms of root rot, foliar chlorosis, lack of vigor and dieback.
Both the A1 and A2 compatibility types for P. nicotianae were detected during this study and sometimes occurred the same location. When both mating types are present oospores may also be produced which aid survival of the fungus. Oospores form when the opposite mating types are present, which may occur infrequently in some citrus soils. Although the role of the oospore in the disease cycle is unclear, oospores may serve as an overwintering structure and increase the potential for variation in the fungus (Zltko et al. 1987). The predominance of the Al mating type of P. nicotianae has been noted in this study and also has been found in citrus orchards in Taiwan and Texas (Timmer 1973; Timmer et al. 1987) and Florida (Zltko et al. 1987). In-vitro, foliar symptoms appeared after inoculation with zoospores, suggesting that these P. cryptogea isolates were pathogen to citrus orchards in Tunisia. In greenhouse, when mycelial fragments were used as inoculum in soil plants developed symptoms. Presumably, mycelium may directly penetrate into root or crown tissues under orchard conditions. Symptoms were similar to those described for diseases caused by this pathogen in other species and include wilt, moderate leaf chlorosis, necrosis, root rot.
P. cryptogea has a host range that includes several trees (Strouts et al. 1985; Erwin and Ribeiro 1996), but as far as we know, it has not been reported as a pathogen on citrus trees. This oomycota was first described in 1919 (Pethybridge and Lafferty 1919) and has since then been reported from several areas around the world, as a pathogen on roots of several cultivated plants (Stamps 1978). In Tunisia, all infested trees observed, were grafted onto sour orange rootstock. This rootstock is widely used in this region, and it has previously been considered tolerant to the disease, especially to root rot caused by P. nicotianae, as affirmed by other author (Graham 1995). However, our survey revealed severe attacks on citrus orchards of trees grafted on this rootstock. Thus, the introduction of resistant varieties and rootstocks to gummosis should be enhanced through germplasm exchange and selection programs to avoid further degeneration of the citrus plantations in Tunisia. Recently, the rootstocks ‘Citrumelo Swingle-4475’ was shown to be tolerant to P. nicotianae in Tunisia (Benfradj et al. 2016).
The presence and aggressiveness of P. nicotianae may be due to the interactions between the pathogen and other biotic and abiotic factors. The regions are characterized by soils with high salinity level (Trabelsi et al. 2005). This factor could affect the behavior of the rootstock by stressing it, especially because there is a positive correlation between salinity level and Phytophthora infections severity (Blaker and MacDonld 1986). Other research mentioned that salinity increased the severity of root rot caused by P. nicotianae, when troyer citrange was used as rootstock (Benyahia et al. 2004). Therefore, the emergence of P. nicotianae pathogen in Tunisian citrus growing areas could be related to an increasing soil salinity. The rootstock resistance seems to be relative and dependent on environmental factors like soil and quality of irrigation water. For example, P. nicotianae has been reportd as the more frequently associated with loamy soils (Taso 1990; Jung et al. 2000).
Our results showed also a dry weight reduction of roots of citrus plants growing on artificially Phytophthora-infested soils. A reduction of root system in citrus plantations could bring to lower growth and fruit production resulting in huge economic losses.
P. cryptogea was never successfully re-isolated from in-vitro inoculations and no symptoms were observed in branches. This is probably due to the fact that P. cryptogea is a minor pathogen in citrus causing disease only on heavily stressed plants. However, symtoms of necrosis has been observed in leaves of the same variety of citrus inoculated by P. cryptogea and necrosis was more severe in the wounded treatments than in the non-wounded treatments. P. cryptogea is an emerging one in citrus production areas in Tunisia. The virulence of this pathogen could be the results of the introduction of new virulent strains. In fact, the import of plants, especially from Europe, has been increased in Tunisia (FAOSTAT 2016). The presence of P. cryptogea could be the consequence of the introduction and dissemination of non-native Phytophthora spp. by the international plant trade (Brasier and Jung 2006). Significant differences in pathogenicity among P. cryptogea isolates might explain why this pathogen has not decribed as an agent of citrus gummosis so far (Larsson and Gerhardson 1990). In addition P. cryptogea, on some stages of disease development, behaves as a typical vascular wilt disease, hampering the possibility of being isolated from cambial tissues (Larsson and Gerhardson 1990). It is also possible, that, in lack of closed recirculation water system in greenhouses and plastic tunnels, the pathogen can easily spread with surplus water from infected plants to local streams, lakes or rivers (Orlikowski and Ptaszek 2007). The extent to which this pathway of spread is common under ordinary orchard conditions still remains to be ascertained.
Orchards irrigated by submersion generates favorable conditions to infection by Phytophthora. Thus, the flooding conditions during the irrigation favors fungal sporulation and allows the fungus to reach the plants (Timmer et al. 2003). The inoculum of Phytophthora diseases of citrus could be dispersal in surface water (Ristaino and Gumpertz 2000). So, a good drainage and a good aeration of soil should be maintained to reduce the dissemination and spread of Phytophthora; especially that the airborne-disseminated Phytophthora species that can be floated to a new host plant. Climate change could affect the behavior of Phytophthora tree pathogens (Brasier 2000).
This aspect should be considered as factor of the disease, because Tunisia is characterized by a warm dry summers and cold and wet winters and since P. nicotianae is most active during the summer at high temperatures (> 30 °C) in citrus areas (Ricci et al. 1990; Erwin and Ribeiro 1996), an increase of temperatures could hamper the efforts to limit the spread of this pathogen. Phytophthora can be also spread by invertebrate from soil to other part of the trees (Taylor and Griffin 1981; El-Hamalawi and Menge 1996; Konam and Guest 2004). Such mechanisms should also be considered in future epidemiological studies to better understand the biology of P. nicotianae. Gummosis caused by P. cryptogea maybe a potential problem for commercial cultivation of citrus even if no serious losses due to this disease has been reported in Tunisia so far. Different Citrus species displays different susceptibility to this pathogen, leading to a loss of fruit harvest from 10 to 50% (Ptaszek et al. 2009).
The biology and ecology of P. cryptogea on citrus must be further investigated because, although the pathogenicity of P. cryptogea to a number of host plants has been reported, little information is available about its biology. To our knowledge, this is a first report describing a disease caused by P. nicotianae and P. cryptogea occurring on gummosis of citrus in Tunisia. Consequently, the Tunisian citrus industry has to consider the risk of a new outbreak due to these pathogens. The information provided in this paper will be helpful for developing the strategies of management against the disease.
References
Ampuero J, Latorre BA, Torres R, Chávez ER (2008) Identification of Phytophthora cryptogea as the cause of rapid decline of petunia (Petunia × hybrida) in Chile. Plant Disease 92:1529–1536
Benfradj N, Bessaies N, Boughalleb-M’Hamdi N (2016) Screening for tolerance of different citrus rootstocks against zoospores of Phytophthora nicotianae in infected soil. Journal of Phytopathology and Pest Management 3:63–75
Benfradj N, Migliorini D, Luchi N, Santini A, Boughalleb-M’Hamdi N (2017) Occurrence of Pythium and Phytopythium species isolated from citrus trees infected with gummosis disease in Tunisia. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 50:286–302
Benigni M, Bompeix G (2006) Post-harvest control of Phytophthora cryptogea of witloof chicory with different fungicides and possible occurrence of resistant strains. Crop Protection 25:350–355
Benyahia H, Mouloud MAH, Jrifi A, Lamsettef Y (2004) Effet de la salinité de l'eau d'irrigation sur la colonisation des racines des porte-greffes d’agrumes par Phytophthora parasitica. Fruits 59:101–108
Blaker NS, MacDonld JD (1986) The role of salinity in the development of Phytophthora root rot of citrus. Phytopathology 76:970–975
Brasier CM (2000) The role of Phytophthora pathogens in forests and semi-natural communities in Europe and Africa. In: Hansen EM, Sutton W (eds) Phytophthora Diseases of Forest Trees. Forest, Research Laboratory. Oregon State University, Corvallis, pp 369–377
Brasier CM, Jung T (2006) Recent developments in Phytophthora diseases of trees and natural ecosystems in Europe. In: progress in research on phytophthora diseases of forest trees. Proc 3rd Int IUFRO Working Party 7.02.09 (pp. 5–16), Meeting UK: Forest Research
Bumbieris M (1979) Aspects of the biology of Phytophthora cryptogea. Australian Journal of Botany 27(1):11–16
Cacciola SO, Magnano Di San Lio G (2008) Management of citrus diseases caused by Phytophthora spp. In: Phytoplasma and bacteria (eds) Integrated management of diseases caused by fungi. Springer Netherlands, pp 61–84
CTA (2014) Centre Techniques des agrumes en Tunisie. Available at: http://www.cta.com.tn. Accessed 1 Aug 2016
Cooke DEL, Drent A, Duncan JM, Wagels G, Brasier CM (2000) A molecular phylogeny of Phytophthora and related Oomycetes. Fungal Genetics and Biology 30:17–30
El-Hamalawi ZA, Menge JA (1996) The role of snails and ants in transmitting the avocado stem canker pathogen, Phytophthora citricola. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121:973–977
Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK (1996) Phytophthora diseases worldwide. APS Press, St Paul
Faldoni L, Cristofani-Yaly M, Pires Boava L, Schinor EH, Kupper KC (2015) Effect of organic manure in the induction of resistance of citrus to Phytophthora parasitica. Journal of Agricultural Science 7:135
FAOSTAT (2016) Food and agriculture organization corporate statistical database. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx. Accessed 15 June 2016
Garibaldi A, Gullino ML, Lisa V (2000) Malattie Delle Piante Ornamentali: Malattie Da Funghi, Batteri, Virus, Viroidi, Fitoplasmi e Da Cause Abiotiche, Calderini Edagricole, Bologna
Garibaldi A, Minuto A, Grasso V, Gullino ML (2003) Application of selected antagonistic strains against Phytophthora cryptogea on gerbera in closed soilless systems with disinfection by slow sand filtration. Crop Protection 22:1053–1061
Graham JH (1995) Root regeneration and tolerance of citrus rootstocks to root rot caused by Phytophthora nicotianae. Phytopathology 85:111–117
Hendrix FJR, Campbell WA (1970) Distribution of Phytophthora and Pythium species in soils in the Continental United States. Canadian Journal of Botany 48:377–384
Jagtap GP, Dhavale MC, Dey U (2012) Symptomatology, survey and surveillance of citrus gummosis disease caused by Phytophthora spp. Agricultural advances 1:14–20
Jeffers SN, Martin SB (1986) Comparison of two media selective for Phytophthora and Pythium species. Plant Disease 70:1038–1043
Jung T, Blaschke H, Oûwald W (2000) Involvement of soilborne Phytophthora species in Central European oak decline and the effect of site factors on the disease. Plant Pathology 49:706–718
Konam JK, Guest DI (2004) Role of beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae and Nitidulae) as vectors of Phytophthora palmivora diseases of cocoa in Papua New Guinea. Australasian Plant Pathology 33:55–59
Kröber H, Karnatz A (1979) Susceptibility of apple cultivars to Phytophthora cactorum and dependence on different factors. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 86:1–11
Larsson M, Gerhardson B (1990) Isolates of Phytophthora cryptogea pathogenic to wheat and some other crop plants. Journal of Phytopathology 129:303–315
Maseko BO, Coutinho TA (2002) Pathogenicity of Phytophthora and Pythium species associated with citrus root rot in South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 68:327–332
Mounde LG, Ateka EM, Kihurani AW, Wasilwa L, Thuranira EG (2009) Occurrence and distribution of citrus gummosis (Phytophthora spp.) in Kenya. African Journal of Horticultural Science 2:56–68
Naqvi SAMH (2004) Diagnosis and management of certain important fungal diseases of citrus. Diseases of fruits and vegetables. Kluwer Academic Publishers 1, pp 247–290
Orlikowski LB, Ptaszek M (2007) Phytophthora spp. in polish ornamental nurseries. I. Perennial plants, new hosts of P. cryptogea. Journal of Plant Protection Research 47:401–408
Parke JL, Linderman RG, Hansen EM (2002) Susceptibility of vaccinium to Phytophthora ramorum, cause of sudden oak death. Phytopathology 92:6
Pethybridge GH, Lafferty HA (1919) A disease of tomato and other plants caused by a new species of Phytophthora. Science Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 15:487–503
Ptaszek M, Orlikowski LB, Skrzypczak C (2009) New host plants for development of Phytophthora cryptogea in Poland. Sodininkystė ir Daržininkystė 28:159–164
Ricci P, Pope-de-Vallaviejlle C, Panabières F, Marais A, Auge G (1990) Caractères compares des espèces de Phytophthora pathogènes des agrumes. EPPO Bulletin 20:19–28
Ristaino JB, Gumpertz MC (2000) New frontiers in the study of dispersal and spatial analysis of epidemics cause by species in the genus Phytophthora. Annual Review of Phytopathology 38:541–576
Savita GSV, Avinash N (2012) Citrus diseases caused by Phytophthora species. GERF Bulletin of Bioscience 3:18–27
Stamps DJ (1978) Phytophthora erythroseptica. Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria. IMI Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria 60
Stanghellini ME, Rasmussen SL (1994) Hydroponics: a solution for zoosporic pathogens. Plant Disease 78:1129–1138
Strouts RG, Rose DR, Reffold TC, Redfern DB, Gregory SG, Pratt JE, Gibbs JN, Greig BJW, Hickman IT (1985) Pathology. In: Report on forest research for the year ended March 198 (pp 33-36). Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, UK
Taso PH (1990) Why many Phytophthora roots rots and crown rots of tree and horticultural crops remain undetected. EPPO Bulletin 20:11–17
Taylor B, Griffin MJ (1981) The role and relative importance of different ant species in the dissemination of black pod disease of cocoa. In: Gregory PH, Madison AC (eds) Epidemiology of Phytophthora on cocoa in Nigeria. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 132–144
Timmer LW (1973) Characteristics of Phytophthora isolates from Texas citrus orchards. Rio Grande Valley horticultural. Society 27:44–48
Timmer LW, Sandier HA, Graham JH, Zitko SE (1987) Sampling of citrus orchards for estimation of Phytophthora parasitica populations. Phytopathology 68:1760–1765
Timmer LW, Zitko SE, Gottwald TR, Graham JH (2000) Phytophthora brown rot of citrus: temperature and moisture effects on infection, sporangium production, and dispersal. Plant Disease 84:157–163
Timmer LW, Peever TL, Solel Z, Akimitsu K (2003) Alternaria diseases of citrus—novel pathosystems. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 42:99–112
Trabelsi R, Zaïri M, Smida H, Ben Dhia H (2005) Géosciences de surface (Hydrologie–Hydrogéologie) Salinisation des nappes côtières: cas de la nappe nord du Sahel de Sfax, Tunisie. CR. Geoscience 337:515–524
Verniere C, Cohen S, Raffanel B, Dubois A, Venard P, Panabières F (2004) Variability in pathogenicity among Phytophthora spp. isolated from citrus in Corsica. Journal of Phytopathology 152:476–483
Zitko SE, Timmer LW, Castle WS (1987) Survey of Florida citrus nurseries for Phytophthora spp. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 100:82–85
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Section Editor: Adalberto C. Café-Filho
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boughalleb-M’hamdi, N., Benfradj, N., Migliorini, D. et al. Phytophthora nicotianae and P. cryptogea causing gummosis of citrus crops in Tunisia. Trop. plant pathol. 43, 36–48 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-017-0180-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-017-0180-2