Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this multicentric study is to assess the usefulness of multiphasic Computed tomography in the identification of spontaneous non-traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma (SRH) and its management, with references to the role of interventional radiology.
Materials and methods
From January 2011 to June 2014, 27 patients with SRH were selected. Patients with aortic, traumatic, or iatrogenic source of bleeding were excluded. All the patients were studied with multiphasic MDCT after injection of intravenous contrast. Digital Subtraction angiography and percutaneous embolization treatment were performed.
Results
CT identified SRH in all cases (100 %), showing the source of bleeding in 11 cases (40 %) and pointing out the source of bleeding in 15 cases (55 %). In one case (5 %), the bleeding origin was recognized only at surgery as adrenal source. CT has identified a contrast medium extravasation in the arterial phase in 17 patients (63 %), treated successfully by percutaneous embolization in 13 and by open-surgery in two cases. Two patients died before undergoing intervention and surgery, respectively. Ten patients (37 %) were non-operatively treated successfully with clinical, laboratory, and imaging follow-up.
Conclusions
Multiphasic CT is the gold standard for the identification of a SRH. Recognition of CT signs of active bleeding is the crucial feature influencing the timing of therapeutic treatment. Urgent embolization should be performed in cases of arterial bleeding or contained vascular injuries supplying the retroperitoneal hematoma. Surgery is to be addressed in cases of actively bleeding hematomas associated with complication. Finally, an initial more conservative approach can be adopted in patients without signs of contrast extravasation or low-flow active bleeding. Technical skill, expertise, and recognition of CT signs of arterial active bleeding are critical features influencing patients management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage (SRH) without aortic rupture, trauma, or iatrogenic causes represents a rare and insidious condition that recognizes different etiologies [1]. Most frequent causes are parenchymal diseases related to vascular rupture of retroperitoneal organ expansive lesions, most often spontaneous rupture of renal carcinomas and angiomyolipomas [2] and adrenal expansive lesions [3]; further causes include vascular diseases related to the rupture of splanchnic artery aneurysms or small vessels injuries [4–6]. According to the etiology, symptoms may vary from mild abdominal pain to acute abdomen until cardiovascular collapse [1].
Ultrasound (US) and plain film of the abdomen provide insufficient and often non-specific diagnostic information. Multidetector Computed tomography (MDCT) plays a primary role because of its ability to identify, with high sensitivity and specificity, the presence and cause of hematomas into the retroperitoneal space, significantly influencing the subsequent management [7].
Current literature is mainly focused on classification of etiologies and clinical management of the disease. The current multicentric study has the primary purpose to assess the usefulness of MDCT in the diagnosis of SRH, pointing out how CT can influence patients management approach.
Materials and methods
From January 2011 to June 2014, we retrospectively evaluated data of four emergency radiology departments, selecting patients who performed a CT examination for suspected retroperitoneal hemorrhage. We excluded patients with aortic rupture, and traumatic or iatrogenic retroperitoneal hemorrhage, selecting a total of 27 patients (16 males and 11 females aged between 45 and 91 years) with SRH from different causes.
All patients were studied with multidetector CT scanners (Toshiba Aquilion 128 slices, General Electrics Lightspeed 64 slices, Siemens Somatom S. 64 slices) using a pre-contrast phase followed by a multiphasic study after injection of intravenous contrast agent at high rate (4–5 ml/sec). The multiphasic study consisted of an arterial phase, using the ‘bolus tracking’ technique, followed by a portal phase at about 70 s from the beginning of the injection of the contrast medium. A delayed phase at 180–300 s has been done in all patients for characterization of vascular lesions or differentiation between vascular and urinary injuries. Post-processing techniques were routinely performed with Multi planar reconstruction (MPR) and Maximum intensity projection (MIP).
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed using a C-ARM angiography system (Philips Allura Xper FD 20). DSA and percutaneous embolization treatment (PET) were routinely performed using a 0.028-inch lumen microcatheter (Microcatheter System Progreat, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) with a compatible 0.018-inch guidewire passed through different 5-F angiographic catheters (Cordis, Johnson & Johnson Company, Miami Lakes, Florida). Diagnostic angiography through the main bleeding vessel was performed to confirm extravasation of contrast medium revealed by CT scan. The microcatheter was advanced as close as possible to the bleeding site in all cases. Different embolic materials were used: microcoils, absorbable gelatin sponge, glue, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) microspheres.
DSA was performed at the end of each procedure to confirm the cessation of the bleeding.
All patients were clinically monitored and followed up with a CT scan or ultrasound in an interval period between 2 days and 2 months.
Results
Cause of the bleeding was properly vascular in 18 patients (67 %) and parenchymal in nine cases (33 %) as detailed in Table 1.
CT allowed a rapid diagnosis of retroperitoneal hemorrhage in all cases (100 %). In 11 cases (40 %), CT identified the source of bleeding: two cases from renal cysts (Fig. 1), three cases from a malignant renal tumor, one case from an adrenal carcinoma, adrenal metastasis, and a renal angiomyolipoma (Fig. 2), two cases of aneurysm of segmental renal artery branch, and one case of aneurysm of the pancreatic-duodenal artery (Fig. 3). In 15 cases (55 %), CT has identified a retroperitoneal hematoma, pointing out the site of bleeding: four cases from pancreatic-duodenal artery (Figs. 4, 5, 6), one case from sacral artery, one case from right subphrenic artery, one case from left subphrenic artery, three cases from lumbar artery (Fig. 7), two cases from ileo-lumbar artery (Fig. 8), two cases from obturator artery (Fig. 9), and one case from right testicular artery (Fig. 10). However, in one case (5 %), the bleeding origin was not recognized at CT, identified at surgery as small bleeding of adrenal metastases into the subphrenic space (Fig. 11).
CT has identified a contrast medium extravasation in the arterial phase in 17 patients (63 %): 13 patients were treated successfully with intervention in the emergency setting. Two patients were treated by open-surgery for sudden worsening of hemodynamic conditions. One patient underwent open-surgery to remove a bleeding adrenal metastasis with nephrectomy. Two patients died before undergoing DSA and surgery for hemodynamic complications.
Ten patients (37 %) with SRH were treated non-operatively with clinical and laboratory monitoring and follow-up with CT or ultrasound examinations, until resolution of the hematoma. Particularly, in three cases, CT showed signs of active venous low-flow bleeding, detectable only in the portal phase and, for this reason, patients received a non-operative management. CT revealed retroperitoneal hematomas without active bleeding in remaining seven patients.
Discussion
Spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage is a rare disease associated with data limited to case reports and small case series, with a prevalence in elderly patients undergoing chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment [4] or dialysis [8]. Symptoms often appear fuzzy, non-specific, and difficult to classify in the initial phase. They can be represented by general abdominal pain in the epigastric region, in the region of the hips or radiated to the lumbar region, pelvis, and legs [2–4]. In cases of massive spontaneous bleeding, with initial onset of cardiovascular decompensation, suspicion of bleeding is more suggestive.
Main causes can be essentially divided into parenchymal bleeding and vascular bleeding.
Parenchymal bleeding
Parenchymal bleeding is often related to renal or adrenal injuries.
Wunderlich’s syndrome is a clinical condition defined as a spontaneous renal bleeding of non-traumatic origin [9]. Based on the literature, various etiologies have been suggested [10]. Benign and malignant renal neoplasms and cystic disease can be the etiology of bleeding. Renal cell carcinoma [11] and angiomyolipoma [12] seem to be the major etiology. CT scan clearly depicts both the primary tumor and signs of spontaneous rupture [13].
Cases of spontaneous rupture of adrenal masses include pheochromocytoma [14], myelolipoma [15], cortical adenoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, and metastases [16]. CT of adrenal hemorrhage appears as a round solid adrenal mass with attenuation comparable to soft tissue, which decreases in size during follow-up [17]. MR is very sensitive and specific for diagnosing adrenal hemorrhage and determining if blood is the sole component of the hematoma [18].
“Vascular” bleeding
Primary causes of vessel injuries include rupture of splanchnic arteries aneurysms [19, 20], arteriovenous malformations [21], or disease resulting from atherosclerotic or inflammatory small vessels injuries [22, 23] with a prevalence in patients with antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants [1]. In these patients, CT can identify the presence of aneurysmal dilatation and vascular abnormalities or suggest the origin related to the site of hematoma and of contrast extravasation [19–24].
Current literature reports more frequently rupture of aneurysms and pseudo-aneurysms of the superior mesenteric artery branches, renal artery aneurysms, and pancreatic-duodenal artery aneurysms, the latter often associated with stenosis of the celiac artery [25–31].
Lumbar, ileo-lumbar and obturator artery were identified as source of bleeding in six patients; these sites represent other sources of non-traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma frequently described in the literature [25–27].
Imaging
X-ray and ultrasound examination are often the first imaging examination for patients with mild to moderate symptoms as pain in the epigastric region, hips, and back. Their role is currently confined to the preliminary exclusion of G.I. tract perforation and for identification of other more common causes of acute abdomen, especially if related to intra-peritoneal origin or of the urogenital tract. Known limits of US in the evaluation of the retroperitoneum are generally related to meteoric distension of the intestinal loops and poor patients cooperation in the majority of cases [7–35].
CT scan is usually performed in patients with drug-resistant pain symptoms or in case of uncertain ultrasound diagnosis; more often, a CT scan is performed as the first exam to quickly get the correct diagnosis of any intra and/or retroperitoneal disease in patients with severe symptoms, worsening of hemodynamic conditions, or clinical suspicion of an abdominal bleeding source. For this reason, CT plays a primary role in the detection of retroperitoneal bleeding, its location, size, and source, with high sensitivity and specificity [1, 3, 7, 34]. Some authors have highlighted the importance of a deep knowledge of the anatomy of the retroperitoneal fascial planes [36].
The execution of CT with injection of intravenous contrast with multiphase acquisitions is an essential issue both for early diagnosis and management of patients with suspected abdominal and/or retroperitoneal bleeding, allowing optimal detection and characterization of vascular structures [36–39].
At baseline acquisition, a recent hematoma appears as a soft tissue density mass (30–50 HU) that sometimes displaces the adjacent structures. In the first hour after bleeding, an area of higher density surrounded by serum of relatively lower density, “the sentinel clot sign,” may suggest the bleeding site [37, 38]. In the next phases, a fluid–fluid level in the context of the hematoma, known as ‘hematocrit effect’, can be visible (Fig. 4). This sign is generated by the stratification of cellular elements heavier and serous fluid supernatant [39, 40].
If active bleeding is present in the context of a hematoma with fluid–fluid level, it is possible to identify the ‘signal flare sign’ (Fig. 4), generated by the different gravitational weight that determines layering of the contrast medium between cellular and fluid component [40].
The multiphasic CT acquisition requires high flow injection of contrast medium (4–5 ml/sec) to differentiate hematomas actively supplied in the arterial phase from venous bleeding. Furthermore, CT can help detection of contained vascular lesions such as aneurysms or pseudo-aneurysms within a hematoma.
A technically correct CT exam allows, with high diagnostic confidence, to exclude significant arterial supply in the context of a hematoma. This distinction is essential from a management view-point [41].
On CT-angiography imaging, hemorrhage is defined as free extravasation of contrast media that persist and enlarge on delayed images and pseudoaneurysm as a round or ovoid cavity, communicating with an injured vessel wall, that shows wash out on delayed phase. Arteriovenous fistula is defined as early, simultaneous vessel enhancement of both artery and vein. From a therapeutic view-point, arterial active bleeding lesions can be safely treated with angiographic embolization. On the other way, exclusion of a significant arterial supply in the context of a hematoma initially addresses the patient toward a non-operative management, with laboratory and instrumental follow-up. Existence of intermittent bleeding can be supposed, when CT-angiography does not demonstrate any source of active bleeding and the hematoma increases in size. Actually, in these patients, DSA is recommended [42–44].
Several studies on vascular traumas support the notion that a rigorous multiphase CT technique can address patients to a tailored management—i.e., intervention, surgical or conservative—[45–48]. This management approach can be safely extended to non-traumatic conditions. In all our cases, CT has appropriately directed patients to the proper management, confirming to be the cornerstone for a fast and correct diagnosis and treatment. Our data also show a high prevalence of active arterial bleeding among patients with retroperitoneal hematoma with source of vascular origin. This finding supports the relationship that exists between this event and a small vessels chronic disease [4–7].
Conclusions
Spontaneous retroperitoneal bleeding represents a pathological entity of difficult clinical classification, in which early diagnosis is crucial to prevent a severe involvement of clinical conditions.
Multiphasic CT is the gold standard for the identification of a spontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma. Recognition of CT signs of active bleeding is the most important element influencing the timing of therapeutic treatment. Urgent embolization should be performed in cases of arterial bleeding or contained vascular injuries supplying the retroperitoneal hematoma. Surgery is to be addressed in cases of actively bleeding hematomas associated with complication. Finally, an initial more conservative approach can be adopted in patients without signs of contrast extravasation or low-flow active bleeding.
References
Sunga KL, Bellolio F et al (2012) Spontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma: etiology, characteristics, management, and outcome. J Emerg Med 43(2):e157–e161
Zhang JQ, Fielding JR, Zou KH (2002) Etiology of spontaneous perirenal hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. J Urol 167:1593–1596
Jordan E, Poder L, Courtier J et al (2012) Imaging of nontraumatic adrenal hemorrhage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(1):W91–W98
Lopez-Sanchez M, Gonzalez-Fernandez C, Valero-Diaz DLC et al (2005) Enoxaparin, retroperitoneal haematoma in the elderly and impaired renal function. Anaesth Intensive Care 33:689–695
Buresta P, Freyrie A, Paragona O et al (2004) Ruptured pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm. A case report and review of the literature. J Cardiovasc Surg 45:153–157
Bonamigo TP, Erling N Jr, Faccini FP (2002) Rupture of a saccular renal artery aneurysm: report of a case. Surg Today 32:753–755
Chan YC, Morales JP, Reidy JF et al (2008) Management of spontaneous and iatrogenic retroperitoneal haemorrhage: conservative management, endovascular intervention or open surgery? Int J Clin Pract 62(10):1604–1613
Kruzel-Davila E, Frajewicki V, Kushnir D et al (2005) Retroperitoneal hematoma in a hemodialysis patient receiving low molecular weight heparin. Isr Med Assoc J 7:611–612
Guttilla A, Crestani A, Cattaneo F et al (2013) Wunderlich’s syndrome: three cases of acute spontaneous renal bleeding, conservatively treated. Arch Ital Urol Androl 85(4):210–213
Malek-Marin T, Arenas D, Gil T et al (2010) Spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage in dialysis: a presentation of five cases and review of the literature. Clin Nephrol 74:229–244
Tomic M, Ulamec M, Trnski D et al (2013) Renal adenocarcinoma presenting as a spontaneous perirenal hematoma in a patient on warfarin therapy—case report and literature review. Coll Antropol 37(2):629–632
Parekh S, Jolapara M, Shah T et al (2014) Emergency embolization of actively bleeding renal angiomyolipoma in a patient of tuberous sclerosis. Ren Fail 21:1–5
Lu CY, Min PQ, Wu B (2012) Ct evaluation of spontaneously ruptured renal angiomyolipomas with massive hemorrhage spreading into multi-retroperitoneal fascia and fascial spaces. Acta Radiol Short Rep 1:18
Hanna J, Spencer P, Cornelia S et al (2011) Spontaneous adrenal pheochromocytoma rupture complicated by intraperitoneal hemorrhage and shock. World J Emerg Surg 6:27
Nakajo M, Onohara S, Shinmura K et al (2003) Embolization for spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage from adrenal myelolipoma. Radiat Med 21:214–219
Kavashima A, Sandler CM, Ernst RD et al (1999) Imaging of non traumatic hemorrhage of adrenal gland. Radiographics 19:949–963
Sacerdote M, Johnson P, Fishman E (2012) CT of the adrenal gland: the many faces of adrenal hemorrhage. Emerg Radiol 19(1):53–60
Manganaro L, Al Ansari N, Barchetti F et al (2013) Bilateral adrenal hemorrhage in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome: value of MRI in the differential diagnosis. Case Rep Radiol 2013:479836
Mohan IV, Stephen MS (2013) Peripheral arterial aneurysms: open or endovascular surgery? Prog Cardiovasc 56(1):36–56
Balderi A, Antonietti A, Grosso M et al (2012) Endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm: our experience. Radiol Med 117(5):815–830
Lee SM, Kim HD, Lee YK et al (2013) A case of rupture renal cortical arteriovenous malformation of the right vein in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Korean J Intern Med 28:365–369
Boersma HE, Nap RH, Haanstra WP et al (2013) A rare cause of spontaneous perirenal haemorrhage in a patient with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Neth J Med 71(6):318–322
Yang HC, Lee S, Kim W et al (2012) Spontaneous perirenal hematoma due to multiple renal artery aneurysms in a patient with presumed polyarteritis nodosa. Vasc Med 17(6):427–428
Saba L, Anzidei M, Lucatelli P et al (2011) The multidetector computed tomography (MDCTA) in the diagnosis of splenic artery aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm. Acta Radiol 52(5):488–498
Basheer A, Rajan J, Toomas A et al (2013) Bilateral iliopsoas hematoma: case report and literature review. Surg Neurol Int 4:121
Sasson Z, Mangat I, Peckham KA (1996) Spontaneous iliopsoas hematoma in patients with unstable coronary syndromes receiving intravenous heparin in therapeutic doses. Can J Cardiol 12:490–494
Dauty M, Sigaud M, Trosseart M et al (2007) Iliopsoas hematoma in patients with hemophilia: a single center study. Joint Bone Spine 74:179–183
Shu C, Hu X, Luo M et al (2011) A review of SA aneurysms with a small subsection on aneurysms arising from a splenomesenteric trunk. Int Angiol 30(5):395–407
Pavlis T, Seretis C, Gourgiotis S et al (2012) Spontaneous rupture of splenic artery aneurysm during the first trimester of pregnancy: report of an extremely rare case and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2012:528051
Akkary E, Cramer T, Patel M et al (2010) Superior mesenteric artery aneurysm: an uncommon disease with potentially serious complication. W.V Med J. 106(7):10–14
Seo PW (2013) Surgical treatment of rupture renal artery aneurysm: a report of two cases. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46:467–470
Flood K, Nicholson AA (2013) Inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm associated with occlusive lesions of the celiac axis: diagnosis, treatment options, outcomes, and review of the literature. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36(3):578–587
Brocker JA, Maher JL, Smith RW (2012) True pancreaticoduodenal aneurysms with celiac stenosis or occlusion. Am J Surg 204(5):762–768
Gonzalez C, Penado S, Llata L et al (2003) The clinical spectrum of retroperitoneal hematoma in anticoagulated patients. Medicine 82:257–262
Chenaitia H, Abrous K, Louis F et al (2011) Relevance of sonography for retroperitoneal hematoma. Am J Emerg Med 29(7):827–828
Scialpi M, Scaglione M, Angelelli G et al (2004) Emergencies in the retroperitoneum: assessment of spread of disease by helical CT. Eur J Radiol 50(1):74–83
Furlan A, Fakhran S, Federle MP (2009) Spontaneous abdominal hemorrhage: causes, CT findings and clinical implication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1077–1087
Zissin R, Ellis M, Gayer C (2006) The CT findings of abdominal anticoagulant-related hematomas. Smin Ultrasound CT MR 27:117–125
Federle MP, Pan KT, Pealer KM (2007) CT criteria for differentiating abdominal hemorrhage: anticoagulation or aortic aneurysm rupture? AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1324–1330
Ibukuro K, Oishi A, Tanaka R et al (2006) Signal flare phenomenon as active bleeding in retroperitoneal hematoma with hematocrit effect on dynamic CT scan: three clinical cases and experimental study based on a specific gravity theory. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(5):787–790
Roy-Choudhury SH, Gallacher DJ, Pilmer J et al (2007) Relative threshold of detection of active arterial bleeding: in vitro comparison of MDCT and digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(5):W238–W246
Angle JF, Siddiqi NH, Wallace MJ et al (2010) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transcatheter embolization: Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21(10):1479–1486
Guzzardi G, Fossaceca R, Carriero A et al (2014) Endovascular treatment of spontaneous extraperitoneal haemorrhage: immediate and long-term clinical efficiency. Radiol Med 119(2):121–127
Pathi R, Voyvodic F, Thompson WR (2004) Spontaneous extraperitoneal haemorrhage: computed tomography diagnosis and treatment by selective arterial embolization. Australas Radiol 48(2):123–128
Anderson SW, Hirsch EF, Soto JA et al (2007) Blunt splenic trauma: delayed-phase CT for differentiation of active hemorrhage from contained vascular injury in patients. Radiology 243(1):88–95
Uyeda J, Anderson SW, Soto JA et al (2010) Pelvic CT angiography: application to blunt trauma using 64MDCT. Emerg Radiol 17(2):131–137
Anderson SW, Hirsch EF, Rhea JT et al (2008) Blunt trauma: feasibility and clinical utility of pelvic CT angiography performed with 64-detector row CT. Radiology 246(2):410–419
Pinto A, Niola R, Tortora G et al (2010) Role of multidetector-row CT in assessing the source of arterial haemorrhage in patients with pelvic vascular trauma. Comparison with angiography. Radiol Med (Torino) 115(4):648–667
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caleo, O., Bocchini, G., Paoletta, S. et al. Spontaneous non-aortic retroperitoneal hemorrhage: etiology, imaging characterization and impact of MDCT on management. A multicentric study. Radiol med 120, 133–148 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0482-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0482-0