Abstract
Preharvest fruit splitting is a significant concern for Daisy mandarin cultivation due to its adverse effects on both fruit quality and yield. This study, which was conducted at Punjab Agricultural University, aimed to analyze the anatomical changes in the peel, pedicel and stem end of healthy and split fruits of Daisy mandarin. Light microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy were employed to examine the different sections of the peel, stem end and pedicel of the fruits. Significant differences were observed between the healthy and split fruits in terms of peel thickness, epidermal cell arrangement and vascular tissue organization. Split fruits, exhibited structural deformities in vascular bundles with limited functioning of the vascular bundles. Displaced xylem tissues in split fruits formed damaged cell masses in the pith and the parenchymatous cells lacked intercellular spaces. Additionally, pedicel vascular bundles in split fruits were often deformed and fused with adjacent bundles. Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis revealed a smooth and uniform epidermis with well-developed oil glands in healthy fruit peels, in contrast to disorganized and ruptured oil glands with empty spaces in split fruits. Thinner, coarser peels with larger oil glands and smaller epidermal thickness were found to be more susceptible to fruit splitting. Disorganized xylem tissue disrupted the flow of water and minerals to growing fruits, potentially due to irregular water transport and pulp expansion, leading to fruit splitting. This disruption of vascular tissues impaired the transport of water and nutrients to the albedo and flavedo, contributing to fruit splitting.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Mandarins are highly preferred in India due to their easy-to-peel nature and high juice content. Among them, Daisy mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco), a recently selected variety, has early maturation and high-quality, attractive coloured fruits [1]. This variety was introduced to extend the market period of mandarins in Punjab from November to February [2]. Daisy mandarin fruits ripen between 15 and 20th November, yielding medium to large-sized fruits with attractive dark orange peels. Mr Dowling Young of Young's Nursery in California (USA) named this cultivar Daisy tangerine, resulting from a cross between Fortune (Clementine mandarin × Dancy mandarin) and Fremont (Clementine × Ponkan) mandarins [3, 4].
Despite its promising attributes, Daisy mandarin faces significant developmental challenges, notably fruit splitting. This prevalent physiological disorder affects more than 60 per cent of global citrus production [5,6,7]. Fruit splitting, characterized by a meridian fissure starting at the stylar end, is influenced by a combination of cultural, genetic and environmental factors [8, 9]. Irregular climatic conditions, nutrient imbalances, uneven water supply and heavy crop loads are key contributors [10,11,12].
Splitting mainly occurs under irregular growing conditions, such as water stress followed by sudden rainfall and uneven fertilizer application [13, 14]. This disorder renders fruits more susceptible to pathogen infections and water loss, making them unsuitable for commercial use. [7, 15, 16]. The mechanical properties of the peel and fruit growth dynamics play crucial roles in splitting and are important factors affecting the occurrence of fruit splitting [17,18,19]. The occurrence of fruit splitting is closely associated with the number of cell layers and the composition of the flavedo [20].
Studies on 'Newhall' and 'Bonanza' navel oranges revealed that varieties with a higher density of oil glands, like ‘Newhall’, exhibit less fruit splitting due to the ability of surrounding cells to resist greater pressure. Conversely, the split fruits show poor cell wall integrity and deformed layers [21]. Splitting mainly results from uncoordinated growth between the outer dermal and inner parenchyma tissues. During the rapid growth period, the inner parenchyma develops faster, while the epidermis develops slowly. The presence of interspace in cutin acts as a break for splitting. Rapid inner growth increases the internal turgor forces on the fruit surface and causes skin elasticity loss, which causes fruit cracking [22, 23]. Fruit splitting may occur as a result of disorganized rapid water absorption through the vascular system, which causes an uneven increase in fruit turgor pressure [24,25,26]. Fruit splitting is characterized by the separation of cells in albedo tissue, creating rind channels that weaken the flavedo [27,28,29]. A thicker peel correlates with lower splitting rates due to greater resistance to deformation. [30]. Considering the seriousness of fruit splitting in Daisy mandarin, which limits its production, the present research was conducted to unravel the anatomical variations associated with fruit splitting. Most of this research has involved fruit types like sweet cherry tomato, and lemon [26, 33], with less frequent studies on the relationship between Daisy mandarin fruit splitting and its anatomical structure. This study aims to bridge this gap in knowledge by exploring the potential link between the anatomical characteristics of Daisy mandarin peels and their susceptibility to splitting. By examining the peel’s structure, this research will provide valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying fruit splitting in this specific citrus cultivar.
Materials and methods
The investigation of fruit splitting in Daisy mandarin was conducted at the Jallowal-Lesriwal, Jalandhar, Fruit Research Farm of the Department of Fruit Science and laboratories of the Department of Botany, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana in 2021 and 2022. Samples of both split and healthy Daisy mandarin fruits were collected for subsequent anatomical analysis.
Light microscopy
For anatomical examinations, both split and healthy fresh Daisy mandarin fruit samples were collected. Hand sections of the fruit peel, stem end and pedicel of the fruits were meticulously cut by embedding the samples within the potato pith. These sections were stained using safranin-fast green combination techniques [31], following the specified procedure:
Staining procedure
Initially, the sections were immersed in a 2% aqueous solution of safranin (2%) for 5 min. After safranin staining, sections were washed with water and swiftly passed through an ascending series of alcohol. Counterstaining was achieved by briefly submerging the sections in a 2% solution of fast green followed by passage through alcohol, alcohol: xylene (1:1) and ultimately pure xylene. Subsequently, these sections were permanently mounted using DPX under a cover slip.
Microscopic examination
The prepared slides were then examined under a microscope equipped with a digital camera and computing imaging systems utilizing software equipped with NIS Elements F 3.0. Observations were made at magnifications of 4X and 10X. Measurements of tissues in the fruit peel, stem end and pedicel were recorded at various locations in each cross-section and the following parameters were investigated:
Observations recorded
Cross-sections of peels
-
a.
Epidermal thickness
-
b.
Size of oil glands
Cross-sections of the stem end
-
a.
Number of vascular bundles
-
b.
Arrangement of vascular bundles
Cross-sections of pedicels
-
a.
Epidermal thickness
-
b.
Size of vascular bundles
-
c.
Arrangement of vascular bundles
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
For Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), peel samples from both healthy and split fruits were sectioned into small fragments measuring 0.5 to 1 cm2. These fragments were fixed using a 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution (v/v), overnight at 4 °C. After draining the fixative, the samples were washed three times with 0.1 M Caco buffer, each lasting 15 min. Subsequently, the wash buffer was removed and a 1% solution of osmium tetraoxide was applied for 1–2 h at 4 °C. Following the osmium tetraoxide treatment, the samples were subjected to three additional washes with 0.1 M Caco buffer.
Next, a dehydration process was initiated using a series of ethanol solutions (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% v/v). Following dehydration, the samples were subjected to critical-point drying and subsequently placed in vacuum desiccators overnight for thorough drying. The dried samples were then coated with gold using a sputter coater process to enhance the surface conductivity.
SEM examination
The samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope located at the EMN lab, at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. During SEM analysis, the thickness and texture of the peel were studied, focusing on differences between healthy and split fruits.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of the data was performed using Tukey’s HSD test to determine statistically significant differences. Differences were considered significant at the level of p < 0.05. The analysis was conducted using the statistical analysis software SAS (version 9.3 for Windows).
Results
Peel cross-section
Epidermal thickness
The ultrastructure of peels from both split and healthy Daisy mandarin fruits were thoroughly examined (Fig. 1). There was a significant difference in epidermal thickness between the peels of healthy and split fruits (Table 1). The epidermal thickness was greater in the healthy peels (2.62 mm) compared to split fruits (2.18 mm). The peel of healthy fruit exhibited consistent and uniform epidermal thickness (Fig. 2).
Oil glands
In both healthy and split fruit peels, oil glands were located directly below the epidermal layer. The oil glands of healthy fruit peels were well-developed. The size of the oil glands was found to be significantly greater in the peel of the split fruit (788.52 mm2), whereas it was lower in the peel of the healthy fruit (615.93 mm2) (Table 1). However, in split fruit peels, the oil glands were deformed and appeared as empty spaces lacking any cellular arrangement (Fig. 2). Compared with those of healthy fruits, the peels of split fruits had larger oil glands (Fig. 2).
Cross section of the stem end
In healthy fruits, vascular bundles were consistently observed, forming a well- organized circular pattern with phloem and xylem components properly aligned with their respective channels. However, in split fruits, structural deformities were evident in the arrangement of vascular bundles, and only a limited number of vascular bundles were observed in split fruits. Furthermore, in split fruits, xylem tissues were dislodged from the vascular bundles and shifted to the pith as a mass of damaged cells (Fig. 3).
Cross section of the pedicel
Ultrastructural analysis of a healthy pedicel revealed a consistent epidermal layer comprising oval cells covered by a cuticle. Within the cortical region, parenchymatous cells were organized without any intercellular spaces. In the pedicel of the split fruits, vascular bundles were deformed as they fused with adjacent bundles (Fig. 4).
Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the peels of healthy fruits exhibited a uniform and smooth epidermis along with well-developed oil gland pits. The oil glands in healthy fruits were well developed. However, in the peel of the split fruits these oil glands appeared disorganized and ruptured and contained empty spaces (Figs. 5,6,7).
Discussion
Fruit splitting
Citrus fruits are susceptible to a physiological disorder known as fruit splitting, a severe form of cracking that occurs during the fruit’s maturation or cell enlargement stages [11, 21]. This physiological disorder is characterized by cracks in the exocarp and mesocarp of the fruit, resulting from mechanical rupture. The peel, acting as a barrier between the external environment and fruit tissue, protects the fruits from external injury while bearing internal pulp pressure during development. Consequently, both the stricture of the peel and its degree of ageing are critical factors in fruit cracking [32].
The anatomical structure of the fruits is a significant factor affecting the occurrence of fruit splitting. The previous studies investigated the anatomy of lemon peel, revealing significant variations in peel thickness [26]. They reported considerable differences between epidermal thickness, and vascular bundles arrangement between healthy and split fruits. Current research on fruit anatomy and splitting has mainly focused on the fruit peel, the size of oil glands, epidermis, subepidermal thickness, the arrangement of vascular bundles and the overall mechanical properties of the peel.
Anatomical characteristics of healthy and split fruits
The peel, also known as the flavedo, plays a vital role in protecting citrus fruits from external damage and internal pressure caused by the developing pulp [32]. The structure and integrity of the peel are critical factors influencing its susceptibility to splitting [34]. The thickness and hardness of the fruit peel serve as crucial parameters for assessing its strength, directly influencing citrus fruit peel splitting. Thicker peels are less likely to stretch and deform thus exhibiting greater resistance to splitting [35]. Studies have shown that cultivars with thicker peels have a lower incidence of splitting compared to those with thinner peels [21, 36]. Splitting damage progresses through distinct stages [37]. Initially, the peel appears normal. During the critical period, visible signs emerge, including a brown stripe, cuticle fractures, and crack development. Oil glands may also begin to deform at this stage [26, 38]. In the later stages, extensive surface damage makes it difficult to distinguish between the flavedo and albedo tissue layers. Research suggests that there is a potential link between oil glands health and spitting susceptibility. Studies have reported that split fruits tend to have more malformed or larger oil glands compared to healthy fruits [26, 38]. Alternations in the mechanical properties of the peel, including disordered subepidermal cells and oil glands, are associated with fruit splitting [20, 21]. These damaged tissues exhibit disorganized cytoplasm, leading to a loss of cellular osmoregulatory capacity and cellular lipids. Similar observations have been made in tomatoes, where cracking-resistant fruits have more tightly packed subepidermal cells compared to susceptible fruits [33]. The shape and arrangement of these cells may also influence splitting susceptibility.
Fruit growth in many crops depends on the accumulation of water, assimilates, and ions transported through the vascular tissue of the pedicel towards the fruit [26, 39]. Pedicels are crucial for yield, as the growth of fruits depends on the uptake of water, nutrients and assimilates transported from the other parts of the plant to the fruit through the xylem and phloem tissues of the pedicel [40, 41]. In healthy citrus fruits, the vascular bundles in the pedicel are well-organized in a ring-like pattern for efficiently transporting water, nutrients, and photosynthates between the fruit and the rest of the plant. However, excessive internal pressure leading to fruit splitting disrupts this organization. The vascular bundles become twisted, compressed, or irregularly spaced, accompanied by a thinner epidermis. This weakening is attributed to environmental stress, nutrient deficiencies, and physiological stress [42].
Splitting often initiates from the inner peel along the path of these vascular bundles. The disruption weakens the peel due to reduced epidermal thickness and deformed vascular structures. Uneven and rapid water uptake through the compromised vascular systems is suggested as a potential cause. This can lead to unequal fruit turgor pressure, a major contributing factor to splitting [24,25,26].
Sudden water influx, especially after dry periods, is particularly damaging. The rapid expansion of fruit cells caused by this influx can lead to epidermal rupture and internal structural deformation, including damage to the vascular bundles. Uneven cell division and expansion during rapid growth further cause this problem, resulting in a weak epidermis and deformation of vascular bundles.
Consequently, studying vascular tissues is for understanding the mechanism involved in the transport of water, minerals and assimilates from the pedicel to the fruits and within the peel. The uptake of water and its movement in small citrus plants bearing fruits indicated that significant water flow occurs within the xylem elements, which serve as the major part of the transpiration stream. It was reported that fruit growth was limited by the rigidity of pericarp cell walls [43]. It was suggested that water uptake via the phloem could increase the pressure within the fruit. The restoration of water by xylem tissues decreases the susceptibility of plants to water stress [40] and potentially reduces their susceptibility to cracking [44].
Scanning electron microscopy analysis
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed significant differences in between healthy and split fruits of Daisy mandarin. Split fruits exhibited a ruptured, disorganized, and rougher peel texture compared to the smooth and uniform peel of healthy fruits. This observation is consistent with findings from previous studies, which indicate that the rind of citrus fruits, comprising the flavedo and albedo, exhibits structural variations among different cultivars (Hardiyanto et al., 2022). Supporting these observations, Kaur et al. and Agusti et al. reported similar findings in lemon and ‘Navelate’ oranges. Their studies suggest that rind breakdown initiates in the deeper flavedo and outer albedo cell layers. In affected fruits, these cells appeared twisted and compressed, forming a layer of collapsed cells between the healthy, intact cells of flavedo and albedo. This progression eventually leads to the oxidation of the albedo and, subsequently, the epidermis, where oxidized tissue manifests as dark-brown areas. Collectively, these SEM studies reveal the critical role of rind structural integrity in maintaining fruit health. Disruptions in the peel’s architecture, as observed in split Daisy mandarin fruits, can lead to significant deterioration, evident from the the visual differences compared to healthy fruits.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study highlights the significant anatomical differences between healthy and split Daisy mandarin fruits, specifically in the peel, pedicel and stem end. Split fruits exhibited reduced peel thickness and ruptured, malformed oil glands compared to healthy fruits. Additionally, split fruits show structural deformities in vascular bundles, displaced xylem tissue and ruptured oil glands, which increase susceptibility to fruit splitting. Disorganization of vascular tissues in the pedicel results in disturbed nutrient and water translocation, leading to an imbalance that causes fruit splitting. Understanding these anatomical changes is crucial for developing effective strategies to reduce fruit splitting and enhance both the fruit quality and yield in Daisy mandarin.
Data availability
The data will be made available by the corresponding author upon request.
References
K. Kaur, M. Gupta, H.S. Rattanpal, T.S. Chahal, G. Singh, Impact of foliar application of growth regulators on fruit splitting, yield and quality of Daisy mandarin (Citrus reticulata). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 94, 181–86 (2024). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i2.143183
W.S. Dhillon, B.V.C. Mahajan, T.S. Chahal, M. Kumar, M.K. Sidhu, S.P. Singh, Effect of different packaging films on shelf-life and quality of Daisy mandarin under ambient conditions. Indian J. Hortic. 73, 262–266 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2016.00058.X
K. Kaur, M. Gupta, H.S. Rattanpal, A. Arora, V. Sharma, S. Singh, Physiological and biochemical characterisation of split and healthy Daisy mandarin fruits. J. Crop. Hortic. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2024.2371970
M.S. Gill, J.S. Brar, P.P.S. Gill, S. Khehra, Performance of Daisy mandarin on three different rootstocks under the subtropics of North-Western India. Eco. Env. Cons. 23, 177–183 (2017)
M.D. Chabbal, M.D.L.M. Yfran-Elvira, L.I. Giménez, G.C. Martínez, L.A. Llarens-Beyer, V.A. Rodríguez, Control of fruit cracking in clementine mandarin plants. Cultiv. Trop. 41, 06 (2020)
P. Xylia, A. Chrysargyris, Z.F.R. Ahmes, N. Tzortzakis, Application of rosemary and Eucalyptus essential oils and their main component on the preservation of apple and pear fruits. Hortic 7, 479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7110479
J. Yu, M. Zhu, M. Bai, Y. Xu, S. Fan, G. Yang, Effect of calcium on relieving berry cracking in grape (Vitis vinifera L) ‘Xiangfei.’ Peer J 8, 9896 (2020)
P.F. Measham, A. Bound, J. Gracie, S.J. Wilson, Incidence and type of cracking in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) are affected by genotype and season. Crop Pasture Sci. 60, 1002–1008 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1071/CP08410
S. Correia, R. Schouten, A.P. Silva, B. Gonçalves, Sweet cherry fruit cracking mechanisms and prevention strategies: a review. Sci. Hortic. 240, 369–377 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.042
Li, J., 2009. Cell wall metabolism and related gene isolation of pitting fruit peel in citrus [Ph. D. Dissertation]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University. (In Chinese)
P.J.R. Cronje, O.P.J. Stander, K.L. Theron, Fruit splitting in citrus. Hortic. Rev. 41, 177–200 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118707418.ch04
S.A. El-Sayed, Some factors affecting orange fruit splitting of washington navel orange under Kafr Elsheikh conditions. A-the effect of rootstock. J. Plant. Prod. Mansoura Univ. 7, 343–49 (2016). https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2016.45358
M. Agusti, V. Almela, M. Juan, C. Mesejo, A. Martinezfuentes, Rootstock influence of the incidence of rind breakdown in ‘Navelate’ sweet orange. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 78, 554–558 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2003.11511662
J. Li, C. Liang, X. Liu, B. Huai, J. Chen, Q. Yao, X. Luo, Effect of Zn and NAA co-treatment on the occurrence of creasing fruit and the peel development of ‘Shatangju’ mandarin. Sci. Hortic. 201, 230–237 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.039
A. Khadivi-Khub, Physiological and genetic factors influencing fruit cracking. Acta Physiol. Plant. 37, 1718 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1718-2
I. Ginzberg, R.A. Stern, Strengthening fruit-skin resistance to growth strain by application of plant growth regulators. Sci. Hortic. 198, 150–153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.016
M. Brüggenwirth, H. Fricke, M. Knochen, Biaxial tensile tests identify epidermis and hypodermis as the main structural elements of sweet cherry skin. AoB Plants 6, 490–552 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu019
M. Brüggenwirth, M. Knoche, Factors affecting mechanical properties of the skin of sweet cherry fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 141, 45–53 (2016). https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.141.1.45
M. Brüggenwirth, M. Knoche, Mechanical properties of skins of sweet cherry fruit of differing susceptibilities to cracking. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 141, 162–168 (2016). https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.141.2.162
J. Li, J.Z. Chen, J.F. Wan, Z.E. Huang, Q. Yao, Investigation on occurrence regularity of fruit pitting in citrus. South China Fruits 40, 25–28 (2011)
L.I. Juan, J. Chen, Citrus fruit-cracking: causes and occurrence. Hortic. Plant J. 3, 255–260 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2017.08.002
L.J. Zhang, G.M. Zhu, Cracking mechanism of Prunus salicina and related preventions. Acta Hortic. Sinica 33, 699–704 (2006)
Z. Linjing, G. Mingzhu, Cracking mechanism of Prunus salicina and related preventions. Acta Hortic. Sinica. 33, 699 (2006)
C. Balbontin, H. Ayala, R.M. Bastias, G. Tapia, M. Ellena, C. Torres, J.A. Yuri, J. Quero-Garica, J.C. Rios, H. Silva, Cracking in sweet cherries: a comprehensive review from a physiological, molecular and genomic perspective. Chill. J. Agric. Res. 73, 66–72 (2013)
A. Galindo, P. Rodriguez, J. Collado-Gonzalez, Z.N. Cruz, E. Torrecillas, S. Ondono, M. Corell, A. Moriana, A. Torrecillas, Rainfall intensifies fruit peel cracking in water-stressed pomegranate trees. Agric. Meteorol. 194, 29–35 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.03.015
R. Kaur, N. Kaur, H. Singh, Pericarp and pedicel anatomy in relation to fruit cracking in lemon (Citrus limon L. Burm.). Sci. Hortic. 246, 462–468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.040
I.M. Gilfillan, J.A. Stevenson, J.P. Wahl, Control of creasing in navels with gibberellic acid. Proc. Int. Soc. Citricult. 1, 224–226 (1981)
M.T. Treeby, R. Storey, K.B. Bevington, Rootstock, seasonal and fruit size influence on the incidence and severity of albedo breakdown in Bellamy navel oranges. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 35, 103–108 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9950103
A. Ali, L.L. Summers, G.J. Klein, C.J. Lovatt, Albedo breakdown in California. Proc. Int. Soc. Citric. Congr. 2, 1090–1093 (2000)
H. Ashari, N.F. Devy, Application of K, Ca and Mg on peel thickness and fruit cracking incidence of citrus. Russ. J. Agric. Socioecon. Sci. 87, 45–56 (2019). https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2022.v34.i12.2980
R. Schiff, L.Y. Quin, J.H.D. Bryan, A safranin-fast green strain for the differentiation of the nuclei of rumen protozoa. Stain Technol. 42, 75–80 (1967). https://doi.org/10.3109/10520296709114985
A. Singh, A.K. Shukla, P.R. Meghwal, Fruit cracking in pomegranate: extent, cause, and management-a review. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 20, 1234–1253 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1784074
Z.E. Yang, Z. Wu, C. Zhang, E.M. Hu, R. Zhou, F.L. Jiang, The composition of pericarp, cell ageing, and changes in water absorption in two tomato genotypes: mechanism, factors, and potential role in fruit cracking. Acta. Physiol. Plant. 38, 215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2228-1
R. Kaur, N. Kaur, M. Bajya, T. Bajaya, Physiological and biochemical analysis of fruit cracking: a review. Indian J. Agric Sci. 92(5), 547–53 (2022). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i5.124620
R. Kaur, N. Kaur, H. Singh, M.K. Sangha, Compositional differences in peel and juice of cracked and normal fruits of lemon (Citrus limon Burm.). J. Agric. Sci. Tech. 24, 861–72 (2022)
Phiri, Z.P., 2010. Creasing studies in citrus [M.D. Dissertation]. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.
Li, L., 2006. An anatomical study of rind development and splitting occurrence in navel orange. Huazhong Agri Univeristy
D.N.F. Hardiyanto, M.E. Deiastuti, A. Sugiyatno, H. Asharu, O. Endarto, A. Triwiratno, C. Martasari, The fruit peel anatomy, leaf nutrient content and fruit quality of ‘Teriags’ mandarin in relation to fruit cracking. Emirates J Food Agric. 34(12), 1072–1078 (2022)
D.R. Lee, Vasculature of the abscission zone of tomato fruit: implications for transport. Can. J. Bot. 67, 1898–1902 (1989)
W. Van Ieperen, V.S. Volkov, U. Van Meeteren, Distribution of xylem hydraulic resistance in fruiting truss of tomato influenced by water stress. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 317–324 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg010
M.A. Matthews, K.A. Shackel, Growth and water transport in fleshy fruit, in Vascular transport in plants. (Academic Press, 2005), pp.181–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088457-5/50011-3
Josan J S, Sandhu A and Kaur J. Pericarp anatomy in relation to fruit cracking in lemon (Citrus limon). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 65, (6) (1995)
D. Rančić, S.P. Quarrie, I. Pećinar, Anatomy of tomato fruit and fruit pedicel during fruit development. Microsc. Sci. Technol. Appl. Educ. 2, 851–61 (2010)
B. Choat, G.A. Gambetta, K.A. Shackel, M.A. Matthews, Vascular function in grape berries across development and its relevance to apparent hydraulic isolation. Plant Physiol. 151, 1677–1687 (2009)
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Komalpreet Kaur performed the experiment, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, Monika Gupta designed the experiment and supervised the project, H S Rattanpal, Nirmaljit Kaur and T S Chahal supervised the project; T S Chahal provided the planting material; Monika Gupta and Nirmaljit Kaur revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kaur, K., Gupta, M., Rattanpal, H.S. et al. Anatomical features of pericarp and pedicel influencing fruit splitting in Daisy mandarin. Food Measure (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02859-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02859-2