Abstract
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group, \(K\) be an LCA group, \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism and \(G_\tau =H\ltimes _\tau K\) be the semi-direct product of \(H\) and \(K\) with respect to the continuous homomorphism \(\tau \). In this article, we introduce the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\). We define the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform of \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) with respect to a window function \(u\in L^2(K)\) as a function defined on \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\). It is also shown that the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform satisfies the Plancherel Theorem and reconstruction formula. This approach is tailored for choosing elements of \(L^2(G_\tau )\) as a window function. Finally, we indicate some possible applications of these methods in the case of some well-known semi-direct product groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In [15] Gabor used translations and modulations of the Gaussian signal to represent one-dimensional signals. The Gabor transform, named after Gabor, is a special case of the short-time Fourier transform (STFT). It is used to determine the sinusoidal frequency and phase content of local sections of a signal as it changes over time. The function to be transformed is first multiplied by a Gaussian function, which can be regarded as a window, and the resulting function is then transformed with a Fourier transform to derive the time–frequency analysis. The window function term means that the signal near the time being analyzed will have higher weight. The Gabor transform of a signal \(x(t)\) is precisely defined by
Due to (1.1) the Gabor transform of a signal \(x(t)\) is a function defined on \(\mathbb {R}\times \widehat{\mathbb {R}}\) called the time–frequency plane. There is also standard extension of the continuous Gabor transform of a signal \(x(\mathbf{t})\) on \(\mathbb {R}^n\) which is defined for \((\mathbf{y},\mathbf{w})\in \mathbb {R}^n\times \widehat{\mathbb {R}^n}\) by (see [9, 16])
Since the theory of Gabor analysis based on the structure of translations and modulations (time–frequency plane), it is also possible to extend concepts of the Gabor theory to other locally compact abelian (LCA) groups. For more explanation, we refer the reader to the monograph of Gröchenig [17] or complete works of Feichtinger and Strohmer [8] and also [7] in the case of finite abelian groups. The continuous Gabor transform for LCA groups is closely related to the Feichtinger–Gröchenig theory (coorbit space theory). In view of voice transform and the coorbit space theory, the continuous Gabor transform for an LCA group \(G\) is precisely the voice transform generated by the Schrödinger representation of the Weyl–Heisenberg group associate with \(G\) (see [4–6, 19]).
Many locally compact spaces and locally compact groups which are used in mathematical physics and also various topics of engineering such as the \(n\)-dimensional unit sphere, Heisenberg group, affine group, or Euclidean groups are non-abelian groups or they are homogeneous spaces of non-abelian groups (see [10, 13, 21]). Large class of non-Abelian locally compact groups is the class consist of semi-direct product group of an LCA group with another locally compact group. The theory of harmonic analysis for semi-direct product of locally compact groups is a significant tool in the theory of wavelet analysis (see [1, 12, 18, 23]). We recall that in the classical theory of harmonic analysis for non-abelian locally compact groups (see [3, 10, 24, 26, 27]) we lose many useful results and basic numerical concepts in abelian harmonic analysis of LCA groups (see [10, 25]), which play important roles in the usual Gabor theory of LCA groups. If \(G\) is a non-abelain locally compact group via a natural approach, modulation by a character will be replaced by a modulation by an equivalence class of an irreducible representation of \(G\) (see [14]) and the natural candidate for the generalization of the time frequency plane will be \(G\times \widehat{G}\), where \(\widehat{G}\) stands for the set of all equivalence class of irreducible continuous unitary representations of \(G\). It is clear that this extension will not be appropriate from the numerical computational aspects and also application viewpoints. Thus, we need a new approach to find an appropriate generalization of the continuous Gabor transform which be useful and also efficient in application.
This article contains 5 sections. Section 2 is devoted to fix notations including a brief summary about harmonic analysis of semi-direct product of locally compact groups also standard Fourier analysis and Gabor analysis on LCA groups. In Sect. 3 we assume that \(H\) is a locally compact group and \(K\) is an LCA group, \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) is a continuous homomorphism and \(G_\tau =H\ltimes _\tau {K}\). We define the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\) and the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform of \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) with respect to a window function \(u\in L^2(K)\). We also prove a Plancherel and inversion formula for the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform. To choose elements of \(L^2(G_\tau )\) as window functions we define the \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) and also the \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform in Sect. 4. As an application, we study this theory on the affine group, Weyl–Heisenberg group and the Euclidean groups in Sect. 5.
2 Preliminaries and Notations
Let \(H\) and \(K\) be locally compact groups with identity elements \(e_H\) and \(e_K\), respectively, and left Haar measures \(\mathrm{d}h\) and \(dk\) respectively, also let \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a homomorphism such that the map \((h,k)\mapsto \tau _h(k)\) is continuous from \(H\times K\) onto \(K\). There is a natural topology, sometimes called Braconnier topology, turning \(Aut(K)\) into a Hausdorff topological group(not necessarily locally compact), which is defined by the sub-base of identity neighborhoods
where \(F\subseteq K\) is compact and \(U\subseteq K\) is an identity neighborhood. Continuity of a homomorphism \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) is equivalent with the continuity of the map \((h,k)\mapsto \tau _h(k)\) from \(H\times K\) onto \(K\) (see [22]).
The semi-direct product \(G_\tau =H\ltimes _\tau K\) is the locally compact topological group with the underlying set \(H\times K\) which is equipped by the product topology and also the group operation is defined by
If \(H_1=\{(h,e_K):h\in H\}\) and \(K_1=\{(e_H,k):k\in K\}\) then \(K_1\) is a closed normal subgroup and \(H_1\) is a closed subgroup of \(G_\tau \). The left Haar measure of \(G_\tau \) is \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_\tau }(h,k)=\delta (h)\mathrm{d}h\mathrm{d}k\) and the modular function \(\Delta _{G_\tau }\) is
where the positive continuous homomorphism \(\delta :H\rightarrow (0,\infty )\) is given by [21]
From now on, for all \(p\ge 1\) we denote by \(L^p(G_\tau )\) the Banach space \(L^p(G_\tau ,\mu _{G_\tau })\) and also \(L^p(K)\) stands for \(L^p(K,dk)\). When \(f\in L^p(G_\tau )\), for a.e. \(h\in H\) the function \(f_h\) defined on \(K\) via \(f_h(k):=f(h,k)\) belongs to \(L^p(K)\) (see [11]).
If \(K\) is an LCA group all irreducible representations of \(K\) are one-dimensional. Thus, if \(\pi \) is an irreducible unitary representation of \(K\) we have \(\mathcal {H}_\pi =\mathbb {C}\) and also according to the Schur’s Lemma there exists a continuous homomorphism \(\omega \) of \(K\) into the circle group \(\mathbb {T}\) such that for each \(k\in K\) and \(z\in \mathbb {C}\) we have \(\pi (k)(z)=\omega (k)z\). Such homomorphisms are called characters of \(K\) and the set of all characters of \(K\) denoted by \(\widehat{K}\). If \(\widehat{K}\) equipped by the topology of compact convergence on \(K\) which coincides with the \(w^*\)-topology that \(\widehat{K}\) inherits as a subset of \(L^\infty (K)\), then \(\widehat{K}\) with respect to the point-wise product of characters is an LCA group which is called the dual group of \(K\). The linear map \(\mathcal {F}_K:L^1(K)\rightarrow \mathcal {C}(\widehat{K})\) defined by \(v\mapsto \mathcal {F}_K(v)\) via
is called the Fourier transform on \(K\). It is a norm-decreasing \(*\)-homomorphism from \(L^1(K)\) into \(\mathcal {C}_0(\widehat{K})\) with a uniformly dense range in \(\mathcal {C}_0(\widehat{K})\) (Proposition 4.13 of [10]). If \(\phi \in L^1(\widehat{K})\), the function defined \(a.e.\) on \(K\) by
belongs to \(L^\infty (K)\) and also for all \(f\in L^1(K)\) we have the following orthogonality relation (Parseval formula);
The Fourier transform (2.4) on \(L^1(K)\cap L^2(K)\) is an isometric transform and it extends uniquely to a unitary isomorphism from \(L^2(K)\) onto \(L^2(\widehat{K})\) (Theorem 4.25 of [10]) also each \(v\in L^1(K)\) with \(\widehat{v}\in L^1(\widehat{K})\) satisfies the following Fourier inversion formula (Theorem 4.32 of [10]);
The fundamental operator in standard Gabor theory is the time–frequency shift operator. If \(K\) is an LCA group, the translation (time-shifts) operator is given by \(T_sv(k)=v(k-s)\) for all \(k,s\in K\) and also the modulation (frequency-shifts) operator is given by \(M_\omega v(k)=\omega (k)v(k)\) for all \(\omega \in \widehat{K}\), \(k\in K\). The time–frequency shift operator is defined on the time–frequency plane (time–frequency group) \(K\times \widehat{K}\) by \(\varrho (k,\omega )=M_{\omega }T_k\) for all \((k,\omega )\in K\times \widehat{K}\).
Given an appropriate window function \(u\in L^2(K)\) on \(K\), the short time Fourier transform (STFT) or the continuous Gabor transform of \(v\in L^2(K)\) is given by
The continuous Gabor transform (2.8) satisfies the following Plancherel formula
for all \(u,v\in L^2(K)\) (see [17]). If \(u,u'\in L^2(K)\) with \(\langle u,u'\rangle _{L^2(K)}\not =0\), then each \(v\in L^2(K)\) satisfies the following inversion formula in the weak sense (see [16])
If a window function \(u\in L^2(K)\) has Fourier transform \(\widehat{u}\) in \(L^1(\widehat{K})\), then each \(v\in L^2(K)\) with \(\widehat{v}\in L^1(\widehat{K})\) satisfies the following inversion formula;
for all \(s\in K\).
3 \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-Continuous Gabor Transform
Throughout this paper, let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also let \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism and \(G_\tau =H\ltimes _\tau K\). For simplicity in notations we use \(k^h\) instead of \(\tau _h(k)\) for all \(h\in H\) and \(k\in K\). In this section we introduce the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group and also we define the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform of \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) with respect to a window function in \(L^2(K)\).
Define \(\widehat{\tau }:H\rightarrow Aut(\widehat{K})\) via \(h\mapsto \widehat{\tau }_h\), given by
for all \(\omega \in \widehat{K}\), where \(\omega _h(k)=\omega (\tau _{h^{-1}}(k))\) for all \(k\in K\). If \(\omega \in \widehat{K}\) and \(h\in H\) we have \(\omega _h\in \widehat{K}\), because for all \(k,s\in K\) we have
According to (3.1) for all \(h\in H\) we have \(\widehat{\tau }_h\in Aut(\widehat{K})\). Because, if \(k\in K\) and \(h\in H\) then for all \(\omega ,\eta \in \widehat{K}\) we have
Also \(h\mapsto \widehat{\tau }_h\) is a homomorphism from \(H\) into \(Aut(\widehat{K})\), cause if \(h,t\in H\) then for all \(\omega \in \widehat{K}\) and \(k\in K\) we get
Thus, we can prove the following theorem.
Theorem 3.1
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism and let \(\delta :H\rightarrow (0,\infty )\) be the positive continuous homomorphism satisfying \(\mathrm{d}k=\delta (h)\mathrm{d}k^h\). The semi-direct product \(G_{\widehat{\tau }}=H\ltimes _{\widehat{\tau }}\widehat{K}\) is a locally compact group with the left Haar measure \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\widehat{\tau }}}(h,\omega )=\delta (h)^{-1}\mathrm{d}h\mathrm{d}\omega \).
Proof
Continuity of the homomorphism \(\widehat{\tau }:H\rightarrow Aut(\widehat{K})\) given in (3.1) guaranteed by Theorem 26.9 of [21]. Hence, the semi-direct product \(G_{\widehat{\tau }}=H\ltimes _{\widehat{\tau }}\widehat{K}\) is a locally compact group. We also claim that the Plancherel measure \(\mathrm{d}\omega \) on \(\widehat{K}\) for all \(h\in H\) satisfies
Let \(h\in H\) and \(v\in L^1(K)\). Using (2.3) we have \(v\circ \tau _h\in L^1(K)\) with \(\Vert v\circ \tau _h\Vert _{L^1(K)}=\delta (h)\Vert v\Vert _{L^1(K)}\). Thus, for all \(\omega \in \widehat{K}\) we achieve
Now let \(v\in L^1(K)\cap L^2(K)\). Due to the Plancherel theorem (Theorem 4.25 of [10]) and also preceding calculation, for all \(h\in H\) we get
which implies (3.2). Therefore, \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\widehat{\tau }}}(h,\omega )=\delta (h)^{-1}\mathrm{d}h\mathrm{d}\omega \) is a left Haar measure for \(G_{\widehat{\tau }}=H\ltimes _{\widehat{\tau }}\widehat{K}\). \(\square \)
Remark 3.2
Due to (3.1) for all \(k\in K\), \(\omega \in \widehat{K}\) and \(h,t\in H\) we have
Now we are in the position to introduce the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group. Define \(\tau ^{\times }=\tau \times \widehat{\tau }:H\rightarrow Aut(K\times \widehat{K})\) via \(h\mapsto \tau ^{\times }_h\) given by
for all \((k,\omega )\in K\times \widehat{K}\). Then, for all \(h\in H\) we have \(\tau _h^\times \in Aut(K\times \widehat{K})\). Because for all \((k,\omega ),(k',\omega ')\in K\times \widehat{K}\) we have
Also \(\tau ^\times =\tau \times \widehat{\tau }:H\rightarrow Aut(K\times \widehat{K})\) defined by \(h\mapsto \tau ^\times _{h}\) is a homomorphism, because for all \(h,t\in H\) and all \((k,\omega )\in K\times \widehat{K}\) we have
In the following proposition we show that \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }} =H\ltimes _{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}(K\times \widehat{K})\) is a locally compact group.
Proposition 3.3
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism and let \(\delta :H\rightarrow (0,\infty )\) be the positive continuous homomorphism satisfying \(\mathrm{d}k=\delta (h)\mathrm{d}k^h\). The semi-direct product \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }} =H\ltimes _{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}(K\times \widehat{K})\) is a locally compact group with the left Haar measure
Proof
Continuity of the homomorphism \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }:H\rightarrow Aut(K\times \widehat{K})\) given in (3.4) guaranteed by Theorem 26.9 of [21]. Thus, the semi-direct product \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}=H\ltimes _{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}(K\times \widehat{K})\) is a locally compact group. Due to (2.3), (3.2) and also (3.4), for all \(h\in H\) we have
which implies that \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\) is a locally compact group with the left Haar measure \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}}(h,k,\omega )=\mathrm{d}h\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\omega \). \(\square \)
We call the semi-direct product \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\) as the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group associated to \(G_\tau \). According to (3.4) for each \((h,k,\omega ),(h',k',\omega ')\in G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\) we have
Let \(u\in L^2(K)\) be a window function and \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\). The \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\) -continuous Gabor transform of \(f\) with respect to the window function \(u\) is define by
In the following theorem we prove a Plancherel formula for the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform defined in (3.6).
Theorem 3.4
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism and let \(u\in L^2(K)\) be a window function. The \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform \(\mathcal {V}_u:L^2(G_\tau )\rightarrow L^2(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }})\) is a multiple of an isometric transform which maps \(L^2(G_\tau )\) onto a closed subspace of \(L^2(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }})\).
Proof
Let \(u\in L^2(K)\) be a window function and also \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\). Using Fubini’s Theorem and also Plancherel formula (2.9) we have
Therefore, \(\Vert u\Vert _{L^2(K)}^{-2}\mathcal {V}_u:L^2(G_\tau )\rightarrow L^2(G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\) is an isometric transform with a closed range in \(L^2(G_{\tau }\times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\). \(\square \)
Corollary 3.5
The \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform defined in (3.6), for all \(f,g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) and window functions \(u,v\in L^2(K)\) satisfies the following orthogonality relation;
The \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform (3.6) satisfies the following inversion formula.
Proposition 3.6
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also let \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism and \(u\in L^2(K)\) with \(\widehat{u}\in L^1(\widehat{K})\). Every \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) with \(\widehat{f_h}\in L^1(\widehat{K})\) for a.e. \(h\in H\), satisfies the following reconstruction formula;
Proof
Using (2.11) for a.e. \(h\in H\) we have
\(\square \)
We can also define the generalized form of the \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform. Let \(u\in L^2(K)\) be a window function and \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\). The generalized \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\) -continuous Gabor transform of \(f\) with respect to the window function \(u\) is define by
The generalized \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform given in (3.9) satisfies the following Plancherel Theorem.
Theorem 3.7
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism and let \(u\in L^2(K)\) be a window function. The generalized \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform \(\mathcal {V}^\dagger _u:L^2(G_\tau )\rightarrow L^2(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }})\) is a multiple of an isometric transform which maps \(L^2(G_\tau )\) onto a closed subspace of \(L^2(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }})\).
Proof
Let \(u\in L^2(K)\) be a window function and also \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\). Using Fubini’s Theorem, Plancherel formula (2.9) and also (2.3), (3.2) we have
Thus, \(\Vert u\Vert _{L^2(K)}^{-2}\mathcal {V}^\dagger _u:L^2(G_\tau )\rightarrow L^2(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }})\) is an isometric transform with a closed range in \(L^2(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }})\). \(\square \)
Corollary 3.8
The generalized \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform defined in (3.9), for all \(f,g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) and window functions \(u,v\in L^2(K)\) satisfies the following orthogonality relation;
In the next proposition we prove an inversion formula for the generalized \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform given in (3.9).
Proposition 3.9
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also let \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism and \(u\in L^2(K)\) with \(\widehat{u}\in L^1(\widehat{K})\). Every \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) with \(\widehat{f_h}\in L^1(\widehat{K})\) for a.e. \(h\in H\), satisfies the following reconstruction formula;
Proof
Using (2.11) for a.e. \(h\in H\) we have
\(\square \)
Remark 3.10
It is also possible to define different variants of the Gabor transform as we defined in (3.6) and (3.9), with similar properties. Let transforms \(A_u\) and \(B_u\) for \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) be given by
It can be checked that transforms given in (3.12) satisfy the Plancherel theorem and the following inversion formulas;
4 \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-Continuous Gabor Transform
In this section we introduce another Gabor transform which we call it the \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform. In the \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-Gabor theory we can choose elements of \(L^2(G_\tau )\) as window functions.
Again let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also let \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism. Define \(\tau ^\otimes =\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }:H\times H\rightarrow Aut(K\times \widehat{K})\) via \((h,t)\mapsto \tau ^\otimes _{(h,t)}\) given by
for all \((k,\omega )\in K\times \widehat{K}\). Then, for all \((h,t)\in H\times H\) we get \(\tau ^\otimes _{(h,t)}\in Aut(K\times \widehat{K})\). Because for all \((k,\omega ),(k',\omega ')\in K\times \widehat{K}\) we have
As well as \(\tau ^\otimes =\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }:H\times H\rightarrow Aut(K\times \widehat{K})\) defined by \((h,t)\mapsto \tau ^\otimes _{(h,t)}\) is a homomorphism, because for all \((h,t),(h',t')\in H\times H\) and also all \((k,\omega )\in K\times \widehat{K}\) we have
Hence, we can prove the following interesting theorem.
Theorem 4.1
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also let \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism. The semi-direct product \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}=\left( H\times H\right) \ltimes _{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\left( K\times \widehat{K}\right) \) is a locally compact group with the left Haar measure
and also \(\Phi :G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }}\rightarrow G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) given by
is a topological group isomorphism.
Proof
Using Theorem 26.9 of [21], homomorphism \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }:H\times H\rightarrow Aut(K\times \widehat{K})\) given in (4.1) is continuous. Therefore, \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}=\left( H\times H\right) \ltimes _{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\left( K\times \widehat{K}\right) \) is a locally compact group. Also, \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}} (h,t,k,\omega )=\delta (h)\delta (t)^{-1}\mathrm{d}h\mathrm{d}t\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\omega \) is a left Haar measure for \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\). Indeed, due to (2.3) and (3.2) for all \((h,t)\in H\times H\) we have
The \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-group law for all \((h,t,k,\omega ),(h',t',k',\omega ')\in G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) is
It is clear that \(\Phi :G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }}\rightarrow G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) is a homeomorphism. It is also a group homomorphism, because for all \((h,k,t,\omega ),(h',k',t',\omega ')\) in \(G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }}\) we get
\(\square \)
We call the semi-direct product \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) as the \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group associated to \(G_\tau \) which is precisely \(G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }}\). Thus, form now on we use the locally compact group \(G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }}\) instead of the semi-direct product \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\).
Let \(g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) be a window function and \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\). The \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\) -continuous Gabor transform of \(f\) with respect to the window function \(g\) is defined by
The \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform given in (4.4) satisfies the following Plancherel Theorem.
Theorem 4.2
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group, \(K\) be an LCA group and \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism also \(G_\tau =H\ltimes _\tau K\) and let \(g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) be a window function. The continuous Gabor transform \(\mathcal {G}_g:L^2(G_\tau )\rightarrow L^2(G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\) is a multiple of an isometric transform which maps \(L^2(G_\tau )\) onto a closed subspace of \(L^2(G_{\tau }\times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\).
Proof
Let \(g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) be a window function and also let \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\).
Thus, \(\Vert g\Vert _{L^2(G_\tau )}^{-2}\mathcal {G}_g:L^2(G_\tau )\rightarrow L^2(G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\) is an isometric transform with a closed range in \(L^2(G_{\tau }\times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\). \(\square \)
Corollary 4.3
The \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform defined in (4.4), for all \(f,f'\in L^2(G_\tau )\) and window functions \(g,g'\in L^2(G_\tau )\) satisfies the following orthogonality relation;
In the following proposition we also prove an inversion formula.
Proposition 4.4
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also let \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism. Every \(f,g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) with \(\widehat{f_h},\widehat{g_h}\in L^1(\widehat{K})\) for a.e. \(h\in H\), satisfy the following reconstruction formula;
for a.e. \(h,t\in H\) and \(k\in K\). In particular, for a.e. \(h\in H\) we have
Proof
Using (2.11) for a.e. \(h,t\in H\) we have
\(\square \)
Let \(g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) be a window function and \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\). The generalized \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\) -continuous Gabor transform of \(f\) with respect to the window function \(g\) is defined by
In the next theorem, a Plancherel formula for the generalized \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform defined in (4.8) proved.
Theorem 4.5
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group, \(K\) be an LCA group and \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism also \(G_\tau =H\ltimes _\tau K\) and also let \(g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) be a window function. The generalized continuous Gabor transform \(\mathcal {G}_g^\dagger :L^2(G_\tau )\rightarrow L^2(G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\) is a multiple of an isometric transform which maps \(L^2(G_\tau )\) onto a closed subspace of \(L^2(G_{\tau }\times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\).
Proof
Let \(g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) be a window function and also let \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\). Using Fubini’s theorem and also Theorem we achieve
Thus, \(\Vert g\Vert _{L^2(G_\tau )}^{-2}\mathcal {G}_g^\dagger :L^2(G_\tau )\rightarrow L^2(G_\tau \times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\) is an isometric transform with a closed range in \(L^2(G_{\tau }\times G_{\widehat{\tau }})\). \(\square \)
Corollary 4.6
The \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform defined in (4.8), for all \(f,f'\in L^2(G_\tau )\) and window functions \(g,g'\in L^2(G_\tau )\) satisfies the following orthogonality relation;
Also, the generalized \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform satisfies the following inversion formula.
Proposition 4.7
Let \(H\) be a locally compact group and \(K\) be an LCA group also let \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) be a continuous homomorphism. Every \(f,g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) with \(\widehat{f_h},\widehat{g_h}\in L^1(\widehat{K})\) for a.e. \(h,t\in H\), satisfy the following reconstruction formula;
for a.e. \(h,t\in H\) and \(k\in K\). In particular for a.e. \(h\in H\) we have
Proof
Using (2.11) for a.e. \(h,t\in H\) we have
\(\square \)
5 Examples and Applications
5.1 The Affine Group \(\mathbf {a}\mathbf {x}+\mathbf {b}\)
Let \(H=\mathbb {R}^*_+=(0,+\infty )\) and \(K=\mathbb {R}\). The affine group \(a\mathbf{x}+b\) is the semi-direct product \(H\ltimes _\tau K\) with respect to the homomorphism \(\tau :H\rightarrow Aut(K)\) given by \(a\mapsto \tau _a\), where \(\tau _a(x)=ax\) for all \(x\in \mathbb {R}\). Hence, the underlying manifold of the affine group is \((0,\infty )\times \mathbb {R}\) and also the group law is
The continuous homomorphism \(\delta :H\rightarrow (0,\infty )\) is given by \(\delta (a)=a^{-1}\) and so that the left Haar measure is in fact \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_\tau }(a,x)=a^{-2}\mathrm{d}a\mathrm{d}x\). Due to Theorem 4.5 of [10] we can identify \(\widehat{\mathbb {R}}\) with \(\mathbb {R}\) via \(\omega (x)=\langle x,\omega \rangle =e^{2\pi i\omega x}\) for each \(\omega \in \widehat{\mathbb {R}}\) and so we can consider the continuous homomorphism \(\widehat{\tau }:H\rightarrow Aut(\widehat{K})\) given by \(a\mapsto \widehat{\tau }_a\) via
Thus, \(G_{\widehat{\tau }}\) has the underlying manifold \((0,\infty )\times \mathbb {R}\), with the group law given by
Due to Theorem 3.1 the left Haar measure \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\widehat{\tau }}}(a,\omega )\) is precisely \(\mathrm{d}a\mathrm{d}\omega \). The \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\) has the underlying manifold \((0,\infty )\times \mathbb {R}\times \widehat{\mathbb {R}}\) and the group law is
with the left Haar measure \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}}(a,x,\omega )=a^{-1}\mathrm{d}a\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}\omega \). The geometry of this locally compact group and also the wave packet approaches of this locally compact group was studied in [2, 20]. If \(u\in L^2(\mathbb {R})\) is a window function and also \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\). According to (3.6) we have
Using Theorem 3.4, if \(\Vert u\Vert _{L^2(\mathbb {R})}=1\) we get
Due to the reconstruction formula (3.8) if for a.e. \(a\in (0,\infty )\) we have \(\widehat{f_a}\in L^1(\mathbb {R})\), then for a.e. \(x\in \mathbb {R}\) we get
As well as according to (3.9) we have
Using Theorem 3.7, if \(\Vert u\Vert _{L^2(\mathbb {R})}=1\) we get
Due to the reconstruction formula (3.11) if for a.e. \(a\in (0,\infty )\) we have \(\widehat{f_a}\in L^1(\mathbb {R})\), then for \(x\in \mathbb {R}\) we achieve
Example 5.1
Let \(N>0\) and also \(u_N=\chi _{[-N,N]}\) be a window function with compact support and \(\Vert u_N\Vert _{L^2(\mathbb {R})}=2N\). Then, for all \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) and \((a,x,\omega )\in G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\) we have
If we set \(x=0\), then we get
Similarly, for the generalized \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform we have
and also if we set \(x=0\), then we get
Example 5.2
Let \(u(x)=e^{-\pi x^2}\) be the one-dimensional Gaussian window function with \(\widehat{u}=u\) and \(\Vert u\Vert _{L^2(\mathbb {R})}=2^{-1/4}\). Then, for all \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) and \((a,x,\omega )\in G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\) we have
If \(f\) for a.e. \(a\in (0,\infty )\) satisfies \(\widehat{f_a}\in L^1(\mathbb {R})\), then we can reconstruct \(f\) via
As well as, we can compute the generalized \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-continuous Gabor transform by
If \(f\) for a.e. \(a\in (0,\infty )\) satisfies \(\widehat{f_a}\in L^1(\mathbb {R})\), then we can reconstruct \(f\) via
The \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) has the underlying manifold \((0,\infty )\times (0,\infty )\times \mathbb {R}\times \widehat{\mathbb {R}}\) and the group law is
with the left Haar measure \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}}(a,b,x,\omega )=a^{-2}\mathrm{d}a\mathrm{d}b\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}\omega \). If \(g\in L^2(G_\tau )\) is a window function and also \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\). According to (4.4) we have
Using Theorem 4.2, if \(\Vert g\Vert _{L^2(G_\tau )}=1\) we get
Using the reconstruction formula (4.7), if for a.e. \(a\in (0,\infty )\) we have \(\widehat{f_a},\widehat{g_a}\in L^1(\mathbb {R})\), then for \(x\in \mathbb {R}\) we can write
and also in particular we get
As well as according to (4.8) we have
Using Theorem 4.5, if \(\Vert g\Vert _{L^2(G_\tau )}=1\) we get
Due to the reconstruction formula (4.7) if for a.e. \(a\in (0,\infty )\) we have \(\widehat{f_a}\in L^1(\mathbb {R})\), then for all \(x\in \mathbb {R}\) and a.e. \(a,b\in (0,\infty )\) we get
and also in particular we have
Example 5.3
Let \(N>0\) and also \(g_N(a,x)=\chi _{[1/N,N]\times [-N,N]}(a,x)\) be a window function which has a compact support. Then, for all \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) and \((a,x,b,\omega )\in G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) we have
If we set \(x=0\) and \(a=1\) we achieve
Also, for \((a,x,b,\omega )\) we have
If we set \(x=0\) and \(a=1\) then
Example 5.4
Let \(g(a,x)=ae^{-\pi (a^2+x^2)}\) be the Gaussian type window function in \(L^2(G_\tau )\) with \(\Vert g\Vert _{L^2(G_\tau )}=2^{-1}\). For a.e. \(a\in (0,\infty )\) we have \(\widehat{g_a}=g_a\) and \(\Vert g_a\Vert _{L^1(\mathbb {R})}=ae^{-\pi a^2}\) also \(\Vert g_a\Vert _{L^2(\mathbb {R})}=2^{-1/4}ae^{-\pi a^2}\). It is also separable i.e. \(g(a,x)=au(a)u(x)\). Then, for all \(f\in L^2(G_\tau )\) and also \((a,x,b,\omega )\in G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) we have
Using the reconstruction formula if \(\widehat{f_a}\in L^1(\mathbb {R})\) for a.e. \(a\in (0,\infty )\) we have
As well as, for all \((a,x,b,\omega )\in G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) we have
Due to the reconstruction formula if \(\widehat{f_a}\in L^1(\mathbb {R})\) for a.e. \(a\in (0,\infty )\) we have
In the sequel we compute \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\) and \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) associate to other semi-direct products.
5.2 The Weyl–Heisenberg Group
Let \(K\) be an LCA group with the Haar measure \(\mathrm{d}k\) and \(\widehat{K}\) be the dual group of \(K\) with the Haar measure \(\mathrm{d}\omega \) also \(\mathbb {T}\) be the circle group and let the continuous homomorphism \(\tau :K\rightarrow Aut(\widehat{K}\times \mathbb {T})\) via \(s\mapsto \tau _s\) be given by \(\tau _s(\omega ,z)=(\omega ,z\cdot \omega (s))\). The semi-direct product \(G_\tau =K\ltimes _\tau (\widehat{K}\times \mathbb {T})\) is called the Weyl–Heisenberg group associated with \(K\). The group operation for all \((k,\omega ,z),(k',\omega ',z')\in K\ltimes _\tau (\widehat{K}\times \mathbb {T})\) is
If \(\mathrm{d}z\) is the Haar measure of the circle group, then \(\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\omega \mathrm{d}z\) is a Haar measure for the Weyl–Heisenberg group and also the continuous homomorphism \(\delta :K\rightarrow (0,\infty )\) given in (2.3) is the constant function \(1\). Thus, using Theorem 4.5, Proposition 4.6 of [10] and also Proposition 3.1 we can obtain the continuous homomorphism \(\widehat{\tau }:K\rightarrow Aut(K\times \mathbb {Z})\) via \(s\mapsto \widehat{\tau }_s\), where \(\widehat{\tau }_s\) is given by \(\widehat{\tau }_s(k,n)=(k,n)\circ \tau _{s^{-1}}\) for all \((k,n)\in K\times \mathbb {Z}\) and \(s\in K\). Due to Theorem 4.5 of [10], for each \((k,n)\in K\times \mathbb {Z}\) and also for all \((\omega ,z)\in \widehat{K}\times \mathbb {T}\) we have
Thus, \((k,n)_s=(k-ns,n)\) for all \(k,s\in K\) and \(n\in \mathbb {Z}\). Therefore, \(G_{\widehat{\tau }}\) has the underlying set \(K\times K\times \mathbb {Z}\) with the following group operation;
The \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\)-time frequency group has the underlying set \(K\times \widehat{K}\times \mathbb {T}\times K\times \mathbb {Z}\) with the group law
and the left Haar measure is \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}}(k,\omega ,z,s,n)=\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\omega \mathrm{d}z\mathrm{d}s\mathrm{d}n\).
The \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\)-time frequency group has the underlying set \(K\times K\times \widehat{K}\times \mathbb {T}\times K\times \mathbb {Z}\) with group operation
and also the left Haar measure is \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}}(r,k,\omega ,z,s,n)=\mathrm{d}r\mathrm{d}k\mathrm{d}\omega \mathrm{d}z\mathrm{d}s\mathrm{d}n\).
5.3 Euclidean Groups
Let \(E(n)\) be the group of rigid motions of \(\mathbb {R}^n\), the group generated by rotations and translations. If we put \(H=\mathrm{SO}(n)\) and also \(K=\mathbb {R}^n\), then \(E(n)\) is the semi-direct product of \(H\) and \(K\) with respect to the continuous homomorphism \(\tau :\mathrm{SO}(n)\rightarrow Aut(\mathbb {R}^n)\) given by \(\sigma \mapsto \tau _\sigma \) via \(\tau _\sigma (\mathbf {x})=\sigma {\mathbf {x}}\) for all \(\mathbf {x}\in \mathbb {R}^n\). The group operation for \(E(n)\) is
Identifying \(\widehat{K}\) with \(\mathbb {R}^n\), the continuous homomorphism \(\widehat{\tau }:\mathrm{SO}(n)\rightarrow Aut(\mathbb {R}^n)\) is given by \(\sigma \mapsto \widehat{\tau }_\sigma \) via
where \((.,.)\) stands for the standard inner product of \(\mathbb {R}^n\). Since \(H\) is compact we have \(\delta \equiv 1\) and therefore \(d\sigma d\mathbf{x}\) is a left Haar measure for \(E(n)\). Thus, \(G_{\widehat{\tau }}\) has the underlying manifold \(\mathrm{SO}(n)\times \mathbb {R}^n\) with the group operation
According to Theorem 3.1 the left Haar measure \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\widehat{\tau }}}(\sigma ,\mathbf{w})\) is precisely \(\mathrm{d}\sigma \mathrm{d}\mathbf{w}\). The \(\tau \times \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\) has the underlying manifold \(\mathrm{SO}(n)\times \mathbb {R}^n\times \mathbb {R}^n\) with the group law
Due to Proposition 3.3 and also compactness of \(H\), \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}}(\sigma ,\mathbf{x},\mathbf{w})=d\sigma d\mathbf{x}d\mathbf{w}\) is a Haar measure for \(G_{\tau \times \widehat{\tau }}\). The \(\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }\)-time frequency group \(G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}\) has the underlying manifold \(\mathrm{SO}(n)\times \mathrm{SO}(n)\times \mathbb {R}^n\times \mathbb {R}^n\) equipped with the group law
and also the Haar measure is \(\mathrm{d}\mu _{G_{\tau \otimes \widehat{\tau }}}(\sigma ,\varrho ,\mathbf{x},\mathbf{w})=\mathrm{d}\sigma \mathrm{d}\varrho \mathrm{d}\mathbf{x}\mathrm{d}\mathbf{w}\).
References
Bernier, D., Taylor, K.F.: Wavelets from square-integrable representations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 27(2), 594–608 (1996)
Czaja, W., Kutyniok, G., Speegle, D.: Geometry of sets of parameters of wave packet frames. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 20(1), 108–125 (2006)
Dixmier, J.: \(C^{*}\)-Algebras. North Holland, Amsterdam (1977)
Feichtinger, H.G., Gröchenig, K.: Banach spaces related to integrable group representations and their atomic decompositions. Int. J. Funct. Anal. 86(2), 307–340 (1989)
Feichtinger, H.G., Gröchenig, K.: Banach spaces related to integrable group representations and their atomic decompositions. II. Monatsh. Math. 108(2–3), 129–148 (1989)
Feichtinger, H.G., Gröchenig, K.: A unified approach to atomic decompositions via integrable group representations. Function Spaces and Applications. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1302, pp. 52–73. Springer, Berlin (1988)
Feichtinger, H.G., Kozek, W., Luef, F.: Gabor analysis over finite abelian groups. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 26(2), 230–248 (2009)
Feichtinger, H.G., Strohmer, T.: Advances in Gabor Analysis. Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis. Birkhäuser, Boston (2003)
Feichtinger, H.G., Zimmermann, G.: A Banach space of test functions for Gabor analysis. Gabor Analysis and Algorithms: Theory and Applications. Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis, pp. 123–170. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA (1998)
Folland, G.B.: A Course in Abstract Harmonic Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995)
Folland, G.B.: Real Analysis, Modern Techniques and their Applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, London (1999)
Fuhr, H.: Abstract Harmonic Analysis of Continuous Wavelet Transforms. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Ghaani Farashahi, A.: Convolution and involution on function spaces of homogeneous spaces. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. (2) 36(4), 1109–1122 (2013)
Farashahi Ghaani, A., Kamyabi-Gol, R.: Continuous Gabor transform for a class of non-abelian groups. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. 19(4), 683–701 (2012)
Gabor, D.: Theory of communication. J. IEEE 93(26), 429–457 (1946)
Gröchenig, K.: Foundation of Time–Frequency Analysis. Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA (2001)
Gröchenig, K.: Aspects of Gabor Analysis on locally compact abelian groups. Gabor Analysis and Algorithms: Theory and Applications. Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis, pp. 211–231. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA (1998)
Gröchenig, K., Kaniuth, E., Taylor, K.F.: Compact open sets in dual and projections in \(L^1\)-algebras of certain semi-direct product groups. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 111(2), 545–556 (1992)
Heil, C., Walnut, F.D.: Continuous and discrete wavelet transforms. SIAM Rev. 31(4), 628–666 (1989)
Hernandez, E., Labate, D., Weiss, G., Wilson, E.: Oversampling, quasi affine frames and wave packets. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 16, 111–147 (2004)
Hewitt, E., Ross, R.A.: Abstract Harmonic Analysis, vol. 1. Springer, Berlin (1963)
Hochschild, G.: The Structure of Lie Groups. Hpolden-day, San Francisco (1965)
Ishi, H.: Wavelet transform for semi-direct product groups with not necessarily commutative normal subgroups. J. Fourier Anal. App. 12(1), 37–52 (2006)
Lipsman, R.: Non-Abelian Fourier Analysis. Bull. Sci. Math., \(2^e\) series, 98, 209–233 (1974)
Reiter, H., Stegeman, J.D.: Classical Harmonic Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)
Segal, I.E.: An extension of Plancherel’s formula to separable unimodular groups. Ann. Math. 52, 272–292 (1950)
Taylor, M.E.: Noncommutative Harmonic Analysis. Mathematics Surveys and Monographs, vol. 22. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1986)
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments and remarks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Ang Miin Huey.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghaani Farashahi, A. Continuous Partial Gabor Transform for Semi-Direct Product of Locally Compact Groups. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 38, 779–803 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-014-0049-1
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-014-0049-1
Keywords
- Semi-direct product
- Time–frequency plane (group)
- Short-time Fourier transform (STFT)
- Continuous Gabor transform
- Plancherel theorem