Abstract
Peroxiredoxin 1 (Prdx1) is a member of the peroxiredoxin family of antioxidant enzymes and implicated in cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. The aim of the present study was to determine the expression and diagnostic and prognostic significance of Prdx1 in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Prdx1 expression was examined in 76 HCC patients and 20 healthy volunteers. The relationships between Prdx1 expression and clinicopathological features were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of serum Prdx1, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and their combination. The prognostic impact of Prdx1 on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of HCC patients was investigated. Prdx1-positive rate was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in HCC (77.1 %) than in adjacent non-tumorous liver tissues (18.4 %). Prdx1 immunoreactivity was positively correlated with tumor vascular endothelial growth factor expression and microvessel density. Prdx1 expression was significantly associated with tumor size, microvascular invasion, Edmondson grade, tumor capsula status, serum AFP, and tumor-node-metastasis stage. The combination of serum Prdx1 and AFP had a markedly higher area under the curve than serum Prdx1 alone. Positive Prdx1 expression was associated with unfavorable OS (p = 0.004) and DFS (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed intra-tumoral Prdx1 staining as an independent poor prognostic marker for OS (p = 0.006) and DFS (p = 0.002). Taken together, our data suggest that increased Prdx1 expression is associated with tumor angiogenesis and progression in HCC and serves as a promising biomarker for detection and prognosis of this malignancy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Despite improvements in care and therapeutic approaches, the 5-year survival rate of HCC patients is only approximately 10 % [2, 3]. One important reason for this low survival rate is that the majority of HCC patients are diagnosed at advanced stage, where curative treatments are not effective or feasible due to tumor spread. Identification of specific biomarkers, especially for early stage tumors, is of significance to improve the prognosis of HCC.
Peroxiredoxin 1 (Prdx1) is a member of the thiol-dependent peroxiredoxin family of antioxidant enzymes that control cytokine-induced peroxide levels and mediate signal transduction in mammalian cells [4]. It is implicated in regulation of numerous biological processes including cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis [5]. Previous studies have reported Prdx1 to be upregulated in many types of cancer such as thyroid cancer [6], bladder cancer [7], lung cancer [8], and prostate cancer [9], suggesting its contribution to cancer development and progression. The interaction of Prdx1 with toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) promotes prostate cancer growth through enhancement of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-dependent tumor angiogenesis [9]. However, in some other cancer types, Prdx1 may function as a tumor suppressor [10]. For example, Hoshino et al. [11] reported that the activation of Prdx1 mediates the antitumor activity of FK228, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in esophageal cancer cells.
A recent study has demonstrated that upregulation of Prdx1 contributes to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) resistance in liver cancer [12]. However, the clinical significance of Prdx1 in HCC is not yet clear. In this study, we examined the expression of Prdx1 in tumor tissues from 76 patients with HCC and evaluated the associations of Prdx1 tissue expression levels with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival. Additionally, we assessed the potential of serum Prdx1 in differentiating HCC patients from healthy individuals.
Materials and methods
Patients and tissue samples
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (Hefei, China), and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. For immunohistochemistry, tumor samples and paracarcinomatous liver tissues were collected from 76 patients with a definitive diagnosis of HCC and undergoing surgical resection at the Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University between 2006 and 2009. Patients with any prior anticancer therapy or concurrent second primary cancer were excluded from this study. Demographic and clinicopathological data were retrieved from medical records and consisted of age, gender, tumor size, number of tumor nodule, tumor capsula, microvascular invasion, Edmondson grade, status of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), cirrhosis, Child–Pugh grade, levels of preoperative alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and tumor stage. Sixty-four were male and twelve were female, with a mean age of 53 ± 12 years (range 19–74 years). Tumor differentiation was defined according to the Edmondson grading system [13], and tumor stage was performed according to the sixth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification of the International Union Against Cancer. Liver function was assessed using Child–Pugh classification. Follow-up data were available for all patients. Median follow-up was 24 months (range 2–72 months). For the measurement of serum Prdx1, peripheral blood samples were collected from each patient before surgery. As control, blood samples were also obtained from 20 age-matched, healthy volunteers.
Immunohistochemical staining for Prdx1, CD31, and VEGF
Tissue sections (4 μm thick) were deparaffinized with xylene, rehydrated, and subjected to microwave antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 20 min. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched with 3 % hydrogen peroxide for 10 min. The sections were then separately incubated with rabbit anti-human antibodies against Prdx1, VEGF (Beijing Biosynthesis Biotechnology, Beijing, China), or CD31 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4 °C overnight. After washing, sections were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 20 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. Negative controls were included by omitting the primary antibody.
The tumor expression of Prdx1 and VEGF was semiquantitatively assessed. Ten random fields per gene were selected, and the percentage of immunoreactive cells in a total of 1,000 tumor cells was determined [14]. No staining or focal or weak staining in <10 % of tumor cells was clarified as negative, moderate, or patchy immunopositivity in 10–30 % of tumor cells as “+,” and strong or diffuse immunopositivity in >30 % of tumor cells as “++.” To evaluate the association of Prdx1 with tumor angiogenesis, microvessel density (MVD) was calculated after immunostaining for CD31 [14]. In each tumor, at least three hotspots displaying the highest vessel density were initially identified at low-power magnification (×100), and the maximum number of microvessels was counted for each area under high-power magnification (×400). According to the median value of 68, MVD was classified as either low or high. The immunohistochemical results were evaluated by two pathologists who were blinded to clinical data, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
Measurement of serum Prdx1 levels by ELISA
A 5-ml venous blood sample was withdrawn from each subject and centrifuged for 10 min at 2,500 r/min at 4 °C. Serum was subsequently collected and stored at −80 °C until testing. Serum Prdx1 levels were measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Shanghai Yuan Ye Biological Technology Co., LTD). Briefly, 100 μl of serum samples or standards was added to a 96-well ELISA plates. After incubation for 2 h at room temperature, the wells were washed three times. Each well was added with the detection antibody and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After washing, 100 μl of the working dilution of horseradish peroxidase-labeled streptavidin was added to each well and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The substrate solution was then added and incubated for another 20 min. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm with a microtiter plate reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) after 100 μl of stop solution was added to each well. Each assay was performed in triplicate and repeated three times.
Statistical analysis
Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences in the means were determined using the Student’s t test or one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey’s test. The chi-square test and Spearman’s correlation test are used to analyze the immunohistochemistry results. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to determine the diagnostic performance of serum Prdx1, serum AFP, and their combination. The Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test were applied to determine the survival analysis. The Cox regression model was employed to determine the independent prognostic value. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Immunohistochemical staining for Prdx1 and VEGF in HCC tissues
Immunohistochemistry showed that Prdx1 was mainly localized in the cytoplasm of tumor cells with varying staining intensity (Fig. 1). The positive rate of Prdx1 was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in HCC tissues (56/76, 77.1 %) than in adjacent non-tumorous liver tissues (14/76, 18.4 %). Cytoplasmic VEGF expression was detected in 53 of 76 HCC specimens (69.7 %; Fig. 1). Spearman’s rank correlation test revealed a significant positive correlation between tissue expression of Prdx1 and VEGF in HCC tissues (r = 0.452, p < 0.001; Table 1).
Relationship between Prdx1 expression and MVD
The MVD ranged from 0 to 198/200 per field (median, 65/200 per field) in HCC tissues, as determined by CD31 staining (Fig. 2a). Tumors with positive Prdx1 expression had significantly greater MVD than Prdx1-negative counterparts (78.8 ± 39.4 vs. 33.8 ± 26.6, p < 0.01; Fig. 2b).
Correlation of tissue Prdx1 expression with clinicopathological parameters
We next analyzed the associations between tissue Prdx1 expression and clinicopathological parameters in HCC. As shown in Table 2, the expression level of Prdx1 was significantly associated with tumor size (p = 0.012), microvascular invasion (p < 0.001), Edmondson grade (p = 0.004), tumor capsula status (p = 0.001), serum AFP (p = 0.008), and TNM stage (p < 0.001). However, Prdx1 immunoreactivity showed no significant correlation with age, gender, HBeAg status, cirrhosis, Child–Pugh grade, and tumor nodule number.
Clinical significance of serum Prdx1 in HCC
The results of ELISA showed that HCC patients had a significantly higher level of serum Prdx1 than healthy individuals (31.3 ± 13.4 vs. 8.2 ± 6.8 ng/ml, p < 0.01; Fig. 3a). Furthermore, as shown in Table 2, there were significantly higher serum levels of Prdx1 in patients with multiple tumor nodules (p = 0.014), vascular invasion (p = 0.006), incomplete capsule (p = 0.032), serum positive HBeAg (p = 0.041), and more advanced TNM staging (p < 0.001). An ROC curve (Fig. 3b) was performed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of Prdx1 for the detection of HCC. Serum Prdx1 level was effective in distinguishing HCC patients from healthy subjects (AUC = 0.817; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.726–0.908). Moreover, the addition of serum AFP increased the ability of serum Prdx1 to detect HCC, with an AUC of 0.822 (95 % CI 0.742–0.903).
Survival analyses
Kaplan–Meier curves (Fig. 4) were plotted to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival time (DFS) between Prdx1-positive HCC patients and Prdx1-negative HCC patients. Patients with Prdx1-positive expression (23.2 months; 95 % CI 17.9–28.5) had a shorter OS compared to Prdx1-negative patients (48.7 months; 95 % CI 36.5–60.9; p = 0.004). Similarly, the DFS was significantly lower in patients with Prdx1-positive expression (26.1 months; 95 % CI 20.8–31.3) than in those with Prdx1-negative expression (48.0 months; 95 % CI 35.5–60.4; p = 0.001).
Univariate analysis indicated that tumor expression of Prdx1, sex, tumor size, vascular invasion, Edmondson grade, tumor capsula status, serum AFP, and TNM stage had significant prognostic influences on OS (Table 3). Multivariate survival analysis (Table 4) further revealed intra-tumoral Prdx1 staining as an independent poor prognostic marker for OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.897; 95 % CI 1.355–6.194; p = 0.006] and DFS (HR = 3.268; 95 % CI 1.532–6.971; p = 0.002). Additionally, sex, tumor size, vascular invasion, tumor capsula status, and TNM stage were also independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS (Table 4).
Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the expression and clinical significance of Prdx1 in HCC. Upregulation of Prdx1 has been documented in many cancers, including liver cancer [6, 8, 12]. Our present data confirm the increased expression of Prdx1 in HCC relative to adjacent non-tumorous liver tissues. Moreover, we have demonstrated, to the best of our knowledge for the first time, that serum Prdx1 levels are significantly raised in HCC patients compared to healthy individuals. Identification of effective biomarkers for the detection of HCC is of clinical significance. Several non-invasive serum biomarkers such as AFP, des-gamma carboxyprothrombin, glypican-3, and osteopontin have been proposed [15]. Peroxiredoxin 3, another member of the peroxiredoxin family, has been suggested as a biomarker for HCC [16]. Serum concentrations of Prdx1 have shown diagnostic value in patients with lung cancer [17]. Thus, here we explored the potential of Prdx1 as a diagnostic marker in HCC. Our data revealed that serum Prdx1 had a similar diagnostic accuracy to serum AFP in differentiating between HCC and healthy subjects, as evidenced by comparable AUC values. Most interestingly, the combination of Prdx1 and AFP had a markedly higher AUC than each of them alone. These findings suggest that when used in combination with other biomarkers, serum Prdx1 may provide additional diagnostic power in HCC.
Accumulating evidence indicates that Prdx1 plays a prominent role in tumor survival and progression [18, 19]. Du et al. [18] reported that Prdx1 is capable of suppressing proteasome inhibitor-mediated cell death in thyroid cancer cells through modulation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 activation. Ha et al. [19] showed that Prdx1 overexpression enhances transforming growth factor β1-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cell migration in cancer cells. EMT is regarded as a key event involved in tumor invasion and metastasis [20]. HCC is characterized by its high propensity for vascular invasion and metastasis. Our findings provide clinical evidence for the link between Prdx1 expression and HCC development. We found that increased hepatic and serum expression of Prdx1 was significantly associated with numerous aggressive parameters of HCC, including higher tumor size, multiple tumor nodules, microvascular invasion, advanced Edmondson grade, incomplete tumor capsula, greater serum AFP, and advanced TNM stage. These data, combined with the previous study demonstrating an involvement of Prdx1 in TRAIL resistance in HCC cells [12], highlight an important role for Prdx1 in HCC survival and metastasis.
It is widely accepted that tumor angiogenesis is a key component in tumor metastasis [21]. Our data revealed that Prdx1 expression was positively correlated with MVD in HCC, suggesting its implication in tumor angiogenesis. VEGF is a well-defined pro-angiogenic factor. Several previous studies have demonstrated that VEGF expression significantly correlates with MVD in HCC [22, 23]. Notably, our data revealed a significant positive correlation between tissue expression of Prdx1 and VEGF in HCC. These findings collectively suggest that Prdx1 may be involved in VEGF-mediated tumor angiogenesis in HCC, which provides an explanation for the significant associations between Prdx1 immunoreactivity and HCC aggressiveness. Indeed, induction of VEGF-dependent tumor angiogenesis by Prdx1 has been documented in prostate cancer [9, 24]. However, further studies are still needed to unravel the biological functions of Prdx1 in tumor angiogenesis and progression in HCC.
Several studies have shown the prognostic significance of Prdx1 expression in different malignancies [25–27]. For instance, Kim et al. [25] reported that Prdx1 expression status predicts recurrence and shorter survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer after surgery. Likewise, Li et al. [27] demonstrated that positive Prdx1 expression serves as an independent poor prognostic marker in squamous cell/adenosquamous carcinomas and adenocarcinoma of gallbladder. Using the Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test, we found that HCC patients with Prdx1-positive tumors had a significantly shorter OS and DFS than those with Prdx1-negative tumors. Furthermore, using the Cox proportional hazards regression model, we revealed positive Prdx1 expression as an independent prognostic factor in HCC. The adverse prognostic effect of Prdx1 further suggests a tumor-promoting role for this gene in HCC.
A major limitation of this single-institute study is relatively small sample size. Additionally, there is a potential selection bias inherent to any retrospective study. A prospective study with a larger cohort of patients is thus needed to confirm the present findings.
In conclusion, we have provided the first evidence that upregulation of Prdx1 is associated with tumor angiogenesis and progression in HCC. Serum Prdx1, in conjunction with serum AFP, is effective in differentiating HCC from healthy individuals. Prdx1-positive expression is an independent predictor of poor OS and DFS in HCC patients receiving curative surgery. These findings warrant further investigation into the biological relevance of increased expression of Prdx1 in HCC.
Abbreviations
- AFP:
-
α-Fetoprotein
- DAB:
-
3,3-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride
- DFS:
-
Disease-free survival
- ELISA:
-
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- EMT:
-
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- HBeAg:
-
Hepatitis B e antigen
- HCC:
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- HE:
-
Hematoxylin and eosin
- MVD:
-
Microvessel density
- OS:
-
Overall survival
- PBS:
-
Phosphate buffered saline
- Prdx1:
-
Peroxiredoxin 1
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristics
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- TLR4:
-
Toll-like receptor 4
- TNM:
-
Tumor-node-metastasis
- TRAIL:
-
Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand
- VEGF:
-
Vascular endothelial growth factor
References
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.
Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Reichman ME. Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1485–91.
El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1118–27.
Wood ZA, Schroder E, Robin Harris J, Poole LB. Structure, mechanism and regulation of peroxiredoxins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28:32–40.
Kim JH, Lee JM, Lee HN, Kim EK, Ha B, Ahn SM, et al. RNA-binding properties and RNA chaperone activity of human peroxiredoxin 1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;425:730–4.
Yanagawa T, Ishikawa T, Ishii T, Tabuchi K, Iwasa S, Bannai S, et al. Peroxiredoxin I expression in human thyroid tumors. Cancer Lett. 1999;145:127–32.
Quan C, Cha EJ, Lee HL, Han KH, Lee KM, Kim WJ. Enhanced expression of peroxiredoxin I and VI correlates with development, recurrence and progression of human bladder cancer. J Urol. 2006;175:1512–6.
Kim JH, Bogner PN, Baek SH, Ramnath N, Liang P, Kim HR, et al. Up-regulation of peroxiredoxin 1 in lung cancer and its implication as a prognostic and therapeutic target. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2326–33.
Riddell JR, Bshara W, Moser MT, Spernyak JA, Foster BA, Gollnick SO. Peroxiredoxin 1 controls prostate cancer growth through toll-like receptor 4-dependent regulation of tumor vasculature. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1637–46.
Neumann CA, Krause DS, Carman CV, Das S, Dubey DP, Abraham JL. Essential role for the peroxiredoxin Prdx1 in erythrocyte antioxidant defence and tumour suppression. Nature. 2003;424:561–5.
Hoshino I, Matsubara H, Hanari N, Mori M, Nishimori T, Yoneyama Y, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor FK228 activates tumor suppressor Prdx1 with apoptosis induction in esophageal cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:7945–52.
Song IS, Kim SU, Oh NS, Kim J, Yu DY, Huang SM, et al. Peroxiredoxin I contributes to TRAIL resistance through suppression of redox-sensitive caspase activation in human hepatoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1106–14.
Edmondson HA, Steiner PE. Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer. 1954;7:462–503.
Shao R, Bao S, Bai X, Blanchette C, Anderson RM, Dang T, et al. Acquired expression of periostin by human breast cancers promotes tumor angiogenesis through up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:3992–4003.
Bertino G, Ardiri A, Malaguarnera M, Malaguarnera G, Bertino N, Calvagno GS. Hepatocellualar carcinoma serum markers. Semin Oncol. 2012;39:410–33.
Qiao B, Wang J, Xie J, Niu Y, Ye S, Wan Q, et al. Detection and identification of peroxiredoxin 3 as a biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma by a proteomic approach. Int J Mol Med. 2012;29:832–40.
Rostila A, Puustinen A, Toljamo T, Vuopala K, Lindström I, Nyman TA, et al. Peroxiredoxins and tropomyosins as plasma biomarkers for lung cancer and asbestos exposure. Lung Cancer. 2012;77:450–9.
Du ZX, Yan Y, Zhang HY, Liu BQ, Gao YY, Niu XF, et al. Suppression of MG132-mediated cell death by peroxiredoxin 1 through influence on ASK1 activation in human thyroid cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17:553–60.
Ha B, Kim EK, Kim JH, Lee HN, Lee KO, Lee SY, et al. Human peroxiredoxin 1 modulates TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition through its peroxidase activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;421:33–7.
Lee TK, Poon RT, Yuen AP, Ling MT, Kwok WK, Wang XH, et al. Twist overexpression correlates with hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5369–76.
Folkman J. Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. Semin Oncol. 2002;29:15–8.
Chen ZB, Shen SQ, Ding YM, Wang WX, Tao JP, Liang LJ, et al. The angiogenic and prognostic implications of VEGF, Ang-1, Ang-2, and MMP-9 for hepatocellular carcinoma with background of hepatitis B virus. Med Oncol. 2009;26:365–71.
Wada H, Nagano H, Yamamoto H, Yang Y, Kondo M, Ota H, et al. Expression pattern of angiogenic factors and prognosis after hepatic resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: importance of angiopoietin-2 and hypoxia-induced factor-1 alpha. Liver Int. 2006;26:414–23.
Riddell JR, Maier P, Sass SN, Moser MT, Foster BA, Gollnick SO. Peroxiredoxin 1 stimulates endothelial cell expression of VEGF via TLR4 dependent activation of HIF-1α. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e50394.
Kim JH, Bogner PN, Ramnath N, Park Y, Yu J, Park YM. Elevated peroxiredoxin 1, but not NF-E2-related factor 2, is an independent prognostic factor for disease recurrence and reduced survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3875–82.
Yonglitthipagon P, Pairojkul C, Chamgramol Y, Loukas A, Mulvenna J, Bethony J, et al. Prognostic significance of peroxiredoxin 1 and ezrin–radixin–moesin—binding phosphoprotein 50 in cholangiocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:1719–30.
Li J, Yang ZL, Ren X, Zou Q, Yuan Y, Liang L, et al. ILK and PRDX1 are prognostic markers in squamous cell/adenosquamous carcinomas and adenocarcinoma of gallbladder. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:359–68.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81201906 and 81172364).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Qi-Kai Sun and Jian-Yu Zhu have contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.
Wei Wang and Wei-Dong Jia have contributed equally to this work as co-correspondence authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, QK., Zhu, JY., Wang, W. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of peroxiredoxin 1 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Oncol 31, 786 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0786-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0786-2