Introduction

PETG (C14H20O5S) is the improved thermoplastic version of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), produced by copolymerizing with glycol, which enhances the material’s flexibility, formability, and impact strength compared to PET [1]. PETG is one of the most suitable polymers for 3D printing because of its good layer adhesion and minimal warping [2]. It is used for functional prototypes, mechanical parts, and end-use products. Its electrical insulation, chemical, and moisture-resistant properties make it a suitable candidate for electronic and electrical applications such as substrate material for sensors, electrical enclosures, circuit board components, and cable insulations [3]. PETG is widely used in the packaging industry as it is a food-grade material that is durable, safe at elevated temperatures, chemically resistant, transparent, and tough, and it can bear the impact load. Generally, it is used for food containers, clamshell packing, cosmetic packing, blister packs, display cases, hot-fill containers, etc. [4,5,6,7]. Due to its optical clarity and excellent light transmission, it is used for signage, point-of-sale displays, retail fixtures, exhibition stands, etc. [3]. Automotive parts such as light covers, door panels, instrument clusters, grille inserts, interior trim, etc., are manufactured using PETG because of the resistance to impact loading and weatherability. Many of these are 3D-printed parts [8]. Medical and dental equipment comprises PETG because of its biocompatibility [9, 10] and ease of sterilization. Some are trays, housings, instrument handles, and dental retainers. PETG has also been used in tissue engineering [10]. PETG is ideal for protective equipment like face shields, safety goggles, visors, and helmets. It is a non-biodegradable polymer made from petroleum-based sources. Supports made of PETG in 3D printing are removed to get the desired product, leading to PETG being wasted. Trimming and scraping during packaging and signage contribute to the wastage of PETG. While manufacturing and processing, the unusable and unsuitable material is discarded as pellets, flakes, or regrind material. Hence, the wastage from the abovementioned applications leads to high volumes of non-biodegradable waste. PETG products’ post-consumer waste is enormous [11], and significant recycling efforts are required. Commercially, waste material is collected from post-consumer products and sorted to get the necessary material. The collected material is shredded into small pieces and cleaned using warm water. After cleaning, PETG flakes are dried to remove moisture. Dried PETG is melted and forced to pass through a small opening to form thin strands or filaments. Then, this recycled material is used to manufacture a product using injection moulding, 3D printing, etc. [12].

The literature reveals that owing to its various advantages, PETG has been employed in a broad spectrum of applications, including the packing of foodstuff, biomedical devices, containers, 3D printing, etc., which has led to it contributing to waste (both domestic and commercial) [12,13,14]. Several studies have recently been reported on PETG waste recycling [15], but little has been reported on processing PETG waste for sensory applications. This study highlights the processing of waste PETG for 3D printing of sensors supported by mechanical, thermal, rheological, and mechanical characterization.

Materials and Methods

Figure 1 shows the methodology adopted in this study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Methodology adopted

Collection of Waste Material

Post-consumer waste of PETG bottles from various medical research labs was collected. These bottles are used to store media for cell culture. This media comprises amino acids, vitamins, inorganic salts, glucose, and serum. The cells grown in this media are used in the In-Vitro analysis.

Crushing and Melting

Unwanted material from the bottles, like tags, labels, etc., was removed. Bottles were crushed and shredded as per the reported study [16]. These crushed bottles were then exposed to high temperatures, i.e., 250 °C, and melted to form pellets for virgin PETG. These pellets were remelted and processed for four recycling cycles.

Melt Flow Index (MFI)

The MFI of virgin and recycled PETG has been evaluated according to ASTMD1238. It measures the quantity of molten material in (g) coming out in 10 min by putting 2.16 kg weight [17, 18]. This process was performed twice, and a mean MFI of the samples was calculated for virgin and four recycling cycles to minimize the experimental error.

DSC Analysis

A thermoanalytical technique DSC has been used to determine the Tg and effect of recyclability on the thermal properties of the PETG material. This analysis has been performed in 3 cycles. A cycle consists of heating material from 0 to 300 °C and cooling it to 0 °C at 10 °C/min with an airflow rate of 50 ml/min. In the first cycle, it is assumed that the pre-history of the material is removed, and the data of the other two cycles has been considered for the analysis [19, 20]. The study was performed on virgin and recycled PETG (processed for four recycling cycles).

FTIR Analysis

The molecular vibrations in the sample to absorb/transmit the incident infrared radiation (IR) corresponding to a specific wavenumber were ascertained. The IR spectrum was categorized into three distinct wavenumber ranges: the far-IR spectrum (below 400 cm− 1), the mid-IR spectrum (ranging from 400 to 4000 cm− 1), and the near-IR spectrum (ranging from 4000 to 13,000 cm− 1) [21]. This study used the mid-IR spectrum for virgin and recycled PETG.

V-R Analysis

The source measure unit (SMU) was used to explore the resistance behaviour of the virgin and recycled PETG. SMU is a specialized device capable of accurately delivering voltage/current while measuring current/voltage. It integrates the functionalities of a digital multimeter, electronic load, accurate current source, and pulse generator into a single compact instrument with tight synchronization. The experiment was conducted in a dark room with uniform surroundings for comparative studies.

Injection Molding

For the mechanical characterization of the PETG polymer, a tensile specimen (as per ASTM D638, Type V) [18] has been fabricated using an injection moulding machine. The temperature was kept at 245 °C, and the pressure was in the 6 to 8 bar range. Figure 2a and b show the injection moulding setup used in this study and the prepared tensile specimen. It has been observed that with the increase in MFI, the injection dwell and cooling time of the injection moulding decreases, further reducing the operation time.

Fig. 2
figure 2

(a) Injection moulding set up, (b) Tensile specimen

UTM

Mechanical properties of the material have been calculated using a UTM with 400 N capacity (Fig. 3). The prepared tensile specimen has been jogged into the machine, and at a rate of 10 mm/s, both ends of the specimen have been pulled to calculate the E of PETG specimens [17].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Tensile specimen jogged in UTM

SEM Images and Porosity (%)

Fractured samples, which were used to evaluate E, were examined using SEM. The voltage of 3 kV was used to direct an electron beam at the fractured site to capture the image at ×100 magnification. These images of SEM were further used in metallurgical image analysis software (MIAS) to find the porosity percentage (as per ASTM B 276) at the fractured sites.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 shows observations for MFI in different processing cycles.

Table 1 MFI observations for virgin and recycled PETG

It has been observed from Table 1 that the MFI was increased with the recycling cycles, which may be due to breakage of polymer chains (due to mechanical and thermal stresses) in repeated cycles, resulting in shortening of the polymer chain and lowering the average molecular weight of the polymer. Due to this, the recycled PETG flow rate was improved. The recycling was only explored for up to 4 cycles because stagnation in MFI values was observed.

The FTIR analysis (Fig. 4) shows the peak at WN 1700 cm− 1 represents the C = O bond [2]. The intensity of this bond, represented by the peak’s height, is decreasing continuously from virgin to recycled PETG. The C-H bond of the cyclo-hexylene ring at WN 950 cm− 1 does not show any effect of recycling on it. There is no specific variation in the intensity of the -CH2- bond at WN 1410 cm− 1 [4] and peaks at 1600 cm− 1, 1575 cm− 1, 1500 cm− 1, and 1450 cm− 1 which is associated with stretching of the C-C bond in benzene rings [19]. The FTIR analysis has been used to identify the type of molecule from its signature wavenumber absorbance, and it does not exhibit any relation with any physical property of the material. As observed from Fig. 4, the continuous decrease in the peak of the C = O bond and the corresponding absorbance value may be used for sensing capabilities by relating the change in resistance/ capacitance and the dielectric property of the substrate material.

Fig. 4
figure 4

FTIR of virgin and recycled PETG

Further, to ascertain the sensor applications in the temperature range of 50–75 °C, a DSC analysis was performed (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

DSC analysis of PETG virgin (a), cycle 1 (b), cycle 2 (c), cycle 3 (d), and cycle 4 (e)

As observed in Fig. 5, only one peak, i.e., of Tg, was noticed because of the amorphous nature of PETG [19]. The Tg of the recycled PETG displays a slightly lower value than the virgin samples, which implies that the polymer might have undergone plasticization [19]. Then, for recycled PETG, the Tg remains constant due to the homogeneity of PETG and the lack of involvement of any solvent while recycling [15]. The single peak of Tg is also evidence of the purity of the material [22, 23]. Based on Fig. 5, the consolidated data is shown in Table 2.

Figure 6 shows the stress-strain plots of samples prepared from virgin, cycle 1, cycle 2, cycle 3, and cycle 4 processed PETG, which shows continuous improvement in E.

Table 2 Tg of virgin and recycled PETG
Fig. 6
figure 6

Stress-Strain plots of samples prepared from virgin (a), cycle 1 (b), cycle 2 (c), cycle 3 (d), and cycle 4 (e) processed PETG

Figure 7 shows the SEM (×100) and corresponding porosity images of the fractured site of samples after testing on UTM. The increase in the E (Fig. 6) is closely related to the decreased porosity (Fig. 7) of the PETG samples at the fracture site because the pores create the stress concentration points in the material, leading to localized strain and decreasing the E. Both E and porosity are in inverse relation, which aligns with previously reported studies [24].

Fig. 7
figure 7

SEM and porosity (%) of the processed PETG samples virgin (a), cycle 1 (b), cycle 2 (c), cycle 3 (d), and cycle 4 (e)

Finally, for sensor applications, V-R and V-I plots have been developed to understand the effect of recycling on the resistance/charge-carrying capacity of the substrate material (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

V-R and V-I plots of processed PETG virgin (a, b), cycle 1 (c, d), cycle 2 (e, f), cycle 3 (g, h), and cycle 4 (i, j)

As observed from Fig. 8, the samples’ resistance continuously increased from 43.79 Ω to 93.4 Ω for a virgin to cycle 4 PETG, respectively. In other words, the material resistance increases as the number of processing cycles increases. Hence, PETG recycling will restrict the flow of electric charge to move the same amount of charge through the 1-volt potential difference; more power is required. So, a higher voltage is needed to move 0.5 amp of current (Fig. 8). This is due to the increasing amorphous nature of PETG with recycling in line with the observed rheological property (Table 1). As the MFI of PETG increases with different processing cycles, polymer chains may go out of fashion and get misaligned, and the amorphous nature increases. With the rise in amorphous nature, restriction to the electron flow increases, and the resistance of PETG increases in line with a previous study [25]. Based on different mechanical, rheological, morphological, thermal, and FTIR analyses, the overall comparison is shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Comparison of E, porosity (%), MFI, resistance, tg, and value of absorbance of the virgin, cycle 1, cycle 2, cycle 3, and cycle four processed PETG samples

Conclusions

  • PETG was mechanically recycled in this study, and its E was analyzed. The value of E increased by 42.8% (from 0.586 GPa to 0.737 GPa) as it was recycled due to the decrease in the porosity of recycled material. For the charge-carrying capacity analysis, the resistance of the samples has been evaluated. It has been observed that the resistance to recycling continuously increases. The resistance of cycle 4 PETG has risen by 113.29% compared to virgin PETG. The MFI of the material after cycle four has increased by 186.98% compared to virgin PETG. As the MFI increased, dis-ordered short polymer chains were formed, and the material became more amorphous. Due to the increase in the amorphous nature, a resistance to the electron flow occurs.

  • Recycling does not affect the thermal stability of PETG as there is no considerable change in its Tg. In FTIR analysis, it has been observed that no specific variation in the absorption intensity of bonds of PETG at WN 950 cm−1, 1410 cm−1, 1600 cm−1, 1575 cm−1, 1500 cm−1, and 1450 cm−1 were noticed except the C = O bond at 1700 cm−1. The absorption intensity of the C = O bond decreased continuously from virgin to cycle 4 PETG.

  • For sensor applications, as the resistance increases with recyclability, more energy is required to move a specific amount of charge through 1 V of potential difference, or a high potential difference is needed to pass the same amount of current, i.e., 0.5 Amp. Threshold energy also increases as the number of recyclables increases. Hence, the recycling of PETG material may be restricted to the four cycles for sensing applications in the case of the samples used in the present study.

Further studies may be performed to ascertain the effect of secondary, tertiary and quarternary recycling methods on overcoming the limitations observed after 04 recycling cycles in the present study.