1 Introduction

Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is a local malignant tumor with high incidence in middle age and males in China [1]. In 2020, the number of newly discovered cases and deaths of NPC worldwide are 133,000 and 80,000 respectively [2]. The risk factors associated with NPC pathogenesis include genetic susceptibility, EBV infection [3], and environmental factors [4]. Due to the hidden location of NPC tumors, the early symptoms are not obvious, causing misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. About 1/3 of NPC cases are found in the advanced stage of distant metastasis, and the cancer progresses rapidly leading to death [5]. For advanced NPC, the 5-year survival rate can be as high as 90% after effective radiotherapy or radiotherapy [6]. Therefore, it is essential to develop better diagnostics and treatments based on understanding the molecular mechanisms of NPC progression.

Circular RNA (circRNA) is a class of ncRNAs that are commonly found in eukaryotic cells and are made by reverse splicing linear mRNA precursors into continuous covalent rings [7]. circRNAs are involved in tumorigenesis and cancer progression [8,9,10], such as hsa_circ_0004872 in gastric cancer [11], circLIFR in bladder cancer [12], and circDLC1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [13]. Circ_ROBO1 remains a mystery as to whether it plays a role in NPC and tumor progression.

Many mechanisms have been proposed for how circRNAs perform biological functions, such as competitively binding miRNAs or interacting with RNA-binding proteins [14,15,16]. This work mainly explored the interplay between circ_ROBO1, miR-324-3p, and nucleoside diphosphokinase 1 (NME1) in NPC development.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Patient specimens

NPC tissues and normal tissues (35 pairs) were obtained from patients undergoing biopsy in Xiangtan Central Hospital in 2021–2022. All specimens were pathologically confirmed. No radiation or chemotherapy was given to the patients before biopsy. Those with infection, autoimmune disease, or other tumor were excluded. Table 1 lists patients’ clinicopathological data. All subjects signed written informed consent. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangtan Central Hospital (No. 202010HN93).

Table 1 Correlation analysis between circ_ROBO1 expression and clinicopathological features of 35 cases

2.2 Cell culture

RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS (Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Life Technologies, USA) was taken as a culture medium for NPC cell lines (CNE2, HK1, HONE1, HNE2) and immortalized NPE cell line (NP69). Cell culture was done with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

2.3 RT-qPCR

TRIzol reagents (Invitrogen, USA) were taken to collect total RNA. The collected RNA was subjected to reverse-transcription using PrimeScript RT Kit (Takara, China). Then, RT-qPCR was conducted using TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA) in AB7300 (Applied Biosystems). In the case of circ_ROBO1 and NME1, GAPDH was used as an endogenous control, which for miR-324-3p was U6. The 2−ΔΔCt method was utilized to calculate gene expression. Primers (Table 2) were obtained from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). The subcellular localization of circ_ROBO1 was determined by RT-qPCR using PARISTM Kit (Ambion, Life Technologies, USA), with U6 and GAPDH as controls in the nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively.

Table 2 Primer sequence

2.4 Treatment of actinomycin D and RNAse R

Actinomycin D treatment (2 mg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in cells was performed to block transcription. RNAse R (3 U/μg, Epicenter Technologies, USA) was incubated with 5 μg total RNA at 37 °C for 15 min. After treatment, circ_ROBO1 and ROBO1 levels were detected by RT-qPCR.

2.5 Cell transfection

circ_ROBO1 small interfering RNA (si-circ_ROBO1#1/#2), circ_ROBO1 overexpressed plasmid, NME1 siRNA (si-NME1) or siRNA negative control (si-NC) at 100 nM, miR-324-3p mimics/inhibitors, or corresponding negative controls at 50 nM (GenePharma) were transfected into HONE1 and HK1 cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen). RT-qPCR was performed 36 h later to verify the transfection efficiency.

2.6 CCK-8 assay

Cells were plated in the 96-well plate (1 × 103 cells/well) and incubated with 10 μL CCK-8 reagent (Dojindo, Japan) at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, respectively for additional 2 h. Optical density values at 450 nm were read on a microplate reader.

2.7 Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) assay

Cells were incubated with 10 μM BrdU solution (BD Pharmingen, USA) for 12 h and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. Then, anti-BrdU (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich) or IgG was detected for 1 h. After that, a secondary antibody (1:500, Beyotime, China) was added for another 1 h. Cells were then stained with DAPI (Beyotime) and cleared with PBS, and BrdU-positive cells in 3 fields of view were microscopically counted.

2.8 Transwell analysis

Transwell chambers (BD Biosciences, USA) were coated with matrigel (BD Biosciences). Matrigel was only used in the invasion detection. HONE1 and HK1 cells were suspended in FBS-free DMEM to reach 5 × 106 cells/ml concentration. Next, 200 μl cell suspension was added in the upper compartment, and 500 μl DMEM + 20% FBS was supplemented in the lower compartment. After 24 h, after the removal of non-migratory and non-invasive cells, the remaining cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. Cells were counted in 5 fields of view under an inverted microscope (Olympus, Japan).

2.9 Flow cytometry

FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences) was taken to assess cellular apoptosis. HONE1 and HK1 cells were re-suspended in 500 μl 1 × binding buffer and stained with 5 μl Annexin V-FITC and 5 μl PI solutions, respectively. After 15 min, apoptotic cells were measured on the FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

2.10 Luciferase reporter gene assay

Binding sites between miR-324-3p 3'UTR fragments and circ_ROBO1 were predicted by starBase 3.0. The target of miR-324-3p was searched by TargetScan 3.0 7.1 and starBase. Wild type or mutant circ_ROBO1 and NME13ʹUTR sequences containing miR-324-3p binding sites were inserted into the pmirGLO vector and transfected into cells with miR-324-3p mimics or control vector based on Lipofectamine® 2000. After 48 h, cells were lysed with a lysis buffer (100 μL/well) in the dual luciferase reporter assay kit (Beyotime) and centrifuged at 10,000–15,000 g for 3–5 min for the detection of luciferase activities.

2.11 RIP assay

RIP was implemented based on the EZMagna RIP kit (Millipore, USA). HONE1 and HK1 cells were lysed in the RIP lysis buffer, added to RIP buffer containing anti-AgO2 or IgG (Millipore), and incubated with magnetic beads. Then, cells were treated with protease K and DNase (Beyotime), and RNA was purified for RT-qPCR detection.

2.12 RNA pull-down

RNA pull-down test was performed using Pierce Magnetic RNA–protein Pull-Down kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Bio-miR-324-3p-WT and Bio-miR-324-3p-MUT were generated by biotinizing miR-324-3p WT/MUT sequences were biotinized to obtain Bio-miR-324-3p-WT and Bio-miR-324-3p-MUT. HONE1 and HK1 cells were transfected with Bio-miR-324-3p-WT and Bio-miR-324-3p-MUT and lysed with a lysis buffer (Sigma) for 10 min. After centrifugation, the sample was detected with streptavidin magnetic beads overnight. After elution, RNA was extracted and detected by RT-qPCR.

2.13 Western blot analysis

Cells or tissues were added with a lysis buffer (Beyotime) and placed on ice for 20 min. After protein concentration detection based on Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, USA), proteins were separated using 15% SDS-PAGE, loaded onto PVDF membranes, and sealed with 5% skim milk powder for 1 h. Then, E-cadherin (Abcam, ab76319, 1:2000), Vimentin (Abcam, ab92547, 1:2000), or NME1 (Sigma-Aldrich, HPA041113, 1:1000) was incubated overnight at 4 ℃, followed by a secondary antibody (CST, USA) bound to horseradish peroxidase for 1 h at 37 ℃. Color development was done with the ECL kit (ultrassignal, China).

2.14 Animal experiment

The animal experiments were approved by the Animal Protection and Use Committee of Xiangtan Central Hospital (No.20201206N). Four-week-old male BALB/c nude mice (Laboratory Animal Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences) were housed in an SPF-grade laminar flow chamber, with 12/12-h light/dark cycles, and enough foodstuff and water. HONE1 cells (1 × 106) stably knocking down circ_ROBO1 were constructed using circ_ROBO1-targeted shRNA sequence lentiviruses (HanBio, Shanghai, China). Mice were given a subcutaneous injection with HONE1 cells to observe tumor growth or an intravenous injection via the tail vein to detect lung metastasis (10 mice per group). Tumor volume = length × width2 × 0.5. Lungs were harvested from euthanized mice 4 weeks later. The collected samples were analyzed for HE staining, and lung metastatic nodules were observed under an inverted microscope. Severe: ≥ 50% metastatic nodules in the visual field; moderate: 25–50%; mild: less than 25%.

2.15 Statistical analysis

All the experiments were done at least three times. SPSS 19.0 software was adopted for statistical analysis. All measurements were represented as mean ± standard deviation. Data comparisons were done with student t-test or one-way ANOVA and post hoc test. Pearson method was utilized to analyze data correlation. P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

3 Results

3.1 circ_ROBO1 expression in NPC

Based on the GSE143797 dataset, high-throughput sequencing was performed to identify circRNA expression profiles in NPC patients. A total of 93 up-regulated circRNAs and 77 down-regulated circRNAs were identified. circ_ROBO1 was significantly up-regulated in NPC (Fig. 1A). It was found by RT-qPCR that circ_ROBO1 was upregulated in cancer tissues of NPC patients (Fig. 1B). Overexpressed circ_ROBO1 was also found in the 4 NPC cell lines compared to NP69 cell line (Fig. 1C). Moreover, circ_ROBO1 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis and clinical stage in NPC patients (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

circ_ROBO1 expression in NPC. A. Volcano plots of the differentially expressed circRNAs. Horizontal dotted line: P = 0.05 (–log10 scaled); red points: upregulated circRNAs with statistical significance; green points: downregulated circRNAs with statistical significance. B. RT-qPCR detected circ_ROBO1 in 35 pairs of NPC tissues and normal tissues. C. RT-qPCR detected circ_ROBO1 in CNE2, HK1, HONE1, HNE2 and NP69 cells. The data were presented as mean ± SD (P < 0.01). ***

3.2 Expression characteristics of circ_ROBO1 in NPC cells

According to data from CircBase, circ_ROBO1 (hsa_circ_0001946) was derived from exons 3 to 5 of the ROBO1 gene located on chromosome Xq27.1 via reverse folding, with a length of 1485 bp (Fig. 2A). RNAs from HONE1 and HK1 cells were reverse-transcribed using random hexamers or oligomers (dT) 18 primers. The expression of circ_ROBO1 was determined by RT-qPCR in the presence of random hexamer primers (Fig. 2B), demonstrating the absence of poly A tails in circ_ROBO1.circ_ROBO1 and ROBO1 were detected in HONE1 and HK1 cells treated with actinomycin D. The results showed that circ_ROBO1 was more stable than ROBO1 (Fig. 2C). Moreover, circ_ROBO1 was resistant to RNAse R degradation, while ROBO1 mRNA was not (Fig. 2D). Circ_ROBO1 was mainly localized in the cytoplasm of HONE1 and CNE-2 cells (Fig. 2E).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Expression characteristics of circ_ROBO1 in NPC cells. A. circ_ROBO1 gene information. B. RT-qPCR detected circ_ROBO1 and ROBO1 expression. C, D. RT-qPCR detected circ_ROBO1 and ROBO1 expression in cells treated with actinomycin D or RNAse R. E. RT-qPCR detected circ_ROBO1 subcellular location. The data were presented as mean ± SD (P < 0.01). ***

3.3 Downregulating circ_ROBO1 represses NPC cell growth

circ_ROBO1 level was the highest in HONE1 and HK1 cells. Thus, siRNAs targeting circ_ROBO1 (si-circ_ROBO1#1/2) were transfected into HONE1 and HK1 cells. si-circ_ROBO1#2 with high knockout efficiency was utilized in the following cellular assays (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. 1). Data from CCK-8 assay and BrdU analysis showed that HONE1 and HK1 cell proliferation was impaired after circ_ROBO1 silencing (Fig. 3B, C). Transwell test data validated that circ_ROBO1 silencing weakened cellular migration and invasion (Fig. 3D, E). Western blot analysis detected that circ_ROBO1 knockdown inhibited Vimentin and elevated E-cadherin expression in cells (Fig. 3F). Flow cytometry demonstrated that downregulating circ_ROBO1 enhanced apoptosis of NPC cells (Fig. 3G).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Elimination of circ_ROBO1 expression represses NPC cell growth. A. RT-qPCR detected circ_ROBO1 after si-circ_ROBO1#1#2 transfection. B, C. CCK-8 and BrdU assays detected cell proliferation. D, E. Transwell assays detected cell migration and invasion. F. Western blot assayed E-cadherin and Vimentin expression. G. Flow cytometry measured cell apoptosis. The data were presented as mean ± SD (P < 0.01).***

3.4 circ_ROBO1 competes with miR-324-3p

miR-324-3p may be a downstream target of circ_ROBO1 (Fig. 4A), and the binding sites between them were found (Fig. 4B). When detecting luciferase activity, it was measured that miR-324-3p upregulation caused a reduction in luciferase activity of circ_ROBO1-WT, but not affected that of circ_ROBO1-MUT (Fig. 4C). RIP experiments detected the enrichment of circ_ROBO1 and miR-324-3p in the microspheres containing Ago2, but not in those containing IgG (Fig. 4D). In HONE1 and HK1 cells, circ_ROBO1 was pulled down by Bio-miR-324-3p-WT (Fig. 4E). miR-324-3p was lower in NPC tissues than in normal tissues (Fig. 4F). Pearson correlation analysis proved the existence of a negative correlation between miR-324-3p and circ_ROBO1 expression in NPC samples (Fig. 4G).

Fig. 4
figure 4

circ_ROBO1 competes with miR-324-3p. A. Bioinformatics analysis predicted the targeted miRNA downstream of circ_ROBO1. B. The schematic diagram showed the presumed binding site between miR-324-3p and circ_ROBO1. CE. Luciferase reporter gene assay, RIP, and RNA pull-down verified the interaction between miR-324-3p and circ_ROBO1. F. RT-qPCR detected miR-324-3p expression in 35 pairs of NPC tissues and normal tissues. G. Pearson correlation analysis determined the correlation between circ_ROBO1 and miR-324-3p in NPC. The data were presented as mean ± SD (P < 0.01). ***

3.5 miR-324-3p downregulation reverses the effect of knockdown of circ_ROBO1 on NPC cellular progression

miR-324-3p inhibitor lowered miR-324-3p expression in HONE1 and HK1 cells (Fig. 5A). Next, HONE1 and HK1 cells were co-treated with si-circ_ROBO1 and miR-324-3p inhibitor (Fig. 5B). Although knockdown of circ_ROBO1 blocked cellular proliferation, inhibition of miR-324-3p partially offset these effects (Fig. 5C, D). Additionally, inhibition of miR-324-3p expression partially mitigated the effect of circ_ROBO1 knockdown on migration, invasion, and apoptosis of HONE1 and HK1 cells (Fig. 5E–G).

Fig. 5
figure 5

miR-324-3p reduction after knockdown of circ_ROBO1 promotes NPC cellular progression. A. RT-qPCR detected miR-324-3p. B. RT-qPCR detected miR-324-3p after co-transfection. C, D. CCK-8 and BrdU assays detected cell proliferation. E, F. Transwell assays detected cell migration and invasion. G. Flow cytometry measured cell apoptosis. The data were presented as mean ± SD (P < 0.01).***; (P < 0.01).##

3.6 circ_ROBO1 regulates NME1 expression by miR-324-3p

Potential targets of miR-324-3p were identified by bioinformatics databases, and NME1 was finally focused (Fig. 6A, B). NME1 level was higher in NPC tissues than in normal tissues (Fig. 6C). Based on the binding site shared by miR-324-3p and NME1 (Fig. 6D), luciferase activity was determined, showing that miR-324-3p mimic significantly weakened NME1-WT luciferase activity (Fig. 6E). Downregulation of circ_ROBO1 significantly inhibited NME1 protein expression, while inhibiting miR-324-3p partially offset this impact (Fig. 6F).

Fig. 6
figure 6

circ_ROBO1 regulates NME1 by miR-324-3p. A. Venn diagram showed the target of miR-324-3p. B. Predicted target of miR-324-3p. C. RT-qPCR detected NME1 expression in 32 pairs of NPC tissues and normal tissues. D. Binding site between miR-324-3p and NME1 3’UTR. E. Luciferase reporter gene assay verified the interplay between miR-324-3p and NME13. F. Western blot assayed NME1 expression after regulating circ_ROBO1 and miR-324-3p. The data were presented as mean ± SD (P < 0.05; P < 0.01).***

3.7 NME1 upregulation reversed the circ_ROBO1 shRNA-induced inhibition of NPC cell invasion, proliferation and migration

To elucidate the role of NME1, in circ_ROBO1 shRNA-mediated NPC progression, NPC cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-NME1,. As shown in Fig. 7A, B, the NME1, levels in NPC cells were decreased by circ_ROBO1 shRNA, while the effect of sh-circ_ROBO1 on NME1, expression was restored by NME1, overexpression. In addition, the circ_ROBO1 shRNA-induced decrease in NPC cell viability was significantly abolished by NME1, (Fig. 7C). Consistently, the migration and invasion of circ_ROBO1 shRNA-treated NPC cells were obviously increased by the upregulation of NME1, (Fig. 7D). In summary, overexpression of NME1, reversed the circ_ROBO1 shRNA-induced downregulation of NPC cell invasion, proliferation and migration.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Overexpression of NME1 reversed the circCRIM1 shRNA-induced inhibition of NPC cell invasion, proliferation and migration. A. the circ_ROBO1, miR-324-3p and NME1 levels in NPC cells were determined by RT–qPCR. B. The NME1 levels in NPC cells were determined by Western blot. GAPDH was used for normalization. C. NPC cell viability was assessed by the MTT assay. D. NPC cell invasion and migration were assessed by the transwell assay. **P < 0.01. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD)

3.8 circ_ROBO1 stimulates xenograft tumor growth and metastasis

Xenotransplantation experiments confirmed that circ_ROBO1 knockout reduced tumor weight and volume (Fig. 8A, B). In addition, downregulating circ_ROBO1 inhibited circ_ROBO1 and NME1 levels in tumor tissues while elevating miR-324-3p expression (Fig. 8C–E). HE staining validated that knocking down circ_ROBO1 repressed lung metastasis of NPC cells (Fig. 8F).

Fig. 8
figure 8

circ_ROBO1 promotes NPC xenograft tumor growth and metastasis. A. Tumor growth curve. B. Tumor weight. CE. RT-qPCR detected circ_ROBO1, miR-324-3p, and NME1 in tumors. F. HE staining of lung metastatic nodules in mice. The data were presented as mean ± SD (P < 0.01). ***

4 Discussion

circRNAs are related to tumorigenesis [17, 18] and regulate the activities of cells [19]. In recent years, new circRNAs have been confirmed to be abnormally expressed in NPC and are involved in NPC pathogenesis [20,21,22,23,24]. circRNAs act as gene expression regulators and are involved in cancer progression. However, their functions have not been sufficiently investigated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In this work, circ_ROBO1 was upregulated in NPC, and circ_ROBO1 knockdown inhibits NPC cell activities, suggesting that circ_ROBO1 plays a carcinogenic role in NPC.

circRNAs can bait miRNAs and participate in tumor progression by regulating downstream targets of miRNAs. For example, circ_0000215 silencing blocks NPC cell metastasis via competing with miR-512-5p to mediate phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1 [25]. circ-ZNF609 accelerates NPC cell metastasis through miR-150-5p to upregulate Sp1 [20]. This study indicates that miR-324-3p was the direct downstream target of circ_ROBO1. miR-324-3p has been studied to suppress tumor growth in ovarian cancer [26]. Also, miR-324-3p is associated with tumorigenesis, including NPC [27,28,29]. Additionally, miR-324-3p increases the sensitivity of lung adenocarcinoma cells to cisplatin by induction of ferroptosis [30]. In gastric cancer, miR-324-3p is a stimulating factor for the colonization and growth of tumor cells [31]. In this study, miR-324-3p downregulation pattern was determined in NPC, and suppressing miR-324-3p impaired the effect of circ_ROBO1 knockdown on NPC cells.

The NME gene family was the first gene to be discovered as being related to tumor metastasis inhibition. At present, 10 members of the NME gene family have been found, including NME1 ~ NME10 [32]. The NME gene family has conserved domains of nucleoside diphosphokinase function [33] and modulates some physiological and pathological processes [34]. NME1, the most studied member of the NME gene family, is differentially expressed in cancers and indicates an association with tumor metastasis [35]. For example, the interaction of linc00261 with NME1 protects NME1 from degradation and increases NME1 levels, thereby inhibiting tumor metastasis in breast cancer [36]. NME1 expression is upregulated in HCC, and knocking down NME1 inhibits cancer cell malignant biological behaviors [37]. In addition, NME1 also acts as an oncogene in breast cancer and neuroblastoma [38, 39]. This work identified NME1 as a target of miR-324-3p. Downregulating circ_ROBO1 inhibited NME1, while downregulating miR-324-3p restored NME1 expression, implying that circ_ROBO1/miR-324-3p/NME1 network is involved in NPC development.

In summary, circ_ROBO1 level is elevated in NPC and modulates NPC malignancy through the miR-324-3p/NME1 axis. Useful information can be obtained from this work to explain circ_ROBO1-related mechanism in NPC, thereafter confirming circ_ROBO1 as a potential target for NPC management. There are still some shortcomings in this study. NPC cells are used for functional experiments and mechanism studies in the later stage about NME1, and other NPC cell lines can be added for similar experiments in the later stage to further confirm the research conclusion. In addition, whether circ_ROBO1 plays a role in the clinicopathological progression of tumor TNM staging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients needs further clinical studies and in vivo experiments to verify. Finally, because of circ_ROBO1’s covalent ring structure, circ_ROBO1 is not easily degraded by exocentase, indicating that circ_ROBO1 is structurally stable. Therefore, it is expected to be a molecular marker for the study of early diagnosis and prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the lack of relevant literature support and data reference, we will continue to verify its functional relationship with the occurrence and development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.