Abstract
Despite a specific data assimilation method, data assimilation (DA) in general can be decomposed into components of the prior information, observation forward operator that is given by the observation type, observation error covariances, and background error covariances. In a classic Lorenz model, the influences of the DA components on the initial conditions (ICs) and subsequent forecasts are systematically investigated, which could provide a theoretical basis for the design of DA for different scales of interests. The forecast errors undergo three typical stages: a slow growth stage from 0 h to 5 d, a fast growth stage from 5 d to around 15 d with significantly different error growth rates for ensemble and deterministic forecasts, and a saturation stage after 15 d. Assimilation strategies that provide more accurate ICs can improve the predictability. Cycling assimilation is superior to offline assimilation, and a flow-dependent background error covariance matrix (Pf) provides better analyses than a static background error covariance matrix (B) for instantaneous observations and frequent time-averaged observations; but the opposite is true for infrequent time-averaged observations, since cycling simulation cannot construct informative priors when the model lacks predictive skills and the flow-dependent Pf cannot effectively extract information from low-informative observations as the static B. Instantaneous observations contain more information than time-averaged observations, thus the former is preferred, especially for infrequent observing systems. Moreover, ensemble forecasts have advantages over deterministic forecasts, and the advantages are enlarged with less informative observations and lower predictive-skill model priors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson J L, Anderson S L. 1999. A Monte Carlo implementation of the nonlinear filtering problem to produce ensemble assimilations and forecasts. Mon Wea Rev, 127: 2741–2758
Balsamo G, Albergel A, Beljaars A, Boussetta S, Brun E, Cloke H L, Dee D. 2012. ERA-Interim/Land: A global land-surface reanalysis based on ERA-Interim meteorological forcing. ERA-Report series: 13
Bannister R N. 2017. A review of operational methods of variational and ensemble-variational data assimilation. Quart J R Meteoro Soc, 143: 607–633
Bauer P, Thorpe A, Brunet G. 2015. The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. Nature, 525: 47–55
Brajard J, Carrassi A, Bocquet M, Bertino L. 2020. Combining data assimilation and machine learning to emulate a dynamical model from sparse and noisy observations: A case study with the Lorenz 96 model. J Comput Sci, 44: 101171
Brunet G, Shapiro M, Hoskins B, Moncrieff M, Dole R, Kiladis G N, Kirtman B, Lorenc A, Mills B, Morss R, Polavarapu S, Rogers D, Schaake J, Shukla J. 2010. Collaboration of the weather and climate communities to advance subseasonal-to-seasonal prediction. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 91: 1397–1406
Buehner M, Houtekamer P L, Charette C, Mitchell H L, He B. 2010. Intercomparison of variational data assimilation and the ensemble Kalman filter for global deterministic NWP. Part I: Description and single-observation experiments. Mon Weather Rev, 138: 1550–1566
Cardinali C, Isaksen L, Andersson E. 2003. Use and impact of automated aircraft data in a global 4DVAR data assimilation system. Mon Weather Rev, 131: 1865–1877
Courtier P, Thepaut J N, Hollingsworth A. 1994. A strategy for operational implementation of 4D-Var, using an incremental approach. Quart J R Meteorol Soc, 120: 1367–1387
Courtier P, Andersson E, Heckley W, Vasiljevic D, Hamrud M, Hollingsworth A, Rabier F, Fisher M, Pailleux J. 1998. The ECMWF implementation of three-dimensional variational assimilation (3D-Var). I: Formulation. Quart J R Meteoro Soc, 124: 1783–1807
Cucurull L, Derber J C, Treadon R, Purser R J. 2007. Assimilation of Global Positioning System radio occultation observations into NCEP’s global data assimilation system. Mon Weather Rev, 135: 3174–3193
Gaspari G, Cohn S E. 1999. Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart J R Meteoro Soc, 125: 723–757
Geer A J, Lonitz K, Weston P, Kazumori M, Okamoto K, Zhu Y, Liu E H, Collard A, Bell W, Migliorini S, Chambon P, Fourrié N, Kim M, Köpken-Watts C, Schraff C. 2018. All-sky satellite data assimilation at operational weather forecasting centres. Quart J R Meteoro Soc, 144: 1191–1217
Hamill T M, Snyder C. 2000. A hybrid ensemble Kalman filter-3D variational analysis scheme. Mon Wea Rev, 128: 2905–2919
Hamill T M, Whitaker J S, Mullen S L. 2006. Reforecasts: An important dataset for improving weather predictions. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 87: 33–46
Houtekamer P L, Zhang F. 2016. Review of the ensemble kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev, 144: 4489–4532
Huang B, Wang X, Kleist D T, Lei T. 2021. A simultaneous multiscale data assimilation using scale-dependent localization in GSI-based hybrid 4DEnVar for NCEP FV3-based GFS. Mon Weather Rev, 149: 479–501
Judt F. 2020. Atmospheric predictability of the tropics, middle latitudes, and polar regions explored through global storm-resolving simulations. J Atmos Sci, 77: 257–276
Jung T, Gordon N D, Bauer P, Bromwich D H, Chevallier M, Day J J, Dawson J, Doblas-Reyes F, Fairall C, Goessling H F, Holland M, Inoue J, Iversen T, Klebe S, Lemke P, Losch M, Makshtas A, Mills B, Nurmi P, Perovich D, Reid P, Renfrew I A, Smith G, Svensson G, Tolstykh M, Yang Q. 2016. Advancing polar prediction capabilities on daily to seasonal time scales. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 97: 1631–1647
Kalnay E. 2002. Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Predictability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 341
Karspeck A R, Yeager S, Danabasoglu G, Hoar T, Collins N, Raeder K, Anderson J, Tribbia J. 2013. An ensemble adjustment kalman filter for the CCSM4 ocean component. J Clim, 26: 7392–7413
Laloyaux P, Balmaseda M, Dee D, Mogensen K, Janssen P. 2016. A coupled data assimilation system for climate reanalysis. Quart J R Meteoro Soc, 142: 65–78
Lei L, Wang Z, Tan Z M. 2021. Integrated hybrid data assimilation for an ensemble kalman filter. Mon Weather Rev, 149: 4091–4105
Li J, Geer A J, Okamoto K, Otkin J A, Liu Z, Han W, Wang P. 2021. Satellite all-sky infrared radiance assimilation: Recent progress and future perspectives. Adv Atmos Sci, 39: 9–21
Li Z, McWilliams J C, Ide K, Farrara J D. 2015. A multiscale variational data assimilation scheme: Formulation and illustration. Mon Weather Rev, 143: 3804–3822
Lorenz E N. 1969a. Three approaches to atmospheric predictability. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 50: 345–349
Lorenz E N. 1969b. The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus A-Dynamic Meteor Oceanography, 21: 289–307
Lorenz E N. 2005. Designing chaotic models. J Atmos Sci, 62: 1574–1587
Lu F, Liu Z, Zhang S, Liu Y. 2015a. Strongly coupled data assimilation using leading averaged coupled covariance (LACC). Part I: Simple model study. Mon Weather Rev, 143: 3823–3837
Lu F, Liu Z, Zhang S, Liu Y, Jacob R. 2015b. Strongly coupled data assimilation using leading averaged coupled covariance (LACC). Part II: CGCM experiments. Mon Weather Rev, 143: 4645–4659
Lucarini V, Blender R, Herbert C, Ragone F, Pascale S, Wouters J. 2014. Mathematical and physical ideas for climate science. Rev Geophys, 52: 809–859
Massonnet F, Mathiot P, Fichefet T, Goosse H, König Beatty C, Vancoppenolle M, Lavergne T. 2013. A model reconstruction of the Antarctic sea ice thickness and volume changes over 1980–2008 using data assimilation. Ocean Model, 64: 67–75
Matsikaris A, Widmann M, Jungclaus J. 2015. On-line and off-line data assimilation in palaeoclimatology: A case study. Clim Past, 11: 81–93
Meehl G A, Goddard L, Murphy J, Stouffer R J, Boer G, Danabasoglu G, Dixon K, Giorgetta M A, Greene A M, Hawkins E, Hegerl G, Karoly D, Keenlyside N, Kimoto M, Kirtman B, Navarra A, Pulwarty R, Smith D, Stammer D, Stockdale T. 2009. Decadal prediction. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 90: 1467–1486
Mochizuki T, Masuda S, Ishikawa Y, Awaji T. 2016. Multiyear climate prediction with initialization based on 4D-Var data assimilation. Geophys Res Lett, 43: 3903–3910
Palmer T N, Doblas-Reyes F J, Weisheimer A, Rodwell M J. 2008. Toward Seamless prediction: Calibration of climate change projections using seasonal forecasts. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 89: 459–470
Penny S G. 2014. The hybrid local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Mon Weather Rev, 142: 2139–2149
Penny S G, Hamill T M. 2017. Coupled data assimilation for integrated Earth system analysis and prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 98: ES169–ES172
Poli P, Healy S B, Dee D P. 2010. Assimilation of Global Positioning System radio occultation data in the ECMWF ERA-Interim reanalysis. Quart J R Meteoro Soc, 136: 1972–1990
Rawlins F, Ballard S P, Bovis K J, Clayton A M, Li D, Inverarity G W, Lorenc A C, Payne T J. 2007. The Met Office global four-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Quart J R Meteoro Soc, 133: 347–362
Ruti P M, Tarasova O, Keller J H, Carmichael G, Hov Ø, Jones S C, Terblanche D, Anderson-Lefale C, Barros A P, Bauer P, Bouchet V, Brasseur G, Brunet G, DeCola P, Dike V, Kane M D, Gan C, Gurney K R, Hamburg S, Hazeleger W, Jean M, Johnston D, Lewis A, Li P, Liang X, Lucarini V, Lynch A, Manaenkova E, Jae-Cheol N, Ohtake S, Pinardi N, Polcher J, Ritchie E, Sakya A E, Saulo C, Singhee A, Sopaheluwakan A, Steiner A, Thorpe A, Yamaji M. 2020. Advancing research for seamless Earth system prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 101: E23–E35
Shapiro M, Shukla J, Brunet G, Nobre C, Béland M, Dole R, Trenberth K, Anthes R, Asrar G, Barrie L, Bougeault P, Brasseur G, Burridge D, Busalacchi A, Caughey J, Chen D, Church J, Enomoto T, Hoskins B, Hov Ø, Laing A, Le Treut H, Marotzke J, McBean G, Meehl G, Miller M, Mills B, Mitchell J, Moncrieff M, Nakazawa T, Olafsson H, Palmer T, Parsons D, Rogers D, Simmons A, Troccoli A, Toth Z, Uccellini L, Velden C, Wallace J M. 2010. An earth-system prediction initiative for the twenty-first century. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 91: 1377–1388
Sun H, Lei L, Liu Z, Ning L, Tan Z. 2022. An analog offline EnKF for paleoclimate data assimilation. J Adv Model Earth Syst, 14: e2021MS002674
Sun J, Liu Z, Lu F, Zhang W, Zhang S. 2020. Strongly coupled data assimilation using leading averaged coupled covariance (LACC). Part III: Assimilation of real world reanalysis. Mon Weather Rev, 148: 2351–2364
Tan Z M, Zhang F, Rotunno R, Snyder C. 2004. Mesoscale predictability of moist baroclinic waves: Experiments with parameterized convection. Mon Weather Rev, 61: 1794–1804
Tardif R, Hakim G J, Snyder C. 2014. Coupled atmosphere-ocean data assimilation experiments with a low-order climate model. Clim Dyn, 43: 1631–1643
Tardif R, Hakim G J, Snyder C. 2015. Coupled atmosphere-ocean data assimilation experiments with a low-order model and CMIP5 model data. Clim Dyn, 45: 1415–1427
Tong M, Sippel J A, Tallapragada V, Liu E, Kieu C, Kwon I H, Wang W, Liu Q, Ling Y, Zhang B. 2018. Impact of assimilating aircraft reconnaissance observations on tropical cyclone initialization and prediction using operational HWRF and GSI ensemble-variational hybrid data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev, 146: 4155–4177
Whitaker J S, Hamill T M, Wei X, Song Y, Toth Z. 2008. Ensemble data assimilation with the NCEP global forecast system. Mon Weather Rev, 136: 463–482
Xie Y, Koch S, McGinley J, Albers S, Bieringer P E, Wolfson M, Chan M. 2011. A space-time multiscale analysis system: A sequential variational analysis approach. Mon Weather Rev, 139: 1224–1240
Yang X, Rosati A, Zhang S, Delworth T L, Gudgel R G, Zhang R, Vecchi G, Anderson W, Chang Y S, DelSole T, Dixon K, Msadek R, Stern W F, Wittenberg A, Zeng F. 2013. A predictable AMO-like pattern in the GFDL fully coupled ensemble initialization and decadal forecasting system. J Clim, 26: 650–661
Zeng Y, Janjić T, de Lozar A, Welzbacher C A, Blahak U, Seifert A. 2021. Assimilating radar radial wind and reflectivity data in an idealized setup of the COSMO-KENDA system. Atmos Res, 249: 105282
Zhang F. 2005. Dynamics and structure of mesoscale error covariance of a winter cyclone estimated through short-range ensemble forecasts. Mon Weather Rev, 133: 2876–2893
Zhang F, Bei N, Rotunno R, Snyder C, Epifanio C C. 2007. Mesoscale predictability of moist baroclinic waves: Convection-permitting experiments and multistage error growth dynamics. J Atmos Sci, 64: 3579–3594
Zhang F, Weng Y, Sippel J A, Meng Z, Bishop C H. 2009. Cloud-resolving hurricane initialization and prediction through assimilation of doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon Wea Rev, 137: 2105–2125
Zhang F, Sun Y Q, Magnusson L, Buizza R, Lin S J, Chen J H, Emanuel K. 2019. What is the predictability limit of midlatitude weather? J Atmos Sci, 76: 1077–1091
Zhang S. 2011. A study of impacts of coupled model initial shocks and state-parameter optimization on climate predictions using a simple pycnocline prediction model. J Clim, 24: 6210–6226
Acknowledgements
The code that is used to generate the nature run, synthetic observations, and assimilation experiments, and the output of assimilation experiments with different assimilation configurations are available at https://meso.nju.edu.cn/xwdt/20220718/i226029.html. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42192553, 41922036 & 41775057), the Frontiers Science Center for Critical Earth Material Cycling Fund (Grant No. JBGS2102), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 0209-14380097).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Sun, H., Lei, L. et al. The importance of data assimilation components for initial conditions and subsequent error growth. Sci. China Earth Sci. 67, 105–116 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1229-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1229-7