Opinion statement
The arterial switch operation (ASO) is now the most frequently performed surgical correction in individuals with dextro-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA). Patients who undergo this procedure as neonates have overall good clinical outcomes yet continued clinical follow-up is important to evaluate for postoperative complications. In this group, the highest mortality is in the immediate postoperative period and is generally associated with reimplantation of the coronary arteries. As these patients live into adulthood, longitudinal follow-up for other ASO complications including neo-pulmonary stenosis, right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction, or neo-aortic root dilation and resulting aortic insufficiency should be performed. In adults, extra care should be taken to identify and treat traditional cardiovascular risk factors as individuals with coronary obstruction may not present with typical anginal symptoms. Management of these patients should be performed in collaboration with an adult congenital heart center of excellence. This population offers a unique opportunity to provide timely feedback to adult congenital heart community of providers regarding late outcomes from surgical intervention and in the next decade will hopefully demonstrate a model for clinical feedback cycles in lifelong congenital care.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Dextro-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) occurs in approximately 0.2 in 1000 births [1]. The most recent surgical correction for D-TGA was originally described in 1975 by Jatene and colleagues and the surgery still carries his name [2]. Surgical correction as a neonate is preferred and delay was found to be associated with an increased mortality and overall increased cost to the healthcare system [3]. As these patients are living longer and into adulthood, we will review the currently available data regarding late complications, management, and treatment after the arterial switch operation (ASO).
Prognosis and post-procedural complications
In most high-volume congenital centers, the early operative mortality associated with the ASO is approximately 3% [4]. Overall, there are good long-term (>10 years) survival rates reported as 88–97% and freedom from reoperation of approximately 82% [5, 6]. As patients progress into their adult years, postoperative late complications of the Jatene operation include the following: coronary artery obstruction, progressive neo-aortic dilatation, neo-pulmonary stenosis (supravalvular and branch pulmonary stenosis), and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction.
In patients who have had an ASO, the electrocardiogram may show a right bundle branch block or a first-degree AV block. Although atrial arrhythmias may occur [7], they occur less often than in patients who underwent Mustard or Senning procedures [8] where atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmias occur around surgical sites and prosthetic material [9]. Arrhythmias in the immediate postoperative period should raise concern for ischemia related to coronary artery reimplantation and correlate with increased morbidity and mortality [10, 11]. Individuals who develop late-onset atrial arrhythmias or cardiac dysfunction, new-onset aortic insufficiency may be the inciting cause and should be excluded.
Asymptomatic coronary artery obstruction is a significant challenge in the ASO population. Coronary artery obstruction may be underdiagnosed in this population due to the lack of ischemic changes on testing [12]. The prevalence of coronary artery obstruction after ASO is approximately 8% [13,14,15] with coronary artery obstruction leading to the primary cause of death after ASO [16]. The coronary arteries associated with D-TGA may arise from varying locations on the aortic sinuses, and this anatomy is taken into consideration when the transfer of the coronary ostia is performed [17, 18]. During coronary artery transfer, anatomic torsion or extrinsic compression of the coronary arteries may cause ischemia. Late coronary events may also be attributed to progressive intimal thickening or stretching as patients age [13]. Residual cardiac sympathetic denervation [19] may lead to the lack of pain sensation during ischemic evaluation.
Intervention on the aortic valve after ASO has thus far rarely been needed; however, the rates of intervention on the aortic valve as this population further ages has yet to be determined. Aortic insufficiency (AI) may develop and patients should undergo clinical and imaging surveillance. The amount of AI at the time of discharge from ASO is associated with the progression to greater than moderate aortic insufficiency. One study found that 29% of patients discharged with mild AI progressed to greater than moderate AI, whereas of those with no AI at discharge only 3.4% progressed [20]. Baseline degree of AI may therefore guide active surveillance intervals.
Individuals with D-TGA may have the concomitant presence of a ventricular septal defect (VSD) at birth. These individuals may have undergone pulmonary artery (PA) banding in order to prepare or “train” the left ventricle to be able to handle the afterload required to be the systemic ventricle [21]. The presence of a VSD, history of PA banding, or older age at the time of ASO contributes to the incidence of AI as well as aortic root enlargement [22, 23]. Fortunately, although the aortic root may dilate, patients are unlikely to have an aortic dissection [24].
Another possible sequela from ASO, RVOT obstruction, is the most frequent reason for reoperation [6, 25]. RVOT obstruction can occur after ASO at the main PA, branch PAs, pulmonic valve (PV), or the subpulmonic valve area. For supravalvular and branch PA stenosis, balloon angioplasty, stenting, or surgical intervention may be warranted. Suprapulmonic stenosis is the most common complication seen after ASO and may reflect anastomotic site or old PA band site narrowing [26]. Suprapulmonic valve stenosis and branch PA stenosis may also occur due to the Lecompte maneuver used during the ASO procedure which orients the pulmonary artery bifurcation anterior to the ascending aorta and drapes the PA branches around the often dilated aorta [27, 28] (see Fig. 1). The frequency of PA intervention reported in the literature varies between 3 and 28% and is often center specific [4, 26, 29]. Multidisciplinary review at an adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) center with ACHD cardiologists, interventionalists, surgeons, and imagers is extraordinarily useful in determining indications, timing, and methods of repair as the guidelines continue to evolve.
Management and recommendations
All patients with D-TGA should be seen and followed annually for development of symptoms or complications at an ACHD center of excellence. As this population is still young, there is a paucity of data regarding management of ASO patients and the frequency of surveillance. The 2008 ACC/AHA guidelines [30] recommend that noninvasive testing be performed every 3–5 years to evaluate for ischemia. After ASO repair, at least one study to evaluate patency of the coronary arteries either invasively or noninvasively is recommended. The ESC guidelines [31] recommend a one-time invasive assessment of coronary vessel anatomy by cardiac catheterization be performed in asymptomatic patients; however, the risk/benefit of invasive assessment, whether singular or several, needs to be considered carefully for each individual patient. At our institution, the use of coronary computed tomography angiogram (CTA) has significantly decreased the need for invasive testing, although serial testing with this modality may again carry some risk and warrants further discussion. Continued follow-up with echocardiography is recommended in patients with previous ASO at least every 2 years at a center with experience in adult congenital echocardiography [30].
Current guidelines recommend that in the ASO population, long-term complications requiring intervention may include stenting or surgery for coronary arteries that are causing ischemia and/or surgical repair of RVOT obstruction in symptomatic patients with right ventricular (RV) systolic pressures >60 mmHg or asymptomatic patients with RV systolic pressures >80 mmHg. The guidelines also support surgical RVOT obstruction repair when RV dysfunction develops regardless of symptoms [31].
Although some patients after ASO were found to have impairment of chronotropic response, it does not usually interfere with exercise capacity [24, 32]. Physical activity leads to a higher quality of life in D-TGA patients after ASO [33] and, as in other ACHD lesions, should be prescribed. In the setting of a normal stress test, patients can participate in all sports if there is normal ventricular function and no documentation of an arrhythmia. If ventricular dysfunction or mild hemodynamic abnormalities are found, low to moderate static/dynamic exercise may be evaluated on an individual basis [34]. In the presence of aortic dilatation, although the guidelines do not specifically address that issue, clinicians may consider recommending aerobic over isometric exercise.
As the patients reach childbearing age, pre-conception counseling is recommended at an ACHD center in collaboration with maternal fetal medicine. The hemodynamic changes associated with pregnancy can present risk to the patient [35] and a pre- and postpartum plan should be discussed. Evaluation for ischemia, valvular dysfunction, arrhythmia, and aortic dilatation should be included in the preconception visit to guide risk stratification [36].
Conclusion
Individuals with D-TGA who undergo an ASO a young age thus far have excellent long-term outcomes. As these patients age, traditional cardiovascular risk factors should be assessed and managed with awareness that typical anginal symptoms may not be present. Long-term complications for the ASO should be monitored for and patients should have routine follow-up at ACHD centers of excellence.
References and Recommended Reading
Long J, Ramadhani T, Mitchell LE. Epidemiology of nonsyndromic conotruncal heart defects in Texas, 1999–2004. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:971–9.
Jatene AD, Fontes VF, Paulista PP, Souza LC, Neger F, Galantier M, et al. Anatomic correction of transposition of the great vessels. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1976;72(3):364–70.
Anderson BR, Ciarleglio AJ, Hayes DA, Quaegebeur JM, Vincent JA, Bacha EA. Earlier arterial switch operation improves outcomes and reduces costs for neonates with transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(5):481–7.
Fricke TA, d’Udekem Y, Richardson M, et al. Outcomes of the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: 25 years of experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:139–45.
Lim HG, Kim WH, Lee JR, Kim YJ. Long-term results of the arterial switch operation for ventriculo-arterial discordance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43:325–34.
Losay J, Touchot A, Serraf A, Litvinova A, Lambert V, Piot JD, et al. Late outcome after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation. 2015;131(24), e535.
Amoozgar H, Amirghofran AA, Salaminia S, Cheriki S, Borzoee M, Ajami G, et al. Evaluation of electrocardiographic changes after arterial switch operation. Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2014;8(3):99–104.
Khairy P, Landzberg MJ, Lambert J, O’Donnell CP. Longterm outcomes after the atrial switch for surgical correction of transposition: a metaanalysis comparing the Mustard and Senning procedures. Cardiol Young. 2004;14:284–92.
Brouwer C, Hazekamp MG, Zeppenfeld K. Anatomical substrates and ablation of reentrant atrial and ventricular tachycardias in repaired congenital heart disease. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5(2):150–60.
Lalezari S, Bruggemans EF, Blom NA, Hazekamp MG. Thirty-year experience with the arterial switch operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:973–9.
Hayashi G, Kurosaki K, Echigo S, Kado H, Fukushima N, Yokota M, et al. Prevalence of arrhythmias and their risk factors mid- and long-term after the arterial switch operation. Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;27(6):689–94.
Legendre A, Losay J, Touchot-Kone A, et al. Coronary events after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation. 2003;108(suppl I):II186–90.
Bonnet D, Bonhoeffer P, Piéchaud JF, et al. Long term fate of the coronary arteries after the arterial switch operation in newborns with transposition of the great arteries. Heart. 1996;76:274–9.
Kim H, Sung SC, Kim SH, Chang YH, Ahn HY, Lee HD. Arterial switch operation in patients with intramural coronary artery: early and mid-term results. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;44(2):115–22.
Thrupp SF, Gentles TL, Kerr AR, Finucane K. Arterial switch operation: early and late outcome for intramural coronary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:2084–90.
Villafañe J, Lantin-Hermoso MR, Bhatt AB, Tweddell JS, Geva T, Nathan M, et al. American College of Cardiology’s Adult Congenital and Pediatric Cardiology Council. D-transposition of the great arteries: the current era of the arterial switch operation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(5):498–511.
Sithamparanathan S, Padley SP, Rubens MB, Gatzoulis MA, Ho SY, Nicol ED. Great vessel and coronary artery anatomy in transposition and other coronary anomalies: a universal descriptive and alphanumerical sequential classification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(5):624–30.
Radley-Smith R, Yacoub MH. Anatomy of the coronary arteries in transposition of the great arteries and methods for their transfer in anatomical correction. Thorax. 1978;33:418–24.
Kuehn A, Vogt M, Schwaiger M, Ewert P, Hauser M. Ventricular sympathetic innervation in patients with transposition of the great arteries after arterial switch operation and Rastelli procedure: impact of arterial dissection and coronary reimplantation. Circ J. 2014;78(7):1717–22.
Lo Rito M, Fittipaldi M, Haththotuwa R, Jones TJ, Khan N, Clift P, et al. Long-term fate of the aortic valve after an arterial switch operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(4):1089–94.
Yacoub MH, Radley-Smith R, Maclaurin R. Two-stage operation for anatomical correction of transposition of the great arteries with intact interventricular septum. Lancet. 1977;8025:1275–8.
Bovѐ T, De Meulder F, Vandenplas G, De Groote K, Panzer J, Suys B, et al. Midterm assessment of the reconstructed arteries after the arterial switch operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:823–30.
Schwartz ML, Gauvreau K, del Nido P, Mayer JE, Colan SD. Long-term predictors of aortic root dilation and aortic regurgitation after arterial switch operation. Circulation. 2004;110(11 Suppl 1):II128–32.
Khairy P, Clair M, Fernandes SM, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes after the arterial switch operation for D-transposition of the great arteries. Circulation. 2013;127:331–9.
Hutter PA, Kreb DL, Mantel SF, Hitchcock JF, Meijboom EJ, Bennink GB. Twenty-five years’ experience with the arterial switch operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124(4):790–7.
Nellis JR, Turek JW, Aldoss OT, Atkins DL, Ng BY. Intervention for supravalvar pulmonary stenosis after the arterial switch operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:154–62.
Lecompte Y, Neveux JY, Leca F, Zannini L, Tu TV, Duboys Y, et al. Reconstruction of the pulmonary outflow tract without prosthetic conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;84(5):727–33.
Rickers C, Kheradvar A, Sievers HH, et al. Is the Lecompte technique the last word on transposition of the great arteries repair for all patients? A magnetic resonance imaging study including a spiral technique two decades postoperatively. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22(6):817–25. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivw014.
Oda S, Nakano T, Sugiura J, Fusazaki N, Ishikawa S, Kado H. Twenty-eight years’ experience of arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries in a single institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42(4):674–9.
Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, Child JS, Connolly HM, Dearani JA, et al. ACC/AHA, 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: Executive Summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease). Circulation. 2008;118(23):2395–451.
Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM, de Haan F, Deanfield JE, Galie N, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J. 2010;31(23):2915–57.
Mahle WT, McBride MG, Paridon SM. Exercise performance after the arterial switch operation for D-transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:753–8.
Dean PN, Gillespie CW, Greene E, et al. Sports participation and quality of life in adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease (SQUAD study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12_S).
Graham Jr TP, Driscoll DJ, Gersony WM, Newburger JW, Rocchini A, Towbin JA. Task Force 2: congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(8):1326–33.
Tobler D, Fernandes SM, Wald RM, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with transposition of the great arteries and arterial switch operation. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(3):417–20.
Ploeg M, Drenthen W, van Dijk A, Pieper PG. Successful pregnancy after an arterial switch procedure for complete transposition of the great arteries. BJOG. 2006;113(2):243–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Lucy Safi declares no potential conflicts of interest.
Ami Bhatt is a section editor for Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Adult Congenital Heart Disease
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Safi, L.M., Bhatt, A.B. Update on the Management of Adults With Arterial Switch Procedure for Transposition of the Great Arteries. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 19, 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-017-0505-y
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-017-0505-y