Abstract
Ralstonia solanacearum is an important plant pathogen which infects a large number of agriculturally important crops. The Type Three Secretion System (T3SS) plays a major role in its pathogenicity by secreting type III effectors (T3Es) which overthrow the host defence mechanism. The secretion of T3Es is transcriptionally regulated by hrpB and its secretion is dependent on the pili formed by hrcV gene. In this study, two T3SS mutants of R. solanacearum strain Rs-09-161 viz. Rs-HrpB− and Rs-HrcV− were developed through insertional mutagenesis. The method of development of insertional mutant is quite simple and reliable. The plasmid integrates through homologous recombination and in vitro studies have proved that the integration was stable for several generations. The mutants are non-pathogenic on its highly susceptible hosts, brinjal and tomato inoculated by soil drench method and by petiole inoculation directly into the vascular system. Further it was observed that the colonisation ability of the mutants was also highly reduced in the susceptible host. These mutants will be useful in validating putative T3E through translocation studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Ralstonia solanacearum is a soil borne phytopathogen which causes bacterial wilt in a large number of agriculturally important crops [1]. Phylogenetic studies of R. solanacearum strains reveals the presence of huge diversity among the strains, therefore this group of strains is now referred as Ralstonia solanacearum species complex (RSSC) [2]. This species complex is divided into four phylotypes which roughly reflect their area of origin: Phylotype I (Asia), Phylotype II (America), Phylotype III (Africa) and Phylotype IV (Indonesia) [2].
The type three secretion system (T3SS) was initially identified in animal and human pathogens, and is studied in various pathogens like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Brucella spp., etc. [3, 4]. The study of type three secretion system (T3SS) is vital as it plays a crucial role in the pathogenicity of R. solanacearum. It is encoded by the hrp (hypersensitive response and pathogenicity) regulon and defects in the T3SS impair the induction of hypersensitive response in resistant hosts and pathogenicity in its susceptible hosts [5]. The T3SS injects pathogenicity proteins termed as Type III effectors (T3Es) into the eukaryotic hosts through the hrp pili [5]. These effectors are directly translocated into the cytosol of the hosts [6]. Once within the host cells, the effectors promote its colonisation by interacting with various host proteins and subverting the host immunity [7]. The T3SS and the expression of T3Es is controlled by an AraC family transcriptional regulator called as the hrpB [2, 8]. Whole genome sequencing of R. solanacearum strains have revealed the presence of large number of effectors distributed throughout the genome of the bacteria. R. solanacearum model strain GMI1000 possesses 72 T3Es [9]. Recently we have reported 72 and 77 T3Es in R. solanacearum strains Rs-09-161 and Rs-10-244 [10] Many of the T3Es expressed by R. solanacearum are validated through translocation studies in GMI1000 and RS1000 with the help of T3SS mutants [5, 11, 12].
In India, bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum is widespread and severe incidence is well documented across various states of the country. R. solanacearum has been isolated from wilted plants of brinjal, tomato, potato, chilli, capsicum, cluster beans, elephant foot yam, water melon, banana, Jute, tobacco, ginger, cardamom, coleus, davana, marigold and sunflower [13,14,15,16]. The genetic diversity among the isolated strains is also analysed by REP PCR, ITS-PCR, PCR RFLP, MLST and sequencing of egl, pga and hrp gene [17, 18]. Though the genetic diversity of the pathogen is widely reported, the molecular aspects and the importance of the T3SS as the main pathogenicity determinant of Indian isolates are not reported. Majority of the work on T3SS is carried out using the strains, GMI1000 and RS1000. Present study aims at development of T3SS mutants of Indian strain of R. solanacearum and assessing the reduction in virulence of the mutants on its susceptible hosts. This will provide the basic information and strains/mutants to validate the putative T3Es of Indian strains of R. solanacearum.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Plasmids
R. solanacearum strain Rs-09-161 maintained at the culture collection of Plant Pathology laboratory, ICAR-CCARI was used in this study to develop mutants. This strain is highly pathogenic on its susceptible hosts (brinjal and tomato), and its whole genome sequence is available [18]. The details about the plasmid used in this study and the clones developed are listed in Table 1. The bacterial strains, vectors and mutants were maintained as 30% glycerol stock at − 80 °C. R. solanacearum was routinely grown on BG medium (1% peptone, 0.1% casamino acids, 0.1% yeast extract, 0.5% glucose) at 28 °C. E. coli was grown at 37 °C in Luria and Bertani medium. Ampicillin was used in the concentration 50 µg/ml while growing E. coli and R. solanacearum mutants.
Development of Clones in E. coli Vector
The genes of the T3SS viz. hrpB and hrcV were selected in this study. HrpB is the transcriptional regulator of the T3SS and hrcV forms the transmembrane component of the hrp pili involved in the translocation of the T3Es into the host cells. Primers were designed for the amplification of internal fragments of the genes using Oligo primer analysis software, version 6.4. The sequences of the primers, reaction mixture and standardised PCR conditions are given in Table 2. Mastercycler Pro (Eppendorf, GmBH) was used for product amplification. The amplicons were visualised on 1.0% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/ml of ethidium bromide and documented with MultiImage Light Cabinet (Alpha Innotech Corporation). The amplified products were purified using GeneJETTM PCR Purification Kit (Fermentas Life Sciences, EU) and quantified using Nano drop-1000, Thermo fisher scientific, USA. The purified fragments were cloned in the vector pTZ57R/T as per manufacturer’s protocol (Fermentas TA cloning kit). The positive colonies were identified using blue-white selection. The selected white colonies were confirmed for the presence of insert by colony PCR using the same conditions as amplification of the internal fragment. The recombinant plasmid was isolated using QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit and clone was confirmed by restriction digestion at 37 °C for 1 h.
Development of R. solanacearum Mutants
Overnight grown culture of R. solanacearum isolate Rs-09-161 was inoculated into BG medium to an initial OD600nm of 0.15 and grown at 28 °C at 160 rpm. Actively growing cells were harvested at 0.5 OD600nm and electro-competent cells were prepared under ice cold conditions using standard procedure with minor modifications as follows. A series of centrifugations were carried out at 8000 rpm for 10 min to reconstitute the active cells in equal volume of cold MilliQ water, half volume of MilliQ water, one-fourth volume of 10% glycerol and finally in 1/100th volume of 10% glycerol solution respectively. Electroporation was carried out using MicroPulser (Biorad) at 2 kV using 2 µg of plasmid for hrpBpTZ57R/T and hrcVpTZ57R/T respectively, plated on BG medium with ampicillin.
Confirmation of R. solanacearum Mutants
The Genomic DNA was extracted from the antibiotic resistant colonies by the method described by Ramesh et al. [16]. Confirmation of integration of the plasmid and the orientation of the insert at the genomic level was done using specifically designed diagnostic primers and M13 primers for hrpB and hrcV genes. Diagnostic primers were designed in the region 1000 bp upstream of the internal fragment of hrpB and hrcV genes. The sequences of the diagnostic primers and standardised PCR conditions are given in Table 2. The confirmed mutants were then maintained as 30% glycerol stock at −80 °C.
Stability Studies of the Rs-HrpB− and Rs-HrcV− Mutant
A single colony of Rs-hrpB− and Rs-hrcV− was inoculated in 10 ml of BG broth without ampicillin and maintained at room temperature on a shaker for 24 h. After 24 h, 1 ml of the culture aliquot was diluted to 0.1O.D.600nm and 10−6 dilution was plated on BG agar with and without ampicillin. The plates were incubated for 48 h and the number of colonies obtained on the two media was counted. Two replications were maintained for each dilution plated on each medium. Next, 100 µl of culture was inoculated from 24 h old day-one tube to a fresh 10 ml BG broth and incubated for 24 h, diluted to 0.1O.D.600nm and 10−6 dilution was plated on BG agar with and without ampicillin. The same cycle was repeated for 10 consecutive days and the stability of the plasmid was assessed by plating after every 24 h.
Inoculation of R. solanacearum Mutants on Brinjal and Tomato: Virulence Assay
Virulence of the mutants was assayed on brinjal and tomato by soil drench inoculation and petiole inoculation. Highly susceptible brinjal cultivar (Agassaim), tomato variety (Pusa Ruby) was used in the studies. Seedlings were raised and maintained in the greenhouse at 30 °C during the day with 60% relative humidity, 16 h of light and 8 h of dark period. Thirty days old seedlings grown in the potting mixture containing red soil: FYM: sand (2:1:1) were used for inoculation studies. Wild type strain Rs-09-161 was used as a positive control and sterile water was used as a negative control in each of the experiments. In case of soil drench inoculation, 10 ml of inoculum of 0.1 OD600nm (108 cfu/ml) prepared from overnight grown bacterial culture was drenched around the root zone [19]. In case of petiole inoculation, the seedlings were inoculated on the third leaf petiole from the shoot apex. The petiole of the seedlings was cut 2 cms away from the stem, 2000 cells of R. solanacearum were inoculated on the petiole of tomato and 500 cells on brinjal (standardized in the previous studies). The seedlings were observed for wilt symptoms for 21 days post inoculation.
Colonization of R. solanacearum Mutants in Brinjal
Colonisation of R. solanacearum wild type strain Rs-09-161 and mutants Rs-hrpB− and Rs-hrcV− was assessed in 30 days old highly susceptible brinjal cv. Agassaim. The seedlings were raised and maintained in the greenhouse at 30 °C during the day with relative humidity of 60% and a light: dark period of 16:8 h. Overnight grown R. solanacearum strains Rs-09-161, Rs-hrpB− and Rs-hrcV− were resuspended to 0.1 OD600nm (108 cfu/ml) and 10 ml of this inoculum was drenched around the root zone. Three replications were maintained for each strain. Colonisation of R. solanacearum was studied on day 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 after the inoculation in experiment 1 and on day 4 after the inoculation in experiment 2. The root of the inoculated plant was cut into fine pieces of 1–2 mm and re-suspended in 5 ml of sterile water. The tubes were maintained on shaker at 150 rpm for 1 h and later at 4 °C for 30 min under stationary condition. Appropriate dilutions were prepared and 20 μl was spot inoculated on BG agar plates containing antibiotic wherever required. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 14–16 h. Two replications were maintained per sample. R. solanacearum colonies were observed under Olympus CX41 microscope at 10X magnification and identified by their twitching motility (Fig. 1).
Result and Discussion
R. solanacearum Rs-09-161 is a highly virulent strain, isolated from the west coast of India [18]. It is pathogenic on agriculturally important crops like brinjal, tomato and causes 100% wilt in 10–15 days after inoculation in the greenhouse studies. Owing to its high pathogenicity and the availability of genome sequence [18], this strain was selected in this study. We aimed to develop T3SS mutants of R. solanacearum using a simple and reliable method, check the stability of the mutant in the absence of antibiotic selection and further investigate the virulence of the mutants on its susceptible hosts. The two genes studied here, hrpB and hrcV play an important role in the pathogenesis caused by the T3SS.
Development of Clones with Internal Fragment of hrpB and HrcV Gene in E. coli Vector
The amplified internal fragments of gene hrpB (582 bp) and hrcV (763 bp) were used in the concentration of 100 and 131 ng respectively for cloning in the vector pTZ57R/T. Positive clones were selected by blue and white selection. Amplification of internal fragment of hrpB gene is depicted in Fig. 2. The presence of hrpB and hrcV gene insert fragment in the recombined plasmid was confirmed with colony PCR of Ec-hrpB and Ec-hrcV which gave the characteristic amplification bands at 582 bp (Fig. 2) and 763 bp (Fig. 3) respectively. Restriction digestion of the isolated plasmid confirmed the orientation of the insert. The restriction profile of plasmid hrpBpTZ57R/T and plasmid hrcVpTZ57R/T is depicted in Figs. 2 and 3 respectively.
Development of R. solanacearum Mutants
Cloning of internal fragment of specific R. solanacearum gene in the vector pTZ57R/T generates a recombined plasmid that lacks the oriC for R. solanacearum and hence cannot replicate in the host. However, due to the sequence similarity shared by the cloned insert fragment and the target gene, the plasmid integrates itself into the target gene by homologous recombination leading to the disruption of the cloned gene. The insert fragment is flanked by M13 primers nucleotide sequence on the either side. The diagnostic primer designed 1000 bp upstream of the gene located in the genome pairs with either of the M13 primers based on the orientation of the plasmid and amplifies the region directing the disruption of the gene at the desired site. Rs-hprB− was confirmed by the presence of 1628 bps band with M13 forward primer and Rs-hrcV− was confirmed by 1624 bps band with M13 reverse primer. Amplification of hrpB and hrcV disrupted gene is depicted in Fig. 3c. This is a simple, time saving and cost efficient method and can be easily used for the development of insertional mutants for a large number of genes.
HrpB is the transcriptional regulator which controls the expression of T3SS and the T3Es [20] and hrcV is a transmembrane protein that forms a component of hrp Pili, the needle like apparatus which is involved in translocation of the T3Es into the host cells. The hrpB mutant of R. solanacearum will fail to express the hrpB-dependent T3Es whereas the mutant of hrcV gene will fail to secrete the T3Es in the external environment. These mutants will form a base material for validating the secretion of novel T3Es by translocation studies [21]. These factors make them excellent choice of gene for development of T3SS mutant.
Stability of Mutants
The mutants Rs-hrpB− and Rs-hrcV− were found to be stable in the absence of antibiotic for a period of 10 days. There was no significant difference in the population of mutants on BG medium with antibiotic and without antibiotic in each day. Population of Rs-hrpB− was log 10.72 cfu/ml on BG medium without ampicillin and log 10.15 cfu/ml on BG medium with ampicillin after 10 days. The population of Rs-hrcV− was log 9.9 cfu/ml on BG medium without ampicillin and log 9.5 cfu/ml on BG with ampicillin after 10 days (Table 3). This indicates the plasmid was stably integrated into the genome and would not lose in the plant where the antibiotic selection is absent.
Virulence of R. solanacearum Mutants on Brinjal and Tomato
T3SS in R. solanacearum is the main pathogenicity determinant and the mutants of the T3SS are unable to cause the disease [21, 22]. The wild type strain of R. solanacearum, Rs-09-161 caused 100% wilt in brinjal seedlings with drench inoculation on day 13 whereas 95% wilt was observed with cut petiole inoculated seedlings on day 8 (Figs. 4, 5, 6). In case of tomato, 100% wilt was observed in 10–11 days when seedlings were inoculated by soil drench or cut petiole (Figs. 6, 7, 8).
Our results are in agreement with this observation as we did not observe any wilt in the brinjal and tomato seedlings inoculated with the mutant Rs-hrcV− around the root through drench inoculations which follows the conditions of natural infection process as well as in the vascular system through petiole inoculation. In case of Rs-hrpB− inoculated seedlings, the petiole inoculated seedlings of brinjal and tomato as well as drench inoculated seedlings of tomato did not show any wilt. However, the brinjal seedlings inoculated by drench inoculation resulted in 3.33% wilt which might be an exception as the wilt was observed in only one out of 15 inoculated seedlings in the second experiment.
The expression of the T3SS was considered very crucial during the early stages of infection to suppress the host immunity and gets turned down in the higher cell densities. However, the recent studies using in planta transcriptome have proved that the T3SS plays an important role throughout the disease cycle and is not repressed during high cell densities [20, 23]. This can be the probable reason for the reduction in wilt by the Rs-hrpB− and R-hrcV− mutants in tomato and brinjal seedlings inoculated through drench and petiole inoculation.
Colonization of R. solanacearum mutants in Brinjal
We observed that, the colonization ability of the mutants was highly reduced in brinjal seedlings as compared to the wild type strain even though the inoculum concentration of the three strains was uniform. In the plant colonization experiment, experiment 1 was conducted to standardize the optimum day for studying the colonization of wild type and mutants of R. solanacearum. Day four was considered as optimum day for colonization studies as the wild type showed an average population of log 11 cfu/g and Rs-hrpB− also showed its highest population. The population of wild type Rs-09-161 in the roots of the susceptible brinjal was log 6 cfu/g on day two which gradually increased to log 14 cfu/g till day 6 and in the stem was 4 cfu/g on day two and increased to 16 cfu/g on day eight in experiment 1. On day 10, the wild type inoculated plants had wilted completely so the colonisation was not assessed for them. Rs-hrpB− did not colonise in the susceptible plants and the population was log 1.2 cfu/g on day two, log 3.3 cfu/g on day four and log 1.5 cfu/g on day 10 in the roots and log 1.2 cfu/g on day 10 in the stem respectively in experiment 1. After day four, the population of Rs-hrpB− disappeared which might be due to the reduced virulence mechanism of the Rs-hrpB− mutant against the host. The reduction in colonization was also observed in In-planta assays on tomato, brinjal and Arabidopsis thaliana with wild type and hrp− mutant of R. solanacearum [21].
In experiment two we observed that, the mutants, Rs-hrpB− and Rs-hrcV− failed to colonise in the plants and their population was less than 108 cfu which is correlated as threshold population for initiating wilt in the susceptible tomato [24] whereas the wild type attained the population of log 10 cfu/g (Table 4). Similar results were also obtained by others wherein the hrpB and hrcV mutants are weakly invasive, poorly infective and exhibit limited multiplication in the intercellular spaces of the root cortex and vascular system of the inoculated tomato plants and are discussed in Genin and Denny [2].
This is the first report on the development of mutants of the T3SS Indian strains of R. solanacearum and the mutants were developed through a simple method. This is an easy, cost effective and reliable method that develops a stable insertional mutant through homologous recombination in the genome of the R. solanacearum cells. It is understood from the available literature that the Rs-hrpB− mutant is defective in expression or production of T3Es within the cell and the Rs-hrcV− mutant is defective in the secretion of the produced T3Es in the external environment through the type three secretion pili. These mutants can be used in future to study the putative T3Es and validate their secretion through translocation assays.
References
Álvarez B, Biosca EG, López MM (2010) On the life of Ralstonia solanacearum, a destructive bacterial plant pathogen. In: Mendez Vilas A (ed) Current research, technology and education topics in applied microbiology and microbial biotechnology, vol 1. Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, pp 267–279
Genin S, Denny TP (2012) Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:67–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173000
Burstein D, Satanower S, Simovitch M, Belnik Y, Zehavi M, Yerushalmi G, Ben-Aroya S, Pupko T, Banin E (2015) Novel type III effectors in Pseudomomas aeruginosa. MBio 6:e00161-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00161-15
Sankarasubramanian J, Vishu US, Sridhar J, Gunasekaran P, Rajendhran J (2015) Pan-genome of Brucella Species. Indian J Microbiol 55:88–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-014-0486-4
Mukaihara T, Tamura N (2009) Identification of novel Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector proteins through translocation analysis of hrpB-regulated gene products. Microbiology 155:2235–2244. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.027763-0
Poueymiro M, Genin S (2009) Secreted proteins from Ralstonia solanacearum: a hundred tricks to kill a plant. Curr Opin Microbiol 12:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2008.11.008
Poueymiro M, Cazale AC, Francois JM, Parrou JL, Peeters N, Genin S (2014) A Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector directs the production of the plant signal metabolite trehalose-6-phosphate. MBio 5:02065-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02065-14
Coll NS, Valls M (2013) Current knowledge on the Ralstonia solanacearum type III secretion system. Microb Biotechnol 6:614–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12056
Peeters N, Carrere S, Anisimova M, Plener L, Cazale AC, Genin S (2013) Repertoire, unified nomenclature and evolution of the type III effector gene set in the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. BMC Genom 14:859. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12038
Asolkar T, Ramesh R (2017) Identification of virulence factors and type III effectors of phylotype I, Indian Ralstonia solanacearum strain Rs-09-161 and Rs-10-244. J. Genet 97:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-018-0894-z
Mukaihara T, Tamura N, Iwabuchi M (2010) Genome-wide identification of a large repertoire of Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector proteins by a new functional screen. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-23-3-0251
Sole M, Popa C, Mith O, Sohn KH, Jones JD, Deslandes L et al (2012) The awr gene family encodes a novel class of Ralstonia solanacearum type III effectors displaying virulence and avirulence activities. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25:941–953. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-12-11-0321
Bholanath M, Indrabrata B, Khatua DC (2014) Incidence of bacterial wilt disease in West Bengal, India. Acad J Agric Res 2:139–146. https://doi.org/10.15413/ajar.2014.0118
Chandrashekara KN, Prasannakumar MK (2010) New host plants for Ralstonia solanacearum from India. Plant Pathol 59:1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02358.x
Chandrashekara K, Prasannakumar M, Deepa M, Vani A, Khan A (2012) Prevalence of races and biotypes of Ralstonia solanacearum in India. J Plant Prot Res 52:53–58. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-012-0009-4
Ramesh R, Achari GA, Gaitonde S (2014) Genetic diversity of Ralstonia solanacearum infecting solanaceous vegetables from India reveals the existence of unknown or newer sequevars of phylotype I strains. Eur J Plant Pathol 140:543–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-014-0487-5
Kumar A, Prameela TP, Bhai RS, Siljo A, Biju CN, Anandaraj M, Vinatzer BA (2012) Small cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton.) and ginger (Zingiber officinale Roxb) bacterial wilt is caused by same strain of Ralstonia solanacearum: a result revealed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Eur J Plant Pathol 132:477–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-011-9903-2
Ramesh R, Gaitonde S, Achari G, Asolkar T, Singh NP, Carrere S et al (2014) Genome sequencing of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 3, phylotype I, strains Rs-09-161 and Rs-10-244, isolated from eggplant and chili in India. Genome Announc 2:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-014-0487-5
Ramesh R, Achari G, Asolkar T, Dsouza M, Singh N (2016) Management of bacterial wilt of brinjal using wild brinjal (Solanum torvum Sw) as root stock. Indian Phytopathol 69:1–6
Monteiro F, Genin S, Van Dijk I, Valls M (2012) A luminescent reporter evidences active expression of Ralstonia solanacearum type III secretion system genes throughout plant infection. Microbiology 158:2107–2116. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.058610-0
Monteiro F, Sole M, Van Dijk I, Valls M (2012) A chromosomal insertion toolbox for promoter probing, mutant complementation, and pathogenicity studies in Ralstonia solanacearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25:557–568. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-07-11-0201
Meng F (2013) The virulence factors of the bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 4(168):10–4172. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7471.1000168
Jacobs JM, Babujee L, Meng F, Milling A, Allen C (2012) The in planta transcriptome of Ralstonia solanacearum: conserved physiological and virulence strategies during bacterial wilt of tomato. MBio 3:00114-12. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00114-12
Huang Q, Allen C (2000) Polygalacturonases are required for rapid colonization and full virulence of Ralstonia solanacearum on tomato plants. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 57:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.2000.0283
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India through “Outreach project on Phytophthora, Fusarium and Ralstonia diseases of horticultural and field crops”—(PhytoFuRa). We are grateful to Director, ICAR- Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Old Goa for providing other necessary facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asolkar, T., Ramesh, R. Development of T3SS Mutants (hrpB− and hrcV−) of Ralstonia solanacearum, Evaluation of Virulence Attenuation in Brinjal and Tomato—A Pre-requisite to Validate T3Es of R. solanacearum. Indian J Microbiol 58, 372–380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-018-0736-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-018-0736-y