Abstract
The release of untreated dye textile wastewater into receiving streams is unacceptable not only for aesthetic reasons and its negative impacts on aquatic life but also because numerous dyes are toxic and carcinogenic to humans. Strategies, as of now, used for treating textile wastewaters have technical and economical restrictions. The greater part of the physico-chemical methods, which are used to treat this kind of wastewater, are costly, produce large amounts of sludge and are wasteful concerning some soluble dyes. In contrast, biological treatments such as constructed wetlands are cheaper than the traditional methods, environmental friendly and do not produce large amounts of sludge. Synthetic wastewater containing Acid Blue 113 (AB113) and Basic Red 46 (BR46) has been added to laboratory-scale vertical-flow construction wetland systems, which have been planted with Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (common reed). The concentrations 7 and 208 mg/l were applied for each dye at the hydraulic contact times of 48 and 96 h. Concerning the low concentrations of BR46 and AB113, the unplanted wetlands are associated with significant (ρ < 0.05) reduction performances, if compared with planted wetlands concerning the removal of dyes. For the high concentrations of AB113, BR46 and a mixture of both of them, wetlands with long contact times were significantly (ρ < 0.05) better than wetlands that had short contact times in terms of dye, colour and chemical oxygen demand reductions. Regarding nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), the reduction percentage rates of AB113, BR46 and a mixture dye of both of them were between 85 and 100%. For low and high inflow dye concentrations, best removals were generally recorded for spring and summer, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Textile dyeing processes are one of the most environmental-unfriendly industrial processes, because the reagents used are very rich in chemical compounds comprising both inorganic and organic products (Juang et al. 1996; Robinson et al. 2001). Furthermore, the presence of colour in the effluent textile wastewater is one of the most important problems. Sultana (2014) stated that coloured wastewaters, produced from dyeing processes, are heavily polluted with chemicals, textile auxiliaries and dyes. The properties of textile wastewater depend on the production, technology and chemicals used (Wang et al. 2011).
Textile industries devour gigantic amounts of water and generate vast volumes of wastewater through different steps in the dyeing and finishing processes, and the discharged wastewater is an overwhelming blend of various polluting substances such as organic, inorganic, elemental and polymeric products (Babu et al. 2007; Kant 2012). Dye wastes are the most dominating materials in textile wastewater, and these materials are often toxic to the biological world as well as the dark colour of some of these materials blocking sunlight, which causes acute problems in biological communities (Ratna and Padhi 2012; Dey and Islam 2015).
The use of constructed wetlands in azo textile dye wastewater treatment is still at an experimental stage (Nawab et al. 2016). Although many researchers investigated the performance of constructed wetlands to treat textile wastewater in terms of dye, chemical oxygen demand (COD), phosphorus and nitrogen reductions, all corresponding results related to short-term operation and the data rarely covered all seasons (Table 1).
Two azo textile dyes [Acid Blue 113 (AB113) and Basic Red 46 (BR46)] were selected in this research with two different concentrations: low with a target concentration of 5 mg/l and high with a target concentration of 200 mg/l. Typically, textile industry-processing effluents contain dyes in the range between 10 and 200 mg/l (Lavanya et al. 2014). Most textile dyes can be detected at a rather low concentration of even < 1 mg/l by the human eye (Chung 1983; Lavanya et al. 2014; Pandey et al. 2007). Furthermore, Van der Zee (2002) stated that algal growth was not inhibited at dye concentrations < 1 mg/l. Both of which are commercial dyes, which are extensively used in the textile industry (Chung et al. 1992; Riu et al. 1997; Pervez et al. 1999; Olgun and Atar 2009; Ong et al. 2010; Deniz and Karaman 2011; Deniz and Saygideger 2011). AB113 is an acid dye, and BR46 is a basic dye. An acid dye is defined as a negatively charged dye at a chemical level, which contains one or more acidic groups such as a sulfonic group (Akbari et al. 2002; Martínez-Huitle and Brillas 2009). A basic dye is defined as a positively charged stain at a chemical level (Martínez-Huitle and Brillas 2009; Brillas and Martínez-Huitle 2015), which means it reacts well with negatively charged materials (Sun and Yang 2003).
The aim of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of vertical-flow constructed wetlands in reducing azo textile dyes contaminated with artificial wastewater, aromatic amines and other water quality variables including COD and ortho-phosphate-phosphorus (PO4-P). The corresponding objectives are to assess (a) the role of plants in reducing azo textiles within artificial wastewater, (b) the influence of the mixture of both of these two dyes on the performance of vertical-flow constructed wetlands, (c) the ability of this type of constructed wetland to reduce aromatic amines and (d) the influence of seasonal variation and operational parameters such as resting and contact times on dye reduction.
Materials and methods
Wetland set-up and operation
The research has been performed between 1 June 2016 and 31 May 2017. This system has been used for treating azo textile dye wastewater since 1 May 2015 (Hussein and Scholz 2017). The constructed wetlands have been located within a university greenhouse (Supplementary Material 1) and operated to treat artificial wastewater treating two azo textile dyes. The rig consisted of 18 vertical-flow constructed wetlands. Wastewater drained vertically to enhance aerobic biodegradation of nitrogen and organic matter (Fuchs 2009). The experiment evaluates the wetland performance by simulating processes occurring within large-scale reed beds. The filters were located at random within the system set-up. Resting and contact times as well as hydraulic loading rate impacts on dye removal were evaluated. The period of time when a wetland is empty (no liquid inside) is known as resting time, while contact time is known as the duration of the wastewater when it is in touch with the aggregates and/or plants in the system.
In this study, artificial wastewater containing two azo dyes (BR46 and AB113) was assessed at the concentrations of 7 and 208 mg/l for the contact times of 48 and 94 h with respect to their impact on the constructed wetland performance. All artificial wastewater chemicals (Wießner et al. 2005; Ong et al. 2009) were bought from the Scientific Laboratory Supplies (Wilford Industrial Estate, Wilford, Nottingham, UK). Details of each dye and the composition of artificial wastewater including its chemical concentrations used in the experimental work are shown in Supplementary Material S1 and Table 2, respectively. BR46 has a maximum absorbance (λ max) of 530 nm (Khataee 2009) and was sourced from DyStar (Am Prime Park, Raunheim, Germany). AB113 had a λ max of 566 nm (Shirzad-Siboni et al. 2014) and was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (The Old Brickyard, New Road Gillingham, Dorset, UK). Both dyes were used without further purification. The wavelength for the maximum absorbance of the dye mixture had been determined experimentally by using a WPA Biowave II Spectrophotometer (Biochrom, Cambourne Business Park, Cambourne, Cambridge, UK). At first, λ max of the mixed dye was determined by scanning the absorption of different dye mixture concentrations for wavelengths between 300 and 800 nm. The λ max for the mixed dye was found to be 511 nm.
Plastic drainage pipes were used for wetland construction (Supplementary Material 1). All 18 wetlands had heights of 100 cm and diameters of 10 cm. All wetlands were filled to 90 cm with washed gravel, applying two layers of aggregates. Large gravel (diameter; 10–20 mm) was used at the bottom, preventing clogging. Pea gravel (diameter; 5–10 mm) was at the top of each wetland. The outlet valves were at the centre of the bottom plate of each filter.
All wetlands contained Phragmites australis, which was monitored for health and growth. Dead plants were cut to about 13 cm in terms of height. The corresponding cuttings were recycled within the filters.
The aquatic fertiliser TNC Complete was purchased from TNC Limited (Spotland Bridge Mill, Mellor Street, Rochdale, UK) and applied in the experimental research as a nutrient for the plants and microorganisms. The associated key ingredients were phosphorus (0.2%), nitrogen (1.5%), iron (0.08%), manganese (0.018%), potassium (5%), magnesium (0.08%), copper (0.002%), molybdenum (0.001%), boron (0.01%) and zinc (0.01%). TNC Complete also provides ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) that is a source of the elements copper, iron, manganese and zinc. One millilitre of fertiliser was added to 10 l of tap water.
The packing order of the experimental constructed wetland set-up treating artificial wastewater containing two azo textile dyes is shown in Table 3. All wetlands were filled with the same washed gravel.
Analytical methods and equipment
Measurement of physical parameters
The physical parameters included dye concentration, colour, total suspended solids (TSS), dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity, pH, redox potential, electric conductivity (EC) and temperature. Dye concentration, colour and TSS were measured by the spectrophotometer Hach Lange DR2800 (Pacific Way, Salford, UK). Dye concentrations were quantified through a selective wavelength at maximum absorbance for each dye. Colour was measured using a unit Pt/Co scale. The TSS were measured in milligrams/litre. Samples were filtered by using Whatman grade 1 qualitative filter paper (standard grade; circle, 320 mm), which was bought from the Scientific Laboratory Supplies (Wilford Industrial Estate, Wilford, Nottingham, UK).
The DO was estimated using a Hach Lange HQ30D Flexi Meter (Pacific Way, Salford, UK) promptly after taking samples. Turbidity (NTU) was measured by using a TurbiCheck Portable Turbidity Meter (Lovibond Water Testing, Tintometer Group, Division Street, Chicago, IL, USA). The pH (−) and redox potential (mV) were determined by applying a portable WTW VARIO pH meter (Wissenschaftlich-Technische Werkstätten, Weilheim, Germany). The equipment was calibrated with standardised buffer solutions of pH 4, 7 and 9, whenever required. The acceptable range of pH is from 6.5 to 9 (Boyd and Gautier 2000).
The EC (μS/cm) was determined applying a portable Mettler Toledo Education Line Conductivity Meter (Boston Road, Leicester, UK). Although EC itself is not of aquatic or human health concern, its value gives an indication, if there is any other water quality problem. A sudden increase in EC values indicates that there is a source of dissolved ions in the wetland filter (Kumar and Chopra 2012). Furthermore, the site temperature was noted each day, applying a thermometer which was located alongside the wetland filters.
Measurement of chemical parameters
The chemical parameters included COD, ammonia nitrogen (NH4-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), PO4-P and amines. The spectrophotometer Hach Lange DR2800 was applied for the water quality analysis for parameters such as COD, PO4-P, NO3-N and ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) with milligrams per litre (mg/l) as a unit. The aromatic amines were measured as absorbance by using a WPA Biowave II UV/visible spectrophotometers (Cambourne, Cambridge, UK). Specific wavelengths for the absorbance of every type of aromatic amine exist. Also, samples were filtered by using a specific filter paper (Whatman grade 1 qualitative filter paper, standard grade, circle, 320 mm). The water quality analysis was performed according to APHA (1995), if not clarified otherwise. Liquid samples were taken between 10:00 and 11:00 a.m.
The Shapiro-Wilk test (Shapiro and Wilk 1965; Razali and Wah 2011) was applied to judge data normality. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was performed with the help of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software to analyse normally distributed data. The Mann-Whitney test was applied to evaluate non-normal data (Stoline 1981; Kasuya 2001). The ANOVA and Mann-Whitney tests compared averages between various treatments (e.g. Table 4).
Results and discussion
Test of normality for plant and liquid samples
Test of normality findings concerning the dimensions of P. australis and effluent water quality variables is shown in Supplementary Material S3.
Plant growth assessment
Plants became yellow in winter. Dead plant parts were cut and recycled within the wetlands (Stefanakis et al. 2014). Plants subjected to the dye AB113 developed well compared to those linked to BR46. Plants for systems with long contact time grew better than those plants associated with short time (Table 5). These findings support similar ones by Pagter et al. (2005).
Regarding plant growth, there was a significant (ρ < 0.05) difference concerning the length and diameter at low and high AB113 concentrations (wetlands 3, 9, 13 and 17). Concerning plant growth at the presence of BR46, significant (p < 0.05) differences for the length and diameter at the low dye concentrations were recorded (wetlands 5 and 7). No significance (p > 0.05) for either parameter was noted for the high dye concentrations (wetlands 11 and 15). In case of the mixed dye, there was no significant (p > 0.05) difference regarding the length at the low and high dye concentrations (wetlands 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18). While with respect to the plant diameter, there was no significant (p > 0.05) difference for wetlands 12 and 14 (high concentration).
Redox potential and dissolved oxygen
Redox potentials above 100 mV are linked to aerobic environments. In comparison, values below − 100 mV highlight anaerobic boundary conditions (Suthersan 2001). The DO is an important parameter in constructed wetlands, since it is essential for aerobic respiration for microorganisms and it regulates the oxidation-redox potential in wastewater (Boyd 2000). Wu et al. (2011b) and Hou et al. (2016) highlighted that the main pathways for oxygen transfer in constructed wetlands such as the system in this research (tidal flow) are wetland macrophytes releasing oxygen via their roots, contact transfer at the interface of biofilm and atmosphere and DO associated with influent wastewater. In case of low concentration, redox potential values (Table 6) for the effluent of BR46, AB113 and the mixture of both of them were in the range between − 34 and − 64 mV, and for the effluent high concentrations, the values were in the range between − 56 and − 95 mV. These results show dye degradation, regardless of aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Regarding DO for both dyes (BR46 and AB113), the lowest effluent values (Table 6) were noted for planted wetlands 5 and 3 (low resting and high contact times of 2.97 and 3.37 mg/l, respectively) when compared with the unplanted wetlands 1 and 2 and planted wetlands 7 and 9 (high resting time and low contact time), respectively. Concerning the mixture between the two dyes, the value of DO for wetlands 4 and 6 (low resting and high contact times) was lower than that for wetlands 8 and 10 (high resting and low contact times) as a result of the higher contact time leading to consumption of more DO by the microbial community. The same findings for the DO between wetlands 11 and 13 and wetland 12 (low resting and contact times) and between wetlands 15 and 17 and wetland 16 (high resting and contact times) concerning a high concentration for BR46, AB113 and the mixture between them were noted. The result was opposite between wetlands 14 (low resting time and low contact time) and 18 (high resting time and high contact time). Furthermore, in the case of low and high concentrations of the two dyes and the mixture of both of them during spring time, wetlands with higher resting time started to consume more DO when compared to wetlands with lower resting time, because the increase in aerobic microorganisms was greater than that of the anaerobic ones.
Conductivity, suspended solids and turbidity
The EC is commonly applied as an indicator for ion-carrying species (Islam et al. 2011), and corresponding EC values may be used as an indicator for other water quality challenges. Any sudden increase in EC value indicates that there is a source of dissolved ions in the wetland filter (Kumar and Chopra 2012). In comparison, all effluent values for all wetlands in cases of low and high concentrations for both dyes and the dye mixture were compliant with the national effluent discharge quality standards set by the Government of Bangladesh, which stated that the maximum effluent of EC for inland surface water, public sewer secondary treatment plants and irrigated land is 1200 μS/cm (Ahmed et al. 2002). Furthermore, the Sri Lanka Central Environmental Authority (2008) stated that the maximum EC discharge on land for irrigation purpose is 2250 μS/cm. Reference to standards set on the Indian sub-continent is made here, because corresponding countries produce most of the dye wastewater being discharged to the environment.
Concerning the low concentration of BR46 and AB113 (Table 6), a higher elevation was found in planted wetlands 5 and 3 (contact time 94 h), respectively, when compared to the unplanted control wetlands 1 and 2 (contact time 94 h), respectively, while a decrease in EC effluent values was found in wetlands 7 and 9 (contact time 48 h), respectively. For the high concentration for both dyes (BR46 and AB113), the EC effluent values for all wetlands were less than the influent values. Furthermore, wetlands 15 and 17 (long resting and contact times) had EC values less than wetlands 11 and 13 (low resting time and low contact time), respectively. Regarding the dye mixture for both low and high concentrations, all effluent values were less than the influent ones as shown in Table 6. Nevertheless, all previous results indicated no sudden increase in EC values for all wetlands.
The measurement of the conventional pollutant TSS is essential for water treatment works design (Dzurik 2003; Bell et al. 2011). Concerning low concentrations of BR46 and AB113, there were increases in TSS effluent for all wetlands when compared to the influent as shown in Table 6. A lower increase was found in the planted wetlands 7 and 9 (high resting and low contact times) when compared with the unplanted wetlands 1 and 2 and the planted wetlands 5 and 3 (low resting and high contact times), respectively. For the mixture of both dyes, a slight increase of TSS was found for wetland 4, while a decrease was recorded for wetlands 6, 8 and 10. In case of high concentrations for both dyes (BR46 and AB113) and the mixture of the two dyes, a good TSS reduction was recorded for all wetlands as shown in Table 6. Wetlands with high resting and contact times had a lower TSS effluent concentrations, when compared with wetlands, which have low resting and contact times.
All wetland effluents of low and high concentrations of BR46, AB113 and the mixture of both dyes (Table 6) were compliant with the national effluent discharge quality standards set by the Government of Bangladesh, which stated that the maximum TSS effluent concentrations for inland surface water, public sewer secondary treatment plant outflow and irrigated land application are 150, 500 and 200 mg/l, respectively (Ahmed et al. 2002).
A high turbidity of surface water may indicate cloudiness due to elevated concentrations of TSS (Postolache et al. 2007). A higher turbidity value can also increase the temperature of surface water as a result of increased absorption of heat from sunlight, as well as leading to reduced light penetration, which affects photosynthesis (Håkanson 2006).
For the low concentration of the dye BR46, there was an increase in all effluent wetlands when compared with the influents. The planted wetland 7 (high resting and low contact times) has a smaller increase when compared with the unplanted wetland 1 and the planted wetland 5 (low resting and high contact times). In case of dye AB113, a slight increase was recorded for the mean value of the planted wetland 3 (low resting time and high contact time), while a slight decrease was noted for the unplanted wetland 2 (low resting and high contact times) and the planted wetland 9 (high resting time and low contact time). For the mixture of the two dyes, an increase was recorded in wetlands 4 and 6 (low resting time and high contact time), while a decrease was noted in wetlands 8 and 10 (high resting time and low contact time). Regarding the high concentrations of BR46, AB113 and the mixture of these two dyes, all wetlands had a good effluent reduction when compared with the influent. Wetlands 15, 17, 16 and 18 (high resting and contact times) had a greater reduction when compared with wetlands 11, 13, 12 and 14 (low resting and contact times), respectively.
Lin et al. (2005) and Bulc and Ojstršek (2008) stated that the ability of vertical-flow constructed wetlands to reduce TSS and turbidity is relatively poor. In this study, for a low concentration of AB113, a short contact time (48 h) was more advantageous than a long (94 h) one for the reduction of TSS and turbidity as well as in the case of the mixture of both of the dyes (BR46 and AB113). While for high concentrations of both dyes and a mixture of both dyes, the long contact time was better than the short contact time. The percentage TSS reduction rates for BR46, AB113 and the mixture of these dyes were 69, 47 and 71%, respectively.
pH value
The measuring of pH is very important due to its impact on nutrients, COD and TSS in constructed wetlands. The pH value influences microbial populations in degrading pollutants (Eke and Scholz 2008; Lavrova and Koumanova 2013; Paing et al. 2015). Concerning the low BR46 concentration, the mean influent pH was 7.47, a minute decrease in the pH effluent value of 0.3 was noted in the planted wetland 5 (low resting time and high contact time), while there was a slight increase of 0.25 and 0.1 for the unplanted wetland 1 (low resting time and high contact time) and the planted wetland 7 (high resting and low contact times), respectively. For the dye AB113, there was a slight effluent increase of 0.24, 0.22 and 0.16 for the unplanted control wetland 2, planted wetland 3 (low resting and high contact times) and planted wetland 9 (high resting and low contact times), respectively, when compared to the influent value of 7.35 as shown in Table 6. In case of the mixture of both dyes, there was a slight decrease of 0.03, 0.23 and 0.05 for wetland 4, wetland 6 (low resting and high contact times) and wetland 10 (high resting and low contact times), respectively, if compared with the influent value of 7.32, while for wetland 8 (high resting and low contact times), there was a slight increase of 0.01. For the high concentration for both dyes (BR46 and AB113) and the mixture of the two dyes, a slight increase was found ranging between 0.08 and 0.65 for wetlands 11, 13, 12, 14 (low resting and contact times), 17, 16 and 18 (high resting and contact times), while an increase of 1.04 was recorded for wetland 15 (high resting and contact times), when compared with the corresponding influent value of 6.94. This increase in effluent pH values is due to the formation of basic aromatic amine metabolites (Chandra 2015).
Regarding the effect of plants on the pH value for the low concentration of the dye AB113, there was a slight difference of 0.02 between the unplanted control wetland 2 and the planted wetland 3 (both of them have the same conditions). This result suggests that the pH modification in vertical-flow constructed wetlands is probably as a result of interactions between the media and its biofilms, rather than due to the plants; this result confirms findings by Kadlec and Wallace (2008). Unlike the result for the dye BR46, there was a difference of 0.55 between the unplanted control wetland 1 and the planted wetland 5 (both of them have the same conditions). The different results regarding the role of plants on pH are most likely due to each dye having a different chemical structure and molecular weight as shown in Table 3. Furthermore, there were no change in pH values in contrast to the findings, which were obtained by Wieder (1989), who surveyed 128 constructed wetlands treating acid coal mine wastewater and found a difference of 0.11(influent pH was 2.5) between effluent and influent. Mitsch and Wise (1998) corroborated this finding; they found that the difference between the influent and the effluent is 0.52 (influent pH was 2.82).
Kadlec and Wallace (2008) stated that the pH value for most bacteria responsible for degradation is between 4 and 9.5. Nevertheless, findings indicate the ability of macrophytes to modify pH conditions in the rhizosphere (Brix et al. 2002). Furthermore, the effluent pH values for all wetlands in case of low and high concentrations of BR46, AB113 and the mixture of these dyes during the whole period were compared with the effluent discharge quality standards set by the Government of Bangladesh and the Sweden Textile Water Initiative, which state that the pH effluent for inland surface waters, public sewer secondary treatment plants and irrigated land should be between 6 and 9 (Ahmed et al. 2002; STWI 2012).
Dye, colour and chemical oxygen demand reductions
The degradation of azo dyes in aerobic and anaerobic environments involves enzymes and chemical reduction (Khehra et al. 2005; Pandey et al. 2007; Saratale et al. 2011). The first contaminant to be easily recognised in an effluent textile wastewater is colour, which adsorbs and reflects sunlight entering the water, thereby interfering with the aquatic species growth and hindering photosynthesis (Pereira and Alves 2012; Yadav et al. 2012).
For dye and colour reductions concerning low concentrations of dyes (BR46 and AB113), and the mixture of these two dyes, wetlands with long contact times have the best dye and colour reductions (regardless of the planting regime), when compared to wetlands having short contact times. For the high concentration of the dyes BR46 and AB113 (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4), and the mixture of both of them, wetlands, which have a low loading rate (high resting and contact times), have better dye and colour reductions (p < 0.05), if compared to wetlands with a high loading rate (low resting and contact times) as shown in Table 7, although wetlands that have a low loading rate have better dye reductions when compared with wetlands which have a high loading rate. The influent values expressed as a mass loading rate for wetlands 11 and 13 (high loading rate) were 573.71 ± 26.74 and 576.49 ± 38.15 g/m2/day, respectively, while for wetlands 15 and 17 (low loading rate), they were 286.86 ± 13.37 and 288.25 ± 19.08 g/m2/day, respectively (Table 8). The final decision about which loading rate (low or high) is better for a treatment system depends on the design conditions of the specific constructed wetland in the field. The effluent colour values for those wetlands of low concentrations concerning BR46, AB113 and the corresponding mixture of these dyes were compliant with the national effluent discharge quality standards set by the Government of India (1986), which stated the maximum colour value is 400 Pt/Co. In case of the high concentrations for BR46, AB113 and the mixture of these two dyes, they were not compliant even when compared to the maximum threshold for colour (550 Pt/Co.) set by the Government of Taiwan (2003).
For textile wastewater, the measurement of COD is very important to assess organic matter in wetlands. Its reduction processes may be aerobic or anaerobic and are based on filtration, adsorption and microbial metabolism processes (Vymazal et al. 1998; Song et al. 2006; Stefanakis et al. 2014). The effluent COD values for a low concentration of BR46, AB113 and the mixture of both dyes (Table 7) were complaint with the national effluent discharge quality standards set by the Government of Bangladesh, which has set the maximum COD values for inland surface water, public sewer secondary treatment plant outflow and irrigation water to be 200, 400 and 400 mg/l, respectively. In case of high concentrations for BR46, AB113 and a mixture of these dyes for both dyes (Table 7), values were compliant for public sewer secondary treatment and irrigated land (Ahmed et al. 2002). For COD reduction concerning the low concentration of dyes (BR46 and AB113) and the mixture of both of these dyes, the results showed that all wetlands demonstrated good COD reduction as shown in Table 7. Furthermore, wetlands with a long resting time had the best COD reductions, if compared to the control (unplanted wetlands) and/or other wetlands having short resting times. These results indicated that both aerobic and anaerobic environments are acceptable for COD reduction. These findings are supported by the DO values for wetlands as shown in Table 6. Wetlands 7, 9, 8 and 10 have effluent DO values higher than those for wetlands 5, 3, 4 and 6. For the high concentration, COD reductions in wetlands, which have low loading rates (high resting and contact times), were better than for those wetlands with high loading rates (low resting and contact times) in terms of COD concentration (Table 7). However, the influent mass loading rates for wetlands 11 and 13 (high loading rate) were 1423.1 ± 102.27 and 1668.2 ± 132.73 g/m2/day, respectively, as shown in Table 9, while for wetlands 15 and 17 (low loading rate), they were 711.6 ± 51.14 and 834.1 ± 66.37 g/m2/day. The final decision about which wetland performs better depends on the design conditions of constructed wetlands in the field. All previous findings regarding low and high concentrations for BR46, AB113 and the mixture of these two dyes indicate that having both aerobic and anaerobic conditions will improve the COD reduction (Vymazal et al. 1998; Li et al. 2012; Lehl et al. 2016).
Seasonal comparison of effluent dye reductions
The overall seasonal comparison of the influent and effluent dye concentrations for all wetlands is shown in Table 10. In case of low concentration for BR46 and AB113, the best and significant (ρ < 0.05) reduction percentages were recorded for the spring season as a result of well-established microbial populations, favourable operating conditions achieved over time and plants, as confirmed by many publications (Scholz et al. 2002; Al-Isawi et al. 2015; Scholz 2015). In case of high concentrations of BR46, AB113 and the mixture of both dyes, the best and significant (ρ < 0.05) reduction percentages were linked to summer as shown in Table 9 as a result of the higher temperature as confirmed by several researchers, who stated that the best treatment performance occurs during higher temperatures (Song et al. 2006; Sani et al. 2013).
Nutrient reduction
The removal of ortho-phosphate-phosphorous is controlled by chemical and physical adsorption, sedimentation, plant uptake, precipitation and microbial uptake in constructed wetland systems (Brix 1997; Vymazal 2007, 2010; Johari et al. 2016). Moreover, many researchers have reported that the reduction efficiency of phosphorous compounds is generally poor within constructed wetlands (Choudhary et al. 2011; Lavrova and Koumanova 2013; Ge et al. 2016).
For low concentrations in case of AB113 and BR46, the reductions for planted wetlands 3 and 5 (low resting time and high contact time) were significantly (p < 0.05) better compared to those for the unplanted control wetlands 2 and 1 (low resting time and high contact time) and the planted wetlands 7 and 9 (high resting time and high contact time; Table 11). In case of the mixture of both dyes (BR46 and AB113), wetlands 4 and 6 (low resting and high contact times) had better reduction percentages when compared with wetlands 8 and 10 (high resting and low contact times), respectively (Table 11). Assessing the high concentrations for BR46, AB113 and the mixture of these dyes, wetlands 15 and 17 and wetlands 16 and 18 (high resting and contact times) had lower PO4-P effluent concentrations when compared with wetlands 11 and 13 and wetlands 12 and 14 (low resting and contact times), respectively (Table 8). The previous results for low and high concentrations indicate that the reduction efficiency for PO4-P was relatively good, especially for wetlands, regardless of planting regime, with long contact times (and lower resting times).
A typical standard set by environment agencies for PO4-P reduction concerning secondary wastewater treatment is 2 mg/l (Royal Commission on Sewage Disposal 1915). Effluent PO4 p values were complaint to this standard for low concentrations of BR46 (planted wetland 5; 1.76 mg/l). In comparison, a slight increase in case of the low concentration for the mixture of these two dyes (wetland 6; 2.03 mg/l) was noted. However, the value was relatively high in case of low concentration of AB113 (planted wetland 3; 3.91 mg/l). For other wetlands, the effluent values of PO4-P were much higher than the standard value of 2 mg/l.
Nitrification and denitrification are the main reduction mechanisms of nitrogen in constructed wetlands, and these mechanisms include a two-step process: ammonium is oxidised to nitrite followed by oxidisation of nitrite to nitrate (nitrification process). The subsequent denitrification process involves the reduction of nitrate to gaseous nitrogen (Schaechter 2009; Kessel et al. 2015; Song et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2016). Regarding NH4-N reduction percentages for low concentrations of BR46 and AB113 (Table 11), planted wetlands 7 and 9 (high resting and low contact times) have better reduction percentages when compared with the unplanted control wetlands 1 and 2 as well as the planted wetlands 5 and 3 (low resting and high contact times), respectively. In case of a mixture of both dyes, wetlands 8 and 10 (high resting and low contact times) had better reduction percentages compared to wetlands 4 and 6 (low resting time and high contact time), respectively (Table 11). For the high concentrations of BR46, AB113 and the mixture of both dyes, wetlands 15, 17, 16 and 18 (high resting and contact times) have better reduction percentages when comparing them with wetlands 11, 13, 12 and 14 (low resting and contact times), respectively. The previous results indicate that aeration plays a major function in determining the performance of higher nitrogen reduction. These findings are confirmed by many researchers (Vymazal 2007; Wu et al. 2011a; Fan et al. 2013). The effluent NH4-N values for all wetlands in case of low and high concentrations for BR46, AB113 and the mixture of both dyes were compared to the traditional UK standard (Royal Commission on Sewage Disposal 1915), which states that the NH4-N outflow from the secondary wastewater should not exceed 50 mg/l. Furthermore, both the Government of India (1986) and the Government of Bangladesh (Ahmed et al. 2002) stated that 50 mg/l is an acceptable outflow threshold to protect surface waters.
Regarding NO3-N reduction for low concentrations of BR46, AB113 and the mixture of both dyes (Table 11), the influent NO3-N values were in the range 23.53 to 25.37 mg/l. The reduction percentages for all wetlands were in the range between 83 and 100%. For the high concentration of BR46, AB113 and the mixture of both dyes, the influent values were approximately 33.45 mg/l and the reduction percentages for all wetlands were in the range from 75 to 86% (Table 11). The NO3-N reduction percentages indicate that vertical-flow constructed wetlands have a good ability to reduce nitrogen in high percentages, especially when there is a source of organic carbon, and both dyes have carbon in their chemical structure (Supplementary Material S1). These findings have been confirmed by Lavrova and Koumanova (2014) as well as Shen et al. (2015).
Furthermore, Lavrova and Koumanova (2013) demonstrated that vertical-flow constructed wetlands can effectively reduce NO3-N with and without plants with a sufficient organic carbon source. The effluent NO3-N values for all wetlands in case of low and high concentrations for BR46, AB113 and the mixture of both dyes were compared to the traditional UK standard, which states that the NO3-N outflow concentration should not exceed 50 mg/l (Royal Commission on Sewage Disposal 1915).
Aromatic amine reductions
Azo dye decolourisation is achieved under aerobic, anaerobic and anoxic conditions (O’Neill et al. 2000; Sponza and Işik 2002; Van Der Zee 2002; Davies et al. 2006). In anaerobic conditions, the azo bond (N=N) cleaves (cutes), and this process releases aromatic amine, which resists any further anaerobic treatment (Brown and Hamburger 1987; Chung and Stevens 1993). Aromatic amine can be reduced under aerobic treatment (Weber and Wolfe 1987; Pinheiro et al. 2004; Ong et al. 2011). The amine compounds are toxic and negatively impact on some bacteria, leading to insufficient dye degradation (Phugare et al. 2011; Holkar et al. 2014). Each dye has one or more types of aromatic amines (Pielesz et al. 2002; Pinheiro et al. 2004). Wetlands can degrade aromatic amines under aerobic conditions (Mbuligwe 2005; Ong et al. 2010, 2011).
In this study, three types of amines were released as a result of the degradation of the dye AB113: 3-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (ABSA), 1,4-diaminonaphthalene (DAN) and 5-amino-8-(phenylamino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (ANSA) (Senthilvelan et al. 2014). The corresponding wavelengths for maximum absorbance are 288, 255 and 225 nm, respectively (Koepernik and Borsdorf 1983; Paul et al. 1990). In case of BR46, two aromatic amines were released as a result of its degradation: N-benzyl-N-methylaniline (NBNMA) and N-benzyl-N-methylbenzene-1,4-diamine (NBNMD), with wavelengths of maximum absorbance of 254 and 290 nm, respectively (Fihtengolts 1969; Küçükgüzel et al. 1999). For the low concentration of AB113, in case of ABSA (Supplementary Material 4), wetland 9 (high resting and low contact times) had a significant (ρ < 0.05) reduction efficiency when compared with the unplanted wetland 2 and the planted wetland 3 (low resting time and high contact time). Regarding the high concentration of AB113 and for ABSA amine (Fig. 5), wetland 17 (high resting time and high contact time) has a significant (ρ < 0.05) reduction efficiency when compared with wetland 13 (low resting and contact times). It follows that a reduction of aromatic amine compounds requires aerobic conditions (see above). The amines DAN and ANSA were not detected for low and high concentrations by a UV spectrophotometer. This is because both of them are instable, and therefore, they were not detected in solution as confirmed by Davies et al. (2005) and Davies et al. (2006), who also found that using HPLC analysis did not detect this type of amine.
For the low concentration of BR46 concerning the NBNMD amine, wetland 7 (high resting and low contact times) has a significant (ρ < 0.05) reduction efficiency when compared with the unplanted wetland 1 and the planted wetland 5 (low resting and high contact times) as shown in Supplementary Material 5. The NBNMA amine was not detected by the UV spectrophotometer regarding the unplanted wetland 1, while for the planted wetlands 5 and 7, it was sometimes detected, but this amine was not dependent on the activity of microorganisms required to degrade this type of amine. For the high concentration of BR46 in case of the NBNMD amine (Fig. 6), wetland 15 (high resting and contact times) had a significant (ρ < 0.05) reduction efficiency when compared with wetland 11 (low resting and contact times). Furthermore, during the period between 19 December 2016 and 3 February 2017, the NBNMD amine was not detect as a result of a decrease in temperature during this period and because of the growth and development of microbial communities (Jerman et al. 2009). The NBNMA amine was not detected by the UV spectrophotometer for the same reason as stated above.
Conclusions and recommendations for further research
Regarding low BR46 and AB113 reductions, the unplanted wetlands had good reduction performances, if compared with planted wetlands concerning the removal of dyes. For the high concentrations of AB113, BR46 and a mixture of both of them, wetlands with long contact times were considerably better than wetlands which had short contact times, in terms of dye, colour and COD reductions. For low and high inflow dye concentrations, best removals were recorded for spring and summer in this order. Furthermore, aromatic amine concentrations were very low.
The vertical-flow wetland filters were linked to significantly (p < 0.05) good denitrification processes for both low and high concentrations of AB113, BR46 and the mixture of both dyes throughout the year. Regarding nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), the reduction percentage rates of AB113, BR46 and a mixture dye of both of them were between 85 and 100%.
Future wetland designs for the treatment of dye wastewater should be based on these recent more long-term research findings. The authors recommend to assess the effect of pH (low and high) on dye reduction. Aromatic amine compounds require more large-scale process investigations, especially in case of mixtures of dyes.
Abbreviations
- AB:
-
Acid blue
- ABSA:
-
3-Aminobenzenesulfonic acid
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- ANSA:
-
5-Amino-8-(phenylamino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid
- AO:
-
Acid orange
- AY:
-
Acid yellow
- BR:
-
Basic red
- CASRN:
-
Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
- COD:
-
Chemical oxygen demand
- DAN:
-
1,4-Diaminonaphthalene
- DO:
-
Dissolved oxygen
- DY:
-
Disperse yellow
- EC:
-
Electric conductivity
- HF:
-
Horizontal-flow
- N:
-
Nitrogen
- N/A:
-
Not applicable
- NBNMA:
-
N-Benzyl-N-methylaniline
- NBNMD:
-
N-Benzyl-N-methylbenzene-1,4-diamine
- NH4-N:
-
Ammonia nitrogen
- NO2-N:
-
Nitrite nitrogen
- NO3-N:
-
Nitrate nitrogen
- PO4–P:
-
Ortho-phosphate-phosphorus
- RB:
-
Reactive black
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- SE:
-
Standard error
- TDS:
-
Total dissolved solids
- TN:
-
Total nitrogen
- TOC:
-
Total organic carbon
- TP:
-
Total phosphorus
- TSS:
-
Total suspended solids
- VF:
-
Vertical-flow
- VY:
-
Vat yellow
- λ max :
-
Maximum absorbance
References
Ahmed S, Alexandra C, Clark M, Tapley K (2002) Choosing an effluent treatment plant. Genesis (Pvt.), Dhaka
Akbari A, Remigy J, Aptel P (2002) Treatment of textile dye effluent using a polyamide-based nanofiltration membrane. Chem Eng Process 41(7):601–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(01)00181-7
Al-Isawi R, Sani A, Almuktar S, Scholz M (2015) Vertical-flow constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater contaminated by hydrocarbons. Water Sci Technol 71(6):938–946. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.054
APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Babu B, Parande A, Raghu S, Prem K (2007) Textile technology-cotton textile processing: waste generation and effluent treatment. J Cotton Sci 11:141–153
Bell C, Case D, Brownell W (2011) Environmental law handbook. Government Institutes, Plymouth
Boyd C (2000) Dissolved oxygen and redox potential. Water quality: an introduction. Springer, Boston
Boyd C, Gautier D (2000) Effluent composition and water quality standards. Glob Aquac Advocate 3(5):61–66
Brillas E, Martínez-Huitle C (2015) Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods. An updated review. Appl Catal B Environ 166–167:603–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.016
Brix H (1997) Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci Technol 35(5):11–17
Brix H, Dyhr-Jensen K, Lorenzen B (2002) Root-zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate. J Exp Bot 53(379):2441–2450. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erf106
Brown D, Hamburger B (1987) The degradation of dyestuffs: part III—investigations of their ultimate degradability. Chemosphere 16(7):1539–1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(87)90094-4
Bulc T, Ojstršek A (2008) The use of constructed wetland for dye-rich textile wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater 155(1):76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.068
Chandra R (2015) Environmental waste management. CRC, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19243
Choudhary A, Kumar S, Sharma C (2011) Constructed wetlands: an approach for wastewater treatment. Elixir Pollut 37(8):3666–3672
Chung K (1983) The significance of azo-reduction in the mutagenesis and carcinogenesis of azo dyes. Mutat Res Rev Genet Toxicol 114(3):269–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1110(83)90035-0
Chung K, Stevens S (1993) Degradation azo dyes by environmental microorganisms and helminths. Environ Toxicol Chem 12(11):2121–2132
Chung K, Stevens S, Cerniglia C (1992) The reduction of azo dyes by the intestinal microflora. Crit Rev Microbiol 18(3):175–190. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408419209114557
Cumnan S, Yimrattanabovorn J (2012) The use of constructed wetland for azo dye textile wastewater. Int J Civ Eng Build Mat 2(4):150–158
Davies L, Carias C, Novais J, Martins-Dias S (2005) Phytoremediation of textile effluents containing azo dye by using Phragmites australis in a vertical flow intermittent feeding constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 25(5):594–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.003
Davies L, Pedro I, Novais J, Martins-Dias S (2006) Aerobic degradation of acid orange 7 in a vertical-flow constructed wetland. Water Res 40(10):2055–2063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.03.010
Deniz F, Karaman S (2011) Removal of Basic Red 46 dye from aqueous solution by pine tree leaves. Chem Eng 170(1):67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.029
Deniz F, Saygideger S (2011) Removal of a hazardous azo dye (Basic Red 46) from aqueous solution by princess tree leaf. Desalination 268(1):6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.043
Dey S, Islam A (2015) A review on textile wastewater characterization in Bangladesh. Resour Environ 5(1):15–44
Dzurik A (2003) Water resources planning. Littlefield, Rowman
Eke P, Scholz M (2008) Benzene removal with vertical-flow constructed treatment wetlands. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 83(1):55–63
Fan J, Zhang B, Zhang J, Ngo H, Guo W, Liu F, Guo Y, Wu H (2013) Intermittent aeration strategy to enhance organics and nitrogen removal in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Bioresour Technol 141:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.077
Fihtengolts V (1969) Atlas of UV absorption spectra of substances used in synthetic rubber manufacture. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database 69
Fuchs V (2009) Nitrogen removal and sustainability in vertical flow conctructed wetlands for small scale wastewater treatment. PhD thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton
Ge Y, Wang X, Dzakpasu M, Zheng Y, Zhao Y, Xiong J (2016) Characterizing phosphorus removal from polluted urban river water by steel slags in a vertical flow constructed wetland. Water Sci Technol 73(11):2644–2653. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.118
Håkanson L (2006) The relationship between salinity, suspended particulate matter and water clarity in aquatic systems. Ecol Res 21(1):75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-005-0098-x
Holkar C, Pandit A, Pinjari D (2014) Kinetics of biological decolorisation of anthraquinone based Reactive Blue 19 using an isolated strain of Enterobacter sp. F NCIM 5545. Bioresour Technol 173:342–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.108
Hou Y, Liu X, Zhang X, Hu X, Cao L (2016) Rhizosphere phytoremediation with Cyperus rotundus for diesel-contaminated wetlands. Water Air Soil Pollut 227(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2728-4
Hussein A, Scholz M (2017) Dye wastewater treatment by vertical-flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 101:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.016
India Ministry of Environment, Forest and Environment Change (1986) Environmental (protection) rules. http://envfor.nic.in/legis/env/env4.html. Accessed 9 May 2017
Islam M, Mahmud K, Faruk O, Billah M (2011) Textile dyeing industries in Bangladesh for sustainable development. Int J Environ Sci Dev 2(6)
Jerman V, Metje M, Mandić-Mulec I, Frenzel P (2009) Wetland restoration and methanogenesis: the activity of microbial populations and competition for substrates at different temperatures. Biogeosciences 6(6):1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1127-2009
Johari N, Abdul-Talib S, Wahid M, Ghani A (2016) Trend of total phosphorus on total suspended solid reduction in constructed wetland under tropical climate. ISFRAM 2015. Springer, Singapore
Juang R, Tseng R, Wu F, Lin S (1996) Use of chitin and chitosan in lobster shell wastes for color removal from aqueous solutions. J Environ Sci Health A 31(2):325–338
Kabra A, Khandare R, Govindwar S (2013) Development of a bioreactor for remediation of textile effluent and dye mixture: a plant–bacterial synergistic strategy. Water Res 47(3):1035–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.007
Kadlec R, Wallace S (2008) Treatment wetlands. CRC, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420012514
Kant R (2012) Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Nat Sci 4(1):22
Kasuya E (2001) Mann–Whitney U test when variances are unequal. Anim Behav 61(6):1247–1249. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1691
Kessel M, Speth D, Albertsen M, Nielsen P, Den Camp H, Kartal B, Jetten M, Lücker S (2015) Complete nitrification by a single microorganism. Nature 528(7583):555–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16459
Khandare R, Kabra A, Kadam A, Govindwar S (2013) Treatment of dye containing wastewaters by a developed lab scale phytoreactor and enhancement of its efficacy by bacterial augmentation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 78:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.01.003
Khataee A (2009) Photocatalytic removal of C.I. Basic Red 46 on immobilized TiO2 nanoparticles: artificial neural network modelling. Environ Technol 30(11):1155–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330903133911
Khehra M, Saini H, Sharma D, Chadha B, Chimni S (2005) Comparative studies on potential of consortium and constituent pure bacterial isolates to decolorize azo dyes. Water Res 39(20):5135–5141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.033
Koepernik H, Borsdorf R (1983) Identification of substituted naphthalenesulfonic acids by means of UV-spectroscopy-a contribution to the structure determination of acid azo dyes. Fur Praktische Chemie 325(6):1002–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/prac.19833250617
Küçükgüzel I, Ülgen M, Gorrod JW (1999) In vitro hepatic microsomal metabolism of N-benzyl-N-methylaniline. Il Farmaco 54(5):331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-827X(99)00034-8
Kumar V, Chopra A (2012) Monitoring of physico-chemical and microbiological characteristics of municipal wastewater at treatment plant, Haridwar City (Uttarakhand) India. J Environ Sci Technol 5(2):109–118. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2012.109.118
Lavanya C, Dhankar R, Chhikara S, Sheoran S (2014) Degradation of toxic dyes: a review. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3(6):189–199
Lavrova S, Koumanova B (2013) Nutrients and organic matter removal in a vertical-flow constructed wetland. In: Yogesh BP, Prakash R (eds) Appl bioremediation-active and passive approaches. InTech, Rijeka. https://doi.org/10.5772/56245
Lavrova S, Koumanova B (2014) Nutrients removal from landfill leachate in “wetland” system. J Chem Technol Metall 49(2):143–148
Lehl H, Ong S, Ho L, Wong Y, Naemah F, Oon Y, Oon Y, Yong C, Thung W (2016) Multiple aerobic and anaerobic baffled constructed wetlands for simultaneous nitrogen and organic compounds removal. Desalin Water Treat 57(60):29160–29167. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1189698
Li F, Shan S, Li Y, Li Y, Wang Z (2012) Optimization of aerobic/anaerobic subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Huan jing ke xue 33(2):436–441
Lin Y, Jing S, Lee D, Chang Y, Chen Y, Shih K (2005) Performance of a constructed wetland treating intensive shrimp aquaculture wastewater under high hydraulic loading rate. Environ Pollut 134(3):411–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.09.015
Martínez-Huitle C, Brillas E (2009) Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods: a general review. Appl Catal B Environ 87(3):105–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.017
Mbuligwe S (2005) Comparative treatment of dye-rich wastewater in engineered wetland systems (EWSs) vegetated with different plants. Water Res 39(2):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.022
Mitsch W, Wise K (1998) Water quality, fate of metals, and predictive model validation of a constructed wetland treating acid mine drainage. Water Res 32(6):1888–1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00401-6
Nawab B, Esser K, Jenssen P, Nyborg I, Baig S (2016) Technical viability of constructed wetland for treatment of dye wastewater in Gadoon Industrial Estate, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Wetlands 36(1):1–9
Nilratnisakorn S, Thiravetyan P, Nakbanpote W (2009) A constructed wetland model for synthetic reactive dye wastewater treatment by narrow-leaved cattails (Typha angustifolia Linn.) Water Sci Technol 60(6):1565–1574. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.500
Ojstršek, A., Fakin, D. & Vrhovšek, D. 2007. Residual dyebath purification using a system of constructed wetland. Dyes and pigments 74(3):503–507.
O’Neill C, Hawkes F, Hawkes D, Esteves S, Wilcox S (2000) Anaerobic–aerobic biotreatment of simulated textile effluent containing varied ratios of starch and azo dye. Water Res 34(8):2355–2361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00395-4
Olgun A, Atar N (2009) Equilibrium and kinetic adsorption study of Basic Yellow 28 and Basic Red 46 by a boron industry waste. Hazard Mater 161(1):148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.064
Ong S, Katsuhiro U, Daisuke I, Kazuaki Y (2009) Simultaneous removal of color, organic compounds and nutrients in azo dye-containing wastewater using up-flow constructed wetland. Hazard Mater 165(1–3):696–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.071
Ong S, Katsuhiro U, Daisuke I, Yuji I, Kazuaki Y (2010) Treatment of azo dye Acid Orange 7 containing wastewater using up-flow constructed wetland with and without supplementary aeration. Bioresour Technol 101(23):9049–9057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.034
Ong S, Ho L, Wong Y, Dani Leonard D, Hafizah S (2011) Semi-batch operated constructed wetlands planted with Phragmites australis for treatment of dying wastewater. Eng Sci Technol Taylor’s Univ 6(5):623–631
Pagter M, Bragato C, Brix H (2005) Tolerance and physiological responses of Phragmites australis to water deficit. Aquat Bot 81(4):285–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.01.002
Paing J, Guilbert A, Gagnon V, Chazarenc F (2015) Effect of climate, wastewater composition, loading rates, system age and design on performances of French vertical flow constructed wetlands: a survey based on 169 full scale systems. Ecol Eng 80:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.029
Pandey A, Singh P, Iyengar L (2007) Bacterial decolorization and degradation of azo dyes. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 59(2):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.08.006
Paul A, Sarpal R, Dogra S (1990) Effects of solvent and acid concentration on the absorption and fluorescence spectra of α, α-diaminonaphthalenes. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 86(12):2095–2101. https://doi.org/10.1039/FT9908602095
Pereira L, Alves M (2012) Dyes-environmental impact and remediation. In: Malik A, Grohmann E (eds) Environmental protection strategies for sustainable development. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1591-2_4
Pervez A, Headley A, Terzis E (1999) The treatment of azo dyes using reedbed treatment systems. In: Wetlands remediation: an international conference, pp 187–194
Phugare S, Kalyani D, Patil A, Jadhav J (2011) Textile dye degradation by bacterial consortium and subsequent toxicological analysis of dye and dye metabolites using cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and oxidative stress studies. J. Hazard Mater 186(1):713–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.049
Pielesz A, Baranowska I, Rybak A, Włochowicz A (2002) Detection and determination of aromatic amines as products of reductive splitting from selected azo dyes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 53(1):42–47. https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.2002.2191
Pinheiro H, Touraud E, Thomas O (2004) Aromatic amines from azo dye reduction: status review with emphasis on direct UV spectrophotometric detection in textile industry wastewaters. Dyes Pigments 61(2):121–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2003.10.009
Postolache O, Girão P, Pereira J, Ramos H (2007) Multibeam optical system and neural processing for turbidity measurement. Sens J IEEE 7(5):677–684
Ratna A, Padhi B (2012) Pollution due to synthetic dyes toxicity & carcinogenicity studies and remediation. Int J Environ Sci 3(3):940
Razali N, Wah Y (2011) Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. J Stat Model Anal 2(1):21–33
Riu J, Schönsee I, Barcelo D, Rafols C (1997) Determination of sulphonated azo dyes in water and wastewater. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 16(7):405–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(97)00034-4
Robinson T, Mcmullan G, Marchant R, Nigam P (2001) Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Bioresour Technol 77(3):247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00080-8
Royal Commission on Sewage Disposal (1915) Final report of the commissioners appointed to inquire and report what methods of treating and disposing of sewage may properly adopted. His Majesty’s Stationary Office, London
Sani A, Scholz M, Bouillon L (2013) Seasonal assessment of experimental vertical-flow constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater. Bioresour Technol 147:585–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.076
Saratale R, Saratale G, Chang J, Govindwar S (2011) Bacterial decolorization and degradation of azo dyes: a review. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 42(1):138–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2010.06.006
Schaechter M (2009) Encyclopedia of microbiology. Elesvier, Oxford
Scholz M (2015) Wetlands for water pollution control. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Scholz M, Höhn P, Minall R (2002) Mature experimental constructed wetlands treating urban water receiving high metal loads. Biotechnol Prog 18(6):1257–1264. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp0200503
Senthilvelan T, Kanagaraj J, Panda R (2014) Enzyme-mediated bacterial biodegradation of an azo dye (CI Acid Blue 113): reuse of treated dye wastewater in post-tanning operations. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174(6):2131–2152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1158-x
Shapiro S, Wilk M (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4):591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
Shehzadi M, Afzal M, Khan M, Islam E, Mobin A, Anwar S, Khan Q (2014) Enhanced degradation of textile effluent in constructed wetland system using Typha domingensis and textile effluent-degrading endophytic bacteria. Water Res 58:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.064
Shen Z, Zhou Y, Liu J, Xiao Y, Cao R, Wu F (2015) Enhanced removal of nitrate using starch/PCL blends as solid carbon source in a constructed wetland. Bioresour Technol 175:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.006
Shirzad-Siboni M, Jafari S, Giahi O, Kim I, Lee S, Yang J (2014) Removal of Acid Blue 113 and Reactive Black 5 dye from aqueous solutions by activated red mud. J Ind Eng Chem 20(4):1432–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.07.028
Song Z, Zheng Z, Li J, Sun X, Han X, Wang W, Xu M (2006) Seasonal and annual performance of a full-scale constructed wetland system for sewage treatment in China. Ecol Eng 26(3):272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.10.008
Song X, Ding Y, Wang Y, Wang W, Wang G, Zhou B (2015) Comparative study of nitrogen removal and bio-film clogging for three filter media packing strategies in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 74:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.08.008
Sponza D, Işik M (2002) Decolorization and azo dye degradation by anaerobic/aerobic sequential process. Enzym Microb Technol 31(1):102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00081-9
Sri Lanka Central Environmental Authority (2008) National Environmental (Protection and Quality) Regulations. http://www.cea.lk/web/index.php/en. Accessed 9 May 2017
Stefanakis A, Akratos C, Tsihrintzis V (2014) Vertical flow constructed wetlands: eco-engineering systems for wastewater and sludge treatment. Newnes, China
Stoline M (1981) The status of multiple comparisons: simultaneous estimation of all pairwise comparisons in one-way ANOVA designs. Am Stat 35(3):134–141
Sweden Textile Water Initiative (STWI) (2012) Guidelines for sustainable water use in the production and manufacturing processes of textiles. Available: http://stwi.se/guidelines/. Accessed 9 May 2017
Sultana M (2014) Treatment of industrial and agro-industrial wastewater using constructed wetlands. PhD thesis, Patras University, Patras
Sun Q, Yang L (2003) The adsorption of basic dyes from aqueous solution on modified peat–resin particle. Water Res 37(7):1535–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00520-1
Suthersan S (2001) Natural and enhanced remediation systems. Lewis, Washington. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420033069
Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (2003) Taiwan effluent standards
Van Der Zee F (2002) Anaerobic azo dye reduction. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen
Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380(1):48–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014
Vymazal J (2010) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):61–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101403q
Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper P, Haberl R, Perfler R, Laber J (1998) Removal mechanisms and types of constructed wetlands. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe. Backhuys, Leiden
Wang Z, Huang K, Xue M, Liu Z (2011) Textile dyeing wastewater treatment. InTech, Rijeka
Weber E, Wolfe L (1987) Kinetic studies of the reduction of aromatic azo compounds in anaerobic sediment/water systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 6(12):911–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620061202
Wieder R (1989) A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in the eastern United States. Wetlands 9(2):299–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160750
Wießner A, Kappelmeyer U, Kuschk P, Kästner M (2005) Influence of the redox condition dynamics on the removal efficiency of a laboratory-scale constructed wetland. Water Res 39(1):248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.08.032
Wu H, Zhang J, Li P, Zhang J, Xie H, Zhang B (2011a) Nutrient removal in constructed microcosm wetlands for treating polluted river water in Northern China. Ecol Eng 37(4):560–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.020
Wu S, Zhang D, Austin D, Dong R, Pang C (2011b) Evaluation of a lab-scale tidal flow constructed wetland performance: oxygen transfer capacity, organic matter and ammonium removal. Ecol Eng 37(11):1789–1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.026
Yadav A, Dash P, Mohanty A, Abbassi R, Mishra B (2012) Performance assessment of innovative constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell for electricity production and dye removal. Ecol Eng 47:126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.029
Yalcuk A, Dogdu G (2014) Treatment of azo dye Acid Yellow 2G by using lab-scale vertical-flow intermittent feeding constructed wetlands. J Selcuk Univ Nat Appl Sci:355–368
Yang Y, Zhan X, Wu S, Kang M, Guo J, Chen F (2016) Effect of hydraulic loading rate on pollutant removal efficiency in subsurface infiltration system under intermittent operation and micro-power aeration. Bioresour Technol 205:174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.088
Acknowledgements
Amjad Hussein obtained a PhD Studentship from the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of the Government of Iraq via Al-Muthanna University. The sponsor had no influence over the analysis and presentation of findings.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Hussein, A., Scholz, M. Treatment of artificial wastewater containing two azo textile dyes by vertical-flow constructed wetlands. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 6870–6889 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0992-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0992-0