Abstract
Purpose
It is currently very difficult to accurately evaluate the soil contamination by heavy metals (HMs) attributed to the unavailability of local geochemical background values (LGBVs). This study was performed to establish the geochemical baseline concentrations (GBCs), as an alternative for LGBVs to use for HM pollution assessment of agricultural soil.
Materials and methods
GBCs of the HMs selected were determined using the cumulative frequency distribution curves (CFDCs). GBCs were then used to pursue the HM soil pollution and associated ecological risks, via calculation of geo-accumulation indices (Igeo), pollution load indices (PLI), as well as potential ecological risk indices (RI).
Results and discussion
As to the soil investigated, the GBCs of Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr were 29.34 mg/kg, 45.54 mg/kg, 21.81 mg/kg, and 33.65 mg/kg, respectively. Igeo values ranged from − 4.58 to 0.33 (Ni), from − 2.46 to 2.14 (Zn), from − 5.32 to 0.77 (Pb), and from − 3.83 to 0.96 (Cr), suggesting that the region was not polluted by these HMs. PLI values ranged from 0.08 to 2.45 with an average of 1.02. 49.6% of soil samples had the PLI values > 1.0, indicating that some of the soil may be moderately contaminated by HMs. The RI values of selected HMs were < 150, indicating a low potential ecological risk. Principal component analysis (PCA) implied Zn, Pb, and Cr were mainly sourced from parent (geological) materials, as well as agricultural activities, atmospheric deposition, etc., depending on the element.
Conclusions
The present study illustrates the necessity of the characterization of GBCs at a regional scale, allowing for more accurate assessment of soil contamination by HMs. We hope that this will eventually lead to further development of better environmental management practices for agricultural soil polluted by HMs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Due to our reliance on agricultural production, human health and ecological security are closely linked to soil contamination (Burges et al. 2015; He et al. 2017). The increasing demand for food coupled with growing population pressures has led to increasingly intensive development of farmland (de Vries et al. 2013; Garnett 2014; Tilman and Clark 2015). As a result, there have been elevated levels of heavy metals (HMs) in soils, mainly attributed to the significant utilization of fertilizers, pesticides, etc. (Tian et al. 2017; Zhou et al. 2017, 2019). HM accumulation in agricultural soils can have detrimental effects on soil ecosystems and can potentially threaten human health via food chain accumulation (Liu et al. 2013; Wongsasuluk et al. 2014; Singh and Prasad 2015; Yu et al. 2016; Li et al. 2018). Thus, agricultural soil contamination by HMs has become an increasingly prevalent environmental problem (Shao et al. 2016; Fan et al. 2017; Lawal et al. 2017). In fact, thousands of studies have evaluated the risks of agricultural soil contamination by HMs to human and environmental health (Marrugo-Negrete et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2017) by comparing the data with local geochemical background values (LGBVs).
LGBVs are references used to identify the differences between the natural and anthropogenically influenced concentrations of elements/compounds in potentially contaminated soil (Matschullat et al. 2000; Karim et al. 2015). Due to both the natural variability and anthropic influence, it has been almost impossible to determine true target LGBVs (Wei and Wen 2012; Karim et al. 2015). In this regard, the term “geochemical baseline concentrations” (GBCs) was coined and suggested to be used to represent the true background concentrations (Wei and Wen 2012). GBCs are often considered as the boundary dividing the anomalous values and the LGBVs. And, the data below the GBCs are thought to be the LGBVs while those above to be anomalous (Teng et al. 2009; Wei and Wen 2012). From a regulatory perspective, the GBCs provide an opportunity to identify whether the enrichment of elements has arisen. In general, the GBCs are the important benchmarks of soil pollution evaluation and soil quality management such as protection and legislation (Levitan et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2014). The methods that have been used to determine the GBCs of the elements in the soils (Gałuszka 2007; Teng et al. 2009; Wei and Wen 2012) consist of statistical procedures generally employed as the concentration distributions are normal or log-normal, normalization methods for which reference materials such as Al and Li are used to normalize the data, substitution methods using the values of soil samples of deep layers as the GBCs, and integration methods combining two or more methods. The specific description for the estimation of GBCs can be available from Wei and Wen (2012), Gałuszka (2007), and Zhang et al. (2014). And, cumulative frequency distribution curves (CFDCs), an important method used by statistical procedures, have been used widely to build up the GBCs of the elements in soils. The projects and studies focused on GBCs in Europe, the USA, and other countries were conducted. This work had found out the GBCs of HMs in soils and sediments. However, current research in GBCs for agricultural soils, especially in terms of HM contamination, is seriously lacking. Therefore, the characterization of GBCs in local soils has been a priority to assess the agricultural soil HM contamination (Tian et al. 2017).
This study is focused to characterize the GBCs of HMs in agricultural soils, to determine the pollution levels and potential ecological risks of HMs selected, and to discuss the sources of the HMs targeted.
2 Materials and methods
The place involved (approximately 60 km2) was located in the north of Huainan City (116° 21′ 21″ N~117° 11′ 59″ E, 32° 32′ 45″~33° 00′ 24″ N), Anhui Province, China. China is divided into North China and South China by the Qinling Mountains and Huai River. The study area, located at the south of Huai River, is part of the Jianghuai Hills zone. The GBCs of HMs in the soil from the Jianghuai Hills zone have not been studied yet. Geologically, it belongs to the Huainan terrace plain and the Huai River stratigraphic division zone. Shungeng Mountain appears in the northern part with the direction from the east to west. The area is completely covered by the Quaternary with the development from Archaeozoic to Mesozoic and Cenozoic. The thickness of loose layer is increased from the east and south to the west and north with the range of 0 m to 700 m, controlled by the paleotopography. Sedimentary facies change from the upper fluvial facies to the lacustrine facies. The vertical zoning of the aquifer is obvious with the transition from the upper HCO3-type fresh water to the deep Cl-Na-type water. The groundwater flows from the north and west to the south and east, which is basically consistent with the surface water flow. The climate is characterized by monsoon humid weather in temperate zone. On average, the annual temperature, rainfall, and humidity were 15.7 °C, 970 mm, and 76.9%, respectively. The study area is predominantly covered by paddy soil but also contains zones with brown-red and yellow-brown soils. In addition to the stone mining activity for Shungeng Mountain, over several decades during twentieth, this area was mainly subjected to intense agricultural activities, predominantly producing rice, wheat, and rapeseed. During the sampling process, 112 samples (20 cm depth) were obtained (Fig. 1). The sampling, sample preparation, and element determination were operated based on the method from Niu et al. (2015).
In this study, CFDCs were used to determine the GBCs of HMs. Specifically, a curve with decimal coordinates was plotted by arranging all the element concentrations on the X-axis and their corresponding cumulative frequency on the Y-axis. Generally, the curve had two inflections: the lower inflection point (the upper limit of natural origin concentrations) and the higher inflection point (the lower limit of abnormal concentrations). This indicated HM concentration was above background level, which may or may not be related to the anthropogenic activities (Matschullat et al. 2000; Karim et al. 2015). However, occasionally, an approximately linear curve was obtained, which means that the concentration data is within the baseline range. To determine the baseline value, a linear regression method described by Wei and Wen (2012) was employed, with modifications (i.e., p < 0.05 and R2 > 0.95 were used in this study instead of p < 0.05 and R2 > 0.90).
To evaluate soil pollution by the HMs selected, geo-accumulation indices (Igeo), single-factor pollution indices (PI), and the pollution load indices (PLI) are obtained using Eqs. (1) to (3), respectively:
where Ci is the soil content of element i, Bi is the geochemical background value (GBV) of i in local soil, and n is the number of HMs investigated. The levels of HM pollution classified based on Igeo and PLI are summarized in Table 1.
Potential ecological risk index (RI) was calculated by summing individual potential risk factor (Ei) using Eq. (4) (Ke et al. 2017; Liao et al. 2017; Tian et al. 2017)
where Ti is the biological toxicity factor of metal i (defined as Zn = 1, Ni = Pb = 5, Cr = 2, and Cd = 30) (Suresh et al. 2012). The ecological risk of HMs with respect to RI is listed in Table 1 (Ekere et al. 2017).
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Soil HMs
The following levels of HMs were detected in the soils: Ni = 0.45–61.10 mg/kg, Zn = 5.82–579.03 mg/kg, Pb = 0.16–70.95 mg/kg, and Cr = 1.10–132.17 mg/kg. Statistical analysis indicates that the datasets were normally distributed for Ni and Cr and log-normally distributed for Zn. Based on the average values, Zn (60.20 mg/kg) had the highest concentration followed by Cr (44.21 mg/kg), Ni (29.34 mg/kg), and Pb (24.02 mg/kg). The coefficient of variation value (CVV) is employed to show the variability degree of the soil concentrations of HMs: CVV < 20% with low variability, 20% ≤ CVV ≤ 50% with moderate variability, CVV > 50% with high variability, and CVV > 100% with exceptionally high variability (Xiao et al. 2015). In general, for HMs, the CVV governed by the anthropogenic sources is higher than that derived from the natural sources (Han et al. 2006; Guo et al. 2012; Karim et al. 2015).
The CVVs of HMs investigated were as follows: Zn (73%) > Cr (32%) > Pb (16%) > Ni (14%). As shown in Fig. 2, the highest contents of HMs selected, except for Cr, were found at a site near Shungeng Mountain. This is likely due to the previous stone mining activity. The highest Cr concentration appeared in the southeast, potentially from the discharge of vehicles from the He-Huai-Fu highway.
To comprehensively understand the HM pollution status of the agricultural soils investigated, we compare our result to the data from other regions of China (Table 2). In China, the HM concentrations in agricultural soils changed remarkably depending on sample site, ranging from 15.5 to 40.9 for Ni, from 42.2 to 414.0 for Zn, from 6.74 to 159.25 for Pb, and from 7.17 to 285.8 for Cr, respectively. The highest levels of Zn and Pb occurred in Zhuzhou, likely due to Pb-Zn mining activity that occurred in that area. Interregional comparisons show that Zn, Pb, and Cr in the soils had lower levels than those reported by the literature (p < 0.05, independent-samples t test), while across all the soils, Ni was similar (p > 0.05). However, HM concentrations varied remarkably within this region, indicating that due to the spatial variation of soil heterogeneity, HM concentrations in selected soils may not represent the actual pollution level. Therefore, it is almost impossible to evaluate HM soil pollution solely based on their concentrations, so geological background concentrations should be considered in risk assessment practices (Tian et al. 2017).
Pearson’s correlation analysis was conducted among the HMs selected (Table 3). In summary, there was no significant relationship between Zn, Pb, and Cr (p < 0.001). Therefore, the main sources of Zn, Pb, and Cr were different. However, Ni had a significantly positive correlation with the other three HMs (p < 0.001), indicating that Ni in the sampled soil came from at least three sources.
Principal component analysis (PCA) has also been employed by many studies to pursue the sources of trace element in the soils (Chabukdhara and Nema 2012; Cai et al. 2015). To supplement our analysis, the result of PCA is used to determine the sources of the HMs. The results of the PCA for the selected HMs are shown in Tables 4 and 5. The agricultural production was the only predominant activity, and there were almost no factories discharging the solid waste or wastewater containing HMs in this region. Moreover, the previous small-scale stone mining activity for Shungeng Mountain could only affect the accumulation of HMs in the soils near the mountain. However, there were several factories and coal-fired power plants with gas emissions not far away. In this regard, based on the result of PCA and the literatures, the sources of HMs in the region can be easily identified.
It is found that the first three principal components (PCs) could explain the 85.92% variance, according to their eigenvalues, which are over 1.0 after varimax. Moreover, the first two extracted factors had the eigenvalues of > 1, while the third gradually became > 1. The component matrix rotated indicates that Ni and Cr fell in F1, Pb in F2, and Zn in F3.
F1 (30.3% of the total variance) could be regarded as a lithogenic component, because the variabilities of Ni and Cr were likely to be governed by the parent materials (Sun et al. 2013). This result arose in consistency with the geostatistical analyses presented in Fig. 2, showing that in the study area, there was no significant anthropic contribution to Ni and Cr, based on their spatial distribution. The result is in accordance with the previous studies that parent materials, together with pedogenic processes, predominantly affect the distribution of Ni and Cr (Rodríguez et al. 2008), while anthropic contribution including fertilizers, manure, and limestone is typically limited (Facchinelli et al. 2001).
And, F2 explained the 29.3% variance. Pb is generally sourced from industrial fumes, vehicle exhaust, pesticides, and sewage sludge (Francouría et al. 2009; Lu et al. 2012). Usually, Pb, which is from car exhaust, cannot extend appreciably to the place 30 m away from the roadside (Smith 1976); therefore, vehicle discharge could not be considered a significant input in this area. However, the exhaust fumes can move over longer distance via wind action (Facchinelli et al. 2001), so atmospheric deposition could be one of the significant contributors to soil Pb enrichment (Davis et al. 2001). Considering the location of the study area, industrial fumes, coal-burning exhaust, and domestic waste are likely to be the most important contributors of soil Pb.
F3 (26.3% of the total variance) included Zn. Zn in the soils can be from lithogenic sources, with the forms of various soluble (e.g., nitrates and chlorides) and insoluble (e.g., sulfides, phosphates, carbonates, silicates) salts. In addition to the pedogenic processes, Zn enrichment is also close to the utilization of fertilizers containing Zn (Sun et al. 2013; Moreno-Jiménez et al. 2016). Hence, the concentrations of Zn found in the soils could be changed depending on the specific human activities. Forty-six percent of the samples had the Zn concentrations higher than the corresponding GBV (Niu et al. 2015), indicating that Zn was sourced from both the parent materials and applied fertilizers.
3.2 GBCs of selected HMs in soil
Due to anthropogenic influence, in recent practice, it has been impossible to obtain a natural background for elemental composition based on the pristine geochemical characteristics of soil. As a result, the geochemical baseline has been suggested as an alternative to use as a natural comparison (Karim et al. 2015). The GBCs of HMs selected were characterized and demonstrated in Fig. 3.
CDFCs of Zn, Pb, and Cr had only one inflection, respectively. Ni had no inflection, implying that concentrations of Ni in soil were not human induced. GBCs of HMs are presented in Tables 4 and 5. For the soil sampled, Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr had baseline concentrations of 29.34 mg/kg, 45.54 mg/kg, 21.81 mg/kg, and 33.65 mg/kg, respectively. A comparison of GBCs of selected HMs with respect to regional land use type is carried out and shown in Table 6. According to the literatures, the GBCs of Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr arose with the range of 18.7395.5 mg/kg, from 32.8 to 218.2 mg/kg, from 14.96 to 58.2 mg/kg, and from 12.9 to 340.7 mg/kg, respectively, depending on the regional land use type. Even in the same land type like agricultural soil, the GBCs in soils also varied greatly. Overall, the baseline value of Ni established for the present study is within the general range of 20–30 mg/kg reported by the literatures, suggesting that this value is comparable to the other values, whereas the GBCs of Zn, Pb, and Cr are generally smaller than those from the other regions. And, the variation of GBCs of Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr is in accordance with the change of their contents discussed above. This work suggests that regional GBCs for HMs towards specific land use type should be proposed in order to easily facilitate the identification of soil contamination and risk assessment. However, the LGBVs for these HMs were reported as 25.74 mg/kg for Ni, 80.81 mg/kg for Zn, 30.47 mg/kg for Pb, and 64.93 mg/kg for Cr (Niu et al. 2015). Thus, the GBCs derived are significantly lower than the LGBVs from the literature, indicating that ecological risk assessments based on the previously reported background values may underestimate risk. However, due to regional differences, these results of HM GBCs may not apply the different environments (Tables 4 and 5). Therefore, a more concerted effort needs to be made to determine if the GBCs for HMs can be applied across the different geographic regions so that we can accurately evaluate the risks from HMs to human and environmental health.
3.3 I geo of soil HMs
Igeo values of HMs were calculated and are given in Fig. 4. The Igeo of Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr ranged from − 4.58 to 0.33, from − 2.46 to 2.14, from − 5.32 to 0.77, and from − 3.83 to 0.96, respectively. All the mean Igeo values were lower than 0. Hence, most of the studied area had not been contaminated by Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr. However, some sampled areas were subjected to moderate HM contamination. It should be highlighted that Igeo just can show the accumulation degree of the HMs selected by comparing the contents obtained with GBCs whereas it cannot give the implication of ecological risk. As a result, the condition with small Igeo but high ecological risk is likely to arise as GBCs are high.
3.4 PLI and ecological risk of soil HMs
The PI values of Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr ranged from 0.02 to 2.08, from 0.13 to 12.71, from 0.01 to 3.25, and from 0.03 to 3.93, respectively (Table 7). Overall, Zn had the highest PI value followed by Cr and Pb and then Ni. The average PI values were mainly in the range of 1 and 2, suggesting that the study soil had been moderately polluted by individual elements. However, some areas in the region were subjected to high HM contamination (PI > 2) by Zn (11.7% of samples), Pb (9.3% of samples), and Cr (22.5% of samples). Ni PI values mainly remained < 1.0, meaning that Ni pollution had not taken place in the study area. The PLI of the site ranged from 0.08 to 2.45, with an average of 1.02. However, 49.6% of samples had the PLI values > 1.0, suggesting that the soil may have been moderately contaminated by HMs. Soil with higher PLI values was mostly sampled around the mountain, and most contamination was attributed to significant accumulation of Zn in soil. However, the PLI of this region was 0.87 with the elemental PLI of 0.84 for Ni, 0.98 for Zn, 0.80 for Pb, and 0.92 for Cr, which means that overall there was no pollution by HMs.
RI is employed commonly to find out the ecological risks of trace element. As shown in Fig. 4, all the samples had the RI values less than 150, indicating a low potential ecological risk from the HMs, and the HMs, despite the huge amount of fertilizers and pesticides, had been used in agricultural practices.
4 Conclusions
In the region investigated, the concentrations of Zn, Pb, and Cr were generally lower than those reported by the literature. The GBCs of Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr were 29.34 mg/kg, 45.54 mg/kg, 21.81 mg/kg, and 33.65 mg/kg, respectively. The Igeo values indicated that most of the study area was not contaminated by the elements selected, the PLI values suggested a moderate HM contamination, but the RI values indicated a low potential ecological risk. Therefore, the variation between these different risk evaluation methods should be further investigated. Moreover, further study towards the depth profile of GBCs of HMs should also be carried out in pursuing the contamination levels, sources, and ecological risk of this region well in the future. Ni and Cr appeared in the soils mainly from the parent materials. Industrial fume and coal burning exhaust were likely the significant sources of Pb. Zn was sourced not only from the parent material (pedagogic processes) but also from the fertilizer application. For environmental risk assessment, we commonly assume that the reference soil used in HM characterization has not been influenced by human activity. Indeed, as it has been impossible to obtain a natural soil (with quantified GBCs), the commonly used HM background values are obtained via characterization of sample soil from a reference site. However, in this study, we have established that this practice may be resulting in underestimation of HM soil contamination and thus underestimating the risk HMs are currently posing to human and environmental health. Therefore, it is urgent to establish GBCs for agricultural soils at the regional scale, to enhance ecological risk management practices, and to improve regulatory controls.
References
Burges A, Epelde L, Garbisu C (2015) Impact of repeated single-metal and multi-metal pollution events on soil quality. Chemosphere 120:8–15
Cai L, Xu Z, Bao P et al (2015) Multivariate and geostatistical analyses of the spatial distribution and source of arsenic and heavy metals in the agricultural soils in Shunde, Southeast China. J Environ Manag 148:189–195
Chabukdhara M, Nema AK (2012) Assessment of heavy metal contamination in hindon river sediments: a chemometric and geochemical approach. Chemosphere 87(8):945–953
Chen F, Pu LJ (2007) Relationship between heavy metals and basic properties of agricultural soils in Kunshan County. Soils 39:291–296
Chen HF, Li Y, Wu HX, Li F (2013) Characteristics and risk assessment of heavy metals pollution of farmland soils relative to type of land use. J Ecol Rural Environ 29:164–169
Chen P, Wang Y, Zhang M (2014) Investigation and analysis of heavy metal pollution in the agricultural soils of Pingdingshan. Heilongjiang Sci Technol Inform 44(12):18–19
Chen Y, Zhou J, Xing L, Feng Y, Hang X, Wang H (2015) Characteristics of heavy metals and phosphorus in farmland of Hailun City, Heilongjiang Province. Soils 47(5):965–972
Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Ni S (2001) Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff from specific sources. Chemosphere 44(5):997–1009
Ding H (2018) Study on the geochemical baseline value of heavy metals in farmland of Jinchang Suburb. Environ Res Monit 31(2):1–5 (in Chinese)
Dou L, Zhou Y, Ma J, Li Y, Cheng Q, Xie S et al (2008) Using multivariate statistical and geostatistical methods to identify spatial variability of trace elements in agricultural soils in Dongguan City, Guangdong, China. J China Univ Geosci 19(4):343–353
Du P, Xie Y, Wang S, Zhao H, Zhang Z, Wu B, Li F (2015) Potential sources of and ecological risks from heavy metals in agricultural soils, Daye City, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(5):3498–3507
Ekere N, Yakubu N, Ihedioha J (2017) Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of rivers Niger and Benue confluence, Lokoja, Central Nigeria. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(23):18966–18978
Facchinelli A, Sacchi E, Mallen L (2001) Multivariate statistical and gis-based approach to identify heavy metal sources in soils. Environ Pollut 114(3):313–324
Fan K, Wei C, Yang X (2014) Geochemical baseline of heavy metals in the soils of Qiaokou Town, Changsha City and its application. Acta Sci Circumst 32(12):3066–3083
Fan Y, Zhu T, Li M, He J, Huang R (2017) Heavy metal contamination in soil and brown rice and human health risk assessment near three mining areas in Central China. J Health Eng 2017:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4124302
Francouría A, Lópezmateo C, Roca E, Fernándezmarcos ML (2009) Source identification of heavy metals in pastureland by multivariate analysis in NW Spain. J Hazard Mater 165(1):1008–1015
Gałuszka A (2007) A review of geochemical background concepts and an example using data from Poland. Environ Geol 52(5):861–870
Garnett T (2014) Three perspectives on sustainable food security: efficiency, demand restraint, food system transformation. What role for life cycle assessment? J Clean Prod 73:10–18
Gong WH, Wang ZQ, Wei YU, Gao Y, Wang HG (2014) Content and evaluation of heavy metals in farmland soil of Nantong. Heilongjiang Agric Sci 10:34–39
Guo G, Wu F, Xie F, Zhang R (2012) Spatial distribution and pollution assessment of heavy metals in urban soils from Southwest China. J Environ Sci 24:410–418
Han YM, Du PX, Cao JJ, Posmentier ES (2006) Multivariate analysis of heavy metal contamination in urban dusts of Xi’an, Central China. Sci Total Environ 355:176–186
He K, Sun Z, Hu Y, Zeng X, Yu Z, Cheng H (2017) Comparison of soil heavy metal pollution caused by e-waste recycling activities and traditional industrial operations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(10):1–12
Huang SS, Liao QL, Hua M, Wu XM, Bi KS, Yan CY, Chen B, Zhang XY (2007) Survey of heavy metal pollution and assessment of agricultural soil in Yangzhong District, Jiangsu Province, China. Chemosphere 67(11):2148–2155
Jarva J, Ottesen R, Tarvainen T (2014) Geochemical studies on urban soil from two sampling depths in Tampere Central Region, Finland. Environ Earth Sci 71(11):4783–4799
Karim Z, Qureshi BA, Mumtaz M (2015) Geochemical baseline determination and pollution assessment of heavy metals in urban soils of Karachi, Pakistan. Ecol Indic 48:358–364
Ke X, Gui S, Huang H, Zhang H, Wang C, Guo W (2017) Ecological risk assessment and source identification for heavy metals in surface sediment from the Liaohe River protected area, China. Chemosphere 175:473–481
Lawal NS, Agbo O, Usman A (2017) Health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil, irrigation water and vegetables grown around Kubanni River, Nigeria. J Phys Sci 28(1):49–59
Levitan D, Schreiber M, Seal II R, Bodnar R, Aylor Jr JG (2014) Developing protocols for geochemical baseline studies: an example from the Coles Hill uranium deposit, Virginia, USA. Appl Geoche 43:88–100
Li C (2010) Heavy metal from farmland of Shenyang. Environ Prot Recy Ecom 30(9):56–58
Li L, Chen W (2014) An evaluation of soil lead and cadmium content in rural areas of Bazhong City. J Henan Norm U (Nat Sci Edit) 42(4):91–95
Li X, Chen X (2016) Characteristics of heavy metals pollution and health risk assessment in farmland soil of Zhuzhou. J Guilin Univ Technol 36(3):545–549
Li Y, Li J (2012) Research on soil environmental quality of Jiamusi City. Journal of Environmental Management College of China 22(6):15–18
Li Y, Gou X, Wang G, Zhang Q, Su Q, Xiao G (2008) Heavy metal contamination and source in arid agricultural soils in Central Gansu Province, China. J Environ Sci-China 20:607–612
Li J, Lu Y, Yin W, Gan H, Zhang C, Deng X, Lian J (2009) Distribution of heavy metals in agricultural soils near a petrochemical complex in Guangzhou, China. Environ Monit Assess 153(1):365–375
Li R, Hao Y, Li G, Jiang Y, Zhang H, Han X (2011) Characteristics and sources analysis of soil heavy metal pollution in Taian City, Shandong, China. J Agro-Environ Sci 30(10):2012–2017
Li A, Shi Z, Ni S (2012) Geochemical baseline and pollution evaluation of heavy metals in soils of Longtan Town, Zigong City. Comput Tech Geophy Geochem Explor 34(4):470–474
Li H, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Mao Q, Yang Y, Huang H, Liu Z, Peng Q, Luo L (2018) Effects of red mud based passivator on the transformation of Cd fraction in acidic Cd-polluted paddy soil and Cd absorption in rice. Sci Total Environ 640-641:736–745
Liao J, Ru X, Xie B, Zhang W, Wu H, Wu C, Wei C (2017) Multi-phase distribution and comprehensive ecological risk assessment of heavy metal pollutants in a river affected by acid mine drainage. Ecotox Environ Safe 141:75–84
Liu WH, Zhao JZ, Ouyang ZY, Söderlund L, Liu GH (2005) Impacts of sewage irrigation on heavy metal distribution and contamination in Beijing, China. Environ Int 31(6):805–812
Liu C, Shang Y, Yin G (2006a) Primary study on heavy metals pollution in farm soil of Chengdu City. Trace Elem Sci Guangdong 13(3):41–45
Liu H, Han B, Hao D (2006b) Evaluation to heavy metals pollution in agricultural soils in northern suburb of Xuzhou City. Chin J Eco-Agr 14:159–161
Liu Q, Wang J, Shi Y, Zhang Y, Wang Q (2006c) Heavy metal pollution in cropland soil in Cixi City of Zhejiang Province. J Agro-environ Sci 26(2):639–644
Liu WX, Shen LF, Liu JW, Wang YW, Li SR (2007) Uptake of toxic heavy metals by rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivated in the agricultural soil near Zhengzhou City, People’s Republic of China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 79(2):209–213
Liu X, Song Q, Tang Y et al (2013) Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil–vegetable system: a multi-medium analysis. Sci Total Environ 463:530–540
Liu Y, Wang H, Li XT, Li JC (2015) Heavy metal contamination of agricultural soils in Taiyuan, China. Pedosphere 25(6):901–909
Lu A, Wang J, Qin X, Wang K, Han P, Zhang S (2012) Multivariate and geostatistical analyses of the spatial distribution and origin of heavy metals in the agricultural soils in Shunyi, Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ 425(1):66–74
Lu X, Kang Z, Gu A, Zhang Y (2018) Environmental geochemical baseline of soil metallic elements in agricultural soil. Adv Geosci 8(4):811–819
Marrugo-Negrete J, Pinedo-Hernández J, Díez S (2017) Assessment of heavy metal pollution, spatial distribution and origin in agricultural soils along the Sinú River Basin, Colombia. Environ Res 154:380–388
Matschullat J, Ottenstein R, Reimann C (2000) Geochemical background—can we calculate it? Environ Geol 39(9):990–1000
Meng F, Liu M, Cui J (2008) Spatial distribution of heavy metals in agricultural soils of Shanghai. Acta Pedol Sin 45(4):725–728
Micó C, Peris M, Recatalá L, Sánchez J (2007) Baseline values for heavy metals in agricultural soils in an european mediterranean region. Sci Total Environ 378(1–2):13–17
Moreno-Jiménez E, Fernández JM, Puschenreiter M, Williams PN, Plaza C (2016) Availability and transfer to grain of As, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in a barley agri-system: impact of biochar, organic and mineral fertilizers. Agric Ecosyst Environ 219:171–178
Niu S, Gao L, Zhao J (2015) Risk analysis of metals in soil from a restored coal mining area. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 95(2):183–187
Qiu L, Liu M, Liu Y, Chen H, Lan S, Li Q (2017) Investigation and analysis of heavy metal pollution in the soil of vegetable cropland in Jiangmen. Guangdong Chem Industry 44(12):18–19
Rodríguez JA, Nanos N, Grau JM, Gil L, López-Arias M (2008) Multiscale analysis of heavy metal contents in Spanish agricultural topsoils. Chemosphere 70(6):1085–1096
Shao D, Zhan Y, Zhou W, Zhu L (2016) Current status and temporal trend of heavy metals in farmland soil of the Yangtze River Delta region: field survey and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut 219:329–336
Shen JW, Xu JK, Liu JG, Wang MX, Chai YH (2010) Study on heavy metal pollution in agricultural soils of Suzhou. Environ Sci Technol (China) 33(12):87–93
Singh A, Prasad SM (2015) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated ecosystem: an overview on technology advancement. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(1):353–366
Smith WH (1976) Lead contamination of the roadside ecosystem. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 26(8):753–766
Song Z (2008) Farmland soil heavy metal pollution and its bioremediation countermeasures at Zhangzhou. Fujian Sci Technol Tropical Crops 33(3):34–36
Sun C, Liu J, Wang Y, Sun L, Yu H (2013) Multivariate and geostatistical analyses of the spatial distribution and sources of heavy metals in agricultural soil in Dehui, Northeast China. Chemosphere 92(5):517–523
Suresh G, Sutharsan P, Ramasamy V, Venkatachalapathy R (2012) Assessment of spatial distribution and potential ecological risk of the heavy metals in relation to granulometric contents of Veeranam lake sediments, India. Ecotox Environ Safe 84:117–124
Teng Y, Ni S, Tuo X, Zhang C, Ma Y (2002) Geochemical baseline and trace metal pollution of soil in Panzhihua mining area. Chin J Geochem 21(3):274–281
Teng Y, Ni S, Wang J, Niu L (2009) Geochemical baseline of trace elements in the sediment in Dexing area, South China. Environ Geol 57(7):1649–1660
Tian K, Huang B, Xing Z, Hu W (2017) Geochemical baseline establishment and ecological risk evaluation of heavy metals in greenhouse soils from Dongtai, China. Ecol Indic 72:510–520
Tilman D, Clark M (2015) Food, agriculture & the environment: can we feed the world & save the earth? Daedalus 144(4):8–23
de Vries FT, Thébault E, Liiri M et al (2013) Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(35):14296–14301
Wang B, Wang Y, Li D, Gao Y, Mao R (2006) Spatial variability of farmland heavy metals contents in Qianan City. J Appl Ecol 17(8):1495–1500
Wei C (2009) Study on the conditions of heavy metal contamination of basic farmland soil of Huangshi City. Environ Sci Manag 34(2):80–83
Wei C, Wen H (2012) Geochemical baselines of heavy metals in the sediments of two large freshwater lakes in China: implications for contamination character and history. Environ Geochem Health 34:737–748
Wongsasuluk P, Chotpantarat S, Siriwong W, Robson M (2014) Heavy metal contamination and human health risk assessment in drinking water from shallow groundwater wells in an agricultural area in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand. Environ Geochem Health 36(1):169–182
Wu H (2016) Geochemical baseline concentrations and risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soils of Qintan District, Gugang City. South Land Resources 10:34–36 (in Chinese)
Wu F, Chen L, Yi T, Yang Z, Chen Y (2018) Determination of heavy metal baseline values and analysis of its accumulation characteristics in agricultural land in Chongqing. Environ Sci 11:1–16 (in Chinese)
Xiao Q, Zong Y, Lu S (2015) Assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risk in urban soils of steel industrial city (Anshan), Liaoning, Northeast China. Ecotox Environ Safe 120:377–385
Xu L, Li Y, Su Q, Wu J, Xiong X, Song B, Zheng GD, Chen YC (2007) Contents and spatial distribution patterns of heavy metals in ffarmland soils of Fuxin City. Chin J Appl Ecol 18(7):1510–1517
Yang P, Mao R, Shao H, Gao Y (2009) The spatial variability of heavy metal distribution in the suburban farmland of Taihang Piedmont Plain, China. CR Biol 332(6):558–566
Yang Y, Christakos G, Guo M, Xiao L, Huang W (2017) Space-time quantitative source apportionment of soil heavy metal concentration increments. Environ Pollut 223:560–566
Yu L, Cheng J, Zhan J, Jiang A (2016) Environmental quality and sources of heavy metals in the topsoil based on multivariate statistical analyses: a case study in Laiwu City, Shandong Province, China. Nat Hazards 81(3):1435–1445
Zakir H, Arafat M, Isl M (2017) Assessment of metallic pollution along with geochemical baseline of soils at Barapukuria open coal mine area in Dinajpur, Bangladesh. Asian J Water Environ Pollut 14(4):77–88
Zha X, Zhang W, Yi H, Wang J, Muhetaer T, Jia M (2016) Research on characteristics of agricultural soil heavy metal pollution evaluation in Kashgar. Hubei Agr Sci 55(15):3891–3896
Zhang S, Yang D, Li F, Chen H, Bao Z, Huang B, Zou D, Yang J (2014) Determination of regional soil geochemical baselines for trace metals with principal component regression: a case study in the Jianghan Plain, China. Appl Geochem 48:193–206
Zhao X (2014) Investigation of heavy metals pollution of farmland soil in Xiangyang City, Hubei Province. J Green Sci Technol 2:207–209
Zhao Y, Shi X, Huang B et al (2007a) Spatial distribution of heavy metals in agricultural soils of an industry-based peri-urban area in Wuxi, China. Pedosphere 17:44–51
Zhao Z, Rate AW, Tang S, Bi H (2007b) Characteristics of heavy metal distribution in agricultural soils of Hainan Island and its environment significances. J Agro-Environ Sci 27(1):182–187
Zheng G (2008) Investigation and assessment on heavy metal pollution of farming soil in the Jinghe River Basin. Arid Zone Res 25:627–630
Zhou J, Wang F, Lou Y, Jin S (2016) Investigation on heavy metal pollution in agricultural soils of Ningbo. J Zhejiang Agr Sci 57(8):1301–1303
Zhou Y, Liu X, Xiang Y et al (2017) Modification of biochar derived from sawdust and its application in removal of tetracycline and copper from aqueous solution: adsorption mechanism and modelling. Bioresour Technol 245(Pt A):266–273
Zhou Y, He Y, Xiang Y, Meng S, Liu X, Yu J, Yang J, Zhang J, Qin P, Luo L (2019) Single and simultaneous adsorption of pefloxacin and Cu(II) ions from aqueous solutions by oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube. Sci Total Environ 646:29–36
Zhu X, Yang Z (2014) Analysis and prevention of heavy metal pollution in farmland soil in Zhangye. Environ Stud Monit 27(4):9–12
Acknowledgements
The farmers provided us with the basic information of studied area and issued the permission to conduct the sampling in the land. The authors are grateful for the support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Responsible editor: Daniel C. W. Tsang
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niu, S., Gao, L. & Wang, X. Characterization of contamination levels of heavy metals in agricultural soils using geochemical baseline concentrations. J Soils Sediments 19, 1697–1707 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2190-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2190-1