Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the Western world, affecting about 1/3 of the US general population and remaining as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The hallmark of the disease is the excessive accumulation of fat within the liver cells (hepatocytes), which eventually paves the way to cellular stress, injury and apoptosis. NAFLD is strongly associated with components of the metabolic syndrome and is fast emerging as a leading cause of liver transplant in the USA. Based on clinico-pathologic classification, NAFLD may present as isolated lipid collection (steatosis) within the hepatocytes (referred to as non-alcoholic fatty liver; NAFL); or as the more aggressive phenotype (known as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; NASH). There are currently no regulatory agency- approved medication for NAFLD, despite the enormous work and resources that have gone into the study of this condition. Therefore, there remains a huge unmet need in developing and utilizing pre-clinical models that will recapitulate the disease condition in humans. In line with progress being made in developing appropriate disease models, this review highlights the cutting-edge preclinical in vitro and animal models that try to recapitulate the human disease pathophysiology and/or clinical manifestations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a leading cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality worldwide and affects almost a third of all American adults [1]. It is strongly related to insulin resistance and its associated clinical conditions such as excess body weight, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-cholesterol (all of which constitute essential elements in the spectrum of the metabolic syndrome). The NAFLD disease spectrum has two phenotypes, namely, nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) which is characterized by simple steatosis without obvious cellular injury; and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a more aggressive disease marked by cellular injury, inflammatory infiltrates and possible progression to fibrosis or cirrhosis [2]. NASH is increasing as an etiology for end-stage liver disease as well as for hepatocellular cancer-related liver transplantation; and is expected to surpass hepatitis C for this indication in the foreseeable future [3]. The hallmark lesion of NASH is hepatocellular ballooning, which is a marker of hepatocyte injury and constitutes one of the drivers of disease progression into fibrogenic remodeling [4, 5]. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for the definitive diagnosis of NASH, even though there is significant on-going work at using non-invasive modalities for diagnosis [6].
While data on incident rates are deficient, there are several reports that shed light on the prevalence of NAFLD. A fairly recent meta-analysis estimates the overall global prevalence of NAFLD (as diagnosed via imaging; but not biopsy) at about 25%, with the Middle East and South America (at approximately 32 and 30%, respectively) sharing the highest prevalence rates, while Africa (with about 13%) having the lowest [7]. However, in the specific case of NASH, given that liver biopsies cannot be routinely obtained at the population level, there is an inadequate direct assessment for true incidence or prevalence rates. Therefore, given the limitation in obtaining direct data on NASH, a rough estimate of prevalence in the general population, is thought to be in the range of 1.5–6.5% [7, 8].
The high prevalence of NAFLD in patients with the metabolic syndrome is likewise reciprocated by an increased risk of developing NAFLD in subjects bearing elements of the metabolic syndrome, giving credence to the bidirectional association that bind these two disease entities together [7, 9,10,11]. Patients with NAFLD have been shown to have higher overall mortality when compared with matched controls from the general population. However, the most common cause of death in NAFLD has been cardiovascular disease, irrespective of any metabolic comorbid conditions. Hence, the joint European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASL-EASD-EASO) guidelines recommend screening for NAFLD in all patients with persistent abnormal liver enzymes, as well as screening for metabolic syndrome in persons with steatosis, independent of liver enzymes. Likewise, they also recommend routine screening with liver enzymes and/or ultrasound for NAFLD in subjects with obesity or the metabolic syndrome [12]. In contrast, the American Association for the Study of the Liver Practice Guidance in 2017 does not recommend routine screening for NAFLD in high-risk individuals at this time. However, it calls for a high index of suspicion for NAFLD/NASH in subjects with type 2 diabetes and the use of non-invasive means to identify those at risk for advanced fibrosis (these practice guidance statements from the AASLD may be rendered obsolete by the association′s announced 2018 guidelines, which were close to publication at the time of original submission of this manuscript) [6].
Despite the significant toll that NAFLD has on health systems worldwide, the disease still remains without any approved therapies [13]. Therefore, there is an immediate unmet need to better understand the molecular drivers of the disease and its progression, and to develop methods for the best targeting and therapeutic strategies for individual patients. These require developing preclinical models that recapitulate as many aspects of human disease as possible, and allow for translation of findings from simple models to human therapeutics [13, 14]. Here, we will review some recent advances that provide hope for future precision-medicine based approaches for the treatment of NASH.
Human in vitro organotypic models of NAFLD
While numerous animal models have been developed to mimic various aspects of this complex disease spectrum (reviewed below), the use of human primary liver cells to study NAFLD in a meaningful context continues to mature. To address this need, organotypic liver systems aim to incorporate the complexities of the native human liver in vitro, including three-dimensional (3D) architecture, multiple cell types, and the dynamic microenvironment stemming from blood flow through the sinusoids. The development of complex organotypic liver systems has been reviewed elsewhere, and this section of the review will focus on how these organotypic systems have been adapted for studying NAFL and NASH [15,16,17,18,19].
Though immortalized human cell lines, such as HUH7 and HepG2, as well as iPSC-derived hepatocytes, can be induced towards a steatotic phenotype in culture, multiple studies have shown that these cells poorly represent the native liver metabolic function, thus keeping primary human hepatocytes as the gold standard for in vitro studies [20,21,22]. In addition to hepatocytes, the addition of non-parenchymal cells (NPC), including human hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), resident inflammatory cells (e.g., Kupffer cells, macrophages), and/or sinusoidal endothelial cells (sECs), affect liver biology and are known to contribute to the progression of NAFLD [23,24,25]. Thus, these additional cell types enable the evaluation of NPC-driven disease mechanisms, such as inflammatory cytokine expression or stellate cell activation, which are hallmark features of NASH and fibrosis.
Diverse approaches have been utilized to combine these different cell types into 3D tissues in order to mimic the architecture found in the intact liver, including layered co-cultures, spheroids, micro-patterned surfaces, human precision cut liver slices (hPCLS), and bioprinting [15,16,17,18,19, 26]. Further, many of these tissues can be cultured within specialized devices (e.g. microfluidic chambers) to include aspects of flow and transport. Table 1 provides a summary of companies currently developing organotypic liver models who have developed perfused multicellular liver organotypic models.
Currently, most organotypic models have focused on drug safety and toxicity with few adaptations to mimic other aspects of NAFLD or NASH. In this context, the liver microenvironment includes a number of circulating risk factors that can be incorporated into the media formulation in vitro to promote a NASH-relevant phenotype. These risk factors include endotoxin, inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, glucose, insulin, and free fatty acid (FFA) exposure. In particular, FFAs are known to induce a lipotoxic phenotype and are the most commonly used stimuli in NAFLD in vitro models, as they may also lead to increased levels of additional factors, such as inflammatory cytokines [27].
Several groups are actively developing these models. For example, Organovo’s bioprinting platform showed evidence of steatosis (drug-induced) and fibrosis, and is being developed as a NASH model. Kostrzewski et al. improved upon a previous microfluidics-based (designed by CellASIC) NAFLD model seeded with HepG2 cells, by incorporating primary human hepatocytes (no NPCs) into CN Bio’s microfluidic liver platform [28, 29]. To generate a NAFLD-relevant phenotype, both studies exposed the hepatocytes to high concentrations of oleic acid (400–660 μM) and palmitic acid (200–330 μM) combinations to create a “fat media”. In keeping with histological observations in NAFLD patients, Kostrzewski et al. reported that the fat media increased lipid accumulation in the cells and altered gene and activity levels of many CYP P450 enzymes. Cytokine levels, such as IL8, were increased in fat media conditions, but other cytokines, such as IL6 were not detected, likely due to the absence of additional cell types, such as Kupffer cells or HSCs [28]. Pioglitazone, which was found in the PIVENS trial to ameliorate fat accumulation and other histological features of NASH in the clinical setting, reduced lipid accumulation in the lipid-loaded hepatocytes, but no additional effects were reported [30].
While the previous model incorporates NASH-associated risk factors in a flow-based system, the lack of additional cell types, functional endpoints and validation confine the model’s potential use for target discovery. Feaver et al. recently developed a lipotoxic organotypic system for studying NAFL and NASH using the HemoShear liver platform [31]. This lipotoxic system incorporates hemodynamic and transport conditions derived from the liver sinusoid in a 3D culture system that contains primary human hepatocytes, macrophages, and HSCs (Fig. 1). The components of the milieu were similar to those of Kostrzewski et al., using physiologically relevant levels of glucose, insulin, oleic acid (65 μM) and palmitic acid (45 μM) derived from circulating levels in NASH patients [32]. Under these lipotoxic conditions, increased intracellular lipid accumulation was observed in agreement with Kostrzewski et al.; and additional functional endpoints were evaluated, including evidence of insulin resistance, increased inflammatory and fibrosis biomarkers, and HSC activation (Fig. 2).
A key differentiator was the use of two-omic approaches to more deeply understand the lipotoxic phenotype and directly validate the response to human biopsies [31]. RNA sequencing and lipidomic metabolite signatures from the lipotoxic system and patient biopsies from control and histologically confirmed NASH patients were compared. There was a high degree of concordance between the gene pathways and lipidomic signature induced in the in vitro system and those from patient biopsies [33]. This is the only in vitro model to benchmark -omic responses to those observed in human biopsies at this time.
Lastly, an additional and vital validation step required for in vitro systems to be utilized in drug discovery is to provide evidence of clinical translation. As previously mentioned, Kostrzewski et al. evaluated the impact of pioglitazone and showed anti-steatotic effects. While hPCLS fail to incorporate flow aspects, disease-associated risk factors, and have short time windows before the tissue begins to decline in function, they excel at incorporating the full complement of liver cell types and are freshly isolated from the human liver. Ljssennagger et al. used hPCLS to evaluate the farnesoid X receptor (FXR)-agonist, obeticholic acid (OCA, 1 μM for 24 h), which is currently in Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of NASH, and reported that gene expression profiling revealed on-target engagement of FXR [26]. Similarly, the lipotoxic system developed by Feaver et al. observed several clinically-relevant effects with 0.5-μM OCA treatment, including on-target effects and reductions in steatosis, inflammatory cytokines, fibrotic biomarkers, and triglycerides—all of which were observed in the Phase 2b clinical trial [31, 34, 35]. OCA was found in the clinic to raise LDL, a risk not observed in pre-clinical animal studies. Both hPCLS and the lipotoxic system reported transcriptional signatures that may explain the cholesterol endpoints observed in the clinical trials for OCA [26, 35]. Additionally, in the lipotoxic system, OCA treatment induced high secretion of ApoB (the primary apoprotein associated with LDL) and increased intracellular levels of cholesterol, suggesting dysregulation of this pathway, in agreement with what was observed in the clinic [31, 34]. Thus, while not perfect, substantial progress has been made in development of in vitro models that capture many aspects of NASH at a functional, molecular, transcriptomic and metabolomic levels that provide opportunities to test specific compounds, or combinations of compounds, for their anti-NASH efficacy.
Animal models of NAFLD/NASH
The liver has a substantial capacity to synthesize as well as store fat. It is therefore not surprising that a variety of manipulations targeting the metabolic machinery of the liver alters lipid flux and leads to accumulation of fat in the liver. This induces cell stress and may also lead to modest inflammation [36, 37]. These findings have fueled intense interest in studying pre-clinical models of human NAFLD. However, the great majority of animal models, especially those with specific gene knockouts or unusual diets do not come close to recapitulating human disease [38].
An ideal animal model must meet the following criteria in order to be considered representative of human disease. It must recapitulate human NAFLD by: (1) not requiring a specific gene knockout since human NAFLD is not marked by these gene-specific deficiencies, (2) induction by diet-induced obesity, (3) use of diets with at least a macronutrient composition similar to those consumed by most humans, (4) development of adiposity, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia similar to that in humans, (5) demonstrating a systemic inflammatory state with visceral adipose tissue inflammation and increased systemic inflammatory cytokines, (6) activation of cell signaling pathways that are relevant to human disease and disease progression, (7) transcriptomic concordance with human disease, (8) lipidomic concordance with human disease, and (9) histological concordance with human disease and progression to advanced fibrosis and hepatocellular cancer.
A variety of animal models have been described using many species from zebrafish and sandflies to rodents and even large mammals. They generally involve either dietary manipulation or genetic manipulation. Diets have, however, been largely inconsistent with what is known in humans. For example, the majority of human diets are not choline-deficient [38], and while choline deficient diets can induce steatohepatitis, its translatability to the human state is low, especially since the animals do not develop insulin resistance and can actually lose weight. Other diets that include 2% cholesterol are simply unphysiologic. The ALIOS model and the high-fat diet with ad lib use of glucose/fructose described by Tetri et al. and others come closest to mimicking the average macronutrient composition of humans with NAFLD in the West [39, 40].
These limitations of existing models led us to work on a mouse model of NAFLD that, to a reasonable extent, answers to important elements of the criteria outlined above [14]. The discovery of this model was made by serendipity, but over the course of 10 years and extensive validation, we believe this model is perhaps the most rigorously evaluated and meets many of the quality metrics for an optimal representation of NAFLD. This Diet-Induced Animal Model Of NAFLD (DIAMOND) is an isogenic strain of a C57Bl/J and a S129/V mouse with 60% of genetic materials from the C57Bl/J. A key feature is that, while neither parent strain develops a phenotype, this mouse develops a consistent phenotype even after re-derivation in three different environments. Upon initiation of a high fat (40% calories from fat and 0.1% cholesterol) diet with ad lib glucose–fructose in drinking water, the mice sequentially develop fatty liver and then steatohepatitis with classical hepatocellular ballooning (Mallory–Denk bodies); and then progressive fibrosis resulting in bridging fibrosis and early nodule formation (Fig. 3). In some mice, this disease will progress to hepatocellular cancer, as in humans. Disease progression is generally accompanied by obesity, adipose tissue inflammation, elevated liver enzymes and activation of lipogenic, oxidative stress, unfolded protein response, inflammatory and apoptotic pathways. At a transcriptomic and lipidomic level, it has a strong concordance with human NASH [14].
This model, which has close resemblance to human NAFLD with respect to the features noted above, provides an opportunity to evaluate the evolution of the disease and its progression to cirrhosis at a molecular level while longitudinal human transcriptomic data are awaited. Interrogation of the transcriptome identified early activation of metabolic pathways including PPAR-α and FXR, both known to be relevant in human disease. Interestingly, despite continuing on the same diet, with disease progression, there was a decrease in many metabolic pathways with the exception of FXR [14]. There was, however, progressive activation of inflammatory pathways. Furthermore, at a transcriptomic level, fibrogenic signaling peaked when the disease activity and inflammatory activation was the greatest. Together, these provide a molecular signature of disease evolution. Also, it demonstrated that, even though the histology showed steatohepatitis with some fibrosis, at different points in time, there was differential activation levels of metabolic, cell stress, apoptosis, inflammatory and fibrosis related pathways. If also true for the human state, this may provide insights into why only some patients respond to a given therapy.
As may be expected from any animal model, the DIAMOND also has its limitations, such as the prolonged period of time to develop steatosis (16 weeks) and bridging fibrosis (36 weeks) and the relatively high HCC frequency. Furthermore, and as a departure from the human disease state, there appears to be suppression of cholesterol synthesis in the DIAMOND [14]. The true implication of this difference is yet unclear.
Translating from preclinical models to human therapeutics
Despite the high interest in NASH, there continues to be a lack of common therapeutic strategy, as evidenced by the over 30 different targets currently in development. This result likely stems from a lack of disease understanding and experimental models for identifying and validating targets. Preclinical models that show human translation can provide powerful platforms for gaining deeper mechanistic understanding of not only disease progression, but also therapeutic response mechanisms. The ability to develop in vitro and mouse models of NAFLD that recapitulate many features of human disease allow conceptualization of seamless drug development where the effects of one or more drugs on the key pathways relevant for disease progression in humans can be assessed. For example, recently a detailed description of FXR pharmacology has been described using such an approach in vitro [23, 27]. As a proof-of-concept, Fig. 4 illustrates the utility of in vitro systems for evaluating the impact of individual drugs or drug combinations (Feaver et al., unpublished data). The radar plot provides a visualization of how OCA, a TGFβR inhibitor (LY2109761), or the combination of both impact gene expression of specific pathways relative to vehicle controls in the lipotoxic system described by Feaver et al. above [31]. The impact of on-target signaling for each compound can be observed where OCA potently activated FXR signaling (Fig. 4, dotted line), while the TGFβR strongly inhibited TGFβ signaling (Fig. 4, dashed line). Used in combination (Fig. 4, solid line), an additive effect was observed yielding a therapeutic treatment that could simultaneously activate FXR and inhibit TGFβ. Thus, in vitro systems could aid in the discovery of drug/target combinations that may synergistically ameliorate key aspects of the NASH disease phenotype for future development.
There is currently an unmet need to assess the status of the hepatic transcriptome in ways that are easy to implement in clinical practice. There are ongoing efforts to reverse-engineer the transcriptomic profile to predict its impact on the metabolome and capture that signature in circulation. However, much more work needs to be done before these approaches become reality. It is hoped that, with continuing innovation and translation of scientific discovery in preclinical stages, as well as with the growing number of relevant animal models, the specific drivers of disease in a given patient will be readily identifiable and specific therapies can be brought to bear on these targets.
References
Loomba R, Sanyal AJ. The global NAFLD epidemic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;10(11):686–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.171.
Oseini AM, Sanyal AJ. Therapies in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver Int 2017;37(Suppl 1):97–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13302.
Charlton MR, Burns JM, Pedersen RA, Watt KD, Heimbach JK, Dierkhising RA. Frequency and outcomes of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States. Gastroenterology 2011;141(4):1249–53. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.061.
Hirsova P, Gores GJ. Ballooned hepatocytes, undead cells, sonic hedgehog, and vitamin E: therapeutic implications for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2015;61(1):15–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27279.
Bedossa P. Histological assessment of NAFLD. Dig Dis Sci 2016;61(5):1348–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4062-0.
Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2017;. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29367.
Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016;64(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28431.
Golabi P, Sayiner M, Fazel Y, Koenig A, Henry L, Younossi ZM. Current complications and challenges in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis screening and diagnosis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;10(1):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2016.1099433.
Byrne CD, Targher G. NAFLD: a multisystem disease. J Hepatol 2015;62(1 Suppl):S47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.012.
Argo CK, Caldwell SH. Epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Liver Dis 2009;13(4):511–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2009.07.005.
Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Afendy M, Fang Y, Younossi Y, Mir H, et al. Changes in the prevalence of the most common causes of chronic liver diseases in the United States from 1988 to 2008. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9(6):524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.020.
European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetologia 2016;59(6):1121–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-3902-y.
Sanyal AJ, Friedman SL, McCullough AJ, Dimick-Santos L. Challenges and opportunities in drug and biomarker development for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: findings and recommendations from an American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-US Food and Drug Administration Joint Workshop. Hepatology 2015;61(4):1392–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27678.
Asgharpour A, Cazanave SC, Pacana T, Seneshaw M, Vincent R, Banini BA, et al. A diet-induced animal model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular cancer. J Hepatol 2016;65(3):579–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.005.
Bale SS, Vernetti L, Senutovitch N, Jindal R, Hegde M, Gough A, et al. In vitro platforms for evaluating liver toxicity. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2014;239(9):1180–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370214531872.
Bhatia SN, Ingber DE. Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat Biotechnol 2014;32(8):760–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2989.
Chang SY, Weber EJ, Ness KV, Eaton DL, Kelly EJ. Liver and kidney on chips: microphysiological models to understand transporter function. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2016;100(5):464–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.436.
Dash A, Blackman BR, Wamhoff BR. Organotypic systems in drug metabolism and toxicity: challenges and opportunities. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2012;8(8):999–1014. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2012.693161.
LeCluyse EL, Witek RP, Andersen ME, Powers MJ. Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing. Crit Rev Toxicol 2012;42(6):501–48. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2012.682115.
Gao X, Liu Y. A transcriptomic study suggesting human iPSC-derived hepatocytes potentially offer a better in vitro model of hepatotoxicity than most hepatoma cell lines. Cell Biol Toxicol 2017;33(4):407–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-017-9383-z.
Hart SN, Li Y, Nakamoto K, Subileau EA, Steen D, Zhong XB. A comparison of whole genome gene expression profiles of HepaRG cells and HepG2 cells to primary human hepatocytes and human liver tissues. Drug Metab Dispos 2010;38(6):988–94. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.109.031831.
Rodriguez-Antona C, Donato MT, Boobis A, Edwards RJ, Watts PS, Castell JV, et al. Cytochrome P450 expression in human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell lines: molecular mechanisms that determine lower expression in cultured cells. Xenobiotica 2002;32(6):505–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00498250210128675.
Guguen-Guillouzo C, Clement B, Campion JP, Brechot C, Fauchet R, Brissot P, et al. Excretion of HBs and HBe antigens by normal human adult hepatocytes infected in vitro by hepatitis B virus. Presse Med 1983;12(19):1232–3.
Krause P, Saghatolislam F, Koenig S, Unthan-Fechner K, Probst I. Maintaining hepatocyte differentiation in vitro through co-culture with hepatic stellate cells. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2009;45(5–6):205–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-008-9166-1.
Takayama G, Taniguchi A, Okano T. Identification of differentially expressed genes in hepatocyte/endothelial cell co-culture system. Tissue Eng 2007;13(1):159–66. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.0143.
Ljssennagger N, Janssen AW, Milona A, Ramos Pittol JM, Hollman DA, Mokry M, et al. Gene expression profiling in human precision cut liver slices in response to the FXR agonist obeticholic acid. J Hepatol 2016;64(5):1158–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.016.
Alkhouri N, Dixon LJ, Feldstein AE. Lipotoxicity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: not all lipids are created equal. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;3(4):445–51. https://doi.org/10.1586/egh.09.32.
Kostrzewski T, Cornforth T, Snow SA, Ouro-Gnao L, Rowe C, Large EM, et al. Three-dimensional perfused human in vitro model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2017;23(2):204–15. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.204.
Gori M, Simonelli MC, Giannitelli SM, Businaro L, Trombetta M, Rainer A. Investigating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a liver-on-a-chip microfluidic device. PLoS ONE 2016;11(7):e0159729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159729.
Ratziu V, Harrison SA, Francque S, Bedossa P, Lehert P, Serfaty L, et al. Elafibranor, an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha and -delta, induces resolution of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis without fibrosis worsening. Gastroenterology 2016;150(5):1147–1159. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.038.
Feaver RE, Cole BK, Lawson MJ, Hoang SA, Marukian S, Blackman BR, et al. Development of an in vitro human liver system for interrogating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. JCI Insight 2016;1(20):e90954. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.90954.
de Almeida IT, Cortez-Pinto H, Fidalgo G, Rodrigues D, Camilo ME. Plasma total and free fatty acids composition in human non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Nutr 2002;21(3):219–23.
Puri P, Baillie RA, Wiest MM, Mirshahi F, Choudhury J, Cheung O, et al. A lipidomic analysis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2007;46(4):1081–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21763.
Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Loomba R, Sanyal AJ, Lavine JE, Van Natta ML, Abdelmalek MF, et al. Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015;385(9972):956–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61933-4.
Dash A, Figler RA, Blackman BR, Marukian S, Collado MS, Lawson MJ, et al. Pharmacotoxicology of clinically-relevant concentrations of obeticholic acid in an organotypic human hepatocyte system. Toxicol In Vitro 2017;39:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2016.11.014.
Perla FM, Prelati M, Lavorato M, Visicchio D, Anania C. The role of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Children (Basel) 2017;4(6):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/children4060046.
Mota M, Banini BA, Cazanave SC, Sanyal AJ. Molecular mechanisms of lipotoxicity and glucotoxicity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism 2016;65(8):1049–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2016.02.014.
Hardy T, Oakley F, Anstee QM, Day CP. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathogenesis and disease spectrum. Annu Rev Pathol 2016;11:451–96. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-012615-044224.
Tetri LH, Basaranoglu M, Brunt EM, Yerian LM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Severe NAFLD with hepatic necroinflammatory changes in mice fed trans fats and a high-fructose corn syrup equivalent. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2008;295(5):G987–95. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.90272.2008.
Charlton M, Krishnan A, Viker K, Sanderson S, Cazanave S, McConico A, et al. Fast food diet mouse: novel small animal model of NASH with ballooning, progressive fibrosis, and high physiological fidelity to the human condition. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2011;301(5):G825–34. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00145.2011.
Novik E, Maguire TJ, Chao P, Cheng KC, Yarmush ML. A microfluidic hepatic coculture platform for cell-based drug metabolism studies. Biochem Pharmacol 2010;79(7):1036–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2009.11.010.
Kostadinova R, Boess F, Applegate D, Suter L, Weiser T, Singer T, et al. A long-term three dimensional liver co-culture system for improved prediction of clinically relevant drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2013;268(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.012.
Huh D, Kim HJ, Fraser JP, Shea DE, Khan M, Bahinski A, et al. Microfabrication of human organs-on-chips. Nat Protoc 2013;8(11):2135–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.137.
Vernetti LA, Senutovitch N, Boltz R, DeBiasio R, Shun TY, Gough A, et al. A human liver microphysiology platform for investigating physiology, drug safety, and disease models. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016;241(1):101–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370215592121.
Khetani SR, Bhatia SN. Microscale culture of human liver cells for drug development. Nat biotechnol 2008;26(1):120–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1361.
Khetani SR, Kanchagar C, Ukairo O, Krzyzewski S, Moore A, Shi J, et al. Use of micropatterned cocultures to detect compounds that cause drug-induced liver injury in humans. Toxicol sci 2013;132(1):107–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfs326.
March S, Ramanan V, Trehan K, Ng S, Galstian A, Gural N, et al. Micropatterned coculture of primary human hepatocytes and supportive cells for the study of hepatotropic pathogens. Nat protoc 2015;10(12):2027–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.128.
Bell CC, Hendriks DF, Moro SM, Ellis E, Walsh J, Renblom A, et al. Characterization of primary human hepatocyte spheroids as a model system for drug-induced liver injury, liver function and disease. Sci Rep 2016;6:25187. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25187.
Messner S, Agarkova I, Moritz W, Kelm JM. Multi-cell type human liver microtissues for hepatotoxicity testing. Arch Toxicol 2013;87(1):209–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0968-2.
Nguyen DG, Funk J, Robbins JB, Crogan-Grundy C, Presnell SC, Singer T, et al. Bioprinted 3D primary liver tissues allow assessment of organ-level response to clinical drug induced toxicity in vitro. PLoS ONE 2016;11(7):e0158674. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158674.
Janssen AW, Betzel B, Stoopen G, Berends FJ, Janssen IM, Peijnenburg AA, et al. The impact of PPARalpha activation on whole genome gene expression in human precision cut liver slices. BMC genomics 2015;16:760. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1969-3.
Domansky K, Inman W, Serdy J, Dash A, Lim MH, Griffith LG. Perfused multiwell plate for 3D liver tissue engineering. Lab Chip 2010;10(1):51–8. https://doi.org/10.1039/b913221j.
Sarkar U, Rivera-Burgos D, Large EM, Hughes DJ, Ravindra KC, Dyer RL, et al. Metabolite profiling and pharmacokinetic evaluation of hydrocortisone in a perfused three-dimensional human liver bioreactor. Drug Metab Dispos 2015;43(7):1091–9. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.115.063495.
Chapman KA, Collado MS, Figler RA, Hoang SA, Armstrong AJ, Cui W, et al. Recapitulation of metabolic defects in a model of propionic acidemia using patient-derived primary hepatocytes. Mol Genet Metab 2016;117(3):355–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.12.008.
Acknowledgement
Support: RO1 DK 105961 (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases). T32 DK007150/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States [National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US)]. R44 DK115301 (SBIR, HemoShear Therapeutics).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Abdul M. Oseini, MD No conflicts to disclose, Danny Issa, MD No conflicts to disclose, Ryan E. Feaver, PhD Employee of HemoShear, Banumathi K. Cole, PhD Employee of HemoShear. Dr. Sanyal is President of Sanyal Biotechnology and has stock options in Genfit, Akarna, Tiziana, Indalo, Durect, Exhalenz and Hemoshear. He has served as a consultant to AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Nitto Denko, Ardelyx, Conatus, Nimbus, Amarin, Salix, Tobira, Takeda, Fibrogen, Jannsen, Gilead, Boehringer, Lilly, Zafgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Jannsen and Genfit. He has been an unpaid consultant to Intercept, Echosens, Immuron, Galectin, Fractyl, Syntlogic, Novo Nordisk, Affimune, Chemomab, Nordic Bioscience and Bristol Myers Squibb. His institution has received grant support from Gilead, Salix, Tobira, Bristol Myers, Shire, Intercept, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Malinckrodt, Cumberland and Novartis. He receives royalties from Elsevier and UptoDate.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oseini, A.M., Cole, B.K., Issa, D. et al. Translating scientific discovery: the need for preclinical models of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatol Int 12, 6–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-017-9838-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-017-9838-6