Abstracts
Purpose
Food addiction (FA) is one of the causes of widespread obesity in modern society. It was shown that there is an age-associated increase in incidence rate of FA in adolescents/young adults. The purpose of this study was to analyze food preferences in schoolchildren and university students with FA.
Methods
High school and university students (N = 1607; age: 17.8 ± 2.7 years; girls: 77.0%) located in four settlements of Russia anonymously took part in the study. Study participants provided personal data (age, sex, height, and weight) and completed the Yale Food Addiction Scale, the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire. In addition, they indicated food products with which they had problems.
Results
The frequency of detection of FA among university students was twice as high as among schoolchildren. University students with FA were 20.2% more likely than schoolchildren to report the symptom ‘use continues despite knowledge of adverse consequences,’ and 13.7% more likely to report the symptom ‘tolerance.’ Schoolchildren and university students with FA most often noted that foods high in sugar and fat were problematic. University students with FA also reported that foods with a high carbohydrate content were problematic.
Conclusion
In university students with FA, in comparison with schoolchildren with FA, there is an increase in list of problematic food products, mainly due to products with a high carbohydrate content.
Level of evidence
Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In the course of evolution, people’s food preferences were formed in conditions of food scarcity and irregularity of their receipt due to differences in the number of animals that people hunted and the instability of crop yield. The most important properties of food products that people preferred in these conditions were a high caloric content and rapid absorption of components, and an important feature of eating behavior, digestion and metabolism that people sought after was the ability to consume food after full saturation and store an excessive amount of food components in the form of fat deposits [1]. In modern conditions, where, in most countries, there is an abundance of cheap, high-calorie foods, these food preferences and eating behaviors have caused an extremely widespread proliferation of cases of obesity, which has become an epidemic [2]. In 2014, 1.9 billion overweight people and 900 million obese people were identified worldwide [3]. Moreover, this problem is equally relevant for both industrialized and developing countries. A recent, pooled analysis of 2416 population-based studies involving 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults found that rising trends in the body mass index (BMI) of children and adolescents have plateaued in many high-income countries—albeit at high levels. However, the trend for increasing BMI in youth has accelerated in parts of Asia, and frequently fails to correlate with that of adults [4]. Russia has also seen an increased prevalence of adolescent obesity in recent years. Between 2002 and 2014, the prevalence of obesity in the Russian Federation increased by fourfold among girls and threefold among boys [5]. The increased risk of obesity is due to a number of reasons, including genetics, explaining 70% of the indicator variability [6]. At the same time, it is assumed that external factors make a significant contribution to the risk of obesity. It has been suggested that the active advertising and easy availability of cheap, high-calorie foods with a high content of fats and sugars (the so-called “obesogenic environment”) is an important factor in the spread of obesity among the population in modern society [7].
Data have been obtained that indicate the existence of the psychophysiological mechanisms underlying obesity. It has been shown that the consumption of certain foods can lead to persistent activation of the nerve centers that make up the dopamine reward system [8]. This can lead to the formation of dependence on certain food products, which has similarities with nicotine, alcohol and drug addiction. On this basis, the concept of food addiction (FA) was proposed [8]. The Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) was developed [9] to detect FA in accordance with the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual on Psychological Disorders for Drug Dependence [10]. The YFAS has been translated into many languages [11,12,13,14,15,16], passed extensive testing in different countries, and generally given comparable results in the frequency of detection of FA in different groups of healthy populations [17] and in specific groups of people with eating disorders [18].
Numerous similarities between substance use disorder (SUD) and FA have now been described. Individuals with SUD [10] and FA [19] are unable to control the consumption of problematic substances/products and continue to consume them, despite the negative physical and emotional consequences they experience. Problematic substances [20] and food products [21] can cause craving and addictive behavior in humans. Problematic substances/food products activate the dopamine reward system [8]. Repeated consumption of problematic substances [22] and food products [23] increases the sensitivity of the dopaminergic system.
The unresolved question is what specific components of problematic food products cause FA. Since the avalanche-like spread of obesity in society began relatively recently, over several decades, the attention of scientists has been focused on food products that appeared relatively recently but take a significant place in the diet of modern men. Modern food products are usually subjected to deep processing, which increases their digestibility. At the same time, the modern food industry is characterized by the widespread use of food additives, various flavors and flavor enhancers, as a result of which food acquire enhanced taste. In this regard, it was suggested that FA is caused by food products with very high palatability [24], as well as deeply processed foods [25]. However, in these cases, it is difficult to talk about any specific food components that cause FA. The most likely candidates for the role of food components that cause FA are sugars and fats [26, 27]. Sugars and fats are currently most often used as food additives; thus, modern foods are characterized by a high content of these components. People who prefer foods high in sugars and fats are exposed to high doses of these substances. As is known, a gradual increase in the dose of a problematic substance is a key condition for the formation of any dependence (nicotine, alcohol, etc.) [28, 29]. Studies using functional MRI showed that foods with a high content of fats and sugars lead to the activation of the dopamine reward system [30, 31]. A recent review [32] summarized neuroimaging data and found that there was significant overlap in the areas of the brain that were activated in association with food and drug addiction. These experimental data provide convincing evidence for the roles of sugar and fat in the formation of FA.
It has been repeatedly noted that the FA concept has a number of drawbacks [25]. In particular, it was shown that the diagnostic criteria used in the YFAS do not always accurately distinguish FA from other eating disorders [33, 34]. An insufficiently strong association was noted between FA and the anthropometric indicators of obesity (BMI, waist circumference) [35, 36]. Moreover, FA is sometimes detected in individuals with normal body weight [16, 23]. Recent findings indicate that the relationship between FA and BMI could be non-linear [37,38,39]. The correlation between FA and depression [16, 17], as well as between FA and sleep–wake rhythm characteristics [40, 41], was repeatedly noted. It can be assumed that in some cases, the respondents’ choice of problematic food products may be caused not only by their FA but also by the accompanying psychophysiological problems. Therefore, the urgent task is the identification of specific food preferences in people with FA.
Recently, the incidence of FA has been shown to be age dependent. The highest frequency of detection of FA was observed in young adults, while the indicator was found to be lower in children [16] and the elderly people [37, 42]. We have previously shown [16, 43] that the frequency of detection of FA more than doubles at the age of 16-18 years. The reasons for such significant changes in eating behavior are unknown. One of the possible factors may be the fact that at the age of about 18, young people strive to gain social independence and the associated greater freedom of food choice [44, 45]. It can be assumed that significant changes in food preferences occur at this age.
The aim of this study was to curry out retrospective comparative analysis of food preferences in schoolchildren and university students with FA.
Materials and methods
The study was conducted from March 2017 to March 2019. The research program was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Physiology of the Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Informed parental consent from the parents of students of secondary schools located in the city of Syktyvkar and informed consent from students of universities located in Syktyvkar, Kirov, Yekaterinburg and Tyumen was obtained to participate in the study. The participation in the study was voluntary and anonymous. High school students were informed of the study by school psychologists and filled out paper forms in their classrooms. University students were informed of the study by university professors and received course credit for completing the study. These students filled out an online battery of tests.
Participants
A total of 2722 questionnaires were administered. Inclusion criteria were as follows: students of 6–11-th grades of secondary schools and students of 1–5-th grades of universities were recruited, informed consent or parental informed consent to participate in the study was obtained. Of these, 372 (13.7%) had errors or omissions and were excluded from the analysis (Step 1, Fig. 1). An additional 753 questionnaires failed to indicate any product as being problematic (see below) and were also excluded from the analysis (Step 2, Fig. 1). The final dataset included the responses from 1607 questionnaires, of which 658 corresponded to school-aged subjects and 949 corresponded to university students (Table 1). The average age of the survey participants was 17.8 ± 2.7 years, range: 12-30 years, and female: 77.0%. Each survey participant indicated their personal data (date of completion of the questionnaire, place of residence, sex, age, height, weight) and filled out three questionnaires: the YFAS, the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS) and the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ). Their BMIs were evaluated using their self-reported heights and weights. According to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria [46], all survey participants were assigned to one of the following BMI groups: (1) underweight; (2) normal weight; (3) overweight and (4) obese. Socio-demographic and psycho-emotional characteristic of study participants presented in Table 1.
Measures
To assess FA in university students and schoolchildren, the YFAS [9] and the children’s version of the YFAS (YFAS-C) [47] were translated into Russian and subsequently used. The Cronbach’s α for these samples were 0.862 and 0.909 for YFAS-C and YFAS, respectively.
In addition, the study participants were asked to answer two questions:
-
1.
“Please circle ALL of the following foods you have problems with:
Ice cream, white bread, pretzels, pizza, chocolate, rolls, French fries, soda pop, apples, lettuce, carrots, doughnuts, pasta, steak, broccoli, strawberries, bananas, cookies, rice, bacon, cake, crackers, hamburger, candy, chips, cheeseburger, none of the above.”
-
2.
“Please list any other foods that you have problems with that were not previously listed.”
The level of depression was assessed using the ZSDS [48]. Schoolchildren filled out the ZSDS adapted for children. The ZSDS consists of 20 statements describing the symptoms of depression. The sum of raw ZSDS scores ranging from 20 to 80 was converted to ZSDS indices (ZSDSIs) varying from 25 to 100, as described by Zung [49] and Passik et al. [50]. The ZSDSIs were used to evaluate four levels of depression: I, no depression (ZSDSI ≤ 50); II, from minimal to mild depression (ZSDSI 51–59); III, moderate to significant depression (ZSDSI 60–69); and IV, severe to extreme depression (ZSDSI ≥ 70). The Cronbach’s α for this sample was 0.865.
Circadian misalignment or social jetlag (SJL) was assessed using the MCTQ as described previously [51]. The test contains questions about sleep and wakefulness on school days and on weekends. Each respondent, in particular, was asked to indicate the times at which he goes to bed and gets out of bed, the time needed to completely fall asleep and to wake up, and whether he uses an alarm clock on school days and on weekends. SJL was calculated as the difference in hours between the middle of the sleep phase on school days and that on weekends. Respondents with SJL ≥ 1 h were assigned to the circadian misalignment group.
Statistical analyses
The statistical software package SPSS was used for statistical analyses. Chi squared test was used to evaluate significance of difference between categorical variables. One way analysis of covariance was used to evaluate significance of differences between continuous variables using age and sex as covariates. Eta-squared (η2) was used as a measure of effect size. Small, medium, and large effects would be reflected in values of η2 equal to 0.0099, 0.0588, and 0.1379, respectively [52].
Only food products that were mentioned at least 100 times were used in the analysis. We performed a series of binary logistic regression analyses for schoolchildren and university students separately, where “food products” (codes: 0—no problems; 1—there are problems) were used as dependent variables; “sex” (codes: 0—males, 1—females), “BMI” (codes: 0—underweight/normal weight, 1—overweight/obese), “ZSDSI” (codes: 0—no to mild depression; 1—moderate to extreme depression), “FA” (codes: 0—NoFA, 1—FA), “SJL” (codes: 0—SJL < 1 h, 1—SJL ≥ 1 h) as independent variables. Only significant factors were included in the final model using the procedure ‘stepwise inclusion’. Bonferroni correction of P value was performed as follows, 0.05/5 = 0.01, where 5 is a number of predictors. Regression coefficients B, Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for all problematic food products. For each model goodness of fit was evaluated by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test and Omnibus tests of model coefficients.
Results
Schoolchildren and university students did not differ in the incidence of obesity (χ2 = 3.7; P > 0.05) or depression (χ2 = 2.8; P > 0.05; Table 1). The group of university students in this study comprised 11% more girls (χ2 = 28.0; P < 0.0001), 7.8% fewer people with SJL (χ2 = 14.6; P < 0.001), and twice as many people with FA (χ2 = 24.1; P < 0.00001; Table 1) compared with the group of schoolchildren. The pooled responses from university and school-aged children most frequently reported the following symptoms of FA: ‘persistent desire or repeated unsuccessful attempts at quitting,’ ‘use continues despite knowledge of adverse consequences,’ and ‘tolerance.’ University students without FA reported these symptoms 45.8%, 29.8%, and 9.2% more often than schoolchildren, respectively (Table 1). University students with FA were 20.2% and 13.7% more likely than schoolchildren to report symptoms of ‘use continues despite knowledge of adverse consequences’ and ‘tolerance,’ respectively (Table 1).
Most often, the respondents, regardless of their FA status, overweight status, level of depression and SJL, noted the following food products as problematic (the first 10 products, in decreasing order of frequency): chocolate, candy, chips, rolls, soda, pizza, cookies, cheeseburgers, hamburgers, and cake (Fig. 2). Sex differences in food preferences were noted. Females were significantly more likely to report chocolate, candy, rolls, cookies, ice cream, cake, white bread, and doughnuts as problematic. Males were significantly more likely to report soda as problematic product (Table 2). Age-related differences in food preferences were also observed. Specifically, university students indicated that soda, white bread, doughnuts, crackers, bacon, and steak were problematic (Table 2; Fig. 3).
The list of problematic food products for persons with FA included chocolate, candy, pizza, cookies, ice cream, French fries, rolls, cake, white bread, and crackers. Overweight/obese university students indicated bacon, and steak as problematic. University students who have symptoms of FA and overweight/obesity referred to ice cream, and French fries as problematic. Schoolchildren with depression regarded cake as problematic. Schoolchildren and university students with SJL indicated chips as problematic (Table 2; Fig. 3).
Food products that people of both sexes with symptoms of FA regarded as problematic included pizza, and crackers. Female respondents with symptoms of FA indicated chocolate, candy, cookies, ice cream, rolls, cake, and white bread as problematic (Table 2; Fig. 3).
Discussion
In our study, we first evaluated the food preferences of schoolchildren and university students from Russia who have symptoms of FA. The most frequently detected symptoms of FA in the school children in this study were ‘persistent desire or repeated unsuccessful attempts at quitting,’ ‘use continues despite knowledge of adverse consequences’, and ‘tolerance.’ These results are similar to those previously reported [47, 53]. Of note, the frequency of all three of these symptoms increased with age in the NoFA group, and the frequency of the latter two symptoms increased with age in the FA group. It is possible, that the change in the frequency of detection of these symptoms is associated with a 2–3-fold increase in the detection of FA in adolescents at the age of 18–19 (this study and [43]). Despite a significant increase in FA, we did not observe a corresponding significant increase in weight disorders in adolescents. This finding could be explained by the fact that the consumption of high-calorie foods is compensated for by an increased energy expenditure due to growth that ends at this age [54].
We confirmed previous data that people with FA most often call high-calorie foods high in carbohydrates and fats as problematic [55,56,57]. It has been previously shown that the currently widely used YFAS has several disadvantages. The group of people with FA includes people with depression [17] and those with sleep–wake rhythm disorders [40], and there is no strict association between FA and obesity [35]. Therefore, the respondents’ choice of some problematic products is determined not only by FA but also by concomitant psychophysiological and weight disorders. We tried to identify problematic products that are specific to individuals with FA.
The inclusion of a wider range of food preference predictors in the analysis allowed us to show for the first time that some foods (i.e., chips) are associated with SJL, a circadian misalignment most frequently observed in 18-year-olds [58]. A food product (i.e., cake) was also found to be associated with depression in schoolchildren. Some food products (i.e., ice cream and French fries) were associated with FA and weight disorders in university students. Foods high in protein and fat (i.e., bacon, steak) were only associated with being overweight/obese. The relationship between FA and depression is well known [16, 17]. However, obesity is influenced by complex genetic, behavioral, and environmental factors [59]. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust for indicators characterizing circadian misalignment, depression, and weight disorders to more robustly identify the food preferences of adolescents with FA.
Significant age-related differences in food preferences were observed between our two study groups. Some products, mainly sweets, were problematic for both schoolchildren and university students. However, the university students also reported other products, mainly flour products, as being problematic. Age-related differences in the food preferences of people with FA could be explained by the fact that university students tend to live separately from their parents and are free from parental control when choosing food. Previous research has shown that the diet of university students is characterized by a predominance of high-sugar, high-fat foods [44, 45].
We observed sex-related differences in the food preferences of individuals with FA. Females more often identified foods with a high sugar content as being problematic. Previously, it was shown that females are more likely to have unhealthy food preferences associated with FA [57, 60].
Strengths and limitations
The food preferences of schoolchildren and university students were assessed in two independent studies, and university students from four settlements were examined simultaneously and independently. The similar associations between problematic food products and emotional state in subjects from different age groups and geographic locations indicates that our results may be generalized to the Russian population. However, this study included a significantly greater proportion of female subjects; therefore, the finding regarding sex-related differences in food preferences should be taken with caution. It was also not possible to infer cause-and-effect relationships between the indicators in the study because of the cross-sectional nature of the study design.
Conclusions
The frequency of detection of FA among university students was twice as high as among schoolchildren. University students with FA were 20.2% more likely than schoolchildren to report the symptom ‘use continues despite knowledge of adverse consequences,’ and 13.7% were more likely to report ‘tolerance.’ Schoolchildren and university students with FA most often indicated foods high in sugar and fat as being problematic. However, university students with FA also reported that products with a high carbohydrate content were problematic.
What is already known on this subject?
The concept of FA postulates the existence of certain food products that can cause addiction, similar to nicotine, alcohol and drug addiction. There is currently no consensus on which food products and their components cause FA. The main problem is the low specificity of the YFAS test in the assessment of FA symptoms.
What your study adds?
To overcome the low specificity of the YFAS, we used a procedure in which we identified foods that are problematic for persons with symptoms of FA and some other related psychophysiological disorders. Then, from this list, food products were selected that were called problematic only by individuals with symptoms of FA without concomitant psychophysiological disorders. Thus, from our point of view, a higher specificity was achieved in identifying foods with high addictive potential.
References
Brunstrom JM, Cheon BK (2018) Do humans still forage in an obesogenic environment? Mechanisms and implications for weight maintenance. Physiol Behav 193:261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.038
Drewnowski A, Darmon N (2005) The economics of obesity: dietary energy density and energy cost. Am J Clin Nutr 82(1):265S–273S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.1.265S
World Health Organization (WHO) (2015) Obesity and overweight. Fact sheet No: 311, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/
Abarca-Gómez L, Abdeen ZA, Hamid ZA, Abu-Rmeileh NM, Acosta-Cazares B, Acuin C et al (2017) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 390(10113):2627–2642. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe (2017) Adolescent obesity and related behaviours: Trends and inequalities in the WHO European Region, 2002–2014. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/329417
Walley AJ, Blakemore AI, Froguel P (2006) Genetics of obesity and the prediction of risk for health. Hum Mol Genet 15:R124–R130. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddl215
Corsica JA, Hood MM (2011) Eating disorders in an obesogenic environment. J Am Diet Assoc 111(7):996–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.04.011
Volkow ND, Wise RA (2005) How can drug addiction help us understand obesity? Nat Neurosci 8:555–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1452
Gearhardt AN, Corbin WR, Brownell KD (2009) Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale. Appetite. 52:430–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.12.003
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (4th ed. text revision). American Psychiatric Association, Washington
Brunault P, Ballon N, Gaillard P, Réveillère C, Courtois R (2014) Validation of the French version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: an examination of its factor structure, reliability, and construct validity in a nonclinical sample. Can J Psychiatry 59:276–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371405900507
Chen G, Tang Z, Guo G, Liu X, Xiao S (2015) The Chinese version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: an examination of its validation in a sample of female adolescents. Eat Behav 18:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.002
Manzoni GM, Rossi A, Pietrabissa G, Varallo G, Molinari E, Poggiogalle E et al (2018) Validation of the Italian Yale Food Addiction Scale in postgraduate university students. Eat Weight Disord 23:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0495-0
Meule A, Vögele C, Kübler A (2012) Deutsche Übersetzung und Validierung der Yale Food Addiction Scale. Diagnostica. 58:115–126. http://hdl.handle.net/10993/3342
Nantha YS, Patah NAA, Pillai MP (2016) Preliminary validation of the Malay Yale Food Addiction Scale: factor structure and item analysis in an obese population. Clin Nutr ESPEN 16:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.08.001
Borisenkov MF, Tserne TA, Bakutova LA (2018) Food addiction in Russian adolescents: associations with age, sex, weight, and depression. Eur Eat Disord Rev 26(671–678):1. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2644
Burrows T, Kay-Lambkin F, Pursey K, Skinner J, Dayas C (2018) Food addiction and associations with mental health symptoms: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Hum Nutr Diet 31:544–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12532
Pursey KM, Stanwell P, Gearhardt AN, Collins CE, Burrows TL (2014) The prevalence of food addiction as assessed by the Yale Food Addiction Scale: a systematic review. Nutrients 6(10):4552–4590. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6104552
Gold MS, Frost-Pineda K, Jacobs WS (2003) Overeating, binge eating, and eating disorders as addictions. Psychiatr Ann 33:117–122. https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-20030201-08
Field M, Kiernan A, Eastwood B, Child R (2008) Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 39:209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.06.001
White MA, Grilo CM (2005) Psychometric properties of the Food Craving Inventory among obese patients with binge eating disorder. Eat Behav 6:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2005.01.001
Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2001) Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 96:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.9611038.x
Gearhardt AN, Yokum S, Orr PT, Stice E, Corbin WR, Brownell KD (2011) Neural correlates of food addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68:808–816. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry
Gearhardt AN, Davis C, Kuschner R, Brownell KD (2011) The addiction potential of hyperpalatable foods. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 4:140–145
Schulte EM, Grilo CM, Gearhardt AN (2016) Shared and unique mechanisms underlying binge eating disorder and addictive disorders. Clin Psychol Rev 44:125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.02.001
Pursey KM, Davis C, Burrows TL (2017) Nutritional aspects of food addiction. Curr Addict Rep 4(2):142–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-017-0139-x
Gordon EL, Ariel-Donges AH, Bauman V, Merlo LJ (2018) What is the evidence for “food addiction?” A systematic review. Nutrients 10:477. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10040477
Henningfield JE, Keenan RM (1993) Nicotine delivery kinetics and abuse liability. J Consult Clin Psychol 61:743–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.5.743
Klatsky AL, Armstrong MA, Kipp H (1990) Correlates of alcoholic beverage preference: traits of persons who choose wine, liquor or beer. Br J Addict 85:1279–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb01604.x
Stice E, Burger KS, Yokum S (2013) Relative ability of fat and sugar tastes to activate reward, gustatory, and somatosensory regions. Am J Clin Nutr 98:1377–1384. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.069443
Stice E, Yokum S (2016) Neural vulnerability factors that increase risk for future weight gain. Psychol Bull 142:447–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000044
Gordon EL, Lent MR, Merlo LJ (2020) The effect of food composition and behavior on neurobiological response to food: a review of recent research. Curr Nutr Rep 9:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-020-00305-5
Gearhardt AN, White MA, Potenza MN (2011) Binge eating disorder and food addiction. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 4:201–207. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473711104030201
Ziauddeen H, Farooqi IS, Fletcher PC (2012) Obesity and the brain: How convincing is the addiction model? Nat Rev Neurosci 13:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3212
Pedram P, Wadden D, Amini P, Gulliver W, Randell E, Cahill F et al (2013) Food addiction: its prevalence and significant association with obesity in the general population. PLoS One 8:e74832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074832
Borisenkov MF, Popov SV, Pecherkina AA, Dorogina OI, Martinson EA, Vetosheva VI (2020) Food addiction in young adult residents of Russia: associations with emotional and anthropometric characteristics. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 28:465–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2731
Hauck C, Weiß A, Schulte EM, Meule A, Ellrott T (2017) Prevalence of ‘food addiction’ as measured with the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 in a representative German sample and its association with sex, age and weight categories. Obes Facts 10(1):12–24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000456013
Meule A, Gearhardt AN (2019) Ten years of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: a review of version 2.0. Curr Addict Rep 6:218–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00261-3
Manzoni GM, Rossi A, Pietrabissa G, Mannarini S, Fabbricatore M, Imperatori C et al (2020) Structural validity, measurement invariance, reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the Italian version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 in patients with severe obesity and the general population. Eat Weight Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-00858-y
Kandeger A, Selvi Y, Tanyer DK (2019) The effects of individual circadian rhythm differences on insomnia, impulsivity, and food addiction. Eat Weight Disord Stud Anorex Bulim Obes 24:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0518-x
Najem J, Saber M, Aoun C, El Osta N, Papazian T, Khabbaz LR (2019) Prevalence of food addiction and association with stress, sleep quality and chronotype: a cross-sectional survey among university students. Clin Nutr 5:6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2019.02.038
Pipová H, Kaščáková N, Fürstová J, Tavel P (2020) Development of the Modified Yale Food Addiction Scale version 2.0 summary version in a representative sample of Czech population. J Eat Disord 8:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00292-6
Borisenkov MF, Popov SV, Tserne TA, Bakutova LA, Pecherkina AA, Dorogina OI et al (2020) Food addiction and depression among northerners: associations with sleep characteristics and photoperiod. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 28:332–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ERV.2728
El Ansari W, Stock C, Mikolajczyk RT (2012) Relationships between food consumption and living arrangements among university students in four European countries-a cross-sectional study. Nutr J 11(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-11-28
Papadaki A, Hondros G, Scott JA, Kapsokefalou M (2007) Eating habits of university students living at, or away from home in Greece. Appetite 49(1):169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.01.008
World Health Organization (WHO) (2007) Growth reference data for 5–19 years. http://www.who.int/growthref/who2007_bmi_for_age/en/
Gearhardt AN, Roberto C, Seamans M, Corbin W, Brownell K (2013) Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale for children. Eat Behav 14:508–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.07.002
Zung WW (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70
Zung WW (1972) The depression status inventory: an adjunct to the self-rating depression scale. J Clin Psychol 28(4):539–543
Passik SD, Lundberg JC, Rosenfeld B, Kirsh KL, Donaghy K, Theobald D et al (2000) Factor analysis of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale in a large ambulatory oncology sample. Psychosomatics 41(2):121–127. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.41.2.121
Borisenkov MF, Petrova NB, Timonin VD, Fradkova LI, Kolomeichuk SN, Kosova AL, Kasyanova ON (2015) Sleep characteristics, chronotype, and winter depression in 10–20-year-olds in northern European Russia. J Sleep Res 24:288–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12266
Richardson JT (2011) Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ Res Rev 6(2):135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
Meule A, Gearhardt AN (2014) Five years of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: taking stock and moving forward. Curr Addict Rep 1(3):193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-014-0021-z
Valentin J (2002) Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values: ICRP publication 89. Ann ICRP 32(3–4):1–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6453(03)00002-2
Pursey KM, Collins CE, Stanwell P, Burrows TL (2015) Foods and dietary profiles associated with ‘food addiction’ in young adults. Addict Behav Rep 2:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2015.05.007
Schulte EM, Avena NM, Gearhardt AN (2015) Which foods may be addictive? The roles of processing, fat content, and glycemic load. PLoS One 10(2):e0117959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117959
Ayaz A, Nergiz-Unal R, Dedebayraktar D, Akyol A, Pekcan AG, Besler HT, Buyuktuncer Z (2018) How does food addiction influence dietary intake profile? PLoS One 13(4):e0195541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195541
Borisenkov MF, Tserne TA, Panev AS, Kuznetsova ES, Petrova NB, Timonin VD et al (2017) Seven-year survey of sleep timing in Russian children and adolescents: chronic 1-h forward transition of social clock is associated with increased social jetlag and winter pattern of mood seasonality. Biol Rhythm Res. 48(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2016.1223778
Qi L, Cho YA (2008) Gene-environment interaction and obesity. Nutr Rev 66(12):684–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00128.x
Sengor G, Gezer C (2020) The association between food addiction, disordered eating behaviors and food intake. Rev Nutr 33:e190039. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202033e190039
Acknowledgements
The YFAS scale and scoring instruction were kindly provided by Dr. Ashley Gearhardt.
Funding
No grant was obtained for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Institute of Physiology of Komi Science Center, Ural Branch of RAS, and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki declaration.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants and parents of minors included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The article is part of the Topical Collection on Food and Addiction.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borisenkov, M.F., Tserne, T.A., Popov, S.V. et al. Food preferences and YFAS/YFAS-C scores in schoolchildren and university students. Eat Weight Disord 26, 2333–2343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-01064-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-01064-6