Abstract
A common question in the study of graph decompositions is when does a graph G decompose the complete graph or the complete graph with a 1-factor removed or added. It is known that a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of a tripartite graph G with n edges can be used to obtain a cyclic G-decomposition of \(K_{2nt+1}\) for every positive integer t. Moreover, it can be used to obtain a cyclic G-decomposition of both \(K_{2nt+2}-I\) and \(K_{2nt}+I\), where I is a 1-factor. We show that if G is an odd prism on 10 or more vertices or an even Möbius ladder, then G admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
For integers r and s, we denote the set \(\{r, r+1, \dots , s\}\) by [r, s] (if \(r>s\), then \([r,s]=\emptyset \)). Let \(\mathbb {N}\) denote the set of nonnegative integers, \(\mathbb {Z}^{+}\) denote the set of positive integers, and \(\mathbb {Z}_n\) denote the group of integers modulo n. Call a graph Gtripartite if the chromatic number of G is at most 3. Thus, bipartite graphs can be considered tripartite.
Let m be a positive integer and let \(V(K_m)=[0, m-1]\). The length of an edge \(\{i,j\}\) in \(K_m\) is \(\min \{|i-j|,m-|i-j|\}\). Note that if m is odd, then \(K_m\) consists of m edges of length i for \(i\in [1,\frac{m-1}{2}]\). However, if m is even, then \(K_m\) consists of m edges of length i for \(i\in [1,\frac{m}{2}-1]\) and of only \(\frac{m}{2}\) edges of length \(\frac{m}{2}\). In this case, the edges of length \(\frac{m}{2}\) form a 1-factor in \(K_m\). Throughout this manuscript, if m is even, we will denote the 1-factor formed by the set of edges of length \(\frac{m}{2}\) in \(K_m\) by I.
Let \(V(K_m)=\mathbb {Z}_m\) and let G be a subgraph of \(K_m\). By clickingG, we mean applying the permutation \(i\mapsto i+1\) to V(G). Note that clicking an edge does not change its length. Let H and G be graphs such that G is a subgraph of H. A G-decomposition of H is a set \(\Delta =\{G_1,G_2,\dots ,G_t\}\) of pairwise edge-disjoint subgraphs of H each of which is isomorphic to G and such that \(E(H)=\bigcup _{i=1}^{t}E(G_i)\). A G-decomposition of \(K_m\) is also known as a \((K_m,G)\)-design. A \((K_m,G)\)-design \(\Delta \) is cyclic if clicking is an automorphism of \(\Delta \). The study of graph decompositions is generally known as the study of graph designs, or G-designs. For surveys on G-designs, see [1] and [2].
Let G be a graph with n edges. A primary question in the study of graph designs is: for what values ofvdoes there exist a\((K_v,G)\)-design? Another question of interest is the existence of \((K_v \pm I,G)\)-designs where v is even. For most studied graphs G, it is often the case that if \(v \equiv 1\pmod {2n}\), then there exists a \((K_v,G)\)-design. Similarly, if \(v \equiv 2 \pmod {2n}\) or \(v \equiv 0 \pmod {2n}\), then there often exists a \((K_v-I,G)\)-design in the former and a \((K_v+I,G)\)-design in the latter. A common approach to finding these designs is through the use of graph labelings.
1.1 Graph Labelings
For a graph G, a one-to-one function \(f:V(G)\rightarrow \mathbb {N}\) is called a labeling (or a valuation) of G. In a seminal paper on the topic [11], Rosa introduced a hierarchy of labelings. Let G be a graph with n edges and no isolated vertices and let f be a labeling of G. Let \(f(V(G))=\{f(u): u \in V(G)\}\). Define a function \(\bar{f}:E(G) \rightarrow \mathbb {Z}^+\) by \(\bar{f}(e)=|f(u)-f(v)|\), where \(e=\{u,v\} \in E(G)\). We will refer to \(\bar{f}(e)\) as the label of e. Let \(\bar{f}(E(G))=\{\bar{f}(e): e\in E(G)\}\). Consider the following conditions:
- (\(\ell 1\)):
-
\(f(V(G)) \subseteq [0,2n]\),
- (\(\ell 2\)):
-
\(f(V(G)) \subseteq [0,n]\),
- (\(\ell 3\)):
-
\(\bar{f}(E(G)) = \{x_1, x_2, \ldots , x_n\}\), where for each \(i \in [1,n]\) either \(x_i=i\) or \(x_i=2n+1-i\),
- (\(\ell 4\)):
-
\(\bar{f}(E(G)) = [1,n]\).
If in addition G is bipartite with bipartition \(\{A, B\}\) of V(G) consider also
- (\(\ell 5\)):
-
for each \(\{a,b\} \in E(G)\) with \(a \in A\) and \(b \in B\), we have \(f(a)<f(b)\),
- (\(\ell 6\)):
-
there exists an integer \(\lambda \) such that \(f(a) \le \lambda \) for all \(a \in A\) and \(f(b) > \lambda \) for all \(b \in B\).
Then a labeling satisfying the conditions:
- \((\ell 1), (\ell 3)\) :
-
is called a \(\rho \)-labeling;
- \((\ell 1), (\ell 4)\) :
-
is called a \(\sigma \)-labeling;
- \((\ell 2), (\ell 4)\) :
-
is called a \(\beta \)-labeling.
A \(\beta \)-labeling is necessarily a \(\sigma \)-labeling, which in turn is a \(\rho \)-labeling. Suppose G is bipartite. If a \(\rho \)-, \(\sigma \)-, or \(\beta \)-labeling of G satisfies condition \((\ell 5)\), then the labeling is ordered and is denoted by \(\rho ^+\), \(\sigma ^+\), or \(\beta ^+\), respectively. If in addition \((\ell 6)\) is satisfied, the labeling is uniformly ordered and is denoted by \(\rho ^{++}\), \(\sigma ^{++}\), or \(\beta ^{++}\), respectively.
A \(\beta \)-labeling is better known as a graceful labeling, and a uniformly ordered \(\beta \)-labeling is an \(\alpha \)-labeling as introduced in [11]. Labelings of the types above are called Rosa-type labelings because of Rosa’s original article [11] on the topic. (See [4] for a recent comprehensive survey of Rosa-type labelings.) A dynamic survey on general graph labelings is maintained by Gallian [8].
Labelings are critical to the study of cyclic graph decompositions as seen in the following theorem from [11].
Theorem 1
Let G be a graph with n edges. There exists a cyclic G-decomposition of \(K_{2n+1}\) if and only if G admits a \(\rho \)-labeling.
If G admits a \(\sigma \)-labeling instead, then cyclic G-decompositions of \(K_{2n+2}-I\) and of \(K_{2n}+I\) can also obtained. Theorem 2 appears as Theorem 3.5 in [4]. We provide a proof of Theorem 3 for the sake of completeness.
Theorem 2
Let G be a graph with n edges. If G admits a \(\sigma \)-labeling, then there also exists a cyclic G-decomposition of \(K_{2n+2}-I\).
Theorem 3
Let G be a graph with n edges. If G admits a \(\sigma \)-labeling, then there exists a cyclic G-decomposition of \(K_{2n}+I\).
Proof
Let G, n and I be as in the statement of the theorem. Let \(V(K_{2n})=\mathbb {Z}_{2n}\). Note that \(K_{2n}+I\) is the multigraph obtained form \(K_{2n}\) by making each of the edges of length n have multiplicity 2. Thus, for each \(i \in [1,n]\), the number of edges of length i in \(K_{2n}+I\) is 2n. Let h be a \(\sigma \)-labeling of G. Let \(G_0\) be the subgraph of \(K_{2n}+I\) obtained by identifying vertex \(v \in V(G)\) with \(i \in V(K_{2n})\) if \(h(v)=i\). Thus, \(G_0\) is an embedding of G in \(K_{2n}\) so that there is an edge in \(G_0\) of length i for each \(i\in [1,n]\). For \(t\in [1,2n-1]\), let \(G_t\) be the subgraph of \(K_{2n}+I\) obtained by clicking \(G_0\) a total of t times. Then \(\Delta =\{G_t: t \in \mathbb {Z}_{2n}\}\) is a cyclic G-decomposition of \(K_{2n}+I\). \(\square \)
If G admits an \(\alpha \)-labeling, then we have the following powerful result of Rosa [11].
Theorem 4
Let G be a bipartite graph with n edges. If G admits an \(\alpha \)-labeling, then there exists a cyclic G-decomposition of \(K_{2nt+1}\) for all positive integers t.
We illustrate how Theorem 4 works. Let h be an \(\alpha \)-labeling of a graph G with n edges and bipartition (A, B). Let \(A=\{u_1, u_2, \ldots , u_r\}\) and \(B=\{v_1, v_2, \ldots , v_s\}\). Let t be a positive integer. For \(1 \le i \le t\), let \(G_i\) be a copy of G with bipartition \((A,B_i)\) where \(B_i=\{v_{i,1}, v_{i,2}, \ldots , v_{i,s}\}\) and \(v_{i,j}\) corresponds to \(v_j\) in B. Let \(G(t)=G_1 \cup G_2 \cup \ldots \cup G_t\). Thus, G(t) has nt edges and is bipartite with bipartition \((A,B_1 \cup B_2 \cup \ldots \cup B_t)\). Define a labeling \(f'\) of G(t) as follows: \(f'(u_j)=f(u_j)\) for each \(u_j \in A\) and \(f'(v_{i,j})=f(j)+(i-1) n\) for \(1 \le i \le t\) and \(1 \le j \le s\). It is easy to see that \(f'\) is an \(\alpha \)-labeling of G(t), and thus, Theorem 1 applies. Since \(f'\) is necessarily a \(\sigma \)-labeling, Theorems 2 and 3 also apply, and we have the following.
Corollary 5
Let G be a bipartite graph with n edges. If G admits an \(\alpha \)-labeling, then there exist cyclic G-decompositions of \(K_{2nt+2}-I\) and of \(K_{2nt}+I\) for all positive integers t.
From a graph decompositions perspective, Theorem 2 offers a slight advantage over Theorem 1. In the case G is bipartite, Theorem 4 offers a great advantage over the first two. However, there are many classes of bipartite graphs (see [4]) that do not admit \(\alpha \)-labelings. Theorem 4 was extended to cover graphs that admit \(\rho ^+\)-labelings in [5].
Theorem 6
Let G be a bipartite graph with n edges. If G admits a \(\rho ^+\)-labeling, then there exists a cyclic G-decomposition of \(K_{2nt+1}\) for all positive integers t.
Again, since Theorem 6 is \(\rho \)-labeling based, it does not guarantee the existence of decomposition results involving the addition or removal of a 1-factor. Two labelings that lead to results similar to those of Theorems 4 and 6 were recently introduced for tripartite graphs in [3]. One of them is called a \(\rho \)-tripartite labeling and the other a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling. Both lead to cyclic G-decompositions of \(K_{2nt+1}\), but only the \(\sigma \)-labeling-based one leads to results involving the addition or removal of a 1-factor. In this manuscript, we focus on the \(\sigma \)-labeling-based one.
Let G be a tripartite graph with n edges having the vertex tripartition \(\{A, B, C\}\). A \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of G is a one-to-one function \(h:V(G) \rightarrow [0, 2n]\) that satisfies the following conditions:
- (s1):
-
h is a \(\sigma \)-labeling of G.
- (s2):
-
If \(\{a,v\} \in E(G)\) with \(a \in A\), then \(h(a)<h(v)\).
- (s3):
-
If \(e=\{b,c\} \in E(G)\) with \(b \in B\) and \(c \in C\), then there exists an edge \(e' =\{b',c'\} \in E(G)\) with \(b' \in B\) and \(c' \in C\) such that \(|h(c')-h(b')|+|h(c)-h(b)| = n\).
- (s4):
-
If \(a \in A\) and \(v \in B \cup C\), then \(h(a)-h(v) \ne n\).
- (s5):
-
If \(b \in B\) and \(c \in C\), then \(|h(b)-h(c)| \not \in \{n, 2n\}\).
Note that e and \(e'\) in (s3) need not to be distinct. Also note that there need not be an edge \(\{a,v\}\) in (s4) nor an edge \(\{b,c\}\) in (s5). The following theorem from [3] shows that a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling yields results similar to those from \(\alpha \)-labelings.
Theorem 7
Let G be a tripartite graph with n edges. If G admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling, then there exists a cyclic G-decomposition of \(K_{2nt+1}\) for all positive integers t.
Again, we illustrate how Theorem 7 works. Let G have n edges and let h be a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of G with vertex tripartition \(\{A, B, C\}\) as in the above definition. Let \(B_{1}, B_{2}, \ldots , B_{t}\) be t vertex-disjoint copies of B, and let \(C_{1}, C_{2}, \ldots ,C_{t}\) be t vertex-disjoint copies of C. The vertex in \(B_{i}\) corresponding to \(b \in B\) will be called \(b_{i}\). Similarly, the vertex in \(C_{i}\) corresponding to \(c \in C\) will be called \(c_{i}\). Let \(B^{*}=\bigcup _{i=1}^{t}B_{i}\) and \(C^{*}=\bigcup _{i=1}^{t}C_{i}\). We define a new graph \(G^{*}\) with vertex set \(A \bigcup B^{*} \bigcup C^{*}\) and edges \(\{a,v_{i}\}\), \(1 \le i \le t\), whenever \(a\in A\) and \(\{a,v\}\) is an edge of G, and \(\{{b_{i}},c_{i}\}\), \(1 \le i \le t\), whenever \(\{b,c\}\) is an edge of G with \(b \in B\) and \(c\in C\). Clearly \(G^{*}\) has nt edges and G divides \(G^{*}\). Define a labeling \(h^{*}\) on \(G^{*}\) by
The labeling \(h^*\) is a \(\sigma \)-labeling of \(G^*\) and the result follows by Theorem 1. Moreover, we can use Theorems 2 and 3 to obtain cyclic G-decompositions of \(K_{2nt+2}-I\) and of \(K_{2nt}+I\) as well. The \(K_{2nt+2}-I\) result appears as Corollary 5 in [3].
Corollary 8
Let G be a graph with n edges. If G admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling, then there exist cyclic G-decompositions of \(K_{2nt+2}-I\) and of \(K_{2nt}+I\) for every positive integer t.
In Fig. 1, we demonstrate the use of Theorem 7 in the case \(t=3\) by showing a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of the graph G consisting of a triangle with a pendent edge. The labeling of G on the left can be used to yield cyclic G-decompositions of \(K_{9}\), of \(K_{8}+I\), and of \(K_{10}-I\). The labeling of the three copies of G on the right can be used to yield cyclic G-decompositions of \(K_{25}\), of \(K_{24}+I\), and of \(K_{26}-I\).
Some Rosa-type labelings of various cubic graphs have been investigated. It is known that all bipartite prisms [6, 7] and bipartite Möbius ladders [9] admit \(\alpha \)-labelings. In [17], it is shown that if G is cubic and bipartite and if every component of G is either a prism, a Möbius ladder, or has order at most 14, then G admits an \(\alpha \)-labeling. Hence, if such a bipartite G has n edges, then it cyclically decomposes \(K_{2nt+1}\), \(K_{2nt}+I\), and \(K_{2nt+2}-I\) for every positive integer t. In [16], it is shown that if G is an odd prism, an even Möbius ladder, or a connected cubic tripartite graph of order at most 10, then G admits a \(\rho \)-tripartite labeling. Hence, such a G of size n would cyclically decompose \(K_{2nt+1}\) for every positive integer t. However, no G-decompositions of \(K_{2nt}+I\) or \(K_{2nt+2}-I\) can be obtained from this labeling. In [15], it is shown that every cubic graph of order at most 12, other than \(2K_4\) and \(3K_4\), admits a \(\beta \)-labeling. Vietri [13, 14] has shown that certain classes of generalized Petersen graphs are graceful. It is also known that \(2K_4\) does not admit a \(\rho \)-labeling, but \(3K_4\) does.
In this article, we show that if G is an odd prism on 10 or more vertices or an even Möbius ladder, then G admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling, and hence, such a G of size n would cyclically decompose \(K_{2nt}+I\) and \(K_{2nt+2}-I\), in addition to \(K_{2nt+1}\), for every positive integer t.
1.2 Additional Definitions and Notation
We denote the path with vertices \(x_0, x_1, \ldots , x_k\), where \(x_i\) is adjacent to \(x_{i+1}\), \(0 \le i \le k-1\), by \((x_0, x_1, \ldots , x_k)\). In using this notation, we are thinking of traversing the path from \(x_0\) to \(x_k\) so that \(x_0\) is the first vertex, \(x_1\) is the second vertex, and so on. Let \(G_1 =(x_0, x_1, \ldots , x_j)\) and \(G_2=(y_0, y_1, \ldots , y_k)\). If \(G_1\) and \(G_2\) are vertex-disjoint except for \(x_j=y_0\), then by \(G_1+G_2\) we mean the path \((x_0, x_1, \ldots , x_j, y_1, y_2, \ldots , y_k)\). If the only vertices they have in common are \(x_0=y_k\) and \(x_j=y_0\), then by \(G_1+G_2\) we mean the cycle \((x_0, x_1, \ldots , x_j, y_1, y_2, \ldots , y_{k-1}, x_0)\).
Let P(2k) be the path with 2k edges and \(2k+1\) vertices \(0, 1, \ldots , 2k\) given by \((0, 2k, 1, 2k-1, 2, 2k-2, \ldots , k-1,k+1,k)\). Note that the set of vertices of this graph is \(A\cup B\), where \(A = [0,k ]\), \(B = [k+1,2k]\), and every edge joins a vertex from A to one from B. Furthermore, the set of labels of the edges of P(2k) is [1, 2k].
Let a and b be nonnegative integers and k, \(d_1\), and \(d_2\) be positive integers such that \(a+kd_1<b\). Let \(\hat{P}(2k, d_1,d_2,a,b)\) be the path with 2k edges and \(2k+1\) vertices given by \((a, b+(k-1)d_2, a+d_1, b+(k-2)d_2, a+2d_1, \ldots , a+(k-1)d_1,b,a+kd_1)\). Note that \(\hat{P}(2k,1,1,0,k+1)\) is the graph P(2k). Note that this graph \(\hat{P}(2k, d_1,d_2,a,b)\) has the following properties:
- P1::
-
\(\hat{P}(2k, d_1,d_2,a,b)\) is a path with first vertex a, second vertex \(b+(k-1)d_2\), and last vertex \(a+kd_1\).
- P2::
-
Each edge of \(\hat{P}(2k, d_1,d_2,a,b)\) joins a vertex from \(A = \{a+id_1:0 \le i \le k\}\) to a vertex with a larger label from \(B =\{b+id_2: 0 \le i \le k-1\}\).
- P3::
-
The set of edge labels of \(\hat{P}(2k, d_1,d_2,a,b)\) is \(\{b-a-kd_1+i(d_1+d_2): 0 \le i \le k-1\} \cup \{b-a-(k-1)d_1+i(d_1+d_2): 0 \le i \le k-1\} \).
The path \(\hat{P}(12,2,4,10,30)\) is shown in Fig. 2 below.
2 \(\sigma \)-Tripartite Labelings of Some Cubic Graphs
We will show that odd prisms and even Möbius ladders admit \(\sigma \)-tripartite labelings.
2.1 \(\sigma \)-Tripartite Labelings of Odd Prisms
By the prism\(D_{n}\ (n\ge 3)\) we mean the Cartesian product of a cycle with n vertices and a path with 2 vertices: \(C_{n}\times P_{2}\). For convenience, we let \(D_n=C_n \cup C'_n \cup F\), where \(C_n=(v_{1},v_{2},\ldots ,v_{n},v_1)\), \(C'_n=(v'_{1},v'_{2},\ldots ,v'_{n},v'_1)\), and \(F=\{\{v_i,v'_i\}: 1 \le i\le n\}\). We shall refer to \(C_n\) as the outer cycle, to \(C'_n\) as the inner cycle, and to F as the spokes. We note that \(D_{2n+1}\) (for \(n > 1\)) is necessarily tripartite with tripartition \(\{A, B, C\}\) where \(A= \{v'_1\} \cup \{v_{2i+1}: 2\le i \le n\} \cup \{v'_{2i}: 2\le i \le n\}\), \(B= \{v_{2i}: 1 \le i \le n\} \cup \{ v'_{2i+1}: 1\le i \le n\}\), and \(C= \{v_1, v_3, v'_2\}\). Figure 3 shows the prism \(D_7\). In this figure, the vertices in A are shown with white circles while the vertices in B are shown with black circles and the vertices of C are shown with white squares. The edges between sets B and C are shown in thick lines. We will adopt this convention in all our figures. It is easy to see that \(D_3\) cannot admit a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling. We will show that \(D_{n}\) admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling for all odd integers \(n \ge 5\).
Lemma 9
The prism \(D_3\) does not admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling.
Proof
If \(\{A,B,C\}\) is a vertex tripartition of \(D_3\), then the number of edges between B and C is necessarily 3. Since the number of edges of \(D_3\) is odd, it is impossible for \(D_3\) to admit a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling.
Lemma 10
The prism \(D_n\) admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling for all \(n \in \{5, 7, 9\}\).
Proof
We give \(\sigma \)-tripartite labelings of \(D_5\), \(D_7\), and \(D_9\) in Fig. 4. \(\square \)
Theorem 11
The prism \(D_n\) admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling for all odd \(n\ge 5\).
Proof
The cases with \(n\le 9\) are covered in Lemma 10. We separate the rest of the proof into 3 cases.
Case 1\(n \equiv 1 \pmod {6}\).
Let \(n=6t+1\) where \(t\ge 2\). Thus, \(|V(D_{n})|=12t+2\) and \(|E(D_{n})|=18t+3\). Define a one-to-one function \(f:V(D_{6t+1}) \rightarrow [0,36t+6]\) as follows:
Note that \(A=\{v_{6t+1}, v'_1, v'_4\}\cup A_1\cup A'_1\), \(B=\{v_2, v_4, v_{6t}, v'_3, v'_5, v'_{6t+1} \} \cup B_1 \cup B_2 \cup B'_1 \cup B'_2\) and \(C=\{v_1, v_3, v'_2\}\). Thus, the domain of f is indeed \(V(D_{6t+1})\). Next, we confirm that f is one-to-one. We compute
Note that f is piecewise strictly increasing by 2 or strictly decreasing by 4 and that all labels are distinct. Thus, f is one-to-one. Moreover, \(f(A)\subseteq [0,6t+2]\) and \(f(B \cup C) \subseteq [6t+6, 36t+2]\).
To help compute the edge labels, we will describe \(f(V(D_{6t+1}))\) in terms of the \(\hat{P}(2k,d_1,d_2,a,b)\) path notation. For convenience, we will identify the vertices of \(C_{6t+1}\) and \(C'_{6t+1}\) with their labels. We have \(f(C_{6t+1})=G_1+G_2+(6t+1, 18t-5, 1, 18t-1, 18t, 36t+2, 18t+2, 7)\), where
By P3, the resulting edge label sets are:
Moreover, edge labels \(12t-6, 18t-6, 18t-2, 1, 18t+2, 18t,\) and \(18t-5\) occur on the path \((6t+1, 18t-5, 1, 18t-1, 18t, 36t+2, 18t+2, 7)\).
Similarly, we have \(f(C'_{6t+1})=G'_1+G'_2+(6t+2, 18t-7, 0, 18t+3, 18t+1, 5,12t-3,8)\), where
By P3, the resulting edge label sets are:
Moreover, edge labels \(12t-9\), \(18t-7\), \(18t+3\), 2, \(18t-4\), \(12t-8\), and \(12t-11\) occur on the path \((6t+2, 18t-7, 0, 18t+3, 18t+1, 5, 12t-3, 8)\).
For each spoke \(\{v_i,v'_i\}\), the labels on the spokes are given by
Thus, the set of edge labels on the spokes is
It is easy to verify now that each \(\ell \in [1,18t+3]\) occurs on exactly one edge in \(D_{6t+1}\). Hence, the defined labeling is a \(\sigma \)-labeling, and condition (s1) for a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling is satisfied. Condition (s2) also holds since \(f(A) \subseteq [0, 6t+2]\) and \(f(B \cup C) \subseteq [6t+6, 36t+2]\). Condition (s3) holds since \(|f(v_1)-f(v_2)| + |f(v_2)-f(v_3)|=18t+3\), \(|f(v_3)-f(v_4)|+|f(v_2)-f(v'_2)|=18t+3\), and \(|f(v_3)-f(v'_3)| + |f(v'_2)-f(v'_3)|=18t+3\), number of edges of \(D_{6t+1}\). Condition (s4) clearly holds. Also \(|f(b)-f(c)| \in \{18t+3, 36t+6\}\), where \(b \in B\) and \(c \in C\), is impossible since \(|f(b)-f(c)| \in \{1, 2, 3, 18t, 18t+1, 18t+2\}\). Thus, condition (s5) holds, and we have a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(D_{6t+1}\). Figure 5 shows a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(D_{13}\).
Case 2\(n \equiv 3 \pmod {6}\).
Let \(n=6t-3\) where \(t\ge 3\). Thus, \(|V(D_{n})|=12t-6\) and \(|E(D_{n})|=18t-9\). Define a one-to-one function \(f:V(D_{6t-3}) \rightarrow [0,36t-18]\) as follows:
Note that \(A=\{v'_1\}\cup A_1\cup A'_1\), \(B=\{v_2, v_4, v'_3 \} \cup B_1 \cup B_2 \cup B_3 \cup B'_1 \cup B'_2\cup B'_3\) and \(C=\{v_1,v_3, v'_2\}\). If we proceed as in Case 1, it is easy to verify that we have a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(D_{6t-3}\). Figure 6 shows a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(D_{15}\).
Case 3\(n \equiv 5 \pmod {6}\).
Let \(n=6t-1\) where \(t\ge 2\). Thus, \(|V(D_{n})|=12t-2\) and \(|E(D_{n})|=18t-3\). Define a one-to-one function \(f: V(D_{6t-1}) \rightarrow [0,36t-6]\) as follows:
We have that \(A=\{v_{6t-1}, v'_1, v'_4\}\cup A_1\cup A'_1\), \(B=\{v_2, v_4,v_{6t-2}, v'_3,v'_{6t-1}\} \cup B_1 \cup B_2 \cup B'_1 \cup B'_2\) and \(C=\{v_1, v_3, v'_2\}\). If we proceed as in case 1, it is easy to verify that we have a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(D_{6t-1}\). Figure 7 shows a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(D_{11}\). \(\square \)
2.2 \(\sigma \)-Tripartite Labelings of Even Möbius Ladders
For \(n\ge 3\), let \(v_{1},v_{2},\ldots ,v_{n}\) and \(v'_{1},v'_{2},\ldots ,v'_{n}\) denote the consecutive vertices of two disjoint paths with n vertices. The Möbius ladder\(M_n\) is the graph obtained by joining \(v_{i}\) to \(v'_{i}\) for \(i=1,2,\ldots ,n \) and by joining \(v_{1}\) to \(v'_{n}\) and \(v_{n}\) to \(v'_{1}\). For convenience, we let \(M_n=P_n \cup P'_n \cup F \cup H\), where \(P_n=(v_{1},v_{2},\ldots ,v_{n})\), \(P'_n=(v'_{1},v'_{2},\ldots ,v'_{n})\), \(F=\{\{v_i,v'_i\}: 1 \le i\le n\}\) and \(H=\{\{v_1,v'_n \}, \{v_n,v'_1\}\}\). We shall refer to \(P_n\) as the outer path, to \(P'_n\) as the inner path, and to F as the spokes. Figure 8 shows the Möbius ladder \(M_{10}\). We note that \(M_{2n}\) (with \(n \ge 2\)) is necessarily tripartite with tripartition \(\{A, B, C\}\), where \(A =\{v'_1, v'_4\} \cup \{v_{2i-1}, v'_{2i} : 3\le i \le n\}\), \(B = \{v_2\} \cup \{ v'_{2i-1}, v_{2i} : 2 \le i \le n\}\), and \(C = \{ v_1, v_3, v'_2\} \). We will show that \(M_{n}\) admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling for all even integers \(n \ge 4\).
Lemma 12
The Möbius ladder \(M_n\) admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling for all \(n \in \{4, 6, 8, 10,12\}\).
Proof
We give \(\sigma \)-tripartite labelings of \(M_4\), \(M_6\), \(M_8\), \(M_{10}\), and \(M_{12}\) in Fig. 9. \(\square \)
Theorem 13
The Möbius ladder \(M_n\) admits a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling for all even \(n \ge 4\).
Proof
The cases with \(n \le 12\) are covered in Lemma 12. We separate the rest of the proof into 3 cases.
Case 1\(n \equiv 0 \pmod {6}\).
Let \(n=6t\) where \(t \ge 3\). Thus, \(|V(M_{n})|=12t\) and \(|E(M_{n})|=18t\). Define a one-to-one function \(f :V(M_{6t}) \rightarrow [0,36t]\) as follows:
Note that \(A = \{v'_1\} \cup A_1 \cup A'_1\), \(B =\{v_2, v'_3 \} \cup B_1 \cup B_2 \cup B_3 \cup B'_1 \cup B'_2 \cup B'_3\), and \(C = \{v_1, v_3, v'_2\} \). Thus, the domain of f is indeed \(V(M_{6t})\). Next, we confirm that f is one-to-one. We compute
Note that f is piecewise strictly increasing by 2 or strictly decreasing by 4 and that all labels are distinct. Thus, f is one-to-one. Moreover, \(f(A)\subseteq [0,6t-1]\) and \(f(B \cup C) \subseteq [6t+3, 36t-4]\).
To help compute the edge labels, we will describe \(f(M_{6t})\) in terms of the \(\hat{P}(2k,d_1,d_2,a,b)\) path notation. For convenience, we will identify the vertices of \(P_{6t}\) and \(P'_{6t}\) with their labels. We have \(f(P_{6t})=(18t, 18t-1, 36t-4, 18t-3, 4)+G_1+G_2+G_3+(6t-2, 6t+3)\), where
By P3, the resulting edge label sets are:
Moreover, edge labels 1, \(18t-3\), \(18t-1\), and \(18t-7\) occur on the path \((18t, 18-1, 36t-4, 18t-3, 4)\) and the edge label 5 occurs on the edge \(\{6t-2, 6t+3\}\).
Similarly, we have \(f(P'_{6t})=(0, 18t-4, 18t-2, 3)+G'_1+G'_2+ G'_3\), where
By P3, the resulting edge label sets are:
Moreover, edge labels \(18t-4\), 2, and \(18t-5\) occur on the path \((0, 18t-4, 18t-2, 3)\).
For each spoke \(\{v_i,v'_i\}\), the labels on the spokes are given by
Thus, the set of edge labels on the spokes is
Moreover, edge labels \(12t+1\) and \(6t+3\) occur on the edges \(\{v_1, v'_{6t}\}\) and \(\{v'_1, v_{6t}\}\).
It is easy to verify now that each \(\ell \in [1,18t]\) occurs on exactly one edge in \(M_{6t}\). Hence, the defined labeling is a \(\sigma \)-labeling and condition (s1) for a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling is satisfied. Condition (s2) also holds since \(f(A) \subseteq [0, 6t+2]\) and \(f(B \cup C) \subseteq [6t+3, 36t]\). Condition (s3) holds since \(|f(v_1)-f(v_2)| + |f(v_3)-f(v_4)|=18t\), \(|f(v_2)-f(v_3)| + |f(v_2)-f(v'_2)|=18t\), and \(|f(v_2)-f(v'_3)|+|f(v_3)-f(v'_3)|=18t\), the number of edges of \(M_{6t}\). Condition (s4) clearly holds. Also \(|f(b)-f(c)|\in \{18t, 36t\}\), where \(b \in B\) and \(c \in C\), is impossible since \(|f(b)-f(c)| \in \{1, 2, 3, 18t-1, 18t-2, 18t-3\}\). Thus, condition (s5) holds, and we have a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(M_{6t}\). Figure 10 shows a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(M_{18}\).
Case 2\(n \equiv 2 \pmod {6}\).
Let \(n=6t+2\) where \(t \ge 2\). Thus, \(|V(M_{n})|=12t+4\) and \(|E(M_{n})|=18t+6\). Define a one-to-one function \(f :V(M_{6t+2}) \rightarrow [0,36t+12]\) as follows:
Note that \(A = \{v'_1, v'_4, v'_{6t+2}\} \cup A_1 \cup A'_1 \), \(B =\{v_2, v_4, v_{6t+2}, v'_3, v'_{6t+1} \} \cup B_1 \cup B_2 \cup B'_1 \cup B'_2 \), and \(C = \{v_1, v_3, v'_2\} \). If we proceed as in Case 1, it is easy to verify that we have a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(M_{6t+2}\). Figure 11 shows a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(M_{14}.\)
Case 3\(n \equiv 4 \pmod {6}\).
Let \(n=6t-2\), where \(t \ge 3\). Thus, \(|V(M_{n})|=12t-4\) and \(|E(M_{n})|=18t-6\). Define a one-to-one function \(f :V(M_{6t-2}) \rightarrow [0,36t-12]\) as follows:
Note that \(A = \{v'_1\} \cup A_1 \cup A'_1 \), \(B =\{v_2, v_{6t-2}, v'_3\} \cup B_1 \cup B_2 \cup B_3 \cup B'_1 \cup B'_2 \cup B'_3\), and \(C = \{v_1, v_3, v'_2\} \). If we proceed as in Case 1, it is easy to verify that we have a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(M_{6t-2}\). Figure 12 shows a \(\sigma \)-tripartite labeling of \(M_{16}\). \(\square \)
Because it is known that bipartite prisms and bipartite Möbius ladders admit \(\alpha \)-labelings and in light of our results here, we have the following.
Corollary 14
If G of size n is a prism (other than \(D_3\)) or a Möbius ladder, then there exists a cyclic G-decomposition of \(K_{2nt+1}\), of \(K_{2nt}+I\), and of \(K_{2nt+2}-I\) for all positive integers t.
References
Adams, P., Bryant, D., Buchanan, M.: A survey on the existence of G-designs. J. Combin. Des. 16, 373–410 (2008)
Bryant, D., El-Zanati, S.: Graph decompositions. In: Colbourn, C.J., Dinitz, J.H. (eds.) Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, 2nd edn, pp. 477–485. Chapman, Boca Raton (2007)
Bunge, R.C., Chantasartrassmee, A., El-Zanati, S.I., Eynden, C.Vanden: On cyclic decompositions of complete graphs into tripartite graphs. J. Gr. Theory. 72, 90–111 (2013)
El-Zanati, S.I., Eynden, C.Vanden: On Rosa-type labelings and cyclic graph decompositions. Math. Slov. 59, 1–18 (2009)
El-Zanati, S.I., Eynden, C.Vanden, Punnim, N.: On the cyclic decomposition of complete graphs into bipartite graphs. Australas. J. Combin. 24, 209–219 (2001)
Frucht, R., Gallian, J.: Labeling prisms. Ars Combin. 26, 69–82 (1988)
Gallian, J.A.: Labeling prisms and prism related graphs. Congr. Numer. 59, 89–100 (1987)
Gallian, J.A.: A dynamic survey of graph labeling. Electron. J. Combin., Dynamic Survey DS6 (2015). http://www.combinatorics.org
Pasotti, A.: Constructions for cyclic Moebius ladder systems. Discret. Math. 310, 3080–3087 (2010)
Read, R.C., Wilson, R.J.: An Atlas of Graphs. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998)
Rosa, A.: On certain valuations of the vertices of a graph. In: Théorie des graphes, journées internationales d’études, Rome, Dunod, Paris, 1967) 349–355 (1966)
Šajna, M.: Mateja Decomposition of the complete graph plus a 1-factor into cycles of equal length. J. Combin. Des. 11, 170–207 (2003)
Vietri, A.: Graceful labellings for an infinite class of generalised Petersen graphs. Ars Combin. 81, 247–255 (2006)
Vietri, A.: A new infinite family of graceful generalised Petersen graphs, via “graceful collages” again. Australas. J. Combin. 41, 273–282 (2008)
Wannasit, W., El-Zanati, S.I.: On graceful cubic graphs. Congr. Numer. 208, 167–182 (2011)
Wannasit, W., El-Zanati, S.: On cyclic \(G\)-designs where \(G\) is a cubic tripartite graph. Discret. Math. 312, 293–305 (2012)
Wannasit, W., El-Zanati, S.I.: On free \(\alpha \)-labelings of cubic bipartite graphs. J. Combin. Math. Combin. Computing 82, 269–293 (2012)
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank an anonymous referee for several helpful suggestions that improved the presentation of the results in this paper. This research was supported by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and Chiang Mai University, Grant No. TRG5880080.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Sandi Klavžar.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wannasit, W., El-Zanati, S. On \(\sigma \)-Tripartite Labelings of Odd Prisms and Even Möbius Ladders. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 42, 677–696 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-017-0503-y
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-017-0503-y