Introduction

Creatine (Cr) is a nitrogenous acid involved in energy homeostasis. Through a Cr kinase (CK)-mediated process, Cr is phosphorylated at sites of energy production and diffuses through the cytosol, creating phospho-Cr (PCr) pools (Wallimann et al. 2011, Lowe et al. 2013). At sites of ATP consumption, CK transfers the phosphate from PCr to ADP (Wyss and Kaddurah-Daouk 2000). The Cr/PCr shuttle is a spatial and temporal ATP buffer, preventing transient changes in ATP:ADP or ATP:AMP ratios from increasing mitochondrial production (Wallimann et al. 2011). Reflecting the importance of Cr in energetically demanding tissue, the highest Cr concentrations are seen in the brain, heart, and muscle. In addition, Cr has antioxidant, neuroprotective, and mitochondria-protective capabilities (Wyss and Kaddurah-Daouk 2000). The significance of brain Cr is highlighted by the hallmark phenotype of intellectual disability and aphasia in cerebral Cr deficiency syndromes (CCDS) (Cecil et al. 2001, deGrauw et al. 2002, van de Kamp et al. 2013). Cr transporter (Crt; SLC6A8) deficiency (CTD) is the most prevalent type of CCDS and is thought to be responsible for ~ 2% of all X-linked intellectual disability (Rosenberg et al. 2004; Newmeyer et al. 2005). While intellectual disability is the most striking feature of CTD, the incidence of motoric impairments is high among CTD patients (van de Kamp et al. 2013; van de Kamp et al. 2014). To date, it is unclear how the loss of Cr leads to cognitive deficits. One of the primary challenges in elucidating the mechanisms of Cr-mediated deficits is that the importance of Cr in specific neurotransmitter systems is unknown. This limits the ability to focus on a distinct cellular process that might be exclusive to one neuronal cell type and could be overlooked by global evaluation of the brain.

Dopamine (DA) is the primary neurotransmitter involved in voluntary motor function (Beninger 1983). Many movement disorders, e.g., Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease, are caused by disruptions in dopaminergic function. Drugs that increase DA release, such as amphetamine and cocaine, cause hyperactivity (Roberts et al. 1975; Faraone 2018; Runegaard et al. 2018). Conversely, drugs that deplete DA result in hypoactivity and motor deficits (Koob et al. 1978; Beninger 1983). Additionally, DA neurons are especially sensitive to mitochondrial deficits. 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) (Gomez-Lazaro et al. 2008), rotenone (Xiong et al. 2012), and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) (Przedborski et al. 2004) are mitochondrial toxicants that degenerate DA neurons and cause motor dysfunction. As such, they are regularly used to model Parkinson’s disease (Sakai and Gash 1994; Matthews et al. 1999; Przedborski et al. 2004; Tirmenstein et al. 2005; Hosamani and Ramesh 2010; Glajch et al. 2012; Xiong et al. 2012). Importantly, Cr supplementation prevents or attenuates MPTP- (Matthews et al. 1999; Klivenyi et al. 2004), 6-OHDA- (Cunha et al. 2013; Cunha et al. 2014), and rotenone-induced toxicity (Hosamani and Ramesh 2010) suggesting that Cr could be an important mediator of mitochondrial-induced motor impairments.

To better understand the role of brain Cr, we developed transgenic mice with exons 2–4 of the murine Slc6a8 (Crt) gene flanked by loxP sites (Slc6a8Flox; Skelton et al. 2011). The Slc6a8 gene is responsible for the transport of Cr into cells (Wyss and Kaddurah-Daouk 2000). Ubiquitous knockout (Slc6a8−/y) mice generated from this line have reduced cerebral Cr, lower body weight, show significant learning and memory deficits (Skelton et al. 2011, Hautman et al. 2014, Ullio-Gamboa 2019, Udobi et al. 2019), and importantly, have increased striatal DA concentrations (Skelton et al. 2011; Abdulla et al. 2019). Additionally, Slc6a8−/y mice have reduced swim speed compared with control (Slc6a8+/y) mice (Skelton et al. 2011), indicative of the potential presence of motor impairments. Interestingly, Slc6a8−/y mice were hypoactive during the first 5 min of a 1 h open field test; however, female Slc6a8± (Hautman et al. 2014) and male brain-specific Slc6a8 knockout mice (Udobi et al. 2018) were hyperactive for the whole hour. This would suggest that Cr plays a role in exploratory behavior or activity levels. In order to isolate Slc6a8’s influence on the dopaminergic system, and to reduce potential confounds created by the size differences in ubiquitous knockout mice, we created a DA-specific Slc6a8 knockout mouse (dCrt−/y). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a DA-specific Slc6a8 knockout on locomotor activity and motor performance during adulthood.

Experimental Procedures

Subjects

Slc6a3tm1.1(cre)Bkmn/J (DATIREScre) mice were obtained from Jackson Labs (Bar Harbor, ME) (Backman et al. 2006). DATIREScre+ mice were bred to wild-type mice from the same background strain (C57Bl/6J) for at least one generation to establish an in-house colony. In-house generated female Slc6a8fl/fl mice (Skelton et al. 2011) were mated with the in-house generated male DATIREScre+ mice. The resulting offspring were used as subjects for these studies with no more than 1 mouse/genotype/litter represented. Male Slc6a8fl/y:: DATIREScre+ (dCrt−/y) and Slc6a8fl/y:: DATIREScre− (Slc6a8fl/y) were tested every 30 days beginning at postnatal day (P) 90 and ending on P360. Hyperactivity has not been observed in either the Slc6a8fl/y (Udobi et al. 2018; Udobi et al. 2019) or the heterozygous DATIREScre mice (Birgner et al. 2010) when compared with wild-type mice, so we selected the Slc6a8fl/y littermates as controls. Mice were weighed monthly prior to running behavioral assessments. Thirteen Slc6a8fl/y and 11 dCrt−/y mice were enrolled at the beginning of the study and the study concluded with 8 Slc6a8fl/y and 7 dCrt−/y mice. There was no clear cause of death for the mice that were lost during testing and none of the deaths were related to testing. A separate group of 3 dCrt−/y, 3 Slc6a8+/y, and 3 Slc6a8−/y mice were used for in situ hybridization. All procedures were performed in the Cincinnati Children’s Research Foundation vivarium which is fully accredited by AAALAC International and protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee (protocol no. 2017-0019). Mice (2–4/cage) were housed in microisolators equipped with an automatic watering system. Lights were on a 14:10 light:dark cycle, room temperature was maintained at 19 ± 1 °C. Sterilized food and water were available ad libitum. All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.

Behavior

Challenging Beam Task

The protocol was adapted from Fleming (2004) with minor changes. A 1 m beam was divided into four 25 cm segments: the first was 3.5-cm wide and the width of each subsequent segment was reduced in 1 cm increments to a final width of 0.5 cm. A wire mesh grid (0.5 cm × 0.5 cm) was placed atop the beam. The bridge was elevated 13 cm from the tabletop using standard barrier mouse cages. Mice were trained for 2 days prior to testing. On day one, mice were assisted as they traversed the 1 m beam to the home-cage goal for two trials. Day one concluded when mice were able to complete 5 unassisted bridge traversals. On the second day of training, mice were required to complete 5 unassisted bridge traversals. For testing, mice were assessed over three, 2 min trials. Trials were recorded and scored by a trained observer blinded to genotype. The variables measured were latency to cross (2 min maximum), errors—defined as a foot-slip during forward progress—committed per steps taken, and total number of steps (Fleming 2004).

Spontaneous Activity

A transparent glass cylinder (15.5 cm [h] × 12.7 cm [dia]) was placed on a plexiglass platform with a camera below to record activity. Mice were placed in the cylinder for 3 min. Trials were recorded and scored offline by a trained observer blinded to genotype. The dependent measures were steps per limb (front and hind limb), rears, and total time grooming.

Overnight Locomotor Activity

Locomotor activity was assessed in automated activity monitoring chambers (40 cm [w] × 40 cm [d] × 38 cm [h]) with 16 LED-photodetector beams in the X and Y planes (Photobeam Activity System, Open Field, San Diego Instruments, San Diego, CA). Photocells were spaced 2.5 cm apart. Mice were tested for 14 h, consisting of the last 2 h of the light phase, the 10 h dark phase, and 2 h of the following light phase.

In situ Hybridization

Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane, rapidly decapitated, and the brains dissected. Fresh-frozen sections through the ventral midbrain were cut on a cryostat (at 10 μm thickness) and slide-mounted onto Superfrost plus microslides (VWR, Batavia, IL). Semi-adjacent sections were processed for the in situ hybridization localization of Slc6a8 and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNAs using 35S-labeled riboprobes, as described in detail previously (Seroogy and Herman 1997; Numan et al. 2005; Hemmerle et al. 2012). Briefly, for pretreatment, the sections were placed in 4% paraformaldehyde (10 min), rinsed in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (5 min; twice) and 0.1 M PBS/0.2% glycine (5 min; twice), acetylated in triethanolamine (pH 8.0) containing 0.25% acetic anhydride (10 min), dehydrated in a series of ethanol washes, delipidated in chloroform, and air-dried. Sections were hybridized overnight in a humidified chamber at 60 °C in hybridization solution with the 35S-labeled probe at a concentration of 3 × 105 cpm/50 μl. The composition of the hybridization cocktail for each probe was as follows: 50% deionized formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA, 40 mM dithiothreitol, 1X Denhardt’s, 335 mM NaCl, 0.3 mg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA, 0.15 mg/ml tRNA, DEPC H2O, and the appropriate 35S-labeled cRNA probe. The TH cDNA plasmid (kindly provided by J. Herman, University of Cincinnati) was contained in a pCR-TOPO vector and consisted of 366 bp. The templates for the 515 bp Slc6a8 sense and antisense probes were generated by PCR amplification of exons 2–4 of murine Slc6a8 mRNA. Total RNA was extracted from the hippocampus of a C57BL/6J mouse using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and a cDNA library was generated using iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). For the antisense probe, a T3 promoter was added to the 5′ prime end of the reverse primer (5′ AATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGTGTGTTCCTTATTCCCTA 3′, T3 sequence underlined) and the sense probe was generate by adding the T7 promoter to the 5′ end of the forward primer (5′ TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCTTTCCTGTTGACTTGACC 3′; T7 sequence underlined). Probes were generated by in vitro transcription and labeled by incorporation of 35S-ATP. Following hybridization, coverslips were removed and the sections were taken through a series of post-hybridization washes in decreasing concentrations of standard sodium citrate, treated with ribonuclease A, rinsed again, and air-dried. The sections were then exposed to BioMax MR film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) for 2 days (TH cRNA) or 14 days (Crt cRNA) for generation of film autoradiograms. The films were developed with Kodak GBX developer and fixer (Kodak). Images were scanned at 3200 dpi from the film autoradiograms using Epson Scan software (Epson America, Inc., Long Beach, CA).

Statistics

Repeated-measures two-way ANOVAs (age × genotype) were used for all analyses in this study. Significant interactions were evaluated using post hoc analysis with the two-stage step up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli (Benjamini et al. 2006). Significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests. Data were analyzed and graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism version 8.2.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).

Results

Weight

While there were no weight differences between groups when the mice were younger, dCrt−/y mice did show a weight reduction from P270 to P330 compared with Slc6a8fl/y mice (age × gene interaction: F(9,153) = 1.95, p < 0.05; Fig. 1). All mice gained weight as they aged (F(9,153) = 18.92, p < 0.0001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Weight. An age × gene interaction revealed that dCrt−/y mice weighed less than Slc6a8fl/y mice from P270 to P330. All animals gained weight as they aged. (*p < 0.05)

Challenging Beam

dCrt−/y mice traversed the beam faster than Slc6a8fl/y mice and the latency to cross decreased as mice aged (main effect of gene: (F(1,152) = 19.98, p < 0.0001); main effect of age: F(8,152) = 5.03, p < 0.001; Fig. 2a). On P90, dCrt−/y mice took fewer steps to cross the beam than Slc6a8fl/y mice but took more steps on P330 (age × gene interaction: F(9,116) = 5.77, p < 0.001; Fig. 2b). For number of errors committed, there were no differences between groups (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

dCrt−/y mice have decreased beam crossing latencies. a dCrt−/y mice traversed the beam faster than Slc6a8fl/y animals and the latency to cross decreased as mice aged. b An age × gene interaction was reported for number of steps required to cross the beam, with dCrt−/y mice requiring less steps on P90 and more steps on P330. c Groups did not differ on number of errors committed

Spontaneous Activity

dCrt−/y mice reared more (main effect of gene: F(1,14) = 8.899, p < 0.01; Fig. 3a) and had more hindlimb steps (main effect of gene: F(1,14) = 11.8, p < 0.01; Fig. 3b) than Slc6a8fl/y mice. Regardless of genotype, mice had fewer forelimb steps as they aged (main effect of age: F(8,112) = 3.465, p < 0.05; Fig. 3c). No differences were found for grooming duration (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3
figure 3

dCrt-y mice have increased spontaneous activity. a dCrt−/y mice reared more and b took more hindlimb steps than Slc6a8fl/y mice, but recorded similar activity on c and forelimb steps d and grooming duration

Overnight Locomotor Activity

dCrt−/y mice were hyperactive compared with Slc6a8fl/y mice at all ages except P120, P150, and P330 (main effect of gene: F(1,16) = 21.09, p < 0.001; main effect of age: F(9,144) = 3.89, p < 0.001; age × gene interaction: F(9,144) = 3.88, p < 0.001; Fig. 4a, Fig. 5). Hyperactivity was present during both the light phase (main effect of gene: F(1,16) = 35.51, p < 0.0001; main effect of age: F(9,144) = 5.05, p < 0.0001; age × gene interaction: F(9,144) = 4.78, p < 0.0001; Figs. 4b and 5) and the dark phase (main effect of gene: F(1,16) = 15.42, p < 0.01; main effect of age: F(9,144) = 2.56, p < 0.01; age × gene interaction: F(9,144) = 3.49, p < 0.001; Fig. 4c and 5) for all ages except P120, P150, and P330.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Persistent hyperactivity in dCrt−/y mice. a dCrt−/y mice had increased activity compared with Slc6a8fl/y mice at all ages except P120, P150, and P330. During both the b light and c dark phases of the experiment, dCrt−/y mice were more active than Slc6a8fl/y controls on all testing periods except P120, P150, and P330

Fig. 5
figure 5

Overnight locomotor activity. dCrt−/y mice are hyperactive compared to Slc6a8fl/y mice throughout testing. 14-h locomotor assessments from a P90, b P120, c P150, d P180, e P210, f P240, g P270, h P300, i P330, and j P360 with the dark phase contained within the gray box

In situ Hybridization

Widespread expression of Slc6a8 mRNA was observed in brain sections of Slc6a8+/y and dCrt−/y mice, but, as expected, expression was not present in Slc6a8−/y mouse brains (Fig. 6a–c). Representative autoradiograms from the dCrt−/y mice demonstrated that Slc6a8 cRNA hybridization was absent specifically in the region of the ventral midbrain corresponding to ventral midbrain dopaminergic nuclei, as determined by processing semi-adjacent sections for TH mRNA localization (Fig. 6d–f). No labeling was present using the sense Slc6a8 riboprobe (Fig. 6g–i). These results provide strong evidence that the knockout of Slc6a8 mRNA was restricted to DAT-containing midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the dCrt−/y mice.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Confirmation of knockout. ac Film autoradiograms showing hemisections at the level of the ventral midbrain hybridized with either antisense Slc6a8 cRNA, df TH cRNA or gi control sense Slc6a8 cRNA. Robust Slc6a8 cRNA-labeling is present throughout the sections from the a Slc6a8+/y and b dCrt−/y mice; note, however, the absence of hybridization signal in the substantia nigra in the dCrt−/y brain section (arrows in b; compare to same area in a). c Labeling for Slc6a8 mRNA is absent (only typical background expression) in sections from Slc6a8−/y mouse brains. Panels df show TH cRNA labeling in sections semi-adjacent to panels ac, respectively, and serve to identify the corresponding localization of dopaminergic cells in the ventral midbrain. Hybridization of semi-adjacent sections from each mouse genotype with the control sense Slc6a8 cRNA probe reveals complete absence of labeling for Slc6a8 mRNA (gi)

Discussion

dCrt−/y mice traversed the challenging beam faster than controls, exhibited more stepping activity in spontaneous activity, and were hyperactive in overnight locomotor assessments. These results were consistent, not progressive, across the duration of this experiment, indicating that deletion of Slc6a8 in dopaminergic neurons results in persistent hyperactivity in mice. Additionally, in situ hybridization confirmed the successful targeted deletion of Slc6a8 in DA neurons, as minimal expression of Slc6a8 mRNA was observed in TH-rich regions of the dCrt−/y brain. Our results suggest that the Slc6a8 gene plays an important role in DA-mediated locomotion.

The challenging beam task was designed to uncover subtle motor deficits that could provide translational value to human neurodegenerative disorders (Fleming 2004). For instance, mice exhibiting a Parkinson’s-like phenotype display increased errors, steps to cross, and latency to cross the beam (Fleming 2004; Glajch et al. 2012). dCrt−/y mice did not show any deficits on challenging beam task. Instead, dCrt−/y mice had shorter latencies when crossing the tapered beam and never relied on more steps to cross the beam than control mice. Coupled with a lack of errors on this task, dCrt−/y performance on the challenging beam task appears to be mediated by a hyperactivity that apparently does not impair motor control.

Furthermore, in the spontaneous activity task, dCrt−/y mice had increased rearing behavior and hindlimb steps compared with Slc6a8fl/y mice. Mice with motor deficits typically display a decrease in these behaviors (Schallert et al. 2000; Fleming 2004; Glajch et al. 2012; Pinto et al. 2016). These increases are indicative of hyperactivity (O’Neill and Gu 2013; Kostrzewa et al. 2015). Similarly, dCrt−/y mice were hyperactive in overnight locomotor activity assessments during both light and dark phases, compared with Slc6a8fl/y controls. This hyperactivity was observed in 70% of the assessments. Taken together, these behavioral measures indicate that the dCrt−/y mice are hyperactive.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of DAT-specific deletion of Slc6a8 affected motor behavior or activity levels. The results suggest that deletion of the Slc6a8 gene in DA neurons is sufficient to induce a persistent, life-long hyperactivity while sparing motor function. CTD patients are frequently diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (van de Kamp et al. 2013). There are logistical issues, such as the size, distribution, and heterogeneity of brain regions containing DAT+ neurons that prevent Cr measurement in dopaminergic areas of dCrt−/y mice. However, multiple lines of evidence would suggest that deletion of Slc6a8 leads to a significant reduction in Cr levels. Slc6a8 appears to be the only means of Cr entry into neurons (Ohtsuki et al. 2002). This is shown by the lack of brain Cr in brain-specific Slc6a8 knockouts (Udobi et al. 2018), where Slc6a8 expression is likely unchanged in the microcapillary endothelial cells that allow Cr entry into the brain, and the decline of brain Cr following Slc6a8 deletion in adult mice (Udobi et al. 2019). Further, the expression of Cr synthesis enzymes AGAT and GAMT are relatively low in the substantia nigra (Braissant et al. 2001). Therefore, it is possible but not likely that the Slc6a8 deletion did not alter Cr levels in these regions. It should be noted that despite the expression of AGAT and GAMT, there has been no conclusive proof that the brain generates a significant amount of Cr through de novo synthesis. Even if Cr levels are unchanged, these results show that loss of Slc6a8 expression in DA neurons leads to persistent hyperactivity, which is especially relevant given the high rate of ADHD in the CTD population. Future studies will look for attentional abnormalities in dCrt−/y mice. Because dCrt−/y mice display a robust hyperactivity, this may indicate the presence of an ADHD-like phenotype and potentially explain the high comorbidity of ADHD and CTD. Future studies will also examine the causes of the weight differences between dCrt−/y and control mice. DA is highly involved in motivation and it is possible that alterations to the dopaminergic system could lead to altered feeding behavior (Palmiter 2007).