1 Introduction

Throughout this paper, group means finite group. Suppose G is a finite group and \(P(G)= \frac{|\{(x,y) \in G \times G \ | \ \langle x,y\rangle =G \}|}{{|G|}^2}\). It is clear that \(0 \le P(G) \le 1\) and this quantity is the probability that G can be generated by two elements. This quantity is the source of several research works in computational group theory [23]. It is well known that \(P(G) \ne 0\), when G is a non-abelian finite simple group. By motivation of this probability function, the generating graph\(\Gamma (G)\) is defined as a graph with vertex set \(V(\Gamma (G)) = G\) in such a way that two distinct vertices are connected by an edge if and only if they generate G [32, 33].

Suppose X is a graph and \(\theta \) is a partition on V(X). The quotient graph \(\widehat{X}\) is a graph with vertex set \(\theta \) in such a way that two elements \(A, B \in \theta \) are adjacent if and only if there are \(a \in A\) and \(b \in B\) such that a and b are adjacent in X. For simplicity of our argument, we introduce another graph \(\Gamma ^\star (G) = \Gamma (G) - \{ 1_G\}\), where \(1_G\) is the identity element of group G.

The Q-generating graph\(\Omega (G)\) is the quotient graph \(\widehat{\Gamma ^\star (G)}\) over the partition \(\theta \) of all non-identity conjugacy classes of G.

Let G be a finite group with at least one non-identity conjugacy class of elements. The Q-generating graph of G has all non-identity conjugacy classes as the vertices and two different classes are adjacent when there is at least one element in each class which make a pair of generators of G. It is well known that for any involution a in a finite simple group G, there exists \(b \in G\) with \(G = \langle a, b \rangle \). So, the condition of choosing a pair of elements from two different classes of a group makes the Q-generating graph to be simple without loop.

Following Woldar [39], the group G is said to be nX-complementary generated if for an arbitrary non-identity element \(x \in G\), there exists a \(y \in nX\) such that \(G = <x,y>\). If there exist \(x \in lX\), \(y \in mY\) and \(z \in nZ\) such that \(xy = z\) and \(G = <x,y>\), then the group G is said to be (lXmYnZ)-generated. A group G is called (lmn)-generated, if these exist three conjugacy classes lX, mY and nZ in G such that G is a (lXmYnZ)-generated. If G is (lmn)-generated, then we can see that for any permutation \(\pi \) of \(S_3\), the group G is also \(((l)\pi ,(m)\pi ,(n)\pi )\)-generated. Therefore, without loss of generality, we may assume that \(l \le m \le n\).

Suppose G is a non-abelian simple group. By [13], if G is (lmn)-generated, then either \(G\cong A_{5}\) or \(\frac{1}{l} + \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n} < 1\). Hence, if G is a non-abelian finite simple group and lmn are divisors of |G| such that \(\frac{1}{l} + \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n} < 1\), then it is natural to ask whether or not G is (lmn)-generated. The motivation for this question came from the calculation of the genus of finite simple groups [37, 40]. The problem of finding all triples (lmn) such that G is (lmn)-generated was presented many years ago by Moori [35]. Ganief and Moori [25, 29] computed all 2-generations of the Janko groups \(J_1, J_2, J_3\) and \(J_4\). We refer the interested readers to [24] and references therein for the motivation of this study and for more information on this topic. Interest in studying the (2, mn)-generated groups has a geometrical motivation which is related to the study of regular maps on surfaces and their automorphisms. Brahana [11] proved a necessary and sufficient condition for a group G to be the automorphism group of a regular map on a surface is that G can be generated by an involution and another element of order greater than 2.

Suppose lXmY and nZ are conjugacy classes of a finite group G. The cardinality of the set

$$ \begin{aligned} \Lambda = \left\{ (x,y) \ | \ x \in lX, \ y \in mY \ \& \ xy = z \in nZ \ \text {is} \ \text {a} \ \text {fixed} \ \text {element}\right\} \end{aligned}$$

is denoted by \(\Delta _G = \Delta _G (lX,mY,nZ)\). This number is called the structure constant of G in the classes lXmY and nZ. The quantities \(\Delta ^\star _G = \Delta ^\star _G(lX,mY,nZ)\) and \(\Sigma (H_1 \cup H_2 \cup \cdots \cup H_r)\) are also defined as the number of pairs \((x,y) \in \Lambda \) such that \(G = \langle x,y \rangle \) and \(\langle x,y \rangle \subseteq H_i\), for some \(1 \le i \le r\), respectively. The number of pairs \((x,y) \in \Lambda \) generating a subgroup H of G will be given by \(\Sigma ^\star (H)\), and the centralizer of a representative of lX will be denoted by \(C_G(lX)\). A general conjugacy class of a subgroup H of G with elements of order n will be denoted by nX. It is clear that if \(\Delta ^\star (G) > 0\), then G is (lXmYnZ)-generated. In this case, the triple (lXmYnZ) is called a generating triple for G and we will use GAP [36] for the computations in order to compute the generating triples of G. For the sake of completeness, we mention here some useful results in resolving generation-type questions for finite groups.

Lemma 1.1

[39] The group G is nX-complementary generated if and only if for each conjugacy class pY in G, there is a conjugacy class \(t_p Z\), where \(t_p\) is a divisor of |G| related to the prime p, such that G is \((pY, nX, t_pZ)\)-generated.

Lemma 1.2

[39] Let G be a finite simple group with a conjugacy class pX where p is a greatest prime divisor |G|, then G is a pX-complementary generated.

Theorem 1.3

[25] Let G be a finite centerless group and suppose lXmY and nZ are G-conjugacy classes for which \(\Delta ^\star (G) = \Delta ^\star _G(lX,mY,nZ)< |C_G(z)|, z \in nZ\). Then, \(\Delta ^\star (G) = 0\) and therefore G is not (lXmYnZ)-generated.

Throughout this paper, our notation is standard and taken mainly from [3, 14, 31]. The complete and star graph with exactly n vertices are denoted by \(K_n\) and \(Star_n\), respectively.

2 Examples

In this section, we aim to construct and mention some of the properties of the Q-generating graphs of some finite groups as dihedral, semidihedral, dicyclic, \(V_{8n}\) and \(U_{6n}\). The conjugacy classes of \(D_{2n}\), \(T_{4n}\), \(V_{8n}\) and \(U_{6n}\), when n is odd, are calculated in the famous book of James and Liebeck [31]. The conjugacy classes of \(V_{8n}\), with n even and \(SD_{8n}\) of order 8n are computed in [22, 30], respectively.

Example 2.1

\(D_{2n} = \langle a, b \ | \ a^{n} = b^{2} = 1, \ bab^{-1} = a^{-1} \rangle \). For an even \(n = 2m\), the Q-generating graph \(\Omega (D_{2n})\) is a disconnected graph with \(m+2\) vertices and \(2\phi (m-1)+1\) edges, where \(\phi \) denotes the Euler’s totient function. The set of vertices is:

$$\begin{aligned} V(\Omega (D_{2(2m)}))= & {} \bigg \{ \big \lbrace a^{m} \big \rbrace , \big \lbrace a^{-1}, a \big \rbrace , \big \lbrace a^{2}, a^{-2} \big \rbrace , \ldots , \big \lbrace a^{m-1}, a^{-m+1} \big \rbrace ,\\&\big \lbrace b, a^{2}b, a^{4}b, \ldots , a^{n-2}b \big \rbrace , \big \lbrace ab, a^{3}b, a^{5}b, \ldots , a^{n-1}b \big \rbrace \bigg \}.\\ \end{aligned}$$

In this case, \(\Omega (D_{2n})\) contains the triangles which have an edge \(\{b^{D_{2n}}- {ab}^{D_{2n}}\} \) in common and the isolated vertices corresponding to the representatives \(a^r\), \(1 \le r \le m-1\) and \((r,n) \ne 1\). For an odd number n, \(\Omega (D_{2n})\) is disconnected with \(\frac{1}{2}(n+3) -1\) vertices

$$\begin{aligned}&V(\Omega (D_{2n}))\\&\quad =\bigg \{ \big \lbrace a,a^{-1} \big \rbrace , \big \lbrace a^{-2},a^{2} \big \rbrace , \ldots , \big \lbrace a^{(n-1)/2}, a^{-(n-1)/2} \big \rbrace , \big \lbrace b,ab,\ldots ,a^{n-1}b \big \rbrace \bigg \}. \end{aligned}$$

and \(\phi ((n-1)/2)\) edges. We can see that in this case \(\Omega (D_{2n})\) contains the star \(Star_{\phi (n-1)/2}\) with the vertex \(b^{D_{2n}}\) in the center and the isolated vertices corresponding to the representatives \(a^r\), \(1 \le r \le (n-1)/2\) and \((r,n) \ne 1\).

Example 2.2

\(SD_{8n} = \langle a, b \ | \ a^{4n} = b^{2} =1, \ bab = a^{2n-1} \rangle \). For an even number \(n \ge 2\), \(\Omega (SD_{8n})\) has \(2n+2\) non-identity conjugacy classes as the vertices

$$\begin{aligned}&V(\Omega (SD_{8n})) = \bigg \{ \big \{ a^{2n} \big \}, \big \{ a^{r}, a^{(2n-1)r} \big \}, \\&r \in \big \{1,3, \ldots , n-1, 2, 4, \ldots , 2n-2, 2n+1, 2n+3, 2n+5, \ldots , 3n-1 \big \}, \\&\quad \big \{ ba^{2t}, 0 \le t \le 2n-1\big \}, \big \{ ba^{2t+1}, 0 \le t \le 2n-1\bigg \}. \end{aligned}$$

It is clear that \(b^{SD_{8n}}\) and \((ab)^{SD_{8n}}\) are adjacent and \(a^{SD_{8n}}- ab^{SD_{8n}} \in E(\Omega (SD_{8n}))\). The vertices \(\{a^{2n} \}\) and \(\{ a^{2r}, a^{(2n-1)r} \}\) are isolated, where r is even. Then, the graph is a union of isolated vertices and triangles sharing a common edge. For an odd number n, \(\Omega (SD_{8n})\) has \(2n+5\) vertices as follows,

$$\begin{aligned}&V(\Omega (SD_{8n})) =\big \{ \big \{ a^{n} \big \}, \big \{ a^{2n} \big \}, \big \{a^{3n} \big \}, \big \{a^{r}, a^{(2n-1)r} \big \},\\&r \in \big \{1,3, \ldots , n-2, 2, 4, \ldots , 2n-2, 2n+1, 2n+3, 2n+5, \ldots , 3n-1\big \},\\&\quad \big \{ ba^{4t}, 0 \le t \le n-1\big \} , \big \{ ba^{4t+1}, 0 \le t \le n-1\big \}, \\&\quad \big \{ ba^{4t+2}, 0 \le t \le n-1\big \}, \big \{ ba^{4t+3}, 0 \le t \le n-1 \big \}. \end{aligned}$$

The vertex with the representative b is adjacent to the vertices with representatives ba and \(ba^3\). Also the vertices with representatives \(a^r\), \((r,n)=1\) and r is not even, are linked to the vertices with the representatives b, ba, \(ba^2\) and \(ba^3\). Moreover, there are no edges between the vertices with representative \(a^r\). In this graph, \(\{ a^{n} \}\), \(\{ a^{2n} \}\), \(\{ a^{3n} \}\), \(\{a^{r}, a^{(2n-1)r} \}\), where r is even number in the mentioned set of vertices, are the isolated vertices of \(\Omega (SD_{8n})\).

Example 2.3

\(T_{4n} = \langle a, b \ | \ a^{2n} = 1, a^n = b^2, b^{-1}ab = a^{-1} \rangle \). The structure of \(\Omega (T_{4n})\) is similar to \(\Omega (D_{2(2m)})\), with \(n+2\) vertices of

$$\begin{aligned} V(\Omega (T_{4n}))= & {} \bigg \{ \big \{ a^{n} \big \}, \big \{ a^r, a^{-r} \big \}, 1 \le r \le n-1, \big \{a^{2s}b, 0 \le s \le n-1\big \}, \nonumber \\&\quad \big \{ a^{2s+1} b, 0 \le s \le n-1 \big \}\bigg \} \end{aligned}$$

and \(2\phi (n)+1\) edges. This graph is also disconnected with \(\phi (n)\) triangles which have a common edge and \(n-\phi (n)\) isolated vertices.

Example 2.4

\(V_{8n} = \langle a, b \ | \ a^{2n} = b^{4} = 1, \ aba = b^{-1}, \ ab^{-1}a = b \rangle \). When n is even, the vertices of \(\Omega (V_{8n})\) are listed as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} V(\Omega (V_{8n}))= & {} \bigg \{\big \{ b^2 \big \}, \big \{ a^n \big \}, \big \{ a^n b^2 \big \}, \big \{ a^{2r+1}, a^{-2r-1}b^{2}\big \}, 0\le r \le n-1,\\&\quad \big \{a^{2s}, a^{-2s}\big \}, 1\le s \le \frac{n}{2}-1, \big \{ a^{2s}b^{2}, a^{-2s}b^{2}\big \}, 1\le s \le \frac{n}{2}-1,\\&\quad \big \{ a^{2k}b^{(-1)^{k}} | 0\le k \le n-1\big \}, \big \{a^{2k}b^{(-1)^{k+1}} | 0\le k \le n-1\big \},\\&\quad \big \{ a^{2k+1}b^{(-1)^{k}} | 0\le k \le n-1 \big \}, \big \{ a^{2k+1}b^{(-1)^{k+1}} | 0\le k \le n-1 \big \}\bigg \}. \end{aligned}$$

The Q-generating graph \(\Omega (V_{8n})\) is a disconnected graph in which \(\{ b^{2} \}\), \(\{a^{n} \}\), \(\{a^{n}b^{2} \}\), \({(a^{2s})}^{V_{8n}}\), \({(a^{2s}b^{2})}^{V_{8n}}\) and \({(a^{2r+1})} ^{V_{8n}} \) are the isolated vertices, where \(1 \le r \le n-1\), \((2r+1,n)=1\) and \(1 \le s \le \frac{n}{2}\). Among the vertices with representatives b, \(b^{-1}\), ab and \(ab^{-1}\), we can see that b is adjacent to the vertex \(\{a^j b \ | \ j \ \text {is odd}, k = 1, 3\}\) and also ab is adjacent to the vertex \(\{a^j b \ | \ j \ \text {is even}, k = 1, 3 \}\). These four vertices are also adjacent to the vertices of \(\{a^{2r+1}, a^{-2r-1} b^2 \}\), where \((2r+1,n)=1\).

When n is odd, the graph \(\Omega (V_{8n})\) is disconnected with the vertex set

$$\begin{aligned} V(\Omega (V_{8n}))= & {} \bigg \{ \big \{ b^{2} \big \}, \big \{ a^{2r+1}, a^{-2r-1}b^{2}\big \}, 0\le r \le \frac{n-1}{2},\\&\big \{ a^{2s}, a^{-2s} \big \}, 1\le s \le \frac{n-1}{2}, \big \{ a^{2s}b^{2}, a^{-2s}b^{2}\big \}, 1\le s \le \frac{n-1}{2},\\&\big \{ a^{j} b^{k} | j \ \text { even}, k=1,3 \big \}, \big \{ a^{j} b^{k} | j \ \text { odd }, k=1,3 \big \}\bigg \}. \end{aligned}$$

When \(n=p > 2\) is prime, then the graph \(\Omega (V_{8p})\) is a union of the triangles which share an edge and the vertices corresponding to the class representatives \( b^2, a^{2s}, a^{2s}b^{2}\) and \(a^{p}\), are the isolated vertices. When n is odd but not prime, then \(\Omega (V_{8n})\) is again disconnected and the vertices \(\{ b^{2} \}\), \({ (a^{2s})}^{V_{8n}}\), \({( a^{2s}b^{2})}^{V_{8n}}\), \({a^n}^{V_{8n}}\) and \({ \{ a^{2r+1}, a^{-2r-1}b^2 \}}\), \(0 \le r \le n-1\) are the isolated vertices, where \((2r+1, n) \ne 1 \) or \((-2r-1,n) \ne 1\). In this case, again the graph is the union of triangles with a common edge and some isolated vertices.

Example 2.5

\(U_{6n} = \langle a, b \ | \ a^{2n} = b^{3} = 1, \ bab = a \rangle \). The Q-generating graph \(\Omega (U_{6n})\) is also disconnected with the vertex set

$$\begin{aligned} V(\Omega (U_{6n}))=\{ \{ a^{2r} \}, \{ a^{2r}b, a^{2r}b^{2} \}, \{ a^{2r+1}b, a^{2r+1}, a^{2r+1}b^{2} \}, 0 \le r \le n-1 \}. \end{aligned}$$

Among the vertices, the vertices \({( a^i)}^{U_{6n}}\) are isolated, when i is even. The vertices \({(a^j)}^{U_{6n}}\), \(j \ne i\) and \((j, n) =1\) are joined to all other vertices, because they generate \(U_{6n}\).

It is merit to mention here that Breuer et al. [12], proved that if G is a non-abelian finite simple group, then for every pair of non-identity elements \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) in G there exists an element y in G such that \(\langle x_1, y\rangle = \langle x_2, y\rangle = G\). So \(\Gamma ^\star (G)\) is a connected graph of diameter 2. Notice that if the Q-generating graph \(\Omega (G)\) is connected, then it has at most diameter 2.

3 Finite Groups with Complete Q-Generating Graph

In this section, we first present a characterization of finite solvable groups with complete Q-generating graph. The sporadic groups with complete Q-generating graphs are also classified.

Theorem 3.1

Let G be a finite solvable group such that the Q-generating graph \(\Omega (G)\) is complete. Then, G is isomorphic to one of the following groups:

  1. 1.

    G is isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}_4\), \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\) or \(\mathbb {Z}_p\),

  2. 2.

    \(G \cong S_3\) or G is a non-abelian group of order \(2^r (2^r -1)\), r is prime, and \(2^r - 1\) is a Mersenne prime. Moreover, the Sylow 2-subgroup of G is normal and elementary abelian.

Proof

Suppose the Q-generating graph of a solvable group G is complete. Suppose \(1< N < G\) and that N is normal. (If no such N exists, then G is simple, and since G is solvable, it has prime order and we are done.) Then, no two distinct classes of G contained in N can be connected, so all non-trivial elements of N are conjugate in G, and it follows that N is an elementary abelian p-group for some prime p.

Also, there cannot exist a normal subgroup M of G with \(N< M < G\) because by the same reasoning, all non-trivial elements of M would have to be conjugate in G and this is not the case since elements of M not in N cannot be conjugate to elements of N. Since no such subgroup M can exist, \(\frac{G}{N}\) is simple, and since G is solvable, \(\frac{G}{N}\) has prime order q for some prime q.

If \(|N| = 2\), then N is central and \(|G| = 2q\). Then, G is abelian and every minimal normal subgroup of G has order 2, so \(q = 2\) and \(|G| = 4\). We can now assume \(|N| > 2\), and since the non-identity elements of N are conjugate in G, we see that G is not abelian. Then, N is the centralizer of each of its non-identity elements, so the class of each of these elements has size q. It follows that \(|N| = q+1\), and this is a power of p. If \(q = 2\), then \(|N| = 3\) and \(G = S_3\). Otherwise, q is odd, so |N| is even and \(p = 2\). If \(|N| = 2^r\), we have \(2^r - 1 = q\), so q is Mersenne. \(\square \)

Lemma 3.2

The Q-generating graphs of sporadic groups are connected.

Proof

By a result of Woldar [38], if pX is a conjugacy class of a group G such that p is the greatest prime divisor of |G|, then the group G is pX-complementary generated. Hence, the vertex pX of the corresponding Q-generating graph \(\Omega (G)\) is joined to all other vertices. As a consequence, \(\Omega (G)\) is connected. \(\square \)

Lemma 3.3

The following are hold:

  1. 1.

    \(J_1\) and \(J_3\) are nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n > 2\).

  2. 2.

    The group \(O^{\prime }N\) is nX-complementary generated for \(n \in \{4,6,8,10,12,14,\)\(15,16,20,28 \}\) or \(n = p\), an odd prime divisor of \(|O^{\prime }N|\).

  3. 3.

    The group Th is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n> 2\) and also it is (pqr)-generated where pqr are the distinct prime divisors of |Th|, with \(p< q < r\), except when \((p,q,r) = (2,3,5)\).

Proof

The proof of (1) follows from [24], proof of (2) follows from [19], and proof of (3) follows from [5]. \(\square \)

Theorem 3.4

Suppose G is a sporadic group. Then, \(\Omega (G)\) is complete if and only if \(G \cong J_1, J_3, {O^\prime }N\) or Th. Moreover, \(\Omega (J_1) \cong K_{14}\), \(\Omega (J_3) \cong K_{20}\), \(\Omega (O^\prime N) \cong K_{29}\) and \(\Omega (Th) \cong K_{46}\).

Proof

The first Janko group \(J_1\) has 14 non-identity conjugacy classes as the vertices

$$\begin{aligned} 2A, 3A, 5A, 5B, 6A, 7A, 10A, 10B, 11A, 15A, 15B, 19A, 19B, 19C , \end{aligned}$$

in which there is only one class of involutions. By Lemma 3.3(1), \(J_1\) is nX-complementary generated for each divisor n of \(|J_1|\), \(n > 2\). Hence, all vertices are connected and \(\Omega (J_1) \cong K_{14}\).

The group \(J_3\) has 20 non-identity conjugacy classes which are the vertices as \(V(\Omega (J_3))= \{ 2A\), 3A, 3B, 4A, 5A, 5B, 6A, 8A, 9A, 9B, 9C, 10A, 10B, 12A,  15A, 15B, 17A, 17B, 19A, \(19B\}\). This group is nX-complementary generated for \(n > 2\), and it has only one conjugacy class of involutions. It means that \(\Omega (J_3)\) is complete and isomorphic to \(K_{20}\).

We now prove that the group \(O^{\prime }N\) with 29 non-identity conjugacy classes has a complete Q-generating graph isomorphic to \(K_{29}\). The vertices are

2A

3A

4A

4B

5A

6A

7A

7B

8A

8B

10A

11A

12A

14A

15A

15B

16A

16B

16C

16D

19A

19B

19C

20A

20B

28A

28B

31A

31B

    

Based on Lemma 3.3(2), since \(O^\prime N\) is pX-complementary generated for each prime divisor \(p > 2\) of its order, and it has only one conjugacy class of involutions, we can conclude that each pX is connected to other vertices. Also the other vertices nX, n is not prime, are adjacent to other vertices, again because \(O^\prime N\) is nX-complementary generated. Then, \(\Omega (O^\prime N) \cong K_{29}\).

The Q-generating graph \(\Omega (Th)\) has 46 vertices as follows.

2A

3A

3B

3C

4A

4B

5A

6A

6B

6C

7A

8A

8B

9A

9B

9C

10A

12A

12B

12C

12D

13A

14A

15A

15B

18A

18B

19A

20A

21A

24A

24B

24C

27A

27B

27C

28A

30A

30B

31A

31B

36A

36B

36C

39A

39B

         

Based on Lemma 3.3(3), Th has only one class of involutions and for \(n>2\) it is nX-complementary generated, so all vertices are joined and \(\Omega (Th) \cong K_{46}\).

By Atlas of finite groups [14], we can see that the Monster group M, the baby monster group B and the Fischer group \(Fi_{24}^{\prime }\) have more than one conjugacy classes of involutions. Suppose G is one of these groups and A and B are two G-conjugacy classes of involutions. Choose \(x \in A\) and \(y \in B\). Since \(\langle x,y\rangle \) is a dihedral group of order 2o(xy) and G is simple, \(\{ x,y\}\) is a not a generating set for G. This proves that the conjugacy classes A and B are not adjacent in the Q-generating graph of G. Therefore, G is not complete. The graphs of some other sporadic groups are not complete, and their proofs will be given Sect. 4. \(\square \)

4 Sporadic Groups with Non-complete Q-Generating Graphs

Now we bring one of the main results of this paper, which is related to the structure of Q-generating graphs of some other sporadic groups. In an exact phrase, the Q-generating graphs of \(M_{11},\)\(M_{22},\)\(M_{23}\), McL, \( J_2, J_4\), \(Fi_{22}\), \(Fi_{23}\), Ly, He, \(Co_1\), \(Co_2\), \(Co_3\), Suz and HS are calculated. To do this, we need the following crucial lemmas:

Lemma 4.1

The (lmn)-generating triple of some sporadic groups are as follows:

  1. 1.

    Every sporadic group G is (2, mn)-generated, for some integers m and n the divisors of |G|.

  2. 2.

    The sporadic groups except \(M_{11}\), \(M_{22}\), \(M_{23}\) and McL are (2, 3, n)-generated, for some n.

  3. 3.

    The groups \(J_3\), \(Fi_{22}\), Ly, He, HN, \(Co_3\) and Ru are (pqr)-generated where pqr are the distinct prime divisors of \(|J_3|\), \(|Fi_{22}|\), |Ly|, |He|, |HN|, \(|Co_3|\) and |Ru|, respectively, with \(p< q < r\), except when \((p,q,r) = (2,3,5)\).

  4. 4.

    The Conway group \( Co_1\) is (pqr)-generated for each prime p and \(q \in \{7, 11, 13, 23\}\). This group is also \((pX, 5Y, t_p Z)\)-generated for each prime class pX and \(Y \in \{B, C\}\). Besides \(Co_1\) is (2, pq)-generated for all \(p, q \in \{3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 23\}\) with \(p < q\), except when \((p, q) = (3, 5)\) or (3, 7).

  5. 5.

    \(Co_2\) is (pqr)-generated for all pqr in \(\{ 2,3,5,7,11,23\}\) with \(p<q<r\), except with \((p,q,r)=(2,3,5)\) or (2, 3, 7).

  6. 6.

    The Suzuki’s sporadic simple group Suz is (2, 3, t)-generated, where t is an odd divisor of |Suz| except \(t = 7\).

  7. 7.

    The Higman–Sims group HS is (pqr)-generated for all pqr in \(\{2,3,5,7,11\}\) with \(p<q<r\), except with \((p,q,r) = (2,3,5)\) or (2, 3, 7).

Proof

We refer to the papers [1, 2, 4, 7, 15,16,17,18, 20, 24,25,26,27,28, 34, 39] for a complete proof for different parts of this result. \(\square \)

Lemma 4.2

The nX-complementary generations of the sporadic groups are as follows:

  1. 1.

    McL is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n \ge 4\).

  2. 2.

    \(J_4\) and Ru are nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n > 2\).

  3. 3.

    \(J_2\) is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(nX \in \{5C,5D\}\) or \(n \ge 6\).

  4. 4.

    He is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n \ge 4\) or \(nX = 3B\).

  5. 5.

    \(Co_1\) is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n \ge 4\) and \(nX \notin \{4A, 4B,\)\( 4C, 4D, 5A, 6A\}\).

  6. 6.

    \(Co_2\) is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n \ge 7\) or \(nX \in \{4G,5A,5B,\)\(6A,6B,6E,6F\}\).

  7. 7.

    Ly is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n \ge 3\) and \(nX \ne 3A\).

  8. 8.

    \({Fi}_{22}\) is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(nX \in \{6K, 8C, 8D, 9C,\)\(12E, \ldots , 12K\}\) or n\(\in \)\(\{7, 10, 11, 13, \ldots , 30 \}\).

  9. 9.

    \(Fi_{23}\) is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n>12 \) or \(n \in \{7,8,10, 11\}\) or

    $$\begin{aligned} nX \in \{6N, 6O, 9D,9E, 12C,12D, \ldots , 12O \}. \end{aligned}$$
  10. 10.

    Suz is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(nX =3C\) or \(n \ge 4\) and \(nX \ne 4A, 6A\).

  11. 11.

    HN is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(nX \notin \{2A, 2B, 3A, 5A, 5B \}\).

  12. 12.

    HS is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(nX= 4C\) or \(n \ge 5\).

Proof

The proofs of (1) and (12) follow from [26], proofs of (2), (3) and (8) follow from the main results of [8, 24] and proofs of (4), (5), (6), (7), (9), (10) and (11) follow from [6, 9, 10, 18, 20, 21, 28], respectively. \(\square \)

In the following two results, the Q-generating graph of some sporadic groups is obtained.

Theorem 4.3

The Q-generating graph of the sporadic groups He, \(J_2\), \(M_{12}\), \(M_{24}\), McL, HN, \(Fi_{22}\), \(Fi_{23}\), \(Co_1\), \(Co_2\), \(Co_3\), Suz and HS can be computed as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} {\begin{array}{llll} 1. &{} \Omega (He) \cong K_{32}- H_1, \ \ \ &{} 2. &{} \Omega (J_2) \cong K_{20} - H_2,\\ 3. &{} \Omega (M_{12}) \cong K_{14} - H_3, \ \ \ &{} 4. &{} \Omega (M_{24}) \cong K_{25} - H_4, \\ 5. &{} \Omega (McL) \cong K_{23} -H_5, \ \ \ &{} 6. &{} \Omega (HN) \cong K_{53} - H_6,\\ 7. &{} \Omega (Fi_{22}) \cong K_{64} -H_7, \ \ \ &{} 8. &{} \Omega (Fi_{23}) \cong K_{97} -H_8 , \\ 9. &{} \Omega (Co_1) \cong K_{100} - H_9, \ \ \ &{} 10. &{} \Omega (Co_2) \cong K_{59}- H_{10}, \\ 11. &{} \Omega (Co_3) \cong K_{41} - H_{11}, \ \ \ &{} 12. &{}\Omega (Suz) \cong K_{42} - H_{12} \\ 13. &{} \Omega (HS) \cong K_{23}- H_{13}, \ \ \ &{} &{}\\ \end{array}} \end{aligned}$$

in which the graph \(H_i\), \(1 \le i \le 13\), are depicted in Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The graph \(H_1\)

Fig. 2
figure 2

The graph \(H_2\)

Fig. 3
figure 3

The graph \(H_3\)

Fig. 4
figure 4

The graph \(H_4\)

Fig. 5
figure 5

The graph \(H_5\)

Fig. 6
figure 6

The graph \(H_6\)

Fig. 7
figure 7

The graph \(H_7\)

Fig. 8
figure 8

The graph \(H_8\)

Fig. 9
figure 9

The graph \(H_9\)

Fig. 10
figure 10

The graph \(H_{10}\)

Fig. 11
figure 11

The graph \(H_{11}\)

Fig. 12
figure 12

The graph \(H_{12}\)

Fig. 13
figure 13

The graph \(H_{13}\)

Proof

Our main proof will consider some separete cases as follows:

  1. 1.

    In the following, there are 32 non-identity conjugacy classes of Held group He,

    2A

    2B

    3A

    3B

    4A

    4B

    4C

    5A

    6A

    6B

    7A

    7B

    7C

    7D

    7E

    8A

    10A

    12A

    12B

    14A

    14B

    14C

    14D

    15A

    17A

    17B

    21A

    21B

    21

    21D

    28A

    28B

     

    Based on Lemma 4.2(4), in the Q-generating graph of He all conjugacy classes nX, \(n \ge 4\), are adjacent. On the other hand, the vertex 3B and all other vertices are adjacent and since He is simple, there is no edge between 2A and 2B. Also for each vertex tZ, \(t \ne 2\), we have \(\Delta _{He} (2A, 3A, tZ) < |C_{He}(tZ)|\). Then by Theorem 1.3, \(\Delta ^ *(2A,3A,tZ) = 0\) and so \(2A-3A \notin E(\Omega (He))\). Therefore, \(\Omega (He) \cong K_{32} - \{2A-2B, 2A-3A\}\).

  2. 2.

    The Q-generating graph of \(J_2\) with 20 vertices of

    2A

    2B

    3A

    3B

    4A

    5A

    5B

    5C

    5D

    6A

    6B

    7A

    8A

    10A

    10B

    10C

    10D

    12A

    15A

    15B

    is not a complete graph. By Lemma 4.2(3), \(J_2\) is nX-complementary generated if and only if \(n \ge 6\) or \(nX \in \{ 5C, 5D\}\) and it is not (2AmYtZ)-generated where tZ is an arbitrary conjugacy class and \(mY\in \{ 3A, 3B, 4A, 5A, 5B \}\). Besides, our calculations show that \(\Delta (2B,3A,tZ) < |C_{J_2}(tZ)|\) for each vertex tZ and so \(\Delta ^ * (2B,3A,tZ)=0\). Also for \(tZ \ne 7A \), we have \({\Delta }_{J_2} (3A, 4A, tZ) < |C_{J_2} (tZ)|\) and hence \(\Delta ^*(3A,4A,tZ)\)\(=0\). But \(\Delta _{J_2} (3A, 4A,7A) = 14 > |C_{J_2}(7A)|=7\) and (3A, 4A, 7A) is a generating triple of the maximal subgroup \(U_3(3)\). Our computations show that the elements of 7A are located in two different conjugacy classes 7a and 7b of \(U_3(3)\) which have non-empty intersection with 3a and 4c, then \(\Sigma _{U_3(3)}((3a,4c,7a) + (3a,4c,7b) =7+7 =14\). Hence,

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta ^*< \Delta (3A,4A,7A) - \Sigma _{U_3 (3)}(3A,4A,7A) = 14 -14 <|C_{J_2}(7A)|=7. \end{aligned}$$

    Then \(3A-4A \notin E(\Omega (J_2))\). Therefore, \(\Omega (J_2) \cong K_{20} - H_2\).

  3. 3.

    The Q-generating graph of \(M_{12}\) has 14 vertices with two conjugacy classes of involutions. By Atlas [14],

    $$\begin{aligned} V(\Omega (M_{12}))=\{ 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, 6A, 6B, 8A, 8B, 10A, 11A, 11B\}. \end{aligned}$$

    For \(n> 4\), \(M_{12}\) is nX-complementary generated and so all vertices nX, (\(n > 4\)) are connected in the graph. Obviously, \(2A-2B \notin E(\Omega (M_{12}))\). Also the vertex 2A is not adjacent with 3B. Note that \(\Delta (2A,3B,5A)=20> |C_{M_{12}}(5A)|=10\) and there exists a maximal subgroup \(L_2(11)\) which intersects conjugacy classes 2A, 3B and 5A. Then,

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,3B,5A) -\Sigma _{L_2(11)}((2a,3b,5a)+(2a,3b,5b)) = 20- (10+10) = 0 \end{aligned}$$

    and so \(2A-3B \notin E(\Omega (M_{12}))\). Also the vertex 2B is not adjacent to the vertices 3A, 4A and 4B. Since \(M_{11}\) is the maximal subgroup of \(M_{12}\) which has intersection with 2B, 3A and 5A, and

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2B,3A,5A)-\Sigma _{M_{11}}(2B,3A,5A) = 20 -15< |C_{M_{12}}(5A)|=10, \end{aligned}$$

    \(\Delta ^*(2B,3A,5A)=0\) and \(2B-3A \notin E(\Omega (M_{12}))\). Also, \(\Delta (2B,4A, 5A)=20 > |C_{M_{12}}(5A)|=10\) and the maximal subgroup M2 of \(M_{12}\) (Gap notation) has non-empty intersection with 2B, 4A and 5A. Hence

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2B,4A,5A)-\Sigma _{M2}(2B,4A,5A) = 20-15 <|C_{M_{12}}(5A)|=10. \end{aligned}$$

    This shows that \(\Delta ^*(2B,4A,5A)=0\) and \(2B-4A \notin E(\Omega (M_{12}))\). Again by GAP, one can see that

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2B,4B,5A)-\Sigma _{M_{11}}(2B,4B,5A) =20 - 15< |C_{M_{12}}(5A)|=10. \end{aligned}$$

    Then \(\Delta ^*(2B,4B,5A)=0\) and \(2B-4B\) is not an edge in \(\Omega (M_{12})\) and \(\Omega (M_{12}) \cong K_{14} - H_3\).

  4. 4.

    For the Mathieu group \(M_{24}\), the graph \(\Omega (M_{24})\) has 25 vertices as follows:

    2A

    2B

    3A

    3B

    4A

    4B

    4C

    5A

    6A

    6B

    7A

    7B

    8A

    10A

    11A

    12A

    12B

    14A

    14B

    15A

    15B

    21A

    21B

    23A

    23B

            

    For \(n > 2 \), all vertices nX are adjacent except 3A and 4B, since \(M_{24}\) is nX-complementary generated for \(n > 2\) and \(nX \ne 3A, 4B\). Clearly, \(2A-2B \notin E(\Omega (M_{24}))\), and for each conjugacy class tZ we have that \(\Delta (2A,3A, tZ) < |C_{M_{24}}(tZ)|\). Then, \(\Delta ^*(2A,\) 3AtZ) \(=0\). Hence, \(M_{24}\) is not (2A, 3A)-generated. Moreover, \(2A-4B \notin \)\(E(\Omega (M_{24}))\), since \(\Delta (2A,4B,3A)=1215\), \(|C_{M_{24}}(3A)| =1080\) and the maximal subgroup \(M_{23}\) in triple (2a, 4a, 3a) has this property that \(\Sigma _{M_{23}}(2a, 4a,3a) = 540\). On the other hand, \(1215-540 =675 < 1080\) which implies that \(\Delta ^* (2A,4B,3A)=0\) and \(\Omega (M_{24}) \cong K_{25}- H_4\).

  5. 5.

    The sporadic group McL has 23 non-identity conjugacy classes as vertices;

    2A

    3A

    3B

    4A

    5A

    5B

    6A

    6B

    7A

    7B

    8A

    9A

    9B

    10A

    11A

    11B

    12A

    14A

    14B

    15A

    15B

    30A

    30B

           

    According to Lemma 4.2(1), McL is nX-complementary generated for \(n \ge 4\), and it has only one conjugacy class of involutions. Then, we should check the adjacency between the vertices 2A and 3Y, \(Y \in \{A,B\}\). Our computations show that for any conjugacy class tZ, \(\Delta (2A,3Y,tZ) < |C_{McL}(tZ)|\), which implies that \(2A-3Y \notin E(\Omega (McL))\), \(Y \in \{A,B\}\). Hence, \(\Omega (McL) \cong K_{23} - \{2A-3A, 2A-3B\}\).

  6. 6.

    The Harada-Norton group HN has 53 non-identity conjugacy classes as follows:

    2A

    2B

    3A

    3B

    4A

    4B

    4C

    5A

    \(\cdots \)

    5E

    6A

    6B

    6C

    7A

    8A

    8B

    9A

    10A

    \(\cdots \)

    10H

    11A

    12A

    12B

    12C

    14A

    15A

    15B

    15C

    19A

    19B

    20A

    \(\cdots \)

    20E

    21A

    22A

    25A

    25B

    30A

    30B

    30C

    35A

    35B

    40A

    40B

    Based on Lemma 4.2(11), HN is nX-complementary generated when \(nX \ne 2A\), 2B, 3A, 5A and 5B, which means that the degree of the other vertices equals 52. Also based on Lemma 4.1(3) HN is (pqr)-generated when \((p,q,r) \ne (2,3,5)\). Thus, each vertex pX has degree 52 where p is a prime divisor of |HN| except 2, 3 or 5. For each conjugacy class tZ, we have \(\Delta (2A, nY, tZ)\) < \(|C_{HN}(tZ)|\), where \(nY \in \{3A, 5A, 5B \}\). Then, \(\{2A-3A, 2A-5A, 2A-5B \} \nsubseteq E(\Omega (HN))\) and also it is obvious that \(2A-2B \notin E(\Omega (HN))\). Our computations show that these are the only pairs of conjugacy classes that cannot generate HN and do not belong to the set of edges of Q-generating graph \(\Omega (HN)\). Hence, \(\Omega (HN) \cong K_{53} -H_6\).

  7. 7.

    \(Fi_{22}\) has 64 non-identity conjugacy classes as the vertices of \(\Omega (Fi_{22})\) with three conjugacy classes of involutions.

    2A

    2B

    2C

    3A

    3B

    3C

    3D

    4A

    \(\cdots \)

    4E

    5A

    6A

    \(\cdots \)

    6K

    7A

    8A

    8B

    8C

    8D

    9A

    9B

    9C

    10A

    10B

    11A

    11B

    12A

    \(\cdots \)

    12K

    13A

    13B

    14A

    15A

    16A

    16B

    18A

    18B

    18C

    18D

    20A

    21A

    22A

    22B

    24A

    24B

    30A

             

    By Lemma 4.1(3) and 4.2(8), we conclude that in this graph the vertices pX and qY are adjacent to all other vertices except when \(p=2\) and \(q=3\). Since for every non-identity conjugacy class tZ,

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,3Y,tZ)< & {} |C_{Fi_{22}}(tZ)|, \ \ \ Y \ne A,\\ \Delta _{Fi_{22}}(2A,4Y,tZ)< & {} |C_{Fi_{22}}(tZ)|, \ \ \ Y \in \{A, \ldots , E \}, \end{aligned}$$

    we conclude that for these triples \(\Delta ^*=0\) and \(\{2A-3B,2A-3C, 2A-3D, 2A-4Y \} \nsubseteq E(\Omega (Fi_{22}))\), where \(Y \in \{A,\ldots , E \}\). Also our computations show that

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,5A,30A) - \Sigma _{2 \cdot U_6(2)}(2A,5A,30A) = 36 -30 < |C_{Fi_{22}}(30A)| =30, \end{aligned}$$

    which means \(\Delta ^* =0\) and \(2A-5A \notin E(\Omega (Fi_{22}))\). Also \(2A-6Y \notin E(\Omega (Fi_{22}))\), \(Y \in \{A, \ldots , I \}\) because for each vertex tZ, \(\Delta (2A,6Y,tZ) < |C_{Fi_{22}}(tZ)|\). \(Fi_{22}\) is not 6J-complementary generated and

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,6J,14A)= & {} 14=\Sigma _{2 \cdot U_6(2)}(2A,6J,14A) \\ \Delta (2A,6J,21A)= & {} 21=\Sigma _{O^+ _8 (2) : S_3}(2A, 6J,21A) \\ \Delta (2A,6J,24A)= & {} 24= \Sigma _{O^+ _8(2) : S_3}(2A,6J,24A) \end{aligned}$$

    then \(2A-6J \notin E(\Omega (Fi_{22}))\). Besides

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,8A,10B) -\Sigma (2 \cdot U_6(2))= & {} 45-25< |C_{Fi_{22}}(10B)|=40 \\ \Delta (2A,8A,12K) -\Sigma (O^+ _8 (2) :S_3)= & {} 36-12< |C_{Fi_{22}}(12K)|=36,\\ \Delta (2A,8A,18D) -\Sigma (2 \cdot U_6(2))= & {} 36-18< |C_{Fi_{22}}(18D)|=36\\ \Delta (2A,8A,22A)- \Sigma (2 \cdot U_6(2))= & {} 22- 22 < |C_{Fi_{22}}(22A)|, \end{aligned}$$

    which means that in each case \(\Delta ^* =0\), so 2A and 8A are not adjacent. Since

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,8B,11Z) - \Sigma (2 \cdot U_6(2))= & {} 22 -22<|C_{Fi_{22}}(11Z)|, \\ \Delta (2A,8B,14A) - \Sigma (2 \cdot U_6(2))= & {} 14-14< |C_{Fi_{22}}(14A)|, \\ \Delta (2A,8B,21A) -\Sigma (O^+ _8 (2) :S_3)= & {} 21-21 < |C_{Fi_{22}}(21A)| , \end{aligned}$$

    where \(Z\in \{A, B\}\), \(\Delta ^* =0\) and \(2A-8B \notin E(\Omega (Fi_{22}))\). Our computations show that \(\{2A-9A, 2A-12A, 2A-12B, 2A-12C, 2A-12D \} \nsubseteq E(\Omega (Fi_{22}))\).

  8. 8.

    The group \(Fi_{23}\) has 97 non-identity conjugacy classes.

    2A

    2B

    2C

    3A

    3B

    3C

    3D

    4A

    4B

    4C

    4D

    5A

    6A

    6B

    \(\cdots \)

    6N

    6O

    7A

    8A

    8B

    8C

    9A

    9B

    9C

    9D

    9E

    10A

    10B

    10C

    11A

    12A

    12B

    \(\cdots \)

    12O

    13A

    13B

    14A

    14B

    15A

    15B

    16A

    16B

    17A

    18A

    18B

    \(\cdots \)

    18H

    20A

    20B

    21A

    22A

    22B

    22C

    23A

    23B

    24A

    24B

    24C

    26A

    26B

    27A

    28A

    30A

    30B

    30C

    35A

    36A

    36B

    39A

    39B

    42A

    60A

         

    By Lemma 4.2(9), for \(n>12\) or \(n \in \{7, 8,10, 11 \}\), \({Fi}_{23}\) is nX-complementary generated which means \(\text {deg}(nX)=96\) for such n. If \(nX \in \{6N,6O,\) 9D,  9E\(12C, \ldots , 12O \}\), \(\text {deg}(nX)=96\). Clearly, \({Fi}_{23}\) is not 2X-complementary generated, and then \(\{2A-2B, 2A-2C, 2B-2C \} \nsubseteq E(\Omega (Fi_{23}))\). For each conjugacy class tZ, we have that

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,3Y,tZ)< & {} |C_{Fi_{23}}(tZ)|, \ \ Y \in \{A, B, C, D\}, \\ \Delta (2A,4Y, tZ)< & {} |C_{Fi_{23}}(tZ)|, \ \ Y \in \{A, B,C, D \}, \\ \Delta (2A,5Y, tZ)< & {} |C_{Fi_{23}}(tZ)|, \ \ Y = A, \\ \Delta (2A, 6Y, tZ)< & {} |C_{Fi_{23}}(tZ)|, \ \ Y \ne N, O,\\ \Delta (2A,12Y,tZ)< & {} |C_{Fi_{23}}(tZ)|, \ \ Y \in \{A, B\}, \\ \Delta (2A,9Y, tZ)< & {} |C_{Fi_{23}}(tZ)|, \ \ Y \in \{A, B\}. \end{aligned}$$

    For the pair (2A, 9C), our computations show that \(\Delta (2A,9C,30C)= 30 = |C_{Fi_{23}}(30C)|\). Besides, the maximal subgroup \(M=O_8 ^+ (3) \cdot 3 \cdot 2\) has intersection with the conjugacy classes 2A, 9C and 30C, such that

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,9C,30C)- \Sigma _{M}(2A,9C,30C)=30- 30< |C_{Fi_{23}}(30C)|, \end{aligned}$$

    then \(\Delta ^*(2A,9C,30C)=0\) and \(2A-9C \notin E(\Omega (Fi_{23}))\). For vertex 2B we obtained that for each conjugacy class tZ

    $$\begin{aligned}&\Delta (2B,3Y,tZ)< |C_{Fi_{23}}(tZ)|, \ \ \ Y \in \{A,B, C \}, \\&\Delta (2B,6A,tZ) < |C_{Fi_{23}}(tZ)|, \end{aligned}$$

    and also for \(tZ = 20A\), since

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2B,4A,20A)- \Sigma _{2 \cdot Fi_{22}}(2B,4A,20A) = 165-55< |C_{Fi_{23}}(20A)|=120, \end{aligned}$$

    \(2B-4A \notin E(\Omega (Fi_{23}))\). Moreover,

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2B,6B,18G)-\Sigma _{O_8^+(3) \cdot 3 \cdot 3}(2B,6B,18G)=81-81<|C_{Fi_{23}}(18G)|=54, \end{aligned}$$

    and \(2B-6B \notin E(\Omega (Fi_{23}))\). The conjugacy class 2C is not adjacent to 4Y, \(Y \in \{A,B \}\), because for each vertex tZ, \(\Delta (2C,4Y,tZ) < |C_{Fi_{23}}(tZ)|\). Consequently, \(\Omega (Fi_{23}) \cong K_{97} - H_8\).

  9. 9.

    The Conway group \(Co_1\) has 100 non-identity conjugacy classes as follows,

    2A

    2B

    2C

    3A

    3B

    3C

    3D

    4A

    \(\cdots \)

    4F

    5A

    5B

    5C

    6A

    \(\cdots \)

    6I

    7A

    7B

    8A

    \(\cdots \)

    8F

    9A

    9B

    9C

    10A

    \(\cdots \)

    10F

    11A

    12A

    \(\cdots \)

    12M

    14A

    14B

    15A

    \(\cdots \)

    15E

    16A

    16B

    18A

    18B

    18C

    20A

    20B

    20C

    21A

    21B

    21C

    22A

    23A

    23B

    24A

    \(\cdots \)

    24F

    26A

    28A

    28B

    30A

    \(\cdots \)

    30E

    33A

    35A

    36A

    39A

    39B

    40A

    42A

    60A

              

    which are the vertices of \(\Omega (Co_1)\). Based on Lemma 4.2(5), \(\text {deg}(nX)=99\), for \(n\ge 4\) and \(nX \notin \{4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 5A, 6A \}\). Since for each vertex tZ, we have

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,3A,tZ)<|C_{Co_1}(tZ)|,&\Delta (2B,3A,tZ)<|C_{Co_1}(tZ)|, \\ \Delta (3A,5A,tZ)< |C_{Co_1}(tZ)|,&\Delta (3A,4D,tZ)< |C_{Co_1}(tZ)|, \\ \Delta (2A,4C,tZ)<|C_{Co_1}(tZ)|,&\Delta (2A,6A,tZ)<|C_{Co_1}(tZ)|, \end{aligned}$$

    then \(\Delta ^*=0\) and \(\{2A-3A,2B-3A, 3A-5A, 3A-4D,2A-4C, 2A-6A \} \nsubseteq E(\Omega (Co_1))\). For two vertices 2B and 3B, \(\Delta (2B,3B,tZ)=84 > |C_{Co_1}(tZ)|=72\) and there is a maximal subgroup \(M=3.Suz.2\), such that \(\Sigma _M(2B,3B,12L)=24\) and \(\Delta (2B,3B,12L)-\Sigma _M(2B,3B,12L)=84-24<72\) which implies that \(\Delta ^*(2B,3B,12L)=0\) and \(2B-3B \notin E(\Omega (Co_1))\). Also we have \(\Delta (2A,4B,12L)=96 > |C_{Co_1}(12L)|=72\), but

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,4B,12L)-\Sigma _M(2A,4B,12L) = 96 - 24 <|C_{Co_1}(12L)|, \end{aligned}$$

    which means that (2A, 4B) is not a generating pair of \(Co_1\). Similarly, we have

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2B,4A,12E)-\Sigma _M(2B,4A,12E) = 243-81 < |C_{Co_1}(12E)|=216, \end{aligned}$$

    so the pair of (2B, 4A) does not generate \(Co_1\). For the conjugacy classes 2C and 4A, our calculations show that \(\Delta (2C,4A,tZ)\) is greater than \(|C_{Co_1}(tZ)|\), for every vertex tZ. On the other hand, there is no maximal subgroup containing the subgroup \(\langle 2C, 4A\rangle \) and so (2C, 4A) is a generating pair for \(Co_1\). This concludes that \(\Omega (Co_1) \cong K_{100} - H_9\).

  10. 10.

    The Conway group \(Co_2\) has 59 non-identity conjugacy classes as the vertices of \(\Omega (Co_2)\) which are

    2A

    2B

    2C

    3A

    3B

    4A

    \(\cdots \)

    4G

    5A

    5B

    6A

    \(\cdots \)

    6F

    7A

    8A

    \(\cdots \)

    8F

    9A

    10A

    10B

    10C

    11A

    12A

    \(\cdots \)

    12H

    14A

    14B

    14C

    15A

    15B

    15C

    16A

    16B

    18A

    20A

    20B

    23A

    23B

    24A

    24B

    28A

    30A

    30B

    30C

    According to our calculation with GAP, we can see that for each vertex tZ, \(\Delta (2A,3Y,tZ)\), \(Y \in \{A, B\}\), \(\Delta (2A,4Y,tZ)\), \(Y \in \{A,B,C, D\}\), \(\Delta (2B,3A, tZ)\) and \(\Delta (2B,4A, tZ)\) are less than \(|C_{{Co}_2}(tZ)|\). Since the group generated by two involutions is isomorphic to dihedral group, the conjugacy classes of the involutions are not adjacent in \(\Omega ({Co}_2)\). Up to isomorphism, the Conway group \(Co_2\) has eleven maximal subgroups \(m_1, m_2, \ldots , m_{11}\) as follows:

    $$\begin{aligned} {\begin{array}{cccc} m_1=U_6(2) \cdot 2 &{} m_2= 2^{10}: M_{22} :2 &{} m_3= McL\\ m_4= 2^1 +8:s6f2 &{} m_5= HS \cdot 2 &{} m_6= 2^1+4+6 \cdot a8 \\ m_7=U_4(3) \cdot D_8 &{} m_8= 2^{(4+10)}(S_5 \times S_3) &{} m_9= M_{23} \\ m_{10}= 3^1+4: 2^1 +4\cdot s5 &{} m_{11}= 5^{(1+2)}:4 S_4 &{}\\ \end{array}} \end{aligned}$$

    For two vertices 2B, 3B we have \(\Delta (2B,3B,7A)=91> |C_{Co_2}(7A)|=56\). The maximal subgroup \(m_1\) has non-empty intersection with these conjugacy classes and \({\Sigma }_{m_1}(2B,3B, 7A)= 63\), so \(91- 63< 56\), which implies that \(\Delta ^* (2B,3B, 7A)=0\). For vertices 2A, 4E and 4F we have,

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,4E,10C) - \Sigma _{m_4}(2A,4E, 10C)= & {} 50- 17< |C_{Co_2}(10C)|=40,\\ \Delta (2A,4F, 11A) - \Sigma _{m_2}(2A,4F, 11A)= & {} 11-11< |C_{Co_2}(11A)| =11. \end{aligned}$$

    Then \(\Delta ^*(2A,4E,10C)=0\) and \(\Delta ^*(2A,4F,11A)=0\). Since

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2B,4B,10C)- \Sigma _{m_2}(2B,4B, 10C)= & {} 40-30<|C_{Co_2}(10C)|=30,\\ \Delta (2B,4C, 7A)-\Sigma _{m_1}(2B,4C, 7A)= & {} 91-63< |C_{Co_2}(7A)|=56,\\ \Delta (2B,4D,15A)-\Sigma _{m_1}(2B,4D, 15A)= & {} 45-30<|C_{Co_2}(15A)|=30,\\ \Delta (2B,4E,11A) -\Sigma _{m_1}(2B,4E, 11A)= & {} 11-11<|C_{Co_2}(11A)|=11, \end{aligned}$$

    \(2B-4Y \notin E(\Omega (Co_2))\), where \(Y \in \{B, C, D, E\}\). For the vertices 2C and 4A, we have that \(\Delta (2C,4A, 12G)=84> |C_{Co_2}(12G)|=48\) and the maximal subgroups which have non-empty intersection with three conjugacy classes 2C, 4A and 12G are conjugate to \(m_1\) or \(m_4\). Then

    $$\begin{aligned}{}[ \Delta - (\Sigma _{m_1} + \Sigma _{m_4})](2C,4A, 12G)= 84-(24 +36) < |C_{Co_2}(12G)|=48. \end{aligned}$$

    By Lemma 4.2(6), \(Co_2\) is 4G-, 5A-, 5B-generated, then they are adjacent to all other vertices in \(\Omega (Co_2)\). On the other hand, the group \(Co_2\) is 6A-, 6B-, 6E- and 6F-complementary generated, but for the pair (2A, 6C), one can see that for each vertex tZ,

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta ^*(2A,6C, tZ) \le (\Delta _{Co_2} - \Sigma _{m_1})(2A,6C,tZ) < |C_{Co_2}(tZ)|, \end{aligned}$$

    where \(tZ \in \{14A,16B,18A,24A \}\) and \(m_1 \) is the only maximal subgroup of \(Co_2\) with non-empty intersection by 2A and 6C. Moreover, for the pair (2A, 6D), again we have

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta ^*(2A,6D, tZ) \le (\Delta _{Co_2}- \Sigma _{m_1})(2A,6D, tZ) <|C_{Co_2}(tZ)|, \end{aligned}$$

    where \(tZ \in \{7A,9A, 10B,11A,16A,18A\}\). Furthermore \(\{2A-6C, 2A-6D\} \nsubseteq E(\Omega (Co_2))\). Since \(Co_2\) is nX-complementary generated for \(n \ge 7\), for these vertices, we have \(\text {deg}(nX)= 58\) and \(\Omega (Co_2) \cong K_{59}- H_{10}\).

  11. 11.

    The Conway group \(Co_3\) has 41 non-identity conjugacy classes as the vertices of \(\Omega (Co_3)\) which are

    2A

    2B

    3A

    3B

    3C

    4A

    4B

    5A

    5B

    6A

    6B

    6C

    6D

    6E

    7A

    8A

    8B

    8C

    9A

    9B

    10A

    10B

    11A

    12A

    12B

    12C

    14A

    15A

    15B

    18A

    20A

    20B

    21A

    22A

    22B

    23A

    23B

    24A

    24B

    30A

    By Lemma 4.1(3), \(Co_3\) is (pXqY, 23Z)-generated for the primes \(p \le q\) and \(pX \ne qY\), if and only if \((pX, qY) \notin \{(2A,3A), (2A,3B), (2B,3A)\}\), then we should obtain the adjacency of these pairs. Since for each conjugacy class tZ, \(\Delta (2A,3A,tZ) < |C_{Co_3}(tZ)|\), then \(2A-3A \notin E(\Omega (Co_3))\). For two classes 2A and 4A and each class tZ, we have \(\Delta (2A,4A,tZ) \ge |C_{Co_3}(tZ)|\), but there is a maximal subgroup McL : 2 which is of order divisible by 8 such that

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,4A,8B) - \Sigma _{McL:2} (2A,4A,8B)= & {} 260-164< |C_{Co_3}(8B)|, \\ \Delta (2A,4A,10B) - \Sigma _{McL:2} (2A,4A,10B)= & {} 30-25< |C_{Co_3}(10B)|, \\ \Delta (2A,4A,24A) - \Sigma _{McL:2} (2A,4A,24A)= & {} 24-24 < |C_{Co_3}(24A)|. \end{aligned}$$

    Then, \(2A-4A \notin E(\Omega (Co_3))\). For the vertices 2A and 3B, \(\Delta (2A,3B,7A)=63\) > \(|C_{Co_3}(7A)| =42\), but for the maximal subgroup McL : 2 we have \(\Sigma _{McL:2}(2a,3a,7a)=49\), then

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta ^*< \Delta (2A,3B,7A) - \Sigma _{McL:2}(2a,3a,7a)=63-49<|C_{Co_3}(7A)|= 42 \end{aligned}$$

    and \(2A-3B \notin E(\Omega (Co_3))\). Also for the conjugacy classes 2B and 3A, since \(\Delta (2B, 3A, 10B) = |C_{Co_3}(10B)| = 20\) and \(\Sigma _{McL:2}(2b,3a,10b)=10\),

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta ^*<\Delta (2B,3A,10B) -\Sigma _{McL:2}(2b,3a,10b)=20-10< |C_{Co_3}(10B)|=20, \end{aligned}$$

    which means that \(\Delta ^* =0\) and \(2B-3A \notin E(\Omega (Co_3))\). Our calculations with GAP show that for each \(x \in 2A\) and \(y\in 4B\), \(\langle x, y \rangle \) is a proper subgroup in \(Co_3\) and so it is not a generating pair. Hence, \(2A-4B \notin E(\Omega (Co_3))\). Also, the Conway group \(Co_3\) is 3C-complementary generated, \(\text {deg}(3C)= 40\) and similarly for all nX, \(n>4\), \(\text {deg}(nX)=40\). As a result, we can see that \(\Omega (Co_3) \cong K_{41} - H_{11}\).

  12. 12.

    The Suzuki group Suz has 42 non-identity conjugacy classes in which there are two classes of involutions that are not adjacent in Q-generating graph \(\Omega (Suz)\). The vertices are listed as follows

    2A

    2B

    3A

    3B

    3C

    4A

    4B

    4C

    4D

    5A

    5B

    6A

    \(\cdots \)

    6E

    7A

    8A

    8B

    8C

    9A

    9B

    10A

    10B

    11A

    12A

    \(\cdots \)

    12E

    13A

    13B

    14A

    15A

    15B

    15C

    18A

    18B

    18B

    20A

    21A

    21B

    24A

         

    By Lemma 4.2(10), since Suz is 3C-complementary generated, \(\text {deg}(3C)=41\). Also for \(n \ge 4\), \(\text {deg}(nX)=41\) except when \(nX =4A\) or 6A. For each conjugacy class tZ, we have that

    $$\begin{aligned}&\Delta (2A,3A,tZ)< |C_{Suz}(tZ)|, \qquad \Delta (2A,4A,tZ)<|C_{Suz}(tZ)|, \\&\Delta (3A,3B,tZ)< |C_{Suz}(tZ)|, \qquad \Delta (3A,4A,tZ) < |C_{Suz}(tZ)|. \end{aligned}$$

    Then, \(\{2A-3A, 2A-4A, 3A-3B, 3A-4A\} \nsubseteq E(\Omega (Suz))\) and for the pair (3A, 6A), our calculations show that

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (3A,6A,7A)- \Sigma _{G_{2}(4)}(3A,6A,7A) = 112- 63< |C_{Suz}(7A)|=84, \end{aligned}$$

    where \(G_{2}(4)\) is the maximal subgroup of Suz which contains this triple. Hence, \(\Delta ^* =0\) and \(3A-6A \notin E(\Omega (Suz))\). Thus \(\Omega (Suz) \cong K_{42} - H_{12}\).

  13. 13.

    The Higman–Sims group HS has 23 non-identity conjugacy classes

    2A

    2B

    3A

    4A

    4B

    4C

    5A

    5B

    5C

    6A

    6B

    7A

    8A

    8B

    8C

    10A

    10B

    11A

    11B

    12A

    15A

    20A

    20B

           

    as the vertices of \(\Omega (HS)\), where \(2A-2B \notin E(\Omega (HS))\) and based on Lemma 4.2(12), HS is nX-complementary generated for \(nX=4C\) or \(n \ge 5\), so for these vertices \(\text {deg}(nX)=22\). But according to the computations by GAP and [26], we see that for every conjugacy class tZ, \(\Delta (2A,3A,tZ) < |C_{HS}(tZ)|\), \(\Delta (2A,4A,tZ) < |C_{HS}(tZ)|\) and \(\Delta (2A,4B,tZ)< |C_{HS}(tZ)|\). For example

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2A,4B,6B) - \Sigma _{M_{22}} (2A,4B,6B)= & {} 48- 36< |C_{HS}(6B)|, \\ \Delta (2A,4B,8A) - \Sigma _{M_{22}} (2A,4B,8A)= & {} 46-44< |C_{HS}(8A)|, \\ \Delta (2A,4B,11X) - \Sigma _{M_{22}} (2A,4B,11X)= & {} 22-22< |C_{HS}(11X)|,\\ \Delta (2A,4B,12A) - \Sigma _{S_8} (2A,4B,12A)= & {} 18-18< |C_{HS}(12A)|,\\ \Delta (2A,4B,15A) - \Sigma _{S_8} (2A,4B,15A)= & {} 15-15 < |C_{HS}(15A)|, \end{aligned}$$

    and for the triple (2A, 4B, 7A), the maximal subgroup \(M_{22}\) has two conjugacy classes with non-empty intersection with these three classes, say \(m_1\) and \(m_2\). Then, we have

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta ^* < \Delta - (\Sigma _{m_1} +\Sigma _{m_2} - \Sigma _{m_1 \cap m_2})(2A,4B,7A) =7-(28 -21)=0. \end{aligned}$$

    Then, \(\{2A-3A, 2A-4A, 2A-4B \} \nsubseteq E(\Omega (HS))\). The only conjugacy class which has a non-empty intersection with 2B and 4A is 7A and \(\Delta (2B,4A,7A) = 7 = |C_{HS}(7A)| \). The maximal subgroup \(U_3(5) \cdot 2\) has non-empty intersection with the classes of 2B, 4A and 7A such that

    $$\begin{aligned} \Delta (2B,4A,7A)-\Sigma _{U_3(5)\cdot 2}(2B,4A,7A)= 7-7 < |C_{HS}(7A)|, \end{aligned}$$

    then \(2B-4A \notin E(\Omega (HS))\) . Hence \(\Omega (HS) \cong K_{23} -H_{13}\).

This completes our argument. \(\square \)

We end this paper with the following theorem that its proof is similar to those cases given in Theorem 4.3 and so omitted.

Theorem 4.4

If G is one of the following groups, then \(\Omega (G)\) is obtained by removing an edge from a complete graph and we have that

  1. 1.

    \(\Omega (M_{11}) \cong K_9 - \{2A-3A \}\),

  2. 2.

    \(\Omega (M_{22}) \cong K_{11} - \{2A-3A\} \),

  3. 3.

    \(\Omega (M_{23}) \cong K_{16}-\{2A-3A\}\),

  4. 4.

    \(\Omega (Ru) \cong K_{35} - \{2A-2B\}\),

  5. 5.

    \(\Omega (J_4) \cong K_{61} - \{2A-2B\} \),

  6. 6.

    \(\Omega (Ly) \cong K_{52} - \{2A-3A\}\).