Abstract
Polymer concrete is a relatively new type of concrete in which polymer is used as a binder. This paper investigates the effect of compositions on the tensile strength and mode-I fracture toughness of polymer concrete (PC) and fiber-reinforced polymer concrete (FRPC). According to the literature, the range of compounds (in unit weight) is selected 15 to 25% for resin, 0 to 2% for fibers, 45 to 55% for fine aggregates, and 25 to 35% for fine and coarse aggregates. Using a design of experiment software, 198 specimens made of 66 different mixture designs have been designed, prepared, and tested. The results show that reducing the size of aggregates, increasing fiber content, and increasing resin content increase the tensile strength and fracture toughness. Results show that fiber reinforcement effect on mixtures with higher resin and smaller aggregates content is more promising. In addition, the minimum resin content for PC and FRPC materials is about 12.5%. In addition, the results show that the optimal percentage of fiber depends on the percentage of resin; in a mixture with 15%, optimum resin content is equal to 1.5%, and in a mixture, with 25%, optimum resin content is equal to 4.0%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Different kinds of concretes are widely used in the construction industry. As the most widely used type of concrete, cement concrete has noticeable disadvantages, such as poor tensile strength, high porosity, and sensitivity to environmental conditions. Polymer concrete (PC) is a relatively new generation of concrete; manufactured by mixing a polymeric adhesive and aggregates (Asdollah-Tabar et al. 2021; Mehmet et al. 2017; Huang et al. 2017). In comparison with ordinary cement concrete, PC properties such as strength, adhesion, water tightness, chemical resistance, freeze–thaw durability, and abrasion resistance improved noticeably; hence, this is a suit material for the construction and repairing of many structures and infrastructures such as hydraulic or offshore structures or even road pavements and overlays (Martínez-Barrera et al. 2019; Seco et al. 2020; Ohama 2008; Sun et al. 2018). Fiber-reinforced polymer concrete (FRPC) is a polymer-based concrete composite that randomly distributed short fibers are used to strengthen its matrix. FRPC is stronger and more durable and has higher tensile and flexural strength values than polymer concrete (Küçük et al. 2019; Ghassemi and Toufigh 2020; Ferdous et al. 2020).
Such as cement in cement concrete and bitumen in asphalt concrete, in PC and FRPC materials, polymer binders, or liquid resin provide a firm matrix and create a strong bond between the aggregates and fibers (Hajiloo, et al. 2022; Saed et al. 2022; Dong et al. 2014; Seco et al. 2020). Considering the cost, availability of materials, and required mechanical and strength properties, different polymeric resins are usually used for manufacturing polymer concrete materials (ACI Committee 548 1997; Anand et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2020). Epoxy, polyester, methacrylate, and polyurethane resin are among the commonly used polymers for manufacturing PC and FRPC materials (Huang et al. 2021; Heidarnezhad et al. 2020; Reis 2009).
Large proportions of resin in polymer concrete mixtures are not common, because the high price of resins makes structures uneconomical. To overcome this issue, adding high proportions of aggregates is a common method. In this condition, PC strength affects by aggregate (especially reduction of tensile strength and cracking resistance), so the addition of fiber appears as a solution (Ohama 2008; Golestaneh et al. 2010).
Mineral admixtures and industrial aggregates (i.e., limestone, basalt, silica, quartz, granite, fly ash, slag, or silica fume) can be added to a polymeric matrix, and by using them, properties of PC in liquid and hardened states (i.e., shrinkage deformation, density, or strength) can be controlled. However, due to the excellent characteristics of the epoxy resin matrix, the added aggregate must be very durable and has suit mechanical behavior (Marinela et al. Jul. 2010; Shams and El-Hajjar 2013; Reis and Ferreira 2003a). A suitable gradation of aggregates is also important; it results in fewer air voids, minimizes the amount of resin required to generate proper adherences between the aggregate particles, and results in a more economical PC (Ohama 2008; Muthukumar and Mohan 2004; Castro et al. 2020).
As said, fiber addition is a common method for reinforcing polymeric concrete mixtures (Moreira et al. 2016; Nunes and Reis 2012); however, the influence of fibers may strongly depend on the type, shape, and percentage of fibers used in the mixture. The two main types of fibers commonly used in the mixture of polymeric concrete materials are glass fibers and carbon fiber (Reis and Ferreira 2006a; Naser et al. 2019; Belnoue et al. 2021; Lee et al. 2016).
Cracking is one of the major failure modes in brittle and quasi-brittle materials. Along with the compressive and tensile strength as two primary parameters to evaluate the behavior of a material, fracture toughness as a parameter that describes the resistance of a material to cracking is an important mechanical characteristic (Chen et al. 2011; Aliha et al. 2022a; Reis and Jurumenh Sep. 2011; Reis et al. 2011).
Several researchers have investigated the effect of ingredients on the behavior of PC and FRPC materials. For example, Niaki et al. (Niaki et al. 2018) investigated the effect of clay nanoparticles and basalt fiber on the mechanical behavior (compressive, flexural, splitting, and impact strength) of polymer concrete (PC) made of epoxy resin. Results showed basalt fiber increased the mechanical strength and increased the thermal stability of FRPC. At the same time, clay nanoparticles improve the compressive strength, flexural strength, and impact strength but decrease the tensile strength of the PC.
Seco et al. (2020) investigate the effect of adding alumina filler and ladle slag as two metallurgical wastes on the fresh and cured properties of polyester-based polymer concretes. The consistency test showed low representativeness of the recycled fresh mix’s workability. The mixtures containing alumina filler and ladle slag showed higher shrinkages than those containing sand. In addition, the density of the cured samples was measured in the range of 1.59–1.91 g/cm3. Results also show that the flexural strength of polyester polymer concretes containing alumina filler and sand reached 10.93 and 11.02 kN, respectively, while the ladle slag contained mixture showed 19.31 kN flexural strength. The alumina filler and sand contained mixture compressive strength reached 104.2 and 106.2 MPa, respectively, while the ladle slag contained mixture achieved 160.5 MPa.
Bulut and Sahin (2017) investigated the effects of electronic plastic waste (e-plastic) addition on the mechanical properties of unsaturated polyester-based polymer concrete. E-plastic was used as a part of the filler and fine-graded materials. The ratio of resin to filling material has been assumed as 10–90%, 15–85%, and 20–80%, and the e-plastic to aggregates ratio has been decided to be 0%, 5%, 15%, and 25%. Results show that an increase in resin content increases the compressive strength but does not cause a significant increase or decrease in the flexural and splitting tensile strength. Compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strength values decrease as the amount of e-plastic content increases. In contrast, increases in electronic plastic waste increase the polymer concrete ductility.
Simsek and Uygunoglu (2016) used a multi-response optimization method to achieve an acceptable level of compressive strength of PC material. In their study workability, mechanical and thermal properties with different polymer binders (thermoplastic polyurethane, polycarbonate, and polybutylene terephthalate) were analyzed and optimized using a full-factorial design-based desirability function approach. The results show that polycarbonate-based PC has the lowest thermal conductivity, and thermoplastic polyurethane and polycarbonate significantly reduce the percentage of water absorption. It was concluded that experimental designs, which take into account interaction effects, such as full factorial design, should be used to determine the optimal mixture parameters of polymer concrete.
Among the researchers, Reis and Ferreira (2004a, b, 2003b) comprehensively studied the fracture behavior of PC and FRPC mixtures. Reis and Ferreira studied the fracture parameters of different glass fiber reinforced polymer concrete materials. Results have shown that fracture resistance can be improved due to the addition of short fibers. For example, according to their findings, the glass fiber reinforcement can improve the fracture toughness and modulus of elasticity up to 13 and 39%, respectively. Their study also shows that unlike conventional PC materials (which behave completely brittle), the fiber addition can change the behavior from brittle to quasi-brittle and noticeably the post-peak failure behavior. Reis and Ferreira (2006b) also evaluated the effect of environmental conditions (atmospheric exposure, freeze–thaw cycle, and temperature cycles) on the fracture properties of polymer concrete materials. Results show that the glass fiber reinforcement enhanced the resistance of FRPC against exposure, and almost no degradation is seen. The flexural elasticity decreases by increasing the temperature, and the failure becomes more ductile and enhances fracture toughness value (after 100 thermal cycles, the fracture toughness of epoxy polymer concrete increases up to 33%). Reis (2006) also studied the effect of chopped natural fibers on FRPC materials. Results showed that coconut fiber and sugar cane bagasse fiber increase fracture toughness and fracture energy of PC, but banana pseudostem fiber does not enhance fracture toughness and only increases fracture energy value.
Aliha et al. (2012a) investigated the tensile strength and fracture toughness of polymer concrete (epoxy-based polymer concrete reinforced chopped glass fiber) using cracked and un-cracked semi-circular bend (SCB) specimens. They showed that cracked and uncracked SCB specimens are suitable specimens for measuring tensile strength and fracture toughness. They state that the SCB samples need less material than the rectangular bend beam specimen previously used by researchers.
In the most recent research by Karimi and Aliha (2021) and Aliha et al. (2022a, b), the mode-I and mode-II fracture parameters for PC and FRPC materials were investigated. They used SCB specimens made of several mixed designs to formulate the relationship between fracture toughness and fracture energies in pure mode-I and mode-II conditions using statistical methods such as trend and cluster analysis. Their study shows that there is a strong relationship between mentioned parameters. Also, they showed that the fiber reinforcement significantly affects the fracture behavior of FRPC material, especially in mode-I conditions.
Generally, polymer concrete is made of at least 3 or 4 ingredients (i.e., resin, fine aggregates, coarse aggregate, and sometimes fiber or additives). Such ingredients have different shapes, percentages, and different mechanical behaviors. Same as other composite materials, each ingredient affects the mechanical properties of the final material; indeed, increasing or decreasing the percentages of the compositions changes properties such as ductility or brittleness and can affect significantly (Reis et al. 2003; Douba et al. 2612; Aliha et al. 2012; Nunes and Reis 2014). However, most of the previous research used fixed or limited mix designs to characterize the mechanical properties of the PC materials, and the effect of PC mix-design on the mechanical parameters and fracture toughness of PC materials has not been comprehensively investigated.
In this research using experimental design software, 66 PC mixtures with different percentages of ingredients were designed, prepared, and tested. In these mix designs, the percentage of resin, fine and coarse aggregate, and fiber materials are assumed as variable parameters to investigate their effect on mechanical and fracture behaviors. In the current study, both fracture toughness and tensile strength values are evaluated using SCB specimen (in pre-cracked and intact conditions), while pre-cracked SCB specimen as a simple and easy to prepare specimen used by many researchers to obtain fracture toughness, but intact SCB specimen is used less frequently to obtain tensile strength. Besides typical evaluations such as evaluation of the effect of resin content or fiber content on strength parameters of mixture which enable the comparison of data with other researches, in this study, some firstly conducted evaluations such a determination of minimum resin content required to develop the matrix or the effect of size of the aggregates is reported.
Experimental procedure
The epoxy resin produced by Iranian Mokarrar Co. with a commercial code of M-20 was used in current research for manufacturing the PC material. Table 1 shows the properties of resin (presented by the manufacturer) used for manufacturing the samples.
In PC materials, high-strength aggregates must be used to prevent the matrix from weakening due to the addition of aggregates. In the current study, siliceous aggregate as a high-strength material was used. This aggregate was supplied from Kavyan Industry and Stone Company (Iran). Aggregates were sorted as two fine and coarse graded aggregates. The aggregate gradation is given in Fig. 1.
Based on data presented by the producer company, the chemical composition of aggregates has been given in Table 2.
E-glass fibers used for reinforcing the PC mixture has a diameter of 13 µm and chopped in the length of 6 mm. Same as other ingredients, the fibers are randomly distributed in the mixtures. The chopped glass fibers and silica aggregates are shown in Fig. 2.
To investigate the effect of ingredients on the behavior of PC and FRPC materials, suitable ranges of resin, aggregate, and fiber ingredients should be considered. Some researchers have focused on obtaining the acceptable range of input mix design parameters and optimum percentages of ingredients. For example, by performing some mechanical tests, Shokrieh et al. obtained the optimum percentages of ingredients: epoxy resin 19%, coarse aggregates 48.3%, fine aggregates 32.2%, and glass fiber 0.5% of weight unit (Shokrieh et al. 2011). Other researchers such as Karimi and Aliha, Aliha et al., Ribeiro et al., or Reis and Ferreira also state the similar optimum mix design with nearly the same ranges for the percentages of PC ingredients (Aliha et al. 2022a, b; Reis and Ferreira 2003b; Karimi and Aliha 2021; Ribeiro et al. 2003; Heidari-Rarani and Bashandeh-Khodaei-Naeini 2018).
This paper chose the minimum and maximum range of variables to oscillate ± 5% of the optimum percentage values reported in the previous works. Therefore, percentages of ingredients were varied in the ranges of coarse aggregates 45 to 55% of weight unit, fine aggregates 25 to 35% of weight unit, epoxy resin 15 to 25% of weight unit, and e-glass fibers 0 to 2% of weight unit.
The range of ingredients was used as input variables to design several PC and FRPC mixtures. Considering the percentages of ingredients in the mentioned ranges, mix designs must satisfy the following design requirement:
To achieve this purpose, the design of experiment (DOE) module of the Minitab software was used. Besides the design of experiments based on input variables, DOE programs were used to assess the effects of input variables on output variables. Such experiments mainly consist of a series of tests that make purposeful changes to the input variables. According to the percentages mentioned in the previous section, mixing designs were obtained from the full factorial design by considering the percentage of resin, fibers, and coarse and fine aggregates as variable factors. To investigate the effect of aggregate sizes on the results, a parameter called the aggregate coarseness ratio (β) is defined as follows. The higher the β value, the finer the granulation in the mixture.
Among the feasible PC mix-designs obtained from the requirements and constraints, a total number of 66 mix-designs was chosen (shown in Table 3) for manufacturing the PC specimens (after eliminating invalid mixing designs) and conducting the experiments. The mixture ID was chosen as two parts, letters and a number. The letters are present the resin content, including ultra-low (UL) for mixtures with 15% resin content, low (L) and moderate-low (ML) for mixtures with 17 and 19% resin content, and also moderate-high (MH), high (H), and ultra-high (UH) for mixtures with 21, 23, and 25% resing content respectively. The following number in the mixture’s ID shows the mixture aggregate coarseness ratio (previously defined by β).
Test configuration
Experimental studies on actual components are often expensive and challenging, so researchers prefer to use laboratory specimens. There are several specimens to investigate the behavior of brittle materials such as edge-notched disc bend (ENDB) specimen (Aliha and Pour 2020; Mansourian et al. 2018; Fuan et al. 2021; He et al. 2021; Haghighat Pour et al. 2018; Aliha et al. 2018, 2016; Pirmohammad and Bayat 2016, 2017; Motamedi et al. 2020; Najjar et al. 2020; Eghbali et al. 2019), edge-notched diametrically compressed (ENDC) disc specimen (Aliha et al. 2017a; Bahmani et al. 2021), edge crack torsion (ECT) specimen (Ahmadi-Moghadam and Taheri 2015), Modified compact tension specimen (Feng et al. 1993; Wang et al. 2020), compact, double notch diametral compression (DNDC) specimen (Mohammad Aliha et al. 2021), U-notch diametral compression (UNDC) specimen (Mohammad Aliha et al. 2021), rectangular beams subjected to three or four-point bend loading (Reis and Ferreira 2004a, 2003b; Guzlena and Sakale 2021; Avci et al. 2005; Krause and Fuller 1984; Kim et al. 2011; Aliha et al., 2021), semi-circular bend (SCB) specimen (Aliha et al. 2012a), and Brazilian disc (BD) specimen (Asdollah-Tabar et al. 2021; Martínez-López et al. 2016). However, a suitable fracture specimen has a simple geometry, easy preparation, and simple test setup. In this study, the SCB specimen is used for obtaining the mechanical and fracture parameters of the PC and FRPC material. The SCB specimens are favorite because of their advantages, such as ease of casting and introducing the pre-crack, ease of testing, and lesser amount of material required for manufacturing the test sample. This type of specimen is suitable for conducting experiments on other construction and building materials such as asphalt concrete, polymer concrete, and cement concrete (Aliha et al. 2012a, 2020, 2017b; Fuan et al. 2021; He et al. 2021; Fattahi Amirdehi et al. 2019; Ameri et al. Jul. 2016; Fakhri et al. 2018a, 2020, 2018b; Aliha 2019; Mirsayar et al. Jan. 2017; Razmi and Mirsayar 2017; Yang et al. 2021; Somé et al. 2018; Aliha et al. Mar. 2020; Ziari et al. 2020; Xiongzhou et al. 2021; Mahdavi et al. 2020) and also geo-materials such as rocks (Aliha et al. 2012b, 2021; Aliha and Ayatollahi 2011; Mirsayar et al. 2018; Akbardoost et al. 2014; Aliha and Ayatollahi May 2013). In addition, the previously used test samples for investigating the behavior of PC materials are rectangular beams subjected to three or four-point bend loading (Reis and Ferreira 2004a, 2003b; Guzlena and Sakale 2021; Avci et al. 2005; Krause and Fuller 1984; Kim et al. 2011), semi-circular bend (SCB) specimen (Aliha et al. 2012a), and Brazilian disc (BD) specimen subjected to diametral compression (Asdollah-Tabar et al. 2021; Martínez-López et al. 2016).
Figure 3 illustrates two SCB specimens with and without pre-crack to measure fracture and tensile strength, respectively. Previously, Aliha et al. used these specimens to investigate the tensile strength and fracture resistance of a PC material with a fixed composition and mixture (Aliha et al. 2012a).
Although applied load for the test of SCB specimen is compressive, the stresses in specific locations of specimen become tensile (i.e., middle of the bottom edge of the SCB specimen in un-cracked SCB and tip of the crack in pre-cracked SCB). Due to these tensile stresses, the specimen is split into two halves at a critical level of the applied load. Consequently, the maximum critical tensile stress can determine material tensile strength. The mentioned method is called the indirect test method, and such method is often used for brittle and quasi-brittle materials, weak against the direct tensile loads.
Mode-I fracture is simulated by test in symmetric loading conditions. Due to load application, the stresses in the crack tip become tensile, and at a certain level of applied load, the specimen splits. The critical stress intensity factor of this specimen under mode-I condition that is known as fracture toughness (KIc), is determined from the following equation based on the framework of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) concept (Ayatollahi and Aliha 2006):
where r and t are the radius and thickness of the specimen, and a is the length of the crack; also Pf is the fracture load, and YSCB is the geometry factor for the SCB specimen that is a function of a/R and S/R (S is the span of supports). Based on Ayatollahi and Aliha (2006), the corresponding value of YSCB for the testing conditions (a/R = 0.3 and S/R = 0.6) was equal to 3.3.
The tensile strength of materials using the uncracked SCB specimen can be determined (Aliha et al. 2012a). Using the maximum load for un-cracked SCB specimen, the tensile strength (σt) value can be calculated from Eq. (4).
The ingredients with the given percentages were adequately mixed and then cast inside the PVC molds for manufacturing the test specimens. The diameter and heights of semi-circular specimens were 100 and 30 mm, respectively. After hardening the samples (24 h), the specimens were de-molded and cured in an 80 °C oven for 1 h. In fracture test specimens, a pre-crack of length 15 mm was introduced in the middle of the flat surface of each specimen using a narrow saw blade. A servo-hydraulic test machine loaded the samples with a constant span of 2S = 60 mm and a 1 mm/min loading rate for conducting the tests. Figure 4 shows the specimen placed in the loading machine.
Results and discussion
As expected, for the tensile strength and mode-I fracture tests, a vertical crack was developed in all tested specimens (e.g., Fig. 5). Close observations of fracture surface show that a suit number of fibers appear and fail on crack propagation surface. The crack path majorly crossed the resin region, and a small number of aggregates were fractured; this indicates the strength of silica aggregates.
Based on the loads obtained by the fracture and tensile strength tests, the fracture toughness and tensile strength of each mix-design are calculated and presented in Table 4.
Figure 6 shows the influence of fiber and resin values on the fracture toughness and tensile strength of PC materials. In this figure, order-2 polynomial trend lines were drawn on the data points for further evaluation. As seen, the fracture toughness and tensile strength of mixtures increase with the addition of glass fiber; however, this increase depends on resin content. With the increase of resin content, the optimum percentage of fiber rises, so that in mixtures with 15% resin content, the optimum fiber percentage is about 1.5%, while with an increase of resin percentage to 25%, the optimum fiber content is obtained as about 4%. In explaining such behavior, it can be said that, in mixtures with low resin content, the amount of resin to cover the outer surface of the fiber is limited, and adding more fiber does not increase the strength. While with the increase of resin, the amount of resin to cover the outer surface of the fiber has increased, and a higher percentage of fiber can be used.
Figure 7 shows the trends of optimum fiber percentage obtained from Fig. 6. This figure shows that the trend of optimum fiber percentage obtained from both fracture toughness and tensile strength are similar. From the trends, it can be understood that the maximum fiber content that positively influences the FRPC mixture is about 4.1%.
Figure 8 shows resin percentage influence on fracture toughness and tensile strength of PC materials with different fiber percentages. The figure shows that the fracture toughness and tensile strength increase with the increase of resin content. However, this increase has a nonlinear relationship with resin content based on fiber percentage. The highest fracture toughness measured in the mixture without the fiber is limited to 1.75 MPa√m (seen in the mixture with 25% resin). On the other hand, the highest fracture toughness measured in a mixture with 1% and 2% fiber reached 2.06 and 2.26 MPa√m, respectively. Also, the highest tensile strength measured in the mixture without the fiber is 17 MPa, (seen in the mixture with about 25% resin). On the other hand, the highest tensile strength measured for mixtures with 1 and 2 fiber percentages reaches 19.2 and 21.4 MPa, respectively.
Based on extrapolations, fracture toughness and tensile strength of mixtures can be increased further by increasing the resin content to about 30%. In addition, it can be seen that the minimum resin content in both PC and FRPC materials is about 13%; and the resin content below this percentage is unable to develop a proper matrix between ingredients.
Observation of specimens and their fracture surface shows the effect of resin content on the resulted mixture and specimens. As seen in Fig. 9a, an H specimen made with 23% resin content has a more uniform state with lower air voids than an L specimen with 17% resin content. This increase in air voids due to a decrease in resin content can also be seen in the fractured surface of specimens, so as can be seen in Fig. 9b, a considerable number of air voids can be seen in the mid-section of an L series specimen.
Figure 10 shows the influence of aggregate size on fracture toughness and tensile strength of PC materials with different resin percentages. From this figure, it can be understood that with the decrease in aggregate sizes (lower β value), the fracture toughness and tensile strength of the mixture increase. However, increasing the outer surface due to the reduction of aggregate size increases the minimum resin content (13% for β = 1.5 and 14% for β = 14%). In other words, although the minimum resin content for PC made of finer aggregates is slightly higher, in mixtures with higher resin contents, the strength of the mixture made of finer aggregates is higher.
Comparison with other studies
For decades, several researchers have evaluated the mechanical strength of polymer concretes containing different types, sizes, or percentages of aggregates, fillers, and fibers. To assess the mechanical characteristics of PC material evaluated in the current study, the results of some of the related investigations are compared with data obtained in the current study (Fig. 11). These researchers used different types of epoxy resin to produce polymer concrete with different fibers or fillers. As seen, most of these researches obtained the tensile strength and fracture toughness in the same range (about 5 to 25 MPa for tensile strength and 0.62 to 4.0 MPa√m for fracture toughness), which is in agreement with the range of results of the current study (about 3.9 to 22. MPa for tensile strength and 0.48 to 2.36 MPa√m for fracture toughness).
Conclusion
The current paper studied the effect of percentages of ingredients (i.e., resin, fine and coarse silica aggregates, and E-glass fibers) on tensile strength and fracture toughness experimentally. Using SCB specimen, different mixes made of 15 to 25% resin, 45 to 55% coarse aggregate, 35 to 45% fine aggregate, and 0 to 2% short fiber were tested. Based on the results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
-
The experimental results show the noticeable influence of mixture compositions on the fracture load and tested polymer concrete materials. All the compositions affect resulted strengths; however, the effect of resin content is more significant.
-
Results showed that the FRPC fracture toughness and tensile strength values increase with increasing the fiber percentages and resin percentage; however, the addition of fiber more than a certain amount (optimum percentage) has a negative effect on the strength of the mixture. Results show that with the increase of resin content from 15 to 25%, fracture toughness and tensile strength increase by about 250 and 325%, respectively.
-
The optimum fiber percentage is highly dependent on resin content. In mixtures with 15% resin content, the optimum fiber content is about 1.5%, and with the increase of resin content to 25%, the optimum fiber content increase to about 4.0%. In other words, by increasing the proportion of the matrix relative to the other ingredients, the acceptance of the fiber in the matrix increases.
-
The minimum resin content for PC and FRPC material is about 12%. However, the size of the aggregate affects the minimum resin content required for the development of the matrix, so that the minimum resin content for the mixture made of fines aggregates (used in the current study) is about 2% higher than the minimum resin content for the coarsest aggregates used in the current study. Such behavior can be related to the higher outer surface of the finer aggregates and the higher required resin content to develop a firm matrix.
References
ACI Committee 548 (1997) Guide for the use of polymers in concrete. Aci 548.1R-97
Ahmadi-Moghadam B, Taheri F (2015) Influence of graphene nanoplatelets on modes I, II and III interlaminar fracture toughness of fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Eng Fract Mech 143:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.026
Akbardoost J, Ayatollahi MR, Aliha MRM, Pavier MJ, Smith DJ (2014) Size-dependent fracture behavior of Guiting limestone under mixed mode loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 71:369–380
Aliha MRM (2019) On predicting mode II fracture toughness (KIIc) of hot mix asphalt mixtures using the strain energy density criterion. Theor Appl Fract Mech 99:36–43
Aliha MRM, Ayatollahi MR (2011) Mixed mode I/II brittle fracture evaluation of marble using SCB specimen. Procedia Eng 10:311–318
Aliha MRM, Ayatollahi MR (2013) Two-parameter fracture analysis of SCB rock specimen under mixed mode loading. Eng Fract Mech 103:115–123
Aliha MRM, Pour PJH (2020) Fracture resistance study for hot mix asphalt mixture under out of plane sliding mode. Eng Fract Mech 238:107230
Aliha MRM, Heidari-Rarani M, Shokrieh M, Ayatollahi MR (2012) Determination of tensile strength and crack growth of a typical polymer concrete using circular disc samples. J Mech Res Appl 4:49–56
Aliha MRM, Heidari-Rarani M, Shokrieh MM, Ayatollahi MR (2012a) Experimental determination of tensile strength and KIc of polymer concretes using semi-circular bend (SCB) specimens. Struct Eng Mech. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.43.6.823
Aliha MRM, Sistaninia M, Smith DJ, Pavier MJ, Ayatollahi MR (2012b) Geometry effects and statistical analysis of mode I fracture in guiting limestone. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 51:128–135
Aliha MRM, Bahmani A, Akhondi S (2016) A novel test specimen for investigating the mixed mode I+III fracture toughness of hot mix asphalt composites – experimental and theoretical study. Int J Solids Struct 90:167–177
Aliha MRM, Sarbijan MJ, Bahmani A (2017a) Fracture toughness determination of modified HMA mixtures with two novel disc shape configurations. Constr Build Mater 155:789–799
Aliha MRM, Razmi A, Mansourian A (2017b) The influence of natural and synthetic fibers on low temperature mixed mode I+II fracture behavior of warm mix asphalt (WMA) materials. Eng Fract Mech 182:322–336
Aliha MRM, Linul E, Bahmani A, Marsavina L (2018) Experimental and theoretical fracture toughness investigation of PUR foams under mixed mode I+III loading. Polym Test 67:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.02.015
Aliha MRM, Ziari H, Mojaradi B, Sarbijan MJ (2020) Modes I and II stress intensity factors of semi-circular bend specimen computed for two-phase aggregate/mastic asphalt mixtures. Theor Appl Fract Mech 106:102437
Aliha MRM, Ebneabbasi P, Reza Karimi H, Nikbakht E (2021) A novel test device for the direct measurement of tensile strength of rock using ring shape sample. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 139:104649
Aliha MRM, Imani DM, Salehi SM, Shojaee M, Abedi M (2022a) Mixture optimization of epoxy base concrete for achieving highest fracture toughness and fracture energy values using Taguchi method. Compos Commun 32:101150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2022.101150
Aliha MRM, Karimi HR, Abedi M (2022b) The role of mix design and short glass fiber content on mode-I cracking characteristics of polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 316:125590
Aliha MRM, Ziari H, Mojaradi B, Sarbijan MJ (2020) Heterogeneity effects on mixed-mode I/II stress intensity factors and fracture path of laboratory asphalt mixtures in the shape of SCB specimen. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 43(3):586–604
Aliha MRM, Reza Karimi H, and Ghoreishi SMN (2021) Design and validation of simple bend beam specimen for covering the full range of I+II fracture modes. Eur J Mech - A/Solids 104425
Ameri M, Nowbakht S, Molayem M, Aliha MRM (2016) Investigation of fatigue and fracture properties of asphalt mixtures modified with carbon nanotubes. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 39(7):896–906
Anand A, Banerjee P, Sahoo D, Rathore DK, Prusty RK, Ray BC (2019) Effects of temperature and load on the creep performance of CNT reinforced laminated glass fiber/epoxy composites. Int J Mech Sci 150:539–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.048
Asdollah-Tabar M, Heidari-Rarani M, Aliha MRM (2021) The effect of recycled PET bottles on the fracture toughness of polymer concrete. Compos Commun 25:100684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2021.100684
Avci A, Akdemir A, Arikan H (2005) Mixed-mode fracture behavior of glass fiber reinforced polymer concrete. Cem Concr Res 35(2):243–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.003
Ayatollahi MR, Aliha MRM (2006) On determination of mode II fracture toughness using semi-circular bend specimen. Int J Solids Struct 43(17):5217–5227
Bahmani A, Farahmand F, Janbaz MR, Darbandi AH, Ghesmati-Kucheki H, Aliha MRM (2021) On the comparison of two mixed-mode I + III fracture test specimens. Eng Fract Mech 241:107434
Belnoue JP-H, Valverde MA, Onoufriou M, (Ric) Sun X, Ivanov DS, Hallett SR (2021) On the physical relevance of power law-based equations to describe the compaction behaviour of resin infused fibrous materials. Int J Mech Sci 199:106425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106425
Bulut HA, Şahin R (2017) A Study on mechanical properties of polymer concrete containing electronic plastic waste. Compos Struct 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.058
Castro RG, Amorim FC, Reis J (2020) Effects of fiber length on the performance of piassava-reinforced epoxy composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 234:146442072094498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420720944982
Chen Z, Adams RD, da Silva LFM (2011) Fracture toughness of bulk adhesives in mode I and mode III and curing effect. Int J Fract 167(2):221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-010-9547-9
Choi W-C, Jung K-Y, Jang S-J, Yun H-D (2019) The influence of steel fiber tensile strengths and aspect ratios on the fracture properties of high-strength concrete. Mater (Basel, Switzerland) 12(13):2105
Dong W, Liu H-C, Park S-J, Jin F-L (2014) Fracture toughness improvement of epoxy resins with short carbon fibers. J Ind Eng Chem 20(4):1220–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.06.053
Douba A, Emiroglu M, Tarefder R, Kandil U, Reda Taha M (2017) Use of carbon nanotubes to improve fracture toughness of polymer concrete. Transp Res Rec J Transp ResBoard 2612:96–103. https://doi.org/10.3141/2612-11
Eghbali MR, Fallah Tafti M, Aliha MRM, Motamedi H (2019) The effect of ENDB specimen geometry on mode I fracture toughness and fracture energy of HMA and SMA mixtures at low temperatures. Eng Fract Mech 216:106496
Emiroglu M, Douba AE, Tarefder RA, Kandil UF, Taha MR (2017) New polymer concrete with superior ductility and fracture toughness using alumina nanoparticles. J Mater Civ Eng 29(8):4017069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001894
Fakhri M, Haghighat Kharrazi E, Aliha MRM (2018a) Mixed mode tensile – in plane shear fracture energy determination for hot mix asphalt mixtures under intermediate temperature conditions. Eng Fract Mech 192:98–113
Fakhri M, Haghighat Kharrazi E, Aliha MRM, Berto F (2018b) The effect of loading rate on fracture energy of asphalt mixture at intermediate temperatures and under different loading modes”. Frat Ed Integrita Strutt 12:113–132
Fakhri M, Ali Siyadati S, Aliha MRM (2020) Impact of freeze–thaw cycles on low temperature mixed mode I/II cracking properties of water saturated hot mix asphalt: an experimental study. Constr Build Mater 261:119939
FattahiAmirdehi HR, Aliha MRM, Moniri A, Torabi AR (2019) Using the generalized maximum tangential stress criterion to predict mode II fracture of hot mix asphalt in terms of mode I results – a statistical analysis. Constr Build Mater 213:483–491
Feng X, Kumar AM, Hirth JP (1993) Mixed mode I/III fracture toughness of 2034 aluminum alloys. Acta Metall Mater 41(9):2755–2764. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(93)90144-H
Ferdous W et al (2020) Optimal design for epoxy polymer concrete based on mechanical properties and durability aspects. Constr Build Mater 232:117229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117229
Fuan S, Ke M, Kanghe L, Kun L, Aliha MRM (2021) Influence of specimen geometry on mode I fracture toughness of asphalt concrete. Constr Build Mater 276:122181
Ghassemi P, Toufigh V (2020) Durability of epoxy polymer and ordinary cement concrete in aggressive environments. Constr Build Mater 234:117887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117887
Golestaneh M, Amini G, Najafpour G, HosseinaliBeygi M (2010) Evaluation of mechanical strength of epoxy polymer concrete with silica powder as filler. World Appl Sci J 9:216–220
Guzlena S, Sakale G (2021) Self-healing of glass fibre reinforced concrete (GRC) and polymer glass fibre reinforced concrete (PGRC) using crystalline admixtures. Constr Build Mater 267:120963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120963
Haghighat Pour PJ, Aliha MRM, Keymanesh MR (2018) Evaluating mode I fracture resistance in asphalt mixtures using edge notched disc bend ENDB specimen with different geometrical and environmental conditions. Eng Fract Mech 190:245–258
Hajiloo HR et al (2022) Crack resistance of fiber-reinforced asphalt mixtures: effect of test specimen and test condition. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13647
He J, Liu L, Yang H, Aliha MRM, Karimi HR (2021) Contribution of interface fracture mechanism on fracture propagation trajectory of heterogeneous asphalt composites. Appl Sci 11(7)
Heidari-Rarani M, Bashandeh-Khodaei-Naeini K (2018) Micromechanics based damage model for predicting compression behavior of polymer concretes. Mech Mater 117:126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.11.004
Heidarnezhad F, Jafari K, Ozbakkaloglu T (2020) Effect of polymer content and temperature on mechanical properties of lightweight polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 260:119853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119853
Huang H et al (2017) Experimental study on low temperature tensile properties of epoxy mortar in hydropower project. Energy Proc 105:1205–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.414
Huang H et al (2021) Influence of hard segment content and soft segment length on the microphase structure and mechanical performance of polyurethane-based polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 284:122388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122388
Karimi HR, Aliha MRM (2021) Statistical assessment on relationship between fracture parameters of plain and fiber reinforced polymer concrete materials. Compos Commun 28:100969
M. Kim, Y. Lee, H.-C. Kim, A. Scanlon, and J. Lee (2011) Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) bars. Struct EngMech 38. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.38.4.459
Krause RF, Fuller ER (1984) Fracture toughness of polymer concrete materials using various chevron-notched configurations. In: Underwood JH, Freiman SW, Baratta FI (eds) Chevron-Notched Specimens: Testing and Stress Analysis. West Conshohocken, ASTM International, pp 309–323
Küçük VA et al (2019) Thermal, electrical and mechanical properties of filler-doped polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 226:188–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.256
Lee SK, Kim MW, Park CJ, Chol MJ, Kim G, Cho J-M (2016) Effect of fiber orientation on acoustic and vibration response of a carbon fiber/epoxy composite plate: natural vibration mode and sound radiation. Int J Mech Sci 117:162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.08.023
Lee S-C, Oh J-H, Cho J-Y (2015) Compressive behavior of fiber-reinforced concrete with end-hooked steel fibers. Materials 8(4)
Mahdavi E, Aliha MRM, Bahrami B, Ayatollahi MR (2020) Comprehensive data for stress intensity factor and critical crack length in chevron notched semi-circular bend specimen subjected to tensile type fracture mode. Theor Appl Fract Mech 106:102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102466
Mansourian A, Hashemi S, Aliha MRM (2018) Evaluation of pure and mixed modes (I/III) fracture toughness of Portland cement concrete mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Constr Build Mater 178:10–18
Marinela B, Maria H, Irina B (2010) Comparison of mechanical properties for polymer concrete with different types of filler. J Mater Civ Eng 22(7):696–701. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000069
Martínez-Barrera G et al (2019) Modified recycled tire fibers by gamma radiation and their use on the improvement of polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 204:327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.177
Martínez-López M, Martínez-Barrera G, Nunes LCS, Reis JML, da Costa Mattos HS (2016) Mixed mode fracture analysis in a polymer mortar using the Brazilian disk test. Eng Fract Mech 154:140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.01.007
Mirsayar MM, Razmi A, Aliha MRM, Berto F (2018) EMTSN criterion for evaluating mixed mode I/II crack propagation in rock materials. Eng Fract Mech 190:186–197
Mirsayar M, Shi X, Zollinger D (2017) Evaluation of interfacial bond strength between Portland cement concrete and asphalt concrete layers using bimaterial semicircular bend test specimen. Eng Solid Mech 5(4):293–306
Mohammad Aliha MR, GhesmatiKucheki H, Asadi MM (2021) On the use of different diametral compression cracked disc shape specimens for introducing mode III deformation. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 44(11):3135–3151
Moreira GC, Reis JML, Rohan U, Soares CAP, da Costa Mattos HS (2016) Effect of fiber reinforcement on mixed-mode fracture of polymer mortars. Compos Struct 141:179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.059
Motamedi H, Fazaeli H, Aliha MRM, Reza Amiri H (2020) Evaluation of temperature and loading rate effect on fracture toughness of fiber reinforced asphalt mixture using edge notched disc bend (ENDB) specimen. Constr Build Mater 234:117365
Muthukumar M, Mohan D (2004) Studies on polymer concretes based on optimized aggregate mix proportion. Eur Polym J 40(9):2167–2177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.004
Najjar S, MohammadzadehMoghaddam A, Sahaf A, Aliha MRM (2020) Low temperature fracture resistance of cement emulsified asphalt mortar under mixed mode I/III loading. Theor Appl Fract Mech 110:102800
Naser MZ, Hawileh RA, Abdalla JA (2019) Fiber-reinforced polymer composites in strengthening reinforced concrete structures: a critical review. Eng Struct 198:109542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109542
Niaki SM, Fereidoon A, Ahangari M (2018) Experimental study on the mechanical and thermal properties of basalt fiber and nanoclay reinforced polymer concrete. Compos Struct 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.063
Nunes LCS, Reis JML (2012) Estimation of crack-tip-opening displacement and crack extension of glass fiber reinforced polymer mortars using digital image correlation method. Mater Des 33:248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.051
Nunes LC, Reis J (2014) Experimental investigation of mixed-mode-I/II fracture in polymer mortars using digital image correlation method. Lat Am J Solids Struct 11:330–343. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-78252014000200011
Ohama Y (2008) Developments in the Formulation and Reinforcement of Concrete. Woodhead Publishing
Pirmohammad S, Bayat A (2016) Characterizing mixed mode I/III fracture toughness of asphalt concrete using asymmetric disc bend (ADB) specimen. Constr Build Mater 120:571–580
Pirmohammad S, Bayat A (2017) Fracture resistance of HMA mixtures under mixed mode I/III loading at different subzero temperatures. Int J Solids Struct 120:268–277
Razmi A, Mirsayar MM (2017) On the mixed mode I/II fracture properties of jute fiber-reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 148:512–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.034
Reis JML (2006) Fracture and flexural characterization of natural fiber-reinforced polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 20(9):673–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.02.008
Reis J (2009) Effect of textile waste on the mechanical properties of polymer concrete. Mater Res 12:63–67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392009000100007
Reis JML, Ferreira AJM (2003a) The influence of notch depth on the fracture mechanics properties of polymer concrete. Int J Fract 124(1):33–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRAC.0000009302.36274.e9
Reis JML, Ferreira AJM (2003b) Fracture behavior of glass fiber reinforced polymer concrete. Polym Test 22(2):149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00063-6
Reis JML, Ferreira AJM (2004a) A contribution to the study of the fracture energy of polymer concrete and fibre reinforced polymer concrete. Polym Test 23(4):437–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.09.008
Reis JML, Ferreira AJM (2004b) Assessment of fracture properties of epoxy polymer concrete reinforced with short carbon and glass fibers. Constr Build Mater 18(7):523–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.010
Reis JML, Ferreira AJM (2006a) Freeze–thaw and thermal degradation influence on the fracture properties of carbon and glass fiber reinforced polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 20(10):888–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.021
Reis JML, Ferreira AJM (2006b) The effects of atmospheric exposure on the fracture properties of polymer concrete. Build Environ 41(3):262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.12.017
Reis J, Jurumenh M (2011) Experimental investigation on the effects of recycled aggregate on fracture behavior of polymer concrete. Mater Res 14:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392011005000060
Reis JML, de Oliveira R, Ferreira AJM, Marques AT (2003) A NDT assessment of fracture mechanics properties of fiber reinforced polymer concrete. Polym Test 22(4):395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00120-4
Reis JML, Chianelli-Junior R, Cardoso JL, Marinho FJV (2011) Effect of recycled PET in the fracture mechanics of polymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 25(6):2799–2804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.056
Ribeiro MCS, Tavares CML, Figueiredo M, Ferreira AJM, Fernandes AA (2003) Bending characteristics of resin concretes”. Materials Research 6(scielo):247–254
Saed SA, Karimi HR, Mousavi Rad S, Aliha MRM, Shi X, Pour PJH (2022) Full range I/II fracture behavior of asphalt mixtures containing RAP and rejuvenating agent using two different 3-point bend type configurations. Constr Build Mater 314:125590
Seco A, Echeverría AM, Marcelino S, García B, Espuelas S (2020) Durability of polyester polymer concretes based on metallurgical wastes for the manufacture of construction and building products. Constr Build Mater 240:117907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117907
Seco A, Lazcano A, Marcelino-Sádaba S, García B, Espuelas S (2020) Characterization of fresh and cured properties of polymer concretes based on two metallurgical wastes. Appl Sci 10:825. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030825
Shams SS, El-Hajjar RF (2013) Effects of scratch damage on progressive failure of laminated carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Int J Mech Sci 67:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.12.008
Shi X, Park P, Rew Y, Huang K, Sim C (2020) Constitutive behaviors of steel fiber reinforced concrete under uniaxial compression and tension. Constr Build Mater 233:117316
Shokrieh MM, Heidari-Rarani M, Shakouri M, Kashizadeh E (2011) Effects of thermal cycles on mechanical properties of an optimized polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 25(8):3540–3549
Şimşek B, Uygunoğlu T (2016) Multi-response optimization of polymer blended concrete: A TOPSIS based Taguchi application. Constr Build Mater 117:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.027
Somé SC, Feeser A, Pavoine A (2018) Numerical and experimental investigation of mode I cracking of asphalt concrete using semi-circular bending test. Constr Build Mater 169:34–46
Sun G, Tong S, Chen D, Gong Z, Li Q (2018) Mechanical properties of hybrid composites reinforced by carbon and basalt fibers. Int J Mech Sci 148:636–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.007
Wang Y, Wang W, Zhang B, Li C-Q (2020) A review on mixed mode fracture of metals. Eng Fract Mech 235:107126
Xiongzhou Y, Yuze T, Qinglin L, Song L, Qianwen D, Aliha MRM (2021) KIc and KIIc measurement for hot mix asphalt mixtures at low temperature: experimental and theoretical study using the semicircular bend specimen with different thicknesses. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 44(3):832–846
Yang D, Karimi HR, Aliha MR (2021) Comparison of testing method effects on cracking resistance of asphalt concrete mixtures. Appl Sci 11(11)
Yu-Chen O, Mu-Sen T, Kuang-Yen L, Kuo-Chun C (2012) Compressive behavior of steel-fiber-reinforced concrete with a high reinforcing index. J Mater Civ Eng 24(2):207–215
Zhang Z, Hou S, Mao Y, He L, Han X (2020) Rate-related study on the ply orientation of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite laminates. Int J Mech Sci 188:105968
Ziari H, Aliha MRM, Moniri A, Saghafi Y (2020) Crack resistance of hot mix asphalt containing different percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement and glass fiber. Constr Build Mater 230:117015
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology for supporting this work under research grant No.181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karamzadeh, N.S., Aliha, M.R.M. & Karimi, H.R. Investigation of the effect of components on tensile strength and mode-I fracture toughness of polymer concrete. Arab J Geosci 15, 1213 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10466-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10466-y