Abstract
Purpose
To investigate Asherman syndrome (AS) related to potential factors during uterine artery embolization (UAE) treatment of adenomyosis.
Materials and methods
This is a retrospective analysis of 195 women with adenomyosis who underwent UAE treatment from 2009 to 2016. All preoperative and intraoperative risk-related potential factors of AS were recorded. And AS events were carefully monitored during follow-up (range, 0–15 months). Potential risk-related factors of AS events were determined via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
Results
The rate of AS events after UAE for adenomyosis was 12.82% (25/195). The univariate and multivariate analyses revealed the association of low vascularity with a significant risk for AS (P = 0.019).
Conclusion
Patients with low vascularity of adenomyosis at the time of UAE are more likely to have AS. And adenomyosis patients with low vascularity should be carefully selected to undergo UAE treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Recent studies suggest that uterine artery embolization (UAE) is an effective treatment for adenomyosis [1,2,3,4]. However, there are reports of adverse events associated with UAE, although it is still considered a safe treatment [5, 6]. For instance, the use of UAE leads to lower pregnancy rates compared to other treatment methods [7,8,9,10]. This indicates that the outcomes of the UAE procedure on the reproductive function need to be clarified [11]. The decline of pregnancy rates after UAE is generally ascribed to the impaired endometrial function or ovarian function [12]. Several studies show that UAE has little effect on ovarian function [13,14,15,16]. It has been reported that the incidence of Asherman syndrome (AS) in uterine myoma UAE is about 10.2%–13.7% and AS arises from partial or complete endometrial damage or adhesions caused by uterine invasive diagnosis and treatment. AS is mainly manifested as hypomenorrhea, amenorrhea, infertility and miscarriage, etc. [17, 18]. So far, few studies have evaluated the incidence of AS after UAE treatment for adenomyosis. Therefore, the clinical profile of AS after UAE is poorly understood. We postulate that the identification of factors that lead to the occurrence of AS will provide information that will guide decision-making concerning the application of UAE in adenomyosis.
The objective of this study was to investigate the factors that predict the incidence of AS after the application of UAE in patients with adenomyosis.
Materials and methods
Patient population and selection criteria
This is a retrospective and non-randomized study in which the medical data of 195 consecutive women with pure symptomatic adenomyosis (mean age, 40.42 ± 4.67 years) who underwent UAE from 2009 to 2016 were analyzed. The inclusion criteria included patients with adenomyosis diagnosed by either magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasonography (US) and clinical symptoms of menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea, and those who expressed the desire to preserve the uterus. The exclusion criteria included a current pregnancy, suspected gynecologic tumor or pelvic inflammatory diseases, endometrial hyperplasia, contrast allergy, or other severe diseases. Baseline demographic, type of adenomyosis, related symptoms, and history of therapy were recorded for each patient and summarized in Table 1.
Procedure and angiographic endpoint of embolization
The common right femoral approach under local anesthesia was used to perform catheterization on all patients using a 4- or 5-Fr Cobra (Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA) catheter and selective catheterization of the bilateral uterine arteries under digital subtraction angiography (DSA). A nonionic contrast medium (300 mg iodine/mL; Omnipaque; GE, Shanghai, China) was used as the injection medium. Angiography was performed using high-pressure injector at 68 kPa of pressure (abdominal aortography: 10 ml/s, 20–25 ml; uterine arterial angiography: 1–2 ml/s, 6–8 ml), during which the vascular characteristics of adenomyosis were observed. Angiographic images were assessed using a digital post-processing workstation.
The primary endpoints of embolization treatments included lesion occlusion, stasis of the distal end of the uterine artery, and decrease in flow to the proximal end of the uterine artery, at constant patency of the uterine artery.
Classification of vascular types
The vascular characteristics of adenomyosis were categorized by interventional radiologists as detailed by Tang, Zhou, and Chen [19,20,21]. These include levels 1, 2, and 3, according to the vascularity grade. Level 1 lesions, the hypervascular subgroup, exhibit abundant peripheral and central blood (Fig. 1a). Level 2 lesions, the isovascular subgroup, exhibit peripheral blood flow but less blood flow on the center of the lesions (Fig. 1b). Level 3 lesions, the hypovascular subgroup, do not have blood flow at both the periphery and the center of the lesions and only a mild staining signal (Fig. 1c). Subgroups of uterine artery supply are graded as either equal or unequal. The equal subgroup has equal blood supply from both uterine arteries (Fig. 2a), while the unequal subgroup has one uterine artery supplying more than 60% of the uterus (Fig. 2b). The development of the ovarian branch is classified as either unilateral, bilateral, or none. All angiograms were analyzed and determined by two experienced radiologists.
Follow-up
Following successful procedures, a series of follow-ups were done on the patients. These included outpatient gynecological evaluation of complications, questionnaire on adenomyosis-related symptoms, gynecological examination, and imaging (MRI or US) for up to 15 months. In patients with hysterectomy due to serious adverse events from the UAE during follow-up, the timing was recorded. Patients who experienced oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea underwent a hormonal evaluation and hysteroscopy at 3 to 6 months. All intrauterine adhesions (IUA) were evaluated based on the American Fertility Society (AFS) scoring system and divided into three levels (Table 2) [22].
Statistical analysis
In both univariate and multivariate analyses, age, uterine size, type, secondary anemia, previous medical therapy, previous gynecological invasive therapy vascularity grade, vascular supply, ovarian branch development, uterine size, and PVA vial dose were included to assess the factors affecting AS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 195 patients who successfully underwent bilateral uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis and were available for analysis during the period were included. The vascularity of the lesions was identified through DSA. All vascular subtraction maps were distinguished by vascularity density, blood supply, and ovarian branch artery development, as shown in Table 3.
The 15-month follow-up indicated that a total of 113 of the 147 patients (76.87%) with dysmenorrhea and 136 of 159 patients (85.53%) with menorrhagia experienced improvement after UAE. The overall mean uterine volume decreased with 37% (from 330.79 to 208.40 cm3). Three patients had severe persistent pelvic pain, and one of these three patients underwent a hysterectomy. Four patients had severe menorrhagia, and one of these four patients underwent a hysterectomy. Three patients had severe uterus infection, and two of these three patients underwent a hysterectomy.
A total of 27 patients had either oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea, two of which were an ovarian failure. And 25 (12.82%) patients had AS after UAE, of which three cases were mild, ten were moderate, and 12 were severe. Of seven patients (two cases were moderate and five cases were severe) who have fertility requirements undergoing hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, only three cases showed improvement in AFS scores and there is no case of a successful pregnancy.
Univariate logistic regression analyses showed that vascularity grades and uterine size were significantly associated with AS after UAE. The risk of AS progression was increased (Table 4) in patients with hypovascular lesions and uterine size ≥ 314.90 cm3.
Following univariate analysis, the factors found to be significantly associated with disease progression were included in the multivariate analysis. After adjusting for all other factors, the multivariate analysis showed that the AS in patients with hypovascular lesions was significantly higher than that in other patients (Table 5).
Discussion
In the case of poor drug treatment of adenomyosis, including hormonal [23], UAE as a conservative treatment can effectively improve the symptoms of adenomyosis [24, 25]. However, the effect of adenomyosis on the fertility outcome after UAE treatment remains to be further explored; compared to myoma embolization, literature data as well as guidelines concerning the role of embolization in adenomyosis are still scarce, and whether it can replace hysterectomy depends on this [26].
This study retrospectively analyzed AS in 195 patients with adenomyosis after UAE treatment. The frequency of AS following UAE was 12.82%. Results showed that low vascularity was an independent risk factor for AS. Previous studies have shown that vascularity grades in uterine myoma are related to the clinical efficacy and complications of UAE and consider that the same procedures are applied to study adenomyosis [20, 27, 28]. Another research found that the development process and vascularity of adenomyosis are closely associated with estrogen concentration [29]. There is, therefore, a difference in the vascularity of adenomyosis lesions. Currently, many imaging studies on the vascularity of adenomyosis have focused on MRI [30,31,32]. However, DSA is the current “gold standard” for evaluating the distribution of blood flow to the lesion [33], and it can accurately identify the abundance of vessels in adenomyosis lesions. Angiography of adenomyosis also reflects its pathological features, and the distribution of embolic agents in the lesions after embolization depends on the degree of vascular abundance. The pathological examination of adenomyosis after UAE by Dundr et al. [34] revealed that embolic agents are randomly distributed throughout the myometrium, with partial or complete vascular destruction accompanied by inflammatory and foreign body granuloma reactions. Compared with the myoma, the embolic agent accumulated in the medium-sized vessels of the lesions after UAE. The cause is speculated to be as follows: (1) compared with the adenomyosis, lesions of myoma usually have a more abundant blood supply; (2) adenomyosis lesions often show an ill-defined margin and no regular pattern, and endometrial cells and focal angiogenesis undergo a progressive process similar to that of tumor metastasis. However, most uterine myoma has a pseudo-envelope [19, 30, 35].
The above speculations lead to reduced efficiency of embolic agents into the lesions and increase the likelihood of reflux, despite super-selective catheterization. We tried to avoid reflux during embolization. However, in order to achieve an endpoint of embolization, a small amount of embolic agent reflux is inevitable, resulting in ectopic embolization including normal myometrium, especially at the end of the embolization in the area with low vascularity, the injection of a higher-density contrast agent may displace the lower-density particles, causing embolic agent reflux [36]. By contrast, there are well-developed vessels in hypervascular areas, and the embolic agent reaches farther than the hypovascular regions, which results in the avoidance of the embolization of nontarget vessels.
AS events were significantly higher in the low vascular adenomyosis compared with the high vascular adenomyosis, which is like the above view, because the flow made it difficult for the embolic agent to reach the target vessel and reflux deposited more embolic agents into the surrounding myometrium. And there will be a series of ischemic, incomplete, or complete necrosis and inflammatory reactions after embolization [37, 38]. Some studies suggest that chronic endometritis, and the resulting endometrial fibrosis, is an essential factor in the formation of IUA [39, 40]. Of the 195 patients, 25 developed AS after UAE, 14 cases (56.0%) in the hypovascular group. It is possible to over-embolic for the low vascular adenomyosis. Treatment of adenomyosis by UAE can lead to the destruction of parts of the uterine myometrium and the endometrial basal layer, secondary IUA, and endometrial atrophy resulting in AS. UAE had a worse prognosis in that, out of seven cases who had fertility requirements undergoing hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, only three cases showed improvement in AFS score. However, there was no case of a successful pregnancy, which concurred with the findings of Song et al. [12].
This study had some limitations. Our study did not include potential factors during the perioperative period and lacked long-term follow-up. Although the DSA is an accurate procedure, it is an invasive examination, and we should, therefore, explore an effective and noninvasive preoperative method of examination. Therefore, further research should consider these aspects.
In conclusion, the grades of vascularity were found to be an independent prognostic factor affecting AS after UAE for adenomyosis. According to this study, the treatment of adenomyosis with low vascularity by embolism should be performed with much caution. However, irreversible AS is a severe complication for patients with fertility requirements, and patients who have fertility requirements should, therefore, try other treatment options.
References
Kim MD, Kim S, Kim NK, Lee MH, Ahn EH, Kim HJ, Cho JH, Cha SH (2012) Long-term results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:176
Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Boekkooi PF, Vervest HA, van Rooij WJ, Lohle PN (2012) Long-term follow-up of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:815–819
Bratby MJ, Walker WJ (2009) Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic adenomyosis-mid-term results. Eur J Radiol 70:128–132
Pelage JP, Jacob D, Fazel A, Namur J, Laurent A, Rymer R, Le Dref O (2005) Midterm results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: initial experience. Radiology 234:948–953
Tropeano G, Amoroso S, Di Stasi C et al (2014) Incidence and predictive factors for complications after uterine leiomyoma embolization. Hum Reprod 29:1918–1924
Moss JG, Cooper KG, Khaund A et al (2011) Randomised comparison of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) with surgical treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (REST trial): 5-year results. Int J Obstet Gynaecol 118:936–944
Holub Z, Mara M, Kuzel D et al (2008) Pregnancy outcomes after uterine artery occlusion: prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril 90(5):0–1891
Mara M, Kubinova K, Maskova J (2012) Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion: the outcomes of a prospective nonrandomized clinical trial. Cardiovasc Int Radiol 35(5):1041–1052
Goldberg J, Pereira L, Berghella V et al (2004) Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for fibromyomata: uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(1):18–21
Walker WJ, Mcdowell SJ (2006) Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: a series of 56 completed pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(5):1266–1271
De Bruijn AM, Smink M, Lohle PNM et al (2017) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Int Radiol 28(12):1629–1642
Song D, Liu Y, Xiao Y, Li TC, Zhou F, Xia E (2014) A matched cohort study comparing the outcome of intrauterine adhesiolysis for asherman syndrome after uterine artery embolization or surgical trauma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:1022–1028
Spies JB, Spector A, Roth AR et al (2002) Complications after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol 100(5):873–880
Ahmad A, Qadan L, Hassan N et al (2002) Uterine artery embolization for treatment of uterine fibroids: effect on ovarian function in younger women. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(10):1017–1020
Lanciego C, Diazplaza I, Ciampi JuanJosé et al (2012) Utero-ovarian Anastomoses and Their Influence on Uterine Fibroid Embolization. J Vasc Int Radiol 23(5):595–601
Rashid S, Khaund A, Murray LS et al (2010) The effects of uterine artery embolisation and surgical treatment on ovarian function in women with uterine fibroids. Bjog An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 117(8):985–989
Mara M, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D et al (2007) Hysteroscopy after uterine fibroid embolization in women of fertile age. Obstet Gynaecol Res 33:316–324
Mara M, Horak P, Kubinova K et al (2012) Hysteroscopy after uterine fibroid embolization: evaluation of intrauterine findings in 127 patients. Obstet Gynaecol Res 38:823–831
Chen CL, Xu YJ, Liu P et al (2013) Characteristics of vascular supply to uterine leiomyoma: an analysis of digital subtraction angiography imaging in 518 cases. Eur Radiol 23(3):774–779
Yixin T, Chunlin C, Hui D et al (2016) Low vascularity predicts favourable outcomes in leiomyoma patients treated with uterine artery embolization. Eur Radiol 26(10):1–9
Zhou J, He L, Liu P et al (2016) Outcomes in adenomyosis treated with uterine artery embolization are associated with lesion vascularity: a long-term follow-up study of 252 cases. PLoS ONE 11(11):e0165610
Listed NA (1988) The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49(6):944
Guo SW (2018) Is it time for a paradigm shift in drug research and development in endometriosis/adenomyosis? Hum Reprod Update 24:1–22
Lohle PNM, Higué D (2019) Uterine artery embolisation in women with symptomatic adenomyosis. Presse Med 48:435–439
de Bruijn AM, Smink M, Hehenkamp WJK et al (2017) Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: 7-year clinical follow-up using UFS-Qol questionnaire. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40:1344–1350
Dessouky R, Gamil SA, Nada MG et al (2019) Management of uterine adenomyosis: current trends and uterine artery embolization as a potential alternative to hysterectomy. Insights Imaging 10:48
Isonishi S, Coleman RL, Hirama M et al (2008) Analysis of prognostic factors for patients with leiomyoma treated with uterine arterial embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(3):270e1–270e6
Kim MD, Lee M, Jung DC et al (2012) Limited efficacy of uterine artery embolization for cervical leiomyomas. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23(2):236–240
Zhou S, Yi T, Liu R et al (2012) Proteomics identification of annexin A2 as a key mediator in the metastasis and proangiogenesis of endometrial cells in human adenomyosis. Mol Cell Proteomics Mcp 11:3929–3936
Kitamura Y, Allison SJ, Jha RC, Spies JB, Flick PA, Ascher SM (2006) MRI of adenomyosis: changes with uterine artery embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:855–864
Park Y, Man DK, Jung DC et al (2015) Can measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient before treatment predict the response to uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis? Eur Radiol 25:1303–1309
Jung DC, Kim MD, Oh YT, Won JY, Lee DY (2012) Prediction of early response to uterine arterial embolisation of adenomyosis:value of T2 signal intensity ratio of adenomyosis. Eur Radiol 22:2044–2049
Lee CC, Reardon MA, Ball BZ et al (2015) The predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating intracranial arteriovenous malformation obliteration after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 123:136–144
Dundr P, Mára M, Masková J, Fucíková Z, Povỳsil C, Tvrdík D (2006) Pathological findings of uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis following uterine artery embolization. Pathol Res Pract 202:721–729
Discepola F, Valenti DA, Reinhold C (2007) Analysis of arterial blood vessels surrounding the myoma: relevance to myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 110:1301–1303
Speir E, Shekhani H, Peters G (2017) Temporary anorgasmia following uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40:1–4
Bilhim T, Pisco JM (2010) The role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the management of the post-embolization symptoms after uterine artery embolization. Pharmaceuticals 3:1729–1738
Zheng R, Zeng D, Wan TT et al (2018) Predisposing factors for predicting the therapeutic response of adenomyosis after uterine artery embolization: serum CA125 levels and accompanying endometriosis. Diagn Interv Radiol 24:364–371
Chen Y, Liu L, Luo Y, Chen M, Huan Y, Fang R (2016) Prevalence and impact of chronic endometritis in patients with intrauterine adhesions:a prospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:74–79
Dalton VK, Saunders NA, Harris LH, Williams JA, Lebovic DI (2006) Intrauterine adhesions after manual vacuum aspiration for early pregnancy failure. Fertil Steril 85:1823(e1–3)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person’s data included in the study.
Ethical approval
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Lyu, W., Xu, W. et al. Asherman syndrome in adenomyosis treated with uterine artery embolization: incidence predictive factors. Radiol med 125, 437–443 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01136-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01136-8