Abstract
Often seen as nonvegetated unutilized wastelands, mudflats pose the least resistance to land claim for coastal development. Here, we studied the large Klang mudflat (Straits of Malacca) from September 2011 to September 2014 to determine the fish species that utilize it and the abiotic factors that influence species composition and abundance, to evaluate the ecological role of the mudflat in support of coastal fisheries. The spatial and temporal assemblage of fish species and their abundance was examined at two sites, during two monsoon seasons, and under the effect of period (wet/dry), moon phase (full/new moon), and diel cycle (day/night). Fish were sampled during ebb tide by a stationary large barrier net that enclosed a calculable area of sampling. A total of 119 species belonging to 46 families of mainly small-sized and juvenile fish made regular ingressions into the mudflat throughout the year. Fish abundance varied spatially and temporally, suggesting site preference and variability in juvenile recruitment. Higher fish abundance due to recruitment occurred during the northeast monsoon season (NEM), as compared to the southwest monsoon. Fish composition but not total fish abundance during the NEM differed between wet/dry periods and diel cycles. Ariidae and Sciaenidae were dominant families during the wet period, whereas Engraulidae dominated during the dry period. Predatory fish species (e.g., Lagocephalus lunaris, Otolithes ruber, and Hexanematichthys sagor) were recorded during the daytime, whereas planktivorous and detrivorous species (e.g., Ambassis gymnocephalus and Liza subviridis) were more abundant during the night.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Intertidal mudflats being a regular feature of calm, shallow coastal waters are prime targets for land reclamation. Often seen as nonvegetated unutilized wastelands, tropical mudflats among all the common coastal biotopes (e.g., mangroves) pose the least resistance to land claim for coastal development. Since the early 1980s, East Asian countries especially the small nations have increasingly reclaimed land from the sea for development in order to support their increasing populations (Kao et al. 1998). The problem is that there is almost no or very little scientific information regarding the significance of tropical mudflats (to humans) to garner support for their protection in the tropics. Mudflats are generally characterized as covering a considerable part of the total estuarine area that harbors high productivity (Elliot and Dewailly 1995). They frequently occur as part of the natural transition of habitat between the sublittoral zone and mangroves. Although structurally much less complex than mangroves or other vegetated estuarine systems, the mudflat contains a high abundance and diversity of fauna, including infauna, epifauna, as well as fauna that periodically enter it during high tide (Laegdsgaard and Johnson 2001; Chong et al. 2012b). The importance of coastal mudflats as feeding areas for marine fish and invertebrates has gained attention from fishery ecologists (de Boer and Prins 2002; Morrison et al. 2002; Tse et al. 2008; Nip and Wong 2010; Chaudhuri et al. 2013).
The fish assemblage on the mudflat depends on its high productivity (Laegdsgaard and Johnson 2001; Nagelkerken and Van Der Velde 2002) making it a suitable feeding and nursery area (Mumby et al. 2004; Cardoso et al. 2011). Intertidal flats have long been referred to as ecological turntables between land and sea, where tidal flats receive nutrients, detritus, and plankton derived from the adjacent land and open sea, utilizing the energy inputs and in turn exporting their production off-shore (Reise 1985). The input of energy as well as high in situ microphytobenthic production (Guarini et al. 2000) provides ample food resources for resident benthic consumers such as crabs (Dittmann 1993) and molluscs (Boehs et al. 2004). The resident macrofauna and meiofauna are in turn exploited by periodic visitors to the tidal flats during flood tide such as fish and shrimps including commercially important species belonging to the genera Parapenaeopsis and Metapenaeus (Leh and Sasekumar 1984; Marsitah and Chong 2002; Melville and Connolly 2005; Franca et al. 2008; Chong et al. 2012a), as well as shore birds and mammals (Riak et al. 2003; Norhayati et al. 2009; Norma-Rashid and Teoh 2012). Moreover, Hill et al. (1982) described the use of mudflats by mud crabs (Scylla spp.) as nursery habitat in Australia, where the juveniles live and feed on intertidal mudflats and gradually migrate to the subtidal area as they mature. In several Southeast Asian countries, blood cockles are naturally found or artificially seeded on coastal mudflats to produce significant harvests of commercial importance (Broom 1982; Jarernpornnipat et al. 2003; Yurimoto et al. 2014). Where coastal biotopes co-occur such as among mangroves, seagrass meadows, or coral reefs, the mudflat often acts as a corridor for fish to travel between these habitats, e.g., during ontogenetic migration (Clark and Pessanha 2015) and foraging (Nagelkerken and Van Der Velde 2002; Connolly et al. 2005). The connectivity between mudflats and other adjacent biotopes also influences fish community structure due to diel and tidal migration of fish (Unsworth et al. 2008; Kundu et al. 2012).
Environmental variables may modify fish species distribution and abundance under different spatial and temporal scales (e.g., seasonally, interannually) (Thiel et al. 1995; Salgado et al. 2004; Terlizzi et al. 2005; Franca et al. 2008; Cardoso et al. 2011; Ooi and Chong 2011; Chaudhuri et al. 2013). In tropical areas, long-term or seasonal variability in fish composition is usually related to high rainfall and dry periods which may significantly influence environmental variables such as salinity (Satpathy 1996), temperature (Blaber 2000), and pH (Chaudhuri et al. 2013). In contrast, short-term variability in fish composition results from daily fish movements into and out of the mudflat; this may be related to not only feeding dynamics but also to avoidance of predators. Since the scale of tidal inundation is related to the tidal cycle, and predation is affected by light intensity, the pattern of fish ingression into the mudflat is hypothesized to be affected by diel light (day-night) and lunar (moon light) cycles. In spite of the diel nocturnal activity exhibited by many fish species, stronger light intensity during the full moon at night may facilitate the hunt of prey fish by predators (Horký et al. 2006), whereas prey species may make use of the new moon to avoid predators (Stokesbury and Dadswell 1989).
Despite the ecological and economic contributions of intertidal mudflats, studies on intertidal mudflats in Malaysia are unfortunately few. Yet, coastal mudflats such as those in Selangor can produce up to 40,000 tonnes of blood cockles or 8 tonnes ha−1 annually with a total market value of 20 million USD (DOF 2010). Compared to mangrove studies (e.g., Sasekumar et al. 1992; Tanaka et al. 2011; Chew and Chong 2011), the study of mudflats in Malaysia has been sporadic in the past (Broom 1982; McIntosh 1984; Sasekumar and Chong 1991; Riak et al. 2003) but has gained recent attention (Chong et al. 2012b; Ramarn et al. 2012; Teoh and Chong 2013; Norazlimi and Ramli 2014). Recent work based on stable isotope analysis has unequivocally shown the mudflat’s trophic support for coastal zooplankton (Chew and Chong 2011; Ooi and Chong 2011), mysid shrimps (Ramarn et al. 2012), penaeid shrimps (Newell et al. 1995; Chong et al. 2001), hermit crabs (Teoh and Chong 2013), and fish (Chong et al. 2012a; Tanaka et al. 2011).
This study thus aimed to determine what species of fish utilize the coastal mudflat in order to gain some measure of mudflat contribution to fisheries support, and to determine the abiotic factors that may influence fish ingression into the mudflat. More specifically, we tested the hypothesis that mudflat usage by fish fauna (composition and abundance) is dependent on location (site), diel cycle (day/night), lunar light (new/full moon), and wet/dry period.
Materials and Methods
Study Areas and Sampling Design
The study area was located on the most extensive mudflat in the state of Selangor, west coast of Peninsular Malaysia. The Klang mudflat continuously flanks the eastern seaboard of Klang Strait, spanning 55 km from Kapar to Sekinchan in the north, being interrupted only by the mouths of three major rivers (Fig. 1). The mudflat extends between 1 and 2 km from the sea to the shoreline where fragmented mangrove forests still remained, especially south of the Selangor estuary. The entire mudflat has no seagrass meadows found only at the southern end of the peninsula (Bujang et al. 2006). The Klang mudflat covers about 8000 ha and almost 63 % of its area serves as culture beds for the blood cockle. This study examined the influence of the seasonal monsoon and diel/lunar light cycles on fish ingression at two locations (sites) on the Klang Strait mudflat, one at Bagan Pasir (BP) and other at Bagan Sungai Buloh (SB) (Fig. 1). Monthly field collections of fish from September 2011 to November 2014 were conducted to cover two seasonal reversals of weather pattern due to the northeast monsoon (NEM, November–March) and southwest monsoon (SWM, May–September). The onset of the NEM is characterized by a period of very heavy rainfall followed by dry spells during the later part. The SWM, however, starts with a period of relatively less rainfall until later when the monsoon “breaks” between July and September, and heavy rainfall may result due to the convergence of low-level easterly and southwesterly winds over the Sumatran region (Cheang 1988). Although the SWM season signifies drier weather, there is no distinct wet and dry season in the study area.
Fish sampling in the mudflat was conducted using a traditional fishing net or barrier net (belat lengkong), deployed in the daytime (10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.) during the spring tide from September 2011 to November 2013, except on May 2013 (at BP and SB) and October 2013 (at SB) when sampling was not possible due to extremely rough weather. This sampling regime constituted the “a posteriori” study to distinguish it from the “a priori” study. For the a priori study, diel light (day-night) sampling using the barrier net was conducted on two occasions each during the wet period (November 2013 and March 2014) and dry period (June and September 2014) at both sites. Samples were collected during the day (10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.) and at night (10:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.) on the new moon and full moon phase of each month sampled. Day and night sampling represented the diel light factor, whereas the new moon and full moon represented the moon light factor.
The commercial barrier net is designed to catch vagile fish and invertebrates on the mudflat when they retreat to the sea during spring ebb tide. This commercial gear operates about 6 days during the two spring tides of each month. The gear was deployed during high slack when the water depth was not more than 1.5 m depth. The wooden stakes of the attached net were manually driven into the mud to form an approximately “L” configuration. The longer net wing was deployed along the direction of ebb flow (southwesterly) and the shorter wing deployed nearly perpendicular and as close as 400 m to the mangrove fringe (see Fig. 1). The set barrier net enclosed a large triangular area calculated to vary between 1.5 and 4.0 ha. The enclosed area was estimated by using a three-point GPS determination of the coordinates of its two ends and vertex. Based on the great circle distance formula (Weisstein 2014a), the distance among the three-point GPS was calculated. These distances were then applied to Heron’s formula (Weisstein 2014b) to calculate the area for an irregular triangle (the enclosed area of the barrier net).
The great circle distance between any two (1, 2) of three GPS points was calculated from
where d is equatorial radius of the earth ≈6378 km; δ is latitude in radians, i.e., degree * π/180; and λ is longitude in radians.
The area (A) for an irregular triangle was then calculated viz.
where s = (d1 + d2 + d3) / 2, and d1, d2, and d3 are the length of each side.
Fish were trapped mainly at the net’s vertex during the subsequent ebb tide when water completely receded from the mudflat. Fish were taken out from the cod-end bag (mesh size 3.81 cm) at the net’s vertex and subsampled when the catch was too large. This was done by filling the catch into sampling baskets and taking the required number of baskets (80 cm × 55 cm × 60 cm) as subsample, usually representing one fifth to half of the total catch. Fish were kept on ice while in the field and then promptly frozen in the laboratory at −20 °C before analysis. Environmental variables (i.e., salinity, pH, temperature, and dissolved oxygen concentration) were measured during high slack at 0.5 m depth using a multiparameter sonde (Model YSI 556). When the shore was exposed during low tide, nine sediment core samples (32 mm diameter × 140 mm length) were taken at each site (BP and SB) and the top 0.0–0.5 cm was taken for subsequent particulate organic content (POM) and grain size analysis. Rainfall data during sampling periods was obtained from the Malaysian Meteorological Department based on measurements recorded at Sungai Buloh Estate located 15 km to the southeast of Kuala Selangor river mouth.
Laboratory Procedures
All catch samples in the laboratory were sorted, and the fish were identified before they were counted, measured (standard length, mm), and weighed (g). Fish were identified to the species level using the following references: Munro (1974), De Bruin et al. (1994), Mohsin and Ambak (1996), and Carpenter and Niem (1998a, b).
Sediment chlorophyll pigments were extracted by acetone for at least 12 h inside a −20 °C freezer. Chlorophyll a concentration was then measured fluorometrically (Parson et al. 1984) by a Turner 10 AU fluorometer. Chlorophyll a concentration was calculated using the formula by Lorenzen (1967) and expressed in microgram per gram dry weight.
Sediment samples for grain size analysis and total organic matter content were dried in an oven at 60 °C for a week. The dried sediment samples were subject to prior treatments in 6 % hydrogen peroxide overnight and then sodium hexametaphosphate (6.2 g/l aqueous) overnight (Holme and Mclntyre 1971). Grain size of the treated samples was subsequently analyzed by a Coulter 230L Particle Size Analyzer. The soil particle groups were categorized according to the Wentworth grade scale (Buchanan 1984). The organic matter content of the sediment was estimated by subtracting the weight of combusted sediment (at 500 °C for 6 h in a muffle furnace) from the weight of dried sediment (at 60 °C for at least 3 days in an oven) (Holme and Mclntyre 1971).
Data Analysis
The dry or wet period was determined based on the standardized precipitation index (SPI), where precipitation of below average (SPI < 0) was regarded as a dry period, whereas precipitation of above average (SPI > 0) was regarded as a wet period. The SPI was calculated using the following equation:
where X i is the total rainfall of the ith month, X is the mean monthly rainfall over a 4-year timescale, and SD is the standard deviation of the monthly total rainfall (McKee et al. 1993). Four years (2010–2013) of rainfall data from the Malaysian Meteorological Department were analyzed.
Fish abundance expressed as number per hectare was calculated by using the following equation:
where N is the total number of fish, a is the enclosed area, and d is the raising factor due to subsampling.
Fish biomass was expressed as kilogram per hectare and calculated using the following equation:
where G is the total weight of fish, a is the enclosed area, and d is the raising factor due to subsampling.
Environmental variables (temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen concentration, and pH value) were considered as the abiotic variables in the analysis. Biotic indices including Shannon-Wiener diversity index (Shannon 1948) and Pielou’s evenness (Pielou 1969) were determined for each factor level using the DIVERSE routine of PRIMER software version 6.1.13 (PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, UK) (Clarke and Gorley 2006; Anderson et al. 2008).
Monthly fish abundance and biomass data were grouped by site (BP and SB) and season (SWM and NEM) for a posteriori analysis. Fish abundance data were also subjected to a priori testing of the effects of site (BP/SB), period (dry/ wet), moonlight (new moon/full moon), and diel light cycle (day/night). Results from both a posteriori and a priori studies were subjected to similar but independent univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analyses were performed to test the null hypothesis of no significant difference in fish abundance, biomass, environmental parameters (temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen concentration, pH value, sediment chlorophyll a content, sediment particle size, sediment organic matter), or diversity indices (Shannon-Wiener diversity index or Pielou’s evenness) among factor levels by using multiway ANOVA test in the STATISTICA software, version 8.0. A two-way ANOVA was used for the a posteriori test, while a four-way ANOVA was used for the a priori test. Prior to univariate analysis, the assumption of homogeneity of variance was tested. Skewed data were transformed with square root transformation to homogenize the variance. Following unsuccessful transformation, Kruskal-Wallis test was used for significant test. All mean values are reported with standard error (SE) unless stated otherwise. Significance level at p = 0.05 was applied for all tests to determine significant difference.
Distance-based permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) in the PRIMER software was performed on transformed data. Prior to multivariate analysis, all fish abundance data were square rooted to downweigh the contribution of dominant species (Clarke and Warwick 2001). The Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distance was used to test the null hypothesis of no differences in fish assemblage between the stated levels for each factor (i.e., site, period, lunar phase, and sampling time). Each factor was analyzed as fixed factors with two levels each using 4999 permutations. The null hypothesis of no difference in dispersions among a priori groups was tested using test of homogeneity of dispersions (PERMDISP) (Anderson et al. 2008), followed by post hoc pairwise test if the test was significant. Following pairwise tests on abundance data between and within each factor by PERMANOVA, the similarity percentage (SIMPER) tests were carried out on pairs with significant p values to identify the significant distinguishing fish species. Species that fulfilled the criteria \( \%{\overline{\delta}}_i>3\kern0.22em \% \) and \( {\overline{\delta}}_i/\mathrm{S}\mathrm{D}>1 \) (where \( {\overline{\delta}}_i \) is the overall dissimilarity between two groups and SD is the standard deviation) were arbitrarily accepted as important contributors to dissimilarity among each factor.
The groupings or patterns were visualized on a constrained ordination using canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP), which maintained a priori site, period, lunar phase, and sampling time classifications (Clarke and Gorley 2006). Null hypothesis of no difference between groups, formed by combining each factor, was tested using 4999 random permutations. An appropriate subset of canonical axes (m) for the CAP analysis was determined by maximizing the leave-one-out allocation success (Anderson and Willis 2003). A Spearman correlation coefficient of >0.40 was used as an arbitrary limit to display potential correlation between individual species abundances relative to the canonical axes.
Results
Environmental Parameters
Based on the SPI of 4 years of rainfall data recorded at Sungai Buloh Estate station, the NEM from November–March was the wetter season compared to the SWM from May to September (Fig. 2).
Water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between BP and SB and between SWM and NEM season (Table 1). Water temperature in BP ranged from 28.9 to 31.2 °C and 28.6 to 30.6 °C for SB. The lowest mean salinity (30.2) was recorded at SB during the NEM period of high rainfall (October 2012) and the highest salinity (35.1) was recorded in February 2012. Mean DO concentration showed no significant difference between sites and between monsoon seasons, ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 mg/l. Although both sites did not show a significant difference in terms of pH value, the SWM period had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher pH value (8.0 ± 0.2) than in the NEM period (7.7 ± 0.3). No interaction effects were found for all factors. Mean water temperature and DO concentration collected during the a priori study revealed rather consistent mean values at both sites and seasons. However, water temperature at the new moon phase (30.44 ± 0.84 °C) and at nighttime (30.44 ± 0.63 °C) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than during the full moon phase (29.75 ± 0.66 °C) and daytime (29.75 ± 0.85 °C). Post hoc analysis revealed that water temperature at SB was significantly higher during nighttime than daytime. Water temperature was significantly higher at new moon than full moon during both the dry and wet periods. Although no significant difference was generally observed for water parameters in the a posteriori study, only mean salinity recorded in the dry period (32.73 ± 1.15) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than in the wet period (31.53 ± 1.40).
Analysis of sediment for both sites revealed that percentage organic matter in sediment at SB (10.1 ± 0.2 %) was significantly higher than at BP (7.1 ± 0.5 %). In terms of particle size, SB (clay 16.1 ± 0.3 %; silt 63.2 ± 0.6 %) had significantly higher percentage of clay but lower percentage of silt than BP (clay 9.5 ± 0.4 %; silt 69 ± 1.8 %). No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed for percentage of fine sand (SB 20.7 ± 0.8 % vs. BP 21.5 ± 2.1 %) and coarse sand was absent in both sites. In terms of sediment chlorophyll a content, SB (9.3 ± 0.6 μg/g DW) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than BP (5.8 ± 0.4 μg/g DW).
Species Diversity
A total of 119 species belonging to 46 families of fish were sampled from September 2011 to September 2014 (30 months). The Sciaenidae was the most speciose family (12 species), followed by Ariidae (10 species) and Engraulidae (7 species) (Appendix). The most abundant species was the Caroun croaker (Johnius carouna), followed the anchovy Kammal thryssa (Thryssa kammalensis) and the Sagor catfish (Hexanematichthys sagor) (Appendix). The majority of the fish sampled had standard lengths (SL) of less than 120 mm and were thus made of juvenile or subadult fish (He. sagor, Eleutheronema tetradactylum, Plotosus canius), or the adult of small-sized fish (Ambassis gymnocephalus, Th. kammalensis, and Leiognathus brevirostris). Based on the results of univariate ANOVA for both the a posteriori and a priori studies, Shannon diversity was significantly higher (p < 0.05) at SB compared to BP, whereas no significant difference (p > 0.05) in diversity was observed between SWM vs. NEM, dry vs. wet period, new moon vs. full moon, or day vs. night (Table 1). In terms of Pielou’s evenness, ANOVA shows no significant difference between levels for all four factors examined in both a priori and a posteriori studies.
Spatial and Temporal Distribution
Mean total fish abundance in the a posteriori study was significantly higher (p < 0.05) at NEM (5152 ± 1068 ind. ha−1) compared to SWM (2178 ± 362 ind. ha−1). Fish abundance in SB (2744 ± 948 ind. ha−1) and BP (4722 ± 698 ind. ha−1) mudflat did not show significant difference in fish abundance (p > 0.05). The highest monthly fish density recorded at both sites also fell in the NEM period (Fig. 3), i.e., January 2012 (16,473 ind. ha−1) for BP and November 2012 (24,337 ind. ha−1) for SB. Caroun croakers contributed the most to both density peaks, accounting for about 66 % of total fish abundance in January 2012 at BP and 38 % in November 2012 at SB. In terms of total fish biomass, BP had significantly higher (p < 0.05) mean biomass (109.4 ± 29.3 g/ha) than SB (58.0 ± 28.6 g/ha), but no significant difference (p > 0.05) was found between seasons (SWM 65.0 ± 26.4 g/ha; NEM 103.9 ± 32.1 g/ha). The highest fish biomass (531.2 kg/ha) was recorded in September 2012 and the lowest biomass (15.9 kg/ha) in August 2013 for BP. In the SB, the highest (554.7 kg/ha) and lowest (5.6 kg/ha) biomass were obtained in November 2012 and May 2012, respectively. The high catches of fish during these months were attributed to large catches of ariids (>90 %).
The 10 species of highly abundant and commercially important fish species were found to be more abundant during the NEM period compared to the SWM period (Fig. 4). Only three species of fish (Cynoglossus cynoglossus, J. carouna and Pl. canius) were more abundant at BP, whereas the other seven species were more abundant at SB. The majority of fish sampled (62.7 %) were small-sized (<120 mm) and considered juvenile fish based on their sampled lengths relative to their maximum lengths (Nagelkerken and Van Der Velde 2002), such as the tongue sole Cy. cynoglossus, Indian threadfin E. tetradactylum, Sagor catfish He. sagor, and silver pomfret Pampus argenteus. Most individuals of the gray mullet Liza subviridis and three sciaenid species (J. carouna, Otolithes ruber, and Panna microdon) were often found slightly larger than their minimum juvenile size.
In the a priori study, the mean total fish abundance and biomass were significantly higher in BP (4086 ± 2678 ind. ha−1; 73.2 ± 53.2 kg/ha) than in SB (1035 ± 635 ind. ha−1; 16.2 ± 8.2 kg/ha) mudflat (p < 0.05). However, there was neither significant difference between levels for period, moon light, and diel light effect nor their interaction effects (p > 0.05).
Fish Assemblage Structure
The fish assemblage (species composition and abundance) examined according to four influencing factors differed significantly between sites, wet/dry periods, and day/night (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between full/new moon (p > 0.05). There were also no significant interactions among factors at all levels (p > 0.05; Table 3).
The test of homogeneity of dispersions showed no significant assemblage dispersion for site (p = 0.545), period (p = 0.803), moon light (p = 0.810), and diel light (p = 0.308). This result, together with PERMANOVA results showed that the fish assemblage structure did not show dispersion effect but differed significantly within the factors (site, period, and daytime-nighttime). Fish assemblage structure under new moon and full moon phase was not significantly different among and within levels; therefore, the moon light factor was omitted in subsequent constrained CAP analyses.
The separation of species assemblages between sites (BP/SB), period (dry/wet), and diel light (day/night) is visualized in constrained CAP ordination results (Fig. 5). The null hypothesis of no differences between the six groups of fish (for each level) due to the effect of site, period, and diel light was rejected (p < 0.05) based on CAP test. The leave-one-out allocation success was maximized at m = 8, where 40.63 % (canonical correlation, δ 2 = 0.88) of the samples were allocated to the correct group. The spread along the first canonical axis separated the fish assemblage at BP (squares, right) from the fish assemblage at SB (circles, left), whereas the second canonical axis separated those from the dry/wet period (wet at the top, dry at the bottom) and diel light (day on the top, night at the bottom). Distinct groups of fish were identified from CAP analysis (Fig. 5b) with abundances significantly correlated (Spearman correlation > 0.40) with site, period, and diel light. The abundance of seven species of fish namely Anodontostoma chacunda, Kurtus indicus, Upeneus sulphureus, Dasyatis zugeii, Le. brevirostris, Pa. argenteus, and Coilia dussumieri were significantly associated with SB, whereas BP was characterized by fish assemblage comprising mainly Th. kammalensis, Am. gymnocephalus, Scatophagus argus, Strongylura strongylura, Hemiramphus far, Pl. canius, Li. subviridis, and Stolephorus baganensis. There were seven species of fish whose abundance were significantly associated with wet period and daytime (Takifugu oblongus, Aspericorvina jubata, Johnius belangerii, Plicofollis argypleuron, Liza melinoptera, He. sagor, and Ot. ruber), and three species of fish were found significantly associated with dry period and night sampling (Congresox talabonoides, Ilisha melastoma, and Nibea soldado).
SIMPER analysis indicated that four species of fish (Th. kammalensis, J. carouna, He. sagor, and Am. gymnocephalus) showed the most differences between levels of site, period, moon light, and diel light (\( {\overline{\delta}}_i>3\kern0.22em \% \) and \( {\overline{\delta}}_i/\mathrm{S}\mathrm{D}>1 \)). Abundance of all four species was higher in BP than SB. Both Kammal anchovy and Caroun croaker had higher abundance at full moon (moonlit night) during the dry period compared to new moon and wet period. On the other hand, Sagor catfish and bald glassy were more abundant at new moon during the wet period compared to full moon during the dry period. Both Caroun croaker and Sagor catfish recorded higher abundance during daytime, while Th. kammalensis and Am. gymnocephalus had higher abundance at nighttime.
Discussion
This study recorded the ingression of 119 species of fish into two sites at the coastal Klang mudflat (i.e., BP/SB) during high tide based on samplings using a stationary large barrier net. Previously, Chong et al. (1990) only recorded 70 fish species at SB using the same sampling gear; however, the dominant fish families were consistent among the two studies. Species richness was generally higher in the present study compared to similar habitats in other geographical areas; however, this result is likely influenced by differences among studies in terms of the type of gear used, sampling effort, and/or season sampled. For example, 31 fish species were recorded in a tropical mudflat of the Indian Sundarbans sampled seasonally using a gill net (Chaudhuri et al. 2013), 39 species on a mudflat in southern Australia (Hindell and Jenkins 2004: sampled seasonally using a fyke net, gill net, and beach seine), 20 species in the Tama River mudflat in central Japan (Kanou et al. 2005: sampled day and night with a beach seine), and 51 species in a Hong Kong mudflat (Tse et al. 2008: seasonally with beach seine). Thus, differences in the number of species sampled could be due to different locations, sampling gears, effort, and/or seasons. The Klang mudflat fish community was comprised of several distinct groups discernable from one another by a few dominant species. These groups of fish species displayed their favored period of ingression into the mudflat (see Figs. 4 and 5), apparently driven by suitable abiotic (see Tables 1, 2, and 3) and biotic factors (Chong et al. 2012a). Previous studies in the Klang mudflat reported a mean fish biomass of 10.53 kg/ha (Sasekumar and Chong 1991) using similar sampling gear and 5.96 kg/ha (Chong et al. 1990) using a trawl net. Chong et al. (1990) further estimated the mean biomass of the juvenile fish stock in the adjacent Klang mangroves at 17.7 kg/ha. All fish biomass estimates are generally lower than those found in the present study (Table 1) which ranged from 5.6 to 554.7 kg/ha. Another study by Chong et al. (2012b) at Matang coastal mudflat, located farther north of the current study site, estimated total faunal standing biomass of 21.23–34.89 kg/ha. The standing stock biomass of invertebrates at Matang mudflat constituted approximately 87 % of the total fauna sampled by a small beam trawl. Compared to the present study, the mean invertebrate biomass at BP mudflat was 3.6 kg/ha and at SB mudflat 6.7 kg/ha (unpublished data). However, the passive barrier net in Klang mudflat was ineffective in catching molluscs, and the majority of invertebrates caught were shrimp (~82 %) (unpublished data).
Although there were no significant differences in water temperature, salinity, pH, and dissolved oxygen between seasons (NEM vs. SWM) in the present study, mean fish abundance on the mudflat was higher during the NEM compared to the SWM. Most studies that have found the monsoon to be an important influence on fish assemblages indicate that major shifts in environmental parameters, such as salinity, dissolved oxygen, and wind strength, were important in influencing species composition, abundance, biomass, and recruitment (Abesamis and Russ 2010; Bijoy Nandan et al. 2012; Mukherjee et al. 2013). At both sites in the present study, two peaks in fish ingression were observed: a small one during the SWM and a larger one during the NEM. These peaks likely reflect the main fish recruitment months resulting from two peak spawnings coinciding with the onset of the two tropical monsoons as reported by previous workers (Barlow 1981; Pauly and Navaluna 1983). Monsoon winds may enhance recruitment by influencing the dispersal of fish larvae over larger spatial scales (Sponaugle and Cowen 1994) and increasing the encounter rates between larval fish and their prey due to turbulent mixing of water column (MacKenzie and Kiorboe 1995; Utne-Palm 2004).
The water parameters examined (i.e., salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH) at SB and BP sites did not differ significantly (see Fig. 3). This was not surprising since the two sites were located in the same general area; however, interestingly, differences in species assemblage and the timing of peak fish ingression were observed. The peak ingression at SB occurred 2 months earlier than at BP. This may suggest that substrate differences, mudflat productivity, or/and other factors may be important in determining the type of fish species and when they are attracted to the mudflats. Sediment grain size analyses indicated that BP contained a greater percentage of silt and sand-sized particles than at SB, whereas sedimentary organic carbon and chlorophyll a content was higher in the finer sediments at SB. Fine-grained sediments generally have a higher organic content compared to coarse sediment (Köster and Meyer-Reil 2001). High organic matter may also indicate higher food availability in sediment that can support benthic feeders including shrimps, stingrays, and catfish. In particular, the benthic feeding Sagor catfish (Hajisamae et al. 2003) was found to be abundant at SB.
Compared to BP, SB is anthropogenically disturbed, being an extensive culture bed (2500 ha) for blood cockles that are artificially seeded throughout the year. Bivalve culture beds can influence the local system in three ways namely food and waste production, alteration of physical structure (such as substrate), and disturbance through harvesting activities (Dumbauld et al. 2009). Several manipulative studies on bivalves have shown that the physical structure of the bivalve itself may be more important than the bivalve’s biological role in modifying the local habitat (Bódis et al. 2014; Dumbauld et al. 2009; Ricciardi et al. 1997). Densely cultured shells create nooks and crannies on and among them, allowing sediments to accumulate within the matrix, thus forming different microhabitats and increasing habitat heterogeneity (Lohse 1993; Mohammed 1992; Borthagaray and Carranza 2007). This may explain the high species diversity of fish as observed at SB and may contribute to the relatively higher POM content in the sediments (Gutierrez et al. 2003). The culture of cockles also attracts their natural predators into the culture area, such as gastropods (Vermeij 1980; Broom 1982).
At both sites, the majority of fish caught were small in size, including the bald glassy and anchovies, and juvenile Caroun croakers. Juvenile fish are more prone to predation by large predatory fish (Fuiman 1989; Cowan and Houde 1992). Therefore, smaller fish that periodically ingress into the mudflat during high tide may be doing so to avoid their predators. Morrison et al. (2002) also showed that tidal flats are utilized as nursery habitats by large numbers of small fish and juveniles. Examples of large predatory fish that preyed on anchovies include the threadfin (Leptomelanosoma indicum), Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson), and barramundi (Lates calcarifer). These large predatory fish were more common in SB than in BP, where anchovies and Caroun croaker were abundant. Other than small species and juvenile fish caught, large predatory fish species that were commonly present in BP included the eel catfish (Pl. canius) and spotted needlefish (Str. strongylura). The main diet of the eel catfish at SB consisted of bivalves such as blood cockles (Leh et al. 2012). However, preliminary stomach content analysis of Pl. canius revealed very low consumption of blood cockles and a high abundance of sesarmid crabs and polychaetes in our samples.
The dry period of Klang mudflat recorded significantly higher salinity than the wet period. Seasonal fluctuations of both salinity and temperature were generally small in Klang Strait (Chong et al. 1996). Although heavy rainfall during the wet period resulted in high input of freshwater into the intertidal area via the three major rivers (Fig. 1), there appears to be significant mixing by high salinity seawater at both study sites (Table 1). Nevertheless, the wet period appears to have more fish species compared to the dry period. The fish consisted of mainly predatory fish such as sciaenid species (J. carouna, Ot. ruber, J. belangerii, and As. jubata) and catfishes (He. sagor and Pli. argypleuron). In particular, the Caroun croaker’s density peaked during the NEM between October 2012 and January 2013. The catfish Cryptarius truncatus and soldier croaker Ni. soldado were however found abundantly during the dry period, particularly at BP. The high occurrence of the soldier croaker was similarly observed during the SWM period (June–September) on the west coast of India (Ansari et al. 1995). A study by Pang (1990) revealed that the maturation process for both Cr. truncatus (total length 300–340 mm) and Nemapteryx caelata (220–260 mm) could start in August and reached its peak from December to January. In the present study, Cr. truncatus recorded a peak density during September and Ne. caelata in November. Most specimens of these two species had a size range of 220 to 330 mm during these periods, which indicate that both catfish ingressed into the mudflat as mature stages; hence, it is conceivable that the catfish spawned here. Interestingly, many small juveniles of Ne. caelata were recorded subsequently except Cr. truncatus which indicate that the latter may spawn farther offshore. Other than for feeding or spawning, the movement of fish may also be a result of wind forcing. Several studies had revealed that fish movement and larval recruitment were positively correlated with wind force and direction (Findlay and Allen 2002; Thorrold et al. 1994).
Although the moon light intensity has been reported to have an impact on the composition and breeding of fish (Horký et al. 2006; Ikegami et al. 2014; Krumme et al. 2015) and invertebrates (Nascimento et al. 1991; Camargo et al. 2002; Bentley et al. 1999), full moon or new moon appears to have no effect on the mudflat fish species assemblage in Klang Strait. This may be due to the high turbidity of the mudflat water so that moon light may offer little advantage to visual predators. In fact, turbid shallow waters provide protection to young fish from predators (Blaber 2000; McLusky and Elliot 2004), which is further enhanced by darkness provided by the new moon (Krumme et al. 2015). The effect of moon light may have a more pronounced effect on the molting and spawning of local shrimp species compared to fish species (Pushparajan et al. 2012; Ramarn et al. 2014).
The majority of fish species that were found to be abundant during the day were predatory fish such as Caroun croaker (J. carouna), Lunartail puffer (Lagocephalus lunaris), Tardoore (Opisthopterus tardoore), Indian Threadfin (E. tetradactylum), Tigertooth croaker (Ot. ruber), and Belanger’s croaker (J. belangerii). Analysis of fish diet of these species revealed that the majority of food items were shrimp (unpublished data). These visual predatory fish may hunt their prey during daylight. On the other hand, small fodder fish such as Am. gymnocephalus occurred abundantly in the mudflat at night. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies (Martin and Blaber 1983; Krumme et al. 2015) which reported that ambassids feed and occur mainly during the night. The present study also recorded that the ambassids were abundant especially during the NEM (November to January). According to Chew et al. (2012), common mangrove and mudflat fish species such as ariids, engraulids, and ambassids fed primarily on copepods. Interestingly, copepod and phytoplankton density peaked during the wetter months (November and February) of the NEM (Chew and Chong 2011). In contrast, several studies showed that ambassids were scarce in the mudflat as compared to mangrove forest (Tse et al. 2008), as they prefer sheltered (Shao and Chen 2003) and structurally complex habitats (Laegdsgaard and Johnson 2001). This may indicate that ambassids utilize the shallow coastal mudflats in Klang Strait more for nocturnal feeding rather than to seek refuge from predators, or perhaps they, like other marine stragglers, irregularly visit the coastal mudflat without any apparent estuarine requirement (Elliot and Dewailly 1995; Franca et al. 2008).
The coastal ichthyofauna that utilize the Klang mudflat are mainly juvenile fish of which 82 % are commercially exploited on maturity, while the remainder constitute fodder fish integral to the coastal food web. Among the six major feeding guilds of fish on the mudflat, the shrimp feeders (45 %) constituted the largest group, and penaeid shrimps were the most dominant prey item (32 %) followed by molluscs (12 %) (Lee, unpublished). This underlines the importance of the coastal mudflat as rich feeding ground, nursery, and habitat for coastal fishes, shrimps, and molluscs. Mudflat productivity also enables the successful culture of blood cockles over large areas of the mudflat (Broom 1985). It is not known to what extent Klang mudflat is functionally connected to coastal mangrove, the only other coastal biotope present and occurring adjacent to one another. They may be ecologically connected via upwelling of organic matter and nutrients from the mangrove (Alongi 1996), but stable isotope or δ 13C studies of mudflat consumers have shown negligible assimilation of mangrove carbon (Newell et al. 1995; Lee, unpublished). Nevertheless, regardless of whether mudflats are in fact powerhouses in their own right (i.e., fueled by in situ benthic diatoms and phytoplankton) or receiving allochthonous energy sources, the Klang mudflat is increasing threatened by both coastal reclamation and shrinking mangrove forests, as well as coastal erosion and pollution (Bird and Teh 1990; Leong et al. 2005; Lee and Bong 2012; Chew et al. 2015).
Conclusion
Site and monsoon influence the fish species diversity and abundance on Klang mudflat. The site factor could be attributed to cockle farming on the mudflat and/or differences in soil substrate, which may increase species diversity and modulate community structure. The fish assemblage at SB was comprised of fish from many taxa, but Ariidae, Clupeidae, Engraulidae, and Tetraodontidae were numerically dominant. In contrast, BP’s fish assemblage consisted of mainly Cynoglossidae, Plotosidae, and Ambassidae. Most species occurred throughout the year. Although no major differences in the water parameters were observed between the monsoons, the NEM appeared to attract more fish into the mudflat as compared to SWM. Species composition but not total abundance differed between the dry and wet period and between day and night; however, there was no difference between full and new moon. Daytime attracted more large predatory fish species into the mudflat, while nighttime attracted large numbers of small fish and nocturnal feeders into the mudflat. Future studies on predator-prey relationships and diet analysis may give clearer reasons why fish are attracted to the mudflat throughout the year. Conservation efforts to protect coastal mangrove forests or seagrass meadows must also include the adjacent mudflats, for these barren muddy lands are not wastelands but powerhouses generating food both directly and indirectly for fisheries and aquaculture.
References
Abesamis, R.A., and G.R. Russ. 2010. Patterns of recruitment of coral reef fishes in a monsoon environment. Coral Reefs 29(4): 911–921.
Alongi, D.M. 1996. The dynamics of benthic nutrient pools and fluxes in tropical mangrove forests. Journal of Marine Research 54(1): 123–148.
Anderson, M.J., and T.J. Willis. 2003. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84: 55–80.
Anderson, M.J., R.N. Gorley, and K.R. Clarke. 2008. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.
Ansari, Z.A., A. Chatterji, B.S. Ingole, R.A. Sreepada, C.U. Rivonkar, and A.H. Parulekar. 1995. Community structure and seasonal variation of an inshore demersal fish community at Goa, west coast of India. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 41: 593–610.
Barlow, C.G. 1981. Breeding and larval rearing of Lates calcarifer (Bloch) (Pisces: Centropomidae) in Thailand. New South Wales State Fisheries Report 8.
Bentley, M.G., P.J.W. Olive, and K.S. Last. 1999. Sexual satellites, moonlight and the nuptial dances of worms: the influence of the moon on reproduction of marine animals. Earth, Moon and Planets 85–86: 67–84.
Bijoy Nandan, S., P.R. Jayachandran, and O.K. Sreedevi. 2012. Temporal pattern of fish production in a microtidal tropical estuary in the south-west coast of India. Indian Journal of Fisheries 59: 17–26.
Bird, E.C.F., and T.S. Teh. 1990. Current state of the coastal zone in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Tropical Geography 21(1): 9–24.
Blaber, S.J.M. 2000. Tropical estuarine fishes: ecology, exploitation and conservation. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Bódis, E., B. Tóth, J. Szekeres, P. Borza, and R. Sousa. 2014. Empty native and invasive bivalve shells as benthic habitat modifiers in a large river. Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 49: 1–9.
Boehs, G., T.M. Absher, and A.C. Cruz-Kaled. 2004. Composition and distribution of benthic molluscs on intertidal flats of Paranaguá Bay (Paraná, Brazil). Scientia Marina 68(4): 537–543.
Borthagaray, A.I., and A. Carranza. 2007. Mussels as ecosystem engineers: their contribution to species richness in a rocky littoral community. Acta Oecologica 31: 243–250.
Broom, M.J. 1982. Size selection, consumption rates and growth of the gastropods Natica maculosa Lamarck and Thais carinifera (Lamarck) preying on the bivalve Anadara granosa (L.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 56: 213–233.
Broom, M.J. 1985. The biology and culture of marine bivalve of Genus Anadara. ICLARM Studies and Reviews 12: 37.
Buchanan, J.B. 1984. Sediment analysis. In Methods for the study of marine benthos, ed. N.A. Holme and A.D. McIntyre, 41–65. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bujang, J.S., M.H. Zakaria, and A. Arshad. 2006. Distribution and significance of seagrass ecosystems in Malaysia. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 9(2): 203–214.
Camargo, W.N., L. Van Vooren, and P. Sorgeloos. 2002. Effects of lunar cycles on Artemia density in hypersaline environments. Hydrobiologia 468: 251–260.
Cardoso, I., S. França, M.P. Pais, S. Henriques, L. Cancela da Fonseca, and H.N. Cabral. 2011. Fish assemblages of small estuaries of the Portuguese coast: a functional approach. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 93(1): 40–46.
Carpenter, K.E., and V.H. Niem. 1998a. FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific, Seaweed, corals, bivalves and gastropods, vol. 1. Rome: FAO.
Carpenter, K.E., and V.H. Niem. 1998b. FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific, Cephalopods, crustaceans, holothurians and sharks, vol. 2. Rome: FAO.
Chaudhuri, A., S. Mukherjee, and S. Homechaudhuri. 2013. Seasonal dynamics of fish assemblages in an intertidal mudflat of Indian Sundarbans. Scientia Marina 77(2): 301–311.
Cheang, B. K. 1988. A summary of the results of studies on southwest monsoon in Malaysia conducted during 1972–1988. Malaysian Meteorological Service Technical Note No. 31.
Chew, L.L., and V.C. Chong. 2011. Copepod community structure and abundance in a tropical mangrove estuary, with comparisons to coastal waters. Hydrobiologia 666(1): 127–143.
Chew, L.L., V.C. Chong, K. Tanaka, and A. Sasekumar. 2012. Phytoplankton fuel the energy flow from zooplankton to small nekton in turbid mangrove waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series 469: 7–14.
Chew, L.L., V.C. Chong, R.C. Wong, P. Lehette, C.C. Ng, and K.H. Loh. 2015. Three decades of sea water abstraction by Kapar power plant (Malaysia): what impacts on tropical zooplankton community? Marine Pollution Bulletin 101(1): 69–84.
Chong, V.C., A. Sasekumar, M.U.C. Leh, and R. D’Cruz. 1990. The fish and prawn communities of a Malaysian coastal mangrove system, with comparison to adjacent mud flats and inshore waters. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 31: 703–722.
Chong, V.C., A. Sasekumar, and E. Wolanski. 1996. The role of mangroves in retaining penaeid prawn larvae in Klang Strait, Malaysia. Mangroves and Salt Marshes 1: 11–22.
Chong, V.C., C.B. Low, and T. Ichikawa. 2001. Contribution of mangrove detritus to juvenile prawn nutrition: a dual stable isotope study in a Malaysian mangrove forest. Marine Biology 138: 77–86.
Chong, V.C., A. Sasekumar and S.W. Zgozi. 2012. Ecology of fish and shrimp communities. In: Sasekumar, A. and Chong, V.C. (eds) Mangrove and coastal environment of Selangor, Malaysia. IOES Monograph Series 14: 215–241.
Chong, V.C., H.W. Teoh, A.L. Ooi, A.R. Jamizan, and K. Tanaka. 2012b. Ingression and feeding habits of fish in Matang coastal mudflats, Malaysia. JIRCAS Working Report 75: 15–24.
Clark, F.J.K., and A.L.M. Pessanha. 2015. Diet and ontogenetic shift in habitat use by Rhinosardinia bahiensis in a tropical semi-arid estuary, north-eastern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 95: 175–183. doi:10.1017/S0025315414000939.
Clarke, K.R., and R.N. Gorley. 2006. PRIMER V6; user manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.
Clarke, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd ed. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.
Connolly, R.M., D. Gorman, and M.A. Guest. 2005. Movement of carbon among estuarine habitats and its assimilation by invertebrates. Oecologia 144: 684–691.
Cowan Jr., J.H., and E.D. Houde. 1992. Size-dependent predation on marine fish larvae by ctenophores, scyphomedusae, and planktivorous fish. Fisheries Oceanography 1: 113–126.
de Boer, W.F., and H. Prins. 2002. The community structure of a tropical intertidal mudflat under human exploitation. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59(6): 1237–1247.
De Bruin, G.H.P., B.C. Russel, and A. Bogusch. 1994. The marine fishery resources of Sri Lanka. FAO species scientific field guide for fishery purposes. Rome: FAO.
Dittmann, S. 1993. Impact of foraging soldiercrabs (Decapoda: Mictyridae) on meiofauna in a tropical tidal flat. Revista de Biología Tropical 41(3): 627–637.
DOF. 2010. Annual fisheries statistics 2010. WismaTani, Putrajaya, Malaysia: Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Agrobased Industry.
Dumbauld, B.R., J.L. Ruesink, and S.S. Rumrill. 2009. The ecological role of bivalve shellfish aquaculture in the estuarine environment: a review with application to oyster and clam culture in West Coast (USA) estuaries. Aquaculture 290(3–4): 196–223.
Elliot, M., and F. Dewailly. 1995. The structure and components of European estuarine fish assemblages. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 29: 1237–1247.
Findlay, A.M., and L.G. Allen. 2002. Temporal patterns of settlement in the temperate reef fish Paralabrax clathratu. Marine Ecology Progress Series 238: 237–248.
Franca, S., M. Pardal, and H. Cabral. 2008. Mudflat nekton assemblages in the Tagus estuary (Portugal): distribution and feeding patterns. Scientia Marina 72(3): 591–602.
Fuiman, L.A. 1989. Vulnerability of Atlantic herring larvae to predation by yearling herring*. Marine Ecology Progress Series 51: 291–299.
Guarini, J.M., G.F. Blanchard, C. Bacher, P. Gros, D. Gouleau, and C. Bacher. 2000. Dynamic model of the short-term variability of microphytobenthic biomass on temperate intertidal mudflats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 195: 291–303.
Gutierrez, J.L., C.G. Jones, D.I. Strayer, and O.O. Iribarne. 2003. Mollusks as ecosystem engineers: the role of shell production in aquatic habitats. Oikos 101: 79–90.
Hajisamae, S., L.M. Chou, and S. Ibrahim. 2003. Feeding habits and trophic organization of the fish community in shallow waters of an impacted tropical habitat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58: 89–98.
Hill, B.J., M.J. William, and P. Dutton. 1982. Distribution of juvenile, sub-adult, and adult Scylla serrata (Crustacea, Portunidae) on tidal flats in Australia. Marine Biology 69(1): 117–120.
Hindell, J.S., and G.P. Jenkins. 2004. Spatial and temporal variability in the assemblage structure of fishes associated with mangroves (Avicennia marina) and intertidal mudflats in temperate Australian embayments. Marine Biology 144(2): 385–395.
Holme, N.A., and A.D. Mclntyre. 1971. IBP handbook no 16. Methods for the study of marine benthos. Oxford: Blackwell.
Horký, P., O. Slavík, L. Bartoš, J. Kolářová, and T. Randák. 2006. The effect of moon phase and seasonality on the behaviour of pikeperch in the Elbe River. Folia Zoologica 55(4): 411–417.
Ikegami, T., Y. Takeuchi, S.P. Hur, and A. Takemura. 2014. Impacts of moonlight on fish reproduction. Marine Genomics 14: 59–66.
Jarernpornnipat, A., O. Pedersen, K.R. Jensen, S. Boromthanarat, S. Vongvisessomjai, and P. Choncheanchob. 2003. Sustainable management of shellfish resources in Bandon Bay, Gulf of Thailand. Journal of Coastal Conservation 9(2): 135–146.
Kanou, K., M. Sano, and H. Kohno. 2005. Larval and juvenile fishes occurring with flood tides on an intertidal mudflat in the Tama River estuary, central Japan. Ichthyological Research 52: 158–164.
Kao, T. C., L. W. Wong and C. T. Chin. 1998. Land reclamation in South East Asia. Proceedings of 13th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, 137–144.
Köster, M., and L.A. Meyer-Reil. 2001. Characterization of carbon and microbial biomass pools in shallow water coastal sediments of the southern Baltic Sea (Nordrügensche Bodden). Marine Ecology Progress Series 214: 25–41.
Krumme, U., K. Grinvalds, M. Zagars, D. Elferts, K. Ikejima, and P. Tongnunui. 2015. Tidal, diel and lunar patterns in intertidal and subtidal mangrove creek fish assemblages from southwest Thailand. Environmental Biology of Fishes 98(6): 1671–1693.
Kundu, N., A. Chaudhuri, S. Mukherjee, S. Sen, and S. Homechaudhuri. 2012. Seasonal fish diversity under tidal influence in the intertidal mudflats of Indian Sundarbans. Indian Journal of Fisheries 59(4): 43–52.
Laegdsgaard, P., and C. Johnson. 2001. Why do juvenile fish utilise mangrove habitats? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 257: 229–253.
Lee, C. W. and C.W. Bong. 2012. Microbial ecology of Port Klang waters. In: Sasekumar, A. and Chong, V.C. (eds) Mangrove and coastal environment of Selangor, Malaysia. IOES Monograph Series 14:163–173.
Leh, M.U.C., and A. Sasekumar. 1984. Feeding ecology of prawns in shallow waters adjoining mangrove shores. Proc. Asian Symp. Mangrove Environment (Eds: E. Soepadmo et al.), 321. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya. 321–353 pp.
Leh, M.U.C., A. Sasekumar, and L.L. Chew. 2012. Feeding biology of eel catfish Plotosus canius Hamilton in a Malaysian mangrove estuary and mudflat. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 60(2): 551–557.
Leong, L.F., K.K. Kwan, V.C. Chong, and A. Sasekumar. 2005. Resource valuation of Kuala Selangor mangrove forest. In Ecology of Klang Strait, ed. A. Sasekumar and V.C. Chong, 230–252. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.
Lohse, D.P. 1993. The importance of secondary substratum in a rocky intertidal community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 166: 1–17.
Lorenzen, C.J. 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and pheo-pigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnology and Oceanography 12: 343–346.
MacKenzie, B.R., and T. Kiorboe. 1995. Encounter rates and swimming behavior of pause-travel and cruise larval fish predators in calm and turbulent laboratory environments. Limnology and Oceanography 40: 1278–1289.
Marsitah, I., and V.C. Chong. 2002. Population and feeding ecology of Parapenaeopsis sculptilis (Heller, 1862) in Klang Strait, Peninsular Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Science 21: 61–68.
Martin, T.J., and S.J.M. Blaber. 1983. The feeding ecology of Ambassidae (Osteichthyes: Perciformes) in Natal estuaries. South African Journal of Zoology 18: 353–362.
McIntosh, D. J. 1984. Ecology and productivity of Malaysian mangrove crab populations (Decapoda: Brachyura). In: Proceeding of the Asian symposium on mangrove environment research and management. (eds: E. Soepadmo et al.). University of Malaya and UNESCO, 354–377 pp.
McKee, T. B., N. J. Doesken and J. Kleist. 1993. The relationship of drought frequency and duration of time scales. In: Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society, Jan 17–23, 1993, Anaheim CA, 179–186 pp.
McLusky, D.S., and M. Elliot. 2004. The estuarine ecosystem: ecology, threats and management, 3rd ed. Oxford: OUP.
Melville, A., and R. Connolly. 2005. Food webs supporting fish over subtropical mudflats are based on transported organic matter not in situ microalgae. Marine Biology 148(2): 363–371.
Mohammed, S.Z. 1992. The interaction between adults and recruitments in the Brachidontes variabilis L. (Lamellibranchiata) bed in the Bitter Great Lake, Suez Canal. Qatar University Science Journal 12: 228–232.
Mohsin, A.K.M., and M.A. Ambak. 1996. Marine fishes and fisheries of Malaysia and neighbouring countries. Serdang, Malaysia: University Putra Malaysia.
Morrison, M.a., M.P. Francis, B.W. Hartill, and D.M. Parkinson. 2002. Diurnal and tidal variation in the abundance of the fish fauna of a temperate tidal mudflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 54(5): 793–807.
Mukherjee, S., A. Chaudhuri, N. Kundu, S. Mitra, and S. Homechaudhuri. 2013. Comprehensive analysis of fish assemblages in relation to seasonal environmental variables in an estuarine river of Indian Sundarbans. Estuaries and Coasts 36(1): 192–202. doi:10.1007/s12237-012-9558-z.
Mumby, P.J., A.J. Edwards, J.E. Arias-Gonzalez, K.C. Lindeman, P.G. Blackwell, A. Gall, M.I. Gorczynska, A.R. Harborne, C.L. Pescod, H. Renken, C.C.C. Wabnitz, and G. Llewellyn. 2004. Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean. Nature 427(6974): 533–536.
Munro, I.S.R. 1974. The marine and freshwater fishes of Ceylon. Canberra, Australia: Dept. of External Affairs.
Nagelkerken, I., and G. Van Der Velde. 2002. Do non-estuarine mangroves harbour higher densities of juvenile fish than adjacent shallow-water and coral reef habitats in Curaçao (Netherlands Antilles)? Marine Ecology Progress Series 245(Sutherland 1996): 191–204.
Nascimento, I.A., W.A. Bray, J.R. Leung-Trujilo, and A.L. Lawrence. 1991. Reproduction of ablated and unablated Penaeus schmitti in captivity using diets consisting of fresh-frozen natural and dried formulated feeds. Aquaculture 99: 387–398.
Newell, R.I.E., N. Marshall, A. Sasekumar, and V.C. Chong. 1995. Relative importance of benthic microalgae, phytoplankton, and mangroves as sources of nutrition for penaeid prawns and other coastal invertebrates from Malaysia. Marine Biology 123: 595–606.
Nip, T.H.M., and C.K. Wong. 2010. Juvenile fish assemblages in mangrove and non-mangrove soft-shore habitats in eastern Hong Kong. Zoological Studies 49(6): 760–778.
Norazlimi, N., and R. Ramli. 2014. Temporal variation of shorebirds population in two different mudflats areas. International Journal of Biological, Veterinary, Agricultural and Food Engineering 8: 106–1112.
Norhayati, A., M.N. Shukor, S. Juliana, and W.A. Wan Juliana. 2009. Mangrove flora and fauna of Klang Islands mangrove forest reserve, Selangor, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Science 28(3): 275–288.
Norma-Rashid, Y. and H. W. Teoh. 2012. Mammals and birds in coastal swamps (mud flats, mangroves and peat swamps). In: Sasekumar, A. and Chong, V.C. (eds) Mangrove and coastal environment of Selangor, Malaysia. IOES Monograph Series 14: 139–149.
Ooi, A.L., and V.C. Chong. 2011. Larval fish assemblages in a tropical mangrove estuary and adjacent coastal waters: offshore-inshore flux of marine and estuarine species. Continental Shelf Research 31: 1599–1610.
Pang, S.C. 1990. Some aspects of the biology of Arius truncatus (C. and V.) and Arius caelatus (Val.) (Osteichthyes, Tachysuridae) in the Sungai Salak mangrove estuary, Sarawak, Malaysia. Fisheries Bulletin 63.
Parson, T.R., Y. Maita, and C. Lalli. 1984. Manual of chemical and biological methods for sea water analysis. Oxford: Pergamon.
Pauly, D., and N.A. Navaluna. 1983. Monsoon-induced seasonality in the recruitment of Philippine fishes. FAO Fisheries Report 3(291): 824–853.
Pielou, E.C. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley.
Pushparajan, N., P. Soundarapandian, P.S. Lyla, T. Anand, and D. Varadharajan. 2012. Shrimp larval ingress in Pitchavaran mangroves south east coast of India. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 68(3): 1775–1786.
Ramarn, T., V.C. Chong, and Y. Hanamura. 2012. Population structure and reproduction of the mysid shrimp Acanthomysis thailandica (Crustacea: Mysidae) in a tropical mangrove estuary, Malaysia. Zoological Studies 51(6): 768–782.
Ramarn, T., V.C. Chong and Y. Hanamura. 2014. Lunar tidal rhythms of the mysid shrimp (Acanthomysis thailandica) population structure and reproduction in a tropical mangrove, Malaysia. Proceedings International Conference on Agricultural, Environmental and Biological Sciences (AEBS-2014), April 24–25, 2014 Phuket (Thailand), (eds. Sandhu P.S. and Rahman, M.A.), 71–76.
Reise, K. 1985. Tidal flat ecology. An experimental approach to species interactions. Berlin: Springer.
Riak, K.M., A. Ismail, A. Arshad, and A.R. Ismail. 2003. Intertidal macrobenthic fauna: the food resources for migratory shorebirds in Kapar and Pantai Remis, Selangor, Malaysia. Malaysian Applied Biology Journal 32(1): 51–60.
Ricciardi, A., F.G. Whoriskey, and J.B. Ramussen. 1997. The role of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in structuring macroinvertebrate communities on hard substrata. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2596–2608.
Salgado, J., M.J. Costa, H. Cabral, and L. Deegan. 2004. Comparison of the fish assemblages in tidal marsh creeks and adjoining mudflat areas in the Tejo estuary (Portugal). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 45: 213–224.
Sasekumar, A. and V. C. Chong. 1991. Fish and prawn communities in mangrove estuaries and mudflats in Selangor (Malaysia). Proceeding regional symposium of living resources in coastal area (ed: A C Alcala), Marine Sciences Institute, University of Philippines, 495–502 pp.
Sasekumar, A., V.C. Chong, M.U. Leh, and R. D’Cruz. 1992. Mangroves as a habitat for fish and prawns. Hydrobiologia 247: 195–207.
Satpathy, K.K. 1996. Seasonal distribution of nutrients in the coastal waters of Kalpakkam, east coast of India. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences 25: 221–224.
Shannon, C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(379–423): 623–656.
Shao, K.T., and C.Y. Chen. 2003. Atlas of fishes. Taiwan: Yuan-Liou Publishing Company.
Sponaugle, S., and R.K. Cowen. 1994. Larval durations and recruitment patterns of two Caribbean gobies (Gobiidae): contrasting early life histories in demersal spawners. Marine Biology 120: 133–143.
Stokesbury, K.D.E., and M.J. Dadswell. 1989. Seaward migration of juveniles of three herring species, Alosa, from an estuary in the Annapolis River, Nova Scotia. Canadian Field Naturalist 103: 388–393.
Tanaka, K., Y. Hanamura, V.C. Chong, S. Watanabe, A. Man, M.K. Faizul, M. Kodama, and T. Ichikawa. 2011. Stable isotope analysis reveals ontogenetic migration and the importance of a large mangrove estuary as a feeding ground for juvenile John’s snapper Lutjanus johnii. Fisheries Science 77(5): 809–816.
Teoh, H.W., and V.C. Chong. 2013. Shell use and partitioning of two sympatric species of hermit crabs on a tropical mudflat. Journal of Sea Research 86: 13–32.
Terlizzi, A., L. Benedetti-cecchi, S. Bevilacqua, S. Fraschetti, P. Guidetti, and M.J. Anderson. 2005. Multivariate and univariate asymmetrical analyses in environmental impact assessment: a case study of Mediterranean subtidal sessile assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 289: 27–42.
Thiel, R., A. Sepulveda, R. Kafemann, W. Nellen, and U. Hamburg. 1995. Environmental factors as forces structuring the fish community of the Elbe estuary. Journal of Fish Biology 46: 47–69.
Thorrold, S.R., J.M. Shenker, E.D. Maddox, R. Mojica, and E. Winshinski. 1994. Larval supply of shore fishes to nursery habitats around Lee Stocking Island, Bahamas II: lunar and oceanographic influences. Marine Biology 118: 567–578.
Tse, P., T.H.M. Nip, and C.K. Wong. 2008. Nursery function of mangrove: a comparison with mudflat in terms of fish species composition and fish diet. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 80(2): 235–242.
Unsworth, R.K.F., P.S. De León, S.L. Garrard, J. Jompa, D.J. Smith, and J.J. Bell. 2008. High connectivity of Indo-Pacific seagrass fish assemblages with mangrove and coral reef habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 353: 213–224.
Utne-Palm, A.C. 2004. Effects of larvae ontogeny, turbidity, and turbulence on prey attack rate and swimming activity of Atlantic herring larvae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 310: 147–161.
Vermeij, G.J. 1980. Drilling predation in a population of the edible bivalve Anadara granosa (Arcidae). Nautilus 94: 123–125.
Weisstein, E. W. 2014. “Great circle.” From MathWorld—a Wolfram web resource. Retrieved from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GreatCircle.html.
Weisstein, E. W. 2014. “Heron’s formula.” From MathWorld—a Wolfram web resource. Retrieved from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HeronsFormula.html.
Yurimoto, T., M.K. Faizul, R. Fuseya, and A. Man. 2014. Mass mortality event of the blood cockle, Anadara granosa, in aquaculture ground along Selangor coast, Peninsular Malaysia. International Aquatic Research 6(4): 177–186.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS, grant no. 57-02-03-1005) and University of Malaya (UM, grant no. PV003/2012A). We are grateful to Koh Lay Tung, Abdullah bin Saad, and others for their help in fish trappings. We thank UM for logistical and laboratory support. Special thanks to Chew Li Lee for the help in the analysis. We greatly appreciate the meticulous reviewing and proofreading of our manuscript by the reviewers particularly Associate Editor Patricia Ramey-Balci.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Patricia Ramey-Balci
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, S.L., Chong, V.C. & Yurimoto, T. Ichthyofauna on a Tropical Mudflat: Implications of Spatial and Temporal Variability in Assemblage Structure and Abundance. Estuaries and Coasts 39, 1543–1560 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0083-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0083-3