Abstract
Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) containing metallic iron (Fe0) as reactive materials are currently considered as an established technology for groundwater remediation. Fe0 PRBs have been introduced by a field demonstration based on the fortuitous observation that aqueous trichloroethylenes are eliminated in Fe0-based sampling vessels. Since then, Fe0 has been tested and used for treating various biological (e.g. bacteria, viruses) and chemical (organic and inorganic) contaminants from polluted waters. There is a broad consensus on the view that “reactivity loss” and “permeability loss” are the two main problems hampering the design of sustainable Fe0 systems. However, the view that Fe0 is a reducing agent (electron donor) under environmental conditions should be regarded as a distortion of Corrosion Science. This is because it has been long established that aqueous iron corrosion is a spontaneous process and results in the Fe0 surface being shielded by an oxide scale. The multi-layered oxide scale acts as a conduction barrier for electrons from Fe0. Accordingly, “reactivity loss”, defined as reduced electron transfer to contaminants, must be revisited. On the other hand, because “stoichiometric” ratios were considered while designing the first generation of Fe0 PRBs (Fe0 as reductant), “permeability loss” should also be revisited. The aim of this communication is to clarify this issue and reconcile a proven efficient technology with its scientific roots (i.e. corrosion science).
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Dissolved species and pathogens are mostly quantitatively removed from aqueous solutions in the presence of metallic iron (Fe0) (Devonshire 1890; Baker 1934). This century-old knowledge has been intensively applied during the past three decades in solving the challenges for a clean environment and safe drinking water (Wakatsuki et al. 1993; Henderson and Demond 2007; Chen et al. 2014; Ghauch 2015; Guan et al. 2015; Singh et al. 2023; Lawrinenko et al. 2023a). Despite such a broad application, an understanding of the science of the Fe0 remediation technology has not yet been achieved (Cao et al. 2022; Lawrinenko et al. 2023b; Noubactep 2023). In particular, an understanding of the mechanisms of water decontamination in Fe0/H2O systems is useful for designing sustainable systems in practice (Comba et al. 2011; Fu et al 2014; Obiri-Nyarko et al 2014).
Mechanistic information regarding the operating mode of Fe0/H2O systems is conflicting. For example, Matheson and Tratnyek (1994) used slowly stirred batch experiments (≤ 15 rpm) to suggest that chlorinated carbons (RCl) are removed from aqueous solution mostly via reductive degradation mediated by electrons from Fe0. Weber (1996) reported to have confirmed that reductive transformation by Fe0 is a surface-mediated process while using 4-aminoazobenzene as a probe contaminant and a completely different experimental design. Weber (1996) also reported that the requirement that the contaminant contacts the Fe0 surface for electron transfer can be circumvented by the addition of soluble electron mediators. Roberts et al. (1996) and several other authors made similar conclusion which finally led to the “broad concensus” (O’Hannesin and Gillham 1998) that Fe0 oxidative dissolution is the anodic reaction occurring simultaneously to the cathodic reduction in the contaminant of interest (e.g. an electrochemical reaction). It should be pointed out that this reasoning is limited to reducible contaminants, while several other non-reducible species, including pathogens, have been quantitatively eliminated from the aqueous phase in the presence of Fe0 (You et al. 2005; Henderson and Demond 2007; Noubactep 2007). Thus, the removal of non-reducible contaminants and microbes cannot be explained by the concept of reductive transformation or degradation.
In contrast, Lipczynska-Kochany et al. (1994) questioned the validity of the reductive transformation concept in a context where iron corrosion increases the pH value of the system and the universal oxide scale on Fe0 impedes any (quantitative) electron transfer from the metal body. Similarly, Schreier and Reinhard (1994) found a lag time between the initiation of the reaction and the start of the degradation of chlorinated organic compounds in Fe0/H2O systems. Further results questioning the validity of the reductive transformation concept were presented by several authors including Cantrell et al. (1995), Warren et al. (1995), Fiedor et al. (1998), Qiu et al. (2000), Farrell et al. (2001), Lavine et al (2001), and Jiao et al. (2009).
While it is certain that the reductive transformation concept has never been univocally accepted/established, a cursory survey of the Fe0 literature reveals that it is favoured by the large majority of active researchers investigating Fe0/H2O systems (Chen et al. 2014; Guan et al. 2015; Hu et al. 2021; Lawrinenko et al. 2023a). In particular, Lawrinenko et al. (2023a) recently attempted to reiterate the validity of the named concept while characterizing divergent views as “isolated misconceptions”. The views reported by Lawrinenko et al. (2023a) contrast with recent developments that the observation that organic substances are reductively degraded in Fe0/H2O systems was not entirely new, rather, it has been known around 1990 as reported by Reynolds et al. (1990) (Hu et al. 2021; Konadu-Amoah et al. 2021). Moreover, the view that any dissolved species can exchange electrons with Fe0 disproves a century-old knowledge that protons (H+) and protons alone oxidize Fe0 under environmental conditions (pH > 4.5) (Whitney 1903). Actually, the pioneers of the Fe0 remediation technology have not considered Whitney (1903) and other ancient works like Gould (1982), Murphy (1988), Khudenko (1991), and Murphy (1991), while introducing their concept. Table 1 gives an overview of the extent to which six selected relevant pioneering scientific articles have been considered in the Fe0 remediation literature. Khudenko (1991) utilized Cu2+ cementation by Fe0 to generate FeII species (and H/H2 species) for the reductive destruction of organics. This approach was rooted in the knowledge that direct electron transfer from Fe0 is impossible (Whitney 1903; Khudenko 1985, 1987). In other words, it was established before 1994 that Fe0 is corroded by an electrochemical mechanism while contaminants are reduced by a chemical mechanism.
Table 1 clearly shows that our research group (RGN) has largely considered the pioneering works with a citation rate varying from 6.1% for Gillham and O’Hannesin (1994) to 33.7% for Schreier and Reinhard (1994). Table 1 also reflects the fact that the reductive transformation concept was favoured (Sect. 1) as Gillham and O’Hannesin (1994) and Matheson and Tratnyek (1994) were roundly referenced 10 times more than Lipczynska-Kochany et al. (1994) and Schreier and Reinhard (1994). This selective citation is particularly evident considering that these papers were published in the same year (i.e., 1994). Another important feature reflected in Table 1 is that only a tiny fraction of published articles have referenced the original mechanistic works. In fact, recent bibliometric studies suggest that more than 10,000 scientific articles on “Fe0 for water remediation” have been published since 1994 (Chen et al. 2019; Antia 2020; Li et al. 2021). Actually, Google Scholar covers also graduation thesis and technical documents.
Given the crucial importance of the actual reaction mechanisms for the design of sustainable Fe0 remediation systems, the present work critically analyses the contaminant-free Fe0/H2O system to improve the mechanistic understanding of its operating mode. The presentation starts with a discussion of the chemistry of aqueous iron corrosion.
Aqueous iron corrosion: the Fe0/H2O system
Iron primarily exists in the environment in two oxidation states: (i) highly soluble Fe2+ (ferrous iron) and (ii) lowly soluble Fe3+ (ferric iron) (Langmuir 1997). Once immersed in water, reactive Fe0 undergoes oxidative dissolution (corrosion) owing to its instability. It was demonstrated 120 years ago that aqueous iron corrosion under environmental conditions is an electrochemical process, whereby Fe0 dissolves at an anode (Eq. 1) and proton (H+ from water dissociation) reduction takes place at a cathode (Eq. 2) (Whitney 1903). Clearly, the knowledge that water (H+) and only water (H+) accepts electrons from Fe0 (Eq. 3) is a century-old scientific fact.
It should be highlighted that Whitney (1903) explicitly excluded the possibility that dissolved oxygen accepts electrons from Fe0 (Eq. 1). This makes the following reaction (Eq. 4) impossible:
As shown in Table 1, Whitney (1903) has been overlooked in the Fe0 remediation literature until 2018. This means that the pioneers of the technology have performed incomplete literature research. This is unfortunate as the paper has been published twice: (i) in 1903 at the Journal of the American Chemical Society (original version) and (ii) in 1947 at CORROSION, The Journal of Science and Engineering. The textual reproduction was enriched with the mention: “Dr. W.R. Whitney’s classical paper on the electrochemical principles of corrosion is reproduced here by courtesy of the American Chemical Society from that Society’s 1903 journal. In recognition of Dr. Whitney’s work in establishing this theory of corrosion, the National Association of Corrosion Engineers this year founded the Willis Rodney Whitney Award in the Science of Corrosion, and designated Dr. Whitney the first recipient of the award, presentation of which was made during the NACE award meeting in Chicago, III, April 7–10, 1947.”
Dr. Whitney’s theory negates the popular view that Fe0 is corroded by water (Eq. 3) only under anoxic conditions (absence of O2) (Matheson and Tratnyek 1994; Zhang et al. 2022). It also reiterates that under oxic conditions (presence of O2), Fe0 corrosion is accelerated because O2 consumes Fe2+ for its reductive transformation (Eq. 5) (Le Chatelier Principle).
In other words, the often-written reaction of Fe0 oxidation by O2 (under oxic conditions) (Eq. 4) should be regarded as impossible, even though it is still regarded as textbook knowledge. Once this misconception is fixed, scope exists for an agreement on the further transformations of ferrous and ferric ions to generate an oxide scale shielding the Fe0 surface and slowing the kinetics of Fe0 corrosion (Nesic 2007; Noubactep 2010). As evident from Eqs. 3 and 5, Fe0 corrosion consumes H+ and induces a significant increase in the pH value of the solution. A concomitant decline in solution redox potential (Eh) has been documented (Matheson and Tratnyek 1994; Singh et al. 2023). In other words, irrespective of the presence of any contaminant, the immersion of Fe0 in a system may lead to the development of highly reducing conditions.
Another key feature from Whitney (1903, 1947) is that depending on the salinity of natural waters, for pH > 4.5, Fe0 corrosion produces low-solubility hydroxides/oxides and more soluble salts (Antia 2020, 2022; Tao et al. 2023). The generation of iron hydroxides/oxides is certain as far as Fe0 is reactive. However, the amount generated is unknown and cannot be estimated because the corrosion rate is unknown (non-constant and nonlinear) (Angst 2019; Yang et al. 2021, 2022). In a porous system, the extent of Fe0 corrosion (spatially and temporally) depends on three key factors: (i) the relative solubility of hydroxides and salts, (ii) the concentration of dissolved O2, and (iii) the residual porosity and the pore size distribution. For the proper discussion of the mechanisms of water decontamination using Fe0/H2O systems, it is essential to consider the relative abundance of Fe0, O2 and salts. Assuming that Fe0 is available in stoichiometric abundance, for highly soluble salts (e.g. FeCl2, FeCl3), the extent of hydroxide precipitation depends on the time scale of Cl– exhaustion (Antia 2020; Tao et al. 2023).
This section has reiterated the complexity of the contaminant-free Fe0/H2O system. The challenge for scientists is to properly investigate its changes with the numerous influencing factors, including: (i) Fe0 intrinsic reactivity, (ii) water chemistry (electrolyte), (iii) water flow velocity (stagnant vs. convection), (iv) the presence of microorganisms, and (v) the presence of reactive phases (e.g. FeS2, MnO2) (Cao et al. 2022). In dynamic systems, the time-dependent properties of the porous medium (pore size and pore size distribution) must be considered as well (Wielinski et al. 2022). Clearly, it is about a holistic consideration of various interdependent dynamic processes such as Fe0 corrosion, contaminant transport, chemical reactions, and particle transport (Bedrikovetsky 2008; Yang et al. 2021).
Investigating the remediation Fe0/H2O system
Section 2 recalls the major characteristics of the contaminant-free Fe0/H2O system which can be summarized in two points: (i) Fe0 corrodes, and an oxide scale is generated in its vicinity (not really at its surface), and (ii) the extent of Fe0 corrosion depends on various inter-related factors, including water chemistry (electrolyte’s nature) and the available volume of pores (e.g. pore size and pore size distribution). In other words, polluted water (to be remediated) is just an electrolyte containing elevated concentrations of selected contaminants, typically in trace amounts (µg/L or mg/L). However, the electrolyte is just one component of an electrochemical cell. The three other components are: (i) the anode where Fe0 is dissolved (to Fe2+) and electrons are released, (ii) the uncorroded Fe0 conducting the released electrons to the cathode, and (iii) the cathode where electrons from Fe0 are exchanged (with protons) and molecular H2 is generated (Groysman 2010; Noubactep 2014). At this stage of reasoning, four points need to be highlighted: (i) immersed Fe0 corrodes also in the absence of O2 and any contaminant (Fact 1), (ii) the oxide scale on Fe0 acts as a diffusion barrier for O2 and contaminants (Fact 2), (iii) the oxide scale on Fe0 is non-conductive and acts as conduction barriers for electrons from Fe0 (Fact 3), and (iv) Fe2+ and H2 are standalone reducing agents (Fact 4). Facts 1–4 have been presented by Noubactep (2007, 2008) to refute the validity of the theory that Fe0 donates electrons to any dissolved species. Attempts to falsify Noubactep’s view to date were collectively limited to supporting the view introduced in the 1990s. For example, Lawrinenko et al. (2023a, 2023b) supported their views while citing Cutler (1987), Gillham and O’Hannesin (1994), and Matheson and Tratnyek (1994). These three articles are claimed to have provided “evidence for direct electron transfer and the corrosion of Fe0 in contact with chlorinated hydrocarbons”. However, as shown in Table 1, the two papers from 1994 have not considered Whitney (1903), while Cutler (1987) is rather a review article on the interactions of Al0 with halogenated hydrocarbons. Clearly, since the rejection of the reductive transformation concept about 15 years ago, some colleagues have approved the alternative concept (Ghauch et al. 2011; Gheju 2011; Giles et al. 2011; Ghauch 2015; Sista et al. 2021; Gheju and Balcu 2019, 2023; Lan et al. 2023), while the large majority has overlooked it. Lawrinenko et al. (2023a) is the very first attempt to falsify the new concept.
Coming back to the contaminant-free Fe0/H2O system, and considering dissolved O2 as a non-polluting contaminant, its reduction by Fe2+ (Eq. 4) induces concentration changes in the vicinity of Fe0 and in the adjacent porous system. However, the dynamic relationships between these concentration changes and the extent of Fe0 corrosion are complex and depend on many factors, including: (i) chemical reactions (e.g. O2 reduction, oxide precipitation), (ii) local pore structure (e.g. size of Fe0 and sand particles), and (iii) ionic transport, diffusion within the oxide scale, and advection in moving water. The presence of contaminants and site-specific microorganisms are two other complicating parameters (Angst 2019; Yang et al. 2021; Tao et al. 2023). Thus, it is impossible to root the understanding of the Fe0/H2O system on simple engineering approaches, merely based on the nature of the contaminant and its redox reactivity relative to the redox couple Fe0/FeII (E0 = –0.44 V) (Gillham and O’Hannesin 1994; Matheson and Tratnyek 1994; Sarr 2001; Fu et al. 2014; Obiri-Nyarko et al. 2014; Lawrinenko et al. 2023a).
At this stage of reasoning, it should be highlighted that E0 = –0.44 V, the electrode potential of the FeII/Fe0 redox couple, is not the decisive factor to justify the use of Fe0 in water treatment. The first reason for this is that the oxide scale is positively charged and will selectively attract negatively charged pollutants (Sato 2001; Miyajima 2012; Phukan et al. 2015). On the other hand, Al0 (E0 = –1.66 V), Mg0 (E0 = –2.38 V), and Zn0 (E0 = –0.76 V) are more powerful reducing agents than Fe0 (Cutler 1987; Shreier and Reinhardt 1994; Warren et al. 1995). Proponents of the reductive transformation concept have not really considered this key aspect to explain why these metals are not used for the removal of contaminants in a similar way as Fe0. Rather, their reasoning was limited to toxicity and cost issues. However, particularly, Al0 and Zn0 are not suitable for long-term operations because they just form one hydroxide each (Al(OH)3 and Zn(OH)2) and one oxide (Al2O3 and ZnO). The unit cells in Al and Al2O3 on the one side and that of Zn and ZnO on the other side are very similar to one another. Thus, Al2O3 adheres tightly to Al0 beneath it, just as ZnO adheres tightly to Zn0. In both cases, the oxidized surface provides a protective layer that prevents O2 from getting to the underlying metal surface (Dickerson et al. 1979; Noubactep 2010). In contrast, the packing dimensions of Fe0 and Fe oxides are not particularly close; thus, there is no tendency for an iron oxide layer to adhere to Fe0. Accordingly, the oxide scale on Fe0 constantly flakes off and exposes fresh Fe0 surfaces for attack or corrosion (Dickerson et al. 1979). This is the reason why Fe0 is a long-term source of iron oxides for water remediation (James et al. 1992; Wakatsuki et al. 1993; Jia et al. 2007; Bradley et al. 2011), and not a long-term source of electrons for the reductive transformation of selected species (Lawrinenko et al. 2023a) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1 recalls that both concepts recognized the formation of the oxide scale on Fe0. On the one hand, the reductive transformation concept strives to explain why electron transfer from Fe0 occurs despite the presence of the oxide scale (Scherer et al. 2000; Lawrinenko et al. 2023a). On the other hand, the alternative concept supported by the seminal work of Whitney (1903) argues that such an electrochemical reaction is impossible (Cao et al. 2022; Noubactep 2023). It is very important to recall that for the concentration ranges of natural water, chemical reduction is not even a relevant remediation mechanism for many substances, particularly when it comes to safe drinking water (Noubactep 2011; Heimann et al. 2018). The reason is that even reaction products have to be removed from the aqueous phase. However, the maximum contamination limit (MCL) is generally lower than the solubility limit (Kalin et al. 2005; Ndé-Tchoupé et al. 2015). For this reason, adsorption, co-precipitation, and size-exclusion as occurring in all Fe0/H2O systems are fundamental (Noubactep 2007, 2008; Ghauch et al. 2011; Gheju 2011; Giles et al. 2011; Noubactep 2011; Gheju and Balcu 2019; Sista et al. 2021).
Designing sustainable Fe0 PRBs
The view that Fe0 is an electron donor under environmental conditions has led to an empirical design of the first generation of Fe0 PRBs. In fact, the stoichiometry of the reaction between Fe0 and the contaminants of concern were considered (Sarr 2001), and a “safety factor” was used to “increase assurance of successful remediation” (Lawrinenko et al. 2023a). In this approach, mixing Fe0 with non-expansive materials like pumice or sand was regarded as a “ Fe0 dilution” with cost benefits, but possible negative impacts on the efficiency of the resulting systems (Kenneke and McCutcheon 2003; Westerhoff and James 2003; Bi et al. 2009). Fe0/sand mixtures were also used as pre-treatment systems to free inflowing water from dissolved O2 such that the pure Fe0 main treatment system could be fully anoxic (O2 free) (Westerhoff and James 2003). Ironically, these efforts coexisted in the literature with the demonstration of the efficiency of Fe0 PRBs using a Fe0/sand mixture comprising 22% Fe0 (w/w) (O’Hannesin and Gillham 1998).
Although differences in density between Fe0 (d = 7.6 g/cm3) and its corrosion products (d < 5.2 g/cm3) have been previously considered in justifying permeability loss in Fe0 PRBs (Liang et al. 2003, 2005), our research group led Dr. Noubactep was the first to properly consider the volumetric expansive nature of iron corrosion in designing Fe0 filters (Noubactep and Caré 2010). Accordingly, replacing a fraction of Fe0 in a filtration system with a non-expansive material (e.g. MnO2, pumice, sand) is a tool to enable complete exhaustion of Fe0 in the long-term (Moraci and Calabrò 2010; Noubactep et al. 2012; Caré et al. 2013; Bilardi et al. 2023). In 100% Fe0 filters (Fig. 2), clogging occurs before Fe0 exhaustion because of a lack of space for further dissolution. Figure 3 shows two systems, one with 100% Fe0 and the other with 50% Fe0 (vol/vol). Here, it is seen that the pure Fe0 system clogs when the 50% Fe0 has just lost 50% of its porosity. This reasoning implies that mixing Fe0 and a non-expansive material is a tool to enable better material efficiency (avoid Fe0 wastage), and a prerequisite for sustainability in terms of long-term permeability (Noubactep et al. 2012; Caré et al. 2013; Domga et al. 2015; Bilardi et al. 2023; Tao et al. 2023). Proponents of the reductive transformation concept have considered a decrease in the source of electrons (Fe0 ratio) as a cause of declined system performance for Fe0 filters (Kenneke and McCutcheon 2003; Bi et al. 2009). Yet data from both batch and column studies show that admixing Fe0 with non-expansive aggregates improves the performance of Fe0/H2O systems (Westerhoff and James 2003; Song et al. 2005; Moraci and Calabrò 2010; Miyajima 2012; Tepong-Tsindé et al. 2019; Gheju and Balcu 2023; Lan et al. 2023). Surprisingly, proponents of the reductive transformation concept have not yet revisited their theory in the light of this evidence (Wielinski et al. 2022; Lawrinenko et al. 2023a).
Another point of discrepancy between the two views is how to investigate spatio-temporal changes in Fe0/H2O systems. Proponents of the reductive transformation concept are still combining analytical tools to monitor changes in mineral phases in short-term experiments (some few weeks) (Wielinski et al. 2022), while our research group insists on the scarcity of long-term column studies (e.g. > 52 weeks, 1 year) (Tepong-Tsindé et al. 2019; Yang et al. 2022). In fact, using a pure thermodynamic approach (mass balance), the optimum Fe0 ratio to avoid material wastage was determined as 25% (vol/vol) in hybrid Fe0/sand systems (Miyajima 2012; Miyajima and Noubactep 2013). There is material wastage whenever Fe0 is not completely exhausted as the system is clogged (Caré et al. 2013; Domga et al 2015). This is when the time to material exhaustion (t∞) is lower than the time to clogging (tclog). A Fe0 volumetric ratio of 25% in a Fe0/sand system roughly corresponds to (i) 50% Fe0 (w/w) which has been used at several field installations (Henderson and Demond 2007; Guan et al. 2015) and (ii) the solution to the special case (t∞ = tclog, where clogging occurs promptly at Fe0 complete exhaustion). The temporal issue that is the extent of porosity loss at any time (or time to clogging) is difficult or even impossible to address because the corrosion kinetics is not known and has even not been really investigated in the Fe0 remediation context (Moraci et al. 2016; Noubactep 2016; Yang et al. 2022). Ironically, while Fe0 oxidation by water is mostly considered as a side reaction, modelling efforts, since Mayer et al. (2001), are mainly rooted in its corrosion rate as determined by Dr. Eric J. Reardon 33 years ago (Reardon 1995).
A last fundamental design aspect to consider is how the expected decrease of the permeability will influence the long-term efficiency of Fe0 PRBs. In fact, Fe0 PRBs are designed to be more permeable than the surrounding aquifer material (O’Hannesin and Gillham 1998; Zhang et al. 2022; Plessl et al. 2023). However, despite mixing Fe0 with non-expansive materials, the permeability of the reactive zone (Fe0 PRB) will still decrease. Therefore, it makes sense to forecast specific cases, for example, when the initial PRB‘s permeability will decrease by one-quarter, one-third, or one-half. Considering such scenarios in the design phase would be useful for better monitoring of the system’s performance (Yang et al. 2021, 2022).
Practical significance
The analysis in this study shows that under given operational conditions, Fe0 can generate various amounts of FeCPs which are highly effective in removing many classes of contaminants from aqueous solutions (Bigg and Judd 2000; Henderson and Demond 2007; Cundy et al. 2008; Noubactep et al. 2009). Adsorption, co-precipitation, and size-exclusion (chromatographic effects) are the common underlying removal mechanisms, including for redox-active species. The robust design of sustainable Fe0 PRBs depends on the profound understanding of how site-specific characteristics (e.g. O2 availability, pH value, salinity) affect the long-term availability of FeCPs within the system (Naseri et al. 2017; Noubactep 2018; Tao et al. 2023). In other words, the analysis presented herein provides a new starting point for the conceptualization of future laboratory, pilot, and field-scale studies for the design of efficient and sustainable Fe0 PRBs for groundwater remediation as well as systems to treat wastewater and Fe0 filters for safe drinking water provision.
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, only the research group of Dr. Vollprecht (starting later) has designed their whole experiments correctly and interpreted the results according to the state-of-the-art knowledge (Vollprecht et al. 2018, 2020; Sedlazeck et al. 2019, 2020). In retrospect, Vollprecht’s articles on the “Ferrodecont Process” are built on Müller et al. (2014) entitled “Implementation of fluidized granulated iron reactors in a chromate remediation process”. Müller et al. (2014) is nothing new, but an independent rediscovery of the Anderson Process as implemented in the 1880s in the waterworks of Antwerpten (Belgium) (Devonshire 1890; van Craenenbroeck 1998; Mwakabona et al. 2017; Antia 2020). Both processes (Anderson and Ferrodecont) are rooted in the evidence that in filtration systems, clogging is a special (or geometrical) effect occurring because space lacks to store the in-situ generated corrosion products (contaminant scavengers) (Caré et al. 2013; Domga et al. 2015; Bilardi et al. 2023).
Conclusions and a look ahead
This article presents a critical assessment of the state-of-the-art knowledge on the operating mode of engineered Fe0-based systems for water remediation as used for safe drinking water supply, wastewater treatment, and environmental remediation. The following major conclusions are drawn:
Immersing a reactive Fe0 specimen in (polluted) water at a pH value higher than 4.5 results in its oxidative dissolution by H+ ions and the generation of solid iron corrosion products which act as contaminant scavengers. Fe0 dissolution also generates standalone reducing agents (e.g. FeII oxides, FeII/FeIII oxides, H2) which may reduce selected contaminants by a chemical reaction. In other words, although Fe0 corrosion in PRBs is an electrochemical process, oxidizing electrons are not supplied by any dissolved contaminant. This century-old knowledge has been overlooked for 28 years while discussing the mechanisms of contaminant removal in Fe0/H2O systems (Table 1).
Despite the discrepancy in the actual operating mode of engineered Fe0-based systems, a well-documented advantage of these systems is that their decontamination efficiency can be maintained for decades (Phillips et al. 2010; Wilkin et al. 2014, 2019). This is an additional motivation to root this technology in its scientific background (i.e. iron corrosion).
The relationship between Fe0 dissolution, porosity loss, and water decontamination is very complex. This is because of the numerous inter-related and partly dynamic influencing factors involved in the processes. Relevant influencing factors include: (i) the porous structure (e.g. size, distribution), (ii) the water chemistry (e.g. O2 availability, pH value, salinity), (iii) water flow velocity, and (iv) the action of microorganisms. Thus, engineering or pragmatic approaches for understanding the mechanisms of water treatment using Fe0/H2O systems have proven unreliable. The scientific challenge for the coming years is to properly consider advances in numerical modelling (e.g. reactive transport modelling in porous media) to devise models capable of considering: (i) the spatio-temporal changes within the Fe0/H2O system at the pore-scale level, and (ii) the interdependence between the involved processes (e.g. chemical reactions, Fe0 reactivity, Fe0 ratio, and transport processes).
A concerted effort is needed to pave the way out of the current “valley of confusion” characterized by a high level of empiricism. It is hoped that based on the clarifications presented herein, new engineering tools will be developed to increase the effectiveness and reliability of the next generation of Fe0 PRBs as an efficient and sustainable technology for groundwater remediation.
References
Angst UM (2019) A critical review of the science and engineering of cathodic protection of steel in soil and concrete. Corrosion 75:1420–1433
Antia DDJ (2022) Catalytic partial desalination of saline water. Water 14:2893
Antia DDJ (2020) Water treatment and desalination using the eco-materials n-Fe0 (ZVI), n-Fe3O4, n-FexOyHz[mH2O], and n-Fex[Cation]nOyHz[Anion]m [rH2O]. In: Kharissova OV et al (eds) Handbook of nanomaterials and nanocomposites for energy and environmental applications. Springer, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11155-7_66-1
Baker MN (1934) Sketch of the history of water treatment. J Am Water Works Assoc 26:902–938
Bedrikovetsky P (2008) Upscaling of stochastic micro model for suspension transport in porous media. Transp Porous Med 75:335–369
Bi E, Devlin JF, Huang B (2009) Effects of mixing granular iron with sand on the kinetics of trichloroethylene reduction. Ground Water Monit Remediat 29:56–62
Bigg T, Judd SJ (2000) Zero-valent iron for water treatment. Environ Technol 21:661–670
Bilardi S, Calabrò PS, Moraci N (2023) A review of the hydraulic performance of permeable reactive barriers based on granular zero valent iron. Water 15:200
Bradley I, Straub A, Maraccini P, Markazi S, Nguyen TH (2011) Iron oxide amended biosand filters for virus removal. Water Res 45:4501–4510
Cantrell KJ, Kaplan DI, Wietsma TW (1995) Zero-valent iron for the in situ remediation of selected metals in groundwater. J Hazard Mater 42:201–212
Cao V, Bakari O, Kenmogne-Tchidjo JF, Gatcha-Bandjun N, Ndé-Tchoupé AI, Gwenzi W, Njau KN, Noubactep C (2022) Conceptualizing the Fe0/H2O system: a call for collaboration to mark the 30th anniversary of the Fe0-based permeable reactive barrier technology. Water 14:3120
Caré S, Crane R, Calabrò PS, Ghauch A, Temgoua E, Noubactep C (2013) Modeling the permeability loss of metallic iron water filtration systems. CLEAN—Soil Air Water 41:275–282
Chen S, Fan D, Tratnyek PG (2014) Novel contaminant transformation pathways by abiotic reductants. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:432–436
Chen Q, Fan G, Na W, Liu J, Cui J, Li H (2019) Past, present, and future of groundwater remediation research: a scientometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:3975
Comba S, Di Molfetta A, Sethi R (2011) A Comparison between field applications of nano-, micro-, and millimetric zero-valent iron for the remediation of contaminated aquifers. Water Air Soil Pollut 215:595–607
Cundy AB, Hopkinson L, Whitby RLD (2008) Use of iron-based technologies in contaminated land and groundwater remediation: a review. Sci Tot Environ 400:42–51
Cutler DP (1987) Reactions between halogenated hydrocarbons and metals: a literature review. J Hazard Mater 17:99–108
Devonshire E (1890) The purification of water by means of metallic iron. J Frankl Inst 129:449–461
Dickerson RE, Gray HB, Haight GP Jr (1979) Chemical principles, 3rd edn. Benjamin/cummings inc, London, Amsterdam, p 944
Domga R, Togue-Kamga F, Noubactep C, Tchatchueng JB (2015) Discussing porosity loss of Fe0 packed water filters at ground level. Chem Eng J 263:127–134
Farrell J, Wang J, O’Day P, Conklin M (2001) Electrochemical and spectroscopic study of arsenate removal from water using zero-valent iron media. Environ Sci Technol 35:2026–2032
Fiedor JN, Bostick WD, Jarabek RJ, Farrel J (1998) Understanding the mechanism, of uranium removal from groundwater by zero-valent iron using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 32:1466–1473
Fu F, Dionysiou DD, Liu H (2014) The use of zero-valent iron for groundwater remediation and wastewater treatment: a review. J Hazard Mater 267:194–205
Ghauch A (2015) Iron-based metallic systems: an excellent choice for sustainable water treatment. Freib Online Geosci 32:1–80
Ghauch A, Abou AH, Baydoun H, Tuqan AM, Bejjani A (2011) Fe0-based trimetallic systems for the removal of aqueous diclofenac: mechanism and kinetics. Chem Eng J 172:1033–1044
Gheju M (2011) Hexavalent chromium reduction with zero-valent iron (ZVI) in aquatic systems. Water Air Soil Pollut 222:103–148
Gheju M, Balcu I (2019) Sustaining the efficiency of the Fe(0)/H2O system for Cr(VI) removal by MnO2 amendment. Chemosphere 214:389–398
Gheju M, Balcu I (2023) Effect of sand co-presence on CrVI removal in Fe0-H2O system. Water 15:777
Giles DE, Mohapatra M, Issa TB, Anand S, Singh P (2011) Iron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water. J Environ Manag 92:3011–3022
Gillham RW, O’Hannesin SF (1994) Enhanced degradation of halogenated aliphatics by zero-valent iron. Ground Water 32:958–967
Gould JP (1982) The kinetics of hexavalent chromium reduction by metallic iron. Water Res 16:871–877
Groysman A (2010) Corrosion for Everybody. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, p 368
Guan X, Sun Y, Qin H, Li J, Lo IMC, He D, Dong H (2015) The limitations of applying zero-valent iron technology in contaminants sequestration and the corresponding countermeasures: the development in zero-valent iron technology in the last two decades (1994–2014). Water Res 75:224–248
Heimann S, Ndé-Tchoupé AI, Hu R, Licha T, Noubactep C (2018) Investigating the suitability of Fe0 packed-beds for water defluoridation. Chemosphere 209:578–587
Henderson AD, Demond AH (2007) Long-term performance of zero-valent iron permeable reactive barriers: a critical review. Environ Eng Sci 24:401–423
Hu R, Gwenzi W, Sipowo HuR, Ndé-Tchoupé AI, Cao V, Gwenzi W, Noubactep C (2021) Metallic iron for environmental remediation: The fallacy of the electron efficiency concept. Frontiers Environ Chem 2:677813
James BR, Rabenhorst MC, Frigon GA (1992) Phosphorus sorption by peat and sand amended with iron oxides or steel wool. Water Environ Res 64:699–705
Jia Y, Breedveld GD, Aagaard P (2007) Column studies on transport of deicing additive benzotriazole in a sandy aquifer and a zerovalent iron barrier. Chemosphere 69:1409–1418
Jiao Y, Qiu C, Huang L, Wu K, Ma H, Chen S, Ma L, Wu L (2009) Reductive dechlorination of carbon tetrachloride by zero-valent iron and related iron corrosion. Appl Catal B: Environ 91:434–440
Kalin M, Wheeler WN, Meinrath G (2005) The removal of uranium from mining waste water using algal/microbial biomass. J Environ Radioact 78:151–177
Kenneke JF, McCutcheon SC (2003) Use of pretreatment zones and zero-valent iron for the remediation of chloroalkenes in an oxic aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 37(12):2829–2835
Khudenko BM (1985) Mechanism and kinetics of cementation processes. Water Sci Technol 17:719–731
Khudenko BM (1987) Mathematical models of cementaion process. J Environ Eng 113:681–702
Khudenko BM (1991) Feasibility evaluation of a novel method for destruction of organics. Water Sci Technol 23:1873–1881
Konadu-Amoah B, Ndé-Tchoupé AI, Hu R, Gwenzi W, Noubactep C (2021) Investigating the Fe0/H2O systems using the methylene blue method: Validity, applications and future directions. Chemosphere 291:132913
Lan LE, Reina FD, De Seta GE, Meichtry JM, Litter MI (2023) Comparison between different technologies (zerovalent iron, coagulation-flocculation, adsorption) for arsenic treatment at high concentrations. Water 15:1481
Langmuir D (1997) Aqueous environmental geochemistry. Prentice hall, 600
Lavine BK, Auslander G, Ritter J (2001) Polarographic studies of zero valent iron as a reductant for remediation of nitroaromatics in the environment. Microchem J 70:69–83
Lawrinenko M, Kurwadkar S, Wilkin RT (2023a) Long–term performance evaluation of zero-valent iron amended permeable reactive barriers for groundwater remediation—a mechanistic approach. Geosci Front 14:101494
Lawrinenko M, Kurwadkar S, Wilkin RT (2023b) Reply to comment by C. Noubactep on “Long-term performance evaluation of zero-valent iron amended permeable reactive barriers for groundwater remediation: a mechanistic approach.” Geosci Front 14:101583
Li X, Li Z, Du C, Tian Z, Zhu Q, Li G, Shen Q, Li C, Li J, Li W, Zhao C, Zhang L (2021) Bibliometric analysis of zerovalent iron particles research for environmental remediation from 2000 to 2019. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:4200–34210
Liang L, Sullivan AB, West OR, Moline GR, Kamolpornwijit W (2003) Predicting the precipitation of mineral phases in permeable reactive barriers. Environ Eng Sci 20:635–653
Liang L, Moline GR, Kamolpornwijit W, West OR (2005) Influence of hydrogeochemical processes on zero-valent iron reactive barrier performance: a field investigation. J Contam Hydrol 78:291–312
Lipczynska-Kochany E, Harms S, Milburn R, Sprah G, Nadarajah N (1994) Degradation of carbon tetrachloride in the presence of iron and sulphur containing compounds. Chemosphere 29:1477–1489
Matheson LJ, Tratnyek PG (1994) Reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated methanes by iron metal. Environ Sci Technol 28:2045–2053
Mayer KU, Blowes DW, Frind EO (2001) Reactive transport modeling of an in situ reactive barrier for the treatment of hexavalent chromium and trichloroethylene in groundwater. Water Resour Res 37:3091–3103
Miyajima K (2012) Optimizing the design of metallic iron filters for water treatment. Freib Online Geosci 32:1–60
Miyajima K, Noubactep C (2013) Impact of Fe0 amendment on methylene blue discoloration by sand columns. Chem Eng J 217:310–319
Moraci N, Calabrò PS (2010) Heavy metals removal and hydraulic performance in zero-valent iron/pumice permeable reactive barriers. J Environ Manag 91:2336–2341
Moraci N, Lelo D, Bilardi S, Calabrò PS (2016) Modelling long-term hydraulic conductivity behaviour of zero valent iron column tests for permeable reactive barrier design. Can Geotech J 53:946–961
Müller P, Lorber KE, Mischitz R, Weiß C (2014) Implementation of fluidized granulated iron reactors in a chromate remediation process. Sci Tot Environ 485–486:748–754
Murphy AP (1988) Removal of selenate from water by chemical reduction. Ind Eng Chem Res 27:181–191
Murphy AP (1991) Chemical removal of nitrate from water. Nature 350:223–225
Mwakabona HT, Ndé-Tchoupé AI, Njau KN, Noubactep C, Wydra KD (2017) Metallic iron for safe drinking water provision: considering a lost knowledge. Water Res 117:127–142
Naseri E, Ndé-Tchoupé AI, Mwakabona HT, Nanseu-Njiki CP, Noubactep C, Njau KN, Wydra KD (2017) Making Fe0-based filters a universal solution for safe drinking water provision. Sustainability 9:1224
Ndé-Tchoupé AI, Crane RA, Hezron T, Mwakabona NC, Njau KN (2015) Technologies for decentralized fluoride removal: testing metallic iron based filters. Water 7:6750–6774
Nesic S (2007) Key issues related to modelling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipelines—a review. Corros Sci 49:4308–4338
Noubactep C (2007) Processes of contaminant removal in “Fe0–H2O” systems revisited. The importance of co-precipitation. Open Environ Sci 1:9–13
Noubactep C (2008) A critical review on the mechanism of contaminant removal in Fe0–H2O systems. Environ Technol 29:909–920
Noubactep C (2010) The suitability of metallic iron for environmental remediation. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 29:286–291
Noubactep C (2011) Aqueous contaminant removal by metallic iron: Is the paradigm shifting? Water SA 37:419–426
Noubactep C (2014) Flaws in the design of Fe(0)-based filtration systems? Chemosphere 117:104–107
Noubactep C (2016) Predicting the hydraulic conductivity of metallic iron filters: modeling gone astray. Water 8:162
Noubactep C (2018) Metallic iron (Fe0) provide possible solution to universal safe drinking water provision. J Water Technol Treat Methods 1(1):102
Noubactep C (2023) Comments on “long-term performance evaluation of zero-valent iron amended permeable reactive barriers for groundwater remediation: a mechanistic approach” by Lawrinenko et al., Geoscience Frontiers 14, 2023 101494. Geosci Front 14:101582
Noubactep C, Caré S (2010) Dimensioning metallic iron beds for efficient contaminant removal. Chem Eng J 163:454–460
Noubactep C, Schöner A, Woafo P (2009) Metallic iron filters for universal access to safe drinking water. Clean: Soil, Air, Water 37:930–937
Noubactep C, Caré S, Btatkeu KBD, Nanseu-Njiki CP (2012) Enhancing the sustainability of household Fe0/sand filters by using bimetallics and MnO2. Clean—Soil Air Water 40:100–109
O’Hannesin SF, Gillham RW (1998) Long-term performance of an in situ “iron wall” for remediation of VOCs. Ground Water 36:164–170
Obiri-Nyarko F, Grajales-Mesa SJ, Malina G (2014) An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation. Chemosphere 111:243–259
Phillips DH, Van Nooten T, Bastiaens L, Russell MI, Dickson K, Plant S, Ahad JME, Newton T, Elliot T, Kalin RM (2010) Ten year performance evaluation of a field-scale zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier installed to remediate trichloroethene contaminated groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 44:3861–3869
Phukan M, Noubactep C, Licha T (2015) Characterizing the ion-selective nature of Fe0-based filters using azo dyes. Chem Eng J 259:481–491
Plessl K, Russ A, Vollprecht D (2023) Application and development of zero-valent iron (ZVI) for groundwater and wastewater treatment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 20:6913–6928
Qiu SR, Lai H-F, Roberson MJ, Hunt ML, Amrhein C, Giancarlo LC, Flynn GW, Yarmoff, (2000) Removal of contaminants from aqueous solution by reaction with iron surfaces. Langmuir 16:2230–2236
Reardon JE (1995) Anaerobic corrosion of granular iron: Measurement and interpretation of hydrogen evolution rates. Environ Sci Technol 29:2936–2945
Reynolds GW, Hoff JT, Gillham RW (1990) Sampling bias caused by materials used to monitor halocarbons in groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 24:135–142
Roberts AL, Totten LA, Arnold WA, Burris DR, Campbell TJ (1996) Reductive elimination of chlorinated ethylenes by zero-valent metals. Environ Sci Technol 30:2654–2659
Sarr D (2001) Zero-valent-iron permeable reactive barriers - how long will they last? Remediation 11:1–18
Sato N (2001) Surface oxides affecting metallic corrosion. Corros Rev 19:253–272
Scherer MM, Richter S, Valentine RL, Alvarez PJJ (2000) Chemistry and microbiology of permeable reactive barriers for in situ groundwater clean up. Rev Environ Sci Technol 30:363–411
Schreier CG, Reinhard M (1994) Transformation of chlorinated organic compounds by iron and manganese powders in buffered water and in landfill leachate. Chemosphere 29:1743–1753
Sedlazeck KP, Vollprecht D, Müller P, Mischitz R, Gill J, Trois W, Maunz I, Frate R, Mann O, Wruss K (2019) Decomposition of dissolved organic contaminants by combining a boron-doped diamond electrode, zero-valent iron and ultraviolet radiation. Chemosphere 217:897–904
Sedlazeck KP, Vollprecht D, Müller P, Mischitz R, Gieré R (2020) Impact of an in-situ Cr(VI)-contaminated site remediation on the groundwater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:14465–14475
Singh R, Chakma S, Birke V (2023) Performance of field-scale permeable reactive barriers: an overview on potentials and possible implications for in-situ groundwater remediation applications. Sci Tot Environ 858:158838
Sista KS, Kumar D, Sinha GR, Moon AP, Dwarapudi S (2021) Iron powders as a potential material for arsenic removal in aqueous systems. ISIJ Int 61:2687–2702
Song D-I, Kim YH, Shin WS (2005) A simple mathematical analysis on the effect of sand in Cr(VI) reduction using zero valent iron. Korean J Chem Eng 22:67–69
Tao R, Cui X, Xiao M, Hu R, Gwenzi W, Ruppert H, Noubactep C (2023) Influence of water salinity on the efficiency on Fe0-based systems for water treatment. Water 15:2466
Tepong-Tsindé R, Ndé-Tchoupé AI, Noubactep C, Nassi A, Ruppert H (2019) Characterizing a newly designed steel-wool-based household filter for safe drinking water provision: Hydraulic conductivity and efficiency for pathogen removal. Processes 7:966
van Craenenbroeck W (1998) Easton & Anderson and the water supply of Antwerp (Belgium). Ind Archaeol Rev 20:105–116
Vollprecht D, Krois L-M, Sedlazeck KP, Müller P, Mischitz R, Olbrich T, Pomberger R (2018) Removal of critical metals from waste water by zero-valent iron. J Clean Prod 208:1409–1420
Vollprecht D, Plessl K, Neuhold S, Kittinger F, Öfner W, Müller P, Mischitz R, Sedlazeck KP (2020) Recovery of molybdenum, chromium, tungsten, copper, silver, and zinc from industrial waste waters using zero-valent iron and tailored beneficiation processes. Processes 8:279
Wakatsuki T, Esumi H, Omura S (1993) High performance and N, P removable on-site domestic wastewater treatment system by multi-soil-layering method. Water Sci Technol 27:31–40
Warren KD, Arnold RG, Bishop TL, Lindholm LC, Betterton EA (1995) Kinetics and mechanism of reductive dehalogenation of carbon tetrachloride using zero-valence metals. J Hazard Mater 41:217–227
Weber EJ (1996) Iron-mediated reductive transformations: investigation of reaction mechanism. Environ Sci Technol 30:716–719
Westerhoff P, James J (2003) Nitrate removal in zero-valent iron packed columns. Water Res 37:1818–1830
Whitney WR (1903) The corrosion of iron. J Am Chem Soc 25(4):394–406
Whitney WR (1947) The corrosion of iron. Corrosion 3:331–340
Wielinski J, Jimenez-Martinez J, Göttlicher J, Steininger R, Mangold S, Hug SJ, Berg M, Voegelin A (2022) Spatiotemporal mineral phase evolution and arsenic retention in microfluidic models of zerovalent iron-based water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 56:13696–13708
Wilkin RT, Acree SD, Ross RR, Puls RW, Lee TR, Woods LL (2014) Fifteen-year assessment of a permeable reactive barrier for treatment of chromate and trichloroethylene in groundwater. Sci Tot Environ 468–469:186–194
Wilkin RT, Lee TR, Sexton MR, Acree SD, Puls RW, Blowes DW, Kalinowski C, Tilton JM, Woods LL (2019) Geochemical and isotope study of trichloroethene degradation in a zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier: a twenty-two-year performance evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 53:296–306
Yang H, Hu R, Ruppert H, Noubactep C (2021) Modeling porosity loss in Fe0-based permeable reactive barriers with Faraday’s law. Sci Rep 11:16998
Yang H, Liu Q, Hu R, Ptak T, Taherdangkoo R, Liu Y, Noubactep C (2022) Numerical case studies on long-term effectiveness of metallic iron based permeable reactive barriers: importance of porosity heterogeneity of the barrier. J Hydrol 612:128148
You Y, Han J, Chiu PC, Jin Y (2005) Removal and inactivation of waterborne viruses using zerovalent iron. Environ Sci Technol 39:9263–9269
Zhang Y-F, Zhang C-H, Xu J-H, Li L, Li D, Wu Q, Ma L-M (2022) Strategies to enhance the reactivity of zero-valent iron for environmental remediation: a review. J Environ Manag 317:115381
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China through the Programme “Driving process and mechanism of three dimensional spatial distribution of high risk organic pollutants in multi-field coupled sites” (Project Code: 2019YFC1804303).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception (MX, RH and CN), developing the original idea (MX, RH, CN, AINT, and WG), literature review (all), supervision (RH, CN and WG), redaction and revisions (all).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no confict of interest.
Ethical approval statement
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, M., Hu, R., Tao, R. et al. Metallic iron for environmental remediation: the still overlooked iron chemistry. Appl Water Sci 13, 222 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-02028-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-02028-8