Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) prognosis and risk were associated to obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Two Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) of the adrenergic receptor-2a gene (ADRA2A): rs1800544 and rs553668, have been associated to these metabolic disorders. We investigated these SNPs in BC risk and prognosis. A total of 102 BC patients and 102 healthy controls were included. The rs1800544 and rs553668 were determined by real-time PCR. Genotypes and haplotypes frequencies between patients and controls, and for different clinico-pathologic parameters were compared. We found a significant association of rs1800544 GG genotype with young age at diagnosis, premenopausal status, higher tumor size, metastasis in lymph nodes, advanced TNM stages and higher Nottingham Prognosis Indicator (NPI) (p < 0.05). There was no association between rs1800544 and SBR stages, Her2, ER and PR statuses and the molecular classification. The rs553668 AA genotype was associated to young age at diagnosis and premenopausal status (p < 0.05). The haplotype GA was associated to the early age of diagnosis (p = 0.03), and the haplotype GG to higher tumor size, lymph node involvement, advanced TNM stages and Her2 positive status (p < 0.05). There was no polymorphism or haplotype association with BC risk (p > 0.05). ADRA2A polymorphism is associated with indicators BC poor prognosis but not with BC susceptibility. This is the first report suggesting that ADRA2A germline gene polymorphism could represent a predictor factor for BC outcome. Further investigation of other ADRA2A polymorphisms in BC risk or prognosis are needed and may lead to a genotype-based therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is the second cause of women cancer death in the developed regions after lung cancer, and the first one in less developed regions. With 522,000 deaths per year in the world [1], it represents a critical public health problem.
Genetics has been to the rescue of BC in the last decade, since BC prognostication is now based on both clinico-anatomical criteria and tumor gene expression or their surrogate immunohistochemical criteria [2–4]. But in addition to acquired somatic mutations of the tumor cell, different germline genetic variants have been associated to BC risk [5] and/or outcome [6–8]. However, it is estimated that these germline genetic variants explain only 28 % of the innate causes of BC [5], and much less is known about the role that patient’s genetic background plays in BC prognosis [8]. Therefore, identifying genetic variants involved in BC risk and/or progression is of crucial importance.
Adrenoceptors (AR) are G protein-coupled receptors for adrenergic neurotransmitters: adrenalin and noradrenalin. AR can be divided into three types, each one having three subtypes: α1AR (α1A, α1B, α1D); α2AR (α2A, α2B, α2C); and βAR (β1, β2, β3). They are expressed by almost all organs in the body and encoded by separate genes. The AR α2A gene (ADRA2A) is an intronless gene located in chromosome 10q25.2, encoding a protein receptor of 450 amino acid residues [9]: α2A-adrenergic receptor which is implicated in several functions in the central nervous system, cardiovascular system, neurotransmitter release, platelet aggregation, blood pressure, insulin secretion and lipolysis [10]. ADRA2A has several SNPs. The SNP rs1800544 is located in its promoter region [11] and was associated to obesity and body fat content and distribution [12, 13]. Another SNP named rs553668 that is located in the 3′-UTR region was associated to blood pressure response to adrenergic agonists [14], to body fat accumulation in the truncal-abdominal region [15, 16] and to obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) [17–19].
On the other hand, it is now well established that obesity is a risk [20–22] and a prognostic factor [23] for BC. This is also valid for T2D patients who are more likely to develop BC, and those among them who have already developed this cancer get a poorer prognosis [24].
This double association of obesity and T2D with ADRA2A polymorphisms, on the one hand, and with BC risk/prognosis at the other hand, prompted us to conduct this work aiming to investigate the possible association of ADRA2A polymorphisms with BC prognosis indicators and BC risk. Our approach was supplied by the fact that α2-ARs are expressed on BC cell lines [25, 26] which proliferate after stimulation by α2-adrenergic agonists [25, 27] or by catecholestrogens (estrogen metabolites) [28]. This proliferation can be reversed by α2-adrenergic antagonists [26]. Moreover, the same α2-adrenergic agonist/antagonist effects have been reproduced on mammary tumour growth in mice [29]. To our knowledge, the current study is the first investigation of ADRA2A germline gene polymorphism association with BC prognosis indicators and BC risk.
Patients, Materials and Methods
Patients and Controls
In this case-control study, unrelated subjects were included: a total of 102 prevalent cases of invasive BC female patients (age 48.51 ± 10.32) and 102 healthy controls (age 47.63 ± 10.31). Patients were diagnosed in the Anti-Cancer Center of Batna, between September 2012 and June 2014. Control subjects were matched to cases by age and geographical origin.
Registered data regarding: tumor size (maximum diameter), lymph node involvement, tumor-nodal-metastatic (TNM) stage, Scarff-Bloom and Richardson (SBR) histological grade at time of diagnosis, as wel as tumor expression of progesterone receptors (PR), estrogen receptors (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), were obtained from medical records (Table 1). We used these expressions to categorize patients into four molecular subtypes: luminal-A, luminal-B, Her-2, and basal-like according to Perou et al. [30]. The Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) was calculated according to Todd et al. [31] then patients were separated into three prognostic groups: Good prognostic group GPG (NPI ≤ 3.4), Moderate prognostic group MPG (3.4 < NPI ≤ 5.4) and Poor prognostic group PPG (NPI > 5.4) (Table 1). Necessary precautions to protect participant’s information were taken according to the principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 and its later amendments. An informed written consent was obtained from all patients and controls.
DNA Extraction and Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral whole blood using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The SNPs rs1800544 and rs553668 were determined by allelic discrimination with validated TaqMan probes using the TaqMan® SNP Genotyping Assays C_7611979_10 and C_996424_20, respectively (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). A quantity of 20 ng DNA was used in each reaction tube with the Type-it® Fast SNP Probe PCR master mix (QIAGEN, Basel, Switzerland) to reach a final volume of 25 μL. The reactions were carried in the Rotor Gene 1.7.94 real-time cycler (QIAGEN, Basel, Switzerland). Amplification was performed according to the following cycling protocol: Initial PCR activation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s by 45 cycles, then by annealing/extension at 60 °C for 30 s. Some samples were carried in triplicate in order to insure reproducibility of the assay.
Statistical Analysis
We used QUANTO program version 1.2.4, May 2009 (http://biostats.usc.edu/software) to estimate sample size, with a minor allele frequency data obtained from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/) and a study power fixed at 80 %. To test Hardy–Weinberg (HW) equilibrium of alleles frequencies we used SNPstats software [32]. This software was used also to estimate haplotype frequencies in BC cases and controls. The chi-square test or Fisher exact test (when the number of subjects was less than 5) were used to assess the significance of any difference in genotype frequency between subjects or between patient’s series. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to assess whether the distribution of a categorical variable is the same between genotype groups. Patient series were stratified according to separate prognostic factors (TNM stage, SBR grade, ER, PR or HER2 receptors status and molecular subtype) or prognostic group (GPG, MPG and PPG). For the molecular subtypes, and as Ki67 expression was not available to well distinguish between luminal-A and luminal-B, these subtypes were merged to form the ‘luminal subtype’ which is known to have better prognosis than the other subtypes [33]. Odds ratio (OR), used as a measure of association strength, and the corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 based on a two-sided calculation. Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corporation) and GraphPad Prism version 6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
Results
Allele and Genotype Frequencies
Allele and genotype frequencies of the rs1800544 and rs553668 in BC cases and controls are shown in Table 2. The loci were in HW equilibrium (p > 0.05) in both groups. There was no significant difference in the distribution of the rs1800544 or the rs553668 genotypes between BC cases and controls in different genetic models (P > 0.05) (Table 3).
Haplotype Analysis
Haplotype frequencies in BC cases and controls were estimated using SNPstats software. The most frequent haplotype in cases and in controls was CG (56 % and 59 %, respectively). No difference was observed between both groups regarding the distribution of all the haplotypes (Table 4).
Age and Menopausal Status at BC Diagnosis
Young age at diagnosis is often associated to more aggressive disease course and to poorer outcome [34–36], therefore we investigated the association between ADRA2A polymorphisms and age at BC diagnosis. We plotted the age of BC diagnosis following the genotypes of ADRA2A polymorphisms (Fig. 1a). There was a significant difference in the median of the age of onset in each genotype group for both rs1800544 and rs553668 (p = 0.01 for each loci), which means that these polymorphisms are associated with age at diagnosis (Fig. 1a). Additionally, and as there is no consensus about age cut-off for defining “young age” BC, we chose to set it at 40 years like other authors [35, 36], than we studied the distribution of the genotypes in the two age groups (≤40 y and >40 y) (Table 5). There was a significant association between the rs1800544 GG genotype and BC early age of onset in a codominant, a recessive and a log-additive genetic model (p = 0.01, p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Similarly, the rs553668 AA genotype trended to be associated with BC early age of diagnosis in a codominant and a recessive model although this association did not reach statistical significance (Table 5). In agreement with these results, haplotype analysis showed a significant association of the haplotype (GA), which involves the minor alleles, with early age of diagnosis of BC (p = 0.03, OR = 0.43, 95 % CI (0.20–0.94)).
At another hand, we considered genotypes association with menopausal status (Table 6). There was a significant association between the rs1800544 GG genotype and premenopausal status in both a codominant and a recessive genetic model (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, respectively). Similarly, the rs553668 AA genotype trended to be associated premenopausal status although this association did not reach statistical significance (Table 6). This trend was observed also with the haplotype (GA) (p = 0.05, OR = 0.51, 95 % CI (0.26–0.99)).
Clinico-Pathological Features
We studied the association of ADRA2A polymorphisms with panoply of clinico-pathological features which are classical indicators of BC prognosis: tumor size, lymph node involvement, TNM stages, SBR grades [37], NPI [31], and ER, PR, Her2 statuses which are predictor factors of BC prognosis, individually [38–41] or in combination [30, 42, 43].
The rs1800544 GG genotype was significantly more frequent in tumors with larger size (> 5 cm), in a codominant and in a recessive genetic model (p = 0.03; p = 0.01, respectively) (Table 7). This genotype was more frequent also in case of positive lymph node involvement, in a codominant model although this did not reach significant level (p = 0.05, OR = 3.21, 95 % IC (1.01–10.22)), but the allele G of rs1800544 was significantly associated to positive lymph node involvement in a log-additive model (p = 0.03) (Table 7). After stratifying TNM stages by the menopausal status, the allele G of rs1800544 was found to be strongly associated to higher TNM stages (III and IV) in premenopausal patients (p = 0.01). The rs1800544 GG genotype was also significantly more frequent in the PPG (in a codominant model, p = 0.04) and the allele G of this SNP was significantly associated to PPG (in a log-additive model, p = 0.03) (Table 7). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the median of the NPI between rs1800544 genotype groups (p = 0.02), which means that this SNP is associated to the NPI (Fig. 1b). There was no association between rs1800544 and the other clinico-pathologic features: SBR stages, and ER, PR, Her2 statuses, as well as the molecular classification which is based on these statuses, even after stratification by the menopausal status. The rs553668 was not associated with all the studied clinico-pathologic features. However, hayplotype analysis showed that the haplotype GG was significantly associated with poor prognosis indicators: higher tumor size (p = 0.03), lymph node involvement (p = 0.006), advanced TNM stages (p = 0.03) and Her2 expression by the tumor (p = 0.007), (Table 8).
Discussion
Through the last decades, BC heterogeneity induced prognostication evolving from the classical clinico-pathological and histological classifications to more accurate classifications based on advances in molecular biology. However, these classifications are mainly focusing on tumor intrinsic features [3, 4]. Yet, despite these progresses, different outcomes still exist between patients even when they belong to the same categories [44]. One of the possible explanations to such discrepancies may be the denial of the implication of tumor’s growing environment, as part of patients' background genotype, in its progression. In the present study, we explored the association of two SNPs in ADRA2A gremline gene with BC prognostic indicators and with BC susceptibility.
We found that rs1800544 GG genotype is significantly associated with poor prognosis indicators: young age at the onset of the disease, premenopausal status, larger tumor size, positive lymph node involvement, advanced TNM stages and higher NPI. The rs553668 AA genotype was significantly associated to young age at the onset of BC and to the premenopausal status, but not to any of the other studied prognosis indicators although many trends to such association have been observed. By haplotype analysis, we found that the haplotype GA is associated to the early onset of the disease and the haplotype GG is associated to poor prognosis indicators: larger tumor size, positive lymph node involvement, advanced TNM stage and Her2 positive status.
The SNP rs1800544 is located in the promoter region of ADRA2A gene [11] and this may lead to its implication in gene expression. Interestingly, Small et al. found that cell-lines that are transfected with different ADRA2A haplotypes showed a diffential expression of both mRNA and protein [45]. Another study conducted on human subjects showed that different ADRA2A haplotypes are associated to different responses to an α2-AR-agonist: dexmedetomidine [14]. Thus, it is possible that the association of both GA and GG haplotypes with poor prognosis indicators of BC could be explained by a differential expression α2A-AR. It has been shown that the α2A-AR receptors mediate adrenergic suppression of insulin secretion, and that human pancreatic islets having a lower expression of this receptor show a higher insulin secretion [17]. Insulin is known to enhance cell proliferation, angiogenesis and estradiol bioavailability [23]. Therefore, we can hypothesize that the observed association of the ADRA2A haplotype GA and GG with poor prognosis indicators could be explained by the elevated insulin secretion in patients who harbour these haplotypes. However, and as we did not investigate other ADRA2A SNPs concomitantly with rs1800544 and rs553668, further investigations are needed to confirm or infirm such hypothesis especially because in Small et al. study [45], other ADRA2A haplotypes with the same alleles G (rs1800544) and G (rs553668) but accompanied with alleles of other SNPs, showed an enhanced α2A-AR expression. On the other hand, it has been shown by using cDNA microarray technology for assessing gene expression profile in BC tumors, that ADRA2A gene expression is lower in the tumors of patients with poor clinical outcome [46–49]. Aditionnaly, Du et al. showed, by using immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded samples, that α2a AR expression is associated with Her-2 status (p = 0.048) [50]. Hence, we can speculate that the different expression of α2a AR between tumors with distinct outcome could be explained by differential mutations in tumor genes or by differential genetic background of mammary tissue in the patient before malignancy occurrence.
Additionally, in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies have shown that the long-term effects of stress promote tumor growth and progression [51]. Adrenalin and noradrenalin are at the centre of the adrenergic stress response and are recognized by the adrenergic receptors. Activation of α2A-AR in normal tissues decreases intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) by downregulating the synthesis of adenylate cyclase [52] and contribute to the regulation of blood flow in different tissues including mammary gland [53], they also may inhibit milk secretion in this gland [54]. In vitro and in vivo studies on BC cell lines showed that activation of alpha adrenergic receptors induced chemoresistance and cell proliferation [25, 55, 56]. Hence, adrenergic receptors may be the leaders of stress effect on BC outcome. Interestingly, in a murine model of BC, selective alpha adrenergic receptors antagonists (rauwoscine), reduced tumor volume [29]. Hence, further detection of ADRA2A polymorphisms that are associated to poor BC prognosis may open the door for genotype-based treatment testing in this disease.
Conclusion
Our study showed that ADRA2A polymorphism rs1800544, alone and in a haplotype combination with rs553668, is associated with indicators of BC poor prognosis: young age at the onset of the disease, premenopausal status, larger tumor size, positive lymph node involvement, advanced TNM stages, higher NPI and Her2 positive status. These data suggest that ADRA2A germline polymorphism could represent a predictor factor for BC prognosis. The two studied SNPs were not associated to BC risk. However, further investigation of other ADRA2A polymorphisms, either in BC risk or BC prognosis, are needed.
References
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. IARC CancerBase 2012; No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed on 2019th Dec 2014
Pusztai L (2011) Anatomy and biology: two complementary sides of breast cancer prognostication. J Clin Oncol 29(33):4347–4348
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, et al. (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22(8):1736–1747
Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, et al. (2013) Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 24(9):2206–2223
Zhang B, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Long J, Zheng W (2011) Genetic variants associated with breast-cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence. Lancet Oncol 12(5):477–488
Rafiq S, Khan S, Tapper W, Collins A, Upstill-Goddard R, et al. (2014) A genome wide meta-analysis study for identification of common variation associated with breast cancer prognosis. PLoS One 9(12):e101488
Sapkota Y (2014) Germline DNA variations in breast cancer predisposition and prognosis: a systematic review of the literature. Cytogenet Genome Res 144(2):77–91
Ribelles N, Santonja A, Pajares B, Llacer C, Alba E (2014) The seed and soil hypothesis revisited: current state of knowledge of inherited genes on prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 40(2):293–299
Kobilka BK, Matsui H, Kobilka TS, Yang-Feng TL, Francke U, et al. (1987) Cloning, sequencing, and expression of the gene coding for the human platelet alpha 2-adrenergic receptor. Science 238(4827):650–656
Hoffman BB, Taylor P (2001) Neurotransmission: the autonomic and somatic motor nervous systems. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Gilman AG (eds) Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 115–153
Lario S, Calls J, Cases A, Oriola J, Torras A, et al. (1997) MspI identifies a biallelic polymorphism in the promoter region of the alpha 2A-adrenergic receptor gene. Clin Genet 51(2):129–130
Lima JJ, Feng H, Duckworth L, Wang J, Sylvester JE, et al. (2007) Association analyses of adrenergic receptor polymorphisms with obesity and metabolic alterations. Metabolism 56(6):757–765
Garenc C, Perusse L, Chagnon YC, Rankinen T, Gagnon J, et al. (2002) The alpha 2-adrenergic receptor gene and body fat content and distribution: the HERITAGE family study. Mol Med 8(2):88–94
Kurnik D, Muszkat M, Li C, Sofowora GG, Friedman EA, et al. (2011) Genetic variations in the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor are associated with blood pressure response to the agonist dexmedetomidine. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 4(2):179–187
Oppert JM, Tourville J, Chagnon M, Mauriege P, Dionne FT, et al. (1995) DNA polymorphisms in the alpha 2- and beta 2-adrenoceptor genes and regional fat distribution in humans: association and linkage studies. Obes Res 3(3):249–255
Ukkola O, Rankinen T, Weisnagel SJ, Sun G, Perusse L, et al. (2000) Interactions among the alpha2-, beta2-, and beta3-adrenergic receptor genes and obesity-related phenotypes in the Quebec family study. Metabolism 49(8):1063–1070
Rosengren AH, Jokubka R, Tojjar D, Granhall C, Hansson O, et al. (2010) Overexpression of alpha2A-adrenergic receptors contributes to type 2 diabetes. Science 327(5962):217–220
Bo S, Cassader M, Cavallo-Perin P, Durazzo M, Rosato R, et al. (2012) The rs553668 polymorphism of the ADRA2A gene predicts the worsening of fasting glucose values in a cohort of subjects without diabetes. A population-based study. Diabet Med 29(4):549–552
Talmud PJ, Cooper JA, Gaunt T, Holmes MV, Shah S, et al. (2011) Variants of ADRA2A are associated with fasting glucose, blood pressure, body mass index and type 2 diabetes risk: meta-analysis of four prospective studies. Diabetologia 54(7):1710–1719
Trentham-Dietz A, Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Longnecker MP, Baron J, et al. (1997) Body size and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 145(11):1011–1019
van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, Adami HO, Beeson L, et al. (2000) Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 152(6):514–527
Key TJ, Appleby PN, Reeves GK, Roddam A, Dorgan JF, et al. (2003) Body mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(16):1218–1226
Sinicrope FA, Dannenberg AJ (2011) Obesity and breast cancer prognosis: weight of the evidence. J Clin Oncol 29(1):4–7
DeCensi A, Gennari A (2011) Insulin breast cancer connection: confirmatory data set the stage for better care. J Clin Oncol 29(1):7–10
Vazquez SM, Mladovan AG, Perez C, Bruzzone A, Baldi A, et al. (2006) Human breast cell lines exhibit functional alpha2-adrenoceptors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 58(1):50–61
Perez Pinero C, Bruzzone A, Sarappa MG, Castillo LF, Luthy IA (2012) Involvement of alpha2- and beta2-adrenoceptors on breast cancer cell proliferation and tumour growth regulation. Br J Pharmacol 166(2):721–736
Vazquez SM, Pignataro O, Luthy IA (1999) Alpha2-adrenergic effect on human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 55(1):41–49
Chiesa IJ, Castillo LF, Luthy IA (2008) Contribution of alpha2-adrenoceptors to the mitogenic effect of catecholestrogen in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 110(1–2):170–175
Bruzzone A, Pinero CP, Castillo LF, Sarappa MG, Rojas P, et al. (2008) Alpha2-adrenoceptor action on cell proliferation and mammary tumour growth in mice. Br J Pharmacol 155(4):494–504
Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, et al. (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406(6797):747–752
Todd JH, Dowle C, Williams MR, Elston CW, Ellis IO, et al. (1987) Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 56(4):489–492
Sole X, Guino E, Valls J, Iniesta R, Moreno V (2006) SNPStats: a web tool for the analysis of association studies. Bioinformatics 22(15):1928–1929
Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer P, Pradervand S, et al. (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10(4):R65
El Saghir NS, Seoud M, Khalil MK, Charafeddine M, Salem ZK, et al. (2006) Effects of young age at presentation on survival in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 6:194
Bharat A, Aft RL, Gao F, Margenthaler JA (2009) Patient and tumor characteristics associated with increased mortality in young women (< or =40 years) with breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 100(3):248–251
Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, Phillips M, Bleyer A (2009) Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol 36(3):237–249
Le Doussal V, Tubiana-Hulin M, Friedman S, Hacene K, Spyratos F, et al. (1989) Prognostic value of histologic grade nuclear components of scarff-bloom-Richardson (SBR). an improved score modification based on a multivariate analysis of 1262 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Cancer 64(9):1914–1921
Osborne CK, Yochmowitz MG, Knight 3rd WA, McGuire WL (1980) The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast cancer. Cancer 1980 46(12 Suppl):2884–2888
McGuire WL, Osborne CK, Clark GM, Knight 3rd WA (1982) Steroid hormone receptors and carcinoma of the breast. Am J Phys 243(2):E99–102
Clark GM, McGuire WL (1988) Steroid receptors and other prognostic factors in primary breast cancer. Semin Oncol 15(2 Suppl 1):20–25
Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, et al. (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235(4785):177–182
Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, et al. (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(19):10869–10874
Hugh J, Hanson J, Cheang MC, Nielsen TO, Perou CM, et al. (2009) Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial. J Clin Oncol 27(8):1168–1176
Boyle DP, McCourt CM, Matchett KB, Salto-Tellez M (2013) Molecular and clinicopathological markers of prognosis in breast cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 13(5):481–498
Small KM, Brown KM, Seman CA, Theiss CT, Liggett SB (2006) Complex haplotypes derived from noncoding polymorphisms of the intronless alpha2A-adrenergic gene diversify receptor expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(14):5472–5477
Lim E, Vaillant F, Wu D, Forrest NC, Pal B, et al. (2009) Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat Med 15(8):907–913
Finak G, Bertos N, Pepin F, Sadekova S, Souleimanova M, et al. (2008) Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nat Med 14(5):518–527
Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, Korn EL, Long PM, et al. (2003) Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(18):10393–10398
Shkurnikov MY, Galatenko VV, Lebedev AE, Podol’skii VE, Tonevitskii EA, et al. (2014) On statistical relationship between ADRA2A expression and the risk of breast cancer relapse. Bull Exp Biol Med 157(4):454–458
Du Y, Zhou L, Wang Y, Yan T, Jiang Y, et al. (2014) Association of alpha2a and beta2 adrenoceptor expression with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Curr Med Res Opin 30(7):1337–1344
Lutgendorf SK, Sood AK, Antoni MH (2010) Host factors and cancer progression: biobehavioral signaling pathways and interventions. J Clin Oncol 28(26):4094–4099
Docherty JR (1998) Subtypes of functional alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptors. Eur J Pharmacol 361(1):1–15
Giessler C, Wangemann T, Silber RE, Dhein S, Brodde OE (2002) Noradrenaline-induced contraction of human saphenous vein and human internal mammary artery: involvement of different alpha-adrenoceptor subtypes. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 366(2):104–109
Bruckmaier RM, Wellnitz O, Blum JW (1997) Inhibition of milk ejection in cows by oxytocin receptor blockade, alpha-adrenergic receptor stimulation and in unfamiliar surroundings. J Dairy Res 64(3):315–325
Su F, Ouyang N, Zhu P, Jia W, Gong C, et al. (2005) Psychological stress induces chemoresistance in breast cancer by upregulating mdr1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 329(3):888–897
Flint MS, Kim G, Hood BL, Bateman NW, Stewart NA, et al. (2009) Stress hormones mediate drug resistance to paclitaxel in human breast cancer cells through a CDK-1-dependent pathway. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34(10):1533–1541
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the patients and control subjects for their participation.
Authors' Contributions
GB conceived of the study, obtained financial support for the project, carried out genotyping, carried out the statistical analyses, managed the project, coordinated data collection and wrote the manuscript. BK carried out genotyping, retrieved the clinical data and wrote the manuscript. WB and KH retrieved the clinical data. WT and MS carried out genotyping. HB co-ordinated data collection.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this study are in accordance with the ethical standards of the Thematic Agency for Research in Health Sciences (ATRSS, ex-ANDRS) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Funding
This work was funded by contract No. 71/ANDRS/2011, from the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Algeria.
Additional information
Batoul Kaabi and Ghania Belaaloui contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaabi, B., Belaaloui, G., Benbrahim, W. et al. ADRA2A Germline Gene Polymorphism is Associated to the Severity, but not to the Risk, of Breast Cancer. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 22, 357–365 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-015-0010-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-015-0010-0